Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES WITH SAVINO & MILLER, WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECT 0 FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FL JULY 2005
IMPROVING SOUTH POINTE PARK BODR basis of design report
HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES WITH SAVINO & MILLER, WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECT 1 FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FL JULY 2005
Acknowledgements
1.0 What are the planning tasks? 9 6.0 What impacts might the changes cause? 81
Purpose, scope & team Positive impacts - improved systems
Boundaries people & pet interaction
Planning process servicing & safety access
comfort & conveniences
2.0 What makes up the place? 15 signage, interpretation & art
Existing spaces & facilities planting & habitat
People & park users energy & lighting
3.0 How does the place work? 21 Negative impacts - mitigation
Visitation
7.0 Which changes should be made? 89
Changes over time
Recommended improvements
4.0 Does the place work well? 29 Implementation strategy
Park user satisfaction Funding
Park differentiation Compliance & Approvals
Layout issues Schedule
IMPROVE IMPROVE
mejore mejore
PARKS
parques
inputs communities
materials
information
waves
spaces within
does the place work
well? rain
materials & facilities
P $
how might it be sun
revenue
changed? living resources energy
In its negative aspect, park’s outputs are the litter, waste, Finally, one of the most important inputs to parks are the
traffic, and crime that come with popular civic places. people who use them. The most successful, vibrant parks
Unfortunately, park design cannot solve all social problems, are used by a diversity of people at all times of day.
but can minimize or deter negative outputs. For example,
open sight lines and generously sized paths can both Why do we study park outputs and inputs? To prioritize the
provide a comfortable pedestrian experience and support needs of this specific place, conditions, and people. For
police cars for occasional patrolling. South Pointe Park, there were several issues that emerged
during the planning process that helped the Consultant team
All of this comes with an economic cost, another negative understand and balance the input and output factors. These
output. Park development costs depend on design goals to are discussed more specifically in the 10 Improvement
be met and budget allowances. Ongoing maintenance and Projects Section of this Report.
services after park design is essential for a park’s success,
F M A M J J
kick off site visioning community community draft BODR final BODR
visit concepts design design report report
what parts make up the workshop 1 workshop 2
place?
what processes are at
adapt
work?
does the place work
well?
review
study
how might it be
changed?
what impacts might the
changes cause? act
av.
2 acres added apogee
n
ingto
portofino
P public parking-
wash
115 spaces
boat continuum
restaurant basin lawn
P
P restaurant parking-105 spaces
lawn dune
additional
maintenance storage public park
shelter
grove
restrooms beach
fishing pier
fisher
island
city resident -
1. City of Miami Beach Market Study 2002 fulltime mexican
cuban
2. opinion of how many people in the world 0% city resident - 1% white
13%
see an image out of city resident seasonal 27%
staying nights 0% puerto rican
3. estimate 420,000 people / yr 3% black or african
4. estimate 250 people/day 23%
other hispanic or american
5. 30% of units in portofino, continuum, latino 3%
american
murano /day from (1) 18% Indian/alaska native
6. 50% of Port of Miami 2003 passengers asian 0%
7. estimate 35 cars/day at Washington Ave. 1%
out of city resident hispanic or latino(of
terminus
on day trip any race)
8. US Census 2000 77% 34%
Day to Day Park Users. People come to the Park alone, with
family or friends, and with their pets. This is the largest user
group whose needs are the primary focus of improvement
projects here.
walking to beach is
South Pointe Park user activities rank (3) Biscayne Bay resident user activates rank (2)
mostly a weekend &
holiday activity Walking to Beach 1 Viewing the Bay while walking, dining 1
Walking the Cut 2 Swimming 2
Eating out / dining out 3 Fishing 3
other activities are both Bicycling 4 Boating for pleasure / partying 4
weekend & weekday Walking with dog 5 Sailing 5
Walking with stroller 6 Picnicking on Bay 6
Sitting & viewing ships 7 Snorkeling 7
the park is very social- Jogging/running 8 Scuba diving 8
over 90% of people are Blading 9 Sunset cruise 9
Blading with dog 10 Canoeing / Kayaking 10
with other people or pets Quinceaneras 11 Windsurfing 11
Sitting & reading 12 Personal watercraft boating 12
missing activities & Sleeping in shade 12
Personal watercraft boating 12
programs (eg. kids play, Cooking out 12
small events) Skateboarding 12
Picnicking 12
Photography 12
viewing ships & Fishing 12
quinceaneras is unique Swimming (not permitted) 12
Segwaying 12
(2) Intercept survey of residents winter 2004, Biscayne Bay Economic Study Task 2 Report
(3) Observations president's day weekend 2005
Government Cut’s currents are too swift for access directly into
the water. Therefore water sports here such as swimming,
kayaking and surfing are unsafe and discouraged.
25000
visitation will increase
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
There are few civic events held here. Of those occurring here,
they tend to be small in size and do not effect overall visitation
numbers.
av.
running
n
apogee
ingto
service deliveries & portofino
wash
maintenance crews bay
P P continuum
morning dog walking lawn
P
restaurant lunching dune
lawn
shelter
lunch time visits grove
beach
afternoon dog walking
afternoon running gov
jetty
ern
me
sunset photography nt c
ut
pier
fishing
restaurant dining fisher
island
park closes
IMPROVING SOUTH POINTE PARK BODR basis of design report
HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES WITH SAVINO & MILLER, WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECT 25 FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FL JULY 2005
visitation: weekend patterns
P
murano av.
n biscayne st Weekday parking control
apogee
ingto
bay P
parking in offsite and
P continuum walking through park to
lawn
P beach
fisher
island
1902 Government Cut dredging to 18’ 1914 first streets laid out
project authorized by Federal 1915 Town of Miami Beach
Government incorporated
adapted from CABE Space Manifesto for Better Public Spaces 2004 ranked park issues
f flamingo
-is rec. park more cultural
-is neighborhood
sports complex
-is more “active”
botanic garden
l lummus f
plaza
-is tourist show park
-is beach higher central park
lower
use use
-is “fun” l s
per acre pocket park per acre
s south pointe urban wild
av.n
2.under used path apogee
ingto
portofino 2
wash
3.boat basin unstable
bay
3 1 continuum
4.low rise neighbors 5 6
4
5.dog off leashing
6 dune
6.barriers 7
11 8 6
7.berm camp beach
av.n
2. connect walks apogee
“residential”
ingto
2 portofino
wash
3. phased add on bay
3 6 2 continuum
4. leave some lawns
1 “bay” 5
10
5. remove barriers
5 2 dune
6. mid park walk & patrol 7 4 8
5 1 “beach”
7. upgrade “cut” walk 9 beach
1 “cut”
8. consolidate new
jetty
building program gov
ern
me
nt c
9. add missing program ut 11
pier
10. mitigate current
parking (no extra) fisher
island
11. address pier
IMPROVING SOUTH POINTE PARK BODR basis of design report
HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES WITH SAVINO & MILLER, WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECT 35 FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FL JULY 2005
Layout Strategy: Planning Principles
The adjacent diagram shows the principles for Park planning
concepts.
1. Respond to frontages. The frontages to Biscayne Bay,
Atlantic Ocean, and Government Cut makes this Park
unique and special and should be acknowledged.
2. Connect walks. The connections between Washington
Ave, Ocean Drive, Bay Walk and Beach Walk should be
strengthened.
3. Phased add on. Include Alaska parcel in a seamless way
to existing Park places.
4. Leave some lawns. Lawns are popular for passive uses
and should remain.
5. Remove barriers. The existing maintenance building and
berm should be removed to open up and unify the Park.
6. Mid park walk & patrol. Access to the Park’s center is
limited today and should be provided for access by people
and patrolling.
7. Upgrade “cut” walk. The experience at Government Cut is
the most exciting in the Park and should be celebrated in a
more inviting, unique manner.
8. Consolidate new building program. A new building
should re-image the building uses so it can be seen as a
community-wide amenity.
9. Add missing program. Playgrounds, diversified
plantings, community rooms, and plazas should expand
the uses and users in this area of the Park.
10. Mitigate current parking (no extra). The parking should
be reorganized to minimize its visual and circulation
impacts.
11. Address pier. Park modifications should allow for future
use of the pier.
av.n
1.bay inlet apogee
ingto
5 portofino
wash
2.palm lawns bay
9
1 continuum
3.tropical garden lots 3 5
6 2
4. dune fields
8
B 7 dune
Frameworks & Features 2 4
5.mid park walks 5 beach
9.washington av.
fisher
10.pier island
Spaces
1. Bay Inlet: Alaska parcel addition affords the opportunity to
create stronger conceptual and physical orientation to
Biscayne Bay.
2. Palm Lawns: Wide-open, flat lawns dotted with palm trees
will provide shade and indicate that large events would not
occur here.
3. Tropical Garden Lots: Garden areas will screen and
reorganize parking lots.
4. Dune Fields: a landscape here should connect
conceptually and visually to the adjacent beach.
regional materials
Potential Program
• 2000’ long; 20’ wide elevated pathway (12’ for wheeled
recreation and service vehicles)
• Maximum 18” high seat wall
• Benches, trash receptacles
• Trees and lawn areas
• ADA accessible with sloping walks
• Special Light Beacons, lighting
• New Irrigation system
Potential Materials
Materials should be upgraded and richer to South Pointe Park’s
other materials. These should reflect the regional pallet and be
durable and well detailed. Hardscape materials could be
Florida Limestone or other stone, colored concrete imbedded
with sea shells, or precast concrete pavers similar to the Beach
Walk. Furnishings should be comfortable, durable, and able to
withstand salt- i.e. appropriate metal and/or wood. It could be a
variation of the other Park furnishings because of its intention
to be a special feature. Lighting should be durable and
innocuous so that the Beacon lighting is featured. Plant
materials should be salt and wind tolerant.
existing proposed
appropriate width
special lighting
sidewalk table
congestion
existing proposed
boat basin
creating an inlet
Potential Program
• Pathways for direct access to other areas
• Open lawn areas
• Informal palm tree plantings
• Trash receptacles/ dog trash bag dispenser
• Formal and informal tree plantings
• Pedestrian lighting
• New Irrigation system
strong connection to
ocean drive
existing proposed
beach goers
shortcutting
New Pathways
Continuum
Operations
Parking near the beach is a premium in Miami Beach. At
South Pointe Park, the need for parking is exasperated on
the weekends, when people flock to the beach. Frustration
can occur on the part of the users wanting parking when
they see available parking spaces that they cannot use
because of the restaurant parking allowances. Weekend
parking management should clarify parking rules and
availability so that frustrations are minimized.
Native Dunes
In true native plant areas in the Miami region, dune plantings
mingle with scrub plants to form a rich mosaic of beach flora.
This exists somewhat in Miami Beach at the linear dune that
parallels the Atlantic Ocean. A greater species and landform
diversity could be achieved at South Pointe Park with the
creation of the native dune fields. Here, undulating landforms
could represent the shifting pattern of native dunes, revealing
the ecological processes in a manner appropriate for a
manmade park.
Potential Program
• Crushed coquina (coral shells) pathways
• Native dune plantings
• Temporary Irrigation system until landscape is established
• Interpretive/ educational signage
Potential Materials
Because of the ecological sensitivity of this area, walks should
be constructed of crushed coquina. There should be no lighting
due to the turtle nesting nearby. Benches should be minimal for
the least noise pollution.
existing proposed
lack of ecological
diversity
aged, underutilized
picnic area
existing proposed
typical proposed
Potential Program
• Benches and seating
• Park entry elements at Washington Ave- drinking fountain,
informational signage, Trash receptacles/ dog waste bag
dispenser
• Formal tree plantings
• Gardens and lawns
• Pedestrian lighting
• New Irrigation system
• A new gateway sign to replace the existing one
Potential Materials
A hardscape pattern of special materials used elsewhere-
stone, colored concrete imbedded with sea shells, or precast
concrete pavers- would add richness and sense of quality to
this space.
existing proposed
gateway enhancement
needed to provide better
sense of park entry
1. 2.
3.
-more berms
IMPROVING SOUTH POINTE PARK BODR basis of design report
HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES WITH SAVINO & MILLER, WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECT 80 FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FL JULY 2005
WHAT IMPACTS MIGHT THE CHANGES
6.0 CAUSE?
positive impacts – improved systems
and center
Restrooms
Signage, interpretation
and art Informational signage
Interpretive opportunities
integrate with park elements
Integrated art
Gateway sign
utilize park’s physical assets
in ecological/ sustainability
expressions
Solar Power
Native Dune
funding Funding:
Total project budget for South Pointe Park is currently $10.2
million. $5 million dollars of this was the result of the 2004
compliance & approvals County G.O. Bond referendum. Of the total amount, the
targeted construction budget is approximately $8.8 million
including construction contingency and mobilization.
schedule
At the request of the City, the Consultant Team was asked
to proceed with design refinement and approvals for the
Recommended Plan. This scheme most satisfied the needs
and desires of the community and City alike. The
construction budget for this scheme is estimated at $10.2
million.
Schedule:
The project schedule is not known at this time. Listed below are
the steps that would be taken for implementation of South
Pointe Park Improvements.
Action:
1. Obtain additional funding
2. Additional agency approval
3. Design documentation:
4. Bidding/ Award
5. Construction
6. Park Opens
33. Be aware of the sea turtle issues when designing the lighting effects.
34. The parking at this park is also to accommodate residents outside of Miami Beach. The county has contributed funds for the
parking here.
35.There should be no “no dog” policies in the park
We should find ways to accommodate both dog and non-dog user groups.
36.The outdoor dining at the cut walk intrudes on the walkway. How will this be addressed?
The outdoor dining is allowed under an ordinance similar to Ocean Drive. The ordinance needs to be enforced here.
37.Can the extension of Washington drive be eliminated? It currently doesn’t read as a park entrance.
The design team and city will look into it.
38.Can the rip rap edge be eliminated or beautified?
It is under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers and is unlikely.
39.The lighting concept is interesting. Don’t scale it down when it gets implemented.
Our intention with the plan is to fully fund the improvement parts and do them well.
40.Maintenance will really need to be thought through as the city does not currently maintain the park well now. Many lights are
not working even after several calls to the city. The design needs to be “tank proof.”
41. Are there opportunities to use renewable solar energy?
There will likely be that opportunities in the lights and pavilion building.
Summary:
The presentation was generally well received by the community. The approximately 1 1/2 hour dialogue session following the
presentation provided a great deal of focused, useful information for the design team and city. There was a general consensus
that the design approach was on track with the community’s needs and desires for South Pointe Park. When asked about the
pier, the community felt that the proposed configuration was good and that they did not want the pier demolished completely.
The Design Team and City will refine, clarify, or revise the plan in the following areas for presentation at CDW #2.
• Entrance at Washington Avenue and Ocean Drive- How can it be improved as a “gateway” to Park?
• Dunes- What does it look like? What uses and programming can occur here?
• Parking lot- Can reconfiguration be prioritized? Can it be operated to avert unlawful activities? Can planting buffer the parking
lot from the park?
• Cut walk at the restaurant- clarify the relationship between the public area and the restaurant’s private uses.
• Art/ lighting experience- provide more examples of how that will be experienced.
• Bay Inlet – What does it look like; how will people and other wildlife use &enjoy it?
A question and answer period followed. The list below is a summary of each comment from attendees. The responses by the
consultant and/or city representative, when offered, are in italics. Following this list is a summary of actions that the design team
and city will be studying in response to this meeting.
1. Will level of the bay walk be the same on both sides?
The walk will be raised about 18”, and level on both sides. You will be able to sit in both edges of the walk.
2. The cost of the cutwalk at $2million seems costly. If it were redesigned to 12’ instead of the 20’ width, that money could be
used to fund other improvements.
We have provided a 12’ wide travel lane in the proposed cut walk, within the 20’ total width. We have found that 20’ is a national
standard for major walks like these. The 8’ extra is a ‘slow lane’ so that walkers can stand aside from wheeled users. Regarding
cost, this is the one location where finishes greater than standard concrete is used. Design team will look at options between 12’
and 20’.
3. Regarding dogs in the park, this is as much a people issue as it is a dog issue. There are a number of responsible dog owners
here. There is also a lot of area in the park where it is an informal off area leash now. Access to the water is important as is a
piece of the beach. I think we should accommodate both a restricted area and an off leash area.
We need to study further the options for accommodating dogs and other park users. At the last public meeting, there was only
one ‘dog’ comment mentioned. We related our view that small enclosures are not the solution and it seemed to satisfy the
attendees.
4. It is good that you have eliminated the parking to the east, but now it has been shifted to Portifino and South Pointe Towers,
which have a greater population to them. The noise and illicit activities will be shifted to this area now. Why did you do this?
With the new configuration, we are not adding full amount of parking back but actually reducing numbers.
5. We have submitted a petition to the mayor for a dog park with a 160 signatures.
6. Is fixed dog park a consensus here?
We have not yet studied the options for a dog park here. (Gavin showed an example of an adventure dog park in Chelsea Piers,
New York City). It has an asphalt surface which is good for cleaning. But when the dog shown in the picture left the dog park, he
peed in the lawn area outside of the dog park.
7. Is dog park funded?
Nothing is funded for a special dog area. We have not defined an area. One possibility would be to do it as trial- try out some
options until the right solution is found. This would prevent spending money on something that won’t provide a good solution.
8. How sure are you about getting the Alaska parcel?
The city is confident in getting it
9. I would estimate that there is an average dog use of 80-100 dogs in Park. Your numbers of 3 dogs per acre is hard to enforce.
Yes, it is hard to enforce this.
10. If you have 70- 80 dogs, using it every day, how can dogs be accommodated?
A fixed dog park cannot fully accommodate the need for all of the dogs. Enclosure is not an issue; it gets down to management
and enforcement.
11. Management and enforcement needs to come from the top [in City of Miami Beach authority]. Maybe we should have $1000
fine like New York City.
Currently the park is dog free-for-all, with no place for people. The City has to create a dog guide or system so that people who
don’t have dogs or don’t like dogs can also enjoy it.
12. Can parking be taken up with Apogee facility?
No
13. You are showing a lot of walks made of crushed coral walk. There also seems to be a shortage of park benches. You should
think about seniors.
Most of the walks are concrete. We could consolidate some of the walks at the dunes. The crushed coral occurs at the dunes and
at the cut side of the cut walk. We have accounted for benches in our cost estimates; they are just not shown at this scale in the
plan.
14. $700,000 seems like a lot of money for children’s playground.
Standards for Kid’s playgrounds are bigger these days. It provides adults space and comfort too.
15. Is there an ordinance in place to pick up after dogs? How is it being enforced?
It is enforced by the police. It is a civil infraction if in violation; is committed. It is at the officer’s discretion to ticket. It is easy to
enforce but becomes a manpower issue. We have traffic and other violations to do as well. Having your dog off- leashing is one
offence, not cleaning up after your dog is another offence.
16. Most pet owners clean up after dogs.
17. Is it not too much to ask to have a designated area for dogs?
18. I have contacts at the National Playground Safety Institute. They represent the premiere in playground design. I can help you
make connections if you would like.
19. Regarding the Boat Basin changes, if you are looking for funding its not likely. The Army Corps budget cut by half recently.
20. The Beacon lights look like an accident waiting to happen. Maybe the walk could be shortened to end at the Beacon? There
is a link at Ocean Drive; it is public access and should read that way. With the parking gone it should feel like you have “arrived”
into the park. Perhaps we can put the dog area where Alaska parcel is.
This can be studied during detailed design.
21. Is there another dog park surface other than grass? Other mediums are gross.
Grass is does not hold up well with continued traffic and dog urination in enclosures less than an acre. That is why bark mulch or
hard surface is used in dog parks.
22. There is a lot of noise from parking and it is not relaxing.
There is a big difference in weekend and weekday modes here. We are creating a mid block walk to try to pull the weekend crowd
from the north edge to the middle of the park. .
23. I’m not crazy about the mid side walk. I’m not sure if that will work.
There are many people who park outside the park, in the street, and walk through the park. The parking works well during mid
week. Management during the weekend is an issue.
24. The design team was hired to design more than a dog park.
There is a possibility to address this within park. We need to look at a solution within the current design.
24. The informal dog area is of most enjoyable places in South Pointe Park. A confined, fenced area is not the best solution.
Maybe the western 1/3or ½ could be dog friendly, where no dogs would be allowed in the other ½.
This is what I’m hearing the dog proponents want: 1) informality and free reign 2) a prudent location where dogs are not allowed
Summary:
The design clarifications that were addressed in the presentation were generally well received by the community. The feedback
showed support for the Recommended Plan, and that the design needs some minor fine-tuning. There was overwhelming support
to move forward with completing the planning phase so that the design team can proceed with the process in order to get the
improvements built.
As the Dog issues discussion took some time, George Chartrand, Miami Beach C.I.P., called for consensus on the park design
improvements. Consensus was reached on proceeding with the recommended scheme with the following issues to be resolved
before the BODR: