Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mean(Liking)=3.6
Mean(Liking)=3.0
Salary
23000
32000
20000
Frequency
3
5
1
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
VS
Sample Mean
liking: 4.1
Population mean
liking: 3.2
Statistical Significance
Reflects the probability that the difference
Critical Value
The value of Z that must be exceeded in order to
Commercial:
Mean(Liking):
Standard Dev:
Sample Size:
Formula:
Z=7.5
Where does 7.5 fall on the Normal
Distribution?
Z=7.5
Critical Value=+/- 1.96
If H0 is true, it is not likely (.05) to observe a
sample mean (Budweiser) more than +/- 1.96
standard deviations from the hypothesized
value (All Previous)
Decision: Reject H0
Conclusion: The mean liking score of the new
Budweiser horse commercial is significantly
different from the mean liking score of all
previous Bud commercials.
Group 2:
Experimental Group.
Average body
temperature of this
group?: 97.6
Step 1:
Or
Two-tailed test:
1.65
1.96
Quality control
Allows comparison of small sample sizes
means
Test Statistic:
Previous Years
3.9
Step 1:
t=-6.25
Critical Value=- 1.71
If 2012 freshmen did not spend less time
studying than all previous freshmen (H0), it is
unlikely (.05) that the mean of 2012 would be
further than -1.71 standard deviations from
the mean of all previous grads.
Test Statistic:
s2 =Sample Variance
Group:
Males
Mean(Liking): 4.2
Variance:
1.6
Sample Size:
50
Formula:
Females
3.7
1.4
50
Z=2.08
Critical Value=1.65
If males did not like the Bud Light campaign
more than females (H0), it is unlikely (.05) that
the Male sample mean would be more than
1.65 standard deviations from the Female
sample mean.
Decision: Reject H0
Conclusion: Males like the Bud Light Real
Men of Genius campaign better than
females do.
What am I comparing?
One-tailed or two-tailed?
Sample size?