Professional Documents
Culture Documents
From its contents it is apparent that there has been some misunderstanding as to
the specificity of my complaints, as most of them were not addressed.
To the point, my formal complaint of April 27, 2007 is not even acknowledged in
your letter.
You state that I have “four distinct complaints”. I disagree with this
interpretation and will explain why.
My concern is that the height variance granted by the Aurora ZBA came
with certain requirements and those requirements have not been met.
The variance was given based on the plans submitted to the ZBA. As
stated at the May 24, 2006, public hearing: “the front yard will be in-filled
to meet the front door of the house with no entry step.”
My position is that by constructing this wall and steps, the owners do not
meet the requirements of the height variance that they received.
• In regard to the retaining wall on the north side, that was built extending
on to the property of 331 Main Street, I had hoped that the complaint that I
made on April 27, 2007, made clear that my concern was primarily that the
owners of 331 Main Street at that time – Wells College - had not pursued
or received any kind of village approval for construction, excavation, and
earthmoving on their property.
• Your letter dated July 3 stated “Mr. Staley must order a work stop on this
addition immediately.” Meanwhile, as of today, July 10, work continues
on the addition. When will this stop work order be issued?
Sincerely,
Laura Holland