Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEFORMITY
MADE
OF IDIOPATHIC
VISIBLE
BY COMPUTER
F. R. HOWELL,
From
We present
and computer
radiographs
a method
help
Radiography
of
structure
planes
spinal
projection.
lateral
measurements
of
1969;
1973;
in three
Leeds
dimensions
can be determined
using
from
the fundamental
lesion,
The method
is applicable
obtained
need
from
for
consistent
two
multiple
standard
inappropriate
1981).
two radiographic
By
MATERIALS
views
McNiece
population
of 15,793
followed
longitudinally,
cally. Postero-anterior
the apparent
image
viewpoint
The
depict
This
to be displayed
of the
conventional
the
can
views
deformity
then
in two
be manipulated
dimensions,
varying
observer.
of
idiopathic
obliquely
because
scoliosis
of
its
axial
rotation.
The size of the deformity
as measured
by the
Cobb
angle
(Cobb
1948) is thus an underestimate
of its
true size which
will be seen when the deformity
is viewed
en face
(du Peloux
et al. 1965 ; Deacon,
Flood
and
Dickson
project
The
1984).
Similarly,
the lateral
radiograph
deformity
to
be
reproduced
from
the
does
not
of the curve.
views
of the
information
Leeds
MA,
FRCS
Ed,
Medical
Research
Council
Research
Fellow
R. A. Dickson,
University
Hospital,
MA,
Department
Leeds
LS9
Correspondence
should
ChM,
FRCS,
Professor
ofOrthopaedic
7TF,
England.
be sent
to Mr
F.
1989 British
Editorial
Society
of Bone
030l-620X/89/308l
$2.00
J Bone Joint Surg [Br] l989;7l-B:399-403.
VOL.
71-B,
No.
3, MAY
1989
of Orthopaedic
Surgery,
R.
and
St. Jamess
Howell.
Joint
Surgery
University
MRC
history
of idiopathic
962 schoolchildren
truncal
asymmetry
and lateral
lordosis,
can be
deformities
and
radiographs,
The
lordosis
and
results
is
avoids
the
confirm
that
the
underlying
(Somerville
AND
METHODS
epidemiological
survey
of the
natural
scoliosis
has identified
a group
aged eight to 1 3 years with a degree
on forward
bend
testing,
from
of
of
a
children.
This
cohort
is being
both clinically
and radiographiand lateral
radiographs
are taken
each
year,
using
the low-dose
technique
and standardised positioning
ofArdran
et al. (1980),
and these form
the basis
for this study.
The computer
method
requires
identification
of the
same anatomical
points
on both views of the spine
(Suh
1974). The points
chosen
are the bases
of the pedicles,
and the mid points
of the upper
and lower
end plates
(Figs
1 and 2); these
have
been
shown
to be the most
consistent
(Brown
et al. 1976; De Smet et al. 1982). The
on the radiograph,
and, by means
of a
sonic
digitising
device,
their
co-ordinates
are entered
into a microcomputer
for processing
and storage.
The
data
F. R. Howell,
radiographs
deformity
in late-onset
idiopathic
scoliosis
1952; Roaf 1966; Dickson
et al. 1984).
The
1980).
an abnormal
to other spinal
exposures.
ofthe
same deformity,
a three-dimensional
image
can be
reconstructed
with
the aid of a computer
(Suh
1974;
Brown
et al. 1976;
De Smet
et al. 1980;
Hindmarsh,
Larsson
and
Mattsson
1980;
Raso,
Gillespie
and
geometrically
conventional
the anteroposterior
Moe
and
Dahlborn
from
on
usually
(Nash
and
three-
to the patient,
be inferred
from
rotation
Aaro
the information
its
are
in reference
structure
can
Hospital,
shape.
depending
These
vertebral
scoliosis,
views.
displays
dimensions,
University
column
three-dimensional
GRAPHICS
R. A. DICKSON
deformities
idiopathic
for additional
deformity
in two
anteroposterior
and
but the three-dimensional
Mehta
their
spinal
of
combining
adolescent
the need
to elucidate
dimensional
the
Jamess
graphics.
The shape of the spinal
and displayed
in any projection.
In patients
with
demonstrated
without
may
St.
ofvisualising
SCOLIOSIS
for
merged
points
each
point
to provide
per vertebra,
from
each
visualised.
A three-dimensional
thus recorded.
The
Surgery
projection
a two-dimensional
any
desired
direction
pair
of radiographs
three Cartesian
co-ordinates,
for all the vertebrae
which
of this model
image,
which
model
of
the
are
for four
can be
spine
is
on to a plane
produces
may then be rotated
in
by a mathematical
transformation.
399
400
F. R. HOWELL,
This
can
and
lateral
chosen
produce
images
relating
radiographic
to the
R. A. DICKSON
postero-anterior
projections,
or
to
any
other
viewpoint.
The
formula,
transformation
itself
is by a simple
algebraic
which
for rotation
of a point
x, y, z by an angle
A around
the vertical
y-axis,
will relate
the horizontal
projection
in the new vertical
plane,
xt, to the old, x, and
to the third co-ordinate,
z, as follows:
xt
The
using
. cosA
microcomputer
the
basic
sin
is programmed
language.
The
to perform
limiting
factor
this
in
the
technique
as we describe
it is the identification
of the
chosen
anatomical
points.
The errors
involved
have been
quantified
(Hindmarsh
et al. 1980).
Magnification
and
other
problems
have
been overcome
by other
Validation.
The
anteroposterior
and
lateral
mounted
scoliosis
museum
specimens
were
processed
representation
radiographed
from
above
as
cases
and
axis.
The
rotation
and the
can be compared,
computer
diagram
radiograph
taken
were then
around
a
at
at that
of
of idiopathic
a computer
created.
The same
specimens
at 10#{176}
intervals
of rotation
vertical
means.
views
any
same
given
rotation
The
identification
anteroposterior
RESULTS
In
the
cohort
of 962
children
type
followed
up
an idiopathic
then
towards
the convexity
ofthe
curve.
In all 69 cases there is
lordosis
at the apex of the curve.
There
of
a Cobb
nature.
Two
information
years,
69 have
rotation
with
two
greater
10#{176}
and
of curve,
for
the
vertebral
angle
plane and
radiographs
body
during
an inappropriate
lordosis
corresponds
(Dickson
be a frank
lordosis
visible
on the lateral
the computer
model
is rotated
then an
becomes
to the
1987).
obvious
Stagnara
A normal,
straight
lordosis,
but a rotated
curves.
These
type
curves
Fig.
6)
could
radiograph
If a progressive
of time,
increase
on
other
the
measures
spine
view
idiopathic
then
does
does
be confused
on a plain
period
(see
the
oblique
of the
Fig.
or Leeds
minor
if viewed
curve
is followed
can
(see
Fig.
cannot
adequately
demonstrate
scoliosis
single
its
of
the
the
observation
every
these,
case
the
the
four
points
lateral
radiographs.
(see
be seen
to
with
7).
is known
to be a
plane
radiographs
tion,
we
found
apparent
thoracic
a fundamental
idiopathic
was small
idiopathic
on
the
all the
in any
scoliosis
this
that
lordosis
was
not
practical
to positional
curves
declare
and reconstruction
an underlying
of their
lordosis
is
lordosis
is followed,
it increases
deformity
progresses
(Fig.
as the
there
overall
are greater
shape
of
to the sagittal
plane
bodies
definition
come
to face
of kyphosis,
of the patient
scoliosis
which
simulates
and lumbar
curve
(Fig.
JOURNAL
and
7).
degrees
of vertebral
rotathe patient
is spuriously
THE
in
scoliosis.
In some of
(5#{176}
or less),
and a
of the curve
in relation
However,
these early
kyphotic,
as the vertebral
wards.
We do not use this
relates
digitised
can avoid
the need for multiple
the radiation
dosage
to a child
of progressive
initial
curve
spine,
because
pathogenesis
1984; Stokes,
A normal
be
or treatment.
cohort,
of early
When
the
to
views do however
contain
to describe
the deformity
use of this
and reduce
present. When
starts to rotate
a
three-dimensional
and
themselves
by progression,
early
deformities
shows
DISCUSSION
The deformity
of idiopathic
rotated
lordoscoliosis,
but
Fig.
because
of the size
and other variables.
over
in parallel
orthogonal
required
In our
diagnosis
idiopathic
obliquely
lordosis
reconstruction
deformity
view
projection
not show
any such
produce
artefactual
with
abnormal
5). This
lateral
Fig.
backwhich
in discussion
of the
past (De Smet et al.
1987).
obliquely,
shows an
6).
OF BONE
a double
structural
On a plain
radio-
AND
JOINT
SURGERY
THE
DEFORMITY
OF IDIOPATHIC
SCOLIOSIS
Fig.
MADE
VISIBLE
BY COMPUTER
GRAPHICS
401
L
>
_
_
Fig.
Radiographs
specimen
VOL.
71-B,
No.
of a museum
specimen
of a scoliotic
at the same
positions
of rotation.
3, MAY
1989
spine
taken
at 0, 40, 90 and
1 30
of rotation,
with
computer
reconstructions
of the
402
F. R. HOWELL,
R. A. DICKSON
vt:
c
7
7
c;
cz:i
p
E
L
L::
i
4
4
4
L
1
4
:N
4
c:
Fig.
L::
&
A
z1
L
#{163}
L
Fig.
Reconstruction
of a case with right thoracic
idiopathic
scoliosis:
projections
at 0, 35,
and
90
of rotation,
equivalent
to
anteroposterior,
oblique
and
lateral
views.
An
abnormal
lordosis
is visible
in the oblique
view.
Reconstruction
oblique
450
and
of a normal
straight
lateral
projections.
in anteroposterior,
r
1
#{163}:
#{163}
&
#{163}
Fig.
Reconstructions
of the curve
successive
years,
all viewed
progression
of the lordosis.
at
Fig. 8
shown
the
in Figure
5 over
three
same
obliquity,
showing
graph,
the lumbar
component
true
idiopathic
scoliosis,
and
is indistinguishable
is apparently
lordosis
convexity
however,
vertebral
body
to the
thoracic
component,
because
rotation
is in the
with
rotation
of
of the
curve.
can be differentiated
the
The
from
a rotated
opposite
direction;
the displacement
of the vertebral
body is to the concavity
of the curve,
showing
it to be a
rotated
kyphosis,
not a rotated
lordosis.
This
phenortienon may explain,
in part at least, the observation
of a
population,
(Armstrong
in which
et al.
Top
view
scoliosis.
1982).
flexible
of
left
thoracic
The concept
of Eulerian
column
as the cause
(Gordon
progress
idiopathic
buckling
of a unstable
of idiopathic
scoliosis
1978) would
predict
that these
curves
as the idiopathic
type may well do.
will
not
this
claimed
to monitor
the deformity
(De
Again,
the lordosis
may be seen.
Scoliotic
deformity
is complex
more
Smet
and
does
not
THE
AND
JOINT
SURGERY
progression
has
been
of
JOURNAL
OF
BONE
accurately
et al.
the
1983).
lend
F. R. HOWELL,
R. A. DICKSON
403
itself readily
to quantification.
The Cobb angle at least
has the merit that it is widely
used. The computer
method
we have
described
goes
no further
in quantifying
the
deformity,
nor is it intended
that
it should.
It does,
De Smet
however,
easily
make
the
qualitative
nature
of the
deformity
visible.
No benefits
commercial
in any
party
received
or will be received
or indirectly
to the subject
from a
of this
article.
AA,
Ardran
GM,
Coates
Assessment
technique.
Armstrong
scoliosis
Br J Radiol
GWD,
by computer
and
NB
rotation
relation
to
III,
Suzuki
in scoliosis
the
and
the spinal
tomography.
RA, Dixon-Brown
in children
: low
1980:53:146-7.
Livermore
vertebral
prevalence
rotation
R, Dickson
of
Nonstandard
of vertebral
in scoliosis
A,
dose
N,
Spine
Harding
FM.
radiographic
Armstrong
screening
clinical
JG.
patients
deformity.
Cobb
JR. Outline
Course Lect
Deacon
P, Flood
BM,
Dickson
RA.
Idiopathic
dimensions
: a radiographic
and morphometric
Joint
Surg [Br] 1984:66-B:509-12.
VOL.
71-B,
No.
Am
Tarlton
MA,
Cook
LT, Fritz
method
for three-dimensional
Radiology
1980;137
:343-8.
1989
how
LT, Bemdge
scoliosis
Fritz
SL. Evaluation
of
spinal
analysis.
In:
scoliosis
: Proceedings
of
held Sept
1982. Chicago:
AS, Asher
progression.
MA.
big
: its
Acad
Orthop
Surg
scoliosis
analysis.
in
!nstr
three
J Bone
JE. Structures:
Middlesex:
Penguin
The top
Radiologi
analysis
you?
MH.
J Bone
Nash
Orthopedics
Dwyer
analysis
SJ III. A
of spinal
dont/all
1978.
Roaf
J, Gillespie
R.
R,
The
basic
of
of
Surg
1987:l0:88l-7.
EW.
IA,
anatomy
Rotational
Analysis
of changes
in the
radiographic
technique.
G.
rotation.
Determination
idiopathic
of
rotation
J Bone
Joint
of the
scoliosis.
scoliosis.
in scoliosis.
Bone
plane
Orthop
Joint
Surg
of
Trans
Surg
[Br]
The
lordosis:
the
development
of the
single
Bigalow
curvature
spine.
in
Harmondsworth,
:786-92.
curve. J Bone
Suh CH.
of vertebral
McNeice
deformity
1966:48-B
Somerville
down.
Radiographic
estimation
of vertebral
Joint Surg [Br] 1973:SS-B:5l3--20.
maximum
1980:4:23.
Stokes
SL,
or win things
Books
Ltd.
Mehta
3, MAY
Cook
of
MA, Cook
idiopathic
Scoliosis:
JE,
of idiopathic
Conference
1982:45-59.
J, Larsson
J, Mattsson
0.
scoliotic
spine
using
a three-dimensional
J Biomech
1980; 13:279-90.
Raso
RH, Burstein
AH, Nash
dimensional
radiographic
Smet
AA,
radiographic
configuration.
RA.
Goin
Hindmarsh
Spine
1982:7:50-4.
Brown
De
LT,
for three-dimensional
Dickson
RA, Lawton
JO, Archer
idiopathic
scoliosis
: biplanar
[Br] 1984;66-B:8-1S.
Gordon
M. Estimation
Cook
du Peloux
J, Fauchet
R, Faucon
B, Stagnara
P. Le plan d#{233}lection pour
lexamen
radiologique
des
cypho-scolioses.
Re,
Chir
Orthop
1965:51 :517-24.
REFERENCES
S, Dahlborn
DB,
landmarks
Jacobs
RR, ed. Pathogenesis
an international conference.
Scoliosis
Research
Society,
Dickson
Aaro
Burr
radiographic
LC,
Moreland
MS.
in idiopathic
scoliosis.
fundamentals
of computer
J Biomech
1974:7:161-9.
Three-dimensional
J Orthop
aided
Res
X-ray
spinal
1987:5:102-13.
analysis
of the