Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAY 2014
LAB REPORT
LAB INSTRUCTOR: Mohamed
EXPERIMENT
GROUP
GROUP MEMBERS
LAB INSTRUCTOR
DATE OF EXPERIMENT
DATE OF SUBMISSION
15277
15352
15578
15647
TABLE OF CONTENT
NO
CONTENT
PAGES
1.0
Introduction
2.0
Objectives
3.0
Methodology
4-7
4.0
Result
8-10
5.0
Discussion
11-12
6.0
Conclusion
12
7.0
References
12
8.0
Appendices
13
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Control valves are valves used to control conditions such as flow, pressure, temperature,
and liquid level by fully or partially opening or closing in response to signals received from
controllers that compare a "set point" to a "process variable" whose value is provided
by sensors that monitor changes in such conditions. Control Valve is also termed as the Final
Control Element. Only three common types of control valve will be focused in this
experiment.
In this experiment, students will be able to learn three types of control valve that are
widely used in industry which are linear control valve, equal percentage control valve, and
finally is quick opening control valve. They are used differently under certain situation and
condition. For example, the quick opening control valve is to be used in the situation where
pressure accumulated is high and may cause explosion if no reaction taken. The quick
opening control valve will release the pressure in this kind of condition and hence saves the
situation. Meanwhile for equal percentage control valve, small opening of the valve can
result in more flow. For instance, 30% opening may produce 80% flow which is larger than
the actual opening control. This control valve is the cheapest and easiest among these three
types of control valve. Lastly, linear control valve is suitable to be used when the steam is
coming from no pressure drops.
The difference in valve opening between these valves is caused by the physical shape of the
plug and seat arrangement, sometimes referred to as the valve 'trim'. Typical trim shapes
for spindle operated globe valves are compared in the figure below:
2.0 OBJECTIVE
In this experiment, students are expected to learn:
a. To classify three common types of control valve characteristics used in real life
b. To determine the characteristic curves for each of the control valve type
3.0 METHODOLOGY
1. Calibration of thermocouples
a. Experimental Setup and Procedure
Thermocouples can be calibrated up to 6500C using the constant temperature bath (Figure
8.5)
2. Adjust the bath temperature for 400C. After the temperature has stabilized read the value
given by the digital thermometer and the digital indicator.
3. Repeat the experiment by selecting a minimum of FIVE (5) bath temperatures between 400C
and 3000C
4. Record all relevant data.
4. Resistance thermometer transmitter
a. Experimental Set-up and Procedure
Two and three wire connections in resistance thermometers
5. Resistance thermometers
a. Experimental Set-up and Procedure
3.0 RESULTS
1. Linear Valve
P = 2psi
Flow meter
(L/min)
0.98
7.95
20.09
36.6
48.81
51.75
50.12
36.27
18.7
2.64
Valve
opening
0
14
36
64
85.7
99.9
90.7
59.9
31.1
5
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
P = 0.5 psi
Flow meter
(L/min)
0.98
9.36
21.38
42.49
52.68
52.79
50.56
40.96
32.17
3.97
Valve
opening
(%)
0
10
20.5
50.4
90.7
83.3
70.5
40.8
29
1.8
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Valve
opening
(%)
0
6.7
20.4
47.5
75.2
98.3
62.7
49.8
37.7
12
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
P = 0.5 psi
0
10.3
15.3
31
73
99
85.1
63.7
34.1
3.7
Flow
meter
(L/min)
1.09
2.38
2.91
4.74
13.27
16.34
15.71
12.38
5.4
1.8
Valve
opening (%)
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
20
40
60
Valve Opening (%)
80
100
120
Valve
opening
(%)
0
3.6
19
35.2
67.5
94.2
83.5
44.5
18.8
2
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
P = 0.5 psi
Flow meter
(L/min)
2.24
12.07
47.86
50.91
58.2
59.76
59.6
59.14
53.78
10.14
Valve
opening
(%)
0
2.7
20.8
45
65.9
99.3
80.9
73.1
30
1.4
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
Valve Opening (%)
10
80
100
120
4.0 Discussion
As stated in the objectives, we want to determine and compare the characteristic of a linear control
valve, equal percentage control valve, and quick opening control valve. All the graphs can be
referred on the result section. We have done 2 times of different pressure for this particular
experiment. For this part of the experiment, we kept the differential pressure transmitter reading at
2psig. This is because when there is a constant pressure drop maintained across the valve, the
characteristic of the valve alone controls the flow, thus resulting to the characteristic known as
inherent flow characteristic.
All the 3 graphs if combine together will show us that linear type of valve will show that the flowrate
percentage are increases linearly as the valve opening is drawn wider (Graph 1). However, for Equal
percentage valve, the flowrate increases slowly as the valve is open more bigger. We can also see
that the flowrate is increases gradually after 50% opening (Graph 3). For the third valve, which is
quick opening valve the flowrate increases drastically and are seem to approach the maximum
flowrate at about 70% opening (Graph 5). Also not forgotten, the experiment was done by keeping
the upstream pressure indicator reading to 0.5kgf/cm2. Theoretically, valves of any size or inherent
flow characteristic, when subjected to the same volumetric flow rate and differential pressure will
have the same orifice pass area. However, different valve characteristics will give different valve
openings for the same pass area.
On the other hand we also conducted our second experiment where the pressure is constant at 0.5
psig. We still study about the 3 types of opening. The first one produce Graph 2 shows that the
flowrate are going up as the opening become larger. But we can see that a small change on the
opening almost does not give effect on the flowrate. Differently from Graph 4, the flowrate line
almost seems linear. At 100% opening the flowrate reach it maximum at 62 L/min. Lastly, the Graph
6 shows that the air was increasing and it almost reach the maximum flowrate (constant) from 75%
opening. We can likely say that, for quick opening valve, the valve just need to be slightly open.
At the end we are able to study the 3 types of controller and how it is function. This is important as
we want to make sure that our plant is safe and environmental friendly. We can prevent explosion,
fire or accidents to happen in the plant.
11
impossibility of maintaining the differential pressure and upstream pressure at 2 psig and
0.5kgf/cm2, respectively. The values were constantly fluctuating and the method used to
keep the pressure values at this rate was a bit tiresome. It was therefore important for the
success of the experiment to have someone constantly watch the values and ensure that
they are within the acceptable range.
parallax error. Even though the differential pressure transmitter was digital, the upstream
pressure indicator was not. Therefore, maintaining the upstream pressure at 0.5kgf/cm 2
catered for some error due to parallax. The ingenuity of the results depended partly on
whether the student assigned on reading the pressure indicator was not under the influence
of parallax.
5.0 CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we were able to accomplish the objectives of this experiment which were to
calibrate Type K, and Type J thermocouples, able to analyze the principles of a thermocouple
transmitter and calibration of a thermocouple transmitter and we are also achieve to calibrate
Platinum Resistance thermometers. From the result that we get, we can say that the measurement
for temperature for type K is the best by using MMU because is more sensitive and less percentage
error if we compare with UUT. For second experiment, we can conclude as thermocouple J get more
accurate reading by using UUT compare to the thermocouple K. From our 3rd experiment, It is found
that 2-wire has the least percentage error while 3-wire ans MSU has also the same percentage error.
2-wire has the least percentage error due to its less amount of resistance. Lesser amount of
resistance results in high sensitivity thus lowering the error. For our 4th experiment, two-wire
configurations are the simplest resistance thermometer configuration. It is used when high accuracy
is not required. The resistance of the connecting wires is always included with that of the sensor
leading to errors of the signal. Three-wire configuration: this configuration can be used to minimize
the effects of lead resistances. The two leads to the sensor are on adjoining arms and there is a lead
resistance in each arm of the bridge and therefore the lead resistance is cancelled out. Due to some
errors that happen during the experiment, some of our result will not be same as the theoretical.
6.0 REFERENCES
Coughanowr, D. R, Process System Analysis and Control, 2nd edition McGraw Hill New York
1991.
Emerson Process Management "Control valve handbook, fourth edition, Fisher Controls International
LLC, 2005.
12