You are on page 1of 32

EE6531: Selected Topics in Smart Grid Technologies

Renewable to Grid Integration


Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Senior Member IEEE
Assistant Professor
Electrical and Computer Engineering
National University of Singapore
eleakr@nus.edu.sg
http://www.ece.nus.edu.sg/stfpage/akr

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Layout of Lecture
Major difference between single-stage and multi-stage inverters
Need of high-frequency power electronics
PV to Grid interfacing schemes
Comparison of interfacing schemes
Conclusions

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Renewable to Grid Integration


It requiresPower electronics inverter (DC/AC conversion)
Controller (power flow control)

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Renewable to Grid Integration

Locallygeneratedenergyisusedbylocalload.
Excessissoldtotheutility
Excesscanbestoredifoptionisavailable.
Allsuchactionsneedpowerelectronicsinterfaceandcontrol.

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Important Terms/Key Words


Variability of renewables
Point of Common Coupling (PCC)
Standalone (off-grid)
Grid-interfaced/grid-tied/grid-connected
Active and reactive power flow control, i.e., power factor
adjustment
Mode of control (voltage and current control)
Decoupling stage (DC and AC decoupling)
High-frequency conversion

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Inverter (Power Electronics Interface)


Low cost
Light and compact
High efficiency
Efficient handling of variability of renewables (input source)
Low THD current delivery to the grid and load
Ease and simplicity of interface

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Variability in V-I and Power


Transfer Capacity

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Efficiency variation with Input Voltage


and Power (Load) Variation
100

% Efficiency

90
80
70
60
50
0

20

40
Load current (A)

Efficiencycurveforwideinputvoltagevariation
Renewablesshowvoltagevariationof1:3orhigher
Efficiencydropswithincreasinginputvoltage
Renewablesshowloadvariationof1:20orhigher
Efficiencydropswithatlightcurrentorload
Poorsourceutilization
Longerpaybackperiod
Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

60

80

Specifications of a Residential
PV Inverter
PV panel voltage (DC) = 18 V to 65 V
Inverter O/P AC voltage =230 V RMS at 50 Hz
Output power = 250 W (micro-inverter) or 1 kW.
Switching frequency = 100 kHz ?? High (What is its impact ?)

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Single stage Grid-tied Inverter

Single-stage dc-to-ac conversion (least conversion stage)


Line frequency transformer (50/60 Hz)
High efficiency
Simple
Low components count
SIZE ?? VOLUME ??
Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Two Stage Grid-tied/connected Inverters

Two-stage dc-to-ac conversion


Line frequency transformer with relatively less turns ratio than
single-stage conversion
High efficiency but relatively lower than single-stage conversion
Simple but two stages to control
Increased components count
SIZE ?? VOLUME ??
Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

High-frequency Power Electronics


Compact
Low cost
Light weight
Easy transportation
Efficiency
Reliability
Selection
Compare1) 10 kHz v/s 1 MHz
2) 50 Hz v/s 500 kHz

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Multistage High-frequency Power


Conversion for RE to Grid Integration

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Scheme 1: Two Stage Single-ended Inverter

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Continued
Advantages: 1) Two stage power conversion.
2) Simple, low component count, and low cost solution for low power.

Disadvantages: 1) Such types of converters suffer from lossy resetting and


limited duty cycle.
2) There is a risk of transformer saturation. So discharge of energy stored in
transformer must be ensured during the turn-off period of switch(es).
3) Transformer size will be bigger to avoid saturation.
4) Due to limited duty cycle, one switch topology and single-ended
operation, it cannot be used for high power.
5) Low efficiency
6) Difficult to stabilize the feedback circuit in flyback converter.
7) The components of both stages are designed for peak power rating.
Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Scheme 2: Two Stage Conversion with Double-ended


Inverter on Primary Side and Cycloconverter on
secondary side: Case 1
Lin
PV

+
-

Lo

Cin

DC-AC

HF
double-ended
inverter

AC-AC
HF
Transformer
HF Cycloconverter
Control
Circuit

Co

vu

Utility

iu

Reference
current
(Line frequency)

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Scheme 2: Two Stage Conversion with Double-ended


Inverter on Primary Side and Cycloconverter on
secondary side: Case 2

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Continued
Advantages: 1) Two stage power conversion.
Disadvantages:
1) Cycloconverter switches show commutation overlap when the
current through the transformer leakage inductance changes
direction. It reduces average output voltage and modifies the
voltage waveform (distortion). This is a major problem and
removes cycloconverter configuration from the list of choices
because at higher operating frequency, the overlap forms the
large part of HF cycle.
2) The components of both stages are designed for peak power
rating.
Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Scheme 3: Intermediate DC Link and Last Stage


PWM Voltage Source Inverter with Voltage Control
Lin
PV

+
-

Cin

Lo

Ld
DC-AC

AC-DC
HF

Transformer
HF
inverter

Control
Circuit

Rectifier

+
Vdc DC-AC
-

Cd

Intermediate
DC link

vinv

Control
Circuit

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

vu Utility

vL
iu

HF voltage
controlled
PWM VSI

+
Reference
voltage

Co

+
Reference
voltage
(Line frequency)

Power flow control


No power flow

(b)

(a)

(c)

Only reactive power flow


No active power flow
Power factor = 0

Both active and


reactive power flow
0 < pf < 1

Only active power flow


No reactive power flow
Power factor = 1
(d)

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Continued
Advantages: 1) Components of first two stages are designed for average power
and only the components of III stage are designed for peak power.
2) The second harmonic pulsation is reflected and absorbed at the intermediate
DC link. Therefore, risk of low frequency current ripple at the input side is low.
3) Suitable for standalone mode of operation.
Disadvantages: 1) The HF switching operation at III stage VSI will decrease the
size of the filter but will increase the switching losses and the heat sink size.
2) A large inductor is required to control the active power flow between PWM
VSI and utility line.
3) A complex control circuit to control the active power flow from DC source to
the utility (feed the current at nearly unity power factor to keep the reactive power
at minimum) is required. Interface to utility is complex.
3) Utility line power factor is good but unstable with load and input voltage
variations.
Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Scheme 4: Intermediate DC Link and Last Stage PWM


Voltage Source Inverter with Current Control

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Continued
Advantages:
1) Components of first two stages are designed for average power and only the
components of III stage are designed for peak power.
2) The second harmonic pulsation is reflected and absorbed at the intermediate
DC link. Therefore, risk of low frequency current ripple at the input side is low.
3) No extra large inductor is required to control the power flow into grid.
4) The control is simple. Current control makes the utility connection simple.
5) The utility power factor is good and stable. Output line current has low THD.

Disadvantages: The HF switching operation at III stage VSI will decrease the
size of the filter but will increase the switching losses and the heat sink size.

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Scheme 5: Three Stage Conversion with Last Stage


Line Commutated Square Wave Inverter

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Continued
Advantages:
1)The interface to utility is simple.
Disadvantages:
1)The output line current will have high THD. Line filters are necessary to
minimize the current harmonics injected into the utility line.
Active filter (AF) can be used to reduce THD to a desired low level but the
complexity of the control and requirement of extra components limit the use of
this scheme with AF.
2) Stand alone operation not possible.

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Scheme 6: Rectified Sine DC Link with


Unfolding Inverter with Current Control

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Continued
Advantages: 1) Interface to utility is simple.
2) Only I stage (HF inverter) needs to be controlled.
3) Unlike scheme 3, no extra large inductor is required.
4) Power factor is near to unity with low THD.
5) Line frequency switched last stage inverter.
6) The size of output filter (Lo, Co) is smaller as compared to schemes 3-5.
Disadvantages: 1) The components of all three stages are designed for peak
power rating.
2) The risk of HF transformer saturation is higher as compared to schemes 3-5.
Therefore, flux sensing is needed to avoid saturation.

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Comparison
Parameter

Scheme 1

Scheme 2

Scheme 3

Scheme 4

Scheme 5

Scheme 6

No. of power stages

Filter circuits

Large input capacitor


to absorb 2nd harmonic

yes

yes

No

no

no

Yes

Intermediate DC link
capacitor

NA

NA

large

large

NA

Small

last stage
capacitor

small

small

small

small

small

Small

Extra inductor

No

No

Yes

No

No

No

THD

low

low

low

low

high

Low

Utility line p.f.

good

good

good but
unstable

good

Good
(fundamental)

Good

Ease of connection
to utility line

Simple

Simple

complex

simple

simple

Simple

III stage switching

NA

NA

HF
Switched

At least one
leg HF
switched

Line
frequency
switching

Line
frequency
Switching

Simplicity of control

Simple

Simple

Complex

Simple

Simple*

Simple

Size

large

small

small

small

small

Small

Efficiency

low

high

high

high

high

High

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Continued
High Efficiency
Low THD, high power factor
Easiness and simplicity

High power density per cell


Volume
Transformer saturation
Second harmonic pulsation: Effects : MPPT, Stability, Efficiency
Components rating
Conversion topology options and issues

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Decoupling Capacitor Requirement


Energy storage/decoupling
capacitor

Scheme 4

Scheme 6

Value/rating

Co = 2.2 mF, 450 V

Cin = 100 mF, 80 V

Cost

24 $ US

37 $ US

Volume

Dia = 2.5'', height = 4.13''

Dia = 3'', height = 5.63''

Life

2000 hours @ 85oC

2000 hours @ 85oC

Efficiency curve
Scheme B Cin = 100 mF 80 V

Scheme B Cin = 35 mF, 80 V

Scheme A 2.2 mF 450 V


100

% Efficiency

95

Vin = 30-60 V, effective energy storage capacity


at full-load power transfer of 1 kW, which is at
low input voltage, in scheme A is CdcV2 (=
0.0022 * 3502) = 134.75 J.

90
85
80
75
70
0

100

200

300
Pow er (W)

400

500

600

However, for scheme B, it is CinV2 (= 0.035


* 302) = 15.75 J for 35 mF value capacitor and
is CinV2 (= 0.1 * 302) = 45 J for 100 mF
value capacitor.

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Summary
---

31

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Q(s) & A(s)

32

Dr. Akshay K. Rathore, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

You might also like