[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]
Table of Content
1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 2. Public policy and Cost Benefit analysis in Public Policy decision ............................... 1 3. Opportunity Cost, Cost Benefit analysis and Public Policy ........................................... 3 3.1. Opportunity Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 3.2. Opportunity cost, cost benefit analysis and Public Policy ............................................. 4 4. Case study about the limitation of public policies without mentioning about Opportunity Cost ..................................................................................................................... 5 4.1. Opportunity Cost and Proposed environment policy Air Pollution Reduce SO2 objective in UK ....................................................................................................................... 5 4.2. Opportunity Cost and Municipal Solid Waste Case Study ............................................ 6 4.3. Opportunity Cost and Policy Evaluation ....................................................................... 8 5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 8 6. Reference .......................................................................................................................... 8
List of Figure
Figure 1: Strategic Management Framework ............................................................................. 2 Figure 2: Production Possibilities Curve ..................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Cost Benefit framework for Municipal Solid Waste ...................................................... 7 1 | P a g e
1. Introduction According to ODA (1988), opportunity cost is defined as the value of goods and services with the usage of producing the other goods and service. Moreover, in the perfectly competitive market, as defined by Perkins (1994), the price of input is the same with supply price which has reflected opportunity cost and this opportunity cost has been defined as the total resources to product input for other goods and services. Hence, opportunity cost is available when there is any choice. In the meantime, public policies have been established with the focus on the choices of individuals and government. Hence, policy decision maker needs to involve opportunity cost into their process of creating new policies. This paper emphasizes on the relationship between opportunity cost and public policies. However, as mentioned in many studies, opportunity cost is involved into public policy indirectly through Cost Benefit analysis which is the tool to choose or make the decision on policies because opportunity cost is one of the most important elements of Cost Benefit analysis. Hence, this paper will be outlined as follow Public policy and Cost Benefit analysis in Public Policy decision Opportunity Cost, Cost Benefit analysis and Public Policy decision Case study about the limitation of public policies without mentioning about Opportunity Cost 2. Public policy and Cost Benefit analysis in Public Policy decision With the appearance in the mid-1960s, public policy is considered the subfield of political science and the decisions and actions which have been implemented by government to deal with some public concerns (Cochran and Malone, 2005). There are many studies analyzing Cost Benefit analysis. As defined by Pearce (1983), Cost Benefit analysis is the process in which there is the measurement of gains and losses to individuals as well as to society. Moreover, Board et al (2006), Cost Benefit analysis is considered the method of accessing policy to find out the monetary terms as well as all consequences which have been influenced to all members of society. In short, Cost Benefit analysis is used to make the analysis of many choices for making the decision. Moreover, it is the tool which has been to determine the value of the project, program and policy. Cost benefit analysis and public value 2 | P a g e
The goal of public policy has been debated by many scholars and public decision makers. As mentioned by Moore (1995), the goal of public policy is to create public value which has been achieved when the policy has implemented three tests, for example, firstly, the policy need to be valuable for all members of society such as institutions, clients and others; secondly, its result is to create the sustainability of politics and lastly, the policy need to be implemented operationally and administratively (Moore, 1995) (Figure 1, p. 2) Figure 1: Strategic Management Framework
Source: Moore (1995) With the purpose of achieving the sustainable value of the policy, Cost Benefit analysis is considered the analytical tool which has been used. Even though Cost Benefit analysis has not been able to find out all kinds of public value (Kelly et al, 2002, p. 32), this method can help policy decision maker recognize the value of public policies (Moore, 1995). Moreover, the key steps of Cost Benefit analysis have shown the importance of this tool to the decision process. According to Hills and Sullivan (2006), the process of Cost Benefit analysis comprises 8 steps such as determining scope and objectives, finding out the constraints, clarifying the alternatives, identifying costs and benefits, evaluating costs and benefits, sensitivity for uncertainty, considering some issues relating to cost and benefits, and lastly, reporting. The importance of Cost Benefit analysis in the process of decision making has been defined through most of countries all over the world having their specific guidelines relating to the implement of regulatory impact analysis in which Cost Benefit analysis is considered the factor playing the important role (Kitchen, 2010) 3 | P a g e
3. Opportunity Cost, Cost Benefit analysis and Public Policy 3.1. Opportunity Cost Opportunity cost is the kind of cost which always exists when having any choice and defined in many studies. However, there are two kinds of opportunity cost in the analysis of economy such as the opportunity cost on utilizing the private resource and the opportunity cost for taking another action. From two branches of the definition of Opportunity cost, there are many different studies mentioning different ways when defining opportunity cost. According to ODA (1988), opportunity cost is defined as the value of goods and services with the usage of producing the other goods and service. Moreover, in the perfectly competitive market, as defined by Perkins (1994), the price of input is the same with supply price which has reflected opportunity cost and this opportunity cost has been defined as the total resources to product input for other goods and services. It means that the opportunity cost is equal the value of goods and services which are foregone. For example, when you decide to take the learning course, the cost of this course comprise not only the fee of tuition and other fee but also the forgone salary. In society, people have faced many choices hence the cost of pursing this choice is the foregone result of the other choice. In aspect of government programs, the opportunity cost has been determined through the most valuable alternative one. There are two kinds of tradeoff which society has faced such as the tradeoff between national defense and social goods, the tradeoff between environment and income. In the first tradeoff, for the fixed amount of money, government can use it for military or social goods with the same amount. However, government cannot use this amount of money to buy for both. It means that the decision of having more one good is also the decision of having less other kind of goods. The second tradeoff which society faces is the tradeoff between cleaner environment and higher salary. It means that with the purpose of having cleaner environment, government have implemented more laws with many regulations to reduce pollution level which results in the higher production cost. Even though regulations can make cleaner environment, but increase the operation cost and then, decrease the profit rate which has influence to the wages and salary of employees. Hence, with the target of cleaner environment, there is the tradeoff in decreasing salary and increasing product price offered to customers. 4 | P a g e
3.2. Opportunity cost, cost benefit analysis and Public Policy As mentioned in the process of Cost Benefit analysis, identifying costs and benefits is one of the most important steps of Cost Benefit analysis which is used to make the decision of public policy. For one proposal, there are some typical costs such as initial investment capital, other capital costs for any tangible assets which need to be replaced in the life of the proposal, the cost used for operation and maintenance in the life of the project and the cost which cannot be determined by money terms, called intangible. However, besides these kinds of costs, one other cost which is easily forgotten by economists and policy makers is opportunity cost. Resources can be used for many programs and policies. Hence, they can be implemented for this project, instead of other projects. In practice, opportunity cost is considered the fundamental part of Cost Benefit analysis (Commonwealth of Australia, 2006). As considered as one of the important costs in Cost Benefit analysis which has been used for making the decision on public policy, opportunity cost is also involved into the process of public policy making. Besides involving into Cost Benefit analysis on Public Policy decision, there is the direct relationship between opportunity cost and public policy. Society is considered the group of people with unlimited demands under the limited resources, hence, public policy will determine which one needs to be satisfied and which will be forgotten. For example, there is the tradeoff between national defense and social goods. It means that with the fixed amount of money, when government invests into buying military goods, they will buy social goods. Or in aspect of environment and economy, when some regulations are applied to reduce the amount of pollution, organizational profit will be decreased because operation cost, including environment cost, increases. Hence, income and other related economic criteria will be influenced in the negative way. In detail of involving opportunity cost into the process of making the decision on public policy, the example of national defense and social welfare has been taken to analyze through Production Possibilities Curve. As shown in Figure 2 (p. 5), for example, the economy stands at the point of A and there are two kinds of idea, one wants to pull A to B to invest more into national defense while the other wants to pull to C with the higher production of social goods. It means that society wants to move to Point D and has higher demand with the limitation of good. However, there is no solution to have more social goods without reducing national defense or vice serve. If government makes the decision to move from A to B, society is at the expense of creating less amount of social welfare. Or if government wants to move from A to C, it cannot satisfy the higher level of national defense. 5 | P a g e
Figure 2: Production Possibilities Curve
Source: Rittenberg and Tregarthen (Chapter 2) 4. Case study about the limitation of public policies without mentioning about Opportunity Cost 4.1. Opportunity Cost and Proposed environment policy Air Pollution Reduce SO2 objective in UK This case study has implemented the appraisal of new SO2 air quality objective in UK. This project needs to implement two objectives such as the assessment of the minimum cost method to meet the requirements of NAQS which is National Air Quality Strategy and the assessment of SO2 deduction. To handle these two objectives, Cost Benefit analysis has been 6 | P a g e
handled (European Commission, 1999, p. 113). This project has been implemented through 8 steps basing on the process of Cost Benefit analysis. Mentioning about the comprehensive Cost Benefit analysis, from the cost side, there are some kinds of cost which have been analyzed and calculated such as foreseeable direct and indirect or secondary effects. From this analysis, the net social value of meeting the requirements of NAQS has been remained positive. However, this value has not be compared with alternative policies relating to the reduction of SO2 in UK such as road safety, handling research on cancer, education course on health, making laws and regulations relating to SO2 limitation, etc. It means that there is no opportunity cost between air pollution policy and other policies relating to health safety. Hence, it is difficult to know whether implementing air pollution policy will bring better result than other policies on health safety 4.2. Opportunity Cost and Municipal Solid Waste Case Study Through applying Cost Benefit analysis under the management system on Municipal Solid Waste, the Commission has implemented its aim in this project as the assessment of some kinds of costs such as environment cost and economic costs in the different ways. After implementing Cost Benefit analysis, this framework of cost and benefit for this project has been shown and summarized in the Figure 3 (European Commission, 1999, p. 159). With the full Cost Benefit Analysis shown in the above figure, there is no mention about the potential impacts which this project has been caused in the implementing process. Hence, it is difficult to determine what are opportunity costs to apply one management system or to change to other system. 7 | P a g e
Figure 3: Cost Benefit framework for Municipal Solid Waste
Source: European Commission (1999, p. 159) 8 | P a g e
4.3. Opportunity Cost and Policy Evaluation As mentioned above, there are two ways which opportunity cost appears. Firstly, opportunity cost is considered the result on using individual resources defined as the inputs of policies and proposals. Secondly, opportunity cost will be lower if one policy has been implemented at the higher level (European Commission, 1999, p. 159, 153). In aspect of economic policy, European Commission stated that it is necessary to involve opportunity cost which has been associated with the usage of particular resources from economic appraisal (Smith, 1999). When facing many choices, to make the best public policy, government needs to consider and evaluate each option to decide which must be satisfied and unsatisfied. 5. Conclusion It is necessary to involve opportunity cost into public policies, especially economic and environmental policies. This paper has analyzed the relationship between opportunity cost and public policies through the intermediate called Cost Benefit analysis as well as found out some case study mentioning the limitation of public policies without mentioning about Opportunity Cost. 6. Reference Overseas Development Administration (1988): Appraisal of Projects in Developing Countries. A Guide for Economists, London, HMSO. Cochran, C.L.and Malone, E.F. (2005). Public Policy: Perspectives and Choices. 3 RD Edition. USA: 1800 30th Street, Ste. 314 Boulder, CO 80301 Jacob, K, Hertin, J, Hjerp, P, Radaelli, C, Meuwese, A, Wolf, O, Pacchi, C & Rennings, K (2008). Improving the practice of impact assessment, Evaluating Integrated Impact Assessments, Project No. 028889, 6th Framework Program. Available at: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/ffu/evia/EVIA_Policy_Paper.pdf Boardman, AE, Greenberg, DH, Vining, AR & Weimer, DL (2006). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concept and practice, 3rd edn, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Moore, M.H. (1994). Public value as the focus of strategy, Australian Journal of Public Administration. 53(3), p. 296-303. 9 | P a g e
Kelly, G, Mulgan, G & Muers, S (2002). Creating Public Value. An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. Discussion paper, The Strategy Unit, UK Cabinet Office Hills, D & Sullivan, F (2006). Measuring public value 2 practical approaches. The Work Foundation, London. European Commission (1999). Induced and Opportunity Cost and Benefit Patterns in the Context of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Field of Environment. Risk & Policy Analysts Limited. UK: Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Road, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT Rittenberg, L. and Tregarthen, T. (2014). Principles of Macroeconomics. Available at: http://catalog.flatworldknowledge.com/bookhub/23?e=rittenmacro- ch02_s03#rittenmacro-ch02 (Accessed on 19 October, 2014)