You are on page 1of 705

Planning Commission October 14, 2014 - Page 1

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA


COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011
CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov

LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)
Mayor Pro-Tem Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4)
Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1)
Councilman Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6)
Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5)
Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3)
Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2)
City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell

COMMISSIONERS

Gus W. Flangas, Chair
Todd L. Moody, Vice Chair
Byron Goynes
Richard Truesdell
Vicki Quinn
Trinity Haven Schlottman
Richard P. Bonar


Facilities are provided throughout City Hall Ior convenience oI persons with disabilities. For meetings held in the
Council Chambers, sound equipment is available Ior persons with hearing impairments. II you need an accommodation
to attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at (702) 229-6301 and advise oI
your need at least 48 hours in advance oI the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 Ior Relay Nevada.


October 14, 2014
6:00 PM

ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO OR
MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BE
REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDA
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM CHRYSTAL JACOBS, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3
RD

FLOOR, (702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITY`S WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.

NOTICE: This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the Iollowing locations:

City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1
st
Floor
Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City oI Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive

ACTIONS: ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASES
THERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITY
COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPON
FILING OF THE APPLICATION.

ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
AGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY
IMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BE
HEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.

Planning Commission October 14, 2014 - Page 2

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

1. StaII will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and
suggested conditions oI approval, iI appropriate.

2. The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staII presentation. When the staII presentation is
complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staII`s conditions oI
approval.

3. II areas oI concern are known in advance, or iI the applicant does not accept staII`s condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brieI presentation oI his item with emphasis on any items oI concern.

4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brieI statements aIter the applicant. II
more than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and
indicate that he speaks Ior others in the audience who share his view.

5. Objectors to the item will be heard aIter the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard,
but in the interest oI time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views oI any groups
oI interested parties.

6. AIter all objectors` input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.

7. Following the applicant`s response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst
themselves, ask any questions they Ieel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.

8. Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained Ior the record. Large maps,
models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission Irom the microphone area, but need not be handed in
Ior the record unless requested by the Commission.

As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciate
your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and Iair experience.


BUSINESS ITEMS:

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

3. ROLL CALL

4. PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THE
AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR
THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE
SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

5. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
OF AUGUST 12, 2014 AND SEPTEMBER 9, 2014

6. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items Irom the Planning Commission, staII and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or
held in abeyance to a Iuture meeting may be brought Iorward and acted upon at this time.

CONSENT ITEMS:

CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.

Planning Commission October 14, 2014 - Page 3

ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGS
WILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALL
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE
THAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.

7. TMP-55736 - TENTATIVE MAP - ALTURA - APPLICANT/OWNER: TOLL SOUTH LV, LLC - For possible
action on a request Ior a Tentative Map FOR A 119-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 31.31
acres on the north side oI Alta Drive 950 Ieet west oI Desert Foothills Drive (APN 137-34-519-001), P-C (Planned
Community) Zone |SF3 (Single Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 2 (Beers) |PRJ-
55042|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

8. VAR-55721 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRAYER MOUNTAIN/INTERNATIONAL
CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER: INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS, INC., ET AL - For
possible action on a request to reinstate a previously approved Variance TO ALLOW 119 PARKING SPACES WHERE
338 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on a portion oI 4.99 acres generally located at the southwest corner oI CliII Shadows
Parkway and Clark County 215 (APN 137-12-401-011), PD (Planned Development) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-
55315|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

9. VAC-55722 - VACATION RELATED TO VAR-55721 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRAYER
MOUNTAIN/INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER: INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS
VEGAS, INC., ET AL - For possible action on a request to reinstate a previously approved Petition to Vacate U.S.
Government Patent Easements generally located southwest oI the intersection oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Novat Street,
Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55315|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

10. SDR-55723 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-55721 AND VAC-55722 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: PRAYER MOUNTAIN/INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER:
INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS, INC., ET AL - For possible action on a request to reinstate a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED TWO-STORY, 35-FOOT TALL, 66,192
SQUARE-FOOT CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND SCHOOL WITH WAIVERS OF THE LONE MOUNTAIN
WEST WALL AND LANDSCAPE STANDARDS TO ALLOW RETAINING WALLS UP TO 16 FEET IN HEIGHT
WHERE THREE-FOOT, SIX-INCH WALLS ARE REQUIRED AND ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG
PORTIONS OF THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST PERIMETERS WHERE SEVEN FEET IS REQUIRED on a
portion oI 9.12 acres at the southwest corner oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Clark County 215 (portions oI APNs 137-12-
401-001, 137-12-401-011 and 040; and 137-12-410-003), PD (Planned Development) and C-V (Civic) Zones, Ward 4
(Anthony) |PRJ-55315|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

11. VAR-55763 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WESTCARE NEVADA, INC. - OWNER:
FITZHOUSE ENTERPRISES INC. - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A PROPOSED PORTE COCHERE WHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED at 323 North
Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-35-211-071, 072, 093 and 139-35-299-058), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5
(Barlow) |PRJ-55585|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

12. SDR-55764 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-55763 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: WESTCARE NEVADA, INC. - OWNER: FITZHOUSE ENTERPRISES INC. - For possible action
on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review TO EXPAND THE PARKING LOT AND ADD A PORTE COCHERE
WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH WHERE 15 FEET IS
REQUIRED ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT WIDTH ADJACENT TO
INTERIOR LOT LINES at 323 North Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-35-211-071, 072, 093 and 139-35-299-058), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-55585|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

Planning Commission October 14, 2014 - Page 4

13. SUP-55639 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: NEVADA HEALTH CENTERS,
INC. - OWNER: CONSTANTINO NOVAL NEVADA 2, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Major
Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-25366) FOR A PROPOSED 2,357 SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION
TO AN EXISTING 1,840 SQUARE-FOOT SOCIAL SERVICE PROVIDER USE at 5001 East Bonanza Road, Suite
#104 (APN 140-32-502-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55628|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

14. SUP-55674 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY -
OWNER: SIMON CHELSEA LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special
Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 8,861 SQUARE-FOOT SUPPER CLUB (RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL)
ESTABLISHMENT USE WITH A 1,631 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING
CENTER at 505 South Grand Central Parkway (APN 139-33-710-005), PD (Planned Development) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) |PRJ-55562|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

15. SUP-55720 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DEVICE PIT STOP - OWNER:
EXCEL CENTENNIAL, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,234
SQUARE-FOOT SECONDHAND DEALER (PERSONAL COMPUTER, LAPTOP COMPUTERS AND OTHER
SIMILAR COMPUTER DEVICES) USE at 6440 Sky Pointe Drive, Suite #130 (APN 125-21-813-002), T-C (Town
Center) Zone |GC-TC (General Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55626|.
StaII recommends APPROVAL.

16. SUP-55741 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: FARM CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,700
SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT (WITH DRIVE-THROUGH) USE on 7.59 acres located at 8416 Farm Road (APN
125-17-610-017), T-C (Town Center) Zone |SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|,
Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55578|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

17. VAC-55747 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TOLL SOUTH LV, LLC - For possible
action on a request Ior a Petition to Vacate Public Utility Drainage and City oI Las Vegas Sewer Easements generally
located north oI the northern alignment oI Seborga Avenue between Fox Hill Drive and Sky Vista Drive, P-C (Planned
Community), Ward 2 (Beers) |PRJ-55387|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

18. ABEYANCE - VAR-53657 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ERIK MARTONOVICH -
OWNER: BCNV, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW TWO EXISTING ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES (CLASS II) TO BE 16 FEET AND 37 FEET IN HEIGHT WHERE TEN FEET, SIX INCHES IS THE
MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED on 2.07 acres at 5636 Donald Road (APN 125-24-104-001), R-E (Residence Estates)
Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-52356|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

19. ABEYANCE - SUP-55031 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: CCOB
FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY
USE at 5705 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-27-803-004), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-
55030|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

20. ABEYANCE - SDR-55043 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-55031 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CCOB FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED THREE BUILDING, 8,044 SQUARE-FOOT PRIVATE SCHOOL,
PRIMARY WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A TWO-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON A PORTION OF THE
SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED AND A ZERO-FOOT WIDE
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WHERE FIFTEEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.95
acres at 5705 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-27-803-004), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-
55030|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

Planning Commission October 14, 2014 - Page 5

21. GPA-55743 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GABRIELA
NAVARRO - For possible action on a request to amend a portion oI the General Plan FROM: L (LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO SC: (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 1.97 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard
and Michael Way (APNs 138-24-305-001 and 003), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54639|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

22. ZON-55744 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-55743 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
GABRIELA NAVARRO - For possible action on a request Ior a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO:
C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.97 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way (APNs
138-24-305-001 and 003), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54639|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

23. SDR-55745 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-55743 AND ZON-55744 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GABRIELA NAVARRO - For possible action on a request Ior a Site
Development Plan Review FOR TWO PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 15,350 SQUARE FEET
on 1.97 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way (APNs 138-24-305-001 and 003), Ward
5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54639|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

24. GPA-55775 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CHURCH LDS
PRESIDING BISHOP - For possible action on a request Ior a General Plan Amendment FROM: PF (PUBLIC
FACILITIES) TO: ML (MEDIUM-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.19 acres located on the north side oI Bonanza
Road 1,540 Ieet east oI Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54464|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

25. ZON-55777 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-55775 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CHURCH
LDS PRESIDING BISHOP - For possible action on a request Ior a Rezoning FROM: R-1 (LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.19 acres located on the north side oI Bonanza
Road 1,540 Ieet east oI Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54464|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

26. SDR-55779 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-55775 AND ZON-55777 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CHURCH LDS PRESIDING BISHOP - For possible action on a request Ior a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 39-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE
WEST PERIMETER WHERE A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET IS REQUIRED on 2.19 acres located on the north side oI
Bonanza Road 1,540 Ieet east oI Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54464|. StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

27. ZON-55758 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS' RX NEVADA, INC - For
possible action on a request Ior a Rezoning FROM: P-R (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND PARKING) TO: C-1
(LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 0.04 acres located at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard (APN 138-25-613-043), Ward 5
(Barlow) |PRJ-55629|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

28. VAR-55760 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-55758 - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS R X
NEVADA, INC - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY
SETBACK OF 66 FEET WHERE 85 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED 5,459 SQUARE-FOOT ANIMAL
HOSPITAL, CLINIC OR SHELTER (WITH NO OUTSIDE PENS) on 0.32 acres located at 1117 North Decatur
Boulevard (APNs 138-25-613-043, 044 and 045), P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) and C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zones |Proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial)|, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-55629|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

29. SDR-55761 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-55758 AND VAR-55760 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS' RX NEVADA, INC - For possible action on a request Ior a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 5,459 SQUARE-FOOT ANIMAL HOSPITAL, CLINIC OR SHELTER
(WITH NO OUTSIDE PENS) WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A
PORTION OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE WHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.32 acres located at 1117 North
Decatur Boulevard (APNs 138-25-613-043, 044 and 045), P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) and C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zones |Proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial)|, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-55629|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

Planning Commission October 14, 2014 - Page 6

30. VAR-55684 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DAVID V CUNG - For possible action
on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE FIVE FEET IS THE
MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING PATIO COVER on 0.16 acres at 8962 Bracken CliII Court (APN 138-08-
212-010), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-54450|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

31. SUP-55715 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BARNET LIBERMAN - OWNER:
LEAH PROPERTY, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT on 0.64 acres at the northeast corner oI Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue (APNs 139-34-
410-056 through 059), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55636|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

32. SDR-55716 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-55715 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: BARNET LIBERMAN - OWNER: LEAH PROPERTY, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 17-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING 34,500
SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE AND 281 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS on 0.64 acres at the
northeast corner oI Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue (APNs 139-34-410-056 through 059), C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55636|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

33. SUP-55733 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: QUEST CHARTER SCHOOL -
OWNER: WESTLAND ENTERPRISES, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A
PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE at 4500 North Tenaya Way (APN 138-03-601-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55262|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

34. SDR-55724 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-55733 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: QUEST CHARTER SCHOOL - OWNER: WESTLAND ENTERPRISES, LLC - For possible action
on a request Ior a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (Z-0105-93) FOR A
136,528 SQUARE-FOOT PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE on 9.88 acres at 4500 North Tenaya Way (APN 138-03-
601-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55262|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

35. SUP-55012 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIAN AND 1UDY
ALBISER LIVING TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER
OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN AN EXISTING 2,000 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE,
OTHER THAN LISTED at 1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #3 (APNs 139-35-211-073 and 074), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54768|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

36. SUP-55390 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: EARL M MORIMOTO
TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED OFF-PREMISE SIGN at 3838
Meadows Lane (APN 139-31-510-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55084|. StaII
recommends DENIAL.

37. SUP-55487 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: MR. N & S BONANZA, LLC -
OWNER: WATER STREET, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PACKAGE
LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN A PROPOSED 1,882 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT at
3595 East Bonanza Road, Suite #140 (APN 140-31-121-007), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin). StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

38. SUP-55677 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ACE LOAN COMPANY - OWNER:
B F TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PAWN SHOP WITHIN AN
EXISTING 1,651 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A 50-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND 920 FEET FROM
A SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at 519 East St. Louis Avenue (APN 162-03-311-017), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55676|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

39. SUP-55682 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: THREE TWENTY TWO,
LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,467 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR
ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 130-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) AND A 1,200-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE 1,500 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIRED
at 322 Fremont Street (APN 139-34-510-026), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-55576|. StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

Planning Commission October 14, 2014 - Page 7

40. SUP-55786 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT HOUSE OF BARGAINS - OWNER:
DUCK HORN, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 5,950 SQUARE-
FOOT THRIFT SHOP USE at 4000 West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-06-812-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward
1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55655|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:

41. TXT-55360 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For
discussion and possible action on a request to update the Downtown Centennial Plan to add Medical Marijuana Dispensary
as a permitted use with approval oI a special use permit in 18b The Las Vegas Arts District, Ward 3 (CoIIin). StaII has
NO RECOMMENDATION.

42. TXT-56022 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - For discussion and possible action on a request to amend
LVMC Chapter 19.08.120.4 related to changeable electronic message signage and to provide Ior other related matters.
StaII has NO RECOMMENDATION.

CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:

43. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE
LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY
BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS
SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME
FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED



Agenda tem No.: 1.


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING

SUB1ECT:
CALL TO ORDER


Agenda tem No.: 2.


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING

SUB1ECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW


Agenda tem No.: 3.


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING

SUB1ECT:
ROLL CALL


Agenda tem No.: 4.


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING

SUB1ECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO
THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF
DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED



Agenda tem No.: 5.


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING

SUB1ECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2014 AND SEPTEMBER 9, 2014


Agenda tem No.: 6.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:
Any items Irom the Planning Commission, staII and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or held
in abeyance to a Iuture meeting may be brought Iorward and acted upon at this time.


Agenda tem No.: 7.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
TMP-55736 - TENTATIVE MAP - ALTURA - APPLICANT/OWNER: TOLL SOUTH LV,
LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Tentative Map FOR A 119-LOT SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 31.31 acres on the north side oI Alta Drive 950 Ieet west oI
Desert Foothills Drive (APN 137-34-519-001), P-C (Planned Community) Zone |SF3 (Single
Family Detached) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 2 (Beers) |PRJ-55042|.
StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: TOLL SOUTH LV, LLC



`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``



CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
TMP-55736 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:



`` CONDITIONS ``



IMF-5573 CONDIIIONS


Planning


1. Approval oI the Tentative Map shall be Ior no more than Iour (4) years. II a Final Map is
not recorded on all or a portion oI the area embraced by the Tentative Map with Iour (4)
years oI the approval oI the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. All development shall conIorm to the Conditions oI Approval oI Rezoning (Z-0119-96),
the Summerlin West Development Agreement and the Summerlin Development
Standards.

3. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City`s Street Naming Regulations.

4. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.
TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation oI the subject common-interest
community, and prior to recordation oI the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions
('CC&R), or conveyance oI any unit within the community, the Developer is required to
record a Declaration oI Private Maintenance Requirements ('DPMR) as a covenant on
all associated properties, and on behalI oI all current and Iuture property owners. The
DPMR is to include a listing oI all privately owned and/or maintained inIrastructure
improvements, along with assignment oI maintenance responsibility Ior each to the
common interest community or the respective individual property owners, and is to
provide a brieI description oI the required level oI maintenance Ior privately maintained
components. The DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City oI Las Vegas
Department oI Field Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all
properties within the community are subject to assessment Ior all associated costs should
private maintenance obligations not be met, and the City oI Las Vegas be required to
provide Ior said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement oI obligation oI
compliance with the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies oI
the recorded DPMR and CC&R documents to the City oI Las Vegas Department oI Field
Operations.

6. All development is subject to the conditions oI City Departments and State Subdivision
Statutes.

Public Works

7. Unless already constructed or guaranteed by the adjacent developer to the southeast
(Parcel P), construct the Iull width oI the private entry street adjacent to this site
concurrent with development oI this site. II this site develops prior to the site to the
southeast (Parcel P), appropriate easements outside the bounds oI this Tentative Map Ior
Iull construction oI the entry street and Ior complete access Irom the entry street shall be
granted by separate document prior to the approval oI construction drawings Ior this site
or the recordation oI a map, whichever may occur Iirst. Extend all required underground
inIrastructure past the limits oI the Iully constructed entry iI this site develops beIore the
site to the south.

8. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map Ior this site as Public Utility
Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements with
private maintenance by the Homeowner`s Association.

9. Appropriate public easements (Sewer, Drainage, Emergency Access, etc) over the
adjacent Common Lot COS-3 oI the Summerlin Village 23B Unit No. 2 Final Map (book
145 page 28) matching the alignment oI Common Element 'I shall be granted to the
City oI Las Vegas by separate document as determined by the Department oI Public
Works prior to the recordation oI a Final Map Ior this site requiring these easements.
These easements are outside the boundary oI this Tentative Map and are to be privately
maintained.
TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB

Conditions Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



10. Common Element 'I shall be an Emergency Access Easement, Public Sewer and Public
Drainage Easement to be privately maintained. No structures, and no trees or vegetation
taller than three Ieet, shall be allowed within the Public Sewer Easement.

11. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior this Site Plan Prior to submittal oI construction drawings Ior
this site.

12. All landscaping shall be situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility
obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all development access drives and abutting street
intersections.

13. Prior to the release oI a Final Map Ior recordation on this site, the property owner must
contact the Special Improvement District Section oI the Department oI Public Works
(229-2136) and sign a notarized aIIidavit acknowledging and agreeing to a per lot
assessment oI all lots that will be created through a Final Map Ior this site. The City shall
prepare an apportionment report Iollowing recordation oI the Final Map and this
apportionment report must be signed by the property owner prior to the release oI any
building permits Ior this site.

14. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by
the Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits,
submittal oI any construction drawings or the submittal oI a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the
approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements as are recommended by the
City oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study
concurrent with development oI this site.

15. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions oI approval Ior Summerlin
Village 23B, SV-0018-01, Z-0119-96 and all other applicable site-related actions.

16. The approval oI all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is
in concept only. SpeciIic design and construction details relating to size, type and/or
alignment oI improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainage
improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval oI the construction plans by the City.
No deviations Irom adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless speciIic written
approval Ior such is received Irom the City Engineer prior to the recordation oI a Final
Map or the approval oI subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur Iirst.
Approval oI this Tentative Map does not constitute approval oI any deviations. II such
approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing
elimination oI such deviations.

TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``


PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing a 119-lot single-Iamily residential subdivision on a 31.31-acre (net)
undeveloped site on the north side oI Alta Drive 950 Ieet west oI Desert Foothills Drive, located
within Village 23B oI Summerlin West. The map has been reviewed and approved by the
Summerlin Design Review Committee and conIorms to the Summerlin Development Standards,
applicable NRS statutes and Title 19 requirements; thereIore, staII recommends approval with
conditions. II denied, a Iinal map subdividing the subject property cannot be accepted or
approved.


ISSUES

Access to the subdivision will be shared between this site and the parcel to the east. As a
condition oI approval oI this map, the Iull width oI the shared private street must be
constructed concurrently with development oI the site, unless the parcel to the east is
developed Iirst or the improvements are guaranteed by that site's developer.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0119-96) Irom N-U (Non-Urban)
to P-C (Planned Community) on 8,318 acres along the west side oI Clark
County 215, between Charleston Boulevard and Lake Mead Boulevard. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval. 01/27/97
The City Council approved a Development Agreement (DA-0001-96) Ior the
area known as Summerlin West, which includes the subject site. The Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval.
01/16/02
The City Council approved a Master Development Plan Review (SV-0018-
01) establishing land use designations within Summerlin Villages 23A and
23B (The Paseos). The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
12/11/02
The City ReIerral Group approved a request (CRG-1302) Ior a Summerlin
Site Development Plan Review Ior an Aggregate and Asphalt Plant on
property located west oI the intersection oI Summerlin Parkway and I-215.
12/04/03
The Planning Commission approved Tentative Map (TMP-3280) Ior a 11-lot
residential development (Summerlin 23B) on 439 acres located at the
northwest corner oI Alta Drive and Desert Foothills Drive. StaII
recommended approval oI the request.
TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
04/30/03
The City ReIerral Group approved a request (CRG-2243) Ior a Summerlin
Site Development Plan Review Ior Community, Village and Neighborhood
Entry Monumentation located in Villages 23A and 23B.
07/16/12
Department oI Planning staII approved a Minor ModiIication (MOD-45960)
to the Master Development Plan Review (SV-0018-01) Ior Village 23A and
23B.
09/11/12
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-46270) Ior a 20-
lot subdivision (Summerlin Village 23B) on 440 acres at the northwest corner
oI Alta Drive and Desert Foothills Drive. StaII recommended approval.
08/28/13
A parent Final Map (FMP-48545) Ior a Iive-pod single Iamily residential
subdivision on 289.58 acres at the northwest corner oI Desert Foothills Drive
and Alta Drive that established the boundaries oI this site (Parcel Q) was
recorded.
07/25/14
The Summerlin Design Review Committee approved the applicant`s request
Ior the subject tentative map with conditions.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
03/20/14 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
There are no building permits or business licenses relevant to the subject proposal.


Pre-Application Meeting
07/15/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss submittal
requirements Ior a Tentative Map.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
The subject site is currently undeveloped with single-Iamily residential
development to the west and south.
TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting





Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 31.32


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property
Undeveloped
(Parcel Q)
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)
North
Undeveloped
(Parcel ES-2)
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)
South
Single-Family
Residential
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)
East
Undeveloped
(Parcel P)
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)
West
Single-Family
Residential
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
Summerlin Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
P-C (Planned Community) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to the Summerlin Development Standards, the following standards apply:
Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed Units Provided
P-C |SF3| 10 du/ac 313 119
TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks:
Front (garage) 18 Feet 23 Feet Y
Front (building Iace) 10 Feet 18 Feet Y
Side 5 Feet 6 Feet Y
Rear 15 Feet 20 Feet Y
Rear Patio Cover 15 Feet 15 Feet Y
Maximum Height 45 Feet N/A N/A


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Alta Drive
Secondary
Collector
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
80 N/A


19.4.4 Connectivity
1ransportation Aetwork Element # Links # Aodes
Internal Street 17
Intersection Internal 13
Cul-de-sac Terminus 1
Intersection External Street or Stub Terminus 1
Intersection Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
Easements
0
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted 1
Total 18 15
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Aodes): N/A 1.20


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Single-Family
Detached
119 du
2 spaces
per du
238

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 238

238

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 238 0 238 0 Y
TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



ANALYSIS

The subject property is part oI Summerlin West, which is governed by a Development
Agreement between the Master Developer and the City oI Las Vegas, as well as the Summerlin
Development Standards. The proposed tentative map, as well as the speciIic residential product
to be constructed on the site, was reviewed and conditionally approved by the Summerlin Design
Review Committee on 07/25/14, prior to submittal to the City Ior review.

The Summerlin Development Land Use Plan designates the subject property as SF3 (Single
Family Detached), which allows up to 10 residential units per gross acre. The proposed density
oI 3.80 dwelling units per net acre Ialls well within the maximum allowed. As this site is part oI
a master plan with its own improvement standards, it is not subject to Title 19.04 street section
requirements. Although it is not subject to Title 19 connectivity requirements, the design oI the
subdivision has a Connectivity Score oI 1.20, which is below the preIerred ratio oI 1.30.

The proposed lots range in size Irom 6,935 square Ieet to 12,951 square Ieet. Site access is
proposed Irom Antelope Ridge Drive by way oI a 45-Ioot public street that will serve this site, as
well as Parcel P to the east, which has not yet been subdivided. Emergency access to Alta Drive
is provided through a proposed public utility easement in the southern portion oI the site.
Interior circulation is provided by 39-Ioot wide private streets with sidewalks and L-curbs on one
side oI the street and L-curbs and no sidewalks on the other side. No required trails are adjacent
to the site. Two pedestrian access connections have been provided paseos trail area along the
western perimeter oI the subdivision. No neighborhood parks are proposed.

The submitted cross sections indicate that the maximum natural grade across the site Irom both
north to south and Irom east to west is greater than 2. Village walls on the southern and
northern perimeter oI the site are up to eight Ieet in height screening and retaining in
conIormance to the Summerlin Development Standards, which allow up to 10 Ieet total height.
Product walls along the eastern perimeter are a maximum oI Iive and one halI Ieet in height with
a two and a halI Ioot retaining wall; along the western perimeter adjacent to the paseos trail area
Iive and one halI Ioot view Ience with a seven-Ioot retaining wall has been provided. The walls
are designed in accordance with Summerlin Village 23B requirements (enIorced by Summerlin),
with mortar washed slump stone Iascia and decorative capped stucco exterior pilasters.

The Clark County School District projects that approximately 51 primary and secondary school
students would be generated by the proposed development on this site. OI the three schools
serving the area (Givens Elementary School, Rogich Middle School and Palo Verde High
School), the District notes that only Palo Verde was not over capacity Ior the 2013-14 school
year, and no new schools are planned in this area at this time.
TMP-55736 PR1-55042]
JB

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



FINDINGS (TMP-55736)

The proposed Tentative Map conIorms to Nevada Revised Statutes, Title 19 and the Summerlin
Development Standards, and has been approved by the Summerlin Design Review Committee.
ThereIore, staII recommends approval with conditions.




NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 16


NOTICES MAILED N/A


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0
08/21/14
PRJ-55042
TMP-55736
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/21/2014 4:55:19 PM
Applicant Email: jstone@tollbrothersinc.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Thompson
Rep First Name: Chris
Applicant State: Nevada
Applicant Phone: (702) 515-2817
Applicant Zip: 89144
Rep Address: 4325 Dean M<artin Drive, Suite 300
Rep Email: cthompson@rcinevada.com
Rep Fax: (702) 453-0801
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702) 998-2101
Rep Zip: 89103
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13734519001
Project Name ALTURA PARCEL Q VILLAGE 23B SUMMERLIN
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 2 (BOB BEERS)
Application Number: PRJ-55042
Applicant City: Las Vegas
ProjectAddress (Location): NORTH SIDE OF ALTA DRIVE 950 FEET WEST OF DESERT FOOTHILLS DRIVE
Application/Petition For: Altura Parcel Q Village 23B Summerlin
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Jeremy
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 1140 Town Center Drive, Suite 250
Applicant Last Name: Stone
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
08/21/14
PRJ-55042
TMP-55736
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/21/2014 4:55:19 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
! certify that ! am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. ! understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be re]ected. !
further certify that ! am the owner
or purchaser or option holder of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
! Accept:
Yes
TOLL SOUTH L V L L C 1140 TOWN CENTER DR #250 LAS VEGAS, NV 89144-0500
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Chris Thompson RCI Engineering Mr. cthompson@rcinevada.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
08/21/14
PRJ-55042
TMP-55736
08/21/14
PRJ-55042
TMP-55736
08/21/14
PRJ-55042
TMP-55736
T
M
-
1

T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E

M
A
P

F
O
R

A
L
T
U
R
A

S
I
T
E

P
L
A
N

D
I
S
C
L
A
I
M
E
R

N
O
T
E
:

L
E
G
E
N
D

L
E
G
A
L

D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N

S
H
E
E
T

I
N
D
E
X

A

S
I
N
G
L
E

F
A
M
I
L
Y

R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N

B
A
S
I
S

O
F

B
E
A
R
I
N
G
S

B
E
N
C
H
M
A
R
K

T E N T A T I V E M A P
A L T U R A B Y T O L L B R O T H E R S
S
U
M
M
E
R
L
I
N

V
I
L
L
A
G
E

2
3
B

P
A
R
C
E
L

Q

A
P
N

1
3
7
-
3
4
-
5
1
9
-
0
0
1

B
Y

3
1
.
3
1

+
/
-

A
C
R
E
S

D
E
S
I
G
N

E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
:

O
W
N
E
R
/
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
E
R

V
I
C
I
N
I
T
Y

M
A
P

G
E
N
E
R
A
L

N
O
T
E
S

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

S
E
T
B
A
C
K

R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S

L
A
N
D

U
S
E

I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
:

A
LTA
D
R
IV
E
D
E
S
E
R
T
F
O
O
T
H

I
L
L
S

D
R

P
A
R
C
E
L

P

P
A
R
C
E
L

T

C O V E R S H E E T
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
4
2
T
M
P
-
5
5
7
3
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
T
M
-
2

T E N T A T I V E M A P
A L T U R A B Y T O L L B R O T H E R S
M A T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T T M - 3
M A T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T T M - 3
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

L
O
T

6
5
'
X
1
0
5
'

T E N T A T I V E M A P
O
N
S
I
T
E

P
R
I
V
A
T
E

3
9
'
S
T
R
E
E
T

9999999
'
S
T
R
E
E
T
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
4
2
T
M
P
-
5
5
7
3
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
T
M
-
3

T E N T A T I V E M A P
A L T U R A B Y T O L L B R O T H E R S
L
E
G
E
N
D

V
I
C
I
N
I
T
Y

M
A
P


T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

L
O
T

6
5
'
X
1
0
5
'
T E N T A T I V E M A P
O
N
S
I
T
E

P
R
I
V
A
T
E

3
9
'
S
T
R
E
E
T

9999999
'
S
T
R
E
E
T
0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
4
2
T
M
P
-
5
5
7
3
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
T E N T A T I V E M A P
A L T U R A B Y T O L L B R O T H E R S
1

2

5

4

5

3

7

8

9

1
0

1
2

1
5

1
4

6

1
3

T
M
-
5

C R O S S S E C T I O N S
1
1

1
6

1
7

1
8

1
9

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
4
2
T
M
P
-
5
5
7
3
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
T E N T A T I V E M A P
A L T U R A B Y T O L L B R O T H E R S
T
M
-
6

C R O S S S E C T I O N S
2
2

2
0

2
3

2
1

2
3

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
4
2
T
M
P
-
5
5
7
3
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
T
M
-
4

C R O S S S E C T I O N S
T E N T A T I V E M A P
A L T U R A B Y T O L L B R O T H E R S
M A T C H L I N E S E E B E L O W

0
9
/
2
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
4
2
T
M
P
-
5
5
7
3
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
School Development Tracking Form
Date Filed Application Number Entity
Company Name
Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Mobile Fax Email
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
CCSD Comments*
Approved Disapproved
Real Property Management
4190 McLeod Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89121
Single-Family Units (1) x 0.195 = x 0.102 = x 0.135 =
Multi-Family Units (2) x 0.135 = x 0.056 = x 0.062 =
Resort Condo Units (3)
http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property
Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School
Total
(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD
Name
Schools Serving the Area*
Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date
9/8/2014 PRJ-55042 LV
Toll Brothers
Summerlin Village 23B Parcel Q (Altura-The Paseos)
Fox Hill & Alta
137-34-519-001
119 23 12 16
0 0 0
23 12 16
Givens ES 655 Park Vista Dr K-5 788 1115 05/16/14
Rogich MS 6-8 235 N. Pavillion Center Dr. 1664 1821 05/16/14
Palo Verde HS 333 S. Pavillion Center Dr 9-12 2944 2779 05/16/14
Givens ES and Rogich MS were over capcity for the 2013-14 school year. Givens ES is
40.99% over capacity and Rogich MS is 10.82% over capacity for the 2014 projected
enrollment. No new schools are planned for the area.
TMP-55736
T
M
P
-

7
3


[
P
P
J
-

0
4
Z
j

-

T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E

M
A
P

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

T
O
L
L

S
O
U
T
H

L
V


L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H

S
I
D
E

O
F

A
L
T
A

D
P
I
V
E

9

0

F
E
E
T

W
E
S
T

O
F

D
E
S
E
P
T

F
O
O
T
H
I
L
L
S

D
P
I
V
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


September 19, 2014

David Straub
Division President
Toll Brothers, Inc.
1140 N. Town Center Dr. Suite 250
Las Vegas, NV 89144

RE: SDRC Tentative Map and Preliminary Grading Conditional Approval Parcel Q (Altura), Toll
Brothers, Summerlin Village 23B (The Paseos)

Dear Mr. Straub,

The Summerlin Design Review Committee has reviewed your Tentative Map and Preliminary Grading
Plan submittal for Parcel Q (dated August 13, 2014). The plans are approved with the following
condition:

Sheet TM4
1. Section 14 and 15: It is understood that the OnSite Paseo is a Common Lot to be maintained
by the subassociation. In this case the property line should be situated such that the entire
wall is located on the property owners Lot with the property line matching the interior face
along the Common Lot. Revise Section 15 to match Section 14.

Please contact us if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Betty Shevorski
Senior Design Manager
SDRC
09/25/14
PRJ-55042
TMP-55736 - REVISED


Agenda tem No.: 8.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
VAR-55721 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRAYER
MOUNTAIN/INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER: INTERNATIONAL
CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS, INC., ET AL - For possible action on a request to reinstate a
previously approved Variance TO ALLOW 119 PARKING SPACES WHERE 338 SPACES
ARE REQUIRED on a portion oI 4.99 acres generally located at the southwest corner oI CliII
Shadows Parkway and Clark County 215 (APN 137-12-401-011), PD (Planned Development)
Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55315|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 6 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-55721 and SDR-55723 |PRJ-55315|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - VAR-55721, VAC-55722 and SDR-55723 |PRJ-55315|
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-55721, VAC-55722 and SDR-55723 |PRJ-55315|
4. Photos - VAR-55721, VAC-55722 AND SDR-55723 |PRJ-55315|
5. JustiIication Letter - VAR-55721, VAC-55722 and SDR-55723 |PRJ-55315|
6. Protest Postcards

VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: PRAYER MOUNTAIN / INTERNATIONAL
CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER: INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS,
INC., ET AL


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``

CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-55721 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
VAC-55722 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

VAR-55721

SDR-55723 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
VAR-55721
VAC-55722


`` CONDITIONS ``

VAk-55721 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior a Petition to Vacate (VAC-
55722) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55723) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



VAC-55722 CONDIIIONS

1. The limits oI this Petition oI Vacation shall be the U.S. Government Patent Easements
generally located approximately 63 Ieet southwest oI the intersection oI CliII Shadows
Parkway and Novat Street, exclusive oI the Iive Ieet adjacent to CliII Shadows Parkway
(area back oI curb) and the area needed Ior access to Assessor`s Parcel Number 137-12-401-
010. Alternatively, prior to the recordation oI the Order oI Vacation, provide a recorded
Joint Access Agreement between this site and Assessor`s Parcel Number 137-12-401-010.

2. All public improvements, iI any, adjacent to and in conIlict with this vacation application
are to be modiIied, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation oI an
Order oI Relinquishment oI Interest.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with code requirements and design standards oI all
City Departments.

4. II the Order oI Relinquishment oI Interest is not recorded within one (1) year aIter approval
by the City oI Las Vegas or an Extension oI Time is not granted by the Planning Director,
then approval will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.


SDk-55723 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior a Variance (VAR-55721)
and Petition to Vacate (VAC-55722) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building
elevations, date stamped 08/21/14, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. A Waiver Irom the Lone Mountain West Wall and Landscape Standards is hereby approved,
to allow retaining walls oI up to 16 Ieet in height without intermediate terracing, and to
allow a zero-Ioot landscape buIIer along portions oI the north, south, east and west property
lines.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Conditions Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




5. An Exception Irom Title 19.08.110(C)(10) is hereby approved, to allow 78 parking lot trees
Ior the overall site where 87 trees are required and Iour diamond planters within the east lot
where eight parking lot islands are required.

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

7. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit.

8. This approval shall apply to the site as a whole. Any proposed phasing plan Ior site
construction shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department Ior
consideration prior to issuance oI any building permits to determine whether a Minor or
Major Site Development Plan Review is required Ior approval.

9. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape
Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same
time application is made Ior a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisIactory manner; the landscape
plan shall include irrigation speciIications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility
oI any traIIic control device. The technical landscape plan shall include the Iollowing
changes Irom the conceptual landscape plan: on the south side oI CliII Shadows Parkway,
west oI the intersection with the Iuture Desert Hope Drive, a Multi-Use Transportation Trail
is required and shall meet all minimum standards oI the Trails Element oI the Las Vegas
2020 Master Plan.

10. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

11. A Comprehensive Construction Staging Plan shall be submitted to the Department oI
Planning Ior review and approval prior to the issuance oI any building permits. The
Construction Staging Plan shall include the Iollowing inIormation: Design and location oI
construction trailer(s); design and location oI construction Iencing; all proposed temporary
construction signage; location oI materials staging area; and the location and design oI
parking Ior all construction workers.

12. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Conditions Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting





Public Works


13. Coordinate with the Right-oI-Way Section oI the Department oI Operations and
Maintenance to obtain a Bureau oI Land Management (BLM) Right-oI-Way Grant
Easement at the northwest corner oI this site (Assessor`s Parcel #137-12-401-001),
including the existing circular turn around and roadway providing access to both Assessor`s
Parcel #137-12-401-010 and this site Irom CliII Shadows Parkway prior to the issuance oI
any permits Ior this site. Comply with the requirements oI the Right-oI-Way Section.

14. Prior to the issuance oI permits Ior the parking areas that is not owned by the applicant,
coordinate with the Department oI Operations and Maintenance to obtain agreements to
construct and operate these parking areas. Provide written prooI that the required parking
agreements meet the satisIaction oI the Operations and Maintenance Department.

15. Complete the required improvements Ior the Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail along CliII
Shadows Parkway Ior all portions oI this site that are adjacent to CliII Shadows Parkway.
Coordinate with the Right-oI-Way Section oI the Department oI Operations and
Maintenance to determine BLM document requirements to construct the portions oI the
Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail that are on Assessor`s Parcel #137-12-401-040. Comply
with the requirements oI the Right-oI-Way Section.

16. A Petition oI Vacation Ior the existing Cheyenne Avenue right-oI-way adjacent to the
southwest corner oI this site shall be submitted to the City and shall be approved by the City
Council prior to the submittal oI any construction drawings Ior this site. The Order oI
Vacation shall record prior to the issuance oI any permits Ior this site. II such Petition oI
Vacation is not approved by City Council, this site shall be redesigned to accommodate
dedication oI appropriate right-oI-way to extend or terminate Cheyenne Avenue.

17. Petition oI Vacation VAC-55722 shall record prior to the issuance oI permits.

18. II not already in place at the time oI development oI this site, construct all incomplete street
improvements on CliII Shadows Parkway and Iull street improvements on Desert Hope
Drive concurrent with development. Desert Hope Drive improvements shall be built per the
approved construction drawings Ior 'Improvement Plans Ior Desert Hope Drive Access
Road, Reverence (Village 26), modiIied as approved by the Department oI Public Works.
Required improvements on Desert Hope Drive may be phased in accordance with the
submitted phasing plan as Iollows:
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Conditions Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Phase I: Construct the Iull width oI the intersection oI Desert Hope Drive and CliII
Shadows Parkway, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, bases, conduits, and poles Ior the
Iuture signalization oI the Desert Hope Drive / CliII Shadows Parkway intersection, on
both southwest and southeast quadrants concurrent with on-site development activities.
Construct permanent improvements including curb/gutter, sidewalk and asphalt paving on
the west halI oI Desert Hope Drive Irom the intersection with CliII Shadows Parkway
extending south to the Iirst driveway into the proposed site, and including the northern
curb return Ior the driveway. A minimum oI two lanes oI temporary asphalt roadway shall
be constructed Ior the east halI oI Desert Hope Drive, extending southward a minimum oI
150 Ieet Irom the intersection, beIore transitioning to the permanent improvements on the
west halI. The developer shall work with the TraIIic Engineering Division to ensure that
the temporary improvements accommodate the proposed grade diIIerences between east
and west halves in an appropriate and saIe manner.

Phase II: Construct all remaining permanent improvements on the Iull width oI Desert
Hope Drive, removing and replacing all temporary improvements as needed, extending to
the southern edge oI this site concurrent with on-site development activities.
Extend all required underground utilities, such as electrical, telephone, etc., located within
public rights-oI-way, past the boundaries oI this site prior to construction oI hard surIacing
(asphalt or concrete).

19. Submit an Encroachment Agreement Ior landscaping and private improvements, iI any, in
the CliII Shadows Parkway and Desert Hope Drive public rights-oI-way prior to this
issuance oI permits Ior these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy
Ior the term oI the Encroachment Agreement and add the City oI Las Vegas as an
additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. II requested by the City, the applicant
shall remove property encroaching in the public right-oI-way at the applicant`s expense
pursuant to the terms oI the City`s Encroachment Agreement. The installation and
maintenance oI all private improvements in the public right-oI-way shall be the
responsibility oI the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transIerred with the sale oI the
property Ior the entire term oI the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements
Ior the Encroachment Agreement with the Land Development Section oI the Department oI
Building and SaIety (702-229-4836).

20. II not already in place, extend public sewer in Desert Hope Drive to the southern edge oI
this site at a size, depth and location acceptable to the Collection System Planning Section oI
the Department oI Public Works. Provide public sewer easements Ior all public sewers not
located within existing public street right-oI-way or public sewer easements prior to the
issuance oI any permits as required by the Department oI Public Works. Improvement
Drawings submitted to the City Ior review shall not be approved Ior construction until all
required public sewer easements necessary to connect this site to the existing public sewer
system have been granted to the City.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Conditions Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



21. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.

22. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior the proposed use oI this Iacility. The design and layout oI all
onsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the approval oI the Department oI Fire
Services.

23. An update to the previously approved TraIIic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and
approved by the Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or
grading permits or the submittal oI any construction drawings, whichever may occur Iirst.
Comply with the recommendations oI the approved update to the TraIIic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy oI the site. Phased compliance will be allowed iI recommended by the
approved TraIIic Impact Analysis. No recommendation oI the approved TraIIic Impact
Analysis, nor compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modiIy or eliminate any condition
oI approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development
oI this site.

24. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the
Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits,
submittal oI any construction drawings or the submittal oI a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainage ways recommended in the
approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements as are recommended by the City
oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study
concurrent with development oI this site. In lieu oI constructing improvements, in whole or
in part, the developer may agree to contribute monies Ior the construction oI neighborhood
or local drainage improvements, the amount oI such monies shall be determined by the
approved Drainage Plan/Study and shall be contributed prior to the issuance oI any building
or grading permits, or the recordation oI a Map subdividing this site, whichever may occur
Iirst, iI allowed by the City Engineer.


VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing a two-story, 66,192 square-Ioot church with ancillary pre-school and
religious education classrooms at the southwest corner oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Clark
County 215. The land is currently undeveloped, except Ior an unpaved access road along the
west side oI the Ireeway and the paved entrance to the city`s La Madre equestrian trailhead
located to the north and west oI the site. A phased project is anticipated in which 27,870 square
Ieet would be constructed in parts oI two levels in the Iirst phase and 38,322 square Ieet would
be constructed in the remainder oI the building, which would also contain a mezzanine level.
The project as submitted was approved in July 2010; however, those approvals expired in July
2014, and the applicant is now requesting to reinstate the same entitlements.

The site includes Iour lots, two oI which are owned by the International Church oI Las Vegas
and two that are owned by the Bureau oI Land Management that are leased to the City oI Las
Vegas Ior development as the La Madre Trailhead park complex. The applicant has entered into
a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with the City to develop and landscape
additional parking Iacilities and public right-oI-way (Desert Hope Drive) on these parcels, to be
shared by the church and park Iacilities. The U.S. Government Patent easements in conIlict with
the proposed development must be vacated. These easements would not be needed in the Iuture
and staII does not object to the request.

The requested Variance to allow a reduced number oI parking spaces is appropriate, as the
applicant has provided evidence oI unique and extraordinary circumstances related to the
topography oI the site. The requested landscape waivers and exceptions can also be supported,
as they are mitigated by additional landscaping located throughout the interior oI the site.
ThereIore, staII recommends approval oI these requests with conditions.


ISSUES

Previous land use approvals included rezoning oI the applicant`s parcels to PD (Planned
Development), a modiIication to the Lone Mountain West Master plan to add the Iive-acre
parcel and allow churches in residential districts, a special use permit Ior the church use,
vacation oI U.S. Government Patent Easements, a parking variance and a site review Ior a
similar request. However, the Vacation, Variance and Site Development Plan Review
expired 07/07/14 aIter they were not exercised within the required time limits. The Special
Use Permit (SUP-3304) Ior the House oI Worship use was allowed to expire 12/17/10, as this
use is permitted as oI right in the PF (Public Facilities) special land use designation.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




The site consists oI portions oI Iederally owned land under lease to the City oI Las Vegas
(APNs 137-12-401-001 and 040) and privately owned parcels (APNs 137-12-401-011 and
137-12-410-003). Assessor`s Parcel Number 137-12-410-003 is a 0.08-acre remnant parcel
Irom the existing commercial subdivision to the north (west side oI CliII Shadows Parkway).
The site is divided by a proposed public right-oI-way (Desert Hope Drive) that has not yet
been dedicated but is part oI the DDA between the City oI Las Vegas and the proposed
church. OverIlow parking (120 spaces) would be provided to the east oI this planned
roadway. Access to the church site (APN 137-12-401-011) would be provided via two
driveways Irom Desert Hope Drive and one Irom the shared access to the equestrian
trailhead.
A Waiver oI the Lone Mountain West Wall and Landscape Standards is required to allow
retaining walls oI up to 16 Ieet in height without intervening terracing, and to allow a zero-
Ioot landscape buIIer along portions oI the north, south, east and west property lines. StaII
supports the requested waivers.
An Exception oI Title 19.08.110 is required to allow 78 parking lot trees Ior the overall site
where 87 trees are required and Iour parking lot landscape diamonds where eight parking lot
landscape islands are required. StaII supports the requested Exceptions.
'Churches is a permitted use throughout Lone Mountain West and in the current PF (Public
Facilities) special land use designation. Development standards Ior this area are established
by approved site development plans. Religious education and pre-school activities are
proposed as ancillary to the Church use.
A Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail is required along the south side oI CliII Shadows
Parkway. A condition oI approval will require the trail to be shown on the technical
landscape plan, along with the appropriate plantings within this corridor, pursuant to the
Trails Element oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan.
Drainage Study and Hillside Review: Under Title 19.10.140, a review oI proposed grades
and drainage is required on this site due to existing slopes. On 07/21/14, the requirement Ior
an update to the existing drainage study was waived by the Department oI Public Works, as
drainage patterns have not changed since the original submittal.
Project Phasing: A condition oI approval will require any proposed phasing plan Ior site
construction to be submitted to the Department oI Planning Ior consideration prior to the
issuance oI any building permits; staII would determine iI the proposed development
qualiIies Ior Major or Minor Site Development Plan Review. The phasing plan included in
this submittal notes only
Vacation oI U.S. Government Patent Easements is requested where they come into conIlict
with the proposed development; however, access must be granted to APN 137-12-401-010
through the north side oI the subject site. A condition oI approval will address this and the
required private access agreement.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-3209) Irom U (Undeveloped)
|PCD (Planned Community Development) General Plan Amendment| to PD
(Planned Development) on 5.00 acres on the south side oI CliII Shadows
Parkway, approximately 375 Ieet west oI Clark County 215. The Planning
Commission had no recommendation; staII recommended approval.
12/17/03 The City Council approved a Major ModiIication (MOD-3206) oI the Lone
Mountain West Master Plan to add approximately 5.00 acres to the Plan area
and to allow churches within all residential land use designations with
approval oI a Special Use Permit, on the south side oI CliII Shadows
Parkway, approximately 375 Ieet west oI Clark County 215. The Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval.
01/09/08
The City Council approved a Disposition and Development Agreement to
allow the International Church oI Las Vegas to develop portions oI APNs
127-12-401-011 and 040 and to share the use oI these areas Ior purposes oI
overIlow parking and recreation.
10/01/08
Department oI Planning staII approved a Hillside Development Plan Review
(HIL-30765) pursuant to Title 19.06.170 (now UDC 19.10.140) Ior a
proposed Iive-story, 89,550 square-Ioot Church/House oI Worship on 5.07
acres at the southwest corner oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Clark County
215.
At the applicant`s request, the City Council tabled a request Ior a Rezoning
(ZON-31062) Irom U (Undeveloped) |PCD (Planned Community
Development) General Plan Designation| to PD (Planned Development) on
0.08 acres at the southwest corner oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Novat
Street. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
At the applicant`s request, the City Council tabled a request Ior a Major
ModiIication (MOD-30617) oI the Lone Mountain West Master Land Use
Plan to amend the land use designation Irom L (Low Density Residential) and
P (Park/School/Recreation/Open Space) to PF (Public Facilities) on 5.07 acres
approximately 660 Ieet east oI the southwest corner oI CliII Shadows
Parkway and Clark County 215. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
04/01/09
At the applicant`s request, the City Council tabled a request Ior a Variance
(VAR-30620) to allow an 85-Ioot tall building where two stories or 35 Ieet is
allowed and to allow a site disturbance oI 3.78 acres where 3.56 acres is
allowed on 4.99 acres approximately 660 Ieet east oI the southwest corner oI
CliII Shadows Parkway and Clark County 215. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staII recommended denial.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS
Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
At the applicant`s request, the City Council tabled a request Ior a Variance
(VAR-31394) to allow 175 parking spaces where 375 spaces are required on
4.99 acres approximately 660 Ieet east oI the southwest corner oI CliII
Shadows Parkway and Clark County 215. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staII recommended denial.
At the applicant`s request, the City Council tabled a request Ior a Petition to
Vacate (VAC-30622) U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located
63 Ieet southwest oI the intersection oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Novat
Street. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.

At the applicant`s request, the City Council tabled a request Ior a Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-30614) Ior a proposed Iive-story, 89,550
square-Ioot Church/House oI Worship with waivers oI the Lone Mountain
West Wall and Landscape Standards on 9.12 acres at the southwest corner oI
CliII Shadows Parkway and Clark County 215. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staII recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Major ModiIication (MOD-30617) oI the Lone
Mountain West Master Land Use Plan to amend the land use designation Irom
L (Low Density Residential) and P (Park/School/Recreation/Open Space) to
PF (Public Facilities) on 5.07 acres approximately 660 Ieet east oI the
southwest corner oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Clark County 215. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval. |APNs 137-12-401-
011 and 137-12-410-003|
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-31062) Irom U (Undeveloped)
|PCD (Planned Community Development) General Plan Designation| to PD
(Planned Development) on 0.08 acres at the southwest corner oI CliII
Shadows Parkway and Novat Street. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval. |APN 137-12-410-003|
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-30622) U.S.
Government Patent Easements generally located approximately 63 Ieet
southwest oI the intersection oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Novat Street.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval. The approval
expired 07/07/14.
07/07/10
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-37943) to allow 119 parking
spaces where 338 are required on 4.99 acres at the southwest corner oI CliII
Shadows Parkway and Clark County 215. The Planning Commission and
staII recommended approval. |APN 137-12-401-011|. The approval expired
07/07/14.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-37942)
Ior a proposed two-story, 35-Ioot high, 66,192 square-Ioot Church/House oI
worship and related school with waivers oI the Lone Mountain West Wall and
Landscape Standards to allow retaining walls up to 16 Ieet in height and zero-
Ioot landscape buIIers along portions oI the north, south, east and west
perimeters on 9.12 acres at the southwest corner oI CliII Shadows Parkway
and Clark County 215. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval. |APNs 137-12-401-001, 011, 040 and 137-12-410-003|. The
approval expired 07/07/14.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
12/21/12
A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership on APNs 137-12-401-011 and
137-12-410-003. The remaining parcels are owned by the United States oI
America, managed by the Bureau oI Land Management and leased to the City
oI Las Vegas.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
There are no related building permits or business licenses associated with the site.


Pre-Application Meeting
07/21/14
StaII met with the applicant, who wishes to reinstate the previous approvals
on the site with no alterations to the approved plans. The applicant was
advised to submit the approved drawings without any changemarks, and to
request the same waivers and exceptions. Per e-mail Irom the Director oI
Public Works dated 07/21/14, an update to the existing drainage study that
would validate the previous Hillside Development Standards approval was
waived, as drainage patterns had not changed since the original submittal.
Submittal requirements Ior Variance, Vacation and Site Development Plan
Review application were discussed with the applicant. New applications and
Statements oI Financial Interest would be required.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14 The site is undeveloped and Iree oI trash and debris.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Details of Application Request
Site Area
Gross Acres 9.12 (subject site, including BLM land)
Net Acres 5.07 acres (applicant owned parcels)


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
PF (Public Facilities)
PD (Planned
Development)
Subject Property Undeveloped OS-R (Open
Space/Recreation)
Lone Mountain West
C-V (Civic)
Public Park
(Equestrian
Trailhead)
OS-R (Open
Space/Recreation)
Lone Mountain West
C-V (Civic)
Financial Institution,
General with Drive
Through
North
Service Station and
Auto Repair Garage,
Minor
VC (Village
Commercial) Lone
Mountain
PD (Planned
Development)
South Undeveloped
COS (Community Open
Space) - Summerlin
P-C (Planned Community)
East CC 215 ROW ROW (Right-oI-Way) ROW (Right-oI-Way)
West Undeveloped
L (Low Density
Residential) Lone
Mountain West
U (Undeveloped)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
Lone Mountain West N
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
C-V (Civic) District Y
PD (Planned Development) District Y
Hillside Development Area Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails By Condition
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

All development within the Lone Mountain West Master Plan area is subject to the requirements
oI the Lone Mountain West Master Plan. The Lone Mountain West Master Plan does not
establish design standards Ior buildings located within the PF (Public Facilities) land use
designation; thereIore, the development standards Ior this development shall use the Iollowing
criteria: the development standards shall be established by the PF (Public Facilities) Lone
Mountain West special land use designation and any corresponding Site Development Plan
Review approval under Title 19.16.100.

The site also Ialls within the Hillside Development Overlay District, which is subject to the
regulations contained in Title 19.10.140. The standards shall be designed to ensure compatibility
oI the development with existing and planned development in the surrounding area.


1he proposed landscaping, parking, setbacks, and maximum building heights for this project
are defined below. Any future development will require review for determination of
appropriate development standards.
Standard Provided Compliance
Building Floor Area 66,192 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
263 Feet
40 Feet
N/A
203 Feet
Y
Y
N/A
Y
Max. Lot Coverage 19 Y
Max. Building Height 2 Stories and 35 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure Walled, Gated, RooIed Y
Mech. Equipment Parapet screened Y
Site Disturbance 3.43 acres Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.1.14 Hillside Development Overlay District Standards, the following
site disturbance standards apply:
Slope Site Area Maximum Disturbance
Allowed
Proposed
Disturbance
Compliance
0-15 2.70 acres 100 2.70 acres
15-25 0.43 acres 50 0.21 acres
25 and
greater
1.86 acres 35 0.65 acres

Total Parcel
Area
4.99 acres 3.56 acres 3.43 acres Y
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Pursuant to 1itle 19.12 and the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design
Standards, the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees (West):
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
21 Trees
13 Trees
26 Trees
23 Trees
27 Trees
0 Trees
26 Trees
11 Trees
Y
N
Y
N
BuIIer Trees (East):
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
8 Trees
3 Trees
25 Trees
16 Trees
8 Trees
4 Trees
26 Trees
32 Trees
Y
Y
Y
Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 135 Trees 134 Trees N
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
87 Trees 78 Trees N
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
7 Feet
7 Feet
7 Feet
7 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
N
N
N
N



Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
CliII Shadows
Parkway
Major Collector
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways Map
100 Y
Desert Hope Drive N/A
Civil Improvement
Drawing Set
(#107Y4950)
90 N/A

VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Nine
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Church/House
oI Worship
1,350-seat
gathering
room
1 space
per 4 seats
in
gathering
room
338

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 338

119

N
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 330 8 111 8 N
Percent Deviation 65



Waivers of the Lone Mountain West Design Standards
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
Maximum 3`6 tall retaining
walls with 5` terraces in
between |Subsection 3.6.1 (i)|
Retaining walls up to
16 Ieet with no
terracing
Approval
7` perimeter landscape planting
strip along interior lot lines
|Subsection 4.3.3 (i)|
Zero-Ioot landscape
planting strip along
portions oI the north,
south, east and west lot
lines
Approval



Exceptions of 1itle 19
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
One 24 box shade tree per 6
uncovered parking spaces in
islands and at ends oI rows
(87 parking lot trees required)
78 parking lot trees Approval
8 parking lot islands in oIIsite
lot
4 diamonds in oIIsite
lot
Approval

VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS
Staff Report Page Ten
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



ANALYSIS

Plans Ior this development and the vacation oI government patent easements have been provided
exactly as they were approved in July 2010; no alterations have been made to the uses or
Iacilities proposed. Similarly worded conditions oI approval will apply to the reinstated project,
updated Ior compatibility with the UniIied Development Code, which was adopted in 2011.

The proposed church and school Iacility will consist oI two interconnected buildings with an
amphitheater in between. The proposed buildings are no more than 35 Ieet in height. Parking
will be provided to the north oI the structures and in a satellite lot to the east across Desert Hope
Drive. A total oI 337 parking spaces are proposed on the overall site; however, only 119 spaces,
including eight handicap accessible spaces, can be provided on property owned by the church.
As the remaining spaces are located on property owned by the BLM and cannot be guaranteed
beyond the lease expiration oI 2032, a Variance Ior parking is required. StaII can support this
request, as the overall site has extraordinary topographical conditions that will result in undue
hardship Ior development in strict compliance with the provisions oI Title 19.

Although phasing oI construction activities has previously been discussed, no phasing plan has
been submitted Ior consideration. A condition oI approval has been added to require that any
proposed phasing plan Ior site construction shall be submitted to the Department oI Planning Ior
consideration prior to issuance oI any building permits to determine whether a Minor or Major
Site Development Plan Review is required Ior approval. This additional review will ensure that
the site will be compatible with the surrounding area, and that improvements that are required Ior
the public health, saIety and welIare are addressed through all phases oI construction.

Waivers oI the Lone Mountain West Master Development Plan and Design Standards are
required Ior walls and landscaping. Per Subsection 3.6.1(i), retaining walls are limited to a
maximum oI three Ieet, six inches, with Iive-Ioot wide terraces separating the walls. The
applicant is proposing walls up to 16 Ieet in height with no intervening terracing. The waiver
request is supported by staII, as the site is subject to extreme topographical conditions, and the
highest walls are located behind the buildings and not visible Irom public right-oI-way.

As previously addressed, the subject site is comprised oI multiple lots with diIIering ownership,
resulting in lot lines that are located at the interior oI the overall subject site. In addition, the
south lot line is inaccessible due to the topography oI the site. Because oI these conditions,
perimeter landscaping is not proposed along all lot lines as required, and thus a waiver oI
Subsection 4.3.3(i) oI the Lone Mountain West Plan has been requested. Exceptions Ior parking
lot landscaping have also been requested to allow 78 parking lot trees and Iour landscape
diamonds where 87 trees and eight landscape islands are required. StaII supports the requested
waiver and exceptions, as the applicant has provided buIIers in conIorming widths along all
public rights-oI-way, and in a reduced width oI Iive Ieet along the west lot line, where drainage
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Eleven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



and topographic conditions allow. Additional trees and shrubs in signiIicant quantities have been
included in planters throughout the interior oI the site. A Multi-Use Transportation Trail is
located along the CliII Shadows Parkway street Irontage, which has been conditioned to comply
with the provisions oI the Trails Element oI the City oI Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan.

This was the Iirst project to be considered under the Hillside Development Standards and
Guidelines, adopted by City Council on August 15, 2007 and codiIied under LVMC 19.10.140.
As required, a preliminary review oI the project (HIL-30765) was completed prior to submittal
oI the original entitlement applications to identiIy existing geographic, topographic and
environmental Ieatures oI the site, determine the impact oI the proposed project on these
Ieatures, and to determine compliance with the standards and guidelines in general. Grading
plans and sections, a slope analysis, a ridgeline/elevation study and a drainage study were all
submitted by the applicant and previously reviewed by city staII in the Department oI Planning,
the Development Coordination, Flood Control, Land Development Services and Transportation
Planning sections oI the Department oI Public Works, and Department oI Fire Services. The
current submittal is in compliance with the requirements oI the ordinance. An updated study was
determined not to be needed, as site conditions had not changed since the original submittal in
2010.

Vacation oI U.S. Government Patent Easements around the principal private parcel is needed
where these easements conIlict with the proposed development; however, access must be granted
to APN 137-12-401-010 through the north side oI the subject site, either through reservation oI
the existing easements or provision oI a recorded Joint Access Agreement between this site and
Assessor`s Parcel Number 137-12-401-010. This is noted as a condition oI approval oI the
Petition to Vacate. StaII has no objection to the vacation request, as the easements are not
needed at this location.

As the proposed site is in substantial compliance with Title 19 and the Lone Mountain West
Master Plan, is compatible with the existing surrounding land uses, and measures have been
taken to mitigate the impacts that the development may have on adjacent properties, staII is
recommending approval oI the requests Ior a parking Variance and Site Development Plan
Review.


FINDINGS (VAR-55721)

In accordance with the provisions oI Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits oI a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;
2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, selI-created or Iinancial in nature.
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Twelve
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:
'Where by reason oI exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape oI a speciIic piece oI
property at the time oI enactment oI the regulation, or by reason oI exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition oI
the piece oI property, the strict application oI any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical diIIiculties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner oI the property, a variance Irom that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the diIIiculties or hardship, iI the relieI may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment oI aIIected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose oI any ordinance or
resolution.

Evidence has been presented oI extraordinary topographic conditions that would result in undue
hardship Ior developing the site in strict compliance with the provisions oI Title 19. In view oI
the diIIiculties imposed by the site`s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s
hardship in providing the required number oI parking spaces is justiIied, and it is thereby within
the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.


FINDINGS (SDR-55723)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The proposed development, as conditioned, is compatible with the adjacent development
and development in the area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, but not consistent with
Title 19 and the Lone Mountain West Master Plan due to the requested Variance, Waivers
and Exceptions. These requests are supported due to extreme topographical site conditions
and mitigating Iactors such as additional landscaping within interior planting areas.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 AND VAC-55722 PR1-55315]
SS

Staff Report Page Thirteen
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The site will be accessed by two driveways: a driveway that will serve the subject site, the
La Madre Trailhead Park and the adjacent property to the west, with access Irom CliII
Shadows Parkway, which is classiIied as an 80-Ioot Major Collector; and a second
driveway with access Irom the Iuture Desert Hope Drive, which is anticipated to be a
Major Collector in the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

Building and landscape materials conIorm to the requirements oI Title 19 and the Lone
Mountain West Master Plan, and are appropriate Ior the area and Ior the City.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

Building elevations are not unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious, and create an orderly and
aesthetically pleasing environment. The proposed development is harmonious and
compatible with development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

The proposed development is subject to permit review and inspection; thereIore,
appropriate measures will be taken to protect the health, saIety and general welIare.


NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 28


NOTICES MAILED 498 - VAR-55721 |PRJ-55315|
2 - VAC-55722 |PRJ-55315|
498 - SDR-55723 |PRJ-55315|


APPROVALS 0 - VAR-55721 |PRJ-55315|
0 - VAC-55722 |PRJ-55315|
0 - SDR-55723 |PRJ-55315|


PROTESTS 6 - VAR-55721 |PRJ-55315|
0 - VAC-55722 |PRJ-55315|
4 - SDR-55723 |PRJ-55315|
08/21/14
PRJ-55315
VAR-55721
08/21/14
PRJ-55315
VAR-55721
10/14/14 PC
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
2
1
,

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
3

&

V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2
V
A
P
-

7
Z
1

[
P
P
J
-

3
1

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
C
-

7
Z
Z

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

7
Z
3

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

P
P
A
Y
E
P

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
/
I
N
T
E
P
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L

C
H
U
P
C
H

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

I
N
T
E
P
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L

C
H
U
P
C
H

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S


I
N
C
,


E
T

A
L

S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
L
I
F
F

S
H
A
D
O
W
S

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
L
A
P
k

C
O
U
N
T
Y

Z
1


0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


V
A
P
-

7
Z
1

[
P
P
J
-

3
1

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
C
-

7
Z
Z

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

7
Z
3

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

P
P
A
Y
E
P

M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
/
I
N
T
E
P
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L

C
H
U
P
C
H

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

I
N
T
E
P
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L

C
H
U
P
C
H

O
F

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S


I
N
C
,


E
T

A
L

S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
L
I
F
F

S
H
A
D
O
W
S

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

A
N
D

C
L
A
P
k

C
O
U
N
T
Y

Z
1


0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4

_ /

8100 Westcliff Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89145


702.242.2273 Fax 702.673.4771

To: Steve Swanton, CLV Planning Dept.




From: Janet L. Kennedy, Admi ni strator
Internati onal Church of Las Vegas

Date: August 20, 2014




Subject: Project 55315 Prayer Mountai n Appli cati on for:
- Si te Development Revi ew
- Variance
- Vacati on

Proposed Use: House of Worshi p / School / Day Care

Dear Mr. Swanton:


As you know, ICLV previously received Cit y Council approvals on t he following
applicat ions:
- SDR - 37942
- VAC - 30622
- VAR 37943

The International Church of Las Vegas operates its main ministry of worship services, pastoral
care, day care, K-8 education, bible and ministry training, and ministry events on a 15-acre
campus located at 8100 Westcliff Dr. in the City of Las Vegas. Through its main campus and 3
other smaller campuses in the Las Vegas Valley, ICLV regularly provides the same services as
its main campus and in addition serves the homeless community, provides food and clothing to
those in need, and a variety of ministerial services to the community through its outreach
programs.
The City Council had previously approved and granted extensions of time for the SDR
y through its outre
of time fo ff r the S
08/21/14
PRJ-55315
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 & VAC-55722
/VAR/VAC based on the extraordinary length of time it took to work through neighborhood
issues and through the planning process. From that time until 2013, the crash of the real estate
market in Las Vegas and the local economy has taken a severe toll on the church as well as
business and residents of Clark County. Other conditions impacted the ability to move forward
with development.

As the 2012 EOT has expired, we would like to formally request a review and approval of
our project for:
1) A Site Development Review same as previously approved SDR- 37942 with related
waivers of the Lone Mountain West Wall and Landscape Standards to allow retaining
walls up to 16 feet in height and zero-foot landscape buffers along portions of the
North, South, East, and West perimeters of the property,
2) ) Related parking variance same as previous approved VAR-37943, and
3) Related vacation request to vacate 63-ft. of government patent easements- same as
previously approved VAC 30622.

4) Note 1: The church i s NOT requesti ng any changes to the previ ously approved
Si te Development Revi ew, Vacation, and Vari ance. Plans and documents remai n
the same. All the condi ti ons previ ously i mposed by the Planni ng Department,
Publi c works, and Ci ty Counci l are accepted by the church i n submi tti ng thi s
appli cati on.

Note: 2: Conditions in the area relative to new buildings have not changed since the most
recent EOT in 2012. No new building has occurred.

CLV Cri teri a for Si te Development Plans:


The City of Las Vegas has established criteria that must be met to gain approval.

Note: Thi s appli cati on and accompanyi ng drawi ngs and documents for Si te Development
Plans are i denti cal to the previ ous approvals by the Ci ty Counci l. It accomplishes the
following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and development in the
area;

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, the Design Standards Manual,
the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly adopted city plans, policies and
standards;

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or neighborhood
traffic;
ways or neighborh rr
08/21/14
PRJ-55315
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 & VAC-55722

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic features are not
unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious in appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing
environment; and are harmonious and compatible with development in the area.

Green Ini ti ati ves:


This project has not been fully engaged with the architectural design and drawings. However,
the church has already identified several areas where it fits into the City of Las Vegas adopted
sustainability policies.

Ci ty of Las Vegas Green Bui ldi ng Program


To the degree that funds are available to make participation a reality, the church plans to
participate in the citys Green Building Program.

1. Sustainability Trails. The City of Las Vegas has installed a trail along part of the
property, which is the subject of these applications. The church cooperated with the
City of Las Vegas in granting an easement to the city on one of the church parcels to
allow for a trail on either side of the churchs property owed by the BLM and/or under
lease agreement with the city. This allows for continuous connectivity between adjacent
parcels and creates access to the adjacent equestrian park and to the trail system
currently under construction throughout the Cliff Shadows/Cheyenne corridor. The
church desires to contribute to making the area a walkable community.

2. Bike racks and storage will be made available for cyclists.

3. Water saving measures will be part of the engineering and design of the site. Xeriscape
features will be installed where possible.

4. It is the churchs intent to construct the facilities using sustainable and environmentally safe
materials; i.e. plumbing and water system will be engineered to result in significant
conservation measures. Lighting systems will include LED low voltage fixtures and bulbs
and/or CFL lighting wherever allowed.

5. LEED standards or equivalent standards are intended for portions of the facilities. Use of
solar powered equipment and materials are desired where applicable. Parking, roof systems,
plumbing.

6. Buildings will be situated with a building footprint location (N-S-E-W) with energy and
cost savings in mind;
A couple i ssues worthy of noting are as follows:
1. Pulte Homes Termination / Reinstatement of the "Reverence" project.
ICLV has had several recent meetings and discussions with represent at ives from Pulte
roj o ect.
sent at ives fr ff om P
08/21/14
PRJ-55315
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 & VAC-55722
Homes r elat in g t o it s Rever en ce Pr o j ect The church had spent thousands of
dollars on engineering and design fees on the road project for what was at one time the
main entrance for Pulte's project. After approximately 12 - 15 months of executing our
original DDA, Pulte stopped all work on the project, leaving the roadway and associated
engineering and design issues in limbo. It also created unanswered financial issues for
the church. We are now in discussions with Pulte and they suggest that the project is back
on track and they may be at least 18 months to 2 years in a new planning and acquisition
process for its Reverence Project. ICLVs infrastructure along Desert Hope Drive is
dependent on what Pulte is doing, hence the delay in getting to this point.

2. Movi ng Forward
The result of Pultes reinstatement of the Reverence Project means that the church can
begin planning activities associated with architectural design and financial planning in
procuring the necessary funding for the project. Going forward, this will require close
coordination between Pulte, ICLV, and their respective engineers, architects, and
consultants along with Planning and Public Works.

For these reasons, we request that this applications move forward to allow for the
continued planning and engineering and ultimate construction of the churchs Prayer
Mountain project.

Please let us know (through our church representative Ron Portaro) if you require any
additional information associated with this application. Thank you for your assistance
in this matter.

Warmest Regards,








Administrator


Cc: Paul Goulet
Ron Portaro
08/21/14
PRJ-55315
VAR-55721, SDR-55723 & VAC-55722


Agenda tem No.: 9.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
VAC-55722 - VACATION RELATED TO VAR-55721 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
PRAYER MOUNTAIN/INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER:
INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS, INC., ET AL - For possible action on a
request to reinstate a previously approved Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements
generally located southwest oI the intersection oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Novat Street,
Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55315|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps
3. Supporting Documentation

Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
08/21/14
PRJ-55315
VAC-55722
08/21/14
PRJ-55315
VAC-55722
10/14/14 PC
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
3
1
5
V
A
C
-
5
5
7
2
2


Agenda tem No.: 10.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SDR-55723 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-55721 AND
VAC-55722 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRAYER MOUNTAIN/INTERNATIONAL
CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS - OWNER: INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF LAS VEGAS, INC.,
ET AL - For possible action on a request to reinstate a previously approved Site Development
Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED TWO-STORY, 35-FOOT TALL, 66,192 SQUARE-FOOT
CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND SCHOOL WITH WAIVERS OF THE LONE
MOUNTAIN WEST WALL AND LANDSCAPE STANDARDS TO ALLOW RETAINING
WALLS UP TO 16 FEET IN HEIGHT WHERE THREE-FOOT, SIX-INCH WALLS ARE
REQUIRED AND ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG PORTIONS OF THE
NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST PERIMETERS WHERE SEVEN FEET IS REQUIRED
on a portion oI 9.12 acres at the southwest corner oI CliII Shadows Parkway and Clark County
215 (portions oI APNs 137-12-401-001, 137-12-401-011 and 040; and 137-12-410-003), PD
(Planned Development) and C-V (Civic) Zones, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55315|. StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 4 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Postcards
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
09/03/14
PRJ-55315
SDR-55723
09/03/14
PRJ-55315
SDR-55723
10/14/14 PC


Agenda tem No.: 11.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
VAR-55763 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WESTCARE NEVADA,
INC. - OWNER: FITZHOUSE ENTERPRISES INC. - For possible action on a request Ior a
Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A PROPOSED
PORTE COCHERE WHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED at 323 North Maryland Parkway
(APNs 139-35-211-071, 072, 093 and 139-35-299-058), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward
5 (Barlow) |PRJ-55585|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-55763 and SDR-55764 |PRJ-55585|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - VAR-55763 and SDR-55764 |PRJ-55585|
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-55763 and SDR-55764 |PRJ-55585|
4. Photos - VAR-55763 and SDR-55764 |PRJ-55585|
5. JustiIication Letter - VAR-55763 and SDR-55764 |PRJ-55585|

VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: WESTCARE NEVADA, INC. - OWNER:
FITZHOUSE ENTERPRISES, INC.


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-55763 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SDR-55764 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions VAR-55763


`` CONDITIONS ``


VAk-5573 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-55764) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed
in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set
submitted Ior building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be
satisIied, except as modiIied herein.
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




SDk-5574 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Variance (VAR-55763)
shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building
elevations, date stamped 08/25/14, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staII to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.

5. The new trash enclosure must be screened, gated with a rooI or a trellis.
A Waiver Irom Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved to allow zero-Ioot landscape buIIers along a
portion oI the north, east and west perimeters.

6. An Exception Irom Title 19.08.110 is hereby approved to allow two shade trees in the
parking lot where seven are required.

7. An Exception Irom Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved to allow Iive perimeter landscape
buIIer trees where 15 are required.

8. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed
in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

9. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set
submitted Ior building permit.

10. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staII to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Conditions Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



11. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

12. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be
satisIied, except as modiIied herein.


Public Works

13. A Petition oI Vacation, such as VAC-52721, shall record prior to the issuance oI any
building permits iI required.

14. In accordance with code requirements oI Title 13.56, remove all substandard public street
improvements and unused driveway cuts, including all sidewalk ramps adjacent to this
site, and replace with new improvements meeting current City Standards concurrent with
development oI this site. However, the existing pan style driveways may remain. All
existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original
location and to its original width concurrent with development oI this site.

15. The proposed driveway on the northwest corner oI the site shall be exit only to Maryland
Parkway.

16. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior this site.

17. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-oI-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.

18. Submit an Encroachment Agreement Ior landscaping and private improvements in the
Maryland Parkway and 13th Street public rights-oI-way, iI any, prior to the issuance oI
permits Ior these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy Ior the
term oI the Encroachment Agreement and add the City oI Las Vegas as an additionally
insured entity on this insurance policy. II requested by the City, the applicant shall
remove property encroaching in the public right-oI-way at the applicant's expense
pursuant to the terms oI the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and
maintenance oI all private improvements in the public right oI way shall be the
responsibility oI the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transIerred with the sale oI
the property Ior the entire term oI the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all
requirements Ior the Encroachment Agreement with the Land Development Section oI
the Department oI Building and SaIety (702-229-4836).

VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The subject site contains an existing 18,588 square-Ioot commercial building at 323 North
Maryland Parkway. The applicant is requesting minor site modiIications, an expansion to the
existing parking lot and the addition oI a porte cochere to the existing commercial building. The
minor site modiIications include a new trash enclosure and two new courtyard areas adjacent to
the west building elevation. As proposed, the porte cochere and parking lot expansion do not
adhere to all requirements as established by Title 19. The required landscape buIIers adjacent to
the expanded parking lot are not being provided. In addition, landscape exceptions are needed in
the parking lot. Furthermore, the proposed porte cochere does not adhere to minimum setback
requirements and the applicant is requesting a Variance (VAR-55763) to address the issue.

The requested deviations Irom landscape requirements can be supported as they are mitigated by
additional landscaping located within existing landscape buIIers in the right-oI-way. In addition,
the request to expand the parking lot decreases an existing parking variance (VAR-52719)
deviation Irom 46 to 7. The design oI the parking lot is conducive to accommodating more
parking stalls to a parking deIicient site. StaII also supports the associated Variance (VAR-
55763) Ior the porte cochere, as it would improve site accessibility and would visually improve
the west building elevation Ironting Maryland Parkway.


ISSUES

City Council approved a parking Variance (VAR-52719) to allow 29 parking spaces
where 62 spaces are required, which represented a 46 deviation Irom standard. The
applicant has added 29 parking spaces. As a result, the original parking variance
deviation has decreased Irom 46 to 7.
A Variance is needed to allow the porte cochere to be set back zero Ieet where a
minimum oI ten Ieet is required.
A Waiver oI Title 19.08 perimeter landscape requirements is needed to allow a zero-Ioot
buIIer along the east and west property lines where 15 Ieet is required.
A Waiver oI Title 19.08 perimeter landscape requirements is needed to allow a zero-Ioot
buIIer along the north property line where 8 Ieet is required.
An Exception oI Title 19.08.110 is required to allow two parking lot trees in islands and
at the ends oI new parking rows where seven are required.
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
02/24/78
The Board oI Zoning Adjustment approved a Special Use Permit (U-0005-78)
to allow a child care center at 323 North Maryland Parkway.
09/01/90
The Planning and Development Department approved a plot plan Ior an
addition to an existing structure at 323 North Maryland Parkway.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-14246) Irom R-2 (Medium-
Low Density Residential) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 1.47 acres at 323
North Maryland Parkway. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-14252) Ior an existing
social service provider at 323 North Maryland Parkway. The Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval.
09/06/06
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-14251) to allow 29 parking
spaces where 50 parking spaces are the minimum required on 1.47 acres at
323 North Maryland Parkway. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-52715) Ior a Social
Service Provider use at 323 North Maryland Parkway. Planning Commission
and staII recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-52717) Ior a Facility
To Provide Testing, Treatment, or Counseling For Drug or Alcohol Abuse at
323 North Maryland Parkway. Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-52719) to allow 29 parking
spaces where 62 spaces are required at 323 North Maryland Parkway.
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
04/16/14
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-52721) a public right-
oI-way at 323 North Maryland Parkway. Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
05/05/14 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
c.1979 The existing 18,588 square-Ioot commercial building was constructed.
03/13/91
A building permit (#91100014) was issued Ior shade structures at 323 North
Maryland Parkway. The permit received a Iinal inspection on 03/31/91.
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK
Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
06/01/95
A building permit (#95378462) was issued Ior an AC unit at 323 North
Maryland Parkway. The permit received a Iinal inspection on 06/28/95.
04/17/98
A building permit (#98007999) was issued Ior a new rooI at 323 North
Maryland Parkway. The permit received a Iinal inspection on 04/29/98.


Pre-Application Meeting
08/14/14
StaII conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant to discuss the
proposed parking lot expansion and porte cochere expansion. StaII concluded
that a Variance would be required Ior the porte cochere, as it would encroach
within the Iront yard setback. As a result oI the Variance, the minor expansion
would require a public hearing Site Development Plan Review.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a well maintained commercial
building Iree oI trash and debris.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 1.47


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Social Service
Provider
Subject Property
Facility To Provide
Testing, Treatment,
or Counseling For
Drug or Alcohol
Abuse
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North I-515 Right-oI-Way I-515 Right-oI-Way I-515 Right-oI-Way
General Retail
South Social Service
Provider
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
General Personal
Service
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East
Multi-Family
MXU (Mixed Use)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
West Multi-Family MXU (Mixed Use)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 1itle 19.8, the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Side
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
20 Feet
0 Feet
54 Feet
180 Feet
35 Feet
N*
Y
Y
Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 31 Y
Max. Building Height N/A 26 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Not
Indicated
Y**
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y
*The applicant is requesting an associatea Jariance (JAR-55763) to allow a :ero-foot front
yara setback where ten feet is requirea.
**A conaition of approval has been aaaea requiring the proposea trash enclosure to be
screenea, gatea with a roof or trellis.
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Pursuant to 1itle 19.8, the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
3 Trees
6 Trees
6 Trees
2 Trees
3 Trees
0 Trees
N
N
N
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 15 Trees 5 Trees N
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
7 Trees 2 Trees N
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
East
West
8 Feet
15 Feet
15 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
N
N
N


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Maryland Parkway Major Collector
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
80 Y
13
th
Street Collector
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
65 Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross
Floor Area
or Aumber
of Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Social Service
Provider
1:300 SF
Facility To
Provide Testing,
Treatment, or
Counseling For
Drug or Alcohol
Abuse
18,588 SF
1:300 SF
62

VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross
Floor Area
or Aumber
of Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 62 58 Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 60 2 56 2 Y*
Percent Deviation 7
*City Council approvea a parking Jariance (JAR-52719) to allow 29 parking spaces where 62
spaces are requirea, which representea a 46 aeviation from stanaara. The applicant has aaaea
29 parking spaces, as a result, the original parking variance aeviation has aecreasea to 7
percent.


Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
8-Ioot perimeter landscape
buIIer along the north property
line
Zero-Ioot buIIer Approval
15-Ioot perimeter landscape
buIIer along the east property
line
Zero-Ioot buIIer Approval
15-Ioot perimeter landscape
buIIer along the west property
line
Zero-Ioot buIIer Approval


Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
24-inch box shade trees in
islands per six spaces and at the
ends oI each parking row (7
required)
2 Trees Approval
24-inch box shade trees per 30
linear Ieet within the east
landscape buIIer (6 required)
3 Trees Approval
24-inch box shade trees per 30
linear Ieet within the west
landscape buIIer (6 required)
Zero Trees Approval
24-inch box shade trees per 20
linear Ieet within the north
landscape buIIer (3 required)
2 Trees Approval
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



ANALYSIS

The subject site contains an existing 18,588 square-Ioot commercial building at 323 North
Maryland Parkway. The applicant is requesting minor site modiIications, an expansion to the
existing parking lot and the addition oI a porte cochere to the existing commercial building. The
minor site modiIications include a new trash enclosure located at the southeast corner oI the site and
two new courtyard areas adjacent to the west building elevation. The courtyard areas adhere to Title
19 standards as they do not Iurther inIringe upon the existing building setback.

As proposed, the porte cochere and parking lot expansion do not adhere to all requirements as
established by Title 19. The required landscape buIIers adjacent to the expanded parking lot are not
being provided. In addition, landscape exceptions are needed in the parking lot. StaII supports the
requested landscape waivers and exceptions, as the subject site is uniquely shaped and the applicant
has mitigated the lack oI required landscaping with additional planting materials throughout the
interior oI the site and along landscape buIIers within the right-oI-way. The buIIers located within
the right-oI-way cannot be included in the provided counts but provide additional visual interest.

In 2014, a parking variance (VAR-52719) was approved to allow 29 parking spaces where 62
spaces were required, representing a 46 percent deviation Irom standard. This proposal to expand
the parking lot does not eliminate the necessity oI a parking variance, but it improves the deviation
oI standard to seven percent. The design oI the parking lot is conducive to accommodating more
parking stalls to a parking deIicient site.

Finally, the proposed porte cochere does not adhere to minimum setback requirements and the
applicant is requesting a Variance (VAR-55763) to address the issue. The proposed porte cochere
would locate at the existing Iront entrance to the commercial building and provide a covered pick-
up and drop-oII area Ior visitors. The proposed porte cochere does not increase the square-Iootage
oI the existing commercial building. However, it would improve site accessibility and would
visually improve the west building elevation Ironting Maryland Parkway. StaII supports the waiver
and exception requests, as well as the associated Variance (VAR-55763), as the uniquely shaped
site would be improved with the proposed modiIications. II denied, the requested site improvements
could not be constructed and the parking lot would remain 46 deIicient in required parking.


FINDINGS (VAR-55763)

In accordance with the provisions oI Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits oI a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;
2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, selI-created or Iinancial in nature.
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:
'Where by reason oI exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape oI a speciIic piece oI
property at the time oI enactment oI the regulation, or by reason oI exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition oI
the piece oI property, the strict application oI any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical diIIiculties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner oI the property, a variance Irom that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the diIIiculties or hardship, iI the relieI may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment oI aIIected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose oI any ordinance or
resolution.

The applicant has provided evidence oI a unique or extraordinary circumstance, in that the
unique shaped lot physically restricts development on the subject site. The relieI granted will not
create any substantial detriment to the public good, substantial impairment oI aIIected natural
resources or substantially impair the intent and purpose oI any ordinance or resolution.
ThereIore, staII recommends approval oI this request.


FINDINGS (SDR-55764)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The proposed parking lot expansion and site modiIications are compatible with the
surrounding commercial uses. The design oI this proposed development would improve
the existing site conditions and is typical in this area oI the City.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

Although the site is not Iully consistent with all landscaping and setback requirements,
staII can support the requested waivers, exceptions and variance as they are mitigated by
additional landscaping located throughout the interior oI the site and through improved
Iunctionality. The proposed development is consistent with all other Title 19 requirements
and the General Plan.
VAR-55763 AND SDR-55764 PR1-55585]
GK

Staff Report Page Nine
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;

The subject site is accessed Irom Maryland Parkway, an 80-Ioot wide Major Collector and
13
th
Street, a 65-Ioot wide Collector as classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and
Highways. Both streets are adequate in size to continue to provide access and site
circulation.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The proposed building and landscape materials are appropriate Ior the desert environment
and the neighborhood.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

The building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
Ieatures are compatible with development in the area. The elevations provide a variety oI
patterns oI visual interest.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

The proposed project will not impact the public health, saIety or general welIare as the site
is subject to City inspections during construction, as well as routine business license
inspections Ior any commercial activity.


NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 37


NOTICES MAILED 232


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0

08/25/14
PRJ-55585
VAR-55763
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/26/2014 9:54:45 AM
Applicant Email: robert.adams@westcare.com
Applicant Fax: (702) 448-8100
Rep Last Name: Adams
Rep First Name: Robert
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: (702) 290-3567
Applicant Zip: 89014
Rep Address: 1711 Whitney Mesa Drive
Rep Email: robert.adams@westcare.com
Rep Fax: (702) 448-8100
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Henderson
Rep Phone: (702) 290-3567
Rep Zip: 89014
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13935211071, 13935211072, 13935211093, 13935299058
Project Name WESTCARE
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Application Number: PRJ-55585
Applicant City: Henderson
ProjectAddress (Location): 323 NORTH MARYLAND PARKWAY
Application/Petition For: VAR and SDR
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Robert
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 1711 Whitney Mesa Drive
Applicant Last Name: Adams
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
VAR-55763 & SDR-55764
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/26/2014 9:54:45 AM
Is the Owner Information Correct: No
If no, ...change what FitzHouse Enterprises Inc. P.O. Box 94738 Las Vegas, NV 89193
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
SOUTHERN NV HOUSING
AUTHORITY
340 N 11TH ST #170 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101-3125
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Robert Adams FitzHouse Enterprises, Inc. Deputy Administator robert.adams@westcare.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
VAR-55763 & SDR-55764
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
8
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
4
08/25/14
PRJ-55585
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
4
08/25/14
PRJ-55585
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
4
08/25/14
PRJ-55585
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
4
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
8
5
V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
4
V
A
P
-

3

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
E
S
T
C
A
P
E

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
I
T
Z
H
O
U
S
E

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S

I
N
C
,

3
Z
3

N
O
P
T
H

M
A
P
Y
L
A
N
D

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


V
A
P
-

3

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
E
S
T
C
A
P
E

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
I
T
Z
H
O
U
S
E

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S

I
N
C
,

3
Z
3

N
O
P
T
H

M
A
P
Y
L
A
N
D

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


V
A
P
-

3

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
E
S
T
C
A
P
E

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
I
T
Z
H
O
U
S
E

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S

I
N
C
,

3
Z
3

N
O
P
T
H

M
A
P
Y
L
A
N
D

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


V
A
P
-

3

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

W
E
S
T
C
A
P
E

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

F
I
T
Z
H
O
U
S
E

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S

I
N
C
,

3
Z
3

N
O
P
T
H

M
A
P
Y
L
A
N
D

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4

5385 CAMERON ST, STE 15, LAS VEGAS, NV 89118 I PH 702.871.3416 I


WWW.JVCARCHITECTS.NET
August 19, 2014

City of Las Vegas


Planning Department
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106

Re: Westcare CTC - Interior Renovation and Site Improvement


323 N. Maryland Parkway
Design Review Application

To Whom It May Concern,

This Site Development Review application consists of an existing 19,000 square foot single
story interior renovation and site development project located at 323 N. Maryland Parkway. The
building will consist of a Community Triage Center per the SUP-52715 approval as well as
office space for the Westcare facility. The renovation includes a new covered entry for
emergency drop-offs as well as new trash enclosure..

Due to the nature of the existing conditions, the Owner respectfully requests approval of non-
standard conditions as described. The owner requests a variance of the required building
setback to 0'-0" front setback for the proposed Porte Cochere (covered drop-off) where a 10'-0"
building setback is required. The existing building is approximately 7'-0" from the property line
and does not meet the 10'-0" setback requirement. The variance should also include trellis
structures within the proposed courtyards as well as the courtyard walls that are proposed to
align with the existing building exterior walls.

With this Site Development Review (SDR), the owner requests to expand the existing parking
lot and other site improvements with waivers to allow 0'-0" perimeter landscape buffers,
decorative wrought iron fence locations, as well as an exception for parking lot landscape
requirements. The new site plan indicates a total of 58 parking spaces proposed, exceeding the
approved 29 parking spaces approved per VAR-52719.

We respectfully request your approval of this project. Please contact our office should you have
any questions or comments.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Roy Burson, AIA


JVC Architects
...3416 I
08/25/14
PRJ-55585
VAR-55763 & SDR-55764


Agenda tem No.: 12.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SDR-55764 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-55763 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: WESTCARE NEVADA, INC. - OWNER: FITZHOUSE
ENTERPRISES INC. - For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review TO
EXPAND THE PARKING LOT AND ADD A PORTE COCHERE WITH WAIVERS TO
ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH WHERE 15 FEET IS
REQUIRED ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT WIDTH
ADJACENT TO INTERIOR LOT LINES at 323 North Maryland Parkway (APNs 139-35-211-
071, 072, 093 and 139-35-299-058), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-
55585|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
08/25/14
PRJ-55585
SDR-55764


Agenda tem No.: 13.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55639 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: NEVADA
HEALTH CENTERS, INC. - OWNER: CONSTANTINO NOVAL NEVADA 2, LLC - For
possible action on a request Ior a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-
25366) FOR A PROPOSED 2,357 SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING 1,840
SQUARE-FOOT SOCIAL SERVICE PROVIDER USE at 5001 East Bonanza Road, Suite #104
(APN 140-32-502-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55628|. StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

SUP-55639 PR1-55628]
GK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: NEVADA HEALTH CENTERS, INC - OWNER:
CONSTANTINO NOVAL NEVADA 2, LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55639 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:


`` CONDITIONS ``


SbF-553 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Social Service
Provider use.

2. ConIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Special Use Permit (SUP-25366) shall be
required, except as amended herein.

3. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

5. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

SUP-55639 PR1-55628]
GK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-25366) to add
2,357 square Ieet oI additional Iloor space to an existing Social Service Provider use at 5001 East
Bonanza Road, Suite #104. The requested area would expand an existing Social Service Provider
use Irom 1,840 square Ieet to 4,197 square Ieet, which represents a 78 percent increase Irom the
original approval. StaII recommends approval oI the proposed expansion, as it meets the
minimum Title 19.12 requirements and can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible
manner with the surrounding area. II denied, the applicant would not be allowed to expand the
use; however, the existing 1,840 square-Ioot Social Service Provider may remain open at 5001
East Bonanza Road, Suite #104.


ISSUES

A Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-45965) is required to
expand an existing ThriIt Shop use by more than 50 percent in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
04/15/81
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0020-81) Irom R-
E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) and a plot plan review Ior
a commercial center on property generally located on the southwest corner oI
Nellis Boulevard and Bonanza Road. Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
02/20/08
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit Ior a Social Service Provider
use at 5001 East Bonanza Road. Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
05/26/04 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.
SUP-55639 PR1-55628]
GK

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
c.1984 The existing 45,496 square-Ioot shopping center was constructed.
06/16/06
A business license (N33-00020) was issued Ior a Social Service Provider at
5001 E. Bonanza Road, Suite #104. The license is still active.
08/10/07
A building permit (TI-93570) was issued Ior a tenant improvement at 5001
East Bonanza Road, Suite #104. A Iinal inspection was completed and a
CertiIicate oI Occupancy was issued on 09/11/07.


Pre-Application Meeting
08/19/14
StaII met with the representative to discuss the proposal to expand the
existing Social Service Provider use. StaII determined that the proposed
expansion would increase the existing use by more than 50 percent. As such,
the proposal would require a Major Amendment to the existing Special Use
Permit (SUP-25366). The submittal requirements Ior a Special Use Permit
were discussed.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a well maintained shopping
center Iree oI any trash or debris.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Gross Acres 4.13


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
South
Undeveloped
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
SUP-55639 PR1-55628]
GK
Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
East Shopping Center
North Las Vegas CG
(Commercial General)
North Las Vegas C-2
(General Commercial)
West Undeveloped
MLA (Medium Low
Attached)
R-MH
(Mobile/ManuIactured
Home)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance Y


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Bonanza Road Primary Arterial
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
100 Feet Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
45,496 SF 1:250 189

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 189

221

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 182 7 212 9 Y
Loading Zones 3 3 Y
SUP-55639 PR1-55628]
GK

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



ANALYSIS

The Social Service Provider use is deIined as 'a Iacility that provides assistance to persons with
limited ability Ior selI-care, but Ior whom medical care is not a major element. This use includes
a Iacility that provides assistance concerning psychological problems, employment, learning
disabilities or physical disabilities, but does not include a rescue mission, homeless shelter or
adult day care center. There are no minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior the Social
Service Provider use.

The applicant is requesting a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-
25366) to add 2,357 square Ieet oI additional Iloor space to a Social Service Provider use at 5001
East Bonanza Road, Suite #104. The applicant has been operating as a Social Service Provider at
this location since 2006. The requested area would expand the existing Social Service Provider
use Irom 1,840 square Ieet to 4,197 square Ieet, which represents a 78 percent increase Irom the
original approval. According to the justiIication letter, the current tenant space is constrained.
The proposed expansion would not increase customer volumes but would rather create additional
oIIice space Ior existing employees. The increase in space is meant to create a more comIortable
working environment Ior staII. StaII recommends approval oI the proposed expansion, as it
meets the minimum Title 19.12 requirements and can be conducted in a harmonious and
compatible manner with the surrounding area. II denied, the applicant would not be allowed to
expand the use; however, the existing 1,840 square-Ioot Social Service Provider may remain
open at 5001 East Bonanza Road, Suite #104.


FINDINGS (SUP-55639)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed expansion oI an existing Social Service Provider use can continue to be
conducted in compatible and harmonious manner with the existing and Iuture surrounding
land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The site is physically suitable Ior the type and intensity oI land uses proposed, as the use
would be located within an existing shopping center with ample parking. The site is
designed to accommodate a number oI uses such as oIIices, retail shops and other
commercial uses.
SUP-55639 PR1-55628]
GK

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The site is accessed by Bonanza Road, a 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial as classiIied by
the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. The right-oI-way provides adequate capacity to
serve the proposed use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

The existing Social Service Provider use is subject to regular inspections and will not
compromise the public health and saIety.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The use meets all Title 19.12 requirements Ior a Social Service Provider use.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 17


NOTICES MAILED 154


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0

08/21/14
PRJ-55628
SUP-53639
08/21/14
PRJ-55628
SUP-53639
10/14/14 PC
5
6
# 6
' 1 ( 0 ' 8 #
&
#
#
4
%
* + 6 '
% 6

4
'
)
+ 5 6 ' 4 '
&

0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
8
S
U
P
-
5
3
6
3
9
5
6
# 6
' 1 ( 0 ' 8 #
&
#
#
4
%
* + 6 '
% 6

4
'
)
+ 5 6 ' 4 '
&

0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
8
S
U
P
-
5
3
6
3
9
S
U
P
-

3
9

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

N
E
V
A
D
A

H
E
A
L
T
H

C
E
N
T
E
P
S


I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
O
N
S
T
A
N
T
I
N
O

N
O
V
A
L

N
E
V
A
D
A

Z


L
L
C

0
0
1

E
A
S
T

O
N
A
N
Z
A

P
O
A
D


S
U
I
T
E

1
0
4

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

3
9

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

N
E
V
A
D
A

H
E
A
L
T
H

C
E
N
T
E
P
S


I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
O
N
S
T
A
N
T
I
N
O

N
O
V
A
L

N
E
V
A
D
A

Z


L
L
C

0
0
1

E
A
S
T

O
N
A
N
Z
A

P
O
A
D


S
U
I
T
E

1
0
4

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

3
9

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

N
E
V
A
D
A

H
E
A
L
T
H

C
E
N
T
E
P
S


I
N
C
,

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

C
O
N
S
T
A
N
T
I
N
O

N
O
V
A
L

N
E
V
A
D
A

Z


L
L
C

0
0
1

E
A
S
T

O
N
A
N
Z
A

P
O
A
D


S
U
I
T
E

1
0
4

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


08/21/14
PRJ-55628
SUP-53639


Agenda tem No.: 14.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55674 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THE
CHEESECAKE FACTORY - OWNER: SIMON CHELSEA LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT,
LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 8,861
SQUARE-FOOT SUPPER CLUB (RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL) ESTABLISHMENT
USE WITH A 1,631 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO WITHIN AN EXISTING
SHOPPING CENTER at 505 South Grand Central Parkway (APN 139-33-710-005), PD
(Planned Development) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55562|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter
6. Support Postcard

SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY - OWNER:
SIMON CHELSEA LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55674 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:


`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5574 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Supper Club
(Restaurant with Alcohol) use.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

5. Prior to the submittal oI a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department oI Planning staII to develop a comprehensive address plan Ior the subject site.
A copy oI the approved address plan shall be submitted with any Iuture building permit
applications related to the site.
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



6. Approval oI this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval oI a liquor license.

7. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or Iermented liquors
or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or
booths are provided separate Irom the bar in conIormance with Title 6.50.

8. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6.50 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.

9. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol)
within a portion oI a building at 505 South Grand Central Parkway located within an existing
shopping center. The proposed establishment will utilize 8,861 square Ieet oI interior space in
addition to 1,631 square Ieet oI outdoor patio. As this request meets all the minimum Special Use
requirements and can be conducted in a compatible and harmonious manner within the existing
shopping center, staII recommends approval oI this application. II denied, the applicant will not
be allowed to conduct the Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol) use at this location.


ISSUES

The Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol) use is permitted in the Downtown Centennial
Plan (Parkway Center) district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION


Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
11/23/98
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0100-97) request Irom M
(Industrial) to PD (Planned Development) oI the subject property as part oI a
larger request. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
06/14/99
The City Council approved a Development Standard and Master Plan Review
|Z-0100-97(1)| request oI one-lot oI the Parkway Center Planned
Development. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Major ModiIication |Z-0100-97(5)| oI the
Parkway Center Master Plan to amend or delete certain provisions oI the
Master Development Plan Ior Lot 1 oI Parkway Center. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
11/07/01
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review |Z-0100-97(6)|
request Ior a proposed 478,028 square-Ioot retail mall on 39.20 acres at the
southwest corner oI Bonneville Avenue and Grand Central Parkway. The
Planning Commission recommended approval.
09/26/02
The Planning Commission approved a Master Sign Plan (MSP-0007-02)
request Ior an approved 478,028 square-Ioot outlet mall on the subject
property. StaII recommended approval.
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting


Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
09/15/04
The City Council approved a request Ior Directors Business (DIR-4831) to
allow Iour water Ieatures Ior a commercial development located at 777 south
Grand Central Parkway.
09/15/05
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-7335) Ior a proposed 1.09 million square-Ioot mixed-use development
consisting oI a 32-story hotel tower, a 16-story oIIice tower and a 24-story
residential tower, including 470,000 square Ieet oI commercial space, 670
condominium hotel units and 146 residential units with waivers oI the
parkway center build-to-line requirement, streetscape requirements, and
exterior Iinish materials requirements on 4.48 acres adjacent to the southwest
corner oI Bonneville Avenue and Grand Central Parkway. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
The Parkway Center Architectural Review Committee (PC-ARC) approved
the expansion oI an existing commercial center to include a Iive-story parking
garage with 500 parking spaces, a Iour-story parking garage with 1,115
parking spaces, and Iour one-story retail buildings with 109,370 square Ieet oI
commercial Iloor space on 34.53 acres adjacent to the west side oI Grand
Central Parkway, approximately 600 Ieet south oI Bonneville Avenue (ARC-
10223).
11/15/05
The PC-ARC approved a Major Amendment (ARC-10224) oI a previously
approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-0007-02) Ior a proposed 109,370 square-
Ioot expansion oI an existing commercial center on 34.53 acres adjacent to
the west side oI Grand Central Parkway, approximately 600 Ieet south oI
Bonneville Avenue.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10131)
request Ior the expansion oI an existing commercial center to include a Iive-
story parking garage with 500 parking spaces, a Iour-story parking garage
with 1,115 parking spaces, and Iour one-story retail buildings with 109,370
square Ieet oI commercial Iloor space on 34.53 acres adjacent to the west side
oI Grand Central Parkway, approximately 600 Ieet south oI Bonneville
Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval. 02/15/06
The City Council approved a Major Amendment (MSP-10136) request oI a
previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-0007-02) Ior a proposed
109,370 square-Ioot expansion oI an existing commercial center on 34.53
acres adjacent to the west side oI Grand Central Parkway, approximately 600
Ieet south oI Bonneville Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
03/21/06
The Planning Commission Architecture Review Committee (PC-ARC)
approved a Site Development Plan Review (ARC-12214) request Ior an
additional story and 191 parking spaces to Parking Deck 'A Ior a total oI
1,306 spaces on 34.53 acres adjacent to the west side oI Grand Central
Parkway, approximately 600 Ieet south oI Bonneville Avenue.
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting


Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
04/27/06
The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-12213)
request oI a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
10131) to add an additional story and 191 parking spaces to Parking Deck
'A and a waiver oI the Parkway Center Development Standards to allow
parking directly adjacent to a building where such is prohibited on 34.53 acres
adjacent to the west side oI Grand Central Parkway, approximately 600 Ieet
south oI Bonneville Avenue. StaII recommended approval.
05/17/06
The City Council approved a request Ior a Review oI Condition (ROC-12885)
Ior a Review oI Condition Number 15 oI an approved Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-10131) to remove the condition that required a meeting with
the Nevada Department oI Transportation (NDOT) to determine additional
right-oI-way requirements Ior the Iuture Bonneville/Alta bridge structure, iI
any. Also, provide written prooI that NDOT is satisIied prior to or concurrent
with submittal oI construction drawings Ior this site Ior an existing
commercial development at 979 South Grand Central Parkway.
08/28/08
The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (MSP-29008) oI a
previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-0007-02) Ior additional signage
Ior an existing commercial center with a waiver oI the Downtown Centennial
Plan Standards to allow signage above the bottom oI the second Iloor window
sill and in excess oI two tenants per building elevation at the southwest corner
oI Bonneville Avenue and South Grand Central Parkway. StaII
recommended approval.
05/08/12
The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-44929)
request to Site Development Plan Review |(Z-0100-97 (6) and SDR-10131|
Ior a 159,257 square-Ioot expansion oI an existing commercial center and a
Iour-level expansion oI an existing parking garage with waivers Irom the
downtown centennial plan build-to-line requirement along Bonneville avenue
and Grand Central Parkway and architectural detail, streetscape and interior
landscape requirements on 39.08 acres at the southwest corner oI Grand
Central Parkway and Bonneville Avenue. StaII recommended approval oI the
request.
11/08/12
The Department oI Planning administratively approved a Minor Amendment
request (SDR-46841) to approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
44929) to add a valet area and a walled service area and to revise the building
conIiguration oI an approved 159,257 square-Ioot expansion oI an existing
commercial center on 39.01 acres at the southwest corner oI Grand Central
Parkway and Bonneville Avenue.
09/04/13
The City Council approved Ordinance #6266 which replaced Supper Club use
and Liquor License Update (replaced Supper Club use with Restaurant with
Alcohol Use in Title 19). Updates the City`s alcohol licensing regulations,
including the adjustment oI license categories, and updates corresponding
zoning, gaming and other regulatory provisions regarding alcohol-related
uses.
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
10/17/13
The Department oI Planning administratively approved a Minor Amendment
(MSP-49564) oI a previously approved Master Sign Plan (MSP-0007-02) to
add signage Ior phase 3 oI an existing shopping center on 39.02 acres at the
southwest corner oI Bonneville Avenue and Grand Central Parkway.
08/20/14
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-54331)
Ior a proposed 2,095 square-Ioot beer/wine/cooler on-sale establishment use
at 885 South Grand Central Parkway, Suite #55. The Planning Commission
recommended approval oI the request 07/08/14.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
08/30/12 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
08/01/02
A building permit (#02013868) was issued Ior onsite improvements and
hardscapes at 777 South Grand Central Parkway. A Iinal inspection was
completed 09/25/03.
08/01/02
Building permits (#02013869 through #02013875) were issued Ior 16 shell
retail buildings (Buildings 1-16) located at the southwest corner oI Bonneville
Avenue and Grand Central Parkway. Final inspections were completed
between 09/25/03 and 01/23/04.
06/19/06
A building permit (#06004202) was issued Ior a parking garage structure
(Deck 'A) at 955 South Grand Central Parkway. A Iinal inspection was
completed 08/24/07.
04/09/07
A building permit (#07001176) was issued Ior a parking garage structure
(Deck 'B) at 695 South Grand Central Parkway. There is no record oI an
approved Iinal inspection or a CertiIicate oI Occupancy.
05/04/07
Building permits (#070011493 and #07001495 through #07001497) were
issued Ior Iour shell retail buildings (Buildings 20-23) located at 685, 785,
795 and 885 South Grand Central Parkway. Final inspections were completed
between 04/28/08 and 05/21/08.
05/08/14
A building permit (#249164) was issued Ior retail building at 505 South
Grand Central Parkway. A Iinal inspection has not been completed.


Pre-Application Meeting
08/14/14
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over the
application materials and submittal requirements Ior a Special Use Permit Ior
a proposed Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol) use.
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
The site contains an existing general retail shopping center. During a routine
site inspection staII observed a well maintained commercial site Iree oI trash
and debris.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 38.94


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)
North
Wholesale
Showroom Facility
MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)
South
I-15 OII-Ramp to
Charleston Blvd./
Grand Central Pkwy
MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)
Clark County
Government Center
PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
East
On-Ramp to I-15
Northbound
MXU (Mixed Use)
PD (Planned
Development)
West Interstate 15 ROW (Interstate 15) ROW (Interstate 15)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
PD (Planned Development) District Y
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (Parkway Center) Y
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Grand Central
Parkway
Primary Arterial
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
100 Feet Y


Parking Requirement - Downtown
Base Parking Requirement Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
737,860 SF 1/250 SF 2,952

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 2,952

2,623

N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 2,912 40 2,574 49 N*
*Profects locatea within the Las Jegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subfect to the
automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table shoula be usea to illustrate
the requirements of an analogous profect in another location in the City.


ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to establish a Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol) within an
existing shopping center within a portion oI a building at 505 South Grand Central Parkway. The
subject site is located with the PD (Planned Development) zoning district, within the Las Vegas
Downtown Centennial Plan Parkway Center District. The submitted plans indicate the
proposed establishment will utilize 8,861 square Ieet oI space with a 1,631 square-Ioot outdoor
patio with approximately 277 seats Ior dining.

The subject site is located in an existing 737,860 square-Ioot shopping center. The existing
commercial subdivision provides shared access and parking throughout the subject site. The
proposal adheres to all minimum parking requirements.

A Restaurant with Alcohol use is described in Tile 19.12 as: 'A restaurant and bar operation with
alcoholic beverage sales in which:

The actual seating available at all times within the dining area will accommodate at
least 100 persons. For purposes oI this requirement, the 'dining area does not
include bar stool seating at the bar or lounge seating, but may include table or booth
seating within the bar area and table seating within a patio area;
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Staff Report Page Seven


October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



2. Alcoholic beverages are served in the restaurant area only in conjunction with the
service oI Iood;
3. Full-course meals are available during all hours the bar area is open to the public;
4. A cook and Iood server, other than a bartender, are available at all times the bar area
is open to the public; and
5. The restaurant operation is the principal portion oI the business.


Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:

1. No restaurant with alcohol use shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church/house oI
worship, school, individual care center licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The subfect site is not locatea within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school, inaiviaual
care center licensea for more than 12 chilaren, or City park.

2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances reIerred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two property
lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest to the existing
use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line oI that existing use
which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line
without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes oI measurement, the term 'property line
reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels and does not include the property line oI:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on-site parking and
which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.

Distances have been measurea from Commercial Subaivision 'Parkway Center` Book 53, Page
61.

3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in size,
the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the structure
in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping center
or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the existing use to the
nearest property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will
be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.

This conaition is not applicable, the subfect site is not locatea on a parcel of at least 80 acres of
si:e.
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



4. When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior an establishment which also requires a
waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission shall take into
consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its recommendation to the City Council,
state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the reasons in support oI the
decision.

No aistance separation Waivers from any church/house of worship, school, ana inaiviaual care
center licensea for more than 12 chilaren, or City park are associatea with this proposal.

5. The minimum distance requirement in Requirement 1 does not apply to an establishment
which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel having 200 or more guest
rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992, or in connection with a resort hotel having in excess oI 200
guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992.

This conaition is not applicable, the subfect site is not locatea within 400 feet of any
church/house of worship, school, inaiviaual care center licensea for more than 12 chilaren, or
City park. Nor is the subfect site locatea within an establishment which has a non-restrictea
gaming license in connection with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms. The subfect site is
however locatea with an existing shopping center with 737,860 square feet of retail floor space.

6. The parcel or use is operated or controlled by an agency or subdivision oI local, state or
Iederal government. (C-V only)

This conaition is not applicable, the proposea use is not locatea in a C-J (Civic) :oning aistrict.

* 7. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter 6.50.

The proposea use will be subfect to all business licensing requirements outlinea in LJMC
Chapter 6.50 if approvea.

According to the submitted justiIication letter and Iloor plan, the proposed use meets the
deIinition outlined above. The proposed Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol) use adheres to
all minimum special use permit requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. The subject site is not
located within 400 Ieet oI any church/house oI worship, school, individual care center licensed
Ior more than twelve children, or City park. In addition, staII has added a condition oI approval
requiring the business conIorm to all provisions oI LVMC Chapter 6.50 with regards to an
alcohol license. It has been determined that the proposed Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol)
use can be conducted in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding land uses, thereIore,
staII is recommending approval, as the use is considered appropriate Ior the surrounding area.
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Staff Report Page Nine
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




FINDINGS (SUP-55674)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol) use will be ancillary to the existing
shopping center use at the subject site. The proposed use is compatible with the
surrounding land uses and can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious with
surrounding land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The subject site is located within an existing commercial shopping center that is physically
suitable Ior the intensity oI the proposed land use.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property Irom South Grand
Central Parkway, a 100-Ioot Primary Arterial as classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

Approval oI this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health saIety and
general welIare oI the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject
to licensing restrictions.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed use meets all applicable conditions oI approval Ior Supper Club (Restaurant
with Alcohol) use per Title 19.12.
SUP-55674 PR1-55562]
JB

Staff Report Page Ten
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 39


NOTICES MAILED 150


APPROVALS 1


PROTESTS 0
08/25/14
PRJ-55562
SUP-55674
08/21/14
PRJ-55562
SUP-55674
New Jersey Statute Authorizing Attorneys to Acknowledge Documents

41:2-1. Officials authorized to take oaths.

41:2-1. All oaths, affirmations and affidavits required to be made or taken by law of this
State, or necessary or proper to be made, taken or used in any court of this State, or for any
lawful purpose whatever, may be made and taken before any one of the following officers:

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or any of the justices or judges of courts of record of
this State;

Masters of the Superior Court;

Municipal judges;

Mayors or aldermen of cities, towns or boroughs or commissioners of commission governed


municipalities;

Surrogates, registers of deeds and mortgages, county clerks and their deputies;

Municipal clerks and clerks of boards of chosen freeholders;

Sheriffs of any county;

Members of boards of chosen freeholders;

Clerks of all courts;

Notaries public;

Commissioners of deeds;

Members of the State Legislature;

Attorneys-at-law and counsellors-at-law of this State;

Certified court reporters, as defined in section 10 of P.L.1940, c.175 (C.45:15B-10).

This section shall not apply to official oaths required to be made or taken by any of the
officers of this State, nor to oaths or affidavits required to be made and taken in open court.

Amended 1951, c.302, s.1; 1953, c.39, s.1; 1953, c.428, s.3; 1964, c.165, s.1; 1968, c.169;
1970, c.182; 1983, c.495; 1986, c.124; 2007, c.73.

08/21/14
PRJ-55562
SUP-55674
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/21/2014 3:39:33 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
SIMON CHELSEA L V DEV L L C P O BOX 6120 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46206-6120
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Brian Mac Kellar The Cheesecake Factory Senior VP of Development jnavarro@thecheesecakefactory.co
m
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
SUP-55674
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/21/2014 3:39:33 PM
Applicant Email: jnavarro@thecheesecakefactory.com
Applicant Fax: 949-261-9614
Rep Last Name: Navarro
Rep First Name: Jeremiah
Applicant State: CA
Applicant Phone: 949-261-2602
Applicant Zip: 92606
Rep Address: 19 Corporate Park
Rep Email: jnavarro@thecheesecakefactory.com
Rep Fax: 949-261-9614
Rep State: CA
Rep City: Irvine
Rep Phone: 949-261-2602
Rep Zip: 92606
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13933710005
Project Name THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY - SPECIAL USE PERMIT [SUPPE
Is the Application Information
Correct:
No
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN), WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Application Number: PRJ-55562
Applicant City: Irvine
ProjectAddress (Location): 575 SOUTH GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY SUITE #130
Application/Petition For: The Cheesecake Factory - Special Use Permit [Supper Club (Restaurant with Alcohol)]
If no, ...change what Update address and suite number
Applicant First Name: Brian
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 19 Corporate Park
Applicant Last Name: Mac Kellar
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SUP-55674
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
7
4
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
7
4
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
7
4
S
U
P
-

7
4

[
P
P
J
-

Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

T
H
E

C
H
E
E
S
E
C
A
k
E

F
A
C
T
O
P
Y

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

S
I
M
O
N

C
H
E
L
S
E
A

L
A
S

V
E
S
A
S

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T


L
L
C


S
O
U
T
H

S
P
A
N
D

C
E
N
T
P
A
L

P
A
P
k
W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4

August 19, 2014


Planning Department
City of Las Vegas

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:


Please accept this as the required justification letter for a special use permit for a restaurant with bar
(supper club, in the Downtown Centennial Plan), within the Las Vegas Premium Outlet North,
APN 139-33-710-005, a portion of Parkway Center:
1. The requested use is allowed within the PD District subject to a special use permit.
2. The proposed design meets the seating and other requirements for the use.
3. The use is similar to existing uses in the same center.
4. The use is typical for this applicant (The Cheesecake Factory) which has operated at numerous
other locations with no reported issues.
The Cheesecake Factory is a successful sit down restaurant located in many malls throughout the nation
and has complemented the success of the mall establishment it has been part of. Liquor service is
necessary in order to compete with other facilities within the Las Vegas Premium Outlet North.
The Cheesecake Factory restaurant is an upscale casual dining concept first created in 1978. The
Company operates 182 full-service, casual dining restaurants throughout the U.S. and Puerto Rico,
including 170 restaurants under The Cheesecake Factory mark; 11 restaurants under the Grand Lux
Cafe mark; and one restaurant under the RockSugar Pan Asian Kitchen mark.
The anticipated hours of operation for the restaurant are as follows:
Monday Thursday 11:00 am - 11:30 pm
Friday 11:00 am - 12:30 am
Saturday 10:00 am 12:30 am
Sunday 10:00 am 11:30 pm

The construction and design of the project is compatible with the existing structure in the overall center
and respects all of the normal development standards of the district.

Development Department
19 Corp Park Irvine, CA 92606 (949) 261-2602 Fax (949) 261-9614 ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 222222226666661111111111----999999999999999999999966666666666666666666666111111444444
08/21/14
PRJ-55562
SUP-55674


Agenda tem No.: 15.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55720 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DEVICE PIT
STOP - OWNER: EXCEL CENTENNIAL, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special
Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,234 SQUARE-FOOT SECONDHAND DEALER
(PERSONAL COMPUTER, LAPTOP COMPUTERS AND OTHER SIMILAR COMPUTER
DEVICES) USE at 6440 Sky Pointe Drive, Suite #130 (APN 125-21-813-002), T-C (Town
Center) Zone |GC-TC (General Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|,
Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55626|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DEVICE PIT STOP - OWNER: EXCEL
CENTENNIAL, LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``

CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55720 StaII recommends APPROVAL.

N/A

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-55720 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under Town Center Development Standards
Manual, Section B.4.B Ior a Secondhand Dealer use.

2. Secondhand sales shall be limited to personal computer, laptop computers and other similar
computer devices.

3. All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days oI Iinal
approval.

4. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``


PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit to allow a Secondhand Dealer (personal and laptop
computers and other similar computer devices) use within a proposed 1,234 square-Ioot retail
establishment at 6440 Sky Pointe Drive, Suite #130. This use meets all code requirements Ior a
Secondhand Dealer use and can be conducted in a compatible and harmonious manner with the
surrounding land uses; thereIore, staII recommends approval, with conditions. II this application
is denied, then secondhand sales cannot take place at this location.


ISSUES

A Second Hand Dealer use is permitted with the approval oI a Special Use Permit in the GC-
TC (General Commercial Town Center) Special Land Use designation.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc. and Property Sales
01/12/97
The City Council approved an Extension oI Time |Z-0101-94(3)| request Ior
a previously approved 705,000 square Ioot retail shopping center located at
the northwest corner oI Centennial Parkway and BuIIalo Drive. The Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval.
12/07/98
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) request Irom U
(Undeveloped), R-E (Residential Estate), R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development 7 Units per Acre), R-PD11 (Residential Planned Development
11 Units per Acre), R-PD13 (Residential Planned Development 13 Units
per Acre), R-PD18 (Residential Planned Development 18 Units per Acre),
R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2
(General Commercial), C-V (Civic), and PD (Planned Development) Zones to
TC (Town Center) on 1,468 acres. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
01/19/00
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review |Z-0076-98(10)|
request Ior a proposed commercial center located on the southwest corner oI
BuIIalo Drive and Rome Boulevard. Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
03/23/00
The Planning Commission approved a Final Map (FMP-0017-00) request Ior
one-lot Commercial Subdivision at the northwest corner oI Sky Pointe Drive
and BuIIalo Drive. StaII recommended approval.
SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting


Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc. and Property Sales
07/12/01
The Planning Commission approved Major ModiIication |Z-0076-98(21)|
request oI an approved Site Development Review Plan |Z-0076-98(10)| to
change the building Iootprints and pad site locations on the west side oI John
Herbert Boulevard between BuIIalo Drive and Sky Pointe Drive. StaII
recommended approval.
08/01/01
The City Council denied a Variance (V-0035-01) request to allow an eighty-
Ioot high Ireestanding sign where an eight Ioot high Ireestanding sign is the
maximum height allowed located on the west side oI John Herbert Boulevard
between BuIIalo Drive and Sky Pointe Drive. Planning Commission and staII
recommended denial.
09/19/01
The City Council approved a Master Sign Plan (MSP-0002-01) request Ior an
approved 265,000 square-Ioot commercial center located at Sky Pointe Drive
and John Herbert Drive. Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
04/25/02
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review |Z-
0076-98(29)| request to modiIy one pad site and the parking layout oI a
previously approved Site Development Review Plan |Z-0076-98(10)| located
on the west side oI John Herbert Boulevard between BuIIalo Drive and Sky
Pointe Drive. StaII recommended approval.
08/06/02
The Centennial Hills Architectural Review Committee approved a request Ior
a Master Sign Plan (CHR-0006-02) Ior a 266,000 square-Ioot commercial
center located at Sky Point Drive and John Herbert Drive.
10/04/06
The City Council approved Bill 2006-53, adopting a revised Town Center
Development Standards Manual that did not include language regarding the
use oI asterisks prohibiting speciIic Special Use Permit conditions Irom being
waived.
05/16/07
The City Council approved Bill 2007-17 amending the Town Center
Development Standards Manual with respect to Secondhand Dealer
establishments. Due to an error, the published version oI the Town Center
Development Standards Manual included language regarding the use oI an
asterisk to denote non-waivable Special Use Permit conditions.
02/04/09
The City Council adopted Ordinance #6027 which amended the Town Center
Development Standards Manual Secondhand Dealer use to allow on a non-
consignment basis the dealing in secondhand personal computers, laptop
computers and other similar computer devices. The Planning Commission and
staII recommended approval oI the Text Amendment (TXT-31179) which
was heard at the City Council as Bill 2009-2.
04/21/10
The City Council approved a Major ModiIication (MOD-37375) request oI
the Town Center Land Use Plan Irom SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use Town
Center) to GC-TC (General Commercial Town Center) on 8.63 acres within
an existing shopping center located at the northwest corner oI John Herbert
Boulevard and Centennial Parkway. The Planning Commission and staII
Recommended denial.
SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc. and Property Sales
03/19/14



The City Council adopted Ordinance #6307 which amended the Town Center
Development Standards Manual and updated the Town Center Development
Standards with various clariIications related to changes made to LVMC Title
19 with the adoption oI the UniIied Development Code. The Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval oI the Text Amendment (TXT-
5110) which was heard at the City Council as Bill Number 2014-15.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
11/22/13 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
09/06/02
A building permit (#2016202) was issued Ior a retail shell building at 6440
Sky Pointe Drive. The permit was Iinalized on 01/02/03.
01/27/03
A building permit (#3001579) was issued Ior a tenant improvement and
CertiIicate oI Occupancy at 6440 Sky Pointe Drive, Suite #130. The permit
was Iinalized on 03/07/03.
A business license (G50-00818) was issued Ior General Retail Sales at 6440
Sky Pointe Drive, Suite #130. The license was marked out oI business on
03/17/13.
03/17/03
A business license (B05-02880) was issued Ior a Barber or Cosmetology shop
at 6440 Sky Pointe Drive, Suite #130. The license was marked out oI business
on 03/17/13.

Pre-Application Meeting
08/19/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the Special
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Secondhand Dealer use in Town
Center.

Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the site and Iound the proposed suite is
vacant and within a well maintained commercial shopping center.

Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 8.63
SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Shopping Center
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
North Shopping Center
SX-TC (Suburban
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
South Freeway
Interstate 215 Right-OI-
Way
N/A
Undeveloped
SX-TC (Suburban
Mixed Use Town
Center)

T-C (Town Center)
Single-Family
Residential
U (Undeveloped) R (Rural)



East
Single-Family
Residential
RL (Residential Low)
Clark County
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark County
West Shopping Center
SX-TC (Suburban
Mixed Use Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
Town Center Master Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A

Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance Y


SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
266,816 SF 1:250 SF 1,068

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 1,068

1,107

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 1,047 21 1,086 21 Y


ANALYSIS

The Town Center Development Standards manual does not deIine a Secondhand Dealer use.
Title 19.18 deIines the Secondhand Dealer use as 'A retail Iacility which deals solely in used
commodities with no new commodities, or in which the sale oI secondhand or used articles is
incidental to the sale oI new articles oI the same kind. For purposes oI this deIinition, the sale oI
secondhand or used articles is deemed to be incidental to the sale oI new articles. Used articles
may include wearing apparel, Iurniture, Iixtures, appliances, tableware, oIIices supplies, pictures,
paintings, jewelry, cutlery, guns or scrap precious metals as deIined in LVMC Chapter 6.74, but
does not include the sale oI junk as deIined in that Chapter or the sale oI used cars. The term
does not include the buying and selling oI Ioreign or domestic coins Ior numismatic purposes or
used books, which shall be allowed where retail sales oI new merchandise, is permitted. The
term also does not include a ThriIt Shop.

Per the justiIication letter the applicant intends to 'buy, sell trade and service laptops, tablets and
smart phone devices, thereby meeting the above deIinition.

The Special Use Permit requirements Ior a Secondhand Dealer use in Town Center Iollow:
a. Except as otherwise provided in Paragraph (c), the use may be operated Ior consignment
sales only and such consignment sales shall be limited to the Iollowing merchandise:
jewelry (including Class III), Iurniture, Iixtures, tableware, pictures, paintings, wearing
apparel and Iirearms.

This requirement aoes not apply, as the applicant intenas to buy ana sell personal ana
laptop computers or similar computer aevices.
SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



b. Payment to the consignor Ior consigned merchandise may not be made until aIter the
merchandise has been sold.
The proposea use shoula meet this requirement, as it is a stanaara business practice ana
the business will receive regular licensing ana inspections reviews.

c. The Iollowing (and only the Iollowing) secondhand merchandise may be sold on a non-
consignment basis to, or purchased Irom or exchanged with, customers oI the operation:

i. Personal computers;
ii. Laptop computers;
iii. Other similar computer devices;
iv. Wearing apparel; and
v. Firearms.

This requirement is met per the fustification letter the applicant plans to 'buy, sell, trade
ana service laptops, tablets ana smart phone aevices.`
d. No outdoor displays, sales or storage oI any merchandise shall be permitted.

The proviaea site ana floor plans illustrate this requirement is met.

e. The hours oI operation shall be limited to the hours between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.,
unless otherwise speciIied by the City Council.

This requirement is met per the fustification letter proviaea, the hours of operation for
are 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monaay through Friaay, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturaay ana 11 a.m.
to 4 p.m. on Sunaay.

I. The use shall comply with the applicable requirements oI LVMC Title 6.

The proposea use shoula meet this requirement, as it is a conaition of approval of the
Special Use Permit.

g. The conditions listed above are not waivable development standards under the
provisions oI the Town Center Development Standards Manual.

This requirement is instruction on how to interpret the requirements listea above.

This project is located in existing shopping center within the GC-TC (General Commercial
Town Center) Land Use designation within Town Center zoning district. The GC-TC
designation allows Ior all types oI retail service, oIIice and other general business uses oI a more
SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



intense commercial character. These more intense uses normally require a Special Use Permit.
This location meets all the minimum requirements Ior a Secondhand Dealer use and will be
located in a shopping center that is currently over-parked by 39 spaces. The Secondhand Dealer
use can be conducted compatible and harmonious manner with the existing retail, oIIice and
restaurant uses within said shopping center. For these reasons, staII is recommending approval
oI the Special Use Permit.


FINDINGS (SUP-55720)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

With compliance to the conditions oI approval, a Secondhand Dealer use can be conducted
in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the existing and Iuture land uses.


2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The subject site will be able to accommodate the proposed use and provide adequate
parking and access.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The proposed Secondhand Dealer use has primary access Irom the intersection oI Sky
Pointe Drive and Centennial Center Boulevard; the Iormer is a 70-Ioot Frontage Street and
the latter is a 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial. Secondary access is provided by BuIIalo
Drive, a 100-Iootwide Primary Arterial. Theses roadways are adequate to meet the
requirements oI the proposed Secondhand Dealer use and other uses in the shopping
center.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

The proposed Secondhand Dealer use will be subject to licensing review and inspection,
thereby protecting the public health, saIety and welIare.
SUP-55720 PR1-55626]
MR

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The project meets all conditions Ior a Secondhand Dealer (personal computer, laptop
computers and other similar computer devices) use required by the Town Center
Development Standards and Title 19.12.




NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 31


NOTICES MAILED 70


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0
08/25/14
PRJ-55626
SUP-55720
08/25/14
PRJ-55626
SUP-55720
10/14/14 PC
08/25/14
PRJ-55626
SUP-55720
08/25/14
PRJ-55626
SUP-55720
S
i
t
e

P
l
a
n

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

T
o
t
a
l

P
a
r
k
i
n
g

S
p
a
c
e
s
:

1
,
0
9
0

T
o
t
a
l

H
a
n
d
i
c
a
p

s
p
a
c
e
s
:


3
8

0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
2
0



B
e
t
w
e
e
n

V
o
n
s

a
n
d

S
u
i
t
e

1
3
0

i
s

W
e
i
g
h
t

W
a
t
c
h
e
r
s

a
n
d

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

F
a
m
i
l
y

I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
,

w
h
i
c
h

r
e
c
e
n
t
l
y

c
l
o
s
e
d

d
o
w
n

a
n
dd
SS
u
ii
t
e
11
33
00
ii
s
WW
e
ii
g
hh
t
WW
a
t
c
hh
e
r
s
a
n
dd
iii
ccc
h
r
e
c
e
n
t
l
y
c
l
o
s
e
d
d
o
w
n
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
2
0
4
'
-
6
"

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

d
i
s
p
l
a
y

c
o
u
n
t
e
r

T
E
C
H

R
O
O
M

F
R
O
N
T

S
A
L
E
S

F
R
O
N
T

S
A
L
E
S

R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M

S
T
O
R
A
G
E

6
6
'
-
7

12
"

1
8
'
-
6
"

3
1
'
-
4

14
"

2
7
'
-
2

14
"

6
'

D a t e : 1 - 7 - 1 4 C o n t r a c t o r : 6 8 5 N . F o g g S t
L a s V e g a s N e v a d a
8 9 1 1 0
7 0 2 4 9 1 - 8 2 2 1 D i r e c t
7 0 2 4 3 8 - 0 6 6 9 F a x
L i c e n s e # 0 0 6 3 7 4 1
P a g e :
#
P r o j e c t :
D e v i c e P i t S t o p
6 4 4 0 S k y P o i n t e
L a s V e g a s N e v a d a
D r a w n b y : J o b G o n z a l e z
S i g n e d : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
N

1
/
2
"
=
1
'0
"

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

F
l
o
o
r

p
l
a
n

2

0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
2
0
O
u
r

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

f
l
o
o
r

p
l
a
n
,

t
o

b
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

n
e
w

l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

a
t

6
4
4
0

S
k
y

P
o
i
n
t
e
,

i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

o
u
r

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

f
i
x
t
u
r
e
s

a
n
d

s
l
a
t
w
a
l
l
.


T
h
e

g
r
a
p
h
i
c
s

i
n

t
h
e

s
t
o
r
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

u
p
d
a
t
e
d

f
o
r

o
u
r

r
e
c
e
n
t

r
e
b
r
a
n
d
i
n
g

f
r
o
m

L
a
p
t
o
p
X
c
h
a
n
g
e

t
o

D
e
v
i
c
e

P
i
t
s
t
o
p
.


T
h
e

f
i
r
s
t

p
i
c
t
u
r
e

i
s

o
f

t
h
e

f
r
o
n
t

o
f

t
h
e

s
t
o
r
e

a
n
d

s
e
c
o
n
d

i
s

o
f

t
h
e

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

b
a
c
k

o
f

t
h
e

s
t
o
r
e

s
h
e
l
v
i
n
g

f
o
r

o
u
r

t
e
c
h
/
s
e
r
v
i
c
e

b
e
n
c
h
e
s
.

0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
2
0

0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
2
0
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
2
0
S
U
P
-

7
Z
0

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

D
E
V
I
C
E

P
I
T

S
T
O
P

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

E
X
C
E
L

C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L


L
L
C

4
4
0

S
k
Y

P
O
I
N
T
E

D
P
I
V
E


S
U
I
T
E

1
3
0

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4

______________________________________________________________________________________
5765 Centennial Center Blvd | Suite 160 | Las Vegas, NV | 89149 | 702-387-9768 |
www.LaptopXchange.com

City of Las Vegas


Planning Department

To whom it may concern,

We currently operate our store, dba LaptopXchange, at 5765 Centennial Center Blvd, Suite 160, Las
Vegas, 89149. All LaptopXchange stores rebranded to Device Pitstop beginning in July. We
currently operate under a general business license and a second hand dealer license with the City of Las
Vegas. In our store, we buy, sell, trade and service laptops, tablets and smartphones (devices). We
sell refurbished and used devices and pay cash for used devices.

Our lease expires at the end of September 2014 and we intend to move our store, fixtures, inventory, etc.
to 6440 Sky Pointe Dr, Suite 130, Las Vegas, 89131. Both our current and future locations are in
Town Center designated area and the pads are retail, shopping centers.

Our hours of operation will remain the same as they currently are:
Monday - Friday: 10:00 AM - 7:00 PM
Saturday: 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Sunday: 11:00 AM - 4:00 PM

We are requesting a second hand dealer license (privileged license) for 6440 Sky Pointe Dr., Suite 130,
Las Vegas, 89131 similar to what we have for our current location.

Thank you,

Jonathan Waite
President
LX Store Enterprises, Inc.
702-740-8005
_______________
49 | 702-387-9768
08/25/14
PRJ-55626
SUP-55720


Agenda tem No.: 16.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55741 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: FARM
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit
FOR A PROPOSED 1,700 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT (WITH DRIVE-THROUGH)
USE on 7.59 acres located at 8416 Farm Road (APN 125-17-610-017), T-C (Town Center) Zone
|SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation|, Ward 6 (Ross)
|PRJ-55578|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter
6. Protest Postcards

SUP-55741 PR1-55578]
GK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: FARM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55741 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:


`` CONDITIONS ``


SbF-55741 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Restaurant with
drive-through use.

2. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-55742) shall be required.

3. ConIormance to the approved conditions Ior Site Development Plan Review |Z-0076-
98(14)|.

4. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.
SUP-55741 PR1-55578]
GK

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



7. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

Public Works

8. An update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be
submitted to and approved by the Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any
building or grading permits or submittal oI any construction drawings, whichever may occur
Iirst. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage study.

9. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions oI approval Ior Z-0076-98, and
all other applicable site-related actions.

SUP-55741 PR1-55578]
GK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant proposes to develop a 3,900 square-Ioot pad building comprised oI a 1,700 square-
Ioot restaurant (with drive-through) use and 2,200 square-Ioot general retail use on a vacant pad
site (Pad C) within an approved shopping center located within Town Center. According to the
Town Center Development Standards, a building utilizing a Restaurant (with drive-through) use
requires a Special Use Permit. The proposed 1,700 square-Ioot restaurant (with drive-through)
use is compatible with the shopping center and adjacent development. As such, staII
recommends approval oI the proposed Special Use Permit. II denied, the proposed 3,900 square-
Ioot commercial building could not incorporate a drive-through Iacility.


ISSUES

According to the Town Center Development Standards, a Restaurant (with drive-through)
use requires a Special Use Permit. There are no Minimum Special Use Permit
Requirements Ior such use.
An associated Minor Amendment (SDR-55742) to Site Development Plan Review |Z-
0076-98(14)| was approved by staII Ior the construction oI the 3,900 square-Ioot
commercial building.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
05/17/00
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review |Z-0076-98(14)|
Ior a 208,211 square-Ioot shopping center at the northwest corner oI Farm
Road and Tule Springs Road. Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Review oI Condition |Z-0076-98(27)| to
eliminate condition number 9 oI an approved Site Development Plan Review
|Z-0076-98(14)| to allow restaurants with drive-through uses within the
existing shopping center. Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
06/05/02
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0028-02) Ior a 4,544
square-Ioot restaurant with drive-through use at the northeast corner oI
Durango Drive and Farm Road. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
SUP-55741 PR1-55578]
GK
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review |Z-0076-98(28)|
Ior a 4,544 square-Ioot restaurant with drive-through at the northeast corner oI
Durango Drive and Farm Road. Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10505)
Ior a 153,650 square-Ioot expansion to an existing shopping center on 18.9
acres located at the northeast corner oI Farm Road and Durango Drive.
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-10514) Ior a 5,000
square-Ioot restaurant with drive through use on a portion oI 18.9 acres
located at the northeast corner oI Farm Road and Durango Drive. Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval.
04/19/06
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-10520) Ior an 89,250
square-Ioot mini storage Iacility on 18.9 acres located at the northeast corner
oI Farm Road and Durango Drive. Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
02/28/08
The Planning Commission approved a Major ModiIication (ARC-25687) to
an approved Master Sign Plan (CHR-0003-02) to allow two pylon signs
where only one pylon sign per street Irontage is permitted and to allow the
pylon sign to be within 100 Ieet oI a single-Iamily residence where a
minimum oI 330 Ieet is required at 8420 Farm Road.
09/15/14
StaII administratively approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
55742) Ior a 3,900 square-Ioot commercial building at 8416 Farm Road.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
05/27/14 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Pre-Application Meeting
08/14/14
StaII conducted a pre-application meeting with the representative to discuss
the proposed restaurant with drive-through building at 8416 Farm Road. StaII
concluded that a Special Use Permit would be required Ior the use. In
addition, a minor site development plan review would be required to construct
the building, as the expansion to the shopping center use would be less than
10 percent. The submittal requirements Ior each applicant were discussed in
Iurther detail.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
SUP-55741 PR1-55578]
GK

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a well maintained shopping
center Iree oI trash and debris.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 13.14


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Shopping Center
SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
North
Single-Family
Residential
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
R-CL (Residential
Compact-Lot)
South Undeveloped
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
East
Single-Family
Residential
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-PD4 (Residential
Planned Development 4
Units per Acre)
General Retail
West
Shopping Center
SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
Town Center Master Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
T-C (Town Center) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A
SUP-55741 PR1-55578]
GK

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Durango Drive
Town Center
Parkway Arterial
Town Center
Development Standards

120 Feet Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
258,845 SF 1:250 846

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 846

961

Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 829 17 938 23 Y*
Loading Zones 6 9 Y
*The subject site is parking impaired. A major amendment (SDR-10505) approved the shopping
center in 2006 with 846 parking spaces. The subject proposal to decrease Pad 'C by 1,100
square Ieet does not increase the required parking.


ANALYSIS

The subject site is located at the northeast corner oI Farm Road and Durango Drive within the
SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) Special Land Use designation. The SC-TC
designation is designed to provide local services Ior area residents. This category allows
medium intensity retail, oIIice and other commercial uses that are intended to serve the
Centennial Hills area and do not include more intense general commercial characteristics.
Examples include neighborhood shopping centers, theaters, bowling alleys and other places oI
public assembly and quasi-public uses.

The applicant proposes to develop a 1,700 square-Ioot restaurant (with drive-through) use and a
2,200 square-Ioot general retail use on a vacant pad site (Pad C) within an approved shopping
center located within Town Center. In total, a 3,900 square-Ioot commercial building would be
developed on pad site C located at 8416 Farm Road. According to the Town Center
Development Standards, a building utilizing a Drive-Through Facility use requires a Special Use
Permit.
SUP-55741 PR1-55578]
GK

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The Town Center Development Standards Manual provides no deIinition Ior the Restaurant with
drive-through use, however, the Title 19.18 deIinition Ior a 'Drive-Through is provided below
to illustrate the requirements oI an analogous use in another location oI the City.

'The use oI a dedicated drive lane that, incidental to a principal use, provides access to a
station, such as a window, door or mechanical device, Irom which occupants oI a motor
vehicle receive or obtain a product or service.

The proposed use meets the Title 19 deIinition, as the primary use on the property is a Restaurant
and the drive lane is provided Ior pickup oI Iood and beverages Irom the restaurant. The drive-
through lane provides vehicle stacking Ior seven cars, where typically stacking Ior six cars is
required.

An accompanying Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55742) has been approved
administratively by staII Ior the 3,900 square-Ioot commercial building. A condition oI approval
was added to the application requiring approval oI this Special Use Permit Ior the drive-through
Iacility. With approval oI this Special Use Permit, the proposed use will be in conIormance with
the development requirements listed in the Town Center Development Standards Manual and the
Title 19 development standards as well; thereIore, staII recommends approval oI this request.


FINDINGS (SUP-55741)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The Town Center Development Standards allow Ior a Restaurant (with drive-through) use
with an approved Special Use Permit. The proposed Restaurant (with drive-through) use is
compatible with the adjacent uses and is designed in manner that is compatible with the
existing shopping center.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The existing shopping center can accommodate the proposed Restaurant (with drive-
through) use, as adequate parking, access and circulation are provided and unhindered by
the location oI the drive-through lane.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.
SUP-55741 PR1-55578]
GK

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Site access (ingress and egress) Ior this shopping center is along Durango Drive and Farm
Road. Secondary site circulation is adequately supported along the periphery oI the main
parking lot to the retail pads located along Durango Drive.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

The proposed Restaurant (with drive-through) will be subject to ongoing City inspections
Ior licensing; thereIore, public health, saIety, and welIare will not be compromised.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

There are no minimum requirements listed in the Town Center Development Standards
Manual Ior a Restaurant (with drive-through) use. The proposed use would meet the
conditions listed in Title 19.12, iI applicable.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 51


NOTICES MAILED 601


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 2
08/21/14
PRJ-55578
SUP-55741
08/21/14
PRJ-55578
SUP-55741
10/14/14 PC
0 8 / 2 1 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 5 7 8
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
4
1



0 8 / 2 1 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 5 7 8
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
4
1
0 8 / 2 1 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 5 7 8
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
4
1
0 8 / 2 1 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 5 7 8
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
4
1
0 8 / 2 1 / 1 4
P R J - 5 5 5 7 8
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
4
1
S
U
P
-

7
4
1

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

F
A
P
M

C
A
P
I
T
A
L

M
A
N
A
S
E
M
E
N
T


L
L
C

4
1


F
A
P
M

P
O
A
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
4
1

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

F
A
P
M

C
A
P
I
T
A
L

M
A
N
A
S
E
M
E
N
T


L
L
C

4
1


F
A
P
M

P
O
A
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


08/21/14
PRJ-55578
SUP-55741


Agenda tem No.: 17.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
VAC-55747 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TOLL SOUTH LV,
LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Petition to Vacate Public Utility Drainage and City
oI Las Vegas Sewer Easements generally located north oI the northern alignment oI Seborga
Avenue between Fox Hill Drive and Sky Vista Drive, P-C (Planned Community), Ward 2
(Beers) |PRJ-55387|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

VAC-55747 PR1-55387]
YK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: TOLL SOUTH LV, LLC



`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``



CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAC-55747 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:



`` CONDITIONS ``



VAC-55747 CONDIIIONS


1. The limits oI this Petition oI Vacation shall be deIined as all unused public sewer and
drainage easements granted by 'Montecito at Summerlin Village 23B Final Map, Book
147, Page 23. The public utility portion oI the legal description shall be removed Irom the
vacation as these easements cannot be vacated by the City oI Las Vegas.

2. The Order oI Vacation shall record just prior to the recordation oI an amended Final Map
Ior this site.

3. An update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study to
address the area requested Ior vacation must be submitted to and approved by the
Department oI Public Works prior to submittal oI any construction drawings or the
issuance oI any building or grading permits, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and
improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage study update.

4. All public improvements, iI any, adjacent to and in conIlict with this vacation application
are to be modiIied, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation oI an
Order oI Vacation.
VAC-55747 PR1-55387]
YK

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



5. The Order oI Vacation shall not be recorded until all oI the conditions oI approval have
been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modiIication oI public
improvements may be IulIilled Ior purposes oI recordation by providing suIIicient security
Ior the perIormance thereoI in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance oI the City oI
Las Vegas. City StaII is empowered to modiIy this application iI necessary because oI
technical concerns or because oI other related review actions as long as current City
right-oI-way requirements are still complied with and the intent oI the vacation application
is not changed. II applicable, a Iive Ioot wide easement Ior public streetlight and Iire
hydrant purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors
that will remain dedicated and available Ior public use. Also, iI applicable and where
needed, public easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should
cross any right-oI-way or easement being vacated must be retained.

6. All development shall be in conIormance with code requirements and design standards oI
all City Departments.

7. II the Order oI Vacation (or Order oI Relinquishment oI Interest iI a Patent Reservation) is
not recorded within one (1) year aIter approval by the City oI Las Vegas or an Extension oI
Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval will terminate and a new
petition must be submitted.



VAC-55747 PR1-55387]
YK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This Petition is a request to vacate City oI Las Vegas Sewer Easements, Public Drainage
Easements, and Public Utility Easements on property located on the west side oI Fox Hill Drive,
approximately 2,685 Ieet north oI Alta Drive. This Vacation will Iacilitate the development oI
the subject site, which has been approved Ior a 79-lot single-Iamily residential development. As
the easements are no longer required in their current conIiguration, staII recommends approval.
II denied, the existing easements would remain and would encumber any development oI the
site.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0119-96) Irom N-U (Non-Urban)
to P-C (Planned Community) on 8,318 acres along the west side oI Clark
County 215, between Charleston Boulevard and Lake Mead Boulevard. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval. 01/27/97
The City Council approved a Development Agreement (DA-0001-96) Ior the
area known as Summerlin West, which includes the subject site. The Planning
Commission and staII recommended approval.
01/16/02
The City Council approved a Master Development Plan Review (SV-0018-
01) establishing land use designations within Summerlin Villages 23A and
23B (The Paseos). The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
07/16/12
Department oI Planning staII approved a Minor ModiIication (MOD-45960)
to the Master Development Plan Review (SV-0018-01) Ior Village 23A and
23B.
09/11/12
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-46270) Ior a 20-
lot subdivision on 440 acres at the northwest corner oI Alta Drive and Desert
Foothills Drive. StaII recommended approval.
03/12/13
A Parcel Map (PMP-47903) Ior a three-lot subdivision on 5,920 acres at the
southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Clark County 215 was
recorded.
04/16/13
A Final Map (FMP-48049) Ior a six-pod single-Iamily residential subdivision
with two open space parcels on 428 acres at the northwest corner oI Alta
Drive and Desert Foothills Drive was recorded, creating the subject parcel
(Parcel X).
VAC-55747 PR1-55387]
YK
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
10/22/13
The Summerlin Design Review Committee approved the applicant`s request
Ior the subject Tentative Map with conditions.
12/10/13
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-51773) Ior a 79-
lot single-Iamily residential subdivision located 2,685 Ieet north oI the north
oI Alta Drive on Fox Hill Drive, within Village 23B oI Summerlin West.
StaII recommended approval.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
09/17/13 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
05/29/14
A building permit (#53318) Ior Civil Drawing #107Y4997 was Iinalized Ior a
79-lot residential subdivision.


Pre-Application Meeting
No pre-application meeting was required.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14 StaII visited the site and Iound the site to be undeveloped, but being graded.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 23.31


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Undeveloped
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)
North Undeveloped
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)
VAC-55747 PR1-55387]
YK
Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
South Undeveloped
SF3 (Single Family
Detached)
P-C (Planned Community)
East Undeveloped PF (Public Facilities) P-C (Planned Community)
West
Undeveloped-
Village 28
SUM (Summerlin) P-C (Planned Community)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
Summerlin Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
P-C (Planned Community) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Those City oI Las Vegas Sewer Easements, Public Drainage Easements, and Public Utility
Easements granted over common lot 'H, oI the Plat oI 'Montecito at Summerlin Village 23B,
on Iile in the Clark County, Nevada Recorder`s OIIice in Book 147 oI Plats, Page 23. Situate
within the West halI (W ) oI Section 27, Township 20 South, Range 59 East, M.D.M., City oI
Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.


ANALYSIS

This Vacation application proposes to vacate existing City oI Las Vegas Sewer Easements,
Public Drainage Easements, and Public Utility Easements. Public Works has no objection to the
Vacation application requests generally located on the west side oI Fox Hill Drive,
approximately 2,685 Ieet north oI Alta Drive.


FINDINGS (VAC-55747)

StaII has no objection to the Vacation oI these easements, as the easements are no longer required in
their current conIiguration. StaII recommends approval, with conditions.
VAC-55747 PR1-55387]
YK

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 8


NOTICES MAILED 1


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0
08/25/14
PRJ-55387
VAC-55747
08/25/14
PRJ-55387
VAC-55747
10/14/14 PC
08/25/14
PRJ-55387
VAC-55747
V
A
C
-

7
4
7

[
P
P
J
-

7
j

-

V
A
C
A
T
I
O
N

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

T
O
L
L

S
O
U
T
H

L
V


L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H

O
F

T
H
E

N
O
P
T
H
E
P
N

A
L
I
S
N
M
E
N
T

O
F

S
E

O
P
S
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

E
T
W
E
E
N

F
O
X

H
I
L
L

D
P
I
V
E

A
N
D

S
k
Y

V
I
S
T
A

D
P
I
V
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


08/25/14
PRJ-55387
VAC-55747
08/25/14
PRJ-55387


Agenda tem No.: 18.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - VAR-53657 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ERIK
MARTONOVICH - OWNER: BCNV, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO
ALLOW TWO EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (CLASS II) TO BE 16 FEET AND
37 FEET IN HEIGHT WHERE TEN FEET, SIX INCHES IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
ALLOWED on 2.07 acres at 5636 Donald Road (APN 125-24-104-001), R-E (Residence
Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-52356|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter
6. Protest/Support Postcards

VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ERIK MARTONOVICH - OWNER: BCNV, LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-53657 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:



`` CONDITIONS ``


VAk-5357 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

3. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit.

4. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

Public Works

5. Prior to construction, obtain approval Irom the Southern Nevada Health District to insure
there is no conIlict with the existing Individual Sewage Disposal System (Septic Tank).

VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The subject site consists oI a 1,092 square-Ioot single Iamily residence, a horse corral and horse
stables located at 5636 Donald Road. The applicant is requesting a Variance to address a citation
issued by Code EnIorcement Ior excessive accessory structure height. The applicant constructed
a 16-Ioot tall and a 37-Ioot tall horse training apparatuses that exceed the height oI the main
dwelling unit. The horse training apparatuses were constructed without proper building permits.
StaII recommends denial, as the applicant has presented no evidence oI a unique or extraordinary
circumstance pursuant to Title 19.16.140 that would justiIy the request.


ISSUES

A code enIorcement case is active on this property Ior two unpermitted accessory
structures being taller than the primary dwelling unitThe citation also includes excessive
junk cars, scrap metal, trash, and a grandstand built without permits at the subject site.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
05/06/64
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Petition to Annex (A-0003-64)
approximately 5,000 acres located north oI Lone Mountain Road and west oI
Decatur Boulevard. The annexation recorded on 05/20/64.
06/10/14
The request Ior a Variance (VAR-53657) was pulled Irom the 06/10/14
Planning Commission meeting Ior missing ownership documents. The case is
scheduled to be heard at the 07/08/14 Planning Commission meeting.
07/08/14
The request Ior a Variance (VAR-53657) was pulled Irom the 07/08/14
Planning Commission meeting Ior missing ownership documents. The case is
scheduled to be heard at the 08/12/14 Planning Commission meeting.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
08/27/04 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.
VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
c. 1974 The existing 1,092 square-Ioot single Iamily residence was constructed.
01/31/11
A code enIorcement citation (#97700) was issued Ior junk cars, scrap metal,
trash, and an open Iire pit in the Iront yard at 5636 Donald Road. The citation
was resolved on 03/01/11.
07/02/13
A code enIorcement citation (#130630) was issued Ior junk cars, scrap metal,
garbage and unpermitted horse trapeze and grandstands at 5636 Donald Road.
The citation remains unresolved.



Pre-Application Meeting
12/17/13
StaII met with the representative to discuss the existing horse apparatuses at
5636 Donald Road. StaII concluded that a Variance would be required to
allow the accessory structures to remain on-site. The submittal requirements
Ior an accessory structure were discussed.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
05/01/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check at 5636 Donald Road and noted debris
and scrap metal within the rear and side yards.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Gross Acres 2.07


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property
Single Family
Residence
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
North Undeveloped
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
South
Single Family
Residence
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
East
Single Family
Residence
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
West Undeveloped
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Rural Preservation Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A



DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 1itle 19., the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 89,975 SF Y
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 295 Feet Y
Accessory Structure Min. Setbacks
Side
Corner
Rear
10 Feet
15 Feet
10 Feet
200 Feet
57 Feet
55 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Accessory Structure Max. Building Height

Feet
Feet
16 Feet
37 Feet
N
N


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Donald Road Collector Street
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
34 Feet N


ANALYSIS

The applicant is requesting approval oI a Variance to address a citation issued by Code
EnIorcement Ior excessive accessory structure height at 5636 Donald Road. The subject site is
approximately two acres in size, contains a 1,092 square-Ioot single Iamily residence and two
horse stables located within the rear yard. The property has a current zoning designation oI R-E
(Residence Estates), which allows Ior the accommodation oI horses. The applicant constructed
two accessory structures, a 16-Ioot tall and a 37-Ioot tall horse training apparatuses that exceed
the height oI the main dwelling unit. According to the applicant`s justiIication letter, the heights
VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



oI the accessory structures are required to saIely train the horses Ior 'trick riding. The applicant
is a competitive vaulter, which is the sport oI gymnastics on horseback. He started the company
Big Horse Productions, which travels across the United States perIorming equestrian acrobatic
shows. Big Horse Company is based in Las Vegas where the horses stay at 5636 Donald Road
while not traveling. The applicant resides at the location and uses the two-acre site to train his
personal horses. The letter Iurther explains that although no commercial events take place on the
subject site, the applicant does invite neighbors to watch the training at any time.

The proposed accessory structures meet all other Title 19 requirements regarding location,
setbacks, and building area. However, the applicant has presented no evidence oI unique or
extraordinary circumstances pursuant to Title 19.16.140 that would justiIy the request.
ThereIore, staII recommends denial.



FINDINGS (VAR-53657)

In accordance with the provisions oI Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits oI a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;
2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, selI-created or Iinancial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:
'Where by reason oI exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape oI a speciIic piece oI
property at the time oI enactment oI the regulation, or by reason oI exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition oI
the piece oI property, the strict application oI any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical diIIiculties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner oI the property, a variance Irom that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the diIIiculties or hardship, iI the relieI may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment oI aIIected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose oI any ordinance or
resolution.

No evidence oI a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant
has created a selI-imposed hardship by constructing the accessory structures without Iirst
obtaining required entitlements and building permits. Alternative design oI the structure would
allow conIormance to the Title 19 requirements. In view oI the absence oI any hardships
imposed by the site`s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is
preIerential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI
Variances.
VAR-53657 PR1-52356]
GK

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 33


NOTICES MAILED 112


APPROVALS 1


PROTESTS 2
04/14/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
04/14/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
06/10/14 PC
07/22/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
07/22/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
07/22/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
04/14/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
0 4 / 1 4 / 1 4
P R J - 5 2 3 5 6
V
A
R
-
5
3
6
5
7
V
A
P
-

7

[
P
P
J
-

Z
3

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
P
I
k

M
A
P
T
O
N
O
V
I
C
H

-

O
W
N
E
P
:


C

N

V


L
L
C


D
O
N
A
L
D

P
O
A
D

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4


V
A
P
-

7

[
P
P
J
-

Z
3

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
P
I
k

M
A
P
T
O
N
O
V
I
C
H

-

O
W
N
E
P
:


C

N

V


L
L
C


D
O
N
A
L
D

P
O
A
D

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4


V
A
P
-

7

[
P
P
J
-

Z
3

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
P
I
k

M
A
P
T
O
N
O
V
I
C
H

-

O
W
N
E
P
:


C

N

V


L
L
C


D
O
N
A
L
D

P
O
A
D

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4


V
A
P
-

7

[
P
P
J
-

Z
3

j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

E
P
I
k

M
A
P
T
O
N
O
V
I
C
H

-

O
W
N
E
P
:


C

N

V


L
L
C


D
O
N
A
L
D

P
O
A
D

0
b
/
0
I
/
I
4


04/14/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657
To Whom it May Concern,
We would like to apply for a Variance to allow a 16-foot and 37-foot tall
accessory structure where Title 19.06.060 limits the height to that of the main
dwelling unit.
The purpose of our variance Backyard Toys. We use our 37 apparatus
for training purposes with our horses. This allows us to safely train for the
trick riding we do. This is intended for personal use and there will be no
public event taking place at this property where we invite people to watch
at any time. There is also a 10 tall structure, which is a seating structure
for us to watch the training. There is also a 20 structure, which is a pole
with a light on it (the light does not work or have power to it).
We believe the variance should be approved because it is not affecting
anyone in a negative way. It is not obstructing any view, as most of the
surrounding properties are vacant lots. There are already 6 telephone poles
of similar hight existing on the property that were put up by NV Energy.
Several of our neighbors also have light poles that exceed the height of
their homes as well. There is no reason we should be treated differently.
The apparatus is over 100 from the house and over 50 from the closest
property line. This ensures it has no way of causing any damage to any
structure on the property. We have collected 44 signatures from our closest
neighbors stating that they are not effected by these apparatuses in any
negative way. In addition to that, we speak to many of them on a daily
basis and they enjoy walking by and seeing us train our horses.
Sincerely, Erik Martonovich
05/08/14
PRJ-52356
VAR-53657


Agenda tem No.: 19.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-55031 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/
OWNER: CCOB FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit
FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE at 5705 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-27-
803-004), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55030|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 80 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 |PRJ-55030|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 |PRJ-55030|
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 |PRJ-55030|
4. Photos - SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 |PRJ-55030|
5. JustiIication Letter - SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 |PRJ-55030|
6. Protest Postcards, Letter and Petition with 77 Signatures - SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 |PRJ-
55030|

SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: CCOB FAMILY TRUST



`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``



CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55031 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SDR-55043 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-55031



`` CONDITIONS ``


SbF-55031 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Public or
Private School, Primary use.

2. No residential use shall be permitted on the site, including the two existing accessory
buildings.

3. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-55043) shall be required.

4. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.


Public Works


8. The number oI students Ior this site is limited to a maximum oI 50 students. Alternatively,
A TraIIic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department oI Public
Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits, submittal oI any
construction drawings or the recordation oI a Map subdividing this site, whichever may
occur Iirst to determine the appropriate number oI maximum students allowed. Comply with
the recommendations oI the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy oI the site.
No recommendation oI the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis, nor compliance therewith,
shall be deemed to modiIy or eliminate any condition oI approval imposed by the Planning
Commission or the City Council on the development oI this site.


SDk-55043 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Special Use Permit (SUP-
55031) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building
elevations, date stamped 07/16/14, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. No residential use shall be permitted on the site, including the two existing accessory
buildings.

5. A Waiver Irom Title 19.06.060 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-Ioot wide landscape
buIIer adjacent to a right-oI-way, where 15 Ieet is required.
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

Conditions Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



6. A Waiver Irom Title 19.06.060 is hereby approved, to allow a two-Ioot wide landscape
buIIer on a portion oI the south perimeter, where eight Ieet is required.

7. An Exception Irom Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow 27 perimeter landscape trees,
where 42 are required.

8. A minimum oI ten, 24-inch box trees shall be provided along the west perimeter and a
minimum oI twelve, 24-inch box trees shall be provided along the north perimeter.

9. No chain link Ience shall be permitted on site.

10. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

11. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit.

12. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

13. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.


Public Works


14. Construct halI-street improvements to match existing improvements to the south and
transition pavement to the north acceptable to the City TraIIic Engineer, on Rainbow
Boulevard adjacent to this site, concurrent with development oI this site. All existing paving
damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its
original width concurrent with development oI this site.

15. The applicant shall connect to public sewer in Rainbow Boulevard and abandon the existing
individual sewage disposal system according to Southern Nevada Health District regulations
concurrent with onsite development.

16. All private improvements and landscaping installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

Conditions Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



17. Contact the City Engineer`s OIIice at 229-6272 to coordinate the development oI this
project with the 'Ann Road Channel West Rainbow Boulevard project and any other
public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations oI the
City Engineer.

18. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior this site.

19. Meet with the Flood Control Section oI the Department oI Public Works Ior assistance with
establishing Iinished Iloor elevations and drainage paths Ior this site prior to submittal oI
construction plans, the issuance oI any building or grading permits, whichever may occur
Iirst. Provide and improve all drainage ways as recommended.


SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to convert an existing single-Iamily dwelling, with a casita into a
Public or Private School, Primary use Ior a private school at 5705 North Rainbow Boulevard.
The property is currently vacant and in disrepair. The applicant is proposing to remodel the
existing structures Ior use as a two-room private school, with space to grow in the Iuture. The
exterior will be painted using a similar color pallet as the current color in order to keep with the
aesthetic oI the residential neighborhood. A Waiver and an Exception are required Ior perimeter
landscape buIIers and trees, but the overall impact to the site is minimal. StaII recommends
approval oI the applications with conditions. II denied, the property could not be used as a
school.


ISSUES

A Special Use Permit Ior a Public or Private School, Primary use in an R-E (Residence
Estates) zone is required. StaII supports this request.
A Waiver is required Ior the south and east perimeter landscape buIIers. StaII supports
this request.
An Exception is required to allow 27 perimeter landscape buIIer trees where 42 are
required. StaII supports this request.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
08/20/14
The City Council approved an Annexation (ANX-54655) Ior 0.95 acres at
5705 North Rainbow Boulevard. The eIIective date is 08/28/14.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
08/20/13 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
CC. 1974 A residential building was constructed.
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Pre-Application Meeting
05/28/14
StaII met with the applicant and explained the steps required Ior 5705 North
Rainbow Boulevard to become a private school. BeIore any application could
be considered, the applicant would have to have the property annexed into the
City. Once this is completed, a Special Use Permit and Site Development
Plan Review could be considered.


Aeighborhood Meeting
09/29/14
At the request oI the Planning Commission the applicant held a neighborhood
meeting. Two City staII members, along with the applicant and several
members oI the public attended. The major concern was the increased traIIic
that would be generated with the proposed school.


Field Check
07/31/14
StaII visited the site and Iound a boarded up residential dwelling with two
accessory structures. The property had dead and overgrown vegetation. The
property is located in the county with an annexation case scheduled to be
heard by City Council on 8/20/14.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.95


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property
Single-Family,
Detached (Vacant)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
North
Single-Family,
Dwelling (Vacant)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
South
Primary School,
Private
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R-D (Single Family
Residential-Restricted)
East
Single-Family,
Detached
RN (Rural
Neighborhood) Clark
County
R-E (Rural Residential
Estate) Clark County
West
Single-Family,
Detached
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-PD8 |Residential-
Planned Development 8
Units per Acre|
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK
Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance Y


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 1itle 19.., the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 41,382 SF Y
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 145 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
50 Feet
10 Feet
15 Feet
35 Feet
56 Feet
16 Feet
N/A
185 Feet
Y
Y
N/A
Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 6 Feet 25 Feet Y
Max. Building Height 35 Feet 24 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/ a
RooI or Trellis
Curb Side
Pick-up
Y
Mech. Equipment Screened
Screened by
Condition Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19. and 19.8.4(F), the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
15 Trees
15 Trees
4 Trees
8 Trees
10 Trees
8 Trees
4 Trees
5 Trees
N
N
Y
N
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 42 Trees 27 Trees N
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK
Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
4 Trees 4 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
8 Feet
8 Feet
15 Feet
8 Feet
8 Feet
2 Feet
Zero Feet
8 Feet
Y
N
N
Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Y Y

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Rainbow Boulevard Primary Arterial
Planned Streets and
Highways
90 Y

Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross
Floor Area
or Aumber
of Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Public or Private
School, Primary
2
Classrooms
3 spaces
per
Classroom
6

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 6

10

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 5 1 9 1 Y

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To provide a 15-Ioot wide
perimeter landscape buIIer
along the east perimeter.
To provide a zero-Ioot wide
perimeter landscape buIIer along the
east perimeter.
Approval
To provide an 8-Ioot wide
perimeter landscape buIIer
along the south perimeter.
To provide a 2-Ioot wide perimeter
landscape buIIer along a portion oI
the south perimeter.
Approval
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To provide 42 perimeter
landscape buIIer trees.
To allow 27 perimeter
landscape buIIer trees.
Approval


ANALYSIS

The Public or Private School, Primary use is permitted with approval oI a Special Use Permit.
The Public or Private School, Primary use is deIined as 'An institution that provides
kindergarten through 8
th
grade education and is support by a public, religious or private
organization. The proposed use meets the deIinition as indicated by the applicant`s justiIication
letter.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior this use include:

1. Adequate pick-up and drop-oII areas must be provided on-site.

The proposed use meets this requirement as an on-site pick-up and drop-oII area is
provided as reIlected on the site plan.

Properties requiring a Special Use Permit that are within 500 Ieet oI properties in Clark County
are deemed Projects oI Regional SigniIicance per Title 19.16.010(F). An impact assessment was
sent to aIIected entities; no comments were received Irom these entities.

The existing single-Iamily dwelling is currently on a septic system; as part oI this development,
the septic must be removed and the school must be hooked up to city sewers. A drainage study
will also be required.

The existing two-story residential structure will be remodeled to accommodate the proposed two-
classrooms oI the school. The two accessory structures will not be used Ior classrooms at this
time. In addition, no residential uses will be permitted in conjunction with a school use oI the
property. A condition has been added to address this concern.

The buildings on the property will be repainted in order to provide a Iresh, clean aesthetic that
will maintain the residential Ieel oI the property. A circular driveway will be installed that will
Iunction as the drop-oII and pick-up area Ior the school. The required parking will be provided
in the Iront and side oI the existing building.

Although staII supports the reduction in perimeter landscape trees, a condition has been added
that a minimum oI ten, 24-inch box trees be provided along the west perimeter and a minimum
oI twelve, 24-inch box trees be provided along the north perimeter. These additional trees will
provide an eIIective screening between the proposed school use and the adjacent residential uses.
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



FINDINGS (SUP-55031)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed private school is appropriate in proximity to existing single-Iamily
residential uses to the north, east and west; with an existing school to the south. This is a
compatible use Ior the residential nature oI the area.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The site is nearly one acre in size and is large enough to accommodate a two classroom
sized school with ancillary recreational areas and parking in conIormance with title 19
requirements.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The site is located on Rainbow Boulevard, a 90-Ioot wide Major Collector as depicted by
the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways and is adequate to meet the needs oI the proposed
school use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

The proposed school use will have regular saIety, health and welIare inspections to insure
the public`s health and welIare.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Public or Private School, Primary use meets the Special Use Permit
requirement Ior and adequate on-site pick-up and drop-oII area.


FINDINGS (SDR-55043)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The proposed primary school is located near major streets and within proximity oI
several residential areas, making it an appropriate location. The existing zoning oI the
property allows this use, the development oI which is compatible with an existing
school to the south and single-Iamily residences to the north, west and east.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed school is consistent with Title 19 standards with the exception oI the
required perimeter landscape buIIers along the south and east perimeters and the reduction
oI perimeter trees. StaII supports theses Waivers and Exceptions due to the adapted re-use
oI the property.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;

The site is located on Rainbow Boulevard, a 90-Ioot wide Major Collector as depicted by
the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways and is adequate to meet the needs oI the proposed
school use.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The existing two-story residential structure will be repainted and will continue to have a
residential aesthetic. All the existing landscape will remain and be enhanced with
additional trees and shrubs appropriate Ior the residential area.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

The submitted elevations show an aesthetically pleasing building with variations in
exterior color, materials, rooIlines and wall planes. The design characteristics are
compatible with other existing buildings in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.
SUP-55031 and SDR-55043 PR1-55030]
YK

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The proposed development will be subject to permit review and inspection through
state and local agencies, thereby protecting the public health, saIety and general
welIare.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 28


NOTICES MAILED 299


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 80

PRJ55030 125-27-803-004
07/16/14
PRJ-55030
SUP-55031
07/16/14
PRJ-55030
SUP-55031
09/09/14 PC
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N

A
C
A
D
E
M
Y

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,

N
E
V
A
D
A

A
.

0
0
1

O
V
E
R
A
L
L

S
I
T
E

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
"

=

2
0
'
-
0
"

P
L
A
N

H

V

7
-
1
1
-
2
0
1
4

H

0
0
1
V
E
R
A
L
L
S
I
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
L
E
:
1
"
=
2
0
'
-
0
"
L
A
N
-----------
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
0000000000000
111111111111111111111111111
4444444444444444444444
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
3
0
S
U
P
-
5
5
0
3
1

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
0
4
3
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
3
0
S
U
P
-
5
5
0
3
1

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
0
4
3
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N

A
C
A
D
E
M
Y

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,

N
E
V
A
D
A

A
.

0
0
7

L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
"

=

2
0
'
-
0
"

P
L
A
N

7
-
1
1
-
2
0
1
4

H

0
0
7
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
L
E
:
1
"
=
2
0
'
-
0
"
L
A
N
-----------
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
0000000000000
111111111111111111111111
444444444444444444444
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
3
0
S
U
P
-
5
5
0
3
1

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
0
4
3
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
3
0
S
U
P
-
5
5
0
3
1

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
0
4
3
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N

A
C
A
D
E
M
Y

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,

N
E
V
A
D
A

A
.

0
0
5

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
/
4
"

=

1
'
-
0
"

7
-
1
1
-
2
0
1
4

E
X
I
S
T
.

P
H
O
T
O

0
0
5
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
TTTTT
IIIII
OOOOOOOOOOOOO
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
22222222
000000000000000000000
11111
44444
IIIIIIII
S
T
.
P
H
O
T
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
3
0
S
U
P
-
5
5
0
3
1

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
0
4
3
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N

A
C
A
D
E
M
Y

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,

N
E
V
A
D
A

A
.

0
0
2

F
L
O
O
R

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
/
4
"

=

1
'
-
0
"

P
L
A
N

7
-
1
1
-
2
0
1
4

.
0
0
2
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
RRRRRRRR
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
L
A
N
1111111
-
222
0000000000000000000
111
4444444444444
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
3
0
S
U
P
-
5
5
0
3
1

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
0
4
3
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N

A
C
A
D
E
M
Y

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,

N
E
V
A
D
A

A
.

0
0
3

E
X
I
S
T
.

B
L
D
G

A

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
/
4
"

=

1
'
-
0
"

F
L
R

P
L
A
N

7
-
1
1
-
2
0
1
4

.
0
0
3
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
IIIIIIIIII
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
TTTTTTTT
.
BBBBBBBBBBBBBB
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
GGGGGGGGGG
C
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
L
R
P
L
A
N
11111111111111111111111
11111111111111111111111
----
2222222222
000000000000000000000000000
1111111111
444444444444444444444444444444
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
3
0
S
U
P
-
5
5
0
3
1

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
0
4
3
I
N
N
O
V
A
T
I
O
N

A
C
A
D
E
M
Y

L
A
S

V
E
G
A
S
,

N
E
V
A
D
A

A
.

0
0
4

O
T
H
E
R

B
L
D
G

S
C
A
L
E
:

1
/
4
"

=

1
'
-
0
"

P
L
A
N

(
N
O
T

U
S
E
D
)

7
-
1
1
-
2
0
1
4

0
0
4
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
RRRRRRRRRR
BBBBB
LLLLLLL
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
AAAAAAAAAA
N
(((((((((((((((((((
N
O
T
UUUUUUU
2222222222222
00000000000000000000
11111
44444
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
3
0
S
U
P
-
5
5
0
3
1

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
0
4
3
YIHONG LIU & ASSOCIATES
7/14/2014
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR
1669 Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 120, Henderson, NV 89012. p: 702-321-9316 f: 702-946-0933
Justification Letter for Private School ( Innovation Academy)
Special Use Permit & Site Development Review & waiver of development
standard
To Whom it may concern:
We are respectfully submitting Special Use Permit and Site Development Design
Review application for a private school use at Rainbow BLVD and Ann Road. APNs
125-27-803-004.
The proposed 0.94 ac project is located at 5705 N. Rainbow BLVD. The site is currently
composed of 3 standing alone buildings where only the ground floor of the main building
is proposed for the school use for current application. Ramaining buildings on site will be
remodeled to fit the school needs in the future.
The building A ground floor will be remodeled to meet the code requirement for school
use. The building exterior will not be changed and will maintain the residential look.
Building exterior will be repaired and repainted using existing building color. Please see
existing photo for reference.
we provided 15 landscape buffer on the North and West Property line with tree 30' on
center landscaping for a good separation to the residential area. We also provided
landscape buffer on the parameter facing streets and the landscape are provided per
code requirement. The existing trees are remained for the project.
At the south property line where parking spaces are provided, we have 56' long
landscape buffer of 2' where 8' is required per development standard. Other areas we
have 8' or morethan 8' in landscape buffer. We respectfully request a landscape waiver
of development standard.
We will allow a 90min drop-off and pickup time frame to not increase flow on street.
There is no need for increased utility or changes that will affect neighboring units. Class
ratios will be very low and we are expected to open with less than 50 students for the
first 2 years.
There are total of 10 parking spaces provided with 1 handicap space. The parking ratio
is at 4 cars per classroom and 1 car for teachers & staffs, which is higher than code
requirements for 3 cars per classroom.
111111111111111111111111111111666666666666666666666 fffffffffffffffffffff:::::: 777777000000000000000000000022222222222222222222-999999944444446666666-00000009999999333333333333333333333333
The parking ratio
gher than code
07/16/14
PRJ-55030
SUP-55031 & SDR-55043
YIHONG LIU & ASSOCIATES
7/14/2014
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR
1669 Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 120, Henderson, NV 89012. p: 702-321-9316 f: 702-946-0933
The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and will
provide an environment of stable and desirable character consistent with the Citys
policies and regulation.
Sincerely,
Yihong Liu, AIA, LEED AP
President
Yihong Liu & Associates, Ltd
111111111111111111111111111111116666666666666666666 fffffffffffffffffff:::::: ffffffffff 77777700000000000000000000000022222222222222222222-999999944444446666666-000000099999993333333333333333333333333
07/16/14
PRJ-55030
SUP-55031 & SDR-55043
S
U
P
-

0
3
1

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

0
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

0
3
0
j

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
C
O


F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

7
0


N
O
P
T
H

P
A
I
N

O
W

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
7
/
3
I
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

0
3
1

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

0
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

0
3
0
j

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
C
O


F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

7
0


N
O
P
T
H

P
A
I
N

O
W

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
7
/
3
I
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

0
3
1

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

0
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

0
3
0
j

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
C
O


F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

7
0


N
O
P
T
H

P
A
I
N

O
W

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
7
/
3
I
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

0
3
1

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

0
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

0
3
0
j

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
C
O


F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

7
0


N
O
P
T
H

P
A
I
N

O
W

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
7
/
3
I
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

0
3
1

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

0
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

0
3
0
j

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
C
O


F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

7
0


N
O
P
T
H

P
A
I
N

O
W

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
7
/
3
I
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

0
3
1

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

0
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

0
3
0
j

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
C
O


F
A
M
I
L
Y

T
P
U
S
T

7
0


N
O
P
T
H

P
A
I
N

O
W

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
7
/
3
I
/
I
4





Agenda tem No.: 20.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
ABEYANCE - SDR-55043 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-
55031 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CCOB FAMILY TRUST - For possible
action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED THREE
BUILDING, 8,044 SQUARE-FOOT PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY WITH WAIVERS TO
ALLOW A TWO-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON A PORTION OF THE SOUTH
SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED AND A ZERO-FOOT
WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WHERE
FIFTEEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.95 acres at 5705 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-27-
803-004), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) |PRJ-55030|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 80 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
PRJ55030 125-27-803-004
07/16/14
PRJ-55030
SDR-55043
07/16/14
PRJ-55030
SDR-55043
09/09/14 PC


Agenda tem No.: 21.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
GPA-55743 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: GABRIELA NAVARRO - For possible action on a request to amend a
portion oI the General Plan FROM: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO SC: (SERVICE
COMMERCIAL) on 1.97 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael
Way (APNs 138-24-305-001 and 003), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54639|. StaII recommends
DENIAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL.

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report -GPA-55743, ZON-55744 and SDR-55745 |PRJ-54639|
3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-55743, ZON-55744 and SDR-55745 |PRJ-54639|
4. Photos - GPA-55743, ZON-55744 and SDR-55745 |PRJ-54639|
5. JustiIication Letter - GPA-55743, ZON-55744 and SDR-55745 |PRJ-54639|
6. Protest Postcard - GPA-55743 and ZON-55744 |PRJ-54639|

GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: GABRIELA NAVARRO


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
GPA-55743 StaII recommends DENIAL.
ZON-55744 StaII recommends DENIAL. GPA-55743
SDR-55745 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:
GPA-55743
ZON-55745


`` CONDITIONS ``


SDk-55745 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior General Plan Amendment
(GPA-55743) and Rezoning (ZON-55744) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the site plan and landscape plan, date
stamped 09/09/14 and the building elevations and Iloor plans, date stamped 08/25/14, except
as amended by conditions herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

5. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




6. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staII to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.

7. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

8. Prior to the submittal oI a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department oI Planning staII to develop a comprehensive address plan Ior the subject site.
A copy oI the approved address plan shall be submitted with any Iuture building permit
applications related to the site.

9. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.


Public Works


10. Dedicate an additional 10 Ieet oI right-oI-way, where such does not exist, Ior a total halI-
street width oI 40 Ieet on Michael Way prior to the issuance oI any permits or through a
mapping action Ior this site.

11. Grant a traIIic signal chord easement at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and
Michael Way prior to the issuance oI any permits.

12. Construct halI-street improvements, including appropriate over paving and transition
paving, on Shadow Mountain Place and Michael Way adjacent to this site concurrent with
development oI this site. Extend all required underground utilities, such as electrical,
telephone, etc., located within public rights-oI-way, past the boundaries oI this site prior to
construction oI hard surIacing (asphalt or concrete).

13. In accordance with code requirements oI Title 13.56, remove all substandard oIIsite
improvements on Lake Mead Boulevard, iI any, and replace with new improvements
meeting Current City Standards concurrent with development oI this site. All existing
paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original location
and to its original width concurrent with development oI this site.

14. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior this site.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Conditions Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




15. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one side oI all
access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent with development
oI this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend Irom the sidewalk on the public street to
the Iirst intersection oI the on-site roadway network and shall be terminated on-site with a
handicap ramp.

16. Extend public sewer to the south edge oI this site in Michael Way to a location and depth
acceptable to the City Engineer concurrent with development oI this site. Provide public
sewer easements Ior all public sewers not located within existing public street right-oI-way
prior to the issuance oI any permits as required by the Department oI Public Works.
Improvement Drawings submitted to the City Ior review shall not be approved Ior
construction until all required public sewer easements necessary to connect this site to the
existing public sewer system have been granted to the City.

17. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-oI-way, iI any, adjacent to this site. All
private improvements and landscaping installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.

18. Submit an Encroachment Agreement Ior landscaping and private improvements in the
Shadow Mountain Place, Lake Mead Boulevard, and Michael Way public rights-oI-way, iI
any, prior to the issuance oI permits Ior these improvements. The applicant must carry an
insurance policy Ior the term oI the Encroachment Agreement and add the City oI Las
Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. II requested by the City,
the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right oI way at the applicant's
expense pursuant to the terms oI the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and
maintenance oI all private improvements in the public right oI way shall be the
responsibility oI the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transIerred with the sale oI the
property Ior the entire term oI the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements
Ior the Encroachment Agreement with the Land Development Section oI the Department oI
Building and SaIety (229 4836).

19. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the
Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits,
submittal oI any construction drawings or the submittal oI a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the
approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements as are recommended by the City
oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study
concurrent with development oI this site.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Conditions Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




20. The approval oI all Public Works related improvements shown on this Site Development
Plan Review is in concept only. SpeciIic design and construction details relating to size,
type and/or alignment oI improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and
drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to submittal oI a Tentative Map or
construction drawings, whichever may occur Iirst. No deviations Irom adopted City
Standards shall be allowed unless speciIic written approval Ior such is received Irom the
City Engineer prior to the submittal oI a Tentative Map or construction drawings, whichever
may occur Iirst.


GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``


PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The 1.97-acre subject site is located at the southwest corner oI Michael Way and Lake Mead
Boulevard and is currently undeveloped. The applicant is requesting to construct two commercial
buildings totaling 15,350 square Ieet. As proposed, the new commercial buildings do not require
any Variances, Waivers or Exceptions and adhere to all minimum requirements as outlined by
Title 19. Included with this proposal is a General Plan Amendment (GPA-55743) Irom the L
(Low Density Residential) Land Use designation to the SC (Service Commercial) Land Use
designation and a Rezoning (ZON-55744) to the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.

This proposal represents the third request to amend the General Plan and Rezone the subject site
to allow Ior commercial development. The previous proposals were withdrawn without prejudice
in 2007 and 2008. StaII recommends denial, as the requested changes to the existing L (Low
Density Residential) General Plan Land Use designation and R-E (Residence Estates) zoning
designation are too intense and intrusive Ior the surrounding properties, particularly Ior the
single-Iamily residences located to the north, east and south. As staII cannot support the
requested General Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications that would allow Ior commercial
development, the requested Site Development Plan Review application to construct the
commercial buildings also cannot be supported. II denied, the subject site would remain
undeveloped, the General Plan Land Use designation would remain L (Low Density Residential)
and the zoning designation would remain R-E (Residence Estates).


ISSUES

A General Plan Amendment is requested to change the land use designation on the
subject site Irom L (Low Density Residential), which allows up to 5.49 dwelling units per
acre, to SC (Service Commercial).
A Rezoning is requested to change the zoning designation on the subject site Irom R-E
(Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial).


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
08/19/99
The City Council approved an update oI the Southwest Sector Map (GPA-
0023-99) oI the city oI Las Vegas General Plan. On this map, the subject
properties were designated Ior R (Rural Residential) land uses, with a
maximum density oI 3.5 dwelling units per acre.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-7323) to
reclassiIy the property Irom R (Rural Density Residential) to L (Low Density
Residential) land use classiIication. Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-7470) Irom R-E (Residence
Estates) to R-PD4 (Residential Planned Development 4 Units per Acre) on
2.8 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way.
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-7473) Ior
an 11-lot single-Iamily residential development on 2.8 acres at the southwest
corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way. Planning Commission and
staII recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-7535) to allow a 2.8-acre R-PD
(Residential Planned Development) zoning district where Iive acres is the
minimum site area required at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard
and Michael Way. Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
01/18/06
The City Council approved a Waiver (WVR-10086) oI Title 18.12.160 to
allow 145 Ieet between street intersections where 220 Ieet is the minimum
intersection oIIset allowed at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard
and Michael Way. Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a request by the applicant to withdraw
without prejudice a request Ior a General Plan Amendment (GPA-24477) to
amend the General Plan Irom L (Low Density Residential) to SC (Service
Commercial) on 1.96 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard
and Michael Way. StaII recommended denial.
The Planning Commission approved a request by the applicant to withdraw
without prejudice a request Ior a Rezoning (ZON-24478) Irom R-E
(Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 1.96 acres at the
southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way. StaII
recommended denial.
12/06/07
The Planning Commission approved a request by the applicant to withdraw
without prejudice a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
24479) Ior a 15,400 square-Ioot general retail development with a waiver to
allow a 3-Ioot wide landscape buIIer along a 15-Ioot portion oI the southern
perimeter where a ten-Ioot wide buIIer is required and a ten-Ioot wide
landscape buIIer along a 20-Ioot portion oI the eastern perimeter where a 15-
Ioot wide landscape buIIer is required on 1.96 acres at the southwest corner oI
Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way. StaII recommended denial.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The City Council approved a request by the applicant to withdraw without
prejudice a request Ior a General Plan Amendment (GPA-27296) to amend
the General Plan Irom L (Low Density Residential) to SC (Service
Commercial) on 1.96 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard
and Michael Way. Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request by the applicant to withdraw without
prejudice a request Ior a Rezoning (ZON-27297) Irom R-E (Residence
Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 1.96 acres at the southwest corner oI
Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way. Planning Commission and staII
recommended denial.
08/06/08
The City Council approved a request by the applicant to withdraw without
prejudice a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-27298) Ior a
two-story, 20,000 square-Ioot medical oIIice, general retail, and clinic
development on 1.96 acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard
and Michael Way. Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
04/02/14 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
There have been no building permits or business licenses issued at the subject site.


Pre-Application Meeting
06/17/14
StaII conducted a pre-application meeting with the representative to discuss
the request to construct two oIIice buildings on two undeveloped parcels.
StaII discussed the submittal requirements Ior a General Plan, Rezoning and
Site Development Plan.


Aeighborhood Meeting
09/10/14
Meeting Start Time: 6:00 pm Meeting End Time: 6:40pm

Attendance: 2 members oI the development team
1 member oI Planning
1 member Irom the Council oIIice
8 members oI the public
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK
Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Aeighborhood Meeting

The public expressed the Iollowing concerns:
Michael Way is already too busy. A commercial use would make the
street busier.
The neighborhood Iought the same development Iour years ago and
will not support any commercial project now.
The owner is proposing oIIice uses, however approval oI the C-1
zoning district is a slippery slope and will allow additional uses other
than oIIice.
There is no existing commercial uses in the immediate area. The
surrounding home values will decrease iI this lot is rezoned to
commercial.
The community is primarily equestrian residential lots. A commercial
property would strip the equestrian identity.
The owner has not speciIied prospective tenants Ior the commercial
buildings. The Iear is that this new commercial property would
become a halI vacant strip mall like others Iound along Smoke Ranch
Road.
The provided parking will be used by the oIIice employees. The actual
customers will be Iorced to park along Michael Way and Shadow
Mountain Place.
The owner purchased the property in early 2014. The commercial proposal
has the Ieel oI a commercial Ilip.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a chain-link Ience around the
perimeter oI the site, mechanical equipment and a pile oI asphalt at the subject
site. The illegal Ience, equipment, and debris was turned over to code
enIorcement Ior Iurther action.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Gross Acres 1.97


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Undeveloped
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-E (Residence Estates)
North
Single-Family
Residential
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single-Family
Residential)
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
South
Single-Family
Residential
R |(Rural Density
Residential) Clark
County|
R-E |(Rural Estates) Clark
County|
East
Single-Family
Residential
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single-Family
Residential)
West Church
R (Rural Density
Residential)
U (Undeveloped)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District 105 Feet Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 1itle 19.8, the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 180 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
20 Feet
20 Feet
90 Feet
20 Feet
30 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 6 Feet 65 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 18 Y
Max. Building Height N/A 17 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Screened,
Gated w/ a
Trellis
Y
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
3:1 proximity slope - North 51 Feet 120 Feet Y
3:1 proximity slope - South 51 Feet 90 Feet Y
3:1 proximity slope - East 51 Feet 110 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 115 Feet Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8, the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
West
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
13 Trees
19 Trees
10 Trees
6 Trees
5 Trees
13 Trees
23 Trees
10 Trees
8 Trees
10 Trees
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 53 Trees 64 Trees Y
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
16 Trees 25 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
15 Feet
8 Feet
15 Feet
15 Feet
15 Feet
10 Feet
15 Feet
15 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Lake Mead
Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
100 Feet Y
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
OIIice, Other
Than Listed
10,559 SF 1:300 SF 36
Financial
Institution,
General
4,793 SF 1:200 SF 24


TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 60

94

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 57 3 88 6 Y
Loading
Spaces
15,350 SF 2 2 Y


ANALYSIS

In 2007 and 2008, two separate proposals were submitted Ior review to change the General Plan
Land Use designation and Rezone the subject site to allow Ior a commercial development. In
each case, the requests were withdrawn without prejudice. This proposal represents the third
request to amend the General Plan and Rezone the subject site to allow Ior commercial
development.

The proposed two commercial buildings totaling 15,350 square Ieet would be located at the
southwest corner oI Michael Way and Lake Mead Boulevard on two parcels totaling 1.97 acres.
The subject site is located in the Southwest Sector oI the General Plan and has a current General
Plan Land Use designation oI L (Low Density Residential) and zoning oI R-E (Residence
Estates). The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment Irom the L (Low Density
Residential) Land Use designation to the SC (Service Commercial) Land Use designation so the
proposed commercial development has a consistent and compatible land use designation.

The proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district provides congruent development
standards that Iunction well within the intent oI the SC (Service Commercial) land use
designation and Ior the proposed commercial structures. The proposed development adheres to
the minimum requirements as outlined by Title 19 in regards to lot coverage, setbacks, parking,
landscape buIIers, perimeter trees, parking lot trees, building placement, residential adjacency
and design.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The proposal to construct commercial development on the subject site supports the City policy oI
encouraging development oI inIill parcels to eIIiciently distribute public resources. However, the
adjacent land use designations include L (Low Density Residential) on the north and east and R
(Rural Density Residential) on the south and west oI the subject site. A land use designation oI
SC (Service Commercial) and a zoning district oI C-1 (Limited Commercial) are too intense Ior
the area. According to Title 19.08.070, the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning designation should
be located on the periphery oI residential neighborhoods and should be conIined along major
retail corridors. The subject site is located in the middle oI a low density single-Iamily
neighborhood and is not along a retail corridor. A major commercial corridor located along
Decatur Boulevard already serves the residential community surrounding the subject site.
Furthermore, Policy 2.1.2 oI the city oI Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan states, 'that development
on vacant or underutilized lots within existing residential neighborhoods be sensitive in use and
design to surrounding development.

StaII recommends denial, as the requested changes to the existing L (Low Density Residential)
General Plan Land Use designation and R-E (Residence Estates) zoning designation are too
intense and intrusive Ior the surrounding properties, particularly Ior the single-Iamily residences
located to the north, east and south. As staII cannot support the requested General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning applications, which would allow Ior commercial development, the
requested Site Development Plan Review application to construct the commercial buildings also
cannot be supported.


FINDINGS (GPA-55743)

Section 19.16.030(I) oI the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the Iollowing conditions be met
in order to justiIy a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible
with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The planned SC (Service Commercial) Land Use designation will not be compatible with
the single-Iamily residential uses located to the north, south, and west oI the subject site.

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible with
the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

A C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning designation would not be an appropriate land use Ior
the subject site. The surrounding area is predominantly single-Iamily residences.
According to Title 19.08.070, the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district should only
be located on the periphery oI residential neighborhoods. The subject site is in the middle
oI a residential neighborhood.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Staff Report Page Nine
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to
accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and

Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way are adequate to meet the requirements oI
commercial uses permitted on a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoned property. All other
public resources and Iacilities are available to the site, as it is an inIill parcel surrounded by
existing development.

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies
that include approved neighborhood plans.

The subject site represents an inIill parcel surrounded by existing development;
thereIore, the proposed commercial zoning and land use designation supports the City
policy oI encouraging the development oI inIill parcels to eIIiciently distribute public
resources.


FINDINGS (ZON-55744)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The accompanying General Plan Amendment (GPA-55743) is proposing to designate the
site to the SC (Service Commercial) land use category, which allows Ior development oI
retail shopping and personal services. The requested zoning change to the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district conIorms to the proposed SC (Service Commercial) land use
designation.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The permitted commercial uses in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district would
allow uses that are too intense and would be incompatible with the surrounding residential
neighborhood.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Staff Report Page Ten
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The subject site represents an inIill parcel primarily surrounded by existing residential
development. It is more appropriate to continue to develop the area as residential and allow
the retail corridor along Decatur Boulevard to serve the existing residences surrounding the
subject site.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The subject site is undeveloped but according to the submitted site plan would have access
Irom Lake Mead Boulevard, a 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial. Street access Irom Lake
Mead Boulevard is adequate to meet the requirements oI the commercial development.


FINDINGS (SDR-55745)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The proposed two commercial buildings totaling 15,350 square Ieet are incompatible with
the surrounding single-Iamily residences to the north, south, and east.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The accompanying General Plan Amendment (GPA-55743) is proposing to designate the
site to the SC (Service Commercial) land use category, which allows Ior development oI
retail shopping and personal services. The requested zoning change to the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district conIorms to the proposed SC (Service Commercial) land use
designation. The proposed Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55745) adheres to all
minimum requirements as outlined by Title 19.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;

The primary access to the subject site is Irom Lake Mead Boulevard, a 100-Ioot wide
Primary Arterial as designated by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. The access
point would serve as adequate to meet the traIIic needs Ior this development.
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 AND SDR-55745 PR1-54639]
GK

Staff Report Page Eleven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The proposed building materials are appropriate Ior the area and Ior the City.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

The proposed building elevations contain articulated walls and variation in materials and
colors that create a pleasant appearance.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

Development oI the site is subject to all applicable codes, permitting and inspection,
thereby securing the public health, saIety and general welIare.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 16


NOTICES MAILED 320 |GPA-55743 & ZON-55744|
320 |SDR-55745|


APPROVALS 0 |GPA-55743 & ZON-55744|
0 |SDR-55745|


PROTESTS 1 |GPA-55743 & ZON-55744|
1 |SDR-55745|

09/17/14
PRJ-54639
GPA-55743
09/17/14
PRJ-54639
GPA-55743
10/14/14 PC
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
3495
2986FX
5086FX
2986FX
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
3499
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
2986FX
5086FX
2986FX
3498
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 1 0 0 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
2986FX
60100
2986FX
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
2986FX
60100
2986FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
5 0 8 6 F X 3 7 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 6 0 1 0 0 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 7 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
2586FX
60100
2586FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
2586FX
5086FX
2586FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
3 4 1 0 0
6
'

B
L
O
C
K

W
A
L
L

9
'

9
'
9
'

9
'

1
6
8
'
4

1
/
1
2
"

2
8
0
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

6 2 ' 8 3 / 8 "
W
.

L
A
K
E

M
E
A
D

B
L
V
D

N.M I C H AE LWAY
2
4
'

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

Z
O
N
E

-

R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

Z
O
N
E

-

C
1

C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L




O
F
F
I
C
E

B
L
D
G
.

A
P
P
R
O
X
.

-

1
0
,
5
5
9

S
Q

F
T
.

-

1
/
3
0
0

=

3
4

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
T
A
L
L
S




B
A
N
K

B
L
D
G
.

A
P
P
R
O
X
.

-

4
7
9
3

S
Q

F
T
.

-

1
/
2
0
0

=

2
4

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
T
A
L
L
S





T
O
T
A
L

-

1
5
,
3
5
0

S
Q

F
T
.

E
X
I
S
T
.

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

-

9
4

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
T
A
L
L
S

R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

-

5
8

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
T
A
L
L
S

2
4
'

S H A D O W M O U N T A I N P L A C E
A
P
N
#

1
3
8
-
2
4
-
3
0
5
-
0
0
1

-

2
"

G
R
O
U
N
D

C
O
V
E
R

1
9
0
'

T
R
A
S
H

D
I
S
P
E
N
S
E

2
4
'

2
4
'

2
4
'

1
O
'

2
O
'

1
0
0
'

L
E
G
E
N
D

2
4
'

3
2
'

M
O
N
D
E
L

P
I
N
E


2
4
'
'

B
O
X

5
7
'
7

1
/
2
"

8
3
'
1

7
/
8
"

1
8
0
'

1
8
0
'

3
7
0
'
E
A
S
T
M
E
N
T

F
O
R

T
R
A
F
F
I
C

&

P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N

U
S
E

S
H
R
U
B
S

5

G
A
L
L
O
N

L
O
A
D
I
N
G

A
R
E
A

1
5
'

2
5
'

2 0 '
3 0 '
3
0
'
3
2
'

2
0
'
R
=
2
5

2
7
'
2 9 '
1
5
'
1
5
'

L
O
A
D
I
N
G

A
R
E
A

1
5
'

2
5
'

E
A
S
T
M
E
N
T

F
O
R

T
R
A
F
F
I
C

&

P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N

U
S
E

2
0
'
R
=
2
5

P
E
R
I
M
E
T
R
A
L

6
'

B
L
O
C
K

W
A
L
L

P
E
R
I
M
E
T
R
A
L

6
'

B
L
O
C
K

W
A
L
L

1
s
t

F
l
o
o
r

S
.
1

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

L
A
K
E

M
E
A
D

A
N
D

M
I
C
H
E
L

W
A
Y

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
S I T E P L A N
D
A
T
E
:

9
/
4
/
2
0
1
4

0
9
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
3495
2986FX
5086FX
2986FX
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
3499
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
2986FX
5086FX
2986FX
3498
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 1 0 0 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
2986FX
60100
2986FX
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
2986FX
60100
2986FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
5 0 8 6 F X 3 7 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 6 0 1 0 0 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 7 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
2586FX
60100
2586FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
2586FX
5086FX
2586FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
5086FX
3786FX
5086FX
3 4 1 0 0
6
'

B
L
O
C
K

W
A
L
L

9
'

9
'
9
'

9
'

1
6
8
'
4

1
/
1
2
"

2
8
0
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

9
'

6 2 ' 8 3 / 8 "
W
.

L
A
K
E

M
E
A
D

B
L
V
D

N.M I C H AE LWAY
2
4
'

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

Z
O
N
E

-

R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

Z
O
N
E

-

C
1

C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L




O
F
F
I
C
E

B
L
D
G
.

A
P
P
R
O
X
.

-

1
0
,
5
5
9

S
Q

F
T
.

-

1
/
3
0
0

=

3
4

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
T
A
L
L
S




B
A
N
K

B
L
D
G
.

A
P
P
R
O
X
.

-

4
7
9
3

S
Q

F
T
.

-

1
/
2
0
0

=

2
4

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
T
A
L
L
S





T
O
T
A
L

-

1
5
,
3
5
0

S
Q

F
T
.

E
X
I
S
T
.

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

-

9
4

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
T
A
L
L
S

R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

-

5
8

P
A
R
K
I
N
G

S
T
A
L
L
S

2
4
'

S H A D O W M O U N T A I N P L A C E
A
P
N
#

1
3
8
-
2
4
-
3
0
5
-
0
0
1

-

2
"

G
R
O
U
N
D

C
O
V
E
R

1
9
0
'

T
R
A
S
H

D
I
S
P
E
N
S
E

2
4
'

2
4
'

2
4
'

1
O
'

2
O
'

1
0
0
'

L
E
G
E
N
D

2
4
'

3
2
'

M
O
N
D
E
L

P
I
N
E


2
4
'
'

B
O
X

5
7
'
7

1
/
2
"

8
3
'
1

7
/
8
"

1
8
0
'

1
8
0
'

3
7
0
'
E
A
S
T
M
E
N
T

F
O
R

T
R
A
F
F
I
C

&

P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N

U
S
E

S
H
R
U
B
S

5

G
A
L
L
O
N

L
O
A
D
I
N
G

A
R
E
A

1
5
'

2
5
'

2 0 '
3 0 '
3
0
'
3
2
'

2
0
'
R
=
2
5

2
7
'
2 9 '
1
5
'
1
5
'

L
O
A
D
I
N
G

A
R
E
A

1
5
'

2
5
'

E
A
S
T
M
E
N
T

F
O
R

T
R
A
F
F
I
C

&

P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N

U
S
E

2
0
'
R
=
2
5

P
E
R
I
M
E
T
R
A
L

6
'

B
L
O
C
K

W
A
L
L

P
E
R
I
M
E
T
R
A
L

6
'

B
L
O
C
K

W
A
L
L

1
s
t

F
l
o
o
r

S
.
1

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

L
A
K
E

M
E
A
D

A
N
D

M
I
C
H
E
L

W
A
Y

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
S I T E P L A N
D
A
T
E
:

9
/
4
/
2
0
1
4

0
9
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1

0

1

2

3

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

O
F
F
S
I
T
E

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S

B
Y

T
I
T
L
E

1
9

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
D
A
T
E
:

S
P
0
0
3

S
H
A
D
O
W

L
A
N
E

M
I
C
H
A
E
L

W
A
Y

8
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
4

0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5
1

0

1

2

3

A
.
2

O
F
F
I
C
E

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

1
/
8
"

=

1
'

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
O F F I C E E L E V A T I O N S
D
A
T
E
:

E
V
0
0
1

M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L

L
E
G
E
N
D

-

3

L
A
Y
E
R

S
T
U
C
C
O

-

A
L
L

W
I
N
D
O
W
S

W
/

R
E
F
L
E
C
T
I
V
E

G
L
A
S
S

B
Y

C
O
D
E

-

S
T
U
C
C
O

P
A
I
N
T

C
O
L
O
R

-

S
W
2
8
3
4

B
I
R
D
E
Y
E

M
A
P
L
E

-

M
E
T
A
L

A
W
N
I
N
G

P
A
I
N
T

C
O
L
O
R

-

M
A
R
O
O
N

8
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
4

0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

0
' -
0
"

P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
L
T
O
P

1
7
' -
0
"

C
E
IL
IN
G

1
3
' -

0
"

S
T
U
C
C
O
(
T
Y
P
)

W
IN
D
O
W
H
E
IG
H
T

8
' -
0
"

N
O
R
T
H

S
T
U
C
C
O
(T
Y
P
)

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

0
' - 0
"
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
L
T
O
P

1
7
' - 0
"
C
E
IL
IN
G

1
3
' -

0
"

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S

W
IN
D
O
W
H
E
IG
H
T

8
'
- 0
"

S
O
U
T
H

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

0
' - 0
"
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
L
T
O
P

1
7
' - 0
"
C
E
IL
IN
G

1
3
' -
0
"

S
T
U
C
C
O

(T
Y
P
)

W
E
S
T

S
T
U
C
C
O
(
T
Y
P
)

P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
L
T
O
P

1
7
' - 0
"
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

0
' - 0
"
C
E
IL
IN
G

1
3
' -
0
"

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S

W
IN
D
O
W
H
E
IG
H
T

8
' -
0
"

E
A
S
T

1

0

1

2

3

A
.
2

O
F
F
I
C
E

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

1
/
8
"

=

1
'

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
O F F I C E E L E V A T I O N S
D
A
T
E
:

E
V
0
0
2

M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L

L
E
G
E
N
D

-

3

L
A
Y
E
R

S
T
U
C
C
O

-

A
L
L

W
I
N
D
O
W
S

W
/

R
E
F
L
E
C
T
I
V
E

G
L
A
S
S

B
Y

C
O
D
E

-

S
T
U
C
C
O

P
A
I
N
T

C
O
L
O
R

-

S
W
2
8
3
4

B
I
R
D
E
Y
E

M
A
P
L
E

-

M
E
T
A
L

A
W
N
I
N
G

P
A
I
N
T

C
O
L
O
R

-

M
A
R
O
O
N

8
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
4

S
T
U
C
C
O
(T
Y
P
))
W
EEEEEE
A
L
L
T
O
P
"LLLLLL
AA
N
"
N
G
0
"
H
E
IG
H
TT
"
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5
1

0

1

2

3

A
.
4

B
A
N
K

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
B A N K E L E V A T I O N S
D
A
T
E
:

E
V
0
0
3

M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L

L
E
G
E
N
D

-

3

L
A
Y
E
R

S
T
U
C
C
O

-

A
L
L

W
I
N
D
O
W
S

W
/

R
E
F
L
E
C
T
I
V
E

G
L
A
S
S

B
Y

C
O
D
E

-

S
T
U
C
C
O

P
A
I
N
T

C
O
L
O
R

-

S
W
2
8
3
4

B
I
R
D
E
Y
E

M
A
P
L
E

-

M
E
T
A
L

A
W
N
I
N
G

P
A
I
N
T

C
O
L
O
R

-

M
A
R
O
O
N

8
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
4

-
S
W
2
8
-
M
E
T
A
L
A
W
N
-
M
A
R
O
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
L
T
O
P

1
7
' - 0
"
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

0
' - 0
"
C
E
I
L
IN
G

1
3
' -
0
"

S
T
U
C
C
O
(
T
Y
P
)

W
I
N
D
O
W
H
E
IG
H
T

8
' -
0
"

N
O
R
T
H

P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
L
T
O
P

1
7
' - 0
"
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

0
' - 0
"
C
E
IL
IN
G

1
3
' -

0
"

S
T
U
C
C
O

(
T
Y
P
)

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S

W
I
N
D
O
W
H
E
IG
H
T

8
' -
0
"

S
O
U
T
H

C
E
IL
IN
G

1
3
' -
0
"

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

0
' - 0
"
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
T
O
P

1
7
' - 0
"
S
T
U
C
C
O
(
T
Y
P
)

W
IN
D
O
W
H
E
IG
H
T

8
' -
0
"

E
A
S
T

F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

0
' - 0
"
C
E
IL
IN
G

1
3
' -

0
"

P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
L
T
O
P

1
7
' - 0
"
S
T
U
C
C
O

(T
Y
P
)

S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S

W
IN
D
O
W
H
E
IG
H
T

8
'
- 0
"

W
E
S
T

1

0

1

2

3

A
.
4

B
A
N
K

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
B A N K E L E V A T I O N S
D
A
T
E
:

E
V
0
0
4

M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L

L
E
G
E
N
D

-

3

L
A
Y
E
R

S
T
U
C
C
O

-

A
L
L

W
I
N
D
O
W
S

W
/

R
E
F
L
E
C
T
I
V
E

G
L
A
S
S

B
Y

C
O
D
E

-

S
T
U
C
C
O

P
A
I
N
T

C
O
L
O
R

-

S
W
2
8
3
4

B
I
R
D
E
Y
E

M
A
P
L
E

-

M
E
T
A
L

A
W
N
I
N
G

P
A
I
N
T

C
O
L
O
R

-

M
A
R
O
O
N

8
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
4

S
T
U
C
C
O
(T((
Y
P
)
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
G
L
A
S
S
W
E
S
T
-
S
W
2
8
-
M
E
T
A
L
A
W
N
-
M
A
R
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5
SB24R

SB24R

SB24L
SB24L
SB24R

SB24R

SB24L
SB24L
2668
2668
2668
2668
3495
2986FX
5086FX
2986FX

4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
3086FX

5086FX
3086FX
3499
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
2986FX
5086FX
2986FX
3498
5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 1 0 0 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX

3086FX
5086FX
3086FX

2986FX

60100
2986FX
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX
4086FX
5086FX
4086FX
2986FX

60100
2986FX
3086FX
5086FX

3086FX
3086FX
5086FX
3086FX

E
1
3
A
.2

E
1
3
A
.2

NO
RTH
1
6
'

1
0
'

1
6
'

1
0
'

1

0

1

2

3

A
.
3

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

L
A
K
E

M
E
A
D

A
N
D

M
I
C
H
E
L

W
A
Y

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
O
F
F
I
C
E

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

O
F
F
I
C
E

-

1
0
,
2
3
9

S
Q

F
T
.

B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M

1

-

1
6
0

S
Q

F
T
.

B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M

2

-

1
6
0

S
Q

F
T
.

T
O
T
A
L

-

1
0
,

5
5
9

S
Q

F
T
.

O F F I C E F L O O R P L A N
D
A
T
E
:

O
F
F
I
C
E

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

F
P
0
0
1

8
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4

3086FXFF
2986FXF
660100
22986FXFF
44086FXF
55086FXFF
44086FXFF
O
F
F
I
C
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
-------
B
A
T
H
R
O
OO
BBBBBBBBBBB
AAAAAAAAAAA
TTTTTTTTTTT
HHHHHHHHHHHH
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
OOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
T
O
T
A
L
-
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5
S
B
24
L

S
B
2
4
L

S
B
24
L

S
B
2
4
L

5 0 8 6 F X 3 7 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 6 0 1 0 0 5 0 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X 3 7 8 6 F X 5 0 8 6 F X
5
0
8
6
F
X

3
7
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

3
7
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

2
5
8
6
F
X

6
0
1
0
0

2
5
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

3
7
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

3
7
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

3
7
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

3
7
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

2
5
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

2
5
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

3
7
8
6
F
X

5
0
8
6
F
X

3 4 1 0 0
2
6
6
8

2
6
6
8

1
6
'

1
0
'

1

0

1

2

3

A
.
5

S
H
E
E
T
:

R E V I S I O N T A B L E
N U M B E R D A T E R E V I S E D B Y D E S C R I P T I O N



S
C
A
L
E
:

L
A
K
E

M
E
A
D

A
N
D

M
I
C
H
E
L

W
A
Y

D R A W I N G S P R O V I D E D B Y :
B A N K F L O O R P L A N
D
A
T
E
:

B
A
N
K

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

B
A
N
K

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

O
F
F
I
C
E

-

4
,
6
3
3

S
Q

F
T
.

B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M

-

1
6
0

S
Q

F
T
.

T
O
T
A
L

-

4
,
7
9
3

S
Q

F
T
.

F
P
0
0
2

8
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
4

5
0
8
6
F
XXX
3
7
8
6
F
XXX
5
0
8
6
F
XXX
55555
00
8
6
F
XXX
O
F
B
A
T
T
O
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
6
3
9
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
4
3
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
4
4

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
4
5
S
P
A
-

7
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

3
9
j

-

S
E
N
E
P
A
L

P
L
A
N

A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

Z
O
N
-

7
4
4

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

7
4


-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A

P
I
E
L
A

N
A
V
A
P
P
O

S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

L
A
k
E

M
E
A
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

A
N
D

M
I
C
H
A
E
L

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
P
A
-

7
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

3
9
j

-

S
E
N
E
P
A
L

P
L
A
N

A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

Z
O
N
-

7
4
4

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

7
4


-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A

P
I
E
L
A

N
A
V
A
P
P
O

S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

L
A
k
E

M
E
A
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

A
N
D

M
I
C
H
A
E
L

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
P
A
-

7
4
3

[
P
P
J
-

3
9
j

-

S
E
N
E
P
A
L

P
L
A
N

A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

Z
O
N
-

7
4
4

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

7
4


-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

S
A

P
I
E
L
A

N
A
V
A
P
P
O

S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

L
A
k
E

M
E
A
D

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

A
N
D

M
I
C
H
A
E
L

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4

August 20, 2014

Current Planning
City of Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada

APN # 138-24-305-001, 003

To Whom May It Concert?

We are writing this letter in order to submit an application to change the General Plan Amendment and
change the existing zone from R-2 Residential Zone to C-1 Commercial Zone, with a Site Development
Review.
The hardship is that my client is been trying to build houses on this property. But one of the main
problems is that is facing a major Traffic Road as is Lake Mead Boulevard, and we are surround on the
Westside by Shadow Mountain and on the Eastside by Michael Way.
Therefore these parcels are not suitable for Residential use. We strongly believed that Service
Commercial use will be a big plus to neighborhood to provided services to the community, and work
also as a buffer to the existing Residences. Our project will be provide with 24 Hrs. security services
around the property, and 20 Feet intense landscaping and a 6 Feet Perimetral Block Wall between the
existing Residential Houses and our project.
We respectfully request your consideration for the approval of this application.

Sincerely,

Tim C. Ayala
Architect/Planning & Zoning Consultant

08/25/14
PRJ-54639
GPA-55743, ZON-55744 & SDR-55745


Agenda tem No.: 22.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
ZON-55744 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-55743 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: GABRIELA NAVARRO - For possible action on a request Ior a
Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.97
acres at the southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way (APNs 138-24-305-001
and 003), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54639|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-55744 and SDR-55745 |PRJ-54639|
3. Supporting Documentation

Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
09/17/14
PRJ-54639
ZON-55744
09/17/14
PRJ-54639
ZON-55744
10/14/14 PC


Agenda tem No.: 23.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SDR-55745 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-55743 AND ZON-
55744 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GABRIELA NAVARRO - For possible
action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR TWO PROPOSED
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 15,350 SQUARE FEET on 1.97 acres at the
southwest corner oI Lake Mead Boulevard and Michael Way (APNs 138-24-305-001 and 003),
Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54639|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Postcard
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
09/17/14
PRJ-54639
SDR-55745
09/17/14
PRJ-54639
SDR-55745
10/14/14 PC
SDR 55745
Gabriela Navarro
SWC Lake Mead Blvd & Michael Wy
Proposed 15.352 thousand square foot commercial development.
First Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF] 10.559
11.01 116
AM Peak Hour 1.55 16
PM Peak Hour 1.49 16
Second Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
WALK-IN BANK [1000 SF] 4.793
156.48 750
AM Peak Hour 4.07 20
PM Peak Hour 12.13 58
Total Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF] 15.352
42.94 866
AM Peak Hour 1.00 36
PM Peak Hour 3.73 74
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:
Lake Mead Blvd.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 16,538
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,323
Michael Wy.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,713
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 217
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Lake Mead Blvd. 34,500
Michael Wy. 13,040
This project will add approximately 866 trips per day on Lake Mead Blvd., Michael Wy. and Shadow Mountain Place. Lake
Mead is currently at about 48 percent of capacity and Michael is at about 21 percent of capacity. With this project, Lake
Mead is expected to be at about 50 percent of capacity and Michael to be at about 27 percent of capacity. Counts are not
available for Shadow Mountain, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 74 additional cars, or about five every four
minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

SDR-55745


Agenda tem No.: 24.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
GPA-55775 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: CHURCH LDS PRESIDING BISHOP - For possible action on a
request Ior a General Plan Amendment FROM: PF (PUBLIC FACILITIES) TO: ML
(MEDIUM-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.19 acres located on the north side oI
Bonanza Road 1,540 Ieet east oI Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), Ward 5 (Barlow)
|PRJ-54464|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 5 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL.

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report - GPA-55775, ZON-55777 and SDR-55779 |PRJ-54464|
3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-55775, ZON-55777 and SDR-55779 |PRJ-54464|
4. Photos - GPA-55775, ZON-55777 and SDR-55779 |PRJ-54464|
5. JustiIication Letter - GPA-55775, ZON-55777 and SDR-55779 |PRJ-54464|
6. Protest Postcards - GPA-55775 and ZON-55777 |PRJ-54464|

GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CHURCH LDS PRESIDING BISHOP


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
GPA-55775 StaII recommends APPROVAL.
ZON-55777 StaII recommends APPROVAL. GPA-55775
SDR-55779 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

GPA-55775
ZON-55777

`` CONDITIONS ``

SDk-5577 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI General Plan Amendment (GPA-55775) and Rezoning (ZON-55777) shall
be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled
Ior consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the building elevations date stamped
8/25/14 and site and landscape plans date stamped 9/4/14, except as amended by
conditions herein.

4. A Waiver Irom Title 19.06.110 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-Ioot wide perimeter
landscape buIIer along a portion oI the west perimeter, where a minimum oI six Ieet is
required.

5. An Exception Irom Title 19.08.110 is hereby approved, to allow 11 parking lot
landscape trees, where a minimum oI 18 is required.

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI
Building and SaIety.
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



7. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set
submitted Ior building permit.

8. The minimum distance between buildings shall be 10 Ieet.

9. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape
Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the
same time application is made Ior a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisIactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation speciIications. Installed landscaping
shall not impede visibility oI any traIIic control device.

10. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

11. Prior to the submittal oI a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department oI Planning staII to develop a comprehensive address plan Ior the subject
site. A copy oI the approved address plan shall be submitted with any Iuture building
permit applications related to the site.

12. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be
satisIied, except as modiIied herein.

Public Works

13. Prior to the submittal oI any construction drawings, meet with the Sanitary Sewer
Section oI the Department oI Public Works to coordinate sewer connection to this site.

14. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.

15. Vehicles backing out onto Bonanza Road shall be prohibited.

16. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by
the Department oI Public Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading
permits, submittal oI any construction drawings or the submittal oI a Map subdividing
this site, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainageways
recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer oI this site shall be
responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage Iacility improvements as
are recommended by the City oI Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and
approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development oI this site.

GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting entitlements Ior a 39-unit condominium project on a 'Ilag shaped lot
currently zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential). This project requires a General Plan
Amendment, Rezoning and Site Development Plan Review applications. The design layout
meets most code requirements. However, a Waiver is needed to allow a zero-Ioot wide
perimeter landscape buIIer along a portion oI the west perimeter and an Exception Ior a reduced
number oI parking lot landscape trees. Both oI these requests are reasonable given the unique
space oI the lot. The project density will be an appropriate transition between the church to the
south and the single-Iamily residential neighborhoods to the east and north. StaII recommends
approval Ior all three applications. In denied, no multi-Iamily units would be permitted.


ISSUES

A General Plan Amendment Irom PF (Public Facilities) to ML (Medium Low Density
Residential) is required. StaII supports this request.
A Rezoning Irom R-1 (Low Density Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential).
StaII supports this request.
A Waiver Irom Title 19.06.110 is needed, to allow a zero-Ioot wide perimeter landscape
buIIer along a portion oI the west perimeter, where a minimum oI six Ieet is required.
StaII supports this request.
An Exception Irom Title 19.08.110 is needed, to allow 11 parking lot landscape trees,
where a minimum oI 18 is required. StaII supports this request.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
10/24/73
The Board oI Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0083-73) Irom R-E
(Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) on the north side oI
Bonanza Road 1,540 east oI Decatur Boulevard as part oI a larger application.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
08/11/61 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
No permits or licenses on Iile Ior this site.


Pre-Application Meeting
06/05/14
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the project. It was determined that
a GPA, ZON and SDR applications would be required. It was also noted that
a Waiver Ior perimeter landscape buIIer(s) would be required.


Aeighborhood Meeting
09/15/14
Meeting Start Time: 6:00 Meeting End Time: 7:00

Attendance
Public: 30 Applicant: Owner and representative
StaII: 2 Planning and 1 - Ward 5 Special Assistant

Ward 5 Councilman in attendance.

Construct 39 condos, 1,050 square Ieet with 2 bedrooms/2 baths, swimming
pool, trash enclosure 50` Irom existing residential, meets parking
requirements. Landscape will meet City requirements except where adjacent
to church parking.

Questions:
Residents worry about crime housing is protected Irom street. No
reason to believe crime will be attracted to this new development
Is there a security gate? - No
Can it be age restricted? No
100 oI meeting attendees are opposed
Will it be Section 8? No
Neighbors have petitions
Neighbors have concerns there is no play area Ior kids, and also don`t
want kids to live there
Will mortgages be sub-prime, government Iunded, Sec. 8? No,
conventional loans
Why buy Ilag lot? Church wants to sell
Will the traIIic impact oI additional units be a problem during school?
City says traIIic study Iindings are ok

GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Field Check
08/28/14
StaII visited the site and Iound an undeveloped parcel oI land. Most oI the
parcel was Ienced by adjacent development. This is a Ilag lot. There were
some large weeds on the property.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 2.19


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Undeveloped PF (Public Facilities)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
North
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Church PF (Public Facilities)
South Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
East
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
West
Multi-Family,
Attached
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-PD8 (Residential
Planned Development - 8
Units per Acre)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (105 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 1itle 19..11, the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 6,500 SF 95,396 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
10 Feet
5 Feet
5 Feet
20 Feet
395 Feet
5 Feet
N/A
58 Feet
Y
Y
N/A
Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
Max. Building Height 55 Feet 28 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/ a
RooI or Trellis
Screened, Gated,
w/ a RooI or
Trellis
Y
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y


Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
3:1 proximity slope 84 Feet 90 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 58 Feet Y


Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
R-1 5.49 Units per Acre 12
Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
R-3 Up to 50 Units per Acre 110
Ceneral Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
ML 8.49 Units per Acre 39


Pursuant to 1itle 19. the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
16 Trees
14 Trees
32 Trees
32 Trees
16 Trees
14 Trees
12 Trees
23 Trees
Y
Y
N
N
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK
Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 95 Trees 65 Trees N
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
18 Trees 11 Trees N
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
6 Feet
5 Feet
6 Feet
5 Feet
6 Feet
5 Feet
6 Feet
0 Feet
Y
Y
Y
N
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Bonanza Road N/A N/A 70 Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Multi-Family,
Attached
39, 2-Bedroom
Units
1.75 per
Unit
69

Guest 39
1 per
every 6
Units
7

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 76

76

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 72 4 70 6 Y


Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To provide a six-Ioot wide
landscape buIIer along all
interior lot lines.
To provide a zero-Ioot wide landscape
buIIer along a portion oI the west
perimeter along the driveway.
Approval
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To provide 18 parking lot
landscape trees.
To provide 11 parking
lot landscape trees
Approval


ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to develop a vacant parcel into a 39-unit condominium complex. The
parcel is the remnant portion oI a Iive-acre lot that was created when the church was constructed.
The result was a Ilag-shaped lot. The lot is adjacent to a high density residential development to
the west, a church to the south and single-Iamily residential neighborhoods to the east and north.
The proposed multi-Iamily project will provide an appropriate transition between the higher
density project on the west and the church on the south with the single-Iamily neighborhoods.
The project is designed to meet the residential adjacency standards with the two-story units being
on the south portion oI the parcel, adjacent to the church.

The General Plan Amendment is needed as the parcel has a PF (Public Facilities) designation
that was assigned to the property when the church acquired it. Once the original parcel was
subdivided, the designation remained. StaII supports the request to change the designation to
ML (Medium-Low Density Residential) to allow Ior a residential development. The designation
is appropriate Ior the area.

The request to rezone the parcel Irom R-1 (Single Family Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density
Residential) is appropriate Ior the site. This designation, iI approved, will allow Ior a transitional
development to buIIer the higher intensity land uses on the west and south with the lower
intensity residential uses on the east and north.

The projects` ingress and egress is via a long driveway oII oI Bonanza Road. The applicant has
designed the project to protect the single-Iamily neighborhood to the east by installing additional
trees and landscaping along the perimeter. These additional trees will also provide shade Ior
pedestrians as they walk in and out oI the complex along the adjacent sidewalk. Parking Ior
guests is provided adjacent to the sidewalk along the driveway.

A Waiver is required to allow no perimeter landscape buIIer along the driveway and the church
parcel to the west. This Waiver is supported by staII due to the unique shape oI the lot and the
Iact that the developer has designed the project Ior maximum protection oI the residential
neighborhood to the east. The church is providing landscape along their side oI the property line
and thus the overall landscape aesthetic oI both projects will be seamless. The approval oI this
Waiver will result in the lack oI 30 landscape buIIer trees.
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



An Exception oI the parking lot landscaping is also required in order to allow Ior the required
number oI parking spaces. The Exception is to allow Ior a reduced number oI required parking
lot trees and landscaped islands. StaII supports this request since additional trees are provided
around the Ioundations oI the buildings and along the east perimeter landscape buIIer. Again,
the unique shape oI the parcel makes maximizing the development oI the site problematic
without the Exception and Waiver requests.

The elevations oI the buildings are similar to many multi-Iamily developments in the City, with
the use oI stucco and tile rooIs. The color pallet consists oI tan and brown earth tones. A clear
residential aesthetic will be provided with the development.

This project supports the City oI Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan Neighborhood Revitalization
Objective 2.2: To ensure that low density residential land uses within mature neighborhoods can
exist in close proximity to higher density residential, mixed-use, or non-residential land uses by
mitigating adverse impacts where Ieasible; via Policy 2.2.1: That any higher density or mixed-
use redevelopment which is adjacent to lower density residential development incorporate
appropriate design, transition, or buIIering elements which will mitigate adverse visual, audible,
aesthetic and traIIic impacts. The additional landscape buIIer trees and overall design oI the
project meet this City goal.


FINDINGS (GPA-55775)

Section 19.16.030(I) oI the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the Iollowing conditions be met
in order to justiIy a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible
with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The density and intensity oI the proposed ML (Medium Low Density Residential)
General Plan Amendment is compatible with the existing adjacent land use
designations.

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible with
the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

The zoning designation allowed by the proposed amendment is compatible with the
existing adjacent land uses and zoning districts oI the adjacent lots.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to
accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




There are existing transportation, recreation, utility and other Iacilities that are adequate
to accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment.

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies
that include approved neighborhood plans.

The proposed amendment conIorms to all adopted City oI Las Vegas plans and policies
Ior the area.


FINDINGS (ZON-55777)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district conIorms to the proposed
ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan designation.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The residential use allowed on the subject property by approving this rezoning is
compatible with the surrounding residential land uses.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

The City has seen a marked increase in the number oI residential use permits being pulled,
which is evidence oI an increase in demand Ior residential properties.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The subject site is accessed by a 70-Ioot local street, which is adequate to meet the
requirements oI the proposed zoning district.

GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Staff Report Page Nine
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



FINDINGS (SDR-55779)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The proposed condominium development is compatible with church to the south, the
condominiums to the west, and the single-Iamily homes to the east and north.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is consistent with the proposed General Plan designation oI
ML (Medium Low Density Residential) and is a permissible use within the proposed R-3
(Medium Density Residential) zoning district.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;

The site is accessed via one proposed driveway onto Bonanza Road, a 70-Ioot wide local
street, which in turn accesses Decatur Boulevard, a designated as 100-Ioot wide Primary
Arterial Street by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. These roadways will provide
adequate access to the site and will not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traIIic.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The proposed building materials are appropriate Ior the area and Ior the City. The
landscape materials are drought-tolerant and typical oI that Iound throughout the Las
Vegas Valley.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

The building elevations depict design and materials that will provide an aesthetically
pleasing building and are compatible with the neighboring single-Iamily and multi-Iamily
development.
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 AND SDR-55779 PR1-54464]
YK

Staff Report Page Ten
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

The proposed development will not impact public health, saIety or welIare since the
development will be subject to the International Building Code and City inspections during
construction.




NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 20


NOTICES MAILED 383 |GPA-55775 & ZON-55777|
383 | SDR-55779|


APPROVALS 0 |GPA-55775 & ZON-55777|
0 | SDR-55779|


PROTESTS 5 |GPA-55775 & ZON-55777|
2 | SDR-55779|


08/26/14
PRJ-54464
GPA-55775
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/26/2014 10:47:30 AM
Applicant Email: mrbbenecon@aol.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: DWYER
Rep First Name: DAVID
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: 702-580-4424
Applicant Zip: 89144
Rep Address: 7310 SMOKE RANCH ROAD; SUITE E
Rep Email: dwyereng@lvcoxmail.com
Rep Fax: 702-254-2236
Rep State: NV
Rep City: LAS VEGAS
Rep Phone: 702-254-2200
Rep Zip: 89128
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13930306002, 13930306003
Project Name INDIGO DEVELOPMENT
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Application Number: PRJ-54464
Applicant City: LAS VEGAS
ProjectAddress (Location): 4500 WEST BONANZA ROAD
Application/Petition For: GPA, ZON, VAR, VAR, SDR for a 39-unit condo complex
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: MARK
Additional Information: Above is for the property we are proposing to develop. The church property adjacent to the subject
property is also part of this application for zone change.
Applicant Address: 10341 FORUM HILLS PLACE
Applicant Last Name: BENNETT
Zoning District: Proposed: R-3 - Medium Density Residential
General Plan Designation: Proposed: PF
Lots/Units: 39
Gross Acres: 2.14
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 & SDR-55779
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/26/2014 10:47:30 AM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
CHURCH L D S PRESIDING
BISHOP
50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST 22ND FLR SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150-0022
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
DAVID DWYER DWYER ENGINEERING INC CIVIL ENGINEER - PRINCIPAL dwyereng@lvcoxmail.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 & SDR-55779
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

S
I
T
E

0
8
/2
5
/1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5

&

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7
S 0 2 7 5 8 " E
2 2 4 . 7 9 '
S
8
9

2
4
0
3
"
W

3
3
1
. 0
0
'
N 0 2 9 3 2 " W
6 2 1 . 4 4 '
N
8
9

2
5
3
5
"
E

2
8
3
.5
0
'
S
0

2
7
5
8
"
E

3
9
6
.5
0
'
N
8
9

2
5
3
5
"
E

4
7
.5
0
'
F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

F
R
O
N
T

S
I N
G
L
E

S
T
O
R
Y

S
I N
G
L
E

S
T
O
R
Y

S
I N
G
L
E

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

T
W
O

S
T
O
R
Y

7

6

2
3

8

1
7

3

C
L
U
B

H
S
E
.
P
O
O
L

7

2
0
'
6 0 '
T
R A S H
E N C
L O S U R E
c

c

c

c

c

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

S
I
T
E
0
9
/
0
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
0
4
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5
,

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
7
9
S
P
A
-

7
7


[
P
P
J
-

4
4

4
j

-

S
E
N
E
P
A
L

P
L
A
N

A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

Z
O
N
-

7
7
7

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

7
7
9

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
H
U
P
C
H

L
D
S

P
P
E
S
I
D
I
N
S

I
S
H
O
P

N
O
P
T
H

S
I
D
E

O
F

O
N
A
N
Z
A

P
O
A
D

1

4
0

F
E
E
T

E
A
S
T

O
F

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
P
A
-

7
7


[
P
P
J
-

4
4

4
j

-

S
E
N
E
P
A
L

P
L
A
N

A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

Z
O
N
-

7
7
7

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

7
7
9

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
H
U
P
C
H

L
D
S

P
P
E
S
I
D
I
N
S

I
S
H
O
P

N
O
P
T
H

S
I
D
E

O
F

O
N
A
N
Z
A

P
O
A
D

1

4
0

F
E
E
T

E
A
S
T

O
F

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
P
A
-

7
7


[
P
P
J
-

4
4

4
j

-

S
E
N
E
P
A
L

P
L
A
N

A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

Z
O
N
-

7
7
7

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

7
7
9

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

C
H
U
P
C
H

L
D
S

P
P
E
S
I
D
I
N
S

I
S
H
O
P

N
O
P
T
H

S
I
D
E

O
F

O
N
A
N
Z
A

P
O
A
D

1

4
0

F
E
E
T

E
A
S
T

O
F

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


08/26/14
PRJ-54464
GPA-55775, ZON-55777 & SDR-55779


Agenda tem No.: 25.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
ZON-55777 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-55775 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: CHURCH LDS PRESIDING BISHOP - For possible action on a
request Ior a Rezoning FROM: R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: R-3 (MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.19 acres located on the north side oI Bonanza Road 1,540 Ieet
east oI Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54464|. StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 5 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL.

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps- ZON-55777 and SDR-55779 |PRJ-54464|
3. Supporting Documentation

Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
08/26/14
PRJ-54464
ZON-55777
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

S
I
T
E

0
8
/2
5
/1
4
P
R
J
-
5
4
4
6
4
G
P
A
-
5
5
7
7
5

&

Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
7
7


Agenda tem No.: 26.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SDR-55779 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-55775 AND ZON-
55777 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CHURCH LDS PRESIDING BISHOP -
For possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 39-
UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A
ZERO-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE WEST
PERIMETER WHERE A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET IS REQUIRED on 2.19 acres located on
the north side oI Bonanza Road 1,540 Ieet east oI Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003),
Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54464|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Postcards
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
08/26/14
PRJ-54464
SDR-55779
SDR 55779
Church LDS Presiding Bishop
N side of Bonanza Rd, E of Decatur Blvd
Proposed 39 unit multi-family residential development.
New Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
APARTMENT [DWELL] 39
6.65 259
AM Peak Hour 0.51 20
PM Peak Hour 0.62 24
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:
Bonanza Rd.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,538
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 203
Decatur Blvd.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 45,263
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 3,621
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Bonanza Rd. 16,300
Decatur Blvd. 51,800
This project will add approximately 259 trips per day on Bonanza Rd. and Decatur Blvd. Bonanza is currently at about 16
percent of capacity and Decatur is at about 87 percent of capacity. With this project, Bonanza is expected to be at about
17 percent of capacity and Decatur to be at about 88 percent capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 24 additional cars, or just under one every two
minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

SDR-55779


Agenda tem No.: 27.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
ZON-55758 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS'' RX
NEVADA, INC - For possible action on a request Ior a Rezoning FROM: P-R
(PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND PARKING) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 0.04
acres located at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard (APN 138-25-613-043), Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-
55629|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL.

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report - ZON-55758, VAR-55760, SUP-55759 and SDR-55761 |PRJ-
55629|
3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-55758, VAR-55760, SUP-55759 and SDR-55761 |PRJ-
55629|
4. Photos - ZON-55758, VAR-55760, SUP-55759 and SDR-55761 |PRJ-55629|
5. JustiIication Letter - ZON-55758, VAR-55760, SUP-55759 and SDR-55761 |PRJ-55629|

ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS' RX NEVADA, INC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
ZON-55758 StaII recommends APPROVAL.

N/A
VAR-55760 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

ZON-55768
SDR-55761 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

ZON-55758
VAR-55769


`` CONDITIONS ``


VAk-5570 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Rezoning (ZON-55758)
and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55761) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed
in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set
submitted Ior building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be
satisIied, except as modiIied herein.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




SDk-5571 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Rezoning (ZON-55758)
and Variance (VAR-55760) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the landscape plan and construction
phasing plan, date stamped 09/09/14, and site plan, Iloor plans, and building elevations,
date stamped 09/15/14, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. A Waiver Irom Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow a six-Ioot wide landscape
buIIer along a portion oI the west property lines where a 10-Ioot wide buIIer is required.

5. An Exception Irom Title 19.08.110(12)(b) is hereby approved, to allow six parking lot
landscape island trees where seven trees are required.

6. An Exception Irom Title 19.08.110(12)(a) is hereby approved, to allow one oI the seven
parking lot island to be two-Ioot where Iive Ieet is required.

7. All operations and activities shall be in accordance with LVMC Title 7.

8. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed
in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

9. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set
submitted Ior building permit.

10. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staII to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Conditions Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



11. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape
Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the
same time application is made Ior a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler
system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisIactory manner; the
landscape plan shall include irrigation speciIications. Installed landscaping shall not
impede visibility oI any traIIic control device.

12. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

13. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be
satisIied, except as modiIied herein.


Public Works

14. In accordance with code requirements oI Title 13.56, remove all substandard public street
improvements and unused driveway cuts, including all sidewalk ramps adjacent to this
site, and replace with new improvements meeting current City Standards concurrent with
development oI this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development
shall be restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with
development oI this site.

15. The proposed new driveways accessing this site Irom Yale Street and Decatur Boulevard
are hereby approved as Deviations oI Standards Ior throat depth, but must comply with
Standard Drawing #235. Any Iurther deviations, iI any, to width or ingress/egress radii
will require separate approval Irom the City Engineer.

16. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-oI-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.

17. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior the proposed use oI this Iacility.

18. Meet with the Flood Control Section oI the Department oI Public Works Ior assistance
with establishing Iinished Iloor elevations and drainage paths Ior this site prior to
submittal oI construction plans, the issuance oI any building or grading permits or the
submittal oI a map Ior this site, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all
drainage ways as recommended.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55761) Ior a proposed 5,459
square-Ioot, two-story Animal Hospital or Clinic (with no Outside Pens) on 0.32 acres at 1117
North Decatur Boulevard. There is an existing animal hospital on site that will be demolished
and the three parcels |two are zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial) and one is zoned P-R (Parking
and OIIice)| will be combined into a single parcel. All three parcels have the General Plan land
use designation oI SC (Service Commercial). The applicant has requested to Rezone (ZON-
55758) the southern parcel (APN 138-25-613-043) to C-1 (Limited Commercial). This rezoning
action will allow Ior the consolidation oI the three lots into one and development oI this site.
There is a residential adjacency setback Variance (VAR-55760), landscape buIIer width Waiver
and two parking lot landscape design Exceptions that are required to proceed with this
application. The requested Waiver and Variance are warranted due to the shallowness oI the lot
and the Exceptions are acceptable, as they are minor in nature. Additionally, the applicant has
submitted a phasing plan that will allow the existing animal hospital to remain open during all
phases oI construction. StaII recommends approval oI all requested applications, with conditions
Ior all but the Rezoning request. II denied, the project as proposed could not be constructed on
the site.


ISSUES

The site currently consists oI three parcels with an animal hospital built across two them with
the third parcel utilized as a parking lot. The applicant intends to construct a new animal
hospital and redesign the site, which requires a Site Development Plan Review.
The site consists oI three separate lots (parcels) that require a mapping action to be combined
into a single lot.
A Variance is required to allow a residential adjacency setback oI 66 Ieet where 85 Ieet is
required.
One oI the three parcels is zoned P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking). A Rezoning Irom P-
R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) is required at allow the
applicant to construct an Animal Hospital, Clinic or Shelter (with no Outside Pens).
An Animal Hospital, Clinic or Shelter (with no Outside Pens) is a Conditional Use in the C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning district.
The applicant intends to keep the existing animal hospital open while the new building is
constructed. This request requires an approved construction phasing plan.
A complaint was Iorwarded to Code EnIorcement Ior outside storage (a cargo container) on
the west side oI the building.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
12/08/71
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0067-71) request
oI the property Irom R-1 (Single Family Residence) to P-R (ProIessional
OIIices and Parking) Ior the property generally located on the west side oI
Decatur Boulevard, 75 Ieet north oI Carmen Boulevard at 1104 North Yale
Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
12/04/74
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0051-74) request
Irom R-1 (Single Family Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) and a Plot
Plan Review (Z-0021-74) Ior property generally located on the west side oI
Decatur Boulevard between Carmen Boulevard and Westmoreland Drive, 270
Ieet north oI Carmen Boulevard, extending west to Yale Street.
02/19/75
The City Council approved a Review oI Conditions |Z-0051-74(1)| to allow
emergency access on Yale Street. StaII recommended approval.
04/27/95
The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan and Building Elevation
Review |Z-0051-74) (2)| request Ior a temporary trailer to be used in
conjunction with an existing animal hospital on the property located at 1117
North Decatur Boulevard. StaII recommended approval.
01/25/95
The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review and Building
Elevations |Z-0021-74(4) and Z-0051-74(3)| requests Ior a cellular
transmission Iacility at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard. StaII recommends
approval.
09/16/14
A complaint was Iorwarded to Code EnIorcement Ior outside storage (a cargo
container) on the west side oI the building.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
07/07/94 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
1975 The existing building was constructed.
11/08/00
A business license (G50-06784) was Ior General Retail Sales at 1117 North
Decatur Boulevard. The license was placed Ior collections as oI 09/17/14.
07/15/06
A business license (P55-01701) was issued Ior ProIessional Services (a
Veterinary Clinic) at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard. The license is active as
oI 09/17/14.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Pre-Application Meeting
08/19/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant`s designated
representative and the Iollowing was discussed:

1. The submittal requirements Ior a Site Development Plan Review to
remove the existing animal hospital and relocate it on the north end oI
the site.
2. The rezoning oI the southern parcel and the remapping oI APNs (138-
25-613-043, 044 and 045) into a single parcel.
3. The plans to have the existing animal hospital remain open while the
new Iacility is constructed.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the site and there is an existing animal
hospital with non-permitted outside storage (a cargo container), a trash
container in the parking lot without an enclosure and limited perimeter
landscaping.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.32


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use Per
1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use
Designation
Existing Zoning District
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Subject Property
Animal Hospital Clinic
or Shelter (with no
Outside Pens)
SC (Service
Commercial) P-R (ProIessional OIIice
and Parking)
North
OIIice, Other than
Listed
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
South
OIIice, Medical or
Dental
SC (Service
Commercial)
P-R (ProIessional OIIice
and Parking)
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR
Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use Per
1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use
Designation
Existing Zoning District
East
Commercial
Recreation/Amusement
(Outdoor)
PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
West
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (105 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 19.8.7 , the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 105 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front (Decatur Boulevard)
Side
Front (Yale Street)
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 38 Y
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Trellis Y
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8.4, the following standards apply:
Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
3:1 proximity slope 85 Feet 66 Feet N*
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 94 Feet Y
*A residential adjacency setback Variance accompanies this application.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Pursuant to 1itle 19.8, the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 24 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 24 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 24 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 24 Linear Feet
6 Trees
6 Trees
6 Trees
6 Trees
6 Trees
6 Trees
6 Trees
6 Trees
Y
Y
Y
Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 24 Trees 24 Trees Y
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
7 Trees 6 Trees N
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
8 Feet
8 Feet
10 Feet
1

10 Feet
1

8 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
6 Feet
2

Y
Y
Y
N
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y
*When a principal structure is built at a less restrictive building setback, the setback shall prevail.


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Decatur Boulevard Primary Arterial
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways Map
112 Y
Yale Street Local Street N/A 51 Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio
Regul
ar
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped

Animal
Hospital,
Clinic or
Shelter (with
Outside Pens)
8 Employees
1 SP Per 2
On-Duty
Employees
4

ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio
Regul
ar
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
2 Doctors
1 SP Per
Doctor
2


4 Exam Room
1 SP Per
Exam Room
4

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 10

14

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 9 1 13 1 Y


Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To provide a 10-Ioot wide
landscape buIIer along the west
property line.
To allow a six-Ioot
wide landscape buIIer
along a portion oI the
west property line.
Approval


Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
Provide one Iive-Ioot wide
landscape Iinger and one 24-
inch box tree throughout the
parking lot (seven total
landscape Iingers Ior this site).
To allow one oI the
seven parking lot
landscaping Iingers to
be two-Ioot in width
and not provide a 24-
inch box tree in said
parking lot Iinger.
Approval


ANALYSIS

This application is Ior a Site Development Plan Review Ior a proposed 5,459 square-Ioot Animal
Hospital, Clinic or Shelter (with no Outside Pens) use. The site consists oI three parcels, one oI
which is zoned P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking) and the others are zoned C-1 (Limited
Commercial). There is a Rezoning application to change the zoning Irom P-R to C-1. The three
lots are shallow and as submitted the project requires a residential adjacency setback Variance, a
landscape buIIer width Waiver and two landscape parking lot design Exceptions.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The Animal Hospital, Clinic or Shelter (with no Outside Pens) use is a conditional use in the in
the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The southern parcel is zoned P-R (ProIessional
OIIice and Parking). The intent is to rezone said parcel to C-1 (Limited Commercial) and
combine the three separate parcels (or lots) into a single lot. The General Plan designation Ior all
three parcels is SC (Service Commercial). The proposed rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan designation oI SC (Service Commercial) and the surrounding neighborhood; thereIore, staII
supports the rezoning oI the southern parcel.

Remapping oI the site will be necessary to combine the three existing lots into a single lot, which
will allow Ior the building to be placed in the proposed location. The property will be a single
through lot (or double Irontage lot), in which the building setback along both Decatur Boulevard
and Yale Street is 10 Ieet. The proposed animal hospital will be constructed in a way that
conIorms to the most oI the development standards in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district, provided the condition oI approval to consolidate the platted lots that make up the site is
exercised.

There are single-Iamily properties to the west the site that are protected Irom nonresidential
development by Title 19.08.040. The submitted elevations Iail to meet the 3:1 Proximity Slope
line on the northwest elevations. To meet the required slope the building would need to be
setback 88 Ieet instead oI the 66 Ieet provided. StaII supports the requested Variance due to the
shallow depth oI this lot.

The architectural design oI the building is modern. The building has clean lines and utilizes a
simple color palette and building material. The building elevations are broken by varying the
wall heights, widows, window treatments, and stucco pop-outs. The building orientation is to the
south and designed in a manner that is accessible by vehicle and pedestrian traIIic Irom Decatur
Boulevard and Yale Street.

The site is located mid-block. StaII determined the existing attached Iive-Ioot sidewalk is
acceptable, as it matches the existing improvements oI the properties to the north and south.
Also, a Iour-Ioot wide by approximately 26-Ioot long portion oI the western landscape buIIer
will be utilized Ior an outdoor patio and secondary entrance. Said area represents a 40 percent
reduction in required in landscape buIIer, which requires a landscape buIIer Waiver. StaII
supports the Waiver due to the shallow depth oI this lot.

The perimeter landscaping is a mix oI native and drought tolerant landscaping. The use oI Desert
Willows and Chinese Pistache trees will provide pink Ilowers during the spring and splashes oI
reds in the Iall with a constant green provided by the AIghan Pine. The accompanying shrubs
will provide blooms oI reds and yellows throughout the spring and summer. The parking lot
landscaping will utilize the same plant palette minus the AIghan Pine. An Exception is required
to allow one oI the seven parking lot islands (Iingers) to be reduced to two Ieet in width. An
additional Exception is required to not provide a 24-inch box tree in said landscape island.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



StaII supports the requests, as both Exceptions are minor in nature and the proposed landscape
will be an improvement to the area. In short, other than the waiver and two exceptions, the
proposed landscape improvements along Decatur Boulevard and Yale Street meet the minimum
standard required by code.

Circulation around the site is logical and easily maneuverable. Primary access to the site will be
Irom a right-in, right-out driveway along Decatur Boulevard, with secondary access provided
Irom a two-way access driveway along Yale Street.

The Animal Hospital, Clinic or Shelter (with no Outside Pens) use is a conditional use in the in
the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The use is deIined by Title 19.12 as 'A Iacility
that: 1. Provides medical or surgical treatment Ior animals or pets, as well as shelter and care
during the time oI such treatment; 2. Does not use any outdoor pens in providing such shelter and
care.

The proposed use meets the deIinition, per the site plan and justiIication letter the applicant
intends to construct a new 'animal hospital with no outside pens.

The Conditional Use Requirements Ior this use include:

1. The use shall have access to a collector street or larger.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as the site has airect access to Decatur
Boulevara, a 100-foot Primary Arterial.

2. Animals shall be conIined within an enclosed building at all times.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as the submittea site ana floor plans illustrate
that no outsiae pens exist.

3. The building shall be designed to provide complete sound barriers and odor protection Ior
adjacent properties.
This requirement shoula be met basea on the arawing submittea ana ongoing regular
inspections that will occur through the licensing process.

4. Rooms containing cages or pens are not permitted to have windows, doors or other
penetrations on exterior walls adjacent to residences.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as the submittea floor plans ana elevations ao
not have winaows, aoors or other penetrations on the exterior walls aafacent to
resiaences.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Nine


October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



5. Noise levels must comply with the applicable provisions oI LVMC Title 7.
The site is an existing animal hospital with no Coae Enforcement violation for noise.
Also, compliance with this requirement is ensurea through regular inspections that occur
through the licensing process. Aaaitionally, a conaition of approval has been aaaea
requiring compliance with LJMC Title 7.

6. No more than 25 oI the Iloor area may be used Ior the boarding oI animals.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as the submittea floor plans illustrate
approximately six percent (or 351 square feet) of the floor area will be utili:ea for the
boaraing of animals.

The proposed Animal Hospital, Clinic or Shelter (with no Outside Pens) use meets all the
Conditional Use requirements detailed in Title 19.12.

In summation, Ior the above reasons staII recommends approval the requested Waiver,
Exceptions, Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55761) and Variance (VAr-55760) with
Conditions and Rezoning (ZON-55758) without conditions.


FINDINGS (ZON55758)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning classiIication is in conIormance with the
SC (Service Commercial) Land Use designation oI the General Plan Ior the subject site.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The site is located in an area along Decatur Boulevard that mostly has a mix oI residential,
oIIice, commercial, and civic uses. The proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district is appropriate Ior this site, as typical uses in C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district are low to medium intensity retail, oIIice or other commercial uses that serve
primarily local area patrons. The C-1 zoning district allows an Animal Hospital, Clinic or
Shelter (with no Outside Pens) as a conditional use. The existing and proposed use oI an
animal hospital meets the intended use.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Ten
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

The existing animal hospital has outgrown the building onsite. The applicant intent is to
redevelop the existing site Ior the same use in a more eIIicient manner. The rezoning oI the
southern parcel is consistent and appropriate Ior this area.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The site is a double Irontage lot with direct access to Decatur Boulevard, a 100-Ioot right-
oI-way and Yale Street a 51-Ioot right-oI-way. Both roadways should have adequate
access to accommodate the existing and proposed use oI an animal hospital.


FINDINGS (VAR-55760)

In accordance with the provisions oI Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits oI a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;
2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, selI-created or Iinancial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:
'Where by reason oI exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape oI a speciIic piece oI
property at the time oI enactment oI the regulation, or by reason oI exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition oI
the piece oI property, the strict application oI any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical diIIiculties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner oI the property, a variance Irom that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the diIIiculties or hardship, iI the relieI may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment oI aIIected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose oI any ordinance or
resolution.

The applicant`s request is within the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting this Variance, due
to the shallow depth oI the lots along Decatur Boulevard and Yale Street. The reduced
residential adjacency setback along Yale Street will allow more space to be utilized on the site
Ior parking, landscaping and the trash enclosure to meet most oI Title 19 requirements. StaII
agrees that the hardship requested in this case is valid and thereIore recommends approval oI this
Variance.
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Eleven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



FINDINGS (SDR-55761)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

Development along this portion oI Decatur Boulevard consists mainly oI single-story
medical oIIices, ancillary personal services and retail building with a Iew two-story
buildings to accommodate said uses. The existing and proposed Animal Hospital, Clinic
or Shelter (with no Outside Pens) is compatible with neighborhood and surrounding land
uses.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is mostly compliant with City plans and standards. The
applicant has requested a landscape buIIer width Waiver and two parking lot landscape
design Exceptions. StaII supports the waiver due to a shallow lot and the landscape
exceptions because a majority oI the landscape complies with code and the exceptions are
Ior one parking lot tree and the reduction oI one parking lot island width.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;

Primary access is provided Irom the east by Decatur Boulevard and secondarily access is
provided Irom the west by Yale Street. TraIIic to and Irom the site is not expected to be
consistently heavy, and this development is expected to add approximately 84 trips per day
to the intersection oI Washington Avenue and Decatur Boulevard, which accounts Ior less
than a one percent increase in traIIic on each street relative to its designed capacity.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

Building materials and landscape material are appropriate Ior the area and consistent with
other commercial sites within the City.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 AND SDR-55761 PR1-55629]
MR

Staff Report Page Ten
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The building elevations, architectural design characteristics and aesthetic Ieatures are not
unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious in appearance. The proposed building will be visual
improvement to the area and could be compatible with the existing neighborhood and
surrounding area. The proposed landscape materials are drought tolerant and appropriate
Ior the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

Site development will be subject to permits and inspection, thereby saIeguarding the public
health, saIety and general welIare.




NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 25


NOTICES MAILED 178 - ZON-55758 & VAR-55760 |PRJ-55629|
178 - SDR-55779 |PRJ-55629|


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0
09/09/14
PRJ-55629
ZON-55758
09/09/14
PRJ-55629 ZON-55758
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 9/11/2014 8:13:09 AM
Applicant Email: charles.nicholls@vcaantech.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Heller
Rep First Name: Doug
Applicant State: California
Applicant Phone: 310-571-6422
Applicant Zip: 90064
Rep Address: 924 Park Ave SW Suite B
Rep Email: doug@mullenheller.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: New Mexico
Rep City: Albuquerque
Rep Phone: (505) 268-4144
Rep Zip: 87102
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13825613043, 13825613044, 13825613045
Project Name VCA NORTH DECATUR ANIMAL HOSPITAL
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN), WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Application Number: PRJ-55629
Applicant City: Los Angeles
ProjectAddress (Location): 1117 NORTH DECATUR BLVD
Application/Petition For: Rezoning, SDR, VAR, and SUP
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Charles
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 12401 West Olympic Blvd
Applicant Last Name: Nicholls
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 & SDR-55761
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 9/11/2014 8:13:09 AM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
PETS R X NEVADA INC 12401 W OLYMPIC BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1022
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Antonio Vigil Mullen Heller Architecture P.C. Project Manager antonio@mullenheller.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 & SDR-55761
N

Y

A
L
E

S
T

CARMEN BLVD
H
I
A

W
A
T
H
A

R
D

ELMHURST LN
APAWANA LN
SANTO AVE
L
A

U
R
E
L
H
U
R
S
T

D
R

N

M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A

S
T

H
A
R
V
A
R
D

S
T

S
T
A
N
F
O
R
D

S
T

WESTMORELAND DR
CANNON BLVD
P
R
I
N
C
E
T
O
N

S
T

S
P
Y
G
L
A
S
S

L
N

E
L
K
O

W
A
Y

CANNON CIR
SEA PINES LN
N

D
E
C
A
T
U
R

B
L
V

D
W WASHINGTON AVE
ZON-55758
FROM P-R TO C-1
SUBJECT
PROPERTY

Date: Thursday, August 28, 2014
GIS maps are normally produced
only to meet the needs of the City.
Due to continuous development activity
this map is for reference only.
Geographic Information System
Planning & Development Dept.
702-229-6301
Subject Property
1000ft Buffer
City Limits
Zoning
R-2 - Medium-Low
Density Residential
R-3 - Medium Density
Residential
R-4 - High Density
Residential
R-MH - Mobile/Manufactured
Home Residence
R-5 - Apartment
R-MHP - Residential Mobile/
Manufactured Home Park
P-R - Professional Offices
and Parking
P-O - Professional Office
N-S - Neighborhood Service
O - Office
C-D - Designed Commercial
C-1 - Limited Commercial
C-2 - General Commercial
C-PB - Planned Business
Park
C-M - Commercial/Industrial
M - Industrial
C-V - Civic
P-C - Planned Community
T-D - Traditional Development
PD - Planned Development
T-C - Town Center
R-E - Residential Estates
U - (GPA Designation)
Undeveloped
R-A - Ranch Acres
R-D - Single-Family
Residential-Restricted
R-PD - Residential
Planned Development
R-1 - Single Family
Residential
R-CL - Single-Family
Compact-Lot
Date: Th
GIS m
ooooonnnnnnnlllllllyyyyyyyyyyyyy tttttoooooo
Due to cccc
thisss
Geogrrr
Plannn
Subject Propert rr y
1000ft ff Buff ff er
City Limits
09/02/14
PRJ-55629
ZON-55758
0
9
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
9
Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
5
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
0

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
1

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
9
Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
5
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
0

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
1

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
Phase 1: Construct New Building - 7 months
The existing building to the south will remain operational. A construction fence will be provided
around the new building construction to maintain site access and parking while this gets
constructed.
New Building
Not to Scale
Construction
Fence
Existing
Building
09/09/14
PRJ-55629
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 & SDR-55761 - REVISED
Phase 2: Demolish Existing Building -1 month
The new building will be completed and ready for occupancy. After this, a construction fence will
be established around the existing building and demolition of this is commence. Some of the
original parking will be maintained for access.
New Building
Not to Scale
Construction
Fence Fence
Demo Existing
Building
09/09/14
PRJ-55629
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 & SDR-55761 - REVISED
Phase 3: Site Improvements - 1 month
With the new building complete and the existing building demolished, the rest of the site
improvements can occur, including asphalt paving, sidewalks, landscaping etc. At this time only
on street parking will be provided and a safe path of travel designated to the front door of the
new facility by a construction fence.
New Building
Not to Scale
Construction
Fence
Site
Improvements
o the front door of
09/09/14
PRJ-55629
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 & SDR-55761 - REVISED
0
9
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
9
Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
5
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
0

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
1

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
9
Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
5
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
0

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
1

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
1
5
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
2
9
Z
O
N
-
5
5
7
5
8
,

V
A
R
-
5
5
7
6
0

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
6
1

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
09/16/14
PRJ-55629
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 & SDR-55761 - REVISED
Z
O
N
-


[
P
P
J
-

Z
9
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-

0

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

1

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
E
T
S
'

P
X

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C

1
1
1
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


Z
O
N
-


[
P
P
J
-

Z
9
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-

0

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

1

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
E
T
S
'

P
X

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C

1
1
1
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


Z
O
N
-


[
P
P
J
-

Z
9
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-

0

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

1

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
E
T
S
'

P
X

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C

1
1
1
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


Z
O
N
-


[
P
P
J
-

Z
9
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-

0

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

1

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
E
T
S
'

P
X

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C

1
1
1
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


Z
O
N
-


[
P
P
J
-

Z
9
j

-

P
E
Z
O
N
I
N
S

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

V
A
P
-

0

A
N
D

S
D
P
-

1

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
E
T
S
'

P
X

N
E
V
A
D
A


I
N
C

1
1
1
7

N
O
P
T
H

D
E
C
A
T
U
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4

Mullen Heller Architecture PC

924 Park Avenue SW Suite B


Albuquerque New Mexico 87102
505 268 4144 [p] 505 268 4244 [f]
September 9, 2014

Mark Rex, Planner I


The Department of Planning
City of Las Vegas
333 N. Rancho Dr., 3
rd
Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106

Re: Site Plan Application 9 Justification Letter VCA Decatur Animal Hospital PRJ55629

Dear Mark;

An existing (approximately 2,800 sf) Animal Hospital located at 1117 N. Decatur Blvd (Las
Vegas, NV 89108) is seeking to upgrade their facility on the same site. The existing
building is very outdated and does not meet the size requirements necessary to function
properly. In hopes of remaining open during construction, a new building is being
proposed on the opposite end of the site.

The .34 acre property is located between N. Yale Street and N. Decatur Blvd., adjacent
to Apawana Ln. It is currently platted as three separate parcels that will be requested to
be combined to only one. There are also two separate zones on the property that we
would like to combine to one (C91). The existing animal hospital is currently located on
the south end of the property and parking is on the north side. The proposed site plan
includes demolishing the existing facility and constructing a new animal hospital on the
north end of the property with parking to the south, essentially flipping the two. This will
require relocating two curb cuts slightly south in order to align with the new parking
layout.

The proposed two story facility will maintain the same use and is approximately 5,459 sf
(3,772 first floor, 1,687 second floor). It will provide animal exam and treatment rooms as
well as doctors offices, employee break room, conference room and a waiting area. It
will seek to operate on the same hours as the currently facility (Monday9Friday 8:00AM9
6:00PM, Saturday 8:00AM94:00PM and closed Sunday).

This project is requesting two variances. All other site requirements appear to have been
met per the pre9planning conference held on August 19, 2014. An outdoor area for
animal walking only is located on the west end of the property. There will be no pet
boarding outside and animals will be accompanied by employees at all times. A Special
Use permit is not being requested for this area due to this use. A 20 rear yard building
setback is required. This is the west end of the property. Due to the narrow site, a
variance is being requested to bring this setback to 10. There is also an 85 residential
adjacency setback above 15. The second floor of the building is approximately 65 from
the residential property to the west. A variance is being requested to allow for this. We
feel that these requests are justified as the commercial strip center to the north is along
the west property and provides no buffer to the residential neighborhood.

Sincerely,
Mullen Heller Architecture, PC

Douglas Heller, AIA, LEED AP

09/09/14
PRJ-55629
ZON-55758, VAR-55760 & SDR-55761 - REVISED


Agenda tem No.: 28.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
VAR-55760 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-55758 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS R X NEVADA, INC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Variance TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK OF 66 FEET WHERE 85
FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED 5,459 SQUARE-FOOT ANIMAL HOSPITAL,
CLINIC OR SHELTER (WITH NO OUTSIDE PENS) on 0.32 acres located at 1117 North
Decatur Boulevard (APNs 138-25-613-043, 044 and 045), P-R (ProIessional OIIice and Parking)
and C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zones |Proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial)|, Ward 5 (Barlow)
|PRJ-55629|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-55760 and SDR-55761 |PRJ-55629|
3. Supporting Documentation

Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
09/09/14
PRJ-55629
VAR-55760
09/09/14
PRJ-55629
VAR-55760


Agenda tem No.: 29.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SDR-55761 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-55758 AND VAR-
55760 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS'' RX NEVADA, INC - For
possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 5,459
SQUARE-FOOT ANIMAL HOSPITAL, CLINIC OR SHELTER (WITH NO OUTSIDE PENS)
WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION
OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE WHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.32 acres located
at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard (APNs 138-25-613-043, 044 and 045), P-R (ProIessional
OIIice and Parking) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zones |Proposed C-1 (Limited
Commercial)|, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-55629|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 11/19/2014

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
09/09/14
PRJ-55629
SDR-55761
09/09/14
PRJ-55629
SDR-55761
SDR 55761
Charles Nicholls
1117 N. Decatur Blvd
Proposed 5.459 thousand square foot animal hospital.
Current Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
ANIMAL HOSPITAL/VETERINARY
CLINIC [1000 SF]
2.8
31.45 88
AM Peak Hour 4.08 11
PM Peak Hour 4.72 13
New Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
ANIMAL HOSPITAL/VETERINARY
CLINIC [1000 SF]
5.459
31.45 172
AM Peak Hour 4.08 22
PM Peak Hour 4.72 26
Net Change
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
ANIMAL HOSPITAL/VETERINARY
CLINIC [1000 SF]
2.659
31.45 84
AM Peak Hour 4.08 11
PM Peak Hour 4.72 13
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:
Decatur Blvd.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 37,450
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 2,996
Washington Ave.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 17,150
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,372
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Decatur Blvd. 51,800
Washington Ave. 34,500
This project will add approximately 84 trips per day on Decatur Blvd., Washington Ave. and Yale St. Decatur is currently at
about 72 percent of capacity and Washington is at about 50 percent capacity. With this project, these capacities are
expected to remain unchanged. No counts are available for Yale, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 13 additional cars, or about one every five
minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

SDR-55761


Agenda tem No.: 30.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
VAR-55684 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DAVID V CUNG -
For possible action on a request Ior a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT SIDE YARD
SETBACK WHERE FIVE FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING
PATIO COVER on 0.16 acres at 8962 Bracken CliII Court (APN 138-08-212-010), R-CL
(Single Family Compact-Lot) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-54450|. StaII recommends
DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 9 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter
6. Support Letters

VAR-55684 PR1-54450]
MR

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: - APPLICANT/OWNER: DAVID V CUNG


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
VAR-55684 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:
N/A


`` CONDITIONS ``


VAk-5584 CONDIIIONS


1. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed
in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

3. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set
submitted Ior building permit.

4. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be
satisIied, except as modiIied herein.

VAR-55684 PR1-54450]
MR

Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Variance to allow a zero-Ioot side yard setback where Iive Ieet is required
Ior an existing patio cover located at 8962 Bracken CliII Court. The site is in an R-CL (Single
Family Compact-Lot) zoning district. The structure does not conIorm to code and was built
without permits; thereIore, the hardship is selI-imposed. For these reasons, staII recommends
denial oI this request. II this request is denied, then the patio cover must be reconIigured to
conIorm to current code requirements or be removed.


ISSUES

A Variance is required to allow a zero-Ioot side yard building setback Ior an existing patio
cover where Iive Ieet is the minimum required.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
06/01/95
The City Council approved an Annexation (A-0015-93) request oI
approximately 343.3 acres located north oI Cheyenne Avenue, between Fort
Apache Road and Durango Drive with the eIIective date oI 02/11/94.
05/12/14
A compliant (#141166) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior the construction
oI a carport without permits. The complaint is open as oI 09/17/14.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
12/02/11 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
1994 The principal structure was built.
01/09/95
A building permit (#95362932) was issued Ior detached patio cover. The
permit was not Iinalized.
VAR-55684 PR1-54450]
MR

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Pre-Application Meeting
06/15/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant`s designated
representative to discuss the submittal requirements Ior a setback Variance Ior
an existing patio cover.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood was not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
A Iield inspection conducted on the subject site revealed that the carport/patio
cover exists and is close to iI not over the existing property line.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.16


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property
Single-Family,
Detached
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
North
Single-Family,
Detached
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
South
Single-Family,
Detached
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
East
Single-Family,
Detached
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
West
Single-Family,
Detached
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A
VAR-55684 PR1-54450]
MR

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 19..4 and 19..8 for a Patio Cover the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Side
Rear
5 Feet
5 Feet
0 Feet
39.5 Feet
N
Y
Max. Building Height 12 Feet 9 Feet Y


ANALYSIS

This application is a request Ior a Variance to allow an existing patio cover on the east property
line where Iive Ieet is required. The patio cover is on the side yard property line, which
represents a 100 percent setback reduction. The requested Variance does not comply with the
minimum side yard setback Ior a R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) zoning district and is not
consistent with the characteristics oI single-Iamily homes throughout the valley.

Several patio covers exist in the required setback area on Bracken CliII Court including one
adjacent to the subject property; however, none have a setback Variance. Additionally, every
Variance is evaluated separately and the approval oI one Variance does not guarantee the
approval oI another. This requested setback Variance is on a lot that is not irregular in shape and
there are no unique site characteristics. The patio cover was constructed without permits and Iails
to meet code. The request is the result oI a selI-imposed hardship. StaII recommends denial oI
this request. II this Variance is denied, then the patio cover must be removed or reconIigured to
conIorm to current code requirements.


FINDINGS (VAR-55684)

In accordance with the provisions oI Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits oI a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;
2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, selI-created or Iinancial in nature.

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:
'Where by reason oI exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape oI a speciIic piece oI
property at the time oI enactment oI the regulation, or by reason oI exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition oI
the piece oI property, the strict application oI any zoning regulation would result in
VAR-55684 PR1-54450]
MR

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



peculiar and exceptional practical diIIiculties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner oI the property, a variance Irom that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the diIIiculties or hardship, iI the relieI may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment oI aIIected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose oI any ordinance or
resolution.

No evidence oI a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant
has created a selI-imposed hardship by constructing a patio cover on the property line without
permits. Alternatively, the patio cover could be reduced in size and in a manner that would allow
conIormance to the Title 19 requirements. In view oI the absence oI any hardships imposed by
the site`s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant`s hardship is preIerential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm oI NRS Chapter 278 Ior granting oI Variances.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 22


NOTICES MAILED 444


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0

08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/21/2014 5:21:04 PM
Applicant Email: tonytina48@yahoo.com
Applicant Fax: (702)441-7111
Rep Last Name: ESTEBAN
Rep First Name: FRANCISCO
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: (702)202-0250
Applicant Zip: 89129
Rep Address: 222 S. RAINBOW BLVD
Rep Email: paxib7@yahoo.com
Rep Fax: (702)441-7111
Rep State: NEVADA
Rep City: LAS VEGAS
Rep Phone: (702)675-0628
Rep Zip: 89145
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13808212010
Project Name 8962 BRACKEN CLIFF COURT SETBACK VARIANCE
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 4 (STAVROS S. ANTHONY)
Application Number: PRJ-54450
Applicant City: LAS VEGAS
ProjectAddress (Location): 8962 BRACKEN CLIFF CT
Application/Petition For: 8962 Bracken Cliff Court setback variance
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: DAVID
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 8962 BRACKEN CLIFF CT
Applicant Last Name: CUNG
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/21/2014 5:21:04 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
! certify that ! am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. ! understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be re]ected. !
further certify that ! am the owner
or purchaser or option holder of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
! Accept:
Yes
CUNG DAVID V 8962 BRACKEN CLIFF CT LAS VEGAS, NV 89129-3648
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
FRANCISCO ESTEBAN - VARIANCE FOR SETBAK FOR
COVERED PATIO
PAXIB7@YAHOO.COM
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
0 8 / 2 1 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 0
V
A
R
-
5
5
6
8
4
0 8 / 2 1 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 0
V
A
R
-
5
5
6
8
4
0 8 / 2 1 / 1 4
P R J - 5 4 4 5 0
V
A
R
-
5
5
6
8
4
V
A
P
-

4

[
P
P
J
-

4
4

0
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

D
A
V
I
D

V

C
U
N
S

P
A
C
k
E
N

C
L
I
F
F

C
O
U
P
T

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


V
A
P
-

4

[
P
P
J
-

4
4

0
j

-

V
A
P
I
A
N
C
E

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

D
A
V
I
D

V

C
U
N
S

P
A
C
k
E
N

C
L
I
F
F

C
O
U
P
T

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4

Las Vegas, May 29


th
, 2014.

To whoever concerns,
My name is David Cung, and I live on 8962 Bracken Cliff Ct, Las Vegas NV 89129. The
reason for the present petition is to get an special use permit/Variance to be able wave the
5 ft side setback requirement, in order to erect a new Covered patio/Carport on the side of
my home to provide of a new covered area to be able to spend sometime with my family
under a roofed area, as well as to have an additional area to park my vehicles or my boat
during the summer or winter time. My family is big and when we get together we like to
have spaces for all of the different phases or ages of the different relatives which is some
areas for the seniors to be able to talk and remember past memories, or for the young to
play around the house, as well as for the women to be able to laugh and chat on a very
family oriented ambiance. Thanks in advance for your understanding
Best Regards

_______________________________
David Cung

08/21/14
PRJ-54450 VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684
08/21/14
PRJ-54450
VAR-55684


Agenda tem No.: 31.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55715 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BARNET
LIBERMAN - OWNER: LEAH PROPERTY, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT on 0.64 acres at the
northeast corner oI Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue (APNs 139-34-410-056
through 059), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55636|. StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 1
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-55715 and SDR-55716 |PRJ-55636|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - SUP-55715 and SDR-55716 |PRJ-55636|
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-55715 and SDR-55716 |PRJ-55636|
4. Photos - SUP-55715 and SDR-55716 |PRJ-55636|
5. JustiIication Letter - SUP-55715 and SDR-55716 |PRJ-55636|
6. Protest and Support Postcards - SUP-55715 and SDR-55716 |PRJ-55636|

SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BARNET LIBERMAN - OWNER: LEAH
PROPERTY, LLC, ET AL


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55715 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SDR-55716 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-55715


`` CONDITIONS ``



SbF-55715 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Mixed-Use use.

2. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-55716) shall be required.

3. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

4. Prior to occupancy, all necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections
shall be completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
oI Building and SaIety.

5. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



SDk-5571 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Special Use Permit
(SUP-55715) shall be required, iI approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the color and materials board, date stamped
08/21/14 and site plan, landscape plan, building elevations and Iloor plans, date stamped
09/02/14, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. Any changes based upon right-oI-way, traIIic or drainage studies or street improvements
required by the city or public utilities shall not reduce the widths oI perimeter landscape
buIIers, height oI walls or quantities oI plant materials Irom that on submitted landscape
plans date stamped 09/02/14. Any changes based upon subsequently submitted studies must
be accommodated elsewhere on the site.

5. Prior to occupancy, all necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections
shall be completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
oI Building and SaIety.

6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit.

7. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staII to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance oI any building permits.

8. All utilities shall comply with the provisions oI the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan.

9. All mechanical equipment shall be screened Irom public right-oI-way view.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Conditions Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Public Works

11. Remove all substandard public street improvements and unused driveway cuts adjacent to
this site, iI any, and replace with new improvements meeting current Las Vegas Downtown
Centennial Plan Standards concurrent with development oI this site, except as amended by
Conditions oI Approval herein.

12. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-oI-way adjacent to this site. All landscaping
and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as to
not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all development access drives
and abutting street intersections.

13. Prior to the approval oI Construction drawings Ior this site, sign a Covenant Running with
Land agreement Ior the possible Iuture undergrounding oI all existing overhead utility lines
adjacent to this site not placed underground per requirements oI the Downtown Centennial
Plan. The Covenant agreement must be recorded with the County Recorder and a copy oI
the recorded document must be provided to the City prior to the issuance oI building permits
Ior this site.

14. Prior to the issuance oI any permits, coordinate with the Sanitary Sewer Planning Section oI
the Department oI Public Works to determine an appropriate location to connect to city
sewer.

15. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior this site.

16. Submit an Encroachment Agreement Ior landscaping and private improvements in the
Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue public rights-oI-way that are not maintained
by the City prior to the issuance oI permits Ior these improvements. The applicant must
carry an insurance policy Ior the term oI the Encroachment Agreement and add the City oI
Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. II requested by the
City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-oI-way at the
applicant's expense pursuant to the terms oI the City's Encroachment Agreement. The
installation and maintenance oI all private improvements in the public right oI way shall be
the responsibility oI the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transIerred with the sale oI
the property Ior the entire term oI the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all
requirements Ior the Encroachment Agreement with the Land Development Section oI the
Department oI Building and SaIety (229-4836).

17. Contact the City Engineer`s OIIice at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development oI this
project with the 'Coolidge BeautiIication Project, the 'Downtown Dual Arm Streetlight
Conversion Project and any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site.
Comply with the recommendations oI the City Engineer.
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Conditions Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



18. A TraIIic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department oI Public
Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits, submittal oI any
construction drawings or the recordation oI a Map subdividing this site. Comply with the
recommendations oI the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy oI the site.
The TraIIic Impact Analysis shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings
#234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-oI-way requirements Ior bus
turnouts adjacent to this site, iI any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved TraIIic
Impact Analysis. All additional rights-oI-way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 Ior
exclusive right turn lanes and dual leIt turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent
with the commencement oI on-site development activities unless speciIically noted as not
required in the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis. II additional rights-oI-way are not
required and TraIIic Control devices are or may be proposed at this site outside oI the public
right-oI-way, all necessary easements Ior the location and/or access oI such devices shall be
granted prior to the issuance oI permits Ior this site. Phased compliance will be allowed iI
recommended by the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis. No recommendation oI the
approved TraIIic Impact Analysis, nor compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modiIy or
eliminate any condition oI approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City
Council on the development oI this site.

19. Meet with the Flood Control Section oI the Department oI Public Works Ior assistance with
establishing Iinished Iloor elevations and drainage paths Ior this site prior to submittal oI
construction plans, the issuance oI any building or grading permits or the submittal oI a map
Ior this site, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.


SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``

PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The subject site is composed oI a vacant building and undeveloped land. The proposal calls Ior a
200-Ioot tall building with ground level retail space, second level oIIice space and residential
units on levels three through seventeen. The site is suitable to accommodate the uses proposed.
An automated parking garage will be will be utilized with this project. The proposed mixed-use
project oI retail, oIIice and residences is an appropriate development Ior the 18b Las Vegas Arts
District area oI downtown. For these reasons, this project is compatible with the surrounding
development and staII recommends approval. II denied, no building permits will be issued Ior a
Mixed-Use development.


ISSUES

Mixed-use developments within 18b The Las Vegas Arts District are permitted with approval
oI a Special Use Permit. StaII supports the Special Use Permit request.
A mapping action will be necessary to consolidate the existing legal lots underlying the
subject site prior to issuance oI building permits.
Approval oI an encroachment agreement is required that would allow storeIront awnings and
trellises to project into the right-oI-way.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
12/16/64
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0100-64) oI approximately 230
acres generally located on property bounded by Main Street to the west,
Bonanza Road to the north, Las Vegas Boulevard to the east and Charleston
Boulevard to the south, Irom R-1 (Single Family Residential), R-4 (High
Density Residential), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2 (General Commercial)
and C-V (Civic) to C-2 (General Commercial).
09/23/04
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
4999) Ior a proposed Iive-story mixed-use Development with 86 residential
units and 22,100 square Ieet oI commercial Iloor area adjacent to the north
side oI Coolidge Avenue between Casino Center Boulevard and Third Street.
StaII recommended approval. The approval expired 09/23/06.
04/19/06
The City Council approved an amendment to the Master Plan oI Streets and
Highways (MSH-11632) to include the Casino Center Boulevard/Third Street
Connector as an 80-Ioot Secondary Collector. The Planning Commission and
staII recommended approval.
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
05/16/07
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-20492)
Ior a 120-Ioot-high, 1,500-space parking structure with 12,000 square Ieet oI
ground Iloor commercial space on 0.63 acres at the northeast corner oI Casino
Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
06/20/07
A Code EnIorcement case (54633) was processed Ior a vacant lot that was
being used as a parking lot at 927 South Casino Center Boulevard. The case
was closed by Code EnIorcement on 07/10/07.
03/24/09
Code EnIorcement processed a case (76026) Ior a Dangerous Building at 931
South Casino Center Boulevard. The case was closed by Code EnIorcement
on 06/30/09.
04/15/09
The City Council approved an Extension oI Time (EOT-33723) oI a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-20492) Ior a 120-
Ioot-high, 1,500-space parking structure with 12,000 square Ieet oI ground
Iloor commercial space on 0.63 acres at the northeast corner oI Casino Center
Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue. StaII recommended approval.
04/21/11
Code EnIorcement processed a case (100895) concerning the accumulation oI
trash and debris on a vacant lot and Ience at 923 South Casino Center
Boulevard. The case was closed by Code EnIorcement on 04/26/11.
07/20/11
The City Council approved an Extension oI Time (EOT-41595) oI a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-20492) Ior a 120-
Ioot-high, 1,500-space parking structure with 12,000 square Ieet oI ground
Iloor commercial space on 0.63 acres at the northeast corner oI Casino Center
Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue. StaII recommended approval. Expired
May 16, 2013.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-41599) Ior a proposed
Mixed-Use Development on 0.64 acres at the northeast corner oI Casino
Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended denial. Expired September 7, 2013.
09/07/11
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-41829)
Ior a proposed 16-story mixed-use development, including 16,000 square Ieet
oI commercial space and 330 multi-Iamily residential units and a Waiver oI
the Downtown Centennial Plan Streetscape Standards on 0.64 acres at the
northeast corner oI Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended denial. Expired September 7,
2013.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
11/07/06 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
11/04/83
A business license (G04-01039) was issued Ior Porcelain Doll Sales at 931
South Casino Center Boulevard. The license is still inactive.
01/04/96
A building permit (#96000299) was issued Ior demolition oI a building at 927
South Casino Center Boulevard. A Iinal inspection was not completed and
the permit expired 07/06/96.
05/13/99
A building permit (#99009154) was issued Ior demolition oI a shed/building
at 923 South Casino Center Boulevard. A Iinal inspection was not completed
and the permit expired on 11/13/99.
01/23/04
A building permit (#04001651) was issued Ior demolition oI a building at 919
South Casino Center Boulevard. A Iinal inspection was not completed and
the permit expired on 07/24/04.
01/23/04
A building permit (#04001649) was issued Ior demolition oI a building at 923
South Casino Center Boulevard. A Iinal inspection was not completed and
the permit expired on 07/24/04.
01/23/04
A building permit (#04001650) was issued Ior demolition oI a building at 927
South Casino Center Boulevard. A Iinal inspection was not completed and
the permit expired on 07/24/04.


Pre-Application Meeting
08/19/14
StaII met with the applicant and reviewed the project. It was determined that
the previous entitlements have all expired and a new Special Use Permit and
Site Development Plan Review applications would be required. It was also
noted that a pre-application meeting would need to be scheduled Ior a
Tentative Map.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII visited the site and Iound a vacate building on the corner with three
vacant, undeveloped parcels adjacent to it.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.64
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
General Retail Store
Subject Property
Undeveloped
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
North
Multi-Family
Residential
(Apartments)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South Undeveloped MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Undeveloped
OIIice
C-2 (General
Commercial)
East
Multi-Family
Residential
(Apartments)
MXU (Mixed Use)

R-4 (High Density
Residential) under
Resolution oI Intent to C-
2 (General Commercial)
Undeveloped
OIIice
C-2 (General
Commercial)
West
Multi-Family
Residential
(Apartments)
MXU (Mixed Use)
R-4 (High Density
Residential) under
Resolution oI Intent to C-
2 (General Commercial)


Master Plan Areas Yes Ao Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan X Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Yes Ao Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (18b The Las
Vegas Arts District) X Y
Live/Work Overlay District X N/A
Trails X N/A
Rural Preservation Overlay District X N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area X Y
Development Impact Notification Assessment X Y
Project of Regional Significance X N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to 19. and the Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply to the
proposal:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size N/A 28,000 SF N/A
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK
Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width N/A 140 Feet N/A
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
0 Feet
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max. Lot Coverage N/A 73 N/A
Max. Building Height N/A 200 Feet N/A
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated, w/
a RooI or Trellis
Interior to
building
Y
Mech. Equipment Screened
Per
condition Y


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Casino Center
Boulevard
Secondary
Collector
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
80 Y
Coolidge Avenue N/A N/A 80 N/A


Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance
Minimum sidewalk width 10 Ieet 10 Ieet Y
Minimum amenity zone width 5 Ieet 5 Ieet Y
Sidewalks
Corner ramps with
patterned concrete
Corner ramps with
patterned concrete
Y
Alleys
Stamped colored
concrete at driveway
Stamped colored
concrete at driveway
Y
Right-oI-Way Improvements
Light Iixtures, trash
receptacles, benches, tree
wells
Light Iixtures, trash
receptacles, benches,
tree wells
Y
North-South Streets (Major)
Deglet-Noor Date Palms
or similar (25` BTH) at
30` intervals
Deglet-Noor Date
Palms or similar (25`
BTH) at 30` intervals
Y
East-West Streets
36 box drought-tolerant
shade trees at 15-20`
intervals
36 box Southern Live
Oak at 20` intervals
Y
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Parking Requirement - Downtown
Base Parking Requirement Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
General Retail
Store, Other
Than Listed
16,000 SF
1 space/
175 SF
92
OIIice 18,500 SF
1 space/
300 SF
62
Multi-Family
Residential
Studio and 1
BR
148 units
1.25
spaces/
unit
185


Multi-Family
Residential
2 BR
133 units
1.75
spaces/
unit
233

Multi-Family
Residential
Guest spaces
281 units
1 space/
6 units
47

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 619

438

Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 571 12 438 0 Y*
Loading 3 3 Y*
*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
automatic application oI parking requirements. However, the above table should be used to illustrate
the requirements oI an analogous project in another location in the City. The project is adjacent to a
bus rapid transit stop, and the applicant expects that this will reduce the number oI vehicle trips to and
Irom the site. This project is subject to the handicapped parking requirements oI the Downtown
Centennial Plan, which reIerences Title 19 handicapped parking requirements. However, the parking
Iacilities are automated, eliminating the need Ior physical handicap spaces at ground level.

Sign 1ype Provided
Canopy:
Number (1) sign on east elevation
Area Maximum 24 SF
Illumination Internal
Wall
Number (4) signs on south elevation, (4) signs on west elevation
Area Maximum 72 SF
Height Maximum 3 Ieet, attached to building at all points
Illumination Internal
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



ANALYSIS

The proposed development is subject to Downtown Centennial Plan standards, and pursuant to
Section VIII.A oI the Plan, qualiIies as a New Development. The proposed Mixed-Use
development occupies exactly 50 percent oI the block and is thereIore not subject to Iull
streetscape and utility requirements at this time; however, streetscape improvements have been
proposed Ior the site. This site is located within the Live/Work Overlay district. The proposed
development will oIIer employment and housing options onsite, but no live/work units as
described by Title 19.10.170 are provided. The site is also within the boundaries oI the Las
Vegas Redevelopment Area; the proposed uses are in conIormance with Redevelopment Plan
policies that encourage innovative, mixed use projects in this area. As part oI 18b The Las
Vegas Arts District, a Mixed-Use development is a permitted use with approval oI a Special Use
Permit.

The applicant is providing both a loading space and a loading dock to provide Ior the commercial
loading and unloading oI service vehicles adjacent to the alley. The existing alley access will
provide a way to service the proposed building without impeding the primary rights-oI-way.

Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
automatic application oI parking requirements. Although the project would normally require
619 parking spaces iI located outside the downtown area, only 438 spaces are being provided.
The opportunities Ior nearby public transportation (bus rapid transit) use will negate the lack oI
parking on site. The Downtown Centennial Plan does not exempt applicants Irom providing
handicap accessible parking Ior commercial uses. No handicap-accessible spaces are provided
on the site because the automated garage eliminates this need. Access to the proposed garage is
Irom a two-way, 20-Ioot wide alley adjacent to the east perimeter. Although integrated into the
design oI the overall development, the garage does not have Irontage on any street.

The project has three components; a retail/commercial area on the ground Iloor, an
oIIice/commercial area on the second Iloor, and residential areas on all Iloors above the second
Iloor. All the areas are to be sold as condominiums and will need to be mapped accordingly.

The Iaade oI the building with be constructed with concrete precast panels. A reddish-brown
earth tone will color the Iirst two levels and stair-step up to the IiIth level transitioning to a light
greyish-white tone. The windows will have architectural metal light shelves and a metal cornice
will top the structure. The modern styled building will also have low-e tinted insulated glazing
over the windows Ior energy eIIiciency.

The north elevation has relatively Iew windows with the overall elevation blank Iaade being
broken up using a somewhat checkered pattern oI earth-tone colors. This elevation is designed
to allow another mid-rise building to be built without interIering in the designed use oI this
project. A portion oI the east elevation also has a substantial windowless Iaade. This is a result
oI the automated garage that is being incorporated with this project.
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Signage is designed as an integral element oI the Iaade and is at an appropriate scale Ior
pedestrians to identiIy individual storeIronts along Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge
Avenue. A three-dimensional sign on a trellis in the alleyway identiIies the parking structure, in
keeping with the Arts District environment. All signs will be illuminated, but should have
minimal impact on adjacent uses. Signage will be reviewed Ior consistency with applicable
codes at the time oI sign permit submittal.

StaII supports the mixed-use concept at this location, the proposed height and commercial and
residential densities; thereIore staII recommends approval, with conditions oI both applications.


FINDINGS (SUP-55715)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The Mixed-Use project can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible
with surrounding land uses and conIorms to the established pattern set Iorth by the
Downtown Centennial Plan and existing nearby properties.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The proposed site is ideal Ior a Mixed-Use development and its` location in the 18b Arts
District and adjacent to a major mass transit stop allows Ior compatibility with the
surrounding area.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The two Irontage streets are adequate in size Ior a Mixed-Use development and the
existing alley will allow Ior ingress and egress to the parking garage.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Staff Report Page Nine
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Approval oI a Special Use Permit Ior a Mixed-Use development is consistent with the Las
Vegas 2020 Master Plan Policy 1.1.3, which encourages new market rate, multi-unit
Mixed-Use residential development on vacant or underutilized sites, with ground Iloor
commercial components included where appropriate. The public health, saIety and
welIare will be protected through permitting and inspection processes.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Mixed-Use Development complies with all Title 19.12 minimum Special
Use Permit requirements.


FINDINGS (SDR-55716)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the Planning
Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The proposed Mixed-Use development is compatible with adjacent and nearby
development. The project is designed to take advantage oI the adjacent Bus Rapid Transit
Station and the 18b Arts District location.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is in conIormance with the Downtown Centennial Plan. The
modern design oI the building and the earth tone materials are compatible with the
adjacent developments in the area.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;

The two Irontage streets are adequate in size Ior a Mixed-Use development and the
existing alley will allow Ior ingress and egress to the parking garage.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

Building materials are appropriate Ior the Downtown area.
SUP-55715 AND SDR-55716 PR1-55636]
YK

Staff Report Page Ten
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

The proposed building elevations and design characteristics are compatible with
development in the Downtown area. The blank Iacades Iound on the north and a portion
oI the east is due to the automated parking garage proposed with the project. RelieI is
provide by a checkered-type pattern created with paint colors.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

Development is subject to permitting and inspections, thereby securing the public health,
saIety and welIare.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 30


NOTICES MAILED 397


APPROVALS 1


PROTESTS 2
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL INTEREST
Case Number: APN :
Name of Property Owner:
Name of Applicant
Name of Representative:
To the best of your knowledge, does the Mayor or any member of the City Council or
Planning Commission have any financial interest in this or any other property with the
property owner, applicant, the property owner or general or limited partners, or
an officer of their corporation or limited liability company?
If yes, please indicate the member of the City Council or Commission who is
involved and list the of the person or persons with whom the City Official holds
an interest. Also list the Assessor's Parcel Number if the property in which the interest is
held is different the case parcel.
City Official:
APN:
Signature of Property Owner:
Subscribed and sworn before me
Notary Public in and for County and State
KASYANCHUK
NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW
No.
In
September
Revised - 14-06 of Financial
September
of Financial
08/21/14
PRJ-55636
SUP-55715
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/26/2014 8:11:50 AM
Applicant Email: barnetlib1@gmail.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Goodell
Rep First Name: Kristen
Applicant State: New York
Applicant Phone: (212)243-1320
Applicant Zip: 10014
Rep Address: 1200 South 4th Street, Suite 206
Rep Email: kristen@aptusarchitecture.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: (702)839-1200
Rep Zip: 89104
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13934410056, 13934410057, 13934410058, 13934410059
Project Name THE ROYALE AT CASINO CENTER
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN), WARD 3 (BOB COFFIN), WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Application Number: PRJ-55636
Applicant City: New York
ProjectAddress (Location): 919 CASINO CENTER
Application/Petition For: SUP and SDR
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Barnet
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 421 Hudson Street
Applicant Last Name: Liberman
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SUP-55715 & SDR-55716
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/26/2014 8:11:50 AM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
LEAH PROPERTY L L C 801 MADISON AVE 4TH FLR NEW YORK, NY 10065
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Kristen Neuman APTUS Project Architect kristen@aptusgroup.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
SUP-55715 & SDR-55716
/Volumes/Projects/06.1 77.7Aquarius-Royale/06.1 77.7.1 /DWGS/06.1 77.7.1 Aquarius-Coolidge 40' bay.pln; 8/27/1 4; 1 1 :42 AM; Frances Grob
S
D
R
0
1

S
I
T
E

/

G
R
O
U
N
D

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
S
u
b
m
it
t
a
l
0
8
.2
1
.1
4

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
R
e
v
is
io
n
s

0
8
.2
7
.1
4

0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1

T
h
e
R
o
y
a
le
a
t
C
a
s
in
o
C
e
n
t
e
r

T
h
e

R
o
y
a
l
e

a
t

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

S
i
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

R
e
v
i
e
w

9
1
9
-
9
3
1

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
1

C
o
p
y
rig
h
t
2
0
1
4

b
y
A
P
T
U
S

1
2
0
0
S
o
u
th
4
th
S
tre
e
t

S
u
ite
2
0
6

L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
, N
e
v
a
d
a
8
9
1
0
4

P
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
0
0

F
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
1
3

A
P
T
U
S

0
'
8
'
1
6
'
3
2
'
n o r t h
1 0 ' - 0 "
5 ' - 0 "
1
0
'-0
"
5
'-0
"
E
X
I S
T
IN
G
A
L
L
E
Y

4 0 ' - 0 "
4
0
' -0
"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E

S
ID
E
W
A
L
K

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
U
R
B

&
G
U
T
T
E
R

N
E
W
A
L
L
E
Y

P
A
V
IN
G
, S
E
E

D
E
T
A
IL
A
T
R
IG
H
T

D
E
S
I G
N
A
T
E
D

H
A
N
D
IC
A
P
P
E
D

L
A
N
E
C
IT
Y

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

L
IG
H
T
P
O
L
E
S
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

C
IT
Y

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

B
E
N
C
H
A
N
D

T
R
A
S
H
B
IN
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

C
IT
Y

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

L
IG
H
T
P
O
L
E
S
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

C
IT
Y

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

B
E
N
C
H
A
N
D

T
R
A
S
H
B
IN
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

N
V
E
N
E
R
G
Y

P
O
W
E
R
P
O
L
E

T
O
R
E
M
A
IN
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I N
E
=
1
4
0
' - 0
"
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I N
E
=
1
4
0
'-0
"
P
R
O
P E R
T Y L I N E = 2 0 0 ' - 0 "
V
E
S
T
.
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
E
D

P
A
R
K
I N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I A
L

C
A
S
I
N
O

C
E
N
T
E
R

B
L
V
D
.

( 8
0
' - 0
" R
. O
. W
. )
C
O
O
L
I
D
G
E

A
V
E
.
(
8
0
'-
0
"

R
.
O
.
W
.
)

C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I A
L

F
IR
E
C
O
M
M
A
N
D

C
E
N
T
E
R
F
I R
E
W
A
T
E
R

S
T
O
R
A
G
E
T
A
N
K
F
I R
E
P
U
M
P
R
O
O
M

T
R
A
S
H
R
O
O
M

T
E
L
E
/
D
A
T
A
G
E
N
E
R
A
T
O
R

E
L
E
C
.
A M E N I T Y Z O N E
S I D E W A L K
A
M
E
N
IT
Y

Z
O
N
E

S
I D
E
W
A
L
K

C
U
R
B
C
U
T
P U B L I C A L L E Y 2 -
W
A Y
V
E
H
IC
L
E
P
I C
K
- U
P

A
R
E
A
V
E
H
I C
L
E

S
T
A
G
I N
G

A
R
E
A
B
L
D
G
. S
U
P
P
O
R
T

D
I S
P
L
A
Y

L
O
A
D
I N
G
Z
O
N
E

O
F
F
IC
E

L
O
B
B
Y
R
E
S
I D
E
N
T
I A
L

L
O
B
B
Y
B
U
I L
D
I N
G

S
U
P
P
O
R
T
D
O
C
K

WARM SPRINGS
L
A S V E G A S B L V D
SAHARA
VEGAS VALLEY
CHARLESTON
U S 95
U
.P.R. R.
WARM SPRINGS
R I D G E P K W Y
P E C O S
S T E P H A N I E
G
R E E N V A L L E Y
I N T E R N A T I O N A L
A I R P O R T
D E C A T U R
M A R Y L A N D
WINDMILL
I - 1 5
G
O ME R SUNSET
WINDMILL
PEBBLE
L A S V E G A S B L V D
U . P . R . R .
V A L L E Y V I E W
E A S T E R N
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
W
IGW A M
S
ILV E R A D O S T R O S E
HENDERSON
R
A N C H
S
E R EN E
PEBBLE
I 215
E A S T E R N
G R E E N V A L L E Y
H
O R I Z O N
P A S E O V E R D E
V A L L E V E R D E
CENTENNIAL
A
NN
GRAND TETON
F O R T A P A C H E
H I L L S C E N T E R
H U A L A P A IH U A L A P A I
RUSSELL
TROPICANA
T O W N C E N T E R
CHEYENNE
ALEXANDER
CRAIG
T E N A Y A
D E C A T U R
L A S V E G A S
R A M P A R T
W
AS HI N G TO N
U S 9 5
T E N A Y A
DESERT INN
FLAMINGO
D U R A N G O
B U F F A L O
R A I N B O W
SAHARA
A N T E L O P E
I - 1 5
V A L L E Y V I E W
A R V I L L E
J O N E S
I N D U S T R I A L
PENNWOOD
R A N C H O
E
L KH O R N
LONE MOUNTAIN
VEGAS
L
A KE M EA D B L VD
R A I N B O W
D
ELWEBB D U R A N G O
T E N A Y A
B U F F A L O
U S 9 5
U S 9 5
R A N C H O
S
M O KE R A N CH
NLV AIRPORT
J O N E S
A L L E N
P E C O S
FLAMINGO
T
RO P ICA N A
R
USSEL L B OUL DE R HWY
TWAIN
DESERT INN
M A R Y L A N D
SANDS
PA R A DIS E B L V D .
U
. P . R . R .
I - 1 5
P K W Y .
E A S T E R N
C A B A N A
M O U N T A I N V I S T A
STEWART
BONANZA
WASHINGTON
L A M B
CENTENNIAL
A
LEX AN DER
ANN
CHEYENNE
CAREY
M A R T I N L . K I N G
C O M M E R C E
B R U C E
CRAIG
L A M B
OWENS
N E L L I S
U
. P . R . R .
D U R A N G O
R A I N B O W
B U F F A L O
J O N E S
L A K E M E A D D R
WARM SPRINGS
WAGON WHEEL
HORIZON
B A S I C
U S 9 5
G I B S O N
I 2 1 5
SUNSET
B
OULD ER H W Y
D
A W S O N
R A C E T R A C K
M A J O R
U.P.R.R.
I - 1 5
H O L L Y W O O D B R OA D B EN T
L A K E M E A D B L V D
NELLIS
AIR FORCE
BASE
M C L E O D
S
I
T
E

C
A S I N O C E N T E R B L V D .
S
IT
E

C
O
O
L
ID
G
E
A
V
E
.
3
R D S T R E E T
H
O
O
V
E
R
A
V
E
.
S
i
t
e

Z
o
n
i
n
g

&

D
a
t
a

S
I
T
E

D
A
T
A

P
A
R
C
E
L
N
U
M
B
E
R

J
U
R
IS
D
IC
T
IO
N

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
P
L
A
N

O
V
E
R
L
A
Y
Z
O
N
E
S

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
Z
O
N
IN
G

S
IT
E
A
R
E
A

S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
- (B
U
IL
D
IN
G
)

R
E
Q
'D

P
R
O
V
ID
E
D

F
R
O
N
T

0
'-0
"
0
'-0
"
IN
T
E
R
IO
R
S
ID
E

0
'-0
"
0
'-0
"
S
ID
E
S
T
R
E
E
T

0
'-0
"
0
'-0
"
R
E
A
R

0
'-0
"
0
'-0
"
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
IA
L
S
P
A
C
E

O
F
F
IC
E
S
P
A
C
E

P
A
R
K
IN
G
S
P
A
C
E
S

1
3
9
-3
4
-4
1
0
-0
5
6

1
3
9
-3
4
-4
1
0
-0
5
7

1
3
9
-3
4
-4
1
0
-0
5
8

1
3
9
-3
4
-4
1
0
-0
5
9

C
IT
Y
O
F
L
A
S
V
E
G
A
S
- 8
9
1
0
1

M
X
U

C
E
N
T
E
N
N
IA
L
P
L
A
N
/ A
R
T
S
D
IS
T
R
IC
T

C
-2

2
8
,0
0
0
N
S
F

.6
4
N
E
T
A
C
R
E
S

1
6
,0
0
0
S
F

1
8
,5
0
0
S
F

3
2
0

R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

U
N
I
T

D
A
T
A

O
N
E
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

T
W
O
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

T
O
T
A
L

1
4
8

1
3
3

2
8
1

G
R
O
U
N
D

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

V
I
C
I
N
I
T
Y

&

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N

M
A
P
S

n o r t h
SSSSS
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
SSSSSSSSSSSS
IIIIIIIIII
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
EEEEEEEEEEEEEE
////////
GGGGGGGGGG
RRRRRRRR
OOOOOOOOO
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
NNNNNNNNN
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1
0
9
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
3
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
1
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
1
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
/Volumes/Projects/06.1 77.7Aquarius-Royale/06.1 77.7.1 /DWGS/06.1 77.7.1 Aquarius-Coolidge 40' bay.pln; 8/27/1 4; 1 1 :42 AM; Frances Grob
S
D
R
0
2

L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E

P
L
A
N

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
S
u
b
m
it
t
a
l
0
8
.2
1
.1
4

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
R
e
v
is
io
n
s

0
8
.2
7
.1
4

0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1

T
h
e
R
o
y
a
le
a
t
C
a
s
in
o
C
e
n
t
e
r

T
h
e

R
o
y
a
l
e

a
t

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

S
i
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

R
e
v
i
e
w

9
1
9
-
9
3
1

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
1

C
o
p
y
rig
h
t
2
0
1
4

b
y
A
P
T
U
S

1
2
0
0
S
o
u
th
4
th
S
tre
e
t

S
u
ite
2
0
6

L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
, N
e
v
a
d
a
8
9
1
0
4

P
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
0
0

F
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
1
3

A
P
T
U
S

0
'
8
'
1
6
'
3
2
'
n o r t h
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E

S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E

S
IZ
E

R
O
C
K
M
U
L
C
H

3
/8
" C
R
U
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
N
IT
E

T
R
E
E
S

H
O
N
E
Y
L
O
C
U
S
T

S
H
O
E
S
T
R
IN
G
A
C
A
C
IA

D
A
T
E
P
A
L
M

S
O
U
T
H
E
R
N
L
IV
E
O
A
K

S
Y
M
B
O
L

S
IZ
E

C
O
M
M
O
N
N
A
M
E

B
O
T
A
N
IC
A
L
N
A
M
E

M
IN
. 2
" D
E
E
P

C
O
L
O
R

D
E
P
T
H

p
ro
s
o
p
is

a
c
a
c
ia
s
te
n
o
p
h
y
lla

- a
c
a
ia
s
te
n
o
p
h
y
lla

2
4
" B
o
x

2
4
" B
o
x

2
5
' H
ig
h

3
6
" B
o
x

T
O
B
E
S
E
L
E
C
T
E
D
B
Y

A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
F
R
O
M

M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
S
S
T
D

T R E E S @
3 0 ' - 0 " O
. C .
T
R
E
E
S
@
2
0
'- 0
" O
. C
.
3
5
'- 0
"
3 5 ' - 0 "
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E

S
ID
E
W
A
L
K

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
U
R
B

&
G
U
T
T
E
R

N
E
W
A
L
L
E
Y

P
A
V
IN
G
, S
E
E

D
E
T
A
IL
A
T
R
IG
H
T

5
'x
5
' T
R
E
E

W
E
L
L
, T
Y
P
.
S
T
A
M
P
E
D

C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E

D
E
S
I G
N
A
T
E
D

H
A
N
D
IC
A
P
P
E
D

L
A
N
E

C
IT
Y

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

L
IG
H
T
P
O
L
E
S
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

C
IT
Y

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

B
E
N
C
H
A
N
D

T
R
A
S
H
B
IN
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

C
IT
Y

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

L
IG
H
T
P
O
L
E
S
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

C
IT
Y

S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

B
E
N
C
H
A
N
D

T
R
A
S
H
B
IN
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

N
V
E
N
E
R
G
Y

P
O
W
E
R
P
O
L
E

T
O
R
E
M
A
IN
,
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I N
E
=
1
4
0
' - 0
"
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I N
E
=
1
4
0
' -0
"
P R O
P E R T Y L I N E = 2 0 0 ' - 0 "
V
E
S
T
.
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
E
D

P
A
R
K
I N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I A
L

C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I A
L

F
I R
E
C
O
M
M
A
N
D

C
E
N
T
E
R
F
I R
E
W
A
T
E
R

S
T
O
R
A
G
E
T
A
N
K
F
I R
E
P
U
M
P
R
O
O
M

T
R
A
S
H
R
O
O
M

T
E
L
E
/

D
A
T
A
G
E
N
E
R
A
T
O
R

E
L
E
C
.
P U B L I C A L L E Y 2 -
W
A Y
V
E
H
IC
L
E
P
I C
K
- U
P

A
R
E
A
V
E
H
I C
L
E

S
T
A
G
IN
G

A
R
E
A

B
L
D
G
. S
U
P
P
O
R
T

D
I S
P
L
A
Y

L
O
A
D
I N
G
Z
O
N
E

O
F
F
I C
E

L
O
B
B
Y
R
E
S
I D
E
N
T
I A
L

L
O
B
B
Y
B
U
I L
D
I N
G

S
U
P
P
O
R
T
D
O
C
K

L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E

P
L
A
N

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

SSSSS
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1
0
9
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
3
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
1
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
1
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
/Volumes/Projects/06.1 77.7Aquarius-Royale/06.1 77.7.1 /DWGS/06.1 77.7.1 Aquarius-Coolidge 40' bay.pln; 8/27/1 4; 1 1 :42 AM; Frances Grob
S
D
R
0
3

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
S
u
b
m
it
t
a
l
0
8
.2
1
.1
4

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
R
e
v
is
io
n
s

0
8
.2
7
.1
4

0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1

T
h
e
R
o
y
a
le
a
t
C
a
s
in
o
C
e
n
t
e
r

T
h
e

R
o
y
a
l
e

a
t

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

S
i
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

R
e
v
i
e
w

9
1
9
-
9
3
1

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
1

C
o
p
y
rig
h
t
2
0
1
4

b
y
A
P
T
U
S

1
2
0
0
S
o
u
th
4
th
S
tre
e
t

S
u
ite
2
0
6

L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
, N
e
v
a
d
a
8
9
1
0
4

P
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
0
0

F
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
1
3

A
P
T
U
S

0
'
8
'
1
6
'
3
2
'
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
4
0 ' - 0 "
4 0 ' - 0 "
4 0 ' - 0 "
4
0
'-0
"
6
'- 0
"
4
0
'-0
"
4
0
'- 0
"
B
L
D
G

S
U
P
P
O
R
T

L
A
U
N
D
R
Y

S
T
O
R
A
G
E
L
O
C
K
E
R
S

T
R
A
S
H

U
N
I T
D

U
N I T C
U N I T A
F
IT
N
E
S
S

R
O
O
M
C
O
M
M
U
N
I T
Y

R
O
O
M
P R O P E R T Y L I N E = 2 0 0 ' - 0 "
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
E
D

P
A
R
K
I N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D

P
O
O
L

U
N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U
N
I T
B

U
N
I T
A

U
N
I T
B

U
N
I T
A

n o r t h
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I N
E
=
1
4
0
' - 0
"
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
IN
E
=
14
0
' -0
"
P R O P E R T Y L I N E = 2 0 0 ' - 0 "
B
U
IL
D
I N
G

S
U
P
P
O
R
T
W
O
M
E
N
S

M
E
N
S

JA
N
.
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
E
D

P
A
R
K
IN
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

O
F
F
I C
E

O
F
F
I C
E

O
F
F
I C
E

C
A
S
I
N
O

C
E
N
T
E
R

B
L
V
D
.

( 8
0
' - 0
" R
. O
. W
. )
C
O
O
L
I
D
G
E

A
V
E
.
(
8
0
'-
0
"

R
.
O
.
W
.
)

T
H
I
R
D

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

S
E
C
O
N
D

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

SSSSS
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
TTTTTTTT
YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
PPPPPPPPP
IIIIIIIII
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1
0
9
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
3
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
1
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
1
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
/Volumes/Projects/06.1 77.7Aquarius-Royale/06.1 77.7.1 /DWGS/06.1 77.7.1 Aquarius-Coolidge 40' bay.pln; 8/21 /1 4; 1 2:48 PM; Frances Grob
S
D
R
0
4

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
S
u
b
m
it
t
a
l 0
8
.2
1
.1
4

0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1

T
h
e
R
o
y
a
le
a
t
C
a
s
in
o
C
e
n
t
e
r

T
h
e

R
o
y
a
l
e

a
t

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

S
i
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

R
e
v
i
e
w

9
1
9
-
9
3
1

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
1

C
o
p
y
rig
h
t
2
0
1
4

b
y
A
P
T
U
S

1
2
0
0
S
o
u
th
4
th
S
tre
e
t

S
u
ite
2
0
6

L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
, N
e
v
a
d
a
8
9
1
0
4

P
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
0
0

F
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
1
3

A
P
T
U
S

0
'
8
'
1
6
'
3
2
'
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
U
N I T F
U N I T E
U N I T C
U N I T A
R
O
O
F
O
F

A
U
T
O
M
A
T
E
D

P
A
R
K
I N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

B
E
L
O
W
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U
N
I T
B

U
N
I T
A

U
N
I T
B

U
N
I T
A

U
N
I T
D

n o r t h
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
U N I T F
U N I T E
U N I T C
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U N I T B
U N I T A
U
N
I T
B

U
N
I T
A

U
N
I T
B

U
N
I T
A

U
N
I T
D

F
L
O
O
R
S
: 4
-
1
0

F
L
O
O
R
S
: 1
1
-
1
7

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

A
B
O
V
E

G
A
R
A
G
E

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

F
L
O
O
R

P
L
A
N

W
/

G
A
R
A
G
E

SSSSS
DDDDDDDDDDD
TTTTTT
YYYYYYYYYYYY
PPPPPPPPP
IIIIIIIII
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
3
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
1
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
1
6
/Volumes/Projects/06.1 77.7Aquarius-Royale/06.1 77.7.1 /DWGS/06.1 77.7.1 Aquarius-Coolidge 40' bay.pln; 8/27/1 4; 1 1 :42 AM; Frances Grob
S
D
R
0
5

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

U
N
I
T

P
L
A
N
S

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
S
u
b
m
it
t
a
l
0
8
.2
1
.1
4

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
R
e
v
is
io
n
s

0
8
.2
7
.1
4

0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1

T
h
e
R
o
y
a
le
a
t
C
a
s
in
o
C
e
n
t
e
r

T
h
e

R
o
y
a
l
e

a
t

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

S
i
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

R
e
v
i
e
w

9
1
9
-
9
3
1

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
1

C
o
p
y
rig
h
t
2
0
1
4

b
y
A
P
T
U
S

1
2
0
0
S
o
u
th
4
th
S
tre
e
t

S
u
ite
2
0
6

L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
, N
e
v
a
d
a
8
9
1
0
4

P
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
0
0

F
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
1
3

A
P
T
U
S

R
R

U N I T B U N I T A
U
N
IT
B

U
N
IT
A

U N I T E
R
R

U N I T C
R

U N I T A
R
A

U
N
IT
D

R
R

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

U
N
I
T

P
L
A
N

E

1
/
8
"

=

1
'-
0
"

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

U
N
I
T

P
L
A
N

A
/
B

1
/
8
"

=

1
'-
0
"

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

U
N
I
T

P
L
A
N

C

1
/
8
"

=

1
'-
0
"

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

U
N
I
T

P
L
A
N

F

1
/
8
"

=

1
'-
0
"

T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

U
N
I
T

P
L
A
N

D

1
/
8
"

=

1
'-
0
"

O
P
T
I
O
N
A
L

U
N
I
T

B

W
I
T
H

1
/
2

B
A
T
H

1
/
8
"

=

1
'-
0
"

U
N
I
T

B
R
E
A
K
D
O
W
N
:

U
N
IT
A
: 8
P
E
R
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
4
F
L
O
O
R
S
+
7
3
R
D
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
F
L
O
O
R

=
1
1
9
U
N
IT
S
(
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
)

U
N
IT
B
: 7
P
E
R
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
4
F
L
O
O
R
S
+
6
3
R
D
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
F
L
O
O
R

=
1
0
4
U
N
IT
S
(
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
)

U
N
IT
C
: 1
P
E
R
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
4
F
L
O
O
R
S
+
1
3
R
D
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
F
L
O
O
R

=
1
5
U
N
IT
S
(
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
)

U
N
IT
D
: 1
P
E
R
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
4
F
L
O
O
R
S
+
1
3
R
D
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
F
L
O
O
R

=
1
5
U
N
IT
S
(
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
)

U
N
IT
E
: 1
P
E
R
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
4
F
L
O
O
R
S

=
1
4
U
N
IT
S
(
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
)

U
N
IT
F
: 1
P
E
R
F
L
O
O
R
x
1
4
F
L
O
O
R
S

=
1
4
U
N
IT
S
(
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
)

=
2
8
1
U
N
IT
S
T
O
T
A
L

(
1
4
8
)
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
IT
S

(
1
3
3
)
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
IT
S

U
N
IT
C

2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

N
E
T
: 9
4
2
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
S
A
B
L
E
: 1
,0
1
5
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
N
IT
A

1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

N
E
T
: 6
7
6
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
S
A
B
L
E
: 7
3
6
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
N
IT
B

2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

N
E
T
: 8
1
4
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
S
A
B
L
E
: 8
8
4
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
N
IT
E

1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

N
E
T
: 6
7
6
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
S
A
B
L
E
: 7
2
1
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
N
IT
F

1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

N
E
T
: 8
1
7
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
S
A
B
L
E
: 8
8
1
S
Q
. F
T
.
E
X
P
L
A
I
N
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

S
Q
U
A
R
E

F
O
O
T
A
G
E

C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
:

N
E
T
S
Q
. F
T
: M
E
A
S
U
R
E
D
P
E
R
IM
E
T
E
R
A
L
O
N
G
IN
T
E
R
IO
R
F
A
C
E
O
F
D
E
M
IS
IN
G
/C
O
R
R
ID
O
R



&
E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
W
A
L
L
S
.

U
S
A
B
L
E
S
Q
. F
T
: M
E
A
S
U
R
E
D
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
O
F
A
L
L
C
O
R
R
ID
O
R
, D
E
M
IS
IN
G
&
O
U
T
S
ID
E
F
A
C
E
O
F



E
X
T
E
R
IO
R
W
A
L
L
S
.
U
N
IT
D

1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

N
E
T
: 7
9
4
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
S
A
B
L
E
: 8
6
0
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
N
IT
B

2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M

N
E
T
: 8
1
4
S
Q
. F
T
.
U
S
A
B
L
E
: 8
8
4
S
Q
. F
T
.
SSSSS
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
YYYYYYYYY
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
CCCCCCCCCCCCC
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1
1
/
8
"
=
1
'-
0
"
0
9
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
3
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
1
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
1
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
/Volumes/Projects/06.1 77.7Aquarius-Royale/06.1 77.7.1 /DWGS/06.1 77.7.1 Aquarius-Coolidge 40' bay.pln; 8/27/1 4; 1 1 :42 AM; Frances Grob
S
D
R
0
6

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
S
u
b
m
it
t
a
l
0
8
.2
1
.1
4

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
R
e
v
is
io
n
s

0
8
.2
7
.1
4

0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1

T
h
e
R
o
y
a
le
a
t
C
a
s
in
o
C
e
n
t
e
r

T
h
e

R
o
y
a
l
e

a
t

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

S
i
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

R
e
v
i
e
w

9
1
9
-
9
3
1

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
1

C
o
p
y
rig
h
t
2
0
1
4

b
y
A
P
T
U
S

1
2
0
0
S
o
u
th
4
th
S
tre
e
t

S
u
ite
2
0
6

L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
, N
e
v
a
d
a
8
9
1
0
4

P
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
0
0

F
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
1
3

A
P
T
U
S

L
O
W
-E
T
IN
T
E
D

IN
S
U
L
A
T
E
D

G
L
A
Z
IN
G

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
R
N
IC
E

A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
U
R
A
L

M
E
T
A
L
L
IG
H
T

S
H
E
L
F

C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
P
R
E
C
A
S
T

P
A
N
E
L
S
, IN
T
E
G
R
A
L

C
O
L
O
R

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS

A
W
N
IN
G

L
O
W
E
T
IN
T
E
D
,
IN
S
U
L
A
T
E
D
G
L
A
Z
IN
G
IN

A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T

IL
L
U
M
IN
A
T
E
D
W
A
L
L
S
IG
N
A
G
E
,
3
' x
1
8
' =
5
4
S
F
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS

E
IG
H
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

8
5
'-0
"
G
R
O
U
N
D
L
E
V
E
L

0
'-0
"
N
IN
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

9
5
'-0
"
S
E
C
O
N
D
L
E
V
E
L

2
0
'-0
"
T
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
0
5
'-0
"
T
H
IR
D
L
E
V
E
L

3
5
'-0
"
F
O
U
R
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

4
5
'-0
"
F
IF
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

5
5
'-0
"
S
IX
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

6
5
'-0
"
S
E
V
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

7
5
'-0
"
E
L
E
V
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
5
'-0
"
T
W
E
L
F
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
5
'-0
"
T
H
IR
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
5
'-0
"
F
O
U
R
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
5
'-0
"
F
IF
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
5
'-0
"
S
IX
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
5
'-0
"
2
0
0
'-0
"
S
E
V
E
N
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
7
5
'-0
"
L
O
W
-E
T
IN
T
E
D

IN
S
U
L
A
T
E
D

G
L
A
Z
IN
G

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
R
N
IC
E

A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
U
R
A
L

M
E
T
A
L
L
IG
H
T

S
H
E
L
F

C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
P
R
E
C
A
S
T

P
A
N
E
L
S
, IN
T
E
G
R
A
L

C
O
L
O
R

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS

A
W
N
IN
G

IL
L
U
M
IN
A
T
E
D

W
A
L
L
S
IG
N
A
G
E

3
' x
2
4
' =
7
2
S
F

L
O
W
E
T
IN
T
E
D
,
IN
S
U
L
A
T
E
D
G
L
A
Z
IN
G
IN

A
L
U
M
IN
U
M
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T

IL
L
U
M
IN
A
T
E
D
W
A
L
L
S
IG
N
A
G
E
,
3
' x
1
8
' =
5
4
S
F
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS

G
R
O
U
N
D
L
E
V
E
L

0
'-0
"
S
E
C
O
N
D
L
E
V
E
L

2
0
'-0
"
2
0
0
'-0
"
E
IG
H
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

8
5
'-0
"
N
IN
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

9
5
'-0
"
T
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
0
5
'-0
"
T
H
IR
D
L
E
V
E
L

3
5
'-0
"
F
O
U
R
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

4
5
'-0
"
F
IF
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

5
5
'-0
"
S
IX
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

6
5
'-0
"
S
E
V
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

7
5
'-0
"
E
L
E
V
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
5
'-0
"
T
W
E
L
F
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
5
'-0
"
T
H
IR
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
5
'-0
"
F
O
U
R
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
5
'-0
"
F
IF
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
5
'-0
"
S
IX
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
5
'-0
"
S
E
V
E
N
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
7
5
'-0
"
W
E
S
T

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

S
O
U
T
H

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

SSSSS
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
BBBBBBBB
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
IIIIIIIII
LLLLLLLLLLLLLL
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
IIIIIIIII
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1
0
9
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
3
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
1
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
1
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
/Volumes/Projects/06.1 77.7Aquarius-Royale/06.1 77.7.1 /DWGS/06.1 77.7.1 Aquarius-Coolidge 40' bay.pln; 8/27/1 4; 1 1 :42 AM; Frances Grob
S
D
R
0
7

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
S
u
b
m
it
t
a
l
0
8
.2
1
.1
4

C
it
y
o
f L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
S
D
R
, S
U
P
R
e
v
is
io
n
s

0
8
.2
7
.1
4

0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1

T
h
e
R
o
y
a
le
a
t
C
a
s
in
o
C
e
n
t
e
r

T
h
e

R
o
y
a
l
e

a
t

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

S
i
t
e

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

R
e
v
i
e
w

9
1
9
-
9
3
1

C
a
s
i
n
o

C
e
n
t
e
r

B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d

L
a
s

V
e
g
a
s
,

N
e
v
a
d
a

8
9
1
0
1

C
o
p
y
rig
h
t
2
0
1
4

b
y
A
P
T
U
S

1
2
0
0
S
o
u
th
4
th
S
tre
e
t

S
u
ite
2
0
6

L
a
s
V
e
g
a
s
, N
e
v
a
d
a
8
9
1
0
4

P
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
0
0

F
7
0
2
.8
3
9
.1
2
1
3

A
P
T
U
S

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS

IL
L
U
M
IN
A
T
E
D
S
IG
N
A
G
E
O
N

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS
,
2
' x
1
2
' =
2
4
S
F
T
Y
P
IC
A
L

E
IG
H
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

8
5
'-0
"
N
IN
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

9
5
'-0
"
T
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
0
5
'-0
"
T
H
IR
D
L
E
V
E
L

3
5
'-0
"
F
O
U
R
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

4
5
'-0
"
F
IF
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

5
5
'-0
"
S
IX
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

6
5
'-0
"
S
E
V
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

7
5
'-0
"
E
L
E
V
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
5
'-0
"
T
W
E
L
F
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
5
'-0
"
T
H
IR
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
5
'-0
"
F
O
U
R
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
5
'-0
"
F
IF
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
5
'-0
"
S
IX
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
5
'-0
"
S
E
V
E
N
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
7
5
'-0
"
L
O
W
-E
T
IN
T
E
D

IN
S
U
L
A
T
E
D

G
L
A
Z
IN
G

G
L
A
S
S
R
A
IL
IN
G

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
R
N
IC
E

A
R
C
H
IT
E
C
T
U
R
A
L

M
E
T
A
L
L
IG
H
T

S
H
E
L
F

C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
P
R
E
C
A
S
T

P
A
N
E
L
S
, IN
T
E
G
R
A
L

C
O
L
O
R

G
R
O
U
N
D
L
E
V
E
L

0
'-0
"
S
E
C
O
N
D
L
E
V
E
L

2
0
'-0
"
2
0
0
'-0
"
L
O
W
-E
T
IN
T
E
D

IN
S
U
L
A
T
E
D

G
L
A
Z
IN
G

M
E
T
A
L
C
O
R
N
IC
E

C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
P
R
E
C
A
S
T

P
A
N
E
L
S
, IN
T
E
G
R
A
L

C
O
L
O
R

M
E
T
A
L
T
R
E
L
L
IS

G
R
O
U
N
D
L
E
V
E
L

0
'-0
"
S
E
C
O
N
D
L
E
V
E
L

2
0
'-0
"
2
0
0
'-0
"
E
IG
H
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

8
5
'-0
"
N
IN
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

9
5
'-0
"
T
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
0
5
'-0
"
T
H
IR
D
L
E
V
E
L

3
5
'-0
"
F
O
U
R
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

4
5
'-0
"
F
IF
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

5
5
'-0
"
S
IX
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

6
5
'-0
"
S
E
V
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

7
5
'-0
"
E
L
E
V
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
1
5
'-0
"
T
W
E
L
F
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
2
5
'-0
"
T
H
IR
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
3
5
'-0
"
F
O
U
R
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
4
5
'-0
"
F
IF
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
5
5
'-0
"
S
IX
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
6
5
'-0
"
S
E
V
E
N
T
E
E
N
T
H
L
E
V
E
L

1
7
5
'-0
"
E
A
S
T

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

N
O
R
T
H

E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N

1
/
1
6
"
=

1
'-
0
"

SSSSS
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
BBBBBBBB
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
IIIIIIIII
LLLLLLLLLLLLLL
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
IIIIIIIII
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
0
6
.1
7
7
.7
.1
0
9
/
0
2
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
3
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
1
5

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
1
6

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
08/21/14
PRJ-55636
SUP-55715 & SDR-55716
S
U
P
-

7
1


[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
1


-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
P
N
E
T

L
I

E
P
M
A
N

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

L
E
A
H

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
Y


L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
A
S
I
N
O

C
E
N
T
E
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

A
N
D

C
O
O
L
I
D
S
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
1


[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
1


-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
P
N
E
T

L
I

E
P
M
A
N

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

L
E
A
H

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
Y


L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
A
S
I
N
O

C
E
N
T
E
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

A
N
D

C
O
O
L
I
D
S
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
1


[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
1


-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
P
N
E
T

L
I

E
P
M
A
N

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

L
E
A
H

P
P
O
P
E
P
T
Y


L
L
C

N
O
P
T
H
E
A
S
T

C
O
P
N
E
P

O
F

C
A
S
I
N
O

C
E
N
T
E
P

O
U
L
E
V
A
P
D

A
N
D

C
O
O
L
I
D
S
E

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


08/21/14
PRJ-55636
SUP-55715 & SDR-55716
08/21/14
PRJ-55636
SUP-55715 & SDR-55716


Agenda tem No.: 32.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SDR-55716 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-55715 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: BARNET LIBERMAN - OWNER: LEAH PROPERTY, LLC - For
possible action on a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 17-
STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING 34,500 SQUARE FEET OF
COMMERCIAL SPACE AND 281 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS on 0.64 acres at
the northeast corner oI Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue (APNs 139-34-410-056
through 059), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55636|. StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consoldiated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL INTEREST
Case Number: APN :
Name of Property Owner:
Name of Applicant
Name of Representative:
To the best of your knowledge, does the Mayor or any member of the City Council or
Planning Commission have any financial interest in this or any other property with the
property owner, applicant, the property owner or general or limited partners, or
an officer of their corporation or limited liability company?
If yes, please indicate the member of the City Council or Commission who is
involved and list the of the person or persons with whom the City Official holds
an interest. Also list the Assessor's Parcel Number if the property in which the interest is
held is different the case parcel.
City Official:
APN:
Signature of Property Owner:
Subscribed and sworn before me
Notary Public in and for County and State
KASYANCHUK
NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW
No.
In
September
Revised - 14-06 of Financial
September
of Financial
08/21/14
PRJ-55636
SDR-55716
SDR 55716
Barnet Liberman
NEC Casino Center Blvd & Coolidge Ave
Proposed 281unit multi-family residential development.
First Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
APARTMENT [DWELL] 281
6.65 1,869
AM Peak Hour 0.51 143
PM Peak Hour 0.62 174
Second Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF] 16
42.94 687
AM Peak Hour 1.00 16
PM Peak Hour 3.73 60
Third Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF] 18.5
11.01 204
AM Peak Hour 1.55 29
PM Peak Hour 1.49 28
Total Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
APARTMENT [DWELL] 281
15.43 2,760
AM Peak Hour 0.51 188
PM Peak Hour 0.62 262
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:
Casino Center Blvd.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,138
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 251
Coolidge Ave.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 425
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 34
Charleston Blvd.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 35,538
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 2,843
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Casino Center Blvd. 15,500
Coolidge Ave. 12,400
SDR-55716
Charleston Blvd. 31,700
This project will add approximately 2,760 trips per day on Casino Center Blvd., Coolidge Ave. and Charleston Blvd.
Casino Center is currently at about 20 percent of capacity, Coolidge is at about 3 percent of capacity and Charleston is
over capacity. With this project, Casino Center is expected to be at about 38 percent of capacity, Coolidge at about 26
percent of capacity and Charleston to remain over capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 262 additional cars, or about nine every two
minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

SDR-55716


Agenda tem No.: 33.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55733 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: QUEST
CHARTER SCHOOL - OWNER: WESTLAND ENTERPRISES, LLC - For possible action on a
request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE at 4500 North
Tenaya Way (APN 138-03-601-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-
55262|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-55733 and SDR-55724 |PRJ-55262|
2. Conditions and StaII Report - SUP-55733 and SDR-55724 |PRJ-55262|
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-55733 and SDR-55724 |PRJ-55262|
4. Photos - SUP-55733 and SDR-55724 |PRJ-55262|
5. JustiIication Letter - SUP-55733 and SDR-55724 |PRJ-55262|
6. Protest Postcards - SUP-55733 and SDR-55724 |PRJ-55262|
7. Withdrawal Request Letter - SUP-55733 and SDR-55724 |PRJ-55262|

SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: QUEST CHARTER SCHOOL - OWNER:
WESTLAND ENTERPRISES, LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55733 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SDR-55724
SDR-55724 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:


`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-55733 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Private School,
Primary use.

2. Approval oI and conIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-55724) shall be required.

3. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

5. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



SDk-55724 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. ConIormance to the Conditions oI Approval Ior the Plot Plan Review (Z-0105-93).

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conIormance with the building elevations date stamped
09/23/14; and site plan and landscape plan date stamped 09/09/14, except as amended by
conditions herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

5. Any proposed recreational Iield lighting must conIorm to Title 19.08.040 requirements.

6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit.

7. A Iully operational Iire protection system, including Iire apparatus roads, Iire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be Iunctioning prior to construction oI any
combustible structures.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City Departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

Public Works

9. In accordance with code requirements oI Title 13.56, remove all substandard oIIsite
improvements on Tenaya Way, iI any, and replace with new improvements meeting Current
City Standards concurrent with development oI this site. All existing paving damaged or
removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original
width concurrent with development oI this site.

10. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section oI the Department oI Fire Services to
discuss Iire requirements Ior this site.
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Conditions Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



11. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-oI-way adjacent to this site. All landscaping
and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as to
not create sight visibility obstructions Ior vehicular traIIic at all development access drives
and abutting street intersections.

12. A TraIIic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department oI Public
Works prior to the issuance oI any building or grading permits, or the submittal oI any
construction drawings. Comply with the recommendations oI the approved TraIIic Impact
Analysis prior to occupancy oI the site. The TraIIic Impact Analysis shall also include a
section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional
right-oI-way requirements Ior bus turnouts adjacent to this site, iI any; dedicate all areas
recommended by the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis. All additional rights-oI-way
required by Standard Drawing #201.1 Ior exclusive right turn lanes and dual leIt turn lanes
shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent with the commencement oI on-site development
activities unless speciIically noted as not required in the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis.
II additional rights-oI-way are not required and TraIIic Control devices are or may be
proposed at this site outside oI the public right-oI-way, all necessary easements Ior the
location and/or access oI such devices shall be granted prior to the issuance oI permits Ior
this site. Phased compliance will be allowed iI recommended by the approved TraIIic
Impact Analysis. No recommendation oI the approved TraIIic Impact Analysis, nor
compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modiIy or eliminate any condition oI approval
imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development oI this site.

13. Meet with the Flood Control Section oI the Department oI Public Works Ior assistance with
establishing Iinished Iloor elevations and drainage paths Ior this site prior to submittal oI
construction plans, the issuance oI any building or grading permits or the submittal oI a map
Ior this site, whichever may occur Iirst. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.



SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``


PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Major Amendment to a previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0105-
93) and Special Use Permit Ior a proposed 136,528 square-Ioot Private School, Primary use
located at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The applicant has proposed to add 59,167 square Ieet oI
interior Iloor space to the existing 77,361 square-Ioot building, re-stripe the parking lot, remodel
the Iaade oI the building and install a soccer Iield with playground equipment to the interior
courtyard on-site. The subject site is located within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district, which requires a Special Use Permit Ior a Private School, Primary use. This project is
compatible with surrounding single-Iamily residential and commercial development in the area;
thereIore, staII is recommends approval oI this project with conditions.


ISSUES

The Public or Private School, Primary use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.
The proposed 59,167 square-Ioot addition in Iloor space represents a 76 increase in
Iloor area Irom the previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0105-93) that approved a
77,361 square-Ioot building; thereIore requiring a Major Amendment.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
12/15/93


The City Council approved a request Ior Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-
0105-93) Irom N-U (Non-Urban) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) oI
approximately 22 acres generally located at the northeast corner oI Craig
Road and Tenaya Way Ior a proposed retail shopping center. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
11/10/97
The City Council denied a request oI an appeal oI a denial by the Planning
Commission Ior a Special Use Permit (U-0095-97) to allow an OII-Premise
Sign (Billboard) at 4500 North Tenaya Way.
01/11/99
The City Council withdrew an appeal oI a denial by the Planning Commission
Ior a request Ior a Special Use Permit (U-0134-98) to allow an OII-Premise
Sign (Billboard) at 4500 North Tenaya Way.
11/15/00
The City Council struck a request Ior an appeal oI a denial by the Planning
Commission Ior a Special Use Permit (U-0152-00) to allow an OII-Premise
Sign (billboard) at 4500 North Tenaya Way
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
01/09/03
The Planning Commission approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-1326) Ior an addition and remodel to an existing building on
9.88 acres adjacent to the northeast corner oI Craig Road and Tenaya Way.
The Planning Department recommended approval oI the request.
10/19/05
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-8697) Ior
a proposed building and landscape material/ lumber yard in an existing
building at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The Planning Commission and staII
recommended approval.
04/17/08
The City Council approved a request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-26774)
Ior a 35-Ioot tall, 14-Ioot by 48-Ioot OII-Premise Sign (Billboard) at 4510
North Tenaya Way. The Planning Commission and staII recommended
approval.
04/06/11
The City Council approved a request Ior a Required Review (RQR-40724) oI
a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-26774) Ior a 35-Ioot tall, 14-
Ioot by 48-Ioot OII-Premise Sign (Billboard) at 4510 North Tenaya Way. The
Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
08/17/11
The Department oI Planning denied a request Ior a Minor Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-42728) Ior the conversion oI a previously approved 14-
Ioot by 48-Ioot, 35-Ioot tall OII-Premise Sign (north Iacing side only) to a
Digital Display Unit (LED) at 4510 North Tenaya Way.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
06/29/11 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
09/28/94
A building permit (#94349835) was issued Ior on-site improvements at 4500
North Tenaya Way. The permit was Iinalized on 04/19/95.
01/25/95
A building permit (#95364842) was issued Ior a new building (Payless
Cashways) at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The permit was Iinalized on 03/10/95.
03/15/95
A building permit (#95370360) was issued Ior masonry walls at 4500 North
Tenaya Way. The permit was Iinalized on 04/28/95.
03/29/95
A building permit (#95371750) was issued Ior a sign at 4500 North Tenaya
Way. The permit has not been Iinalized.
10/30/03
A code enIorcement case (#6313) was processed Ior graIIiti on the building at
4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved 11/14/03.
01/15/04
A code enIorcement case (#8671) was processed Ior water leaking Irom the
rooI oI the building at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved
01/20/04.
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
02/19/04
A code enIorcement case (#10179) was processed Ior litter on-site at 4500
North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved 02/19/04.
03/09/04
A code enIorcement case (#10877) was processed Ior graIIiti on the building
at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved 03/10/04.
07/28/04
A code enIorcement case (#19332) was processed Ior graIIiti on the building
at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved 09/13/04.
11/10/04
A code enIorcement case (#23666) was processed Ior graIIiti on the building
at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved 11/15/04.
03/11/05
A code enIorcement case (#27078) was processed Ior illegal sign Ior a
temporary sale at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved 03/11/05.
09/25/06
A code enIorcement case (#46583) was processed Ior outdoor storage
occurring on-site at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved
11/30/06.
11/09/06
A building permit (#74743) was issued Ior a Iire sprinkler system at 4500
North Tenaya Way. The permit was Iinalized on 10/14/08.
01/30/08
A building permit (#107227) was issued Ior masonry retaining walls at 4500
North Tenaya Way. The permit was Iinalized on 10/14/08.
08/29/08
A building permit (#08000290) was issued Ior an OII-Premise Sign at 4510
North Tenaya Way. The OII-Premise Sign has not been constructed.
03/03/09
A building permit (#08000290) was extended Ior an OII-Premise Sign at 4510
North Tenaya Way. The OII-Premise Sign has not been constructed.
11/17/09
A building permit (#08000290) was extended Ior an OII-Premise Sign at 4510
North Tenaya Way. The OII-Premise Sign has not been constructed.
02/18/10
A building permit (#08000290) was extended Ior one-year Ior an OII-Premise
Sign at 4510 North Tenaya Way. The OII-Premise Sign has not been
constructed as oI yet.
02/16/11
A building permit (#08000290) was extended Ior six-months Ior an OII-
Premise Sign at 4510 North Tenaya Way. The OII-Premise Sign has not been
constructed as oI yet.
08/04/11
A building permit (#08000290) was extended Ior six-months Ior an OII-
Premise Sign at 4510 North Tenaya Way. The OII-Premise Sign has not been
constructed as oI yet.
03/05/12
A business license (#G50-00134) was issued Ior general retail sales (Bigs
Furniture) at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The license is currently still active.
A code enIorcement case (#116055) was processed to check Ior violations
related to trash, debris and weeds at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was
resolved 07/26/12. 06/25/12
A code enIorcement case (#116117) was processed Ior trash on the property
at 4500 North Tenaya Way. The case was resolved 06/25/12.
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting





Pre-Application Meeting
07/23/14
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over the
application materials and submittal requirements Ior a Site Development Plan
Review and Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Private School, Primary use.


Aeighborhood Meeting
09/22/14
A neighborhood meeting will be held at the Durango Hill Community Center
(YMCA) located at 3521 North Durango Drive at 6:30pm to discuss the
proposed development oI a Private School, Primary land use at 4500 North
Tenaya Road (APN 138-03-601-003). The meeting was attended by one staII
member; there were zero members oI the public at the meeting.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a routine site visit and Iound the subject site to be a well
maintained commercial development.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 9.88


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property General Retail
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
Single-Family
Residential
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
01/30/13
A building permit (#228566) was issued Ior a wall sign at 4500 North Tenaya
Way. The permit has not been Iinalized.
05/29/13
A code enIorcement case (#129326) was processed Ior 'Big Iurniture store
dumping trash, debris, boxes and papers in alleyway behind 7109 Golden
Desert Avenue causing all that trash to blow to residents yards at 4500 North
Tenaya Way. The case was resolved 02/04/14.
06/17/14
A code enIorcement case (#142602) was processed Ior 'Big Iurniture store
dumping trash, debris, boxes and papers in alleyway at 4500 North Tenaya
Way. The case was not been resolved.
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Undeveloped Land
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
South
Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East US Highway 95 ROW (Right-oI-Way) ROW (Right-oI-Way)
West
Single-Family
Residential
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Plot Plan Review Rezoning (Z-15-93), the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side (North)
Side (South)
Rear
10 Feet
39.16 Feet
10 Feet
357.08 Feet
10 Feet
39.16 Feet
10 Feet
357.08 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Max. Building Height 33 Feet 26 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure
Screened, Gated,
w/ a RooI or
Trellis
Screened, Gated,
w/ a RooI or
Trellis
Y
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y


Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
3:1 proximity slope 78 Feet 39.16 Feet Y*
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 79.50 Feet Y
*The Plot Plan Review associatea with Re:oning (Z-0105-93) approvea the existing builaing
height at its current location.
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Pursuant to Plot Plan Review Rezoning (Z-15-93), the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio 1rees
Provided

Compliance

BuIIer Trees:
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 50 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 50 Linear Feet
25 Trees
0 Trees
8 Trees
8 Trees
40 Trees
14 Trees
13 Trees
12 Trees
Y
Y
Y
Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 41 Trees 79 Trees Y
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end oI each row oI spaces
24 Trees 39 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
35 Feet
0 Feet
6 Feet
10 Feet
35 Feet
0 Feet
6 Feet
10 Feet
Y*
Y*
Y*
Y*
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Not Indicated N/A
*The Plot Plan Review associatea with Re:oning (Z-0105-93) approvea the existing lanascape
buffer wiaths at subfect site.


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Tenaya Way
Minor Collector
Street
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
60 Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Private
School,
Primary
79
Classrooms
3 spaces
per
classroom
237

SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Individual
Care Center
40 Children
4 StaII
Members
One space
Ior each
staII
member
plus one
Ior each
10
children
8

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 245

320

Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 238 7 312 8 Y
Loading
Spaces
136,528 SF N/A 4 4 Y


ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed a Major Amendment to a previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-
0105-93) and Special Use Permit Ior a proposed 136,528 square-Ioot Private School, Primary
use located at 4500 North Tenaya Way. This project is an adaptive re-use oI a building which has
Iunctioned as a Iurniture store and Building and Landscape Material/Lumber Yard previously.
The applicant has proposed to add 59,167 square Ieet oI interior Iloor space to the existing
77,361 square-Ioot building, re-stripe the parking lot, remodel the Iaade oI the building and
install a soccer Iield with playground equipment to the interior courtyard on-site. The subject site
is located within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district, which requires a Special Use
Permit Ior a Private School, Primary use.

The Private School, Primary use is deIined as 'An institution that provides kindergarten through
8
th
grade education and is supported by a public, religious, or private organization.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior this use include:

1. Adequate pick-up and drop-oII areas must be provided on-site.

The proposea use aaheres to this requirement as the submittea site plan aepicts aaequate on-site
pick-up ana arop-off area which aoes not ao not negatively effect on-sit traffic circulation. The
pick-up ana arop-off area is orientea on the eastern perimeter of the builaing aafacent to the
parking lot allowing traffic to be airectea away from the right-of-way.
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The proposed use meets the deIinition, as the applicant has indicated in the submitted
justiIication letter that it will be providing education Ior pre-kindergarten through 8
th
grade, with
a total oI 79 classrooms provided. The preschool portion oI the program will operate under the
Individual Care Center use, which is a permitted use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district. The applicant has indicated the Individual Care Center will operate with a maximum oI
40 children and have Iour staII members.

The subject site remains in compliance with the landscaping plan Irom previously approved Plot
Plan Review (Z-0105-93). In addition, the proposed use adheres to all minimum special use
permit and parking requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. The applicant has proposed to add
59,167 square Ieet oI Iloor space to the interior oI the existing 77,361 square-Ioot building on-
site by adding a second Iloor. This represents a 76 increase in Iloor area Irom the previously
approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0105-93) and requires a Major Amendment. StaII has determined
the requested renovation and remodel oI the subject site is in compliance with previously
approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0105-93) and qualiIies as a Major Amendment. In addition, this
project is compatible with surrounding development in the area; thereIore, staII is recommends
approval oI this project with conditions.


FINDINGS (SUP-55733)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The applicant`s proposal Ior a Private School, Primary use and Individual Care Center land
use is compatible with the surrounding single-Iamily residential and light commercial land
uses and can be conducted in a harmonious manner.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

There are suIIicient play areas and building Iacilities to accommodate the students and
staII. In addition the subject site provides parking which exceeds the minimum
requirements and provides adequate pick-up and drop-oII access.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Staff Report Page Nine
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The subject site is accessed Irom Tenaya Way, a 60-Ioot wide Minor Collector, as deemed
by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways. A pick-up and drop-oII area is shown on the
east side oI the building and is incorporated into the interior site circulation, so as to not
cause any vehicle conIlict points.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

The proposed Private School, Primary use will be subject to inspections Ior CertiIicate oI
Occupancy, and thereIore the development will not compromise the public health, saIety,
or general welIare.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Private School, Primary use meets all applicable requirements Ior a Special
Use Permit Ior this type oI activity within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.


FINDINGS (SDR-55724)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;

The proposed development is compatible with the adjacent residential and commercial
development in the area. The structure is contextually appropriate with other buildings in
the area and the applicant has provided additional parking lot landscaping to the site
creating an attractive development.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The subject site is consistent with the previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0105-93)
and development standards Iound within Title 19.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;
SUP-55733 AND SDR-55724 PR1-55262]
JB

Staff Report Page Ten
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Access to the site will remain unchanged. The site is accessed Irom Tenaya Way, a 60-Ioot
wide Minor Collector, as deemed by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways; through a
recorded ingress/egress easement associated with Plat Book 77, Page 38. The proposed
pick-up and drop-oII area is located on the east side oI the building and is incorporated into
the interior site circulation, so as to not cause any vehicle conIlict points.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The project design and style are appropriate Ior the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building elevations
indicate the building Iaades will be painted white and royal blue. The landscape materials
are drought tolerant species that are commonly Iound throughout the City oI Las Vegas.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;

The design characteristics oI the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and are
compatible with development in the area and the existing structures on site. The proposed
materials are suitable Ior the surrounding residential uses and the desert environment.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.

The proposed development will be subject to inspections in order to protect the public
health, saIety and general welIare by City staII.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 24


NOTICES MAILED 316


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 2
08/25/14
PRJ-55262
SUP-55733
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/21/2014 4:23:50 PM
Applicant Email: cj@hooglandarchitecture.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Hoogland
Rep First Name: CJ
Applicant State: Nevada
Applicant Phone: 702-343-1850
Applicant Zip: 89113
Rep Address: 5459 S.Durango Dr., Suite 100
Rep Email: cj@hooglandarchitecture.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-343-1850
Rep Zip: 89113
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13803601003
Project Name TENAYA - QUEST CHARTER SCHOOL
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 4 (STAVROS S. ANTHONY)
Application Number: PRJ-55262
Applicant City: Las Vegas
ProjectAddress (Location): 4500 NORTH TENAYA WAY
Application/Petition For: TENAYA - QUEST CHARTER SCHOOL (SDR / SUP) - Applicant must have another pre-application meeting
due to multiple revisions [PREAPP2014-000824 & PREAPP2014-000789]
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: CJ
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 5459 S.Durango Dr., Suite 100
Applicant Last Name: Hoogland
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SDR-55724
SUP-55733 &
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/21/2014 4:23:50 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
WESTLAND ENTERPRISES L L C 1801 SOLAR DR #250 OXNARD, CA 93030-8297
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
CJ Hoogland Hoogland Architecture, Ltd. Principal cj@hooglandarchitecture.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
SDR-55724
SUP-55733 &
K
lN
D
E
R
G
A
R
D
E
N

G
R

N
D

N
D
E
R

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
A
N

1
-5

G
R

N
D

2
2

2
0

3
2
0

N . T E N

E
E
K

V
E

G
O

D
E
N

D
E

E
R
T

V
E

9
5

S
E
T
B
A
C
K

&

A
N
D
S
C
A

E

B

F
F
E
R

S
E T B A
C
K

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

C
1

C
1

1
0
4
6
.4
7
'
4 7 7 . 5 2 '
5
0
'
8
4
5
.4
8
'
4 1 6 . 8 1 '
E
x

s
t

n
g

B
u

I
d

n
g

1 0 ' - 0 "
S E T B A C K
1 0 ' - 0 "
S E T B A C K
1
0
' - 0
"
E
X
I

T
I
N
G

B
U
I

D
I
N
G

l C K - A N D D R F F
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
T
l
T

W
A

lN
E

F
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
A
N

A
B

V
E

N
E
W
D

W
N

lG
H
T
S
T

B
E
M

N
T
E
D
T

T
H
E

N
D
E
R
S
lD
E
F

G
R

N
D

lG
H
T
lN
G

E X l S T l N G T l T W A
7
7
,3
6
1

F
F
O
O
T
P
R
IN
T
(E
X
I
T
IN
G
)

5
9
,1
6
7

F

E
C
O
N
D

E
V
E

(
P
R
O
P
O

E
D
)

1
3
6
,5
2
8

F
T
O
T

9 ' - 2 "

7
8
'-6
"

5
7
'-1
"
1 5 ' - 1 "

P
N
:
1
3
8
-0
3
-
6
0
1
-
0
0
3

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
D
R
A
lN
A
G
E
C
H
A
N
N
E

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
D
R
A
lN
A
G
E
C
H
A
N
N
E


l N E F E X l S T l N G C A N A B V E
N E W D W N l G H T S T B E M N T E D T
N D E R S l D E F R A G R N D l G H T l N G

lN
E

F
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
A
N

A
B

V
E
(C
A
N

R
E
M
A
lN
)
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
4
'
C

N
C
R
E
T
E
S
W
A

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E

T

R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
M

S
lT
E
W
A

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
A
N


B
E
D
E
M

lS
H
E
D

2
0

1
6

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
A
S

H
A

T

T

R
E
M
A
lN
T

.
1
7

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E

T

B
E

R
E

C
A
T
E
D

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

1
2

T

R
F
S

C
C
E
R

F
E
l
D

2
4
' -0
"
2 4 ' - 0 "
F
ir
e
A
p
p
a
r
a
tu
s
A
c
c
e
s
s

1
9

1
8

1
8

1
9
2
0

2
1

2
5

2
1

4
2

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T

lR

N
G
A
T
E

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T

lR

N
F
E
N
C
E

2 4 ' - 0 "

0
.2
'W
lD
E
lN
G
R
E
S
S
/E
G
R
E
S
S
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

4 0 ' W l D E l N G R E S S / E G R E S S
E A S E M E N T
2
0
'W
lD
E

R
lV
A
T
E
D
R
A
lN
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

2 0 ' - 0 "
0 ' - 2 "
4
0
'-0
"
E
X
lS
T
lN
G

0
'T
A

S
lG
N

T

R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
l
E
D

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
l
E
D

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
l
E
D

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

R
E
M
A
lN

7 9 ' - 5 "
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C

R
E

W
lT
H
T
R
E

lS

( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H )
V A N
A D l N G
A D l N G
A D l N G
V A N V A N V A N
5
7
'-1
0
"
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
T

T
H
S
T

B
E

D
E
M

lS
H
E
D
S
T
R

C
T

R
E
T


R
E
M
A
lN
,W
lD
E
N
D
R
lV
E
A
lS

E
T

2
4
'
C

E
A
R

N
E
W
W
R

G
H
T
lR

N

G
A
T
E
S
A
N
D
F
E
N
C
E
S

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T

lR

N
F
E
N
C
E
T


R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T
lR

N

F
E
N
C
E
T

R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T
lR

N

F
E
N
C
E
T

R
E
M
A
lN

G
R

N
D

E
Q

l
M
E
N
T

G
R

N
D

E
Q

l
M
E
N
T
W
/S

F
T

F
A

R
F
A
C
E

T
E
A
T
H
E
R
B
A

T
R
A
C
K

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
lS

A
N
D
E
N
D
S
/

A
R
K
lN
G
T

B
E
S
T
R
l
E
D

2
5
'
5
0
'
1
0
0
'
G
R

P
H
IC

C

E X l S T l N G ' T A F R E E S T A N D l N G
S l G N T R E M A l N
1

5
'-0
"
2 1 0 ' - 0 "
1
6
0
'-0
"

8 1 ' - 0 "
N
E
W
W
R

G
H
T
lR

N
F
E
N
C
E

2
4
'W
lD
E
C
R
A
S
H
G
A
T
E
F

R
F
lR
E
A
C
C
E
S
S

1
3

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
A
S

H
A

T

T

R
E
M
A
lN
T

.
N
E
W
S
T
R
l
lN
G
F

R

F
A
C

A
R
K
lN
G

A D l N G
G
R

N
D
M

N
T
E
D

A
C

N
lT
S

S
C
R
E
E
N

W
A


E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E

T


E
X
lS
T
lN
G
T
l
T
-

W
A

B
E
R
E
M

V
E
D
,
S
T
E
E

C
A
N

S
T
R

C
T

R
E
T

R
E
M
A
lN

R
E
M

V
E
E
X
lS
T
lN
G

T
l
T
-

W
A

E
N
D

A
N
E


N
E
W
S
lD
E
W
A

K
A
R
E
A

2
'-1
"
1 8 ' - 1 "
1
8
'- 0 "
1
5
'-0
"
2 5 ' - 0 "
1
5
'-0
"
2 5 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
1 8 ' - 0 "
9

6 4 ' - " 1 8 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
T
l
T
-

W
A

A
N
D

C
A
N

R
E
M
A
lN

R
=
5
.5
%

6
' -
" 2
0
' - 0
"
9 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
2 4 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
2 4 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
2 9 ' - 9 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
2 6 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
2 5 ' - 1 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 9 "
A N D S C A E B F F E R
5 ' - 0 "

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
B

F
F
E
R

5
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
8
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
5
'-0
"
1
T H E S E D R A W l N G S A N D
S E C l F l C A T l N S A R E T H E R E R T
F H G A N D A R C H l T E C T R E , T D .
S E F T H E S E D R A W l N G S l S l M l T E D
T A S E C l F l E D R J E C T F R
E R S N S N A M E D H E R E N A N D F R
T H E C N S T R C T l N F N E
R J E C T . A N S E R
R E R D C T l N , l N W H E R l N
A R T , B A N M E A N S W H A T S E V E R ,
l S S T R l C T R H l B l T E D W l T H T
T H E W R l T T E N E R M l S S l N F
H G A N D A R C H l T E C T R E , T D .
C R l G H T H G A N D
A R C H l T E C T R E , T D . 2 0 1 4
D
W
G
lS
S

R E V l W E D B D A T E
0 8 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 4 _
D E S C R l T l N l S S E
R E l M l N A R A S B M l T T A
D
A
T
E
:
J

B
#
:
R
E
V
lS
l
N
S

A
R E V # R E V l W E D B D A T E D E S C R l T l N
5 4 5 9 S . D R A N G D R . # 1 0 0
A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 1
7 0 2 . 4 . 1 8 5 0
W W W . H G A N D A R C H l T E C T R E . C M
A R C H l T E C T R E / A N N l N G / D E S l G N
T E N A A C A M S
4 5 0 0 N T E N A A W A
A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 2 9
S
H
E
E
T
N

:
_ _ - / - / -
2 _
_
0 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 S D R S B M l T T A A 9
/8
/2
0
1
4
9
:1
0
:
6
A
M

A
1
.
0

S
ite

la
n

ro
je
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
1
"
=
4
0
'-
0
"

1

S
ite

la
n

P

R
K
I
N
G

P
r
e
-
K
(
2
C

A
S
S
R

M
S
=
4
0
lN
D
lV
lD

S
)

1

E
R
1
0
lN
D
lV
lD

S
=
4

2
T
E
A
C
H
E
R
S
@
1

E
R
S
T
A
F
F
M
E
M
B
E
R
=
2

2
A
lD
S
@
1

E
R
S
T
A
F
F
M
E
M
B
E
R
=
2

K
-
5
(
4
9
C

A
S
S
R

M
S
@

E
R
C

A
S
S
R

M
)
=
1
4
7

6
-
8
(

0
C

A
S
S
R

M
S
@

E
R
C

A
S
S
R

M
)
=
9
0

T
A

A
R
K
lN
G
C

N
T
=
2
4
5
R
E
Q

lR
E
D

3
2
0

V
lD
E
D

*
A

A
R
K
lN
G
S
T
A

S
A
R
E
R
E
G

A
R
S
lZ
E

.N
.
.
A
C
C
E
S
S
lB

A
R
K
lN
G
S

A
C
E
S

0
1
-
4
0
0
S

A
C
E
S
=
8
S

A
C
E
S
R
E
Q

lR
E
D

8
S

A
C
E
S

V
lD
E
D

1
V
A
N
S

A
C
E

E
R
6
A
C
C
E
S
S
lB

E
=
2
R
E
Q

lR
E
D

V
lD
E
D

V
l
C
l
N
l
T

M
A

S 9 5
N R T H B F F A D R l V E
W
E
S
T
C
R
A
lG
R

A
D

N
E
M

N
T
A
lN

T E N A A
4
5
0
0
N
T
E
N

(
T
H
I
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
)
N R T H l N E E R W A
N R T H R A l N B W B E V A R D

E
G
E
N
D

A
D
A
A
C
C
E
S
S
lB

A
T
H

S
T
R
l
lN
G
W
H
E
R
E
R
E
Q

lR
E
D

N
0
9
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
K
lN
D
E
R
G
A
R
D
E
N

G
R

N
D

N
D
E
R

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
A
N

1
-5

G
R

N
D

2
2

2
0

3
2
0

N . T E N

E
E
K

V
E

G
O

D
E
N

D
E

E
R
T

V
E

9
5

S
E
T
B
A
C
K

&

A
N
D
S
C
A

E

B

F
F
E
R

S
E T B A
C
K

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

C
1

C
1

1
0
4
6
.4
7
'
4 7 7 . 5 2 '
5
0
'
8
4
5
.4
8
'
4 1 6 . 8 1 '
E
x

s
t

n
g

B
u

I
d

n
g

1 0 ' - 0 "
S E T B A C K
1 0 ' - 0 "
S E T B A C K
1
0
' - 0
"
E
X
I

T
I
N
G

B
U
I

D
I
N
G

l C K - A N D D R F F
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
T
l
T

W
A

lN
E

F
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
A
N

A
B

V
E

N
E
W
D

W
N

lG
H
T
S
T

B
E
M

N
T
E
D
T

T
H
E

N
D
E
R
S
lD
E
F

G
R

N
D

lG
H
T
lN
G

E X l S T l N G T l T W A
7
7
,3
6
1

F
F
O
O
T
P
R
IN
T
(E
X
I
T
IN
G
)

5
9
,1
6
7

F

E
C
O
N
D

E
V
E

(
P
R
O
P
O

E
D
)

1
3
6
,5
2
8

F
T
O
T

9 ' - 2 "

7
8
'-6
"

5
7
'-1
"
1 5 ' - 1 "

P
N
:
1
3
8
-0
3
-
6
0
1
-
0
0
3

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
D
R
A
lN
A
G
E
C
H
A
N
N
E

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
D
R
A
lN
A
G
E
C
H
A
N
N
E


l N E F E X l S T l N G C A N A B V E
N E W D W N l G H T S T B E M N T E D T
N D E R S l D E F R A G R N D l G H T l N G

lN
E

F
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
A
N

A
B

V
E
(C
A
N

R
E
M
A
lN
)
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
4
'
C

N
C
R
E
T
E
S
W
A

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E

T

R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
M

S
lT
E
W
A

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
C
A
N


B
E
D
E
M

lS
H
E
D

2
0

1
6

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
A
S

H
A

T

T

R
E
M
A
lN
T

.
1
7

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E

T

B
E

R
E

C
A
T
E
D

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

1
2

T

R
F
S

C
C
E
R

F
E
l
D

2
4
' -0
"
2 4 ' - 0 "
F
ir
e
A
p
p
a
r
a
tu
s
A
c
c
e
s
s

1
9

1
8

1
8

1
9
2
0

2
1

2
5

2
1

4
2

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T

lR

N
G
A
T
E

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T

lR

N
F
E
N
C
E

2 4 ' - 0 "

0
.2
'W
lD
E
lN
G
R
E
S
S
/E
G
R
E
S
S
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

4 0 ' W l D E l N G R E S S / E G R E S S
E A S E M E N T
2
0
'W
lD
E

R
lV
A
T
E
D
R
A
lN
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

2 0 ' - 0 "
0 ' - 2 "
4
0
'-0
"
E
X
lS
T
lN
G

0
'T
A

S
lG
N

T

R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
l
E
D

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
l
E
D

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
l
E
D

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G

A
R
K
lN
G

T

R
E
M
A
lN

7 9 ' - 5 "
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C

R
E

W
lT
H
T
R
E

lS

( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H )
V A N
A D l N G
A D l N G
A D l N G
V A N V A N V A N
5
7
'-1
0
"
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
T

T
H
S
T

B
E

D
E
M

lS
H
E
D
S
T
R

C
T

R
E
T


R
E
M
A
lN
,W
lD
E
N
D
R
lV
E
A
lS

E
T

2
4
'
C

E
A
R

N
E
W
W
R

G
H
T
lR

N

G
A
T
E
S
A
N
D
F
E
N
C
E
S

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T

lR

N
F
E
N
C
E
T


R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T
lR

N

F
E
N
C
E
T

R
E
M
A
lN

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
W
R

G
H
T
lR

N

F
E
N
C
E
T

R
E
M
A
lN

G
R

N
D

E
Q

l
M
E
N
T

G
R

N
D

E
Q

l
M
E
N
T
W
/S

F
T

F
A

R
F
A
C
E

T
E
A
T
H
E
R
B
A

T
R
A
C
K

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
lS

A
N
D
E
N
D
S
/

A
R
K
lN
G
T

B
E
S
T
R
l
E
D

2
5
'
5
0
'
1
0
0
'
G
R

P
H
IC

C

E X l S T l N G ' T A F R E E S T A N D l N G
S l G N T R E M A l N
1

5
'-0
"
2 1 0 ' - 0 "
1
6
0
'-0
"

8 1 ' - 0 "
N
E
W
W
R

G
H
T
lR

N
F
E
N
C
E

2
4
'W
lD
E
C
R
A
S
H
G
A
T
E
F

R
F
lR
E
A
C
C
E
S
S

1
3

E
X
lS
T
lN
G
A
S

H
A

T

T

R
E
M
A
lN
T

.
N
E
W
S
T
R
l
lN
G
F

R

F
A
C

A
R
K
lN
G

A D l N G
G
R

N
D
M

N
T
E
D

A
C

N
lT
S

S
C
R
E
E
N

W
A


E
X
lS
T
lN
G

lG
H
T

E

T


E
X
lS
T
lN
G
T
l
T
-

W
A

B
E
R
E
M

V
E
D
,
S
T
E
E

C
A
N

S
T
R

C
T

R
E
T

R
E
M
A
lN

R
E
M

V
E
E
X
lS
T
lN
G

T
l
T
-

W
A

E
N
D

A
N
E


N
E
W
S
lD
E
W
A

K
A
R
E
A

2
'-1
"
1 8 ' - 1 "
1
8
'- 0 "
1
5
'-0
"
2 5 ' - 0 "
1
5
'-0
"
2 5 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
1 8 ' - 0 "
9

6 4 ' - " 1 8 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
E
X
lS
T
lN
G
T
l
T
-

W
A

A
N
D

C
A
N

R
E
M
A
lN

R
=
5
.5
%

6
' -
" 2
0
' - 0
"
9 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
2 4 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
2 4 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
2 9 ' - 9 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
2 6 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 "
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
2 5 ' - 1 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 9 "
A N D S C A E B F F E R
5 ' - 0 "

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
B

F
F
E
R

5
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
8
'-0
"
9
'-0
"
5
'-0
"
1
T H E S E D R A W l N G S A N D
S E C l F l C A T l N S A R E T H E R E R T
F H G A N D A R C H l T E C T R E , T D .
S E F T H E S E D R A W l N G S l S l M l T E D
T A S E C l F l E D R J E C T F R
E R S N S N A M E D H E R E N A N D F R
T H E C N S T R C T l N F N E
R J E C T . A N S E R
R E R D C T l N , l N W H E R l N
A R T , B A N M E A N S W H A T S E V E R ,
l S S T R l C T R H l B l T E D W l T H T
T H E W R l T T E N E R M l S S l N F
H G A N D A R C H l T E C T R E , T D .
C R l G H T H G A N D
A R C H l T E C T R E , T D . 2 0 1 4
D
W
G
lS
S

R E V l W E D B D A T E
0 8 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 4 _
D E S C R l T l N l S S E
R E l M l N A R A S B M l T T A
D
A
T
E
:
J

B
#
:
R
E
V
lS
l
N
S

A
R E V # R E V l W E D B D A T E D E S C R l T l N
5 4 5 9 S . D R A N G D R . # 1 0 0
A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 1
7 0 2 . 4 . 1 8 5 0
W W W . H G A N D A R C H l T E C T R E . C M
A R C H l T E C T R E / A N N l N G / D E S l G N
T E N A A C A M S
4 5 0 0 N T E N A A W A
A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 2 9
S
H
E
E
T
N

:
_ _ - / - / -
2 _
_
0 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 S D R S B M l T T A A 9
/8
/2
0
1
4
9
:1
1
:4
0
A
M

A
1
.
0

S
ite

la
n

ro
je
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
1
"
=
4
0
'-
0
"

1

S
ite

la
n

P

R
K
I
N
G

P
r
e
-
K
(
2
C

A
S
S
R

M
S
=
4
0
lN
D
lV
lD

S
)

1

E
R
1
0
lN
D
lV
lD

S
=
4

2
T
E
A
C
H
E
R
S
@
1

E
R
S
T
A
F
F
M
E
M
B
E
R
=
2

2
A
lD
S
@
1

E
R
S
T
A
F
F
M
E
M
B
E
R
=
2

K
-
5
(
4
9
C

A
S
S
R

M
S
@

E
R
C

A
S
S
R

M
)
=
1
4
7

6
-
8
(

0
C

A
S
S
R

M
S
@

E
R
C

A
S
S
R

M
)
=
9
0

T
A

A
R
K
lN
G
C

N
T
=
2
4
5
R
E
Q

lR
E
D

3
2
0

V
lD
E
D

*
A

A
R
K
lN
G
S
T
A

S
A
R
E
R
E
G

A
R
S
lZ
E

.N
.
.
A
C
C
E
S
S
lB

A
R
K
lN
G
S

A
C
E
S

0
1
-
4
0
0
S

A
C
E
S
=
8
S

A
C
E
S
R
E
Q

lR
E
D

8
S

A
C
E
S

V
lD
E
D

1
V
A
N
S

A
C
E

E
R
6
A
C
C
E
S
S
lB

E
=
2
R
E
Q

lR
E
D

V
lD
E
D

V
l
C
l
N
l
T

M
A

S 9 5
N R T H B F F A D R l V E
W
E
S
T
C
R
A
lG
R

A
D

N
E
M

N
T
A
lN

T E N A A
4
5
0
0
N
T
E
N

(
T
H
I
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
)
N R T H l N E E R W A
N R T H R A l N B W B E V A R D

E
G
E
N
D

A
D
A
A
C
C
E
S
S
lB

A
T
H

S
T
R
l
lN
G
W
H
E
R
E
R
E
Q

lR
E
D

N
0
9
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
K
IN
D
E
R
G
A
R
D
E
N

G
R

N
D

N
D
E
R

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
A
N

1
-5

G
R

N
D

2
2

2
0

3
2
0

N . T E N

E
E
K

V
E

G
O

D
E
N

D
E

E
R
T

V
E

9
5

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
T


R
E
M
A
IN


S
E
T
B
A
C
K

&

A
N
D
S
C
A

E

B

F
F
E
R

S
E
T
B
A
C
K

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

C
1

C
1

1
0
4
6
.4
7
'
4 7 7 . 5 2 '
5
0
'
8
4
5
.4
8
'
4 1 6 . 8 1 '


E
x

s
t

n
g

B
u

I
d

n
g

1 0 ' - 0 "
S E T B A C K
1 0 ' - 0 "
S E T B A C K
1
0
' -0
"
E
X
I

T
I
N
G

B
U
I

D
I
N
G

I C K - A N D D R F F
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
T
I
T

W
A

E X I S T I N G T I T W A
E X I S T I N G
A N D S C A E T
R E M A I N
3 9 ' - "
3
7
8
'-6
"
3
5
7
'-1
"
1 5 ' - 8 "

P
N
:
1
3
8
-0
3
-
6
0
1
-
0
0
3

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
D
R
A
IN
A
G
E
C
H
A
N
N
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
D
R
A
IN
A
G
E
C
H
A
N
N
E


E
X
IS
T
IN
G

D
R
A
IN
A
G
E

A
R
E
A
T

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
T


R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
T

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
T

R
E
M
A
IN

IN
E

F
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
A
N

A
B

V
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
4
'C

N
C
R
E
T
E
S
W
A

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
M

S
IT
E
W
A

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
A
N

B
E
D
E
M

IS
H
E
D

2
0

1
6

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
A
S

H
A

T

T

R
E
M
A
IN
T

.
1
7

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

T

B
E

R
E

C
A
T
E
D

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

R
F
S

C
C
E
R

F
E
I
D

1
9

1
8

1
8
1
9

2
0
2
1

2
5

2
1

4
2

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T

IR

N
G
A
T
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T

IR

N
F
E
N
C
E

3
0
.
'W
ID
E
IN
G
R
E
S
S
/E
G
R
E
S
S
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

4 0 ' W I D E I N G R E S S / E G R E S S
E A S E M E N T

0
'W
ID
E

R
IV
A
T
E
D
R
A
IN
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

0 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - "
4
0
'-0
"
E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
I
E
D

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
I
E
D

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
I
E
D

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

R
E
M
A
IN

7 9 ' - 5 "
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C

R
E

W
IT
H
T
R
E

IS

5
7
'-1
0
"
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T

IR

N
F
E
N
C
E
T


R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T
IR

N

F
E
N
C
E
T

R
E
M
A
IN

G
R

N
D

E
Q

I
M
E
N
T
W
/

S

F
T
F
A

R
F
A
C
E

G
R

N
D

E
Q

I
M
E
N
T
W
/S

F
T

F
A

R
F
A
C
E

T
E
A
T
H
E
R
B
A

T
R
A
C
K

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
IS

A
N
D
E
N
D
S
/

A
R
K
IN
G
T

B
E
S
T
R
I
E
D

5
'
5
0
'
1
0
0
'
G
R

P
H
IC

C

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
M
E
D
I
M
D
E
C
ID

S
T
R
E
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
G
E
E
V
E
R
G
R
E
E
N
T
R
E
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
M
E
D
I
M
S
H
R

B
S

N
E
W

4
"
B

X
T
R
E
E
"
C
H
I
E
A
N
M
E
S
Q

IT
E
"

1
8

6
6

5
5

3
8

(
4
)
5
G
A

S
H
R

B
S

E
R
N
E
W
T
R
E
E

1
6

N
E
W
W
R

G
H
T
IR

N
F
E
N
C
E

4
'W
ID
E
C
R
A
S
H
G
A
T
E
F

R
F
IR
E
A
C
C
E
S
S

1
3
5
'-0
"
1 0 ' - 0 "
1
6
0
'-0
"
1
3

N
E
W
S
T
R
I
IN
G
F

R

F
A
C

A
R
K
IN
G

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T
IR

N

F
E
N
C
E
T

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
A
S

H
A

T

T

R
E
M
A
IN
T

.
A D I N G
A D I N G
A D I N G
A D I N G
G
R

N
D
M

N
T
E
D

A
C

N
IT
S

S
C
R
E
E
N

W
A


7
7
,3
6
1

F
F
O
O
T
P
R
IN
T
(
E
X
I
T
IN
G
)

5
9
,1
6
7

F

E
C
O
N
D

E
V
E

(P
R
O
P
O

E
D
)

1
3
6
,5
2
8

F
T
O
T

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
3
0
'T
A

S
IG
N

T

R
E
M
A
IN

E X I S T I N G 3 ' T A F R E E S T A N D I N G
S I G N T R E M A I N
T

R
E
M

V
E
E
X
IS
T
IN
G

T
I
T
-

W
A

E
N
D

A
N
E

N
E
W
S
ID
E
W
A

K
A
R
E
A

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
T

T
H
S
T

B
E

D
E
M

IS
H
E
D
S
T
R

C
T

R
E
T


R
E
M
A
IN
,W
ID
E
N
D
R
IV
E
A
IS

E
T

4
'
C

E
A
R

N
E
W
W
R

G
H
T
IR

N

G
A
T
E
S
A
N
D
F
E
N
C
E
S

9

( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H )
V A N V A N V A N V A N

IN
E

F
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
A
N

A
B

V
E

N
E
W
D

W
N

IG
H
T
S
T

B
E
M

N
T
E
D
T

T
H
E

N
D
E
R
S
ID
E
F

G
R

N
D

IG
H
T
IN
G

I N E F E X I S T I N G C A N A B V E
N E W D W N I G H T S T B E M N T E D T
N D E R S I D E F R A G R N D I G H T I N G
F

R
=
5
.5
%

0
' - 0
"
3 4 ' - 9 "
A N D S C A E B F F E R
3 5 ' - 0 "

A
N
D
S
C
A
E
B

F
F
E
R

6
'- 3
"
1
T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D
S E C I F I C A T I N S A R E T H E R E R T
F H G A N D A R C H I T E C T R E , T D .
S E F T H E S E D R A W I N G S I S I M I T E D
T A S E C I F I E D R J E C T F R
E R S N S N A M E D H E R E N A N D F R
T H E C N S T R C T I N F N E
R J E C T . A N S E R
R E R D C T I N , I N W H E R I N
A R T , B A N M E A N S W H A T S E V E R ,
I S S T R I C T R H I B I T E D W I T H T
T H E W R I T T E N E R M I S S I N F
H G A N D A R C H I T E C T R E , T D .
C R I G H T H G A N D
A R C H I T E C T R E , T D . 0 1 4
D
W
G
IS
S

R E V I W E D B D A T E
0 8 / 0 7 / 0 1 4 _
D E S C R I T I N I S S E
R E I M I N A R A S B M I T T A
D
A
T
E
:
J

B
#
:
R
E
V
IS
I
N
S

A
R E V # R E V I W E D B D A T E D E S C R I T I N
5 4 5 9 S . D R A N G D R . # 1 0 0
A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 1 3
7 0 . 3 4 3 . 1 8 5 0
W W W . H G A N D A R C H I T E C T R E . C M
A R C H I T E C T R E / A N N I N G / D E S I G N
T E N A A C A M S
4 5 0 0 N T E N A A W A
A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 9
S
H
E
E
T
N

:
_ _ - / - / -
_
3 _
0 8 / 1 / 0 1 4 S D R S B M I T T A A 9
/8
/
0
1
4
9
:1
0
:4
1
A
M

1
.
0

a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

la
n

ro
je
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
1
"
=
4
0
'-
0
"

1

a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

la
n

V
I
C
I
N
I
T

M
A

S 9 5
N R T H B F F A D R I V E
W
E
S
T
C
R
A
IG
R

A
D

N
E
M

N
T
A
IN

T E N A A
4
5
0
0
N
T
E
N

(
T
H
I
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
)
N R T H I N E E R W A
N R T H R A I N B W B E V A R D
N

N
D

P
E

E
G
E
N
D











Q
T

N
0
9
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
K
IN
D
E
R
G
A
R
D
E
N

G
R

N
D

N
D
E
R

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
A
N

1
-5

G
R

N
D

2
2

2
0

3
2
0

N . T E N

E
E
K

V
E

G
O

D
E
N

D
E

E
R
T

V
E

9
5

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
T


R
E
M
A
IN


S
E
T
B
A
C
K

&

A
N
D
S
C
A

E

B

F
F
E
R

S
E
T
B
A
C
K

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

R
-
C

C
1

C
1

1
0
4
6
.4
7
'
4 7 7 . 5 2 '
5
0
'
8
4
5
.4
8
'
4 1 6 . 8 1 '


E
x

s
t

n
g

B
u

I
d

n
g

1 0 ' - 0 "
S E T B A C K
1 0 ' - 0 "
S E T B A C K
1
0
' -0
"
E
X
I

T
I
N
G

B
U
I

D
I
N
G

I C K - A N D D R F F
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
T
I
T

W
A

E X I S T I N G T I T W A
E X I S T I N G
A N D S C A E T
R E M A I N
3 9 ' - "
3
7
8
'-6
"
3
5
7
'-1
"
1 5 ' - 8 "

P
N
:
1
3
8
-0
3
-
6
0
1
-
0
0
3

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
D
R
A
IN
A
G
E
C
H
A
N
N
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
D
R
A
IN
A
G
E
C
H
A
N
N
E


E
X
IS
T
IN
G

D
R
A
IN
A
G
E

A
R
E
A
T

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
T


R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
T

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

E
T

R
E
M
A
IN

IN
E

F
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
A
N

A
B

V
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
4
'C

N
C
R
E
T
E
S
W
A

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
N
D
S
C
A

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
M

S
IT
E
W
A

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
A
N

B
E
D
E
M

IS
H
E
D

2
0

1
6

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
A
S

H
A

T

T

R
E
M
A
IN
T

.
1
7

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

T

B
E

R
E

C
A
T
E
D

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

R
F
S

C
C
E
R

F
E
I
D

1
9

1
8

1
8
1
9

2
0
2
1

2
5

2
1

4
2

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T

IR

N
G
A
T
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T

IR

N
F
E
N
C
E

3
0
.
'W
ID
E
IN
G
R
E
S
S
/E
G
R
E
S
S
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

4 0 ' W I D E I N G R E S S / E G R E S S
E A S E M E N T

0
'W
ID
E

R
IV
A
T
E
D
R
A
IN
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

0 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - "
4
0
'-0
"
E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

IG
H
T

E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
I
E
D

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
I
E
D

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

B
E
R
E
-S
T
R
I
E
D

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
K
IN
G

T

R
E
M
A
IN

7 9 ' - 5 "
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C

R
E

W
IT
H
T
R
E

IS

5
7
'-1
0
"
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T

IR

N
F
E
N
C
E
T


R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T
IR

N

F
E
N
C
E
T

R
E
M
A
IN

G
R

N
D

E
Q

I
M
E
N
T
W
/

S

F
T
F
A

R
F
A
C
E

G
R

N
D

E
Q

I
M
E
N
T
W
/S

F
T

F
A

R
F
A
C
E

T
E
A
T
H
E
R
B
A

T
R
A
C
K

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
IS

A
N
D
E
N
D
S
/

A
R
K
IN
G
T

B
E
S
T
R
I
E
D

5
'
5
0
'
1
0
0
'
G
R

P
H
IC

C

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
M
E
D
I
M
D
E
C
ID

S
T
R
E
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

A
R
G
E
E
V
E
R
G
R
E
E
N
T
R
E
E

E
X
IS
T
IN
G

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
M
E
D
I
M
S
H
R

B
S

N
E
W

4
"
B

X
T
R
E
E
"
C
H
I
E
A
N
M
E
S
Q

IT
E
"

1
8

6
6

5
5

3
8

(
4
)
5
G
A

S
H
R

B
S

E
R
N
E
W
T
R
E
E

1
6

N
E
W
W
R

G
H
T
IR

N
F
E
N
C
E

4
'W
ID
E
C
R
A
S
H
G
A
T
E
F

R
F
IR
E
A
C
C
E
S
S

1
3
5
'-0
"
1 0 ' - 0 "
1
6
0
'-0
"
1
3

N
E
W
S
T
R
I
IN
G
F

R

F
A
C

A
R
K
IN
G

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
W
R

G
H
T
IR

N

F
E
N
C
E
T

R
E
M
A
IN

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
A
S

H
A

T

T

R
E
M
A
IN
T

.
A D I N G
A D I N G
A D I N G
A D I N G
G
R

N
D
M

N
T
E
D

A
C

N
IT
S

S
C
R
E
E
N

W
A


7
7
,3
6
1

F
F
O
O
T
P
R
IN
T
(
E
X
I
T
IN
G
)

5
9
,1
6
7

F

E
C
O
N
D

E
V
E

(P
R
O
P
O

E
D
)

1
3
6
,5
2
8

F
T
O
T

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
3
0
'T
A

S
IG
N

T

R
E
M
A
IN

E X I S T I N G 3 ' T A F R E E S T A N D I N G
S I G N T R E M A I N
T

R
E
M

V
E
E
X
IS
T
IN
G

T
I
T
-

W
A

E
N
D

A
N
E

N
E
W
S
ID
E
W
A

K
A
R
E
A

E
X
IS
T
IN
G
T

T
H
S
T

B
E

D
E
M

IS
H
E
D
S
T
R

C
T

R
E
T


R
E
M
A
IN
,W
ID
E
N
D
R
IV
E
A
IS

E
T

4
'
C

E
A
R

N
E
W
W
R

G
H
T
IR

N

G
A
T
E
S
A
N
D
F
E
N
C
E
S

9

( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H ) ( H )
( H )
V A N V A N V A N V A N

IN
E

F
E
X
IS
T
IN
G
C
A
N

A
B

V
E

N
E
W
D

W
N

IG
H
T
S
T

B
E
M

N
T
E
D
T

T
H
E

N
D
E
R
S
ID
E
F

G
R

N
D

IG
H
T
IN
G

I N E F E X I S T I N G C A N A B V E
N E W D W N I G H T S T B E M N T E D T
N D E R S I D E F R A G R N D I G H T I N G
F

R
=
5
.5
%

0
' - 0
"
3 4 ' - 9 "
A N D S C A E B F F E R
3 5 ' - 0 "

A
N
D
S
C
A
E
B

F
F
E
R

6
'- 3
"
1
T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D
S E C I F I C A T I N S A R E T H E R E R T
F H G A N D A R C H I T E C T R E , T D .
S E F T H E S E D R A W I N G S I S I M I T E D
T A S E C I F I E D R J E C T F R
E R S N S N A M E D H E R E N A N D F R
T H E C N S T R C T I N F N E
R J E C T . A N S E R
R E R D C T I N , I N W H E R I N
A R T , B A N M E A N S W H A T S E V E R ,
I S S T R I C T R H I B I T E D W I T H T
T H E W R I T T E N E R M I S S I N F
H G A N D A R C H I T E C T R E , T D .
C R I G H T H G A N D
A R C H I T E C T R E , T D . 0 1 4
D
W
G
IS
S

R E V I W E D B D A T E
0 8 / 0 7 / 0 1 4 _
D E S C R I T I N I S S E
R E I M I N A R A S B M I T T A
D
A
T
E
:
J

B
#
:
R
E
V
IS
I
N
S

A
R E V # R E V I W E D B D A T E D E S C R I T I N
5 4 5 9 S . D R A N G D R . # 1 0 0
A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 1 3
7 0 . 3 4 3 . 1 8 5 0
W W W . H G A N D A R C H I T E C T R E . C M
A R C H I T E C T R E / A N N I N G / D E S I G N
T E N A A C A M S
4 5 0 0 N T E N A A W A
A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 9
S
H
E
E
T
N

:
_ _ - / - / -
_
3 _
0 8 / 1 / 0 1 4 S D R S B M I T T A A 9
/8
/
0
1
4
9
:1
1
:4
5
A
M

1
.
0

a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

la
n

ro
je
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
1
"
=
4
0
'-
0
"

1

a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

la
n

V
I
C
I
N
I
T

M
A

S 9 5
N R T H B F F A D R I V E
W
E
S
T
C
R
A
IG
R

A
D

N
E
M

N
T
A
IN

T E N A A
4
5
0
0
N
T
E
N

(
T
H
I
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
)
N R T H I N E E R W A
N R T H R A I N B W B E V A R D
N

N
D

P
E

E
G
E
N
D











Q
T

N
0
9
/
0
9
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
2
3
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
2
3
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
2
3
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
2
3
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
T H E S E D R S D
S P E C F C T O S R E T H E P R O P E R T Y
O F H O O L D R C H T E C T U R E , L T D .
U S E O F T H E S E D R S S L M T E D
T O S P E C F E D P R O J E C T F O R
P E R S O S M E D H E R E O D F O R
T H E C O S T R U C T O O F O E
P R O J E C T . Y U S E O R
R E P R O D U C T O , H O L E O R
P R T , B Y Y M E S H T S O E V E R ,
S S T R C T L Y P R O H B T E D T H O U T
T H E R T T E P E R M S S O O F
H O O L D R C H T E C T U R E , L T D .
C O P Y R H T H O O L D
R C H T E C T U R E , L T D . 2 0 1 4
D

S
S
U
E
L
O

R E V E D B Y D T E
0 8 / 0 / 2 0 1 4 _
D E S C R P T O S S U E
P R E L M R Y P P S U B M T T L
D

T
E
:
J
O
B
#
:
R
E
V
S
O


R E V # R E V E D B Y D T E D E S C R P T O
5 4 5 9 S . D U R O D R . # 1 0 0
L S V E S , V 8 9 1 1 3
0 2 . 3 4 3 . 1 8 5 0
. H O O L D R C H T E C T U R E . C O M
R C H T E C T U R E / P L / D E S
T E Y C M P U S
4 5 0 0 T E Y Y
L S V E S , V 8 9 1 2 9
S
H
E
E
T

O
:
_ _ - / - / -
2 _
3 _
0 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 S D R S U B M T T L 8
/2
1
/2
0
1
4
3
:0
5
:0

P
M

L
P
1
.
1

L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
P
h
o
to
s

P
ro
je
c
t

u
m
b
e
r
T
e
n
a
y
a

(

e
s
t
)

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

S
o
u
t
h

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

d
j
a
c
e
n
t

T
o

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
m
e
n
t

o
r
t
h

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

d
j
a
c
e
n
t

T
o

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

o
r
t
h

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

d
j
a
c
e
n
t

T
o

V
a
c
e
n
t

R
-
C
L

P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y

E
a
s
t

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

d
j
a
c
e
n
t

T
o

U
S

9
5

S
o
u
t
h

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e

d
j
a
c
e
n
t

T
o

V
a
c
a
n
t

C
1

P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y

0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&
1
T H E S E D R S D
S P E C F C T O S R E T H E P R O P E R T Y
O F H O O L D R C H T E C T U R E , L T D .
U S E O F T H E S E D R S S L M T E D
T O S P E C F E D P R O J E C T F O R
P E R S O S M E D H E R E O D F O R
T H E C O S T R U C T O O F O E
P R O J E C T . Y U S E O R
R E P R O D U C T O , H O L E O R
P R T , B Y Y M E S H T S O E V E R ,
S S T R C T L Y P R O H B T E D T H O U T
T H E R T T E P E R M S S O O F
H O O L D R C H T E C T U R E , L T D .
C O P Y R H T H O O L D
R C H T E C T U R E , L T D . 2 0 1 4
D

S
S
U
E
L
O

R E V E D B Y D T E
0 8 / 0 / 2 0 1 4 _
D E S C R P T O S S U E
P R E L M R Y P P S U B M T T L
D

T
E
:
J
O
B
#
:
R
E
V
S
O


R E V # R E V E D B Y D T E D E S C R P T O
5 4 5 9 S . D U R O D R . # 1 0 0
L S V E S , V 8 9 1 1 3
0 2 . 3 4 3 . 1 8 5 0
. H O O L D R C H T E C T U R E . C O M
R C H T E C T U R E / P L / D E S
T E Y C M P U S
4 5 0 0 T E Y Y
L S V E S , V 8 9 1 2 9
S
H
E
E
T

O
:
_ _ - / - / -
2 _
3 _
0 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 S D R S U B M T T L 8
/2
1
/2
0
1
4
3
:0
5
:0
1

P
M

5
.
2

E
x
is
tin
g
E
x
te
r
io
r
E
le
v
a
tio
n
s

P
ro
je
c
t

u
m
b
e
r
S
o
u
t
h

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

o
r
t
h

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

E
a
s
t

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

e
s
t

-

E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&
8

1

A

E

2
9
8
'

4
2
'

4
2
'

4
2
'

4
2
'

4
2
'

4
4
'

3

'

2
5
'

2
1
'

4
4
'

2
3
5
S
F

P
r
in
c
ip
a
I

ic


5
4

8
7
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

6
1

1
5
8
S
F

D

a
n

ic


7
1

e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

L
e
g
e
n
d

A
d
m
n

E
le
m
e
n
ta
r
y

C
a
fe
te
r
a

R
e
s
tr
o
o
m
s

U
tlty

K
tc
h
e
n

A
u
d
to
r
u
m

P
r
e

4
8
8
S
F

C
a

r
ia
S
t
o
r
a
g


3
2
3

1
1
9
5
S
F

K
in
d

r
g
a
r
t

n

3
2
5

3
S
F

K
in
d

r
g
a
r
t

n

3
2
6

1
1
4
4
S
F

K
in
d

r
g
a
r
t

n

3
2
8

8
4
2
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5


8
4
2
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
1

8
4
2
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
2

8
4
2
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
3

8
4
2
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
4

8
4
2
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
5

8
4
2
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
6

8
7
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
7

8
7
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
8

8
7
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
5
9

8
7
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6


8
7
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6
1

8
7
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6
2

8
7
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6
3

9
2
4
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6
5

9
2
4
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6
6

9
2
4
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6
7

9
2
4
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6
8

9
2
4
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
6
9

8
6
8
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
7
7

8
3
8
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

3
7
8

S
F

S
P
.
D

3
8
8

1

S
F

C
o
u
n

Io
r

3
8
9

1
5
8
S
F

A

i
t
a
n
t

P
r
in
c
ip
a
I
3
9


A
5
.

1

A
5
.1

2

A
5
.1

1

A
5
.

2

8
5
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

4
2


1
2

3
S
F

K
in
d

r
g
a
r
t

n

4
2
2

9
3
S
F

R
R

4
2
6

1
5
3
S
F

S
t
o
r
a
g


4
3


1
4
6
S
F

U
t
iIit
y

4
3
1

7
1
S
F

R
R

4
3
2

6
9
S
F

R
R

4
3
3

1
1
4
4
S
F

K
in
d

r
g
a
r
t

n

4
3
7

1
1
1
4
5
S
F

C
a

r
ia
/

M
u
It
i
p
u
r
p
o


4
3
8

2
S
F

C
o
u
n

Io
r

4
4


1
5
4
S
F

i
t
a
n
t

P
r
in
c
ip
a
I
4
4
2

1

5
S
F

C
u

t
o
d
ia
n

4
4
4

8
8
5
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

4
6
7

9
2
4
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

5

3

9

S
F

R
R

5
2
7

7
1
S
F

R
R

5
2
8

9
7
S
F

R
R

5
2
9

1
3

S
F

S
t
o
.
5
3
1

5 4 ' 7 6 ' 7 6 ' 3 7 '
2 4 3 '
2
7

S
F

I
c
t
r
ic
a
I1

5
3
5

2
2
9
S
F

N
u
r

/R
R

5
3
8

2
8
9
7
S
F

A
u
d
it
o
r
iu
m

5
3
9

1

5
S
F

F
ir

R
i

r

5
4


8
4
3
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

5
4
1

9
3
7
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

5
4
4

8
6
8
S
F

I
m

n
t
a
r
y

5
4
8

9

1
1

7
6
'

8
1
S
F

P
r

K

5
5

1
1
S
F

P
r

K

5
5
1

9
8
3
S
F

K
in
d

r
g
a
r
t

n

5
5
2

9
6
S
F

R
R

5
5
3

6
3
S
F

R
R

5
5
4

6
7
S
F

R
R

5
5
5

2

9
S
F

I
c
t
r
ic
a
I2

5
5
6

1
1
2

S
F

K
in
d

r
g
a
r
t

n

5
5
7

6
7
S
F

R
R

5
5
8

1
9
2
S
F

/A
c
t
iv
it
i


5
6
3

2

S
F

S
P
.
D

5
6
4

2
4

S
F

C
o
n

n
c


5
6
5

1
4
8
S
F

p
t
io
n
i
t

5
6
6

8
3
1
S
F

p
t
io
n
/

W
a
it
in
g

5
6
8

9
3
S
F

P
u
b
Iic
R
R

5
6
9

9
3
S
F

P
u
b
Iic
R
R

5
7

8
S
F

W
o
m

n
'

R

t
r
o
o
m

5
7
2

1

8
S
F

M

n
'
R

t
r
o
o
m

5
7
3

2
9
6
S
F

W
o
r
k
/C
o
p
y

5
7
4

1

9
S
F

C
o
n
t
r
o
I
5
7
5

1
5
6
S
F

D

a
n

ic


5
7
6

8
5
S
F

A
d
m
in
A

i
t
a
n
t

5
7
9

2
5
5
S
F

n
'

5
8


2
5
5
S
F

W
o
m

n
'

5
8
1

3
7
4
S
F

M

c
h
a
n
ic
a
I
5
8
2

1
6
1
7
S
F

K
it
c
h

n

6
1


5
2
5
S
F

F
a
c
u
It
y
L
o
u
n
g


6
1
1

9
5
7
S
F

K
in
d

r
g
a
r
t

n

6
1
2

3
2

S
F

M

n
'
R
R

6
1
3

3
2

S
F

W
o
m

n
'
R
R

6
1
4

6

S
F

F
a
c
u
It
y
R
R

6
1
5

6

S
F

F
a
c
u
It
y
R
R

6
1
6

4
2
2
S
F

n
'

6
1
7

4
2
2
S
F

W
o
m

n
'

6
1
8

1

'
2

'
4

'
G
R
A
P
H
IC
S
C
A
L

=
3
,6
9
7
S
F

=
3
3
,2
9
9
S
F

=
1
1
,1
4
6
S
F

=
3
,3
0
0
S
F

=
1
,9
8
0
S
F

=
1
,6
1
7
S
F

=
2
,8
9
7
S
F

=
2
,0
9
2
S
F

T

T
A
L
=
6
0
,0
2
8
S
F

C
IR
C
U
L
A
T
I
N
=
1
7
,3
3
3
S
F

G
R
A
N
D
T

T
A
L
=
7
7
,3
6
1
(

X
IS
T
IN
G
S
F
)

2
5

M
a
x
S
e
a
tn
g
C
a
p
a
c
ty

T
A
L

C
C
U
P
A
N
T
L

A
D
=
2
,7
9
6

1
T H E S E R A W l N G S A N
S P E C l F l C A T l O N S A R E T H E P R O P E R T Y
O F H O O G L A N A R C H l T E C T U R E , L T .
U S E O F T H E S E R A W l N G S l S L l M l T E
T O A S P E C l F l E P R O J E C T F O R
P E R S O N S N A M E H E R E O N A N F O R
T H E C O N S T R U C T l O N O F O N E
P R O J E C T . A N Y U S E O R
R E P R O U C T l O N , l N W H O L E O R l N
P A R T , Y A N Y M E A N S W H A T S O E V E R ,
l S S T R l C T L Y P R O H l l T E W l T H O U T
T H E W R l T T E N P E R M l S S l O N O F
H O O G L A N A R C H l T E C T U R E , L T .
C O P Y R l G H T H O O G L A N
A R C H l T E C T U R E , L T . 2 1 4

W
G
lS
S
U
E
L
O
G

R E V l W E Y A T E
8 / 7 / 2 1 4 _
E S C R l P T l O N l S S U E
P R E L l M l N A R Y A P P S U M l T T A L

A
T
E
:
J
O

#
:
R
E
V
lS
lO
N
S

A
R E V # R E V l W E Y A T E E S C R l P T l O N
5 4 5 9 S . U R A N G O R . # 1
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 1 3
7 2 . 3 4 3 . 1 8 5
W W W . H O O G L A N A R C H l T E C T U R E . C O M
A R C H l T E C T U R E / P L A N N l N G / E S l G N
T E N A Y A C A M P U S
4 5 N T E N A Y A W A Y
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 2 9
S
H
E
E
T
N
O
:
_ _ / /
2 _
3 _
8 / 2 1 / 2 1 4 S R S U M l T T A L A 8
/2
1
/2

1
4
3
:
4
:5
8

P
M

A
2
.


L
e
v
e
l 1

P
ro
je
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
1
/1
6

=
1
'

L
e
v
e
l 1
F
lo
o
r
P
la
n

N

N
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&
D
N

D
N

D
N

D
N

8

1

A

E

D

B

.0

1

.1

.1

1

A

.0

2

9

1
0

1
1

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
2


D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

L
e
g
e
n
d

A
d
m
in

E
e
m
e
n
ta
r
y

M
id
d
e
S
c
h
o
o

R
e
s
tr
o
o
m
s

U
tiity

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e

8

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
2

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
2

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
2

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
2
8

8

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
2
9

8

S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

1

0

8

S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

1

1

8

1
S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

2
S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
1

2
S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
1

2
S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
1
8

8

2
S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
1
9

8

2
S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
2
0

8

2
S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1
2
1

9
2

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

I
1

8

1
0
0

S
F

M
S
S
c
ie

c
e

2
8

2
S
F

M
S
S
c
ie

c
e

1
S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y
S
c

2
S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

9

8

0
S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

0

8

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

0

1

0
S
F

P
r
e
p

8
2

1
0
9
S
F

R

0
S
F

R
e
s

u
r
c
e

9

8

9
S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c


9
2

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

8

9
2

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

9

9
2

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

0

9
2

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

1

9
2

S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

2

9

S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

8
8

2

2
S
F

M
e

's

8
9

2

2
S
F

's

9
0

8
9
S
F

U
t
iIit
y

9
1

S
F

R
e
s

u
r
c
e

9
2

9

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

0
1

9

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

0
2

9

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

8
S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

8
S
F

's
R
R

2
0

8

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

2
2
S
F

M
e

's

2
2
S
F

W

's


8
9
1
S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

8
S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

1

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

2
9
S
F

M
e

's
R
R

1
9

S
F

F
a
c
u
It
y
R
R

2
1

S
F

F
a
c
u
It
y
R
R

2
2

O
p
e

B
e
I
w

1
2
0

S
F

M
S
S
c
ie

c
e

1
1
9
1
S
F

M
S
S
c
ie

c
e

S
F

e
r
e

c
e

1
2

O
p
e

B
e
I
w

1
1
9

S
F

M
id
d
Ie
S
c

S
F

IT
O

ic
e


2
1

S
F

P
r
e
p

S
F

S
t

r
a
g
e

9
8

9
9
S
F

Ie
c
t
r
ic
a
I


1
1
0
S
F

U
t
iIit
y

0
8

8
8
2
S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y


8
9

S
F

Ie

t
a
r
y

2
8

O
p
e


B
e
I
w

2
S
F

C

e
r
e

c
e

1

2
1

S
F

D
a
t
a

1
0
'
2
0
'

0
'
G
R
A
P
H
IC
S
C
A
L

2
9
8
' - 0
"

2
' - 0
"

2
' - 0
"

2
' - 0
"

2
' - 0
"

2
' - 0
"

' - 0
"

0
' - 0
"
2

' - 0
"
2
1
' - 0
"

' - 0
"
' - 0 " ' - 0 " ' - 0 " ' - 0 "
2 ' - 0 "

' - 0
"
=
2
3
5
S
F

=
1
1
,3
9
8
S
F

=
2
8
,9
2
7
S
F

=
2
,1
2
1
S
F

=
1
,1
5
4
S
F

=
2
,0
3
1
S
F

T
O
T
A
L
=
4
5
,8
6
6
S
F

C
IR
C
U
L
A
T
IO
N
=
1
3
,3
0
1
S
F

G
R
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
=
5
9
,1
6
7
(
P
R
O
P
O
S

D
S
F
)

T
O
T
A
L
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
D
=
2
,0
4
5

1
T H E S E D R A W l N G S A N D
S P E C l F l C A T l O N S A R E T H E P R O P E R T Y
O F H O O G L A N D A R C H l T E C T U R E , L T D .
U S E O F T H E S E D R A W l N G S l S L l M l T E D
T O A S P E C l F l E D P R O J E C T F O R
P E R S O N S N A M E D H E R E O N A N D F O R
T H E C O N S T R U C T l O N O F O N E
P R O J E C T . A N Y U S E O R
R E P R O D U C T l O N , l N W H O L E O R l N
P A R T , B Y A N Y M E A N S W H A T S O E V E R ,
l S S T R l C T L Y P R O H l B l T E D W l T H O U T
T H E W R l T T E N P E R M l S S l O N O F
H O O G L A N D A R C H l T E C T U R E , L T D .
C O P Y R l G H T H O O G L A N D
A R C H l T E C T U R E , L T D . 2 0 1
D
W
G
lS
S
U
E
L
O
G

R E V l W E D B Y D A T E
0 8 / 0 / 2 0 1 _
D E S C R l P T l O N l S S U E
P R E L l M l N A R Y A P P S U B M l T T A L
D
A
T
E
:
J
O
B
#
:
R
E
V
lS
lO
N
S

A
R E V # R E V l W E D B Y D A T E D E S C R l P T l O N
9 S . D U R A N G O D R . # 1 0 0
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 1
0 2 . . 1 8 0
W W W . H O O G L A N D A R C H l T E C T U R E . C O M
A R C H l T E C T U R E / P L A N N l N G / D E S l G N
T E N A Y A C A M P U S
0 0 N T E N A Y A W A Y
L A S V E G A S , N V 8 9 1 2 9
S
H
E
E
T
N
O
:
_ _ - / - / -
2 _
_
0 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 S D R S U B M l T T A L A 8
/2
1
/2
0
1


:0

:
8

P
M
A
2
.
1

L
e
v
e
2
P
ro
je
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
N

1
/1

"
=
1
'-
0
"

L
e
v
e
2
F
o
o
r
P
a
n

N
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&
0
9
/
2
3
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
0
9
/
2
3
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
2
6
2
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
3
3

&

S
D
R
-
5
5
7
2
4

-

R
E
V
I
S
E
D
S
U
P
-

7
3
3

[
P
P
J
-

Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
Z
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

Q
U
E
S
T

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
E
S
T
L
A
N
D

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S


L
L
C

4

0
0

N
O
P
T
H

T
E
N
A
Y
A

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
3
3

[
P
P
J
-

Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
Z
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

Q
U
E
S
T

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
E
S
T
L
A
N
D

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S


L
L
C

4

0
0

N
O
P
T
H

T
E
N
A
Y
A

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
3
3

[
P
P
J
-

Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
Z
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

Q
U
E
S
T

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
E
S
T
L
A
N
D

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S


L
L
C

4

0
0

N
O
P
T
H

T
E
N
A
Y
A

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
3
3

[
P
P
J
-

Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
Z
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

Q
U
E
S
T

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
E
S
T
L
A
N
D

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S


L
L
C

4

0
0

N
O
P
T
H

T
E
N
A
Y
A

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
3
3

[
P
P
J
-

Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
Z
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

Q
U
E
S
T

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
E
S
T
L
A
N
D

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S


L
L
C

4

0
0

N
O
P
T
H

T
E
N
A
Y
A

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
3
3

[
P
P
J
-

Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
Z
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

Q
U
E
S
T

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
E
S
T
L
A
N
D

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S


L
L
C

4

0
0

N
O
P
T
H

T
E
N
A
Y
A

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
3
3

[
P
P
J
-

Z
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

P
E
L
A
T
E
D

T
O

S
D
P
-

7
Z
4

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

Q
U
E
S
T

C
H
A
P
T
E
P

S
C
H
O
O
L

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
E
S
T
L
A
N
D

E
N
T
E
P
P
P
I
S
E
S


L
L
C

4

0
0

N
O
P
T
H

T
E
N
A
Y
A

W
A
Y

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4



Henry CJ Hoogland, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C
Principal Architect
cj@hooglandarchitecture.com

Aug 21, 2014

City of Las Vegas Planning Commission


495 S. Main Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101

Re: Re: Re: Re: 4500 4500 4500 4500N. Tenaya Way N. Tenaya Way N. Tenaya Way N. Tenaya Way

To Whom It May Concern,

We have been engaged by Quest Preparatory Academy, a State of Nevada-chartered school, to


provide feasibility and design services for the property located at 4500 N. Tenaya Way (APN 138-
03-601-003). Quest would like to improve the existing facility to use as a K-8 school with 2,076
students. The facility will also have some Pre-K (Individual Care) for fewer than 60 children.

The property is currently zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial). Use as a primary or secondary public or
private school is allowed with a special use permit special use permit special use permit special use permit. The property is bound on the east side by the I-
95 freeway, by a commercial development (also C-1) to the south, by a compact lot residential
subdivision to the north (zoned R-CL), and by N. Tenaya Way on the west side. Across N. Tenaya
Way is a compact lot residential subdivision (also zoned R-CL).

Within 1000 feet of the property also exists a CCSD elementary school (Deskin Elementary, C-V),
a large retail commercial development (Craig Marketplace, C-1), an office use (Chase Bank, O),
multiple residential developments (R-1, R-PD3, and R-PD8), a cemetery (Bunkers Memory
Gardens), and a pet cemetery (C.R.P.C. Pet Cemetery). The nearest CCSD public high schools are
Cimarron Memorial (2.6 miles), Cheyenne High School (3.6 miles), and Centennial High School
(4.3 miles).

Quest Preparatory Academy, which is in the process of acquiring 4500 N. Tenaya Way, currently
operates 4 campuses in Las Vegas and is opening another in the Fall of 2014 in another
underserved area. They currently serve over 1000 students with a faculty and
administration/staff of 111. Quest is a public charter school currently offering K-8 education.

Since the propertys original development in 1995 as a building materials retail supply and
lumber yard by now-defunct Payless Cashways, Inc., the property at 4500 N. Tenaya Way has
continuously struggled as a commercial retail location. Multiple tenants have occupied the 9.88
acres, and each ultimately have failed to establish a sustainable retail commercial operation.
While the current and past owners have endeavored to keep the 74,000 sq. ft. building occupied,
the existing building, parking lot and lumber yard have been severely underutilized. We believe
this underutilization has contributed in part to regular incidences of vandalism and graffiti,
despite the owners efforts to maintain the appearance of the property.

Many factors contribute to making this site ideal as an adaptive re adaptive re adaptive re adaptive re- -- -use use use use charter school. Those
factors include: the size, configuration and construction type of the existing main building
(submitted originally under the 1991 Uniform Building Code as a Type IIN), the size and
school. Those
n building
size and
08/21/14
PRJ-55262
SDR-55724
SUP-55733 &
2

5459 S. Durango Dr. #100 Las Vegas, NV 89113 P: 702.343.1850 hooglandarchitecture.com

configuration of the lumber yard for re-use as protected sports and play areas, the height of the
existing lumber yard wall and storage canopy surrounding the western portion of the site for re-
use as a shade canopy, the existing parking capacity on the east side of the property, the sites
adjacency to the Interstate-95 freeway, access to Craig Road (120 Parkway Arterial Street) and to
N. Tenaya Way (60 Collector). The benefits of developing this site as a charter school include: re-
using a site that has historically been vacant or underutilized, beautification of the existing
property through the addition of architecture, upgrading the landscaping to current CLV
Development Code standards, offering a Pre-K and K-8 educational experience for those families
seeking this option, and making available these facilities to other approved community-oriented
organizations and events.

Adequate pick-up and drop-off will easily be provided with all vehicle stacking remaining onsite.
Each morning before school and each afternoon, teachers and other faculty members will be
directing students and parents in the pick-up and drop-off zone in order to maintain a safe
environment for all. Minimum parking requirements (3 spaces per primary classroom and 9
spaces per secondary classroom) have been satisfied through relocating some landscaping
islands and restriping. Egress from the site to Craig Road will occur to the south thru a common
easement.

Currently this site does not provide an accessible route from the public right of way to the
building. As part of the improvements to this site we are proposing a new pedestrian accessible
route from Tenaya to the building entrance. The new route will allow pedestrian access onto the
site from the southwest corner. The accessible route will be shaded by the existing canopy
structure. Some of the existing tilt-up wall panels at the south of the canopy structure will be
removed to improve visibility and security.

We feel privileged to be part of this exciting community-oriented project. We ask for your support
in making this project a reality for our valleys students and teachers. If any additional information
for this project is required, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (702)343-1850.

Respectfully,
CJ

Henry CJ Hoogland, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C


Principal

2
hooglandarchitecture.commmm
08/21/14
PRJ-55262
SDR-55724 SUP-55733 &
1
Nora Lares
Subject: FW: [PRJ-55262 (SDR-55724 & SUP-55733)]

From: cj@hooglandarchitecture.com [mailto:cj@hooglandarchitecture.com]


Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 11:45 AM
To: Jonathan Boyles
Cc: kward@hooglandarchitecture.com
Subject: [PRJ-55262 (SDR-55724 & SUP-55733)]

HiJonathan,

Asafollowuptoourphoneconversation,pleasewithdrawtheapplicationswithoutprejudiceontheQuestTenaya
project[PRJ55262(SDR55724&SUP55733)].Sadly,wewillnotbemovingforwardwiththisprojectatthistime.AsI
stated,thedirectorforcharterschoolsatthestateisnotallowingQuesttoexpandthisyearastheyhadplanned.Ihave
beentoldthathemayallowtheschooltoexpandintwoyears.Wehopetopickupwhereweleftoff,butknowthat
manythingscanchangebetweennowandthen.Thankyousincerelyforyoureffortsandthatofyoursupportstaffon
thisproject.Welookforwardtoworkingwithyouinthenearfuture.

Bestregards,
CJ

HENRY CJ HOOGLAND, III AIA, NCARB, LEED AP


Principal

M7023431850
cj@hooglandarchitecture.com

www.hooglandarchitecture.com

5459S.DurangoDr.#100
LasVegas,NV89113

SUP-55733 & SDR-55724




Agenda tem No.: 34.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SDR-55724 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-55733 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: QUEST CHARTER SCHOOL - OWNER: WESTLAND
ENTERPRISES, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Major Amendment to a previously
approved Site Development Plan Review (Z-0105-93) FOR A 136,528 SQUARE-FOOT
PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE on 9.88 acres at 4500 North Tenaya Way (APN 138-03-
601-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) |PRJ-55262|. StaII recommends
APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
08/25/14
PRJ-55262
SDR-55724
SDR 55724
Quest Charter School
4500 N Tenaya Way
Proposed 2136 student private school.
Current Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
BUILDING MATERIALS &LUMBER
STORE [1000 SF]
136.528
45.16 6,166
AM Peak Hour 2.60 355
PM Peak Hour 4.49 613
Proposed Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
PRIVATE SCHOOL, K-12 [STUDENTS] 2136
2.48 5,297
AM Peak Hour 0.81 1,730
PM Peak Hour 0.58 1,239
Net Change
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
PRIVATE SCHOOL, K-12 [STUDENTS] 2136
15.43 -868
AM Peak Hour 0.81 1,375
PM Peak Hour 0.17 626
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:
Craig Rd.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 20,275
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,622
Tenaya Way
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10,763
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 861
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Craig Rd. 51,800
Tenaya Way 25,400
This project will reduce traffic by approximately 868 trips per day on Craig Rd. and Tenaya Way. Craig is currently at
about 39 percent of capacity and Tenaya is at about 42 percent of capacity. With this project, Craig is expected to be at
about 37 percent of capacity and Tenaya to be at about 39 percent of capacity.


Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 1,375 additional cars, or about twenty-two every
minute.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Consistent with the Citys


sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.


Agenda tem No.: 35.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55012 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIAN
AND JUDY ALBISER LIVING TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use
Permit FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN AN
EXISTING 2,000 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED at
1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #3 (APNs 139-35-211-073 and 074), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-54768|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: BRIAN AND JUDY ALBISER LIVING
TRUST


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55012 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

N/A


SbF-55012 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a
Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale Establishment use.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as part oI any business license application.

5. Approval oI this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval oI a liquor license.

6. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6.50 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting approval oI a Special Use Permit to sell beer, wine and wine coolers
in an existing 2,000 square-Ioot General Retail Store, Other Than Listed located within existing
retail center at 1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #3. This use meets all Title 19.12 requirements Ior
the Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale Establishment use and is compatible with the other retail and
oIIice uses within the retail center. For these reasons, staII recommends approval oI the
requested Special Use Permit, with conditions. II denied, no alcohol may be sold at this location.


ISSUES

A Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-2 (General
Commercial) zoning district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.
There is a non-permitted wall sign on the north side oI the building.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
06/13/63
The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0096-63) request Irom R-4 (High
Density Residential) to a C-2 (General Commercial) at 1201 Stewart Avenue.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.

07/20/11

The City Council denied a Special Use Permit (SUP-41278) request Ior a
Bailbond Service use at 1201 Stewart Avenue. The Planning Commission and
staII recommended denial.
10/25/11
A complaint (#107144) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior work being
perIormed without permits. The complaint was resolved on 11/15/11.
09/11/14
A complaint (#145492) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior the non-
permitted wall sign on the north side oI the building.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
07/22/05 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.
SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
1964 The building was constructed.
12/12/91
A business license (D50-00067) was issued Ior Dry Cleaning/Laundry
Facility and Services at 1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #8. The license is active
as 09/17/14.
01/14/03
A building permit (#3000689) was issued Ior tenant improvement and
certiIicate oI completion at 1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #3. The permit was
Iinalized on 04/01/03.
02/01/05
A business license (B20-00866) was issued Ior Business Services at 1201
Stewart Avenue, Suite #6. The license is active as 09/17/14.
12/28/07
A business license (B05-03080) was issued Ior Barber or Cosmetology at
1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #7. The license is active as 09/17/14.
07/10/08
A business license (R60-60-03249) was issued Ior Janitorial And Building
Maintenance Services at 1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #6. The license was
marked out on 07/19/11.
07/22/08
A business license (G50-00996) was issued Ior General Retail Sales at 1201
Stewart Avenue, Suite #7. The license is active as 09/17/14.
07/25/08
A business license (R25-00335) was issued Ior Property Maintenance at 1201
Stewart Avenue, Suite #2. The license was marked out on 07/14/14.
09/24/09
A business license G50-04269) was issued Ior General Retail Sales at 1201
Stewart Avenue, Suite #5. The license is active as 09/17/14.
05/17/10
A business license (N31-00688) was issued Ior a Non-ProIit Social Service
Provider at 1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #6. The license is active as 09/17/14.
08/9/10
A business license (R60-02440) was issued Ior Janitorial And Building
Maintenance services at 1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #2. The license was
marked out on 07/14/14.
08/29/13
A business license (I50-00795) was issued Ior Instructional And Learning
Services at 1201 Stewart Avenue, Suite #4. The license is active as 09/17/14.
08/29/13
A business license (M21-01293) was issued Ior Merchandise Broker at 1201
Stewart Avenue, Suite #4. The license was marked out on 07/17/14.
01/21/14
A business license (C05-02900) was issued Ior Tobacco Dealer at 1201
Stewart Avenue, Suite #3. The license is active as 09/17/14.
01/21/14
A business license (C15-00431) was issued Ior a Convenience Store at 1201
Stewart Avenue, Suite #3. The license is active as 09/17/14.


Pre-Application Meeting
06/26/13
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the Special
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale
Establishment use.
SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
A Iield check was conducted on the subject property revealed that there was a
non-permitted wall sign on the north side oI the building. Also, that one oI the
adjacent suites was possibly a house oI worship; however, aIter a Iurther
investigation oI building permits and business licenses no house oI worship
legally exists on the subject site.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.49


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
Subject Property
Social Service
Provider
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
North
Social Service
Provider
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
South
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
East
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
OIIice, Other than
Listed
C-2 (General
Commercial)
West
Multi-Family
Residential
MXU (Mixed Use)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Live/Work Overlay District Y
SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR
Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment)
N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
General Retail
Store, Other
Than listed
6000 SF 1:175 35
Social Service
Provider
1000 SF 1:300 4


TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 31*

31

Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 29* 2* 29 2 Y*
*Site is parking impaired as detailed in Title 19.18.030 (D)


ANALYSIS

This application is Ior Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale Establishment use within an existing 2,000
square-Ioot General Retail Store Other, Than Listed (a convenience store) located 1201 Stewart
Avenue, Suite #3. The sale oI alcohol in a convenience store is a compatible use throughout the
valley. The retail center will provide shared parking and access throughout the 0.49-acre site.
The proposed use is permissible in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district with approval
oI a Special Use Permit.

The Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale use is deIined in Title 19.18 as:

'A retail establishment whose license to sell alcoholic beverage is limited to the sale oI
beer, wine, and coolers to consumers only and not Ior resale, in original sealed or corked
containers, Ior consumption oII the premises where the same are sold, and is operated in
connection with a grocery store, drug store, convenience store or specialty merchandise
store.
SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Per the submitted justiIication letter and Iloor plan, the proposed use meets the deIinition
outlined above. The justiIication letter states the applicant`s intent to sell beer and wine Ior oII-
sale consumption at this convenience store location.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior this use include:

*1. Except as otherwise provided, no retail beer/wine/cooler oII-sale (hereinaIter
'establishment) shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church, synagogue, school, child
care Iacility licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea use meets this requirement, there are no protectea uses within 400 feet of
the proposea use.

2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances reIerred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two
property lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest
to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property
line oI that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance
shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes
oI measurement, the term 'property line reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels
and does not include the property line oI:

a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on-site parking
and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in
Requirement 1.

The proposea use meets this requirement, measurement is taken from the existing
property line of Lots 6 ana 8 of Plat Book 1 Page 7, locatea at the northeast corner of
Stewart Avenue ana Marylana Parkway.

3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in
size, the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight
line:
a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the
structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles; or
b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping
center or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the
existing use to the nearest property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as the parcel on which it is
proposea is less than 80 acres in si:e.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application Ior an establishment which also
requires a waiver oI the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission
shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part oI its recommendation
to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the
reasons in support oI the decision.

This requirement aoes not apply to the proposea use, as no aistance separation Waiver is
necessary.

5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:
a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a
hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square Ieet oI retail Iloor
space.

Neither of the above conaitions apply to the proposea use.

6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter 6.50 |Non-Waivable|.

The proposea use meets this requirement, as beer, wine, ana wine coolers will be sola for
off-premises consumption only. Also, conformance to LJMC Chapter 6.50 is a stanaara
conaition of approval that cannot be waivea.

The proposed use will be located within an existing General Retail Store, Other Than Listed
within an existing retail center along Stewart Avenue. There is a Social Service Provider within
the retail center and the adjacent property to the north. Both Social Service Providers assist
individuals with substance abuse issues. There are two establishments within a one-block radius
oI the subject site that have a license to sell beer, wine and wine coolers, and the addition oI
another establishment should not adversely aIIect the characteristics or saIety oI the existing and
Iuture land uses. No additional parking is required Ior this use, as it is ancillary to the primary
use oI General Retail Store, Other Than Listed. All oI the minimum Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale
use requirements detailed in Title 19.12 are met and there no special development requirements
pertaining to this site. There are no protected uses located within 400 Ieet oI the subject
property. For these reasons, the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding uses, and staII
recommends approval oI this applicant with conditions.
SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



FINDINGS (SUP-55012)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The subject location consists oI an in-line retail center. This use and other retail uses are
generally located in strip malls throughout the valley. There are no waivers oI minimum
distance separation requirements Irom protected uses and the use can be conducted in a
harmonious and compatible manner with surrounding land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The 7,000 square-Ioot retail building is designed to accommodate a variety oI retail and
oIIice uses. This site has adequate parking Ior all uses, and the proposed use does not
generate the need Ior any additional parking spaces.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale Establishment use can be accessed Irom Stewart
Avenue and Maryland Parkway (80-Ioot Major Collectors). Both roadways have adequate
capacity to serve the needs oI the proposed development.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler OII-Sale Establishment will be subject to regular
inspections by regulatory agencies Ior business licensing and will thereIore not
compromise the public health, saIety and welIare, or the overall objectives oI the General
Plan.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed use meets all the minimum Special Use Permit requirements detailed in Title
19.12.
SUP-55012 PR1-54768]
MR

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 35


NOTICES MAILED 401


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0
08/19/14
PRJ-54768
SUP-55012
08/19/14
PRJ-54768
SUP-55012
10/14/14 PC
08/19/14
PRJ-54768
SUP-55012
08/19/14
PRJ-54768
SUP-55012
08/19/14
PRJ-54768
SUP-55012
08/19/14
PRJ-54768
SUP-55012
S
U
P
-

0
1
Z

[
P
P
J
-

4
7

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
I
A
N

A
N
D

J
U
D
Y

A
L

I
S
E
P

L
I
V
I
N
S

T
P
U
S
T

1
Z
0
1

S
T
E
W
A
P
T

A
V
E
N
U
E


S
U
I
T
E

3

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

0
1
Z

[
P
P
J
-

4
7

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
I
A
N

A
N
D

J
U
D
Y

A
L

I
S
E
P

L
I
V
I
N
S

T
P
U
S
T

1
Z
0
1

S
T
E
W
A
P
T

A
V
E
N
U
E


S
U
I
T
E

3

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

0
1
Z

[
P
P
J
-

4
7

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

P
I
A
N

A
N
D

J
U
D
Y

A
L

I
S
E
P

L
I
V
I
N
S

T
P
U
S
T

1
Z
0
1

S
T
E
W
A
P
T

A
V
E
N
U
E


S
U
I
T
E

3

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


08/19/14
PRJ-54768
SUP-55012


Agenda tem No.: 36.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55390 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: EARL
M MORIMOTO TRUST - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED OFF-PREMISE SIGN at 3838 Meadows Lane (APN 139-31-510-021), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) |PRJ-55084|. StaII recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: EARL M. MORIMOTO TRUST


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55390 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:


`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5530 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all OII-Premise Sign Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

5. This Special Use Permit shall be reviewed in Iive (5) year(s), at which time the City Council
may require the OII-Premise Sign be removed. The applicant shall be responsible Ior
notiIication costs oI the review. Failure to pay the City Ior these costs may result in a
requirement that the OII-Premise Sign be removed.

6. The OII-Premise Sign and its supporting structure shall be properly maintained and kept Iree
oI graIIiti at all times. Failure to perIorm the required maintenance may result in Iines
and/or removal oI the OII-Premise Sign.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



7. The property owner shall keep the property properly maintained and graIIiti-Iree at all times.
Failure to perIorm required maintenance may result in Iines and/or removal oI the OII-
Premise Sign.

8. Only one advertising sign is permitted per sign Iace.

9. Bird deterrent devices shall be installed on the sign.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``


PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This application is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed 18-Ioot by 31-Ioot OII-
Premise Sign to be located at 3838 Meadows Lane. The sign would be 40 Ieet tall, have 572
square Ieet oI sign area and no additional embellishments. The proposed OII-Premise Sign meets
all minimum code requirements; however the subject site is located within the city oI Las Vegas
Redevelopment Area. The proposal does not meet the Goals, Objectives and Policies oI the
Neighborhood Revitalization section oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. Since the proposal is
not in accordance with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, it does not meet the goals and objectives
oI the Redevelopment Plan Area. By recommending denial oI this proposal, staII Iollows
Objective 2.4, ensuring that the quality oI existing residential neighborhoods are maintained and
enhanced. II denied, no OII-Premise Sign would be allowed on this site.


ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required Ior an OII-Premise Sign in a C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
12/28/77
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0102-73)
Ior property located at the northeast corner oI Valley View Boulevard and
Meadows Lane. Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
04/18/12
The City Council approved General Plan Amendment (GPA-43991) to
establish redevelopment area two and change the Iuture land use designation
on various parcels within the redevelopment area to commercial or mixed use.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
05/04/10 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
c.1980
The existing oIIice and retail complex was constructed at the southwest
corner oI Valley View Boulevard and Meadows Lane.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Pre-Application Meeting
07/16/14
StaII met with the applicant to discuss the proposed OII-Premise Sign at 3838
Meadows Lane. StaII determined that the sign met the minimum requirements
as outlined in Title 19.12.120; however a Special Use Permit would be
required to allow an OII-Premise Sign on property with an C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning designation. The submittal requirements Ior a Special
Use Permit were discussed.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a routine Iield check and noted a well maintained shopping
center Iree oI any trash or debris.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Gross Acres 2.94


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
North
Financial Institution,
General
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Church/House oI
Worship
South
OIIice, Other Than
Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East Government Facility PF (Public Facility) C-V (Civic)
West Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (140 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Valley View
Boulevard
Major Collector
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
80 Feet Y
Meadows Lane Collector
Master Plan oI Streets
and Highways
72 Feet Y


Standards Code Requirements Provided Compliance
Location No OII-Premise Sign may be
located within public right-oI-
way
The sign is not in public right-
oI-way, nor is it in the OII-
Premise Exclusionary Sign
Zone
Y
Zoning OII-Premise Signs are permitted
in the C-1, C-2, C-M and M
zoning districts with approval
oI a Special Use Permit.
The subject site has a zoning
designation oI C-1 (Limited
Commercial).
Y
Area No OII-Premise Sign shall have
a surIace area greater than 672
square Ieet, except that an
embellishment oI not to exceed
Iive Ieet above the regular
rectangular surIace oI the sign
may be added iI the additional
area contains no more than 128
square Ieet.
The sign is 572 square Ieet in
size and does not have a
proposed embellishment.
Y
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK
Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Setback OII-Premise Signs shall not be
located closer than 50 Ieet to
the intersection oI the present or
Iuture rights-oI-way oI any two
public roads, streets or
highways
The proposed OII-Premise
Sign is set back 78 Ieet to the
closest intersection located to
the south at Meadows Lane
and Valley View Boulevard.
Y
Height No higher than 40 Ieet Irom
grade at the point oI
construction: may be raised to
be 30 Ieet above an adjacent
elevated Ireeway.
The sign is 40 Ieet in height.
Y
Screening All structural elements oI an
OII-Premise Sign to which the
display panels are attached shall
be screened Irom view.
All structural elements oI the
signs are screened Irom public
view.
Y
OII-Premise
Sign
At least 750 Ieet to another OII-
Premise Sign along US-95 or at
least 300 Ieet to another OII-
premise Sign (iI not along US-
95)
The proposed sign would not
be located along US-95. The
sign is at least 300 Ieet to
another OII-Premise Sign.
The closest sign is
approximately 1,500 Ieet to
the north.
Y
OII-Premise
Sign
At least 300 Ieet to the nearest
property line oI a lot in any 'R
or U zoned districts.
The sign is more than 700 Ieet
Irom any property line zoned
either 'R or 'U.
Y
Other All OII-Premise Signs shall be
detached and permanently
secured to the ground and shall
not be located on property used
Ior residential purposes.
The sign is permanently
attached to the ground and
detached Irom any other
structures.
Y


ANALYSIS

The OII-Premise Sign use is deIined as 'OII-premise signs are to be considered primarily a
speciIic type oI land use rather than as an incidental use to an existing land use. OII-premise
signs generally produce revenue to the property owner(s) as a land use as compared to on-
premise signs which in themselves do not produce revenue but are incidental to revenue
producing land use. However, because oI the special characteristics oI oII-premise signs as
compared to other types oI land uses and structures, certain qualiIications and requirements are
set Iorth in connection with oII-premise signs as a permitted use in certain zoning districts. The
proposed use meets the deIinition, since the property owner will be obtaining revenue Irom the
proposed signage.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior this use include:

1. No oII-premise signs shall be erected in the public right-oI-way.
The proposea sign is not locatea in the public right-of-way.

2. No oII-premise sign certiIicate oI any kind shall be issued Ior an existing or proposed sign
unless the sign is consistent with all requirements oI this Title (including those protecting
existing signs).
The proposea sign meets all minimum requirements for an Off-Premise Sign.

3. Except as provided in Paragraph (12) below, oII premise signs are permitted in the C-1,
C-2, C-M and M Zoning Districts only.
The subfect site has a :oning aesignation of C-1 (Limitea Commercial), which permits
the Off-Premise Sign with approval of a Special Use Permit. The subfect site meets the
criteria.

4. No oII-premise sign shall have a surIace area greater than 672 square Ieet, except that an
embellishment oI not to exceed Iive Ieet above the regular rectangular surIace oI the sign
may be added iI the additional area contains no more than 128 square Ieet. Any
embellishment may include lettering, text, numerals or images, but only to the extent that
such items do not exceed IiIty percent oI any linear side oI the sign.
The proposea sign is 572 square feet, with no aaaitional embellishment.

5. OII-premise signs which are within 660 Ieet oI the right-oI-way and which can be read
Irom Interstate 15, US 95 Irom the north city limits to the Oran K. Gragson Highway, the
Oran K. Gragson Highway or Interstate 515 shall be no closer than 750 Ieet (measured
along the highway Irontage) to any other oII-premise sign along the same Irontage. Each
side oI the highway shall be considered a separate Irontage. The sign and all other oII-
premise signs not oriented toward the same highway shall be no closer than 300 Ieet in any
direction to any other oII premise sign, wherever located, including an oII premise sign
that is situated outside the corporate boundaries oI the City.

The proposea sign woula not be locatea within 660 feet of Interstate 15, US 95 or
Interstate 515. The closest Off-Premise Sign is more than 1,500 feet to the north of the
proposea sign. The proposea sign meets the 300-foot aistance separation criteria.

6. OII-premise signs shall be no higher than 40 Ieet Irom grade at the point oI construction,
except that an oII-premise sign within 60 Ieet oI the right-oI-way line oI the street to which
it is oriented which, at a height oI 40 Ieet, will have a signiIicant portion oI its display
surIace obscured Irom view Irom the travel lanes oI the street may be increased to a
maximum oI 55 Ieet when authorized by the City Council.
The proposea sign woula be 40 feet in height ana complies with this requirement.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



7. OII-premise signs shall not be located closer than 10 Ieet to the right-oI-way line oI a
Ireeway nor closer than 50 Ieet to the intersection oI the present or Iuture rights-oI-way oI
any two public roads, streets or highways.
The proposea sign is not locatea in close proximity to a right-of-way line of a freeway
ana woula be more than 75 feet from the nearest intersection.

8. No oII-premise sign shall be erected or maintained within 660 Ieet oI the nearest travel
lanes oI the Summerlin Parkway Irom Station 499 78 to Station 601 30.

The proposea sign is more than 660 feet from the nearest travel lane of Summerlin
Parkway.

9. No oII-premise sign shall be allowed within 300 Ieet Irom the nearest property line oI a lot
in the 'U zoning district or any 'R zoning district.

The nearest 'R` :onea property is locatea 700 feet to the south of the proposea Off-
Premise Sign. There are no properties with a 'U` :oning aistrict in the vicinity of the
proposea sign.

The applicant is applying Ior a Special Use Permit to install an OII-Premise Sign at the Meadows
Mall, a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoned property at 3838 Meadows Lane. The proposed OII-
Premise Sign adheres to all minimum code requirements; however the proposed location oI the
OII-Premise Sign is within the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area. There are existing
residential neighborhoods located to the south and west oI the subject site. The proposal to install
an OII-Premise Sign in close proximity to these low density residential neighborhoods Iails to
comply with Objective 2.4 oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, which is to ensure that the quality
oI existing residential neighborhoods are maintained and enhanced. An OII-Premise Sign does
not Iurther mitigate the adverse eIIects associated with an existing residential neighborhood
being located in close proximity to non-residential land uses. Since the proposal is not in
accordance with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, it does not meet the goals and objectives oI the
Redevelopment Plan Area and cannot be conducted in a harmonious or compatible manner with
surrounding land uses. As a result, staII recommends denial.


FINDINGS (SUP-55390)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.
SUP-55390 PR1-55084]
GK

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The subject site is located within an existing shopping corridor and has been included in
the Las Vegas Redevelopment Area. There are existing residential neighborhoods to the
south and west. A proposed OII-Premise Sign does not Iurther mitigate the existing
adverse eIIects associated with a mature neighborhood being located near a major
shopping center. As a result, the proposed OII-Premise Sign Iails to adhere to Objective
2.4 oI the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. As a result oI Iailing to comply with the Master
Plan, the proposal also Iails to adhere to the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan and cannot be
conducted in a harmonious or compatible manner with surrounding land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The existing shopping center site is physically suitable Ior the proposed use.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Site access is provided Irom Valley View Boulevard, an 70-Ioot wide Major Collector and
Meadows Lane, a 72-Ioot wide Collector as classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and
Highways. Both rights-oI-way are adequate in size to accommodate the proposed OII-
Premise Sign use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

Approval oI the proposed Special Use Permit will not be consistent with Objective 2.4 oI
the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. As a result oI Iailing to comply with the Master Plan, the
proposal also Iails to adhere to the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed OII-Premise Sign use complies with all Title 19 requirements.


NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 34


NOTICES MAILED 348


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0
07/30/14
PRJ-55084
SUP-55390
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/26/2014 8:36:58 AM
Applicant Email: PKLENK@WAGNARCHITECTS.COM
Applicant Fax: 702-878-8430
Rep Last Name: KLENK
Rep First Name: PATRICK
Applicant State: NEVADA
Applicant Phone: 702-878-0000
Applicant Zip: 89101
Rep Address: 400 SOUTH 4TH STREET #215
Rep Email: PKLENK@WAGNARCHITECTS.COM
Rep Fax: 702-878-8430
Rep State: NEVADA
Rep City: LAS VEGAS
Rep Phone: 702-878-0000
Rep Zip: 89101
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13931510021
Project Name THE SHOPPES AT MEADOWS LANE SIGNAGE
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN)
Application Number: PRJ-55084
Applicant City: LAS VEGAS
ProjectAddress (Location): 3838 MEADOWS LANE
Application/Petition For: SUP
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: PATRICK
Additional Information: Sign Proposal - Revised corrections per pre-app meeting
Applicant Address: 400 SOUTH 4TH STREET #215
Applicant Last Name: KLENK
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units: 0
Gross Acres: 2.94
SUP-55390
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/26/2014 8:36:58 AM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
MORIMOTO EARL M TRUST 820 RANCHO LN #85 LAS VEGAS, NV 89106-3806
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Patrick Klenk WESTAR President pklenk@wagnarchitects.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
SUP-55390
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
8
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
3
9
0
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
8
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
3
9
0
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
0
8
4
S
U
P
-
5
5
3
9
0
S
U
P
-

3
9
0

[
P
P
J
-

4
j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

E
A
P
L

M

M
O
P
I
M
O
T
O

T
P
U
S
T

3


M
E
A
D
O
W
S

L
A
N
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


08/26/14
PRJ-55084
SUP-55390
08/26/14
PRJ-55084
SUP-55390


Agenda tem No.: 37.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55487 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: MR. N & S
BONANZA, LLC - OWNER: WATER STREET, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a
Special Use Permit FOR A PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE USE WITHIN A PROPOSED
1,882 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT at 3595 East Bonanza Road,
Suite #140 (APN 140-31-121-007), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin). StaII
recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 1 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter
6. Protest Postcard

SUP-55487
JB

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: MR. N & S BONANZA, LLC - OWNER: WATER
STREET, LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``



CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55487 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:


`` CONDITIONS ``


SbF-55487 CONDIIIONS


Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Package Liquor
OII-Sale Establishment use.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

5. Approval oI this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval oI a liquor license.

6. All beer and wine coolers shall remain in the original manuIacturer's conIiguration intended
Ior oII-sale resale.
SUP-55487
JB

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



7. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6.50 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

SUP-55487
JB
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``


PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment
use located at 3595 East Bonanza Road, Suite #140. The subject suite is located within an
existing shopping center and is 1,882 square Ieet in size with 1,357 square-Ieet oI space used Ior
the display oI alcoholic beverages. As this request meets all the minimum Special Use
requirements and can be conducted in a compatible and harmonious manner within the existing
shopping center, staII recommends approval oI this application. II denied, the applicant will not
be allowed to conduct Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment use at this location.


ISSUES

A Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The City Council approved a request Ior a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
5082) to amend the Southeast Sector Plan oI the General Plan Irom L (Low
Density Residential) to SC (Service Commercial) on 1.58 acres and to M
(Medium Density Residential) on 4.4 acres south oI Bonanza Road and east
oI Pecos Road.
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-5093) and Special Use Permit (SUP-5096) Ior a supper club adjacent to
the south oI Bonanza Road approximately 290 Ieet east oI Pecos Road. The
Planning Commission recommended approval oI the request on 01/13/05.
03/02/05
The City Council approved a request Ior a Variance (VAR-5099) to allow an
R-PD (Residential Planned Development) zoning district on 4.40 acres where
5.00 acres is the minimum required adjacent to the east side oI Pecos Road
approximately 290 Ieet south oI Bonanza Road. The Planning Commission
recommended approval oI the request on 01/13/05.
12/07/05
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-9421) Ior a proposed 19,602 square-Ioot oIIice building and a waiver oI
the building placement, parking lot, Ioundation and perimeter landscaping
requirements on 1.5 acres along the south side oI Bonanza Road, approx. 300
Ieet east oI Pecos Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI
the request on 11/03/05.
SUP-55487
JB
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




10/11/07
A reIund was processed Ior a request Ior Variance (VAR-24619) to allow a
Iour-Ioot side yard setback where 10 Ieet is required Ior a proposed
commercial development on 0.44 acres located on the south side oI Bonanza
Road.
11/07/2007
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-24023) Ior a 4,350 square-Ioot commercial building comprised oI
2,450 square Ieet oI retail Iloor space and a 1,900 square-Ioot restaurant on
0.44 acres located on the south side oI Bonanza Road, approximately 460 Ieet
east oI Pecos Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval oI the
request on 10/11/07.
04/02/08
The City Council approved a request Ior a Review oI Condition (ROC-26882)
to remove Condition Number 15 oI an approved Site Development Plan
review (SDR-24023) which required that the developer contribute the
remaining traIIic signal contribution monies on 0.44 acres located on the
south side oI Bonanza Road, approximately 420 Ieet east oI Pecos Road.
04/01/09
The City Council approved a request Ior a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-32837) Ior a 5,375 square-Ioot restaurant with drive-through and retail
building on 2.59 acres generally located on the south side oI Bonanza Road,
approximately 450 Ieet east oI Pecos Road. The Planning Commission
recommended approval oI the request on 02/12/09.
05/18/11
The City Council approved a request Ior a Extension oI Time (EOT-41383) oI
a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-32837) Ior a
5,375 square-Ioot restaurant with drive-through and retail building on 2.59
acres generally located on the south side oI Bonanza Road, approximately 450
Ieet east oI Pecos Road.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
07/31/07 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
A building permit (#113709) was issued Ior a trash enclosure at 3595 East
Bonanza Road. The permit was Iinalized on 02/27/14.
07/06/11
A building permit (#113710) was issued Ior on-site improvements and
hardscapes at 3595 East Bonanza Road. The permit has not been Iinalized.
08/30/11
A building permit (#113708) was issued Ior a restaurant/retail/oIIice shell
building at 3595 East Bonanza Road. The permit has not been Iinalized.
SUP-55487
JB

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Pre-Application Meeting
08/06/14
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over the
application materials and submittal requirements Ior a Special Use Permit Ior
a proposed Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment use.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one conducted.


Field Check
08/28/14
A routine Iield check was conducted by staII and Iound a well maintained
commercial site Iree Irom litter and debris.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.45


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial) and L
(Low Density
Residential)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North Shopping Center
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
South
Single-Family
Residential
MLA (Medium Low
Attached Density
Residential)
R-PD9 (Residential
Planned Development 9
Units per Acre)
East
Single-Family
Residential
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
West OIIice
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
SUP-55487
JB
Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting


Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Bonanza Road Primary Arterial
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
100 Feet Y


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center
27,349 SF 1:250 SF 110

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 110 129 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 105 5 122 7 Y


ANALYSIS

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment
use at 3595 East Bonanza Road, Suite #140. The subject suite is 1,882 square Ieet in size with
1,357 square-Ieet oI space used Ior the display oI alcoholic beverages.

The subject tenant space is located within an existing 27,349 square-Ioot shopping center. The
existing commercial development provides shared access and 129 parking spaces throughout the
subject site. This proposal adheres to all minimum parking requirements as the subject property.

A Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment use is described in Title 19.12 as:
'An establishment, other than a retail establishment with package liquor oII-sale, whose license
to sell alcoholic beverages authorizes their sale to consumers only and not Ior resale, in original
sealed or corked containers, Ior consumption oII the premises where the same are sold. This use
includes an establishment that provides on-premises wine, cordial and liqueur tasting iI the
licensee also holds a wine, cordial and liqueur tasting license Ior that location.
SUP-55487
JB

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:

* 1. Except as otherwise provided, no package liquor oII-sale establishment (hereinaIter
'establishment) shall be located within 400 Ieet oI any church/house oI worship, school,
individual care center licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The subfect site is not locatea within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school, inaiviaual
care center licensea for more than 12 chilaren, or City park.

* 2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances reIerred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reIerence to the shortest distance between two property
lines, one being the property line oI the proposed establishment which is closest to the existing
use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line oI that existing use
which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line
without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes oI measurement, the term 'property line
reIers to property lines oI Iee interest parcels and does not include the property line oI:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area Ior on-site parking and
which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.

Distances have been measurea from Commercial Subaivision 'Pecos Bonan:a Pla:a` Book 88,
Page 26.

* 3. In the case oI an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel oI at least 80 acres in size,
the minimum distances reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line oI the existing use to the nearest portion oI the structure
in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case oI a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping center
or other multiple tenant structure, Irom the nearest property line oI the existing use to the
nearest property line oI a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will
be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.

This conaition is not applicable, as the subfect site 0.44 acres in si:e.

4. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:
a. An establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square-Ieet oI retail Iloor space.

This conaition is not applicable as the subfect site is not locatea within a an establishment which
has a non-restrictea gaming license in connection with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms
or a proposea establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor space.
SUP-55487
JB

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



* 5. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conIorm to the provisions oI LVMC
Chapter 6.50.

The proposea use will be subfect to all business licensing requirements outlinea in LJMC
Chapter 6.50 if approvea.

According to the submitted justiIication letter and Iloor plan, the proposed use meets the
deIinition outlined above. The proposed Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment use adheres to
all minimum special use permit requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. The subject site is not
located within 400 Ieet oI any church/house oI worship, school, individual care center licensed
Ior more than twelve children, or City Park. In addition, staII has added a condition oI approval
requiring the business conIorm to all provisions oI LVMC Chapter 6.50 with regards to package
liquor license. It has been determined that the proposed Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment
use can be conducted in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding land uses, thereIore,
staII is recommending approval, as the use is considered appropriate Ior the surrounding area.


FINDINGS (SUP-55487)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses and can be conducted in a
manner that is harmonious with surrounding land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The subject site is located within an existing commercial building that is physically
suitable Ior the intensity oI the proposed land use.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property Irom Bonanza Road, a
100-Ioot Primary Arterial, as classiIied by the Master Plan oI Streets and Highways.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.
SUP-55487
JB

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Approval oI this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health saIety and
general welIare oI the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject
to licensing restrictions.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed use meets all applicable conditions oI approval Ior a Package Liquor OII-
Sale Establishment use per Title 19.12.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 42


NOTICES MAILED 398


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 1

S
U
P
-

7

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

M
P
,

N

&

S

O
N
A
N
Z
A


L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
A
T
E
P

S
T
P
E
E
T


L
L
C

3


E
A
S
T

O
N
A
N
Z
A

P
O
A
D


S
U
I
T
E

1
4
0

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

M
P
,

N

&

S

O
N
A
N
Z
A


L
L
C

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

W
A
T
E
P

S
T
P
E
E
T


L
L
C

3


E
A
S
T

O
N
A
N
Z
A

P
O
A
D


S
U
I
T
E

1
4
0

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4




Agenda tem No.: 38.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55677 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ACE LOAN
COMPANY - OWNER: B F TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use
Permit FOR A PAWN SHOP WITHIN AN EXISTING 1,651 SQUARE-FOOT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A 50-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND 920
FEET FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at 519 East St. Louis
Avenue (APN 162-03-311-017), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (CoIIin) |PRJ-55676|.
StaII recommends DENIAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ACE LOAN COMPANY - OWNER: B F TRUST,
ET AL


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``


CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55677 StaII recommends DENIAL, iI approved subject to
conditions:
N/A


`` CONDITIONS ``


SbF-5577 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Pawn Shop use.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. A Waiver Irom Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 920-Ioot distance separation Irom
a similar use where a 1000-Ioot distance separation is required.

4. A Waiver Irom Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 50-Ioot distance separation Irom a
residential zoned property where a 200-Ioot distance separation is required.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

Conditions Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



7. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

8. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6.60 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.

9. Prior to occupancy, all necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections
shall be completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
oI Building and SaIety.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.


SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``


The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Pawn Shop use at 519 East St.
Louis Avenue. The proposed location will require two Waivers Irom the minimum distance
requirements, as the use is located 920 Ieet Irom the existing Pawn Shop use where a minimum
1,000-Ioot is required and 50 Ieet Irom a residential zoned property where 200 Ieet is required.
The proposed location does not conIorm to the minimum distance separation requirement Ior a
Pawn Shop use, as required by Title 19.12; thereIore, the use cannot be conducted in a
harmonious and compatible manner with the existing and Iuture land uses. StaII recommends
denial oI this application. II denied, a Pawn Shop use cannot be opened at this location.


ISSUES

A Pawn Shop use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with the
approval oI a Special Use Permit.
The proposed use requires Waivers to allow a 50-Ioot distance separation Irom a residential
use where 200 Ieet is required and a 920-Ioot distance separation Irom an existing Pawn
Shop use where 1,000 Ieet is required. StaII recommends denial oI the Waiver requests.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
09/01/76
The Board oI City Commissioners approved Rezoning and Plot Plan Review
(Z-0050-76) request Ior the property located at 519 East St. Louis Avenue
Irom R-4 (Apartment Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial). The
Planning Commission recommended approval.
08/02/78
The Board oI City Commissioners denied a Plot Plan Review (Z-0050-76)
request to allow an OII-Premise Sign on property located on the northwest
corner oI St. Louis Avenue and Weldon Place. The Planning Commission
and staII recommended denial.
03/19/86
The City Council denied a Plot Plan Review to allow an OII-Premise Sign on
property located on the northwest corner oI St. Louis Avenue and Weldon
Place (Z-0050-76). The Planning Commission recommended approval.
06/20/07
The City Council approved a table request Ior a Special Use Permit (SUP-
15442) Ior a proposed Package Liquor OII-Sale Establishment at 519 St.
Louis Avenue. The Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.
05/04/11
The City Council approved a withdraw without prejudice request Ior a Special
Use Permit (SUP-40739) Ior a proposed Pawn Shop at 519 St. Louis Avenue.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR
Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
01/18/12
The City Council approved a withdraw without prejudice request Ior a Special
Use Permit (SUP-42648) Ior a proposed Pawn Shop at 519 St. Louis Avenue.
The Planning Commission and staII recommended denial.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
06/28/02 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
1950 The building at 519 East St. Louis Avenue was constructed.
07/10/87
A business license (Q01-00052) was issued Ior a Real Estate Firm at 519 East
St. Louis Avenue. The license was marked out oI business on 0/11/09.
11/01/01
A business license (C05-01099) was issued Ior a Tobacco Dealer at 519 East
St. Louis Avenue. The license was marked out oI business on 05/12/08.
11/01/01
A business license (L15-00013) was issued Ior a Package Liquor at 519 East
St. Louis Avenue. The license was marked out oI business on 05/12/08.
09/04/03
A building permit (#03019166) was issued Ior a tenant improvement at 519
East St. Louis Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 09/24/03.
06/14/07
A business license (G01-93893) was issued Ior Restricted Gaming at 519 East
St. Louis Avenue. The license was marked out oI business on 02/28/09.
07/26/11
A building permit (#192520) was issued Ior disaster repair at 519 East St.
Louis Avenue. The permit was Iinalized on 08/25/11.


Pre-Application Meeting
08/21/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the Special
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Pawn Shop use.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the site and Iound a commercial building
vacant and without graIIiti on it.
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.16


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
North Parking Lot C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
South Apartments C (Commercial) R-5 (Apartment)
East Apartments C (Commercial) R-5 (Apartment)
West
Retail Store, Other
Than Listed
C (Commercial) C-2 (General Commercial)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
Beverly Green/Southridge Neighborhood Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Pawn Shop 1,651 SF 1/250 SF 7
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 7

4

Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 6 1 3 1 Y*
*This site is parking impaired as deIined by Title 19.18.030(D).
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
No pawn shop use may be
located closer than 1,000 Ieet
Irom any other pawn shop use.
To allow a 920-Ioot
separation distance
Irom another Pawn
Shop use.
Denial
No pawn shop use may be
located closer than 200Ieet Irom
a residential zoned parcel.
To allow a 50-Ioot
separation distance
Irom a residential
zoned parcel.
Denial


ANALYSIS

Per Title 19.18, the Pawn Shop use is deIined as,

'A Iacility (other than a bank, saving and loan or mortgage banking company) used Ior
the business oI lending money on the security oI pledged goods or Ior the business oI the
purchase oI tangible personal property on condition that it may be redeemed or
repurchased by the seller Ior a Iixed price within a Iixed period oI time.

The proposed use meets this deIinition, as the applicant is proposing to relocate an existing legal
nonconIorming Pawn Shop located at 215 North 3
rd
Street to 519 East St. Louis Avenue.


The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior this use include:

1. The use shall comply with the applicable requirements oI LVMC Chapter 6.60.

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as the minimum coae requirements for a
pawnbroker license will neea to be satisfiea for the change of location for the existing
license to be approvea. Also, conformance to LJMC Chapter 6.60 is a stanaara conaition
of approval that cannot be waivea.

2. No outdoor display, sales or storage oI any merchandise shall be permitted.

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as all merchanaise will be storea within an
enclosea builaing, ana the business will be subfect to regular licensing inspection.

3. No pawn shop shall be located on either side oI Fremont Street or on Las Vegas
Boulevard South, between Charleston Boulevard and Sahara Avenue.
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The proposea use meets this requirement, as the proposea location is not locatea within
the excluaea areas statea above.

4. No pawn shop use may be located closer than 200 Ieet Irom any parcel used or zoned Ior
residential use. In addition, no pawn shop use may be located closer than 1,000 Ieet Irom
any other pawn shop use or speciIied Iinancial institution use. For purposes oI this
Regulation 4, distances shall be measured in a straight line Irom property line to property
line, without regard to intervening obstacles. The term 'property line reIers to property
lines oI Iee interest parcels and not leasehold parcels.

The proposea use aoes not meet this requirement, as the proposea location will be
locatea 50 feet from a parcel :onea for resiaential use ana 920 feet from an existing
Pawn Shop use. This conaition may be waivea, however, staff cannot support the
requestea waivers, as the lessening of the aistance separation is not compatible with the
existing ana future lana uses.


The applicant is proposing a Pawn Shop use at 519 East St. Louis Avenue. The existing building
was constructed in 1950 and is located in downtown Las Vegas. The site is parking impaired as
detailed in Title 19.18.030(D). The prior use was a General Retail Store, Other Than Listed
(parked at one parking space Ior every 175 square Ieet oI gross Iloor area) that has a parking
requirement greater the proposed use, a Pawn Shop (that is parked at one parking space Ior every
250 square Ieet oI gross Iloor). The applicant has requested two minimum distance separation
Waivers. The Iirst Waiver is to allow a Pawn Shop use to be located 50 Ieet Irom a residentially
zoned property where 200 Ieet is required and second is to allow this use 920 Ieet Irom a similar
use where 1,000 Ieet is required. The requested Waivers reinIorce the unsuitability oI a Pawn
Shop at this location. Furthermore, the required Waivers illustrate the use cannot be conducted in
manner that is compatible with the existing and Iuture land uses in the surrounding area. As such,
staII recommends denial oI this application. II denied, the applicant may not operate the Pawn
Shop use Irom this location.


FINDINGS (SUP-55677)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The proposed Pawn Shop use cannot be conducted in a compatible manner with the
surrounding uses, as a protected use (a residential zoned property) is 50 Ieet Irom the
required use and similar use (a Pawn Shop) is within the minimum distance separation
required by code.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The site is physically suitable Ior the type and intensity oI land use proposed, as the use
would be located within an existing single tenant building with ample parking and easy
site access. The site is designed to accommodate a number oI uses such as oIIices, retail
shops or other similar uses and the physical needs oI a Pawn Shop are a hybrid between
oIIice, retail and Iinancial institution.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The proposed Pawn Shop use has primary access Irom St Louis Street, an 80-Ioot wide
Major Collector and secondary access is provided by Weldon Place, a 50-Ioot wide local
street. Both roadways have adequate capacity to meet the requirements oI the proposed
Pawn Shop use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

The proposed Pawn Shop use will be subject to licensing review and inspection, thereby
protecting the public health, saIety and welIare.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The location oI the proposed Pawn Shop use does not meet Requirement 4, as it would be
located 50-Ioot Irom a residential use and 920 Ieet Irom an existing Pawn Shop use. StaII
recommends denial oI the requested Waivers, and the Special Use Permit as it cannot be
conducted in a harmonious manner with the surrounding community.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 26


NOTICES MAILED 170
SUP-55677 PR1-55676]
MR

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




APPROVALS 0



PROTESTS 0

08/25/14
PRJ-55676
SUP-55677
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/25/2014 7:10:46 AM
Applicant Email: bockfam7@yahoo.com
Applicant Fax: 702-629-3176
Rep Last Name: Company
Rep First Name: Ace Loan
Applicant State: NV
Applicant Phone: 702-382-3489
Applicant Zip: 89104
Rep Address: 2230 S. Paradise Road
Rep Email: bockfam7@yahoo.com
Rep Fax: 702-629-3176
Rep State: NV
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-382-3489
Rep Zip: 89104
Assessors Parcel #(s): 16203311017
Project Name PAWN SHOP 519 EAST ST LOUIS AVE
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 3 (BOB COFFIN)
Application Number: PRJ-55676
Applicant City: Las Vegas
ProjectAddress (Location): 519 E ST LOUIS AVENUE
Application/Petition For: SUP Pawn Shop
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Ace Loan
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 2230 S. Paradise Road
Applicant Last Name: Company
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
SUP-55677
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/25/2014 7:10:46 AM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
! certify that ! am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. ! understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be re]ected. !
further certify that ! am the owner
or purchaser or option holder of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
! Accept:
Yes
B F TRUST ETAL 2230 S PARADISE RD LAS VEGAS, NV 89104-2516
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Richard Truesdell Cornerstone Company President/Broker sharon@cornerstonecompany.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
SUP-55677
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
SUP-55677
10/14/14 PC
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
7
7
08/25/14
PRJ-55676
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
7
7
S
U
P
-

7
7

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
C
E

L
O
A
N

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y

-

O
W
N
E
P
:


F

T
P
U
S
T


E
T

A
L

1
9

E
A
S
T

S
T
,

L
O
U
I
S

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-

7
7

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:

A
C
E

L
O
A
N

C
O
M
P
A
N
Y

-

O
W
N
E
P
:


F

T
P
U
S
T


E
T

A
L

1
9

E
A
S
T

S
T
,

L
O
U
I
S

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


08/25/14
PRJ-55676 SUP-55677


Agenda tem No.: 39.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55682 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: THREE
TWENTY TWO, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 2,467 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A 130-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A LIQUOR
ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) AND A 1,200-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE 1,500 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
SEPARATION REQUIRED at 322 Fremont Street (APN 139-34-510-026), C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) |PRJ-55576|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: THREE TWENTY TWO, LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``

CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55682 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

`` CONDITIONS ``

SbF-5582 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) use.

2. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

4. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

5. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or Iermented liquors
or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or
booths are provided separate Irom the bar in conIormance with Title 6.50.

6. Approval oI this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval oI a liquor license.

7. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6.50 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request Ior a Special Use Permit Ior a proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use
within a commercial space located at 322 Fremont Street. The proposed Tavern is 2,467 square
Ieet in size with seating Ior 25 people. This application is accompanied with a Waiver request to
allow a 130-Ioot distance separation Irom an existing Tavern and 1,200-Ioot distance separation
Irom an existing church/house oI worship use where a 1,500-Ioot minimum distance separation
is required. StaII has determined that the proposed use can be conducted in a compatible and
harmonious manner with the existing surrounding land uses; thereIore, staII recommends
approval oI this application. II denied, the applicant will not be allowed to conduct the Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) use at this location.

ISSUES

The Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning
district with the approval oI a Special Use Permit.
A Waiver may be requested Ior a reduction in the required separation distance Irom a similar
use Ior properties located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District.
A distance separation Waiver is required to allow a 130-Ioot distance separation Irom an
existing Tavern and 1,200-Ioot distance separation Irom an existing church/house oI worship
use where a 1,500-Ioot minimum distance separation is required.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
12/16/64
The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0100-64) Irom R-1 (Single Family
Residential), R-4 (High Density Residential), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2
(General Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2 (General Commercial) Ior
approximately 230 Acres generally located on property bounded by Main
Street to the west, Bonanza Road on the north, Las Vegas Boulevard on the
east, and Charleston Boulevard on the south, Wards 1 and 3. The Planning
Commission recommended approval on 12/10/64.


Most Recent Change of Ownership
10/19/07 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting





Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
A business license (L15-00073) was issued Ior Package Liquor at 322
Fremont Street. The license is still active.
A business license (C05-01555) was issued Ior Tobacco Dealer at 322
Fremont Street. The license is still active.
12/13/91
A business license (G50-03258) was issued Ior General Retail Sales at 322
Fremont Street. The license is still active.
10/30/97
A business license (R10-00699) was issued Ior a Restaurant at 322 Fremont
Street. The license is still active.
11/29/05
A building permit (#55057) was issued Ior a re-rooIing consisting oI the -
removal and replacement oI the rooI membrane only. The permit has not been
Iinalized.
07/01/14
A code enIorcement case (#143111) was processed Ior a broken plexiglass
sign above this location that poses a hazard iI it was to break loose and Iall to
the ground. This sign has been broken Ior the past 2 years and needs to be
replaced. The case was resolved on 08/05/14.


Pre-Application Meeting
08/14/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal
process Ior the Special use Permit Ior a proposed Liquor Establishment
(Tavern) use.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/26/14
A Iield inspection was conducted by staII which revealed a well maintained
commercial site located under the Fremont Street Experience canopy.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.14
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting




Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property General Retail C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
North General Retail C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
South Right-oI-Way ROW (Right-OI-Way)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
East General Retail C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
West General Retail C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (Central Casino Core) Y
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 Feet) Y
Downtown Casino Overlay District Y
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS


Street Aame
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Coverning Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Fremont Street Pedestrian Plaza
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
80 Feet Y
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Parking Requirement - Downtown
Base Parking Requirement Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
Liquor
Establishment
(Tavern)
715 SF
seating area
1,752 SF back
oI house
1:50 SF oI
seating
area plus
1:200 oI
remaining
Iloor area
24

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 24 0 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 23 1 0 0 N*
*Profects locatea within the Las Jegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subfect to the
automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table shoula be usea to illustrate
the requirements of an analogous profect in another location in the City.


Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
A 1,500-Ioot minimum distance
separation is required Irom any
other Liquor Establishment
(Tavern), church/house oI
worship, school and individual
care center licensed Ior more
than 12 children.
To allow a 130-Ioot
distance separation
Irom an existing Liquor
Establishment (Tavern)
and to allow a 1,200-
Ioot distance separation
Irom an existing
church/house oI
worship
Approval


ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to establish a 2,467 square-Ioot Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use
within a commercial space located at 322 Fremont Street. The submitted Iloor plan indicates that
this Tavern will provide seating Ior 25 people. The subject site is located within the C-2 (General
Commercial) zoning district, which allows the Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use with an
approved Special Use Permit.

The subject site is located in the Downtown Centennial Plan (Central Casino Core); in the
pedestrian mall controlled and operated by the Fremont Street Experience. The existing
commercial development provides shared access and parking throughout the subject site, through
the utilization oI existing parking lots in the area.
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



A Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is described in Title 19.12 as: 'A Iacility which sells
alcoholic beverages Ior consumption on the premises where the same are sold and authorizes the
sale, to consumers only and not Ior resale, oI alcoholic beverages in original sealed or corked
containers, Ior consumption oII the premises where the same are sold.


Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:

* 1. Pursuant to its general authority to regulate the sale oI alcoholic beverages, the City Council
declares that the public health, saIety and general welIare oI the City are best promoted and
protected by generally requiring both a minimum separation between liquor establishments
(tavern), and a minimum separation between a liquor establishment (tavern) and certain other
uses that should be protected Irom the impacts associated with a liquor establishment (tavern).
ThereIore, except as otherwise provided below, no liquor establishment (tavern) may be located
within 1500 Ieet oI any other liquor establishment (tavern), church/house oI worship, school,
individual care center licensed Ior more than 12 children, or City park.

The proposea Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use aoes not meet this requirement, as the
applicant has requestea Waivers to allow a 130-foot aistance separation from an existing Tavern
ana 1,200-foot aistance separation from an existing church/house of worship use where a 1,500-
foot minimum aistance separation is requirea. This conaition can be waivea in this instance
pursuant to Title 19.12.010 conaition =5a, because the subfect site is locatea within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District. Staff supports this requestea waiver, as the use will be
locatea within the peaestrian corriaor of the Fremont Street Experience that will proviae
security ana control over the aaministration of alcohol sales ana consumption.

* 2. The distance separation reIerred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured with reIerence to the
shortest distance between two property lines, one being the property line oI the proposed liquor
establishment (tavern) which is closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains,
and the other being the property line oI that existing use which is closest to the proposed liquor
establishment (tavern). The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to
intervening obstacles.

Distances have been measurea from Commercial Subaivision 'Clarks Las Jegas Townsite`
Book 1, Page 37, Lot 19, Block 31.

* 3. For the purpose oI Requirement 2, and Ior that purpose only:

a. The 'property line oI a protected use reIers to the property line oI a Iee interest parcel that has
been created by an approved and recorded parcel map or subdivision map, and does not include
the property line oI a leasehold parcel; and
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

Staff Report Page Six
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



b. The 'property line oI a liquor establishment (tavern) reIers to:
i. The property line oI a parcel that has been created by an approved and recorded parcel
map or commercial subdivision map; or
ii. The property line oI a parcel that is located within an approved and recorded
commercial subdivision and that has been created by a record oI survey or legal
description, iI:
A. Using the property line oI that parcel Ior the purpose oI measuring the distance
separation reIerred to in Requirement 1 would qualiIy the parcel under the
distance separation requirement;
B. The proposed liquor establishment (tavern) will have direct access (both
ingress and egress) Irom a street having a minimum right-oI-way width oI 100
Ieet. The required access may be shared with a larger development but must be
located within the property lines oI the parcel on which the proposed liquor
establishment (tavern) will be located;
C. All parking spaces required by this Subchapter 19.12.070 Ior the liquor
establishment (tavern) use will be located on the same parcel as the use; and
D. The owners oI all parcels within the commercial subdivision, including the
owner oI agreement, satisIactory to the City Attorney, that provides Ior perpetual,
reciprocal cross-access, ingress and egress throughout the commercial
subdivision.

Distances have been measurea from Commercial Subaivision 'Clarks Las Jegas Townsite`
Book 1, Page 37, Lot 19, Block 31.

4. The distance separation requirement set Iorth in Requirement 1 does not apply to an
establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel having 200 or
more guest rooms on or beIore July 1, 1992, or in connection with a resort hotel having in excess
oI 200 guest rooms aIter July 1, 1992.

This conaition is not applicable, as there are no existing non-restrictea gaming licenses in
connection with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms associatea with this proposal.

5. The distance separation requirement set Iorth in Requirement 1 may be waived in accordance
with the provisions oI LVMC 19.12.050(C), but only in connection with a proposed liquor
establishment (tavern) that:

a. Will be located on a parcel within the C-V District, the Parkway Center District within
the Downtown Centennial Plan, the Gaming Enterprise Overlay District, or the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. Will be located on a parcel or within a building that, pursuant to State law or City
ordinance, has been designated as an historic property, historic building, or landmark;
c. Will be located within a regional mall; or
d. Will be located within a mixed-use development
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

Staff Report Page Seven
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



i. That has been approved by means oI Special Use Permit pursuant to LVMC
Chapters 19.12 and 19.16;
ii. That has a minimum net site area oI 15 acres; and
iii. Whose gross Iloor area oI nonresidential space is a minimum oI 250,000
square Ieet; or
e. Will be separated Irom the existing use by a street or highway with a minimum right-
oI-way width oI 100 Ieet.

The proposea Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use aoes not meet this aistance separation
requirement set form in conaition =1, as the applicant has requestea Waivers to allow a 130-foot
aistance separation from an existing Tavern ana 1,200-foot aistance separation from an existing
church/house of worship use where a 1,500-foot minimum aistance separation is requirea.

However, the aistance separation requirements outlinea in conaition =1 can be waivea in this
case pursuant to Title 19.12.010 conaition =5a, because the subfect site is locatea within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District.

* 6. The use shall conIorm to, and is subject to, the provisions oI LVMC Chapters 6.40 and 6.50.

The proposea use will be subfect to all business licensing requirements outlinea in LJMC
Chapter 6.40 ana 6.50 if approvea.

According to the submitted justiIication letter and Iloor plan, the proposed use meets the
deIinition outlined above. The proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) also adheres to all
minimum special use permit requirements as outlined by the Title 19.12, except Ior the
associated Waiver to allow a 130-Ioot distance separation Irom an existing Tavern and 1,200-
Ioot distance separation Irom an existing church/house oI worship use where a 1,500-Ioot
minimum distance separation is required. In addition, staII has added a condition oI approval
requiring the business conIorm to all provisions oI LVMC Chapter 6.50 with regards to running
a Liquor Establishment (Tavern). The proposed use meets the intent oI the Downtown
Centennial Plan by providing opportunities Ior community gathering; and is compatible with the
existing entertainment-based uses within the immediate area; thereIore, staII recommends
approval with conditions.


FINDINGS (SUP-55682)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.
SUP-55682 PR1-55576]
JB

Staff Report Page Eight
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is compatible with the surrounding land
uses and can be conducted in harmonious manner with surrounding land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The subject site is located within an approved 2,467 square-Ioot commercial space that is
physically suitable Ior the intensity oI the proposed land use.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Access to the site will not change. There is no vehicle access to the subject site. The site is
accessed by pedestrian mall under the canopy controlled by the Fremont Street
Experience. Fremont Street is an 80-Ioot Major Collector, as classiIied by the Master Plan
oI Streets and Highways.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

Approval oI this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health saIety and
general welIare oI the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject
to licensing restrictions.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed use meets all applicable conditions oI approval Ior a Liquor Establishment
(Tavern) use per Title 19.12, with the exception oI the proposed Waivers to allow a 130-
Ioot distance separation Irom an existing Tavern and 1,200-Ioot distance separation Irom
an existing church/house oI worship use where a 1,500-Ioot minimum distance separation
is required.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 34


NOTICES MAILED 190


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0
08/21/14
PRJ-55576
SUP-55682
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/21/2014 3:13:22 PM
Applicant Email: athiguchi@aol.com
Applicant Fax: 702-736-9430
Rep Last Name: Floyd
Rep First Name: Seth
Applicant State: Nevada
Applicant Phone: 702-736-9730
Applicant Zip: 89118
Rep Address: 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Rep Email: sfloyd@mcdonaldcarano.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: Nevada
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 702-873-4100
Rep Zip: 89102
Assessors Parcel #(s): 13934510026
Project Name 322 FREMONT STREET - LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT TAVERN
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Application Number: PRJ-55576
Applicant City: Las Vegas
ProjectAddress (Location): 322 FREMONT STREET
Application/Petition For: 322 Fremont Street - Liquor Establishment Tavern
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Aliza
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 5151 S. Procyon St. #108
Applicant Last Name: Elazar-Higuchi
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
SUP-55682
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/21/2014 3:13:22 PM
Is the Owner Information Correct: No
If no, ...change what The owner should be Three Twenty Two, LLC.
I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
1602LAMPLIGHT GARDENS AT
PINNAC
LOT 160 BLOCK 2,
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Seth Floyd McDonald Carano Wilson LLP Attorney sfloyd@mcdonaldcarano.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
SUP-55682
08/21/14
PRJ-55576
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
8
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
7
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
8
2
0
8
/
2
1
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
5
7
6
S
U
P
-
5
5
6
8
2
S
U
P
-

Z

[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
/
O
W
N
E
P
:

T
H
P
E
E

T
W
E
N
T
Y

T
W
O


L
L
C

3
Z
Z

F
P
E
M
O
N
T

S
T
P
E
E
T

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4



08/21/14
PRJ-55576
SUP-55682
08/21/14
PRJ-55576
SUP-55682


Agenda tem No.: 40.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
SUP-55786 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT HOUSE OF
BARGAINS - OWNER: DUCK HORN, LLC - For possible action on a request Ior a Special
Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 5,950 SQUARE-FOOT THRIFT SHOP USE at 4000 West
Sahara Avenue (APN 162-06-812-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian)
|PRJ-55655|. StaII recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 11/19/2014
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and StaII Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photos
5. JustiIication Letter

SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT HOUSE OF BARGAINS - OWNER: DUCK HORN,
LLC


`` STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) ``

CASE
AUMBER
RECOMMEADA1IOA
REQUIRED FOR
APPROJAL
SUP-55786 StaII recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

N/A


SbF-5578 CONDIIIONS

Planning

1. ConIormance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 Ior a ThriIt Shop use.

2. All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days oI Iinal
approval.

3. Outdoor donation bins or drop oII areas shall be prohibited.

4. This approval shall be void two years Irom the date oI Iinal approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions oI LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension oI Time may be Iiled Ior
consideration by the City oI Las Vegas.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and Iinal inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department oI Building and
SaIety.

6. These Conditions oI Approval shall be aIIixed to the cover sheet oI any plan set submitted
Ior building permit, as well as submitted as part oI any business license application.

7. This business shall operate in conIormance to Chapter 6 oI the City oI Las Vegas
Municipal Code.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards oI all City departments must be satisIied,
except as modiIied herein.

SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR
Staff Report Page One
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



`` STAFF REPORT ``



PRO1ECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant has requested a Special Use Permit Ior a 5,950 square-Ioot ThriIt Shop use at 4000
West Sahara Avenue. StaII recommends approval oI this application, as all minimum Title
19.12 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use are met and the use can be conducted in a harmonious
and compatible manner with the surrounding area. II denied, a ThriIt Shop will not be allowed
to open at this location.

ISSUES

A ThriIt Shop use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with the
approval oI a Special Use Permit.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION


Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
02/17/60
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0044-59) request
Irom R-1 (Single Family Residential) to CC (Neighborhood Commercial).
The Planning Commission recommended approval.
06/02/76
The Board oI City Commissioners approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0044-59)
request Ior the property located on the northwest corner oI West Sahara
Avenue and Las Verdes Street. The Planning Commission recommended
approval.
05/27/97
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0029-97) request Irom CC
(Neighborhood Commercial) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) as part oI broad
rezoning action. 4000 West Sahara Avenue was included in this rezoning
case. The Planning Commission and staII recommended approval.
08/29/07
A complaint (#57334) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior a non-permitted
sign on a block wall. The complaint was resolved on 09/13/07.
07/09/08
A complaint (#67565) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior graIIiti on the
north side oI the building. The complaint was resolved on 07/10/08.
12/28/09
A complaint (#85198) was Iiled with Code EnIorcement Ior the business not
being handicapped accessible. The complaint was resolved on 01/05/09.
SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR

Staff Report Page Two
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Most Recent Change of Ownership
01/22/09 A deed was recorded Ior a change in ownership.


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
1977 The building was constructed.
06/26/06
A business license (G50-01768) was issued Ior General Retail Sale at 4000
West Sahara Avenue. The permit was marked out on 12/01/11.
07/27/09
A building permit (#144228) was submitted; however, no permit was issued.
The building permit application expired on 05/01/12.
10/02/13
A building permit (#244252) Ior HVAC change out was issued. The permit
was not Iinalized.
08/05/09
Civil Improvement Plans (#24921 L-CIVIL) were submitted; however, they
were not approved.


Pre-Application Meeting
08/20/14
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the Special
Use Permit submittal requirements Ior a Secondhand Dealer or ThriIt Shop
use at 4000 West Sahara Avenue.


Aeighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.


Field Check
08/28/14
StaII conducted a Iield check oI the site and Iound a commercial building
vacant and graIIiti Iree; however, there is signage Irom a prior tenant.


Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 0.43


Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
North
OIIice, Other than
Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR
Staff Report Page Three
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per 1itle 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
South Restaurant C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
East Auto Repair, Minor C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
West
Single-Family,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)


Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project oI SigniIicant Impact (Development Impact NotiIication Assessment) N/A
Project oI Regional SigniIicance N/A


Pursuant to 1itle 19.8 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Parking Parking
Use
Cross Floor
Area or
Aumber of
Units
Parking
Ratio Regular
Handi-
capped
Regular
Handi-
capped
ThriIt Shop 5,950 SF 1:250 SF 24*
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 20

20

Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 19 1 19 1 Y*
*The site is Parking Impaired as detailed in Title 19.18.030 (D)


ANALYSIS

The ThriIt Shop use is deIined by Title 19.18 as 'A retail Iacility that sells any new or used
merchandise that has been donated to the Iacility. Per the justiIication letter, date stamped
08/26/14, the applicant intends to sell purchased and donated items.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Ior this use include:
SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR

Staff Report Page Four
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



1. No outdoor display or sales oI any merchandise shall be permitted (non-waivable
condition).

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as the submittea site plan ana floor plan
show conformance to this conaition, ana it is a conaition of approval of the Special Use
Permit.

2. The use shall comply with the applicable requirements oI LVMC Title 6 (non-waivable
condition).

The proposea use will meet this requirement, as it is a conaition of approval of the
Special Use Permit.

3. Donations shall be accepted only during normal business hours, unless otherwise
speciIically approved in connection with the Special Use Permit. Where aIter-hours
donation oI items is approved, donation areas and containers, whether or not enclosed or
screened, must be designed so that donated items are not visible to the general public.

The proviaea floor plan ana fustification letter illustrate the aonation bins are locatea
insiae the builaing ana will be receivea auring business hours.

The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit Ior ThriIt Shop use located at 4000 West Sahara
Avenue. The site is parking impaired, as detailed in Title 19.18.030 (D). The prior use was
General Retail Store, Other Than listed (which has a parking requirement oI one parking space
Ior every 175 square Ieet oI gross Iloor area) that has a greater parking requirement than the
proposed use oI a ThriIt Shop (which has a parking requirement oI one parking space Ior every
250 square Ieet oI gross Iloor area). The submitted site plan and Iloor plan illustrate donation
bins are located inside the existing building. A condition oI approval was added that prohibits
donation bins or a drop oII area outside to ensure code requirements are met and required
parking will not be utilized as a drop oII area. StaII recommends approval oI this application, as
the minimum Title 19 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use are being met and the use can be
conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner with the surrounding neighborhood. II
denied, a ThriIt Shop use will not be allowed to open at 4000 West Sahara Avenue.


FINDINGS (SUP-55786)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must aIIirm the Iollowing:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.
SUP-55786 PR1-55655]
MR

Staff Report Page Five
October 14, 2014 - Planning Commission Meeting



The proposed ThriIt Shop use can be conducted in compatible and harmonious manner
with the existing and Iuture surrounding land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The site is physically suitable Ior the type and intensity oI land use proposed, as the use
would be located within an existing single tenant building with adequate parking and easy
site access. The site is designed to accommodate a number oI uses such as oIIices, retail
shops, thriIt shops and other similar uses.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The site has direct access to Sahara Avenue, which is a 100-Ioot wide Primary Arterial and
secondary access is provided by Las Verdes Street, a 60 Ioot wide local street. Both
roadways provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.

The ThriIt Shop use is subject to regular inspections and will not compromise the public
health and saIety. Additionally, the donation drop oII area and bins are located inside the
building.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The use meets all Title 19.12 requirements Ior a ThriIt Shop use and no Waivers are
required.



NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 39


NOTICES MAILED 320


APPROVALS 0


PROTESTS 0
08/26/14
PRJ-55655
SUP-55786
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 1 of 2 8/26/2014 8:47:15 AM
Applicant Email: houseofbargains@ymail.com
Applicant Fax:
Rep Last Name: Roberson
Rep First Name: Wallace
Applicant State: Nv
Applicant Phone: 7026364855
Applicant Zip: 89108
Rep Address: 2187 N Decatur Blvd
Rep Email: houseofbargains@ymail.com
Rep Fax:
Rep State: Nv
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep Phone: 7026085319
Rep Zip: 89108
Assessors Parcel #(s): 16206812002
Project Name HOUSE OF BARGAINS
Is the Application Information
Correct:
Yes
Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN)
Application Number: PRJ-55655
Applicant City: Las Vegas
ProjectAddress (Location): 4000 WEST SAHARA AVE
Application/Petition For: SUp thrift shop
If no, ...change what
Applicant First Name: Maryetta
Additional Information:
Applicant Address: 2187 N Decatur Blvd
Applicant Last Name: Brewer
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
General Plan Designation: Proposed: OTHER
Lots/Units:
Gross Acres:
08/26/14
PRJ-55655
SUP-55786
CLV Planning - Application Form
Page 2 of 2 8/26/2014 8:47:15 AM
Is the Owner Information Correct: Yes
If no, ...change what
! certify that ! am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. ! understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be re]ected. !
further certify that ! am the owner
or purchaser or option holder of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
! Accept:
Yes
DUCK HORN L L C 14737 E MARK LN SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262-7814
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2
Wallace Roberson House Of Bargains representative houseofbargains@ymail.com
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
08/26/14
PRJ-55655
SUP-55786
0
8
/
2
6
/
1
4
P
R
J
-
5
5
6
5
5
S
U
P
-
5
5
7
8
6
S
U
P
-


[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T

H
O
U
S
E

O
F

A
P
S
A
I
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
U
C
k

H
O
P
N


L
L
C

4
0
0
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-


[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T

H
O
U
S
E

O
F

A
P
S
A
I
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
U
C
k

H
O
P
N


L
L
C

4
0
0
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


S
U
P
-


[
P
P
J
-

j

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

U
S
E

P
E
P
M
I
T

-

A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T

H
O
U
S
E

O
F

A
P
S
A
I
N
S

-

O
W
N
E
P
:

D
U
C
k

H
O
P
N


L
L
C

4
0
0
0

W
E
S
T

S
A
H
A
P
A

A
V
E
N
U
E

0
8
/
Z
8
/
I
4


Justification Letter:

House Of Bargains
2187 N Decatur Blvd
Las Vegas, Nv 89108

To whom it may concern:


We are applying for a special use permit for thrift store license for the purpose of a operating a used
retail store. We will be selling new & used items from clothes, appliances, furniture, electronics and
other household items. There will also be donations excepted only during business hours. The propose
project is located at 4000 W. Sahara Blvd which is a stand - alone building without any other businesses
in the location. We will be conducting business hours between 9am 9pm open 7 days a week.

Sincerely,
Maryetta Brewer
Maryetta Brewer

08/26/14
PRJ-55655
SUP-55786


Agenda tem No.: 41.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
TXT-55360 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF
LAS VEGAS - For discussion and possible action on a request to update the Downtown
Centennial Plan to add Medical Marijuana Dispensary as a permitted use with approval oI a
special use permit in 18b The Las Vegas Arts District, Ward 3 (CoIIin). StaII has NO
RECOMMENDATION.

THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII has NO RECOMMENDATION.

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
None


Agenda tem No.: 42.



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUB1ECT:
TXT-56022 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - For discussion and possible action
on a request to amend LVMC Chapter 19.08.120.4 related to changeable electronic message
signage and to provide Ior other related matters. StaII has NO RECOMMENDATION.

THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
StaII has NO RECOMMENDATION.

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
None


Agenda tem No.: 43.


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING

SUB1ECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE
AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED
FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE
SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

You might also like