Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Intro
Epidemiology
Risk Factors
Anatomy
Types of Fractures
Initial Management
Prognosis
!
Intro
Epidemiology
Epidemiology
Epidemiology
Intertrochanteric (extracapsular)
mostly age 65-99
F to M = 3:1
!
Subtrochanteric
bimodal distribution: 20s-40s and >60s
!
Risk Factors
Other:
low socioeconomic status, CVD, some endocrine disorder (ie:
thyroid, diabetes,etc)
Anatomy
Anatomy
Types of Fractures
Types of Fractures
Intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric
(extracapsular)
Initial Management
pain management
IV (faster relief), IM, PO, regional nerve blocks
orthopedic surgery consult
obtain blood for type and screen if risk for hemorrhage:
age >75 , Hb <12g/dL, peritrochanteric fx
DVT and wound infection prophylaxis
!
if elderly pt:
identify cause of fall (ie: syncope, etc) by taking good hx
identify sites of injury by physical exam
Prognosis
Intertrochanteric fx:
heals well relatively
high amt cancellous bone, good blood supply
!
Overview:!
! ! subcapital: femoral head/neck junction!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
Mechanism:!
elderly fall!
directly onto lateral hip!
twisting mechanism: foot planted, body rotates!
sudden spontaneous completion of fatigue fx causing a fall!
younger adult fall!
major trauma!
Symptoms:!
sudden onset of hip pain following a fall; may/may not bear weight!
groin pain, leg externally rotated and shortened!
little bruising since its intracapsular!
if insufficient (fatigue) fx: vague knee, buttock, groin or thigh pain
Radiograph:!
AP view w/ max lateral rotation; lateral view!
abnormal trabecular pattern !
defects in the cortex !
shortening or angulation of the femoral neck!
normal b/w femoral neck and femoral shaft on an AP
radiograph is 45 degrees !
normal b/w medial femoral shaft and trabecular lines running
through the shaft to the femoral head is 160 to 170 degrees!
Alterations in these angles suggest a fracture.!
!
!
!
Management:!
Orthopedic surgical consult for surgical fixation OR if pt
minimal symptoms/poor surgical candidate then PMD comanage with Orthopedic surgeon!
Surgery: Open reduction, internal fixation (lower
morbidity) vs. arthroplasty (lower reoperation rate)
Intertrochanteric Fracture
Overview:!
Stable vs unstable!
Stable: lesser trochanter not displaced, no comminution, medial cortices
of prox/distal fragments aligned!
Unstable: displacement occurs, comminution, multiple fracture lines
exist!
!
Mechanism:!
elderly!
fall!
younger adult!
rarer; seen in major trauma!
!
Symptoms!
hip pain, joint swelling, ecchymosis (d/t extracapsular)!
injured leg shortened, externally rotated if fx displaced!
trochanteric tenderness!
look for other injuries d/t high association with concomitant injuries
Intertrochanteric Fracture
Radiograph:!
AP view w/ max lat rotation!
lat view!
!
Intertrochanteric Fracture
Management:!
Orthopedic surgery consult: !
open reduction, internal fixation (vs. arthroplasty)!
no evidence to support one over the other!
ambulatory pt are good surgical candidates!
!
Trochanteric Fractures
Overview:!
due to forceful muscle contraction of a fixed limb!
most often in young active adult!
if elderly if no trauma cause then look for pathologic causes mainly
metastasis!
!
Mechanism:!
isolated avulsion fx of greater or lesser trochanter via forceful muscle
contraction!
greater trochanter fx: resister hip flexion leads to strong contraction of
iliopsoas muscle!
lesser trochanter fx: forceful contraction of hip abductors!
!
Symptoms:!
greater trochanter fx:!
hip pain that increases with abduction and tenderness over greater
trochanter!
lesser trochanter fx: !
groin pain!
knee or posterior thigh pain that worsens with hip flexion and rotation
Trochanteric Fractures
Radiograph!
greater trochanter!
standard AP view!
lesser trochanter!
AP view with leg in ext rotation!
!
Management:!
Most heal well with nonoperative management unless displaced
>1cm!
pt must remain non-weight bearing for 3-4 weeks!
full activity in 2-3 months !
Orthopedic surgery consult!
if displaced >1cm then open reduction internal fixation
Subtrochanteric Fracture
Overview:!
increased need for implanted devices (ie: intramedullary
rods/nails!
higher rate of implant failures d/t increased stress on this
part of femur
The end
Reference
UpToDate
Medscape
PubMed