Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15 September 2014
Report for:
15 September 2014
Report for:
Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 4
1.1 Objective of the Laboratory Test .......................................................................................................... 4
1.2 Purpose and Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 4
1.2.1 Purpose ..........................................................................................................................................4
1.2.2 Compressive Strength ....................................................................................................................4
1.2.3 Significance of the Compressive Strength .....................................................................................4
1.2.4 Factors Affecting Compressive Strength ........................................................................................4
1.2.5 Test Specimens .............................................................................................................................5
Chapter 2. Apparatus and Materials ........................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Loaded Area ........................................................................................................................................ 6
2.2 Procedure ............................................................................................................................................ 7
2.2.1 Placing Specimens in Testing Machine ..........................................................................................7
2.2.2 Loading ..........................................................................................................................................7
Chapter 3. Results, Observations, and Conclusion .................................................................................... 8
3.1 Observations........................................................................................................................................ 8
3.2 Test Results and Calculations ............................................................................................................. 8
3.3 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 8
AIT CONSULTING
page 3 of 9
Introduction
Structural Design Peer Review and Performance Based Evaluation of52-Story Residential Building
Soil cement ratio: Lesser the quantity of the cement equates to lower compressive
strength of the brick, and vice versa.
ii.
Water cement ratio: Smaller w/c ratio means higher strength, and vice versa.
iii.
Grading of the soil: Well-graded soil gives a good mix with higher strength.
iv.
Quality of soil: Well-graded laterite soil gives good mix with higher strength.
v.
vi.
vii.
Curing: The brick must not be allowed to dry for a certain period. Good curing keeps the
brick wet and results in optimum strength.
AIT CONSULTING
page 4 of 9
1.2.5
TestDesign
Specimens
Structural
Peer Review and Performance Based Evaluation of52-Story Residential Building
Rectangular test specimens, each with dimensions measuring 300x150x100 mm, were prepared
and cured for 21 days.
Specimens were tested in the compression testing machine, by applying load gradually till the
specimens were crushed.
AIT CONSULTING
page 5 of 9
Structural Design Peer Review and Performance Based Evaluation of52-Story Residential Building
Plate a
Plate b
Loaded Area
The gross area of the interlocking brick was calculated in square millimeters by multiplying the
length by the width of each specimen. The net area of the brick was calculated by subtracting
the area of opening by the gross area of the brick.
The average net area of the brick was found to be 39317.05 2
AIT CONSULTING
page 6 of 9
Procedure
Structural
Design Peer Review and Performance Based Evaluation of52-Story Residential Building
2.2.1 Placing Specimens in Testing Machine
The bearing surface of the testing machine was cleaned. First, plate-b as placed on the machine
surface, on top of which the interlocking brick was placed. Then, plate-b was placed on top of
the brick surface.
The specimen was aligned carefully so that a uniform seating was obtained.
2.2.2 Loading
Initially the load was applied at the rate of 5000 N/s. After half the expected maximum load was
applied, i.e. 30 KN, the load was then applied at the rate of 2000 N/sec.
Figure 2-3: Loading of the interlocking bricks for compression strength test
AIT CONSULTING
page 7 of 9
Structural Design Peer Review and Performance Based Evaluation of52-Story Residential Building
Observations
The brick developed the first crack at around 190 KN and the material on the vertical face began
to spall after 200 KN. The brick specimen was crushed at an average loading of 298 KN.
Spalling of the
material
Effective
Cross-sectional
Area (mm2)
Maximum
Load (N)
Compressive
Strength (MPa)
39310.77
203,927.3
5.18
39156.53
346,802.1
8.85
39382.49
265,442.9
6.74
39376.41
336,880.3
8.55
39346.81
302,153.9
7.67
39329.26
332,911.2
8.46
Average
39317.05
298019.6
7.58
Conclusion
The average compressive strength of the interlocking brick was determined to be 7.58 MPa.
AIT CONSULTING
page 8 of 9
Postal Address:
AIT CONSULTING, P.O. Box 4 , KlongLuang
Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
Street Address:
AIT CONSULTING, K.M. 58,Moo9, Paholyothin Highway, Klongnueng,
KlongLuang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
Tel
Fax