Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1607
Loading Pattern and Spatial Distribution of Dynamic Wind Load and Comparison of
Wind and Earthquake Effects along the Height of Tall Buildings
1
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is that with respect to the procedure and distribution of dynamic wind and earthquake load,
to investigate the height beyond which the wind load would be dominant over the seismic loading condition. For the current
study, 5 tall steel frames buildings with various lateral resisting system that are almost symmetrical in plan are investigated via
three-Dimensional models. In this study, the effect of dynamic time history wind load is considered and when its applied along
the height of tall buildings, the fluctuating wind speed is simulated as an ergodic multivariate stochastic process, and the Fast
Fourier Transform is needed to estimate the fluctuating wind speed components acting on the structure. The longitudinal wind
load is considered in the following analysis neglecting the transverse and vertical wind load components. For two basic wind
speed (47 m/s and 76 m/s) according to ASCE7-05, mean wind speed along the height was calculated and with accumulating
this component with fluctuation wind speed component, wind speed along the height at each level can be computed. For the
nonlinear dynamic analysis, 16 accelerograms are used that including 8 rock soil types and 8 deep soil types. Finally, One group
of analyses are performed by simulating fluctuation wind speed under dynamic time history wind load and its counterpart,
nonlinear dynamic earthquake load due to excitation from the ground motion earthquake accelerograms. This study determined
that the structure with lower height or number of stories in which parameters dominant in seismic loading and with increasing in
height of buildings, rate of influence of wind load along the height in which parameters is larger than seismic loading and the
results of wind and earthquake characteristics was compared in form of power spectral density (PSD).
KEY WORDS: Dynamic time history wind load; seismic loading; tall building; nonlinear dynamic analysis.
1
INTRODUCTION
v( z=
, t ) v ( z ) + v( z , t )
(1)
z
(2)
) v
10
Where b and are constants that are defined regarding to
exposure categories and v is the basic wind speed (m/s) and in
v ( z) = b (
F ( z, t ) =
1
s ( z ) A( z )v 2 ( z , t )
2
(3)
F ( z , t ) = Cm ( z )v 2 + C f 1 ( z )vv( z , t )
+C f 2 ( z )v 2 ( z , t )
Where Cm ( z ) =
1
2
s ( z ) A( z )b 2 (
z
10
(4)
1608
) 2 is the coefficient of
z
10
and C f 2 ( z ) =
1
2
1609
1610
Damping
SIMULATION
LOAD
OF THE
FLUCTUATING WIND
47 and 76 m/s
0.78
II
B
B
Enclosed
4 rad/s
0.7
10
0.4
1.3
1.226 kg/m3
1611
Deep Soil(Mean)
18
Rock Soil(Mean)
16
14
Wind Load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
12
Story
10
8
6
wind load-Vb=76m-st=60
wind load-Vb=47m-st=3600
2
0
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
wind load-Vb=47m-st=60
Drift(Ratio)
Figure 10. Peak story drifts for 20-story (shear wall system)
30 story-Bracing system
20story-Bracing system
20
Deep Soil(Mean)
18
16
Story
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
0.003
0.006
Deep soil(Mean)
25
Rock Soil(Mean)
20
15
10
0.009
0.012
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
Drift(ratio)
0
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
Drift(ratio)
Story
Story
30
Deep soil(Mean)
25
Rock soil(Mean)
20
Wind Load-V=76ms-t=3600
Mean+ (Deep soil)
15
10
5
0
0
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
Drift(ratio)
Figure 12. Peak story drifts for 30-story (shear wall system)
According to figures, In 20-story and 30-story buildings,
peak of story drift and displacements along the height due to
deep soil types are more than ones in rock soil types and in
peak story shear along the height, thats vice versa. With
1612
40 story
30 story-Bracing system
30
25
30
Deep Soil(Mean)
Rock soil(Mean)
25
Rock Soil(Mean)
wind loadVb=47m-s-t=3600
wind loadVb=47m-s-t=60
wind loadVb=76m-s-t=3600
Deep soil(Mean+)
20
Story
Deep soil(Mean)
15
10
5
0
-5
0
20
Story
35
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
10
Rock soil(Mean+)
wind loadVb=76m-s-t=60
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
0
0.1
0.2
Drift(ratio)
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Displacement(m)
20 story-Bracing system
Deep Soil(Mean)
20
Rock Soil(Mean)
18
Rock soil(Mean)
25
16
14
12
10
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
8
6
2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
Wind Load-V=76ms-t=3600
20
story
Story
Deep soil(Mean)
30
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
Wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Displacement(m)
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
wind load-vb=47ms-t=60
Displacement(m)
40 story
Deep Soil(Mean)
35
20
Deep soil(Mean)
18
30
Rock Soil(Mean)
25
Rock soil(Mean+)
Rock Soil(Mean)
Wind Load-V=76ms-t=3600
Mean+ (Deep soil)
14
12
10
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
6
4
2
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Displacement(m)
20
Story
16
Story
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
15
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
10
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
Deep soil(Mean+)
-5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
Wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
Displacement(m)
1613
20 story-Bracing system
20
18
30
Rock Soil(Mean)
Mean+ (Deep soil)
14
8
6
4
2
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
story
10
Wind Load-V=76ms-t=3600
Mean+ (Deep soil)
20
12
15
10
5
0
0
3000
6000
9000
12000
15000
Figure 22. Peak story shear for 30-story (shear wall system)
40 story
Deep Soil(Mean)
35
Deep Soil(Mean)
Rock Soil(Mean)
30
Rock Soil(Mean)
Wind Load-V=76ms-t=3600
Mean+ (Deep soil)
25
18
14
Story
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
4000
6000
8000
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-vb=47ms-t=60
30 story-Bracing System
30
25
Story
20
15
10
5
0
3000
4000
5000
Rock soil(Mean+)
6000
2000
4000
6000
8000
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
2000
10
1000
15
-5
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
Deep soil(Mean+)
20
Story
16
2000
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
Deep soil(Mean)
Rock soil(Mean)
25
16
Story
30 story-shear wall
Deep Soil(Mean)
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=3600
wind load-Vb=47ms-t=60
wind load-Vb=76ms-t=3600
Wind loadVb=76m-s-t=60
(mean) due to deep soil types and rock soil types with extreme
dynamic wind load in this study (basic wind speed 76m/s and
wind duration 3600 m/s), it is obvious that peak of
displacement and drift of models along the height are sensitive
parameters to dynamic wind load, because as it is observed
responses stem from applying extreme dynamic load on
structures get closer to responses due to rock soil types with
increasing height and finally, in 40-story building, peak
displacements due to extreme wind load became more than
average quantity of responses (mean) due to rock soil types.
According to figure 14, 15, 16, 17 that included peak
displacements derived from dynamic wind and seismic load,
separately, the structures with bracing system are more
flexible that ones with shear wall system.
In these figures, it is obvious that with increasing basic wind
speed and height, difference of wind duration will be more
effective in comparison with lower basic wind speed (47m/s).
On the other hand, at the same basic wind speed, with
decreasing wind duration, because of being neighbor of gust
wind speed to wind speed, participation of gust in mean wind
speed is increasing and vice versa. Therefore, this is an
acceptable reason for this fact that with increasing wind
duration mean wind speed decrease (Durst 1960).
6.1
1.00E+16
1.00E+14
1.00E+12
1.00E+10
1.00E+08
1.00E+06
1.00E+04
1.00E+02
1.00E+00
1.00E-02
0.0001
5st Floor
15st Floor
25st Floor
35st Floor
40st Floor
0.001
0.01
0.1
Frequency(Hz)
1614
CONCLUSION
Simiu E, Scanlan RH. Wind effects on structures. 3rd ed. New York:
Wiley; 1996.
[2] ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 2006. ASCE 7-05,
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Including
Supplement No. 1. ASCE: Reston, VA.
[3] Liu H. Wind engineeringA handbook for structural engineers.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 1991.
[4] Benfratello S, Falsone G, Muscolino G. Influence on the quadratic term
in the along-wind stochastic response of SDOF of structures.
Engineering Structures 1996;18(8):68595.
[5] Deodatis G. Simulation of ergodic multivariate stochastic processes.
Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1996;22(8):77887.
[6] American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC), (2005). "Specification
for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-05", Chicago (IL):
American Institute for Steel Construction.
[7] American Concrete Institute, Building Code Requirements For
Structural Concrete (ACI 318-05).
[8] Building and Housing Research Center, (2007). "Iranian Code of
Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings [Standard No.2800,
3th Edition] ", Tehran, Iran.
[9] CSI (Computers & Structures, Inc.). 2007. Perform 3D Version 4.0.3.
Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment of 3D Structures. CSI:
Berkeley, CA.
[10] Shinozuka, M., and Deodatis, G. (1991). Simulation of stochastic
processes by spectral representation. Appl. Mech., Rev., 44(4), 191204.