The economic policies of each era undoubtedly favored that of the colonizers. Spanish colonizers managed to establish monopolies in different agricultural fields. Galleon trade, from Manila to acapulco, was also kept closed to the Filipinos.
The economic policies of each era undoubtedly favored that of the colonizers. Spanish colonizers managed to establish monopolies in different agricultural fields. Galleon trade, from Manila to acapulco, was also kept closed to the Filipinos.
The economic policies of each era undoubtedly favored that of the colonizers. Spanish colonizers managed to establish monopolies in different agricultural fields. Galleon trade, from Manila to acapulco, was also kept closed to the Filipinos.
From the Spanish Colonial Rule to the American Period to the Japanese Regime, economic control and domination has been the ulterior and main motive of every era. The economic policies of each period undoubtedly favored that of the colonizers, which caused adverse effects to the Filipinos. When the Spaniards came into the Philippines, the ulterior motive was to search for spices such as nutmeg, clove, and paprika, which they can sell at a higher price when they go back to their mother country. However, as the years passed, the economic desire of the Spaniards rose from search of spices to total economic domination in the Philippines. In the span of two hundred years, Spanish colonizers managed to establish monopolies in different agricultural fields such as tobacco and hemp, which paralyzed the economy of the Philippines. Agricultural lands were also taken away from the farmers by the friars, which made the Filipinos poor and unproductive due to loss of lands. Galleon trade, from Manila to Acapulco was also established; however, for many years, it was kept closed to the Filipinos. Hence, for two hundred years, Filipinos were stagnated by the loss of economic participation in the Philippines. Due to the monopolization of many industries made by the Spaniards, the Filipinos were not able to participate in different economic transactions. Also, even though galleon trade was opened until 1815, it only involved Spaniards living in Manila, which had adverse effects to the Filipinos, since they were not allowed to participate in most of the trades.
In the time of the Americans, Filipinos
were allowed to participate in trades with its colonizer. However, due to the rapid industrial development of the United States, the transfer of goods from the Philippines to the US was limited, since an influx of manufactured goods forced the Americans to search of a market that would consume such goods. Hence, Filipinos served as consumers of the finished products instead of being producers, which deeply affected our economy. Although there were years that no tariff or limit was placed on Philippine goods coming into the United States, the continuous flood of American products hindered the Filipinos from establishing a stable and independent economy. In the Japanese Period, the economic participation of the Filipinos was almost inexistent. Since it is time of war, the Filipinos were limited to any economic activity. Due to the fear of raids and bombings, there was hardly any exchange of goods that happened. Also, even if the Filipinos were allowed to buy or sell goods, only Mickey Mouse money was allowed to be used, which technically had no value. Hence, the Filipinos again were stagnated economically in the Japanese period, due to the ongoing war at that time. Summing up from the Spanish Era to the American Period to the Japanese occupation, it can be said that all of the colonizers had negative effects in the economic aspect for the Filipinos. Although there were times that Filipinos were allowed to participate in economic transactions, it was overshadowed
by the economic policies that they imposed,
which hardly favored us. As a result, these economic atrocities by the colonizers created a deep cut in our economy, since it deprived us from having any participation in most of the economic transactions.
Prue Chamberlayne - Joanna Bornat - Tom Wengraf - Turn To Biographical Methods in Social Science - Comparative Issues and Examples (Social Research Today) (2000) PDF