Professional Documents
Culture Documents
it
COMMISSIONER:
listotech@listotech.it
TYPE:
DESIGN ENGINEER:
ANNEX:
APPENDIX A - APPENDIX B
__________________________________________________________________
DATE:
Ascoingegneria S.r.l.
v.le Navigazione Interna n. 51/B - Padova PD (Italy)
Tel. 049772632 Fax. 0498072121
alberto.calzavara@ascoingegneria.it
Summary
Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 2
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
Chapter 1 - General Provisions .......................................................................................................................... 6
1.1
Scope ................................................................................................................................................. 6
1.2
Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 6
1.3
1.4
Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.5
Applicability ....................................................................................................................................... 7
1.6
Placing................................................................................................................................................ 9
General ............................................................................................................................................ 10
2.2
Software .......................................................................................................................................... 10
2.3
Codes ............................................................................................................................................... 10
2.4
Characteristic Loads......................................................................................................................... 10
2.5
2.5.1
Definition ................................................................................................................................. 10
2.5.2
Losses....................................................................................................................................... 12
2.5.3
2.5.4
2.5.5
2.5.6
2.6
Loads ................................................................................................................................................ 14
2.7
Combinations................................................................................................................................... 15
2.8
2.9
Materials .......................................................................................................................................... 16
2.9.1
Concrete .................................................................................................................................. 16
2.9.2
2.10
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.11
Concrete Exposure........................................................................................................................... 18
APPENDIX B...................................................................................................................................... 19
2
3.2
3.3
3.4
Shear ................................................................................................................................................ 19
Abstract
In this document we design and check a typical Listotech continuous beam, total length 4,0
m. The element is placed on support every 0,5 m., thus it's a continuous beam by 8 equal span.
The scope is to define, for a pre-determinate schema, the maximum characteristic live loads
(point forces or line forces) allowable by the User.
Since the listotech elements are not each other connected, the structural approach must take
in account only a single isolated element subject to point forces (N) or line forces (N/m)), put on the
individual beam with no chance of load's partition along adjacent beams. In fact, should be incorrect
a design in order to allow the Listotech system such as capable of a definite capacity and response
with reference to a surface distributed load (N/m2), put on a generic "square meter" of indefinite
deck slab.
Two simplified different schemas of loads are taken in account:
schema 2: live concentrated point force Pk = 1000 (N) at the middle of every
span.
Obviously
We show, in this document, that the values qk = 3500 N/m (for line force) or Pk = 1000 (N) (for
point force), are the maximum against the allowed limit of serviceability.
4
The most limitative, for checking, is the serviceability limit state (and not ultimate capacity
and response), and specifically the restriction of maximum allowable principal stress 1 (at time
infinite (t=18000 days), after all losses), which value must be less or equal than the maximum
allowed tension design concrete value fctd, where fctd = 2,75 Mpa, as that the concrete used is
Concrete Class C 90/105(*).
Note (*): Concrete C 90/105 fctk0,05 = 4,13 Mpa;
2,75 Mpa
for schema 1: x= 500 mm. (or symmetrically x=3500 mm.) (bending moment M-)
for schema 2: x= 250 mm. (or symmetrically x=3750 mm.) (bending moment M+)
In practice, we suggest the User to consider only the possibility of concentrated point forces
(schema 2), determined for example by same table legs.
In such way the only two things to do is simply verify that:
1) There is not any value of concentrated live load Pk more than 1000 N
2) There is not more than one Pk along each every span (0,5 m.).
The Pk live loads can be in the number of height (one every height span), positioned at the middle
of each span, as schema 2 drawing, but, more realistically, can be in any number and any position,
randomly, dealing only same span.
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX C
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this technical report shall be the design and calculation of Listotech prestressed precast
beam in accordance with the exceptions EC2 codes, with the exceptions treated at Chapter 2, to valuate
ultimate and serviceability state limits for designed spans and loads.
Over multiple supports-points, as a continuous beam, having a not negligible internal forces
bending moments and shear, so the beam must testify an appropriate structural behavior.
Therefore in this case binds over same commensurate design and calculation, in this document
treated.
1.4 Use
Recovering argument of previous 1.3, the LISTOTECH decking floor, over several points-supports, can be
used in several general practices (generally outdoor but even indoor), such as, for example, in order of use
like:
For all these cases the design must ensure the safety and serviceability requirements, according structurals
codes, for limiting stress and strains, deflection, crack width, similary to any other kind of decking structural
continous precast prestressed beam.
Indeed, as yet above poited, not all EC2 requimements can be respected, caused by thin section thikness,
low concrete cover, no presence of specific minimum shear reinforcement (even if the design is in the case
of no shear reinforcement required), and no transversal connections for redristribution among accosted
elements. For that, in a parallel way, shall be done a series of testing with official laboratory to confirm and
ratify the theoretic calculation, and shall be to dispacht all procedures to obtain the authorizations the
element from public Structural Departement, according practices indicates by Codes.
Therefore, this design calculation with a parallel dossier of conformity, shall be intended for the use of
LISTOTECH elements as structurals elements, in a system of undefined approached beams to create, all
toghether, a decking surface floor.
loaded by the maximun possible values of characteristic live loads:
qk line forces distributed (1).
or
Pk point forces concentrated (1).
1.5 Applicability
For the purpose, this document shall apply to beams according to the following statically schema and load
condition (Figure 1.5 (a))
Type
LISTOTECH 50/400
L (mm)
4000
n.
span
s (mm)
500
1.6 Placing
The entire deck is shaped by placing LISTOTECH beam elements went alongside by span of 100 mm. (Figure
1.6 (a):
2.2 Software
Software used for structural Analysis & Design: Scia Engineer 2010.
Producer: Nemetschek Scia Group nv - Industrieweg 1007 - B-3540 Herk de Stad - Belgium.
Release: 2010.
License: n. 553497 licensee to Ing. Alberto Calzavara, v.le della Navigazione Interna 51/B 35129 Padova
(Italy).
2.3 Codes
The design shall be in accordance with:
Definition
Design evaluations shall be done out the following construction stages, each through TDA calculation (Time
Dependant Analysis):
ST1:
ST2:
removal of element from stressing bed by raising and transport at storage (temporary
supports); raising and transport from storage into final definitive supports positioning to
form decking floor (1)- Time 2 (1 day (steam curing))
ST3:
placing with lives loads supposed in Schema 1, in final position - Time 3 (t=28 days)
ST4:
lives loads in final position supposed in Schema 2 - Time 4 (t=18000 days - t= - end of
construction life)
Via TDA analysis the full process of aging is taken in account, including relaxion of the steel reinforcement,
creep and shrinkage of concrete.
Note (1): To simplify the different cases of ST2 are merged in only one case: raising and transport on
temporary support (crane hook) at t=1 th day.
Figure 2.5.1 (a) describes the four construction stages.
2.5.2
Losses
During all construction life the beam is subject to varying degrees of losses (1) (2):
I.
I.
II.
III.
Note (1)
In fact under prestressing sustained permanent load, the beam tends to develop some
amount of plasticity and will not return completely to its original shape. There has
been an irreversible deformation or permanent set. Shrinkage of concrete, "creep" of
concrete and relaxion of steel reinforcement are sources of prestress loss and are
provided for in the design of prestressed concrete by TDA analysis. The magnitude of
shrinkage depends on the environmental conditions and type of concrete. With pretensioning, shrinkage starts as soon as the concrete is poured.
Note (2):
In this document (and generally), the sum of all losses (I+II+III+IV) are called and known by the only
denomination as "creep".
"Creep" are variable along beam's section, where the highest losses are at the begin and at the end of
beams.
2.5.3
This first phase consists of pre-tensioning by application, before casting, of a tensile force to high tensile
steel tendons around which the concrete is to be cast. When the placed concrete has developed a sufficient
compressive strength, a compressive force P0 is imparted to it by releasing the tendons, so that the
concrete member is in a permanent state of prestress.
Time - Losses
Heat treatment is used to accelerate the strength-gaining rate of concrete to allow cutting strands the day
after concrete casting. Time t=1 day (t=0).
Total "Creep" at the moment of tendon's releasing, are: I+II+ a small amount of III.
Loads and Static schema
The beam is placed on stressing bed. Tendon has none eccentricity, therefore no bending moment is
created.
The beam is subjected to:
12
2.5.4
P0 - prestressing
G1 - self weight
This phase consists of transport condition from stressing bed to storage and from storage to final placing.
Time - losses
Hereto we unify all that condition in only one at 27 days (from storage to placing) whenas we have the
greater losses. (t=27).
Total "Creep" at 27 days are I+II+III+IV .
Loads and Static schema
The beam is raised by two hook crane at 900 mm. from begin and end nodes.
The beam is subjected to:
G1 - self weight
2.5.5
This phase is the final definitive placing phase at 28 days when lives loads can be applied.
Time - losses
Total "Creep" at 28 days are I+II+III+IV.
Loads and Static schema
Definitive schema:
G1 - self weight
qs1; qs2.....qs8 , live variable loads, on heaviest combinations (1).
Note (1)
The choice is to apply only variable loads without any permanent led load.
13
2.5.6
This phase is the final definitive placing phase at t= (t=18000 days (50 years)) by all possible
combinations of lives loads applied.
Time - losses
Total "Creep" at 18000 days are I+II+III+IV.
Loads and Static schema
Definitive schema (the same of ST3):
G1 - self weight
Ps1; Ps2.....Ps8 , live variable loads, on heaviest combinations (1).
Note (1)
The choice is to apply only variable loads without any permanent led load.
2.6 Loads
The value of characteristic variable load is:
The beam wide is 100 mm. and the elements are accosted with each other, without any connection.
The choose of coefficients of combinations shall be for the most conservative case of use, the Category E
(Table 2.6 (a),
Category
A
B1
B2
C1
C2
Intended use
Residential homes, Hotels (excluded crowded areas)
Private offices
Public offices
Hospitals, Restaurants, Banks, Scools
Balcony, Galleries, Cinema Theatres, Congress rooms, Churchs, Stands (fix
places)
C3
D1
14
D2
E1
E2
F
0j
1j
2j
1,0
0,9
0,8
2.7 Combinations
For checking ULS the combinations are:
ULS (STR/GEO Set B):
G1G1+pP+Q1Qk1+i=2,n(Qi0iQki)
15
2.9 Materials
2.9.1
Concrete
16
17
2.9.2
The precast LISTOTECH beam is prestressed by a tendon up n. 2 strands 2x2,25 in the sectional strand
pattern pointed at Figure 2.1(b). The strands bore holes are Y symmetrical towards the CG section,
therefore the eccentricity of tendon is ep=0.
Main data:
18
Thin thickness
High strength concrete
No minimum shear reinforcement
Low concrete cover value at bottom an top (9 mm.)
No connections among each member with the adjacent
3.4 Shear
The formulae given by EC2 for design of reinforcement concrete members without shear reinforcement are
empirical and have been chosen to fit with extensive test data. The main characteristic governing the shear
strength of members without shear reinforcement are concrete strength, amount of longitudinal
reinforcement in tension, and absolute values of section depth. The longitudinal reinforcement contents
contributes to the shear resistance in two ways:
The member depths have also been shown to have a significant influence on shear strength and EC2 takes
account of this by defining a depth factor, k, given by
k=1+
2,0
EC2 gives the following expression for calculating the shear strength of sections without shear reinforc
ement:
wh6(1-ere:
l =Asl/ bw d
Asl is the area of longitudinal which extends of a minimum of a design anchorage
length and an effective depth beyond the section
bw is the smaller width of the cross section in the tensile zone (the minimum is
quite conservative)
But EC2 further limits the applied shear force (without reduction factor) to a maximum of 0,5 b w d
fcd , where fck/250)
As no shear reinforcement is required on the basis of the design calculation should nevertheless be
provided in accordance with the detailing requirement of EN 1002-2. It would be impractical to put links in
flat slab of decks allows minimum reinforcement to be omitted from members where transverse
redistribution of loads is possible such as slabs. For typical deck built by a series of beam, it's recommended
here that minimum links are always provided in accordance with EN 1992-2 they will, in any case, usually be
needed for the transverse Vierendel behavior of such a deck.
Shear tension failures occur in regions of beams that are un-cracked in flexure where the maximum flexural
tensile stress is smaller than ctfctk0,05/c.
The shear failure criterion for a section with no shear reinforcement assumed in EC2 is that the principal
stress anywhere in the section exceeds the tensile strength of the concrete, fctd.
Equating principal tensile stress to the tensile strength of the concrete gives the following
equation:
- fctd =cp +bend)/2 - (cp +bend)2/2 +2)1/2
where:
Substitution forin the above leads the following expression for shear resistance:
VRd,c = Jbw /S . (fctd2 +cp +bend)2 . fctd)1/2
Assuming the principal tensile stress occurs the centroid of the section and introducing a factor1 gives:
20
21