Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Center for Migration Studies of New York, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to International Migration Review.
http://www.jstor.org
Need
Maslow's
Hierarchy
of
Adjustment
and
the
Immigrants
Seymour Adler
Tel-Aviv University
paper uses the need hierarchy theory of Abraham Maslow
(1970) to describe the stages in the adjustment process of new
immigrants. This notion is then developed and applied to interpret?
ing some longitudinal data on the changing needs of immigrants to
Israel during the first two years after their arrival.
This
THE
NEED
HIERARCHY
THEORY
IMR
Volume
11 No. 4
445
"CRISIS
SUBSEQUENT
OF
IMMIGRATION"
AND
ADJUSTMENT
446
EVIDENCE
Since researchers in the area of immigration have not used the need
hierarchy model, there is no direct evidence for the notion being advanced
here. Some of the data reported in the literature, and some of the data
from the survey on immigrants to Israel that will be described below, can
be interpreted as partial evidence for the validity of the need hierarchy
model in describing immigrant adjustment. A program of more direct
research is obviously required.
Richardson (1957) studied British immigrants to Australia and found
that their initial stage of adaptation was characterized by social isolation.
Conformity to social norms was found generally to begin only after seven
months in Australia and often later.
A study by Shuval (1973) included 1,866 immigrants to Israel who had
arrived during the firstyear after the nation's independence and who were
living in transit camps. She found, among other things, that the desire to
engage in autonomous
activity to improve one's situation was relatively
low soon after arrival and increased over time. In addition, she found the
rate of this increase greater for those with greater education, and that
This suggests that
were more active than non-Europeans.
Europeans
coping resources acquired through education or through membership in
a more advanced culture may facilitate the adjustment process and speed
passage through the hierarchy.
Also looking at immigrants to Israel, Weinberg (1961) related their
to general adjustment or integration. The
satisfaction with occupation
of
satisfaction
for adjustment or integration was
importance
occupational
lower for the first group interviewed, at which time most subjects had
been in the country less than one year, than for a follow-up group
interviewed four years later. Occupational
satisfaction, then, may not
as
a
determinant
of
emerge
significant
adjustment until several years after
arrival, at which point the immigrant has successfully overcome lowerorder hurdles.
Another relevant finding emerges from a study on Hungarian intellec?
tuals who emigrated to Australia
(Taft: 1973). At one point in the
adjustment process it became important to the Hungarian immigrant to
447
OF
IMMIGRATION
TO
ISRAEL
Data which provide a somewhat more direct, although still imperfect, test
of the need hierarchy as descriptive of the immigrant adjustment process
were extracted from a large-scale study of immigrants to Israel. This study
is being conducted by the Central Bureau of Statistics of the Israeli
government under the direction of the Ministry of Immigrant Absorption
of the Israel Institute for
and had, in its early phases, the participation
Social
which
the
data
Research
provided
reported below.
Applied
of
more
than 1,000 adults,
since
1969
representative samples
Every year
each selected from the immigrants arriving that year, have been inter?
viewed and reinterviewed at several points in time. Questions included
information, background
demographic
prior to emigration, status in
Israel, and also several rating scales of satisfaction with specific aspects of
life in Israel and general satisfaction with being in Israel.
Most relevant are the questions concerning satisfaction with housing,
social life and work in Israel, and the relationship between these specific
concerns and general satisfaction.
Monotonicity correlation coefficients (Levy and Guttman: 1975) were
obtained between specific and general satisfaction for four periods of time
after arrival on a sample of 1,270 immigrants who arrived between
September 1969 and April 1971 (Bar and Guttman:
1975). The time
periods were two months, six months, one year, and two years after
arrival.
The assumption
here is that housing satisfaction reflects security
needs, social satisfaction reflects social needs, and work satisfaction
reflects esteem needs. The fit between the conceptual need categories and
the specific questions asked in this research is far from perfect, most
notably in the case of work satisfaction. Perhaps, since those interviewed
were specifically asked about salary satisfaction, their answers to the
question of work satisfaction reflect an intuitive factoring-out of lower-
448
TABLE
THREE SPECIFICSATISFACTION
BETWEEN
AND
MONOTONICITY
COEFFICIENTS
FACTORS
General Satisfaction over Four Points in Time
2 Months
Housing
Satisfaction
Social
Satisfaction
Work
Satisfaction
24 Months
.64
.54
.50
.50
.54
.68
.59
.59
.63
.69
.58
.72
order concerns
2 Months
Housing
Satisfaction
Social
Satisfaction
Work
Satisfaction
13
12
24 Months
3
12
449
Time AfterArrival
in Israel
Housing
with
Social
Social
with
Work
Housing
with
Work
2 Months
6 Months
12 Months
24 Months
.36
.44
.20
.32
.49
.41
.35
.38
.31
.18
.07
.32
450
far is merely suggestive. The data are open to other interpretations and
clearly a more carefully planned program of research to test the notion is
recommended. In general, this entire area of immigrant absorption could
research and such research should
use a good deal more longitudinal
reach beyond the two-year mark used here. It would also be important to
relate the changing needs of immigrants to changes in overt behavior
rather than just to attitudes. For instance, to what extent do new
immigrants actually seek out social contacts at various points after
arrival? To what extent do they refuse secure jobs and choose to wait for
more interesting work, and does this behavior change over a period of
time? Again, following the lead of Eisenstadt (1970), to what extent do
personality and cultural factors affect the pattern and speed of these
changing needs and behaviors?
If the model comes to be, in some way, a reasonable description of the
process, absorption agencies may be able to adapt their resources to the
unfolding hierarchy, provide need gratification at the appropriate time,
and thus facilitate adjustment. Perhaps these agencies could have ade?
quate housing and a secure job prepared for the immigrant upon his
arrival, and worry about challenging
work, social integration, and
cultural programs later. Some of the institutions dealing with immi?
into account at present. One
grants may be taking these considerations
from
has
the
Israeli
thing
government's
clearly emerged
large-scale
longitudinal
study described earlier. Immigrants who have difficulty
overcoming early adjustment hurdles soon become less firm about their
intentions to stay, and overwhelmingly they do, in fact, leave. In Israel, at
least, the emigration of immigrants is a serious concern and any approach
to somewhat reduce this loss would be beneficial.
REFERENCES
Bar, C. and L. Guttman
1975 Changes in the Adjustmentof the New ImmigrantDuring the First Two Years in
Israel. Jerusalem:Israel Instituteof Applied Social Research.
Barker,R. et al.
1941 "Frustrationand Regression: An Experimentwith Young Children", Universityof
Iowa Studies on Child Welfare,18(1):1-314.
Ben-David,J.
or Social Change?" In Integrationand Developmentin Israel. S.N.
1970 "EthnicDifferences
Eisenstadt,R. Bar-Yosefand C. Adler,eds. Jerusalem:Israel UniversitiesPress. Pp.
368-387.
Berkowitz,L.
1969 "Social Motivation." In Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 3. G. Lindzey and
E. Aronson,eds. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Pp. 50-135.
451