Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research article
Discipline of Marine Biotechnology and Ecology, Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Council of Scientic and Industrial Research (CSIR), Bhavnagar 364021, India
Analytical Sciences, Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Council of Scientic and Industrial Research (CSIR), Bhavnagar 364021, India
c
Aquagri Processing Pvt Ltd, 18, Anand Lok, New Delhi 110049, India
b
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 18 July 2011
Accepted 11 August 2011
Available online 22 August 2011
A simple and rapid HPLC-based method was developed for simultaneous determination of major classes
of plant growth regulators (PGRs) in Monostroma and different species of Ulva. The plant growth regulators determined included gibberellic acid (GA3), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), indole3-butyric acid (IBA), salicylic acid and kinetin riboside (KR) and their respective elution time was 2.75,
3.3, 3.91, 4.95, 5.39 and 6.59 min. The parameters optimized for distinct separation of PGRs were mobile
phase (60:40 methanol and 0.6% acetic acid in water), column temperature (35 C) and ow rate (1 ml/
min). This method presented an excellent linearity (0.2e100 mg/ml) with limit of detection (LOD) as
0.2 mg/ml for ABA, 0.5 mg/ml for KR and salicylic acid, and 1 mg/ml for IAA, IBA and GA3. The precision and
accuracy of the method was evaluated after inter and intra day analysis in triplicates. The effect of plant
matrix was compensated after spiking and the resultant recoveries estimated were in the range of 80
e120%. Each PGR thereby detected were further characterized by ESI-MS analysis. The method optimized
in this study determined IBA along with IAA for the rst time in the seaweed species investigated except
Ulva linza where the former was not detected. In all the species studied, ABA level was detected to be the
highest while kinetin riboside was the lowest. In comparison to earlier methods of PGR analysis, sample
preparation and analysis time were substantially reduced while allowing determination of more classes
of PGRs simultaneously.
2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Plant growth regulator
Green seaweed
High performance liquid chromatography
Dispersive liquideliquid micro-extraction
1. Introduction
Plant growth regulators (PGRs) are structurally diverse group of
naturally occurring substances that interacts with each other in
a complex manner to regulate almost every aspect of plant life [1].
They are highly functional and even at trace quantities trigger
a variety of basic physiological processes including cell division,
enlargement and differentiation, organogenesis, seed dormancy
and germination, leaf senescence and abscission as well as defence
against abiotic and biotic stresses [2]. Endogenic cytokinins
together with their riboside conjugate and auxins have been
reported from seaweed species such as Porphyra perforata,
Sargassum muticum [3e5], Laminaria japonica [6], Dictyota humifusa, Ulva fasciata [7], Undaria pinnatida [8] and Caulerpa paspaloides [9]. Recently, Yokoya et al. [10] quantied cytokinin, auxin
and abscisic acid in common red algae from Brazilian coast. The
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 91 278 256 5801/256 3805x614; fax: 91 278 256
7562/256 6970.
E-mail address: crk@csmcri.org (C.R.K. Reddy).
0981-9428/$ e see front matter 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.08.004
1260
Further eld trials of this sap on other agricultural crops has also
shown encouraging results over control and showed increased
yields of 30e40% in sugarcane, 26% in potato, 16% in barley and
gram, and 13e15% in corn (Abhiram Seth personal communication).
The genus Ulva with its worldwide distribution, wider adaptability to diverse environmental conditions, higher growth rates
and amenability for depolymerization makes it an attractive feedstock for developing fertilizer and bio-renery products. The
removal of moisture from the biomass indeed is the bottleneck
toward the economy of energy industry therefore an integrated
process involving extraction of liquid sap having agriculture
applications could make overall process much competitive.
Development of such innovative processes will also be advantageous in utilizing the massive biomass of Ulva produced during
sudden outbreak as green tides or blooms recently reported in
China [18], the Baltic Sea [19] and Chile [20].
The analytical techniques employed for PGR analysis include
high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatographyemass spectrometry (LC-MS), capillary electrophoresis etc. Of these, HPLC with
its inherent advantages such as wide application, short analysis
time and high separation efciency merits its choice as a better tool
over others. However, intracellular traces of PGRs and coexistence
of many interfering substances make the analysis difcult and
necessitate for sample preparation and purication prior to analysis. The most commonly used pre-treatment techniques are
liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), solid phase extraction (SPE), column
chromatography and solid phase microextraction (SPME). Of these
techniques, dispersive liquideliquid microextraction (DLLME)
method developed by Razaee et al. [21] is relatively new and has
several advantageous over others such as 1) sample enrichment, 2)
dispenses the need of purication through column, 3) low organic
solvent consumption and 4) overall short operation time. The
DLLME method together with HPLC coupled to ultraviolet detector
(UV) has been employed for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons [22] and psycotropic drugs [23]. Lu et al. [1] for the
rst time successfully demonstrated DLLME-HPLC-FLD as a powerful pre-concentration method sensitive for detecting auxins.
However, the requirement of rapid methodologies for sample
derivatization has shifted the bottleneck for sample throughput
from analysis to sample preparation. Therefore the objective of this
investigation was to optimize a method for simultaneous determination of broad classes of plant growth regulators such as ABA,
IAA, IBA, GA3, KR along with salicylic acid in common macrophytic
marine green algae Monostroma and Ulva.
2. Results and discussion
The interaction of different endogenetic hormone response
pathways plays a crucial role in regulating various developmental
and physiological processes. Therefore a method determining
simultaneously different classes of endogenetic plant growth
regulators (PGRs) will facilitate the understanding of various
cellular, physiological and biochemical responses. In this study,
a simple and rapid HPLC based method was optimized for simultaneous determination of major classes of PGRs such as auxins (IAA
and IBA), ABA, GA3 in common green seaweeds. The resolution of
hydrophobic PGRs in HPLC analysis was found to signicantly be
affected by mobile phase composition and concentration. The
distinct separation of these PGRs was attained in mobile phase
constituted with methanol: 0.6% acetic acid (60:40). The modied
mobile phase composition was distinct and simple compared to the
binary mixtures used in majority of the studies in seaweed PGR
analysis [7,10,24,25]. Also the modied composition was different
from those reported for PGR analysis in terrestrial plants [26,27]. In
Table 1
Analytical performance data for major endogenetic plant growth regulators.
Analyte
Linear range
(mg/ml)
Regression equation
LOD
(mg/ml)
ABA
GA3
IAA
IBA
KR
Salicylic acid
0.2e100
0.2e100
0.2e100
0.2e100
0.2e100
0.2e100
y 26,547x 10,400
y 53,554x 11,074
y 96,168x 17,311
y 74,274x 72,997
y 15,770x 46,378
y 69,670x 40,625
0.995
0.999
0.995
0.990
0.976
0.971
0.5
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
SSE
Degree of
freedom
F-value
ABA
GA3
IAA
IBA
KR
Salicylic acid
3.127 1012
4.772 1010
4.164 1011
3.872 1011
5.799 1012
1.967 1014
7
5
5
5
6
6
668369.29
97697.27
288587.13
278313.43
983118.76
5.726
2032.14
4148.68
1373.08
901.85
307.57
228.70
1261
Table 3
Comparison of the method optimized in this study with the previously reported methods for detection of plant growth promoting substances. ABA: Abscisic acid, BA: Benzyl
adenine, GA3: Gibberellic acid, IAA: Indole acetic acid, IBA: Indole butyric acid, IPA: Indole propionic acid, KR: Kinetin riboside, KT: Kinetin-6-furfurylaminopurine, NAA:
Naphthaline acetic acid, SA: Salicylic acid, NR: Not required.
Analytical method
HPLC
Pressurized CEC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
Detector
Column ltration
Mobile phase
LOD (mg/ml)
PGRs detected
UV
NR
Single
0.2e1.0
IAA, IBA, ABA,
GA3, KR, SA
This study
UV
SPE
Single
0.1e0.9
IAA, IPA, NAA,
BA, KT
29
Fluorescence
NR
Single
0.001e0.002
IAA, IBA, IPA,
NAA
1
UV
SPE
Binary mixture
0.1e2.0
ABA, IAA, GA3
UV
SPME
Binary mixture
0.05e0.44
ABA, IAA, IBA, NAA
28
Reference
1262
Table 4
Recoveries of endogenetic plant growth regulators from different green seaweed species. The results showed the amount of hormones in nmole/g FW of the extracted samples.
Different letters above the quantied values indicate signicant differences at probability p 0.05 according to one-way ANOVA.
Analytes
Seaweed samples
U. fasciata
U. lactuca
U. linza
U. reticulata
U. taeniata
M. oxyspermum
ABA
GA3
IAA
IBA
KR
Salicylic acid
19.68 2.15c
2.26 0.5c
13.37 0.57c
3.29 0.63c
1.91 0.52bc
3.27 1.44c
34.85 1.75b
3.43 1.68bc
28.12 1.32ab
4.38 0.81b
2.83 1.63b
5.86 2.72b
39.74 5.68b
5.58 0.23ab
31.67 3.74ab
>LOD
3.35 0.53a
6.02 1.02b
68.28 2.09a
8.46 0.29a
35.24 1.59a
11.16 0.85a
3.32 1.75ab
14.85 0.94a
38.5 1.29b
5.88 1.63ab
22.04 0.62ab
5.08 1.02b
1.52 0.22c
2.91 1.23c
11.35 0.48d
>LOD
19.29 0.41b
3.24 0.29d
0.76 0.03d
2.20 1.26c
Water Q-Tof Micromass instrument equipped with an electrospray ionization interface, MCP detector, and Water MassLynx
software (version 4.0) was used. The eluent of each hormone from
HPLC was manually collected and introduced into the mass spectrometer by direct injection. Mass fragmentation pattern of ABA,
IAA, IBA, GA3 and SA was recorded on ESI negative mode (ESI-),
whereas ESI positive mode (ESI) was employed for KR. The mass
spectrometer was operated at the parameters optimized by Prasad
et al. [16].
4.7. Statistical analysis
Each experiment was conducted in triplicates. The repeated data
was evaluated for linear tting followed by F test for regression
analysis using software Origin 8.0. Further, the quantication data
was reported as mean SD and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was
performed for the comparison of the results. Any statistical property p 0.01 was considered as signicant.
Acknowledgments
The nancial support received from the FP7 programme of
European Commission under grant agreement no. 241383 and CSIR
for facilities is gratefully acknowledged. Mr. Vishal and Mr. Manoj
would like to thank CSIR for awarding Senior Research Fellowship.
We would also like to thank Dr. P. Paul, Head, Analytical Sciences for
kindly permitting us to use ESI-MS and HPLC facility.
Appendix. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.08.004.
References
[1] Q. Lu, L. Chen, M. Lu, G. Chen, L. Zhang, Extraction and analysis of auxins in
plants using dispersive liquideliquid microextraction followed by high
performance liquid chromatography with uorescence detection, J. Agric.
Food Chem. 58 (2010) 2763e2770.
[2] H.T. Liu, Y.F. Li, T.G. Luan, C.Y. Lan, W.S. Shu, Simultaneous determination of
phytohormones in plant extracts using SPME and HPLC, Chromatographia 66
(2007) 515e520.
[3] W. Zhang, H. Yamane, N. Takahashi, D.J. Chapman, B.O. Phinney, Identication
of a cytokinin in the green alga Chara globularis, Phytochemistry 28 (1989)
337e338.
[4] W. Zhang, D.J. Chapman, B.R. Phinney, C.R. Spray, Identication of cytokinins
in Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta) and Porphyra perforata (Rhodophyta),
J. Phycol. 27 (1991) 87e91.
[5] W. Zhang, H. Yamane, D.J. Chapman, The phytohormone prole of the red alga
Porphyra perforate, Bot. Mar. 36 (1993) 257e266.
[6] D. Duan, X. Lui, F. Pan, H. Lui, N. Chen, X. Fei, Extraction and identication of
cytokinin from Laminaria japonica Aresch, Bot. Mar. 38 (1995) 409e412.
[7] W.A. Stirk, O. Novk, V. Hradecka, A. Pn
ck, J. Rol
ck, M. Strand, J.V. Staden,
Endogenous cytokinins, auxins and abscisic acid in Ulva fasciata (Chlorophyta)
and Dictyota humifusa (Phaeophyta): towards understanding their biosynthesis and homoeostasis, Eur. J. Phycol. 44 (2009) 231e240.
[8] H. Abe, M. Uchiyama, R. Sato, Isolation and identication of native auxins in
marine algae, Agric. Biol. Chem. 36 (1972) 2259e2260.
[9] W.P. Jacobs, A search for some angiosperm hormones and their metabolites in
Caulerpa paspaloides (Chlorophyta), J. Phycol. 29 (1993) 595e600.
[10] N.S. Yokoya, W.A. Stirk, J. van Staden, O. Novk, V. Ture
ckov, A. Pn
ck,
M. Strand, Endogenous cytokinins, auxins and abscisic acid in red algae from
Brazil, J. Phycol. 46 (2010) 1198e1205.
[11] J.M. Craigie, Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture, J. Appl.
Phycol. (2010). doi:10.1007/s10811-010-9560-4.
[12] W. Khan, U.P. Rayirath, S. Subramanian, M.N. Jithesh, J.S. Craigie, J. Norrie,
B. Prithiviraj, Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development, J. Plant Growth Regul. 28 (2009) 386e399.
[13] J. Norrie, J.P. Keathley, Benets of Ascophyllum nodosum marine-plant extract
applications to Thompson seedless grape production, (Proceedings of the Xth
International Symposium on Plant Bioregulators in Fruit Production, 2005),
Acta Hortic. 727 (2006) 243e247.
1263
[14] T. Chopin, M. Sawhney, Seaweeds and their mariculture. in: J.H. Steele,
S.A. Thorpe, K.K. Turekian (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences. Elsevier,
Oxford, 2009, pp. 4477e4487.
[15] S.S. Rathore, D.R. Chaudhary, G.N. Boricha, A. Ghosh, B.P. Bhatt, S.T. Zodape,
J.S. Patolia, Effect of seaweed extract on the growth, yield and nutrient uptake
of soyabean (Glycine max) under rainfed conditions, S. Afr. J. Bot. 75 (2009)
351e355.
[16] K. Prasad, A.K. Das, M.D. Oza, H. Brahmbhatt, A.K. Siddhanta, R. Meena,
K. Eswaran, M.R. Rajyaguru, P.K. Ghosh, Detection and quantication of some
plant growth regulators in a seaweed-based foliar spray employing mass
spectrometric technique sans chromatographic separation, J. Agric. Food
Chem. 58 (2010) 4594e4601.
[17] K. Eswaran, P.K. Ghosh, A.K. Siddhanta, J.S. Patolia, C. Periyasamy, A.S. Mehta,
K.H. Mody, B.K. Ramavat, K. Prasad, M.R. Rajyaguru, S. Kulandaivel, C.R.K.
Reddy, J.B. Pandya, A. Tewari, Integrated method for production of carrageenan and liquid fertilizer from fresh seaweeds, US Patent No 6,893,479
(2005).
[18] F. Leliaert, E.J. Malta, A.H. Engelen, F. Mineur, O. De Clerk, Qingdao algal bloom
culprit identied, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 56 (2008) 1516.
[19] J. Blomster, S. Back, D.P. Fewer, M. Kiirikki, A. Lehvo, C.A. Maggs, M.J. Stanhope,
Novel morphology in Enteromorpha (Ulvophyceae) forming green tides, Am. J.
Bot. 89 (2002) 1756e1763.
[20] M. Ohno, C. Wetlinger, S. Shimada, M. Hitaoka, A green tide problem caused
by Enteromorpha sp. in Dichato, Chile. in: R.J. Anderson, V.J. Vreeland,
I.R. Davison (Eds.), Proc. Seventeenth Int. Seaweed Symp. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, UK, 2001, pp. 243e248.
[21] M. Razaee, Y. Assadi, M.R.M. Hosseini, E. Aghaee, F. Ahmadi, S. Berijani,
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid-liquid
microextraction, Chromatography 1116 (2006) 1e9.
[22] H. Xu, Z.Q. Ding, L.L. Lv, D.D. Song, Y.Q. Feng, A novel dispersive liquid-liquid
microextraction based on solidication of oating organic droplet method for
determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples, Anal.
Chim. Acta 636 (2009) 28e33.
[23] C.M. Xiong, J.L. Ruan, Y.L. Cai, Y. Tang, Extraction and determination of some
psycotropic drugs in urine samples using dispersive liquideliquid microextraction followed by high performance liquid chromatography, J. Pharm.
Biomed. Anal. 49 (2009) 572e578.
[24] W.A. Stirk, O. Novk, M. Strand, J.V. Staden, Cytokinins in macroalgae, Plant
Growth Regul. 41 (2003) 13e24.
[25] W.A. Stirk, G.D. Arthur, A.F. Lourens, O. Novk, M. Strand, J.V. Staden, Changes
in cytokinin and auxin concentrations in seaweed concentrates when stored
at an elevated temperature, J. Appl. Phycol. 16 (2004) 31e39.
[26] C. Wang, A. Yang, H. Yin, J. Zhang, Inuence of water stress on endogenous
hormone content and cell damage of maize seedlings, J. Integr. Plant Biol. 50
(2008) 427e434.
[27] M. Iqbal, M. Ashraf, A. Jamil, S.U. Rehman, Does seed priming induce changes
in the leaves of some endogenous plant hormones in hexaploid wheat plants
under salt stress? J. Integr. Plant Biol. 48 (2006) 181e189.
[28] P. Tansupo, P. Suwannasom, D.L. Luthria, S. Chanthaia, C. Ruangviriyachaia,
Optimised separation procedures for the simultaneous assay of three plant
hormones in liquid biofertilisers, Phytochem. Anal. 21 (2010) 157e162.
[29] Q. Lu, L. Zhang, L. Chen, M. Lu, P. Tong, G. Chen, Simultaneous analysis of
endogenetic and ectogenic plant hormones by pressurized capillary electrochromatography, J. Sep. Sci. 33 (2010) 651e657.
[30] J. Ludwig-Mller, Indole-3-butyric acid in plant growth and development,
Plant Growth Regul. 32 (2000) 219e230.
[31] J. Ludwig-Mller, W. Hilgenberg, Characterization and partial purication of
indole-3-butyric acid synthetase from maize (Zea mays), Physiol. Plant 94
(1995) 651e660.
[32] T. Li, C. Wang, J. Miao, Identication and quantication of indole-3-acetic acid
in the kelp Laminaria japonica Areschoug and its effect on growth of marine
microalgae, J. Appl. Phycol. 19 (2007) 479e484.
[33] N. Olszewski, T. Sun, F. Gubler, Gibberellins signaling: biosynthesis, catabolism, and response pathways, Plant Cell (2002) S61eS80.
[34] S. Giannarelli, B. Muscatello, P. Bogani, M.M. Spiriti, M. Buiatti, R. Fuoco,
Comparative determination of some phytohormones in wild-type and
genetically modied plants by gas chromatographyemass spectrometry and
high-performance liquid chromatographyetandem mass spectrometry, Anal.
Biochem. 398 (2010) 60e68.
[35] C.A. Auer, Cytokinin conjugation: recent advances and patterns in plant
evolution, Plant Growth Regul. 23 (1997) 17e32.
[36] J.A. Bentley-Mowat, S.M. Reid, Investigation of the radish bioassay for kinetin
and demonstration of kinetin like substances in algae, Ann. Bot. 32 (1968)
23e32.
[37] J. Barciszewski, G.E. Siboska, B.O. Pedersen, B.F.C. Clark, S.I.S. Rattan, Evidence
for the presence of kinetin in DNA and cell extracts, FEBS Lett. 393 (1996)
197e200.
[38] L. Ge, J.W.H. Yong, N.H. Goh, L.S. Chia, S.N. Tan, E.H. Ong, Identication of
kinetin and kinetin riboside in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) water using
a combined approach of liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry,
high performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis,
J. Chromatogr. B 829 (2005) 26e34.