Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Detector Array
ROIC
A
Microbumps
3-D Interconnects
Stacked
ROIC
Figure 1. Performance of state-of-the-art detector arrays hybridized to Si ROICs (A, B) can be dramatically improved by
the integration of multiple Si IC layers (C). The hybridization of the detector layer to the stacked ROIC can be
performed using interconnects through the detector layer (as shown in C) or microbumps.
Bulk CMOS
Wafers from
Foundry
IC3
IC2
Alignment
Mark RIE
Si IC 2
IC2
Thinning
Carrier
CarrierSubstrate
Substrate
singulate
IC3
IC2
IC2
Alignment
Mark RIE
IC2
Thinning
IC2
Si IC 2
IC1
IC1
IC2
Redistribution
Layer
Carrier
CarrierSubstrate
Substrate
singulate
Si IC 1
Si IC 1
Vertical
Interconnects
& Top Pattern
Si IC 1
VISA D2W 3L Lot 1, Wafer 4, Die 11
Si #3
Vertical
Interconnects
& Top Pattern
Si #2
Si IC 1
Si #1
Figure 2. Process flow for the fabrication of integrated two-layer and three-layer readout ICs. The left-hand-side
SEM micrograph inset shows two layer Si IC stack with alignment accuracy of approximately 2 m. The right handside inset shows a three-layer vertically interconnected passive Si stack.
97.5% meet NE
Specification
cm2)
A.
Proof-of-Concept Demonstration
A. Performance of MWIR FPA Detector with 3-D Si ROIC
For an initial demonstration, a passive Si layer was used as a
surrogate for Si IC2. A readout IC incorporating a
multiplexing function was used as Si IC1. The device had the
form of a 256x256 array of pixels on a 30 m pitch. Each
pixel contained one vertical interconnect 4 m in diameter.
Following the fabrication of 3-D interconnects and the
capping and patterning of the Cu film, the MCT FPA layer
was integrated into the stack. The arrays were tested both
before and after the fabrication of the FPA, the former to
verify the operability of the 3-D interconnects and of the
underlying IC. Following the integration of the FPA layer,
electrical testing was performed to obtain a histogram of the
noise equivalent flux, NE, which is a metric of signal-tonoise performance of the device, and a thermal image was
obtained. Figure 4a displays the NE histogram for the
demonstration vehicle. The dotted line indicates the NE
B.
Figure 4. A) Histogram of the noise equivalent flux
measured for the MWIR FPA demonstration vehicle;
B) Infrared image obtained using the demonstration
vehicle.
Figure 5. Schematic illustrating the common side fourwire resistance measurement used for the contact
resistance testbars and a SEM micrograph of the contact
resistance testbar resistance circuit.
Figure 6 shows an 8x8 resistance map obtained from such a
testbar. The four-wire resistance values across the die range
from 30 m to 3 , with an average resistance value around
140 m (excluding the 3 interconnect). Subtracting from
this value the resistance of the vertical interconnect one can
calculate the value for the specific contact resistivity between
the vertical interconnect and the pad. For the interconnects
of the testbar this value was found equal to approximately
1x10-8 cm2.