Authors investigate use of froth flotation to remove carbonaceous material. They also study effect of type and concentration of various oils as collectors. Authors also investigate effect of reduction and oxidation on froth tlotation efficiency.
Authors investigate use of froth flotation to remove carbonaceous material. They also study effect of type and concentration of various oils as collectors. Authors also investigate effect of reduction and oxidation on froth tlotation efficiency.
Authors investigate use of froth flotation to remove carbonaceous material. They also study effect of type and concentration of various oils as collectors. Authors also investigate effect of reduction and oxidation on froth tlotation efficiency.
Using flotation to separate carbon material from Carlin ore
Kenneth N. Han and Yuhong Chen
The authors investigate the use of froth flotation to remove carbonaceous material from Carlin gold ore. They also study the effect of type and concen- tration of various oils as flotation col- lectors and of sodium silicate as the dis- persion agent on the overall recovery of carbonaceous material. And they ex- amine other variables affecting froth flotation efficiency, including particle size, pH of the solution and tempera- ture. Han and Chen also investigate the effect of reduction and oxidation of carbonaceous material on froth tlota- tion efficiency. Kenneth N. Han, member SME, is head, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technol- ogy, 501 E. Joseph St., Rapid City, SD 57701. Yuhong Chen is with the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. This article is excerpted from the authors presentation at the SME GOLDTech 4 symposium Advarrces in in Go/d and Si/ver Processing, in Reno, NV, in September. This investigation showed that aro- matic type oil was the most effective collector. And the authors also found that oxidized carbonaceous material was difficult to float unless tbe oxidized portion was subject to reduction before flotation. Froth flotation removed more than 50% of the carbonaceous material. Tbe effect of pH and temperature during the rougher flotation state is of little signifi- cance to the overall recovery of carbo- naceous material. Since pyrite is re- sponsibleforthe high chlorine consump- tion, pyrite removal is important in order to reduce chlorine consumption. Results of the study, then, showed: G It is possible to use froth flotation to recover carbonaceous material from Carlin gold ore by froth flotation. The best results were obtained when Philips aromatic oil was used as a collector. G One of the reasons for poor flotation recovery was due to oxidation of carbo- naceous material. Therefore, flotation recovery was improved significantly by subjecting the oxidized ore to reduction before flotation. The extent of oxidation was severe for fine size fractions. Des- Iiming the -35 pm (-500 mesh) size fraction before grinding improved flo- tation recovery. G Sodium silicate proved to be an effective dispersing reagent for Carlin gold ore. G The size of particles exhibited was a significant factor in flotation efficiency. The best recovery was obtained for -75 ~m (-200 mesh) size fraction, followed by 150/75and +150 pm ( 100/200 and + 100 mesh), in that order. However, when the size was too fine, less than 35 ~m (500 mesh), flotation results were poor. G Regrinding the rough flotation tail- ing before cleaning flotation is benefi- cial. An additional 20% and 10% carbo- naceous material, respectively, from two ore samples was recovered after re- grinding. G The effect of pH on flotation was insignificant. G The flotation response at room temperature was as good as any other temperature between 15 and60 C (59 and 140 F). + Treatment of refractory ores: A simplified process L. Lichty, G. Ramadorai, R. Bhappu and R. Roman Treatment of refractory gold ores containing arsenic has always presented a major problem in their processing to recover the contained precious metal values. Tbe major difficulties are con- cerned with lower recoveries and pro- duction of hazardous fumes, effluents and residues. Due to these arsenic related prob- lems, many otherwise economically attractive precious metal deposits and dumps all over the world are not ex- ploited. In recent years, treatment processes for refractory gold ores and concen- trates have been explored. A few com- mercial operations employing roasting or pressure leaching have resulted. L. Lichty, G. Ramadorai, R. Bhappu and R. Roman, members SME, are metallurgist, senior project engineer, president and man- ager, respectively, with Mountain State R&D International Inc., Box 310, Vail, AZ 85641. This article is excerpted from the authors presentation at the SME GOLDTech 4 symposium Advances in Go/darrd Si/ver Proc- essirrg, in Reno, NV, in September. Roasting has limitations due to envi- ronmental constraints related to off gases. Pressure leaching involving high temperatures ( 180 to 200 C or 356 to 392 F) and pressures (2.75 MPa or400 psi) is accompanied by high capital and operating costs. An alternate route to roasting for treat- ing pyrite and arsenopyrite ores and concentrates is the lime-oxygen hy - dromet process. This is carried out at a moderate temperature ( 100 C or 212 F) and pressure (689 kPa or 100 psi). The authors presented a simplified process for treating such arsenic con- taining ores and concentrates using low temperature and pressure oxidation. This low-cost treatment with compressed air and lime renders arsenic as an inert component in the residue, meeting all the requirements of the EPA toxicity test. The precious metal values are then extracted from the autoclave residue by standard cyanidation. Results of the authors study make it evident that the proposed lime-oxygen process appears to be an attractive alter- native for treating arsenic-containing ores, concentrates and arsenic contami- nated products. The inherent advan- tages of this process are: G The process is relatively simple and uses low temperature (about 100 C or 212 F) and pressures (345 to482kPaor 50 to 70 psig). G Due to the low pressures involved, the process can be carried out with compressed air rather than using an expensive oxygen plant. G The reaction is completed in a rela- tively short period, about 30 minutes to one hour. G The arsenic is fixed in an insoluble complex in the residue. And this residue meets the EPA toxic test for arsenic. G Due to the simplicity and effective- ness of the process, the required capital and operating costs would be much lower than for alternative processes, such as conventional autoclaving and roasting. G Besides treatment of arsenic-con- taining ores and concentrates, the proc- ess is applicable to the treatment of arsenic contaminated dross, speiss, smelter acid sludges and industrial waste products. It is hoped that this proposed lime- oxygen process, with its technical and economic advantages, will provide the mining industry a simplified process for treating arsenic containing mineral prod- ucts and industrial wastes. +