This document summarizes steam turbine designs for fossil fuel power plants ranging from 350-850 MW ratings. For 500-600 MW plants, it describes options for 2-flow or 4-flow designs with various last stage bucket sizes to optimize performance. For 750-850 MW plants, it recommends a proven 4-flow design with 33.5 or 40-inch last stage buckets. Higher power ratings utilize increased flows and larger last stage buckets.
This document summarizes steam turbine designs for fossil fuel power plants ranging from 350-850 MW ratings. For 500-600 MW plants, it describes options for 2-flow or 4-flow designs with various last stage bucket sizes to optimize performance. For 750-850 MW plants, it recommends a proven 4-flow design with 33.5 or 40-inch last stage buckets. Higher power ratings utilize increased flows and larger last stage buckets.
This document summarizes steam turbine designs for fossil fuel power plants ranging from 350-850 MW ratings. For 500-600 MW plants, it describes options for 2-flow or 4-flow designs with various last stage bucket sizes to optimize performance. For 750-850 MW plants, it recommends a proven 4-flow design with 33.5 or 40-inch last stage buckets. Higher power ratings utilize increased flows and larger last stage buckets.
500 - 600 MW Rating 750 - 850 MW Rating 2 - Flow 40 LP Section 4 Flow 30 or 33.5 LP Section 4 - Flow 33.5 or 40 LP Section Structured Product to Remove Variation Structured Product to Remove Variation 350 - 450 MW Rating 2 - Flow 30 or 33.5 LP Section 300-450 MW Rating Tandem Compound 2 Flow Reheat Steam Turbines Two Casing Machine, Power Ratings to 300-450 MW Full / Partial-Arc {2} Admission Initial Steam Conditions Up To 2400 Psig 1050/1050F Low Pressure Sections with 30 LSB, 33.5 and 40 LSB Over 80 of these machines in operation today Over 80 of these machines in operation today 500-550 MW Rating Tandem Compound 2 Flow Reheat Steam Turbines Two Casing Machine, Power Ratings to 500-550 MW Full / Partial-Arc {2} Admission Initial Steam Conditions Up To 2400 Psig 1050/1050F Two Casing Machine Has Small Station Footprint Two Casing Machine Has Small Station Footprint 500-600 MW Rating Three Casing, 4 Flow, Output Ratings at 500-600 MW Full / Partial-Arc {2} Admission Last Stage Bucket Lengths 30, and 33.5 Higher MW Rating Utilizes a Four Flow Design Higher MW Rating Utilizes a Four Flow Design 7650 7700 7750 7800 7850 7900 7950 1 . 5 2 . 5 3 Ex ha ust Pres s ure H e a t
R a t e TC2F- 40 TC4F- 30 TC4F- 33 .5 7 6 5 0 7 7 0 0 7 7 5 0 7 8 0 0 7 8 5 0 7 9 0 0 7 9 5 0 8 0 0 0 1.5 2.5 3 Exh au st Pres su re H e a t
R a t e TC2F-40 TC4F-30 TC4F-33 .5 7700 7750 7800 7850 7900 7950 8000 1.5 2.5 3 Exh au st Pr es s u re H e a t
R a t e TC 2 F - 4 0 TC 4 F - 3 0 TC 4 F - 3 3 . 5 100 BTU/kW-hr 4F-33.5 WINS 2F-40 WINS At $40,000/BTU 100 BTU=$4 M 4F-33.5 WINS 4F-33.5 WINS 4F-30 WINS 2F-40 WINS What Are the Cooling Water Conditions of the Market Place? 500 MW 550 MW 600 MW Exhaust Pressure Impact Steam Turbine Technology 500 to 600 MW Product Structure 4 Flow Machine With 30, 33.5 LSB 2 Flow Machine With 40 LSB Exhaust Pressure and Economics Will Effect the Optimum Exhaust Pressure and Economics Will Effect the Optimum 750-850 MW Rating Tandem Compound 4 Flow Reheat Steam Turbines Four Casing, Power Ratings to 750 - 850 MW Full / Partial-Arc {2} Admission Initial Steam Conditions up to 3500 Psig 1050/1050F Last Stage Bucket Length 33.5 or 40 Over 40 of These Units in Operation Over 40 of These Units in Operation Impact of Steam Conditions / Harp for Fossil Applications 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 2400 3500 Throttle Pressure P l a n t
H e a t
R a t e
I m p r o v e m e n t 1 0 0 0
F
/
1 0 0 0
F 1 0 5 0
F
/
1 0 5 0
F ~ 1.8% ~ 1.7% ~ 1.5% ~ 0.5% Harp Cycle 600 MW Unit Effect Base line : 2400 / 1000 F / 1000 F ~ 0.8% Ultra Super Critical (3500 / 1050 F / 1100 F) 3500 / 1000 F / 1000 F 2400/ 1050 F / 1050 F Ultra Super Critical Steam Conditions 1050 MW 250 Bar/600/610C (3626 Psia/1112/1130F) 4 Flow 48 LSB Cross-Compound COD 7/00 Steam Turbine 48.7% Thermal Efficiency Worlds Most Powerful Ultra Super Critical Steam Turbine Worlds Most Powerful Ultra Super Critical Steam Turbine Exhaust Hood Performance Validation Outer Hood Inner Casing LP Instrumentation LP Diaphragms - 30 TCs & 30 PTs Exhaust Diffuser - 32 PTs Bearing Cone - 4 PTs Condenser Interface - 11 PTs Last Stage Bucket - 41 PTs L-0 & L-1 - Traverse Probes Exhaust Diffuser 181 Precision Instruments Being Used to Characterize Steam Turbine 181 Precision Instruments Being Used to Characterize Steam Turbine Thermodynamic and Mechanical Performance Thermodynamic and Mechanical Performance Evolution of Steam Path Design 88 89 90 91 93 94 95 96 97 98 92 Typical HP Steam Path Efficiency of Single Stages H P
S t e a m
P a t h
E f f i c i e n c y
-
% 1980s Controlled Vortex Geometry 1960s Free- vortex Design 1990s Advanced Vortex Geometry 2000s Dense Pack W/adv Sealing 1970s Improved Vane Profiles Potential Dense Pack Design Features Baseline Double Flow Inlet 6 Stages Dense Pack Single Flow Inlet More Stages Longer Buckets Smaller Rotor and Wheel Diameters Integral Covers Adv Seals Single Flow Control Stage Dense Pack Diaphragm Dense Pack Diaphragms with Advanced Seals Dense Pack Diaphragms with Advanced Seals Dense Pack HP Section Dense Pack Diaphragms in the Lower Shell Dense Pack Diaphragms in the Lower Shell Dense Pack Hp Section 800 MW HP Dense Pack on the Half Shell 800 MW HP Dense Pack on the Half Shell Summary 500 - 600 MW Rating 2 Flow or 4 Flow Various LSBs to Optimize 750 - 850 MW Rating 4 Flow 33.5 or 40 LSB Proven Designs with Improved Technology Proven Designs with Improved Technology 350 - 450 MW Rating 2 Flow 30 or 33.5 LSB