Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STUDY NOTE - 28
REFUND
Case Law :
i) Board is competent to admit an application for refund even after expiry of period pre-
scribed under section 239, for avoiding genuine hardship in any case or class of cases.
Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan 263 ITR 706.
REFUND ON APPEAL [Sec. 240]
iii) Assessee is entitled to interest if the interest is paid u/s 220(2) subsequently becomes re-
fundable: Interest u/s 244A is payable in respect of the amount of interest earlier paid by
the assessee u/s 220(2) but later determined as refundable. Modipon Ltd. V CIT 270 ITR
257.
Case Laws :
i) Revenue is liable to pay interest on the amount of interest which it should have paid to the
assessee but has unjustifiably failed to do - CIT v. Narendra Doshi 254 ITR 606/122 Taxman
717.
ii) Interest on delayment payment of interest: The Department is liable to pay interest on
interest under sections 214 and 244(1A) if payment of interest is delayed - MC, Nally Bharat
Engg. Co. Ltd. v. CIT Tax L.R. 638
iii) Calculation of interest Interest cannot be granted till date of dispatch of refund order but it
has to be granted till date when order regarding payment of interest has been signed -
Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. CIT 281 ITR 274
iv) Where return is filled belatedly: Where delay in completion of assessment which led to
refund was on account of delay in filing returns by assessee, assessee was not entitled to
interest for period of said delay in terms of section 244A(2) - M. Ahammadkutty Haji v. Chief
CIT 155 Taxman 315
Where a refund is found to be due to any person, the tax authorities may, in lieu of payment of the
refunds, set off the amount of refund against the sum payable under the Income-tax Act.
Case Law :
i) Prior intimation to assessee whether mandatory: While making set off of refunds against
tax remaining payable, intimation is certainly not a jurisdictional requirement and ab-
sence thereof is merely an irregularity and, therefore, want of intimation would not vitiate
the adjustment - Brij Bhushan Lal & Sons v. Designated Authority 246 ITR 353
ii) Refund due to assessee cannot be adjusted against demand raised, against a third party
Archana Shukla v. Joint CIT 244 ITR 829.
Where refund arises as a result of any order passed in appeal or other proceedings under
the Act, no formal application from the assessee is required. The AO has to grant refund
suo moto.
Case Laws :
i) Clause (a) of proviso to section 240 added with effect from 1-4-1989 is merely clarificatory
and hence, must be held to be retrospective - CIT v. Chittoor Electric Supply Corpn. 212 ITR
404 /CIT v. Shelley Products 261 ITR 367
Correctness of assessment not to be questioned.[Sec. 242]
In a claim under this Chapter, it shall not be open to the assessee to question the correct ess
of any assessment or other matter decided which has become final and conclusive or ask
for a review of the same, and the assessee shall not be entitled to any relief on such claim
except refund of tax wrongly paid or paid in excess.
Interest on Refund of Income Tax: Where refund of any amount becomes due to the assessee
under the Income Tax Act, he shall be entitled to receive, in addition to the said amount, simple
interest on the refund calculated in the following manner:
(a) Where the refund is out of any tax deducted at source/ tax collected at source or
advance tax paid during the financial year, interest will be paid at the rate of ½%, per
month or part of a month from the period starting from 1st day of April of the assess-
ment year to the date on which refund is granted.
However, no interest shall be payable if the amount of refund is less than 10% of the
tax determined u/s 143(1).
(b) In other cases, interest shall be paid @ ½% per month for every month or part of
month for the period commencing from the date of payment of tax or penalty to the
date on which refund is granted.
Interest on Refund of Fringe Benefit Tax: Section 244A also provides for interest @ ½% for
every month or part of the month shall be payable where refund of any amount out of fringe
benefit tax paid by way of advance tax becomes due.
However, no interest shall be payable if the amount of refund is less than 10% of the tax deter-
mined u/s 115WE (1).
Similarly interest @ ½% for every month or part of month shall be payable in any other case for
the period or periods from the date or dates of payment of tax or penalty to the date on which
the refund is granted.
Judicial Decisions
i) Section 244(1) nowhere speaks of interest. Provisions of section 240 & 244 reveal liability
to pay interest on delayed payment of refund amount but do not provide for payment of
any interest on interest even though there is delay in payment of such interest to assessee.
Sandvik Asia Ltd. V CIT 280 ITR 643 (SC)
ii) As the assessee has not received the refund of the excess advance tax, he preferred a writ
petition before the Delhi High Court. When the writ petition was pending, the Depart-
ment granted refund of advance tax along with interest thereon. The petitioner claimed
interest on delayed payment of interest. The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is
entitled to interest on delayed payment of interest & accordingly directed the revenue to
pay interest on interest. R.K. Jain & Sons v CIT193 CTR 659.
iii) Assessee is entitled to interest if the interest is paid u/s 220(2) subsequently becomes re-
fundable: Interest u/s 244A is payable in respect of the amount of interest earlier paid by
Case Laws :
i) Revenue is liable to pay interest on the amount of interest which it should have paid to the
assessee but has unjustifiably failed to do - CIT v. Narendra Doshi 254 ITR 606/122 Taxman
717.
ii) Interest on delayment payment of interest: The Department is liable to pay interest on
interest under sections 214 and 244(1A) if payment of interest is delayed - MC, Nally Bharat
Engg. Co. Ltd. v. CIT Tax L.R. 638
iii) Calculation of interest Interest cannot be granted till date of dispatch of refund order but
it has to be granted till date when order regarding payment of interest has been signed -
Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. CIT 281 ITR 274
iv) Where return is filled belatedly: Where delay in completion of assessment which led to
refund was on account of delay in filing returns by assessee, assessee was not entitled to
interest for period of said delay in terms of section 244A(2) - M. Ahammadkutty Haji v. Chief
CIT 155 Taxman 315
Where a refund is found to be due to any person, the tax authorities may, in lieu of payment of the
refunds, set off the amount of refund against the sum payable under the Income-tax Act.
Case Law :
i) Prior intimation to assessee whether mandatory: While making set off of refunds against
tax remaining payable, intimation is certainly not a jurisdictional requirement and ab-
sence thereof is merely an irregularity and, therefore, want of intimation would not vitiate
the adjustment - Brij Bhushan Lal & Sons v. Designated Authority 246 ITR 353
ii) Refund due to assessee cannot be adjusted against demand raised, against a third party
Archana Shukla v. Joint CIT 244 ITR 829.