Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are no prerequisites, corequisites or other restrictions for enrollment in this course. Students are
advised that the course includes discussions of mathematical micro- and macroeconomic models and
econometric techniques that authors have used to estimate their empirical models to examine their
theories.
Course Description
This course provides a theoretical and empirical overview of research on national economic development,
with a focus on developing countries. Topics to be discussed (as time permits) include: macro models of
economic development, economic growth, the notion of dualism, investment through public and private
means, financial intermediation, human resource development, the functioning of labor markets,
environmental issues, sectoral policy, distribution, and planning models.
G.M. Meier and J.E. Rauch, Leading Issues in Economic Development, 8th ed., New York: Oxford
University Press, 2005
The semester grade will be based on a midterm and a final exam, a term assignment, class participation.
The weights of these are:
Midterm exam (October 10) ................................... 35 %
Final exam (November 28, 7:00pm) ....................... 40 %
Term assignment (see below) ................................. 20 %
Participation............................................................. 5 %
Term Assignment:
The term assignment is subject to your choice from the following four alternatives:
• choose an issue, get instructor’s approval of the topic by September 12, hand in a list of possible
literature sources by October 3, and write a 12-to-15-page literature survey that covers a
minimum of 10 literature sources. The final draft is due on November 21.
• choose an issue, get instructor’s approval of the topic by September 12, hand in a list of possible
literature sources by October 3, highlight the main contributions of 5 literature sources in the
literature, extract an interesting research hypothesis, and describe how you would go about testing
this hypothesis (type of sample, type of control variables, etc.). The final draft is due on
November 23.
• (i) make a fifteen-to-twenty-minute presentation in class on one of the papers of this reading list;
and (ii) write a short evaluation on another paper of this reading list. A list of eligible papers will
soon be designated. The presentation and report are due within the ongoing schedule of the
course.
•
If the circumstances so demand, these descriptions and timelines are subject to change at the discretion
of the Professor.
Absence from any exam must be properly documented; otherwise a grade of 0 is assigned to a missed
exam. Make-up exams are scheduled within the same week for those who missed an exam with proper
documentation.
There is no extra credit work.
Papers that are handed in after the due date are penalized 10% per day.
Reading Assignments
The following is a tentative list of issues that we will discuss during this semester. We will not cover all
of the readings: a good number of them are provided only for your interest. If time presses, topics 8, 11
and 12 are most likely to be skipped.
Readings from Meier are always covered; starred readings are likely to be covered; readings from Perkins
et al. are useful background material but not usually covered.
1. INTRODUCTION
Objectives of Development – Development Measures and Indicators – Quality of Data
*Meier, section I.A
Perkins et al., Ch. 1, 2, 4
*T.N. Srinivasan, AData base for development analysis: an overview,@ Journal of Development
Economics, June 1994, 44:1, pp. 3-27.
*J.R. Behrman and M.R. Rosenzweig, ACaveat emptor: cross-country data on education and the labor
force,@ Journal of Development Economics, June 1994, 44:1, pp. 147-171.
*N. Hicks and P. Streeten, “Indicators of development: the search for a basic needs yardstick.”
World Development, 1979 (7) (Also in Meier, 4th ed., pp. 26-30).
Human Development Report, 1991.
*T.N. Srinivasan, “Human development: a new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel.” American
Economic Review, May 1994, 84:2, pp. 238-243.
*Human Development Report, 1994, Ch. 5: “The Human Development Index Revisited.”
*Human Development Report, 2003, pp. 340-344.
R. Kanbur, “Economics, social science and development.” World Development, March 2002, 30:3,
477-486.
Regional Performance
*Meier, section I.B
*T.N. Srinivasan, “China and India: economic performance, competition, and cooperation: an
update.” Journal of Asian Economics, 2004, 15, 613-636.
4. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION
*Meier, section V (except selections V.3 and V.4)
Financial development
M. Fry, Money, Interest, and Banking in Economic Development (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins
University Press, 1988)
*R. Levine, AFinancial development and economic growth: views and agenda.” Journal of Economic
Literature, June 1997, 35:2, 688-726.
R. Levine, “Finance and growth: theory and evidence.” NBER working paper 10766, Sept. 2004
(www.nber.org/papers/w10766).
*R. Cull, “Financial-sector reform: what works and what doesn’t.” Economic Development and
Cultural Change, January 2001, 49:2, 269-290.
R.G. Gelos and A.M. Werner, “Financial liberalization, credit constraints, and collateral: investment
in the Mexican manufacturing sector.” Journal of Development Economics, February 2002,
67:1, 1-27.
*P.O. Demetriades and K.A. Hussein, “Does financial development cause economic growth? Time
series evidence from 16 countries.” Journal of Development Economics, December 1996, 51:2,
387-411.
*G. Bekaert, C.R. Harvey, and C. Lundblad, “Emerging equity markets and economic development.”
Journal of Development Economics, December 2001, 66:2, 465-504.
Group-based lending
*T. Besley and S. Coate, “Group lending, repayment incentives and social collateral.” Journal of
Development Economics, February 1995, 46:1, 1-18.
Special Issue on Group Lending, Journal of Development Economics, October 1999, 60:1.
*J. Morduch, “The microfinance promise.” Journal of Economic Literature, December 1999, 37:4,
1569-1614.
6. HUMAN RESOURCES
Education
*Meier, section IV.A
Perkins et al., Ch. 9
G. Psacharopoulos, “Returns to education: a further international update and implications.” Journal
of Human Resources, Fall 1985, 20, 583-604.
*G. Psacharopoulos, “Returns to education: a global update.” World Development, September 1994,
22:9, 1325-43.
*P. Bennell, “Rates of return to education: does the conventional pattern prevail in sub-Saharan
Africa?” World Development, January 1996, 24:1, 183-199.
*J. Phillips, “Farmer education and farmer efficiency: a meta analysis.” Economic Development and
Cultural Change, October 1994, 43:1, 149-165.
E.M. Godtland, E. Sadoulet, A. De Janvry, R. Murgai, and O. Ortiz, “The Impact of Farmer Field
Schools on Knowledge and Productivity: A Study of Potato Farmers in the Peruvian Andes.”
Economic Development and Cultural Change, October 2004, 53:1, 63-92.
*J. van der Sluis, Mirjam van Praag, and Wim P.M. Vijverberg, “Entrepreneurship Selection and
Performance: A Meta-analysis of the Impact of Education in Less Developed Countries,”
manuscript, September 2003.
K. Flug, A. Spilimbergo, E. Wachtenheim, “Investment in education: do economic volatility and
credit constraints matter?” Journal of Development Economics, April 1998, 55:2, 465-481.
E. Duflo, “Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: evidence
from an unusual policy experiment.” American Economic Review, September 2001, 91:4, 795-
813.
A. Tansel, “Schooling attainment, parental education and gender in Côte d=Ivoire and Ghana.”
Economic Development and Cultural Change, July 1997, 45:4, 825-856.
W.L. Parish and R.J. Willis, “Daughters, education, and family budgets.” Journal of Human
Resources, Fall 1993, 28:4, 863-898.
P. Glewwe, “Schools and skills in developing countries: education policies and socioeconomic
outcomes.” Journal of Economic Literature, June 2002, 40:2, 436-482.
*M. Bills and P.J. Klenow, “Does schooling cause growth?” American Economic Review, December
2000, 90:5, 1160-1183.
*E.A. Hanushek and D.D. Kimbo, “Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations.”
American Economic Review, December 2000, 90:5, 1184-1208.
R.J. Barro, “Human capital and Growth.” American Economic Review, May 2001, 91:2, 12-17.
Health and Nutrition
*Meier, section IV.B
Perkins et al., Ch. 10
*L. Haddad, “Women's income and boy-girl anthropometric status in the Côte d'Ivoire.” World
Development, April 1994, 22:4, 543-553.
*H. Alderman and M Garcia, “Food security and health security: explaining the levels of nutritional
status in Pakistan.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, April 1994, 42:3, 485-507.
*A.V. Swamy, “A simple test of the nutrition-based efficiency wage model.” Journal of
Development Economics, June 1997, 53:1, 85-98.
World Development Report, 1993, Overview, Ch. 1-4, 7
Dasgupta, Ch. 11, 14-16
M. Ravallion, “Famines and Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature, September 1997, 35:3,
1205-1242.
7. LABOR MARKETS
Wage Determination and Unemployment in LDCs
Perkins et al., 8
*J. van der Gaag and W.P.M. Vijverberg, “A Switching Regression Model for Wage Determinants in
the Public and Private Sectors of a Developing Country.” Review of Economics and Statistics,
May 1988, 70:2, 244-252
*A.D. Foster and M.R. Rosenzweig, “Information, learning and wage rates in low-income rural
areas.” Journal of Human Resources, Fall 1993, 28:4, 759-790.
J.-M. Baland, J. Drèze, and L. Leruth, “Daily wages and piece rates in agrarian economies.” Journal
of Development Economics, August 1999, 59:2, 445-461.
J. Anderson Schaffner, “Premiums to employment in larger establishments: evidence from Peru.”
Journal of Development Economics, February 1998, 55:1, 81-113.
E. Funkhauser, “The importance of firm wage differentials in explaining hourly wage variation in the
large-scale sector of Guatemala.” Journal of Development Economics, February 1998, 55:1,
115-131
Special issue on “Labor Market Flexibility in Developing Countries.” Journal of Labor Economics,
July 1997
Dualism: Informal Labor Markets
Meier, section VI.5-IV.7
*J.R. Harris and M.P. Todaro, “Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector model.”
American Economic Review, March 1970, 60:1, 126-142.
*D. Larson and Y. Mundlak, “On the intersectoral migration of agricultural labor.” Economic
Development and Cultural Change, January 1997, 45:2, 295-319.
F. Bourguignon and C. Morrison, “Inequality and development: the role of dualism.” Journal of
Development Economics, December 1998, 57:2, 233-257.
8. AGRICULTURE
*Meier, section VII
Perkins et al., 15
E. Boserup, “Agricultural growth and population change.” The New Palgrave (Econ. Dev.)
N. Johnson and V. Ruttan, “Why are farms so small?” World Development, May 1994, 22:5, 691-
706..
J.O. Lanjouw, AInformation and the operation of markets: tests based on a general equilibrium model
of land leasing in India.” Journal of Development Economics, December 1999, 60:2, 497-527.
M.W. Rosegrant and R.E. Evenson, “Agricultural productivity and sources of growth in South Asia.”
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, August 1992, 74:3, 757-761.
S. Fan and P.E. Pardey, “Research, productivity and output growth in Chinese agriculture.” Journal
of Development Economics, June 1997, 53:1, 115-137.
A.D. Foster and M.R. Rosenzweig, “Learning by doing and learning from others: human capital and
technical change in agriculture.” Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103:6, 1176-1209.
Off-campus, out-of-state, and foreign instruction and activities are subject to state law and University policies and
procedures regarding travel and risk-related activities. Information regarding these rules and regulations may be
found at the website address http://www.utdallas.edu/BusinessAffairs/Travel_Risk_Activities.htm. Additional
information is available from the office of the school dean. Below is a description of any travel and/or risk-related
activity associated with this course.
There will not be any off-campus instruction or travel associated with this course.
The University of Texas System and The University of Texas at Dallas have rules and regulations for the orderly
and efficient conduct of their business. It is the responsibility of each student and each student organization to be
knowledgeable about the rules and regulations which govern student conduct and activities. General information on
student conduct and discipline is contained in the UTD publication, A to Z Guide, which is provided to all registered
students each academic year.
The University of Texas at Dallas administers student discipline within the procedures of recognized and established
due process. Procedures are defined and described in the Rules and Regulations, Board of Regents, The University
of Texas System, Part 1, Chapter VI, Section 3, and in Title V, Rules on Student Services and Activities of the
university’s Handbook of Operating Procedures. Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in
the Office of the Dean of Students, where staff members are available to assist students in interpreting the rules and
regulations (SU 1.602, 972/883-6391).
A student at the university neither loses the rights nor escapes the responsibilities of citizenship. He or she is
expected to obey federal, state, and local laws as well as the Regents’ Rules, university regulations, and
administrative rules. Students are subject to discipline for violating the standards of conduct whether such conduct
takes place on or off campus, or whether civil or criminal penalties are also imposed for such conduct.
The faculty expects from its students a high level of responsibility and academic honesty. Because the value of an
academic degree depends upon the absolute integrity of the work done by the student for that degree, it is imperative
that a student demonstrate a high standard of individual honor in his or her scholastic work.
Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, statements, acts or omissions related to applications for
enrollment or the award of a degree, and/or the submission as one’s own work or material that is not one’s own. As
a general rule, scholastic dishonesty involves one of the following acts: cheating, plagiarism, collusion and/or
falsifying academic records. Students suspected of academic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary proceedings.
Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers for other classes, and from any other source is
unacceptable and will be dealt with under the university’s policy on plagiarism (see general catalog for details).
This course will use the resources of turnitin.com, which searches the web for possible plagiarism and is over 90%
effective.
Email Use
The University of Texas at Dallas recognizes the value and efficiency of communication between faculty/staff and
students through electronic mail. At the same time, email raises some issues concerning security and the identity of
each individual in an email exchange. The university encourages all official student email correspondence be sent
only to a student’s U.T. Dallas email address and that faculty and staff consider email from students official only if
it originates from a UTD student account. This allows the university to maintain a high degree of confidence in the
identity of all individual corresponding and the security of the transmitted information. UTD furnishes each student
with a free email account that is to be used in all communication with university personnel. The Department of
Information Resources at U.T. Dallas provides a method for students to have their U.T. Dallas mail forwarded to
other accounts.
The administration of this institution has set deadlines for withdrawal of any college-level courses. These dates and
times are published in that semester's course catalog. Administration procedures must be followed. It is the student's
responsibility to handle withdrawal requirements from any class. In other words, I cannot drop or withdraw any
student. You must do the proper paperwork to ensure that you will not receive a final grade of "F" in a course if you
choose not to attend the class once you are enrolled.
Procedures for student grievances are found in Title V, Rules on Student Services and Activities, of the university’s
Handbook of Operating Procedures.
In attempting to resolve any student grievance regarding grades, evaluations, or other fulfillments of academic
responsibility, it is the obligation of the student first to make a serious effort to resolve the matter with the instructor,
supervisor, administrator, or committee with whom the grievance originates (hereafter called “the respondent”).
Individual faculty members retain primary responsibility for assigning grades and evaluations. If the matter cannot
be resolved at that level, the grievance must be submitted in writing to the respondent with a copy of the
respondent’s School Dean. If the matter is not resolved by the written response provided by the respondent, the
student may submit a written appeal to the School Dean. If the grievance is not resolved by the School Dean’s
decision, the student may make a written appeal to the Dean of Graduate or Undergraduate Education, and the deal
will appoint and convene an Academic Appeals Panel. The decision of the Academic Appeals Panel is final. The
results of the academic appeals process will be distributed to all involved parties.
Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the Dean of Students, where staff
members are available to assist students in interpreting the rules and regulations.
Disability Services
The goal of Disability Services is to provide students with disabilities educational opportunities equal to those of
their non-disabled peers. Disability Services is located in room 1.610 in the Student Union. Office hours are
Monday and Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.; Tuesday and Wednesday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.; and Friday, 8:30
a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Essentially, the law requires that colleges and universities make those reasonable adjustments necessary to eliminate
discrimination on the basis of disability. For example, it may be necessary to remove classroom prohibitions against
tape recorders or animals (in the case of dog guides) for students who are blind. Occasionally an assignment
requirement may be substituted (for example, a research paper versus an oral presentation for a student who is
hearing impaired). Classes enrolled students with mobility impairments may have to be rescheduled in accessible
facilities. The college or university may need to provide special services such as registration, note-taking, or
mobility assistance.
It is the student’s responsibility to notify his or her professors of the need for such an accommodation. Disability
Services provides students with letters to present to faculty members to verify that the student has a disability and
needs accommodations. Individuals requiring special accommodation should contact the professor after class or
during office hours.
The University of Texas at Dallas will excuse a student from class or other required activities for the travel to and
observance of a religious holy day for a religion whose places of worship are exempt from property tax under
Section 11.20, Tax Code, Texas Code Annotated.
The student is encouraged to notify the instructor or activity sponsor as soon as possible regarding the absence,
preferably in advance of the assignment. The student, so excused, will be allowed to take the exam or complete the
assignment within a reasonable time after the absence: a period equal to the length of the absence, up to a maximum
of one week. A student who notifies the instructor and completes any missed exam or assignment may not be
penalized for the absence. A student who fails to complete the exam or assignment within the prescribed period may
receive a failing grade for that exam or assignment.
If a student or an instructor disagrees about the nature of the absence [i.e., for the purpose of observing a religious
holy day] or if there is similar disagreement about whether the student has been given a reasonable time to complete
any missed assignments or examinations, either the student or the instructor may request a ruling from the chief
executive officer of the institution, or his or her designee. The chief executive officer or designee must take into
account the legislative intent of TEC 51.911(b), and the student and instructor will abide by the decision of the chief
executive officer or designee.