Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I
I
I
I
I
!!
I!
t!
!!
!t
y ft
{:. ^:
-t
tr*
{^f "t- {^=
'-*
r."-*.i ;* ..L (#;- '",* "*^u
Y
"#
{. ,:^) Y
{;
rc"r'pv. m"6 m
ffi w
ry' ffi
4-
t-"\
{* {::
(\yt\
{:" "-,*C , ?#
t--.{;TJ,,L
*;
_f
Y3,
",
tt:'m }
Tffi,
"m.#.
*
I
',
't
.*
I
I
A,
eoipo.
Affair:S;O.ffi$,(CAO)'tvtateiial'
On Org an izational Effedtiveness
-veis&n'N=d. g: 291i2:,.',':'
-Relea
April2012
*ruiy
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Heading
Page No.
Introduction
3-4
5
6
7
8
B
8
9
9- 10
11
11
Multiple
Sources of Feedback
Definition and expectations
Supervisor and employee roles
11-13
13
13
73-14
15
15
15- 16
76-17
18
Appendix
A.
79-25
25
B. Performance
27-30
C.
Planning Worksheet
Coaching Worksheet
M iss ion-Goal-Objective-Outcomes Definition Worksheet
Process Definition Worksheet
The TESDA Operational Context
79
J 1-JJ
34
35
36-38
t
I
Introduction
I:SDA, being an attached agency of the Deparfment of Labor and Employment (DOLE)
is involved in the pilot implementation of the Civii Service Commission's Strategic
Performance Management System (SPMS). Four (4) years earlier, though, TESDA rvas
also implementing the Performance Management System - Office Performance
Evaluation System (PM9OPES)which was also designed and introduced by CSC.
its ou/n account, the Civil Service Comrnission (CSC) , after five (5) of years, has seen
the need to review and enhance the PMS-OPES with the SPMS with a view to address
the gaps and weaknesses that came to be associated with the older system.
B_v
The mix of enhancements which the CSC & DOLE intend to achieve through the SPMS
are as follows:
!T
7.
2.
3.
4.
tr
tl"
h
F
I
I
I
I
evaluation to @
Shi{t from performance
I
Use of success indicators in measuring results
Emphasis on office performance rather than indir,idual competition
Shift of the role of supervisors from mere evaluator to coach or mentor
Having been exposed to the original concept and ramifications of the PMS-OPES Model,
the TESDA Corporate Affairs (TESDA-CAO) has a fa:r appreciahcn of the s)'Stem's
strengths and weaknesses and for this reason, has thought of taku-rg paral1e1 aclion to
enable TESDA to benefit ful1y from its parlicipation in the implementation of the SPMS.
In coming out with this Performance N4aaagement Handbook, CAO airns to provide
TESDA officials and employees r,r,,ith a handv reference on methodoiogies and
techniques in developing success indicators and the conduct of performance planning
and coaching.
Thus, through this handbook, CAO hopes to translale into operational terms, the salient
points of the SPMS , in order to famfiarize both ihe rank-and-file employees and their
supervisors on rationale for, and mechanics of, effective performance management. it is
expected that such a familiarity n ith performance management tools and techniques
will mitigate the unease which manv goverrunent officials and employees tend to
associate with performance planning and execution.
is emphasized that this handbook is designed to complement and augment the SPMS
guidelines, and that in case of conflict, the latter will take precedence over the former.
Ii
Employee Performance M
Handbook V-0.0-2012
]e
.TESDAbeingpartoftheCSC-DOLEpilotimplementationofthecsc-sPl\4sN4ode1;
. The need to provide a foundation for complying with the 4E test for public service
Manual (PGIAM);
deiivery of the Philippine Government h-rternal Audit
. Finaltzation of tt-re euthority's Human Resources Development (HRD) Manual witl-r
revlews;
performance data for informed TESD
reliable
The need to provide accurate,
decisions, rrnd"r'the SD4R policy framework; and
conducive to high performance for
The need to provide an operating environment
all TESDA emPloYees.
a section devoted to performance
.
.
Goals:
. Improve staff performance in meetjng TESDA work and the NTESDP 2011-2016
goals and objectives
.Recognizeexceptionaiperformance,aCComPlishments,andcontributions
. Supp"ort staff development and conlinuous learning
. Strlngthen management accountabilitv for results
Principles:
.Performancemanagementisasharedcomrnitmenttohighperformance..
.Effectiveperformanceandcontinuouslearningshouldbeencouragedand
suPPorted'
1 r-rrrrrc^n
supervrsory
all TESDA ^,,^^
be required of
Fact-based mentoring and coaching should
(TIU) heads are encouraged to
positions. As such, fESOe implemlenting unit
and every subordinate he'/she
a Performance Impait journal flr each
maintain
t Handbook V-0,0-2012
t
T
t
I
7.
2.
t
t
3.
I
r
4.
5.
I
I
I
t
t
I
t
6.
.
.
.
.
.
.
lob Knoroledge
Competent in required job skills and knowledge
Exhibits ability to learn and apply new skills
Keeps abreast of current developments
Requires rninimal supervision
Displays urderstanding of how job relates to others
lJses resources effectively
Quality
7.
8.
9.
Communications
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Customer Seraice
Displays courtesy and sensitivih'
Manages difficult or emotional customer situalions
Meets comrnitments
Responds promptly to customer needs
Soiicits customer feedback to mpror-e sen-ice
.
.
.
.
.
.
Teamrpork
Establishes and maintains effechr-e reiaiions
10,
.
.
.
.
.
1L.
.
.
.
.
.
hritiatiae
Volunteers readi,lr
Undertakes self-der-e1o::rr::r: a-l-ilies
Seeks increased responsibilees
Looks for and takes adr-antaE= e: oppcrtunilies
Asks for help when neeciec
72.
Leadership
For TIU heails, superaisors and rruutagers only
.
.
.
.
.
Employee Performance
lMan
tI
r
I
I
Using these goals and core competencies, the TESDA model of per{ormance
management is an ongoing Process and includes four components:
1.
Z.
3.
4.
h
h
h
h
ir
F
:
|l
rl
t Handbook V-0.0-2012
:l
t
t
t
:I
I
I
I
:I
tf,l
i||
tjr
I
I
qoals.
if!;
Minimum Exoectations
year.
itr
iI
Goal
Component
Consequence management in
effect; high-pedorming u nits
recognized and individual
performers acknowledged.
Employee completes an individual
career development plan.
Handbook
This handbook was designed to assist TESDA supvervisors and managers in conducting the most effective
and timely pedormance reviews. lt includes definition of terms, outlines of supervisor and employee
responsibilities, guidelines for discussions, worksheets and forms appropriate for each of the components of
the Per-formance Management Process, Materials in this handbook may be reproduced for use or electronic
copies may be obtained from HRMD. This handbook is not intended to be used as a policy manual. The
information contained in this handbook is subject to change over time as the Authority revises its policies
and practices and without prior notice to or consent of employees. Should you have any questions about the
Performance Management process contained in this handbook, or other relevant policies of process, call the
Human Resource Development Division, SPMS Section.
Motivating sei{
I'e
rtnrrnanct Flenrin
It is a
In the Performance
unit's goals
Ask the employee what additional irLformation, resources, tools, training, or
supervisory suPPort is needed for them to be successful on the iob
Employee Role
. Have a thorough understanding of the work involved - the critical functions, key
.
.
.
.
.
tasks
Review the job description to ensure that ilformation is accurate and up to date
Understand what constitutes "successful performance" of the core competencies
Understand how the results of this position contribute to the work unit's goals
Communicate what in{ormation, resources, tools, training, and supervision is
needed
Ask questions to clarify information
Handbook V-0.0-2012
lntroduction
This introduction sets the tone of the discussion and presents the focus of the per{ormance planning.
Overview the major tasks assigned to the position
Establish and agree upon performance expectatlons
Clarify what the employee will be evaluated on. and
Set the stage for ongoing feedback and coaching throughout the year.
Revi ew P ositi on D es cri pti on
The performance planning meeting is a good opportunity to review the position description and determine if
it is still accurate. Reviewing the position description:
Clarifies duiies and responsibilities that are unclear to the employee
Helps the supervisor know what the employee does on a daily basis, and
Highlights areas of the job that need special attention
Discuss Competencies
The supervisor and employee should discuss each of the core competencies (including the leadership
competency, if the employee is a manager or supervisor).
o
o
o
o
o
Try to write goals in a positive manner (such as lmprove or lncrease . . .) ratherthan negaiive (Do not . . . or
Stop . . .). Now test the goal against the following - be sure that it does not describe:
o
o
o
-:
, ':s
::-:e
government agencies.
Better; As pa1 of the departmefl: s 3':ss-:'a ^ 'r: ercls, each employee is being assigned as an official
back-up to another employee Tnis 'e:-'3s earrlg enough of the employee's work that you can cover
TSoh ofday-to-day responsibtliries
fo'a
:-:
Nina,
for:n:;,:
:':l':-
The supervisorand employee can Cs:;ss ^:/, :ne employee likes to be recognized forgood pedormance
and whether they prefer to receive ieej;ra:'r i,' en :here is a performance problem,
-:,', slpervisor prefers to receive feedback from the employee.
Superuisor and employee can aiso d s:.rss
Discuss Needed Training and Developmenl Necessary to Attain the Performance Standards
ldentify what knowledge and sKilrs lre er3 r)iee 'r;ili need to learn or improve on io meet performance
standards.
Employee Pedcrmance
1,,1
'1-u.11-u,;lv drsc,r-qs:+ns
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Observingperformalce
Correctjng poor Performance
Providinginstruction
Recognizingexcellentperformance
Directing emploYee's efforts
Listening to employee concerns and ideas
Providingencouragement
Removing barriers to performance
In the TESDA Performance Management Process, it is expected that coaching will occur
on an as-needed basis throughout the year and may be initiated by either the supervisor
or the employee. Supervisors and employees are encouraged to document these
discussions u, upptopiiate. The Coaching Worksheet in the Appendix provides a form
for recording .ouit'tittg notes. Indication of the coaching session should also be noted in
performance imp act documentation.
Supervisor Role
.
.
.
.
.
.
Below are general guidelines for a supervisor to keep in mind when coaching an
employee:
.
11
Do allow time for coachilrg. Even on an inJormal basis, it takes time to do it well.
!anqq99ryq20]3
I
I
ic Performance Man
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
What have I observed about tlr-is sta,rf nterr.tber that I can compliment?
In what ways does this person like to be recognizeci for excellence performance?
How couid this staff member irnpror-e his her perforinance? \\hat is the di{ference
between " actgal" and " desire d" perf or-crance ?
Do I know what thj.s emplo-vee is u orking onl --lnC the p:o1ect status?
How wel1is this employee doing in meeii:-rg his,''her goals? \\hat can be done to
facilitate goal progress?
Have I chlcked to see iJ there are an\- t'ariers this sta^tf member might be
experiencing in performing his he: iudes. such as:
- haviag rvell-defined priorities?
- g"ttirg needed informafion?
equipment?
supplies?
- having appropriate
- having adeqrrate
- working under a reasonable dea,jlme?
7.
Have I provided or mad.e ar-a;iat'1e the training this sta{f member needs to do the
job?
Hurru I asked this staff member harr-I can help hirn/her succeed?
9. Do I know r.n'hat this emplor-ee's career goals are?
10. What have I done to der elop mr seH as a coach?
11. Have I asked thLis emplor-ee for feedback about how I am doing as his/her coach?
B.
Corrective Action:
In some situations, coaching mar- not result in improved performance. lAlhen that
occurs, supervisors mav need to use irLformal andf or formal corrective action
procedurei to address performalce issues. Supervisors have responsibility for
ulderstanding and implementing appropriate corrective action, in accordance with the
prescribed Human Resources PoLicies and Pracfices.
t2
!!!0-:20]!
Employee Role
Staff members are encouraged to be active participants in their own coachtngby:
o
o
o
Questions f or Employees:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
9.
o
o
o
o
o
o
Inadequateinformation?
Unclear direction?
Inadequate supplies or equipment?
Lack of skill or knor,r'ledge?
Difficulty in meeting deaclhne?
Workload?
i
t.
?1.
i
i
i.&R!a!:5:
6
1
,n
1gr
s*& as*e*f, g:*enx-
iilpcr!'rieT' te*dba+l:
-".
irr*luul* i**Ah**k5{?urtrs
'4
rt- sxa
Em
ployee Performance
M an
agement
andbook
V -0.0 -201 2
,
.
.
.
Self eunluation
lfpzuard feedback (people
feedback
wit)
other source
It is expected that every TESDA staff will receive feedback from at least one
complete a
to
is
employee
the
of feed-back in addition to their supervisor. At minimum,
performance review;
self-evaluation at least two weeki prior to their annual written
ideally seu-evaluations should be completed whenever the staff person and supervisor
In addition, the use
feel it would be beneficial (see Self-Eviluation Form in Appendix).
of other feedback sources is strongly encouraged. If you would like to exceed the
you
minimum requirements by obtaining more soufces of feedback, HRMD can assist
with examples.
reflect on their
Self-evaluation can be very heipful to employees, by encouraging them to
Selforgantzatron'
larger
to
the
skills, areas of growth, and how their work contributes
review'
evaluation help"s the empioyee plepale to actively engage in the performance
Selfresponsibility'
a
shared
is
and demonslrates that improrr*g performance
provide
review
evaluations that are shared with the supervisor prior to the performance
opportunity to
an
provide
evaiuations
The
valuable data as input into that process.
discuss and coach where perceptions differ'
Supervisor Role
. 'Gi,ru the employee a copy of the selJ evaluation form and ensure that it is completed
it to the
at least u .onptu of days before the review is to be given; compal.e
performanceleview form and discuss any differences and similarities'
. 'E*phusize the importance of self evaluation as a method for both supervisor and
employee to learn
. frupur" the employee for self evaluation by discussing it briefly in the performance
planning discussion
. Allow a reasonable amount of time (at least two weeks) for the employee to
complete the self evaluation form prior to the arffrual performance review
. Read and reflect on the seu evaluation the employee submits before the performance
review; develop questions and comments in resPonse
. Schedule time io dir.nrt the self evaluation with the employee either prior to or
during the Performance review
Employee Role
. iui"
.
.
L4
thoughtfulway,
employee Performance
Man@
component of the
The actual performance reYieur discussion is an extremely imPortant
between the
performance management process. It is the culminating convelsation
and stalf member regarding:
iupervisor
'
. \\4rere performance exceeded, met, or fe1l below expectations,
. The leaining and development needed and received'
. Goals that were set and achier-ed bi- the staJf membel, and
. Feedback from others #fected L.r the staff member's performance.
Future goals.
InJormation from the performance rer-ierr is crillcal not just for performance
and
improvement, but for other human resorrrce decisions, including step increases
is
a
it
appropriate job assignments. ln the Perfor:narce \Ianagement Process,
sta-ff member rr-i-j :eceir-e' at nLinimum' an annuai review on
."qrrir"rrr"tt itrat
"rr".Jtthat u,jl1 be discussed. riocuri:rented. and subrrritted to l{uman
their anniversary date
Resources for the employee's persorurci rle'
Supervisor Role
Before the performance revielr':
. Shaie your review r,r,ith r our supen-isor and/or deparlment head for input and
support.
. schedule ample time and a pir-aie place for the review discussion'
' NotifY the emPlovee in adr-ance'
. Arrang" fo, *ork co\-erage ior r-our staJf member; reviews should be conducted
is
during regular business hours. rlof during break, lunch, or after the workday
over.
. Review the emplovee's jol. description and the expectations that were set during
the last performance planning discussion'
. Revievv the emplovee s compieted self-evaluation'
. f{syls1a, the documentation r-ou have collected throughout the year both in the
emplol,gs'5 file through goal progress notes and iog events.
. plan for tw,o-1a.- .o-rnllt ication during the review meeting; think of questions
that you call use to help r-our employee "open up'"
. Remind the emplor-ee io bring appropriate materials (self-evaluation, copies of
letters, etc.)
-0'0-2012
.
.
2.
16
c Performance Management
.
3.
.
.
.
.
4.
5.
.
.
6.
7.
.
.
.
.
B.
9.
Close
L7
.
.
with encouragement.
Recerrcy error
kniency elror - Consistently rating someone higher than is deserved. This tends to be
"Exceeds
the molt typical pitfall. It should be very rare to see arr emplovee u'ho
Expectations" on all of their goals and the core competencies.
Seaerity
is deserved.
Clone el.ror
andf or personalitY.
spillorter error
- Continuing to downgrade
in
.
.
.
.
.
1B
Fl
q!!!ook
y-0.
0?qg
c Performance Management
APPENDIX A
TESDA-SPMS PERFORMANCE REPORTING GUIDE
Performance Reporting Principles and Guidelines
Principles at a Glance
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
The strategic context for the plan and reported resuits is discussed.
vii.
viii.
= = ===
= = = =======:
= ====
==
==
= ==
===
= ==
====:1
Principle #1
The organization's public purpose is explained.
Description:
Communicates why an otganTzation exists, what it does, who the organization
serves, and how services are delivered. This should include a statement of the
vision, mission, and mandate.
Purpose:
To communicate the public pu1'pose of the organrzation to help the reader
understand the work of the organrzation. Understanding why an organization
exists, what it does, who the organization serves and how services are delivered
help better understand its performance.
Handbook V-0.0-2012
Self-assessment criteria:
Has the organization's vision, mission, and mandate been
clearly f explicitly stated?
o Have the core values (if applicable) of the organization been stated?
o Has an overvielt. of programs, products or services been included?
o Is it clear v,,ho the organtzation ser\-es - including clients or stakeholders
who rely on programs, products and services?
Has the governance skucture oi the organtzatton (including legislation,
organrzatronal structure and ker reporting relationships) been
communicated clearh ?
If services are delivered rhlough another organizatron (such as an
UTPRAs-registered TESD '.--rogram), has it been explained how those
services are delir.ered?
==:== =====
== ==
==
==::======
===
Principle #2
Description:
Relating the organi zatron' s p:iolries x-ith orzerall government priorities shows
how the broad strategic direcfio:r :ror-ided by government is being implemented
bv the organization,
Purpose:
To help ensure deparhnent
goverrunent are aligned.
Self-assessment criteria:
=::::=
Description:
Linking priorities, objectir-es and actions provides a clear articulation of the work
of the organrzatton and hol- it n-i1l focus its efforts.
20
andbook
V -0.0-201 2
f f SOn Strategic
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tI
i
tt
II
L
It
t,
P.tformt@
at a high level' A
A "priorit y" rs akey area of focus of an organtzatton, stated
or a desired
priority rnay be etfrersed as a statement of a long term goal
actions to achieve them'
outcome. Priorities will have specific objectives and
of what the
"Objective " refersto concise , tealistic, results-oriented statements
organization intends to achieve'
" Acttorr" refers to a specific initiative, strategy, oI program which is designed to
advance the objectii'e.
Purpose:
o{ the org'antzatton'
To promote an outcomes-based approach to the work
the organrzattoLt,
Ruth", than just focusing on accomplishing the activities of
to ensure that the
ciearly linking priorities and objectir'", urrJ actions is intended
work of the organtzatron remains focusecl on its priorities and intended
outcomes.
Self-assessment criteria:
o
o
o
o
o
are?
Has the organtzation clearly indicated r'r'hat its priorities
support
the'
Are the priorities, objecti.ves and actions rn'ell-defined and do
the organtzatton?
the public purpose (i.e. vision, mission and mandate) of
deparlment
and
Is there a cleai link between goverlxrlent priorities
priorities, objectives and actions?
objectives under
Has the organtzation outlined realistic, result-oriented
those Priorities?
feasible actions
Has the organization described specific and financially
thai will be"or have been undertaken to achieve the objectives?
=::=:=:=::=::=:==:==:=======:==:===:===:=:=:===::::::::::=:
Principle #4
on a few critical
Measures are developed with outcomes in mind, focusing
aspects of Performance.
Description:
t Handbook V'0.0-2012
Purpose:
To ensure that information presented is focused on the relevant measures of
performance, and that it provides an overall picture that is meaningful to key
audiences such as members of the legislafure, the public, stakehold-ers and the
nredia. Outcorne measures will usually communicate the organizahons'
achievements more effectively than inputs or outputs.
Self-assessment criteria:
o
o
o
=:::::=::=::::--
__:=::=::::::::=::::::_
Principle #5
Financial and non-financial information are linked.
Description:
Information about the activities of an organization, performance, and resources
should be ]inked.
Meaningful planning and reporting should put information about the results of
activities in context with associated costs.
Purpose:
To link financial inJormation with performance information to help to better
assess the impact of resource allocation and improve decision-muki.,g
regarding
future activities and resource requirements.
Self-assessment criteria:
o
o
o
o
22
J:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
;;,;*;,:;;
The strategic context for the plan and reported results is discussed.
Description:
Discusses the context in which plans are made and activities undertaken
including:
o the key factors that aJfect performance (such as economic, social,
demographic, or envirorrmental);
o risks and hor,r' are they belng managed (such as contingency planning);
o capacitl' of the organtzatron to achieve a result;
o what relationships exist outside of the orgamzation (both in and out of
goverrunent) and hort' do these relationships af{ect activities, and
o other challenges and opportunities.
Purpose:
To provide in{ormation about the sfrategic context of the organtzation to help
better understand the complexity and uncertaintr- associated rt ith the
development and implementation of services and initiatives and the decisionmaking of the organization in that slrategic environment.
Self-assessment criteria:
Has the organizatton outlined the key factors that affect performance in a
concise manner?
Has the organizatron identified key risks and how they are being
managed or addressed?
Has the organtzatton taken steps to develop capacity to meet expected
challenges?
o How did external erzents or circumstances affect activities and results?
o How did the organtzatron deal with those events or circumstances?
o Has the organtzatton identified areas where there are cross-department,
cross-agenc\l or inter- goverrunental initiatives? Does the organizatron
explain the impact these relationships have on performance?
If serrrices are delivered through another organization (such as an
UTPRAS-registered TESD program), have the responsibilities for service
delivery and performance been explained?
aa
LJ
-A.0-201 2
=:::::::=
Description:
Performance reporting should provide comparative information about past
performance and incorporate future expectations, goals, or targets where
applicable. A performance report should compare results in relation to prior
years' results in order to show whether performance is stable, improving or
declining.
Purpose:
To better contextualize the performance inJormation in relation to historical
performance and targets or goals that might have been set.
Self-assessment criteria:
Does the performance measure include baseline data and trend
information?
Does the organizab.on discuss future expectations, goals, or previously
stated targets?
Does the information enable the external reader to understand if
performance is improving, declining or remaining stable and why?
Has the orgarttzaf,on pror-ided comparative information regarding the
performance of other jurisdictions where it is usefui or applicable?
Have any inconsistencies in data or the presentation of data been
explained?
Has the orgarrtzatron discussed significant variances between aclual and
expected results?
In the information presented, has the organrzation considered lessons
learned?
=====:=:=:======::=====:=::=========:::=:====:==:==:=======
Principle #8
24
Purpose:
To provide information on the organizatton and its performance that is
understandable and presents an accurate, reliable assessment.
Self-assessment criteria:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
25
Priority: A key
may
and,f or both.
26
ic Performance Management
APPENDIX
Employee:
Date:
Job Title:
Step 1: Determine Critical ]ob Functions
I4lhat is provided through this job? (administrative support, technical assistance,
customer service, supen-ision, maintenance services, project management, etc.)
List all major functions.
List the most important tasks of tiris job (see job description for samples). Attacl.r
additional sheets, ii neecied. For each task, determine standard(s) of performance
based on at least one of the follon.ing criteria:
r
o
o
Quaiitv
Quantitr.
Timeliness
be
Consfraints
Example:
Task: Resol'es complaints from a member of the community
Quality:
Timeliness:
Standard(s) associated
with this task (either
27
"Qua7tty" , "Quarltrty"
"Timeiiness", or
"Constraints"
Task:
st@
with this task (either
" Quality", "Quantitr ",
"Timeliness", ot
"Constraints"
Task:
Standard(s) associated
with this task (either
" Quality" , " QLtar\tttt-" ,
"Timeliness",
t lme.tlness / or
"Consfraints")
Task:
Standard(s) associated
st@
with this task (either
"QuaIrty" , "Qu.antrt\-"
"Timeliness",
l lmellness' / or
"Constraints")
I
I
I
I
t Handbook V-0.0-2012
I
I
t
I
t
I
i
I
:
I
I
List at least three goals for this position to be completed for the next rating
period. While tire supervisor r,r'ill develop some draft goals to get the discussion
moving, the supervisor and emplovee should work together to determine the
goals and expectations (measures) for the next review period. Goals and
expectations should be at the behar-ioral level. Goals shouid be:
.
.
.
.
o
Goal l
Goal Title:
G""1D"r.tryti"" *rC
Weighting:
G""i
M"""r*-."t
("tth-.
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
t
Goal2
Goal Titie:
G""1D"r.tryt-"
Weighting:
"rd
Goal3
Goal Title:
Goal Description and
Performan ce
lt4
an
agement
H and
book V -0.0-20 1 2
Weighting:
GoaI4
Goal Titie:
Goal Description and
Weighting:
Goal5
Goal Title:
Goal Description and
Weighting:
Once the goals are developed and agreed upon, they are to be entered in the
Performance Measurement and Management Monitoring Network (MoNET)
System for tracking purposes and to enter progress notes tlrroughout the next
rating period.
30
APPENDIX C
Coaching Worksheet
Use this worksheet to prepare for and make notes of your coaching discussion
Emolovee name:
Meeting date:
Supervisor name:
Next Steps in Employee Development (for both the supervisor and emplovee)
Employee Performance
M an
agement
Empl
oy
Fo
rm
Employee Name:
Job Title:
Department:
Date:
Supervisor:
Review Period:
From:
to:
Adaptabiiitv:
Attendance & Puncfualitr.:
Dependabilit,v:
Communications:
Customer Sen'ice:
Teamwork:
Representing the Citr':
Initiative:
Leadership (for office heads, supervisors and managers, only)
32
-0.0-2012
t
I
TESDA Stra
t
I
I
:
:
What goals are important for vou to achieve during the next rating period?
Please be clear and concise.
\Atrich other objectir es clid vou meet, beyond your stated goals?
I
I
\A4-rich
t
I
I
I
\A4rat part(s)
\44-Lat areas
I
I
I
I
I
\Mhat can -voul mar-LagerT supervisor do to help you achieve your future goals
and meet expectations?
Additional Comments
JJ
{3rws*Lv:**ktre*?u\i,aainrl
**.1
I
hfi s
stoir40Al-osJEcTil/E-ouTceils
nEFiHITtot"l wofttt$HEET
it*1
Fr.x-rcDcn,.s i.
2
3
'Itrie
Prograir, :
i:-x'-trc*t
ies,l-
2
3.
4.
CILJTCOi'riE
'/
3
-l
I
I
NA
J.t
I
I
I
tl!+t! w'w
StRVtCE
,I:SCAitcrcini
lliflr
!l
'FtFlc
ll0ltrFE(rst{Ar
tilllnlt!1llFl
iriQRiiSHEtl
RtlLlZtTloHlmt$s
!til
Ill!t
I
t
t
I
I
I
:
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
11:
Hdld l]l
Sa'ilrqiltl
nt Handbook V-0.0-2012
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
:
Thr TE$Bfi
s*
,,,:::, ,lzltjfx@+
.::::=a:l?&^4Eln&trgrew|
,,i;,, Yf*,asy
** *-ttg*a
*.
13.4z2W&4e:::,'.:,:=
I
I
'{titt.;aab sr
*tweruait&Wi'"t:
.r 't'
e;Engrq.s|it.Art
'/
':
'
tti
rsubrad{la.*ia*xd
Wlaffi:a&**
-:,. sfge
I
I
t
fi.;3.,$&.1t
,,;';,::&
;;
1*
='=:::;
I
t
t
lilorkfore*
0rlTt0HE
flry4-,
rt*&.
frttwti
I
I
I
I
I
I
Jb
I
I
I
:
t
I
t
:
i
1
EXECUIIVE OFFICES
so+n
oPLANs
I
a
I
I
I
:
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
TEsDA Ccntrlbrrtlcfi te
FhlllpBine
tFlan *t{*3{ItG
65ld Erzrplerynrer:l Rate {rl
Fl.
Pto$ncjal 8ff'1]E
tr'
!{esu ts
l}Jd
l"i.;
Or*trriSakeral trefc,nnatce
lfi
s.:ituts
5/
irrnn
Radbv
ic Performance Man
Tl"re THSBA
TESDA GovemafiFl lnffAAHXtfl
HF[4D5tl*Wft
fJCS A
ftdivlLl*s
TESBA
iJrG
]f*F16i1ft&s*{rr*&bea*We-?&
Te*n
",,,;:,,CuStOffigN
lg1,*s@
,,
kate
R&S
iA -Y;JXI **o
caco
co-
PO.TI
?twaary
Aali$tiaa
l
l
Logistics
ryryry
{-ogiiffi
coRoPorr
WY- se,"r}*
a&d b's,es
EBnefiA
3.Cost
g{
Ratia
I
I
inbcund oninr?o{rs
Ropon
Each TESDA implementing unil shatl produce euidenee-bssed results along the three
pesormanee areas of lhe 3rd *yele NTFSDP, nam*ly : {1} Acco-untability. t7}
JO