Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Employee engagement is associated with many desirable outcomes, such as job satisfaction,
intention to stay and job performance. Companies with a greater number of engaged employees
typically have lower operating costs, higher customer satisfaction and higher profits. There is a
tangible monetary benefit to companies investing time and resources in fostering higher
engagement within their employees. The task of precisely defining employee engagement is still
ongoing, but it is most often defined in terms of behaviours exhibited in the workplace. Engaged
employees are prepared to go the extra mile in pursuit of workplace excellence. They are
ambassadors for their organisations, who will speak highly of the company and its people, even
when they are not in a work setting.
behaviours such as losing track of time as they are so absorbed in the task at hand. This is
distinct from excessive overtime in order to give the impression of hard work. Both look the
same, but one is productive for the employer- employee relationship and one is not!
Academics would say that not enough is understood about what drives employee engagement as
most research in the area has tended to focus on business outcomes without investigating
underlying causes. As the impact of engagement on business has been positive and has been
linked with higher profitability, practice has raced ahead of the underpinning research in pursuit
of creating a more engaged and hence profitable workforce.
I undertook research to aid understanding of the area by investigating the relationship between
employee engagement and the retention level.
At the same time I looked at the interplay between individual differences and engagement levels
of the organization. I hoped to discover best practices of the organizations and the individuals
expectations from such strategies.
Success today requires a good bit more than good attendance. Yet, multiple studies in different
countries and across industries show that employees who are passionate about their jobs and the
organizations in which they work are in the minority. Some of the Survey conducted by few
organization revealed that approximately 19% of the employees are highly engaged The
1
Corporate Executive Board, looking at levels of engagement across 50,000 employees around the
world, placed only 11 percent in what they dubbed true believer category.1 Towers Perrins
recent Talent Report is slightly more optimistic, finding just 17 percent of the 35,000
employees surveyed to be highly engaged. 40 to 70 percent of employees can be classified as
neutral, middle of the road, or agnostic. Worse yet, an alarming 10 to 20 percent of employees
are actively disengagedjust putting in their time or, worse yet, undermining or badmouthing
their organizations and bosses. The economic impact of low engagement can be staggering.
The global survey shows that 34 per cent of the employees in India are fully engaged and 13 per
cent disengaged. As many as 29 per cent are almost engaged.
What makes these numbers especially discouraging is that, supposedly, we have evolved from
the dark ages of personnel management. On one hand, for the past two decades we have been
trying to realize the benefits of empowerment, teamwork, recognition, people development,
performance management, and new leadership styles.
between putting in place initiatives that have the overall goal of increasing employee
engagement and truly seeing the payoffs. And, on the other hand, one might easily attribute low
engagement to persistent downsizing, which leads to an erosion of loyalty and commitment.
RETAIL INDUSTRY
The retail scenario is one of the fastest growing industries in India over the last couple of years.
India retail sector comprises of organized retail and unorganized retail sector. Traditionally the
retail market in India was largely unorganized. However with changing consumer preferences,
organized retail is gradually becoming popular. Unorganized retailing consists of small and
medium grocery store, medicine stores, subzimandi, kirana stores, paan shops etc. More than
90% of retailing in India fall into the unorganized sector, the organized sector is largely
concentrated in big cities. Organized retail in India is expected to grow 25-30 per cent yearly and
is expected to increase from Rs35, 000 crore in 2004-05 to Rs109, 000 crore ($24 billion) by
2012.
This study is taken up to gain an insight in retail marketing .The project was undertaken during
the month of may 2013 and the main purpose of the project is to know the application of the
theoretical aspects in our course in the corporate environment and gain firsthand experience and
expose ourselves to corporate policies, ethics, culture, practices, procedures, facts about the work
culture and policies of the company.
People often lie in exit interviews about why they are leaving. Managers should, of course, know
in advance who is leaving and why. A comprehensive list like this is of little value unless used as
a guide to gather information as to how to engage the employees so that to retain the talents in
the organization.
1.3 OBJECTIVES
To study the overview of bigbazar
To study the employee engagement practices adopted in bigbazar
To study the correlation between the employee engagement practices carried out in the
company and retention levels.
To understand the various responsibilities and duties carried out by each department.
To offer some suggestions to improve the performance of the organization
1.4 METHODOLOGY
TYPE OF RESEARCH
PRIMARY DATA:
Data collection Method through Questionnaire Method was used and employee responses on that
were tabulated and represented in percentage form, which then were analyzed and interpreted.
This was followed by findings and recommendations.
The questionnaire consisted of both open ended as well as multiple choice questions based on 6
factors as listed below:
1.
2.
Agreeableness
3.
Emotional stability
4.
Openness to experience
5.
Achievement orientation
6.
Self-efficacy
The above factors are independent factors and retention of employees is dependent on it.
SECONDARY DATA:
The data is collected by secondary sources also. The data is collected through company manual,
product brochure, company website.
The study is mainly based on the available printed and published information and opinion of
the officers and employees of the company.
Non-availability of adequate and essential information due to complex nature of the study.
2. BIGBAZAR-OVERVIEW
The history of retail has included countless ways in which retailers have attempted to get their
products in front of the consumer. But it seems that the businesses that have provided their
customers with the most convenience have generally proven to be the most successful.
For centuries, most retail sales were made by the street vendor or the small family owned shop,
which provided their customers with the convenience of not having to grow their own food or
make their own clothes. By the mid nineteenth century, most of the goods that we find in today's
superstores were supplied by craftsmen or local manufacturers who dealt directly with their
customers. Needed, not to mention that they probably had to travel all over town to get their
shopping done.
As manufacturing methods improved, and as the road and rail transport network extended, there
developed specialist manufacturers who needed retail stores to sell their goods. Over time, the
small retail store concept grew, and by the mid 1950's small stores blanketed every high street.
While most people loved the individual attention and great service that the small store provided,
it became more and more difficult for the small store to offer the kind of prices and selection that
the consumer really.
The next big revolution in retailing was the emergence of the retail chains, and later the
superstores. The consumer of the 70's demanded the convenience of having their favorite stores
in one enclosed location where they could easily hop from store to store without having to
concern them about the weather.
This shopping mall concept was quickly embraced by the consumer, but unfortunately the
crowds and traffic of today's mega malls can often turn what should have been a convenient and
comfortable shopping experience into a mission of hand-to-hand combat!
In recent years, the mail order business has experienced some of the most impressive growth,
which would also seem to echo the continuing consumer demand for convenience. Most retailers
are recognizing that they simply have to offer their customers the ability to order products or
services from the comfort of their own home or office in order to compete in today's retail
marketplace.
Global retail giants are also entering the retail industry in India and this is also one of the factors
in the growth of the organized retail sector in India.
10
11
Rank
Retailer
Home Country
Sales
in
Millions
1
Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc.
Carrefour
Group
The
Home
Depot, Inc.
The
Kroger
Co.
USA
$202,011
France
$62,216
USA
$53,553
USA
$50,098
Royal Ahold
Netherlands
$48,239
Metro AG
Germany
$43,816
USA
$39,176
USA
$37,931
USA
$37,328
USA
$36,151
Target
Corporation
Albertson's,
Inc.
Sears,
Roebuck
&Co.
10
Kmart
Corporation
12
US$
SPENCERS RETAIL
SUBHIKSHA
PIRAMYD RETAIL
SHOPPERS STOP
FUTURE GROUP
RELIANCE RETAIL
TRENT
13
SUBHIKSHA:RETAIL VENTURE:
The Chennai-based Subhiksha trading services is a discount chain established in 1997, with
a value for money business philosophy. Subhiksha operates in 4 verticals Fruits & Vegetables,
Pharmaceutical, FMCG and Telecom.
LEADERSHIP:R.Subramanian, Managing Director
CURRENT STATUS:
Subhiksha has crossed the 450-store mark across 5 states with over one million sqft of retail
space. It has ended phase one of its 300-crore investment across the country.
FUTURE PLANS:
With a 200-crore investment lined up for the phase two of expansion, Subhiksha to touch a 1000
store chain with a pan-India presence by 2007.
14
FUTURE PLANS:
Biyani has plans to open 75 more food bazaars in the next year spreading the wings to tier-II
cities.
TRENT:RETAIL VENTURE:
The salt-to-software corporate conglomerate TATA Group entered the modern arena way back in
1998. When it opened its outlet Trent in Bangalore in that year. Today Trent operates in three
formats- Westside, Landmark and Star India Bazaar.
LEADERSHIP:
Noel TATA, MD; Neetichopra, Head, Marketing (Westside).
16
CURRENT STATUS:
Westside has more than 20 outlets spread in Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai, Mumbai, Pune, and
Delhi & Kolkata.
FUTURE PLANS:
The TATA Group, through its retail brand Proma, is set to enter the Electronics and Consumer
Durable market.
17
2.2 TRENDS
The Retail Trade sector comprises establishments engaged in retailing merchandise, generally
without transformation, and rendering services incidental to the sale of merchandise. The
retailing process is the final step in the distribution of merchandise. Retailers are therefore
organized to sell merchandise in small quantities to the general public.
This sector comprises two main types of retailers:
Store retailers
STORE RETAILERS:Operate fixed point-of-sale locations, located and designed to attract a high volume of walk-in
customers. In general, retail stores have extensive displays of merchandise and use mass-media
advertising to attract customers. They typically sell merchandise to the general public for
personal or household consumption, but some also serve business and institutional clients. These
include establishments such as office supply stores, computer and software stores, building
materials dealers, plumbing supply stores and electrical supply stores. Catalog showrooms,
gasoline service stations, automotive dealers and mobile home dealers are treated as store
retailers.
In addition to retailing merchandise, some types of store retailers are also engaged in the
provision of after-sales services, such as repair and installation. For example, new automobile
dealers, electronics and appliance stores, musical instrument and supplies stores often provide
repair services. As a general rule, establishments engaged in retailing merchandise and providing
after-sales services are classified in this sector.
NON STORE RETAILERS:Non-store retailers, like store retailers, are organized to serve the general public, but their
retailing methods differ. The establishments of this sub sector reach customers and market
merchandise with methods, such as the broadcasting of infomercials, the broadcasting and
publishing of direct-response advertising, the publishing of paper and electronic catalogs, door18
to-door solicitation, in-home demonstration, selling from portable stalls (street vendors, except
food) and distribution through vending machines. Establishments engaged in the direct sale (nonstore) of products, such as home heating oil dealers and home delivery newspaper routes are
included here.
The buying of goods for resale is a characteristic of retail trade establishments that particularly
distinguishes them from establishments in the agriculture, manufacturing and construction
industries. For example, farms that sell their products at or from the point of production are not
classified in retail, but rather in agriculture. Similarly, establishments that both manufacture and
sell their products to the general public are not classified in retail, but rather in manufacturing.
FORMATS IN DETAIL
CONVENIENCE STORES:
This industry comprises establishments known as convenience stores or food marts primarily
engaged in retailing a limited line of goods that generally includes milk, bread, soda and snacks
in a 2000 to 3000 square foot store with speedy check out. They are the modern version of the
neighborhood mom-and-pop grocery/general store.
19
HR DEPARTMENT STORES:
This industry group comprises establishments known as department stores primarily engaged in
retailing a wide range of the following new products with no one merchandise line
predominating: apparel; furniture; appliances and home furnishings; and selected additional
items, such as paint, hardware, toiletries, cosmetics, photographic equipment, jewelry, toys, and
sporting goods. Merchandise lines are normally arranged in separate departments.
DISCOUNT STORES:
This industry comprises establishments known as department stores that have central customer
checkout areas, generally in the front of the store. Department stores in this industry offer a wide
range of general merchandise (except fresh, perishable foods), limited service and low prices.
SPECIALITY STORES:
This industry concentrates on a limited number of complementary merchandise categories and
provides a high level of service in an area typically less than 8000 square feet. In recent years, a
specialty apparel store has been one of the weakest, slowest-growing areas in retailing.
CATEGORY KILLERS:
This industry is much nearer to discount store that offers a narrow variety but deep assortment of
merchandise. These retailers are basically discount specialty stores. Most category specialists use
a self-service approach, but some specialists in consumer durables offer assistance to customers.
SUPER CENTERS:
This industry offers a wide variety of food and nonfood merchandise. They are the fastest
growing retail category. Supercenters stock between 100,000 and 150,000 individual items
(SKUs). The store generally is spread across 150,000 to 220,000 square foot.
HYPER MARKETS:
20
This industry is large combination food and general merchandise retailers. They typically stock
less than super centers, between 40,000 and 60,000 items ranging from groceries, hardware, and
sports equipment, to furniture and appliances, to computers and electronics. The store generally
is spread across 100,000 to 300,000 square foot.
COMPANY PROFILE
Pantaloon Retail (India) Limited, is Indias leading retailer that operates multiple retail formats in
both the value and lifestyle segment of the Indian consumer market. Headquartered in Mumbai
(Bombay), the company operates over 10 million square feet of retail space, has over 1000 stores
across 61 cities in India and employs over 30,000 people.
The companys leading formats include Pantaloons, a chain of fashion outlets,
Big Bazaar, a
uniquely Indian hypermarket chain, Food Bazaar, a supermarket chain, blends the look, touch and
feel of Indian bazaars with aspects of modern retail like choice, convenience and quality and Central,
a chain of seamless destination malls. Some of its other formats include, Depot, Shoe Factory, Brand
Factory, Blue Sky, Fashion Station, all, Top 10, m bazaars and Star and Sitara. The company also
operates an online portal, futurebazaar.com.
Future Group is one of the countrys leading business groups present in retail, asset management,
consumer finance, insurance, retail media, retail spaces and logistics. The groups flagship company,
Pantaloon Retail (India) Limited operates over 10 million square feet of retail space, has over 1,000
stores and employs over 30,000 people.
Future Group companies includes, Future Capital Holdings, Future Generally India Indus League
Clothing and Galaxy Entertainment that manages Sports Bar, Brew Bar and Bowling Co. Future
Capital Holdings, the groups financial arm, focuses on asset management and consumer credit. It
21
manages assets worth over $1 billion that are being invested in developing retail real estate and
consumer-related brands and hotels.
We share the vision and belief that our customers and stakeholders shall be served only by
creating and executing future scenarios in the consumption space leading to economic
development.
We will be the trendsetters in evolving delivery formats, creating retail realty, making
consumption affordable for all customer segments for classes and for masses.
We shall ensure that our positive attitude, sincerity, humility and united determination shall
Respect & Humility: to respect every individual and be humble in our conduct.
22
f. At Big Bazaar, you will definitely get the best products at the best prices - that's what it
guarantees.
Big Bazaar promises to sell only the original products from the authorized dealers; so that all
applicable products carry the original manufacturers warranty.
23
purchased at Big Bazaar, customer can visit the authorized service centre of the manufacturer.
The invoice accompanying the product is the warranty document.
b. GUARANTEED DELIVERY:
Big Bazaar guarantees to deliver the exact product that has selected, without defects. In case of
receiving a different product, or if the product is damaged in transit, the customer should contact
it within the stipulated time period and Big Bazaar will ensure that it is replaced or refunded.
c. SECURE PAYMENT:
It commits to ensure that no payment misuse happens, so we work with banks and payment
gateways to ensure that your information is protected. Payments are protected both by it and by
the policies of customers bank, and the chances of fraud in these channels are actually very low.
Big Bazaar openly publishes its office addresses and is part of Indias largest retail company
with a presence all over India so you know how to contact us in person, if required.
If customer has purchased something at Future Bazaar and the product did not meet its
expectations or does not fit to his needs, then it can return the product to us; no questions asked,
as long as it is in its original packaging and accompanied by its invoice
Our customer support is manned by dedicated call centre personnel, who can take decisions and
resolve your problems. They are eager to solve your problems and are aware of the processes
and means to handle them. In case they cannot solve the problem at their end, they will trigger
the required action on your behalf or advise you the best possible method to a successful
fulfillment of all your queries/issues. Be assured that when you call us, your call is being taken
seriously.
24
GUARANTEED DILIVERY
15 DAYS
RETURN
POLICY
PROMPT
CUSTOME-R
SUPPORT
BIG
BAZAAR
MANUFACTURERS
WARRANTY
SECURE
PAYMENT
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
The Future Group has built a strong portfolio of some of the fastest growing consumer brands in
India. This activity is led through Future BrandsIndia Limited, a specialized subsidiary company
that was set up to create and build powerful brands that address the aspirations of the new Indian
consumer.
25
Some of the key brands in this portfolio include, John Miller, Lombard, Bare, DJ&C, Buffalo
and RIG in the fashion and apparel space. Dream line, present in the home segment, offers a
wide range of products in kitchenware, bed & bath linen, and Home Dcor categories.
In the food and home care segment brands include Tasty Treat, Premium Harvest, Fresh & Pure,
Care Mate and Clean Mate.
In consumer durables and electronics space, the groups brands include Koryo and Sensei.
S.M
ADDITIONAL
STORE
MANAGER
DEPARTMENT
MANAGER
SUB- DEPARTMENT
MANAGER
TEAM LEADER
TEAM MEMBER
PRODUCT LINE
Here, one finds over 170,000 products under one roof that cater to every need of a family,
making Big Bazaar Indias favorite shopping destination. Where Big Bazaar scores over other
stores is its value for money proposition for the Indian customers. Big Bazaar, one finds a huge
variety of products to select from with a good price and quality. With the ever increasing array
26
of private labels, it has opened the doors into the world of fashion and general merchandise
including home furnishings, utensils, crockery, cutlery, sports goods and much more at
surprisingly low prices.
In recent years, Big Bazaar has adopted value pricing in which they win loyal customers by
charging a fairly low price for a high quality offering. However, consistent low price for the
products is not only the universally desired characteristic.
27
Three Big Bazaar stores launched within a span of 22 days in Kolkata, Bangalore and
Hyderabad[4]
2003
Food Bazaar becomes part of Big Bazaar with the launch of the first store in Mumbai at
High Street Phoenix
2004
Big Bazaar enters Tier II cities with the launch of the store in Nagpur
Big Bazaar welcomes its 10 million-th customer at its new store in Gurgaon
2005
Big Bazaar wins its first award and national recognition. Big Bazaar and Food Bazaar awarded
the countrys most admired retailer award in value retailing and food retailing segment at the
India Retail Forum
A day before Diwali, the store at Lower Parel becomes the first to touch Rs 10 million
turnover on a single day
2006
Initiates the implementation of SAP and pilots a RFID project at its central warehouse in Tarapur
Launches a unique shopping program: the Big Bazaar Exchange Offer, inviting customers to
2007
Mohan Jadhav sets a national record at Big Bazaar Sangli with a Rs 1,37,367 shopping bill.
Big Bazaar launches Shakti, Indias first credit card program tailored for housewives
2008
Big Bazaar partners with Futurebazaar.com to launch India's most popular shopping portal
Big Bazaar initiates the Power of One campaign to help raise funds for the Save The
Pantaloon Retail wins the International Retailer of the Year at US-based National Retail
Federation convention in New York and Emerging Retailer of the Year award at the World
Retail Congress held in Barcelona.
2009
Big Bazaar becomes the fastest growing hypermarket format in the world with the launch of
Big Bazaar dons a new look with a fresh new section, Fashion@Big Bazaar
Big Bazaar joins the league of Indias Business Superbrands. It is voted among the top ten
Big Bazaar initiates MahaAnnasantarpane program at its stores in South India a unique
Big Bazaar captures almost one-third share in food and grocery products sold through
Future Value Retail Limited is formed as a specialized subsidiary to spearhead the groups
value retail business through Big Bazaar, Food Bazaar and other formats.
29
Big Bazaar wins CNBC Awaaz Consumer Awards for the third consecutive year. Adjudged
the most preferred Most Preferred Multi Brand Food & Beverage Chain, Most Preferred Multi
Brand Retail Outlet and Most Preferred Multi Brand One Stop Shop
2012
Big Bazaar connects over 30,000 small and medium Indian manufacturers and entrepreneurs
Big Bazaar shuold opens its fourth store in Kanpur at Jajmau which is the largest leather
2.
3.
launched in Bangalore.
4.
Fashion Station The Popular Fashion Chain is LaunchedaLL-a little larger-Exclusive store
Future Capital Holdings, the Companys Financial arm launches real estate fund kshitij and
Horizon and Private Equity fund Indivision. Plans forays into insurance and consumer credit.
1991-1992
1.
Future Capital Holdings,the Companys Financial arm launches real estate fund kshitij and
Horizon and Private Equity fund Indivision. Plans forays into insurance and consumer credit.
2.
3.
The Pantaloon Shoppe-exclusive mens wear store in Franchisee format launched across the
nation. The company start the distribution of branded garment through multi-brand retail outlets
across the nation.
4.
5.
The Minuses:
4.
CREDENTIALS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
PARTNER COMPANIES
Home solution Retail (India) Ltd.:-Home solution Retail (India) Ltd. (HSRIL) lead the foray
in the home improvement and consumer electronics retailing segment. It caters to home
management
requirement
and
product
including
furnishing
and
textiles,
furniture,
consumerelectronic, home electronics and home service. It operates retail format like home
town, furnitureBazaar, Collection I,E-Zone, Electronics Bazaar and got it.
Future capital Holdings: :-Future capital is the Financial arm of the group and is involve in
asset management (both private equity and real estate funds) with plans to get into other
financial service.Its associate companies are kshitij Investment Advisory co.Ltd, Indivision
Investment Adviser Ltd, And Ambit Investment Advisory co.Ltd.
Future Media India Ltd.:-Future Media India Ltd. Is a part of the future group, aimed at
creation of media properties in the ambience of consumption and thus active engagement to
brands and consumers.
32
Indus League Clothing Ltd.:- The group own a majority state in Indus League Clothing Ltd.
One of the leading apparel manufactures and marketers in India. Some of its leading brands in
clued Indigo Nation, Scullers, urban,urban yoga and jealous.
Future Bazaar India Ltd.:-Future Bazaar India Ltd. is a subsidiary of pantaloon Retail (India
Ltd.)It owns and operates the online shopping portal.
Galaxy Entertainment corporate Ltd.:-The group owns a state in Galaxy Entertainment
Corporate Ltd. That operates chains like, Bowling Company, Sports Bar and Brew Bar.
Capita Land Retail India:-The group is a Joint venture Partner in capital Land Retail India,
along with Singapore based capital Land Limited. The company provides retail management
services to retail properties owned or managed by various group companies and investment fund.
Footmart Retail:-Footmart retail is a joint venture with liberty shoes and is engaged in the
retailing of footwear product in India.
Planet Retail Holding Ltd.:-The group is a joint venture partner in Planet retail holding ltd.,
which operates sports, life style and leisure retail chain. It also owns the franchisee and
distribution rights of brands like Marks & Spencer, Guess and Puma in India.
33
3. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Definition of Employee Engagement
Employee engagement can be defined as an employee putting forth extra discretionary effort, as
well as the likelihood of the employee being loyal and remaining with the organization over the
long haul. Research shows that engaged employees: perform better, put in extra efforts to help
get the job done, show a strong level of commitment to the organization, and are more motivated
and optimistic about their work goals. Employers with engaged employees tend to experience
low employee turnover and more impressive business outcomes.
Employee engagement is more than just the current HR 'buzzword'; it is essential. In order for
organizations to meet and surpass organizational objectives, employees must be engaged.
Research has proven that wholly engaged employees exhibit,
Higher self-motivation.
Higher productivity.
Reliability.
Lower absenteeism.
The general principles of employee engagement have been around for decades. During the past
five years, though, there has been a surge in the popularity of employee engagement.
1. People have become the primary source of competitive advantage. The Brookings
Institute (2003) examined the primary source of market value in todays organizations and how it
has changed over time. In 1982, 62 percent of an organizations market value came from tangible
34
assets and 38 percent from intangible assets. Tangible assets include things like machinery,
products, facilities, etc. Intangible assets, on the other hand, include factors such as brand,
intellectual property, and, most important, the quality of the workforce. By 2002, 20 years later,
the source of value had almost totally flipped. Almost 80 percent of market value today comes
from the intangible with a scant 20 percent coming from tangible assets. As we all have heard
before, products can easily be copied, a technological edge can prove fleeting, and more facilities
can be built, but the quality of an organizations talent, its passion and commitment, is nearly
impossible to replicate. Engagement is the fuel that drives the value of intangible assets.
2. Retention and the war for talent. The landmark 1998 McKinsey study, The War forTalent,
was among the first to talk about the potential for workforce shortages due to the aging
population. The studys authors called upon organizations to take more seriously their efforts to
attract and retain talent, to assure that they would be able to survive and thrive in the future. In
the late 1990s and early 2000s, the slump in the global economy quickly took the spotlight off of
the anticipated talent shortage. And some predict that a portion of todays aging workers will
delay their retirements out of necessity, attenuating the expected talent shortage. Since 2003 the
picture is once again changing, albeit not as quickly as expected. For example, the Society for
Human Resources Management reported that 48 percent of the employees it polled are actively
seeking new jobs. Additionally, the workforce is getting older, with many of the baby boomers
hitting 60 in 2006 and ready to retire. Over and above the workforce cost of increased
retirements, companies are beginning to take heed of the enormous financial costs of turnover
and increasingly viewing employee engagement as an imperative for keeping their key
employees and attracting new onesas the war for talent heats up once again.
3. Popular appeal. Remember the reengineering wave? Even those who used it as more than
just a guise for massive layoffs found it painful. Six Sigma implementations are invaluable to
business performance, but most companies are finding them too complex to implement well.
Engagement is a different matter altogether. While it still takes patience to implement,
engagement gets to the hard stuff by focusing on the softer stuff. As one manager said: Its
about appealing to the head and the heart. Engagement is about creating passion, its about
focusing on what people do well, and its about development and recognition. Some have called
35
employee engagement a form of positive psychology which, on the whole, is an easy pill for
organizations and their employees to swallow.
4. Overwhelming impact. The human resources function has been under pressure for decades to
prove that it makes a difference. While CEOs may espouse the importance of their workforces in
their annual reports, when times get tough, HR is among the first to get the budget axe. Why? A
lack of convincing evidence on the value of HR initiatives. HR professionals are scrambling,
according to a recent Conference Board report, to prove that their activities and investments are
both efficient and positively influential to business strategy.The positive relationship between
engagement and performance (documented in hundreds of studies, with the evidence mounting
every day) provides a way for HR to prove its contribution. Its a fact: The higher the level of
engagement, the higher the performance of the business. The research is not inconclusive, not
limited to one country or industry, and not contained to a few hundred peopleits
overwhelming.
How to Make Employees Engage
Growth and development - An exciting position, with plenty of opportunity for growth,
company sees an unusual amount of potential in a new hire, management could make them feel
appreciated right off the bat. In a way, this practice can be considered a combination of
recruitment and retention tools.
the organization.
what they should be doing on the job. Each employee needs a solid job description and a clear
set of performance expectations.
about through the ability to make decisions, be responsible, be measured by results, and be
recognized as a thoughtful, contributing human being rather than a pair of hands doing what
others say.
36
require good relationships both within the work group and across work groups. Many
organizations have strong teams with members who work well with each other.
The Benefits of Employee Engagement
The power of employee engagement is that it is closely connected to business results. When
employees work in an environment in which they can focus their attention on their work and
have a drive to do their best, organizations experience higher levels of productivity
andprofitability. Engaged employees look for better ways to do their work, spend less time on
wasted activities, and make effective use of resources. In the end, companies deliver better
products or services and have more resources left to invest in further improvements. Although it
is an important consideration, high financial compensation is not the only driver of increased
employee retention. As addressed previously, employees decide to stay with organizations for
other reasons, such as growth and development opportunities, strong leadership, and meaningful
work. Turnover costs organizations millions of dollars each year, and engagement has a proven
relationship to employee retention. No one likes going into a store where the sales clerks are
sullen, absent, or uncooperative. Its easy to see why customers notice engaged employees and
are more satisfied and willing to purchase again. For example, Tom Labadie, director of training
and development at CompUSA states, When you walk into a store with high engagement
scores, you can sense the positive tone. Employees whistle and smile, they approach customers,
and the store gives off that elusive approachable feeling that customers appreciate.
Organizations with engaged employees have more satisfied customers, but its not just because
employees have better interactions with customers. Engaged employees are more likely to
improve other critical factors affecting customer satisfaction, such as responsiveness, product
quality, thought leadership, innovation, etc. Finally, higher engagement translates into higher
andfaster revenue growth. Engaged employees are more innovative and place more emphasis on
meeting customer needs. The what can I do better or differently attitude of engaged employees
versus the its not in my job description attitude of the unengaged simply leads to better
financial performance.
37
ASSESSING ENGAGEMENT
Over the past eight years, The Gallup Organization has been conducting exhaustive studies of
employee engagement to try and answer these fundamental questions. One of a handful of
engagement evangelists, Gallup has promoted the value of measuring employee engagement
through a series of books, seminars and programmes; it has also taken the lead in identifying and
managing the factors that impact engagement levels.
In order to rate the engagement of a workforce, first Gallup assesses employees to determine
whether they are engaged, not engaged or actively disengaged.
Engaged employees are the stars in a company. Passionate about what they do, they feel a strong
connection to their company and perform at high levels every day while looking for ways to
improve themselves and the company as a whole.
Not engaged employees, according to Gallup, are the company zombies who show up every day
and put in just enough effort to meet the basic requirements of their jobs. Without passion or
innovation, these employees neither commit to the companys direction, nor do they work
against it.
Actively disengaged employees are those who present a big problem for businesses. Negative by
nature, these people are unhappy in their work and they compound their lack of productivity by
sharing this unhappiness with those around them. They are the proverbial bad apples who revel
in their discontent while undermining the accomplishments of others; as a result, not only do
they achieve little themselves, they also prevent others from being productive too.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT
Over the past decade, the way in which people are managed and developed at work has come to
be recognized as one of the primary factors in achieving improvement in organizational
performance. This is reflected by popular idioms such as people are our most important assets.
Back in the good old days of corporate world, things were pretty simple. Companies put people
on career tracks straight out of college; they gave employees a job for life and waved them
38
goodbye with a gold watch at retirement. The promise of the stable life as a company employee
kept both morale and productivity high.
Then things changed. Competition increased, margins shrank and shareholders got more
demanding. Suddenly, company staff were finding the very job security theyd counted on was
disappearing, and at speed. This upheaval meant companies had to find new ways to motivate
their employees in order to make them more productive since, without stability, employees were
looking for something else from their employers. And thus, Engagement was born.
In itself, engagement isnt really a new idea; owners and managers have been talking about
engagement, in one form or another, for centuries they just used different words to express it.
In former times, engagement focused more on productivity and achieving results through threat
of punishment or by means of reward. But common sense - and good communication eventually won out and, today, organizations everywhere are spending serious money on all
forms of employee engagement. Boiled down, it simply means developing a happy and loyal
workforce. Enlightened managers now realize that any company as a whole will benefit when
its employees know whats going on and they feel part of the team. The tricky part is in defining
what makes a workforce happy, and in understanding how this good will translates into company
success.
From the extant literature review, it is acknowledged that successful organizations share a
fundamental philosophy of valuing and investing in their employees. In fact many research
studies have described human resource management as a means of achieving competitive
advantage. Consistent with this it is an equally important issue for the organization to retain their
critical (core) employees. Most organization today continues to struggle with retention because
they are relying on salary increases and bonuses to prevent turnover. Essentially more
organizations are now realizing that retention is a strategic issue and continues to be a
competitive advantage.
The term engagement stems from the work of Kahn (1990) who distinguished between being
engaged and disengaged at work. Putting the humanistic factors together, Beer, Specter,
Lawrence, Quinn-Mills and Walton (1984) created the Harvard Business School model of
39
HRM which focused on people in an organization to be the key resource. In light of such critical
emphasis being placed on human capital, Paula Ketter has aptly noted, Engagement is all about
creating a culture where people do not feel misused, overused, underused or abused.
At a very basic level, employee engagement draws from the tenets of the Hierarchy of Needs as
conceptualized by Maslow, the highest stage of which is self-actualization; the pinnacle of an
individuals fulfillment of talent and potential. This theory of higher order needs was largely
overlooked in the heydays of scientific assembly line manufacturing.
40
41
Many organizations ponder the questions, "What should the goal be for retention?" and "What is
an appropriate level for employee turnover?" Yet, in asking these questions, many organizations
don't realize that there are no set answers. If, for example, an organization loses five percent of
its top performers every year, the results from this turnover could be potentially devastating to
the company. On the other hand, if the company is losing 20 percent of its least productive
42
employees, this could actually be very beneficial for the organization and an opportunity to
increase the strength of its workforce each year.
In other words, it's not just about retention anymore it's about retaining the very best people at
each level within the organization. The key to effective retention of top performers is to
determine the factors that currently do, and will, keep them engaged.
The Starting Point an organization must first determine who the top performers and high
potentials are within their workforce. Of the many ways this can be accomplished, some include
involving management at every level to create a list of those employees who are performing at
levels that exceed expectations and those who exhibit the potential to become top performers, or
utilizing the results from employee performance reviews to separate those who scored the
highest from those who scored the lowest.
This method of gaining a clear understanding of who the top performers are within an
organization is called employee segmentation. Once an organization has segmented its
workforce, it can then start to measure retention among its highest potential and highest rated, or
most productive, employees. By viewing each segment separately, organizations are creating a
more appropriate benchmark to measure employee retention, i.e., is the organization retaining or
losing a high percentage of its best people?
Higher self-motivation.
2.
3.
Higher productivity.
4.
5.
Reliability.
6.
7.
Lower absenteeism.
Current studies show that organizations are focusing on the meaning of employee engagement
and how to make employees more engaged. Employees feel engaged when they find personal
meaning and motivation in their work, receive positive interpersonal support, and operate in an
efficient work environment. What brought engagement to the forefront and why is everyone
interested in it? Most likely, the tight economy has refocused attention on maximizing employee
output and making the most of organizational resources. When organizations focus attention on
their people, they are making an investment in their most important resource. You can cut all the
costs you want, but if you neglect your people, cutting costs wont make much of a difference.
Engagement is all about getting employees to give it their all. Some of the most successful
organizations are known for their unique work environments in which employees are motivated
to do their very best.
The concept of engagement is a natural evolution of past research on high-involvement,
empowerment, job motivation, organizational commitment, and trust. All of these research
streams focus on the perceptions and attitudes of employees about the work environment. In
some ways, there are variations on the same fundamental issue. What predicts employees giving
their all? Obviously, all organizations want their employees to be engaged in their work.
Hierarchy of Engagement
44
While organizations may be aware "through the grapevine" that employees are unsatisfied, it's
the reasons for the dissatisfaction that elude them. While employee satisfaction is important, it's
not the end game it is only one piece of employee engagement. Satisfaction is imperative in
that, for those individuals who are top performers, satisfaction may be derived from their
achievement orientation, their ambition, or their sense of responsibility. On the other hand, the
attempt to satisfy an under-performer who will only be content with a lightened workload may
not be a worthy cause. Again, the focus is on ensuring that those individuals who have been
identified as top performers and high potentials are engaged in the organization.
As stated, employee engagement incorporates employee satisfaction, but also includes the
essential elements of pride, commitment and loyalty in the organization. Engaged employees
aren't concerned with meeting the minimum requirements to complete a task, they are focused on
what they can do to better the company. Essentially, they take ownership in the company despite
whether or not they actually own a share of stock.
45
Drivers of engagement
The importance of the individual being able to align themselves to the products,
Management give staff sufficient elbow room and autonomy to let them fulfil their
potential
Lastly, that management from the top to the bottom of the organisation are committed
leaders and that the key role of the immediate line manager/supervisor is recognised as one of
the most important conduits to achieving effective employee engagement.
Eleme
nts of
Engag
ement
Some researchers conclude that personal impact, focused work, and interpersonal harmony
comprise engagement. Each of these three components has sub-components that further define
the meaning of engagement.
46
Personal Impact-Employees feel more engaged when they are able to make a unique
contribution, experience empowerment, and have opportunities for personal growth. Past
research concurs that issues such as the ability to impact the work environment and making
meaningful choices in the workplace are critical components of employee empowerment. Some
research on retaining talent found that the perception of meaningful work is one of the most
influential factors determining employees willingness to stay with the organization.
Focused Work-Employees feel more engaged when they have clear direction, performance
accountability, and an efficient work environment. Aside from the personal drive and motivation
to make a contribution, employees need to understand where to focus their efforts. Without a
clear strategy and direction from senior leadership, employees will waste their time on the
activities that do not make a difference for the organizations success. Additionally, even when
direction is in place, employees must receive feedback to ensure that they are on track and being
held accountable for their progress. In particular, employees need to feel that low performance is
not acceptable and that there are consequences for poor performance. Finally, employees want to
work in an environment that is efficient in terms of its time, resources, and budget. Employees
lose faith in the organization when they see excessive waste. For example, employees become
frustrated when they are asked to operate without the necessary resources or waste time in
unnecessary meetings.
Interpersonal Harmony-Employees feel more engaged when they work in a safe and cooperative
environment. By safety, we mean that employee trust one another and quickly resolve conflicts
when they arise. Employees want to be able to rely on each other and focus their attention on the
tasks that really matter. Conflict wastes time and energy and needs to be dealt with quickly.
Some researches also find that trust and interpersonal harmony is a fundamental underlying
principle in the best organizations. Employees also need to cooperate to get the job done.
Partnerships across departments and within the work group ensure that employees stay informed
and get the support they need to do their jobs.
Making Use of Engagement
Measurement of employee engagement can have many applications in the organization. Earlier,
it is mentioned that engagement could serve as a general index of HR effectiveness in an HR
scorecard. Also, engagement measures serve as an easy way to benchmark the work climate
against other organizations.
47
48
S.NO
Strongly agree
32
22
Agree
68
45
Disagree
22
14
Strongly disagree
28
19
150
100
Total
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Strongly disagree
19%
Strongly agree
21%
disagree
14%
agree
45%
The above table 4.1 shows the respondents opinion on knowing the expectation from the
work. The data revealed that out of 150 respondents. 22percentage of the employeesstrongly
agreed that they know about their expectations from the work followed by atwork, 45
percentage agreed, and 14 pecentage disagreed and 19 percentage strongly disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents (45percentage) are aware about their
expectations from their work.
49
4.2 At work, do you have the opportunity to do what you do best every day?
NO.OFRESPONDENTS PERCENTAGES
40
26
Agree
30
20
Disagree
35
24
Strongly disagree
45
30
150
100
Total
NO.OFRESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
26%
30%
24
%
20%
The above table 4.2 shows the respondents opinion on what to do best every day in work.
The data revealed that out of 150 respondents. 26 percentage of the employees strongly
agreed that they have opportunity at work every day 20 percentage agreed, and 24
percentage disagreed.30 percentage strongly disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents (30percentage) have no opportunity what to
do best every day at work.
50
4.3 In the last three months, have you received recognition or praise for doing good
work?
Table 4.3 recognition praise for good work
S.NO
OPTIONS
1
Strongly agree
Agree
35
23
Disagree
15
10
Strongly disagree
40
27
Not applicable
35
23
150
100
Total
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Not applicable
23%
17%
23%
27%
10%
The above table 4.3 shows the respondents opinion on received recognition or praise for
doing good work. The data revealed that out of 150 respondent.17 percentage strongly
agreed, that they have received recognition praise for doing good work23 percentage
agreed, 10 percentage disagreed, 27 percentage strongly disagreed, 23 percentage not
applicable.
It is concluded that majority of the respondent (27percentage) not received recognition or
praise for doing good work.
51
S.NO
1
OPTIONS
Strongly agree
NO.OFRESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
50
33
Agree
45
30
Disagree
40
27
Stronglydisagree
15
10
150
100
Total
NO.OFRESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
10%
33%
27%
30%
The above table 4.4 shows the respondents opinion on encouragementfor development at
work to you. the data revealed that out of 150 respondents.33 percentage employees
strongly agreed that they have encouragement for someone at work,30 percentage agreed,27
percentage agreed,10 percentage of the employees strongly disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents (33 percentage) have encouragement for
someone at work.
52
NO.OF
RESPONDENTS
OPTIONS
PERCENTAGE
Stronglyagree
40
27
Agree
29
19
Disagree
36
24
Stronglydisagree
45
30
150
100
Total
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
Agree
30%
24%
Disagree
Strongly disagree
27%
19%
The above table 4.5 shows the respondents opinion seems to count at work.The data
revealed that out of 150 respondents.27 percentage employees strongly agreed that their
opinions seem to count at work, 19 percentage agreed, 24 percentage disagreed, and 30
percentage strongly disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents (30 percentage) opinions had not seem to
count at work
53
4.6 Are your associates (fellow employees) committed to doing quality work?
Table 4.6quality of work employees
S.NO
1
OPTIONS
Strongly agree
NO.OFRESPONDENS PERCENTAGES
45
30
Agree
40
27
Disagree
35
23
Stronglydisagree
30
20
150
100
Total
NO.OFRESPONDENS
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
20%
30%
23%
27%
The above table 4.6 shows the respondents opinion onassociates (fellow employees)
committed to doing quality work.The data revealed that out of 150 respondents.30
percentage of respondents employees strongly agreed, that their associates of respondents
committed to doing quality work.27 percentage agreed, 23 percentage disagreed, 20
percentage of the employees strongly disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the(30 percentage) associates of (fellow employees)
respondents committed to doing quality work.
54
4.7 In the last year, have you had opportunities at work to learn and grow?
OPTIONS
NO.OF
PERCENTAGES
RESPONDENTS
45
30
Strongly agree
Agree
35
23
Disagree
30
20
Stronglydisagree
40
27
150
100
Total
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
agree
disagree
27%
Strongly disagree
30%
20%
23%
The above table 4.7 shows the respondents opinionon regarding opportunities at work to
learn and grow in the last year to employees. The data revealed that out of 150
respondents.30 percentage of the employees strongly agreed that they had got opportunity to
learn and grow in the last year.23 percentage agreed, 20 percentage disagreed and 27
percentage strongly disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of respondents (30 percentage) had got opportunities at work to
learn and grow
55
4.8 Are the pay and benefits in your organization comparable to similar companies?
OPTIONS
NO.OF.RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGES
Strongly agree
50
34
Agree
30
20
Disagree
50
33
Stronglydisagree
20
13
150
100
Total
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
13%
34%
33%
20%
The above table 4.8 shows the respondents opinion on the pay and benefits in the
organization comparable to similar companies.The data revealed that out of 150
respondents.34 percentage of the employees strongly agreed, that their pay and benefits in
this organization were comparable to similar companies 20 percentage agreed, 33percentage
disagreed, 13 percentage of the employees strongly disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents (34 percentages) the pay and benefits of
employees in this organization were comparable to similar companies
56
OPTIONS
Stronglyagree
NO.OF.RESPONDENTS PERCCENTAGES
30
20
Agree
35
23
disagree
45
30
Stronglydisagree
40
27
150
100
Total
NO.OFRESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
agree
disagree
27%
Strongly disagree
20%
23%
30%
The above table 4.9 shows the respondentsopinion on job promotions in this organization.
The data revealed that out of 150 respondents.20 percentage of the employees strongly
agreed, that the job promotions in this organization were fair and objective, 23 percentage
agreed, 30percentage disagreed, 27 percentage of the employees strongly disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents (30 percentage) the job promotions in this
organization were not fair and objective
57
OPTIONS
PERCENTAGES
Strongly agree
NO.OF
RESPONDENTS
58
1
2
Agree
32
21
Disagree
40
27
Strongly disagree
20
13
150
100
Total
39
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
13%
39%
27%
21%
The above table 4.10 shows the respondentsopinion on communication of policies in the
organization. The data revealed that out of 150 respondents.39 percentage of the employees
strongly agreed that the organization policies were clearly communicated in the
organization, 21 percentage agreed, 27percentage disagreed, 13 percentage strongly
disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents (39 percentage) theorganization policies
were clearly communicated in the organization.
58
4.11. Do you see yourself continuing to work for this organization two years from
now?
Table 4.11loyality towards organization
S.NO
OPTIONS
PERCENTAGES
Strongly agree
NO.OF
RESPONDENTS
60
1
2
agree
50
34
disagree
20
13
Strongly disagree
20
13
150
100
Total
40
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
agree
disagree
Strongly disagree
13%
40%
13%
34%
The above table 4.11 shows the respondentsopinion on continuing to work for this
organization two years from now. The data revealed that out of 150 respondents.40
percentage strongly agreed that they continuing to work for this organization two years from
now,34 percentage agreed,13 percentage disagrede,13 percentage of the employees strongly
disagreed.
It is concluded that majority of the respondents (40 percentage) are interested to continuing
to work for this organization two years from now.
59
4.12Do you refer your friends and relatives to work in this organization
S.NO
OPTIONS
PERCENTAGES
Strongly agree
NO.OF
RESPONDENTS
30
1
2
agree
45
30
Disagree
50
33
Strongly disagree
25
17
150
100
Total
20
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Strongly agree
agree
Disagree
17%
33%
Strongly disagree
20%
30%
The above table 4.12 shows the respondent opinion on recommendation to their
friends/relatives in the organization. The data revealed that out of 150 respondents.20
percentage if employees strongly agreed, that they recommend their friends relatives in
their organization.30 percentage agreed, 33 percentage disagreed, 17 percentage strongly
disagreed.
It is concluded that the majority of respondents were not recommend to their friends
relatives in their organization.
.
60
5.1FINDINGS
1.
Nowadays employees are involved in decision making in the organization and majority of
Most of the organizations allow their employees to participate in performance appraisals and
Compensation & Benefit programs are observed as the most effective rewards scheme
5.
For team building companies generally do small team recreational activities and social
activities.
6.
Majority of the sample are loyal towards their organization and they also recommend their
Stress management, Retirement plans and Work life balance surprisingly seem to be of least
Majority of the organizations agreed that the engagement strategies of their organization
Majority has observed 5-10% of reduced attrition rate due to the implementation of
61
5.2SUGGESTIONS
1.
As contrary to what managers believe that decision making is the most effective tool, the
employees still prefer rewards and recognition. The Managers should focus on the rewards and
recognition schemes in their organization.
2.
Practically people dont give much importance to stress management programs, work life
a.
Provide variety: Tedious, repetitive tasks can cause burn out and boredom over time. If the
job requires repetitive tasks, look for ways to introduce variety by rotating duties, areas of
responsibility, delivery of service etc.
b.
Conduct periodic meetings with employees to communicate good news, challenges and
Indulge in employee deployment if he feels he is not on the right job. Provide an open
environment.
d.
Communicate openly and clearly about what's expected of employees at every level - your
Get to know employees' interests, goals, stressors, etc. Show an interest in their well-being
and do what it takes enable them to feel more fulfilled and better balanced in work and life.
f.
Celebrate individual, team and organizational successes. Catch employees doing something
As we have got a very good response from employees so the companies should have the
62
5.3 SUMMARY
The project work report titled Employee engagement with reference BIG BAZAAR,
VISHAKAPATANAM divided into 5 Chapters.
First chapter deals with the introduction to the project report need for the study, objectives of the
study, Methodology and limitations. In the introduction of the study a brief discussion is made
on employee engagement scenario, the popularity of employee engagement and introduction to
the Company.
Employee engagement is associated with many desirable outcomes, such as job satisfaction,
intention to stay and job performance. Companies with a greater number of engaged employees
typically have lower operating costs, higher customer satisfaction and higher profits. There is a
tangible monetary benefit to companies investing time and resources in fostering higher
engagement within their employees. The task of precisely defining employee engagement is still
ongoing, but it is most often defined in terms of behaviours exhibited in the workplace. Engaged
employees are prepared to go the extra mile in pursuit of workplace excellence. They are
ambassadors for their organisations, who will speak highly of the company and its people, even
when they are not in a work setting.
behaviours such as losing track of time as they are so absorbed in the task at hand. This is
distinct from excessive overtime in order to give the impression of hard work. Both look the
same, but one is productive for the employer- employee relationship and one is not!
Academics would say that not enough is understood about what drives employee engagement as
most research in the area has tended to focus on business outcomes without investigating
underlying causes. As the impact of engagement on business has been positive and has been
linked with higher profitability, practice has raced ahead of the underpinning research in pursuit
of creating a more engaged and hence profitable workforce.
63
I undertook research to aid understanding of the area by investigating the relationship between
employee engagement and the retention level.
At the same time I looked at the interplay between individual differences and engagement levels
of the organization. I hoped to discover best practices of the organizations and the individuals
expectations from such strategies.
Success today requires a good bit more than good attendance. Yet, multiple studies in different
countries and across industries show that employees who are passionate about their jobs and the
organizations in which they work are in the minority. Some of the Survey conducted by few
organization revealed that approximately 19% of the employees are highly engaged The
Corporate Executive Board, looking at levels of engagement across 50,000 employees around the
world, placed only 11 percent in what they dubbed true believer category.1 Towers Perrins
recent Talent Report is slightly more optimistic, finding just 17 percent of the 35,000
employees surveyed to be highly engaged. 40 to 70 percent of employees can be classified as
neutral, middle of the road, or agnostic. Worse yet, an alarming 10 to 20 percent of employees
are actively disengagedjust putting in their time or, worse yet, undermining or badmouthing
their organizations and bosses. The economic impact of low engagement can be staggering.
The global survey shows that 34 per cent of the employees in India are fully engaged and 13 per
cent disengaged. As many as 29 per cent are almost engaged.
64
a guide to gather information as to how to engage the employees so that to retain the talents in
the organization.
OBJECTIVES
To study the overview of bigbazar
To study the employee engagement practices adopted in bigbazar
To study the correlation between the employee engagement practices carried out in the
company and retention levels.
To understand the various responsibilities and duties carried out by each department.
To offer some suggestions to improve the performance of the organization
METHODOLOGY
TYPE OF RESEARCH
PRIMARY DATA:
Data collection Method through Questionnaire Method was used and employee responses on that
were tabulated and represented in percentage form, which then were analyzed and interpreted.
This was followed by findings and recommendations.
The questionnaire consisted of both open ended as well as multiple choice questions based on 6
factors as listed below:
7.
8.
Agreeableness
9.
Emotional stability
SECONDARY DATA:
65
The data is collected by secondary sources also. The data is collected through company manual,
product brochure, company website.
The study is mainly based on the available printed and published information and opinion of
the officers and employees of the company.
Non-availability of adequate and essential information due to complex nature of the study.
BIGBAZAR-OVERVIEW
The history of retail has included countless ways in which retailers have attempted to get their
products in front of the consumer. But it seems that the businesses that have provided their
customers with the most convenience have generally proven to be the most successful.
For centuries, most retail sales were made by the street vendor or the small family owned shop,
which provided their customers with the convenience of not having to grow their own food or
make their own clothes. By the mid nineteenth century, most of the goods that we find in today's
superstores were supplied by craftsmen or local manufacturers who dealt directly with their
customers. Needed, not to mention that they probably had to travel all over town to get their
shopping done.
As manufacturing methods improved, and as the road and rail transport network extended, there
developed specialist manufacturers who needed retail stores to sell their goods. Over time, the
small retail store concept grew, and by the mid 1950's small stores blanketed every high street.
While most people loved the individual attention and great service that the small store provided,
it became more and more difficult for the small store to offer the kind of prices and selection that
the consumer really.
The next big revolution in retailing was the emergence of the retail chains, and later the
superstores. The consumer of the 70's demanded the convenience of having their favorite stores
66
in one enclosed location where they could easily hop from store to store without having to
concern them about the weather.
This shopping mall concept was quickly embraced by the consumer, but unfortunately the
crowds and traffic of today's mega malls can often turn what should have been a convenient and
comfortable shopping experience into a mission of hand-to-hand combat!
In recent years, the mail order business has experienced some of the most impressive growth,
which would also seem to echo the continuing consumer demand for convenience. Most retailers
are recognizing that they simply have to offer their customers the ability to order products or
services from the comfort of their own home or office in order to compete in today's retail
marketplace.
67
regions and to increase the number of their outlets in a city. It is expected that by 2010, India
may have 600 new shopping centers.
In the Indian retailing industry, food is the most dominating sector and is growing at a rate of 9%
annually. The branded food industry is trying to enter the India retail industry and convert Indian
consumers to branded food. Since at present 60% of the Indian grocery basket consists of nonbranded items.
India retail industry is progressing well and for this to continue retailers as well as the Indian
government will have to make a combined effort.
Global retail giants are also entering the retail industry in India and this is also one of the factors
in the growth of the organized retail sector in India.
68
CONCLUSION
To concluded if employee engagement is not assessed and addressed employee will multiply and
negative employee satisfaction issues can result in,
1.
Higher employee turnover employee leave, taking their reserve of knowledge and
Diminution performance competency of the workplace is reduced at least shirt term until
Last training money time and invested in training and development programs for departing
workers is wasted
4.
Lower moral remaining employees can be overturning denned with new duties in additions
the unresolved issues that already prevent their full engagement, My final employee engagement
recommendations revolve around creating employee satisfaction, by creating a future and perfect
job fit. Human resource planning should include the following step,
5.
Make your on-boarding process of new employees unique. Your goal should be to have the
employee go home at the end of the first day and tell those closest to them that their first day
with your company was the best first day they ever had. There are many ways to make your
employee engagement special.
6.
Develop a mentoring process in your company to make sure your new employee is
immersed into your company as efficiently as possible. This is especially important when you
consider the generational diversity we are all facing in the workplace and the timeline that
younger employees use to judge whether they have made the right decision.
69
QUESTIONNIARE
Q 1. Do you know what is expected of you at work?
a)
Strongly Agree
e)
Not Applicable
b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
Q 2. At work, do you have the opportunity to do what you do best every day?
a)
Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
e) Not Applicable
Q 3. In the last three months, have you received recognition or praise for doing good work?
a)
Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
e) Not Applicable
Q 4. Is there someone at work who encourages your development?
a)
Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
e) Not Applicable
Q 5. At work, do your opinions seem to count?
a)
Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
e) Not Applicable
Q 6.Are your associates (fellow employees) committed to doing quality work?
a) Strongly Agree b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
e) Not Applicable
Q 7.In the last year, have you had opportunities at work to learn and grow?
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
e) Not Applicable
Q 8.Are the pay and benefits in your organization comparable to similar companies?
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
e) Not Applicable
Q9. Are job promotions in this organization fair and objective?
70
a) Strongly Agree
e) Not Applicable
b) Agree
c) Disagree
d) Strongly Disagree
b) Agree
c) Disagree
71
d) Strongly Disagree
BIBLIOGRPHY
Books
1.
2.
3.
4.
Websites
1.
2.
FutureBazaar (www.futurebazaar.com)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
72