Grammar

Morphology
Overview
Akkadian is an inflected language; and as a Semitic language, its grammatical features are highly similar
to those found in Classical Arabic. And like all Semitic languages, Akkadian uses the system
of consonantal roots. Most roots consist of three consonants (called the radicals), but some roots are
composed of four consonants (so-called quadriradicals). The radicals are occasionally represented in
transcription in upper-case letters, for example PRS (to decide). Between and around these radicals
various infixes, suffixes and prefixes, having word generating or grammatical functions, are inserted. The
resulting consonant-vowel pattern differentiates the original meaning of the root. Also, the middle
radical can be geminated, which is represented by a doubled consonant in transcription (and sometimes
in the cuneiform writing itself).
The consonants , w, j and n are termed "weak radicals" and roots containing these radicals give rise to
irregular forms.
Case, number and gender
Akkadian has two grammatical genders, masculine and feminine, with many feminine forms generated
from masculine words by adding an -at suffix.
Formally, Akkadian has three numbers (singular, dual and plural) and three cases
(nominative, accusative and genitive). However, even in the earlier stages of the language, the dual
number is vestigial, and its use is largely confined to natural pairs (eyes, ears, etc.), and adjectives are
never found in the dual. In the plural numbers, the accusative and genitive are merged into a
singleoblique case.
Akkadian, unlike Arabic, has mainly regular plurals (i.e. no broken plurals), although some masculine
words take feminine plurals. In that respect, it is similar to Hebrew.
The nouns arrum (king), arratum (queen) and the adjective dannum (strong) will serve to illustrate the
case system of Akkadian.
Noun and adjective paradigms
Noun (masc.) Noun (fem.) Adjective (masc.) Adjective (fem.)
Nominative singular arr-um

arr-at-um

dann-um

dann-at-um

Genitive singular

arr-at-im

dann-im

dann-at-im

arr-im

Accusative singular arr-am

arr-at-am

dann-am

dann-at-am

Nominative dual

arr-n

arr-at-n

Oblique dual [t3 1] arr-n

arr-at-n

Nominative plural

arr-

arr-t-um

dann-t-um

dann-t-um

Oblique plural

arr-

arr-t-im

dann-t-im

dann-t-im

^ The oblique case includes the accusative and genitive.

As is clear from the above table, the adjective and noun endings differ only in the masculine plural.
Certain nouns, primarily those referring to geography, can also form a locative ending in -um in the
singular and the resulting forms serve as adverbials. These forms are generally not productive, but in the
Neo-Babylonian the um-locative replaces several constructions with the preposition ina.
In the later stages of Akkadian the mimation (word-final -m) - along with nunation (dual final "-n") - that
occurs at the end of most case endings has disappeared, except in the locative. Later, the nominative
and accusative singular of masculine nouns collapse to -u and in Neo-Babylonian most word-final short
vowels are dropped. As a result case differentiation disappeared from all forms except masculine plural
nouns. However many texts continued the practice of writing the case endings (although often
sporadically and incorrectly). As the most important contact languagethroughout this period
was Aramaic, which itself lacks case distinctions, it is possible that Akkadian's loss of cases was an areal
as well as phonological phenomenon.
[edit]Noun States and Nominal Sentences
As is also the case in other Semitic languages, Akkadian nouns may appear in a variety of "states"
depending on their grammatical function in a sentence. The basic form of the noun is thestatus
rectus (the Governed state), which is the form as described above, complete with case endings. In
addition to this, Akkadian has the status absolutus (the Absolute state) and the status
constructus (Construct state). The latter is found in all other Semitic languages, while the former
appears only in Akkadian and some dialects of Aramaic.
The status absolutus is characterised by the loss of a noun's case ending
(e.g. awl < awlum, ar < arrum). It is relatively uncommon, and is used chiefly to mark the predicate of
a nominal sentence, in fixed adverbial expressions, and in expressions relating to measurements of
length, weight, and the like.
(1) Awl-um arrq
Awl-um

arrq.

Man (Masculine, nominative) he (3rd masc. personal pronoun) thief (status absolutus)
Translation: This man is a thief
(2) arrum l ann
arr-um

ann.

King (Status rectus, nominative) not (negative particle) oppose (verbal infinitive, status absolutus)
Translation: The king who cannot be rivaled
The Status Constructus is a great deal more common, and has a much wider range of applications. It is
employed when a noun is followed by another noun in the genitive, a pronominal suffix, or a verbal
clause in the subjunctive, and typically takes the shortest form of the noun which is phonetically
possible. In general, this amounts to the loss of case endings with short vowels, with the exception of
the genitive -i in nouns preceding a pronominal suffix, hence:
(3) mri-u
mri-u
Son (status constructus) + his (3rd person singular possessive pronoun
Translation: His son, its (masculine) son
but
(4) mr arr-im
mr

arr-im

Son (Status constructus) king (genitive singular)

Translation: The king's son
There are numerous exceptions to this general rule, usually involving potential violations of the
language's phonological limitations. Most obviously, Akkadian does not tolerate word final consonant
clusters, so nouns like kalbum (dog) and marum (front) would have illegal construct state
forms *kalb and *mar unless modified. In many of these instances, the first vowel of the word is simply
repeated (e.g. kalab, maar). This rule, however, does not always hold true, especially in nouns where a
short vowel has historically been elided (e.g. aknum < *akinum "governor"). In these cases, the lost
vowel is restored in the construct state (so aknum yields akin).
(5) kalab belim

kalab

bel-im

dog (Status constructus) master (genitive singular)

Translation: The master's dog
(6) sakin lim
akin

l-im

Governor (Status constructus) city (genitive singular)

A genitive relation can also be expressed with the relative preposition a, and the noun that the genitive
phrase depends on appears in status rectus.
(7) salmtum a awl Enunna
salmtum

awl

Enunna

Alliances (Status rectus,

nominative)

which (relative
particle)

man (status
constructus)

Enunna (genitive,
unmarked)

Translation: The alliances of the Ruler of Enunna (literally "Alliances which man of Enunna (has)")
The same preposition is also used to introduce true relative clauses, in which case the verb is placed in
the subjunctive mood.
(7) awl-um a mt-am i-kud--u
Awl-um

mt-am

i-kud--u

Man (Masculine,
nominative)

that (relative
pronoun)

land (singular,
accusative)

3rd person - conquer (preterite) singular, masculine - subjunctive

Translation: The man who conquered the land

Verbal morphology
Verb aspects
The Akkadian verb has six finite verb
aspects (preterite, perfect, present, imperative, precative and vetitive) and three infinite forms
(infinitive, participle and verbal adjective). The preterite is used for actions that are seen by the speaker
as having occurred at a single point in time. The present is primarily imperfective in meaning and is used
for concurrent and future actions as well as past actions with a temporal dimension. The final three

finite forms are injunctive where the imperative and the precative together form a paradigm for positive
commands and wishes, and the vetitive is used for negative wishes. Additionally
the periphrastic prohibitive, formed by the present form of the verb and the negative adverb l, is used
to express negative commands. The infinitive of the Akkadian verb is a verbal noun, and in contrast to
some other languages the Akkadian infinitive can be declined in case. The verbal adjective is an
adjectival form and designates the state or the result of the action of the verb, and consequently the
exact meaning of the verbal adjective is determined by the semantics of the verb itself. The participle,
which can be active or passive, is another verbal adjective and its meaning is similar to
the English gerund.
The following table shows the conjugation of the G-stem verbs derived from the root PRS ("to decide")
in the various verb aspects of Akkadian:
Preteri
Perfect
te
1st
Perso
n
aprus
singul
ar

Present

Imperati
stative
ve

aptaras

aparras

parsku

1st
Perso
niprus niptaras
n
plural

niparra
s

parsnu

2nd
Perso
n
taprus taptaras
singul
ar
masc.

taparra
purus
s

parsta

2nd
Perso
n
taptars (<
taprus
singul
*taptaras)
ar
fem.

taparra
pursi
s

parsti

Infiniti Participle
ve
(active)

Verbal
adjective

prisum (ma
parsu sc.)
pristum (fe
m
m.)

parsum (mas
c.)
paristum (fe
m.)

2nd
Perso taprus
taptars
n

plural

taparra
pursa
s

parstunu (ma
sc.)
/ parstina(fe
m.)

3rd
Perso
n
iprus
singul
ar

iparras

paris

iparras

parsat

iptaras

3rd
Perso
iptars (<
n
iprus
*iptaras)
plural
masc.

3rd
Perso
iptars(< *iptar iparras
n
iprus
as)

plural
fem.

pars (masc.)
/pars (fem.)

The table below shows the different affixes attached to the preterite aspect of the verb root PRS "to
decide"; and as can be seen, the grammatical genders differ only in the second person singular and third
person plural.
G-Stem

D-Stem

-Stem

N-Stem

1st Person singular

a-prus- u-parris- u-apris- a-pparis-

1st Person plural

ni-prus- nu-parris- nu-apris- ni-pparis-

2nd Person singular masc. ta-prus- tu-parris- tu-apris- ta-pparis-

2nd Person singular fem. ta-prus- tu-parris-

tu-apris-

ta-ppars-

2nd Person plural

ta-prus- tu-parris- tu-apris- ta-ppars-

3rd Person singular

i-prus-

u-parris- u-apris- i-pparis-

3rd Person plural masc.

i-prus-

u-parris-

u-apris-

i-ppars-

3rd Person plural fem.

i-prus-

u-parris-

u-apris-

i-ppars-

Verb moods
Akkadian verbs have 3 moods:
Indicative, used in independent clauses, is unmarked.
Subjunctive, used in dependent clauses. The subjunctive is marked in forms which do not end in a vowel
by the suffix -u (compare Arabic and Ugaritic subjunctives), but is otherwise unmarked. In the later
stages of most dialects, the subjunctive is indistinct, as short final vowels were mostly lost
Ventive or allative. The ventive is not a mood in the strictest sense, being a development of the 1st
person dative pronomial suffix -am/-m/-nim. With verbs of motion, it often indicates motion towards an
object or person (e.g. illik, "he went" vs. illikam, "he came"). However, this pattern is not consistent,
even in earlier stages of the language, and its use often appears to serve a stylistic rather than
morphological or lexical function.
The following table demonstrates the verb moods of verbs derived from the root PRS ("to decide","to
separate"):
Preterite.[t4 1] Stative.[t4 1]
Indicative

iprus

paris

Subjunctive iprusu

parsu

Ventive

parsam

iprusam

^ a b Both verbs are for the 3rd person masculine singular.

Verb patterns
Akkadian verbs have thirteen separate root stems. The basic, underived, stem is the G-stem (from the
German Grundstamm, meaning "basic stem"). Causative or intensive forms are formed with the doubled
D-stem, and it gets its name from the doubled middle radical that is characteristic of this form. The
doubled middle radical is also characteristic of the present, but the forms of the D-stem use the
secondary conjugational affixes, so a D-form will never be identical to a form in a different stem. The stem is formed by adding a prefix -, and these forms are mostly causatives. Finally, the passive forms of
the verb are in the N-stem, formed by adding a n- prefix. However the n- element is assimilated to a
following consonant, so the original /n/ is only visible in a few forms.

Furthermore, reflexive and iterative verbal stems can be derived from each of the basic stems. The
reflexive stem is formed with an infix -ta, and the derived stems are therefore called Gt, Dt, t and Nt,
and the preterite forms of the Xt-stem are identical to the perfects of the X-stem. Iteratives are formed
with the infix -tan-, giving the Gtn, Dtn, tn and Ntn. Because of the assimilation of n, the /n/ is only
seen in the present forms, and the Xtn preterite is identical to the Xt durative.
An alternative to this naming system is a numerical system. The basic stems are numbered using Roman
numerals so thet G, D, and N become I, II, III and IV, respectively, and the infixes are numbered
using Arabic numerals; 1 for the forms without an infix, 2 for the Xt, and 3 for the Xtn. The two numbers
are separated using a solidus. As an example, the tn-stem is called III/3. The most important user of this
system is the Chicago Assyrian Dictionary.
There is mandatory congruence between the subject of the sentence and the verb, and this is expressed
by prefixes and suffixes. There are two different sets of affixes, a primary set used for the forms of the G
and N-stems, and a secondary set for the D and -stems.
The stems, their nomenclature and examples of the third-person masculine singular stative of the
verb parsum (root PRS: 'to decide, distinguish, separate') is shown below:
#

Stem Verb

Description

Correspondence

I.1

PaRiS

the simple stem, used

for transitive and intransitive verbs

Arabic stem I (faala) and

Hebrew qal

II.1 D

PuRRuS

gemination of the second radical, indicating the Arabic stem II (faala) and
intensive
Hebrew piel

III.1

uPRuS

-preformative, indicating the causative

Arabic stem IV (afala) and

Hebrew hiphil

IV.1 N

naPRuS

n-preformative, indicating the reflexive/passive

Arabic stem VII (infaala) and

Hebrew niphal

I.2

PitRuS

simple stem with t-infix after first radical,

indicating reciprocal or reflexive

Arabic stem VIII (iftaala) and

Aramaic ithpeal (tG)

II.2 Dt

PutaRRuS

doubled second radical preceded by infixed t,

indicating intensive reflexive

Arabic stem V (tafaala) and

Hebrew hithpael (tD)

III.2 t

utaPRuS

-preformative with t-infix, indicating reflexive

causative

Arabic stem X (istafala) and

Aramaic ittaphal (tC)

Gt

n-preformative with a t-infix preceding the first

radical, indicating reflexive passive

IV.2 Nt

itaPRuS

I.3

PitaRRuS simple stem with tan-infix after first radical

Gtn

II.3 Dtn

PutaRRuS doubled second radical preceded by tan-infix

III.3 tn

utaPRuS -preformative with tan-infix

IV.3 Ntn

itaPRuS

n-preformative with tan-infix

Stative
A very often appearing form which can be formed by nouns, adjectives as well as by verbal adjectives is
the stative. Nominal predicatives occur in the status absolutus and correspond to the verb "to be" in
English. The stative in Akkadian corresponds to the Egyptian pseudo-participle. The following table
contains an example of using the noun arrum (king), the adjective rapum (wide) and the verbal
adjective parsum (decided).
arrum

rapum

parsum

1st Person singular

arr-ku

rap-ku

pars-ku

1st Person plural

arr-nu

rap-nu

pars-nu

2nd Person singular masc. arr-ta

rap-ta

pars-ta

2nd Person singular fem. arr-ti

rap-ti

pars-ti

2nd Person plural masc.

arr-tunu rap-tunu pars-tunu

2nd Person plural fem.

arr-tina rap-tina pars-tina

3rd Person singular masc. ar-

rapa-

paris-

3rd Person singular fem.

arr-at

rap-at

pars-at

3rd Person plural masc.

arr-

rap-

pars-

3rd Person plural fem.

arr-

rap-

pars-

Thus, the stative in Akkadian is used to convert simple stems into effective sentences, so that the
form arr-ta is equivalent to: "you were king", "you are king" and "you will be king". Hence, the stative
is independent of time forms.
Derivation
Beside the already explained possibility of derivation of different verb stems, Akkadian has numerous
nominal formations derived from verb roots. A very frequently encountered form is the maPRaS form. It
can express the location of an event, the person performing the act and many other meanings. If one of
the root consonants is labial (p, b, m), the prefix becomes na- (maPRaS >> naPRAS). Examples for this
are: makanum (place, location) from KN (set, place, put), maraum (splendour) from R (be
splendid), maarum (guards) from NR (guard), naparum (sum) from PR (summarize).
A very similar formation is the maPRaSt form. The noun derived from this nominal formation is
grammatically feminine. The same rules as for the maPRaS form apply, for example makattum(deposit)
from KN (set, place, put), narkabtum (carriage) from RKB (ride, drive, mount).
The suffix - t is used to derive abstract nouns. The nouns which are formed with this suffix are
grammatically feminine. The suffix can be attached to nouns, adjectives and verbs,
e.g. abtum(paternity) from abum (father), rabutum (size) from rabum (large), watum (leaving) from
WY (leave).
Also derivatives of verbs from nouns, adjectives and numerals are numerous. For the most part, a Dstem is derived from the root of the noun or adjective. The derived verb then has the meaning of "make
X do something" or "becoming X", for example: dum (let sprout) from diu (grass), ulluum (to do
something for the third time ) from al (three).
Pronouns
Personal pronouns
Independent personal pronouns
Independent personal pronouns in Akkadian are as follows:
Nominative

Oblique

Person

singular

Singular

Plural Singular

Plural

1st

anku "I" nnu "we"

yti

niti

niim

Plural

Dative

yim

masculine atta "you" attunu "you" kti (kta)

kunti kim

kunim

feminine atti "you" attina "you" kti

kinti kim

kinim

2nd

masculine "he"

unu "they" tilu (tilu)

feminine "she"

ina "they"

unti uim (im)

unim

3rd
iti (uti;ti) inti iim (im, im) inim

Suffixed (or enclitic) pronouns

Suffixed (or enclitic) pronouns (mainly denoting the genitive, accusative and dative) are as follows:
Genitive

Accusative

Person

singular

Plural Singular Plural

1st

-i, -ya [t5 1] -ni

-ni

-niti

Dative
Singular Plural
-am/-nim -niim

masculine -ka

-kunu -ka

-kunti -kum

-kunim

feminine -ki

-kina -ki

-kinti -kim

-kinim

masculine -

-unu -

-unti -um

-unim

feminine -a

-ina -i

-inti -im

-inim

2nd

3rd

^ -ni is used for the nominative, i.e. following a verb denoting the subject.
Demonstrative pronouns
Demonstrative pronouns in Akkadian differ from the Western Semitic variety. The following table shows
the Akkadian demonstrative pronouns according to near and far deixis:
Deixis
Proximal

Distal

Masc. singular ann "this"

ull "that"

Fem. Singular anntu "this"

ulltu "that"

Masc. plural

anntu "these" ulltu "those"

Fem. plural

anntu "these" ulltu "those"

Relative pronouns

Relative pronouns in Akkadian are shown in the following table:

Nominative Accusative Genitive
Masc. singular u

Fem. Singular t

ti

Dual

Masc. plural

Fem. plural

Unlike plural relative pronouns, singular relative pronouns in Akkadian exhibit full declension to case.
However, only the form a (for the accusative masculine singular) survived, while the other forms
disappeared in time.
Interrogative pronouns
The following table shows the Interrogative pronouns used in Akkadian:
Akkadian English
mannu

who?

mn

what?

ayyu

which?

Prepositions
Akkadian has prepositions which consist mainly of only one word. For example: ina (in, on, out, through,
under), ana (too, for, after, approximately), adi (to), au (because of), eli (up, over),itu/ultu (of,
since), mala (in accordance with), itti (also, with)). There are, however, some compound prepositions
which are combined with ina and ana (e.g. ina maar (forwards), ina balu(without), ana r (up to), ana
maar (forwards). Regardless of the complexity of the preposition, the following noun is always in
the genitive case.
Examples: ina btim (in the house, from the house), ana dummuqim (to do good), itti arrim (with the
king), ana r mru (up to his son).
Numerals

Since numerals are written mostly as a number sign in the cuneiform script, the transliteration of many
numerals is not well ascertained yet. Along with the counted noun, the cardinal numeralsare in
the status absolutus. Because other cases are very rare, the forms of the status rectus are known only by
isolated numerals. The numerals 1 and 2 as well as 2129, 3139, 4149 correspond with the counted in
the grammatical gender, while the numerals 320, 30, 40 and 50 show gender polarity, i.e. if the
counted noun is masculine, the numeral would be feminine and vice versa. This polarity is typical of
the Semitic languages and appears also in classical Arabic for example. The numerals 60, 100 and 1000
don't change according to the gender of the counted noun. Counted nouns more than two appear in the
plural form. However, body parts which occur in pairs appear in the dual form in Akkadian.
e.g. epum (foot) becomes epn (two feet).
The ordinals are formed (with a few exceptions) by adding a case ending to the nominal form PaRuS (the
P, R and S. must be substituted with the suitable consonants of the numeral). It is noted, however, that
in the case of the numeral "one", the ordinal (masculine) and the cardinal number are the same.
A metathesis occurs in the numeral "four". The following table contains the masculine and feminine
forms of the status absolutus of some of the Akkadian cardinal numbers, as well as the corresponding
ordinals.

Cardinal
numeral (masc.)

Cardinal
numeral (fem.)

Congruence (Gender
agreement of the cardinal
numeral)

Ordinal (masc.) Ordinal (fem.)

itn

iteat,
itt

Congruent (no gender

polarity)

itn

iteat

in

itt

Congruent

anm

antum

al

alat

Gender polarity

alum

alutum

erb

erbt

Gender polarity

rebm

rebtum

ami

amat

Gender polarity

amum

amutum

edi

iet

Gender polarity

eum

edutum

seb

sebt

Gender polarity

sebm

sebtum

samn

samnat

Gender polarity

samnum,
samnm

samuntum

te

tit

Gender polarity

tim,

titum,

10

eer

60

eeret

Gender polarity

tem

tetum

erum

eurtum

No gender distinction

100 meat, mt

No gender distinction

1000 lm

No gender distinction

Examples: erb atum (four wives) (male numeral), meat ln (100 towns).
Syntax
Nominal phrases
Adjectives, relative clauses and appositions follow the noun. While numerals precede the counted noun.
In the following table the nominal phrase erbt arr danntum a lam pu abya 'the four strong
kings who built the city are my fathers' is analyzed:
Word

Meaning

Analysis

Part of the nominal phrase

erbt

four

feminine (gender polarity)

Numeral

arr-

king

nominative plural

Noun (Subject)

dann-tum strong

nominative masculine plural

Adjective

which

relative pronoun

l-am

city

accusative singular

pu-

built

3rd person masculine plural

ab--ya

my fathers masculine plural + possessive pronoun Apposition

Relative clause

Sentence syntax
Akkadian sentence order was Subject+Object+Verb (SOV), which sets it apart from most other ancient
Semitic languages such as Arabic and Biblical Hebrew, which typically have a verbsubjectobject
(VSO) word order. (Modern South Semitic languages in Ethiopia also have SOV order, but these
developed within historical times from the classical verbsubjectobject (VSO)language Ge'ez.) It has
been hypothesized that this word order was a result of influence from the Sumerian language, which

was also SOV. There is evidence that native speakers of both languages were in intimate language
contact, forming a single society for at least 500 years, so it is entirely likely that a sprachbund could
have formed. Further evidence of an original VSO or SVO ordering can be found in the fact that direct
and indirect object pronouns are suffixed to the verb. Word order seems to have shifted to SVO/VSO
late in the 1st millennium BC to the 1st millennium AD, possibly under the influence of Aramaic.