Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AN
R
VE
T
R
E
&
K
C
BA
T
BE
E
TH
Forum
Hillsdale
October 2012
rt! P 5
a
l
a
r
e
b
i
l
Math: Its the only
11
P
!
s
e
i
m
e
n
e
r
F
mericas
1
-ball! P 2
B
s
y
a
l
p
en
d
i
B
Contents
Volume xiv, Issue i, october 2012
Conservative Features
3 Drones- Friend or Foe? by James Inwood
The robot apocalypse is coming. What would George Washington do?
5 Math: The Only Liberal Art by Sam Ryskamp
The classical liberal arts were firmly grounded in mathematics, but at Hillsdale the
subject often falls by the wayside. Ryskamp campaigns for a renewed emphasis on
mathematics because of its utility and inherent beauty.
7 Defense Spending and the Destruction of Liberty by Devin Creed
America is spending hundreds of billions on defense in spite of the massive federal
deficit. Creed argues for a paleoconservative approach to foreign policy like that
espoused by many of the Founders.
9 Romney Ryan 2012 by Kelsey Drapkin
Romney might not be Reagan, but hes a nice guy. Drapkin explains why it took
conservatives so long to support him, and how Ryans early interest in Randian
philosphy may not be such a bad thing.
11 The Frenemy Dilemma by Spencer Amaral
The Forums resident libertarian on how America is like a middle-school girl.
Campus Features
With Extra
Vitamins &
Minerals!
Staff
Editor-in-Chief
Wes Wright
Staff Writers
Spencer Amaral
Mike Giles
Corrie Beth Hendon
Nate McBride
Savannah Tibbetts
Chelsey Schimid
Associate Editor
Corrie Beth Hendon
Copy Editor
Chelsey Schmid
Editors
Mike Giles
Rebekah Lindstrom
Caleb Eatough
Photographers
Sheridan Markatos
Laurie Barnes
Shaun Lichti
Design and Layout
Lauren Wierenga
Nathan Wilson
Business Manager
Ryne Bessemer
Advertisement
Manager
Nate McBride
Letter from
the Editor-in-Chief
Condescending Wonka is destroying the American
conservative movement. It is slowly undermining the rock
on which our country is built, making moot the work of the
Founding Fathers.
For those unacquainted with memes, Condescending
Wonka is a still photograph from a 1971 movie based
on Roald Dahls Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. In it,
a bemused Gene Wilder stares into the distance, flanked
by sarcastic sentences in white bubble letters critiquing
everything from politics to Hillsdating. New versions
can be created in moments on web sites like quickmeme.
com. The speed with which they can be produced and
their intensely mocking tone make them useful weapons
in internet arguments, to the detriment of
public discourse.
To be fair, few people go on Facebook
to philosophize or debate. When such
occasions arise, however, they quickly
deteriorate into ad hominem assaults and
brutal meme battles. All too often, actual
discussion of ideas is lost in the mad effort
to win the argument and portray oneself as
humorous.
This form of discourse can lead to one of the problems
Plato describes in the Pheado: misology, hating and
reviling reasoned discussion. The Facebook Generation is
growing up in an atmosphere in which the most common
methods of argumentation are out-of-context sound bites
and sleazy meme attacks. Reasoned political discussion
is virtually impossible on the internet (pun most certainly
intended) and on television, where a debate consists
of candidates reciting talking points and yelling at the
moderator. Why would people like reasoned discussion if
it always devolved into mindless lampoon?
One aspect of The Hillsdale Forums mission is to
Mission Statement
The Hillsdale Forum is an independent, student-run Conservative magazine at Hillsdale College. The Forum, in support of
the mission statement of Hillsdale College, exists to promote a
return to limited government as outlined in the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution. We publish Conservative
opinion, editorials, and campus news. The Forum is a vehicle to
bring the discussion and thought of the intelligent students and
professors at the heart of the Conservative movement beyond the
classroom and beyond Hillsdales campus.
Wes Wright
DroneS: Friend or
When Americas leading statesmen met to
frame a new constitution for the young republic,
they hoped to transform their ideas and principles
into a framework of law. Not all of them got their
way, however. Elbridge Gerry proposed that the
Constitution limit standing armies to five thousand
men. George Washington applauded the motion,
but added that they should consider limiting invading armies to three thousand men. The convention
laughed the motion out of consideration.
Washington was in many ways the original
conservative. During the Revolution, he had worked
tirelessly to defend traditional American liberties
and dedicated himself to keeping the Colonies unified. He also worked to keep the radicals in check,
from liberals who dogmatically opposed any governmental action to nationalists who dreamt of a global
mercantilist power. The Washington who ridiculed
Gerrys motion also believed that an excessive
military establishment could impinge upon personal
freedom. He hoped to maintain the military America
needed and nothing more.
Fast forward to 2012: rows of musketmen
have been replaced by unmanned aerial vehicles
(UAVs) armed with everything from advanced
detection equipment to high-explosive missiles. The
issue divides Democrats and Republicans alike; even
conservatives have no unified position. To some,
drone warfare is part of a hallowed military establishment that must be never questioned. For others,
the UAV is a terrifying encroachment of big government. Those who leap to either conclusion may well
be die-hard nationalists or liberals. A conservative,
however, must apply George Washingtons test: Is
it potentially dangerous and/or necessary to selfgovernment?
First: Are drones a threat to American liberty?
Sadly, the answer is yes. Any policy grants
the government power, which in the hands of a cabal
is a threat to liberty especially when it involves an
exclusive claim on blowing things into little pieces.
Further, the modern drone is not like a welfare check
or a fancy new tank. It has incredible, almost inconceivable destructive potential.
The drone supports a myriad of aerial capabilities. The military and police can outfit it with
a wider array of weapons, surveillance equipment,
and other devices than any helicopter or fighter
plane. Flying lower and more slowly, its precision with these tools surpasses most other aircraft,
watching individual rooms or targeting particular
people for annihilation. Its small profile and quiet
propulsion make the drone almost unnoticeable.
Drones are also incredibly cost efficient.
Uncle Sam can buy thirty Predator drones for the
price of one F-22 fighter, forty for an AC-130
aerial gunship, and 250 for a single B-2 bomber.
In addition, there is no need to risk skilled flight
crews, and it is fair easier to train remote operators
than pilots. A few drones can cover more area than
an AC-130 at lower cost and to greater effect.
Will Americas humane and democratic government use this power against its citizens? Everyone
Left and Right, Occupier and Tea Partier has
witnessed the willingness of government to use
violence against dangerous dissidents. Drones
have already claimed American victims: Anwar
and Abdul-Rahman al-Awlaki and Kamal Derwish, jihadi sympathizers killed by drone strikes
in Yemen, were not saved by their United States
citizenship. Law enforcement use of UAVs for
surveillance purposes has already begun in American cities.
The greatest danger, however, lies in a
drones stealth. Unlike the siege at Waco or the
clashes in Oakland, a UAV flying overhead is
inconspicuous. Pakistanis have reported that one
does not know a drone is around until a missile
strikes. This is a deadly problem because Americans are oblivious to any problem not shoved in
their face by the 24-hour-media. Consider our
budget deficit: until right-wing commentators and
politicians discovered how useful the issue was,
nobody cared. Frankly, Americans would revel
in their limitless freedom even if drones watched
their every move. Our apathy towards the deaths
of innocents at the hands of Americas militarized
police force indicates that drones could murder our
compatriots without inciting protest.
foe of liberty?
On to the second part of the test: might
drones be crucial to our national defense? They
have obvious potential: everything a drone can do
to Americans can be done to jihadists. But potential and actuality are separate questions. So, is the
United States making such productive use of this
weapon that it is absolutely necessary?
Today, the United States uses drones primarily for reconnaissance and precision airstrikes in the
Middle East, especially Pakistan and Yemen. These
strikes can kill jihadis, civilians, or both. Whats the
ratio? Generally, locals think that
most drone strikes kill the innocent. Most sources say that one or
two civilians die for every militant
neutralized. The CIA, on the other
hand, claims that a series of strikes
which killed over 600 militants
resulted in absolutely no collateral
damage.
The ratio that really matters,
though, is how much this campaign helps or hurts America. To
the extent that drone strikes kill
Taliban or Al Qaeda members, they
are good and helpful. On the other
hand, they serve as a propaganda
windfall for terrorists, which is a
problem. The New America Foundation reports that drone strikes
have killed between one and three
thousand militants, but the local
population perceives the cost to
innocent life and local sovereignty as
excessive. The government of Pakistan has publically asked the United States to end the campaign.
These perceptions may be false, even
ridiculous in some cases. But this war is an ideological one, in which those same perceptions draw the
battle lines. Middle-Easterners who see the jihadists
as monsters will aid the US in their defeat, but those
who see America as the murderous party will align
themselves with the enemy, contributing opinions,
By Sam Ryskamp
Im going to go out on a limb and say that, as a Hillsdale College student and avid Forum reader, you probably came here to study the liberal arts. Perusing the diverse institutions of higher education, you discovered that there is no better place to partake in the classical, Greco-Roman pursuit of
the liberal arts than Hillsdale. Now that youre a student, your schedule is brimming with classes in
the Western and American heritage, rhetoric, economics, natural and social sciences, philosophy, music, and the U.S. Constitution. Soon youll march proudly across the stage, clutching a freshly printed
degree that evidences your completion of the most rigorous liberal arts education in America. But if
youre like the majority of Hillsdale students, you will receive that degree despite having utterly ignored the entire field of mathematics, the subject that lies at the center of a traditional liberal arts
education.
Russia 4.1%
United Kingdom
3.6%
France 3.6%
R R
omney
yan
2012
By Kelsey Drapkin
While visiting a V.A. hospital, a politician looked through the hospital ledger. Impressed with the
hospitals financial responsibility, he asked what they might lack in supplies or equipment. Milk, they
reported. The politician, uncomfortable with the heavy press coverage of his visit, jokingly responded
in his own awkward way that they should teach the patients how to milk cows. About a week later, the
milkman arrived at the hospital with 7,000 pints of milk, the exact amount the hospital needed. This delivery continued weekly for two years funded by an anonymous donor. Only when the milkman retired
did the identity of the donor become public: Mitt Romney.
Conservatives were looking for a bold, Reaganesque leader to spark an awakening of sorts that would
return America to its founding principles: a free-market society where personal responsibility and good
morals reign. Unfortunately, it has taken Romney much time to convince the public that he is that man. It was only after his selection of
Ryan for running mate and the first presidential debate that the public
was able to clearly identify his stances and philosophy.
To his credit, Romney was immensely successful in the private sector. He was an extremely competent businessman which allowed him
to accumulate much wealth. This activity is not to be frowned upon.
In a free society, the accumulation of wealth is the result of improving
other peoples lives; the only way to make money is to provide benefi-
helped convince voters that Romney might be the leader for whom they had hoped. Ryans biggest
struggle has been his youthful experiments with Randian Objectivism, which liberals criticize as a heartless and immoral philosophy.
In an interview with Brit Hume of FOX News, Ryan pointed to Ayn Rands Atlas Shrugged as his
reason for interest in economics. He has, however, repeatedly said he disagrees with objectivism due
to its inherent atheism, but he does agree with Rands emphasis on how free enterprise and liberty trump
other socioeconomic systems.
Ryan makes a compelling argument for his partial acceptance of Rands philosophy:
Were coming close to a tipping point in America where
we might have a net majority of takers versus makers in
society, and that could become very dangerous if it sets in as
a permanent condition. Because what we will end up doing
is we will convert our safety net system which is necessary I believe to help people who cant help themselves, to
help people who are down on their luck get back onto their
feet into a hammock that ends up lulling people into lives
of dependency and complacency which drains them of their
incentive and the will to make the most of their lives.
While Ryan is clearly encouraging personal responsibility, he is not promoting isolation of man from society. A
safety net exists, but we expect our fellow man not to abuse
it. Society expects him to try to provide for himself, but if he
absolutely cannot, society will help get him back on his feet.
Discussions of the four major economic issues in the upcoming election Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare
should focus on these principles.
During the first presidential debate, Romney took a strong
stance on the extent of government: The role of government
is to promote and protect the principles of [The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution].
He systematically evaluated the line from the Declaration of Independence that all men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the
pursuit of Happiness emphasizing that it is our Creator, not government, who grants these Rights and
who has allowed us to flourish in the freedom to which we have grown accustomed.
Americans need to remember that this is a country of opportunity, not guarantees. While all men are
created equal, equality before law does not require the imposition of uniform economic outcomes. To
ensure our countrys success, Romney and Ryan must champion the principles of personal responsibility,
drive, and hard work.
ike any middle-school girl, America has BFFs and frenemies. Such relationships on the
part of a major power indicate that the United States also has the planning capacity of a
seventh-grader, but these strategies have been the basis of American grand strategy since
World War Two. It is high time to realize its inadequacy to address the threat of terrorism.
Mob bosses and foreign policy wonks always want others to do their dirty work when confronting an enemy. The problem is dealing with these allies-of-the-moment after they have accomplished their mission. American history is rife with examples of this frenemy problem.
The Soviet Union was a vital ally in WWII, keeping Hitler occupied on the Eastern Front and
paving the way to an eventual Allied victory. The USSR then became Public Enemy #1. America
spent the next 45 years locked in the Cold War, ducking under a doorjamb every five minutes and
interrogating filmmakers accused of promoting communism.
The U.S. then fought a proxy war against the Soviets, supporting those who stood up to socialist
superpower. The Mujahedeen, freedom fighters in Afghanistan, fiercely resisted Russian occupation for almost a decade, with the help of American weapons and funding. After the fall of the
USSR, the Mujahedeen became Al Qaeda and turned against the United States. The 1991World
Trade Center Bombing, the attack on the USS Cole, and the 9/11 attacks eventually forced America to follow Soviet tracks into Afghanistan. Eleven years later, the U.S. still struggles to do what
the USSR could not.
In the 1980s the United States backed Saddam Hussein, militarily and financially supporting
Iraqs war against Iran. In 1990, less than three years after that war ended, America fought Iraq
in the first Persian Gulf War. The sequel came out in 2003, but the U.S. never found the nuclear
MacGuffin that the Bush Administration used to justify the war.
Such precedent should not be taken lightly. America must realize that the enemy of its enemy is
not necessarily a friend. For how long will Congress keep sending taxpayer money to allies who
end up using their new resources and training against the United States? Once again, utilizing
Russia as an ally in the Second World War was a crucial aspect of the plan to defeat Nazi Germany.
But WWII will never happen again. The days of conventional warfare waged between world powers struggling at max capacity ended with the invention of nuclear weapons.
As long as America continues to intervene in the Middle East, it will be waging a war that its
military is not designed to fight. Though the U.S. has the best and most technologically advanced
fighting force in the world, it is being forced to fight on the terrorists terms, playing to their
strengths. America maintains the moral high ground while insurgents plant IEDs and take
* Frenemy is a portmanteau of friend and enemy. It refers to someone who is purportedly a
friend, but who is actually an enemy.
11
Alumni...
Where are they now?
Adam and Samantha Nasser graduated from Hillsdale in
May 2012, were married a few days after graduation and are
currently teaching English in South Korea.
What made you decide to go overseas, and why Korea?
We initially thought coming to Korea after school would be a fun adventure before starting work in the real world and/or grad school. However, as
we got farther along into the process, we began to realize that this is the perfect
opportunity for a recent graduateway better than we initially thought. You
dont have to worry about interviewing with a bunch of companies, trying to find an
apartment, etc. Though the application process was very rigorous in the amount of
paperwork required, it actually seemed easier than the constant interview/waiting game that many of my friends
were going through our last semester.
What exactly does your job entail?
We work with EPIK (English Program in Korea), which is a government sponsored program to bring English
teachers to Korea. On a daily basis, we are either teaching or making lesson plans (I teach Kindergarden, 1st, 2nd,
5th and 6th, Adam teaches 4th, 5th and 6th). However, we have a lot of free time during the day, which is sweet
because we never have to take work home with ustheres always plenty of time at the office to get everything
done.
How do you think your Hillsdale education is going to be helpful/hurtful in the work you are doing?
I dont think that my Hillsdale education will be particularly helpful here - if anything, the idea of teaching English in isolation of other subjects goes against many of the ideas I learned at school. However, I think this is pretty
similar to teaching at most elementary schools in the US, except teachers are well respected and treated far better
here. Oh, there is one way college did prepare me for this job. Korean drinking culture is HUGE and on our first
faculty dinner, the vice-principle literally went around the tables and did a shot of Soju (a Korean drink that is like
watered down Vodka) with every single teacher. There is a lot of pressure to drink socially here and fortunately,
many of the Koreans are lightweights so we dont have a problem keeping up.
What do you miss about Hillsdale?
Hands down, I miss my friends and professors more than anything else at Hillsdale. Though there are plenty of
English teachers in Sokcho, where we live, its just not the same as the kinds of people I knew at Hillsdale.
Whats one thing you learned at Hillsdale that you think you will remember for the rest of your life?
The things that will stick with me the most are great memories, not things I learned: nights with friends, the last
preference party I got to be a part of, my first hangover, our Calvin discussion group, joining a church, office hours
with professors full of great conversations, office hours with professors where I was terrified and stuttered the
whole time, failed exams, learning not to care about failed exams....you get the idea.
Any final thoughts youd like to add?
I really really think more graduating seniors should consider spending a year abroad teaching somewhere like Korea. There is no better way to experience a culture, while being allowed the freedom (both time and financial) to
explore other areas. For example, we get 3 weeks of paid winter vacation, which we will be spending in Italyan
opportunity we absolutely would not have had if Adam had started grad school and I had begun working.
13 13
Professors
iPod
By: Anna Shoffner
Must-hear Bands:
The Rolling Stones
Fleetwood Mac
Eric Clapton
Van Morrison
Bob Dylan
Mumford and Sons
The Who
Flogging Molly
Waylon Jennings
Hank Williams, Jr.
14
VS
Lets Chat
15
15
VS
Spencer Amaral, Junior
Lets Debate
Why do you think its important to discuss political and religious topics?
First and foremost, because political and religious argumentation are what make Hillsdale
special. Take that away, and were no different from any state school. But on a side note,
many consider religion and politics essential factors in the central inquiry of a liberal arts
student: How one ought to live.
In what situations should one refrain from arguing over topics?
When you start receiving threats of violence from disinterested by-standers, you are either
doing something wrong, or among unfavorable company. Either way, just let it go.
What is your favorite thing to argue about?
Whatever it takes to make neo-cons mad. Which is easily done.
From where do you draw inspiration for your debating style?
On a serious note: George Washington, who exemplified good motivations and overriding ethics. You have to approach any discussion assuming your opponent means well, and is
not necessarily evil. The best way for you to show love and care for them is by sharing your
deepest convictions, by providing factual evidence and sound logic in a sincere manner. Its
a difficult standard to always live up to, --especially amid a heated debate-- but a sound one
to aim for.
16 16
Wardrobe: A review
Hillsdale students adore C.S. Lewis. Most students
Lewis for two reasons. First, Lewis wrote it during
first heard The Chronicles of Narnia in between the
essays of the Federalist while they were still in the
womb. At the age of three, these wannabe-Narnians
chased the family pet crying, Aslan is on the move!
By fourteen, they are refuting the last vestiges of
atheism by posting quotes from
Mere Christianity on Facebook.
At college, they seek the
prince or princess with whom
they will have four children
in the hallowed boy-girl-boygirl alternation and bend the
laws of nature to their will.
Perhaps the above is
hyperbole. Regardless, Hillsdale
gets excited about C.S. Lewis.
They pore over the Chronicles
and peruse Lewis nonfictional
greats like Mere Christianity
and The Abolition of Man. Yet
many readers even those who
call themselves triple-A fans
(Avid Aslan Aficionados)
never step outside the Wardrobe
to delve into some of his richest
and, arguably, greatest works.
Dymer, one of Lewis four narrative poems, hides
in a little box of treasures overshadowed by his major
works. The idea for Dymer came to [him] when he
was seventeen: a man who, on some mysterious bride
begets a monster: which monster, as soon as it has
killed its father, becomes a god. He first published
the poem in 1926 under the pseudonym Clive
Hamilton and then republished it under his own name
in 1950. As he wrote the poem, Lewis stood locked
in his intellectual wrestling match with Christianity.
As such, the little nine-canto narrative poem gives
readers a view of Lewis unseen in his other books.
Dymer offers the reader a keen perspective on
17
of CS Lewis narrative
Poem Dymer
Dymer offers a puzzling story full of meaning, but it
serves as a reminder that he did not always churn out
dazzling prose laced with Christian symbolism that
brings the high and divine down to the layman. The
meaning of the story does not come easily. Though it
is always difficult to pin down the exact meaning of
a story, when an author says of his work, Every one
may allegorise it or psychoanalyse it as he pleases:
and if I did so myself my interpretations would have
no more authority than anyone elses, one can be
sure that serious interpretation will require great care.
Indeed, in Dymer Lewis crafts a patchwork quilt that
strings together the greatest of themes: anarchy and
authoritarianism, dreams and disillusionment, love and
lust, destiny and downfall. The jam-packed feel of the
poem has drawn much criticism: Taken as a whole,
Dymer fails. Considered episode by episode, there is a
checkered pattern of failures and successes. In other
words, say such detractors, Dymers quilt has its pretty
patches, but the blanket as a whole is ugly to behold.
But not all quilts weave the particulars into one
clear image. The most meaningful quilts are often
not made of the finest fabric but the scraps of t-shirts
emblazoned with prints from summer camp and the
frayed corner of a childhood blanket. Such quilts
do not meld into one unified idea they tell a story.
Lewis narrative poem is a deeply personal quilt of
old t-shirts from the philosophical places he had been.
Thus, Dymer captures a glimpse of Lewis quest
for joy and his struggle with Christianity. Dymers
feeling of some fear of being found, / Some hope to
find he knew not what may serve as an expression
of Lewis own soul. This looming fear and faint hope
makes Dymer become more than a loosely related
series of themes connected only by the binding of
the pages. It is a vivid account of the search for
meaning everyone endures. Viewed this way, the
18
Dan Reynolds
Hunk
Hillsdales
Year: freshman
Major: ...the liberal arts?
Hometown: Beverly Hills,
MIchigan
What is your favorite personal asset?
HumorIm always trying to keep it light. I havent met a girl who doesnt like humor.
Also, gotta keep the hair lookin goodcondition more than you shampoo.
If you had to marry somebody from a novel, who would it be and why?
I wish I had read more recently. Ive been stuck reading books from Great Books, and
I wouldnt want to marry anybody from Great Books. But maybe Hermione Granger
shes a witch, and shes down with me being a muggle.
Assuming you will actually settle down with one of the thousands upon thousands of desperate
girls throwing rocks at your window every night, how many kids do you aspire to have one day?
Howd you guys know about that? Probably two or three. Three would
be a compromise.
I think thats a little muchI mean, I already have my hands full with my plate
17
and my drinkIm not a waiter, I cant hold two plates and two drinks.
19
Hottie
and
Compiled by
Savanah Tibbetts
t
Victoria Zajac
of the month
Mr. Darcy from Pride and Prejudice. Purely so I could say that my husband is Mr.
Darcyyou have to say it with the accent.
Assuming you will actually settle down with one of the thousands upon thousands of desperate guys
throwing rocks at your window every night, how many kids do you aspire to have one day?
A solid 12 to 24. Theyre just gonna roll out. But realistically like, 5.
What is more romantica heart-shaped box of chocolates or a heart shaped necklace?
A heart shaped box of necklaces.
a. Assuming one lucky guy got to take you into Saga one day, what would be
the appropriate meal (if any) to do so and why?
I feel like Taco Tuesday is always an event. But Fish Friday is kinda similar to a night
on the town. Pulling out all the stops for Fish Friday.
On average, how many dates do you go on per month? I understand this could be
a pretty large number so a rough estimate is okay.
A rough estimate? I mean, I go on dates with my stuffed dinosaur every night
its a true story. 18
So the average per month is 30.
21
MZKXTZMZKTZMZKTZMZK
TZMZKTZMZKTZMZKTZ
ZKTZMZKTZMZKXTZMZKX
TZMZKTZMZKTZMZKT ZK
T MZMZKTZXMZKTZMZK TZ
MXZKTZMZKTZMZKTZMZK
TZMZKTZMZKTZMZTZM
Compiled by Nate McBride - Some Photography by Laurie Barnes
ZKTZMZKT MZKT MZKT
Spotlight on...
RUSH
The Inter-Fraternity Council (IFC) and the various fraternities on campus have elected to change Rush
Week to Rush Month for the 2012-13 academic year. The Dean of Men, the IFC president, and the president of ATO weigh in on the new fraternity rush process.
Dean Petersen
Matt Delapp
22
Cody Eldredge
Hillsdale
in Photos
By Shaun Lichti