Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12
13 SAM DAE ENTERPRISES, INC., a
California corporation
14
Plaintiff,
15
16 v.
17
ERALU FASHION, INC., and DOES 1
18 through 10, inclusive,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COMPLAINT
134152.1
2 through its attorneys of record, allege as follows against Eralu Fashion, Inc.
3 (Eralu), and Does 1 through 10 (collectively Defendants):
4
5
THE PARTIES
2.
3.
11 having its principal place of business at 1702 Floradale Avenue, South El Monte,
12 California 91733.
13
4.
14 true names and capacities are presently unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is informed
15 and believes, and thereon alleges, that at all times herein mentioned, each of the
16 fictitiously named defendants was the agent, servant, and/or employee of his or her
17 co-defendant and, in doing the things herein mentioned, was acting within the
18 scope of his or her authority as such agent, servant, and/or employee, and with the
19 permission and consent of his or her co-defendants, and that each of said
20 fictitiously named defendants is, in some manner, liable or responsible to Plaintiff
21 based upon the facts hereinafter alleged and thereby proximately caused injuries
22 and damages to Plaintiff as more fully alleged herein. Accordingly, Plaintiff sues
23 said defendants by said fictitious names. As such time as said defendants true
24 names and capacities become known to Plaintiff, Plaintiff will seek leave to amend
25 this Complaint to insert said true names and capacities of such individuals and/or
26 entities.
27
5.
Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that at all
28 relevant times mentioned in this complaint, Defendants and each of them, were and
134152.1
COMPLAINT
1
1 are acting in concert and active participation with each other in committing the
2 wrongful acts alleged herein, and were and are the agents of each other and were
3 acting within the scope and authority of that agency and with the knowledge,
4 consent, and approval of one another.
5
6
7 these defendants are located in the Central District of California, target customers
8 in the Central District of California, conduct business in the Central District of
9 California, and/or have otherwise worked with companies in the Central District of
10 California.
11
7.
8.
14 1391 and 1400 because defendants transact business in the Central District of
15 California and may otherwise be found in this district, and a substantial part of the
16 events giving rise to this litigation, including the injury to Plaintiff, occurred in the
17 Central District of California.
18
19
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
9.
Plaintiff owns and had owned prior to the infringing acts complained
10.
134152.1
COMPLAINT
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Figure 1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Figure 2
24
25
26
//
//
27
28
134152.1
COMPLAINT
3
11.
2 sells its products throughout the world, including locally in Los Angeles.
3
12.
4 selling handbags that bear designs that are identical or substantially similar to
5 Plaintiffs Copyrighted Design (the Infringing Handbags). Examples of the
6 Infringing Handbags appear in Figures 3 and 4, below.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Figure 3
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Figure 4
28
134152.1
COMPLAINT
4
13.
2 Copyrighted Design and are selling and/or have sold Infringing Handbags in brick3 and-mortar stores in Los Angeles as well as online through the internet.
4
14.
15.
16.
12 the Copyrighted Design and to unlawfully reproduce, import, distribute, and/or sell
13 the Infringing Handbags in this judicial district, featuring a design which is
14 identical or substantially similar to the Copyrighted Design.
15
16
(Copyright Infringement)
17
18
18.
19.
20.
21.
134152.1
COMPLAINT
5
22.
23.
24.
9 Defendants, and each of them, have obtained direct and indirect profits they would
10 not have otherwise have realized but for the infringement of the Copyrighted
11 Design. As such, Plaintiff is entitled to disgorgement of Defendants profits
12 directly and indirectly attributable to Defendants infringement of the Copyrighted
13 Design in an amount to be established at trial.
14
25.
15 statutory damages pursuant to Section 504(c) of the Copyright Act. Within the
16 time permitted by law, Plaintiff will make his election between actual damages and
17 statutory damages.
18
26.
19 although they were fully aware of Plaintiffs superior rights to the Copyrighted
20 Design. Therefore, Defendants acts of copyright infringement as alleged above
21 were, and continue to be, willful, intentional, and malicious, subjecting
22 Defendants, and each of them, to liability for exemplary statutory damages under
23 Section 504(c)(2) of the Copyright Act in the sum of up to one hundred fifty
24 thousand dollars ($150,000) per infringement.
25
26
27
1.
28 agents, employees, and representatives, and all other persons, firms or corporations
134152.1
COMPLAINT
6
2.
7 reason of the acts complained of herein, in the amount to be proven at trial, or, at
8 Plaintiffs election, statutory damages under the Copyright Act.
9
3.
10 revenues and profits they have derived from their wrongful actions, and a
11 disgorgement of Defendants wrongful profits and unjust enrichment.
12
4.
13
5.
6.
Any other relief that the Court deems just and proper.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
134152.1
COMPLAINT
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
134152.1
COMPLAINT
8