Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Project work entitled A STUDY ON JOB
SATISFACTION IN IQRAA INTERNATIONAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE,
MALAPARAMBAis a bonafied record of the work done by Mr.
RATHEESH.D, Reg No. JDAGBBAR22 submitted to the department in
partial fulfilment for the requirement of BBA (Bachelor of Business
Administration).
Internal Examiner
[1]
DECLARATION
I hereby declare, the project work entitled A STUDY ON JOB
SATISFACTION IN IQRAA INTERNATIONAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE,
MALAPARAMBA for partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award
of the degree of BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, as a
record of original work done by me under the supervision and guidance of
Miss.Nafeeza Masoodha, Lecturer of JDT Islam College of Arts &
science.Vellimadukunnu.. This project work has not formed the basis for
the award of any Degree /Diploma/Associates hip/Fellowship of similar
titles to any Candidate of any university.
Place:
Date:
Ratheesh.D
[2]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
[3]
Ratheesh.D
CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
PARTICULERS
6.1AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS
CHAPTER-1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
10-11
11-13
13-14
15-15
CHAPTER-2
16-18
19-24
25-25
CHAPTER-3
3.1 RESEARCH AND METHODOLOGY
26-27
CHAPTER-4
4.1 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
28-61
62-69
CHAPTER-5
5.1 FINDNGS AND SUGGETIONS
70-72
CHAPTER-6
6.1 CONCLUSION
73-74
6.2 BIBLIOGRAPHY
75-75
6.3 ANNEXURE
76-80
[4]
LIST OF TABLES
SL.N
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
PAGE NO:
29
30
31
32
33
[5]
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
[6]
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
40
41
SL.NO:
68
69
PG.NO
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Chart showing the lightings and other arrangements in the office are
satisfactory of the respondents
36
37
10
11
38
39
12
40
13
41
15
16
14
17
Chart showing we are provided with the rest and lunch room facilities
and they are good of the respondents
[7]
42
43
44
45
18
19
20
Chart showing the parking space for our facilities of the respondents
Chart showing Im satisfied with the first aid facilities of the
respondents.
Chart showing Im satisfied with the loan facilities and other personal
welfare facilities offered by the company of the respondents
46
47
48
21
Chart showing I feel Im paid a fair amount for the work I do of the
respondents
49
22
50
23
51
24
52
25
53
26
54
27
55
28
56
29
Chart showing I love this job and to work in this organization of the
respondents.
57
58
30
31
59
32
60
[8]
33
[9]
61
Chapter -I
INTRODUCTION
[10]
Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
[11]
CO-WORKERS
like to be near their friends. The workers derive satisfaction when the coworkers are helpful, friendly and co-operative.
PAY
Studies also show that most of the workers felt satisfied when they are
paid more adequately to the work performed by them. The relative
important of pay would probably changing factor in job satisfaction or
dissatisfaction.
AGE
Age has also been found to have a direct relationship to level job of
satisfaction of employees. In some groups job satisfaction is higher with
increasing age, in other groups job satisfaction is lower and in other there
is no difference at all.
MARITAL STATUS
Marital status has an important role in deciding the job satisfaction. Most
of the studies have revealed that the married person finds dissatisfaction
in his job than his unmarried counterpart. The reasons stated to be are
that wages were insufficient due to increased cost of living, educations to
children etc.
[12]
EDUCATION
[13]
[14]
[15]
Chapter -2
INDUSTRY PROFILE
[16]
[17]
[18]
Hospital PROFILE
[19]
[20]
and treating those who suffer from myriad diseases .ICU, ICCU, Radiant
Warmer of Photo therapy, computerized Pulmonary function test,
Micrometer, Halter Mentor, Echo Cardiogram-Colour Doppler etc. are
some of this facilities.
[21]
HOSPITAL DEPARTMENTS
General Medicine
General surgery
Genecology
Neurology
Paediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrinology
Dialectology
Dermatology & Venereology
E.N.T
Orthopaedics
Urology
Paediatric Surgery
Plastic & Reconstructive surgery
Ophthalmology
Dental
Psychiatric & De-addiction
Physiotherapy
Anaesthesiology
Medical Social Work
Dialysis Centre
Dietary
[22]
[23]
Potable X-RAY
CLINICAL SERVICES
General Medicine
General surgery
Genecology
Neurology
Paediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrinology
Dialectology
Dermatology & Venereology
E.N.T
Orthopaedics
Urology
Paediatric Surgery
Plastic & Reconstructive surgery
Ophthalmology
Dental
Psychiatric & De-addiction
Physiotherapy
Anaesthesiology
Medical Social Work
Dialysis Centre
Dietary
[24]
ORGANISTAION STRUCTURE
[25]
Chapter -3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
[26]
The research design used for this study is of the descriptive type.
Descriptive research studies are those studies which are concerned with
describing the characteristics of a particular individual or a group..
3.2 Sample size:
The sample size consisting of 100 respondents were selected for the
study.
3.3 Sampling design:
[27]
CHAPTER-4
DATA ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
Chapter IV
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
TABLE NO: 1
[28]
Particulars
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Male
74
74.0
74.0
74.0
Female
26
74.0
74.0
100.0
Total
100
100.0
100.0
CHART NO:1
GENDER
74
80
70
Frequency
60
50
40
26
30
20
10
0
Male
Female
GENDER
TABLE NO: 2
Frequen
cy
Percent
[29]
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
below -Rs.10000
10000-20000
20000-30000
above 30000
Total
45
31
16
8
100
8.0
45.0
31.0
16.0
100.0
8.0
45.0
31.0
16.0
100.0
CHART NO:2
Monthy Income
45
45
40
31
35
Frequency
30
25
16
20
15
10
5
0
below-10000
10000-20000
20000-30000
Above-30000
Monthly Income
TABLE NO:3
Table shows the Educational Qualification the respondents:
[30]
8.0
53.0
84.0
100
Particulars
Frequency
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
P.G
U.G
Total
46
54
100
46.0
54.0
100.0
46.0
54.0
100.0
46.0
100.0
CHART NO:3
Educational Qualification
56
60
46
Frequency
50
40
30
20
10
0
PG
UG
Educational Qualification
TABLE NO;4
[31]
Frequency
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Married
Unmarried
Total
55
45
100
55.0
45.0
100.0
55.0
45.0
100.0
55.0
100.0
CHART NO:4.
Marital Status
55
60
45
Frequency
50
40
30
20
10
0
Married
Unmarried
Marital Status
TABLE NO: 5.
Table shows the years of experience of respondents:
[32]
Particulars
Frequency
Percent
8
27
18
25
22
100
8.0
27.0
18.0
25.0
22.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
8.0
27.0
18.0
25.0
22.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
8.0
34.0
54.0
80.0
100.0
CHART NO:5.
Years of Experience
27
30
25
Frequncy
25
22
18
20
15
10
5
0
Less than
1yrs
1-2yrs
2-3yrs
Years of Experience
[33]
3-4yrs
Above 4yrs
TABLE NO:6
Working hours are convenient for me?
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
34
32
18
13
3
100
34.0
32.0
18.0
13.0
3.0
100
Valid
Percent
34.0
32.0
18.0
13.0
3.0
100
Cumulative
Percent
34.0
66.0
84.0
97.0
100.0
CHART NO:6
32
30
Frequency
25
18
20
13
15
10
5
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above chart and table it is clearly evident that 34% of the
respondents strongly agree that working hours are convenient from them
and 32% agree with that and 18% neither agree nor disagree and
13%disagree with the working hours and 3% are strongly against working
hours.
[34]
TABLE NO:7
I'm happy with my work place?
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
30
39
18
8
5
100
30.0
39.0
18.0
8.0
5.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
30.0
39.0
18.0
8.0
5.0
100.0
CHART NO:7
39
Frequency
40
30
30
18
20
10
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Interpretation:
[35]
Strongly
disagree
Cumulative
Percent
30.0
69.0
87.0
95.0
100.0
From the above table it is clear that 30% respondents strongly agree and
39% respondents agree that they are happy with their work place only
13% disagreed and 18% have no idea towards their work place.
[36]
TABLE NO:8
The lightings and other arrangements with office are satisfactory
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
33
37
18
5
7
100
33.0
37.0
18.0
5.0
7.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
33.0
37.0
18.0
5.0
7.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
33.0
70.0
88.0
93.0
100.0
CHART NO:8
Frequency
40
30
20
10
0
33
37
18
5
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table its is evident that 33% respondents strongly agree
with the lightings and arrangements in the office, 37% agree with that
[37]
and 12% disagree with the lightings and arrangements and 18% have no
idea towards lightings and arrangements.
TABLE NO:9
I feel I have too much work to do?
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
7
9
25
37
22
100
7.0
9.0
25.0
37.0
22.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
7.0
9.0
25.0
37.0
22.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
7.0
16.0
41.0
78.0
100.0
CHART NO:9
40
35
Frequency
30
25
22
25
20
15
7
10
5
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite clear that the work load is not high, 37%
of the respondents disagreed with the question I feel I have too much
[38]
work and another 22% strongly disagreed, 18% admits they have too
much work and 23% have no idea towards this question.
[39]
TABLE NO:10
safety measures provided by the company?
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
28
31
24
11
6
100
28.0
31.0
24.0
11.0
6.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
28.0
31.0
24.0
11.0
6.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
28.0
59.0
83.0
94.0
100.0
CHART NO:10
31
28
30
24
Frequency
25
20
15
11
10
5
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that the safety measures provided by
the organizations are good as 28 and 31% of the respondents agree with
that and only 11& 6% disagreed and 24% neither agreed nor disagreed.
[40]
[41]
TABLE NO:11
My relationship with my supervisor is cordial?
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
30
41
16
6
7
100
30.0
41.0
16.0
6.0
7.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
30.0
41.0
16.0
6.0
7.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
30.0
71.0
87.0
93.0
100.0
CHART NO:11
Frequency
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
41
30
16
6
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that relationship between employees and
their supervisors are cordial because 30% of respondents strongly agreed
[42]
Frequency
Percent
18
30
15
19
18
100
18.0
30.0
15.0
19.0
18.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
18.0
30.0
15.0
19.0
18.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
18.0
48.0
63.0
82.0
100.0
CHART NO:12
Frequency
25
19
18
20
18
15
15
10
5
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that the supervisors are not partial to
the employees as 18% strongly agreed and 30% agreed to the question
[43]
but 19% disagreed and 18% strongly disagreed this level is quite high
compared to other questions
[44]
TABLE NO:13
My supervisor considers my idea too while taking decision
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
26
43
26
22
33
100
26.0
43.0
26.0
22.0
33.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
26.0
43.0
26.0
22.0
33.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
26.0
69.0
95.0
97.0
100.0
CHART NO:13
My supervisor considers my idea too while taking
decision
Frequency
43
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
33
26
26
22
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 26 and 42% of the respondents agree
that supervisors consider their employees ideas also and only 5%
disagreed and 26% neither agreed nor disagreed.
[45]
TABLE NO: 14
I'm satisfied with the support from my co-workers
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
21
47
16
9
7
100
21.0
47.0
16.0
9.0
7.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
21.0
47.0
16.0
9.0
7.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
21.0
68.0
84.0
93.0
100.0
CHART NO: 14
I'm satisfied with the support from my co-workers
Frequency
47
50
40
30
20
10
0
21
Strongly
agree
16
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that relation with co-workers is quite good
as nearly 68% of the respondents agree that they are satisfied with
support from co-workers and only 15% disagreed and 16% have no
answer to this.
[46]
[47]
TABLE NO:15
Table showing People here have concern over one another and tend to help one
Another of the respondents?
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
26
41
19
9
5
100
26.0
41.0
19.0
9.0
5.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
26.0
41.0
19.0
9.0
5.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
26.0
67.0
86.0
95.0
100.0
CHART NO:15
Table showing People here have concern over one
another and tend to help one Another
50
41
Frequency
40
26
30
19
20
10
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Table showing People here have concern over one another and tend to help
oneAnother
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that in this organization people have
concern over each other as 26% strongly agreed and 41% agreedand only
14% disagreed and 19% neither agreed nor disagreed.
[48]
TABLE NO: 16
I'm satisfied with the refreshment facilities?
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
9
20
30
26
15
100
9.0
20.0
30.0
26.0
15.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
9.0
20.0
30.0
26.0
15.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
9.0
29.0
59.0
85.0
100.0
CHART NO:16
26
25
20
Frequency
20
15
15
9
10
5
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that the employees are not satisfied with
the refreshment facilities offered by the company as 26% of respondents
disagreed and 15% strongly disagreed and 30% neither agreed nor
disagreed and only 29% agreed.
[49]
TABLE NO:17
We are provided with the rest and lunch room and they are good
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
8
16
22
34
20
100
8.0
16.0
22.0
34.0
20.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
8.0
16.0
22.0
34.0
20.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
8.0
24.0
46.0
80.0
100.0
CHART NO:18
We are provided with the rest and lunch room and they
are good
34
35
Frequency
30
22
25
20
16
20
15
10
5
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
We are provided with the rest and lunch room and they are good
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite evident that 24% strongly disagreed and
30% of the respondents disagreed and 22% neither agreed nor disagreed
and only 24% of the respondents are satisfied with the rest and lunch
room provided.
[50]
TABLE NO:18
The parking space for our vehicles are satisfactory?
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
32
24
31
4
9
100
32.0
24.0
31.0
4.0
9.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
32.0
24.0
31.0
4.0
9.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
32.0
37.0
57.0
69.0
100.0
CHART NO:18
The parking space for our vehicles are satisfactory
32
35
31
30
24
Frequency
25
20
15
9
10
4
5
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that respondents are not satisfied with the
parking facilities provided by the company as 31% of respondents strongly
[51]
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
31
31
21
12
5
100
31.0
31.0
21.0
12.0
5.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
31.0
31.0
21.0
12.0
5.0
100.0
CHART NO:19
I'm satisfied with the first aid facilities
35
31
31
30
Frequency
25
21
20
12
15
10
5
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Interpretation:
[52]
Strongly
disagree
Cumulativ
e
Percent
31.0
62.0
83.0
95.0
100.0
From the above table it is clear that employees are not satisfied with the
first aid facilities as more than 52% ( 31% disagree and 21% strongly
disagree) disagreed and only 17% agreed and 31% of respondents neither
agreed nor disagreed.
TABLE NO:20
Satisfied with the loan facilities and other personal welfare faclities
offered by the organisation.
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
7
12
30
34
17
100
7.0
12.0
30.0
34.0
17.0
100.0
Cumulativ
e
Percent
7.0
19.0
49.0
83.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
7.0
12.0
30.0
34.0
17.0
100.0
CHART NO;20
Satisfied with the loan facilities and other personal welfare faclities
34
35
30
30
Frequency
25
17
20
12
15
7
10
5
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Satisfied with the loan facilities and other personal welfare faclities
Interpretation:
[53]
From the above table it is quite clear that respondents are not satisfied
with the loan facilities offered by the organization as 34% of respondents
disagree and 17% of respondents strongly disagree 30% of respondents
neither agree nor disagree and only 19% are satisfied with the loan
facilities.
TABLE NO:21
I fell I'm paid a fair amount for the work I do
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Percen
t
15
15.0
15.0
39
39.0
39.0
25
25.0
25.0
13
13.0
13.0
8
8.0
8.0
100
100.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
15.0
54.0
79.0
92.0
100.0
CHART NO:21
I fell I'm paid a fair amount for the work i do
Frequency
39
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
25
15
13
8
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Interpretation:
[54]
Strongly
disagree
From the above table it is evident that the respondents are satisfied with
their salary as 39% agree and 15% strongly agree. Only `3% disagree and
8% strongly disagree, 25% neither agree nor disagree.
[55]
TABLE NO:22
I'm satisfied with the chances for my promotion
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
27
43
13
9
8
100
27.0
43.0
13.0
9.0
8.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
27.0
43.0
13.0
9.0
8.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
27.0
70.0
83.0
92.0
100.0
CHART NO:22
I'm satisfied with the chances for my promotion
43
50
Frequency
40
30
27
13
20
10
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite clear that employees are satisfied with
their chances for promotion as 43% agree and 27% strongly agree. Only
9% disagree and 8% strongly disagree, 13% neither agree nor disagree.
[56]
TABLE NO:23
The salary we receive are good as other organizations offer pay to their
employees
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
27
37
26
6
4
100
27.0
37.0
26.0
6.0
4.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
27.0
37.0
26.0
6.0
4.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
27.0
64.0
90.0
96.0
100.0
CHART NO:23
Frequency
37
27
26
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
The salary we receive are good as other organizations offer pay to their
employees
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite clear that the salary in this organization is
at par to the industry as 37% agree and 27% strongly agree. Only 6%
disagree and 4% strongly disagree, 26% neither agree nor disagree.
[57]
TABLE NO:24
I'm satisfied with the allowances provided by the organization
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
19
42
21
11
7
100
19.0
42.0
21.0
11.0
7.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
19.0
42.0
21.0
11.0
7.0
100.0
Cumulat
ive
Percent
19.0
61.0
82.0
93.0
100.0
CHART NO:24
45
40
35
Frequency
30
25
21
19
20
11
15
10
5
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree
nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that the employees are satisfied with the
allowances and other benefits provided by the organization as 42% agree
and 19% strongly agree. Only 11% disagree and 7% strongly disagree, 21%
neither agree nor disagree.
[58]
TABLE NO:25
I feel my boss motivate me to achieve the organizational goals
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
11
33
25
22
9
100
11.0
33.0
25.0
22.0
9.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
11.0
33.0
25.0
22.0
9.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
11.0
44.0
69.0
91.0
100.0
CHART NO:25
35
Frequency
30
25
25
22
20
15
11
10
5
0
Strongly
Agree
Neither agree
Disagree
Strongly
agree
nor Disagree
disagree
I feel my boss motivate me to achieve the organizational goals
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that employees boss are motivating to
achieve organizational goals as 33% agree and 11% strongly agree. 22%
[59]
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
18
44
18
13
7
100
18.0
44.0
18.0
13.0
7.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
18.0
44.0
18.0
13.0
7.0
100.0
Cumulativ
e
Percent
18.0
62.0
80.0
93.0
100.0
CHART NO:26
Frequency
50
40
30
18
18
20
13
7
10
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
[60]
From the above table it is evident that employees boss motivates the
employee when he is unproductive and help him to be productive as 44%
agree and 18% strongly agree. Only 7% strongly disagree and 7%disagree,
18% neither agree nor disagree.
TABLE NO:27
Communication seems good within this organization
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
26
39
17
10
8
100
26.0
39.0
17.0
10.0
8..0
100.0
Valid
Percent
26.0
39.0
17.0
10.0
8.0
100.0
CHART NO:27
Communication seems good within this organization
39
40
35
Frequency
30
26
25
17
20
15
10
10
5
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
[61]
Cumulative
Percent
26.0
65.0
82.0
92.0
100.0
From the above table it is clear that communication seems good in this
organization as 39% agree and 26% strongly agree. Only 10% disagree and
8% strongly disagree. 17% neither agree nor disagree.
[62]
TABLE NO: 28
Work assignments are explained clearly to me
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
17
41
15
17
10
100
17.0
41.0
15.0
17.0
10.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
17.0
41.0
15.0
17.0
10.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
17.0
58.0
73.0
90.0
100.0
CHART NO: 28
Work assignments are explained clearly to me
Frequency
50
41
40
30
17
15
20
17
10
10
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that respondents are quite happy with
the way work assignments are explained as 41% agree and 17% strongly
agree. Only 10% strongly disagree and 17% agree, 15% neither agree nor
disagree.
[63]
TABLE NO: 29
I love my job and to work in this organization
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
19
38
20
14
9
100
19.0
38.0
20.0
14.0
9.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
19.0
38.0
20.0
14.0
9.0
100.0
Cumulativ
e
Percent
19.0
57.0
77.0
91.0
100.0
CHART NO: 29
I love my job and to work in this organization
38
Frequency
40
30
20
19
20
14
10
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that employees love their job as 38%
agree for this question and 19% strongly agree. Only 9% strongly disagree
and 14% disagree, 20% neither agree nor disagree.
[64]
TABLE NO:30
My work life is meaningful
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
25
40
16
7
12
100
25.0
40.0
16.0
7.0
12.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
25.0
40.0
16.0
7.0
12.0
100.0
Cumulativ
e
Percent
25.0
65.0
81.0
88.0
100.0
CHART NO:30
Frequency
40
30
25
16
20
10
12
0
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that respondents feel that their job is
meaningful for them as 40% agree and 25% strongly agree. Only 7%
disagree and 12% strongly disagree, 16% neither agree nor disagree
[65]
TABLE NO:31
I consider that my work is valuable in attaining my organizational goals
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
25
47
12
7
9
100
25.0
47.0
12.0
7.0
9.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
25.0
47.0
12.0
7.0
9.0
100.0
Cumulativ
e
Percent
25.0
72.0
84.0
91.0
100.0
CHART NO:31
Frequency
47
50
40
30
20
10
0
25
12
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
7
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite clear that most respondents feel that
their job is contributing for organizational goals as 47% agree and 25%
strongly disagree. Only 9% strongly disagree and 7% disagree, 12% neither
agree nor disagree.
[66]
TABLE NO:32
I have adequate opportunity to use my ability
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
12
30
24
21
13
100
12.0
30.0
24.0
21.0
13.0
100.0
Valid
Percent
12.0
30.0
24.0
21.0
13.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
12.0
42.0
66.0
87.0
100.0
CHART NO:32
I have adequate opportunity to use my ability
Frequency
30
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
24
21
13
12
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite clear that respondents have adequate
opportunity to use their ability as 30% agree and 12% disagree Only 13%
strongly disagree and 21% disagree and 24% neither agree nor disagree.
[67]
[68]
TABLE NO: 33
Overall I'm satisfied with my job
Particulars
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Total
Frequency
Percent
Valid
Percent
21
50
15
12
2
100
21.0
50.0
15.0
12.0
2.0
100.0
21.0
50.0
15.0
12.0
2.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
21.0
71.0
86.0
98.0
100.0
CHART NO:33
50
50
40
30
20
10
0
21
15
12
2
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
agree nor
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Interpretation:-
[69]
H0:
Between Groups
Within Groups
TOTAL
Sum of
Squares
Degree of
Freedom
Mena Square
.591
.148
30.168
95
.318
30.758
F Ratio
Significant
.465
.761
99
Interpretation:
Since the significant difference is greater than 0.05 accept null hypothesis
and reject alternate hypothesis which says, there is no significant
inference among respondents of various experience with respect to
environment and nature of work.
[70]
H0:
Table No: 35
Relationship with supervisors and colleagues:
ANOVA
Source of Variation
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
1.199
Within Groups
22.376
TOTAL
Degree of
Freedom
Mena
Square
.300
95
23.576
F Ratio
Significant
1.273
286
.236
99
Interpretation:
Since the significant difference is greater than 0.05 accept null hypothesis
and reject alternate hypothesis which says, there is no significant
difference among respondents of various experience with respect to
Relationship with supervisors and colleagues.
[71]
H0:
There is no significant difference among respondents of various
experience groups with regard to the factor Welfare facilities.
H1:
There is significant difference among respondents of various experience
groups with regard to the factor Welfare facilities
Table No: 36
Welfare facilities
ANOVA
Source of Variation
Sum of Squares
Degree of
Freedom
Mena
Square
Between Groups
1.741
.435
Within Groups
TOTAL
28.699
95
30.440
99
F Ratio
Significant
1.441
.227
.302
Interpretation:
Since the significant difference is greater than 0.05 accept null hypothesis
and reject alternate hypothesis which says, there is no significant
difference among respondents of various experience with respect to
welfare facilities.
[72]
H0:
Sum of Squares
Degree of
Freedom
Mena
Square
Between Groups
3.148
.787
Within Groups
35.017
95
.369
38.165
99
TOTAL
F Ratio
Significant
2.135
.082
Interpretation:
Since the significant difference is greater than 0.05 accept null hypothesis
and reject alternate hypothesis which says, there is no significant
difference among respondents of various experience with respect to Pay
and promotion.
[73]
[74]
H0:
There is no significant difference among respondents of various
experience groups with regard to the factor Communication and
Motivation.
H1:
There is significant difference among respondents of various experience
groups with regard to the factor Communication and Motivation.
Table No: 38
Communication and Motivation
ANOVA
Source of Variation
Sum of Squares
Degree of
Freedom
Mena
Square
Between Groups
937
.234
Within Groups
TOTAL
34.100
95
35.037
99
F Ratio
Significant
.652
.627
.234
Interpretation:
Since the significant difference is greater than 0.05 accept null hypothesis
and reject alternate hypothesis which says, there is no significant
difference among respondents of various experience with respect to
communication and motivation.
[75]
H0:
There is no significant difference among respondents of various
experience groups with regard to Job Factors.
H1:
There is significant difference among respondents of various experience
groups with regard to Job Factors.
Table No: 39
ANOVA
Job factor
Source of Variation
Sum of Squares
Degree of
Freedom
Mena
Square
Between Groups
1.437
.359
Within Groups
39.360
95
.414
40.798
99
TOTAL
F Ratio
Significant
.867
.487
Interpretation:
Since the significant difference is greater than 0.05 accept null hypothesis
and reject alternate hypothesis which says, there is no significant
difference among respondents of various experience with respect to Job
factors
[76]
[77]
H0:
There is no significant difference among respondents of various Age
groups with regard to Job Factors.
H1:
There is significant difference among respondents of various Age groups
with regard to Job Factors.
Table No: 40
ANOVA
Job factor
Source of Variation
Sum of Squares
Degree of
Freedom
Mena
Square
Between Groups
.007
.004
Within Groups
40.790
97
.421
40.798
99
TOTAL
F Ratio
Significant
.009
.991
Interpretation:
Since the significant difference is greater than 0.05 accept null hypothesis
and reject alternate hypothesis which says, there is no significant
difference among respondents of various age groups with respect to Job
factors.
[78]
H0:
There is no significant difference among respondents of various genders
with regard to Job Factors.
H1:
There is significant difference among respondents of various genders with
regard to Job Factors.
Table No: 41
ANOVA
Job factor
Source of Variation
Sum of
Squares
Degree of
Freedom
Mena
Square
Between Groups
.036
.036
Within Groups
40.762
98
.416
40.798
99
TOTAL
F Ratio
Significant
.086
.770
Interpretation:
Since the significant difference is greater than 0.05 accept null hypothesis
and reject alternate hypothesis which says, there is no significant
difference among respondents of various genders with respect to Job
factors.
[79]
[80]
CHAPTER- 5
FINDINGS
&
SUGGESTIONS
[81]
CHAPTER- V
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std.
Deviation
100
1.40
4.20
2.4960
.55740
100
1.00
3.80
2.3620
.48799
Welfare facilities
100
2.00
4.60
3.4600
.55450
100
1.00
4.00
2.3900
.62089
100
1.25
4.00
2.5725
.59490
Job factors
100
1.20
4.40
2.5400
.56174
Particulars
5.1 Findings
The descriptive statistics table helps us to derive satisfaction level of Employees on
various factors:
The respondents are satisfied with the environment and nature of work
Factors as their mean value is near to 2.50
The respondents relationship with the superiors and colleagues are quite good
as their mean value is 2.36 is an agreeable level.
The Respondents are not provided with proper welfare facilities thats the
reason the mean value is quite high at 3.46 levels which is disagree level.
The Pay and promotion activities in this organization is also good as their mean
value is 2.4
[82]
The Respondents are overall satisfied with their job as their mean value is 2.54
which is an agreeable level.
The Parking facilities provided by the organization are not good thats why
most respondents disagree with this question.
The refreshment facilities are also need to be improved because most of the
employees are dissatisfied on this factor.
The Rest room facilities in the hospital are not good and they are not satisfied
with the lunch facilities
5.2 Suggestions:
From my two months of project experience in IQQRA Hospital, I would
like to give the following suggestions.
Respondents are not satisfied with the parking facilities provided
by the hospital authority, so the hospital management takes this
into consideration
Respondents are not satisfied with the available refreshment
facilities in the hospital, so the authority also looks into this
seriously
The employees are strongly disagreeing with their present rest
room facilities in the hospital. The hospital management takes this
into account for better productivity of the employees
Hospital should give more important to Research & development
Conduct work evaluation of employees monthly, quarterly or
yearly.
Make a chance to employees to express their views, ideas and
problem facing in working area
Provide motivation, training and value added services for improve
the productivity and efficiency of the employees.
[83]
CHAPTER-6
CONCLUSION
[84]
CONCLUSION
Job Satisfaction is the favorableness or un-favorableness with which the
employee views his work. It expresses the amount of agreement between
ones expectation of the job and the rewards that the job provides. Job
Satisfaction is a part of life satisfaction. The nature of ones environment
of job is an important part of life as Job Satisfaction influences ones
general life satisfaction.
Within short span of time the IQQRA Hospital has achieved a well position
in Calicut District as well as in Kerala with its distinguishable services . It
sure that the in future the hospital management will find out a good
[85]
solution for the problem which I have mentioned above. I wish every
success to the hospital
[86]
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Text Books:
Job satisfaction
Robert Hoppock
Linda Evans
Suresh Srivastva
Organization Behavior
Fred Luthans
American College
Administration
Hospital Administration
Websites:
www.humanlinks.com
www.wikipedia.org
[87]
ANNEXURE
Questionnaire
A study on Job Satisfaction of Employees in
IQRA INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL
I am Mr.Ratheesh.D, student of JDT Islam College of Arts & Science, Vellimadukunnu.As part of
my academic course curriculum of BBA, I am doing this project.
It is observed that the overall JOB SATISFACTION of this organisation and to helps the managers
in their planning and decision making process. Here I have made an attempt by designing the
following survey questionnaire.
This survey should take approximately 10 minutes of your time to complete. Please respond
candidly to the questions. Confidentiality of your opinions / views would be maintained.
Thank you, in advance, for your time and participation. Inspite of your busy schedule.
wherever applicable)
1. Name:
2. Age:
3. Gender:
Male
Female
5. Department: ...............................................................................
4. Monthly Income:
Below Rest. 10,000
Above 30,000
10,000- 20000
20,000-30000
5. Education Qualification:
Under Graduation
Post Graduation
6. Marital Status:
Married
Unmarried
7. Years of experience:
Less than 1 year
years
1-2 years
2-3 years
[88]
3-4 years
above
S.No
Particulars
2
3
4
5
Agree
Neither
agree
nor
disagree
Disagree
Neither
agree
nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Particulars
Strongly
agree
10
11
[89]
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
Welfare Facilities
Strongly
agree
Sl.No
Particulars
12
13
14
15
16
Agree
Neither
agree nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
S. No
Particulars
17
18
19
20
[90]
Agree
Neither
agree nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
22
23
24
25
Strongly
agree
Particulars
Agree
Neither
agree
nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Job factors:
Sl.No
26
27
28
29
30
Strongly
agree
Particulars
I love my job and to work in this
organization
My work life is meaningful
I consider that my work is valuable in
attaining my organizational goals
I have adequate opportunity to use
my
ability
Overall, Im satisfied with my job
[91]
Agree
Neither
agree
nor
disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Particulars
Career Opportunity
Compensation
Reward
Leadership
Communication Gap
Comment
Date: .............................
Signature
Place: ............................
[92]