Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
IN
FOOD TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE
FAISALABAD, PAKISTAN
2009
53
To
The members of the Supervisory Committee find the thesis submitted by Mr.
Mian Kamran Sharif (Regd. 96-ag-1478) satisfactory and recommend that it be
processed for evaluation by External Examiner(s) for the award of degree.
CHAIRMAN
(Dr. Masood Sadiq Butt)
MEMBER
(Prof. Dr. Faqir Muhammad Anjum)
MEMBER
(Dr. Haq Nawaz)
54
DEDICATED
TO
HAZRAT MUHAMMAD
(Peace Be Upon Him)
&
my parents
who taught me to be responsible and professional in any field
55
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am extremely thankful to ALMIGHTY ALLAH (The Merciful) who
blessed to complete this piece of research work presented in this study. I present
my humble gratitude from the deep sense of heart to the HOLY PROPHET
MUHAMMAD (Peace Be Upon Him), that without him the life would have
been worthless.
I expand my deepest appreciation to my affectionate supervisor,
Dr. Masood Sadiq Butt, Associate Professor, National Institute of Food Science
and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad for his great help,
illuminating guidance, and consistent encouragement during planning,
execution, and final presentation of this piece of research work
With a deep emotion of gratitude, I express the sincere thanks to
Prof. Dr. Faqir Muhammad Anjum, Director General, National Institute Food
Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad for his
sympathetic attitude and cooperation in the preparation and finalization of this
manuscript.
I am also grateful to my committee member, Dr. Haq Nawaz, Associate
Professor, Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology for his
compassionate attitude and kind cooperation provided during my research
project.
I also thank my friends and fellow students, who made my busy and
boring life more interesting. I am also grateful to Mr. Tauseef Sultan, Mr.
Muhammad Nasir, Miss Saima Hafeez Khan, Mr. Akmal Nazir, Mr. Kashif
Khan, Muhammad Issa Khan and Dr. Mumtaz Shaheen who helped me day
and night for final presentation of this dissertation.
Finally I would like to convey my sincere admiration to my father Mian
Muhammad Sharif, mother, brother, Sisters and my wife who were always
very kind to provide moral and financial support during the track of this study.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No.
Contents
Page #
1.
2.
2.1.
2.1.1.
2.1.2.
2.1.3.
2.2.
2.3.
2.3.1.
2.3.2.
2.3.3
2.3.4.
2.3.5.
2.4.
2.4.1.
2.4.2.
2.4.3.
2.5.
2.5.1.
2.5.2.
3.
3.1.
3.2.
3.2.1.
3.2.2.
3.3.
3.3.1.
3.3.2.
3.3.3.
3.3.4.
3.3.5.
List of Abbreviations
Acknowledgement
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Appendices
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Rice bran: an overview
Physiology and general characteristics
Anti-nutritional factors
Dietary fiber
Processing of rice bran
Rice bran oil and its components
Current status
General characteristics
Effective components
Utilization
Economic Feasibility
Hypocholesterolemic effects of rice bran and rice bran oil
Rice Bran
Rice Bran Oil
Cholesterol-lowering mechanisms
Supplementation in baked products
Bread
Cookies
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Rice bran processing
Rice bran stabilization
Denaturation of anti-nutritional factors
Stabilization and anti-nutritional appraisal
Lipase activity
Peroxide value
Thiobarbituric acid no.
Haemagglutinin-lectin activity
Trypsin inhibitor activity
57
i
ii
vii
xi
xii
xiii
1
8
8
8
9
11
12
14
14
15
16
21
22
22
22
25
30
32
33
35
37
37
37
37
38
38
38
38
38
39
39
3.3.6.
2.4.
3.4.1.
3.4.2.
3.5.
3.5.1.
3.5.2.
3.5.3.
3.5.4.
3.5.5.
3.5.6.
3.6.
3.7.
3.7.1.
3.7.2.
3.7.2.1.
3.7.2.2.
3.7.2.3.
3.8.
3.8.1.
3.8.1.1
3.8.1.1.1.
3.8.1.1.2
3.8.1.1.3.
3.8.1.1.4.
3.8.1.1.5.
3.8.2.
3.8.3.
3.8.3.1.
3.8.3.2.
3.8.3.3.
3.8.3.4.
3.8.3.5.
3.8.4.
3.8.5.
3.8.6.
3.8.6.1.
Phytates
Raw Materials Analysis
Proximate analysis
Mineral analysis
Rice bran oil
Extraction
Refining
Yield
Quality of refined rice bran oil samples
Antioxidants potential
39
39
39
40
41
41
41
41
41
42
43
43
43
44
Experimental plan
Analysis of serum profile
Liver function tests
Renal function tests
Lipid profile
Product development
Preparation of rice bran oil cookies
Quality attributes of cookies
Physical analysis
Proximate analysis
Total acidity
Thiobarbituric acid no.
Sensory evaluation
Preparation of rice bran supplemented flours
Analysis of rice bran supplemented flours
Proximate analysis
Mineral analysis
Dietary fiber
Thiobarbituric acid no.
Dough rheological studies
Preparation of rice bran supplemented cookies
Preparation of rice bran supplemented leavened pan bread
Analysis of rice bran supplemented cookies and bread
Physical analysis
58
45
45
45
45
46
46
46
46
47
47
47
47
47
48
48
48
48
49
49
50
50
51
51
3.8.6.2.
3.8.6.3.
3.8.3.4.
3.9.
4.
4.1
4.1.1.
4.1.2.
4.1.3.
4.1.4.
4.1.5.
4.1.6.
4.2.
4.3.
4.3.1.
4.3.2.
4.3.3.
4.3.4.
4.3.5.
4.3.5.1.
4.3.5.2.
4.3.6.
4.4.
4.4.1.
4.4.1.1.
4.4.1.2.
4.4.1.3.
4.4.1.4.
4.4.2.
4.4.3.
4.4.3.1.
4.4.3.2.
4.4.3.3.
4.4.3.4.
4.4.3.5.
4.4.3.6.
4.5.
4.5.1.
4.5.1.1.
4.5.1.2.
4.5.1.3.
4.5.1.4.
Mineral analysis
Dietary fiber
Sensory evaluation
Statistical Analysis
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Stabilization and anti-nutrition appraisal
Lipase activity
Peroxide value
Thiobarbituric acid no.
Haemagglutinin-lectin activity
Trypsin inhibitor activity
Phytates
Raw materials analysis
Rice bran oil
Refining
Yield
Quality evaluation
Fatty acid profile of RBO
Antioxidants potential
Oryzanol
Tocopherols and tocotrienols
Selection of best sample
Efficacy studies
Physical parameters of rats
Feed intake
Water intake
Gain in body weight
Organ weight
Renal and Kidney functioning tests
Serum biochemical profile
Cholesterol
High density lipoprotein (HDL)
Low density lipoprotein (LDL)
Triglycerides (TG)
Glucose
Serum proteins
Product development
Preparation of rice bran oil cookies
Physical analysis
Proximate analysis
Total acidity
Thiobarbituric acid no.
59
51
51
51
52
53
53
54
56
56
57
59
59
60
63
63
63
63
68
71
71
73
74
75
75
75
75
78
79
81
81
83
88
91
91
95
97
99
99
99
102
107
107
4.5.1.5.
4.5.2.
4.5.2.1.
4.5.2.2.
4.5.2.3.
4.5.2.4.
4.5.2.5.
4.5.2.5.1.
4.5.2.5.2.
4.5.3.
4.5.3.1.
4.5.3.2.
4.5.3.3.
4.5.3.4.
4.5.4.
4.5.4.1.
4.5.4.2.
4.5.4.3.
4.5.4.3.1.
4.5.4.3.2.
5.
Sensory evaluation
Preparation of rice bran supplemented flours
Proximate analysis
Mineral analysis
Dietary fiber
Thiobarbituric acid no.
Dough rheological studies
Mixographic studies
Farinographic studies
Preparation of rice bran supplemented cookies
Physical analysis
Mineral analysis
Dietary fiber
Sensory evaluation
Preparation of rice bran supplemented leavened pan bread
Mineral analysis
Dietary fiber
Sensory evaluation
External characteristics
Internal characteristics
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATIONS
LITERATURE CITED
APPENDICES
60
109
115
116
124
127
129
132
132
136
141
142
145
147
147
154
154
157
159
159
165
175
180
181
206
LIST OF TABLES
S. No.
Title
Page #
1.
46
2.
48
3.
50
4.
51
5.
Mean squares for FFA, POV and TBA no. of rice bran samples
55
6.
55
7.
Effect of storage on FFA, POV and TBA no. of rice bran samples
55
8.
58
9.
62
10.
62
11.
62
12.
65
13.
65
14.
70
15.
72
16.
76
17.
80
18.
80
61
19.
80
20.
82
21.
82
22.
82
23.
84
24.
84
25.
84
26.
98
27.
98
28.
98
29.
100
30.
100
31.
100
32.
103
33.
105
34.
105
35.
Mean squares for total acidity and TBA no. of RBO cookies
108
36.
108
37.
108
38.
111
39.
112
40.
112
41.
112
42.
114
43.
114
44.
114
45.
117
62
46.
118
47.
120
48.
122
49.
123
50.
125
51.
126
52.
128
53.
128
54.
Mean squares for dietary fiber and TBA no. of supplemented flours
130
55.
130
56.
131
57.
134
58.
134
59.
135
60.
137
61.
137
62.
140
63.
140
64.
143
65.
144
66.
144
67.
146
68.
146
69.
148
70.
148
71.
149
72.
150
63
73.
150
74.
153
75.
153
76.
156
77.
156
78.
158
79.
158
80.
81.
162
82.
162
83.
164
84.
164
85.
166
86.
166
87.
167
88.
169
89.
169
90.
171
91.
171
92.
173
93.
173
external
64
characteristics
of
rice
bran
161
LIST OF FIGURES
S. No.
Title
Page #
77
77
77
85
89
92
94
96
65
LIST OF APPENDICES
S. No.
Title
Page #
206
II
207
III
208
IV
209
210
VI
211
66
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
RB
Rice bran
FFRB
Fullfat rice bran
DFRB
Defatted rice bran
Un-RB
Unstabilized rice bran
ES-RB Extrusion stabilized rice bran
PAR-RB
Parboiled rice bran
MW-RB
Microwave stabilized rice bran
RBO
Rice bran oil
PAR-RBO
Parboiled rice bran oil
MW-RBO
Microwave stabilized rice bran oil
ES-RBO
Extrusion stabilized rice bran oil
NS
Normal shortening
CSGF
Commercial straight grade flour
POV
Peroxide value
TBA no.
Thiobarbituric acid no.
FFA
Free fatty acids
UC
Unsaponifiable content
Tocols
Tocopherol and tocotrienol
SD-rats
Sprague Dawley rats
NFE
Nitrogen free extract
CVD
Cardiovascular disease
TRF
Tocotrienol rich fraction
HDL
High density lipoprotein cholesterol
LDL
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol
TG
Triglycerides
TC
Total cholesterol
ALP
Alkaline phosphatase
ALT
Alanine amino transferase
AST
Aspartate amino transferase
BRBO
Bioactive components from rice bran oil
SOV
Source of variation
df
Degree of freedom
wk
Weeks
wb
Wet basis
hr
Hour
min
Minutes
rpm
Revolutions per minutes
67
ABSTRACT
Rice bran, one of the main by-products of rice milling industry, has been
recognized as an excellent source of edible oil, protein, dietary fiber and allied
micronutrients. In Pakistan, it is under-utilized and generally used in poultry
feed and fuel purposes. It contains about 15-20% edible oil, which could
efficiently be used for bridging the oil deficiency in the country. Current research
was conducted to utilize indigenous rice bran (RB) for oil extraction as well as
preparation of value-added products. Rice bran samples, stabilized by extrusion
cooking, microwave heating and parboiling; were analyzed for lipase activity
during 60 days storage. On the basis of analysis, microwave (MW) stabilization
was found to be the most effective stabilization technique in controlling lipase
activity. After stabilization, oil was extracted from bran samples and evaluated
for physical & chemical characteristics, fatty acid profile and antioxidant
potential. In current study, microwave stabilized rice bran (MW-RB) was
preferred on the basis of better stability (FFA, POV and TBA no.), color of oil and
high antioxidant potential. MW stabilized fullfat rice bran (FFRB); its defatted
portion (DFRB) and extracted oil (RBO) were used for efficacy studies and
preparation of value added products. The diets prepared from selected
treatments alongwith control were fed to four groups of SD-rats for 45 days and
evaluated for physical and hematological parameters. The rats fed on RBO diet
had the highest feed intake (19.21g/rat/day); water intake (37.81mL/day) and
gain in body weight (7.24g per rat/week). Mean squares for organs weight, renal
and liver functioning tests exhibited non-significant differences with respect to
diets and study periods in different groups of rats. Animals fed on RBO, FFRB
and DFRB resulted significant reduction in serum cholesterol, LDL and
triglycerides. It was concluded that experimental diets imparted no adverse
effects on the animal growth and improved serum profile of SD-rats; showing
suitability of RB and RBO for product development. In the 2nd phase of research,
RBO was supplemented in cookies by replacing normal shortening. It was
concluded that rice bran oil can successfully be used for preparation of cookies
upto 40-60%. Moreover, FFRB and DFRB were mixed separately with commercial
straight grade flour in different proportions and analyzed for chemical
composition and rheological behavior to find out the most appropriate
compositions showing suitability for preparation of cookies and leavened bread.
Later, cookies and leavened breads were prepared from selected FFRB and DFRB
supplemented flours. On the basis of physicochemical and sensory assay, it was
concluded that cookies can be supplemented 10-20% and leavened pan bread
upto 15% with either type of rice bran without affecting nutritional and sensory
quality attributes. From the present investigation, it is concluded that rice bran
has a potential to be used for oil extraction and preparation of value added
products. This will not only be helpful to fulfill the countrys edible oil
requirement but also to cope with the protein deficiency in the communities at
risk through bran supplemented value added products.
68
Chapter-I
INTRODUCTION
Rice (Oryza sativa) is the 2nd leading cereal crop and staple food of half of
the worlds population. It is grown in at least 114 countries with global
production of 645 million tons; share of Asian farmers is about 90% of the total
produce. In Pakistan, rice is the 3rd largest crop after wheat and cotton. During
fiscal year 2007-08, it was cultivated on an area of 2515 thousand hectares with
production of 5563 thousand tons (IRRI, 2008; GOP, 2008).
In the developing countries, budding dilemma of food crisis, arising due
to lower crop yields and escalating population, needs to utilize each pent of
available resources. In order to provide enough food to all people, there is the
holistic approach of using the by-products generated during food processing and
preparations. Rice is being processed in well established industry but the major
apprehension is the utilization of its by-products; rice bran (5-8%) and polishing
(2-3%) that are going as waste. Rice processing or milling produces several
streams of materials including milled rice, bran and husk. In developing
countries, rice bran is considered as a by-product of the milling process and
commonly used in animal feed or discarded as a waste. The potential of
producing rice bran at the global level is 29.3 million tons annually while the
share of Pakistan is worked out to be 0.5 million tons (FAO, 2001; GOP, 2008).
Rice bran, brown outer layer of rice kernel, is mainly comprised of
pericarp, aleuron, subaleuron layer and germ. It contains appreciable quantities
of nutrients like protein, fat and dietary fiber. Furthermore, it contains
substantial amount of minerals like K, Ca, Mg and Fe. Presence of antioxidants
like tocopherols, tocotrienols and - oryzanol also brighten prospects of rice bran
utilization for humans (Gong and Yao, 2001; Moldenhauer et al., 2003).
Although, overall composition and nutritional profile of rice bran holds
significant importance yet presence of anti-nutritional compounds such as
69
products. Rice bran oil (RBO) holds unique nutritional profile and is of high
nutraceutical worth. Recently, scientists have also shown tremendous interest in
exploring the cholesterol lowering properties of RBO. It is extensively used in
Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan and Thailand as a Premium Edible Oil (Ghosh,
2007). In Japan and some western countries, it is more popularly known as a
Heart Oil and acquired the status of Health Food (CAC, 2003). Rice bran and
its oil can be utilized for value addition of cereals based food products to attain
multiple benefits.
RBO contains oleic acid (38.4%), linoleic acid (34.4%), and linolenic acid
(2.2%) as unsaturated fatty acids while palmitic (21.5%) and stearic (2.9%) acids
as saturated fatty acids. A potential advantage of RBO over other oils with
similar fatty acid composition is its oxidative stability imparted by high levels of
tocopherols, tocotrienols and -oryzanol and its cholesterol lowering ability (Kim
and Godber, 2001; Wilson et al., 2000). It also contains high amount of
unsaponifiable matter i.e. 4.2% including phytosterols. It improves plasma lipid
and lipoprotein profiles by interrupting absorption of intestinal hydrophobic
compounds. RBO also lowers total serum cholesterol and low density lipoprotein
concentrations without effecting high density lipoproteins (Wilson et al., 2000;
2007; Most et al., 2005). The occurrence of peculiar components such as oryzanol
and tocotrienols in RBO are responsible for its hypocholesterolemic worth
(Vissers et al., 2000; Nagao et al., 2001).
Rice bran oil is rich source of natural vitamin E that is complex of eight
chemically distinct molecules: , , and -tocopherol; , , and -tocotrienol.
Palm oil and RBO represent two major nutritional sources of natural tocotrienol
(Sen et al., 2007). Oryzanol is nutritionally and medicinally important constituent
of rice bran oil that reduces cholesterol oxidation. The percentage of oryzanol in
crude RBO ranged from 1.9 to 2.2%. In Japan it is widely used as natural
antioxidant in foods and cosmetics. It has functions similar to vitamin E in
promoting growth, facilitating capillary growth in the skin and improving blood
71
circulation along with stimulating hormonal secretion (Luh et al., 1991; Xu and
Godber, 1999; Xu et al., 2001).
Although rice bran has been recognized as an excellent source of vitamins
and minerals yet it has been under-utilized in human diet and in Pakistan 90% is
being used primarily in animal feeds (Moldenhauer et al., 2003). Proteins are
more concentrated in the rice bran and are unique in their nutritional value,
which is quite comparable with that of its endosperm protein or protein from
any other cereal or legume. The protein of rice bran is highly digestible and
hypoallergenic food ingredient (Helm and Burks, 1996; Tang et al., 2003).
Supplementation of wheat flour with rice bran or its defatted portion
holds potential to uplift the nutritional profile of cereal based food products with
special reference to protein, lysine and dietary fiber contents. Research
interventions conducted in the past decade highlighted that stabilized full-fat
rice bran up to 20% level and unstabilized full-fat or stabilized defatted rice bran
upto 10% are suitable in various food preparations (Singh et al., 1995). However,
in yeast leavened pan bread formulations, rice bran can be substituted upto 15%
of the wheat flour without affecting loaf volume (Sharp and Kitchens, 1990).
Rice bran is an excellent source of dietary fiber ranging from 20-51%
(Saunders, 1990). Rice bran fiber has laxative effect with increased faecal output
and stool frequencies. Soluble fibers have gained popularity to reduce the
postprandial glycemia in normal and diabetic subjects. It acts like a sponge and
absorbs water in the intestine, mixes the food into gel and there by slows down
the rate of digestion and absorption (Abdul and Yu, 2000). Use of 1g of soluble
fiber can lower total cholesterol by about 0.045mmol/L. Researchers have also
observed 29% less risk of coronary heart disease for each additional intake of 10g
of fiber daily (Rimm et al., 1996; Brown et al., 1999). Possible health claims of
consumption of rice bran and its defatted portion include increased faecal bulk
and reduced blood cholesterol owing to its dietary fiber contents (Abdul and Yu,
2000).
72
The research was carried out using indigenous rice cultivar i.e. Basmati
Super. Although lot of research has been carried out on various aspects of rice
bran abroad but in our study we have focused on the local cultivar to explore its
potential for human as little or no effort has been made earlier in Pakistan on
extraction of oil form rice bran. There are many factors like soil, environment,
cultural and agronomic practices etc. which have pronounced effects on the grain
quality characteristics. Moreover this work will provide information to the
scientific community, farmers and industrialist about the value addition in rice.
In Pakistan, rice is the 3rd largest crop after wheat and cotton and it is one of the
major foreign exchange earning crops mainly in the form of Basmati super (upto
40% export) which is liked throughout the world due to its specific aroma.
Basmati Super is processed in well established modern mills with production of
good quality rice kernel and bran as a by-product. Other fine rice cultivars and
coarse varieties (for local use) are usually processed through conventional
shellers and bran produced is of poor quality due to more contamination of
endosperm and husk in the resultant bran. So bran of Basmati Super was chosen
due to better quality and relatively higher yield of oil.
Pakistan is confronting with the problem of food security especially in
edible
oils.
Some
of
our
conventional
oil
crops
like
cotton
seed,
rapeseed/mustard, sunflower and canola are used for extracting edible oil but
they only account for 29% of domestic requirements (GOP, 2008) and rest is
imported resulting in huge drainage of foreign exchange. During 2007-08,
Pakistan spent US$ 1217 and $ 92.1 millions on the import of palm oil (unsuitable
due to high melting point) and soybean oil from Malaysia and US, respectively.
Rice bran oil (RBO) production is feasible for the region, where bran can be made
available in abundance within stipulated period during rice milling. Rice bran oil
needs no extra land for cultivation. Moreover, its utilization in baked products
will not only explore its functional and nutraceutical role but also contribute
towards value addition in rice sector. Extraction of RBO through solvent and
73
utilization of stabilized rice bran and its defatted portion in cereal based food
products could also play an important role in minimizing current food crisis.
Moreover, RBO as a cooking medium and its meal for supplementation in wheat
flour reckon its prospects in lowering the blood glucose and cholesterol to
improve consumers health.
There are many challenges involved with the utilization of rice bran in
Pakistan. The main challenge is its utilization as feed ingredient due to low price.
Poultry feed mainly comprised of rice bran. This industry procures almost all
barn from rice industry for its utilization throughout the year. As Pakistan is the
6th most populous country of the world and it population is still increasing with
high rate. Now it is very difficult to feed this population. Utilization of rice bran
for human will results in some relief on grain crops because it can be efficiently
supplemented in baked products both in full fat form as well as after oil
extraction. Another challenge was the stability of rice bran during storage.
Although rice bran is considered an excellent source of edible oil but the main
problem is its inherent enzyme system especially lipases which results in
splitting of triglycerides into free fatty acid and make it unfit for human
consumption. Moreover extracted oil will be of poor quality and results in
economic loss during refining process. So in present study, one of the objectives
was to find out the most suitable stabilization technique. For the purpose, rice
bran samples were stabilized through different stabilization techniques like
extrusion, microwave heating and parboiling and stored for two months. On the
basis of lees FFA production, peroxide value and TBA no., microwave technique
was preferred. Microwave heating is considered to be one of the most energyefficient and rapid method for heating foods. In rice bran, dipolar water
molecules are excited by the electromagnetic waves and are made to spin. The
resultant enhanced kinetic energy, alongwith friction, produces heat that results
in the even distribution of heat having deleterious effects on lipase activity.
Moreover, microwave heat had little effect on nutritional quality and the
74
Utilization of rice industrial by-products for oil extraction and its quality
evaluation
The prospects of blending oil and bran for the preparation of value added
products i.e. cookies and leavened pan bread
75
Chapter-II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Rice bran, a by-product of rice milling industry, is composed of pericarp,
aleurone and subaleurone layers, parts of the germ and small portion of the
starchy endosperm. It is rich in vitamins, minerals, amino acids, dietary fiber,
essential fatty acids and plant sterols like -oryzanol, tocopherol and tocotrienol
having promising health-related benefits. Besides its exceptional nutritional
profile, it is currently used as animal feed and fuel source. The literature
available pertaining to different aspects of the present study has been reviewed
under the following headings:
2.1 Rice bran: an overview
2.2 Processing of rice bran
2.3 Rice bran oil and its components
2.4 Hypocholesterolemic effects of rice bran and its oil
2.5. Supplementation in baked products
Hargrove, 1994). The percentage and composition of rice bran vary according to
the rice variety, pretreatment before milling, type of milling system and the
degree of milling (Saunders, 1990). Rice bran is light in color, sweet in taste,
moderately oily and has a slightly toasted nutty flavor (Hu et al., 1996). Texture
varies from a fine, powder-like consistency to a flake, depending on the
stabilization process (Barber and Benedito de Barber, 1980).
Rice bran contains 12-22% oil, 11-17% protein, 6-14% fiber, 10-15%
moisture and 8-17% ash. It is rich in vitamins including vitamin E, thiamin,
niacin and minerals like aluminum, calcium, chlorine, iron, magnesium,
manganese, phosphorus, potassium, sodium and zinc (Sunders, 1990; Hu et al.,
1996; Xu, 1998). It also contains a significant amount of nutraceutical compounds
and approximately 4% unsaponifiables, mainly comprised of naturally occurring
antioxidant such as tocopherols, tocotrienols and oryzanol (Ju and Vali, 2005).
Rice bran proteins are of high nutritional value (Kennedy and Burlingame,
2003) and hypoallergenic (Tsuji et al., 2001). These proteins are rich in essential
amino acids, especially lysine, hence can be used as ingredients in food recipes
(Wang et al., 1999). Stabilized rice bran is also a good source of both soluble and
insoluble dietary fiber ranging from 20-51% (Saunders, 1990), which is almost twice
as much as that of oat bran. Rice bran can be used as a stool bulking agent
(Tomlin and Read, 1988) and for the enrichment of some foods (Burton, 2000).
2.1.2. Anti-nutritional factors
The effective utilization of rice bran is possible only by deactivating the
lipase enzyme, responsible for the hydrolytic degradation of bran constituents
and denaturation of anti-nutritional factors. Successful developments in the use
of various techniques to stabilize rice bran have resulted in the emergence of rice
bran as an important by-product of the rice milling industry. The following antinutritional factors exist in rice bran:
2.1.2.1. Lipases
77
Lipases (E.C. 3.1.1.3) are enzymes that are primarily responsible for the
hydrolysis of triglycerides into glycerol and fatty acids. Rice bran contains
several types of lipases which results in significant increase of the free fatty acids
(FFA) by hydrolyzing the oil. Rapid increase in the free fatty acid occurs within
hours and reaches 7-8% within 24 hours, followed by about 5% increase per day
(Ramezanzadeh et al., 1999; Rukmani, 2002).
Lipase activity is greatly affected by moisture, temperature, pH, time and
water activity (Dunford and King, 2001; Gangodavilage, 2002). The enzyme was
active up to 40C and the activity declined sharply to 65% at 60C and then
gradually decreased (Bhardwaj et al., 2001). In addition to native lipases, the
microbial lipases also deteriorate the nutritional quality of the oil, making it unfit
for human consumption. The hydrolytic rancidity severely affects the nutritive
value and palatability of rice bran (Rajeshwara and Prakash, 1995).
2.1.2.2. Trypsin inhibitors
Trypsin inhibitors are also endogenous enzymes, which can form stable
complex with proteolytic pancreatic enzymes i.e. trypsin and chemotropysin.
Due to complex formation, the activity of these enzymes decreases. Rice bran
contains trypsin inhibitor (Kratzer and Payne, 1977; Deolankar and Singh, 1979).
Approximately 85-95% trypsin inhibitor activity was found in rice embryo. One
mole of rice bran trypsin inhibitor can inhibit two moles of trypsin.
2.1.2.3. Haemagglutinin-lectin
Haemagglutinin-lectins are toxic globulin proteins present in the rice bran
and agglutinate mammalian red blood cells (Ory et al., 1981). Similarly, lectin is a
glycoprotein and is present in germ portion. It comprised of 27% carbohydrate,
predominantly glucose (Takahashi et al., 1973) while another 10% carbohydrate is
mainly in the form of xylose and arabinose (Indravathamma and Seshadri, 1980).
The lectin also contains a large number of glycine and cystine residues (Tsuda,
1979).
2.1.2.4. Phytates
78
79
fibers include fruits, vegetables, legumes, psyllium seeds and oat bran whereas
whole grains are good sources of insoluble fiber (Matz, 1991).
Fiber supplementation has been used to enhance the fiber content of array
of foods. Traditionally, fiber supplementation has focused on the use of milling
by-products of cereal grains like wheat, corn, sorghum and other grains (McKee
and Latner, 2000). Nowadays, fiber supplementation has focused in cookies,
crackers, snack foods, beverages, spices, imitation cheeses, sauces, frozen foods,
canned meats, meat analogues and many other cereal-based products (Hesser,
1994). The WHO recommendation for total dietary fiber intake is above 25 g/day
(WHO, 2003).
The total dietary fiber content in stabilized rice bran ranges from 25 to 40%
depending on the product (Carroll, 1990). Rice brans fiber comprised of a
relatively low proportion of soluble fiber (713%) and the rest is insoluble fiber
(Anderson et al., 1990). However, rice bran has high percentage of oil (1223%) as
compared to other bran sources, with 4.2% unsaponifiable matter (Sugano and
Tsuji, 1997). Rice bran oil, possibly because of unsaponifiable fraction or its fatty
acid content, lowers cholesterol levels in hamsters, rats, humans and nonhuman
primates (Sharma and Rukmini, 1986; Seetharamaiah and Chandrasekhara, 1989;
Nicolosi et al., 1991; Kahlon et al., 1992; Purushothama et al., 1995).
81
82
Rice bran contains 15-22% oil by weight (Orthoefer, 1996; Patel and
Walker, 2004). Crude rice bran oil contains 90-96% of saponifiable and about 4%
unsaponifiable lipids. The saponifiable lipids include 68-71% triglycerides, 2-3%
diglycerides, 5-6% monoglycerides, 2-3% free fatty acids, 2-3% waxes, 5-7%
glycolipids and 3-4% phospholipids (McCaskill and Zhang, 1999) whereas the
principal component of the unsaponifiable fraction is -oryzanol (Raghuram and
Rukmini, 1995).
Rice bran oil has excellent fatty acid profile. It has oleic acid (38.4 %),
linoleic acid (34.4%) and linolenic acid (2.2%) as unsaturated fatty acids while
palmetic acid (21.5%) and stearic acid (2.9%) as saturated fatty acids (Rukmini
and Raghuram, 1991). The saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated
fatty acids are in the ratio of approximately 1: 2.2: 1.5 (Shin and Chung, 1998;
Krishna, 2002). Three major fatty acids, palmitic, oleic and linoleic make up 90%
of the total fatty acids of the rice bran oil (Amarasinghe and Gangodavilage,
2004).
2.3.3. Effective components
2.3.3.1. Fatty acids
Dietary fat is a crucial factor in the regulation of cholesterol levels and
there is devastating evidence to support the hypocholesterolemic effects of
vegetable oils rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids, mainly linoleic acid (Grundy,
1994). Growing interest in health benefits of polyunsaturated fatty acids has
focused on providing suitable sources of these constituents. Polyunsaturated
fatty acids include linoleic acid (C18:2n6c), -linolenic acid (ALA, C18:3n3), linolenic acid (GLA, C18:3n6), arachidonic acid (AA, C20:4n6), eicosapentaenoic
acid (EPA, C20:5n3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6n3).
Polyunsaturated fatty acids are required in the body for normal
functioning of nervous, immune & inflammatory, cardiovascular, endocrine,
respiratory and reproductive systems (Certik and Shimizu, 1999). Their presence
on membrane phospholipids can influence cellular activities. Fatty acids also
84
85
refined oil may contain 0.3-0.9%; because most part is removed during refining
(Rong et al., 1997). The content of the unsaponifiable material in refined RBO is
regulated to be 0.5% under the Japan Agricultural Standard; this value is
considerably higher than that of other vegetable oils (Sugano and Tsuji, 1997).
The unsaponifiable fraction in RBO also contains a unique complex of naturally
occurring antioxidant, of which the tocopherols, tocotrienols and oryzanol have
received much attention (Sayre et al., 1988). The amount of -tocopherol is
relatively large (0.1% of the total oil) in rice bran oil compared with other
vegetable oils (Nicolosi et al., 1994).
There are several mechanisms by which unsaponifiables improve serum
bio-chemical profile such as by interrupting the absorption of intestinal
cholesterol rather increasing the excretion of fat and neutral sterols (Kahlon et al.,
1996; Nagao et al., 2001) and increased fecal steroid excretion through
interference with cholesterol absorption (Ikeda et al., 1985; Sharma and
Rukumini, 1986).
2.3.3.3. Antioxidants
Any substance that delays or inhibits the oxidation of substrate, inspite of
low concentrations, is called antioxidant. The physiological role of antioxidants is
to prevent damage to cellular components arising as a result of chemical
reactions involving free radicals (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1995).
Several important nutraceutical compounds can be extracted from rice
bran which contains high levels of phytochemicals having antioxidant activities
(Chen and Bergman, 2005). These phytochemicals include vitamin E comprised
of four homologs (, , and ) of tocopherol & tocotrienols (Jariwalla, 2001;
Birringer et al., 2002) and the -oryzanol (Akihisa et al., 2000; Jariwalla, 2001).
Vitamin E is considered to be the major chain-breaking antioxidant especially in
biological membranes (Ricciarelli et al., 2001).
Rice bran is a rich natural source of vitamin E and -oryzanol (Shanggong
et al., 2007). It contains over 300 mg/kg vitamin E (Shin et al., 1997). Vitamin E is
86
pale-yellow and viscous oil (Hu et al., 1996). It protects cell membrane by
blocking the oxidation of the unsaturated fatty acids and acting as a scavenger of
free radicals (Komiyama et al., 1992; Nesaretnam et al., 1998). In addition to
health benefits, antioxidants of rice bran and its oil have a potential use as
additives to improve the storage stability and frying quality of foods (Lloyd et al.,
2000; Nanua et al., 2000; Kim and Godber, 2001). RBO is rich in -oryzanol having
antioxidant properties; their structure includes ferulic acid, a strong antioxidant
(Miller and Rice, 1997; Sierra et al., 2005).
2.3.3.3.1. Oryzanol
Oryzanol is a mixture of ferulate (4-hydroxo-3-methoxycinnamic acid)
esters of sterols (campesterol, stigmasterol and -stigmasterol) and triterpene
alcohols (cycloartenol, 24-methylenecycloartanol, cyclobranol); about 9.8gkg-1 is
found in rice bran (Xu and Godber, 2000; Fang et al., 2003; Miller et al., 2003). It
was first isolated from rice bran oil by Kaneko and Tsuchiya in 1954 (Kaneko and
Tsuchiya, 1954) and named because it was first discovered in rice bran oil (Oryza
Sativa L.). The most accessible natural source of -oryzanol is rice (Seitz, 1989). oryzanol is a white or slightly yellowish, tasteless crystalline powder with little
or no odor and has a melting point of 137.5-138.5oC (Xu and Godber, 2000). It is
insoluble in water, slightly soluble in diethyl ether and n-heptane and practically
soluble in chloroform (Bucci et al., 2003). Initially, it was reported as a single
component in rice bran (Kaneko and Tsuchiya, 1954.) but now it is known a
mixture of at least 10 components (Xu and Godbar, 1999; Kim et al., 2001).
The concentration of -oryzanol in rice bran oil ranges from 115 to
780ppm, depending on the degree and method of processing (Rogers et al., 1993).
-oryzanol is 13-20 times (w/w) in rice bran than total tocopherols and
tocotrienols (Bergman and Xu, 2003). It has been observed that about 20% of
unsaponifiable fraction in RBO is oryzanol (Rong et al., 1997). Different extraction
methods can result in different levels of these components because some
87
have been
88
89
and hydrogenation on -oryzanol content in refined oil has not yet been cleared;
it is considered that -oryzanol is mainly lost after neutralization. Similarly,
tocotrienols are also lost during each step of refining. In some cases, upto 90%
losses have been reported, which demands advance refining techniques.
2.3.4. Utilization
Rice bran oil with higher thermal and oxidative stability than sunflower
oil can be used for deep fat frying (Krishna et al., 2005). Blending of other oils
with rice bran oil has also been found to improve the stability of the blend during
frying and storage. The high oxidative stability of RBO makes it preferred oil for
frying and baking applications (McCaskill and Zhang, 1999; Semwal and Arya,
2001). The stabilized oil may be useful as spray oil for crackers, nuts, chips and
other snack foods. It extends the shelf-life of snack foods due to high levels of
phytosterols which may impart resistance to thermal oxidation and storage
deterioration (Taylor et al., 1996).
2.3.5. Economic Feasibility
Among the food grains, the production of paddy is the highest next to
wheat. In Asian countries, rice is the principal cereal produced and consumed by
the population. In 2001, the world production of paddy was 597.3 MMTs (FAO,
2001). The worldwide estimated potential of rice bran is 29.87 MMTs. However,
the commercial production of RBO in 2000 was estimated to be about 783
thousand tons, extracted with hexane (Perretti et al., 2003). The total potential of
rice bran oil production in the world worked out to be 4.48 MMTs. The Asian
countries alone contribute about 98.4% (4.41 MMTs) of rice bran oil.
In 2007-08, rice was cultivated on an area of 2515 thousand hectares and
yield was 5563 thousand tons. The estimated production of rice bran oil can be
worked out to be 81577-108760 thousand tons. As for as Pakistan is concerned,
out of the non-conventional oil sources, rice bran oil is the most important in
terms of its potential to augment the availability of oils. Full realization of the
90
potential will help in reducing the gap between demand and availability of
indigenous edible oils in the country to a significant extent (GOP, 2008).
and
LDL
levels
in
human
subjects
with
moderate
consumed 300g/d unpolished rice or 100g/d stabilized rice bran (Hakala et al.,
2002). Fullfat rice bran was found to be more effective in lowering cholesterol
than isolated rice bran fractions or their combinations (Kahlon et al., 1992).
Rice bran has been found to be equivalent to oat bran in lowering
cholesterol. Mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects were fed on treatment diets
(100g/day stabilized rice bran or oat bran) with 300mg/day added cholesterol.
Total cholesterol levels were significantly reduced in both bran diets when
compared to the control (Hegsted et al., 1993). Similarly, changes in plasma lipid
levels were studied in men with slightly above the normal cholesterol levels
providing test diets containing 35g/day of wheat bran, 60g/day of rice bran or
95g/day of oat bran. The varying amounts of the different brans provided a
constant amount of total dietary fiber i.e. 11.8g/day. At baseline level, only oat
bran was effective in reducing plasma cholesterol as compared to other
treatments. However, the highest rise in HDL was associated with the rice bran
diet, resulting in an improved HDL to total cholesterol ratio. Moreover, plasma
triglycerides were also lower in case of rice bran compared to wheat bran diet
(Kestin et al., 1990).
2.4.2. Rice Bran Oil
A number of studies in humans and animals have proved that RBO is
effective in lowering plasma cholesterol levels (Rukmini and Raghuram, 1991;
Lichtenstein et al., 1994). In some cases, RBO lowered plasma cholesterol more
effectively than other vegetable oils rich in linoleic acid (Rukmini and Raghuram,
1991); might be due to occurrence of specific components in RBO, -oryzanol and
perhaps tocotrienols (Nicolosi et al., 1994).
Rice bran oil and its components significantly improve the plasma profile
in rats. Rats were fed on diets containing 10% rice bran oil alongwith an equal
amount of groundnut oil as control diet for 8 weeks. Half of the animals in each
group also had 0.1% cholesterol and 0.05% cholic acid added in place of a portion
of starch. Rats fed on 10% RBO showed significantly lower serum cholesterol,
93
94
The cholesterol lowering effects of rice bran oil and safflower oil were
compared, alone and in combinations, both in cholesterol and cholesterol free
diets. Half of the animals were randomly assigned to cholesterol-free diets in
which one of these two oils, alone or in varying combinations, contributed 10%.
The other half were assigned to similar diets with additional 0.5% cholesterol.
Among the animals not fed on dietary cholesterol, total cholesterol levels were
similar between the rice bran oil and safflower oil groups, but HDL levels were
significantly higher in the rice bran oil group, resulting in a higher HDL:total
cholesterol ratio for this test group, although the differences were nonsignificant. Rice bran oil and safflower oil in 7:3 ratios in the diet appeared
optimal with respect to cholesterol levels. The average HDL:total cholesterol
ratio was significantly higher for this group than all other groups (Koba et al.,
2000).
Despite variations in fatty acid profile, rice bran oil has resulted in
reductions in total cholesterol and LDL levels in animals consuming diets
containing rice bran oil. Likewise, LDL levels dropped and HDL levels remained
unchanged or increased in rats fed on diets supplemented with the
unsaponifiable matter from rice bran oil (Sharma and Rukmini, 1987).
Unsaponifiables prepared from rice bran oil were evaluated in
exogenously hypercholesterolemic rats. Animals were maintained for two weeks
on 0.5% cholesterol diet with 10% fat content either rice bran oil, mixture of palm
& safflower oils or palm & safflower oils plus 0.25% of unsaponifiable content
prepared from rice bran oil. Serum and liver total cholesterol concentrations
were significantly lower and HDL levels significantly higher in both groups of
rats consuming the unsaponifiables versus oil without added unsaponifiables.
Higher fecal excretion of cholesterol was noted in the two unsaponifiable groups
as well. It was concluded that the unsaponifiable fraction of rice bran oil acts to
lower cholesterol by interrupting cholesterol absorption in the gut, not by
altering hepatic cholesterol metabolism (Nagao et al., 2001).
95
In a comparative fatty acid study, monkeys were fed on, in random order,
on control diet and three experimental diets having 20% energy content from rice
bran oil, canola oil or corn oil. HDL levels were maintained on the rice bran oil
diet while rest of the diets showed negative effect. The results suggested that
unsaponifiable fraction is critical for oils ability to decrease risk of
cardiovascular disease (Wilson et al., 2000)
Addition of oryzanol to rat diets containing rice bran oil was associated
with lower cholesterol levels compared to rat diets containing rice bran oil alone
(Seetharamaiah
and
Chandrasekhara,
1989).
Oryzanol
administered
to
et
al.,
1970a,b).
Furthermore,
the
blended
oil
still
exerted
hypocholesterolemic effects, even when five eggs were consumed daily for 7
consecutive days. In contrast, there was an increase in HDL-cholesterol after
consumption of the blended oil, and consequently, the atherogenic index was
significantly improved (Tsuji et al., 1989).
The hypocholesterolemic effects of rice bran oil were evaluated in
moderately non-obese hyperlipoproteinemic human subjects fed on rice bran oil
for a longer period. For comparison, the control group continued use of palm or
groundnut oils. The rice bran oil treated patients showed a 16-25% decrease in
plasma total cholesterol and 32-35% in triglycerides after 15-30 days of treatment
as compared to the control group (Raghuram et al., 1989).
The diets of healthy volunteers with normal cholesterol levels were
supplemented with a margarine enriched with rice bran oil sterols to assess the
impact of sterols present in the unsaponifiable fraction of rice bran oil on lipid
profile. The subjects were instructed to continue usual dietary and physical
activities while supplementing their diets with control margarine containing
traces of sterols or one enriched with 2.1g/day of the sterols from rice bran oil for
three weeks each. The enriched margarine, significantly, lowered total and LDL
cholesterol compared to control (Vissers et al., 2000).
Hyperlipidemic subjects were administered -oryzanol (300mg/day) for
three months. A significant decrease in plasma TC and LDL-C was observed in
both hypercholesterolemic and hypertriglyceridemic patients, while a relevant
increase in HDL-C was noted only in the hypercholesterolemic group without
any side effect (Yoshino et al., 1989).
98
It seems that rice bran oil and its components are able to safely improve
the plasma lipid pattern of hypercholesterolemic patients. The available data in
humans suggest that rice bran oil (RBO) is an edible oil of preference for
improving plasma lipid and lipoprotein profiles (Sugano and Tsuji, 1997).
2.4.3. Cholesterol-lowering mechanisms
The mechanism of action of rice bran and its oil on lipid metabolism is not
yet evident. However, the most probable hypothesis of RBO hypolipidemic
action is its specific content of phytosterols, polyphenols (-oryzanol) and tocols
(tocopherols and tocotrienols). The cholesterol-lowering effects of RBO are
possibly attributable to its relatively high unsaponifiables; physiologically
bioactive in controlling cholesterol levels in subjects. These compounds have
been found to work synergistically to exhibit hypocholesterolemic effects.
2.4.3.1. Phytosterols (campesterol, -sitosterol and stigmasterol)
The phytosterols present in crude rice bran oil like campesterol, sitosterol and stigmasterol, have been proven effective in lowering plasma total
and LDL-cholesterol without affecting HDL-cholesterol due to similarities in
structures of plant sterols and cholesterol (Weststrate and Meijer, 1998).
There are several mechanisms through which plant sterols affect
cholesterol concentration in the body like formation of non-absorbable complex
with cholesterol, altering the size and/or stability of the micelles, interferences
with cholesterol esterification in the mucosal cell and interacting with protein
receptors required in cholesterol absorption (Rong et al., 1997). It is generally
assumed that plant sterols inhibit intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary
cholesterol, because of the structural similarities with cholesterol. Some studies
indicated that plant sterols contributed more hypocholesterolemic effects than
unsaponifiables. In addition, some plant sterols may be more active than others
(Wilson et al., 2000). Among the sterols, -sitosterol has been recognized the
99
Nowadays, people are becoming more conscious about their health &
nutrition. Foods that are convenient with good taste, reasonably priced and carry
a favorable nutritional image are in great demand; bakery products especially
cakes and cookies. Wheat flour is the primary raw material which provides a
matrix in which other ingredients are mixed to form dough or batter.
In Pakistan, the predominant use of rice bran is an ingredient in livestock
feed. Considering its importance, value-added processing technologies for rice
bran have been sought by researchers. The products supplemented with rice
bran can play an important role in the existing food crises besides its health
claims.
From a marketing view point, the most available rice bran derived
product is the oil (Orthoefer, 1996). Rice bran oil has an impressive nutritional
quality, which makes it suitable for nutraceutical products. It has industrial
potential particularly in snack food preparation because of great frying stability
and with a good fry life and nutty flavor (Sarkar, 1992). Production of margarine
from rice bran oil has health benefits with reduced saturated fats and trans-fatty
acids.
Rice bran fractions can be used to produce acceptable low fat, high fiber
bakery products (Kennedy et al., 1996). Torticas de Moron, a traditional Cuban
bakery product, was manufactured with 0, 20, 25 or 30% of the usual white flour
replaced by parboiled rice bran. Protein, fat, crude fiber and ash were higher in
the rice Torticas than in the control. It was further observed that 25% replacement
of flour with rice bran resulted in a product with acceptable sensory properties,
chemical composition and shelf life (Zumbado et al., 1997).
Rice bran fiber has been reported to contain high amounts of functional
proteins and fats along with antioxidants, vitamins and trace minerals in
addition to being a concentrated source of fiber. The presence of these nutrients
allows rice bran fiber to be used as both nutritional and functional ingredient.
Chicken coated with stabilized rice bran fiber tend to absorb less fat during
101
frying while the small amount of fat found naturally in rice bran fiber can act as a
carrier for flavors (Hammond, 1994). Later, stabilized rice bran was incorporated
@ 5, 10 and 20% in chutney powder. Addition of the rice bran had more affect on
color and the least on texture with intermediate effects on aroma, taste and
overall acceptability (Prakash and Jyothilakshmi, 1995).
2.5.1. Bread
Bread is considered as one of the prime bakery products. Its large loaf
volume and fine texture require formation of well developed, elastic dough
structure. An essential element in this process is gluten present in the flour
(Eneche, 1999). Rice bran is used by the food industry in the production of baked
goods, snacks, crackers, breads, and cereals (Rukmani, 2002). The functional
properties of fullfat and defatted rice bran were explored by blending rice bran
in wheat flour @ 5, 10 or 15% to prepare leavened pan bread. Addition of any of
the defatted and fullfat rice brans was associated with reduction in loaf volume
and a decrease in overall acceptability of the bread. Breads containing upto 10%
of either type of rice bran was still considered acceptable (Sekhon et al., 1997).
The stabilized rice bran was successfully incorporated upto 20% for the
production of yeast bread. The hygroscopicity of the rice bran improved
moisture retention in the baked products while foaming ability improved air
incorporation and leavening (Carroll, 1990). In similar study, bread volume
decreased with blending of different types of rice bran; however, the decrease
was more pronounced with the defatted bran. Stabilized full fat rice bran up to
20% level and un-stabilized full fat or stabilized defatted rice bran upto 10% was
found suitable in various food products (Singh et al., 1995).
In commercial production of leavened pan bread, wheat flour was
supplemented with rice bran at 15-30%; concluded that rice bran can be
supplemented successfully upto 15% replacement level without affecting loaf
weight, height or volume (Sharp and Kitchen, 1990). Likewise, leavened pan
bread was made by supplementing 10 and 20% processed fullfat and defatted
102
rice bran to study the functional behavior of bread compared with control.
Texture profile analysis showed no significant differences as far as cohesive and
springiness, but bread hardness, gumminess and chewiness increased with
increasing levels of rice bran and were more prominent in bread from defatted
rice bran. Measurements of texture exhibited no detrimental effect of adding
fullfat rice bran upto 10% and slight hardening of loaves with 20% level
compared to control (Lima et al., 2002).
The addition of rice bran to wheat flour increased proteins, lysine and
dietary
fiber
in
bread
and
cookies
proportionately
to
the
level
of
2.5.2. Cookies
Cookie is chemically leavened product, also known as biscuit.
Generally the term biscuit is used in the European countries and cookies in the
USA. Biscuits and biscuit like products have been made and eaten by man for
centuries (Hoseney, 1986). Cookies are ideal for nutrient availability, palatability,
compactness and convenience. They differ from other baked products like bread
and cakes because of having low moisture content, ensure comparatively free
from microbial spoilage and confer a long shelf life of the product (Wade, 1988).
103
104
Chapter-III
105
stabilized rice brans along with un-stabilized bran were packed in zipper-top bags and stored at
room temperature (25oC) for 2 months.
3.2.2. Denaturation of anti-nutritional factors
Inspite of excellent nutritional profile, rice bran also contains some antinutrients like trypsin inhibitor and haemaglutinin-lectin, which must be
denatured before its supplementation in food products. Rice bran samples were
uniformly mixed with 20% (w/w) solution of 1% calcium hydroxide to
accomplish the objective.
3.3. Stabilization and Anti-Nutritional Appraisal
Chemical changes in stabilized and un-stabilized rice bran samples were
monitored by analyzing the samples for lipase activity, peroxide value,
thiobarbituric acid no. (0, 30 and 60 days storage interval), haemagglutinin-lectin
activity, trypsin inhibitor and phytates. The brief description of each method is
given below:
3.3.1. Lipase activity
Lipase activity was determined by estimating the amount of free fatty
acids (FFA) in rice bran on monthly basis upto 2 months (AOCS, 1998; AOAC,
2006). Increase in FFA (%) was taken as function of lipase activity in rice bran
during storage.
3.3.2. Peroxide value
Peroxide value of rice bran samples was determined by the method
described in Pearsons Composition and Analysis of Foods (Kirk and Sawyer,
1991) at the above said intervals up to two months.
3.3.3. Thiobarbituric acid no. (TBA no.)
TBA no. of rice bran samples was determined at specified intervals to
evaluate the stability of rice bran (Kirk and Sawyer, 1991). The rice bran (10g)
was taken in distillation flask and heated to obtain 5.0mL distillate in glass
stoppered test tube with 5.0mL TBA reagent (0.2883g/100mL of 90% glacial
acetic acid) and heated in water bath for 35 min with a blank sample. The tubes
were cooled in water for 10 min and absorbance (D) against blank sample was
taken by adjusting spectrophotometer (Cecil CE-7200, UK) on 538nm
wavelength. TBA no. was calculated by using the following expression:
TBA no. (mg malenaldehyde per Kg sample) = 7.8 x D
106
107
multiplying nitrogen with respective conversion factors i.e. 5.70 and 6.25 for
wheat flour and rice bran, respectively (Pomeranz and Meloan, 1996).
3.4.1.2. Crude fat (CF)
The crude fat content of each sample was estimated by using Soxtech
System (HT2 1045 Extraction Unit, Hoganas, Sweden) by following the AACC
method 30-10 (AACC, 2000).
3.4.1.3. Crude fiber (CF)
Crude fiber content of each sample was determined by digesting the
sample in 1.25% H2SO4 followed by 1.25% NaOH solution through Labconco
Fibertech (Labconco Corporation, Kansas, USA) as described in AACC Method
32-10 (AACC, 2000).
3.4.1.4. Ash
The ash content in each dry sample was determined by incinerating 3g
sample in a Muffle Furnace (MF-1/02, PCSIR, Pakistan) after charring according
to AACC Method 08-01 (AACC, 2000).
3.4.1.5. Nitrogen free extract (NFE)
The NFE was calculated according to the following expression:
NFE = 100 (% CP+ % CF+ % CF+ % Ash)
Where;
CP = Crude protein
CF = Crude fat
CF = Crude fiber
Scientific
Ltd.,
Cambridge)
and
Atomic
3.5.1. Extraction
Rice bran oil was extracted from all bran samples by slurring with four
volumes of food grade hexane at room temperature for 1 hr. Hexane was
evaporated in a rotary evaporator at 40oC (AOCS, 1998).
3.5.2. Refining
Crude rice bran oil was refined to remove pigments and esters by using
dewaxing, degumming, neutralization and bleaching processes. Dewaxing was
carried out by cooling the oil at 15oC, allowing the waxes to crystallize, settle and
then removed through centrifugation. For degumming, phosphoric acid (0.25%)
was added in dewaxed oil along with water for hydration to ensure the complete
hydroxylation and then centrifuged. Lastly, bleaching of oil samples was carried
out through acid activated bleaching clay (3%).
3.5.3. Yield (%)
The yield of refined oil (%) was calculated by the formula:
Wt. of refined oil (g)
Yield of oil (%) =
x 100
109
110
n-hexane. The funnel was shaken gently several times and the upper hexane
layer was removed. Hexane solution was dried over anhydrous sodium
sulphate, filtered and then vacuum distilled to get concentrated methyl ester for
GLC analysis by following IUPAC Method 2.301+2.302+2.304 (IUPAC, 1987).
FAMEs of different RB samples were analyzed on Shimadzu Gas
Chromatograph Model 14A (Shimadzu Co., Japan) fitted with a methyl lignose
rate coated (film thickness = 0.25m), polar capillary column SP-2330
(30mx0.32mm) and a flame ionization detector. Oxygen free nitrogen was used
as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 5mL/min. The temperature programming of the
column oven was set as 180C-2min-4C/min-210C, injector temperature 230C
detector temperature 250C. Identification of fatty acid methyl esters was made
by comparing their relatives retention times with that of known standard
samples using a CSW32 software program and data processor C-R4A
CHROMATOPAC.
relative humidity was controlled at 505%. The rats were nurtured in screenbottomed cages under 12 hr light-dark cycles and had free access to water and
diet during the entire experimental periods. At the initiation of study, some rats
were anaesthetized and sacrificed to measure base line values for respective
parameters. Feed intake and water consumption were measured daily where as
body weight on weekly basis throughout the experimental period. Overnight
fasted rats, from each group (10 rats) were decapitated at 15, 30 and 45 days
under chloroform anesthesia and blood was drawn in lithium heparin tubes
(Becton, Dickinson & Co., US). Organs like liver, heart, lungs, spleen, right and
left kidney were weighed to determine the effect of the individual experimental
diets on these organs.
Experimental diets: The control diet was composed of 65% corn starch, 10% corn
oil, 10% casein, 10% cellulose, 4% salt mixture (Appendix I) and 1% vitamin
mixture (Appendix II). The detail of remaining diets is mentioned below:
Ingredients
Control
(%)
Fullfat RB
Defatted RB
Rice bran oil
Corn Oil
10
Corn Starch
65
Casein
10
Cellulose
10
Salt mixture
4
Vitamins
1
Total
100
Control = Corn oil/ starch
FFRB = Fullfat rice bran (MWSRB)
TDF
= Total dietary fiber
RBO
FFRB
DFRB
50.2
41.75
10
9.65
65
32.92
41.50
10
2.88
2.10
10
4
4
4
1
1
1
100
100
100
RBO = Rice bran oil (MWSRB)
DFRB = Defatted rice bran (MWSRB)
As anticipated from the design of the diets, the protein, fat, total dietary
fiber, salt mixture and vitamins contents of the six diets were identical.
3.7.2. Analysis of serum profile
112
ALP
(Alkaline
Phosphatase)
and
AST
113
10-50D (AACC, 2000). Vegetable shortening and sugar were mixed in Hobart
Mixer-N50 (Hobart Manufacturing Co., Troy, Ohio, USA) for 20-30 min; water
was added followed by eggs and mixed till homogeneity (approx. 5 min at a
speed setting of 2). Lastly, the commercial straight grade flour (CSGF) and
baking powder were added to form a homogeneous mass. The batter was spread
into sheet; cookies were molded and baked in the baking oven at 1755oC for 2530 min. After baking, the cookies were cooled at room temperature and packed
in polyethylene bags for a period of two months for further analysis.
Table 1. Utilization of RBO in cookies
Treatments
NS (%)
RBO (%)
T0
100
T1
80
20
60
40
T2
T3
40
60
T4
20
80
T5
100
T0 acts as control with 100% normal shortening
114
The sensory evaluation of cookies for various attributes like color, flavor,
taste, texture and overall acceptability (Appendix III) was carried out at 0, 30 and
60 days by trained taste panel using 9-Point Hedonic Score System (Meilgaard et
al., 2007) with following individual scores: liked extremely-9, liked very much-8,
liked moderately-7, liked slightly-6, neither liked nor disliked-5, disliked slightly4, disliked moderately-3, disliked very much-2 and disliked extremely-1, to find
out the most suitable composition of cookies for commercialization. All
evaluations were conducted at room temperature on the same day in the
National Institute of Food Science and Technology (NIFSAT), University of
Agriculture, Faisalabad. On the day of evaluation, cookies from all compositions
were placed in transparent cups, labeled with random codes. Panelists were
provided with distilled water and unsalted crackers to rinse their mouths
between the samples. The cookies were presented in random order and panelists
were asked to rate their acceptance by giving a score for all the parameters.
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
80
75
70
60
50
20
25
30
40
50
30
min
for
gelatinization,
hydrolysis
and
and
amyloglucosidase
to
hydrolyze
starch
The dough development time and peak height were interpreted from each
Mixogram.
3.8.3.5.2. Farinographic studies
The rheological behavior of rice bran supplemented flours was evaluated
by running samples through a Brabender Farinograph (Brabender DUISBURG
380, Germany) equipped with 50g bowl capacity to assess the dough behavior of
each sample (AACC Method 54-21). Farinograms were obtained at 500
Brabender Unit (BU) line with 50g flour under controlled conditions of
temperature (30C). The farinograms were interpreted for the characteristics such
as water absorption, dough development time and dough stability.
3.8.4. Preparation of rice bran supplemented cookies
Cookies were prepared from supplemented flour samples (Table 3) with
some modifications in AACC Method 10-50D (AACC, 2000) and analyzed for
quality attributes.
Table 3. Treatments used for preparation of rice bran supplemented cookies
Wheat flour
Stabilized Rice Bran (%)
Treatments
Full fat
Defatted
(%)
T0
100
T1
90
10
T2
80
20
T3
70
30
T4
60
40
T5
50
50
T6
90
10
T7
80
20
T8
70
30
T9
60
40
T10
50
50
T0 (100% commercial straight grade flour) acts as control for both fullfat and defatted rice bran supplementation
118
Wheat flour
(%)
100
95
90
85
80
75
95
90
85
80
75
T0 (100% commercial straight grade flour) acts as control for both fullfat and defatted rice bran supplementation
120
Chapter-IV
4.1.
applications and its successful use is only possible after stabilization. Upon
milling, bran is exposed to enzymes from the outer layers of the rice kernel,
resulting in hydrolysis of its oil. This in turn leads to rancidity of the bran,
making it unsuitable for human consumption. In this study, stabilization of rice
bran was carried out to inactivate lipases and other nutritional inhibitors such as
trypsin inhibitor and haemaglutinin-lectin. After processing, there was
significant reduction in these anti-nutritional factors. The chemical changes in
121
stabilized and unstabilized rice bran samples were monitored by analyzing for
lipase activity (in terms of FFA production), peroxide value (PO) and
thiobarbituric acid number (TBA no.) at 0, 30 and 60 days storage.
Mean squares for FFA, POV and TBA no. of various rice bran samples
showed (Table 5) significant variations due to stabilization techniques and
storage intervals whereas interaction was found to be non-significant for these
traits. The mean values (Table 6) explicated that FFA, POV and TBA no. were
significantly affected by the stabilization techniques.
4.1.1. Lipase activity
Rice bran contains lipases, primarily responsible for the hydrolysis of
triglycerides into glycerol and free fatty acids; further oxidized by peroxidases,
provoking brans rancidity. In present study, increase in FFA was used as
criterion of lipase activity. The highest FFA level (Table 6) was observed in
unstabilized rice bran (17.75%) followed by parboiled (6.95%) and extruded bran
(6.12%); however, the minimum value (5.25%) was observed in microwave
stabilized bran samples. After stabilization, there was less formation of FFA in all
stabilized bran samples. Nevertheless, there was a gradual increase in FFA level
in all bran samples during 60 days storage due to residual lipolytic activity that
increased under favorable conditions (Table 7). At the initiation of study, the
mean FFA level was 3.82% which gradually increased to 7.34 and 15.89% after 30
and 60 days storage, respectively. However, the maximum increase was
observed in unstabilized rice bran.
Hydrolysis of triglycerides forms free fatty acids, the principal cause of
deterioration occurring rapidly during the first few days or weeks after milling
(Randall et al., 1985; Ramezanzadeh et al., 1999). After bran separation, the oil is
exposed to lipases, causing its rapid breakdown to free fatty acids (Desikachar,
1974).
122
Table 5. Mean squares for FFA, POV and TBA no. of various rice bran samples
SOV
df
FFA
POV
TBA
no.
Treatments (T)
Storage (S)
SxT
Error
Total
**
3
2
6
24
35
309.197**
462.575**
82.228**
0.110
0.0227**
0.6188**
8.62010-4ns
0.0013
8.99010-4**
1.7510-4**
1.57410-5ns
0.00002
Table 6. Effect of stabilization on FFA, POV and TBA no. of rice bran samples
Bran types
Un-RB
ES-RB
MW-RB
PAR-RB
FFA
POV
TBA no.
17.75a
6.12c
5.25d
6.95b
0.91a
0.81b
0.80b
0.88a
0.083a
0.063c
0.062c
0.074b
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
Un-RB
Rice bran (unstabilized)
ES-RB
Extrusion stabilized rice bran
MW-RB
Microwave stabilized rice bran
PAR-RB
Parboiled rice bran
Table 7. Effect of storage on FFA, POV and TBA no. of rice bran samples
Storage (days)
0
30
60
FFA
POV
TBA no.
3.82c
7.34b
15.89a
0.63c
0.83b
1.09a
0.0670c
0.0716b
0.0741a
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
123
bran deteriorate rapidly as the oil undergoes hydrolytic and oxidative rancidity
(Subrahmanyan, 1977; Tsai, 1982). Hence, stabilizing the bran just after milling can
prevent oil deterioration.
4.1.2. Peroxide value
The means for peroxide value (Table 6) explicated significance of
stabilization techniques. The highest POV (0.91 mEq/Kg) was observed in
unstabilized rice bran followed by parboiled (0.88 mEq/Kg) whereas the
minimum value (0.80 mEq/Kg) was recorded for microwave stabilized rice bran.
Likewise to FFA development, there was comparatively less increase in POV
bran samples after stabilization. Nonetheless, there was a gradual increase in
POV in bran samples during storage (Table 7). At the start, the mean POV was
0.63 which was steadily increased to 0.83 and 1.09 mEq/Kg after 30 and 60 days,
respectively. The maximum increase was noted in unstabilized samples.
4.1.3. Thiobarbituric acid no.
Thiobarbituric acid test is based on the reaction of thiobarbituric acid with
the oxidation products of fats and oils. It is believed that aldehydes are
responsible for the color formation, measured spectrophotometrically. The
development of red color indicates the degree of oxidation in a given sample.
The mean values for TBA no. (Table 6) also highlighted the importance of
stabilization against lipases. The highest TBA value (0.083) was observed in
unstabilized rice bran followed by parboiled (0.074), extrusion stabilized (0.063)
and microwave stabilized bran (0.062mg malenaldehyde per Kg). Extrusion and
microwave stabilized rice bran showed non-significant differences with respect
to TBA no. Similar to FFA and POV, there was less increase in TBA no. of bran
samples after stabilization. However, a gradual increase was observed in all
124
samples during 60 days storage (Table 7). At the start of study, the mean TBA no.
was 0.067 which was gradually increased to 0.071 and 0.074 mg malenaldehyde
per Kg of bran sample, after 30 and 60 days storage, respectively. TBA no. in
unstabilized bran increased progressively during storage and its measurement
was considered as a viable method to analyze oxidative degradation. Refined oil
in good condition has TBA value of 0.02 to 0.08 whereas badly stored oils have
0.1 to 0.2 mg malenaldehyde per Kg (Kirk and Sawyer, 1999).
Several processes have been studied to inactivate lipases (Rajeshwara and
Prakash, 1995). The commonly used stabilization techniques are thermal and
chemical treatments (Randall et al., 1985; Kim et al., 1987). Thermal treatments are
capable of decreasing the oxidative rancidity (Ramezanzadeh et al., 1999). In
present investigation, pretreatment methods showed a significant reduction in
FFA contents as compared to unstabilized bran. Both microwave heating and
extrusion cooking were found equally effective in controlling lipase activity. The
extrusion process can inactivate the lipases by increasing the temperature of the
extruded material (Sanchez et al., 2000). Extrusion cooking showed no significant
increase in free fatty acids during storage. Heating in the presence of moisture is
more effective for denaturing lipases (Ramezanzadeh et al., 1999). Similar to
extrusion, parboiling also effective to reduce the free fatty acids (Godber et al., 1994). The
thermal efficiency of microwave heat stabilization is greater than that of either dry or wet heating
as enhanced kinetic energy of water molecules due to electromagnetic waves,
Haemagglutininlectin activity
/mg
125
Trypsin
inhibitor
activity /mg
Phytates
(%)
Un-RB
ES-RB
MW-RB
PAR-RB
22.850.19
0.960.008
0.810.009
0.100.001
8.010.07
Nil
Nil
Nil
4.130.04
1.300.012
1.250.013
0.950.008
Values are MeanSD for four rice bran samples, analyzed individually in triplicate
Un-RB
Rice bran (unstabilized)
ES-RB
Extrusion stabilized rice bran
MW-RB
Microwave stabilized rice bran
PAR-RB
Parboiled rice bran
126
decreased after stabilization. Among the stabilized rice bran samples, minimum
activity were observed in parboiled rice bran (0.10) followed by microwave
stabilized (0.81) and extrusion stabilized rice bran (0.96 activity/mg). The results
are in confirmity with the findings of Sayre et al. (1987) and Benedito-de and
Barber (1978). Haemagglutinin activity was reduced by 95% by cooking the moist
rice bran at 1302C. By the addition of acetic acid solution (1%), negligible
activity was observed in extruded rice bran. It can be assumed that these
processes resulted complete denaturation of the toxic globulin proteins. In
another study, haemagglutinin activity was reduced by heating rice bran at 100
C upto six minutes (Rehman and Mahmood, 1996).
4.1.5. Trypsin inhibitor
Trypsin inhibitor is one of the most important anti-nutritional factors
present in rice bran. The maximum activity (8.01 activity/mg) was in
unstabilized rice bran (Table 8). All stabilization techniques resulted in
permanent destruction of trypsin inhibitor from bran samples. The results of the
present investigation are in accordance with earlier findings of Kratzer et al.
(1974) and Kratzer and Payne, (1977). Trypsin inhibitors are readily inactivated
by moist heat treatment (Deolankar and Singh, 1979.)
4.1.6. Phytates
Phosphorus as phytate is relatively unavailable to non-ruminants
resulting in poor absorption of other minerals. The maximum phytate content
(4.13%) was noted in unstabilized rice bran; significantly reduced after
stabilization (Table 8). The minimum phytates were found in parboiled rice bran
(0.95%) followed by microwave stabilized rice bran (1.25%) and extrude bran
(1.30%), respectively. Incubation of rice bran at 55C reduced phytic acid content
upto 80% (Tangendjaja et al., 2006). Heat stabilization of bran significantly reduced the
phytic acid content (Sharma et al., 2004).
The phytate contents of extrusion stabilized rice bran were reduced upto
54.12%. However, the phytates in processed rice bran moist with acetic acid and
127
calcium hydroxide plus extruder cooking, further decreased by 89.88 and 77.65%,
respectively (Shaheen et al., 2005).
Defatted rice bran samples contain 17.41 to 20.16% crude protein, 0.47 to
1.03% crude fat, 13.08 to 21.32% crude fiber, 10.17 to 11.30% ash content and
46.19 to 58.17% nitrogen free extract (Table 11). However, defatted rice bran has
higher levels of protein, fiber and ash content than that of fullfat rice bran
samples.
The results pertaining to proximate composition of processed rice bran
were in conformity with the findings of Farrell (1994) who found 1117% crude
protein, 1118% crude fat, 10% crude fiber and 4565% nitrogen free extract in
rice bran. Similarly, Pomeranz and Oryl (1982) reported 13.217.3% protein, 3.29.5% crude fiber and 9.211.2% ash content in rice bran, on dry weight basis.
Likewise, Warren and Farrell (1990) reported that the crude protein ranged from
13.417.4%, ether extract 20.423.4% and ash 10.5% among several cultivars of
rice bran grown in Australia. The present study is also in concordance with the
findings of Saunders (1990) who reported that stabilized and parboiled rice bran
had 12% moisture, 13% protein, 16% fat, 9% crude fiber and 10% ash. Juliano
(1985) studied proximate composition of rice bran and reported 11.3-14.95%
crude protein and 15.0-19.7% crude fat.
Al-Jasser and Al-Mustafa (1996) conducted proximate analysis of Hassawi rice bran and
reported 12.56% protein, 15.15% fats, 17.74% ash and 45.66% carbohydrates. Similarly, Sharif et
al. (2005) reported that rice bran of Pakistani rice cultivars has 6.68% moisture,
7.89% ash, 15.78% crude protein, 20.55% crude fat, 7.59% crude fiber and 41.51%
nitrogen free extract.
Un-RB
ES-RB
MWRB
PARRB
CSGF
7.500.21
14.200.46
8.560.27
14.420.42
7.450.23
14.450.39
8.200.21
16.200.45
11.500.33
10.230.35
129
Fat
Fiber
Ash
NFE
18.220.51
12.20.36
8.300.19
46.082.15
18.670.45
10.680.32
8.670.21
47.562.62
18.850.55
10.750.35
8.700.25
47.253.06
19.300.60
17.030.47
9.030.28
36.442.33
1.170.04
0.330.01
0.520.02
76.254.41
Un-RB
7.500.19
12800.55
543.730.03
9530.43
ES-RB
7.400.23
12830.48
552.450.01
9350.41
MW-RB
7.200.21
12700.52
538.570.03
9690.45
PAR-RB
9.300.25
18200.46
872.500.02
12330.51
Un-RB
ES-RB
7.450.19
17.410.55
0.890.03
14.950.43
10.170.27
56.583.01
8.400.23
17.660.48
0.470.01
13.080.41
10.620.23
58.172.85
MW-RB
7.390.21
17.690.52
0.550.03
13.150.45
10.650.30
57.963.32
PAR-RB
8.110.25
20.160.46
1.030.02
21.320.51
11.300.29
46.192.56
130
extracted from bran samples by slurring with food grade hexane and refined to
remove unsaponifiables, pigments and limited quantities of partial esters.
4.3.2 Yield (%)
During refining, there was a substantial decrease in the oil recovery at
each step. The yield of oil after extraction and refining is shown in Table 12.
Before refining, maximum oil content (19.30%) was found in parboiled rice bran
followed by MW-stabilized rice bran (18.85%), extrusion stabilized rice bran
(18.67%) and unstabilized rice bran (18.22%). Parboiled rice bran has
approximately 20-26% greater oil content, than raw rice bran (Amarasinghe and
Gangodavilage, 2004). After refining, maximum recovery was observed in
parboiled rice bran (16.10%) whereas minimum oil content was recorded in
unstabilized rice bran (13.39%); might be due to high initial FFA content.
However, the oil recovery from microwave and extrusion stabilized rice bran
was 15.75 and 15.45%, respectively. No doubt, the yield of parboiled oil was
more but the main hurdle is its dark color that is undesirable.
4.3.3. Quality evaluation
Edible oils were evaluated for physical, chemical, nutritional and
technological properties before their applications in food. The oil samples were
analyzed for different quality parameters i.e. color, flavor & odor, specific
gravity, smoke point, fire point, free fatty acids, peroxide value, acid value,
saponification value, iodine value, unsaponifiable matter (Table 13), fatty acid
profile (Table 14) and antioxidant potential (Table 15) by following their
respective procedures.
131
and method of extraction. The color of oil extracted from parboiled rice bran was
dark yellow, might be due to processing conditions; whereas oil extracted from
unstabilized, microwave and extruded bran samples was pale yellow.
4.3.3.2. Flavor and odor
The flavor of the oil is an imperative physical property and is influenced
by moisture, temperature, oxidation, light as well as the presence or absence of
antioxidants. Crude oils are normally deodorized to improve their quality. The
oil extracted from rice bran samples possessed agreeable flavor and odor after
refining process.
4.3.3.3. Specific gravity
It is used as a diagnostic criterion in assessing the extent of purity. The
presence of the number of double bonds and increase in chain length of the fatty
acids tend to increase the specific gravity. It is evident from the results (Table 13)
that the specific gravity of rice bran oil samples ranged from 0.910 to 0.935. For
oils, the value of specific gravity is always <1 and normally ranges from 0.850 to
0.950.
4.3.3.4. Smoke and fire point (C)
The smoke and fire points of a fat or oil are measure of its thermal
stability. It is obvious from the results (Table 13) that smoke and fire points of all
bran oil samples were 239 to 251C and 343 to 359C, respectively. Rice bran oil
has comparatively high smoke and fire point which also indicates its stability for
deep-frying purposes.
132
Table 12. Yield of rice bran oil from different bran samples
Yield (%)
Un-RBO
Crude RBO
Refined
RBO
18.220.39
ESRBO
18.670.43
13.390.29
15.450.53
MW-RBO
18.850.61
15.750.69
PARRBO
19.300.63
16.100.
29
Values are MeanSD for four rice bran oil samples, analyzed individually in triplicate
Un-RBO
ES-RBO
MW-RBO
PAR-RBO
UnRBO
pale yellow
agreeable
ESRBO
pale yellow
agreeable
MWRBO
pale yellow
agreeable
PARRBO
dark yellow
agreeable
0.9350.02
2446.17
34310.59
4.0130.12
0.910.05
1.270.05
1915.73
1173.25
2.750.13
0.9150.04
2427.26
35610.68
0.0450.001
0.890.03
1.190.04
1885.44
1093.27
3.100.22
0.9310.02
2396.13
34910.63
0.0470.007
0.860.01
1.210.05
1875.43
1113.27
3.220.12
0.9100.03
2517.53
35910.77
0.0480.003
0.850.02
1.250.06
1895.67
1053.15
3.010.11
133
134
The acid value is a measure of the free fatty acid content of oil/fat. It is an
index of the measurement of freshness of oil. Humidity and high temperature
result in an increase of the acid value due to hydrolysis of glycerides into free
fatty acids. Higher values indicate undesirable changes as it not only results in
greater refining losses but also increases susceptibility of oils to rancidity. It is
thus very important in economic of oil refining. The oils intended for dietary
purposes should not contain higher amounts of free fatty acids. The presence of
free fatty acids in oils & fats is not desirable because they impart a sharp and
unpleasant flavor to edible fats & oils. The acid value of refined rice bran oil
samples was 1.19 to 1.27mg/g (Table 13); oil extracted from unstabilized and
parboiled bran samples showed maximum acid value i.e. 1.27 and 1.25mg/g,
respectively; might be due to high moisture, temperature and lipase activity in
bran samples.
4.3.3.8. Saponification value (mg/g)
Saponification value gives the molecular weight of the fatty acids present
in oil. The fat or oil with low molecular weight fatty acids has a higher
saponification value. The results in Table 13 showed that saponification value of
refined rice bran oil samples was 187 to 191mg KOH/g.
4.3.3.9. Iodine value (g/100g)
The iodine value is a measure of the degree of unsaturation of fatty acids
and expressed in terms of the number of grams of iodine absorbed by 100g of fat
or oil. It also indicates the stability of oil towards oxidation. It is observed, higher
the iodine value, greater the degree of unsaturation. It is evident from the results
(Table 13) that the iodine value of refined rice bran oils was 105-117g/100g.
4.3.3.10. Unsaponifiable matter (%)
These are bioactive components with nutraceutical worth mainly
composed of sterols, triterpene alcohols and less polar components such as
squalene or tocotrienols. The results in Table 13 elucidate that unsaponifiable
content of refined rice bran oil samples was 2.75 to 3.22%. Crude rice bran oil
contains 90 to 96% saponifiable and about 4% unsaponifiable lipids (Raghuram
135
and Rukmini, 1995; McCaskill and Zhang, 1999) mainly comprised of naturally
occurring antioxidants such as tocopherols, tocotrienols and oryzanol (Sayre et
al., 1988; Ju and Vali, 2005). Recently, rice bran oil has gained attention because
of its unique health claims (Nicolosi et al., 1994) attributed by its high level of
unsaponifiable matter (Shin et al., 1997).
Crude rice bran oil contains high content of unsaponifiables (3-5%) which
are several times greater than that of commonly used vegetable oils (Rong et al.,
1997). According to CAC specification, the unsaponifiable matter in refined rice
bran oil should not be more than 3.5%; however, Japanese Agriculture Standards
specify it to be less than 5% (CAC, 2003). Currently, efforts are being made to
develop RBO with retained non-saponifiable components, while minimizing
levels of problematic free fatty acids (Ginsberg et al., 1998). There are several
mechanisms by which unsaponifiables improve serum bio-chemical profile such
as by interrupting the absorption of intestinal cholesterol rather increasing the
excretion of fat and neutral sterols (Kahlon et al., 1996; Nagao et al., 2001) and
increased fecal steroid excretion through interference with cholesterol
absorption (Ikeda et al., 1985; Sharma and Rukumini, 1986).
4.3.4. Fatty acid profile of RBO
Rice bran oil samples were analyzed for fatty acid profile through gas
chromatography (GC) and the results are presented in Table 14. The saturated
fatty acids i.e. myristic (C14:0), palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0), and arachidic (C20:0)
acids in oil samples extracted from various rice brans were: unstabilized-RBO:
0.19, 17.70, 0.32, 0.50%; extrusion stabilized-RBO: 0.14, 18.37, 0.19, 0.46%;
microwave stabilized-RBO: 0.18, 16.80, 0.44, 0.50% and parboiled-RBO: 0.15,
19.80, 0.22, 0.47%, respectively. The investigated oils were found to contain a
high level of monounsaturated fatty acids (C18:1) i.e. 42.44 to 44.44%. The contents
of linoleic acid (C18:2) in the bran oils were 34.51 to 36.51% whereas the linolenic
acid (C18:3) contents were found to be 0.87 to 1.10%. The levels of saturated and
136
unsaturated fatty acids in the present analysis were comparable to the values
reported in the literature.
Rice bran oil has an excellent fatty acid profile. It has oleic acid (38.4%),
linoleic acid (34.4%) and linolenic acid (2.2%) as unsaturated fatty acids while
palmetic (21.5%) and stearic acid (2.9%) as saturated fatty acids (Rukmini and
Raghuram, 1991). The rice bran oil contains more than 75% unsaturated fatty
acids of which linoleic acid constitute about 35% (CAC, 2003). The saturated,
monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids are in the ratio of
approximately 1:2.2:1.5 (Shin and Chung, 1998; Krishna 2002). Three major fatty
acids palmitic, oleic and linoleic make up 90% of the total fatty acids of the bran
oil (Amarasinghe and Gangodavilage, 2004). Rice bran oil with Ideal
SFA/MUFA/PUFA ratio, is closest to WHO recommendation as compared to
other edible oils (Appendix V).
137
Table 14. Fatty acid composition (%) of rice bran oil samples
Fatty acids Un-RBO
C 14:0
C 16:0
C 18:0
C 18:1
C 18:2
C 18:3
C 20:0
0.190.007
17.700.41
0.320.017
43.331.341
36.211.05
1.090.08
0.500.016
S-RBO
0.140.005
18.370.57
0.190.007
44.041.35
35.651.08
1.100.04
0.460.015
MW-RBO
0.180.006
16.800.51
0.440.014
44.441.337
36.511.13
0.870.03
0.500.016
AR-RBO
0.150.003
19.800.41
0.220.011
42.441.312
34.511.04
0.990.01
0.470.011
Saturated fatty acids: C 14:0 (myristic acid); C 16:0 (palmitic acid); C 18:0 (stearic acid); C 20:0 (arachidic)
Mono-unsaturated fatty acid: C 18:1 (Oleic acid)
Poly-unsaturated fatty acids: C 18:2 (linoleic acid); C 18:3 (linolenic acid)
138
7581.97**
Tocopherol
254.75**
834.062
128.466
20.1803
df
-oryzanol
Treatments
Error
15.036
139
4.488
Tocotrienol
393.0** 254.75**
46.129
5.3081
11
Total
**
-oryzanol
590.7825.75b
690.1730.08a
703.4230.67a
660.1228.77a
Un-RBO
ES-RBO
MW-RBO
PAR-RBO
Values are MeanSD for four rice bran oils, analyzed individually in triplicate
Un-RBO
Rice bran oil extracted from unstabilized rice bran
ES-RBO
Rice bran oil extracted from extrusion stabilized rice bran
MW-RBO
Rice bran oil extracted from microwave stabilized rice bran
PAR-RBO
Rice bran oil extracted from parboiled rice bran
Table 15b. Tocopherols in refined rice bran oil samples (mg/Kg oil)
Antioxidants
Un-RBO
24310.59b
813.53c
361.57d
ES-RBO
26611.59a
893.88b
431.87c
MW-RBO
27511.99a
984.27a
642.79a
PAR-RBO
25511.11ab
873.79bc
472.01b
Table 15c. Tocotrienol in refined rice bran oil samples (mg/Kg oil)
Antioxidants
Un-RBO
924.01c
1406.10b
411.79d
ES-RBO
1054.58b
1606.76a
502.18c
MW-RBO
1141.57a
1677.28a
632.75a
PAR-RBO
1004.97bc
1556.76a
552.40b
140
melting point (137.5 to 138.5oC) resulting in improved thermal stability (Xu and
Godber, 2000). Initially, it was considered as single component but now proved
to be a mixture of at least 10 components (Xu and Godbar, 1999; Kim et al., 2001).
Complete role of -oryzanol as functional ingredient, has not yet been explored.
However, it reduces serum cholesterol in rats and hyperlipidemia in humans
(Seetharamaiah and Chandrasekhara, 1989; Yoshino et al., 1989).
4.3.5.1. Tocopherols and tocotrienols
Means for , and -tocopherols are presented in Table 15b.
Concentration of tocopherols homologs varied significantly among various rice
bran oil samples. Maximum levels of -tocopherol, -tocopherol and tocopherol were detected in oil extracted from MW-RBO (275, 98, 64 mg/kg),
followed by ES-RBO (266, 89, 43 mg/kg) and PAR-RBO (255, 87, 47 mg/kg),
respectively; whereas minimum level was found in Un-RBO (243, 81, 36 mg/kg).
The content of -, - and -tocopherols ranged from 243 to 275, 81 to 98 and 36 to
64 mg/kg, respectively; exhibited high vitamin E activity in the investigated oil
samples compared with other commonly used vegetable oils (Kao and Luh,
1991). The concentration of tocopherols ranged from 36 to 275 mg/kg, thus,
would be expected to contribute high oxidative stability to the oils during
storage (Rossell, 1991). Approximately 1.0% (v/v) of the unsaponifiable fraction
of RBO is -tocopherol. HPLC analysis of RBO showed that 1g of RBO contains
3.02mg of -tocopherol (Qureshi et al., 2000).
Concentration of tocotrienols differs significantly among various rice bran
oil samples (Table 15c). The highest levels of -tocotrienol, -tocotrienol and tocotrienol were detected in MW-RBO (114, 167, 63mg/kg) followed by ES-RBO
(105, 160, 50mg/kg) and PAR-RBO (100, 155, 55 mg/kg), respectively; whereas
least level was observed in Un-RBO (92, 140, 41mg/kg). The content of -, - and
-tocotrienol ranged from 92 to 114, 140 to 167 and 41 to 63mg/kg, respectively.
The concentration of tocotrienol ranged from 41 to 167mg/kg, in experimental
bran oil samples. The contents of -, - and -tocotrienols have proven their
141
worth against coronary diseases due to their anti-thrombotic properties and have
greater antioxidant potential than the tocopherols (Rossell, 1991; Rukmani, 1995).
RBO is a rich source of tocotrienols ranged from 72 to 1157ppm depending upon
different bran sources and commercial refining methods. Approximately 1.7%
(v/v) of the unsaponifiable fraction of RBO is tocotrienol (Deckere and Korver,
1996). Rice bran is a rich natural source of vitamin E; however, different
extraction methods can affect its recovery (Shanggong et al., 2007).
Rice bran contains over 300 mg/kg vitamin E (Shin et al., 1997). Human
physiological system and animals cannot synthesize this vitamin; they primarily
acquire tocols from plants. The structural differences of tocotrienols and
tocopherols influence their biological activities (Qureshi et al., 1996). Tocols
protects cell membrane by acting as a scavenger of free radicals (Nesaretnam et
al., 1998). In addition to health claims, antioxidants of rice bran oil have a
potential use as additives to improve the storage and frying stability of oils (Kim
and Godber, 2001). It has been observed that consumption of 240mg/day of
tocotrienols upto two years caused no adverse effects and they are safe even at
higher levels (Qureshi et al., 2001).
142
alongwith control were fed to four groups of Sprague Dawley rats (SD-rats) for a
period of 45 days and were evaluated for physical and hematological parameters.
The results are summarized as:
4.4.1. Physical parameters of rats
It is obvious from the mean squares (Table 16) that treatments and study
period showed a significant effect on feed intake, water consumption and gain in
body weight of SD-rats.
4.4.1.1. Feed intake
Means for feed intake in different groups of rats (per rat/day) have been
shown graphically in Fig. 1. It is apparent from the results that rats fed on RBO
diet had the highest feed intake (19.21g/rat/day) followed by rats on control diet
(17.85g/rat/day) and FFRB diet (16.88g/rat/day) while the lowest consumption
was observed in rats fed on diet containing DFRB (14.51 g/rat/day). Study
period (weeks) significantly affected the feed intake; highest consumption was
observed on 6th week (19.84g) while the lowest feed intake was observed in 1st
week (15.42g) followed by 4th week (15.73g) per rat per day. There was an
increasing trend for feed intake during first 3 weeks which slightly diminished
on 4th week and then further increased upto 6th week.
4.4.1.2. Water intake
Means for water intake in different groups of rats (per rat/day) have been
illustrated in Fig. 2. It is apparent from the results that highest water intake
(37.81mL/day) was observed in rats fed on diet containing RBO followed by rats
consuming FFRB (35.98mL/day) and DFRB (35.52mL/day). Lowest water intake
(31.85mL/day) was observed in control group. For water intake almost a parallel
143
Table 16. Mean squares for physical parameters of different groups of rats
SOV
Feed
intake
Water
intake
Gain in body
weight
Treatments
11.7271**
87.9719**
8.40602**
23.5655**
37.4444**
3.20624**
Error
15
0.51713
7.7369
0.22927
Total
23
144
Control
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
Feedintake (g)
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
1
Weeks
Fig. 1. Feed intake in different groups of rats during 6 weeks (per rat/day)
Control
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1
Weeks
Fig. 2. Water intake in different groups of rats during 6 weeks (per rat/day)
Control
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
1
Weeks
Fig. 3. Gain in body weight in different groups of rats during 6 weeks (per
rat/week)
145
trend was observed in all groups of rats during the entire study period.
However, rats fed on RBO, consumed more water throughout the experiment.
4.4.1.3. Gain in body weight
The means for gain in body weight in different groups of rats (per
rat/week) has been illustrated in Fig 3. It is evident from the results that highest
gain in body weight was observed in rats fed on diets containing RBO (7.24g per
rat/week) followed by control (7.14g per rat/week) and FFRB (6.86g per
rat/week) while the lowest gain was observed in DFRB (5.99g per rat/week)
group. The rats fed on rice bran oil gained higher body weight compared with
other treatments, from the initiation of study, concomitant with its higher feed
intake (Ahmed et al., 2007). The results with respect to study period (week)
showed that highest gain in body weight was observed in 4th week (8.79g)
followed by 5th week (7.61g) per rat per week. Initially, 4.35 to 8.79g (per
rat/week) gain in body weight was observed during 1st four weeks, later,
decreasing from 8.79 to 6.43g (per rat/week) in all groups of rats; however,
decrease was more pronounced in rats fed on defatted rice bran. Rats fed on
DFRB gained less body weight (16.11%) followed by FFRB group (3.21%) than
that of control; might be due to low feed intake from the initiation of the study. It
has already been recognized from various studies that dietary fiber may have
some potential in the management of weight loss. This effect is derived from the
potential influence of fiber on several aspects of food intake and nutrient
availability (Vahouny, 1982). The effects on weight loss are often deduced from
decreased caloric intake, satiety and increased fecal excretion of energy in the
form of fat and nitrogen (Leeds, 1985; Vahouny, 1985; Wisker et al., 1985). Rats
fed on fullfat and defatted rice bran showed less increase in body weight;
defatted rice bran was found to be more effective in weight loss programs.
146
147
Table 17. Mean squares for organs weight of different groups of rats
d
Liver
Hear
t
Lung
s
0.0013ns
0.0060ns
0.0100ns
0.004
0.0224ns
0.0447ns
0.0665ns
0.0499
SOV
Treatments
Study period
TxS
Error
Total
3
3
9
64
79
9.833ns
0.054ns
0.138ns
0.579
Sple
e
n
Kidney
-L
0.007ns
0.002ns
0.004ns
0.003
0.004ns
0.005ns
0.005ns
0.008
Kidney
-R
0.0026ns
0.0033ns
0.0118ns
0.0080
Heart
Lungs
Spleen
Kidney L
Kidney R
4.210.12
4.130.11
4.100.05
4.070.06
0.380.02
0.440.04
0.340.01
0.390.03
1.190.07
1.140.06
1.250.04
1.200.02
0.360.03
0.340.01
0.300.02
0.310.02
0.480.02
0.450.02
0.460.02
0.490.01
0.460.02
0.460.03
0.460.02
0.490.02
Table 19. Organs weight of different groups of rats during study periods
Study
Period
(days)
0
15
30
45
Heart
Lungs
Spleen
Kidney-L
Kidney-R
4.140.10
4.120.11
4.160.12
4.170.05
0.390.03
0.320.01
0.440.04
0.400.02
1.240.02
1.160.05
1.190.08
1.190.03
0.330.03
0.310.01
0.340.02
0.340.03
0.490.02
0.460.01
0.470.03
0.460.01
0.450.02
0.470.02
0.480.03
0.470.02
148
149
Table 20. Mean squares for serum kidney and liver function tests
SOV
Treatments
Study period
TxS
Error
Total
ns
df
3
3
9
64
79
Urea
0.34097ns
0.10587ns
1.05822ns
1.79386ns
Creatinine
0.00500ns
0.00735ns
0.00238ns
0.00286
ALP
ALT
AST
15.1496ns
282.212ns
218.359ns
527.276
46.8465ns
10.3185ns
84.1880ns
87.4762
112.083ns
13.7500ns
66.8055ns
53.3752
Table 21. Effect of diets on serum kidney and liver function tests in different
groups of rats
Treatme
nts
Control
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
Urea
(mg/dL)
15.400.09
15.470.23
15.550.24
15.550.24
Creatini
ne
(mg/dL)
0.610.01
0.640.01
0.630.04
0.620.01
ALP
(U/L)
260.573.61
266.512.13
269.603.49
265.073.49
ALT
(U/L)
108.001.97
108.602.12
107.302.12
107.001.32
AST
(U/L)
85.002.65
83.251.55
81.501.94
83.002.38
Table 22. Serum kidney and liver function tests in different groups of rats
during study periods
Study
Period
(days)
0
15
30
45
Urea
(mg/dL)
15.580.26
15.580.13
15.300.11
15.520.26
Creatini
ne
(mg/dL)
0.610.03
0.610.01
0.640.02
0.630.01
150
ALP
(U/L)
266.515.87
265.752.77
264.931.13
264.561.85
ALT
(U/L)
105.800.84
108.802.24
107.201.63
109.102.18
AST
(U/L)
82.502.06
82.502.47
82.501.44
83.252.56
4.4.3.1. Cholesterol
Means for serum cholesterol (Table 24) showed significant variations in
different groups of rats fed on various diets. Maximum serum cholesterol was
found to be 93.77mg/dL in control group followed by 89.10 and 86.72 mg/dL in
rats fed on diets containing defatted rice bran and rice bran oil, respectively.
Lowest serum cholesterol was observed in rats fed on fullfat rice bran (85.84
mg/dL). The results indicated that fullfat rice bran is more effective in
cholesterol lowering than either rice bran oil or defatted rice bran; certainly due
to presence of comparatively high levels of tocopherol, tocotrienol and oryzanol
as well as unsaponifiables which are reduced during refining process of bran oil.
It was further observed that FFRB showed a significant reduction (12.92%) in
serum cholesterol of SD-rats followed by RBO (9.66%) and DFRB (6.44%) (Fig. 4).
From the present research, it was concluded that there was 6.44 to 12.92%
reduction in cholesterol by the addition of these treatments. Normal levels of
serum cholesterol were 100.39 and 102 mg/dL in rats as observed by Khosla et al.
(1995) and Rehman et al. (2001). Hematological clinical chemistry values for male
SD-rats of different age groups for cholesterol, ranged from 75.4 to 134.1mg/dL
(TTL, 2008).
Scientific studies support recommendations to increase dietary fiber as
part of hyperlipidemia treatment. Bran fiber offers a protective effect during
cholesterol metabolism and reduces the circulating cholesterol levels (Gerhardt
and Gallo, 1998). Diets containing 10% total dietary fiber from intact fullfat
stabilized rice bran resulted significant decline in cholesterol compared with
151
cellulosic control diet (Kahlon et al., 1985). Stabilized fullfat and defatted rice
bran supplemented with 0.5% cholesterol, resulted significant reduction in
cholesterol concentrations in animals consuming fullfat stabilized (Kahlon et al.,
1990). In cholesterol-fed hamsters, diet containing 11, 22, 33 and 44% rice bran
resulted in plasma cholesterol reductions of 8, 11, 15 and 21% respectively
(Kahlon et al., 1992).
Table 23. Mean squares for lipid profile and serum glucose in different
groups of rats
SOV
Treatments
Study period
TxS
Error
Total
3
3
9
64
79
Choleste
rol
252.638**
140.601*
47.0561ns
59.0513
HDL
LDL
22.337ns
2.2379ns
1.5422ns
12.664
197.373**
155.895**
33.4068ns
8.34113
Triglycerid
es
791.0339**
48.74435ns
89.26417ns
39.43058
Glucose
318.580*
12.4733ns
130.689ns
88.8308
Table 24. Effect of diets on serum lipid profile and glucose (mg/dL) in different
groups of rats
Treatments
Control
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
Cholesterol
93.771.03a
85.842.61b
89.101.28b
86.722.00b
HDL
39.630.33
40.870.29
41.860.20
41.840.25
LDL
37.850.57a
31.582.49bc
33.421.25b
31.261.03c
Triglycerides
81.462.55a
66.952.15c
71.571.12b
69.891.87bc
Glucose
113.162.61
107.002.36
104.602.05
112.350.83
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
Table 25. Serum lipid profile and glucose (mg/dL) in different groups of rats during
various study periods
Study
Period
(days)
0
15
30
Cholesterol
92.510.16a
89.101.19b
87.132.48b
HDL
40.640.27
40.990.62
41.130.67
LDL
37.260.31a
33.551.19b
32.120.16b
Triglycerides
Glucose
73.050.78
74.052.42
72.414.98
110.561.08
109.551.13
108.803.25
70.355.46
108.204.52
45
86.693.49b
41.440.47
31.182.76c
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
152
15 Days
% Decrease in cholesterol
14.00
30 Days
45 Days
12.92
12.00
9.66
9.69
10.00
8.59
8.00
6.00
6.44
4.76
6.43
4.29
4.00
2.15
2.00
0.00
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
Treatments
153
synthesis
in
the
liver
(Fukushima
et
al.,
1999).
The
components
of
RBO
acted
synergistically
to
induce
plasma cholesterol more effectively than other vegetable oils rich in linoleic acid
(Rukmini and Raghuram, 1991); might be due to occurrence of -oryzanol and
perhaps tocotrienols (Rukmini and Raghuram, 1991; Nicolosi et al., 1994). The oryzanol is a unique natural antioxidant occurring only in rice bran. It lowers
cholesterol by inhibiting activity of cholesterol-esterase; by the modulation of
cholesterol esterase and acyl-CoA-cholesterol-acyltransferase (Rukmini and
Raghuram, 1991); by partial splitting off the sterol moiety of -oryzanol from the
ferulic acid in the small intestine (Sugano and Tsuji, 1997); by increasing faecal
excretion of cholesterol and its metabolites (Seetharamaiah et al., 1990; Wilson et
al., 2007) and in some cases, direct inhibition of lipid metabolism (Sakamoto et al.,
1987).
Tocotrienols are naturally present in rice bran and palm oil and the later
contains a lower level than found in rice bran oil. They inhibit the liver
microsomal enzyme HMGCo-A reductase (Qureshi and Qureshi, 1993), the key
enzyme involved in the endogenous synthesis of cholesterol and helps to lower
circulating cholesterol. Inhibition of enzyme, ACAT (Acyl coenzyme A; Acyl
transferase), by -oryzanol results in lowered LDL-cholesterol synthesis and
enrichment of HDL-cholesterol and increased cholesterol excretion. The enzyme
inhibitions by these unique rice bran phytonutrients, tocotrienols and -oryzanol,
help to reduce the elevated cholesterol and other lipid parameters, thereby
reducing the risk of CVD. In an experimental study, significant reduction in
cholesterol (48-54%) and LDL (39-74%) was observed in a dose dependent
manner (Minhajuddin et al., 2005).
There
are
several
mechanism
of
cholesterol
reduction
through
156
15 Days
3.50
% Increase in HDL
45 Days
3.11
2.91
2.84
3.00
2.50
2.15
2.08
1.79
2.00
1.50
30 Days
1.50
1.22
1.17
1.00
0.50
0.00
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
Treatments
157
158
Likewise, HDL level was significantly higher in the rice bran oil group, resulting
in a higher HDL to total cholesterol ratio (Koba et al., 2000).
Male SD-rats were fed on normal, high-cholesterol and high-cholesterol
diet supplemented with the concentrated bioactive components from rice bran
oil (BRBO) for 4 weeks. Serum HDL was significantly increased in rats fed on
BRBO group; it recovered the activities of serum aspartate amino transferase
which was elevated in rats by high cholesterol diet (Haa et al., 2005). Despite
some variations in fatty acid profile, rice bran oil resulted increase in HDL in rats
fed on diets supplemented with the unsaponifiable matter from rice bran oil
(Sharma and Rukmini, 1987).
4.4.3.3. Low density lipoprotein (LDL)
Means for LDL in different groups of rats (Table 24) explicated significant
variations among the rat groups fed on selected diets. Maximum LDL was
37.85mg/dL in control group followed by 33.42, 31.58 and 31.26 mg/dL in
groups fed on DFRB, RBO and FFRB, respectively. Percent decline of LDL in
different groups of rats (Fig. 6) showed maximum reduction (29.74%) in rats fed
on FFRB followed by RBO (23.18%) and DFRB (15.95%).
LDL cholesterol is considered as bad form of cholesterol (James and
Claude, 1998). In a study, rats were fed on experimental diet containing rice bran
and peanut oil; LDL was found to be lowered in rice bran oil fed groups
(Purushothama et al., 1995). In a different study, LDL levels dropped in rats fed
on diets supplemented with the unsaponifiable matter of rice bran oil (Sharma
and Rukmini, 1987).
The hypolipidemic response of rice bran oil was investigated in nonhuman primates fed on semi-purified diets containing blends of oils including
rice bran oil. The supplementation of RBO in the diet, significantly, influenced
serum TC and LDL, resulting upto 40% reduction in LDL without affecting HDL
levels (Nicolosi et al., 1991). In a study, hyperlipidemic subjects were
administered with -oryzanol (300mg/day) for three month. A significant
159
160
15 Days
30 Days
45 Days
35.00
29.74
% Decrease in LDL
30.00
23.99
25.00
21.21
20.00
15.00
15.95
12.21
23.18
17.26
11.54
10.00
6.62
5.00
0.00
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
Treatments
161
whereas minimum level (66.95mg/dL) was noticed in rats fed on fullfat rice
bran. Percent decrease of triglycerides (Fig. 7) in different groups of rats showed
maximum reduction (13.44%) in rats fed on FFRB followed by RBO (10.63%) and
DFRB (6.93%). Normal levels of serum triglycerides were 78 mg/dL in rats
(Khosla et al., 1995). Rats fed on rice and wheat bran showed significant
reduction in liver cholesterol and triglycerides; rice bran diet increased LDL
receptor activity in the liver more than the wheat bran, hence, effectively
lowering plasma cholesterol levels (Topping et al., 1990).
Similarly, triglycerides were significantly lowered in chicks fed on fullfat
rice bran diet (Newman et al., 1992). In another study, changes in plasma lipid
levels were observed in men with slightly above normal cholesterol levels
providing test diets containing 35g/day of wheat bran, 60g/day of rice bran or
95g/day of oat bran with constant amount of total dietary fiber i.e. 11.8g/day.
The highest decrease in plasma triglycerides were found in rice bran group
compared to wheat bran diet (Kestin et al., 1990).
Rice bran oil and its components significantly improved the plasma profile in
rats. Rats were fed on diets containing 10% rice bran oil showed significant
decrease in TG (Sharma and Rukmini, 1986). Addition of oryzanol to rat diets
containing rice bran oil was associated with lower cholesterol levels compared to
rat diets containing rice bran oil alone (Seetharamaiah and Chandrasekhara,
1989). In animal study, diets were enriched with 1% cholesterol and 0.15% bile
salts and either devoid of oryzanol or oryzanol enriched @ 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0%.
A significant decrease in plasma triglyceride levels was seen in the 0.5% oryzanol
group than rats fed on oryzanol free diet (Seetharamaiah and Chandrasekhara,
1989). The hypocholesterolemic effects of rice bran oil were evaluated in
moderately non-obese hyperlipoproteinemic human subjects fed on rice bran oil
for a longer period. For comparison, the control group continued use of palm or
groundnut oils. The rice bran oil treated patients showed 16 to 25% decrease
162
15 Days
% Decrease in TG
16
30 Days
45 Days
13.44
14
10.63
12
10
7.05
6.93
6
4
2
6.53
3.35
1.72
1.29
0.42
0
FFRB
DFRB
RBO
Treatments
163
164
15 Days
% Decrease in glucose
45 Days
9.22
10
8.09
7.80
5.88
6
4
30 Days
3.55
1.47
1.43
0
-2
FFRB
DFRB
-4
RBO
-1.43
-2.14
Treatments
165
166
Table 26. Mean squares for serum proteins in different groups of rats
SOV
Treatments
Study period
SxT
Error
Total
ns
d
3
3
9
64
79
Prot
ein
0.11975ns
0.09576ns
0.14075ns
0.291
Alb
umin
0.1070ns
0.0686ns
0.0174ns
0.0684
Glo
bulin
0.04581ns
0.09355ns
0.03764ns
0.06325ns
A/G
0.0022ns
7.6667ns
0.00894ns
0.00818
= Non-significant
Protein
(g/dL)
6.150.10
6.280.09
6.330.09
6.200.20
Albumin
(g/dL)
2.930.01
3.050.04
3.090.06
2.970.02
Globulin
(g/dL)
2.890.04
2.960.04
2.970.04
2.880.07
A/G
1.010.01
1.030.02
1.030.02
1.040.02
Table 28. Serum proteins in different groups of rats during study periods
Study
Period
(days)
0
15
30
45
Protein
(g/dL)
6.030.05
6.080.13
6.400.07
6.450.05
Albumin
(g/dL)
2.970.02
2.970.03
3.020.03
3.090.07
167
Globulin
(g/dL)
2.860.02
2.900.07
2.930.04
3.020.02
A/G
1.040.01
1.030.02
1.030.02
1.020.23
SOV
Treatments
(T)
Thickn
Width
ess
45.63432**
2.486833**
168
Spread
factor
148.392**
Storage (S)
SxT
Error
Total
**
2
10
36
53
0.065ns
0.04465ns
6.039179
0.0139352ns
3.0185x10-4ns
0.0398
0.08225ns
0.05056ns
8.599
Width
Thickne
ss
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
44.080.18a
43.260.01a
40.370.01b
39.360.01b
38.820.01b
39.270.01b
Spread
factor
9.250.02c
9.370.01c
9.360.02c
9.930.01b
9.970.02b
10.620.02a
47.670.13a
46.160.07a
41.470.07b
40.670.04b
39.480.06bc
36.980.08c
Values are meansSEM; Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ
significantly
T0 = Normal shortening 100%; T1 = RBO 20%; T3 = RBO 40%; T3 = RBO 60%; T4 = RBO 80%;
T5 = RBO 100%.
Width
Thickness
factor
(days)
0
30
60
Spread
40.900.94
40.880.94
40.790.88
9.780.22
9.750.21
9.720.21
42.021.69
42.111.67
42.151.63
169
RBO throughout the study. The results revealed that at 0 day, T0 (100% NS)
exhibits maximum width 44.08 mm while T5 (100% RBO) showed minimum
width 39.27 mm. The remaining treatments T1 (43.26 mm), T2 (40.37 mm), T3
(39.36 mm) and T4 (38.82 mm) followed the similar decreasing trend. It is quite
clear that enhancement in the level of RBO gradually decreased the width of the
cookies. However, there was non-significant effect of storage on width of cookies
(Table 31). Means for storage showed that width was 40.90 mm at 0 day and
40.79 mm after 60 days. These results are in corroborated with the findings of
Sharif et al. (2005) who reported a decrease in width of cookies as a result of
replacement of normal shortening with RBO. However, increase in width was
noted by the use of different levels of emulsifiers in cookies (Leelavathi and Rao,
1993; Patel and Rao, 1996).
4.5.1.1.2. Thickness (T)
The data regarding the means for effect of various treatments on thickness
of cookies (Table 30) elucidated increasing trend with progressive increase in
RBO. The results showed that at 0 day, T0 (100% NS) exhibited minimum
thickness 9.25 mm while T5 (100% RBO) showed maximum thickness 10.62 mm.
The remaining treatments T1 (9.37 mm), T2 (9.36), T3 (9.93 mm) and T4 (9.97 mm)
followed the same increasing trend. It is quite clear that with increased levels of
RBO, thickness of cookies was improved whereas storage has been found to
exhibit non-significant effect (Table 31). Means for storage indicated that
thickness was 9.78mm at 0 days and 9.72mm after 60 days. These results are
consistent with previous findings of Sharif et al., (2005) who also reported an
increase in thickness by replacing normal shortening with RBO.
170
emulsifiers on cookies prepared from blends of wheat and blackgram flours and
reported increase in spread factor with increasing addition of sugar and fat.
Similarly, use of emulsifiers results in significant increase in spread ratio of
cookies (Leelavathi and Rao, 1993).
4.5.1.2. Proximate analysis
The cookies were analyzed for moisture, crude protein, crude fat, crude
fiber, ash and nitrogen free extract (NFE) to find out the impact of RBO
replacement on composition of cookies during storage. Means squares in Table
32 explicated that RBO substitution had non-significant effect on proximate
composition of cookies; however, during storage, moisture, fat and protein
contents of cookies were significantly affected.
171
The moisture content is of great importance for many scientific and technical
reasons. Means for proximate composition of cookies (Table 33) showed nonsignificant effect of RBO replacement with normal shortening. The moisture
content, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, ash and NFE content ranged from
3.77-3.86, 7.49-7.53, 20.72-21.11, 0.25-0.31, 0.51-0.55 and 66.75-67.12%,
respectively. However, during 60 days storage, there was significant increase in
moisture content of cookies (Table 34). In freshly prepared cookies, the average
moisture content was 2.95%, which was gradually increased to 3.64 and 4.87%
after 30 and 60 days of storage, respectively. This phenomenon of moisture
absorption during storage is also supported by Wade (1988), ultimately affecting
sensory attributes of cookies during storage. When cookies are sealed in moisture
proof packaging, the small amount of moisture present in the atmosphere within
the package rapidly come in equilibrium with the product. When cookies are
exposed to outer environment, they quickly absorb moisture. Moreover, wheat
flour is hygroscopic in nature, resulting increase in moisture content of cookies.
Likewise, water is produced as a result of breakdown of chemical constituents of
cookies during storage which also enhanced moisture content of the product. The
results of present study are supported by the previous findings of the various
researchers (Leelavathi and Rao, 1993; Rao et al., 1995; Pasha et al., 2002; Butt et
al., 2004; Sharif et al., 2005).
Means for protein content of different cookies prepared from various levels of
rice bran oil (Table 33) illustrated non-significant differences of RBO substitution in
cookies. The crude protein content ranged from 7.49 to 7.53% in all treatments. Whilst,
during 60 days storage, there was slight decrease in protein content of cookies (Table
34). In freshly prepared cookies, the average protein content was 7.90%, which
reduced to 7.47 and 7.15% after 30 and 60 days storage, respectively. The decrease in
protein during storage was might be due to the increase in moisture content that
accelerates proteolytic activity in cookies. The present investigation is closely in lines
with the findings of (Pasha et al., 2002; Butt et al., 2004; Sharif et al., 2005).
Table 33. Proximate composition of RBO cookies
Treatme
nts
T0
T1
T2
Moist
ur
e
Prote
in
3.800.56
3.810.55
3.850.55
7.520.21
7.500.21
7.510.22
Fat
20.720.64
20.810.60
20.910.57
172
Fiber
Ash
0.290.01
0.290.01
0.270.01
0.540.01
0.530.01
0.550.01
NFE
67.120.30
67.050.26
66.900.23
T3
T4
T5
3.860.58
3.770.57
3.830.57
7.500.21
7.490.22
7.530.23
20.990.56
21.060.52
21.110.49
0.310.01
0.250.01
0.270.01
0.540.02
0.530.01
0.510.01
66.790.21
66.900.16
66.750.14
Moisture
2.950.01c
3.640.02b
4.870.02a
Protein
7.900.01a
7.470.02b
7.150.01c
Fat
Fiber
Ash
NFE
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
173
as well as oxidation of fatty acids resulting in free fatty acid formation. It is worth
mentioning that, although, there was gradual decrease in fat content in all the
treatments, yet, decrease was comparatively low in treatments with higher levels
of rice bran oil; might be due to high levels of oryzanol, tocopherols and
tocotrienols in RBO (Patel and Walker, 2004). Blending of other oils with rice
bran oil has also been found to improve the stability of the blend during frying
and storage. The high oxidative stability of RBO makes it preferred oil for frying
and baking applications (McCaskill and Zhang, 1999; Semwal and Arya, 2001).
Rice bran oil with higher thermal and oxidative stability can be used for deep fat
frying (Krishna et al., 2005). It extends the shelf-life of snack foods due to high
levels of phytosterols; may impart resistance to thermal oxidation and storage
deterioration (Taylor et al., 1996). Regarding fiber and ash, non-significant
differences were observed due to various treatments (Table 33) and storage
intervals (Table 34).
Means for NFE showed non-significant differences of treatments while
significant variations due to storage. The NFE contents ranged from 66.75 to
67.12% in all treatments. In freshly prepared cookies, the mean values were
66.37% that increased to 67.10% after 60 days storage (Table 34). The changes in
moisture, fat and protein content of cookies during storage, showed their
cumulative effect with slight increase in nitrogen free extract. The results of
present study are quite comparable to the observations recorded earlier by Sharif
et al. (2005).
4.5.1.3. Total acidity
Means squares for total acidity and TBA no. of RBO cookies have been
presented in Table 36. The total acidity and TBA no. were significantly affected
during storage; various treatments exhibited non-significant differences with
respect to total acidity and significant for TBA no. of cookies. The interaction
between treatments and storage intervals was to be non-significant for acidity
while significant for TBA no. of cookies.
174
The means for acidity of various treatments showed that storage had
significant effect on acidity; ranged from 0.147 to 0.194% from initiation to end of
the study (Table 37). The present findings concur with Rehman and Shah (1999)
who also observed a similar increasing trend in acidity with storage. Anjum et al.
(2003) has reported a significant increase in acidity for flour samples as a
function of 3 months storage. Leelavathi et al. (1984) described decline in acidity
by lowering moisture contents of stored atta. They observed an increase in
acidity value from 0.098 to 0.400% after 5 months storage. In the present
investigation, there was progressive increase in moisture content of cookies with
the passage of time; might be one of the possible reasons for increase in acidity
during 60 days storage. The rise in acidity may also be credited to the
accumulation of linoleic acid during storage that is oxidized later (Kent and
Evers, 1994).
4.5.1.4. Thiobarbituric acid no. (TBA no.)
Thiobarbituric acid number is a commercial test based on the reaction of
2-thiobarbituric acid with the oxidation products of fats and oils to form a red
color. Means for effect of different treatments of rice bran oil (Table 36) showed
that TBA no. was gradually decreased with proportionate increase of RBO in
cookies formulation. Average TBA values were 0.075, 0.063, 0.056, 0.053, 0.046
and 0.033 mg malenaldehyde/Kg for T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively. It is
obvious from the results that cookies with increased levels of RBO exhibited the
lowest TBA no. compared with control (100% normal shortening); hence
175
Table 35. Mean squares for total acidity and TBA no. of RBO cookies
SOV
df
Treatments (T)
Storage (S)
SxT
Error
Total
**
5
2
10
36
53
Total Acidity
2.4074x10-5ns
0.0106**
2.6296x10-5ns
5.5556x10-5
TBA no.
0.001**
0.009**
9.51810-5**
1.85110-6
Total Acidity
(%)
0.1720.014
0.1730.013
0.1730.013
0.1740.015
0.1740.015
0.1750.015
TBA
(mg
malenaldehyde/Kg
)
0.0750.018a
0.0630.015b
0.0560.014c
0.0530.015d
0.0460.012e
0.0330.009f
Table 37. Effect of storage on total acidity and TBA no. of RBO cookies
Storage
(days)
0
30
60
Total Acidity
(%)
0.1470.001c
0.1760.005b
0.1940.001a
176
TBA
(malenaldehyde/Kg)
0.0330.004c
0.0510.006b
0.0790.008a
inception of rancidity was delayed. At the start, TBA no. of cookies was 0.033
that gradually increased to 0.079 mg malenaldehyde/Kg during storage (Table
37).
Rice bran oil based products have extended shelf life since it is extremely stable against
the onset of rancidity and oxidative deterioration. During storage, there was increase in TBA
value but the treatment T1 (without RBO) showed maximum increase. Treatments containing
RBO also showed some increase in TBA value but were within limits. Rice bran oil contains
In baking, color serves as a cue for the doneness of foods and is correlated
with changes in aroma and flavor. The results pertaining to mean score for the
color of the rice bran oil supplemented cookies (Table 39) revealed that T2 (7.61)
was preferred by the judges because it gave excellent color to cookies, followed
by T3 (7.11) as compared to control (6.69). Treatments prepared from 40 to 60%
rice bran oil substitutions were more liked by the judges. Though remaining
treatments got fewer score, yet they were acceptable. There was dullness in color
during storage, resulted lower score in all the treatments. The maximum score
(7.10) was obtained by cookies at the initiation which gradually decreased to 6.61
and 6.00, after 30 and 60 days storage, respectively (Table 39). These results are in
close agreement with the findings of Elahi (1997) who observed a gradual
decrease in color of biscuits made from composite flour of wheat and gram
during 90 days storage. Similar results have been reported by numerous
researchers including Pasha et al. (2002), Butt et al. (2004) and Sharif et al. (2005) in
cookies during storage. The deterioration in color of cookies was might be due to
the absorption of moisture from the atmosphere and oxidation of fats.
4.5.1.5.2. Flavor
Perceptions of flavor are a synthesis of taste and smell impressions, along
with texture and are even influenced by appearance. Means for flavor of cookies
(Table 40) revealed that T2 (40% RBO) and T3 (60% RBO) were much liked by the
judges and got maximum score, 7.31 and 6.87, respectively; whereas T4 (6.27) and
T5 (6.01) got minimum score. As a whole, the maximum score (7.20) was obtained
by fresh cookies (0 day), that was gradually decreased (6.59 and 6.14) after 60
days (Table 40). Bakery products rapidly stale and loose their flavor because
stailing transforms the rich aroma and flavor of the fresh product to a bland or
an off-flavor (Setser, 1996).
178
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
7.45
7.00
8.02
7.48
6.44
6.20
6.56
6.28
7.75
7.10
6.06
5.91
6.05
5.62
7.06
6.76
5.42
5.10
7.100.28a
6.610.29b
Mea
n
6.690.41c
6.300.40d
7.610.29a
7.110.21b
5.970.30de
5.740.33e
6.000.32c
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
T0 = Normal shortening 100%; T1 = RBO 20%; T3 = RBO 40%; T3 = RBO 60%; T4 = RBO 80%;
T5 = RBO 100%.
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Mean
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
Mea
n
7.32
7.34
7.81
7.28
6.84
6.62
7.200.17a
6.73
6.50
7.10
6.93
6.11
6.14
6.590.17b
6.17
6.10
7.02
6.40
5.86
5.27
6.740.33b
6.650.37b
7.310.25a
6.870.26b
6.270.29c
6.010.40c
6.140.24c
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
7.47
7.13
7.92
7.50
6.64
6.11
6.93
6.68
7.76
7.08
6.20
5.88
6.12
6.08
7.20
7.15
6.02
4.98
7.130.27a
6.760.27b
Mea
6.840.39c
6.630.30c
7.630.22a
7.240.13b
6.290.18d
5.660.34e
6.260.34c
180
4.5.1.5.4. Texture
Food texture is extremely important to the consumer. Yet, unlike color
and flavor, texture is used by the consumers not as a sign of food safety but as an
indicator of food quality. Means for texture of cookies (Table 42) reveled that
average score for texture ranged from 6.22 to 6.92 among the treatments. It is
clear from the results that judges placed T2 (6.92) at the top and T5 (6.22) at the
bottom. Highest mean score (7.09) was assigned to fresh cookies (0 day), that was
decreased (6.10) during two months storage. T2 (40% RBO) was preferred by the
judges because it gave the desired texture to cookies, distinguished from others.
The decreasing trend in quality score for texture of cookies was due to
absorption of moisture from the atmosphere that has negative impact on texture
(Pasha et al., 2002; McWatters, 2003; Sharif et al., 2005).
Table 42. Texture scores of RBO cookies
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Mean
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
7.10
6.90
7.50
7.50
6.90
6.66
6.12
6.22
6.88
6.34
6.30
6.12
5.96
6.08
6.38
6.22
6.06
5.87
7.090.14a
6.330.12b
Mea
6.390.36bc
6.400.25bc
6.920.32a
6.690.41ab
6.420.25bc
6.220.23c
6.100.07c
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
7.06
6.85
7.50
7.50
6.70
6.52
6.56
6.66
7.30
7.23
6.33
6.08
6.02
6.20
6.88
6.74
6.09
5.80
7.020.17a
6.690.20b
181
6.290.17c
Mea
6.550.30b
6.570.19b
7.230.18a
7.160.22a
6.370.18bc
6.130.21c
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Mean
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
Mea
n
7.20
7.30
7.72
7.34
7.06
6.85
7.250.12a
6.76
6.90
7.22
7.10
6.60
6.12
6.780.16b
6.20
6.24
6.90
6.86
6.10
5.82
6.720.29c
6.810.31bc
7.280.24a
7.100.14ab
6.590.28c
6.260.31d
6.350.18c
4.5.1.5.5. Crispness
The quality score in response to crispness of the cookies has been
presented in Table 43. Means for crispness of cookies alluded that T2 got the
maximum score (7.23) followed by T3 (7.16) and T1 (6.57) whereas minimum
score was obtained by T5 (6.13). Cookies prepared from 40 to 60% rice bran oil
substitution got the maximum scores (7.16 & 7.23) while 100% normal shortening
replacement results in significant decrease in crispness. As a whole, the
maximum score (7.02) was obtained by the fresh cookies that decreased
significantly (6.29) after 60 days storage. Cookies lost their crispness during
storage due to moisture absorption (Wade, 1988), might be the reason for this
declining trend.
4.5.1.5.6. Overall acceptability
Overall acceptability was determined on the basis of quality scores
obtained from the evaluation of color, taste, flavor, texture and crispness of the
cookies. The means regarding overall acceptability of cookies are presented in
Table 44. It is evident from the data that the judges placed T2 (7.28) at the top
and T5 (6.26) at the bottom line; where as T3 (7.10) was also favored by the judges.
Collectively, the maximum scores were observed in fresh cookies that gradually
decreased from 7.25 to 6.35 after 60 days storage. The decrease in overall
acceptability was might be due to moisture absorption, increase in peroxide
value and free fatty acid contents in cookies. The present results are in close
agreement with those of Leelavathi and Rao, 1993; Pasha et al., 2002; Butt et al.,
2004 and Sharif et al., 2005. It is concluded from the present study that rice bran
oil can successfully be substituted for preparation of cookies upto 40-60% level,
although higher levels were acceptable with respect to storage stability and
sensoric attributes.
182
The main aim of the present investigation was to utilized rice industrial
by-products rice bran for value added products. Initially, oil extracted from
MW-stabilized rice bran was supplemented in cookies by replacing normal
shortening @ 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100%. In the second phase MW-stabilized rice
bran was used in baked products. Fullfat (FFRB) and defatted rice brans (DFRB)
were mixed separately with commercial straight grade flour (CSGF) in different
proportions and were analyzed for chemical composition and rheological
behavior to find out the most appropriate compositions of fortified flour (Table
2) showing suitability for products preparation i.e. cookies and leavened pan
bread. The following parameters of supplemented flours were evaluated before
final product preparation.
183
Treatments
T0
0 Days
(%)
11.50
30 Days
(%)
12.08
60 Days
(%)
12.32
11.970.24a
T1
11.30
11.81
12.03
11.710.22ab
T2
11.10
11.66
11.84
11.530.22bc
T3
T4
T5
T6
10.90
10.70
10.50
10.30
11.40
11.24
11.03
10.79
11.70
11.40
11.18
10.96
11.330.23cd
11.110.21def
10.90f0.21g
10.680.20gh
184
Mean
T7
T8
T9
T10
T11
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
9.90
9.50
11.33
11.15
10.98
10.80
10.63
10.45
10.10
9.75
10.40
9.98
11.86
11.71
11.40
11.34
11.16
10.97
10.59
10.23
10.56
10.10
12.08
11.89
11.70
11.55
11.31
11.19
10.83
10.39
Mean
10.640.14c
11.150.15b
11.350.15a
10.290.20ij
9.860.18k
11.750.22ab
11.590.22bc
11.360.21cd
11.230.22de
11.030.21ef
10.870.22fg
10.510.21hi
10.120.19j
Values are meansSEM; Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly
different
T0 = Commercial straight grade flour
T1 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 5%
T2 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 10%
T3 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 15%
T4 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 20%
T5 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 25%
T6 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 30%
T7 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 40%
T8 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 50%
study ranged from 9.86% to 11.97%, falls within the range as reported by
Whiteley (1970) who observed that moisture content may vary from 11 to 15%
depending upon storage conditions and hygroscopic nature of starch.
4.5.2.1.2. Crude protein
Protein is important in determining the end use quality of flour. Means for
crude protein content of different supplemented flours (Table 47) demonstrated
highest protein content in T16 (13.68%) followed by T15 (12.95%), T14 (12.21%)
whereas T0 showed the lowest value (10.04%). Overall, the crude protein content
in supplemented flour samples ranged from 10.24 to 13.68%. Moreover, the
highest crude protein content was found in treatments containing higher levels
of defatted rice bran due to high initial protein content of defatted rice bran
(17.69%). The present results are in accordance with the previous findings who
reported that protein content in stabilized rice bran ranged from 13.217.3%
(Pomeranz and Oryl, 1982), 11.3-14.95% (Juliano, 1985), 11-17% (Farrell, 1994)
185
and 15.78% (Sharif et al., 2005), depending upon rice bran sources. There was a
significant decrease in protein content during 60 days storage (Table 47). At 0
day, the mean value for protein was 11.57% which decreased to 11.32% and 11.14
% after 30 and 60 days storage, respectively. In the present investigation, the
decrease in protein contents in the commercial flour and remaining samples were
due to the absorption of moisture from the atmosphere that accelerated the
proteolytic activity of the enzymes. The proteases are responsible for the
degradation of protein during storage. This phenomenon is supported by the
findings of Leelavathi et al. (1984) who observed activity of proteases and lipases
in the resultant atta 2 to 2.5 times higher than (Chakki) atta.
4.5.2.1.3. Crude fat
The means for the crude fat content of different flour samples (Table 48)
showed that T8 got the highest value (9.82%) for the crude fat content followed
186
60 Days
(%)
Mean
T0
10.23
10.01
9.87
10.040.10n
T1
10.44
10.21
10.05
10.240.11mn
T2
10.65
10.43
10.28
10.450.11lm
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
T11
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
10.86
11.07
11.29
11.50
11.92
12.34
10.60
10.98
11.35
11.72
12.10
12.47
13.21
13.96
10.63
10.82
11.02
11.24
11.66
12.07
10.38
10.74
11.10
11.49
11.83
12.18
12.92
13.65
10.48
10.64
10.84
11.06
11.48
11.89
10.24
10.57
10.92
11.33
11.65
11.98
12.71
13.44
10.660.11kl
10.840.12ijk
11.050.13hij
11.260.13gh
11.690.13ef
12.100.13cd
10.410.10lm
10.760.12jk
11.120.12hi
11.510.11fg
11.860.13de
12.210.14c
12.950.14b
13.680.15a
Mean
11.570.26a
11.320.24b
11.140.23c
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
by T7 (8.08%) and T6 (6.34%) whereas the lowest value (0.84%) was found in T16
(defatted rice bran 50%). Fat content in different composite flour samples ranged
from 0.84 to 9.82%. It was observed that as the amount of fullfat rice barn
increased, the crude fat percentage also increased progressively in supplemented
187
flour samples while an inverse correlation exists with the addition of defatted
rice bran. There was significant decrease in fat content of supplemented flours
during storage. At the start, crude fat content was 3.13% that decreased to 3.06%
and 3.01% after 30 and 60 days storage, respectively (Table 48). The results
showed that there was a gradual decrease in fat contents with the passage of
time; may be attributed to the development of rancidity (Leelavathi et al., 1984).
Fat deterioration occurred during storage was probably due to the activation of
lipase enzyme which split off the fat into free fatty acids and glycerol in the
presence of moisture and other proxidants like light and heat. At higher moisture
level, risk of fat oxidation and development of rancidity increases as compared to
flour containing lower levels of moisture (Kent and Evers, 1994). Likewise,
Staudt and Ziegler (1973) reported that fat was gradually split up into glycerol
and fatty acids by lipases and then acids were oxidized by taking up oxygen.
4.5.2.1.4. Crude fiber
The means for the crude fiber content of different supplemented flours
(Table 49) showed that T16 (defatted stabilized rice barn 50%) got the highest
value (6.78%) followed by T8 (5.57%) and T15 (5.49%) whilst T0 (commercial
straight grade flour) exhibited the lowest value (0.33%) for this trait. The results
clearly indicated that wheat flour contained 0.33% crude fiber content. Addition
of fullfat and defatted rice bran upto 50% in commercial wheat flour increased
the fiber level. Storage has non-significant effect on various treatments of
fortified flours. The present study was in line with the findings of Anjum et al.
(2003) who also found non-significant effect of storage in commercial
(unfortified) and fortified flour samples. The findings of Butt et al. (2003) that
188
Treatments
0 Days
(%)
30 Days
(%)
60 Days
(%)
T0
1.17
1.15
1.13
1.170.01i
T1
2.05
2.01
1.98
2.010.02h
T2
2.94
2.88
2.83
2.880.03g
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
T11
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
3.82
4.71
5.59
6.47
8.24
10.01
1.14
1.11
1.08
1.05
1.02
0.98
0.92
0.86
3.74
4.60
5.46
6.33
8.06
9.79
1.12
1.08
1.05
1.03
0.99
0.96
0.90
0.84
3.69
4.52
5.37
6.23
7.94
9.64
1.10
1.07
1.04
1.01
0.98
0.95
0.89
0.83
3.750.04f
4.610.06e
5.470.06d
6.340.07c
8.080.09b
9.820.11a
1.120.01ij
1.090.01ijk
1.060.01ijkl
1.030.01jkl
1.000.01klm
0.960.01lm
0.900.01mn
0.840.01n
Mean
3.130.70a
3.060.69b
3.010.68c
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
189
Mean
Treatments
0 Days
(%)
30 Days
(%)
60 Days
(%)
T0
T1
T2
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.330.00o
0.85
0.86
0.86
0.860.00n
1.37
1.38
1.38
1.380.00l
T3
1.89
1.91
1.91
1.900.01j
T4
2.41
2.43
2.44
2.430.01h
T5
2.94
2.96
2.96
2.950.01g
T6
3.46
3.48
3.49
3.480.01f
T7
4.50
4.53
4.54
4.520.01d
T8
5.54
5.58
5.59
5.570.02b
T9
0.97
0.98
0.98
0.980.00m
T10
1.61
1.62
1.63
1.620.01k
T11
2.25
2.27
2.27
2.270.01i
T12
2.89
2.91
2.92
2.910.01g
T13
3.54
3.56
3.57
3.560.01f
T14
4.18
4.21
4.22
4.200.01e
T15
5.46
5.50
5.51
5.490.02c
T16
6.74
6.79
6.80
6.780.02a
Mean
3.000.44
3.020.45
3.020.45
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
190
Mean
fiber has non-significant influence due to storage intervals further confirmed the
present results.
4.5.2.1.5. Ash
Means for ash content of supplemented flour samples (Table 50) revealed
that ash content ranged from 0.52 to 5.77%. The highest value (5.77%) was noted
for T16 (defatted stabilized rice barn 50%) while T0 (commercial straight grade
flour) exhibited the lowest value (0.52%). Higher ash contents were observed in
T16, T8, T15 and T7 i.e. 5.77, 4.79, 4.78 and 3.99%, respectively, are due to presence
of higher fiber in these treatments. The present findings of ash content are in
corroboration with the results stated in the previous study by Farrell (1994) that
fullfat rice bran addition ultimately resulted in higher ash content of the
respective flours. Storage has non-significant effect on ash content of various
treatments of fortified flours (Table 50). Anjum et al. (2003) also observed similar
non-significant effect of storage on ash content of wheat flour samples.
4.5.2.1.6. Nitrogen free extract
191
The means for NFE content of blended flours (Table 51) showed that the
highest NFE content was observed in T0 (75.89%) followed by T9 (74.43%) and T1
(73.96%) while the lowest value (57.87%) was recorded in T8. These results are
supported by the findings of Siddique (1989) who reported 80.43% NFE contents
in whole wheat flour. Means for NFE revealed non-significant differences due to
storage.
4.5.2.2. Mineral analysis
These are the inorganic materials present in ash when food or any living
organism is cremated. The mean squares for mineral content of supplemented
flour samples showed that blending of fullfat and defatted rice bran in wheat
flour, significantly improved the mineral content of the fortified flours except for
sodium whereas storage and interaction between treatments and storage showed
non-significant differences (Table 52).
Table 50. Ash content of supplemented flours
Treatments
0 Days
(%)
30 Days
(%)
60 Days
(%)
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
T11
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.520.00o
1.21
1.22
1.22
1.220.00n
1.61
1.62
1.62
1.620.00l
2.00
2.02
2.02
2.010.01j
2.40
2.41
2.42
2.410.01h
2.79
2.81
2.82
2.810.01g
3.18
3.21
3.21
3.200.01f
3.97
4.00
4.01
3.990.01c
4.76
4.79
4.80
4.790.01b
1.31
1.32
1.32
1.320.00m
1.80
1.82
1.82
1.810.01k
2.29
2.31
2.32
2.310.01i
192
Mean
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
Mean
2.79
2.80
2.81
2.800.01g
3.28
3.30
3.31
3.290.01e
3.77
3.80
3.80
3.790.01d
4.75
4.79
4.80
4.780.02b
5.74
5.78
5.79
5.770.02a
2.830.34
2.850.35
2.860.35
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
Treatments
0 Days
(%)
30 Days
(%)
60 Days
(%)
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
76.25
75.61
75.52
75.890.23a
74.14
73.89
73.86
73.960.09b
72.33
72.04
72.04
72.140.10d
70.52
70.30
70.21
70.340.09e
68.71
68.50
68.58
68.600.06fg
193
Mean
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
T11
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
Mean
66.90
66.73
66.83
66.820.05h
65.09
64.95
65.05
65.030.04i
61.47
61.35
61.47
61.430.04lk
57.85
57.78
57.98
57.870.06l
74.65
74.34
74.28
74.430.11b
73.35
73.02
73.02
73.130.11d
72.05
71.87
71.75
71.890.09d
70.75
70.43
70.38
70.520.12e
69.45
69.16
69.19
69.270.09f
68.15
67.88
67.86
67.960.09g
65.55
65.30
65.26
65.370.09i
62.96
62.71
62.75
62.810.08j
68.831.22
68.581.20
68.591.18
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
194
and
conduction
of
nerve
impulse.
Maximum
Mg
content
195
df
Na
Ca
16
32682.817** 54122.193**
2
106.338ns
56.7683ns
32
0.2096ns
0.4316ns
102
62.1698
35.0584
152
Mg
249685.08**
80.0322ns
1.9004ns
60.5029
392739.26**
177.3979ns
3.0221ns
123.871
Treatment
Na
Ca
Mg
399.031.04a
90.460.24o
111.570.29o
21.610.06o
379.521.03b
149.790.41n
133.090.36n
69.240.19n
359.840.93c
209.060.54l
154.540.40l
116.840.30l
340.250.88d
268.360.70j
176.03j0.46
164.460.43j
320.840.92e
327.840.94h
197.630.57i
212.190.61h
301.260.88f
387.201.13g
219.140.64h
259.850.76g
281.590.78g
446.431.24f
240.580.67g
307.420.86f
242.350.65h
564.971.52c
283.520.76d
402.621.08d
203.170.55i
683.581.83b
326.500.88c
497.861.34b
379.480.96b
164.040.42m
139.100.35m
80.130.20m
360.010.97c
237.700.64k
166.700.45k
138.690.37k
340.600.93d
311.340.85i
194.270.53i
197.240.54i
320.910.79e
384.750.95g
221.710.55h
255.640.63g
301.550.82f
458.551.24e
249.370.68f
314.310.85f
282.110.80g
532.301.51d
277.000.79e
372.941.06e
243.040.67h
679.481.89b
332.080.92b
489.981.36c
203.990.56i
826.662.26a
387.171.06a
607.021.66a
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
T11
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
Values are MeanSD for rice bran supplemented flour samples, analyzed individually in triplicate
196
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
T0 = Commercial straight grade flour
T1 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 5%
T2 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 10%
T3 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 15%
T4 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 20%
T5 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 25%
T6 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 30%
T7 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 40%
T8 = Fullfat stabilized rice bran 50%
(defatted stabilized rice barn 50%) followed by T15 (18.71%) and T8 (18.53%)
whereas lowest dietary fiber content (5.14%) was observed in T0 (commercial
straight grade flour). Means for dietary fiber content in different supplemented
flours showed non-significant effect of storage (Table 55). Maximum increase in
dietary fiber was observed in T16 i.e. 76.74% followed by T15 (72.52%) and T8
(72.26%) as compared to control.
Dietary fiber is the edible parts of plants or analogous carbohydrates
that are resistant to digestion and absorption in the human small intestine
with partial fermentation in the large intestine (CAC, 1998). These plant food
materials include non-starch polysaccharides such as celluloses, some hemicelluloses, gums and pectins as well as resistant starches (DeVries, 2001). The
WHO recommendation for total dietary fiber intake is above 25 g/day (WHO,
2003). Additional daily intake of 10g fiber appeared to lower the risk of coronary
death by 17% (Morris et al., 1977; Khaw and Barrett, 1987). The total dietary fiber
content in stabilized rice bran ranges from 25 to 40% depending on the product
(Carroll, 1990). Rice brans fiber comprised of relatively low proportion of soluble
fiber (713%) and the rest is insoluble fiber (Anderson et al., 1990). Bran
supplementation has been used to enhance the fiber content of array of foods.
Traditionally, fiber supplementation has been focused in the use of milling byproducts of cereal grains like wheat, corn, sorghum etc. and now has been
197
198
Table 54. Mean squares for dietary fiber and TBA no. of supplemented flours
SOV
Treatments (T)
Storage (S)
SxT
Error
Total
**
df
16
2
32
102
152
Dietary fiber
TBA no.
206.231**
0.091ns
8.85010-4 ns
0.105
1.48510-4**
5.30110-4**
1.96510-5*
9.804
Treatments
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
T11
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
Mean
5.12
5.14
5.15
5.140.01n
6.45
6.48
6.50
6.480.01m
7.79
7.82
7.84
7.820.01k
9.12
9.16
9.18
9.150.02i
10.46
10.50
10.53
10.500.02h
11.79
11.84
11.88
11.840.03g
13.12
13.18
13.22
13.170.03f
15.79
15.85
15.90
15.850.03c
18.46
18.53
18.59
18.530.04b
6.81
6.84
6.85
6.830.01l
8.50
8.53
8.56
8.530.02j
10.19
10.23
10.26
10.230.02h
11.88
11.92
11.96
11.920.02g
13.57
13.63
13.67
13.620.03e
15.26
15.32
15.37
15.320.03d
18.64
18.72
18.77
18.710.04b
22.02
22.11
22.18
22.100.05a
12.061.15
12.111.16
12.141.17
143
Mean
Values are meansSEM; Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly
different
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
T11
T12
T13
T14
T15
T16
Mean
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
Mean
0.082
0.083
0.086
0.0840.001a
0.081
0.082
0.085
0.0830.001a
0.080
0.081
0.084
0.0810.001c
0.079
0.079
0.082
0.0800.001c
0.078
0.078
0.082
0.0790.001c
0.077
0.077
0.081
0.0780.001d
0.075
0.076
0.079
0.0770.001d
0.073
0.074
0.077
0.0750.001d
0.071
0.072
0.075
0.0720.001e
0.082
0.083
0.086
0.0830.001a
0.082
0.083
0.086
0.0840.001a
0.082
0.083
0.086
0.0840.001a
0.082
0.083
0.086
0.0830.001a
0.082
0.083
0.086
0.0830.001a
0.082
0.083
0.086
0.0830.001a
0.082
0.082
0.086
0.0830.001a
0.082
0.082
0.086
0.0830.001a
0.0790.001b
0.0800.001b
0.0830.001a
144
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
(commercial straight grade flour) followed by T10 (defatted stabilized rice barn
10%) and T11 (defatted stabilized rice barn 15%) whereas the lowest value
(0.072%) was found in T8 (fullfat stabilized rice barn 50%).
Wheat flour supplementation with fullfat and defatted rice bran elicited
significant variations due to initial fat content of the stabilized rice bran. Means
for effect of storage on TBA value of different treatments showed (Table 56), that
minimum value (0.079) was at the initiation of the study that was increased to
0.083 after 60 days storage. TBA test appears to measure deterioration in both
extractable and non-extractable lipids (Kirk and Sawyer, 1999). Thiobarbituric
acid reactive substances (TBARS) values were lower in beef roasts containing (2%) rice bran
oil which improved oxidative stability of food product (Kim et al., 2000; Kim and Godber, 2001;
Kim et al., 2001). In present study, rice barn oil in fullfat rice bran, improved the stability of
supplemented flours. However, all supplemented flours were acceptable even after 60 days
storage as indicated by TBA no. and supported by sensory evaluation.
145
146
peak
height
was
gradually
increased
upto
15%
df
10
2
20
66
98
time
Mixing
Peak
height
1.9475174**
0.0843465**
3.198x10-4ns
0.0047657
122.03848**
46.080585**
0.0114737ns
2.625698
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
3.25
2.75
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
3.50
3.00
3.00
3.18
2.69
2.45
2.45
2.44
2.44
3.42
2.93
2.93
3.13
2.65
2.41
2.41
2.40
2.40
3.37
2.89
2.89
147
Mean
3.190.03b
2.700.03d
2.450.03e
2.450.03e
2.450.03e
2.450.03e
3.430.04a
2.940.03c
2.940.03c
T9
T10
Mean
2.00
2.00
2.680.14a
1.96
1.96
1.93
1.93
2.620.14b
1.960.02f
1.960.02f
2.580.13c
Values are meansSEM; Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly
different
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
Mean
0 Days
64.00
64.00
70.00
70.00
60.00
60.00
65.00
65.00
65.00
60.00
60.00
63.911.12a
30 Days
60 Days
62.65
62.59
68.53
68.53
58.60
58.58
63.53
63.58
63.59
58.76
58.69
61.73
61.63
67.52
67.53
57.65
57.62
62.53
62.62
62.62
57.92
57.79
62.511.11b
61.561.10c
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
148
Me
an
62.800.66b
62.740.69b
68.680.72a
68.690.72a
58.750.68c
58.730.69c
63.690.72b
63.730.69b
63.740.69b
58.900.60c
58.830.64c
It was observed that there was prompt increase in peak height of fullfat
supplemented rice bran samples, might be due to inherent oil content, resulting
in better emulsion formation. The peak height percentage in Pakistani wheat
cultivar, Auqab-2000, was 53 to 56% (Afzal, 2004). It was concluded that rice bran
supplementation in wheat flour is suitable upto 15% for the preparation of
leavened pan bread, beyond this level; there was deformation in peaks of
mixograms.
4.5.2.5.2. Farinographic studies
The rheological behavior of rice bran supplemented flours was evaluated
by conducting farinographic studies, before the preparation of rice bran
supplemented leavened pan bread. Mean squares for water absorption, dough
development time and dough stability of different flour samples have been
presented in Table 60. The results indicated significant variations among
different supplemented flour samples due to storage and treatments for different
farinographic characteristics.
4.5.2.5.2.1. Water absorption
149
df
DT
10
133.632**
22.468**
109.993**
2
20
66
98
26.092**
0.088ns
8.816
21.233**
0.983**
0.069
43.039**
0.630**
0.170
**
Treatments
T0
0 Days
67.90
30 Days
60 Days
68.15
68.99
ean
68.350.3
3bc
T1
68.40
69.50
69.420.5
70.35
6abc
T2
69.20
70.45
71.30
70.320.6
1abc
150
T3
69.90
71.00
71.80
70.900.5
5ab
T4
71.00
72.05
72.95
72.000.5
6a
T5
71.40
72.40
73.10
72.300.4
9a
T6
68.20
69.40
70.23
69.280.5
9abc
T7
66.60
67.45
68.54
67.530.5
6cd
T8
64.50
65.20
66.00
65.230.4
3de
T9
61.80
62.80
63.60
62.730.5
2ef
T10
59.40
60.20
61.00
60.200.4
6f
Mean
68.901.72a
67.121
.14b
68.051.
72ab
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Similar findings have been recorded by Nurul Islam and Johnsen (1987)
that water absorption in commercial wheat flour of Indo-Pak wheat varieties
ranged from 60-76%. Flour from strong wheat varieties had the ability to absorb
and retain larger quantities of water (Pyler, 1988). The rheological behavior of
blended flours is greatly influenced by the level of rice bran in wheat flour (Singh
et al., 1995). The results alluded that there was an increase in water absorption of
151
fullfat rice bran supplemented flour samples with subsequent increase in the
amount of rice bran (Barber et al., 1981; Sudha et al., 2007). The increase in water
absorption was might be due to greater number of hydroxyl groups which exist
in the fibre structure and allow more water interaction through hydrogen
bonding (Rosell et al., 2001).
Similarly, enhanced protein contents result in an increase in pentosans,
especially ribose and deoxyribose which have higher water holding capability
(Matz, 1972). Similar findings have been reported by Shahzadi et al. (2005) that
water absorption increases with increased levels of protein in flours. In contrary
to previously reported findings, decrease in water absorption (69.28% to 60.2%)
was observed in defatted rice bran supplemented flours with proportionate
increase in defatted rice bran supplementation, suggesting role of fat besides
protein, for better water absorption and might be due to the reason, better bread
can be prepared from fullfat rice bran supplemented flour even with higher
levels compared with defatted supplemented flours. Storage has significant effect
on water absorption of different fortified flours. At the initiation of study (0 day),
67.12% water absorption was recorded which was increased to 68.05 and 68.90%,
after 30 and 60 days storage, respectively. In previous studies, it has been
reported that water absorption varies (54-65%) based upon the weight of flour
and the way flour is to be used. If too much water is added, dough with low
consistency will be obtained. It is difficult to handle such dough due to sticky
nature and if too little water is added, the dough will be stiff and difficult to
process (Cauvain, 2003).
4.5.2.5.2.2. Dough development time
time
(min)
supplemented
flour
samples
of
rice
bran
showed
highly
in
Table
62
indicate
that
dough
155
Table 62.
supplemented flours
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
Mean
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
4.00
3.00
3.85
3.80
3.50
5.00
4.00
6.00
7.00
7.12
7.25
4.98
3.97
4.65
4.70
4.40
5.97
4.97
6.95
7.92
8.02
8.12
5.50
3.50
5.05
5.18
7.95
6.42
5.40
7.45
8.45
8.55
8.65
5.880.48b
Me
an
4.830.44e
3.490.28h
4.520.35g
4.560.40fg
5.281.36d
5.800.42c
4.790.41ef
6.800.43b
7.790.42a
7.900.42a
8.010.41a
6.550.53a
4.960
.48c
Means carrying the same letters in a column are not significantly different
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
Mean
0 Days
30 Days
60 Days
7.90
6.40
4.70
4.40
3.90
2.50
8.30
10.00
10.00
11.00
14.15
9.15
7.55
8.85
5.60
5.00
3.70
9.45
11.24
11.20
12.30
15.35
10.00
8.35
8.70
6.50
5.85
4.45
10.35
12.05
12.10
13.10
16.55
7.571.07c
9.041.04b
9.821.07a
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
156
Me
an
9.020.61d
7.430.57e
7.421.36e
5.500.61f
4.920.56g
3.550.57h
9.370.59d
11.100.60c
11.100.61c
12.130.61b
15.350.69a
157
to the difference in the protein content and quality (Holas and Tipples, 1978;
Finney, 1984; Hoseney, 1986; Abdel-Kader, 2000; Shahzadi et al., 2005). The
rheological behavior of blended flours is greatly influenced by the level of rice
bran in commercial wheat flour (Singh et al., 1995).
4.5.3. Preparation of Rice Bran Supplemented Cookies
In present research, cookies were prepared from fullfat and defatted rice
bran supplemented flours (Table 3) and evaluated for physical, chemical and
sensoric attributes to find out the effect of rice bran supplementation.
159
160
The results of present study are quite close to the observations reported
earlier by numerous researchers. Wheat flour was supplemented with 5-25%
defatted soy flour samples. Increasing levels of defatted soy flour reduced
diameter and increased thickness of cookies resulting in a significantly reduced
spread ratio (Grover and Singh, 1994). The fullfat and defatted rice brans were
blended in wheat flour @ 5, 10 or 15% to prepare cookies. Spread of cookies
decreased with the addition of rice bran (Sekhon et al., 1997). Cookie spread
decreased with the addition of the various rice brans (Sudha et al., 2007) however, the
decrease was more pronounced in flours containing defatted bran. Stabilized full fat rice bran up
to a level of 20% and stabilized defatted rice bran upto a 10% level was considered suitable for
use in various bakery products (Singh et al., 1995).
df
Treatments
Na
FFRB- Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB- Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
3909.1593**
3876.877**
35823.145**
55178.08**
161
Error
Total
12 43.836839
17
SOV
df
43.93233
125.9768
Ca
FFRB- Cookies
Treatments 5 4703.4242**
Error
12 24.585227
Total
17
**
87.912438
Mg
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB- Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
7732.022**
32.72592
23097.136**
43.269008
34891.56
63.91906
Treatments
FFRBCookies
T0
T1
T2
T3
DFRBCookies
196.518.57a
177.227.22b
157.926.68c
138.636.04d
196.518.57a
177.307.73b
158.086.89c
138.876.05d
FFRB- Cookies
DFRBCookies
44.551.94f
102.964.49e
161.377.03d
219.789.58c
44.551.94f
117.045.10e
189.538.26c
262.0311.4
2c
T4
119.335.20e
119.655.22e
278.1912.13b
334.5214.5
8b
T5
100.044.36f
100.444.38f
336.6014.67a
407.0117.7
4a
Ca
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Mg
FFRBCookies
DFRBCookies
FFRB- Cookies
DFRBCookies
54.952.39f
76.113.32e
97.274.24d
118.445.16c
139.606.09b
160.777.01a
54.952.39f
82.083.58e
109.224.76d
136.355.94c
163.497.13b
190.68.31a
10.640.46f
57.542.51e
104.454.55d
151.356.60c
198.258.64b
245.1510.69a
10.640.46f
68.292.98e
125.935.49d
183.588.00c
241.2210.51b
298.8713.03a
162
163
Table 69. Mean squares for dietary fiber of rice bran supplemented cookies
SOV
df
Treatments
Error
Total
5
12
17
**
Dietary fiber
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
18.682**
0.0756
29.989**
0.1037
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
= Cookies with 100% wheat flour act as control for both fullfat and defatted supplementation
= Cookies with 10% FFRB
T1 = Cookies with 10% DFRB
= Cookies with 20% FFRB
T2 = Cookies with 20% DFRB
= Cookies with 30% FFRB
T3 = Cookies with 30% DFRB
= Cookies with 40% FFRB
T4 = Cookies with 40% DFRB
= Cookies with 50% FFRB
T5 = Cookies with 50% DFRB
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
FFRB-Cookies
2.560.14f
3.900.18e
5.230.21d
6.560.32c
7.900.40b
9.230.37a
164
165
166
168
169
consumption, relatively long shelf-life and good eating quality (Tsen et al., 1973).
Cookies with high sensoric attributes are manufactured from blends of
millet/pigeon pea flour (Eneche, 1999), raw rice and wheat (Singh et al., 1989),
blackgram and wheat (Singh et al., 1993), chickpea and wheat (Singh et al., 1991),
wheat, fonio and cowpea (McWatters et al., 2003) and soybean, chickpea or
lupine with wheat (Hegazy and Faheid, 1990). Similarly, cookies with high
sensory ratings have been prepared from blends of wheat flour and rice bran.
208
Table 76. Mean squares for mineral contents of rice bran supplemented breads
SOV
df
Treatments 5
Error
12
Total
17
SOV
df
Na
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
3292.4867**
241.0441
3193.9309**
227.2736
46237.665**
112.8474
2.8054**
0.0808
Ca
FFRB-Bread
Treatments 5 3777.8979**
Error
12 56.06101
Total
17
**
Mg
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
6396.011**
56.9393
19372.254**
34.15073
29159.351**
69.7736
Treatments
T0
T1
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
358.5518.53a
340.1714.70ab
358.5518.53a
341.7318.60a
80.933.21f
134.214.94e
80.933.21f
146.687.65e
320.3914.02b
186.977.24d
212.669.64d
304.3011.41c
236.938.62c
276.7713.68c
289.2013.66d
293.8714.43b
347.8913.97b
271.3413.67e
349.1613.97a
411.8612.07a
T2
320.8816.58bc
c
T3
303.6315.83cd
d
T4
286.7614.21de
e
T5
269.4212.62e
Ca
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Mg
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
100.574.37f
119.424.92e
139.176.96d
157.036.12c
176.709.34b
195.4010.94a
100.574.37f
123.836.11e
148.297.53d
173.727.86c
197.838.58b
223.339.55a
19.450.89f
62.032.94e
103.794.23d
146.796.69c
191.176.35b
233.989.61a
19.450.89f
71.742.50e
124.916.30d
176.628.60c
230.539.10b
282.7214.65a
Values are MeanSD for rice bran supplemented breads, analyzed individually in triplicate
209
211
Table 78. Mean squares for dietary fiber of rice bran supplemented breads
SOV
df
Treatments
Error
Total
5
12
17
DFRB-Bread
15.1556**
0.12473
24.5812**
0.1537
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
4.620.21f
5.810.24e
6.990.32d
8.160.35c
9.420.43b
10.630.49a
4.620.21f
6.120.29e
7.630.29d
9.150.41c
10.740.45b
12.250.53a
= Bread with 100% wheat flour acts as control for fullfat and defatted rice bran supplementation
= Bread with 5% stabilized fullfat rice bran T1 = Bread with 5% stabilized defatted rice bran
= Bread with 10% stabilized fullfat rice bran T2 = Bread with 10% stabilized defatted rice bran
= Bread with 15% stabilized fullfat rice bran T3 = Bread with 15% stabilized defatted rice bran
= Bread with 20% stabilized fullfat rice bran T4 = Bread with 20% stabilized defatted rice bran
= Bread with 25% stabilized fullfat rice bran T5 = Bread with 25% stabilized defatted rice bran
212
2003). A typical Western diet contains less than 20g/day whereas the
recommended daily intake is 25-30g (Drehner, 1987; WHO, 2003). Abdul-Hamid
and Siew Luan (2000) reported that use of defatted rice bran as a source of
dietary fibre in bread, significantly reduced loaf volume and increased crumb
firmness.
4.5.4.3. Sensory evaluation
Sensory evaluation of bread loaves was carried out for external
characteristics i.e. volume, crust color, symmetry, evenness of bake, character of
crust; and internal characteristics like grain, crumb color, aroma, taste and
texture (Appendix IV) to find out the impact of rice bran supplementation on
these characteristics.
4.5.4.3.1. External characteristics
Mean squares for external characteristics of rice bran supplemented
breads explicated significant differences in volume, crust color, symmetry,
evenness of bake and character of crust due to treatment and storage whereas
interaction was found to be non-significant (Table 80).
4.5.4.3.1.1. Volume
Volume is an important consideration in consumer acceptance and
provides valuable information about product quality. Means for loaf volume in
leavened pan bread (Table 81) showed significant variations within treatments
due to supplementation of fullfat and defatted rice bran in commercial straight
grade flour, used for the bread preparation. In case of fullfat rice bran
supplemented bread, maximum score for volume (7.82) was observed in T0
followed by T1 (7.71) and T2 (6.64) whereas the lowest score (4.67) was found in
T5 with rough grain and honey comb texture. It is obvious from the results that
there was significant decrease in loaf volume with proportionate increase of
supplementation level. The similar decreasing trend in loaf volume was also
observed in bread prepared from different levels of defatted rice bran
supplementation. However, addition of fullfat rice bran produced bread with
improved volume than that of defatted rice bran supplemented flours. Breads
prepared with 100% wheat flour, were comparatively soft when pressed. There
213
was concomitant decrease in gluten protein with an increase in rice bran level
during fermentation. Moreover, by increasing bran portion, there was a decrease
in gas retention resulting lowered bread volume as obvious from the present
results. Means for effect of storage on volume of bread (Table 82) showed
significant decrease in score for volume from 6.68 (0 hour) to 5.74 (120 hours).
The decrease in volume might be due to loss of moisture resulting deleterious
effects on crumb grain and ultimately on volume. The addition of cereal bran,
especially in such amounts that health benefits can be expected, cause problems
in bread quality resulting in flavor changes depending on type of fiber (Seibel,
1983). In previous studies, the deleterious effects of fibre supplementation on
dough structure have been attributed to dilution of gluten network, which in
turn impairs gas retention rather than gas production (Pomeranz et al., 1987).
Bran supplementation usually weakens the structure thus decrease bread
volume and the elasticity of the crumb. Wheat bran upto 20% substitution has
been reported to decrease volume by 19% (Salmenkallio et al., 2001). In another
study, there was 20% decrease in volume with 15% addition of bran (Krishnan et
al., 1987).
4.5.4.3.1.2. Crust color
Bread crust is a dry thin layer that encloses a soft, sponge like cellular
structure. Crust color normally ranges from a deep golden brown of the top to
the light golden brown of the side and bottom. However, the desired crust color
is one with an appetizing golden brown shade. Means for crust color showed
significant variations among the treatments (Table 81). In case of fullfat rice bran
supplemented bread, maximum score for crust color (6.81) was observed in T1
followed by T0 (6.03) and T2 (5.88); whereas the lowest score (3.96) was found in
T5, designated as dark. Means for the effect of storage on bread crust color
showed significant decrease in score (Table 82) from 5.95 (0 hours) to 5.15 (120
hours). Bread prepared from defatted bran also followed similar trend due to
214
treatment and storage. The color of the crust is greatly affected by temperature at
which loaf is baked and the level of residual sugars present in the dough.
Table 80. Mean squares for external characteristics of rice bran supplemented
breads
SOV
df
Treatments 5
Storage
5
TxS
25
Error
144
Total
179
SOV
df
Treatment 5
Storage
5
TxS
25
Error
144
Total
179
SOV
df
Treatment 5
Storage
5
TxS
25
Error
144
Total
179
**
Volume
Color of crust
FFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
57.6282**
3.57841**
0.03718ns
0.07087
31.38776**
2.943544**
0.60965ns
0.071460
29.1606**
1.2347**
0.00681ns
0.05404
38.15416**
1.36105**
0.00872ns
0.05987
Symmetry
Evenness of bake
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
23.3483**
0.97569**
0.02630ns
0.02207
18.16432**
0.817032**
0.016856ns
0.021995
6.15959**
0.09521**
0.02238 ns
0.01068
3.954940**
0.27395**
0.01293 ns
0.00669
Character of crust
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
8.18317**
0.64756**
0.14452ns
0.0785
8.56903**
0.20910**
0.002203ns
0.009718
215
Table 81. Volume and crust color scores of rice bran supplemented breads
Volume
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
FFRB-Bread
Crust color
DFRBBread
7.820.16a
7.710.18a
6.640.17b
5.680.12c
4.830.11d
4.670.11e
7.820.16a
7.670.13b
6.620.13b
6.410.33c
5.750.10d
4.660.10e
FFRB-Bread
6.030.09b
6.810.10a
5.880.09c
5.160.08d
5.020.08e
3.960.06f
DFRBBread
6.030.09b
6.850.10a
6.810.10a
5.880.09c
5.020.08d
3.910.06e
Values are meansSEM; Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ
significantly
T0 = Bread with 100% wheat flour acts as control for fullfat and defatted rice bran supplementation
T1 = Bread with 5% stabilized fullfat rice bran T1 = Bread with 5% stabilized defatted rice bran
T2 = Bread with 10% stabilized fullfat rice bran T2 = Bread with 10% stabilized defatted rice bran
T3 = Bread with 15% stabilized fullfat rice bran T3 = Bread with 15% stabilized defatted rice bran
T4 = Bread with 20% stabilized fullfat rice bran T4 = Bread with 20% stabilized defatted rice bran
T5 = Bread with 25% stabilized fullfat rice bran T5 = Bread with 25% stabilized defatted rice bran
Table 82. Effect of storage on volume and crust color scores of rice bran
supplemented breads
Storage
(Hours)
0
24
48
72
96
120
Volume
Crust color
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
6.680.59a
6.540. 59a
6.440. 59a
6.130.56b
5.930.54c
5.740.52d
6.680.45a
6.660.45a
6.300.41b
6.260.52bc
6.090.39c
5.900.39d
5.950.48a
5.660.42a
5.570.41ab
5.460.40bc
5.350.39c
5.150.38b
5.950.48a
5.940.48a
5.850.47ab
5.730.46bc
5.610.45c
5.400.43d
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
216
217
218
Table 83. Symmetry and evenness of bake scores of rice bran supplemented
breads
Symmetry
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
FFRB-Bread
DFRBBread
4.290.10a
4.220.09a
4.130.10b
2.940.04c
2.940.06c
2.180.05d
4.290.10a
3.930.06b
3.880.07b
3.720.06c
3.070.06d
2.060.06e
Evenness of bake
FFRB-Bread
2.270.04a
2.200.06b
2.170.03b
1.990.19c
1.650.03d
1.500.02e
DFRBBread
2.270.04a
2.190.04b
2.160.03b
1.960.03c
1.500.07d
1.450.02e
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
Table 84. Effect of storage on symmetry and evenness of bake of rice bran
supplemented breads
Storage
(Hours)
0
24
48
72
96
120
Symmetry
Evenness of bake
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
3.640.38a
3.610.38a
3.550.38a
3.450.37b
3.300.33c
3.180.32d
3.640.38a
3.630.32a
3.530.34b
3.450.33c
3.340.31d
3.220.30e
2.520.19a
2.460.10b
2.410.21bc
2.400.21bcd
2.400.21cd
2.350.20d
2.520.19a
2.000.15a
1.980.15a
1.930.14b
1.860.14c
1.760.17d
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
219
for evenness of bake (2.27) was observed in T0 followed by T1 (2.20) and T2 (2.17)
whereas the lowest score (1.50) was found in T5. The loaves were still acceptable
upto 10-15% supplementation levels because crust was still attractive, with
uniform thickness and acceptable color. A similar decreasing trend was observed
with defatted rice bran. However, T1 (bread with 5% stabilized defatted rice
bran) and T2 (bread with 10% stabilized defatted rice bran) were statistically nonsignificant. Means for effect of storage on symmetry showed significant decrease
in score (Table 84) from 2.52 (0 hours) to 2.35 (120 hours) in fullfat rice bran while
2.52 to 1.76 in defatted rice bran supplemented bread.
4.5.4.3.1.5. Character of crust
Generally consumers show a decided preference for a thin, tender crust in
the conventional white pan loaf. The results in Table 85 explored that in case of
fullfat rice bran supplemented bread, maximum scores (2.96) were observed in T0
followed by T1 (2.72) and T2 (2.55); whereas the lowest scores (1.39) were found
in T5. At higher bran levels, crust tends to be too hard, hence unacceptable for the
consumers. It is apparent that there was significant decrease in crust character
with increased supplementation levels and same decreasing trend was also
observed with defatted rice bran supplementation. Means for effect of storage on
character of crust showed significant decrease in score (Table 86) from 2.39 (0
hours) to 1.83 (120 hours) in fullfat rice bran breads while 2.39 to 2.18 in defatted
rice bran supplemented bread.
4.5.4.3.2. Internal characteristics
220
221
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
2.960.41a
2.720.31b
2.550.20bc
2.300.04c
1.480.03d
1.390.03de
2.960.03a
2.570.22ab
2.360.03b
2.120.03bc
2.020.03c
1.520.03d
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
Storage
(Hours)
0
24
48
72
96
120
Character of crust
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
2.390.22a
2.180.25a
2.150.25a
2.010.19b
1.950.19c
1.830.18d
2.390.22a
2.380.22a
2.340.22ab
2.290.22b
2.220.21c
2.180.22c
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
222
Table 87. Mean squares for internal characteristics of rice bran supplemented
breads
SOV
df
Treatment 5
Storage
5
TxS
25
Error
144
Total
179
SOV
df
Treatment 5
Storage
5
TxS
25
Error
144
Total
179
SOV
df
Treatment 5
Storage
5
TxS
25
Error
144
Total
179
**
Grains
Crumb color
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
213.5894**
2.16205**
0.26190ns
0.16594
118.3269**
1.047453**
0.00266ns
0.19020
55.4996**
1.74840**
0.01291ns
0.07582
33.54116**
1.89932**
0.007803ns
0.081061
Aroma
Taste
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
33.27018**
2.22143**
0.00940ns
0.08103
39.47838**
1.93551**
0.00936ns
0.082247
90.0967**
4.3833**
0.02067ns
0.19574
44.75885**
4.504027**
0.008439ns
0.234556
Texture
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
61.02292**
1.52251**
0.00492ns
0.18667
84.17245**
1.66116**
0.00677ns
0.204542
223
large individual cells, and as close if it consists of minute cells. In case of fullfat
rice bran supplemented bread (Table 88), maximum score (11.94) was observed
in T0 followed by T1 (11.50) and T2 (11.02); whereas the lowest score (4.91) was
found in T5. Rice bran at higher levels adversely affects grains of crumb resulting
in thick walled coarse grained crumb structure due to poor gluten development
during mixing. However, at lower supplementation levels, better mixing
stability, resulted in strengthening of dough for better crumb or grain structure.
Similar decreasing trend in quality score was also noted in defatted rice bran
supplementation. In case of defatted rice bran supplementation, T0 and T1; T2 and
T3 were statistically non-significant. Means for effect of storage on crumb grain
showed significant decrease in score (Table 89) both in fullfat and defatted rice
bran supplemented breads. During storage, the phenomenon of starch
retrogradation pick up the pace with the passage of time, leading to recrystallization of starch particles that collapsed the crumb grain, hence decreased
score for this characteristic.
4.5.4.3.2.2. Crumb color
The results in Table 88 elucidated that in fullfat rice bran supplemented
bread, maximum score (7.90) was observed in T0 followed by T1 (7.85) and T2
(7.08) whereas the lowest score (4.86) was recorded for T5 (bread with 25%
stabilized fullfat rice bran), because breads with more bran content are coarse
grained and tend to be darker than those without bran or with low levels of rice
bran (Sharma et al., 2004). The similar decreasing trend in quality score was also
noted in defatted rice bran supplemented breads. However, T0 (bread with 100%
commercial straight grade flour) and T1 (bread with 5% stabilized defatted rice
bran); likewise, T2 and T3 were statistically non-significant. Means for effect of
storage on crumb grain showed momentous decrease in score (Table 89) from
6.98 (0 hour) to 6.07 (120 hours) for fullfat and 6.98 to 6.32 in defatted rice bran
supplemented bread.
224
4.5.4.3.2.3. Aroma
The aroma is the quality perceived by the sense of smell. It plays a
primary role in coining consumer appeal. The means for aroma (Table 90)
showed significant
Table 88. Grains and crumb color scores of rice bran supplemented breads
Grains
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
FFRB-Bread
11.940.09a
11.500.30b
11.020.08c
9.080.07d
8.060.06e
4.910.06f
Crumb color
DFRBBread
11.94a
11.92a
10.98b
10.93b
8.90c
6.90d
FFRB-Bread
7.900.12a
7.850.12a
7.080.11b
6.020.09c
5.010.08d
4.860.07e
DFRBBread
7.900.12a
7.800.12a
6.790.10b
6.740.10b
5.970.09c
5.150.08b
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
Table 89.
Storage
(Hours)
0
24
48
72
96
120
Crumb color
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
10.430.82a
9.631.12a
9.581.12a
9.491.12a
9.151.04b
9.021.03b
10.430.82a
10.420.81a
10.370.81a
10.280.81ab
10.110.81bc
9.970.80c
6.980.45a
6.880.39a
6.550.56ab
6.440.55bc
6.300.54c
6.070.52b
6.980.45a
6.960.45ab
6.820.44bc
6.710.43cd
6.570.42d
6.320.41e
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
225
variations in fullfat rice bran supplemented bread, maximum score (7.97) was
observed in T1 (bread with 5% stabilized fullfat rice bran) followed by T2 (7.78)
and T0 (7.07) whereas the lowest score (5.38) was found in T5 (bread with 25%
stabilized fullfat rice bran); might be due to the presence of too much bran in
bread which alter its aroma towards branny than wheaty. However, bran at low
levels resulted improve aroma, as liked by the judges, especially in rice
consuming regions. In bread, 15% defatted rice bran supplementation was more
appealing as compared to fullfat supplemented breads at same level. Means for
effect of storage on aroma (Table 91) showed momentous decrease in score from
7.02 (0 hour) to 6.29 (120 hours) and 7.07 to 6.36 for fullfat and defatted rice bran
supplemented breads, respectively. Fresh bread loaves had highest aroma due to
presence of more aromatic compounds which were lost with progressive storage.
4.5.4.3.2.4. Taste
Taste is the major component of flavor detected by the taste buds of the tongue
and mouth membranes. Means for taste showed significant variations in fullfat rice
bran supplemented bread (Table 90), maximum score (16.67) was observed in T2
followed by T1 (bread with 5% stabilized fullfat rice bran) and T0 (bread with 100%
straight grade flour) i.e. 15.66 and 15.16, respectively; whereas the lowest score (11.83)
was assigned to T5. Breads supplemented with defatted rice bran at 10 and 15%
supplementation level were statistically non-significant but significantly different
from rest of the treatments; might be due to the presence of higher levels of bran that
alter the taste.
The results of present study are in confirmity with the observations recorded
by previous researchers. There are limits to enrich the baked products with cereal
226
Table 90. Aroma and taste scores of rice bran supplemented breads
Aroma
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Taste
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
7.070.11c
7.970.13a
7.780.13b
6.300.10d
5.860.10e
5.380.09f
7.070.11c
6.790.10d
7.800.12b
8.000.12a
5.970.99e
4.960.08f
15.160.15c
15.660.18b
16.670.19a
13.880.15d
13.470.15e
11.830.12f
15.160.15c
15.740.16b
16.810.18a
16.660.17a
15.250.15c
13.460.13b
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
Table 91.
Storage
(Hours)
0
24
48
72
96
120
Taste
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
7.020.49a
6.980.45ab
6.840.44bc
6.710.43c
6.550.42b
6.290.40e
7.070.49a
7.010.48ab
6.860.47bc
6.750.47cd
6.600.46d
6.360.44e
13.860.73a
13.770.73a
13.660.72ab
13.450.71b
13.210.69c
12.800.67d
14.860.51a
14.840.51a
14.720.51ab
14.520.50bc
14.280.49c
13.860.47d
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
227
228
229
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
12.020.11a
10.850.10b
10.800.10bc
10.610.10c
9.140.08d
8.010.07e
12.020.11a
11.830.11ab
11.780.11b
11.390.10c
8.990.08d
8.160.07e
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
Storage
(Hours)
FFRB-Bread
DFRB-Bread
0
24
48
72
96
120
10.940.70a
10.750.59a
10.340.59ab
10.210.58bc
10.060.57cd
9.910.56b
10.990.70a
10.910.70a
10.810.69ab
10.670.68bc
10.510.67cd
10.350.66d
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
230
of
rice
bran
increased
the
dietary
fiber
in
breads
231
Chapter-V
SUMMARY
Rice bran has been recognized as an excellent source
of
edible
oil,
protein,
dietary
fiber
and
allied
stabilized
by
extrusion
cooking
(ES-RB),
MW-RB
(0.062
mg
malenaldehyde/Kg).
Stabilization
233
bran
supplementation.
There
was
significant
improvement in dietary fiber (3.90-11.01%), K (102.96407.01 mg/100g), Ca (76.11 to 190.6 mg/100g) and Mg (57.54298.87mg/100g)
content
of
cookies
with
bran
to bread prepared
from
CSGF.
Sensory
236
237
RECOMMENDATIONS
238
LITERATURE CITED
AACC (The American Association of Cereal Chemists). 2000. Approved methods
of American Association of Cereal Chemists. The Am. Assoc. Cereal
Chem. Inc., St. Paul. Minnesota.
Abdel-Kader, Z.M. 2000. Enrichment of Egyptian 'Balady' bread: Baking studies,
physical and sensory evaluation of enrichment with decorticated cracked
broad beans flour (Vicia faba L.). Nahrung. 44(6):418-421.
Abdul, H.A. and S.L. Yu. 2000. Functional properties of dietary fibre prepared
from defatted rice bran. Food Chem. 68(1):15-19.
Abdul-Hamid, A. and L.Y. Siew. 2000. Functional properties of dietary fibre
prepared from defatted rice bran. Food Chemistry. 68:15-19.
Afzal, B. 2004. Effect of different improvers on the functional properties of
different wheat cultivars. M.Sc. thesis, Inst. Food Sci. and Technol. Univ.
Agric. Faisalabad, Paksitan.
Ahmed, F., K. Platel and S. Vishwanatha. 2007. Improved shelf-life of rice bran
by domestic heat processing and assessment of its dietary consumption in
experimental rats. J. Sci. Food Agric. 87:60-67.
Akihisa, T., K. Yasukawa, M. Yamaura, M. Ukiya, Y. Kimura, N. Shimizu and K.
Arai. 2000. Triterpene alcohol and sterol ferulates from rice bran and their
anti-inflammatory effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:2313-2319.
Al-Jasser, M.S. and AI-Mustafa. 1996. Quality of Hassawi rice bran. Annals of
Agric. Sci., Ain Shams Univ. 41(2):875-880.
Amarasinghe, B.M.W.P.K. and N.C. Gangodavilage. 2004. Rice bran oil
extraction in Sri Lanka: Data for process equipment design. Food Bioprod. Process. 82(C1):54-59.
Anderson, J.W. and A.E. Siegel. 1990. Hypocholesterolemic effects of oat
products. p. 17-36. In: I. Furda and C. Brine (eds.) New developments in
dietary fibre: physiological and analytical aspects. Plenum Press, New
York.
Anderson, J.W., D.A. Deakins, T.L. Floore, B.M. Smith and S.E. Whitis. 1990.
Dietary fiber and coronary heart disease. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 29:95
147.
239
Anjum, F.M, A. Ahmad, I. Pasha and M.S. Butt. 2003. Micronutrients in various
mill streams of flour of different wheat cultivars. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 40(34):180-185.
Annoni, G., B.M. Botasso, D. Ciaci, M.F. Donato and A. Tripodi. 1982. Liquid
triglycerides (GPO-PAP). Medi Diagnostic Italy. Lab. J. Res. Lab. Med.
9:115.
AOAC (The Association of Official Analytical Chemist). 2006. The official
methods of analysis of AOAC international, 18th ed. The Assoc. Official
Ana. Chem. Arlington, U.S.A.
AOCS
Assmann, G. 1979. HDL cholesterol precipitant. Randox Labs. Ltd. Crumlin Co.
Antrim, N. Ireland. Internist. 20:559.
Barber, S. and B.C. Benedito-de. 1980. Rice bran: chemistry and technology. In:
D.S. Luh (ed.) Rice: production and utilization. AVI Publishing Co.
Westport, C.T., USA.
Barber, S., B.C. Benedito-de and J. Martenz. 1981. Rice bran proteins: Potential value
of rice bran fractions as protein food ingredients. Rev. Agroquim. Tecnol.
Aliment. 21:247-256.
Benedito-de, B.C. and S. Barber. 1978. Toxic constituents of rice bran:
Haemagglutinating activity of raw and heat treated bran. Rev. Agroquim.
Tecnol. Aliment. 18:89-94.
Bergman, C.J., Xu, Z., 2003. Genotype and environment effects on tocopherols,
tocotrienols and -oryzanol contents of Southern US rice. Cereal Chem.
80:446-449.
Bhardwaj, K., A. Raju and R. Rajasekharan. 2001. Identification, purification, and
characterization of a thermally stable lipase from rice bran: A new
member of the (Phospho) lipase family. Plant. Physiol. 127(12): 1728-1738.
Bhattacharya, K.R. 1985. Parboiling of rice. p. 305306. In: B.O. Juliano (ed.) Rice:
Chemistry and technology. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem. Inc., St. Paul.
Minnesota.
Bird, J.N. 1998. Phytase for Chinese poultry feeds. Poult. Int. 9:68-71.
240
241
Cauvain SP (ed.). 2003. Bread making, improving quality. Woodhead Pub. Ltd.,
Abington Hall, Cambridge.
Ceriello, D., A. Giugliano, C. Quatraro, P.J. Dipalo and Lefebvre. 1991. Vitamin e
reduction of protein glycosylation in diabetes. Diabetic Care. 14(1): 68-72.
Certik, M. and S. Shimizu. 1999. Biosynthesis and regulation of microbial
polyunsaturated fatty acid production. J. Biosci. Bioengg. 87:1-4.
Chen, M.H. and C.J. Bergman. 2005. A rapid procedure for analyzing rice bran
tocopherol, tocotrienol and -oryzanol contents. J. Food Comp. Anal.
18:319331.
Chumachenko, N.A., A. Demehuk, L. Zagorodynaya, L. Zubko and A. Shretsova.
1987. Technological indicators of quality of flour mixtures containing
added bran. Pishchevaye Promyshelmost. 2:35-37.
Cicero, A.F. and A. Gaddi. 2001. Rice bran oil and -oryzanol in the treatment of
hyperlipoproteinaemias and other conditions. Phytother. Res. 15:277289.
Decker, L.A. 1977. Worthington enzyme manual. Worthington Biochemical Corp,
Feedhold, NJ.
Deckere, E.A.M. de and O. Korver. 1996. Minor constituents of rice bran oil as
functional foods. Nutr. Rev. 54 (II): S120-S126.
Delahaye, E., P. Jimene and E. Perez. 2005. Effect of enrichment with high content
dietary fiber stabilized rice bran flour on chemical and functional
properties of storage frozen pizzas. J. Food Eng. 68:17.
Deolankar, R.P. and K.S. Singh 1979. Trypsin inhibitor, mineral availability and
performance of broiler chickens fed on diets based on rice bran. Anim.
Feed Sci. Technol. 4:133-141.
Desikachar, H.S. 1974. Status Report: Preservation of by-products of rice milling.
In: Rice by-products utilization. Int. Conf. Valencia. 2:110.
DeVries, J.W. 2001. AACC Report: The definition of dietary fiber. Cereal Foods
World. 46(3):112-126.
Drehner, M.L. 1987. Handbook of dietary fibre - an applied approach. p. 2-3.
Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
242
Dunford, N.T. and J.W. King. 2001. Thermal gradient deacidification of crude
rice bran oil utilizing supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.
78(2): 121-125.
Eneche, E.H. 1999. Biscuit-making potential of millet/pigeon pea flour blends.
Plant Food. Hum. Nutri. 54:2127.
Evans, H.M. and K.S. Bishop. 1922. On the existence of a hitherto unrecognized
dietary factor essential for reproduction. Science. 56(1458):650-651.
Fang, N., Y.U., Shanggong and M.B. Thomas. 2003. Characterization of triterpene
alcohol and sterol ferulates in rice bran using LC-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 51: 3260-3267.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2001. FAOSTAT agriculture data
2001, worlds rice production 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization,
Rome. Available from: http://www.fao.org/.
Farrell, D.J. 1994. Utilization of rice bran in diets for domestic fowl and
ducklings. World Poult. Sci. J. 5:116-131.
Fernando, W.J.N. and L.G. Hewavitharana. 1993. Effect of fluidized bed drying
on stabilization of rice bran. Drying Technol. 11(5):1115-1125.
Finney, K.F. 1984. An optimized, straight-dough, bread-making method after 44
years. Cereal Chem. 61:20-25.
Fukushima, M., S. Fujii, Y. Yoshimura, T. Endo and M. Nakano. 1999. Effect of
rice bran oil on intraintestinal fermentation and cholesterol metabolism in
cecectomized rats. Nutri. Res. 19(2):235-245.
Gangodavilage, N.C. 2002. Optimal operating conditions and equilibrium
characteristics of rice bran oil extraction. M.Sc. thesis, Uni. Moratuwa, Sri
Lanka.
Gerhardt, A.L. and N.B. Gallo. 1998. Fullfat rice barn and oat bran similarly
reduces hypercholesterolemia in humans. J. Nutr. 128(5):865-869.
Ghosh, M. 2007. Review on recent trends in rice bran oil processing. J. Am. Oil
Chem. Soc. 84:315-324.
Ginsberg, H.N., P. Kris-Etherton, B. Dennis, P.J. Elmer, A. Ershow, M. Lefevre, T.
Pearson, P. Roheim, R. Ramakrishnan, R. Reed, K. Stewart, P. Stewart, K.
Phillips and N. Anderson. 1998. Effects of reducing dietary saturated fatty
243
244
Hegazy, N.A. and S.M.N. Faheid. 1990. Rheological and sensory characteristics of
doughs and cookies based on wheat, soybean, chickpea and lupine flour.
Die Nahrung. 34:835841.
Hegsted, M., M.M. Windhauser, S.K. Morris and S.B. Lester. 1993. Stabilized rice
bran and oat bran lower cholesterol in humans. Nutr. Res. 13:387-398.
Helm, R.M. and A.W. Burks. 1996. Hypoallerginicity of rice protein. Cereal Foods
World. 41:839-842.
Hesser, J.M. 1994. Applications and usage of dietary fibre in the USA. Int. Food
Ing. 2:5052.
Hikino, H., M. Takahashi, Y. Oshima and C. Konno. 1988. Isolation and
hypoglycemic activity of Oryza brans A, B, C and D, glycans of Oryza
sativa. Planta Med. 54(1):1-3.
Holas, J. and K.H. Tipples. 1978. Factors affecting farinograph and baking
absorption. Quality characteristics of flour streams. Cereal Chem. 55:637652.
Hoseney, R.C. 1986. Yeast leavened products. p. 203. In: Principles of cereal
science and technology. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem. Inc., St. Paul,
Minnesota.
Hu, W., J.H. Wells, T.S. Shin and J.S. Godber. 1996. Comparison of isopropanol
and hexane for extraction of vitamin E and oryzanols from stabilized rice
bran. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soci. 73:16531656.
Hundemer, J.K., S.P. Nabar, B.J. Shriver and L.P. Forman. 1991. Dietary fiber
sources lower blood cholesterol in C57BL/6 mice. J. Nutr. 121:13601365.
Ikeda, I., Y.K. Nakashima and M. Sugano. 1985. Effects of cycloartenol on
absorption and serum levels of cholesterol in rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol.
31:375-384.
Indravathamma, P. and H.S. Seshadri. 1980. Lectin from rice. J. Biosci. 2:29-36.
IRRI (International Rice Research Institute. 2008. Interesting facts on rice.
Available from: http://www.irri.org/. Accessed on: 07 July 2008.
IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry). 1987. Standard
methods for the analysis of oils, fats and derivatives, 7th ed. C. Paquot and
A. Hautfenne (eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.
245
Jangbloed, A.W., H. Everts and P.A. Kemme. 1991. Recent advances in animal
nutrition. Butter-Worth, London.
Jariwalla, R.J. 2001. Rice bran products: Phytonutrients with potential
applications in preventive and clinical medicine. Drugs Exp. Clin. Res.
27:1726.
Josephson, B. and A. Gyllensward. 1975. Gesamt protein (Biuret method). Scand.
J. Clin. Lab. Fluitest TP, Biocon Diagnostik, Hecke 8, 34516
Vohl/Manenhagen, Germany. Invest. 9:29.
Ju, Y.H. and S.R. Vali. 2005. Rice bran oil as a potential resource for biodiesel. J.
Sci. Ind. Res. 64:822.
Juliano, B.O. 1985. Rice: Chemistry and technology, 2nd ed. Am. Assoc. Cereal
Chem. Inc., St. Paul. Minnesota.
Kahlon, T.S., R.M. Sunder, F.I. Chow, M.M. Chiu and A.A. Betschart. 1985. Effect
of rice bran and oat bran on plasma cholesterol in hamsters. Cereal Food
World. 34:768-774.
Kahlon, T.S., R.M. Saunders, F.I. Chow, M.C. Chiu and A.A. Bestchart. 1990.
Influence of rice bran, oat bran and wheat bran on cholesterol and
triglycerides in hamsters. Cereal Foods World. 67:439-443.
Kahlon, T.S., F.I. Chow, S.R. Sayre and A.A. Betschart. 1992. Cholesterol lowering
in hamsters fed rice bran at various levels, defatted rice bran and rice bran
oil. J. Nutr. 122(3):513-519.
Kahlon, T.S., F.I. Chow, M.M. Chiu, C.A. Hudson and R.N. Sayre. 1996.
Cholesterol lowering by rice bran and rice bran oil unsaponifiable matter
in hamsters. Cereal Chem. 73(1):69-74.
Kahlon, T.S., R.H. Edwards and F.I. Chow. 1998. Effect of extrusion on
hypocholesterolemic properties of rice, oat, corn, and wheat bran diets in
hamsters. Cereal Chem. 75(6):897-903.
Kailasapathy, K. and MacNeil, J.H. 1985. Baking studies with winged beans
(Psophocarpus tetragonolobus L DC.) flour and wheat flour blends. J Food
Sci. 50:1672-1675.
Kaneko, R. and T. Tsuchiya. 1954. New compound in rice bran and germ oils. J.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 57:526.
246
Kao, C. and B.S. Luh. 1991. Rice. p. 295-311. In: B.S. Luh (ed.) Rice bran:
Chemistry and technology, rice production and utilization. Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York.
Katina, K. 2003. High fibre baking. S.P. Cauvain (ed.). In: Bread making:
improving quality. Woodhead Pub. Ltd. Cambridge.
Keerthi, B.P. and C.D.P. Swarnasiri. 1985. Composition of Raw and Parboiled
Rice Bran from common Sri Lankan varieties and from different types of
rice mills J. Agric. Food Chem. 33(4):734-738.
Kennedy, G. and B. Burlingame. 2003. Analysis of food composition data on rice
from a plant genetic resources perspective. Food Chem. 80: 589596.
Kennedy, L.L., H.Y. Chung and M. Hegsted. 1996. New food products developed
from rice bran fractions. IFT Annual Meeting: Book of Abst. p.56.
Kent, N.L. and A.D. Evers. 1994. Technology of cereals, 4th ed. p. 187-188.
Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Kestin, M., R. Moss, P.M. Clifton and P.J. Nestle. 1990. Comparative effect of
three cereal brans on plasma lipids, blood pressure and glucose
metabolism in mildly hypercholesterolemic men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
52:661-666.
Khan, M.A., Rashid, J and F.J. El-Haramein. 1987. Technological values of some
Pakistani wheat varieties. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 8(2):121-4.
Khaw KT and Barrett CE. 1987. Dietary fiber and reduced ischemic heart disease
mortality rates in men and women: a 12-year prospective study. Am. J.
Epidemiol. 126:1093-102.
Khetarpaul, N., R.B. Grewal and S. Jood. 2005. Bakery science and cereal
technology. Daya Pub. House, Delhi.
Khor, H.T. and T.T. Ng. 2000. Effects of administration of tocopherol and
tocotrienols on serum lipids and liver HMG CoA reductase activity. Int. J.
Food Sci. Nutr. 51:S3S11.
Khor, H.T., D.Y. Chieng and K.K. Ong. 1995. Tocotrienols inhibit HMG-CoA
reductase activity in the guinea pig. Nutr. Res. 15:537544.
Khosla, P., D.D. Gupta and R.K. Nagpal. 1995. Effect of Trigonella Foenum
Graecum (Fenygreek) on serum lipids in normal and diabetic rats. Ind. J.
Pharmacol. 27:89-93.
247
Kim, C.J., S.M. Byun, H.S. Cheigh and T.W. Kwon. 1987. Optimization of
extrusion of rice bran stabilization process. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 64:514
516.
Kim, J.S., J.S Godber and W. Prinaywiwatkul. 2000. Restructured beef roasts
containing rice bran oil and fiber influences cholesterol oxidation and
nutritional profile. J. Muscle Foods. 11:111127.
Kim, J.S. and J.S. Godber. 2001. Oxidative stability and vitamin E levels increased
in restructured beef roasts with added rice bran oil. J. Food Qual. 24:1726.
Kim, J.S., J.S. Godber, J.M. King and W. Prinyawiwatkul. 2001. Inhibition of
cholesterol autoxidation by the nonsaponifiable fraction in rice bran in
an aqueous model system. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 78(7):685-689.
Kim, M.K., K.W. Yu, D.H. Kang, J.H. Koh, B.S. Hong and H.J. Suh. 2001. Antistress and anti-fatigue effects of fermented rice bran. Biosci. Biotechnol.
Biochem. 65:22942296.
249
Lloyd, B.J., T.J. Siebenmorgen and K.W. Beers. 2000. Effect of commercial
processing on anti-oxidants in rice bran. Cereal Chem. 77(5):551-555.
Luh, B.S., S. Barber and C. Benedito de Barber. 1991. Rice bran: Chemistry and
technology, rice production and utilization, Vol. II. p. 313. B.S. Luh (ed).
Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Lynn, L. 1969. Edible rice bran foods. Cereal Chem. 46(1):54-172.
Malekian, F., R.M. Rao, W. Prinyawiwatkul, W.E. Marshall, M. Windhauser and
M. Ahmedna. 2000. Lipase and lipoxygenase activity, functionality, and
nutrient losses in rice bran during storage. Agricultural Center, Louisiana
Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge. Bulletin No. 870: 1-68.
Manley, D. 2002. Technology of biscuits, crackers and cookies, 3rd ed. Woodhead
Pub. Ltd., Cambridge.
Manohar, R.S. and P. Haridas Rao. 1999. Effect of emulsifiers, fat level and type
on the rheological characteristics of biscuit dough and quality of biscuits.
J. Sci. Food Agric. 79(10):1223-1231.
Marshall, W.E. and J.I. Wadsworth. 1994. Rice science and technology. Marcel
Dekker, Inc., New York.
Martin, D.E. 1994. Extrusion stabilization and near infrared analysis of rice bran.
M.S. thesis, Louisiana State Uni. U.S.A.
Mattson, F.H. and S.M. Grundy. 1985. Comparison of effects of dietary saturated,
monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids on plasma lipids and
lipoproteins in man. Lipid Res. 20:194202.
Matz, S.A. 1972. Bakery technology and engineering. The AVI Pub. Co.,
Westport, Connecticut.
Matz, S.A. 1991. The chemistry and technology of cereals as food and feed. p.
731741. Van Nostrand Reinhold Pub., New York.
McCaskill, D.R. and F. Zhang. 1999. Use of rice bran oil in foods. Food Technol.
53(2):5053.
McKee, L.H. and T.A. Latner. 2000. Underutilized sources of dietary fiber: A
review Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 55:285304.
250
McNamara, J.R., J.S. Cohn, P.W. Wilson and E.J. Schaefer. 1990. Calculated
values for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the assessment of lipid
abnormalities and coronary disease risk. Clin. Chem. 36:36-42.
McPeak, P., C. Rukmini and S.C. Reddy. 2001. Supportive therapy for diabetes,
hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. US Patent 6303586B1, U.S.A.
McWatters, K.H., J.B. Ouedraogo, A.V.A. Resurreccion, Y.C. Hung and R. Dixon.
2003. Physical and sensory characteristics of sugar cookies containing
mixtures of wheat, fonio (Digitaria exilis) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)
flours. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 38:403410.
Meilgaard, M.C., G.V. Civille and B.T. Carr. 2007. Sensory evaluation techniques,
4th ed. C.R.C. Press L.L.C., New York.
Miller, A., T. Frenzel, H.G. Schmarr and K.H. Engel. 2003. Coupled liquid
chromatographygas chromatography for the rapid analysis of -oryzanol
in rice lipids. J. Chrom. A. 985:403410.
Miller, N.J. and C.A. Rice-Evans. 1997. Cinnamates and hydroxybenzoates in the
diet: antioxidant activity assessed using the ABTS+ radical cation. Br.
Food J. 99:5761.
Minhajuddin, M., Z.H. Beg, J. Iqbal. 2005. Hypolipidemic and antioxidant
properties of tocotrienol rich fraction isolated from rice bran oil in
experimentally induced hyperlipidemic rats. Food Chemical Toxicol.
43:747753.
Minitab Statistical Software V-15. 2008. Minitab Inc., Quality Plaza, 1829 Pine
Hall Road, State College, Pennsylvania 16801, U.S.A.
Moldenhauer, K.A., E.T. Champagne, D.R. McCaskill and H. Guraya. 2003.
Functional products from rice. p. 71-89. In: G. Mazza (ed.) Functional
foods. Technomic Publishing Co. Inc., Lancaster.
Morris, J.N., J.W. Marr and D.G. Clayton. 1977. Diet and heart: a postscript. Br.
Med. J. 2:1307-1314.
Most, M.M., R. Tulley, S. Morales and M. Lefevre. 2005. Rice bran oil, not fiber,
lowers cholesterol in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 81:64-68.
Nagao, K., M. Sato, M. Takenaka, M. Ando, M. Iwamoto and K. Imaizumi. 2001.
Feeding unsaponifiable compounds from rice bran oil does not alter
hepatic mRNA abundance for cholesterol metabolism-related proteins in
hypercholesterolemic rats. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65(2):371-377.
251
Nanua, J.N., J.U. McGregor and J.S. Godber. 2000. Influence of high-oryzanol rice
bran oil on the oxidative stability of whole milk powder. J. Dairy Sci.
83:24262431.
Narisullah and M.N. Krishnamurthy. 1989. Effect of stabilization on the quality
characteristics of rice bran oil. J. Am. Chem. Oil Soc. 66:661-663.
Nasirullah. 2001. Development of deep frying edible vegetable oils. J. Food
Lipids. 8:295304.
Nesaretnam, K., R. Stephen, R. Dils and P. Darbre. 1998. Tocotrienols inhibit the
growth of human breast cancer cells irrespective of estrogen receptor
status. Lipids. 33:461469.
Newman, D.J. and C.P. Price. 1999. Renal function and nitrogen metabolites. p.
12041270. In: C.A. Burtis and E.R. Ashwood (eds.) Textbook of clinical
chemistry. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia.
Newman, R.K., A.A. Betschart,C.W. Newman and P.J. Hofer. 1992. Effect of fullfat or defatted rice bran on serum cholesterol. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr.
42(1):37-43.
Nicolosi, R.J., L.M. Ausman and D.M. Hegsted. 1991. Rice bran oil lowers serum
total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol and apo B levels in
nonhuman primates. Atherosclerosis. 88:133142.
Nicolosi, R.J., E.J. Rogers, L.M. Ausman and F.T. Orthoefer. 1994. Rice bran oil
and its health benefits. p. 421-437. In: Marshall W.E. and J.I. Wordsworth
(eds.) Rice science and technology. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
Nurul Islam, M.D. and H.B. Johansen. 1987. Physico chemical tests - a basis for
selecting the size of wheat flour. J. food Sci. Technol. 24(3):136-138.
Orthoefer, F.T. 1996. Rice bran oil: Healthy lipid source. Food Technol. 50(12):6264.
Ory, R.L., H.T.C. Bog and R.R. Mod. 1981. Properties of haemagglutinin in rice
and other cereal grains. p. 159-168. In: Antineutrinos and Natural
Toxicants in Foods. Food Nutr. Press, Inc., Westport.
Parker, R.A., B.C. Pearce, R.W. Clark, D.A. Gordon and J.J. Wright. 1993.
Tocotrienols regulate cholesterol production in mammalian cells by posttranscriptional suppression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylcoenzyme-A
reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1123011238.
252
Pasha, I., M.S. Butt, F.M. Anjum and N. Shahzadi. 2002. Effect of dietetic
sweeteners on the quality of cookies. 2002. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 4(2):245-248.
Patel, M.M. and G.V. Rao. 1996. Effect of sugar, fat and emulsifiers on cookies
prepared from blends of wheat and blackgram (Phaseolus mungo) flours. J.
Food Sci. Technol. India. 33(4):326-328.
Patel, P. and T. Walker. 2004. Effect of extraction method on the level of
important antioxidants in rice bran oil. ASAE/CSAE Meeting Paper No.
046140. ASAE/CSAE Fairmont Chateau Laurier, the Westin, Government
Centre Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pearce, B.C., R.A. Parker, M.E. Deason, A.A. Qureshi and J.J.K. Wright. 1992.
Hypocholesterolemic activity of synthetic and natural tocotrienols. J. Med.
Chem. 35:35953606.
Perretti, G., E. Miniati, L. Montanari and P. Fantozzi. 2003. Improving the value
of rice by-products by SFE. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 26:63-69.
Petterino, C. and A.A. Storino. 2006. Clinical chemistry and hematological
historical data in control sprague-dawley rats from pre-clinical toxicity
studies. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 57:213-219.
Pomeranz, Y., M. Shorgen, K.F. Finney and D.B. Bechtel. 1987. Fibre in bread
making effects on functional properties. Cereal Chem. 54:24-41.
Pomeranz, Y. and R.L. Oryl. 1982. Rice processing and utilization. In: CRC
Handbook of Processing and Utilization in Agriculture, Vol. II. CRC Press,
West Palm Beach, FL.
Prabhakar, J.V. 1987. Stabilization of bran. In: Hand book on rice bran. Solvent
Extractors Association of India, India.
Prakash, J. and A. Jyothilakshmi. 1995. Utilizing full fat rice bran in traditional
foods. p. 243. In: Book of abstracts. Institute of Food Technologists Annual
Meeting. Abstract No. 81C-4.
Pszczola, D.E. 2001. Rice: not just for throwing. Food Technol. 55:5359.
Purushothama, S., P.L. Raina and K. Hariharan. 1995. Effect of long term feeding
of rice bran oil upon lipids and lipoproteins in rats. Mol. Cell. Biochem.
146(1): 63-69.
Pyler, E.J. 1971. Baking science and technology. p. 546. Siebel, Chicago.
253
Pyler, E.J. 1988. Baking science and technology, 3rd ed. Vol. I & II, Sosland Pub.
Co., Kansas, U.S.A.
Qureshi, A.A., B.C. Pearce, R.M. Nor, A. Gapor, D.M. Peterson and E.C. Elson.
1996. Dietary a-tocopherol attenuates the impact of c-tocotrienol on
hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase activity in
chickens. J. Nutr. 126:389-394.
Qureshi, A.A., H. Mo, L. Packer and D.M. Peterson. 2000. Isolation and
identification
of
novel
tocotrienols
from
rice
bran
with
hypocholesterolemic, antioxidant, and antitumor properties. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 48(8):31303140.
Qureshi, A.A., S.A. Sami, W.A. Salser and F.A. Khan. 2001. Synergistic effect of
tocotrienol-rich fraction (TRF25) of rice bran and lovastatin on lipid
parameters in hypercholesteroleic humans. J. Nutr. Biochem. 12:318-329.
Qureshi, A.A., S.A. Sami, W.A. Salser and F.A. Khan. 2002. Dose dependent
suppression of serum cholesterol by tocotrienol rich fraction (TRF25) of
rice bran in hypercholesterolemic humans. Atherosclerosis. 161: 199207.
Qureshi, N. and A.A. Qureshi. 1993. Novel hypercholesterolemic agents with
antioxidant properties. p. 247267. In: Packer, L. and J. Fuchs (eds.)
Vitamin E in health and disease. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
Raghuram, T.C., R.V. Brahmaji and C. Rukmini. 1989. Studies on hypolipidemic
effect of dietary RBO in human subjects. Nutri. Rep. Int. 39:889895.
Raghuram, T.C. and C. Rukmini. 1995. Nutritional significance of rice bran oil.
Indian J. Med. Res. 102:241244.
Rajeshwara, A.N. and V. Prakash. 1995. Purification and characterization of
lipase from rice (Oryza sativa L.) bran. Die Nahrung. 39:406418.
Ramezanzadeh, F., R. Rao, M. Windhauser, P. Witoon, R. Tulley and W.
Marshall. 1999. Prevention of hydrolytic rancidity in rice bran during
storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:30503052.
Ramezanzadeh, F.M., R.M. Rao, M. Windhauser, W. Prinyawiwatkul and W.E.
Marshall. 1999. Prevention of oxidative rancidity in rice bran during
storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:29973000.
Ramezanzadeh, F.M., R.M. Rao, W. Prinyawiwatkul, W.E. Marshall and M.
Windhauser. 2000. Effects of microwave heat, packaging and storage
254
255
Rosell, C.M., J.A. Rojas and Benedito de Barber. 2001. Influence of hydrocolloids
on dough rheology and bread quality. Food Hydrocolloids. 15:7581.
Rossell, J.B. 1991. Analysis and properties of oilseeds. p. 80-98. In: J.B. Rossell and
J.L.R. Pritchard (eds.) Analysis of oilseeds, fats and fatty foods. Elsevier
Applied Science, New York.
Rukmini, C. 1988. Chemical, nutritional and toxicological studies on rice bran oil.
Food Chem. 30:257268.
Rukmini, C. and Raghuram. 1991. Nutritional and biochemical aspects of the
hypolipidemic action of rice bran oil: A review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr.
10(6):593-601.
Rukmani, C. 1995. Nutritional significance of rice bran oil. Indian J. Med. Res.
102:241-244.
Rukmani, C. 2002. What is rice bran (a web article on rice bran) Available from:
www.moormans.com/equine/TechBulletins/WhatIsRiceBran.htm.
Sakamoto, K., T. Tabata, K. Shirasaki, T. Inagaki and S. Nakayama. 1987. Effects
of gamma-oryzanol and cycloartenol ferulic acid ester on cholesterol diet
induced hyperlipidemia in rats. Jpn. J. Pharm. 45:559-65.
Salmenkallio, M.M., K. Katina and K. Autio. 2001. Effect on bran fermentation on
quality and microstructure of high-fibre wheat bread. Cereal chem.
78(4):229-235.
Salunkhe, D.K., J.K. Chavan, R.N. Adsule and S.S. Kadam. 1992. Rice. p. 424448.
In: World oilseeds: Chemistry, technology and utilization. Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York.
Sanchez, T.S.A., Z.A. Salazar, I.B. Mena and C. Duran de Bazua. 2000. Cinetica de
reaccion para la gelatinizacion bajo tratamiento termico alcalino de
almidon de maiz en un extrusor considerado como un reactor continuo de
flujo tipo piston (In French, with English abstract). Tecnol Ciencia (IMIQ,
Mex). 15:90101.
Sanders, T.A. and S. Reddy. 1992. The influence of rice bran on plasma lipids and
lipoproteins in human volunteers. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 46(3):167-72.
Sarkar, S. 1992. Nutrition of rice bran oil in relation to its purification. J. Am. Oil
Chem. Soc. 68:956-962.
256
Saunders, R.M. 1986. Rice bran composition and potential food uses, Food Rev.
Int. 1:465-495.
Saunders, R.M. 1990. The properties of rice bran as a food stuff. Cereal Foods
World. 35:632-639.
Sayre, R.N., R.M. Saunders, R.V. Enochian, W.G. Schultz and E.C. Beagle. 1982.
Review of rice bran stabilization systems with emphasis on extrusion
cooking. Cereal Foods World. 27:317.
Sayre, R.N. and R.M. Saunders. 1985. Extraction and refining of edible oil
extrusion stabilized rice bran. J. Oil Chem. Soc. 62:1040-1043.
Sayre, R.N., L. Earl, F.H. Kratzer and R.M. Saunders. 1987. Nutritional qualities
of stabilized and raw rice bran for chicks. Poult. Sci. 66:493-499.
Sayre, R.N., L. Earl, F.H. Kratzer and R.M. Saunders. 1988. Effects of diets
containing raw and extrusion cooked rice bran on growth and
efficiency of feed utilization of broilers. Brit. Poult. Sci. 29:8-15.
Schaefer, E.J., R.I. Levy, N.D. Ernst, F.D. Van Sant, H.B. Brewer Jr. 1981. The
effect of low cholesterol, high polyunsaturated fat and low fat diets on
plasma lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol levels in normal and
hypocholesterolemic subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 34:17581763.
Seetharamaiah, G.S. and J.V. Prabhakar. 1986. Oryzanol content of Indian rice
bran oil and its extraction from soap stock. J. Food Sci. Technol. 23:270-74.
Seetharamaiah, G.S. and N. Chandrasekhara. 1989. Studies on
hypocholesterolemic activity of rice bran oil. Atherosclerosis. 78:219223.
Seetharamaiah, G.S., T.P. Krishnakantha and N. Chandrasekhara. 1990. Influence
of oryzanol on platelet aggregation in rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 36:291297.
Seibel, W. 1983. Anrechhing von Brot and Backverhalten. Getreide Mehl und Brot.
45:377-379.
Seitz, L.M. 1989. Stanol and sterol esters of ferulic and p-coumaric acids in wheat,
corn, rye, and triticale. J. Agric. Food Chem. 37:662-667.
Sekhon, K.S., S.S. Dhillon, N. Singh and B. Singh. 1997. Functional suitability of
commercially milled rice bran in India for use in different food products.
Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 50(2):127-140.
257
Semwal, A.D. and S.S. Arya. 2001. Studies on the stability of some edible oils and
their blends during storage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 38:515518.
Sen, C.K., S. Khanna and S. Roy. 2007. Tocotrienols in health and disease: the
other half of the natural vitamin E family. Mol Aspects Med. 28(5-6):692728.
Setser, C.S. 1996. Sensory methods. In: R.E. Hebeda and H.F. Zobel (eds.) Baked goods freshness
technology, evaluation and inhibition of staling. Marcel market, Inc. New York.
Shaheen, M., F.M. Anjum, M.S. Butt, A.D. Khan, T. Zahoor and A. Malik. 2005.
Effect of rice bran supplementation on the quality of bread. Pak. J. Food
Sci. 15(1-2):1-6.
Shahzadi, N., M.S. Butt, Rehman, SU and Sharif K. Rheological and baking
performance of composite flours. 2005. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 7(1):100-104
Shanggong, Y.U., T.N. Zachary, M.B. Thomas and F.
Nianbai. 2007.
Quantification of Vitamin E and -oryzanol Components in Rice Germ
and Bran. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:7308-7313.
Sharif, K., M.S. Butt and N. Huma. 2005. Oil extraction from rice industrial waste
and its effect on physico-chemical characteristics of cookies. Nutr. Food
Sci. 35(6):416-427.
Sharma, H.R. and G.S. Chauhan. 2002. Effect of stabilized rice bran-fenugreek
blends on the quality of breads and cookies. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 39(3):225233.
Sharma, H.R. G.S. Chauhan, K. Agrawal. 2004. Physico-chemical characteristics
of rice bran processed by dry heating and extrusion cooking. Int. J. Food
Prop. 7(3):603614.
Sharma, R.D. and C. Rukmini. 1986. Rice bran oil and hypocholesterolemia in
rats. Lipids. 21:715-717.
Sharma, R.D. and C. Rukmini. 1987. Hypocholesterolemic activity of
unsaponifiable fraction of rice bran oil. Ind. J. Med. Res. 85:278-281.
Sharp, C.Q. and K.J. Kitchen. 1990. Using rice bran in yeast bread in a home
baker. Cereal Foods World. 35:1021-1028.
Shin, D.H. and J.K. Chung. 1998. Changes during storage of rice germ oil and its
fatty acid composition. Korean J. Food. Sci. Technol. 30:7781.
258
Shin, T., J.S. Godber, D.E. Martin and J.H. Wells. 1997. Hydrolytic stability and
changes in E vitamers and oryzanol of extruded rice bran during storage.
J. Food Sci. 62:704-708.
Sierra, S., L.V. Federico, O. Mnica, J. Jess, B. Julio and X. Jordi. 2005. Increased
immune response in mice consuming rice bran oil. Eur. J. Nutr. 44(8):509516.
Singh, B., M. Bajaj, A. Kaur, S. Sharma and J.S. Sidhu. 1993. Studies on the
development of high-protein biscuits from composite flour. Plant Foods
Hum. Nutr. 43:181189.
Singh, B., K.S. Sekhon and N. Singh. 1995. Suitability of full fat and defatted rice
bran obtained from Indian rice for use in food products. Plant Foods
Hum. Nutr. 47(3):191-200.
Singh, N., A. Kaur, R.P. Singh and K.S. Sekhon, K.S. 1989. Rheological and cookie
making studies on wheat-rice flour blends. J. Food Sci. Tech. 26:9094.
Singh, N., K. Harinder, K.S. Sekhon and B. Kaur. 1991. Studies on the
improvement of functional and baking properties of wheat-chickpea flour
blends. J. Food Proc. Pres. 15:391402.
Singh, N., S. Gupta, S.N. Sodhi and R.P. Singh. 2002. Effect of additives on
dough and cookie making properties of flour. Int. J. Food Prop. 5(3):547562.
Staudt, E. and Zeigler. 1973. Flour chemistry, 1st ed. Bhuler Brothers Ltd.,
Engineering Works Uzwil, Switzerland.
Stauffer, C.E. 1993. Dietary fibre: analysis, physiology and calorie reduction. p.
371-398. In: B.S. Kamel and C.E. Stauffer (eds.) Advances in baking
technology. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow.
Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and procedures of
statistics: A biometrical approach, 3rd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., New
York.
Stephens, N.G., A. Parsons, P.M. Schofield, F. Kelly, K. Cheeseman and M.J.
Mitchinson. 1996. Randomised controlled trial of vitamin E in patients
with coronary disease: Cambridge heart antioxidant study (CHAOS).
Lancet. 347:781786.
Stockbridge, Hardy and Glueck. 1989. Photometric determination of cholesterol.
J. Lab. Clin. Med. 114(2):142-151.
259
Tan, N.H., Z.H.A. Rahim, H.T. Khor and K.C. Wong. 1983.
Winged bean (Psophocarpustetragonolobus) tannin
level, phytate content and haemagglutinin activity. J.
Agri. Food Chem. 31:591-599.
Tang, S., N.S. Hettiarachchy, R. Horax and S. Eswaranandam. 2003.
Physiochemical properties and functionality of rice bran protein
260
hydrolyzate prepared from heat-stabilized defatted rice bran with the aid
of enzyme. J. Food Sci. 68:152-157.
Tangendjaja, B., K.A. Buckle and M. Wootton. 2006. Dephosphorylation of
phytic acid in rice bran. J. Food Sci. 46(4): 1021-1024.
Tao, J. 2001. Method of stabilization of rice bran by acid treatment and composition
of the same. U.S. Patent No. 6245377.
Taylor, J.B., T.M. Richard, C.L. Wilhelm, M.M. Chrysam, M. Otterburn, and G.A.
Leveille. 1996. Rice bran oil antioxidant. U.S. Patent No. 5552167.
Tolman, K.G. and R. Rej. 1999. Liver function. p. 1125-1177. In: C.A. Burtis and
E.R. Ashood (eds.) Textbook of clinical chemistry. W.B. Saunders Co.,
Philadelphia.
Tomlin, J. and N.W. Read. 1988. Comparison of the effects on clonic function
caused by feeding rice bran and wheat bran. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 42:857.
Topping, D.L., R.J. Illman, P.D. Roach, R.P. Trimble, A. Kambouris and P.J.
Nestel. 1990. Modulation of the hypolipidemic effect of fish oils by dietary
fiber in rats: Studies with rice and wheat bran. J. Nutr. 120:325-330.
Trautwein, E.A., C. Schulz, D. Rieckhoff, A.K. Rau, H.F. Erbersdobler, W.A.
Groot, and G.W. Meijer. 2002. Effect of esterified 4-Desmethylsterols and
4stanols or 4,4-Dimethylsterols on cholesterol and bile acid metabolism
in hamsters. Br. J. Nutr. 87:227-237.
Tsai, Y.C. 1982. Contribution of protease inhibitors to the deleterious effects of
fractions and heat treated rice bran fed to chicken. J. Chin. Agri. Chem. Soc.
14:187-194.
Tsen, C.C., E.M. Peters, T. Schaffer and W.J. Hoover. 1973. High-protein cookies:
Effect of soy fortification and surfactants. Bakers Digest. 47: 34-39.
Tsuda, M. 1979. Purification and characterization of a lectin from rice bran. J.
Biochem. 86:1451-1461.
Tsuji, E., H. Itoh and H. Itakura. 1989. Comparison of effects of dietary saturated
and polyunsaturated fats on the serum lipids levels. Clin. Terap.
Cardiovasc. 8:149151.
Tsuji, H., M. Kimoto and Y. Natori. 2001. Allergens in major crops. Nutr. Res.
21:925934.
261
WHO (World Health Organization). 2003. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of
chronic diseases. Report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. WHO
Technical Report Series 916.
Wilson, T.A., L.M. Ausman, C.W. Lawton, D.M. Hegsted and R.J. Nicolosi. 2000.
Comparative cholesterol lowering properties of vegetable oils: Beyond
fatty acids. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 19(5):601-607.
Wilson, T.A., R.J. Nicolosia, B. Woolfreya and D. Kritchevsky. 2007. Rice bran oil
and oryzanol reduce plasma lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol
concentrations and aortic cholesterol ester accumulation to a greater
extent than ferulic acid in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. J. Nutr.
Biochem. 18:105112.
Wisker, E., W. Feldheim, Y. Pomeranz and F. Meuser. 1985. Dietary fiber in
cereals. p. 169-238. In: Y. Pomeranz (ed.) Advances in cereal science and
technology, Vol. VII. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem., St. Paul, Minnesota.
Xu, Z. 1998. Purification and antioxidant properties of rice bran -oryzanol
components. Ph.D. dissertation. Louisiana State Uni. U.S.A.
Xu, Z. and J.S. Godber. 1999. Purification and identification of components of oryzanol in rice bran oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47(7):2724-2728.
Xu, Z. and J.S. Godber. 2000. Comparison of supercritical fluid and solvent
extraction methods in extracting g-oryzanol from rice bran. J. Am. Oil
Chem. Soc. 77:11271131.
Xu, Z., N. Hua and J.S. Godber. 2001. Antioxidant activity of tocopherols,
tocotrienols, and c-oryzanol components from rice bran against
cholesterol
oxidation
accelerated
by
2,2V-azobis
(2methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:20772081.
Yap, S.P., K.H. Yuen and J.W. Wong. 2001. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability
of alpha-, gamma- and delta-tocotrienols under different food status. J.
Pharm. Pharmacol. 53:67-71.
Yasukawa, K., T. Akihisa, Y. Kimura, T. Tamura and M. Takido. 1998. Inhibitory
effect of cycloartenol ferulate, a component of rice bran, on tumor
promotion in two-stage carcino-genesis in mouse skin. Bio. Pharm.
Bulletin. 21:1072-1076.
Yeager, S. 1998. Fiber - the ultimate healer. p. 184-185. In: The doctors book of
food remedies. Rodale Press, Inc., Emmaus, Pennsylvania.
263
Yoshida, Y., E. Niki and N. Noguchi. 2003. Comparative study on the action of
tocopherols and tocotrienols as antioxidant: Chemical and physical effects.
Chem. Phys. Lipids 123:6375.
Yoshino, G., T. Kazumi, M. Amano, M. Takeiwa, T. Yamasaki, S. Takashima, M.
Iwai, H. Hatanaka and S. Baba. 1989. Effects of -oryzanol on
hyperlipidemic subjects. Current Therapy Res. 45:543-552.
Zhu, H. 2002. Utilization of rice bran by Pythium irregulare for lipid production.
M.S. thesis, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering,
Agricultural and Mechanical College, Louisiana State Uni. U.S.A.
Zumbado, H., L. Ledesma, S. Fuertes and J. Ventura. 1997. Processing of a baked
product with high levels of parboiled rice bran. Alimentaria. 280:21-23.
264
Appendix I
Composition of salt mixture
Calcium citrate
308.2
Ca (H2PO4)2 H2O
112.8
H2HPO4
218.7
HCl
124.7
NaCl
77.0
CaCO3
68.5
35.1
MgSO4 anhydrous
38.3
91.41
CuSO4. 5H2O
5.98
NaF
0.76
MnSO4. 2H2O
1.07
0.54
KI
0.24
100.00
265
16.7
1000.00
Appendix II
Composition of vitamin mixture
Thiamin hydrochloride
0.060
Riboflavin
0.200
Pyridoxin hydrochloride
0.040
Calcium pentothenate
1.200
Nicotinic acid
4.000
Inositol
4.000
p-aminobenzoic acid
12.000
Biotin
0.040
Folic acid
0.040
Cyanocobalamin
0.001
Choline chloride
12.000
Maize starch
966.419
1000.00
266
Appendix III
Performa for sensory evaluation of cookies
Name of the judge
Character
Color
Flavor
Taste
Texture
Crispness
Overall acceptability
T0
Date..
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Signature..
INSTRUCTIONS
Chew a sample of cookies and score for color, flavor, taste, texture,
crispness and overall acceptability using the following 9-point Hedonic Scale:
Extremely poor
Very poor
Poor
Below fair above poor
Fair
Below good above fair
Good
Very good
Excellent
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Note:
1.
2.
3.
4.
267
209
Appendix V
Saturated / unsaturated fatty acids profile of rice bran oil
Oil
Mustard / Rapeseed
Cottonseed
Sunflower
Safflower
Soybean
Palm
Olive
Canola
Corn
SFA
6
28
12
10
16
51
14
6
13
PUFA
27
50
67
75
60
10
9
36
62
210
Coconut
Palm Kernel
Groundnut
Rice Bran
WHO Recommended
92
86
20
18
28.6
(Below 33%)
6
12
50
45
42.8
(Above 33%)
2
2
30
37
28.6
(Below 33%)
Rice Bran Oil with Ideal SFA/MUFA/PUFA ratio, which is the closest to WHO recommendation as compared to other edible oils (CAC, 2003).
Appendix VI
Micro-nutrient profile of rice bran oil
211
Micro-nutrient
Amount %
Advantages
1.2 1.7
Tocopherol
0.02 0.08
Tocotrienol
0.025 0.170
Hypocholesterolemic,
anticancer,
antioxidant,
protection
from
atherosclerosis
Oryzanol
Squalene
0.3 0.4
Skin toning
(CAC, 2003)
212
Appendix IV
Performa for sensory evaluation of leavened pan bread
Name of the judge..
A
External Characteristics
Max.
Score
Volume
10
Color of crust
Symmetry
Evenness of bake
Character of crust
Sub total
30
Internal Characteristics
Max.
Score
T0
T0
T1
T1
T2
T2
T3
T3
T4
T4
Date..
Treatments
T5
T6
T7
Treatments
T5
T6
T7
T8
T8
T9
T9
T10
T11
T10
T11
213
Grain
15
Color of crumb
10
Aroma
10
Taste
20
Texture
15
Sub total
70
Grand total
100
Signature....
214
df
Moisture
Protein
Fat
Fiber
Ash
Treatments (T)
Storage (S)
SxT
Error
Total
5
2
10
36
53
0.0117ns
17.024**
0.0034ns
0.0220
0.001ns
2.528**
0.004ns
0.039
0.195ns
16.97**
0.054ns
0.090
0.003ns
3.62910-4ns
4.96310-4ns
0.002
0.001ns
0.001ns
7.34010-4ns
0.002
**
104
NFE
0.189ns
2.419**
0.048ns
0.372
df
Color
Flavor
Taste
Texture
Crispness
Treatments (T)
Storage (S)
SxT
Error
Total
5
2
10
36
53
7.539**
9.045**
0.132ns
0.207
3.143**
8.580**
0.128ns
0.195
7.313**
5.719**
0.249ns
0.199
0.957**
8.173**
0.104ns
0.194
2.844**
4.048**
0.047ns
0.206
**
50
Overall acceptability
1.981**
5.965**
0.084ns
0.130
Table 45. Mean squares for proximate composition of rice bran supplemented
flours
SOV
df
Moisture
Protein
Fat
Fiber
Ash
NFE
Treatments (T)
Storage (S)
SxT
Error
Total
16
2
32
102
152
3.294**
6.894**
0.004ns
0.0742
8.776**
2.349**
0.001ns
0.086
72.636**
0.170**
0.009ns
0.011
30.282**
0.012ns
2.82810-5 ns
0.008
17.642**
0.009ns
1.57210-4 ns
0.006
219.80
0.909n
0.019n
0.635
**
Table 64. Mean squares for physical parameters of rice bran supplemented
cookies
SOV
df
eatments
orage
xS
ror
tal
5
2
10
72
89
Width
Thickness
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
48.5929**
0.36501ns
0.00961ns
5.89832
67.5369**
0.3243ns
0.0087ns
0.1138
2.4765**
0.0298ns
4.9778x10-4ns
0.0319
2.0897**
0.0359ns
4.9963x10-4ns
0.0214
**
Spread ratio
FFRB-Cookies
155.2586**
0.016679ns
0.01125ns
7.732122
DFRB
158.43*
0.0616n
0.0158n
0.6908
Width
Thickness
Spread ratio
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Co
44.150.06a
43.090.09a
40.230.09b
39.170.05b
39.050.12b
38.670.08b
44.150.06a
41.250.08b
39.580.10c
39.110.09d
37.490.09e
9.230.02c
9.340.02c
9.350.02c
9.900.02b
9.950.02b
9.230.02c
9.390.03c
9.400.02c
9.430.03c
9.950.03b
47.800.08a
46.100.01a
41.390.01b
40.620.01b
39.410.04bc
47.800.08
45.550.06
41.470.07
38.860.01
38.300.02
36.530.06f
10.600.03a
10.340.03a
36.830.01c
37.670.01
Values are meansSEM; Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ
significantly
T0 = Cookies with 100% wheat flour, act as control for both fullfat and defatted rice bran
supplementation
T1 = Cookies with 10% FFRB
T1 = Cookies with 10% DFRB
T2 = Cookies with 20% FFRB
T2 = Cookies with 20% DFRB
T3 = Cookies with 30% FFRB
T3 = Cookies with 30% DFRB
T4 = Cookies with 40% FFRB
T4 = Cookies with 40% DFRB
T5 = Cookies with 50% FFRB
T5 = Cookies with 50% DFRB
Width
Thickness
Spread ratio
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-C
40.880.86
39.831.02
9.770.20
9.620.18
42.001.54
41.541.5
30
60
40.680.86
40.610.88
39.651.02
39.571.02
9.720.20
9.690.19
9.560.18
9.530.18
42.021.54
42.061.56
41.621.5
41.661.5
Table 71. Mean squares for sensory attributes of rice bran supplemented cookies
OV
df
eatments
orage
xS
ror
tal
OV
5
2
10
72
89
df
eatments
orage
xS
ror
tal
5
2
10
72
89
Color
Flavor
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
9.8286**
4.2255**
0.0058ns
0.0791
4.3269**
5.1145**
0.0156ns
0.0828
12.024**
2.9188**
0.0080ns
0.0823
3.6601**
3.1716**
0.0032ns
0.0829
Texture
Crispness
Taste
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB
12.8208**
3.1682**
0.0152ns
0.0835
3.2393*
2.9323*
0.0055n
0.0824
Overall acceptability
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-
8.4316**
3.0798**
0.0063ns
0.0781
4.6557**
4.0340**
0.0095ns
0.0867
13.2185**
5.2091**
0.0115ns
0.0822
5.2263**
4.9946**
0.0078ns
0.0828
7.6539**
4.8925**
0.0096ns
0.0758
2.8054*
4.2157*
0.0117n
0.0808
**
Table 72. Color, flavor and taste scores of rice bran supplemented cookies
Color
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
Flavor
Taste
FFRB-Cookies DFRBCookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRBCookies
6.650.20b
6.800.23b
7.480.23a
6.780.19b
6.880.16b
7.820.17a
6.780.19b
6.850.19c
7.100.20b
6.870.16b
6.930.16b
7.850.17a
6.870.16
6.830.19
6.900.19
6.650.20bc
6.570.25c
6.810.25b
T3
T4
7.550.23a
6.170.19c
7.480.25a
7.470.26a
7.780.22a
6.130.17c
7.060.19b
7.450.17a
7.820.22a
6.170.19c
T5
5.410.22d
6.120.23d
5.510.17d
5.980.19d
5.480.23d
7.100.17
7.420.20
6.020.17
Values are meansSEM; Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ
significantly
T0 = Cookies with 100% wheat flour, act as control for both fullfat and defatted rice bran
supplementation
T1 = Cookies with 10% FFRB
T1 = Cookies with 10% DFRB
T2 = Cookies with 20% FFRB
T2 = Cookies with 20% DFRB
T3 = Cookies with 30% FFRB
T3 = Cookies with 30% DFRB
T4 = Cookies with 40% FFRB
T4 = Cookies with 40% DFRB
T5 = Cookies with 50% FFRB
T5 = Cookies with 50% DFRB
Table 73. Effect of storage on color, flavor and texture of rice bran
supplemented cookies
Storage
(days)
0
30
60
Color
FFRB-Cookies
7.060.34a
6.670.33b
6.310.32c
Flavor
DFRB-Cookies
7.260.23a
6.860.21b
6.430.22c
FFRB-Cookies
7.130.37a
6.830.37b
6.510.36c
DFRB-Cookies
Taste
FFRB-Cookies
7.190.20a
6.840.20b
6.540.21c
7.180.37a
6.840.38b
6.530.38c
DFRB-Co
7.160.20
6.870.19
6.530.19
Table 74. Texture, crispness and overall acceptability scores of rice bran
supplemented cookies
Texture
Treatments
T0
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
Crispness
Overall acceptabilit
FFRB-Cookies DFRBCookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Co
7.580.22a
7.150.17b
6.800.17c
6.800.20c
6.050.17d
5.520.17e
7.670.25a
7.520.26a
7.170.27b
7.180.23b
5.850.23c
5.400.20d
7.670.25a
7.020.23b
7.100.20b
6.720.25c
6.800.23c
5.870.26d
6.780.25c
7.080.20b
7.300.25a
6.750.25c
5.920.32d
5.450.23e
6.780.25
7.050.20b
7.280.22
6.770.23
6.780.23
6.000.17
7.580.22a
7.330.22b
7.320.25b
7.050.25c
6.820.22d
6.010.17e
Means carrying same letters in a column for each factor do not differ significantly
Table 75. Effect of storage on texture, crispness and overall acceptability of rice
bran supplemented cookies
Storage
(days)
0
30
60
Texture
Crispness
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
FFRB-Cookies
DFRB-Cookies
6.970.32a
6.660.30b
6.330.30c
7.380.24a
7.030.22b
6.650.22c
7.220.40a
6.790.38b
6.380.37c
7.270.24a
6.870.24b
6.450.25c
Overall acceptability
FFRB-Cookies
6.950.30a
6.550.28b
6.140.30c
DFRB-Coo
7.150.19
6.780.18
6.400.17