Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6.1
PILING
The actual load carrying capacity of a sand pile is much less than that
of a similar size concrete pile. The surest way to determine capacity is by
eld load tests.
Minipiles, those smaller in diameter than about 10 inches, function the
same as larger piles. They are particularly suited in places where operating
headroom is low, and where conventional pile driving equipment will not t.
They, too, will densify granular deposits as they are driven. However, their
small cross sectional area makes them unsuitable for (load bearing) sand
piles. The smaller sizes, however, are lled with uncompacted, narrowly
graded sand in clay deposits, to create sand drains.
6.2
SOIL NAILING
6.3
REINFORCED FILL
6.4
between three and 15%, with the lower values for coarser granular materials,
the intermediate values for ne, granular materials, and the higher values for
soils containing organic materials and clays.
Typically, the cement is spread on the soil surface, then thoroughly
mixed to the design depth. Next, the required amount of water is added, and
mixing continues until a homogeneous, uniform mixture is attained. Mixing
continues until all of the mixture passes a 1/2 inch sieve. Many specs also
require 80% of the mixture to pass a No. 4 sieve. Compaction to the values
determined by the moisture-density tests and grading complete the work.
Soil-cement has its initial set in a matter of hours, then cures to its nal
strength over a period of several weeks. It may be necessary to cover or wet
the surface periodically to promote proper curing. Soil-cement mixtures can
attain signicant strengths, as shown in Figure 6.1, where the road surface
has bridged over a washout.
Cohesive materials, particularly clays, are more effectively stabilized
by the addition of hydrated lime. Best results are obtained with clays of
medium to high plasticity. The lime supplies calcium cations, which replace
the cations on the clay minerals, thus changing the mineralogy to a material
with more desirable engineering characteristics. The chemical reaction
continues for a long time, even years, as long as lime is present to keep the
pH above 10.
As with cement, mix design is determined by laboratory tests, and inplace mixing is done in the eld to add the appropriate amount of lime,
FIGURE 6.1
which will generally fall in the three to eight percent range. (Lime may be
spread either dry, or as a slurry). Thorough mixing and pulverization must
be done to combine the lime and the soil intimately. Mixing follows
immediately after spreading, to reduce the soil clods to less than two inch
size. The material is then lightly compacted, and left to cure for several days
(but no longer than a week). Final mixing is then done to reduce all of the
clods to less than one inch, with specs often calling for as much as 60%
passing the No. 4 sieve. Final compaction follows, and is necessary for
maximum development of strength and durability. Curing is also important,
and eld tests can be used to measure the rate of cure, so that loads are not
applied prematurely.
6.5
FIGURE 6.2
site. One such mixing tool is shown in Figure 6.4. These tools can create
stabilized columns as much as ve to six feet in diameter, to depths over 100
feet. Typically, augers rotate in the 30 to 40 rpm range, and can penetrate as
rapidly as three feet per minute. The withdrawal rate is much slower, to
insure thorough mixing, since the success of the work depends upon the
mixing process. The drilling rigs to do deep soil mixing will carry and use
simultaneously as many as four augers, to create stabilized panels quickly
and efciently, as shown in Figure 6.3.
Stabilization materials can also be placed as dry powders. Originally,
lime was used in cohesive deposits, based on its successful use for surface
stabilization. Recent research has indicated, however, that better results are
obtained over a wide range of soils with a cement/lime mixture, with the
lime in the range of 20 to 25% of the mixture. Dry powders are placed by air
pressure, through special auger tips considerably smaller than those used for
slurry injection. Dry placement has obvious advantages in the Scandinavian
FIGURE 6.3 Barrier wall constructed by deep soil mixing, using a limecement slurry. (Courtesy of Underpinning and Foundation, SKANSKA,
Maspeth, NY.)
FIGURE 6.4 Mixing tool for deep soil work. (Bruce, D.A., The Return of Deep
Soil Mixing, Civil Engineering, Dec. 1996, pp 4446. Reproduced by
permission of ASCE, Resion, VA.)
tests for strength, density and permeability. In the largest job done to date in
the US (The Boston Central Artery Tunnel, 1998), the slurry was a mixture
of cement and water of about a three to one ratio. Mixed with local deposits
(Boston blue clay and organic silts), the treated soil met the specications of
300 psi in unconned compression.
6.6
SUMMARY
Piles which are driven to support loads can also densify loose granular
deposits. This will increase the frictional resistance and improve the pile load
capacity. In cohesive soils, remolding and consequent stiffening may also
increase frictional resistance. If the soil is under-consolidated, however, and
the pile driving signicantly shortens the drainage paths, downdrag may
develop, reducing the pile capacity to carry structural loads.
Hollow tubes driven into cohesive soils are lled with loose, narrowly
graded sand to make sand drains. If such tubes are lled with well graded
compacted sand, sand piles result, capable of carrying structural loads.
Compacted gravel and crushed stone may also be used for this purpose.
6.7
REFERENCES
Internet:
http://www.lime.org
http://www.abchance.com/soilscrew
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/soilnail.htm
http://www.nicholson-rodio.com/news/deepsoil.htm
http://www.dot.gov.bridge/if99026.pdf
http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/scangeo.html
http://www..fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/ressa.htm
http://www.dot.gov/brieng.htm
http://www.state.sc.us/doing/Sup Specs/99-04-23.pdf
6.8
PROBLEMS
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4