Effect of steam curing cycles on strength and durability of SCC: A case

study in precast concrete

A.A. Ramezanianpour, M.H. Khazali

, P. Vosoughi
Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Concrete Technology and Durability Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
h i g h l i g h t s
Effects of 36 steam curing regimes on the compressive strength of SCC were studied.
Permeability of steam-cured concrete was investigated.
An optimum steam curing cycle was introduced.
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 25 July 2013
Received in revised form 20 August 2013
Accepted 27 August 2013
Available online 27 September 2013
Keywords:
Steam curing
Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC)
Compressive strength
Surface resistivity
Capillary absorption
Energy consumption
a b s t r a c t
Use of Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) in pre-cast concrete plants is growing rapidly due to its benets
such as reduction in labor and equipment costs, increasing productivity, providing exibility in lling
highly reinforced sections and complex formworks, lowering the noise on job site and having superior
surface quality. Also, considering the critical importance of production time in precast plants, acceler-
ated curing is considered as an inevitable part of precast concrete elements production.
In this study the effects of thirty-six different steam-curing regimes on the compressive strength and
permeability of a self-compacting concrete mixture, used in precast concrete elements of Sadr elevated
highway was investigated. Compressive strength measurements indicated that in a constant total time,
increase in precuring period leads to lower immediate compressive strength. On the other hand, increase
in treatment temperature and total cycle time (which means higher energy and time consumption) led to
higher immediate compressive strength. Furthermore, durability tests results demonstrated that applica-
tion of cycles with maximum temperature of 70 C imposes negative effect on durability properties of ref-
erence SCC, such as surface resistivity and capillary absorption. Finally, on the basis of three criteria
(compressive strength, permeability and energy consumption by steam curing cycle), an optimum steam
curing cycle was introduced and utilized in the precast concrete plant.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Self-Consolidating Concrete (SCC) has some advantages over
conventional concrete making it suitable for use in pre-cast/pre-
stressed concrete plants. These advantages include high workabil-
ity (making it possible to omit vibration), reduction of labor costs,
making feasible to develop more automated plants, and often pos-
sessing higher strength and durability properties. Three essential
characteristics of fresh SCC are lling ability, passing ability, and
segregation resistance which make it an ideal choice for use in ele-
ments with dense reinforcement or complex geometry [14].
There are some reasons such as limitation of formworks, facili-
ties, storage area, and time which encourage precast concrete
plants to obtain high early strength, to speed up the stripping of
forms, and to shorten the curing period [5]. Special techniques
are available to this aim including: (I) Using special cements with
high early strength such as ne or high alumina ones (II) Utilizing
suitable chemical additives (III) Use of accelerated curing (includ-
ing increased temperature and humidity).
According to economy, availability, and long-term performance
of special materials, the most common method is accelerated cur-
ing by means of increased temperature and humidity. Various
methods have been used including steam curing at atmospheric
pressure (temperature less than 100 C), steam curing at high pres-
sure (autoclaving), electrical heating of reinforcement, imposing
electrical current to concrete directly, and microwave heating.
Among these, steam curing at low pressure is most common, espe-
cially for large precast units. A typical steam-curing cycle consists
of a precuring (delay) period after surface nishing, a heating and
cooling rate of 1144 C/h, and a treatment period with constant
temperature for 618 h. Maximum treatment temperature in
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.040

Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +98 21 64543074.

E-mail address: khazali@aut.ac.ir (M.H. Khazali).
Construction and Building Materials 49 (2013) 807813
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Construction and Building Materials
j our nal homepage: www. el sevi er . com/ l ocat e/ conbui l dmat
steam curing is usually limited to 6090 C [610]. The minimum
early compressive strength of concrete, the most important factor
for demolding of concrete elements, is suggested about 25 MPa for
the most cases. Also, the ultimate strength of concrete in plants is
commonly considered to be more than 50 MPa [9,10]. Some of
common formworks of segments utilized in precast concrete pla-
net of Sadr elevated highway are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Generally, the maximum total duration of the steam curing
cycle in a plant is limited to 18 h, since the production is carried
out 24-h and enough time should be available to prepare the form-
work and the arrangement of the reinforcements to continue the
daily production procedure. Besides, it is already shown that
continuing a denite steam curing regime for longer hours can lead
to detrimental changes in porosity and pore size distribution of
concrete [11].
Nowadays, durability of concrete structures is widely believed
to be major concern and much research work is carried out on this
issue. Mehta and Gerwick [12] investigated the San Mateo bridge
over San Francisco bay after being exposed for 17 years in the envi-
ronment; the bridge is comprised of both steam-cured and moist-
cured concrete beams with the same mixture proportions and
materials. The study demonstrated that steam-cured beams had
to be repaired according to corrosion damage, while moist-cured
beams showed no signs of deterioration. Other studies [13,14]
illustrated that accelerated curing by excessively increased tem-
perature leads to porous concrete with coarse and continuous pore
structure, and heterogeneous distribution of hydration products.
Consequently, it increases the permeability of concrete against
aggressive ions such as chlorides or sulfates, and decreases the
strength of concrete. Moreover, it can cause initial decomposing
of ettringite in fresh concrete, which can recreate Delayed Ettring-
ite Formation (DEF) in hardened concrete and produce destructive
expansion [1518].
To the authors knowledge, limited research work is carried out
on the effects of steam curing on the durability of SCC. Bingl and
Tohumcu [19] compared the compressive strength of SCC mixtures
cured in the standard situation, by air, and by exposure to steam;
the results demonstrated that concrete cured in air had the lowest
strength, and the optimum temperature of steam curing is 70 C.
Moreover, Reinhardt and Stegmaier [20] studied the pore size dis-
tribution of steam cured SCC; it made clear that higher maximum
temperature leads to coarser pores, and the changes are correlated
to (w/c)
eq
.
The object of this study is to investigate the effects of steamcur-
ing on the properties of limestone incorporated SCC, which is used
in a precast plant in Tehran, Iran. For this purpose, compressive
strength and permeability (in terms of surface resistivity and cap-
illary absorption) of the reference SCC mixture were investigated
after exposure to 36 different steam curing cycles. Three main
parameters were selected as variables:
(1) Maximum temperature of treatment (50, 60, and 70 C).
(2) Total time of steam curing, which is desired to be at the min-
imum value, while achieving the required compressive
strength (8, 10, 12, and 14 h).
(3) Delay period before commencing the steam curing (1, 2, and
3 h).
Also, it is to be mentioned that two main constraints were im-
posed by the design and project management team, and were con-
sidered in this experimental study:
(1) A minimum of 24 MPa was required for demolding of pre-
cast concrete elements.
(2) A maximum steam curing duration of 14 h was allowed.
(3) Finally, on the basis of three criteria (compressive strength,
permeability and energy consumption by steam curing
cycle), an optimum steam curing cycle was introduced and
utilized in the precast concrete plant.
2. Experimental program
2.1. Materials
The cement used was ASTM C150/C150M-11 [21] Type II Portland cement.
Limestone powder was also used as ller. The chemical composition and physical
characteristics of Portland cement and limestone ller are listed in Table 1.
Natural sand and crushed gravel were used as aggregates. The coarse aggregates
had nominal maximum size of 19 mm, specic gravity of 2.6 gr/cm
3
, and water
absorption of 1.5%. The ne aggregates had specic gravity of 2.3 gr/cm
3
, absorption
of 2.7%, and neness modulus of 3.6. The high neness modulus indicates the low
content of nes in the ne aggregates. Therefore, it was decided to add limestone
ller (150 kg/m
3
) with a maximum particle size of 0.15 mm to compensate for
the lack of ne particles in the local river sand and also to improve the mixture rhe-
ological characteristics [22,23]. The specic gravity of the limestone ller was
2.48 gr/cm
3
. The sieve analyses of ne, coarse and nal mixture of aggregates used
in the concrete are listed in Table 2.
Moreover, a polycarboxylate-ether type High-Range Water Reducer Admixture
(HRWRA) with a specic gravity of 1.1 gr/cm
3
and solids content of 47% was con-
sumed to achieve the required workability for the mixtures.
2.2. Mixture proportions
The mix proportions were selected exactly the same as the reference SCC mix-
ture which was used in the precast concrete plant. These proportions were already
selected based on a comprehensive study of local materials and evaluation of a var-
ious number of mixtures regarding fresh and hardened properties. The mix propor-
tions and properties of the reference SCC mixture are listed in Tables 3 and 4,
respectively.
In order to study the effects of different steam curing cycles, 36 batches were
prepared according to the reference SCC mix proportions. In order to control the
variations and provide the maximum similarity between mixes, slump ow diam-
eter and 28-day compressive strength of water cured specimens were measured
each time. In order to consider a mixture as acceptable, 28-day compressive
strength of control specimens had to be in the range of 5% of reference SCC mix-
ture (59 MPa). Furthermore, slump ow diameter had to be in the range of 680
700 mm while HRWRA dosage was maintained between 0.75 to 0.85 percentages
of cement mass. If either condition was not satised for a mixture, it was considered
as rejected and another batch was prepared and tested.
Fig. 1. Precast concrete element made with self-compacting concrete for Sadr elevated highway, Tehran, Iran.
808 A.A. Ramezanianpour et al. / Construction and Building Materials 49 (2013) 807813
The SCC mixtures were produced in a horizontal pan mixer with 100 l capacity.
A specic mixing sequence was applied for all mixtures; which consisted of dry
mixing the coarse and ne aggregates, limestone ller and Portland cement for
1 min. Then the whole water was added to the dry mixture and mixed for 2 min.
Finally, the HRWRA was introduced to the mixture and mixed for another 2 min.
After testing the fresh mixture for being self-compactible, cylinder and cube spec-
imens were cast without using any vibration.
2.3. Steam curing regimes
In order to study the effects of different steam curing cycles on the hardened
properties of reference SCC mixture, three parameters were selected as variables:
(1) Precuring (delay) period.
(2) Peak temperature.
(3) Total time of steam curing.
Considering the precast factory limitations, values were assigned to the param-
eters and 36 different steam curing regimes were designed (see Table 5). Precuring
temperature was kept constant at 20 C, while any temperature variation (heating
and cooling) occurred during constant period of 2 h.
It is common knowledge that decreasing the steam curing duration is highly de-
sired in the large scale production of precast elements, since it leads to lower produc-
tion cost and also higher productivity. In this study, a maximum allowable steam
curing duration of 14 h was imposed by precast plant project management team.
In addition, Energy Index was dened as the multiply of time by extra tem-
perature (above ambient temperature which was considered 20 C) during each
steam curing regime. This was used as an indicator of the energy consumption by
each cycle.
High-accuracy automatic climate simulators were used to impose various
steam curing cycles on SCC specimens (see Fig. 2). The devices are capable of con-
trolling both humidity and temperature in the range of 20 C to +120 C with
high accuracy. Also, the results ofactual humidity and temperature values during
the steam curing cycle are reported in MS-Excel format.
2.4. Tests procedures
100 100 100 mm cubic specimens were tested for compressive strength
immediately after steam curing cycle and at the ages of 7 and 28 days. Furthermore,
maturity index (ASTM C1074 [24]) was utilized to study the effect of temperature
time history on compressive strength of steam cured specimens. This value was cal-
culated using:
Table 1
Materials properties.
Chemical composition (%) Cement Limestone ller
CaO 62.08 50.17
SiO
2
21.10 3.12
Al
2
O
3
4.18 1.19
Fe
2
O
3
3.34 0.53
MgO 3.79 3.46
SO
3
2.84 0.20
K
2
O 0.69 0.25
Na
2
O 0.14
(Na
2
O)
eq
0.59
Loss on ignition (%) 3.12 40.31
Physical properties
Specic gravity (gr/cm
3
) 3.17 2.48
Blaine (cm
2
/g) 3519
Table 2
Sieve analysis of aggregates (cumulative percentage passing).
Sieve size (mm) River sand Gravel Aggregate mixture
19 100.0 100 100
12.5 100.0 62.6 89.3
9.5 100.0 38.3 82.4
4.75 92.8 1.1 67.1
2.38 63.6 0.4 47.9
1.19 40.6 0 32.8
0.6 26.3 0 22.9
0.3 13.3 0 13.6
0.15 4.0 0 6.5
Table 4
Properties of reference SCC mixture.
Fresh properties Hardened properties (water cured specimens)
Wet density (kg/m
3
) 2370 Slump ow at 45 min (mm) 550 1-Day compressive strength (MPa) 17
Slump ow-Avg. of two diameters (mm) 690 U-box (mm) 10 3-Day compressive strength(MPa) 35
T50 (s) 2.5 J-ring (h2h1) (mm) 5 7-Day compressive strength(MPa) 48
V-funnel (s) 9 L-box (%) 0.85 28-Day compressive strength(MPa) 59
V-funnel at 15
min
(s) 14
Table 5
Steam curing regimes.
No. Curing
regime ID
Precuring
period (h)
Peak
temp. (C)
Total time
of steam
curing (h)
Energy index
(min C)
CTL
1 T50-1-8 1 50 8 180
2 T50-1-10 50 10 240
3 T50-1-12 50 12 300
4 T50-1-14 50 14 360
5 T50-2-8 2 50 8 180
6 T50-2-10 50 10 240
7 T50-2-12 50 12 300
8 T50-2-14 50 14 360
9 T50-3-8 3 50 8 180
10 T50-3-10 50 10 240
11 T50-3-12 50 12 300
12 T50-3-14 50 14 360
13 T60-1-8 1 60 8 240
14 T60-1 -10 60 10 320
15 T60-1-12 60 12 400
16 T60-1-14 60 14 480
17 T60-2-8 2 60 8 240
18 T60-2-10 60 10 320
19 T60-2-12 60 12 400
20 T60-2-14 60 14 480
21 T60-3-8 3 60 8 240
22 T60-3-10 60 10 320
23 T60-3-12 60 12 400
24 T60-3-14 60 14 480
25 T70-1-8 1 70 8 300
26 T70-1-10 70 10 400
27 T70-1-12 70 12 500
28 T70-1-14 70 14 600
29 T70-2-8 2 70 8 300
30 T70-2-10 70 10 400
31 T70-2-12 70 12 500
32 T70-2-14 70 14 600
33 T70-3-8 3 70 8 300
34 T70-3-10 70 10 400
35 T70-3-12 70 12 500
36 T70-3-14 70 14 600
Table 3
Mix proportions of reference SCC mixture.
Constituent Quantity
Cement (kg/m
3
) 400
Filler (kg/m
3
) 150
Sand (kg/m
3
) 921
Gravel (kg/m
3
) 714
Water (kg/m
3
) 156
w/c 0.39
HRWRA
a
(%) 0.8
a
Superplasticizer percentage is presented by Portland cement mass.
A.A. Ramezanianpour et al. / Construction and Building Materials 49 (2013) 807813 809
Mt
X
t
0
T
a
T
0
Dt 1
where M(t) is the temperaturetime factor at age (t), degree-days or degree-hour; Dt
is a time interval, days or hours; T
a
is average concrete temperature during time
interval, C; T
0
is datum temperature, C. It is commonly assumed equal to 10 C
[24].
Capillary absorption was carried out at 28 days age. The capillary absorption
rate of specimens were calculated using their weight after 48 h being in 110 C as
initial weight, and the measured weight after 72 h of being partly in contact with
the water (on side exposed to water at 5 mm depth) [25].
Electrical resistivity is one of the intrinsic specications of concrete which can
be related to its permeability. In 1915, Wenner [26] presented a practical method to
measure the earth electrical surface resistivity by means of a four probes apparatus
which for the rst time, has been standardized to use on concrete in 2004 [27].
Since it is a non-destructive, rapid, low-cost, and reliable method, it is a wide-ac-
cepted technique to investigate durability properties of concrete. Electrical resistiv-
ity refers to the resistance that any electrical charge experiences while passing
through the concrete. The increased electrical resistivity of concrete impedes the
movement of electrons from the anodic to the cathode regions, and consequently
delays the propagation of the corrosion process[28]. As presented in Table 6, FM
5-578 test method [27] denes chloride ion permeability ratings according to the
surface resistivity test results.
The electrical resistivity meter (Fig. 3) was used to measure the surface resistiv-
ity of specimens at the ages of 1, 7, and 28 days age. Three saturated 100 200 mm
cylinders were tested at each age. The test was carried out by the four-point Wen-
ner array probe technique [29].
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Compressive strength and maturity index
The compressive strength test was conducted on 100 mm cube
specimens immediately after steam curing and at the ages of 7 and
28 days. The results are presented in Figs. 46.
As observed in Fig. 4, increase in precuring period has led to
lower immediate compressive strength values. For instance, con-
sidering the total cycle time of 8 h, 2 h increase in delay time has
brought about 5 MPa decrease in immediate strength of reference
SCC mixture. Furthermore, as expected, increase in temperature
and total cycle time (which means higher energy and time con-
sumption) led to higher immediate compressive strength. This is
due to the accelerated hydration reactions and rapid formation of
CalciumSilicaHydrate, CSH gel, the most important bind
phase in hardened concrete [30] in the presence of moisture and
high temperature.
Also, the average ratio of initial compressive strength to 28-day
compressive strength is calculated as 39%, 46% and 53% at the max-
imum temperatures of 50 C, 60 C and 70 C, respectively. By tak-
ing 28-day results into account, it proves that increasing the
maximum cycle temperature has negative effect on compressive
strength of concrete at later ages, while it improves the immediate
strength after curing.
Figs. 5 and 6 illustrate the strength measurements for the spec-
imens exposed to cycles with maximum temperatures of 60 C and
70 C, respectively. The same immediate strength pattern as for
50 C cycles is observed for these cycles, too. Considering the
strength development until the 7 days age, it is observed that in-
crease in total cycle time reduces the strength development during
Fig. 2. Automatic climate simulator devices used for steam curing of specimens.
Table 6
Permeability classes based on surface resistivity by FM 5-578[27].
Chloride ion permeability Surface resistivity (kXcm)
High <12
Moderate 1221
Low 2137
Very low 37254
Negligible >254
Fig. 3. Electrical resistivity meter.
Fig. 4. Relative compressive strength values ofthe cycles with 50 Cpeak temper-
ature (Mean values are presented in MPa).
810 A.A. Ramezanianpour et al. / Construction and Building Materials 49 (2013) 807813
this period. On the other hand, strength development from 7 to
28 days of age is approximately the same for different cycles.
Among all 36 steam curing cycles, T70-2-14 led to the highest
immediate compressive strength (36 MPa), while maximum 28-
day compressive strength was measured for SCC specimens which
were exposed to T603-10 cycle (approximately 64 MPa).
Considering the obtained results and the fact that a minimumof
24 MPa was required for demolding of precast concrete elements,
it was decided not to carry out the durability tests on specimens
which were exposed to cycles with total duration of 8 h. In fact,
the strength measurements demonstrated that none of these cy-
cles developed the requiredminimum strength after exposure to
steam curing.
Maturity index was proposed earlier as a technique to account
for combined effect of time and temperature on the compressive
strength of concrete [31,32]. Although some modied methods
are presented to increase accuracy and reliability of this method
for various types of concrete [33,34], using the basic equation ex-
plained in ASTM C1074 [24]seems to be more reliable. Based on
the data presented in Fig. 7, it can be observed that logarithmic
relations with high R
2
values rule the data. However, constant
parameters (A and B) based on Eq. (2) presented in Table 7 show
that using a specied equation for each maximum temperature
of curing is more appropriate with higher correlation coefcient
(R
2
).
Compressive Strength A lnMaturity Index B 2
3.2. Surface resistivity
The effect of different steam curing cycles on surface resistivity
is illustrated in Figs. 810. Considering the values measured
shortly after steam curing (1-day results) at 50 C, it seems that to-
tal cycle period has minor effect on the resistivity value, since a
maximum 7% variation is measured between cycles of the same
delay time. At higher temperatures, immediate resistivity is more
sensitive to total cycle time variations. For example, as observed
in Fig. 10, at the constant delay time of 3 h and peak temperature
of 70 C, a 4-h increase in total cycle period has improved the resis-
tivity value by 33%. It is also observed that the highest immediate
resistivity value is achieved by exposure to T70-2-14 cycle, which
has the highest energy index (600 min C) among 36 designed
steam curing cycles.
Considering the fact that all the specimens are exposed to steam
curing cycles at early ages, the 28-day resistivity measurements
could be considered as the appropriate criteria for durability
assessment of reference SCC. Accordingly, it can be inferred that
T60-3-10 is the optimum cycle regarding electrical resistivity
Fig. 5. Relative compressive strength values ofthe cycles with 60 Cpeak temper-
ature (mean values are presented in MPa).
Fig. 6. Relative compressive strength values ofthe cycles with 70 C peak temper-
ature (Mean values are presented in MPa).
Fig. 7. Results of compressive strength versus maturity index after accomplishment
of steam curing.
Table 7
Relationship between maturity index and compressive strength.
A B R2
Total data 174 866 0.77
Max. temp. 50 144 699 0.88
Max. temp. 60 155 740 0.88
Max. temp. 70 172 823 0.91
Fig. 8. Inuence of steam curing regimes on surface resistivity (peak
temperature = 50 C).
A.A. Ramezanianpour et al. / Construction and Building Materials 49 (2013) 807813 811
of reference SCC. The test result for SCC specimens which were ex-
posed to this curing cycle is measured 15.5 kXcm, which is rated
as moderate based on the chloride ion permeability classes
dened by FM 5-578 [27].
Also, an average28-day electrical resistivity of 12.2 kXcm is
calculated for 50 C cycles (Fig. 8), while the average values of
11.9 kXcm and 11.6 kXcm are measured for 60 C and 70 C cy-
cles, respectively. Therefore, it is concluded that increasing the
maximum steam curing temperature does not have any positive
effect on surface resistivity of reference SCC; even a minor decrease
should be expected.
3.3. Capillary absorption
Capillary absorption test was carried out at the age of 28 days.
The test results are presented in Figs. 1113.
It is observed that at a constant peak temperature and curing
period, highest absorption values were measured for specimens
exposed to cycles with 1hour delay time. Furthermore, at the three
peak temperatures the highest absorption values were recorded for
14-h long cycles, which prove the negative effect of exposure to
these cycles on capillary absorption of reference SCC.
Also, an average absorption percentage of 6.4 is calculated for
50 C cycles, while the average value of 5.5% is measured for both
60 C and 70 C steam curing cycles. It proves that increase in max-
imum cycle temperature from 60 C to 70 C does not improve the
impermeability of reference SCC regarding capillary pores. This
nding is of high importance regarding the high energy cost, which
plays a crucial role in decision making in large scale precast plants.
Accordingly, T60-3-10 could be introduced as an optimum steam
curing regime, regarding both capillary absorption (4.3%) and
energy consumption.
4. Conclusions
In this study the effects of steam curing on compressive
strength and permeability of ller-type SCC were investigated.
Also, energy consumption was considered as a selection basis
among various steam curing cycles. The major conclusions are as
follows:
Fig. 9. Inuence of steam curing regimes on surface resistivity (peak
temperature = 60 C).
Fig. 10. Inuence of steam curing regimes on surface resistivity (peak
temperature = 70 C).
Fig. 11. Capillary absorption percentages of steam curing cycles with peak
temperature of 50 C.
Fig. 12. Capillary absorption percentages of steam curing cycles with peak
temperature of 60 C.
Fig. 13. Capillary absorption percentages of steam curing cycles with peak
temperature of 70 C.
812 A.A. Ramezanianpour et al. / Construction and Building Materials 49 (2013) 807813
1. Compressive strength measurements indicated that increase in
precuring period leads to lower immediate compressive
strength values. For instance, considering the total curing cycle
of 8 h, 2 h increase in delay time has brought about 5 MPa
decrease in immediate compressive strength of reference SCC
mixture.
2. Increase in temperature and total cycle time (which means
higher energy and time consumption) led to higher immediate
compressive strength. This could be due to the accelerated
hydration reactions and rapid formation of CalciumSilica
Hydrate(CSH gel).
3. An average electrical resistivity of 12.2 kXcm is calculated for
50 C cycles, while the average values of 11.9 kXcm and
11.6 kXcm are measured for 60 C and 70 C cycles, respec-
tively. It proves that increasing the maximum steam curing
temperature does not have any positive effect on surface resis-
tivity of reference SCC; even a minor decrease should be
expected.
4. Capillary absorption test results indicated that at the three peak
temperatures the highest absorption values were recorded for
14-h long cycles, which prove the negative effect of exposure
to these cycles on capillary absorption of reference SCC.
5. Durability tests results demonstrated that application of cycles
with maximum temperature of 70 C could have negative effect
on durability of reference SCC. This could be due to rapid forma-
tion of CSH gel and CH crystalline which results in a hetero-
geneous and coarser pores structure.
6. Considering the three factors of compressive strength, perme-
ability (in terms of surface resistivity and capillary absorption)
and energy consumption by steam curing regime, T60-3-10
was introduced as an optimum steam curing cycle and was
applied to precast concrete elements for Sadr elevated highway.
References
[1] Skarendahl A, Petersson O. Self-compacting concrete, state-of-the-art report of
RILEM Technical Committee 174-SCC. Bagneux: RILEM Publications SARL;
2000.
[2] Amura HO, Ouchi M. Self-compacting concrete: development, present useand
future. In: PRO 7: 1st international RILEM symposium on self-compacting,
concrete, 3.
[3] PCI Interim SCC Guidelines Fast Team. Interim guidelines for the use of self-
consolidating concrete in precast/prestressed concrete institute member
plants. Chicago, USA: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute; 2003.
[4] ACI Committee 237. Self-consolidating concrete (ACI 237R-07), Farmington
Hills, USA: American Concrete Institute; 2007.
[5] Higginson EC. Effect of steam curing on the important properties of concrete.
ACI J Proc 1961.
[6] Shideler J, Chamberlin WH. Early strength of concrete as affected by steam
curing temperatures. ACI J Proc 1942.
[7] ACI Committee 517. Accelerated curing of concrete at atmospheric pressure
(ACI 517.2R-87-revised 1992), Farmington Hills, USA: American Concrete
Institute; 1992.
[8] CSA. Precast concreteMaterials and construction (CSA A23.4). Rexburg, ON,
Canada: Canadian Standards Association; 2005.
[9] Hanson J. Optimum steam curing procedure in precasting plants. ACI J Proc
1963.
[10] Hwang SD, Khatib R, Lee HK, Khayat K. Optimization of steam-curing regime
for high-strength, self-consolidating concrete for precast, prestressed concrete
applications. PCI J 2012;57:4861.
[11] Ba MF, Qian Ch, Guo X, Han X. Effects of steam curing on strength and porous
structure of concrete with low water/binder ratio. Constr Build Mater
2011;25:1238.
[12] Mehta PK, Gerwick B. Cracking-corrosion interaction in concrete exposed to
marine environment. Concr Int: Des Constr 1982;4:4551.
[13] Lothenbach B, Winnefeld F, Alder C, Wieland E, Lunk P. Effect of temperature
on the pore solution, microstructure and hydration products of Portland
cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 2007;37:48391.
[14] Cao Y, Detwiler RJ. Backscattered electron imaging of cement pastes cured at
elevated temperatures. Cem Concr Res 1995;25:62738.
[15] Hime W, Marusin S. Delayed ettringite formation: many questions and some
answers, vol. 177. ACI Special Publication; 1999. p. 199206.
[16] Skalny J, Locher F. Curing practices and internal sulfate attack-the european
experience. Cem Concr Aggreg 1999;21:5963.
[17] Taylor H, Famy C, Scrivener KL. Delayed ettringite formation. Cem Concr Res
2001;31:68393.
[18] Diamond S. Delayed ettringite formationProcesses and problems. Cem Concr
Compos 1996;18:20515.
[19] FerhatBingl A, Tohumcu
_
I. Effects of different curing regimes on the
compressive strength properties of self compacting concrete incorporating
y ash and silica fume. Mater Des 2013;51:128.
[20] Reinhardt HW, Stegmaier M. Inuence of heat curing on the pore structure and
compressive strength of self-compacting concrete (SCC). Cem Concr Res
2006;36:87985.
[21] ASTM. ASTM C150/C150M-11: standard specication for portland cement;
2011.
[22] Georgiadis A, Sideris KK, Anagnostopoulos NS . Properties of SCC produced
with limestone ller or viscosity modifying admixrure. J Mater Civil Eng
2010;22:35260 .
[23] Trkel S, Kandemir A. Fresh and hardened properties of SCC made with
different aggregate and mineral admixtures. J Mater Civil Eng
2010;22:102532.
[24] ASTM C1074. Standard practice for estimating concrete strength by the
maturity method; 2011.
[25] Ramezanianpour AA, Kazemian A, Nikravan M, Mahpur A, Moghadam MA.
Inuence of a low-activity slag and silica fume on the fresh properties and
durability of high performance self-consolidating concrete. In: Presented at
the international conference on sustainable construction materials &
technologies (SCMT3), Kyoto, Japan; 2013.
[26] Wenner F. A method of measuring earth resistivity of Bulletin of the Bureau of
Standards, vol. 12(4). Govt. Print. Off; 1916.
[27] FDOT, (2004) FM 5-578: Florida Method of Test for Concrete Resistivity as an
Electrical Indicator of its Permeability, ed. Florida, USA.
[28] Ramezanianpour AA, Ghiasvand E, Nickseresht I, Mahdikhani M, Moodi F.
Inuence of various amounts of limestone powder on performance of Portland
limestone cement concretes. Cem Concr Compos 2009;31:71520.
[29] Ramezanianpour AA, Kazemian A, Sarvari M, Ahmadi B. Use of natural zeolite
to produce self-consolidating concrete with low portland cement content and
high durability. J Mater Civ Eng 2012;25(5):58996.
[30] Richardson IG. Tobermorite/jenniteand tobermorite/calcium hydroxide-based
models for the structure of CSH: applicability to hardened pastes of
tricalcium silicate, b-dicalcium silicate, Portland cement, and blends of
Portland cement with blast-furnace slag, metakaolin, or silica fume. Cem
Concr Res 2004;34:173377.
[31] Nurse R. Steam curing of concrete. Magaz Concr Res 1949;1:7988.
[32] Saul A. Principles underlying the steam curing of concrete at atmospheric
pressure. Magaz Concr Res 1951;2:12740.
[33] Plowman J. Maturity and the strength of concrete. Magaz Concr Res
1956;8:1322.
[34] Zhang J, Cussona D, Monteiro P, Harvey J. New perspectives on maturity
method and approach for high performance concrete applications. Cem Concr
Res 2008;38:143846.
A.A. Ramezanianpour et al. / Construction and Building Materials 49 (2013) 807813 813