Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a.) Determine the difference between the wet-bulb temperature and the adiabatic saturation
temperature as a function of the dry-bulb temperature (T∞) and relative humidity (RH).
Assume that the Reynolds number associated with the flow over the wet-bulb is Re = 1x105
and then assess the impact of the Reynolds number on your results.
The inputs are entered in EES. Initially, we will carry out the calculation at a dry bulb
temperature of T∞ = 27ºC and relative humidity of RH = 0.5; these quantities will be
parametrically varied as requested in the problem statement.
"Inputs"
T_infinity_C=27 [C] "dry-bulb temperature, in C"
T_infinity=converttemp(C,K,T_infinity_C) "dry-bulb temperature"
RH=0.5 [-] "relative humidity"
p=1 [atm]*convert(atm,Pa) "pressure"
Re=1e5 [-] "assumed Reynolds number"
The air water mixture properties are obtained using the substance AirH2O; in addition to the
typical properties required to specify the state, a parameter that indicates the amount of water
content (either the relative humidity or humidity ratio) is required. The properties of the air
water vapor mixture (k, ρ, c, and μ) are calculated at the film temperature using EES’ internal
property routine for air water mixtures:
T∞ + Twb
T film =
2
where Twb is the wet-bulb temperature. A wet-bulb temperature is initially assumed in order to
compute the film temperature and proceed with the calculations; this assumed wet-bulb
temperature will ultimately be commented out in order to complete the problem.
The kinematic viscosity and thermal diffusivity of the air water mixture are computed according
to:
μ
ν=
ρ
k
α=
ρc
The diffusion coefficient for water vapor in air (Dw,a) is obtained using the data provided by Bolz
and Tuve (1976), as discussed in EXAMPLE 9.2-1, rather than the less accurate estimate that is
available using the EES function D_12_gas.
⎡ m2 ⎤ ⎡ m2 ⎤ -10 ⎡ m
2
⎤ 2
Da , w = −2.775x10-6 ⎢ ⎥ + 4.479x10-8 ⎢ ⎥ T + 1.656x10 ⎢ 2⎥
T
⎣ s ⎦ ⎣ s-K ⎦ ⎣ s-K ⎦
The Prandtl number, Schmidt number, and Lewis number can be computed:
ν
Pr =
α
ν
Sc =
Dw,a
α
Le =
Dw, a
The latent heat of vaporization of water (Δivap) is calculated as the difference between the
enthalpies of saturated vapor (i.e., water at the wet bulb temperature with quality, x = 1) and
saturated liquid (x = 0).
The partial pressure of water vapor at the surface of the wet-bulb is equal to the saturation
pressure of water at the wet-bulb temperature, pw,sat,wb. The concentration of water vapor at the
wet-bulb surface is computed using the ideal gas law:
pw, sat , wb
cw, sat , wb =
Rw Twb
Runiv
Rw =
MWw
where Runiv is the universal gas constant and MWw is the molar mass of water.
The saturation pressure of water vapor in the free stream (pw,sat,∞) is computed using EES’
internal property routine evaluated at T∞. The partial pressure of water vapor in the free stream
is:
The concentration of water vapor in the free stream is calculated using the ideal gas law:
pw , ∞
cw , ∞ =
Rw T∞
p_w_sat_infinity=pressure(Water,T=T_infinity,x=1)
"saturation pressure of water at the dry-bulb temperature"
p_w_infinity=RH*p_w_sat_infinity "partial pressure of water at the dry-bulb temperature"
c_w_infinity=p_w_infinity/(R_w*T_infinity) "concentration of water in the free stream"
The wet-bulb temperature is computed using the equation derived in Section 9.5.1:
Sh ⎛ 1 ⎞
Twb = T∞ − ⎜ ⎟ Δivap ( cw, sat , wb − cw.∞ ) (1)
Nu ⎝ ρ c Le ⎠
Before Eq. (1) is entered in EES, a solution is obtained and the guess values are updated; the
original guess for the wet-bulb temperature is commented out:
This leads to Twb = 292.2 K (19.1°C). Figure 1 illustrates the predicted wet-bulb temperature as a
function of the assumed Reynolds number and shows that the wet-bulb temperature is essentially
independent of the Reynolds number; this result is expected because the average Sherwood
number and average Nusselt number are each approximately proportional to the Reynolds
number to some power (depending on which correlation is applicable from those presented in
Section 4.9.3) and therefore the Reynolds number dependence in the numerator and denominator
of Eq. (1) will cancel.
The adiabatic saturation temperature (Tad,sat) is provided by the EES function WetBULB
(perhaps it should be renamed!). The difference between the wet-bulb temperature and the
adiabatic saturation temperature is computed.
Figure 2 illustrates the discrepancy between the wet-bulb temperature and the adiabatic
saturation temperature as a function of the dry-bulb temperature for several values of the relative
humidity. Note that differences of more than 1°C may occur at low relative humidity and high
temperature. However, the wet-bulb temperature is fairly closely approximated by the adiabatic
saturation temperature over much of the range of interest to heating and air-conditioning
applications.
Figure 2: Difference between the wet-bulb temperature and the adiabatic saturation temperature as
a function of the dry-bulb temperature for several values of relative humidity.