Professional Documents
Culture Documents
christayback@quinnemanuel.com
~ l/iD'7^
*1~ WU^^
ryankeech@quinnemanuel.com
^ 0O%C)
865 South Figueroa Street, 10* Floor
^~
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543sD6Fr- $>*
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(213)443-3000
(213)443-3100
sj&iwrJ
OEC-15'2014
Sherri*
, u ^ i ; uucr/C!etk
j Deputy
By-
h&lfiGuy
10
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT
12
=3
S
CO
13
CASE NO.
COMPLAINT FOR
14
Plaintiff,
805 68 8 2!
15
ssr
WITH CONTRACT;
vs.
16
17
18
Defendants.
19
20
r.
a. i
Trial Date:
None Set
22
._
23
on
3>
..
gisi
S P-
24
..
?!
25
C".
en
en
o
CO
26
o
en
>
--j
..J.-J.
27
28
r
I
W
o
4 t^ i^-4
o o en
o
o
o
o
ci o
o
o
O
en
0< 3T
'
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (the "Academy") alleges:
1.
entitled The Badand the Beautiful (the "Surtees OSCAR"). As a member of the Academy, Robert
Surtees was bound by the Academy's Bylaws (the "Bylaws") which provide the Academy with a
right of first refusal to purchase OSCAR statuettes awarded to its members which they intend to
sell. The Academy's right of first refusal means that neither the recipients of the awards nor their
successors may sell the statuettes without first offering them to the Academy, Surtees died in 1985
10
and. subsequent to that date, the Academy is informed and believes that Defendant Carol Surtees
11
aka Carol Buby ("Carol Surtees") inherited or otherwise received the Surtees OSCAR. On or
12
about December 12, 2014, Carol Surtees and the unknown individual or entity behind the
13
"ellamackey"screen name on the online auction site eBay ("DOE 1") purported to auction the
14
Surtees OSCAR for $40,500 to the unknown individuals or entities sued herein as DOES 2-50 (the
15
"Purchasers"). By this action, the Academy seeks to enforce its rights with respect to the Surtees
16
OSCAR, including recovering any and all profits obtained from the sale of the OSCAR, and
17
obtaining equitable relief, inter alia, declaring that the SurteesOSCAR is held in constructive trust
18
for the Academy and directing Defendants to offer it for sale to the Academy for the sum of
19
$10.00.
OS
,
fly
20
21
2.
The Academy is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a non-profit corporation
22
organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of
23
business in Los Angeles County, California. The Academy was founded in 1927 by a
24
distinguished group of film industry leaders for the purposes of, inter alia, advancing motion
25
picture arts and sciences and promoting cultural, educational and technological progress in the
26
Carol Surtees is an individual who, the Academy is informed and believes, resides
in Carmel and San Francisco, California. The Academy is further informed and believes, and on
COMPLAINT
that basis alleges, that Carol Surtees is aware that OSCAR statuettes are awarded in Los Angeles
2
County, the Academy is headquartered in Los Angeles County, the award of each statuette is
conditioned upon the Academy's right of first refusal, and prospective buyers of an OSCAR
4.
are named herein under the fictitious names DOES 1 through 50, including, without limitation, the
unknown individual or entity behind the "ellamackey" screen name on the online auction site eBay
sued herein as DOE 1. The Academy will seek leave of court to amend this complaint to allege
the true names and capacities of such Defendants whenascertained. The Academy is informed
10
and believes, and on that basis alleges, that each of the fictitiously named Defendants is
11
S3
3
03
The Academy is ignorant of the true names and capacitiesof the Defendants who
The Academy is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that each
defendant was, at all times mentioned herein, acting as the actual or ostensible agent, employee
14
and/or co-conspirator of eachother defendant and, in performing the actions alleged herein, was
15
acting in the course and scope of such agency, employment and/or conspiracy.
16
6.
Venue is proper in Los Angeles County because the Academy is a resident of Los
17
Angeles County and the contract in issue was entered into and was to be performed in Los
18
Angeles County. The county in whichDOES 1 through 50 reside is unknown to the Academy.
THE OSCAR
19
20
7.
Since 1929, as an incentive for members of the motion picture industry to strive for
21
excellence in film making and as a means of recognizing persons who make outstanding
22
contributions in their respective creative fields, the Academy has conferred annual "Awards of
23
24
8.
The OSCAR represents the pinnacle of success and professional recognition in the
25
motion picture industry. The prestige associated with the OSCAR is unparalleled by any other
26
award. To maintain the award's incalculable value and uniqueness, the Academy has established
27
procedures for selecting the recipients of its awards and for distributing OSCAR statuettes to their
28
winners.
COMPLAINT
9.
The Academy has never intended that the OSCAR be treated as an article of trade.
OSCAR recipients
original of which has been registered under federal copyright and trademark laws. The original
4
statuette is registered under the copyright laws as an "unpublished" work of art: copies of the
statuette are not, and never have been, distributed to the general public.
6
7
As mandated by the Bylaws since 1951, members of the Academy who receive an
OSCAR statuette cannot sell the statuette without according the Academy a right of first refusal to
purchase it for the sum of $10.00. Specifically, Article VIII(l)(g) of the Bylaws provides:
11
03
1.0.
10
03
S3
C
3
'"Every award shall be conditioned upon the execution and delivery to the Academy by the
recipient thereof of a receipt and agreement reading as follows:
12
"Gentlemen:
13
"I hereby acknowledge receipt from you of a replica of your copyrighted statuette,
14
15
16
agree to comply with your rales and regulations respecting its use and not to sell
17
18
law, withoutfirst offering to sell it to you for the sum of $10.00. Youshall have
19
thirty days after any such offer is made to you within which to accept it. This
20
agreement shall be binding not only on me, but also on my heirs, legatees,
21
22
shall have the right to acquire said replica, if it becomes part ofmy estate, subject
23
to this agreement.
24
(Signature of Recipient)
25
"Any member ofthe Academy who has heretofore received any Academy trophy
26
shall he bound by theforegoing receipt and agreement with the same force and
27
effect as though he or she had executed and delivered the same in consideration
MHNi
COMPLAINf
(Emphasis added.)
2
3
11.
In 1953, the Academy presented Robert Surtees with the OSCAR for excellence in
Black-and-White cinematography for his work on the motion picture entitled The Bad andthe
Beautiful. At all relevant times, Robert Surtees and his heirs, legatees, executors, administrators,
estate, successors and assigns agreed to be and were in fact bound by the Academy's Bylaws,
including Article VIII(l)(g), above, and thereby agreed that they would never to sell or otherwise
dispose of the Surtees OSCAR, nor permit the Surtees OSCAR to be soldor disposed of by
operation of law, without first offering to sell it to the Academy for the sum of $10.00.
10
11
12
12.
The Academy is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Carol Surtees
03
www;
13.
s
OB
Carol Surtees was and is well aware of the restrictions on the Surtees OSCAR, and
03
14
proceeded with her unlawful puiported disposition of the Surtees OSCAR despite that knowledge.
j ;
15
On November 12, 1999, the Academy sent a letter to Ms. Linda Surtees, heir to Robert Surtees,
16
who claimed to be in possession of the Surtees OSCAR and, the Academy is informed and
17
believes, was one of Robert Surtees' heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, estate, successors
18
and/or assigns. This letter informed her that the Surtees OSCAR could not be "s[old] or otherwise
1.9
transferfred] without first offering them to the Academy for a nominal sum." The Academy is
20
further informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Carol Surtees came to be in
21
possession of the Suttees OSCAR from Linda Surtees after this letter was sent and received.
,,-,.
:-
14.
--
In December, 2014, the Academy learned that Carol Surtees intended to conduct an
oi
auction to sell the SurteesOSCAR. The Academy is informed and believes, and thereupon
24
alleges, that in that same month. Carol Surtees offered the Surtees OSCAR for auction on the
25
eBay online auction website in conjunction with her agent or co-conspirator sued herein as DOE 1
26
- the individual using the screen name "ellamackey." The Surtees OSCAR was offered for
27
auction under the eBay selleraccount of "ellamackey." The Academy is informed and believes,
28
-4.
COMPLAINT
and thereupon alleges that atall relevant time the individual using the screen name "ellamackey"
2
3
15.
Express and certified mail, informing her that the Surtees OSCAR is subject to a right offirst
refusal agreement with and equitable servitude in favor ofthe Academy, pursuant to which the
Academy is entitled to purchase the OSCAR in the event that Robert Surtees orhis heirs, legatees,
executors, administrators, estate, successors or assigns offer it for sale. The Academy further
informed Carol Surtees that the Academy elected to exercise its right of first refusal and, therefore,
10
16.
11
several occasions. On December 12, 201.4, a woman answered the phone at a number associated
12
with Carol Surtees and identified herself as Carol Surtees. She claimed that the auction for the
13
SurteesOSCAR had been ended and the Surtees OSCAR withdrawn. The Academy, however, is
14
informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that onorabout December 12, 2014, the unlawful
15
auction for the Surtees OSCAR concluded with Carol Surtees and DOE 1 purporting to sell the
16
Surtees OSCAR to DOES 2-50 for $40,500. The Academy is informed and believes, and
.17
thereupon alleges, that at all relevant times DOES 2-50 were aware ofthe restrictions on the
18
Surtees OSCAR. None of the Defendants offered to sell the Surtees OSCAR to the Academy
19
S3
a
mm
as
5
03
S
turn
Z3
:->
20
21
22
17.
18.
The Bylaws constituted a binding contract between the Academy, on the one hand,
25
and Robert Surtees and his heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, estate, successors and
26
assigns, including Carol Surtees, on the other hand. Pursuant to this agreement, Carol Surtees was
27
forbidden from selling or otherwise disposing of the Surtees OSCAR or permitting it to be sold or
otherwise disposed of without first offering to sell it to the Academy for the sum of $10.00.
-5COMPLAINT
19.
The Academy is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Carol Surtees
is one of Robert Surtees' heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, estate, successors and/or
assigns. The Academy is further informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Carol
Surtees received the Surtees OSCAR directly or indirectly, by gift, devise, bequest or otherwise,
from Robert Surtees, his estate, or anotherof Robert Surtees' heirs, legatees, executors,
administrators, estate, successors and/or assigns.
20.
Academy and Robert Surtees and his heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, estate, successors
and assigns, including Carol Surtees, which requires that Carol Surtees offer to sell the Surtees
OSCAR to the Academy for the contractual right offirst refusal price - $10.00 - before she sells
or otherwise disposes of the statuette orpermits it to be sold orotherwise disposed of.
21.
03
9
The Academy has fully performed all conditions, covenants and promises required
to be performed on its part in accordance with the contract alleged above, except to the extent that
es
its performance was waived, excused or prevented by Robert Surtees and his heirs, legatees,
03
16
22.
The Academy is informed and believes, and onthat basis alleges, that Carol Surtees
17
breached her contractual obligation to the Academy by offering to sell orotherwise dispose ofthe
18
Surtees OSCAR, permitting it to be sold orotherwise disposed of, oractually selling orotherwise
19
disposing ofit. IfCarol Surtees had offered to sell the Surtees OSCAR to the Academy, the
20
21
22
23
23.
As anactual and proximate result of the breach of contract by Carol Surtees, the
Academv has suffered and will sufferdamages in an. amount to be proved at trial.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION FOR INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH
CONTRACT
24
24.
26
20 and .17 through 23, above, as though fully set forth herein.
27
-6COMPLAINT
25.
The Bylaws constitute a valid and binding contract between the Academy and
Robert Surtees and his heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, estate, successors and assigns,
1
03
s
ar
The Academy is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that DOES 1-50,
name on the online auction site eBay, were aware of the contract between the Academy and
Robert Surtees and his heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, estate, successors and assigns,
27.
The Academy is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that DOES 1-50,
11
including without limitation the unknown individual or entity behind the "ellamackey" screen
12
name on the online auction site eBay, intended to interfere with and disrupt the performance of
13
said contract by auctioning and purchasing the Surtees OSCAR without the Academy having been
14
informed of the auction or sale or having been accorded its right of first refusal.
15
28.
The Academy is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that the conduct
16
of DOES 1-50, including without limitation the unknown individual or entity behind the
17
"ellamackey" screen name on the online auction site eBay, has interfered with and disrupted, and
18
will continue to interfere with and disrupt, the performance of said contract because the Surtees
19
OSCAR has been sold and conveyed to, and is planned to be sold and conveyed to, individuals
20
29.
As an actual and proximate, result of the interference with contract by the DOES 1-
22
50, including without limitation the unknown individual or entity behind the "ellamackey" screen
23
name on the online auction site eBay, the Academy has suffered and continues to suffer damages
24
,,
:-'
26.
including without limitation the unknown individual or entity behind the "ellamackey" screen
21
..
10
S3
S
B
S3
including Carol Surtees, pursuant to which the Academy has had a right of first refusal to purchase
25
30.
In committing the acts alleged herein, the DOES 1-50, including without limitation
26
the unknown individual or entity behind the "ellamackey" screen name on the online auction site
27
eBay, acted despicably, with oppression and malice, and with willful and conscious disregard of
28
COMPLAINT
the Academy's rights. Therefore, the Academy is entitled to recover exemplary and punitive
damages in an amount to be proved at trial.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BREACH OF EQUITABLE SERVITUDE
5
6
7
31.
20. 17 through 23, and 24 through 30, above, as though fully set forth at length.
32.
The Surtees OSCAR is personal property that was in the possession of Robert
Surtees and his heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, estate, successors and assigns, including
Carol Surtees, pursuant to an agreed restriction that it would not be sold or disposed ofwithout
10
first offering itto the Academy for the sum of$10.00. The restriction constitutes an equitable
11
servitude, which is enforceable against all who acquire the Surtees OSCAR either without giving
12
03
13
33.
The Academy is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that all
so
E
03
14
Defendants knew that they acquired possession ofthe Surtees OSCAR subject to the tenns,
15
conditions and obligations ofthe Bylaws and, in particular, knew that they acquired the Surtees
16
OSCAR without giving fair value and subject to the restriction relating to the Academy's right of
17
first refusal. In breach of that restriction, Carol Surtees and DOE 1offered the Surtees OSCAR
18
for sale without first offering it to the Academy, and DOES 2-50 purchased orotherwise acquired
19
20
34.
21
Academy is entitled to an order that Defendants hold the Surtees OSCAR in constructive trust for
22
the Academy.
23
35.
Furthermore, unless the Academy's right of first refusal is enforced, the Academy
24
will suffer substantial irreparable injury inthat the Surtees OSCAR is a unique property and
25
monetary damages will not provide adequate compensation. Therefore, the Academy is entitled to
26
preliminary and permanent injunctive relief (a) enjoining Defendants, during the pendency ofthis
27
action and permanently thereafter, from directly orindirectly transferring, selling, assigning,
28
pledging, encumbering, hypothecating, or in any way disposing ofthe Surtees OSCAR without
-8COMPLAINT
first offering to sell it to the Academy for the sum of $10.00; and (b) directing Defendants to sell
the Surtees OSCAR, to the Academy for the sum of $10.00.
1
i'
i
36.
16, 17 through 23, 24 through 30, and 31 through 35, above, as though fully set forth herein.
37.
An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the Academy, on the one
f
#
hand, and the Defendants, on the other hand, concerning their respective rights and interests in the
Surtees OSCAR. The Academy contends that the Surtees OSCAR is subject to the Academy's
10
right of first refusal and that the Academy has the right to purchase the Surtees OSCAR for the
11
sumof $10.00. The Academy is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that the
12
!
3
1!
j
4
03
CO
I
1
**
B
I
I
'3
sr
11
38.
The Academy seeks a judicial determination of its rights and interests in the Surtees
1.4
OSCAR, i.e. that the Surtees OSCAR is subject to the Academy's right of first refusal and that the
15
Academy has the right to purchase the Surtees OSCAR for the sum of $10.00. The Academy seeks
16
a further judicial declaration that if the Surtees OSCAR is ever offered for sale or other
17
'.
18
39.
19
circumstances so that the Academy and the Defendants may ascertain their rights, interests,
20
obligations and duties with respect to the Surtees OSCAR including their respective claims of
21
22
...
23
-.
'I'
1
1
''''
24
WHEREFORE, the Academy prays for judgment in its favor and against Defendants, and
each, of them, as follows:
2.5
1.
26
2.
27
3.
For an order that (a) Defendants hold the Surtees OSCAR in constructive trust for
2.Q
the Academy, and (b) Defendants must offer the Surtees OSCAR for sale to the Academy and,
:
=2=
COMPLAINT
upon the Academy's tender of the sum of $10.00, deliver immediate possession of the Surtees
OSCAR to the Academy;
4.
4
legatees, executors, administrators and all persons acting in. concert with any such persons, during
the pendency of this action and permanently thereafter, from directly or indirectly transferring,
selling, assigning, pledging, encumbering, hypothecating, or in any way disposing of the Surtees
OSCAR without first offering to sell it to the Academy for the sum of $10.00; and (b) directing
Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, affiliates, representatives, successors,
10
assigns, heirs, legatees, executors, administrators and all persons acting in concert with any such
11
persons to sell the Surtees OSCAR to the Academy for the sum of $10.00.
12
03
9
mm
5.
For a judicial declaration of the parties' rights and interests in the Surtees OSCAR,
13
i.e. that (a) the Surtees OSCAR is subject to the Academy's right of first refusal; (b) the Academy
14
has the right to purchase the Surtees OSCAR for the sum of $10.00; and (c) if the Surtees
15
OSCAR, is ever offered for sale or other disposition, the Academy is entitled to purchase it for the
16
sum of $10.00.
<B
03
For preliminary and permanent injunctive relief(a) enjoining Defendants and their
17
6.
18
7.
Forsuch otherand further reliefas the Court may deem just and proper.
19
20
The Academy hereby demands a jury trial of all issues in this Complaint which are triable
21
to a jury.
22
23
24
25
26
27
Christopr
Ryan Q. Keech
Attorneys for Plaintiff Academy of Motion
Picture Arts and Sciences
28
COMPLAINT