Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This course examines the making of public policy in the United States.
The course begins with an overview of the constitutional foundations of
the U.S. political system and proceeds to a discussion of the public policy
Course Description
process, examining the stages of policymaking and theories of the policy
process. These theories are discussed in the context of specific public
policies and public policy controversies, including social welfare,
defense, tax policy, and other important issues.
Other required readings are listed at the end of the syllabus and referenced
2
* Numbers in brackets refer to the Additional Readings at the end of the syllabus.
3
Course Policies
This course satisfies the UTD Core Communications requirement. A major
requirement therefore is to write a term paper on a recent (post-1980) public policy
decision in the United States or Texas. Each student must choose a specific piece of
legislation, an administrative regulation, or an international treaty as the subject for
his or her paper. Paper topics are due in class Monday, February 1. The paper will be
completed in three installments, due Wednesday March 3, Wednesday March 31, and
Monday May 3.
The first installment should introduce the issue analyze the politics of the situation: -
- What was the problem that lead to the proposed policy?
- How did this problem get on the political agenda?
- Why was this the appropriate level of government (federal, state, local) and forum
(legislature, administrative agency)? (For some issues, this may be obvious.)
- Who were the major private interests, what were the sources of their influence, and
what were their policy positions?
- Who are the major political players, what were the sources of their influence, and
what were their policy positions?
This installment should be about 7-10 double-spaced pages. It will be returned with
comments.
The second installment should address specific policy proposals and the action taken:
- What were the major proposals considered?
- What wee the pros and cons from a substantive policy standpoint?
Grading Criteria - Why was the specific action taken chosen?
- If the policy was adopted, has it succeeded in achieving the goals stated?
- If the policy was rejected, does the problem it was meant to address still persist?
This installment should also be about 7-10 double-spaced pages, and will be returned
with comments.
The final installment should include revised versions of the first two installments, and
should be 15 to 20 double-spaced pages in length (12-point font), excluding
references and any tables or figures.
There will also be two exams on materials in the readings and class lectures and
discussions. Exams will consist of short answer and essay questions. These will be on
Wednesday, February 24 and Wednesday, May 12 (finals week).
Midterm exam 20 %
Final exam 30
First paper installment 12.5
Second paper installment 12.5
Final paper 25
The University of Texas System and The University of Texas at Dallas have rules and
regulations for the orderly and efficient conduct of their business. It is the
responsibility of each student and each student organization to be knowledgeable
about the rules and regulations which govern student conduct and activities. General
information on student conduct and discipline is contained in the UTD publication, A
to Z Guide, which is provided to all registered students each academic year.
A student at the university neither loses the rights nor escapes the responsibilities of
citizenship. He or she is expected to obey federal, state, and local laws as well as the
Regents’ Rules, university regulations, and administrative rules. Students are subject
to discipline for violating the standards of conduct whether such conduct takes place
on or off campus, or whether civil or criminal penalties are also imposed for such
conduct.
The faculty expects from its students a high level of responsibility and academic
honesty. Because the value of an academic degree depends upon the absolute
integrity of the work done by the student for that degree, it is imperative that a student
demonstrate a high standard of individual honor in his or her scholastic work.
Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, statements, acts or omissions
related to applications for enrollment or the award of a degree, and/or the submission
Academic as one’s own work or material that is not one’s own. As a general rule, scholastic
Integrity dishonesty involves one of the following acts: cheating, plagiarism, collusion and/or
falsifying academic records. Students suspected of academic dishonesty are subject to
disciplinary proceedings.
Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers for other classes, and
from any other source is unacceptable and will be dealt with under the university’s
policy on plagiarism (see general catalog for details). This course will use the
resources of turnitin.com, which searches the web for possible plagiarism and is over
90% effective.
Class The administration of this institution has set deadlines for withdrawal of any college-
level courses. These dates and times are published in that semester's course catalog.
Administration procedures must be followed. It is the student's responsibility to
handle withdrawal requirements from any class. In other words, I cannot drop or
withdraw any student. You must do the proper paperwork to ensure that you will not
receive a final grade of "F" in a course if you choose not to attend the class once you
are enrolled.
Procedures for student grievances are found in Title V, Rules on Student Services and
Activities, of the university’s Handbook of Operating Procedures.
Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the
Dean of Students, where staff members are available to assist students in interpreting
the rules and regulations.
As per university policy, incomplete grades will be granted only for work
unavoidably missed at the semester’s end and only if 70% of the course work has
Incomplete
been completed. An incomplete grade must be resolved within eight (8) weeks from
Grades
the first day of the subsequent long semester. If the required work to complete the
course and to remove the incomplete grade is not submitted by the specified deadline,
the incomplete grade is changed automatically to a grade of F.
Essentially, the law requires that colleges and universities make those reasonable
adjustments necessary to eliminate discrimination on the basis of disability. For
example, it may be necessary to remove classroom prohibitions against tape recorders
or animals (in the case of dog guides) for students who are blind. Occasionally an
assignment requirement may be substituted (for example, a research paper versus an
oral presentation for a student who is hearing impaired). Classes enrolled students
with mobility impairments may have to be rescheduled in accessible facilities. The
6
college or university may need to provide special services such as registration, note-
taking, or mobility assistance.
It is the student’s responsibility to notify his or her professors of the need for such an
accommodation. Disability Services provides students with letters to present to
faculty members to verify that the student has a disability and needs accommodations.
Individuals requiring special accommodation should contact the professor after class
or during office hours.
The University of Texas at Dallas will excuse a student from class or other required
activities for the travel to and observance of a religious holy day for a religion whose
places of worship are exempt from property tax under Section 11.20, Tax Code,
Texas Code Annotated.
If a student or an instructor disagrees about the nature of the absence [i.e., for the
purpose of observing a religious holy day] or if there is similar disagreement about
whether the student has been given a reasonable time to complete any missed
assignments or examinations, either the student or the instructor may request a ruling
from the chief executive officer of the institution, or his or her designee. The chief
executive officer or designee must take into account the legislative intent of TEC
51.911(b), and the student and instructor will abide by the decision of the chief
executive officer or designee.
Off-campus, out-of-state, and foreign instruction and activities are subject to state law
Off-Campus and University policies and procedures regarding travel and risk-related activities.
Instruction and Information regarding these rules and regulations may be found at
Course Activities http://www.utdallas.edu/BusinessAffairs/Travel_Risk_Activities.htm.
Additional information is available from the office of the school dean.
These descriptions and timelines are subject to change at the discretion of the Professor.
7
ADDITIONAL READINGS
Readings designed as eReserve are posted on the electronic reserve available through the
library’s web page. A link to reading [3] is posted on eLearning. All other readings can be found
by searching the library’s collection by journal title and then browsing for the appropriate issue.
Additional readings may be added during the semester. If so, they will be announced and links
will be posted if necessary on eLearning.
[1] Kenneth N. Bickers and John T. Williams, “Democratic Governance and Public Policy.”
In Public Policy Analysis: A Political Economy Approach, 17-34. Houghton Mifflin Company
2001. eReserve
[2] Kenneth N. Bickers and John T. Williams, “Forms of Democracy and Implications for
Public Policy.” In Public Policy Analysis: A Political Economy Approach, 35-57. Houghton
Mifflin Company 2001. eReserve
[3] “China’s Thing about Numbers.” The Economist (December 30, 2009). eLearning.
[4] Marcia Clemmitt, “Protestants Today.” CQ Researcher Vol. 17, Issue 43 (December 7,
2007).
[5] Marcia Clemmitt, “Student Aid.” CQ Researcher Vol. 18, Issue 4 (January 25, 2008)
[6] Marcia Clemmitt, “Energy and Climate.” CQ Researcher Vol. 19, Issue 26 (July 24,
2009)
[7] Marcia Clemmitt, “Health-Care Reform.” CQ Researcher Vol. 19, Issue 29 (August 28,
2009)
[8] Alan Greenblatt, "Immigration Debate." CQ Researcher Vol. 18, Issue 5 (February 1,
2008).
[9] Alan Greenblatt, “State Budget Crisis.” CQ Researcher Vol. 19, Issue 31 (September 11,
2009).
[10] Kenneth Jost, “Financial Crisis.” CQ Researcher Vol. 18, Issue 18 (May 9, 2008).
[11] Peter Katel, “Homeland Security.” CQ Researcher Vol. 19, Issue 6 (February 13, 2009).