Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
SBMR 2014
complex fields.
However, the challenge of new scenarios
cannot be fully appreciated by using the
classical methodology. Well design experts,
therefore, have been forced to develop a more
robust field characterization in order to
reproduce the geological and geomechanical
complexity of these sites.
Some of the first attempts to solve this issue
METHODOLOGY
SBMR 2014
Facies modeling
Property
modeling
Integrated data
analysis
Modeling rock
mechanics
Structural and
stratigraphic
modeling
CASE STUDY
SBMR 2014
pressure studies.
Spatial correlation analysis of well data was
performed individually for each facies. Rhob
and Dtc presented good results, respectively
presenting mean absolute percentage errors of
approximately 5% and 2.5% along the well
reserved for blind test. This is considered to be
a small error for predictions in engineering
applications.
For predicting Dtc, interval seismic velocity
was also used as secondary data. Dts, that was
less abundant, was not guided by facies for
distribution, because there were not enough data
to analyze individual variograms. Gamma ray
(GR) did not demonstrate good spatial
correlation on variograms, so it was distributed
by using the inverse distance squared method.
Rock mechanical correlations were directly
applied to these cubes, using facies distribution
to separate the best-fit correlations. A previous
study of recommended correlations for this area
had been done. Figure 4 shows the cube
obtained for unconfined compressive strength
(UCS).
SBMR 2014
Pressure data
analysis
Filter
Filter shale
points
Sand pore
pressure
Global trend
Special filters
Shale pore
pressure
Figure 8. Pore pressure prediction workflow.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Schlumberger for providing
PetrelTM academic license and Petrobras for
making data available for this case study.
REFERENCES
Figure 9. Comparison of project (3D prediction) and postmortem (1D) mud weight window. Blue dots are pressure
measures and the black dot is a LOT pressure.
CONCLUSIONS
SBMR 2014
SBMR 2014