Copyright 1997, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
ASSESSMENT OF HTPB AND PBAN PROPELLANT USAGE IN THE UNITED STATES
Thomas L. Moore* The Johns Hopkins University Chemical Propulsion Information Agency (CPIA) Columbia, Maryland ABSTRACT This paper discusses composite solid propellants based upon the butadiene prepolymers which make up the vast majority of current production in the United Stateshydroxyl- terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), and the terpolymer of butadiene, acrylic acid, and acrylonitrile (PBAN). The objective of this study is to present a brief historical review of the development of HTPB and PBAN propellants, compare their characteristics, describe their applications, and present a statistical analysis of their production and usage for military, launch, and space motors manufactured in the United States. Using CPIA in-house and external resources, a tabulation of all known major systems utilizing HTPB and PBAN propellant was completed. PBAN production over the next ten years will be sustained nearly entirely by the production of the Space Shuttle Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (RSRM), while HTPB production will be limited primarily to tactical and space motors after completion of deliveries of the Titan IV Solid Rocket Motor Upgrade (SRMU) in 1999. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Composite solid propellants using a hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) or polybutadiene-acrylic acid-acrylonitrile (PBAN) binder system have been the choice for most solid rocket motor systems developed and fielded in the United States over the past twenty years. Propellant based upon these binders account for over 800 million pounds (360* 10 6 kg) of domestic production through the end of 1996. Comparative characteristics for typical aluminized formulations of these two types of propellant are presented in Table I. ilTailillil^^ lllllllll^ I ps , lbf-sec/lbm(kN.s/kg) Flame temp., F (K) Solids loading Aluminum content Cross linking agent Operating temperatures, F(K) Hazard Classification PBAN 262 (2.569) 5600(3370) 84 - 86% 16-17% epoxides or aziridines 40to 90 (278 to 305) 1.3 HTPB 264 (2.589) 5950(3560) 88 - 90% 18-20% diisocyanates -50to 150 (228 to 339) 1.3 PBAN The terpolymer PBAN was developed in 1957 as an outgrowth of polybutadiene-acrylic acid (PBAA), the first hydrocarbon binder to be used in a rocket motor. The rather poor tear strength of PBAA propellants was solved by adding a small amount (-10%) of acrylonitrile as a third monomer to the PBAA copolymer, thus becoming known as polybutadiene-acrylic acid-acrylonitrile. The advent of higher hydrogen content liquid polybutadiene polymers offered a means to substantially lower the average molecular weight of motor combustion products while increasing flame temperature and enhancing the combustion of aluminized composite formulations. The resulting significant increase in specific impulse (over former polysulfide formulations) made the polybutadiene propellant system an attractive candidate for the launch stage of the Minuteman Intercontinental Ballistic Missile 1 . *Sr. Research Engineer, Sr. Member AIAA This paper is declared a work of the U.S. Government and Is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Work performed under contracts N00014-91-C-0001 and DSO700-97-D-4004 with the Defense Supply Center Columbus. CPIA is a DoD Information Analysis Center sponsored by the Defense Technical Information Center. 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics D o w n l o a d e d
b y
U n i v e r s i t a t s -
u n d
L a n d e s b i b l i o t h e k
D u s s e l d o r f
o n
A u g u s t
2 6 ,
2 0 1 3
|
h t t p : / / a r c . a i a a . o r g
|
D O I :
1 0 . 2 5 1 4 / 6 . 1 9 9 7 - 3 1 3 7
Copyright 1997, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. Meanwhile, the United Technology Center (later Chemical Systems Division), formed in 1959, was engaged in company funded research to develop PBAN propellents for large solid motors. This research resulted in the successful test firings of the 87-inch (2.21 m) diameter P-1 solid motor in 1960, which produced 200,000 Ibf (890 kN) of thrust, and the 500,000-lbf (2224 kN) P-2 in late 1961 2 . Soon the development of even larger motors containing PBAN propellant would begin in earnest. In 1962, Air Force funding was released to advance the state-of-the-art of large solid motors for potential application to DoD and NASA missions. Aerojet, United Technologies' Chemical Systems Division (UT-CSD), Thiokol, and the former Lockheed Propulsion Company (LPC) were all involved. LPC and Thiokol tested a number of 156-inch (3.96 m) diameter motors while Aerojet successfully tested the largest solid motors ever builtthree 260-inch (6.60 m) motors containing nearly 1.7 million pounds (770000 kg) of PBAN propellant each. Although the 156-in and 260-in designs never became operational, their technology contributed to the future development of other large launch boosters 2 . Concurrent with the development of general large motor technology in the early 1960's was the development of the Titan III launch vehicle which incorporated two 120-inch (3.05 m) diameter booster SRMs containing PBAN propellant 2 . UTC/CSD developed and produced the 5-segment Titan III SRMs, from which the subsequent 5 1 /i- segment Titan 34D and 7-segment Titan IV solid rocket boosters were derived. With the greatest amount of history behind them, PBANs have long been a major staple of production for companies such as Thiokol and UT- CSD. The extensive experience base and solid background of characterization and aging data was no doubt a factor in selecting PBAN as the propellant for the Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Motor in 1974. With a propellant mass of more than 1.1 million pounds (500000 kg), the current four-segment booster, known as the Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (RSRM), is the largest solid propellant rocket motor ever flown. The RSRM propellant, designated TP-H1148, is itself a minor modification of the first PBAN to be used in a major weapon systemTP-H1011 used in the Minuteman II first stage. HTPB Although Aerojet reportedly investigated and demonstrated the application of HTPB propellant in small motors as early as 1961, PBAN and carboxyl-terminated polybutadiene (CTPB) remained the preferred formulations for solid composite rockets until the mid-1970's 3 . With the desire for increased propellant performance, HTPBs were viewed as serious contenders for future solid rocket motors by the early 1970's. Several companies and government propulsion laboratories were active in the development of higher performance propellants at that time. HTPB propellant was used and test flown in a rocket motor as early as 1970. This came about as the result of a NASA-sponsored 1968 study which sought to apply advanced propulsion techniques to small rocket vehicles. Aerojet developed a dual-thrust radial-burning HTPB grain design for the Astrobee D meterological sounding rocket vehicle. The HTPB propellant was selected based upon its favorable mechanical properties, high impulse, and burn rate control which could provide a high initial thrust and an extended sustained burning time approaching that of end burning grains. Following eight successful static tests, two Astrobee D vehicles were successfully launched from White Sands Missile Range to an altitude of 320,000 feet (97.5 km) on 8 June 1970 4 . The Astrobee D subsquently went into production. Based on the initial success of this and other motor demonstrations, other programs began to incorporate HTPB propellants such that these formulations have become the foundation for nearly all weapon system rocket propulsion developed since the late 1970's. The use of HTPB propellants has largely been limited to tactical, air-launch, and upper stage space motors. Even though demonstrated in full- scale motor tests in the early 1970's, the transition of HTPB's into fielded systems was gradual. By the late 1970's and early 1980's, systems such as Maverick, Stinger, Sidewinder, and Castor IV upgraded from older composite propellants to more desirable HTPB formulations. In 1989, Aerojet began the development of the Space Shuttle Advanced Solid Rocket Motor (ASRM) containing an 88% solids HTPB propellant. Designed to improve upon the performance of the RSRM and increase Shuttle payload capacity, the ASRM program eventually fell victim to government budget scrutiny and was canceled in October 1993. At about the same time, however, Hercules Aerospace Company (now Alliant Techsystems) was under contract to develop the Solid Rocket Motor Upgrade (SRMU) for the Air Force's Titan IV launch vehicle. Work on the development of the SRMU had begun in October American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics D o w n l o a d e d
b y
U n i v e r s i t a t s -
u n d
L a n d e s b i b l i o t h e k
D u s s e l d o r f
o n
A u g u s t
2 6 ,
2 0 1 3
|
h t t p : / / a r c . a i a a . o r g
|
D O I :
1 0 . 2 5 1 4 / 6 . 1 9 9 7 - 3 1 3 7
Copyright 1997, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. 1987. The SRMU, with graphite composite case and HTPB propellant, improves upon the performance of the CSD-manufactured Titan IV SRM containing PBAN propellant. Qualification of the new booster was accomplished in 1993, and the SRMU debuted on the successful initial flight of the Titan IVB on February 23,1997 from Cape Canveral. The SRMU design represents the highest performance large solid propellant space booster developed and qualified to date 2 . Production of the 15 flight sets (30 motors) ordered by the Air Force is expected to conclude in 1999. STATISTICAL USAGE Through the use of both CPIA in-house and external resources, a tabulation of all known major systems utilizing HTPB and PBAN propellants was completed. A number of publications 5 ' 6 ' 7 ' 8 were valuable in this effort and, where possible, production statistics were verified to the extent possible with manufacturers. Table II presents a tabulation of PBAN propellant use by selected major systems. The propellant mass per motor and known motor production quantities have been deleted for weapon systems. In some cases, the reported quantity of motors listed in the table may exceed that which is generally known to be under contract in order to account for additional cast grains or motors lost or rejected for one reason or another. Based upon a 1993 Phillips Laboratory survey of U.S. propellant manufacturers 9 , it was determined that for all propellant cast into full-scale end item test motors and deliverables, an additional 14.1% of material is created as a result of testing or scrap. This was factored in the final estimated total production. At more than 550 million pounds (250x10 6 kg), the production of PBAN propellant has far exceeded any other single type. Figure 1 presents a breakdown of propellant usage by system. As expected, the solid rocket boosters for the Space Shuttle account for about half of the total PBAN propellant manufactured to date. The boosters manufactured by UT-CSD for the Titan family of launch vehicles represent 23% of the total propellant produced, followed by the Thiokol M55 Minuteman first stage at 21%. The tabulation of HTPB propellant usage is presented in Table III and its distribution by system in Figure 2. It is interesting to note that one Army system alone, the Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS)at over 500,000 units Table II. PBAN PROPELLANT USE THRU DEC 1996 SYSTEM / MOTOR 156-inDia(Thiokol| 56-in dia motors 156-6 (in) 260-in SL-1 260-in SL-2 260-in SL-3 Algol IIIA, Scout FS BSD 120-in FW-4 FW-5 HGV Minuteman 11 FS M55 P-1 P-1-2 Poseidon C3 FS Space Shuttle FWC demo Space Shuttle RSRM Space Shuttle SRM Titan 34D 5-1/2 seg Titan IIICID Staging Mtr Titan IIIIIIIC Titan III (MOD 7-seg UT- Titan IV SRM Titan Retro SR55-UT-1 Other dev, demo motors PROP. MASS, Ib 800,000 various 272,880 1,676,350 1,673,000 1,645,584 27,986 166,000 605 577 212,000 65,000 121,716 1,107,000 1,106,280 1,110,136 464,436 54 425,150 592,695 593,138 55 QTY. MF'D 1 9 1 1 1 1 47 1 90 27 1 1 1 3 145 TOTAL L8 PRODUCED 800,000 4,359,000 272,880 1,676,350 1,673,000 1,645,584 1,315,342 166,000 54,450 15,579 212,000 105,017,031 65,000 121,716 23,287,800 3,321,000 160,410,600 68l 75,489,248 41j 19,041,876 I.OOSi 54,432 148J 62,922,200 4 48 835 2,370,780 | 28,470,624 45,92 176,34 TOTAL PBAN PROPELLANT IN END ITEMS Est Additional Propellant Tested Est Additional Scrap Propellant 0.06E 0.07: PBAN PROPELLANT MANUFACTURED PROD DATES 964 964-68 966 965 966 967 1966 1965-74 1972-76 1967 1961-73 1961 1961 1970-76 1983-85 1987- 1979-85J 1979-89 1964-79 : 1962-79 1966-69 1987-96 1963-? 492,984,757 Ib 34,015,948 Ib . 35,494,903 Ib 562,495,608 Ib (48.5%) (22.9%) H Shuttle Boosters I Titan Boosters i Z2 Minuteman II | n Poseidon C3 1 "All Others (21.3%) Figure 1. PBAN Propellant Usage Distribution American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics D o w n l o a d e d
b y
U n i v e r s i t a t s -
u n d
L a n d e s b i b l i o t h e k
D u s s e l d o r f
o n
A u g u s t
2 6 ,
2 0 1 3
|
h t t p : / / a r c . a i a a . o r g
|
D O I :
1 0 . 2 5 1 4 / 6 . 1 9 9 7 - 3 1 3 7
Copyright 1997, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. Table III. HTPB PROPELLANT USE THRU DEC 1996 TOTAL LB PRODUCED Maverick RS (Aerojet) Maverick RS (Thiokol) Sidewinder Mk 36 RS Std Missile II Mk 104 Std Missile II Mk 72 Stinger Alt Flight Motor Other dev, demo motors TOTAL HTPB PROPELLANT IN END ITEMS Est Additional Propellent Tested Est Additional Scrap Propellant TOTAL HTPB PROPELLANT MANUFACTURED producedaccounts for nearly 60% of the total HTPB propellant produced through 1996. Atlantic Research Corporation continues to manufacture the propulsion unit for MLRS, and recently began production of an extended range version designated ER-MLRS. Other significant contributors to the HTPB production base have included Peacekeeper, Delta GEM, Standard Missile, and Titan IV SRMU. (59.2%) (7.7%) (77%) (5.2%)' ,(4.5%) Figure 2. HTPB Propellant Usage Distribution SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Since the development of PBAN in the late 1950's, more composite propellant has been produced from this terpolymer than from any other single prepolymer 10 . This is due in large part to the production associated with the Minuteman II first stage and the Titan and Space Shuttle solid rocket boosters. The 1960's are known as the era of large solid rocket motor development. It was in the mid-1960's that the largest solid propellant motors ever tested were built. Substantial production of PBAN will continue over the next 10 years, although this will be largely limited to procurement of the Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (RSRM) for the Space Shuttle. NASA's next intended procurement of 120 motors will provide a steady annual production of over 12 million pounds (5.4x1 o 6 kg) of PBAN propellant for the next ten years. Although Titan IV boosters containing PBAN propellant remain on the launch manifest for the near future, production has been completed as the Titan completes its evolution to the IVB configuration launcher which will use the HTPB- based SRMU for its launches through 2005. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics D o w n l o a d e d
b y
U n i v e r s i t a t s -
u n d
L a n d e s b i b l i o t h e k
D u s s e l d o r f
o n
A u g u s t
2 6 ,
2 0 1 3
|
h t t p : / / a r c . a i a a . o r g
|
D O I :
1 0 . 2 5 1 4 / 6 . 1 9 9 7 - 3 1 3 7
Copyright 1997, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. HTPB propellants have primarily been utilized for tactical and air-launched systems requiring a wide operational temperature range. But the higher energy HTPB propellant has come into its own as a viable option for large launch boosters with the development, qualification, and successful 1997 maiden flight of the Titan IVB vehicle featuring the SRMU. However, HTPB's use in large launch motors for the near future will likely be limited to the SRMU which, under current plans, will conclude production in 1999. As illustrated in Figure 3, the future production base of HTPB is not as stable as PBAN. From peak rates of over 20 million pounds per year in the late 1980's (primarily due to MLRS), annual HTPB propellant production will normalize to an average 4.5 million pounds (2.0x10 6 kg) from the years 2000 through 2005 based on current system procurement plans. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year Figure 3. HTPB Propellant Production Forecast As current design concepts for the Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) lack a solid rocket booster system, the application of HTPB propellants for the forseeable future will rest primarily with small and medium launch vehicle boosters and weapon system propulsion. Substantial production is still forseen for weapon systems such ER-MLRS, Standard Missile, AMRAAM, PAC-3, and AIM-9X Sidewinder. Solid propellant launch boosters such as the Delta GEM, Castor IVA/IVB, and Castor 120 will continue, however, to contribute to the HTPB propellant production base. REFERENCES 1 Sutton, E. S., Morton Thiokol Inc., From Polysulfides to CTPB Binders-A Major Transition in Solid Propellant Binder Chemistry, AIAA-84- 1236, 20th AIAA/SAE/ASME Joint Propulsion Conference, 11-13 June 1984, Cincinnati, OH. 2 Andrepont, W. C., Chemical Systems Division, United Technologies, and Felix, R. M., Sparta Inc., The History of Large Solid Rocket Motor Development in the United States, AIAA 94-3057, 30th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 27-29 June 1994, Indianapolis, IN. 3 Klager, K., Aerojet Strategic Propulsion Company, Polyurethanes, the Most Versatile Binder for Solid Composite Propellants, AIAA-84-1239, 20th AIAA/SAE/ASME Joint Propulsion Conference, 11- 13 June 1984, Cincinnati, Ohio. 4 Jenkins, R. B. and Taylor, J. P., Space General Company; and Browne, T. P. And Briggs, L. A., Aerojet Solid Propulsion Company, Astrobee D - An Advanced Technology Meterological Rocket Vehicle, AIAA 70-1387, AIAA 2nd Sounding Rocket Technology Conference, 7-9 December 1970,Williamsburg, VA. 5 Caceres, M., World Space Systems Briefing, The TEAL Group Corporation, Fairfax, VA. 6 Zaloga, S. J., World Missiles Briefing, The TEAL Group Corporation, Fairfax, VA. 7 The Johns Hopkins University, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency, CPIA/M1 Rocket Motor Manual and CPIA/M2 Solid Propellant Manual. 8 Aerospace Industries Association, Washington, DC, Aerospace Facts and Figures (annual publication). 9 Robinson, K. P., Aerojet, Environmental Issues for Solid Rocket Motors: A Manufacturing Perspective, presented at the AIAA Conference "Large Solid Rockets: Advances Through Experience", 4-6 October 1994, Monterey, CA. 10 Mastrolia, E. J. and Klager, K., Solid Propellants Based on Polybutadiene Binders, Advances in Chemistry Series 88, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 1969, pp. 123-125. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics D o w n l o a d e d