COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR)

D. LORIA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

PROPONENTS NAME
MONITORING PERIOD COVERED: January to June 2!
I. "ASIC PROJECT IN#ORMATION AND $PDATES
ECC Control No/Reference Code No.: ECC%R&A%!'%'%()) *ate* January '+ 2!
Project Title: ",o%Et-ano. P.ant
Project Type: D,/t,..at,on an* #er0entat,on
Location: S,t,o Ma,/an+ "aran1ay Tu2u-an+ Na/u12u+ "atan1a/
Project Coordinates: '&
O
'2!3 to '&
O
'(4.!3 Nort- .at,tu*e an* '2
O
5'&.)3 to
'2
O
5'5'.)3 Ea/t .on1,tu*e
Project Stage/Phase: (i.e. construction; commissioning, etc.) O6erat,on P-a/e
Contact Person: M/. D,1na Lor,a
Contact Numers: (&() 57)%7)7)
E!P "ppro#al: $ 8 % &uring ECC "pplication Stage
$ 8 % 'pdated after ECC (ssuance) appro#ed on May (+ 2!
Changes in Project &esign *if any+: In9rea/e ,n 6ro*u9t,on 9a6a9,ty an* In/ta..at,on o:
A**,t,ona. Ma9-,ner,e/ an* E;u,60ent
II. E<EC$TIVE S$MMAR=
This section should include a summary of the major findings for the monitoring period. ,or
e-ample. a statement that there /ere no major acti#ities that influenced the monitoring
parameters during the monitoring period can e made if there /ere really no acti#ities y the
proponent that affected the monitored parameters.
Ta2.e II%'. Su00ary o: Ma>or #,n*,n1/ :or t-e Mon,tor,n1 Per,o*
Con*,t,on?Re;u,re0ent?
Co00,t0ent
Co06.,an9e Statu/ @ Su00ary
o: A9t,on/ TaAen
Re9o00en*at,on?Co00,t0ent
:or t-e NeBt Re6ort,n1
Compliance /ith ECC Co06.,e* Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 on
9o06.,an9e to ECC 9on*,t,on/
Compliance /ith E!P A,r Po..ut,on: Du/t 9o..e9tor Ca/
,n/ta..e* an* 0a,nta,ne*
Dater Po..ut,on: Da/teCater
Treat0ent #a9,.,ty Ca/ ,n/ta..e*
an* 0a,nta,ne*
So.,* Da/te: ProE,/,on o:
1ar2a1e 2,n/ ,n /trate1,9
.o9at,on/ o: t-e 6.ant.
I06.e0entat,on o: 6ro6er
Se1re1at,on+ Re9y9.,n1+ Reu/e
an* D,/6o/a.. Co00,//,one*
a99re*,te* -au.er/
FaGar*ou/ Da/te: a.. toB,9 an*
-aGar*ou/ Ca/te/ are 6ro6er.y
/tore* ,n t-e *e/,1nate*
9-e0,9a. Ca/te roo0 6r,or to
*,/6o/a. 2y an a99re*,te* treater
Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 an*
9o06.,an9e to t-e 6roE,/,on/ o:
RA !4&)+ RA )245+ RA )( an*
RA 7)7) an* t-e,r re/6e9t,Ee IRR
(mplementation of appropriate
and effecti#e en#ironmental
impact remedial actions in
case of e-ceedances
T-e 6.ant ,/ o6erat,n1 at ,t/
o6t,0u0 e::,9,en9y .eEe. o: !H
an* no re9or*/ o: eB9ee*an9e/
t-at C,.. 9ontr,2ute to
enE,ron0enta. 6o..ut,on.
T-e Cont,n1en9y P.an an*
E0er1en9y Re/6on/e Pro1ra0
/-a.. 2e /tr,9t.y ,06.e0ente* ,n
Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 an*
9o06.,an9e to t-e 6roE,/,on/ o:
RA !4&)+ RA )245+ RA )( an*
RA 7)7) an* t-e,r re/6e9t,Ee IRR
9a/e o: eB9ee*an9e/ to DENR
/tan*ar*/
Complaints management T-e 9o06any ,/ an a9t,Ee
0e02er o: an enE,ron0enta.,/t
1rou6 C-ere 9o06.a,nt/ are
2e,n1 re/o.Ee*. No 9o06.a,nt/
Cere re9e,Ee* 2y t-e 9o06any
:ro0 /taAe-o.*er/ /,n9e t-e
9o06any ,/ a .aC%a2,*,n1 9,t,Gen
In 9a/e o: any 9o06.a,nt/
re9e,Ee*+ t-e 9o06any /-a..
/u20,t t-e re/u.t/ o: t-e
/ett.e0ent or re/o.ut,on
un*ertaAen 2y t-e 9o06any
Realistic and sufficient udget
for conducting the
en#ironmental monitoring and
audit acti#ities
T-e 9o06any a..o9ate*
P5+. :or t-e 6er,o*,9
/a06.,n1 ana.y/e/ an*
*e/,1nate* t-e EnE,ron0enta.
O::,9er?PCO to -an*.e
9o06.,an9e to DENR Stan*ar*/
Co/t /u00ary o: 2u*1etary
re;u,re0ent/ an* 6ro1re//
re6ort /-a.. 2e /u20,tte*
"ccountaility 0 1ualified
personnel are charged /ith the
routine monitoring of the
project acti#ities in terms of
education. training. 2no/ledge
and e-perience of the
en#ironmental team
T-e 9o06any 9reate* an
enE,ron0enta. un,t an*
*e/,1nate* M/. C-ery. Duya a/
,t/ EnE,ron0enta. O::,9er?PCO to
.ea* an* -an*.e 9o06.,an9e to
DENR Stan*ar*/
T-e EnE,ron0enta. O::,9er?PCO
/-a.. 9oor*,nate C,t- t-e EM"
re1ar*,n1 u6*ate/ on 9o06.,an9e
to DENR Stan*ar*/
3thers44 N/"
III. RES$LTS AND DISC$SSIONS
A. Co06.,an9e Mon,tor,n1
The status of compliance to the ECC conditionalities and the attainment of E!P commitments
should e elaorated in this section. Reasons for noncompliance or unmet commitment should
e e-plained and solutions and measures to attain full compliance of ECC terms and
conditions as /ell as satisfactory attainment of E!P commitments should e discussed as
rene/ed efforts for the ne-t monitoring period. Ta2.e ' may e used to summari5e the status
of compliance.
Ta2.e '. Su00ary Statu/ o: ECC @ EMP Co06.,an9e
ECC?EMP
Con*,t,on?Re;u,re0ent
Cate1or,Gat,on
Re.eEant ECC Con*,t,on/ Statu/ o:
Co06.,an9e
(8 ,: 9o06.y,n1)
Re0arA/ I Re;u,re0ent?
De/9r,6t,on
6 Project Co#erage/
Limits
T-e 0aB,0u0 annua. 9a6a9,ty
,/ 5+ 0etr,9 ton/
8
#ro0 January to
May 2!+ t-e
6.ant -a/ a.rea*y
6ro*u9e* a2out
2+ 0etr,9
ton/. In9rea/e ,n
9a6a9,ty Ca/
a66roEe* on
January '+ 2!
7 Components D,/t,..at,on De6art0ent+
#er0entat,on De6art0ent+
"o,.,n1 Fou/e De6art0ent+
PoCer P.ant+ DT#+ Du/t
Co..e9tor Sy/te0+ Stora1e Area
:or raC 0ater,a./ an* :,n,/-e*
6ro*u9t/
8
D,t- ,n/ta..at,on
o: a**,t,ona.
0a9-,nery an*
e;u,60ent
8 3ther sectoral
re1uirements
mandated y other
agencies to e
complied /ith
7 Per0,t/?C.earan9e/ Cere
/e9ure* :ro0 FL$R"+ NDR"+
LG$/+ DOE+ DOLE+ DTI+ DOF+
et9.
8
Co6,e/ o: 6er0,t/?
9.earan9e/ /-a..
2e ,n9.u*e* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
9 E!P and updates
as deemed
re1uired
6. 7.
8. 9.
:. ;. <
Str,9t ,06.e0entat,on o: t-e
a66roEe* EMP
8
T-e u6*ate* EMP
/-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
: Conduct of
aseline.
compliance and
impact self=
monitoring
;. > A,r an* Dater Kua.,ty /a06.,n1
ana.y/e/ Cere 9on*u9te*
8
Re/u.t/ o:
.a2oratory
/a06.,n1
ana.y/e/ /-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
; !ulti=sectoral
monitoring *as may
e re1uired+
6> MOA :or t-e 9reat,on o: MMT
Ca/ a66roEe* on A6r,. (+ 2!
8
Co6y o: t-e MOA
/-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
> Regular reporting < Re1u.ar /u20,//,on o: t-e
/e0,%annua. CMR an* ;uarter.y
SMR
8
Co6y o: t-e CMR
an* SMR /-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
< (nstitutional
arrangements
necessary for
implementation of
en#ironmental
management
measures
6. 9. : Coor*,nat,on C,t- LG$+
1oEern0ent a1en9,e/
9on9erne* on t-e
,06.e0entat,on o: EMP
ISO '& 9ert,:,e*
8
D,t- MOA
Re1u.ar au*,t 2y
au*,tor/
? Standard &ENR
re1uirements on
transfer of
o/nership
8 No tran/:er o: oCner/-,6
8
T-e 9o06any
/-a.. ,n:or0 EM"
on t-,/ 0atter
6@ Standard &ENR
re1uirements on
aandonment
< No a2an*on0ent or tran/:er o:
.o9at,on
8
T-e 9o06any
/-a.. ,n:or0 EM"
on t-,/ 0atter
66 (mpact !itigation
Plan or
Construction/
ContractorAs
En#ironmental
Program
6. 7.
8. 9.
:. ;. <
E!P
Str,9t ,06.e0entat,on o: t-e
a66roEe* IMP
8
T-e u6*ate* IMP
/-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
67 Social
&e#elopment Plan
9
E!P
Se9ure* e06.oy0ent+
tra,n,n1/?/e0,nar/ :or
e06.oyee/+ /9-o.ar/-,6+ /a.ary
.oan/+ 0e*,9a. 9on/u.tat,on :or
e06.oyee/ an* 2ene:,9,ar,e/
8
Co6y o: t-e SDP
/-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
68 (EC Plan 8
E!P
Re1u.ar 9on/u.tat,on C,t- t-e
e06.oyee/ an* -o/t 9o00un,ty
a2out t-e /a:e o6erat,on o: t-e
9o06any
8
Co6y o: t-e IEC
P.an /-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
69 Contingency/
Emergency
Response Plan or
e1ui#alent Ris2
!anagement Plan
7 T-e 9o06any -a/ a
Cont,n1en9y? E0er1en9y
Re/6on/e P.an C-,9- Ca/
,n9or6orate* ,n t-e ECC
a66.,9at,on *o9u0ent/
8
Co6y o: t-e
Cont,n1en9y?
E0er1en9y
Re/6on/e P.an
/-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
6: "andonment Plan
*/hen applicale+
< At 6re/ent+ no :ore9a/t o:
a2an*on,n1 t-e 6ro>e9t
8
T-e A2an*on0ent
P.an /-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* 2
0ont-/ 6r,or to
a2an*on0ent
a9t,E,t,e/.
6; En#ironmental
!onitoring Plan
*E!oP+
E!oP In9or6orate* ,n t-e ECC
a66.,9at,on *o9u0ent/
8
T-e u6*ate*
EMoP /-a.. 2e
/u20,tte* ,n t-e
neBt /u20,//,on
o: CMR or /ee
AnneB JJJ or
Atta9-0ent JJJJ
6> 3thers4444 N/"
". I06a9t Mon,tor,n1
This section shall contain rele#ant graphical presentation of 1uantitati#e and semi=1uantitati#e
impact monitoring results sho/ing trends. comparing past monitoring results /ith the current.
Rele#ant monitoring results in the other S!R modules shall e referred to. The latest
monitoring findings and conclusion should e discussed in te-t form.
Bualitati#e impact monitoring results may e presented in te-t form or in terms of pictorial
co#erage. if applicale. E-amples of 1ualitati#e impacts are those relating to 1uality of life.
degree of happiness. and sense of en#ironmental cleanliness.
Pro>e9t A9t,E,t,e/ Pre*,9te* I06a9t:
De/9r,6t,on 6er
Para0eter
M,t,1at,on?
En-an9e0ent
A9tua.?Re/,*ua.
I06a9t
Pro6o/e* C-an1e/
to t-e M,t,1at,on?
En-an9e0ent P.an
Pre-Construction
Construction
Operation
Abandonment
i. Summary of Previous Monitoring
The 2ey findings. recommendations. and action plan from the pre#ious monitoring and
outstanding issues from earlier monitoring periods *if applicale+ should e highlighted in this
section.
*Provide discussion and results of laboratory sampling analyses
ii. Current Monitoring Results and Findings
The data collected and related e-penses from the #arious sampling and measurement e#ents
done under the En#ironmental !onitoring Plan *E!oP+ or a Sampling and !easurement Plan
*S"!P+ for the current monitoring period shall e summari5ed in a taular form. preferaly
using the prescried format in Ta2.e/ 2 an* ( elo/. and discussed under this section. 3nly
processed and summari5ed data must e presented here.
The current monitoring results must e related to the historical trend for each parameter. "ny
de#iation from this trend must e e-plained. !ore. importantly. the discussion must focus on
point=y=point comparison of the gathered #alues /ith En#ironmental Buality Performance
Le#els *EBPLs+. if EBPLs ha#e een committed y the Proponent or estalished /ith the
!ulti=partite !onitoring Team. The monitoring results could also e used to determine the
action and limit le#els for the specific project. These should all e presented here in detail and
summari5ed in the conclusions and recommendations section.
Compliances. non=compliances and e-ceedances must all e thoroughly e-plained. (n cases
of compliances. success factors must e cited. ,or non=compliances and e-ceedances. the
proponentAs response should e e-plained. !oreo#er. causati#e factors must e identified and
additional solutions and mitigation measures proposed. if needed.
(t should also cite the /eather conditions and other factors /hich may affect the results of the
sampling acti#ities.
The status of compliance to recommendations from pre#ious monitoring and measures
included in the action plan should e descried and any unmet commitment must e
rationali5ed and alternati#e. if needed. presented.
Ta2.e 2. Su00ary Statu/ o: EnE,ron0enta. I06a9t Mana1e0ent an* Mon,tor,n1 P.an I06.e0entat,on
!onitoring
3jecti#e
En#ironmental
"spect
En#ironmental
(mpact
!onitoring
Parameter
Sampling C !easurement Standard/
E(S
Prediction
En#tAl !gt.
!easures
Remar2s
*EBPL
commitme
nt. if any+
Results
Stn/
Loc
Pre#ious Current
Compliance to
R" <>9? *"ir
Buality+
"ir emission
from genset.
oiler
*e1uipment
that use fuel+
"ir pollution.
Noise
pollution.
health
ha5ards
TSP. S3-.
N3-. C3-.
P!6@. P.
38. D7S.
E3C
(dentifi
ed
station
s
FPro#ide
results of
sampling
analyses
FPro#ide
results of
sampling
analyses
Complian
ce to
&ENR
Emission
Standards
Pro#ision
and
maintenan
ce of
CE!S.
stac2s.
uffer
5one. tree
planting
FNo
EBPL/Not
applicale
FSet limits/
/arning
Compliance to
R" ?7>:
*Gater
Buality+
&ischarge of
/aste/ater
and effluent
Gater
pollution. land
contamination.
health
ha5ards
H3&. C3&.
pD. TSS.
Temp..
T&S.
coliform.
E.Coli. 3il C
Irease.
metals
(dentifi
ed
station
s.
outfall
FPro#ide
results of
sampling
analyses
FPro#ide
results of
sampling
analyses
Complian
ce to
&ENR
Effluent C
Gaste/at
er
Standards
Pro#ision
C
maintenan
ce of
GTP
FNo
EBPL/Not
applicale
FSet limits/
/arning
Compliance to
R" ;?;?
*Da5/aste
!gt.+
Ieneration of
to-ic and
ha5ardous
/astes
Gater
pollution. land
contamination.
health
ha5ards
FTCLP
Fmetals
FThose
classified in
Tale 6=6 of
(RR. PCL
Storag
e area
FPro#ide
results of
sampling
analyses
FPro#ide
results of
sampling
analyses
Complian
ce to R"
;?;?
Standards
Pro#ision
C
maintenan
ce of
storage
area
FNo
EBPL/Not
applicale
FSet limits/
/arning
Compliance to
R" ?@@8
Ieneration of
solid /aste
Gater
pollution. land
contamination.
health
ha5ards
Eolume of
solid
/astes
generated
Githin
the
site.
!R,
FPro#ide
#olume
generated
FPro#ide
#olume
generated
Complian
ce to R"
?@@8 (RR
Pro#ision
C
maintenan
ce of ins.
!R,
FNo
EBPL/Not
applicale
FSet limits/
/arning
LEKPL%EnE,ron0enta. Kua.,ty Per:or0an9e LeEe.
o "lert or Red ,lag = early /arning
o "ction Le#el=point /here management measures must e employed so as not to reach the regulated
threshold or limit le#el. or to reduce deterioration of affected en#ironmental component to pre=impact or
optimum en#ironmental 1uality
o Limit Le#el=regulated threshold of pollutant *standard that must not e e-ceeded+) point /here emergency
response measures must e employed to reduce pollutants to lo/er than standard limit.
o NOTE: Section on EBPLs may e filled out as a ProponentAs draft commitment or after these ha#e een
estalished and mutually agreed upon among Proponent. E!H and other !!T memers. 3ther/ise. only
the L(!(T Le#el shall e the reference for regulatory compliance. This means that en#ironmental
management measures are formulated at the J"CT(3N le#elK so as not to e-ceed this regulated threshold.
Ta2.e (. Re6ort on Statu/ o: EnE,ron0enta. "u*1et A..o9at,on/ an* EB6en/e/
EB6en/e Ite0L
"u*1et A9tua. EB6en/e/
D,re9t :ro0
Co06any
"u*1et :or
MMT
D,re9t
Co06any
EB6en/e
MMT
EB6en/e/
A. I06.e0entat,on o: Mana1e0ent P.an/ @ Pro1ra0/
6+ En#ironmental (mpact !itigation Plan P8@@.@@@ FPro#ide the P8@@.@@@
appro#ed G,P
7+ Social &e#elopment Plan P:@.@@@ FPro#ide the
appro#ed G,P
P:@.@@@
8+ (EC Plan P:.@@@ FPro#ide the
appro#ed G,P
P:.@@@
9+ Enhancement Programs *if any+ N/" FPro#ide the
appro#ed G,P
N/"
". ,06.e0entat,on o: Mon,tor,n1 P.an/
6+ Self=!onitoring P6@@.@@@ FPro#ide the
appro#ed G,P
P6@@.@@@
7+ En#ironmental !onitoring ,und */ith
!!T+
FPro#ide the
appro#ed
G,P
FPro#ide the
appro#ed G,P
8+ En#ironmental Iuarantee ,und FPro#ide the
appro#ed
G,P
FPro#ide the
appro#ed G,P
T3T"LS P9::.@@@ P9::.@@@
F,or mining projects. e1ui#alent cost items shall e adopted. e.g. S&!P in lieu of S&P.
IV. CONCL$SIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This section should present the conclusions and recommendations of the current S!R ased
on the results and discussion of the pre#ious sections. (t should also e-plain if the pre#ious
monitoring recommendations should continue *if implemented+. 3n the other hand. if
/arranted. the recommendation may e the cessation of specific or all monitoring acti#ities.
The conclusions and recommendations should preferaly e in a ulleted format and as much
as possile grouped according to coherent themes. such as the follo/ing headings.
A. Co06.,an9e Statu/
3nly the 2ey conclusions aout the status of compliance to ECC and E!P are included in this
section. The status of non=compliances should e particularly trac2ed throughout all S!Rs
e#en if compliance has een already attained. Recommended additional measures or
amendments to the E!P should e presented here.
*ased on t!e presented environmental data and results of actual monitoring activities"
t!e company is compliant to t!e conditions stipulated in t!e #CC
*ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" t!e company complied to $#%R Standards
e&cept e&ceedance to ''''''''''''''''(parameter)due to '''''''''''''''''.
". EnE,ron0enta. Kua.,ty Statu/ (a66.,9a2.e on.y ,: EKPL/ -aEe 2een /et 2y t-e
Pro6onent a/ ,t/ 9o00,t0ent or ,: o6te* to 2e 0utua..y a1ree* u6on 2y Pro6onent
C,t- t-e EM" an* ot-er 0e02er/ o: t-e MMT)
3nly the 2ey conclusions on meeting the set EBPLs are included in this section.
*ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" results of sampling analysis for air and
*ater +uality are *it!in t!e limit set fort! in t!e $#%R Standards.
*ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" t!e company complied to $#%R Standards
e&cept e&ceedance to ''''''''''''''''(parameter)due to '''''''''''''''''.
C. EnE,ron0enta. Mana1e0ent P.an Statu/
3nly the 2ey conclusions aout the status of E!P implementation and recommended
additional measures or amendments should e presented here.
LProE,*e 0atr,B o: t-e a66roEe* EMP?IMP?EMS%2a/e* EMP
D. ENVIRONMENTAL RISM CATEGORINATION
The proponent should fill=up or update the projectAs en#ironmental ris2 categori5ation
1uestionnaire *presented in "nne- 7=>d of the Re#ised Procedural !anual of &"3 7@@8=8@+ 0
applicale on the Second Semi=annual ECC Compliance !onitoring Report.
PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND A$DIT
PRIORITINATION SCFEME (PEMAPS) K$ESTIONNAIRE
Pro>e9t Na0e : ",o%Et-ano. P.ant
Pro>e9t Lo9at,on : S,t,o Ma,/an+ "aran1ay Tu2u-an+ Na/u12u+ "atan1a/
ECC Re:eren9e No/. : ECC%R&A%!'%'%()) *ate* January '+ 2!
Pro6onent O D. Lor,a Internat,ona. Cor6orat,on
Po..ut,on Contro. O::,9er : En1r. C-ery. Duya
Te.. No. : (&() 57)%7)7)
#aB No. : (&() 57)%7)7)
E%0a,. : *.or,aPya-oo.9o0
Pro>e9t Ty6e : J % #oo* an* Re.ate* In*u/tr,e/ J( Q D,/t,..at,on @ #er0entat,on
Pro>e9t Statu/ : O6erat,on
I. PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS
6.6 Si5e and Type
6.6.6 Si5e ased on numer of employees
Numer of Employees 0 ;:@
6.6.6 Type
Non=ECP and Non=EC"
6.7 Gaste Ieneration and !anagement
6.7.6 Gaste Type and Buantity of Gastes Ienerated
Cate1ory Da/te Da/te Ty6e Kuant,ty
"ir Particulate !atter Non=Da5ardous !T/year
Gater Process Gaste/ater Non=Da5ardous Cuic meter/year
Solid !ud ca2e
,ly ash
Hagasse
Non=Da5ardous
Non=Da5ardous
Non=Da5ardous
!T/year
!T/year
!T/year
6.8 Pollution Control System *PCS+
6.8.6 PCS or Gaste !anagement !ethod 'sed
Cate1ory PCS?Da/te Mana1e0ent
Met-o* $/e*
Re0arA/
"ir Get Scruer for Hoiler
Emissions
Complemented y settling
asin for
solid /aste collection
Gater Primary Treatment 0 Settling
Hasins
Secondary Treatment 0
Hiological
Tertiary Treatment = Hiological
Gater recycling practiced.
hence discharge is minimal
Solid Composting ,acility /!R, Coordination /ith LI'.
haulers
II. PATFDA=S
7.6 Pre#ailing /ind to/ards arrioL No
7.7 Rainfall *impacts surface and ground/ater path/ays+
7.7.6 "#erage annual net rainfall = 7.:@@ mm
7.7.7 !a-imum 79=hr rainfall = 67@ mm
7.8 TerrainL ,lat
7.9 (s the facility located in a flood prone areaL No
7.: Iround/ater
&epth of ground/ater *m+ Ireater than 6@
III. RECEIVING MEDIA?RECEPTORS
8.6 "ir *&istance to nearest community+ @.: to 6 2m
8.7 Recei#ing surface /ater ody
8.7.6 &istance to recei#ing surface /ater @.: to 6 2m
8.7.7 Si5e of population using recei#ing 7@ DD
surface /ater
8.7.8 ,resh /ater
8.7.8.6 Classification of fresh /ater Class C
8.7.8.7 Si5e of fresh /ater ody 6:< s1. 2m. drainage area
8.7.8.8 Economic #alue of /ater use (ndustrial
"gricultural
8.7.9 Salt /ater *Estuarine /ater 0 : 2m tidally affected ri#er segment+
8.7.9.6 Classification of salt /ater Class S&
8.7.9.7 Economic #alue of /ater use (ndustrial
8.8 Iround/ater
8.8.6 &istance to nearest recharge area Ireater than 6 2m
8.8.7 &istance to nearest /ell used Ireater than 6 2m
8.8.8 Iround/ater use for nearest /ell (ndustrial
8.9 Land
8.9.6 (ndicate current/actual land uses /ithin @.: 2m radius
(ndustrial
"gricultural
Residential
8.9.7 Potential/proposed land uses /ithin @.: 2m radius
(ndustrial
8.9.8 Numer of affected En#ironmentally Critical "rea /ithin 6 2m
RadiusL None
8.9.9 &istance to nearest EC" Ireater than 6 2m
8.: Compliance *to e chec2ed /ith E("& and PC& files+ Compliant
8.; Numer of #alid complaints
8.;.6 Citi5en and NI3 None
8.;.7 3thers None
IV ENVIRONMENTAL PER#ORMANCE (#OR E<ISTING PROJECTS #OR E<PANSION)
LaC V,o.at,on E0,//,on?E::.uent?
D,/9-ar1e
A02,ent Fu0an
I06a9t
A*0,n/
ECC
Ty6e o:
A*0,n
V,o.at,on
Re0arA/?
Statu/ o:
Co06.,an9e
R"
<>9?
FNone
R"
?7>:
FNone
R"
;?;?
FNone
R"
6:<;
FNone
FMes FE-pansion
/ithout ECC
R"
7@@8
FNone
*To be filled up by EMB personnel)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
"ssessed Hy: NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Noted Hy: NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
E. DORM PLAN #OR NE<T MONITORING PERIOD
The specific actions for the ne-t monitoring period. including carry=o#ers from pre#ious
monitoring periods. should e detailed in this section.
% A/ re;u,re* 2y 9on*,t,on/ /t,6u.ate* ,n t-e ECC %
V. ATTACFMENTS
Please ha#e the follo/ing documents attached:
a+ Laoratory Results of "nalysis from &ENR=E!H recogni5ed laoratory)
+ "ppro#ed (mpact !itigation Plan in the E(S/other E(S 'pdate &ocuments) and
c+ "ppro#ed En#ironmental !onitoring Plan in the E(S/other E(S 'pdate &ocuments
d+ Related data
PREPARED "=: NOTED "=:
CFER=L D$=A . DIGNA LORIA .
Po..ut,on Contro. O::,9er Genera. Mana1er
D. Lor,a Internat,ona. Cor6orat,on D. Lor,a Internat,ona. Cor6orat,on
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
Date Date
%ame
$esignation
Company
$ate