Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(/)
http://www.thenewsminute.com/politics/855
1/8
02/11/2014
According to Chandra, the country was deeply polarized along communal lines
following the defeat of Muslim League in 1937.Mahatma Gandhi at the time felt
that the best person to lead Congress at the time would be Maulana Azad. He was
elected President of the Party in 1940 just 15 weeks before the Lahore Resolution
for the creation of Pakistan which had been moved by Jinnah.
The Second World War was in full swing and with most of the Congress
leadership in gaol, the next elections for the post could not take place until April
1946.The Maulana had represented the Party in various negotiations with the
British government and its Missions.When it became very clear that India was
going to be granted independence, It also became very clear that whosoever was
heading the Congress would be invited to form the Interim Government.
In India Wins Freedom, Maulana states:
The question normally arose that there should be fresh Congress elections and a
new President chosen. As soon as this was mooted in the Press, a general demand
arose that I should be selected President for another term. There was a general
feeling in Congress that since I had conducted the negotiations till now, I should
be charged with the task of bringing them to a successful close and implementing
them.
http://www.thenewsminute.com/politics/855
2/8
02/11/2014
Rajmohan Gandhi in his book Patel:A Life states that this move agonized Azads
close friend and colleague Jawaharlal who had his own expectations.
Gandhi intervened and made his preference for Nehru known on the 20th of April
1946. He wrote to Azad stating:
Please go through the enclosed cuttings. I have not spoken to anyone of my
opinion. When one or two Working Committee members asked me, I said that it
would not be right for the same President to continue. If you are of the same
opinion, it may be proper for you to issue a statement about the cuttings [the
news item Gandhiji had sent him] and say that you have no intention to become
the President again. In todays circumstances I would, if asked, prefer
Jawaharlal. I have many reasons for this. Why go into them?
(Reference:Rajmohan Gandhi, 1991, Patel: A Life, Ahmedabad, p. 370)
http://www.thenewsminute.com/politics/855
3/8
02/11/2014
4/8
02/11/2014
When the independence of India was coming close upon us and Gandhiji was the
silent master of our affairs, he had come to the decision that Jawaharlal, who
among the Congress leaders was the most familiar with foreign affairs, should be
the Prime Minister of India, although he knew Vallabhbhai would be the best
administrator among them all Undoubtedly it would have been better if Nehru
had been asked to be the Foreign Minister and Patel made the Prime Minister. I
too fell into the error of believing that Jawaharlal was the more enlightened
person of the two A myth had grown about Patel that he would be harsh
towards Muslims. This was a wrong notion but it was the prevailing
prejudice(Swarajya, 27.11.1971)
It would also be instructive to delve into the most favourable of Nehru's
biographies - the one authored by Micheal Brecher:
Page is safe
5/8
02/11/2014
exercise especially as it was Patel who had banned the Rashtriya Swayamsewak
Sangh, the organization that has always been the metaphorical foster-mother to
the Bharatiya Janata Party and its predecessor the Jana Sangh.
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
WHAT'S THIS?
Disqus
World News
Sort by Best
http://www.thenewsminute.com/politics/855
Login
Share Favorite
6/8
02/11/2014
2 days ago
Basically, this means that we shouldn't be blaming Nehru for the mess; instead it is the saint
who foisted him on the country.
5
Guest
Reply Share
2 days ago
"I acted according to my best judgment but the way things have shaped since then has
made to realize that this was perhaps the greatest blunder of my political life"
"My second mistake was that when I decided not to stand myself, I did not support Sardar
Patel."
This SOBs are such hypocrites!!!
1. Make a decision to the best of knowledge. But then say, oh my my...i made such a
mistake!!
2. Again make the same decision, and then say oh my my!!!
Such hypocrites are full in Indian society - they want to seen as saints from both ends. No
one should blame them you see. Bunch of egomaniacs, who simply can not say this - "I
took the decision in my best interest". That is what all they did - including Gandhi. So, stop
this nonsense of playing both sides. Gandhi's experiment with truth is filled with such
hypocrisy. Take both sides, play from both angles and then act saintly. In today's age, even
kids are smarter to see this hypocrisy.
It is simple. All of them were acting in their own interests. Period.
2
Reply Share
Anil Prasad
2 days ago
Ranbir42
Reply Share
3 hours ago
I do not wish to be a critique of historical facts, one way or another. I would rather let
contemporary historians do that, as indeed, they have done so in their valuable comments.
Theoretically speaking, if Sardar Patel had become the first prime minister of the country,
we may have been singing paeans to the Gandhi / Nehru family today, as favouring the
"under dog" ( no insult, metaphorically speaking) is our national characteristic.
Reply Share
a day ago
7/8
02/11/2014
only as good a half truth as a photograph showing Gandhi and Nehru and having cut out
Patel on the other side. Dr Prasad's story would have been complete had he narrated the
story prior to the decision of Gandhi's preference for Nehru as Premier. Be it as it may. Here
is the story of how Nehru came to become Prime Minister based on Congress Party
Documents:
By the time World War-II was coming to an end, it was becoming clear that Indias freedom
is not very far. It was also very clear that it will be the Congress President, due to the
number of seats the party had won in the 1946 elections, who shall be invited to form the
Interim Government at the Centre. Thus, suddenly the position of the President of the
Congress Party became a matter of great interest.
Once the election to the post of Congress President was announced, Maulana Abul Kalam
Azad expressed his desire for re-election. This move of the Maulana agonized Azads
close friend and colleague Jawaharlal who had his own expectations.1 However, Gandhi
had made his choice known in favour of Nehru on 20th April, 1946. This was not the first
see more
Reply Share
a day ago
My sincere gratitude to all who have taken the trouble to provide valuable commentsspecially to Professor Lal! His comments although from a source that I had not
perused are illuminating. By and large they tend to support the position taken by
Professor Bipin Chandra ,whose transcript was my main source .The only point of
diversion it seems is that while the Congress (I) documents state that the
Committees which did not nominate Patel presented no other nomination ,Professor
Chandra had a different take.I still retain the transcript of the talk which at the time I
found very helpful. Be that as it may, the broad adumbration is similar . And I would
not like to indulge in any blame game here. The Mahatma may have his own reasons
for taking the position he did but I would not question his motives. Even his
'conscience-keeper' Rajagopalachariar accepted the error as his article in Swarajya
About Us (/div-classcontainerabout-usdiv)
Terms and Conditions
(/terms)
Write to Us (/div-classcontainerwrite-to-usdiv)
Disclaimer (/div-classcontainerliability-disclaimerdiv)
2014 www.thenewsminute.com (http://thenewsminute.com/)
Developed by Girish Swaminathan
http://www.thenewsminute.com/politics/855
8/8