Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4Q and A
5. Compare and contrast the business goals of BPA, BPI, and BPR.
These three business goals vary in the degree to which the basic business processes in
the As-Is system are altered. With "Business Process Automation" the As-Is business
processes are not substantially modified; computers are used to take over some of the
tasks without significantly changing the way things are done. "Business Process
Improvement" involves some evaluation and modification of the basic business
processes, with a goal of making moderate changes to those processes within the new
system design. "Business Process Reengineering" involves major revisions to the basic
business processes, potentially making complete changes to the way the work is
performed in the business area.
6. Compare and contrast problem analysis with root-cause analysis. Under what
conditions would you use problem analysis? Under what conditions would you
use root-cause analysis?
Problem Analysis and Root-Cause Analysis are two different techniques to be employed
in Business Process Automation to determine improvements to the current system. The
Chapter 4Q and A
two strategies vary in the emphasis of the analysis performed. Problem Analysis asks
the users and managers of the As-Is system to identify system problems and to suggest
problem solution. Root-Cause analysis focuses on being sure that the problem's
underlying cause is understood, rather than just assuming that cause is known. This
emphasis helps ensure that solutions chosen will solve real business problems rather
than solving a problem symptom. Problem analysis would be suitable when the
problems being experienced with the As-Is system are relatively minor, and the changes
needed are primarily 'touch-ups'. Root-Cause Analysis is appropriate when the
problems of the As-Is system are more significant, and the team needs assurance that
they are designing a solution that really solves the true problems.
Chapter 4Q and A
the time requirements to complete a process. First, the total time required to complete a
business process is determined. Then the process is broken down into individual steps,
and the time required to complete each step is determined. The total time of all steps is
calculated and compared to the total time of the process. If these totals are substantially
different (total time of process > total time of process steps), then significant
inefficiencies exist, and the process needs major revision. "Activity-Based Costing"
assesses the costs required to perform a process. In this technique, the cost of each
major process or each step in a business function is measured. The most costly
processes are then the targets of the development team's improvement efforts.
Although straightforward in concept, this technique is complex in practice due to the
difficulty of determining the indirect costs to apply to the business process(es).
Incorrectly assigned indirect costs may bias the results of the analysis.
Chapter 4Q and A
customer's view of the real goal of the business function, and is an externally-oriented
technique. Outcome Analysis may help give the analysts a fresh perspective on how the
business operates.
10. Compare and contrast technology analysis with root cause analysis.
The "Technology Analysis" technique is a part of the business process reengineering
strategy. Technology Analysis attempts to create new way of thinking about the business
processes by focusing first on new and innovative technologies. The analysis team
generates a list of promising technologies, then works through this list, generating ideas
on how each technology could be applied to the business processes. By identifying
beneficial new applications of technology, the team may create radically redesigned
business processes around that technology. Root Cause Analysis seeks to define the
new system requirements by identifying solutions to the true underlying problems found
in the current business processes.
12. Assuming time and money were not important concerns, would BPR projects
benefit from additional time spent understanding the As-Is system?
No, the effort spent understanding the As-Is system in BPR only needs to be minimal
since the goal of BPR is to eliminate current business processes. The team only needs
Chapter 4Q and A
a basic understanding of the essence of the As-Is system, and the quality of the BPR
project would not be enhanced by spending more time and money looking at the As-Is
system.
13. What are the key factors in selecting an appropriate analysis strategy?
One factor is the potential value to the business. BPA and BPI both will add low to
moderate value to the business because they strive to make incremental changes to the
as-is system. BPS, on the other had, has the potential to add significant value to the
business because it will make sweeping changes to the business's processes.
The strategies also differ in terms of cost. BPR will probably have significant costs
associated with it, while costs of BPA and BPI will be much more modest.
The breadth of the analysis will also vary between the strategies. BPR will tackle a
much broader piece of the organization, while BPA and BPI are narrower in scope.
Finally, risk as a factor that distinguishes the strategies. BPR, because it attempts more
broad, significant changes, is far more risky than the narrower, more limited BPA or BPI
strategies.
To select an appropriate strategy, the project sponsor needs to evaluate his/her goals
for the project. If the problems being experiences suggest that radical redesign of
business processes is necessary and the organization has the funding and can tolerate
the risk, then a BPR project may be called for. If more moderate changes are required,
or funding is limited, or high risks cannot be tolerated, then BPI is recommended. When
only minor changes are needed because the existing business processes are
acceptable, then BPA is the strategy of choice.
Chapter 4Q and A
14. Which do you think is most common today, BPA, BPI, or BPR? Why?
Probably BPI is the most common. BPA may be the goal of many systems, but there
are so many small ways to improve business processes during the automation that it is
not infrequent that a project will slip into BPI. On the other hand, BPR is generally
viewed as relatively high risk and many firms will want to minimize risk to the degree
that they can. A good number of firms have used BPR or a combination of BPI and
BPR for replacing a number of systems with ERP or enterprise resource planning
systems that bring major transformation to firms.
16. What do you think are three common mistakes novice analysts make in
conducting the analysis process?
Chapter 4Q and A
(1). Spending too little time examining the underlying issues confronting the business
(e.g. not performing root-cause and related analyses); (2) Failing to systematically
develop organizational knowledge about prior projects for purposes of constant
improvement in estimation; (3) Insufficiently identifying, tracking, and resolving the
sources of risk in the project.