2013 Ta MJ 022091065 8

92
DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Aaker, J., Fournier, S. And Brasel, S.A (2004), When good brands do bad, Journal
of Consumer Research, Vol. 31 No.1, pp. 1-16.
Ajzen, I. (2001), Nature and operation of attitudes, Annual Review of Psychology,
Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 27-58.
Aliabadi, V.S, Ahari, H.A, Ghasemi, M. (2012), Analysis of factors affecting
consumer brand preference in brand alliance strategy, Journal of Scientific
Research, pp. 40-47.
Arora, Stoner, & Arora. (2006),Using framing and credibility to incorporate
exercise and fitness in individuals lifestyle, Journal of Consumer Marketing,
Vol. 23 Iss: 4 pp.199 207.
Bassili, J.N. (1995), Response latency and the accessibility of voting intentions:
what contributes to accessibility and how it affects vote choice, Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp. 686-95.
Batt (2003), Building long-term buyer-seller relationships in food chains,
International Farm Management.
Belch, G.E., & Belch, M. A. (1994). Introduction to advertising and Promotion: An
integrated Marketing Communications Perceptive (3rd ed.). Homewood,
Illinois: Irwin.
Bhattacherjee, A. & Sanford, C. (2006), Influence processes for information
technology acceptance: an elaboration likelihood mode, MIS Quarterly, Vol.
30 No. 4, pp. 805-25.
Coetzee, M (2005). Employee Commitment.
Cornwell, T.B. & Coote, L.V. (2005), Corporate sponsorship of a cause: the role of
identification in purchase intent, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58 No.
3, pp. 268-76.
Cornwell, T.B. & Maignan, I. (1998), An international review of sponsorship
research, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
D'Asouts, A. & Blitz, P. (1995), Consumer evaluations of sponsorship
programmes", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 29 No. 12, pp. 6-22.
93

Durianto, Darmadi. Sugiarto & Tony Sitinjak. (2004) Strategi Menaklukkan Pasar:
Melalui Riset Ekuitas dan Perilaku Merek. Cetakan ketiga. Jakarta: PT.
Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Erdem, T. & Swait, J. (1998), Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon, Journal
of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 7 No.2, pp. 131-57.
Erdem, T. & Swait, J. (2004), Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice,
Journal of consumer research, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp 191-8.
Falk, amin & Fischbacher. (2000). A Theory of Reciprocity. Institute for Empirical
Research in Economics University of Zurich - Working Paper Series.
Fill, Crish. (1995). Marketing Communication, Prentice Hall Europe
Hertfondshire, Great Britain.
Fombrum, C. J (1996). Reputation. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
Ghozali, Imam & Fuad. (2005). Structural Equation Modelling: Pengantar. Badan
Penerbit Universitas.
Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B, A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The influence of corporate
credibility on consumer attitudes and purchase intent. Corporate Reputation
Review, 3(4), 204-318.
Goldsmith, R. E. & Lafferty, B. A. & Newell, S.J. (2000) "The impact of corporate
credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements
and brands", Journal of advertising.
Graf, R. & Perrien, J. (2005), The role of trust and satisfaction in a relationship: the
case of high tech firms and banks, Communication Articles-European
Marketing Academy.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2010): Multivariate Data
Analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall.
Hermawan, Asep. (2006). Pedoman Praktis Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta:
Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Trisakti.
Holmlund, Maria. (2007). A definition, model, an empirical analysis of business-to-
business relationship quality, International Journal of Service Industry
Management, Vol 19 No. 1, 2008, pp. 32-62.
Jefkins, Frank, (1996), Periklanan, Terjemahan oleh Haris Munandar, Edisi Ketiga,
Erlangga, Jakarta.
94

Khan, M.A., Bozzo, C. (2012), Connection between self concept and brand
preference and the role of product usage.
Kendzierski, D. & Whitaker, D.J. (1997), The role of selfschema in linking
intentions with behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.
23 No. 2, pp. 139-47.
Kim, Ko, & James. (2011), The impact of relationship quality on attitude toward a
sponsor, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 26 Iss: 8 pp.566-
576.
Koksal, C.D., Demir, M.O. (2012), The impact of self-brand congruence on brand
loyalty: a study on cellular phone users, International Journal of Social
Sciences and Humanity Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2.
Kotler, Philip. & Keller, Lane, Kevin. (2006). Marketing Management. Pearson
International.
Kotler, Philip. (2008). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jilid 1 dan 2. Jakarta: Prehallindo.
Lafferty, B.A. & Goldsmith, R.E. (1999). Corporate credibility's role in
consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low
credibility endorser is used in the ad" Journal of Business Research.
Maathuis, Rodenburg, & Sikkel (2004). Credibility, emotion, or reason?. Corporate
Reputation Review. 6 (4), pp. 333 345.
Morgan, R.M & Hunt, S.D. (1994). The commitment trust theory of relationship
marketing, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, pp. 20-38.
MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural
antecedents of attitude toward ad in ad advertising pretesting context. Journal
of Marketing, 53 (2), 48-65.
MacKenzie, S.B., Lutz, R.J. & Belch, G.E (1989). The role of attitude toward the ad
as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing
explanations", Journal of Marketing Research.
Meenaghan, T. (2001), Understanding sponsorship effects, Psychology &
Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 95-122.
Ohanion, R (1990). Construction & validation of a scale to measure celebrity
endosers perceived exrpertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of
advertising 19(3), 39-52.
95

Palmatier, R.W., Dant, R.P., Grewal, D. & Evans, K. (2005), Leveraging
relationship marketing strategies for better performance: a meta-analysis,
Working Paper Series, Iss: 3, No. 05-003.
Palmatier, R.W., Dant, R.P., Grewal, D. & Evans, K. (2006), Factors influencing
the effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 70 No. 4, pp. 136-53.
Rifon, NJ., Choi, S.M., Trimble, C.S & Li, H. (2004). "Congruence effects in
sponsorship: the mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer
attributions of sponsor motive", Journal of advertising.
Roxenhall, T. & Andresen, E. (2012), Affective, Calculative, and Normative
Commitment: An assessment of relationship, World Review of Business
Research, Vol. 2 No. 5 pp. 86-96.
Sekaran, Uma (2010). Research Method for Business: A skill Building Approach.
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sheeran, P. & Orbell, S. (1998), Social cognition: self, attitudes and attributions, in
Scott, P.J. & Spencer, C.P. (Eds), The Blackwells Introduction to Psychology,
Blackwells, Oxford, pp. 425-66.
Schiffman, Leon. G & Kanuk, Leslie Lazar, (2007), Consumer Behaviour, 9th,
Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Schiffman, Leon. G & Kanuk, Leslie Lazar, (2004), Consumer Behaviour, 8th,
Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Speed, R & Thompson, P. (2000)."Determinants of sports sponsorship response",
Journal of the academy of marketing science.
Tong, Xiao, & Hawley. Jana M. 2009. Measuring Customer Based Brand Equity
Empirical Evidence from The Sportswear Market in China. Journal of
Product & Brand Management. Page 262-271.
Wang, Jain, Cheng, & Aung. (2012), The purchasing impact of fan identification
and sports sponsorship, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 30 Iss: 5
pp. 553-566.
Bisnis-Jatim.com (2011). League Bidik Penjualan Sepatu Tumbuh 100 %.
http://www.bisnis-jatim.com/index.php/2011/09/26/league-bidik-penjualan-
sepatu-tumbuh-100/. Diunduh 12 November 2012.
Bisnisbali.com(2011).http://www.bisnisbali.com/2011/05/13/news/gayahidup/ty.html
Diunduh 12 November 2012.
96

Euro Monitor (2011), http://www.kaskus.co.id/post/510dcb0a542acf744f000013.
IEG (2009), Sponsorship spending to rise 2.2% in 2009, available at:
www.sponsorship.com/About-IEG/Press-Room/Sponsorship-Spending To
Rise-2.2-Percent-in-2009.aspx. Diunduh 12 November 2012.
Indonesia Berprestasi (2011). http://www.indonesiaberprestasi.web.id/berita-
prestatif/karya-anak-bangsa/league-sepatu-lokal-yang-menembus-pasar-global/
Kabar bisnis (2011). League Konsentrasi Garap Pasar Domestik.
http://www.kabarbisnis.com/read/2817518. Diunduh. 12 November 2012.
KementerianPerdagangan(2011).http://www.bisnisbali.com/2011/05/13/news/gayahi
dup/ty.html. Diunduh 12 November 2012.
Murdaya, Prajna (2011). League Konsentrasi Garap Pasar Domestik.
http://www.kabarbisnis.com/read/2817518. Diunduh 12 November 2012.
NBL Indonesia (2011). Berharap Kembali Sold Out.
http://www.nblindonesia.com/v1/index.php?page=newsdetail&id=648
Widjanarko (2011). http://www.bisnisbali.com/2011/05/13/news/gayahidup/ty.html.
Wijaya (2011). http://www.bisnisbali.com/2011/05/13/news/gayahidup/ty.html.

97

Lampiran 1
KUESIONER
Jakarta, Desember 2012
Kepada Yth.
Para Responden.
Saya Dodi Pramaditya, mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Jurusan Manajemen
Universitas Trisakti. Saat ini saya sedang menyelesaikan tugas skripsi sebagai syarat
kelulusan untuk mendapat gelar sarjana. Saya mengharapkan kesediaan dan
partisipasi saudara / saudari untuk mengisi kuesioner ini dengan jujur. Kesediaan
saudara / saudari untuk memberikan jawaban sangat membantu dalam penyelesaian
skripsi ini. Hasil dari kuesioner ini akan bersifat rahasia dan merupakan tanggung
jawab saya sebagai seorang peneliti.
Terima kasih atas bantuan dan partisipasi yang diberikan oleh saudara / saudari.

Hormat saya,
Peneliti

Dodi Pramaditya
(022.09.1065)

98

Bagian I
Lingkarilah salah satu pilihan jawaban yang dapat mewakili diri anda untuk tiap
pernyataan dibawah ini:
1. Apakah anda pernah menonton langsung pertandingan Persija Jakarta di
Stadion Gelora Bung Karno?
a. Tidak pernah d. 3 Kali
b. 1 Kali e. Lebih dari 3 kali
c. 2 Kali

2. Apakah anda tahu merek League merupakan sponsor resmi Persija Jakarta?
a. Tahu
b. Tidak tahu

3. Apakah anda pernah membeli produk League?
a. Pernah
b. Belum pernah

4. Jenis Kelamin : a. Pria
b. Wanita

5. Usia : a. 25 c. 36-45
b. 26-35 d. 46

6. Penghasilan perbulan : a. Rp. 1.000.000
b. Rp. 1.000.000 Rp. 3.000.000
c. Rp. 3.000.000 Rp. 5.000.000
d. Rp. 5.000.000

99

7. Pekerjaan : a. Siswa
b. Mahasiswa
c. Karyawan
d. Lain lain (......................................)

8. Pendidikan Terakhir : a. SD e. Diploma
b. SMP f. Sarjana (S1)
c. SMA g. Magister (S2)

100

Bagian 2
Berilah tanda (X) pada salah satu kotak yang paling mewakili anda untuk produk
olahraga merek League yang mensponsori tim Persija pada setiap pernyataan
dibawah ini!
Keterangan: 1 = Sangat Tidak Setuju, 2 = Tidak Setuju, 3 = Cukup Setuju,
4 = Setuju, 5 = Sangat Setuju.

No Pernyataan 1 2 3 4 5
Bagi saya tim Persija Jakarta:
1. Dapat diandalkan untuk berkompetisi di Liga Indonesia.
2. Memiliki integritas.
3. Dapat dipercaya dalam kompetisi sepak bola nasional.
Diri saya merupakan pribadi yang:
4. Aktif dalam berbagai kegiatan tim Persija Jakarta.
5. Berdedikasi untuk mendukung tim Persija Jakarta.
6. Berkomitmen untuk mendukung tim Persija Jakarta.
Tim Persija Jakarta:
7. Mengingatkan saya sebagai penggemar sepak bola.
8. Dan saya memiliki banyak kesamaan dalam hal sepak bola.
9.
Memiliki image yang serupa dengan citra diri saya dalam
kehidupan sehari hari saya.

Menurut saya tim Persija Jakarta:
10.
Memperhatikan dukungan yang saya berikan dan manfaat
yang saya dapatkan setelah mendukung mereka.

11.
Pasti kembali mendukung saya ketika saya mendukung
mereka.

12. Akan melihat jika saya mendukung mereka.
Merek League yang mensponsori tim Persija:
13. Mengingatkan saya pada produk yang kompeten.
14.
Akan berkomitmen untuk memuaskan pelanggannya dengan
memberikan produk yang berkualitas.

15.
Akan memberikan apa yang telah dijanjikan berupa produk
berkualitas.

Bagi saya sponsor League:
16.
Memiliki alasan utama mensponsori tim Persija Jakarta
karena yakin tim Persija Jakarta layak mendapat dukungan.

17.
Akan cenderung memiliki kepentingan bisnis yang tidak
hanya bertujuan komersial di tim Persija Jakarta.

18.
Mungkin akan mendukung tim Persija Jakarta bahkan jika
prestasi Persija Jakarta menurun.

101

Menurut saya:
19.
Jika saya membeli merek League, yang mensponsori Persija
Jakarta, maka ini merupakan keputusan yang baik.

20.
Merek League, yang mensponsori Persija Jakarta, merupakan
produk olahraga yang dapat memuaskan konsumen.

21.
Apabila mengkonsumsi produk dari merek League bisa
mendapatkan banyak keuntungan.

Saya akan:
22.
Sangat mungkin membeli merek League yang mensponsori
Persija Jakarta.

23.
Membeli merek League, yang mensponsori Persija Jakarta,
jika suatu saat saya membutuhkan produk olahraga.

24.
Aktif mencari merek League, yang mensponsori Persija
Jakarta (Dengan tujuan untuk membeli produk olahraga).

25.
Pasti mencoba produk olahraga merek League, yang
mensponsori Persija Jakarta.

102

Lampiran 2
UJI VALIDITAS DAN REALIBILITAS
Correlations

Correlations

Correlati ons
1 .709** .777** .915**
. .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.709** 1 .721** .888**
.000 . .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.777** .721** 1 .920**
.000 .000 . .000
150 150 150 150
.915** .888** .920** 1
.000 .000 .000 .
150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
relationship quality trust
TOT_RQT
relationship
qualit y trust
relationship
qualit y trust
relationship
qualit y trust TOT_RQT
Correlation is signif icant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
**.
Correlati ons
1 .717** .698** .880**
. .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.717** 1 .889** .943**
.000 . .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.698** .889** 1 .935**
.000 .000 . .000
150 150 150 150
.880** .943** .935** 1
.000 .000 .000 .
150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
relationship quality
commitment
commitment
commitment
TOT_RQC
relationship
qualit y
commitment
relationship
qualit y
commitment
relationship
qualit y
commitment TOT_RQC
**.
103

Correlations

Correlations

Correlati ons
1 .706** .565** .863**
. .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.706** 1 .606** .868**
.000 . .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.565** .606** 1 .864**
.000 .000 . .000
150 150 150 150
.863** .868** .864** 1
.000 .000 .000 .
150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
self connection
self connection
self connection
TOT_RQSC
relationship
qualit y self
connection
relationship
qualit y self
connection
relationship
qualit y self
connection TOT_RQSC
**.
Correlati ons
1 .586** .544** .820**
. .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.586** 1 .701** .891**
.000 . .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.544** .701** 1 .869**
.000 .000 . .000
150 150 150 150
.820** .891** .869** 1
.000 .000 .000 .
150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
relationship
qualit y reciprocity
relationship
relationship
TOT_RQR
relationship
qualit y
reciprocity
relationship
qualit y
reciprocity
relationship
qualit y
reciprocity TOT_RQR
**.
104

Correlations

Correlations

Correlati ons
1 .694** .706** .887**
. .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.694** 1 .784** .910**
.000 . .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.706** .784** 1 .917**
.000 .000 . .000
150 150 150 150
.887** .910** .917** 1
.000 .000 .000 .
150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
sponsor credibility
sponsor credibility
sponsor credibility
TOT_SC
sponsor
credibility
sponsor
credibility
sponsor
credibility TOT_SC
Correlation is signif icant at the 0.01 lev el (1-tailed).
**.
Correlati ons
1 .479** .653** .863**
. .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.479** 1 .349** .759**
.000 . .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.653** .349** 1 .819**
.000 .000 . .000
150 150 150 150
.863** .759** .819** 1
.000 .000 .000 .
150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
sincerity
sincerity
sincerity
TOT_S
sincerity sincerity sincerity TOT_S
Correlation is signif icant at the 0.01 level (1-t ailed).
**.
105

Correlations

Correlations

Correlati ons
1 .678** .556** .859**
. .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.678** 1 .671** .893**
.000 . .000 .000
150 150 150 150
.556** .671** 1 .858**
.000 .000 . .000
150 150 150 150
.859** .893** .858** 1
.000 .000 .000 .
150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
attitude toward sponsor
TOT_ATS
attitude
toward
sponsor
attitude
toward
sponsor
attitude
toward
sponsor TOT_ATS
**.
Correlati ons
1 .520** .540** .507** .794**
. .000 .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150 150
.520** 1 .473** .522** .776**
.000 . .000 .000 .000
150 150 150 150 150
.540** .473** 1 .644** .834**
.000 .000 . .000 .000
150 150 150 150 150
.507** .522** .644** 1 .822**
.000 .000 .000 . .000
150 150 150 150 150
.794** .776** .834** .822** 1
.000 .000 .000 .000 .
150 150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
purchase intention
purchase intention
purchase intention
purchase intention
TOT_PI
purchase
intention
purchase
intention
purchase
intention
purchase
intention TOT_PI
**.
106

Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******
_

R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

Item-total Statistics

Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Alpha
if Item if Item Total if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted

RQT1 8.4133 2.4589 .8023 .8365
RQT2 8.5267 2.6671 .7584 .8745
RQT3 8.5000 2.3993 .8108 .8292

Reliability Coefficients

N of Cases = 150.0 N of Items = 3

Alpha = .8930

Reliability
_




RQC1 7.9867 5.2481 .7280 .9410
RQC2 7.5867 4.9153 .8688 .8212
RQC3 7.4267 5.0382 .8539 .8348



Alpha = .9073

107

Reliability
_




RQSC1 7.6667 2.9620 .6948 .7311
RQSC2 7.9000 3.2315 .7356 .7141
RQSC3 8.3267 2.5436 .6321 .8237



Alpha = .8196

Reliability
_




RQR1 7.2600 3.9923 .6131 .8235
RQR2 7.3000 3.3792 .7326 .7047
RQR3 7.3067 3.6771 .7021 .7376



Alpha = .8250
108

Reliability
_




SC1 7.3333 2.7069 .7414 .8784
SC2 7.2733 2.7234 .7999 .8274
SC3 7.1933 2.6134 .8079 .8191



Alpha = .8887

Reliability
_




S1 7.6533 2.7783 .6879 .5175
S2 7.9800 3.0667 .4528 .7884
S3 7.9400 2.8219 .5729 .6456



Alpha = .7402
109

Reliability
_




ATS1 7.2867 2.3267 .6718 .8008
ATS2 7.2667 2.3714 .7647 .7150
ATS3 7.3800 2.3177 .6670 .8062



Alpha = .8367

Reliability
_




PI1 10.9867 5.4898 .6265 .7807
PI2 11.2133 5.5918 .5977 .7936
PI3 11.3133 4.9683 .6693 .7619
PI4 10.9867 5.4763 .6826 .7569



Alpha = .8200
110

Lampiran 3

KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
jenis kelamin * menonton
secara langsung di
stadion GBK
jenis kelamin *
mengetahui merek
league sebagai sponsor
resmi persija
jenis kelamin * membeli
produk league
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
jeni s kelamin * menonton secara langsung di stadion GBK Crosstabulation
Count
13 15 8 101 137
0 0 0 13 13
13 15 8 114 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
satu kali dua kali tiga kali
lebih dari
tiga kali
menonton secara langsung di stadion GBK
Total
jeni s kelamin * mengetahui merek league sebagai
sponsor resmi persija Crosstabulation
Count
137 137
13 13
150 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
tahu
mengetahui
merek league
sebagai
sponsor
resmi persija
Total
111

Crosstabs

jeni s kelamin * membeli produk league Crosstabul ation
Count
137 137
13 13
150 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
belum pernah
membeli
produk
league
Total
Case Processing Summary
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
150 100.0% 0 .0% 150 100.0%
jenis kelamin * menonton
secara langsung di
stadion GBK
jenis kelamin *
mengetahui merek
league sebagai sponsor
resmi persija
jenis kelamin * membeli
produk league
jenis kelamin * usia
jenis kelamin *
penghasilan
jenis kelamin * pekerjaan
jenis kelamin *
pendidikan terakhir
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
jeni s kelamin * menonton secara langsung di stadion GBK Crosstabulation
Count
13 15 8 101 137
0 0 0 13 13
13 15 8 114 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
satu kali dua kali tiga kali
lebih dari
tiga kali
menonton secara langsung di stadion GBK
Total
112

jeni s kelamin * mengetahui merek league sebagai
sponsor resmi persija Crosstabulation
Count
137 137
13 13
150 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
tahu
mengetahui
merek league
sebagai
sponsor
resmi persija
Total
jeni s kelamin * membeli produk league Crosstabul ation
Count
137 137
13 13
150 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
belum pernah
membeli
produk
league
Total
jeni s kelamin * usia Crosstabul ation
Count
120 12 4 1 137
13 0 0 0 13
133 12 4 1 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
< 25 26-35 36-45 > 46
usia
Total
jeni s kelamin * penghasi lan Crosstabul ation
Count
74 45 11 7 137
3 10 0 0 13
77 55 11 7 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
< 1 juta 1 juta - 3 juta 3 juta - 5 juta > 5 juta
penghasilan
Total
113

jeni s kelamin * pekerjaan Crosstabulation
Count
13 81 32 11 137
0 4 9 0 13
13 85 41 11 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
siswa mahasiswa karyawan lain-lain
pekerjaan
Total
jeni s kelamin * pendidikan terakhir Crosstabul ation
Count
4 108 6 19 137
0 11 1 1 13
4 119 7 20 150
pria
wanita
jenis kelamin
Total
SD SMA Diploma Sarjana (S1)
pendidikan terakhir
Total
114

Lampiran 4

STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF

Descriptives

Descriptives

Descriptives

Descriptive Statistics
150 1.00 5.00 4.3067 .85880
150 1.00 5.00 4.1933 .81674
150 1.00 5.00 4.2200 .87370
150 3.00 15.00 12.7200 2.31459
150
TOT_RQT
Valid N (listwise)
N Minimum Maximum Mean St d. Dev iation
150 1.00 5.00 3.5133 1.23558
150 1.00 5.00 3.9133 1.18682
150 1.00 5.00 4.0733 1.17065
150 3.00 15.00 11.5000 3.30090
150
commitment
commitment
commitment
TOT_RQC
Valid N (listwise)
150 1.00 5.00 4.2800 .92046
150 1.00 5.00 4.0467 .80549
150 1.00 5.00 3.6200 1.10927
150 3.00 15.00 11.9467 2.45164
150
self connection
self connection
self connection
TOT_RQSC
Valid N (listwise)
115

Descriptives

Descriptives

Descriptives

Descriptives

150 1.00 5.00 3.6733 1.03947
150 1.00 5.00 3.6333 1.11377
150 1.00 5.00 3.6267 1.05262
150 3.00 15.00 10.9333 2.76038
150
relationship
relationship
relationship
TOT_RQR
Valid N (listwise)
150 1.00 5.00 3.5667 .90053
150 1.00 5.00 3.6267 .85567
150 1.00 5.00 3.7067 .88649
150 3.00 15.00 10.9000 2.39056
150
sponsor credibility
sponsor credibility
sponsor credibility
TOT_SC
Valid N (listwise)
N Minimum Maximum Mean St d. Deviation
150 1.00 5.00 4.1333 .92444
150 1.00 5.00 3.8067 1.02778
150 1.00 5.00 3.8467 1.00159
150 3.00 15.00 11.7867 2.39851
150
sincerity
sincerity
sincerity
TOT_S
Valid N (listwise)
150 1.00 5.00 3.6800 .86947
150 1.00 5.00 3.7000 .79216
150 1.00 5.00 3.5867 .87613
150 5.00 15.00 10.9667 2.20560
150
TOT_ATS
Valid N (listwise)
116

Descriptives

150 1.00 5.00 3.8467 .91766
150 1.00 5.00 3.6200 .91717
150 1.00 5.00 3.5200 1.01479
150 1.00 5.00 3.8467 .87268
150 6.00 20.00 14.8333 3.00428
150
purchase intention
purchase intention
purchase intention
purchase intention
TOT_PI
Valid N (listwise)
117

Lampiran 5

HASIL PENGUJIAN HIPOTESIS

Estimates (Group number 1 - Default model)
Scalar Estimates (Group number 1 - Default model)
Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
ATS <--- RQT .146 .085 1.729 .084

ATS <--- SC .406 .099 4.122 ***

ATS <--- S .315 .121 2.604 .009

PI <--- RQT .259 .076 3.412 ***

PI <--- SC .058 .096 .600 .548

PI <--- S .092 .110 .835 .404

PI <--- ATS .546 .144 3.799 ***

rqr3 <--- RQT 1.000

rqr2 <--- RQT 1.083 .129 8.425 ***

rqr1 <--- RQT .973 .120 8.116 ***

rqsc3 <--- RQT 1.052 .128 8.215 ***

rqsc2 <--- RQT .685 .093 7.385 ***

rqsc1 <--- RQT .786 .106 7.416 ***

rqc3 <--- RQT 1.275 .136 9.405 ***

rqc2 <--- RQT 1.291 .137 9.398 ***

rqc1 <--- RQT 1.251 .143 8.765 ***

rqt3 <--- RQT .784 .101 7.781 ***

rqt2 <--- RQT .750 .094 7.967 ***

rqt1 <--- RQT .713 .099 7.215 ***

sc3 <--- SC 1.000

sc2 <--- SC .959 .068 14.072 ***

sc1 <--- SC .923 .075 12.220 ***

s3 <--- S 1.000

s2 <--- S .668 .111 6.035 ***

s1 <--- S .971 .097 9.984 ***

ats1 <--- ATS 1.000

ats2 <--- ATS .924 .084 10.953 ***

ats3 <--- ATS .961 .095 10.151 ***

pi4 <--- PI 1.000

pi3 <--- PI 1.141 .125 9.151 ***

pi2 <--- PI .884 .114 7.722 ***

pi1 <--- PI 1.071 .112 9.535 ***

118

Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate
ATS <--- RQT .155
ATS <--- SC .453
ATS <--- S .355
PI <--- RQT .291
PI <--- SC .068
PI <--- S .110
PI <--- ATS .580
rqr3 <--- RQT .705
rqr2 <--- RQT .722
rqr1 <--- RQT .695
rqsc3 <--- RQT .703
rqsc2 <--- RQT .631
rqsc1 <--- RQT .634
rqc3 <--- RQT .808
rqc2 <--- RQT .807
rqc1 <--- RQT .752
rqt3 <--- RQT .666
rqt2 <--- RQT .682
rqt1 <--- RQT .616
sc3 <--- SC .884
sc2 <--- SC .878
sc1 <--- SC .803
s3 <--- S .789
s2 <--- S .514
s1 <--- S .831
ats1 <--- ATS .808
ats2 <--- ATS .819
ats3 <--- ATS .770
pi4 <--- PI .758
pi3 <--- PI .744
pi2 <--- PI .637
pi1 <--- PI .772
Covariances: (Group number 1 - Default model)

RQT <--> SC .281 .062 4.517 ***

RQT <--> S .377 .074 5.105 ***

SC <--> S .447 .076 5.865 ***

119

Correlations: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate
RQT <--> SC .487
RQT <--> S .647
SC <--> S .727
Variances: (Group number 1 - Default model)

RQT

.547 .113 4.831 ***

SC

.610 .092 6.653 ***

S

.621 .115 5.395 ***

e26

.133 .033 3.988 ***

e27

.053 .023 2.360 .018

e12

.554 .069 8.004 ***

e11

.590 .074 7.940 ***

e10

.555 .069 8.038 ***

e9

.617 .077 8.009 ***

e8

.388 .047 8.211 ***

e7

.503 .061 8.205 ***

e6

.472 .064 7.432 ***

e5

.487 .065 7.438 ***

e4

.660 .085 7.806 ***

e3

.422 .052 8.126 ***

e2

.355 .044 8.079 ***

e1

.454 .055 8.242 ***

e15

.171 .032 5.393 ***

e14

.167 .030 5.574 ***

e13

.287 .041 7.034 ***

e18

.376 .061 6.180 ***

e17

.772 .095 8.130 ***

e16

.263 .050 5.295 ***

e19

.261 .039 6.650 ***

e20

.206 .032 6.474 ***

e21

.310 .044 7.109 ***

e25

.322 .044 7.288 ***

e24

.457 .062 7.407 ***

e23

.496 .062 7.977 ***

e22

.338 .047 7.153 ***

120

Squared Multiple Correlations: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate
ATS

.729
PI

.877
pi1

.595
pi2

.406
pi3

.553
pi4

.574
ats3

.594
ats2

.670
ats1

.652
s1

.690
s2

.264
s3

.623
sc1

.644
sc2

.770
sc3

.781
rqt1

.380
rqt2

.465
rqt3

.443
rqc1

.565
rqc2

.652
rqc3

.653
rqsc1

.402
rqsc2

.398
rqsc3

.495
rqr1

.483
rqr2

.521
rqr3

.497

Matrices (Group number 1 - Default model)
Total Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)

S SC RQT ATS PI
ATS .315 .406 .146 .000 .000
PI .264 .280 .339 .546 .000
pi1 .283 .299 .363 .585 1.071
pi2 .234 .247 .300 .483 .884
pi3 .302 .319 .387 .624 1.141
pi4 .264 .280 .339 .546 1.000
ats3 .303 .391 .141 .961 .000
ats2 .291 .375 .135 .924 .000
ats1 .315 .406 .146 1.000 .000
121

S SC RQT ATS PI
s1 .971 .000 .000 .000 .000
s2 .668 .000 .000 .000 .000
s3 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc1 .000 .923 .000 .000 .000
sc2 .000 .959 .000 .000 .000
sc3 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000
rqt1 .000 .000 .713 .000 .000
rqt2 .000 .000 .750 .000 .000
rqt3 .000 .000 .784 .000 .000
rqc1 .000 .000 1.251 .000 .000
rqc2 .000 .000 1.291 .000 .000
rqc3 .000 .000 1.275 .000 .000
rqsc1 .000 .000 .786 .000 .000
rqsc2 .000 .000 .685 .000 .000
rqsc3 .000 .000 1.052 .000 .000
rqr1 .000 .000 .973 .000 .000
rqr2 .000 .000 1.083 .000 .000
rqr3 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000

Standardized Total Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)

S SC RQT ATS PI
ATS .355 .453 .155 .000 .000
PI .316 .331 .381 .580 .000
pi1 .244 .256 .294 .448 .772
pi2 .201 .211 .243 .370 .637
pi3 .235 .246 .283 .432 .744
pi4 .239 .251 .289 .440 .758
ats3 .274 .349 .119 .770 .000
ats2 .291 .371 .127 .819 .000
ats1 .287 .366 .125 .808 .000
s1 .831 .000 .000 .000 .000
s2 .514 .000 .000 .000 .000
s3 .789 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc1 .000 .803 .000 .000 .000
sc2 .000 .878 .000 .000 .000
sc3 .000 .884 .000 .000 .000
rqt1 .000 .000 .616 .000 .000
rqt2 .000 .000 .682 .000 .000
rqt3 .000 .000 .666 .000 .000
rqc1 .000 .000 .752 .000 .000
122

S SC RQT ATS PI
rqc2 .000 .000 .807 .000 .000
rqc3 .000 .000 .808 .000 .000
rqsc1 .000 .000 .634 .000 .000
rqsc2 .000 .000 .631 .000 .000
rqsc3 .000 .000 .703 .000 .000
rqr1 .000 .000 .695 .000 .000
rqr2 .000 .000 .722 .000 .000
rqr3 .000 .000 .705 .000 .000

Direct Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)

S SC RQT ATS PI
ATS .315 .406 .146 .000 .000
PI .092 .058 .259 .546 .000
pi1 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.071
pi2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .884
pi3 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.141
pi4 .000 .000 .000 .000 1.000
ats3 .000 .000 .000 .961 .000
ats2 .000 .000 .000 .924 .000
ats1 .000 .000 .000 1.000 .000
s1 .971 .000 .000 .000 .000
s2 .668 .000 .000 .000 .000
s3 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc1 .000 .923 .000 .000 .000
sc2 .000 .959 .000 .000 .000
sc3 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000
rqt1 .000 .000 .713 .000 .000
rqt2 .000 .000 .750 .000 .000
rqt3 .000 .000 .784 .000 .000
rqc1 .000 .000 1.251 .000 .000
rqc2 .000 .000 1.291 .000 .000
rqc3 .000 .000 1.275 .000 .000
rqsc1 .000 .000 .786 .000 .000
rqsc2 .000 .000 .685 .000 .000
rqsc3 .000 .000 1.052 .000 .000
rqr1 .000 .000 .973 .000 .000
rqr2 .000 .000 1.083 .000 .000
rqr3 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000

123

Standardized Direct Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)

S SC RQT ATS PI
ATS .355 .453 .155 .000 .000
PI .110 .068 .291 .580 .000
pi1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .772
pi2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .637
pi3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .744
pi4 .000 .000 .000 .000 .758
ats3 .000 .000 .000 .770 .000
ats2 .000 .000 .000 .819 .000
ats1 .000 .000 .000 .808 .000
s1 .831 .000 .000 .000 .000
s2 .514 .000 .000 .000 .000
s3 .789 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc1 .000 .803 .000 .000 .000
sc2 .000 .878 .000 .000 .000
sc3 .000 .884 .000 .000 .000
rqt1 .000 .000 .616 .000 .000
rqt2 .000 .000 .682 .000 .000
rqt3 .000 .000 .666 .000 .000
rqc1 .000 .000 .752 .000 .000
rqc2 .000 .000 .807 .000 .000
rqc3 .000 .000 .808 .000 .000
rqsc1 .000 .000 .634 .000 .000
rqsc2 .000 .000 .631 .000 .000
rqsc3 .000 .000 .703 .000 .000
rqr1 .000 .000 .695 .000 .000
rqr2 .000 .000 .722 .000 .000
rqr3 .000 .000 .705 .000 .000

Indirect Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)

S SC RQT ATS PI
ATS .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
PI .172 .222 .080 .000 .000
pi1 .283 .299 .363 .585 .000
pi2 .234 .247 .300 .483 .000
pi3 .302 .319 .387 .624 .000
pi4 .264 .280 .339 .546 .000
ats3 .303 .391 .141 .000 .000
ats2 .291 .375 .135 .000 .000
ats1 .315 .406 .146 .000 .000
124

S SC RQT ATS PI
s1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
s2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
s3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqt1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqt2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqt3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqc1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqc2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqc3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqsc1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqsc2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqsc3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqr1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqr2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqr3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

Standardized Indirect Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)

S SC RQT ATS PI
ATS .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
PI .206 .263 .090 .000 .000
pi1 .244 .256 .294 .448 .000
pi2 .201 .211 .243 .370 .000
pi3 .235 .246 .283 .432 .000
pi4 .239 .251 .289 .440 .000
ats3 .274 .349 .119 .000 .000
ats2 .291 .371 .127 .000 .000
ats1 .287 .366 .125 .000 .000
s1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
s2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
s3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
sc3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqt1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqt2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqt3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqc1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
125

S SC RQT ATS PI
rqc2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqc3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqsc1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqsc2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqsc3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqr1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqr2 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
rqr3 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

Model Fit Summary
CMIN
Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF
Default model 60 838.968 265 .000 3.166
Saturated model 325 .000 0

Independence model 25 2891.748 300 .000 9.639

RMR, GFI
Model RMR GFI AGFI PGFI
Default model .078 .678 .605 .553
Saturated model .000 1.000

Independence model .395 .179 .111 .166

Baseline Comparisons
Model
NFI
Delta1
RFI
rho1
IFI
Delta2
TLI
rho2
CFI
Default model .710 .672 .781 .749 .779
Saturated model 1.000

1.000

1.000
Independence model .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

Parsimony-Adjusted Measures
Model PRATIO PNFI PCFI
Default model .883 .627 .688
Saturated model .000 .000 .000
Independence model 1.000 .000 .000

NCP
Model NCP LO 90 HI 90
Default model 573.968 490.296 665.245
Saturated model .000 .000 .000
Independence model 2591.748 2423.124 2767.748

126

FMIN
Model FMIN F0 LO 90 HI 90
Default model 5.631 3.852 3.291 4.465
Saturated model .000 .000 .000 .000
Independence model 19.408 17.394 16.263 18.575

RMSEA
Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE
Default model .121 .111 .130 .000
Independence model .241 .233 .249 .000

AIC
Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC
Default model 958.968 984.334 1139.606 1199.606
Saturated model 650.000 787.398 1628.456 1953.456

ECVI
Model ECVI LO 90 HI 90 MECVI
Default model 6.436 5.874 7.049 6.606
Saturated model 4.362 4.362 4.362 5.285

HOELTER
Model
HOELTER
.05
HOELTER
.01
Default model 54 58
Independence model 18 19

127

Lampiran 6
OUTPUT SEM

.55
RQT
.61
SC
.62
S
ATS
PI
rqr3
.55
e12
1.00
1
rqr2
.59
e11
1.08
1
rqr1
.56
e10
.97
1
rqsc3
.62
e9
1.05
1
rqsc2
.39
e8
.69
1
rqsc1
.50
e7
.79
1
rqc3
.47
e6
1.27
1
rqc2
.49
e5
1.29
1
rqc1
.66
e4
1.25
1
rqt3
.42
e3
.78
1
rqt2
.35
e2
.75
1
rqt1
.45
e1
.71
1
sc3
.17
e15
1.00
1
sc2
.17
e14
.96 1
sc1
.29
e13
.92
1
s3
.38
e18
1.00
1
s2
.77
e17
.67 1
s1
.26
e16
.97
1
ats1
.26
e19
1.00
1
ats2
.21
e20
.92
1
ats3
.31
e21
.96
1
pi4
.32
e25
1.00
1
pi3
.46
e24
1.14
1
pi2
.50
e23
.88
1
pi1
.34
e22
1.07
1
.15
.41
.32
.26
.06
.09
.28
.38
.45
.13
e26
1
.05
e27
1
.55

2013 Ta MJ 022091065 8

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2013 Ta MJ 022091065 8

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

92

You might also like