Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The rates of both the liquid-phase mass transfer and the internal-difision steps in
ion exchange were studied by means of shallow-bed experiments. The mass transfer
coefficients obtained fitted the general correlations for other packed-bed operations when
the Schmidt group was evaluated with experimentally determined ionic counterdiffusivities.
An incremental calculation of the diffusion rates within the particles yielded a value of
the counterdiffusivity in the resin phase. A general design procedure based on these
findings is proposed.
Page 468
In Ac,/Ac
pDt
where ACO and Ac are the differences between the copper ion concentrations in the
two chambers at the beginning and a t time
t respectively, D the diffusivity, and j3 a
cell constant, determined by means of a
run with a system of known diffusivity
(KC1 into pure H20). The foregoing
formula assumes no concentration gradients
in the bulk of the solution in each chamber
(8).
The counterdiffusivity of silver and
hydrogen ions was determined in similar
fashion by use of equinormal silver nitrate
and nitric acid solutions.
A.1.Ch.E. Journal
Results
kLS(C - Ci)
KLS(C - C*)
(1)
I n Table 1 are listed the operating conditions and the values of kLS forb the
runs made by the authors, as well as
some obtained from other sources (2),
and in Table 2 are the measured counterdiff usivities .
Correlation of Data
General correlations of liquid side coefficients for mass transfer between the
* ~ L is
S obtained by extfapolation of K L S to
December, 1956
TABLE1
Run
x2
A3
P1
F2
13
P4*
15
P6*
Pi
P8*
131 t
B3
Hi
I39
BlO
B11
1312
B13
1314
Bl5
I316
System
Cu-IF
Cu---H
cu--I I
4,
v,
crn.
cc./sce.
sq. cm.
0 ,050
0,050
0.050
CU-H
0.050
cu--li
0 050
Cu---H 0.050
CU-H
0.050
CU-H
0,050
cu--It
0,050
cu-ri
0.050
Ag --I3 0,060
Ag-li
0.060
.4g-I
0.060
Ag--II
0 ,060
0.085
Ag-H
itg-11
0.085
Ag-H
0.042
Ag-11
0 .060
Ag-H
0,060
Ag--li
0 060
Ag-H
0.060
0.545
0.987
0.506
0.880
0.595
0.541
0.326
0.903
0.173
0.196
1.38
3.17
1.81
1.76
1.28
1.16
1.17
1.23
6.31
3.26
1.94
RESINPHASE DIFFUSION
kL
1.98
1.98
I .00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.865
0.865
0.968
0.968
0.968
0.968
0.988
0.968
0.968
0.968
0.968
Re
cc./(g.)(sec.)
1 .oti
1.44
1.32
1.28
1.34
1.92
1.50
2.25
0.945
0.973
2.88
4.45
2.36
2.54
1 .85
1.65
3.08
2.02
4.72
3.55
2.55
4.34
7.80
8.04
10.8
9.43
8.60
5.20
0.723
0.556
0.491
0.353
0,426
0.670
0.869
0.475
1.03
0. !)34
0.258
0.174
0 180
0 ,200
0.234
0.280
0.258
0.314
0.104
0.151
0.182
14.3
2.74
3.12
30.3
69.4
35.6
34.4
35.6
32.2
16.3
24.1
124
64.0
38.1
*Double-bed runs.
t l h t a for rum Bl-BIG were taken from reference 1.
-EXPERIMENTAL
TIME
TABLE
2.
System
Cut+-I+
Ag+--H+
1IEASDREI) CO1JNTERI)IFFUSIVITIES
A.1.Ch.E. Journal
Page 469
Self-difusion coejicients
, Commercial Dowex-50 (5.20 meq./g.
dry hydrogen-form)
0.3C.
25 C
X 10-8
2.89
Zn++:8.77 X 10-9
sq. cm/sec.
1.06 X 10-6
Present results-Counterdifusion
coeficient
Amberlite IR-120,8 to 10% DVB
1.1 x 10-6
Cu++-H+
VC,, - CJ,
w d!?/dt
A.1.Ch.E. Journal
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A
C
liquid, meq./cc.
d, = resin particle diameter, em.
D = diffusivity, sq. cm./sec.
G = superficial liquid velocity, cm./sec.
k = mass transfer Coefficient, meq./
(sec.)(sq. cm.) (meq./cc.)
K = over-all mass transfer coefficient,
meq./(sec.) (sq. cm.) (meq./cc.)
q = concentration of exchanging ion in
resin, meq./g.
Q = exchange capacity of resin, meq./g.
r = resin-particle radius, cm.
S = specific surface area of resin, sq. cm.
/g.
t = time, sec.
V = volumetric rate of flow, cc./sec.
E = void fraction, cc. void space/cc.
bed volume
p = viscosity, g./(cm.)(sec.)
p = density, g./cc.
Subscripts
= solid-liquid interface
L = liquid phase
S = solid (resin) phase
LITERATURE CITED
tion.
2. Bieber, Herman, F. E. Steidler, and
W. A. Selke, Chem. Eng. Progr. Symposium Ser. No. 14, 50, 17 (1954).
3. Boyd, G. E., and B. A. Soldano, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 75, 6091 (1953).
4. Crumpier, R. B., Anal. Chem., 44, 2187
(1952).
5. Dryden, C. E., and W. B. Kay, Znd.
Eng. Chem., 46, 2294 (1954).
6. Dryden, C. E., D. A. Strang, and
A. E. Withrow. Chem. Ena. Proor..
, 49.,
191 (1953).
7. Gilliland, E. R., and R. F. Baddour,
Ind. Ena. Ghem.. 45. 330 (1953).
8. Jost, W , Diffusionin Solids, Liquids
and Gases, pp. 443$., Academic
Press, Inc., New York (1952).
9. Muendel, C. H., and W. A. Selke, Znd.
Eng. Chem., 47, 374 (1955).
10. Piret, E. L., R. A. Ebel, C. T. Kiang,
and W. P. Armstrong, Chem. Eng.
Progr., 47, 405 (1951).
11. Rosen. J. B., Ind. Eng. Chem., 46,
1530 (1954).
12. Selke, W. A., in Ion Exchange Technology, ed. by F. C. Nachod and J.
Schubert, pp. 66$., Academic Press,
Inc., New York (1956).
13. ---,
and Harding Bliss, Chem. Eng.
Progr., 46, 509 (1950).
14. Schmidt, E., Forsch. Gebiete Ingenieurw.,
13, 177 (1942).
k
15. Vermeulen, Theodore, and N. K.
Hiester, Ind. Eng. Chem., 44, 636(1952).
December, 1956.