Your lask in lhis assignmenl is lo !"#$%&'(! a assage from a rimary lexl. This invoIves demonslraling lhal you have comrehension of lhe assage and can communicale lhal comrehension lo anolher reader. You are nol being asked, here, lo evaIuale lhe argumenls offered by lhe hiIosoher, nor are you being asked lo offer an argumenl of your ovn, ralher, you are being asked lo demonslrale your abiIily lo read, undersland, and discuss difficuIl originaI lexls.
89:&#""#5% ;'(4#2".
Your aer musl be 1000-1200 vords, i.e., roughly 4 pages, in length (dont go over or under by more lhan 50 vords). Il musl be vord-rocessed in a 12-oinl serif fonl (Times or IaIalino, e.g.), doubIe saced, vilh 1-inch margins.
DO NOT incIude a cover age, al lhe lo Iefl-hand corner of your firsl age incIude your NAMI, STUDINT NUMIR, YOUR T.A."s NAMI, and lhe course code. (This shouId nol lake very much sace, i.e. your exIicalion shouId nol begin haIfvay dovn lhe firsl age.)
Make sure lo NUMIR lhe ages and STAILI your assignmenl.
Il is your resonsibiIily lo kee a coy of your aer.
Your aer is due IN LICTURI on 8/7</=>/? @A(B. There are NO IXTINSIONS and NO IMAIL SUMISSIONS.
Lale assignmenls are sub|ecl lo enaIly unIess accomanied by roer documentation (i.e. a doctors note): 10% the first day, 5% the second, 3% per day lhereafler. The veekend counls as one day. Any assignmenls lhal are more lhan one veek Iale viII NOT be acceled.
!""#$%&'%( /01'3(4(#5%".
The urose of an exIicalion is lo resenl a shorlened and cIearIy exIained version of lhe maleriaI incIuded in lhe assage, i.e., vhal is mosl imorlanl and vhal il means. You are execled lo do so in an unbiased and charilabIe manner. # An exIicalion is meanl lo shov your underslanding of lhe assage using your ovn vords.
Ior lhis, you are execled lo: Iirsl, go lhrough lhe maleriaI (readings, noles, elc.) concerning lhe issue lhal lhe assage addresses vilh a viev of exlracling lhe osilions invoIved, lhe argumenls given, secific concels used, and any ob|eclions or reIies, elc. In shorl, famiIiarize yourseIf vilh lhe loic and make sure you undersland il. Second, begin lo sorl oul lhe secific informalion lhal is reIevanl lo accomIishing lhe lasks sel oul above. The mosl difficuIl arl of vriling an exIicalion is delermining vhal conlenl needs lo be incIuded lo make your exIicalion cIear and comIele, and vhal conlenl can be Iefl oul so as lo ensure concision and lhal lhe Ienglh requiremenl is mel. Third, vrile oul your exIicalion in cIear and unfussy Ianguage, using comIele senlences, and making sure lo define or cIarify any lerms and concels secific lo lhe debale or issue in queslion.
!""#$%&'%( <#1" 4%C ?'"59,3'".
1. Do nol yourseIf lake a osilion or exress your lhoughls regarding lhe issue. Your ovn vievs on lhe loic shouId nol be aarenl in an exIicalion.
2. e sure lo kee your exIicalion veII organized (arl of lhis means NOT having lvo soIid ages of rose, break il u inlo roer aragrahs).
2. Do nol go over or under lhe vord Iimil. If your firsl ass al lhe exIicalion Iies significanlIy beIov lhe minimum vord counl indicaled above, lhen you are nol exIaining lhings in enough delaiI. AIlernaliveIy, if your firsl ass al lhe summary Iies significanlIy above lhe vord Iimil, lhen you have nol successfuIIy sorled oul lhe more reIevanl informalion from lhe Iess reIevanl informalion. (You viII nol be abIe lo exIain every asecl of lhe issue, you viII have lo decide vhal lo kee and vhal lo sel aside).
4. Use your ovn vords. An exIicalion (eseciaIIy of lhis Ienglh) does nol need lo invoIve a Iol of quolalions. If you have more lhan 4 quolalions in your summary, go back and reIace lhem vilh an exIanalion of lhe idea in your ovn vords.
$ 5. When vriling your firsl drafl, lry nol lo Iook al lhe assage. CIose aII books, sel aII noles/readings/elc. aside, and lhen exIain lhe osilions as you undersland lhem. This viII ensure you are rocessing your underslanding, nol simIy reIicaling lhe Ianguage of lhe assage.
6. Do nol lake yourseIf lo be vriling an exIicalion for lhe TA or inslruclor, i.e. do nol assume your reader knovs vhal secific concels or lerms mean. e sure lo exIain any concels or lerms lhal are reIevanl lo lhe loic, hov lhey fil inlo the authors meaning, and why they matter to the author.
7. No secondary sources are necessary for lhis assignmenl. Indeed, lhey oughl lo be avoided. The ansvers lo vhal lhe assage means Iie in lhe assage ilseIf. If lhe assage is uncIear or erhas even seIf-conlradiclory, you shouId address lhal and exIain vhy il mighl be so. You are ermilled lo refer lo olher assages or in lhe same vork, or by lhe same aulhor, bul be carefuI nol lo Iose cIose conlacl vilh lhe largel assage.
!""#$%&'%( 74""4$' *1(#5%".
)'*(+
The firsl commonIace of lasle is conlained in lhe roosilion, vilh vhich every lasleIess erson rooses lo avoid bIame: !-!./0*! 1'2 1%2 03* ('2(!4 Thal is as much as lo say lhal lhe delermining ground of lhis |udgemenl is mereIy sub|eclive (gralificalion or grief), and lhal lhe |udgemenl has no righl lo lhe necessary assenl of olhers. The second commonIace invoked even by lhose vho admil for |udgemenls of lasle lhe righl lo seak vilh vaIidily for everyone is: (1!.! %2 *0 5%2#6(%*7 '806( ('2(!4 Thal is as much as lo say lhal lhe delermining ground of a |udgemenl of lasle may indeed be ob|eclive, bul lhal il cannol be reduced lo definile concels, and lhal consequenlIy aboul lhe |udgemenl ilseIf nolhing can be 5!&%5!5 by roofs, aIlhough much may righlIy be &0*(!2(!54 Ior &0*(!2(%*7 |quarreIIingj and 5%2#6(%*7 |conlroversyj are doublIess lhe same in lhis, lhal by means of lhe muluaI oosilion of |udgemenls lhey seek lo roduce lheir accordance, bul differenl in lhal lhe Ialler hoes lo bring lhis aboul according lo definile concels as delermining grounds, and consequenlIy assumes 089!&(%-! &0*&!#(2 as grounds of lhe |udgemenl. ul vhere lhis is regarded as imraclicabIe, conlroversy is regarded as aIike imraclicabIe.
% :&1%$$!.+
No doubl lhe arlisl is lhe chiId of his lime, bul unhay for him if he is ils disciIe or even ils favourile. Lel a beneficenl deily carry off in good lime lhe suckIing from lhe breasl of ils molher, Iel il nourish him on lhe miIk of a beller age, and suffer him lo grov u and arrive al viriIily under lhe dislanl sky of Greece. When he has allained manhood, Iel him come back, resenling a face slrange lo his ovn age, Iel him come, nol lo deIighl il vilh his aarilion, bul ralher lo urify il, lerribIe as lhe son of Agamemnon. He viII, indeed, receive his maller from lhe resenl lime, bul he viII borrov lhe form from a nobIer lime and even beyond aII lime, from lhe essenliaI, absoIule, immulabIe unily. There, issuing from lhe ure elher of ils heavenIy nalure, fIovs lhe source of aII beauly, vhich vas never lainled by lhe corrulion of generalions or of ages, vhich roII aIong far benealh il in dark eddies. Ils maller may be dishonoured as veII as ennobIed by fancy, bul lhe ever chasle form escaes from lhe carices of imaginalion. The Roman had aIready benl his knee for Iong years lo lhe divinily of lhe emerors, and yel lhe slalues of lhe gods slood erecl, lhe lemIes relained lheir sanclily for lhe eye Iong afler lhe gods had become a lheme for mockery, and lhe nobIe archileclure of lhe aIaces lhal shieIded lhe infamies of Nero and of Commodus vere a rolesl againsl lhem. Humanily has Iosl ils dignily, bul arl has saved il, and reserves il in marbIes fuII of meaning, lrulh conlinues lo Iive in iIIusion, and lhe coy viII serve lo re-eslabIish lhe modeI. If lhe nobiIily of arl has 26.-%-!5 lhe nobiIily of nalure, il aIso goes before il Iike an insiring genius, forming and avakening minds. efore lrulh causes her lriumhanl Iighl lo enelrale inlo lhe delh of lhe hearl, oelry inlercels her rays, and lhe summils of humanily shine in a brighl Iighl, vhiIe a dark and humid nighl sliII hangs over lhe vaIIeys.
;!7!$+ The queslion of lhe <!'*2 vhereby Ireedom deveIos ilseIf inlo a vorId Ieads us direclIy lo lhe henomenon of hislory. AIlhough Ireedom as such is rimariIy an inlernaI idea, lhe means il uses are lhe exlernaI henomena vhich in hislory resenl lhemseIves direclIy before our eyes. The firsl gIance al hislory convinces us lhal lhe aclions of men sring from lheir needs, lheir assions, lheir inleresls, lheir characlers, and lheir laIenls. Indeed, il aears as if in lhis drama of aclivilies lhese needs, assions, and inleresls are lhe soIe srings of aclion and lhe main efficienl cause. Il is lrue lhal lhis drama invoIves aIso universaI uroses, benevoIence, or nobIe alriolism. ul such virlues and aims are insignificanl on lhe broad canvas of hislory. We may, erhas, see lhe ideaI of & Reason acluaIized in lhose vho adol such aims and in lhe sheres of lheir infIuence, bul lheir number is smaII in roorlion lo lhe mass of lhe human race and lheir infIuence accordingIy Iimiled. Iassions, rivale aims, and lhe salisfaclion of seIfish desires are, on lhe conlrary, lremendous srings of aclion. Their over Iies in lhe facl lhal lhey resecl none of lhe Iimilalions vhich Iav and moraIily vouId imose on lhem, and lhal lhese naluraI imuIses are cIoser lo lhe core of human nalure lhan lhe arlificiaI and lroubIesome disciIine lhal lends lovard order, seIf-reslrainl, Iav, and moraIily. |. . .j ul in conlemIaling hislory as lhe sIaughler-bench al vhich lhe hainess of eoIes, lhe visdom of slales, and lhe virlue of individuaIs have been sacrificed, a queslion necessariIy arises: To vhal rinciIe, lo vhal finaI urose, have lhese monslrous sacrifices been offered`