Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Grard Catala
Bernard Thron
Clamart, France
Gilbert Conort
Montrouge, France
John Ferguson
Cambridge, England
Researchers have sought for years to understand and model the complex flow regimes
found within oil wells. The advent of
increased high-angle and horizontal wells
has only served to make this task harder.
Today, detailed theoretical work coupled
with extensive experimentation has
expanded the frontiers of fluid mechanics
knowledge, which in turn has helped in the
development of new production logging
sensors and analysis (see Revitalizing Production logging, page 44).
Although many key advances have been
made in understanding multiphase flow, it is
first necessary to be familiar with the key
elements of monophase flow.
For help preparing this article, thanks to Christian
Besson, Ken Stephenson and Colin Whittaker,
Schlumberger Cambridge Research (SCR), Cambridge,
England.
1. Dynamic fluid viscosity indicates a fluids resistance
to flow, caused by shear resistance primarily across an
interface. Kinetic viscosity is defined as dynamic viscosity divided by the density of the fluid.
2. Some shallow wells produce low-gravity crudes
where water-in-oil emulsions occur. The viscosity of
these fluids may exceed 100 to 1000 cp, and in these
situations laminar flow may be expected.
Winter 1996
Laminar Flow
Dye
Turbulent Flow
Dye
VD
61
Top
ng
ixi r
M laye
w L
at o
er ca
ho l
ld
u
Velocity
il
O
er
at
W
Decreasing
average
water holdup
Top
Increasing
average
water holdup
62
Bottom
Velocity
Deviated well
Very complex flow
structure.
Monophasic water
phase at the bottom
of the pipe.
Dispersed oil phase at
the uppermost of the
pipe.
Large velocity and
holdup gradients.
Top
Bottom
Holdup
Top
Bottom
Velocity
Bottom
Holdup
Top
Nearly horizontal well
Almost stratified flows.
Monophasic oil at the
top and monophasic
water at the bottom.
Narrow mixing layer.
Oil and water streams
flow at different
velocities.
Bottom
Holdup
Top
Bottom
3. Flow structure and speed are phase-steering mechanisms that may accelerate or slow down the physicalchemical equilibrium of the three fluid phases. Empirical equations are used for transforming the quantities
seen downhole to surface, ambient conditions. These
corrections are small and approximate, and therefore
it is appropriate to neglect these steering effects at logging conditions.
4. The holdup profile can be approximated by a linear
function.
In a system with multiphase flow, buoyancy due to pipe deviation causes different
density phases to separate with a mixing
layer of dispersed bubbles in between.
Separation into at least two different immiscible phases with a mixing layer in between
leads to what is called a flow structure.
Multiphase flow structuresat least in
two-phase floware characterized by the
width of the mixing layer. Under these conditions, another parameter of the flow system becomes critical to understanding the
flow structure: deviation angle of the pipe
from vertical. The mixing layer thickness is
fixed for a given pipe diameter and borehole
deviation. As the overall fractional volume
of water in the pipewater holdup
changes, the position of the mixing layer
moves across the pipe diameter (above left).
Even with a relatively simple two-phase
system, such as water and oil, the effect of
borehole deviation on mixing and flow
structure is complicated. At least three types
of flow structures can be defined based on
the pipe deviation angle.
First, in vertical wells, the oil and water
phases are fully mixed across the entire pipe
cross section. Even for wells with a deviation
less than 20, the mixing layer is large and
the two phases are mixed across the pipe
with a smooth velocity profile. However, as
soon as the pipe is deviated further, gravity
Oilfield Review
6000
Oil
Water
1500
Oil
Water
600
Oil
Water
80
89
90
91
Winter 1996
63
Pure oil
Pure water
90
3
4
2
1
Deviation
Pure
oil
Pure
water
0
0%
100%
Average water holdup
64
Oilfield Review