CRIMINAL LAW I CRIMINAL LAW I I. DEFINITION AND SOURCES A. DEFINITION Criminal law is that branch or division of law which defines crimes, treats of their nature, and provides for their punishment. B. STATE AUTHORITY TO PUNISH CRIMES 1. SOURCES OF PHILIPPINE CRIMINAL LAW (REYES) 1. The Revised Penal Code (Act No. 31!" and its amendments #. $pecial penal laws passed b% the Philippine Commission, Philippine Assembl%, Philippine &e'islature, National Assembl%, the Con'ress of the Philippines, and the (atasan' Pambansa. 3. Penal Presidential )ecrees issued durin' *artial &aw. 1987 Cons!"!on A#!$%& II' S&$!on ( Declaration of Principles and State Policies. The maintenance of peace and order, the protection of life, libert% and propert%, and the promotion of the 'eneral welfare are essential for the en+o%ment b% all the people of the blessin's of democrac%. 1987 Cons!"!on A#!$%& )I' S&$!on 1 The le'islative power shall be vested in the Con'ress of the Philippines which shall consist of a $enate and a ,ouse of Representatives, e-cept to the e-tent reserved to the people b% the provision on initiative and referendum. P&o*%& +. S,n!,-o (19..) Facts. $antia'o was drivin' an automobile at a hi'h speed notwithstandin' the fact that he had to pass a narrow space between a wa'on standin' on one side of the road and a heap of stones on the other side where there were two bo%s standin'. ,e ran over Parondo who was instantl% /illed as a result of the accident. $antia'o was convicted b% the lower court of the crime of homicide b% rec/less imprudence. The accused appealed challen'in' the validit% of Act No. #0 which amended 1eneral 2rder no. ! (which provides that all prosecutions for public offenses shall be in the name of the 3nited $tates a'ainst the persons char'ed with the offenses", claimin' that the le'islature is not authori4ed to amend the latter because its provisions have the character of Constitutional &aw. $ec. # of Act No. #00 contains that 5all prosecutions for public offenses shall be in the name of the People of the Philippine 6slands a'ainst the person char'ed with the offense.7 Held. The procedure in criminal matters is not incorporated in the Constitution of the $tates, but is left in the hands of the le'islature, so it that it falls within the realm of public statutor% law. The states, as part of its police power, have a lar'e measure of discretion in creatin' and definin' criminal offenses. 6t is ur'ed that the ri'ht to prosecute and punish crimes is an attribute of soverei'nt%, but b% reason of the principle of territorialit% as applied in the suppression of crimes, such power is dele'ated to subordinate 'overnment subdivisions such as territories. The Philippine &e'islature b% virtue of the 8ones &aw, li/e other territories of the 3$, has the power to define and punish crimes. The present 'overnment of the Philippines created b% the 3$ Con'ress is autonomous. 6t is within the power of the le'islature to prescribe the form of the criminal complaint as lon' as the constitutional provision of the accused to be informed of the nature of the accusation is not violated. US +. P,/%o (1910) Facts: Pablo, a policeman, arrested )ato who was found in a vacant lot where a +ueten' 'ame was conducted. ,e presented a memorandum to his chief claimin' that he saw *alicsi and Rodri'o leavin' the area. ,owever, durin' the trial, he chan'ed his statement and claimed that he did not see *alicsi nor Rodri'o leavin' the area. As a result, the two accused were ac9uitted. Pablo was char'ed with the crime of per+ur% and was convicted under Act. No. 10:;. 6t was claimed that the Act repealed the provisions of the Penal Code relative to per+ur%, and the last provision of the Administrative Code repealed the Act, thus, there is no penal sanction for the crime of false testimon% or per+ur%. Held: Notwithstandin' that the Act no. 10:; has been interpreted b% this court in its decisions to have repealed provisions of the Penal Code relatin' to false testimon%, it did not e-pressl% repeal the pertinent provisions of the RPC. Also, the Administrative Code, in totall% repealin' Act no. 10:;, did not e-pressl% repeal the said articles of the Penal Code. ,ence, the provisions of the Penal Code relative to per+ur% remain in force. The reason behind such interpretation is that crimes should not 'o unpunished or be freel% committed without punishment of an% /ind. .. LIMITATIONS TO STATE AUTHORITY TO PUNISH CRIMES 1987 Cons!"!on' A#. III S&$. 1. No person shall be deprived of life, libert% or propert% without due process of law, nor shall an% person be denied the e9ual protection of the laws. S&$. 11. No person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense without due process of law. 6n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrar% is proved, and shall en+o% the ri'ht to be heard b% himself and counsel, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation a'ainst him, to have a speed%, impartial and public trial, to meet the witnesses face to face, and to 'ave compulsor% process to secure the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence in his behalf. ,owever, after arrai'nment, trial ma% proceed notwithstandin' the absence of the accused provided that he has been dul% notified and his failure to appear is un+ustifiable. S&$. 18. No person shall be detained solel% b% reason of his political beliefs and aspirations. No involuntar% servitude in an% form shall e-ist e-cept as a punishment for a crime whereof the part% shall have been dul% convicted. S&$. 19. <-cessive fines shall not be imposed, nor cruel de'radin' or inhuman punishment inflicted. Neither shall death penalt% be imposed, unless, for compellin' reasons involvin' heinous crimes, the / viv Pa'e 1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Con'ress hereafter provides for it. An% death penalt% alread% imposed shall be reduced to reclusion perpetua. The emplo%ment of ph%sical, ps%cholo'ical, or de'radin' punishment a'ainst an% prisoner or detainee or the use of substandard or inade9uate penal facilities under subhuman conditions shall be dealt with b% law. S&$. .2. No person shall be imprisoned for debt or non?pa%ment of a poll ta-. S&$. ... No ex post facto law or bill of attainder shall be enacted. 198( R"%&s on C#!3!n,% P#o$&4"#&' R"%& 11( S&$!on 1. Rights of accused at trial. @ 6n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be entitled to the followin' ri'hts. (a" To be presumed innocent until the contrar% is proved be%ond reasonable doubt. (b" To be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation a'ainst him. (c" To be present and defend in person and b% counsel at ever% sta'e of the proceedin's, from arrai'nment to promul'ation of the +ud'ment. The accused ma%, however, waive his presence at the trial pursuant to the stipulations set forth in his bail, unless his presence is specificall% ordered b% the court for purposes of identification. The absence of the accused without +ustifiable cause at the trial of which he had notice shall be considered a waiver of his ri'ht to be present thereat. Ahen an accused under custod% escapes, he shall be deemed to have waived his ri'ht to be present on all subse9uent trial dates until custod% over him is re'ained. 3pon motion, the accused ma% be allowed to defend himself in person when it sufficientl% appears to the court that he can properl% protect his ri'hts without the assistance of counsel. (d" To testif% as a witness in his own behalf but sub+ect to cross?e-amination on matters covered b% direct e-amination. ,is silence shall not in an% manner pre+udice him. (e" To be e-empt from bein' compelled to be a witness a'ainst himself. (f" To confront and cross?e-amine the witnesses a'ainst him at the trial. <ither part% ma% utili4e as part of its evidence the testimon% of a witness who is deceased, out of or can not with due dili'ence be found in the Philippines, unavailable, or otherwise unable to testif%, 'iven in another case or proceedin', +udicial or administrative, involvin' the same parties and sub+ect matter, the adverse part% havin' the opportunit% to cross?e-amine him. ('" To have compulsor% process issued to secure the attendance of witnesses and production of other evidence in his behalf. (h" To have speed%, impartial and public trial. (i" To appeal in all cases allowed and in the manner prescribed b% law. C!+!% Co4&' A#!$%& . Penal laws and those of public securit% and safet% shall be obli'ator% upon all who live or so+ourn in the Philippine territor%, sub+ect to the principles of public international law and to treat% stipulations. P&s!-,n +. An-&%&s (1981) Facts: Anselmo and *arcelo Pesi'an were transportin' carabaos in the evenin' of April #, 1:# from Camarines $ur to (atan'as when the carabaos were confiscated purportedl% in accordance with <.2. No. 0#0?A which prohibits transportation of carabao and carabeef from one province to another. Held: The <.2. should not be enforced a'ainst the Pesi'ans because it is a penal re'ulation (because of its confiscation and forfeiture provision" and was published onl% in the 2fficial 1a4ette on 8une 1>, 1:#. 8ustice and fairness dictate that the public must be informed of that provision b% means of publication in the 1a4ette before violators of the e-ecutive order can be bound thereb%. The summar% confiscation was not in order. The carabaos must be returned. ,owever, the Pesi'ans cannot transport the carabaos to (atan'as because the% are now bound b% the said <.2. T,5,4, +. T"+&#, (198() Facts: The petitioners see/ a writ of mandamus to compel respondent public officials to publish or cause the publication of various P)Bs, <2Bs, &26Bs etc. invo/in' the Constitutional ri'ht of the people to information on matters of public concern. Held: The publication of all presidential issuances of a public nature or of 'eneral applicabilit% is mandated b% law. 6t is a re9uirement of due process. 6t is a rule of law that before a person ma% be bound b% law, he must first be officiall% and specificall% informed of its contents. The Court therefore declares that presidential issuances of 'eneral application which have not been published shall have no force and effect. ,owever, the implementation of the P)s prior to its publication is an operative fact which ma% have conse9uences which cannot be +ustl% i'nored. The past cannot alwa%s be erased b% a new +udicial declaration. Crom the report submitted b% the cler/ of court, it is undisputed that none of these unpublished P)s has ever been implemented b% the 'overnment. PENOLO6ICAL OB7ECTI)ES a. Prevention @ This assumes that man has a tendenc% to commit crime and punishin' offenders will prevent them from doin' so a'ain. $uppression can onl% be made possible throu'h penal +urisprudence. b. Deterrence/Exemplarity @ This assumes that man is endowed with free will and of his awareness of the sanctions a'ainst crimes and his fear of such. <speciall% if there is. 1. Certaint% ? that all crimes will be punished. #. Celerit% @ that punishment will come swiftl% 3. $everit% @ that punishment is proportionate to his crime. 6t is also assumed that punishin' the offender with cruel and conspicuous penalties will ma/e an e-ample of him to deter others from doin' the same in the future. c. Self-Defense @ This is probabl% a conclusion reached b% the social contract theorists who hold that there is an unwritten contract between men and their societ% where individuals a'ree to 'ive up certain ri'hts in e-chan'e for the protection and benefits offered b% a communit%. 6f individuals violate this contract, then the societ%, throu'h the $tate, has the ri'ht to enforce its laws and protect its own e-istence. d. Reformation @ This assumes that punishment is capable of chan'in'Drehabilitatin' individuals. e. Retribution @ This rests on the basic premise that +ustice must be done. the offender shall not 'o unpunished. This belon's to that which maintains / viv Pa'e # #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 that punishment is inherent in the ver% nature of a crime and is thus its necessar% conse9uence. C. BASIC PRINCIPLES Criminal law has three main characteristics. 1" 'eneral, #" territorial, and 3" prospective. 1. 6ENERALITY o8 C#!3!n,% L,9 1987 Cons!"!on' A#!$%& )I' S&$!on 11 A $enator or *ember of the ,ouse of Representatives shall, in all offenses punishable b% not more than si- %ears imprisonment, be privile'ed from arrest while the Con'ress is in session. No *ember shall be 9uestioned nor be held liable in an% other place for an% speech or debate in the Con'ress or in an% committee thereof. C!+!% Co4&' A#!$%& 11 Penal laws and those of public securit% and safet% shall be obli'ator% upon all those who live or so+ourn in the Philippine territor%, sub+ect to the principles of public international law and to treat% stipulations. 6&n&#,% R"%&. The +urisdiction of the civil courts is not affected b% the militar% character of the accused. Civil courts have concurrent +urisdiction with 'eneral court?martial over soldiers of the Armed Corces of the Philippines even in times of war, provided that in the place of the commission of the crime no hostilities are in pro'ress and civil courts are functionin'. Ahen the militar% court ta/es co'ni4ance of the case involvin' a person sub+ect to militar% law, the Articles of Aar appl%, not the RPC or other penal laws. The prosecution of an accused before a court?martial is a bar to another prosecution of the accused for the same offense. 2ffenders accused of war crimes are triable b% militar% commission. A militar% commission has +urisdiction even if actual hostilities have ceased as lon' as a technical state of war continues. E:$&*!ons o ;& -&n&#,% ,**%!$,!on o8 $#!3!n,% %,9 Art. #, RPC, 5<-cept as provided in the treatise or laws of preferential applicationE7 Art. 1>, Civil Code, 5Esub+ect to the principles of public international law and to treat% stipulations.7 An e-ample of a treat% or treat stipulation is the B,s&s A-#&&3&n entered into b% the Philippines and the 3$ on *ar. 1>, 1:>; and e-pired on $ept. 10, 1::1. Another e-ample would be the )FA si'ned on Ceb. 1=, 1:: where the Philippines a'reed that. a. 3$ militar% authorities shall have the ri'ht to e-ercise within the Philippines all criminal and disciplinar% +urisdiction conferred on them b% the militar% law of the 3$ over 3$ personnel in RPF b. 3$ authorities e-ercise e-clusive +urisdiction over 3$ personnel with respect to offenses, includin' offenses relatin' to the securit% of the us punishable under the law of the 3$, but not under the laws of RPF c. 3$ militar% authorities shall have the primar% ri'ht to e-ercise +urisdiction over 3$ personnel sub+ect to the militar% law of the 3$ in relation to. (1" offenses solel% a'ainst the propert% or securit% of the 3$ or offenses solel% a'ainst the propert% or person of 3$ personnelF and (#" offenses arisin' out of an% act or omission done in performance of official dut%. An e-ample of a law of preferential application would be R.A. No. 7( which penali4es acts which would impair the proper observance b% the Republic and inhabitants of the Philippines of the immunities, ri'hts, and privile'es of dul% accredited forei'n diplomatic representatives in the Philippines. Persons e-empt from the operation of our criminal laws b% virtue of the principles of public international law (1" $overei'ns and other chiefs of state. (#" Ambassadors, ministers, plenipotentiar%, ministers resident, and char'es dBaffaires. G a consul is not entitled to the privile'es and immunities of an ambassador or minister. G under the Constitution, members of Con'ress are not liable for libel or slander in connection with an% speech delivered on the floor of an house durin' re'ular or special session. US +. S9&& (1921) Facts. $weet was an emplo%ee of the 3$ arm% in the Philippines. ,e assaulted a prisoner of war for which he was char'ed with the crime of ph%sical in+uries. $weet interposed the defense that the fact that he was an emplo%ee of the 3$ militar% authorities deprived the court of the +urisdiction to tr% and punish him. Held. The case is open to the application of the 'eneral principle that the +urisdiction of the civil tribunals is unaffected b% the militar% or other special character of the person brou'ht before them for trial, unless controlled b% e-press le'islation to the contrar%. .. TERRITORIALITY o8 C#!3!n,% L,9 1987 Cons!"!on' A#!$%& I The national territor% comprises the Philippine archipela'o, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has soverei'nt% or +urisdiction, consistin' of its terrestrial, fluvial, and aerial domain includin' the territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connectin' the islands of the archipela'o re'ardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines. The provisions of the RPC are enforceable to all crimes committed within the limits of Philippine territor% but it ma% also appl% outside of the Philippine +urisdiction a'ainst who. / viv Pa'e 3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 1. should commit an offense while on a Philippine ship or airshipF #. should for'e or counterfeit an coin or currenc% note of the Philippines or obli'ations and securities issued b% the Philippine 'overnmentF 3. should be liable for acts connected with the introduction into the countr% of the obli'ations and securities aforestatedF >. while bein' public officers or emplo%ees, should commit an offense in the e-ercise of their functionsF and !. should commit an% of the crimes a'ainst national securit% and the law of nations defined in Title 6, (oo/ 66 of the Code. The RPC has therefore territorial and e-traterritorial application. The maritime 4one e-tends to three miles from the outermost coastline. (e%ond that is the 5hi'h seas7 which is outside the territorial waters of the Philippines. There are two rules as to +urisdiction over crimes committed aboard merchant vessels while in the territorial waters of another countr%. Crench rule @ $uch crimes are not triable in the courts of that countr% unless their commission affects the peace and securit% of the territor% or the safet% of the state is endan'ered. <n'lish rule @ $uch crimes are triable in that countr% unless the% merel% affect thin's within the vessel or the% refer to the internal mana'ement thereof. Ae observe the <n'lish Rule. )isorders which disturb onl% the peace of the ship or those on board are to be dealt with e-clusivel% b% the soverei'nt% of the home of the ship, but those which disturb the public peace ma% be suppressed, and, if need be, the offenders punished b% the proper authorities of the local +urisdiction. $mo/in' opium aboard a forei'n vessel in Philippine waters constitutes a breach of public order because it causes such dru' to produce its pernicious effects within our territor%. Philippine courts have no +urisdiction over offenses committed on board forei'n warships in territorial waters. Aarships are alwa%s reputed to be the territor% of the countr% to which the% belon' and cannot be sub+ected to the laws of another state. US +. A; S!n- (1917) Facts: )efendant is a sub+ect of China who bou'ht ei'ht cans of opium in $ai'on and brou'ht them on board the steamship Shun Chang durin' the trip to Cebu. Ahen the steamer anchored in the port of Cebu, the authorities in ma/in' the search found the cans of opium. )efendant admitted bein' the owner but did not confess as to his purpose in bu%in' the opium. Held: (rin'in' opium in local territor% even if it is merel% for personal use and does not leave the forei'n merchant vessel anchored in Philippine waters is sub+ect to local laws particularl% under $ec. > Act. No. #31 a./.a. 2pium &aw. 3nder the said law, importation includes merel% brin'in' the dru' from a forei'n countr% to Philippine port even if not landed. M!<"!,/,s +. P;!%!**!n&s=R>"?"s $o33,n4 (1918) Facts: Petitioner is a Cilipino citi4en and a civilian emplo%ee of the 3$ arm%. ,e has been char'ed with disposin' in the Port of *anila area thin's belon'in' to the 3$ arm%. ,e is under the custod% of Commandin' 1eneral, Philippines?R%u/us command and an appointed 1eneral Court *artial found him 'uilt% and sentenced him to 1! %ears imprisonment. Held: 1en. Court?*artial has no +urisdiction because the Port of *anila is not a base under the (ases A'reement entered into b% the Philippines and the 3$. The Port area is merel% a temporar% 9uarters. Also, a civilian emplo%ee cannot be considered a member of the 3$ Arm% as stated in the a'reement. &astl%, no waiver of +urisdiction can be made either b the prosecutin' attorne% or b% the $ecretar% of 8ustice. @. PROSPECTI)ITY o8 C#!3!n,% L,9
RPC' A#..1. Penalties that may be imposed. No felon% shall be punishable b% an% penalt% not prescribed b% law prior to its commission. RPC' A#. ... Retroacti!e effect of penal laws. " Penal laws shall have a retroactive effect in so far as the% favor the person 'uilt% of a felon%, who is not a habitual criminal, as this term is defined in Rule ! of Article 0# of this Code, althou'h at the time of the publication of such laws a final sentence has been pronounced and the convict is servin' the same. C!+!% Co4&' A#. 1 &aws shall have no retroactive effect, unless the contrar% is provided. 6&n&#,% R"%&. <- post facto law is prohibited. <- post facto law is one that is specificall% made to retroact to cover acts before it became effective to the pre+udice of the accusedF or to ma/e a certain crime 'raver or prescribe a heavier penalt% for it.
The law does not have an% retroactive effect <HC<PT if it favors the offender unless he is a habitual delin9uent or the law otherwise provides. This is consistent with the 'eneral principle that criminal laws, bein' a limitation on the ri'hts of the people, should be construed strictl% a'ainst the $tate and liberall% in favor of the accused. D!88&#&n &88&$s o8 #&*&,% o8 *&n,% %,9. 1. 6f the repeal ma/es the penalty lighter in the new law, the new law shall be applied, e-cept when the offender is a habitual delin9uent or when the new law is made not applicable to pendin' action or e-istin' causes of action. #. 6f the new law imposes a hea!ier penalty, the law in force at the time of the commission of the offense shall be applied. 3. 6f the new law totall% repeals the e-istin' law so that the act which was penali4ed under the old law is no lon'er punishable, the crime is obliterated. Ahen the repeal is absolute the offense ceases to be criminal. Ahen the new law and the old law penali4e the same offense, the offender can be tried under the old law. / viv Pa'e > #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Ahen the repealin' law fails to penali4e the offense under the old law, the accused cannot be convicted under the new law. A person erroneousl% accused and convicted under a repealed statute ma% be punished under the repealin' statute. 6"3,/on +. D!#&$o# o8 P#!sons (1971) Facts: Petitioners who were servin' their sentence of life imprisonment for the comple- crime of rebellion with murder and other crimes see/ the retroactive application of the ,ernande4 doctrine which was promul'ated after their conviction. The ,ernande4 rulin' ne'ated the e-istence of the crime char'ed statin' that rebellion cannot be comple-ed with other crimes. Thus, the accused in the ,ernande4 case was sentenced onl% to 1= %ears of imprisonment. Held: (oth RPC and the Civil Code allow for the retroactive application of +udicial decisions. Ahile reference in Art. ## of the Civil Code is made to le'islative acts, it would be merel% an e-altation of the literal to den% its application to a case li/e the present. The Civil Code provides that +udicial decisions appl%in' or interpretin' the constitution, as well as le'islation form part of our le'al s%stem. 1. Nullum Crimen Nulla Poena Sine Lege A#. @. Definitions. I Acts and omissions punishable b% law are felonies (delitos". A#. .1. Penalties that may be impose! I No felon% shall be punishable b% an% penalt% not prescribed b% law prior to its commission. There is no crime when where is no law punishin' it. The phrase 5punished b% law7 should be understood to mean 5punished b% the Revised Penal Code7, and not b% special law. B&#n,#4o +. P&o*%& (198@) Facts: The accused were char'ed and convicted for violatin' P) No. ;;# for possessin' and s9uattin' on a parcel of land owned b% Cru4. Held: Conviction is null and void. P) No. ;;# does not appl% to pasture lands because its preamble shows that it was intended to appl% to s9uattin' in urban communities. 6t is a basic principle of criminal law that no person should be brou'ht within the terms of a penal statute who is not clearl% within them nor should an% act be pronounced criminal which is not clearl% made so b% the statute. P&o*%& +. P!3&n&% (1998) Facts: Respondent Tu+an was char'ed with subversion under RA 1;==. Ahen he was arrested ; %ears after he was char'ed, an unlicensed revolver and ammunition was found in his possession. As such, he was also char'ed with 6lle'al Possession of Cirearms under P) 100. Held. Tu+an was not placed in double +eopard% because the issue had not %et arisen for he had not %et been actuall% convicted. RA ;030 totall% repealed RA 1;== ma/in' subversion no lon'er a crime. (ased on Art. ## of RPC, this law should be 'iven retroactive effect since the law is favorable to the accused and since he is not a habitual delin9uent. The Court convicted Tu+an with simple ille'al possession of firearm and ammunition but since Tu+anBs len'th of detention is 'reater than the penalt% prescribed, the court ordered immediate release. (. STRICT CONSTRUCTION o8 *&n,% %,9s ,-,!ns ;& S,& 1987 Cons!"!on' A#!$%& III' S&$. 11(.) 6n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrar% is provedE. R"%&s o8 Cons#"$!on o8 P&n,% L,9s 1. Criminal statutes are liberall% construed in favor of the offender. This means that no person shall be brou'ht within their terms of the law who is not clearl% within them, nor should an% act be pronounced criminal which is not clearl% made so b% statute. #. The ori'inal te-t in which a penal law is approved will 'overn in case of a conflict with an official translation. ,ence, the RPC, which was approved in $panish te-t, is controllin' over its <n'lish translation. 3. 6nterpretation b% analo'% has no place in criminal matters. ? reasonin' b% analo'% is applied onl% when similarities are limited and it is admitted that si'nificant differences also e-ist. P,s$",% +. Bo,#4 o8 M&4!$,% E:,3!n&#s (1909) Facts: Pascual was char'ed in an administrative case for immoralit% and was announced b% counsel of complainants to be their first witness. Held: The (oard of *edical e-aminers cannot, consistentl% with the self?incriminatin' clause, compel the person proceeded a'ainst to ta/e the witness stand without his consent. A proceedin' for malpractice possesses a criminal or penal aspect in the sense that the respondent would suffer the revocation of his license as a medical practitioner which is even a 'reater form of deprivation than forfeiture of propert%. Ahile crime should not 'o unpunished and that the truth must be revealed, such desirable ob+ective should not be accomplished accordin' to means offensive to hi'h sense of respect accorded to human personalit%. *ore and more in line with the democratic creed, the deference accorded to an individual even those suspected of the most heinous crimes is 'iven due wei'ht. D. 6ENERAL PRO)ISIONS A#. 1 "ime #hen $ct ta%es effect. This code shall ta/e effect on the first da% of 8anuar%, nineteen hundred and thirt%. The RPC consists of two boo/s. (oo/ 2ne consists of 1" basic principles affectin' criminal liabilit% and #" the provisions on penalties includin' criminal and civil liabilit%F (oo/ Two defines felonies with the correspondin' penalties. Two theories in criminal law a. C&A$$6CA& b. P2$6T6J6$T / viv Pa'e ! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 The RPC is based mainl% on principles of old or classical school. C;,#,$&#!s!$s o8 ;& $%,ss!$,% ;&o#> 1. The basis of criminal liabilit% is human free will and the purpose of the penalt% is retribution. #. That man is essentiall% a moral creature with an absolutel% free will to choose between 'ood and evil thereb% placin' more stress upon the effect or result of the felonious act than upon the man, the criminal himself. 3. 6t has endeavored to establish a mechanical and direct proportion between crime and penalt%. >. There is a scant re'ard to the human element. C;,#,$&#!s!$s o8 ;& *os!!+!s ;&o#> 1. That man is subdued occasionall% b% a stran'e and morbid phenomenon which constrains him to do wron', inspite of or contrar% to his volition. #. That crime is essentiall% a social and natural phenomenon, and as such, it cannot be treated and chec/ed b% the application of abstract principles of law and +urisprudence nor b% the imposition of a punishment which is fi-ed and determined a prioriF but rather throu'h the enforcement of individual measures in each particular case after a thorou'h, personal and individual investi'ation conducted b% a competent bod% of ps%chiatrists and social scientists. A#. .. $pplication of its provisions. I <-cept as provided in the treaties and laws of preferential application, the provisions of this Code shall be enforced not onl% within the Philippine Archipela'o, includin' its atmosphere, its interior waters and maritime 4one, but also outside of its +urisdiction, a'ainst those who. 1. $hould commit an offense while on a Philippine ship or airship #. $hould for'e or counterfeit an% coin or currenc% note of the Philippine 6slands or obli'ations and securities issued b% the 1overnment of the Philippine 6slandsF 3. $hould be liable for acts connected with the introduction into these islands of the obli'ations and securities mentioned in the presidin' numberF >. Ahile bein' public officers or emplo%ees, should commit an offense in the e-ercise of their functionsF or !. $hould commit an% of the crimes a'ainst national securit% and the law of nations, defined in Title 2ne of (oo/ Two of this Code. This has been discussed in the Territorialit% principle of criminal law. E:*%,n,!on o8 ;& &:$&*!ons 1. The Philippine ship or airship must be dul% re'istered under the Philippine laws with the Philippine (ureau of Customs. $uch vessel when be%ond the 3?mile limit is considered and e-tension of Philippine national territor%. (3T if said Philippine vessel or aircraft is within the territor% of a forei'n countr% when the crime is committed, the laws of that countr% will appl% as a rule. The Philippine court has no +urisdiction over the crime of theft committed on the hi'h seas on board a vessel not re'istered or licensed in the Philippines. #. An% person who ma/es false or counterfeit coins or for'es treasur% or ban/ notes or other obli'ations and securities in a forei'n countr% ma% be prosecuted before our civil courts for violation of Art. 103 or Art. 100 of the RPC. 3. The reason for the e-ceptions in para'raph (b" and (c" is to maintain and preserve the financial credit and stabilit% of the state. >. The offense committed b% a public officer abroad, li/e a consular official, must refer to the dischar'e of his functions i.e. briber%, malversation or falsification. !. The reason for the e-ception re'ardin' crimes a'ainst national securit% and the law of nations is to safe'uard the e-istence of the state. Pirac% is triable an%where. Pirac% and mutin% are crimes a'ainst the law of nations while treason and espiona'e are crimes a'ainst national securit%. II. FELONIES Art. 3. Definitions. I Acts and omissions punishable b% law are felonies (delitos". Celonies are committed not onl% be means of deceit (dolo" but also b% means of fault (culpa". There is deceit when the act is performed with deliberate intent and there is fault when the wron'ful act results from imprudence, ne'li'ence, lac/ of foresi'ht, or lac/ of s/ill. Celonies are acts and omissions punishable b% the Revised Penal Code. E%&3&ns o8 F&%on!&s 1. There must be an act or omission #. That the act or omission must be punishable b% the RPC 3. That the act is performed or the omission incurred b% means of dolo or culpa. )efinition of terms ACT @ must be overt or e-ternal (mere criminal thou'ht or intent is not punishable" OMISSION @ failure to perform a dut% re9uired b% law e-. Cailure to render assistance, failure to issue receipt, non?disclosure of /nowled'e of conspirac% a'ainst the 'overnment. A. HOW COMMITTED Classification of felonies accordin' to the means b% which the% are committed (6N 1<N<RA& 2N&K" 1. INTENTIONAL A DOLO (by means of deceit# malice$ ? the offender in performin' the act or incurrin' the omission, has the intention to cause an in+ur% to another the word 5deceit7 in par. # of Art. 3 is not the proper translation of the word 5dolo7. Dolus is actuall% e9uivalent to malice which is the intent to do an in%ury to another. .. CULPABLE (by means of fault or culpa$ / viv Pa'e 0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 ? an act performed without malice but at the same time punishable thou'h in a lesser de'ree and with an e9ual result impruence lac/ of precaution to avoid in+ur%, usuall% involves lac/ of s/ill negligence ? failure to foresee impendin' dan'er, usuall% involves lac& of foresight 1. DOLO REBUISITES OF DOLO OR MALICE 1. freeom @ that the act or omission was voluntar% and without e-ternal compulsion. #. intelligence @ /nowled'e needed to determine the moralit% and conse9uences of an act. The imbecile, insane and minors have no criminal liabilit%. 3. intent @ intent to commit the act with malice, bein' purel% a mental process, is presumed and the presumption arises from the proof of the commission of the unlawful act. 6ntent presupposes the e-ercise of freedom and the use of intelli'ence The e-istence of intent is shown b% the overt acts of a person Criminal intent is presumed from the commission of an unlawful act (3T the presumption of criminal intent does not arise from the proof of the commission of an act which is not unlawful. $ctus non facit reum& nisi mens sit rea 5the act itself does not ma/e a man 'uilt% unless his intention were so7 A crime is not committed if the mind of the person performin' to act complained be innocent. 6t must be borne in mind that the act from which the presumption of e-istence of criminal intent sprin's must be a criminal act. $ctus me invito factus non est meus actus 5an act done b% me a'ainst m% will is not m% act7 INTENT ). MOTI)E MOTI)E is the movin' power which impels one to action for a define result. INTENT is the purpose to use a particular means to effect such result. *otive is not an essential element of a crime, and, hence need not be proved for purposes of conviction. *otive is essential onl% when there is doubt as to the identit% of the assailant. 6t is immaterial when the accused has been positivel% identified. Proof of motive alone is not sufficient to support a conviction but lac/ of motive ma% be an aid in showin' the innocence of the accused. There is no felon% b% dolo if there is no intent P&o*%& +. T&3/%o# (1988) Facts: Ca'ampan' and his wife were conversin' in the store ad+acent to their house when Temblor arrived and as/ed to bu% ci'arettes. Temblor, then, shot Ca'ampan' and demanded the wife to brin' out her husbandBs firearm. *onths after, the wife was summoned to the police station and there she identified the accused. The accusedBs defense was alibi and lac/ of motive. Held. The /nowled'e of the accused that Ca'ampan' possessed a firearm was enou'h motive to /ill him as /illin's were perpetrated b% members of the NPA for the sole purpose of ac9uirin' more arms and ammunition. Their 'roup is prevalent not onl% in A'usan del Norte but elsewhere in the countr%. 6t is /nown as the NPABs 5a'aw armas7 campai'n. *oreover, proof of motive is not essential when the culprit has been positivel% identified. P&o*%& +. H,ss,n (1988) Facts: The accused, an illiterate, 1!?%ear?old pushcart car'ador, was convicted of the crime of murder for the death of Ramon. The lone e%ewitness claimed he saw the accused stab Ramon onl% once at the bac/. ,e identified the accused alone at the funeral parlor without bein' placed in a police line?up. Held. The testimon% of witness was wea/. 6t conflicted with the findin's of the *edico?le'al officer who identified # stab wounds which were inflicted while assailant was in front of the victim. The manner b% which the witness was made to identif% the accused was pointedl% su''estive and activated visual ima'ination when there was none. The method of identification became +ust a confrontation and was made in violation of the constitutional ri'ht of the accused. The court noted the total absence of motive ascribed to the accused for stabbin' Ramon who is a complete stran'er to him. Ahile as a 'eneral rule, motive is not essential for purposes of compl%in' with the re9uirement that a +ud'ment of 'uilt% must stem from proof be%ond reasonable doubt, the lac/ of motive on the part of the accused pla%s a pivotal role towards his ac9uittal. This is especiall% true where there is doubt as to the identit% of the culprit as when the identification is e-tremel% tenuous as in this case. P&o*%& +. D&%os S,nos (.22@) Facts: )elos $antos stab Clores with a /itchen /nife hittin' him on the different parts of his bod%, inflictin' upon him mortal wounds which directl% caused his death. )elos $antos then ar'ues that since the prosecution witnesses testified that there was no altercation between him and Clores, it follows that no motive to /ill can be attributed to him. Held: The court held that the ar'ument of )elos $antos is inconse9uential. Proof of motive is not indispensable for a conviction, particularl% where the accused is positivel% identified b% an e%ewitness and his participation is ade9uatel% established. 6n People vs. 1alano, the court ruled that in the crime of murder, motive is not an element of the offense, it becomes material onl% when the evidence is circumstantial or inconclusive and there is some doubt on whether the accused had committed it. 6n this case, the court finds that no such doubt e-its as witnesses, )e &eon and Tablate positivel% identified )elos $antos. MISTACE OF FACT / viv Pa'e ; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 6t is a misapprehension of fact on the part of the person who caused in+ur% to another. ,e is not, however, criminall% liable, because he did not act with criminal intent. R&<"!s!&sD 1. That the act done would have been lawful had the facts been as the accused believed them to be. #. That the intention of the accused in performin' the act should be lawful 3. That the mista/e must be without fault or carelessness on the part of the accused. P&o*%& +. A; C;on- (1912) A housebo% who stabs his roommate in the dar/, honestl% mista/in' the latter to be a robber responsible for a series of brea/?ins in the area, and after cr%in' out sufficient warnin's and believin' himself to be under attac/, cannot be held criminall% liable for homicide. $tabbin' the victim whom the accused believed to be an intruder showed a mista/e of fact on his part which led him to ta/e the facts as the% appear to him and was pressed to ta/e immediate action. P&o*%& +. O,n!s (1988) Police officers who shot a sleepin' man in the bac/ mista/in' him for a notorious escaped convict wanted dead or alive, could still be held liable for the /illin' since the% did not ta/e reasonable precautionar% measures. Police officers are still liable because the% are not +ustified in /illin' a man whose identit% the% did not ascertain. The third re9uisite of mista/e of fact is lac/in'. 6n this case, self?defense is not tenable as a defense as there was no unlawful a''ression but the% ma% avail of the defense of fulfillment of dut% as a miti'atin' circumstance. Criminal intent is replaced b% ne'li'ence and imprudence in felonies committed b% means of culpa. .. CULPA RPC' A#. @0( *,# 7 Rec/less imprudence consists in voluntaril%, but without malice, doin' or failin' to do an act from which material dama'e results b% reason of ine-cusable lac/ of precaution on the part of the person performin' or failin' to perform such act, ta/in' into consideration his emplo%ment or occupation, de'ree of intelli'ence ph%sical condition and other circumstances re'ardin' persons, time and place. $imple imprudence consists in the lac/ of precaution displa%ed in those cases in which the dama'e impendin' to be cause is not immediate nor the dan'er clearl% manifest. R&<"!s!&s o8 culpaD 1. freedom #. intelligence 3. imprudence# negligence or lac& of foresight and s&ill in culpable felonies, the in+ur% caused to another should be unintentional, it bein' simpl% the incident of another act performed without malice. P&o*%& +. B",n (1908) Facts: The accused was drivin' a passen'er bus. Alle'edl% because of his rec/lessness, the bus collided with a +eep in+urin' the passen'ers of the latter. A case was filed a'ainst the accused for slight physical in%uries through rec&less imprudence for which he was tried and ac9uitted. Prior to his ac9uittal, a case for serious physical in%uries and damage to property through rec&less imprudence was filed. Accused claimed that he was placed in twice in +eopard%. Held. The second case must be dismissed. 2nce convicted or ac9uitted of a specific act of rec/less imprudence, the accused ma% not be prosecuted a'ain for the same act. Cor the essence of the 9uasi?offense under Art. 30! of the RPC lies in the e-ecution of an imprudent act which would be punishable as a felon%. The law penali4es the ne'li'ent act and not the result. The 'ravit% of the conse9uences is onl% ta/en into account to determine the penalt%. 6t does not 9ualif% the substance of the offense. A. CRIMES DEFINED AND PENALIEED BY SPECIAL LAWS A#. 12. 'ffenses not sub(ect to the provisions of this Coe! I 2ffenses which are or in the future ma% be punishable under special laws are not sub+ect to the provisions of this Code. This Code shall be supplementar% to such laws, unless the latter should speciall% provide the contrar%. There are 3 classes of crimes. The RPC defines and penali4es the first two classes. 1" intentional and #" culpable felonies. The third class of crimes is those defined and penali4ed b% special laws which include crimes punished b% municipal or cit% ordinances. The provisions of this Code are not applicable to offenses punished b% special laws especiall% those relatin' to the re9uisite of criminal intentF the sta'es of commissionF and the application of penalties. ,owever, when the special law is silent, the Code can 'ive suppletor% effect. )olo is not re9uired in crimes punished b% special laws because these crimes are mala prohibita. 6n those crimes punished b% special laws, the act alone irrespective of its motives, constitutes the offense. 1ood faith and absence of criminal intent are not valid defenses in crimes punished b% special laws )$L$ *N SE an )$L$ PR'+*,*"$ )ala in se an act, b% its ver% nature, is inherentl% and morall% wron'F it should be done with criminal intent )alum prohibitum @ an act is wron' onl% because there is a law punishin' it. 6t is enou'h that the prohibited act was voluntaril% committed and need not be committed with malice or criminal intent to be punishable. Es#,4, +. S,n4!-,n/,>,n (.221) Facts: <strada is challen'in' the plunder law. 2ne of the issues he raised is whether plunder is a malum prohibitum or malum in se. Held: Plunder is a malum in se which re9uires proof of criminal of criminal intent. Precisel% because the constitutive crimes are mala in se the element of mens rea must be proven in a prosecution for plunder. 6t is / viv Pa'e #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 noteworth% that the amended information alle'es that the crime of plunder was committed 5willfull%, unlawfull% and criminall%.7 6t thus alle'es 'uilt /nowled'e on the part of the petitioner. RELATION OF RPC TO SPECIAL LAWS RPC' A#. 12. 'ffenses not sub%ect to the pro!isions of this Code. I 2ffenses which are or in the future ma% be punishable under special laws are not sub+ect to the provisions of this Code. This Code shall be supplementar% to such laws, unless the latter should speciall% provide the contrar%. P,4!%%, +. D!Fon (1988) Facts: Padilla filed an administrative complaint a'ainst RTC 8ud'e )i4on for renderin' a manifestl% erroneous decision ac9uittin' &o Chi Cai of the offense char'ed for smu''lin' forei'n currenc% out of the countr% in violation of Central (an/ Circular No. :0=. The Circular prohibits transmission of forei'n currenc% out of the Philippines without authori4ation from the Central (an/. Penal sanction for such violation is provided in P) No. 13. 8ud'e )i4on ac9uitted accused because of lac/ of intent to violate and benefit from the act alone. Held: 8ud'e showed 'ross i'norance of the law. ,e ou'ht to /now that proof of malice or mens rea is not essential in offense punished b% special laws which are mala prohibita. The +ud'e did not ta/e into consideration the admission of the accused that he was a 5carrier7 of forei'n currenc% for other people but chose to 'ive credence to the fantastic tale of the accused that he and his alle'ed business associate were usin' the mone% for a particular investment.
P,4!%%, +. CA (1997) Facts: Padilla, drivin' his Pa+ero at hi'h speed despite the bad weather, hit a balot vendor. A chase too/ place and eventuall%, PadillaBs vehicle was stopped. ,e was arrested and several firearms were found inside his vehicle. ,e admitted possession claimin' he used them for shootin' but was not able to produce an% permit to carr%. Held: Pd 10 provides onl% # re9uisites to establish crimes involvin' ille'al possession of firearm. (1" e-istence of sub+ect firearm and (#" the fact that the accused who owned or possessed the firearm does not have the correspondin' permit to possess. <ither the testimon% of a representative of or a certification from the PNP Cirearms and e-plosives office would suffice to prove be%ond reasonable doubt the second element of ille'al possession. P) 100 is constitutional. To +ustif% nullification, there must be a clear breach of the constitution. The contention that the penalt% of simple ille'al possession is cruel and e-cessive in contravention of the constitution does not merit serious consideration. The severit% of a penalt% does not ipso facto ma/e the same cruel and e-cessive. The court cited People v. $imon doctrine as to the penalties to be imposed althou'h P) 100 is a special law, the penalties therein were ta/en from the RPC, hence the rules in the said code for 'raduatin' b% de'rees or determinin' the proper period should be applied. P&o*%& +. S,%&> (1998) Facts: $ale% was convicted of 10 cases of ille'al recruitment, one of which was on the lar'e scale. $he was also convicted of 11 counts of estafa. $he claims that she was not en'a'ed in recruitment but is merel% actin' as an a'ent. $he also claimed that she was merel% aidin' the processin' of the complainantBs visas. Held: $ale% is 'uilt% of ille'al recruitment and estafa. $he has no valid license or authorit% to en'a'e in placement of wor/ers. There is no double +eopard% in this case. Conviction under the &abor Code for ille'al recruitment is malum prohibita while estafa under the RPC is malum in se. P&o*%& +. S!3on (1991) Facts: The accused was arrested after a bu%? bust operation conducted b% the police wherein the accused sold # tea?ba's of mari+uana to a poseur bu%er for P>=. Held: To sustain a conviction for sellin' prohibited dru's under the )an'erous )ru's Act of 1:;#, the sale must be clearl% established. The commission of the offense of ille'al sale of prohibited dru's re9uires merel% the consummation of the sellin' transaction. The court held that in the instant case the imposable penalt% under RA 0>#! as amended b% RA ;0!: is prison correccional to be ta/en from the medium period thereof pursuant to Art. 0> of the RPC, there bein' no a''ravatin' and miti'atin' circumstance. )issent. 6t is thus clear that an offense is punished b% the RPC if both its definition and the penalt% therefore are found in the special law. That the latter imports or borrows from the RPC its nomenclature of penalties. 6n short, the mere use b% a special law of a penalt% found in the RPC can b% no means ma/e an offense thereunder an offense 5punished or punishable7 b% the RPC. L,4on-, + P&o*%& (.22() Facts. $pouses &adon'a were convicted b% the RTC for violation of (P. (l'. ## (3 counts". The husband applied for probation while the wife appealed ar'uin' that the RTC erred in findin' her criminall% liable for conspirin' with her husband as the principle of conspirac% is inapplicable to (P (l'. ## which is a special law. Held: (.P. (l'. ## does not e-pressl% prescribe the suppletor% application of the provisions of the RPC. Thus, in the absence of contrar% provision in (.P. (l'. ##, the 'eneral provisions of the RPC which, b% their nature, are necessaril% applicable, ma% be applied suppletoril%. The court cited the case of Ku vs. People, where the provisions on subsidiar% imprisonment under Article 3: of the RPC to (.P. (l'. ## was applied suppletoril%. The suppletor% application of the principle of conspirac% in this case is analo'ous to the application of the provision on principals under Article 1; in 3.$. vs. Ponte. Cor once conspirac% or action in concert to achieve a criminal desi'n is shown, the act of one is the act of all the conspirators, and the precise e-tent or modalit% of participation of each of them becomes secondar%, since all the conspirators are principals. The Court in this case however ruled in favor of &adon'a(wife" as the prosecution failed to prove that she performed an% overt act in furtherance of the alle'ed conspirac%. / viv Pa'e : #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 P&o*%& +. B"s!n&#, (.221) Facts. (ustinera was convicted b% the trial Court for 9ualified theft under Article 31= of the Revised Penal Code for the unlawful ta/in' of the ta-i cab driven b% him which is owned and operated b% Cipriano and was sentenced to suffer the penalt% of reclusion perpetua. Held: The unlawful ta/in' of motor vehicles is now covered b% the anti?carnappin' law (RA No. 0!3:" and not b% the provisions on 9ualified theft or robber%. The trial court havin' convicted (ustinera of 9ualified theft instead of carnappin', erred in the imposition of the penalt%. Ahile the information alle'es that the crime was attended with 'rave abuse of confidence, the same cannot be appreciated as the suppletor% effect of the Revised Penal Code to special laws, as provided in Article 1= of said Code, cannot be invo/ed when there is a le'al impossibilit% of application, either b% e-press provision or b% necessar% implication. *oreover, when the penalties under the special law are different from and are without reference or relation to those under the Revised Penal Code, there can be no suppletor% effect of the rules, for the application of penalties under the said Code or b% other relevant statutor% provisions are based on or applicable onl% to said rules for felonies under the Code. The court cited the case of People v. Panida which involved the crime of carnappin' and the penalt% imposed was the indeterminate sentence of 1> %ears and months, as minimum, to 1; %ears and > months, as ma-imum, this Court did not appl% the provisions of the Revised Penal Code suppletoril% as the anti? carnappin' law provides for its own penalties which are distinct and without reference to the said Code. (ustinera was sentenced to an indeterminate penalt% of 1> %ears and months as minimum, to 1; %ears and > months, as ma-imum for the crime of carnappin' under RA 0!3:, as amended. A#. 1. Criminal liability. I Criminal liabilit% shall be incurred. 1. (% an% person committin' a felon% (delito" althou'h the wron'ful act done be different from that which he intended. #. (% an% person performin' an act which would be an offense a'ainst persons or propert%, were it not for the inherent impossibilit% of its accomplishment or an account of the emplo%ment of inade9uate or ineffectual means. B. PUNISHABLE CONDUCT 1. WRON6FUL ACT DIFFERENT FROM THAT INTENDED 2ne who commits an intentional felon% is responsible for all the conse9uences which ma% naturall% and lo'icall% result therefrom, whether foreseen or intended or not. Rationale. el -ue es causa e la causa es causa el mal causao 5,e who is the cause of the cause is the cause of the evil caused7 Ahen a person has not committed a felon%, he is not criminall% liable for the result which is not intended. The causes which ma% produce a result different from that which the offender intended are. a. ERROR IN PERSONAE @ mista/e in the identit% of the victimF in+urin' one person mista/en for another (this is a comple- crime under Art. >:" b. ABERRATIO ICTUS @ mista/e in the blow, that is, when the offender intendin' to do an in+ur% to one person actuall% inflicts it on anotherF and c. PRAETER INTENTIONEM @ the act e-ceeds the intent, that is, the in+urious result is 'reater than that intended. The felon% committed must be the pro-imate cause of the resultin' in+ur%. PROGIMATE CAUSE @ the cause, which, in natural and continuous se9uence, unbro/en b% an% efficient intervenin' cause, produces the in+ur%, and without which the result would not have occurred. Ahen death is presumed to be the natural conse9uence of ph%sical in+uries inflicted. 1. That the victim at the time the ph%sical in+uries were inflicted was in normal health. #. That the death ma% be e-pected from the ph%sical in+uries inflicted. 3. That death ensued within a reasonable time. The felon% committed is not the pro-imate cause of the resultin' in+ur% when. a. There is an active force that intervened between the felon% committed and the resultin' in+ur%, and the active force is a distinct act or fact absolutel% forei'n from the felonious act of the accusedF or b. The resultin' in+ur% is due to the intentional act of the victim. P&o*%& +. S,/,%on&s (1988) Facts: Two vehicles proceeded to the house of $tephen &im when $abalones et. al. fired towards the vehicles /illin' # of the passen'ers and seriousl% in+urin' 3 others. The lower court convicted the accused. Appellants accuse the trial court of en'a'in' in con+ecture in rulin' that there was aberratio ictus in this case. Held: The alle'ation does not advance the cause of the appellants. 6t must be stressed that the trial court relied on the concept of aberratio ictus to e-plain wh% the appellants sta'ed the ambush, not to prove that appellants did in fact commit the crimes. 6n an% event, the lower court was not en'a'in' in con+ecture because the conclusion that the appellants /illed the wron' persons was based on the e-tra+udicial statement of appellant (eron'a and the testimon% of one witness. Nonetheless, the fact that the% were mista/en does not diminish their culpabilit%. *ista/e in the identit% of the victim carries the same 'ravit% as when the accused 4eroes in on his intended victim. .. OMISSION A#. 110. )isprision of treason. I <ver% person owin' alle'iance to (the 3nited $tates" the 1overnment of the Philippine 6slands, without bein' a forei'ner, and havin' /nowled'e of an% conspirac% a'ainst them, conceals or does not disclose and ma/e /nown the same, as soon as possible to the 'overnor or fiscal of the province, or the ma%or or fiscal of the cit% in which he resides, as the case ma% be, shall be punished as an accessor% to the crime of treason. / viv Pa'e 1= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 A#. 1@7. Disloyalty of public officers or employees! I The penalt% of prision correccional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon public officers or emplo%ees who have failed to resist a rebellion b% all the means in their power, or shall continue to dischar'e the duties of their offices under the control of the rebels or shall accept appointment to office under them. A#. .28. Prosecution of offenses. negligence an tolerance. I The penalt% of prision correccional in its minimum period and suspension shall be imposed upon an% public officer, or officer of the law, who, in dereliction of the duties of his office, shall maliciousl% refrain from institutin' prosecution for the punishment of violators of the law, or shall tolerate the commission of offenses. A#. ..@. Conniving #ith or consenting to evasion. I An% public officer who shall consent to the escape of a prisoner in his custod% or char'e, shall be punished. 1. (% prision correccional in its medium and ma-imum periods and temporar% special dis9ualification in its ma-imum period to perpetual special dis9ualification, if the fu'itive shall have been sentenced b% final +ud'ment to an% penalt%. #. (% prision correccional in its minimum period and temporar% special dis9ualification, in case the fu'itive shall not have been finall% convicted but onl% held as a detention prisoner for an% crime or violation of law or municipal ordinance. A#. .@1. Refusal to ischarge elective office. I The penalt% of arresto mayor or a fine not e-ceedin' 1,=== pesos, or both, shall be imposed upon an% person who, havin' been elected b% popular election to a public office, shall refuse without le'al motive to be sworn in or to dischar'e the duties of said office. A#. .7(. $banonment of person in anger an abanonment of one/s o#n victim! I The penalt% of arresto mayor shall be imposed upon. 1. An% one who shall fail to render assistance to an% person whom he shall find in an uninhabited place wounded or in dan'er of d%in', when he can render such assistance without detriment to himself, unless such omission shall constitute a more serious offense. #. An%one who shall fail to help or render assistance to another whom he has accidentall% wounded or in+ured. 3. An%one who, havin' found an abandoned child under seven %ears of a'e, shall fail to deliver said child to the authorities or to his famil%, or shall fail to ta/e him to a safe place. @. PROPOSAL AND CONSPIRACY A#. 8. Conspiracy an proposal to commit felony. I Conspirac% and proposal to commit felon% are punishable onl% in the cases in which the law speciall% provides a penalt% therefore. A conspirac% e-ists when two or more persons come to an a'reement concernin' the commission of a felon% and decide to commit it. There is proposal when the person who has decided to commit a felon% proposes its e-ecution to some other person or persons. A#. 11(. Conspiracy an proposal to commit treason. Penalty! I The conspirac% or proposal to commit the crime of treason shall be punished respectivel%, b% prision mayor and a fine not e-ceedin' P1=,=== pesos, and prision correccional and a fine not e-ceedin' P!,=== pesos. A#. 1@0. Conspiracy an proposal to commit coup /etat& rebellion or insurrection! I The conspirac% and proposal to commit coup d(etat shall be punished b% prision mayor in minimum period and a fine which shall not e-ceed ei'ht thousand pesos (P,===.==". A#. 111. Conspiracy to commit seition! I Persons conspirin' to commit the crime of sedition shall be punished b% prision correccional in its medium period and a fine not e-ceedin' #,=== pesos A#. 180. )onopolies an combinations in restraint of trae! I The penalt% of prision correccional in its minimum period or a fine ran'in' from #== to 0,=== pesos, or both, shall be imposed upon. 1. An% person who shall enter into an% contract or a'reement or shall ta/e part in an% conspirac% or combination in the form of a trust or otherwise, in restraint of trade or commerce or to prevent b% artificial means free competition in the mar/etF A#. @20. 0ho are brigans. Penalty! I Ahen more than three armed persons form a band of robbers for the purpose of committin' robber% in the hi'hwa%, or /idnappin' persons for the purpose of e-tortion or to obtain ransom or for an% other purpose to be attained b% means of force and violence, the% shall be deemed hi'hwa% robbers or bri'ands. Persons found 'uilt% of this offense shall be punished b% prision mayor in its medium period to reclusion temporal in its minimum period if the act or acts committed b% them are not punishable b% hi'her penalties, in which case, the% shall suffer such hi'h penalties. 6f an% of the arms carried b% an% of said persons be an unlicensed firearm, it shall be presumed that said persons are hi'hwa% robbers or bri'ands, and in case of convictions the penalt% shall be imposed in the ma-imum period. A#. @12. Corruption of minors. H An% person who shall promote or facilitate the prostitution or corruption of persons undera'e to satisf% the lust of another, shall be punished b% prision mayor, and if the culprit is a pubic officer or emplo%ee, includin' those in 'overnment?owned or controlled corporations, he shall also suffer the penalt% of temporar% absolute dis9ualification. Conspirac% and proposal to commit a felon% are two different acts or felonies. (1" conspirac% to commit a felon%, and (#" proposal to commit a felon%. 6ENERAL RULED Conspirac% and proposal to commit a felon% are not punishable EGCEPTIOND The% are punishable onl% in the cases in which the law speciall% provides a penalt% therefore. RATIONALE. Conspirac% and proposal to commit a crime are onl% preparatory acts and the law re'ards them as innocent or at least permissible e-cept in rare and e-ceptional cases. / viv Pa'e 11 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 CONSPIRACY ? e-ists when two or more persons come to an a'reement concernin' the commission of a felon and decide to commit it. The RPC speciall% provides a penalt% for mere conspirac% in treason, coup dBetat, rebellion or sedition. Treason, coup dBetat, rebellion or sedition must not actuall% be committed or else conspirac% shall no lon'er be punishable because it is not a separate offense from the felon% itself. INDICATIONS OF CONSPIRACY ? for a collective responsibilit% amon' the accused to be established, it is sufficient that at the time of the a''ression, all of them acted in concert, each doin' his part to fulfill their common desi'n to commit the felon%. REBUISITES OF CONSPIRACY ,. T;, 9o o# 3o#& *&#sons $,3& o ,n ,-#&&3&nD ? a'reement presupposes meetin' of the minds of two or more persons /. T;, ;& ,-#&&3&n $on$&#n&4 ;& commission o8 , 8&%on>I ,n4 ? the a'reement must refer to the commission of a crime. 6t must be an a'reement to act, to effect, to brin' about what has alread% been conceived and determined $. T;, ;& &:&$"!on o8 ;& 8&%on> /& 4&$!4&4 "*on. ? the conspirators have made up their minds to commit the crime. There must be a determination to commit the crime of treason, rebellion or sedition. P&o*%& +. F,/#o (.222) Facts. Petitioner Cabro to'ether with her common?law husband Pila% and 6rene *artin was char'ed with the crime of Lviolation of $ection #1 (b" Art. 6J, in relation to $ection >, Art. 66 of Republic Act No. 0>#! as amended, for sellin' to P2# Apduhan, who acted as poseur bu%er, one /ilo of dried mari+uana leaves. Cabro contends that her 'uilt was not proven be%ond reasonable doubt as based on the testimon% of the N(6, the real possessor of the confiscated properties was her co?accused *artin. Held. CabroBs contention that *artin was the real curlprit bein' the source of the contraband does not in an% wa% absolve her of the crime of sellin' mari+uana. Ahile it is true that it was *artin who too/ the mone%, it was Cabro who ne'otiated with the poseur bu%ers, fetched her co?accusedF and carried and handed over the mari+uana to Apduhan. The acts of *artin and Cabro clearl% show a unit% of purpose in the consummation of the sale of mari+uana. 6t is clear that $ection #1 (b" of R.A. 0>#! punishes the mere conspirac% to commit the offense of sellin', deliverin', distributin' and transportin' of dan'erous dru's. Conspirac% herein refers to the mere a'reement to commit the said acts and not the actual e-ecution thereof. Ahile the rule is that a mere conspirac% to commit a crime without doin' an% overt act is not punishable, the e-ception is when such is specificall% penali4ed b% law, as in the case of $ection #1 of Republic Act 0>#!. Conspirac% as crime should be distin'uished from conspirac% as a manner of incurrin' criminal liabilit% the latter bein' applicable to the case. P&o*%& +. B&%%o (.221) Facts. Accused (ello et. al. mapped out a plan to rob a mone%chan'er. Callin' the mone%chan'er from a motel room, (ello misrepresented that she came from 8apan and would li/e to convert her >= pieces of %en to pesos. $he re9uested that the currenc% conversion be made in her room as she did not want to carr% around a hu'e sum of mone%. )urin' the occasion of the robber%, Andasan, the messen'er who brou'ht the mone% to (ello was /illed. The trial court ruled that (ello conspired with the other accused and was found 'uilt% as principal for the crime of robber% with homicide. (ello, ar'ued that her alle'ed conspirac% with the other accused was not sufficientl% established b% circumstantial evidence as there was no showin' that she had the same purpose and united with the other accused in the e-ecution of the crime. $he alle'ed that her mere presence in the crime scene is not per se a sufficient indi9ium of conspirac%. $he insists that she acted a'ainst her will due to the irresistible force emplo%ed b% her co?accused. Held: The Court held that (ello conspired with her co?accused to commit the crime. Records clearl% reveal that (ello was part of the plan to rob the mone%chan'er. The chain of events and the conduct of (ello lead to no other conclusion than that she conspired with her co?accused to commit the crime. Conspirac% e-ists where the plotters a'ree, e-pressl% or impliedl%, to commit the crime and decide to pursue it. Conspirac% is predominantl% a state of mind as it involves the meetin' of the minds and intent of the malefactors. Conse9uentl%, direct proof is not essential to establish it. The e-istence of the assent of minds of the co?conspirators ma% be inferred from proof of facts and circumstances which, ta/en to'ether, indicate that the% are parts of the complete plan to commit the crime. L! +. P&o*%& (.221) Facts. (ecause of an altercation between Aru'a% and &i, the latter armed himself with a baseball bat and used the same to hit Aru'a% on the arm. Aru'a% armed with a bolo, retaliated b% hac/in' &i on the head causin' the bat to fall from his hand and leavin' him unconscious or semi?unconsious. At this point in time, $an'alan', who was also present stabbed Aru'a% several times which resulted to the latterBs death. The lower court held that there was conspirac% in the present case Held: The e-istence of conspirac% should be ruled out. $an'alan' was the main actor in stabbin' Aru'a% to death. As &i was incapacitated or probabl% unconscious at the time $an'alan' stabbed Aru'a%, it cannot be assumed that $an'alan' did what he has done with the /nowled'e or assent of &i, much more in coordination with each other. (ased on the circumstances, the Court is hard put to conclude that $an'alan' and &i had acted in concert to commit the offense. 6n fact, the stabbin' of Aru'a% could ver% well be construed as a spur?of?the?moment reaction b% $an'alan' upon seein' that his friend &i was struc/ on the head b% Aru'a%. Crom such a spontaneous reaction, a findin' of conspirac% cannot arise. Provin' conspirac% is a dice% matter, especiall% difficult in cases such as the present wherein the criminal acts arose spontaneousl%, as opposed to instances wherein the participants would have the opportunit% to orchestrate a more deliberate plan. $pontaneit% alone does not preclude the establishment of conspirac%, which after all, can be consummated in a / viv Pa'e 1# #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 momentBs notice I throu'h a sin'le word of assent to a proposal or an unambi'uous handsha/e. Ket it is more difficult to presume conspirac% in e-temporaneous outbursts of violenceF hence, the demand that it be established b% positive evidence. A conviction premised on a findin' of conspirac% must be founded on facts, not on mere inferences and presumption. P&o*%& +. B,-,no (.22.) Facts. 8eremias and his wife *erlinda were sleepin' in their home when the% were awa/ened b% someone repeatedl% callin' 8eremiasM name. 8eremias went to the window to see who it was and thereafter left their room to 'o outside. *erlinda remained in their room, but peerin' throu'h the window, she saw CaNete suddenl% embrace 8eremias as the latter was openin' the 'ate. Thereupon, (a'ano with ice pic/ in hand stabbed 8eremias on the chest. 8eremias stru''led to free himself from CaNeteMs clasp and ran, but (a'ano 'ave chase. 8eremias died upon arrival at the hospital. Held: Conspirac% is attendant in the commission of the crime. Cor conspirac% to e-ist, it is sufficient that at the time of the commission of the offense the accused had the same purpose and were united in its e-ecution. Proof of an actual plannin' of the perpetuation of the crime is not a condition precedent. Crom the mode and manner in which the offense was perpetrated, and as can be inferred from their acts, it is evident that (a'ano and CaNete were one in their intention to /ill 8eremias. ,ence, in accordance with the principle that in conspirac% the act of one is the act of all, the fact that it was (a'ano who delivered the fatal blow on 8eremias and CaNeteMs participation was limited to a mere embrace is immaterial. Conspirac% bestows upon them e9ual liabilit%F hence, the% shall suffer the same fate for their acts. P&o*%& +. B,n-$,4o (.222) Facts. $P21 (an'cado to'ether with $P21 (anisa fris/ed and searched Co'asi, Clemente, Adawan and &ino to see if the% were concealin' an% weapons. After ma/in' sure that the victims were unarmed, (an'cado directed the victims to form a line a'ainst a Cord Cierra. (ecause (an'cado and (anisa were holdin' hand'uns, Co'asi and his friends did as the% were told and were cau'ht unaware when the% were shot b% (an'cado. Adawan and &ino died of 'unshot wounds in the head, while Co'asi and Clemente sustained head wounds. The lower court convicted both (an'cado and (anisa for # counts of murder and # counts of frustrated murder. Held: There bein' no findin' of Conspirac% with (an'cado, the Court ac9uitted (anisa of all the char'es a'ainst him. 6n the absence of an% previous plan or a'reement to commit a crime, the criminal responsibilit% arisin' from different acts directed a'ainst one and the same person is individual and not collective, and that each of the participants is liable onl% for his own acts. Conse9uentl%, (anisa must be absolved from criminal responsibilit% for the assault on the victims. 6t is clear that neither the victims nor (anisa could have anticipated (an'cadoMs act of shootin' the victims since the attac/ was sudden and without an% reason or purpose. Thus, the criminal desi'n of (an'cado had not %et been revealed prior to the /illin's. P&o*%& +. R,3os (.221) Facts. The trial court found appellant <ulalia $an Ro9ue 'uilt% for conspirin' and confederatin' with her co?accused for the murder of her live?in?partner &omida. &omida was stabbed, shot and burned resultin' to his death. Appellant ar'ues that the fact of such conspirac% has not been satisfactoril% proven durin' the trial of the case. $he vi'orousl% contends that she did not participate in the /illin' of the victim. Held: 6n determinin' the e-istence of conspirac%, it is not necessar% to show that all the conspirators actuall% hit and /illed the victim. The presence of conspirac% amon' the accused can be proven b% their conduct before, durin' or after the commission of the crime showin' that the% acted in unison with each other, evincin' a common purpose or desi'n. There must be a showin' that appellant cooperated in the commission of the offense, either morall%, throu'h advice, encoura'ement or a'reement or materiall% throu'h e-ternal acts indicatin' a manifest intent of suppl%in' aid in the perpetration of the crime in an efficacious wa%. 6n such case, the act of one becomes the act of all, and each of the accused will thereb% be deemed e9uall% 'uilt% of the crime committed. The series of events in this case convincin'l% show that appellant and her co?accused acted in unison and cooperated with each other in /illin' &omida. Appellant was the one who opened the door and allowed the other accused to enter the house. $he +oined them in brin'in' the victim to the residence of Ramos, her brother?in?law. Ahile her co?accused dra''ed the helpless victim, tied him to a santol tree, stabbed him twice b% a bladed /nife, and shot him ! to ; times, appellant merel% watched intensel%. $he even 5turned her bac/7 as the lifeless bod% of the victim was bein' burned. And after attainin' their purpose, she fled with the other accused. The above circumstances clearl% show the common purpose and concerted efforts on the part of appellant and her co?accused. PROPOSAL R&<"!s!&sD a. That a person has decided to commit a felon%F and b. That he proposes its e-ecution to some other person or persons. There is no criminal proposal when. a. The person who proposes is not determined to commit the felon%. b. There is no decided, concrete and formal proposal. c. 6t is not the e-ecution of a felon% that is proposed. 6t is not necessar% that the person to whom the proposal is made a'rees to commit treason or rebellion. US +. B,"!s, (1920) Facts: )urin' the latter part of 1:=3, a +unta was or'ani4ed and a conspirac% entered into b% a number of Cilipino residents in ,O for the purpose of overthrowin' the 'overnment of the 3$ in the Philippines and replacin' it with Republica )ni!ersal Democratica Filipinas. )efendant Ricarte was reco'ni4ed as chief of militar% forces to be or'ani4ed in the Philippines. )efendant (autista was an intimate friend of Ricarte and was present in several meetin's. )efendant Pu4on admitted that he accepted emplo%ment as chief of si'nal corps of such +unta. / viv Pa'e 13 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Held. The fact that one accused of conspirac% to overthrow the 'overnment has actuall% and voluntaril% accepted appointment b% the conspirators as an officer of armed forces raised or to be raised in furtherance of the desi'ns of the conspirators ma% be ta/en into consideration as evidence of the criminal connection of the accused with the conspirac%. P&o*%& +. )&n-$o (1981) The conspirac% between Constantino &eneses and &eon )avid is discernible from the wa% in which the assaulted Celaderna and their conduct sometime before and immediatel% after the stabbin' that clearl% show that the% had a'reed to /ill him. The rule is that 5if it is proven that two or more persons aimed b% their acts towards the accomplishment of the same unlawful ob+ect, each doin' a part that their acts, althou'h apparentl% independent, were in fact connected and cooperative, indicatin' a closeness of personal association and concurrence of sentiment, a conspirac% ma% be inferred thou'h no actual meetin' amon' them is proven. P&o*%& +. ),%4&F (1988) Facts: <leno was about to stand up to accompan% a relative to a pra%er meetin' when he was shot at the bac/. The mother loo/ed at the direction from where the 'unshot came from and was able to identif% the # defendants as the% turned and ran down the hill from the bamboo 'rove from which the two hid behind. The brother of the victim also testified that he positivel% identified Jalde4 as the one carr%in' the 'un and that it was 2rodio who was runnin' with him. Held: 6f conspirac% is proved to e-ist in the commission of the felon%, it is not necessar% to prove that participation of each conspirator of all are liable as an% act of a co?conspirator becomes the act of the other re'ardless of the precise de'ree of participation in the act. The evidence is more than ade9uate to show conspirac% between two accused even if prosecution failed to show who actuall% pulled the tri''er of the shot'unF the act of one is the act of all. P&o*%& +. Es$o/&# (1988) Facts: Alorte, <scober and Pun4alan were convicted of havin' /illed the children of spouses Chua while robbin' (ee $en' <lectrical $uppl% owned b% the spouses. Abu%en was the former securit% 'uard of the store while <scober was the present one. Pun4alan is a friend of Abu%en. <scober and Pun4alan were char'ed as principals b% indispensable cooperation. Held: <scober was ac9uitted. <scober bein' on dut% that fateful ni'ht and openin' the 'ate to persons who turned out to be robbers and /illers ma/e him an eas% suspect. ,owever, the fact that accused was at the scene of the crime is not b% itself sufficient to establish his criminal liabilit%. To hold the accused as co?principal in the crime char'ed, the e-istence of conspirac% between the accused and the actual /illers must be shown and the same de'ree of proof re9uired for establishin' the crime is re9uired to support a findin' of the presence of the conspirac%. Pun4alan, on the other hand, is 'uilt% as principal. ,is participation is to act as a loo/?out and even if he did not participate in the actual /illin', he cannot evade responsibilit% for the crime. P&o*%& +. E%!Jo#4& (.22@) Facts: ,ierro and Jisbal went to the sari?sari store where the% encountered <li+orde, Pun4alan and *enes. *enes reacted to a comment made b% ,ierro b% punchin' him in the face followed b% <li+orde who also bo-ed him, and Pun4alan who /ic/ed him in the bac/. The two victims ran awa%. Another confrontation ensued. Pun4alan /ic/ed ,ierro at the bac/ and the latter ran awa% but pursued b% <li+orde. <li+orde, then. $tabbed ,ierro at the bac/ with a /nife resultin' to his death. <li+orde and Pun4alan were char'ed with murder. Held: No conspirac% between the # because there is no evidence to show unit% of purpose and desi'n in the e-ecution of the /illin'. Pun4alan onl% /ic/ed ,ierro twice after which he did not cooperate with <li+orde in pursuin' and /illin' the victim. *ere /ic/in' does not necessaril% prove intent to /ill. Thus, each of the accused is liable onl% for his own acts. Pun4alan is ac9uitted. STA6ES OF COMMISSION OF A CRIME A#. 0. Consummate& frustrate& an attempte felonies! I Consummated felonies as well as those which are frustrated and attempted, are punishable. A felon% is consummated when all the elements necessar% for its e-ecution and accomplishment are presentF and it is frustrated when the offender performs all the acts of e-ecution which would produce the felon% as a conse9uence but which, nevertheless, do not produce it b% reason of causes independent of the will of the perpetrator. There is an attempt when the offender commences the commission of a felon% directl% or over acts, and does not perform all the acts of e-ecution which should produce the felon% b% reason of some cause or accident other than this own spontaneous desistance. DE)ELOPMENT OF A CRIME a. internal acts @ such as mere ideas in the mind of a person, are not punishable even if, had the% been carried out, the% would constitute a crime b. external acts @ cover a" preparator% and b" acts of e-ecution c. preparatory @ acts tendin' toward the crimeF ordinaril% not punishable unless specificall% provided forF these acts do not %et constitute even the first sta'e of the acts of e-ecutionF intent not %et disclosed d. acts of execution @ acts directl% connected to the intended crimeF varies with the crime and is punishable under the codeF usuall% overt acts with a lo'ical relation to a particular concrete offense STA6ES OF COMMISSION 1. $ttempte @ there is an attempt when the offender performs all the acts of e-ecution which would produce the felon% as a conse9uence but which, nevertheless, do not produce it b% reason of causes independent of the will of the perpetrator. #. 1rustrate @ it is frustrated when the offender performs all the acts of e-ecution which would produce the felon% as a conse9uence but which nevertheless, do not produce it b% reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance. / viv Pa'e 1> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 3. Consummate @ a felon% is consummated when all the elements necessar% for its e-ecution and accomplishment are present. ATTEMPTED FELONY E%&3&nsD 1. The offender commences the commission of the felon% directl% b% overt actsF #. ,e does not perform all the acts of e-ecution which should produce the felon%F 3. The offenderBs act is not stopped b% his own spontaneous desistanceF >. The non?performance of all acts of e-ecution was due to cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance. The commission of the felon% is deemed commenced directl% b% overt acts when 1" there be e-ternal actsF #" such e-ternal acts have direct connection with the crime intended to be committed.
'2ER" $C" @ some ph%sical activit% or deed, indicatin' the intention to commit a particular crime, more than a mere plannin' or preparation, which if carried to its complete termination followin' its natural curse, without bein' frustrated b% e-ternal obstacles nor b% voluntar% desistance of the perpetrator, will lo'icall% and necessaril% ripen into a concrete offense. )rawin' or tr%in' to draw a pistol or raisin' a bolo as if to stri/e the offended part% with it is not an overt act of homicide. *NDE"ER)*N$"E '11ENSE @ 6t is one where the purpose of the offender in performin' an act is not certain. 6ts nature in relation to its ob+ective is ambi'uous. The intention of the accused must be viewed from the nature of the acts e-ecuted b% him, and not from his admission. S3,4EC"*2E $ND ',4EC"*2E P+$SES '1 $ 1EL'N5 1. SUB7ECTI)E PHASE ? That portion of the e-ecution of the crime startin' from the point where the offender still has control over his acts. ? 6f the offender reaches the point where he has no more control over is acts, the sub+ective phase is passed. ? 6f it is alread% passed but the felon% is not produced, it is frustrated. .. OB7ECTI)E PHASE ? the result of the acts of e-ecution, that is, the accomplishment of the crime. ? 6f the sub+ective and ob+ective phases are present, there is consummated felon%. P&o*%& +. L,3,;,n- (19@() Facts: The accused was cau'ht in the act of ma/in' an openin' with an iron bar on the wall of a store where the owner was sleepin'. The accused had onl% succeeded in brea/in' one board and in unfastenin' another from the wall, when the policeman showed up, who instantl% arrested him. The trial court convicted him of attempted robber%. Held. The conviction is erroneous. 6t is the opinion of the $C that the attempt to commit an offense which the Penal code punishes is that which has a lo'ical relation to a particular, concrete offenseF that, which is the be'innin' of the e-ecution of the offense b% overt acts of the perpetrator, leadin' directl% to its reali4ation and consummation. Ahat we have here is an attempt to commit an indeterminate offense. There is no doubt that it was the intention of the accused to enter the store b% means of violence, passin' throu'h the openin' which he had started to ma/e on the wall, but it is not sufficient, for the purpose of imposin' penal sanction to ma/e an assumption that the act was in preparation for the commission of robber%. There is no lo'ical and natural relation between the act of enterin' and robber%. Thus, he should be 'uilt% of attempted trespass to dwellin'. P&o*%& +. D!o (1981) Facts: The appellant and his companion tried to divest Crispulo of his $ei/o wrist watch but Crispulo resisted their attempt and fou'ht the robbers. The victim was stabbed and later died. The $ei/o watch was still strapped to his wrist. The lower court convicted the appellant of the special comple- crime of robber% with homicide. Held: The decision of the lower court was erroneous. The accused were unsuccessful in their criminal venture since the watch was still securel% strapped to the victimBs wrist. The crime of robber% was therefore not consummated. The /illin' ma% be considered as merel% incidental to the plan to carr% out the robber%. The accused must be convicted of attempted robber% with homicide. P&o*%& +. T#!n!4,4 (1989) Facts: )eceased $oriano and &aroa to'ether with Tan were inside a Cord Cierra Trinidad as/ed for a ride. The accused shot the two deceased. Tan 'ot off the Cierra and rode a +eepne% which +ust passed b%. Ahen he saw the accused ridin' at the bac/ of the +eep, he tried to run but when the +eep started drivin' awa%, he clun' to its side. The accused fired two shots at Tan, one hittin' him on his thi'h. The lower court convicted him of frustrated murder. Held: The accused can onl% be convicted of Attempted *urder because the accused was unable to perform all acts of e-ecution which would have produced the murder. The victimBs wound in the ri'ht thi'h was not fatal and the doctrinal rule is that where the wound is inflicted on the victim is not sufficient to cause his death, the crime is onl% attempted murder. P&o*%& +. C,3*";,n (.222) Facts: The mother of the >?%ear?old victim cau'ht the housebo% Campuhan in the act of almost rapin' her dau'hter. The h%men of the victim was still intact but since in previous 2rita rulin', entr% into labia is considered rape even without rupture of h%men and full penetration is not necessar%, 9uestion arises whether what transpired was attempted or consummated rape. Held. Attempted rape onl%. *ere touchin' of e-ternal 'enitalia b% penis is alread% rape. ,owever, touchin' should be understood as inherentl% part of entr% of penis into labia and not mere touchin' of the pudendum. There must be clear and convincin' proof that the penis indeed touched the labia and slid into the female or'an and N2T *<R<&K $TR2O<) T,< <HT<RNA& $3RCAC<. $ome de'ree of penetration beneath the surface must be achieved and the labia ma+or must be / viv Pa'e 1! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 entered. Prosecution did not prove that the CampuhanBs penis was able to penetrate victimBs va'ina because the /neelin' position of the accused obstructed the motherBs view of the alle'ed se-ual contact. The testimon% of the victim herself claimed that penis 'ra4ed but did not penetrate her or'an. There was onl% a shelling of the castle but no bombardment of the drawbridge yet. P&o*%& +. L!s&#!o (.222) Facts: (rothers 8eonito and *arlon were passin' b% Tramo, *untinlupa when a 'roup composed of A'apito &isterio, $amson, 1eor'e, and *arlon, all surnamed )ela Torre and (onifacio (anca%a bloc/ed their path and attac/ed them with lead pipes and bladed weapons. &isterio, *arlon and 1eor'e, who were armed with bladed weapons, stabbed 8eonito from behind. 8eonitoBs brother, *arlon, was hit on the head b% $amson and (anca%a with lead pipes and momentaril% lost consciousness. Ahen he re'ained his senses, he saw that 8eonito was alread% dead. Their assailants then fled after the incident. *arlon who sustained in+uries in the arm and bac/, was thereafter brou'ht to a hospital for treatment. The lower court found &isterio 'uilt% for the 5attempt7 to /ill *arlon. Held: The $C held that the crime is a frustrated felon% not an attempted offense considerin' that after bein' stabbed and clubbed twice in the head as a result of which he lost consciousness and fell, *arlonMs attac/ers apparentl% thou'ht he was alread% dead and fled. A crime cannot be held to be attempted unless the offender, after be'innin' the commission of the crime b% overt acts, is prevented, a'ainst his will, b% some outside cause from performin' all of the acts which should produce the crime. 6n other words, to be an attempted crime the purpose of the offender must be thwarted b% a forei'n force or a'enc% which intervenes and compels him to stop prior to the moment when he has performed all of the acts which should produce the crime as a conse9uence, which acts it is his intention to perform. 6f he has performed all the acts which should result in the consummation of the crime and voluntaril% desists from proceedin' further, it cannot be an attempt. P ),%&nF"&%, +. P&o*%& (.227) Facts: A 'rocer% bo% was cau'ht tr%in' to abscond a bo- of Tide 3ltrabar laundr% soap from the $uper $ale Club. The 'uards apprehended him at the store par/in' lot while tr%in' to board a ta-i. ,e claimed the theft was merel% frustrated for he was not able to dispose of the 'oods. Held: The Revised Penal Code provisions on theft have not been desi'ned in such fashion as to accommodate the Adiao, )ino and <mpelis rulin's. A'ain, there is no lan'ua'e in Article 3= that e-pressl% or impliedl% allows that the 5free disposition of the items stolen7 is in an% wa% determinative of whether the crime of theft has been produced. Ae thus conclude that under the Re!ised Penal Code# there is no crime of frustrated theft. FRUSTRATED FELONY E%&3&nsD 1. The offender performs all the acts of e-ecutionF #. All the acts performed would produce the felon% as a conse9uenceF 3. (ut the felon% is not producedF >. (% reason of causes independent of the will of the perpetrator. 6n frustrated felon%, the offender must perform all the acts of e-ecution. Nothin' more is left to be done b% the offender, because he has performed the last act necessar% to produce the crime. FRUSTRATED FELONY )S. ATTEMPTED FELONY 1. 6n both, the offender has not accomplished his criminal purpose. #. Ahile in frustrated felon%, the offender has performed all the acts of e-ecution which would produce the felon% as a conse9uence, in attempted felon%, the offender merel% commences the commission of a felon% directl% b% overt acts and does not perform all the acts of e-ecution. ATTEMPTED OR FRUSTRATED IMPOSSIBLE CRIME The evil intent of the offender is not accomplished The evil intent of the offender is possible of accomplishment The evil intent of the offender cannot be accomplished The evil intent cannot be accomplished because of the intervention of certain cause or accident in which the offender had no part The evil intent of the offender cannot be accomplished because it is inherently impossible of accomplishment or because the means employed by the offender is inade*uate or ineffectual P&o*%& +. E#!5, (19.7) Facts: The victim of the crime was a child of 3 %ears and 11 months. There are doubts whether the accused succeeded in penetratin' the va'ina before bein' disturbed in the timel% intervention of the mother and sister. The ph%sician found a sli'ht inflammation of the e-terior parts of the or'an, indicatin' an effort had been made to enter the va'ina but it is doubtful whether the entr% had been effected. Held: Thou'h complete penetration is not necessar%, penetration of the labia is sufficient. ,owever, since there is no sufficient evidence of such penetration, the act is merel% frustrated. Dissent. 6t is consummated rape. P&o*%& +. O#!, (1992) Facts: The victim was a 1:?%ear old colle'e student. $he arrived at her boardin' house earl% mornin' comin' from a late?ni'ht part%. The accused suddenl% held her and po/ed a /nife to her nec/. The% entered a room and the victim was ordered to lie down. The accused made the victim hold his penis and insert it in her va'ina. (ecause of their position, the accused cannot full% penetrate her. 2nl% a small part of his penis inserted her va'ina. The victim was able to escape and report to the police what happened. The lower court convicted the accused of frustrated rape. Held: Perfect penetration is not essential for the consummation of rape. <ntr% of the labia or lips of / viv Pa'e 10 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 the female or'an without rupture of the h%men or laceration of the va'ina is sufficient to warrant conviction. Clearl%, in the crime of rape, from the moment the offender has carnal /nowled'e of his victim, he actuall% attains his purpose and, from that moment also all the essential elements of the offense have been accomplished. Nothin' more is left to be done b% the offender, because he has performed the last act necessar% to produce the crime. Thus, the felon% is consummated rape. Ta/in' into account the nature, elements and manner of e-ecution of the crime of rape and +urisprudence on the matter, it is hardl% conceivable how the frustrated sta'e in rape can ever be consummated. P&o*%& +. C,/,%%&#o (.22@) Facts. As <u'ene wal/ed b% the 'ate of the *ondra'on Compound, Armando Caballero suddenl% 'rabbed <u'ene towards the compound. <u'ene resisted. $pontaneousl%, ArmandoBs brothers Ricardo, *arciano, 8r., and Robito +oined Armando and assaulted <u'ene. Armando too/ the wooden pole supportin' the clothesline and hit <u'ene with it. <u'eneBs sister, *%rna, saw the Caballero brothers assaultin' <u'ene and shouted for help. Arnold saw the commotion and rushed to the scene to pacif% the prota'onists. ,owever, Ricardo accosted Arnold and stabbed the latter on the left side of his bod%. Corthwith, Robito, *arciano, 8r. and Armando 'an'ed up on Arnold. Two of them stabbed Arnold on his forearm. Arnold fled for his life and hid under the house of a nei'hbor. &eonilo, who li/ewise rushed to the scene was stabbed b% Robito. <u'ene and &eonilo eventuall% died from the stab wounds the% sustained. )r. Quisumbin', who attended to and operated on Arnold, testified that the stab wound sustained b% Arnold on the left side of his bod% was mortal and could have caused his death were it not for the timel% and effective medical intervention. Held: A crime is frustrated when the offender has performed all the acts of e-ecution which should result in the consummation of the crime. The offender has passed the sub+ective phase in the commission of the crime. $ub+ectivel%, the crime is complete. Nothin' interrupted the offender while passin' throu'h the sub+ective phase. ,e did all that is necessar% to consummate the crime. ,owever, the crime is not consummated b% reason of the intervention of causes independent of the will of the offender. 6n homicide cases, the offender is said to have performed all the acts of e-ecution if the wound inflicted on the victim is mortal and could cause the death of the victim barrin' medical intervention or attendance. CONSUMMATED FELONY R&<"!s!&sD 1. All the acts of e-ecution are present #. The result is achieved. <ver% crime has its own elements which must all be present to constitute a culpable violation of a precept of law. Ho9 o 4&!n& 9;&;&# ;& 8&%on> !s ,&3*&4' 8#"s#,&4 o# $ons"33,&4K 6! the nature of the offense e-. 6n arson, it is not necessar% that the propert% is totall% destro%ed b% fire. The crime of arson is therefore consummated even if onl% a portion of the wall or an% other part of the house is burned. 7! the elements constituting the felony e-. 6n theft, the mere removal of the personal propert% belon'in' to another with intent to 'ain is sufficient to consummate the offense. 6n estafa, the offended part% must actuall% be pre+udiced or dama'ed. (Adiao case vs. )omi'ue4 case" 8! the manner of committing the crime ,. formal crimes @ those which are consummated b% a sin'le act (e-. $lander, adulter%" There can be no ATT<*PT in a formal crime. /. crimes consummate by mere attempt (e-. Attempt to flee to an enem% countr%, treason" There is not ATT<*PT<) crime because the overt act in itself consummates the crime. c! felonies by omission There can be no attempted sta'e because the offender does not e-ecute acts. ,e omits to perform an act which the law re9uires him to do. 4. crimes committe by mere agreement ? The offer made b% one of the parties to the other constitutes attempted felon%, if the offer is re+ected. ? 6n view of this rule, it would seem that there is no frustrated briber% but in People v. )ie'o Quin, $C ruled that if the public officer returned the mone% 'iven b% the defendant, there is frustrated briber%. e! material crimes ? There are three sta'es of consummation. attempted, frustrated and consummated. US +. A4!,o (19(() Facts: Adiao is a customs inspector. ,e abstracted a leather belt from the lu''a'e of a 8apanese and secreted the belt under his des/ in the Customs ,ouse where it was found b% other customs emplo%ees. Adiao was convicted of frustrated theft. Held: $ince the defendant performed all the acts of e-ecution necessar% for the accomplishment of the felon%, he is 'uilt% of consummated crime of theft. The fact that he was under observation durin' the entire transaction and was unable to 'et the merchandise out of the Customs ,ouse is not decisiveF all the elements of the completed crime of theft are present. P&o*%& +. H&#n,n4&F (19.() Facts: The accused, a ;=?%ear?old man was convicted b% the trial court of frustrated rape for havin' intercourse with his 'randdau'hter who was at that time onl% : %ears of a'e. The lower court claimed that there can be no consummated rape without a complete penetration of the h%men. Held: Cindin' the h%men intact is not alwa%s proof that no rape has been committed. The law ma% now indeed be considered as settled that while the rupturin' of the h%men is not indispensable to a conviction, there must be proof of some de'ree of entrance of the male or'an within the labia of pudendum. 6n the present case, the ph%sician found the labia and the openin' of the va'ina inflamed to'ether with an abundance of semen. Child even testified that / viv Pa'e 1; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 defendant succeeded partial penetration. The accused is 'uilt% of consummated rape. D. CLASSIFICATION OF FELONIES A#. 9. 9rave felonies& less grave felonies an light felonies. I 1rave felonies are those to which the law attaches the capital punishment or penalties which in an% of their periods are afflictive, in accordance with Art. #! of this Code. &ess 'rave felonies are those which the law punishes with penalties which in their ma-imum period are correctional, in accordance with the above? mentioned Art. Art. : classifies felonies accordin' to their 'ravit%. a. 6RA)E FELONIES @ those in which the law attaches a capital punishment or afflictive penalt%. Capital punishment is death penalt% The afflictive penalties in accordance with Art. #! of this code are. reclusion perpetua reclusion temporal perpetual or temporar% absolute dis9ualification perpetual or temporar% special dis9ualification prision mayor b. LESS 6RA)E FELONIES @ those in which their ma-imum period are correctional Ahen the penalt% prescribed for the offense is composed of two or more distinct penalties, the hi'her or hi'hest of the penalties must be a correctional penalt%. The followin' are correctional penalties prision correccional arresto mayor suspension destierro c. LI6HT FELONIES @ those infractions of law in which the penalt% is arresto menor or a fine not e-ceedin' P#== or both. A felon% punishable b% a fine not e-ceedin' P#== and censure is a li'ht felon%, because public censure, li/e arresto menor, is a li'ht felon%. A#. 7. 0hen light felonies are punishable! I &i'ht felonies are punishable onl% when the% have been consummated, with the e-ception of those committed a'ainst person or propert%. &i'ht felonies are those infractions of law for the commission of which a penalt% of arresto menor or a fine not e-ceedin' #== pesos or bothF is provided. This should be seen in the li'ht of articles prescribin' penalties for crimes in their different sta'es of commission. This means that li'ht felonies which are onl% attempted or frustrated are not punishable b% law. ,owever, in the commission of crimes against persons and property, ever% sta'e of e-ecution is punishable but onl% the principals and accomplices are liable in li'ht felonies, the accessories are not. Rationale. &i'ht felonies produce such sli'ht or insi'nificant moral and material in+uries that public conscience is assua'ed b not providin' for penalt% for li'ht felonies which are not consummated and to mere accomplices. III. CRIMINAL LIABILITY A. HOW INCURRED A#. 1. Criminal liability! I Criminal liabilit% shall be incurred. 1. (% an% person committin' a felon% (delito" althou'h the wron'ful act done be different from that which he intended. #. (% an% person performin' an act which would be an offense a'ainst persons or propert%, were it not for the inherent impossibilit% of its accomplishment or an account of the emplo%ment of inade9uate or ineffectual means. This article has no reference to the manner criminal liabilit% is incurred. The manner incurrin' criminal liabilit% under the RPC is stated under Art. 3, that is, performin' or failin' to do an act, when either is punished b law, b% means of deceit or fault. Art. > merel% states that criminal liabilit% is incurred b% those mentioned b% the said article. 6! ,y any person committing a felony although the #rongful act one be ifferent from that #hich he intene REBUISITESD a. That an intentional felony has been committedF and b. That the wron' done to the a''rieved part% be the direct and natural and logical conse9uence of the felon%. An% person who creates in anotherBs mind an immediate sense of dan'er, which causes the latter to do somethin' resultin' in the latterBs in+uries, is liable for the resultin' in+uries. Aron' done must be the direct, natural and lo'ical conse9uence of the felon% committed. ? where it clearl% appears that the in+ur% would not have cased death, in the ordinar% course of events, but would have healed in so man% da%s and where it is shown be%ond all doubt that the death was due to the malicious or careless acts of the in+ured person or a third person, the accused is not liable for homicide. The offended part% is not obli'ed to submit to a sur'ical operation to relieve the accused from the natural and ordinar% results of his crime. The felon% committed must be the pro-imate cause of the resultin' in+ur%. The causes which ma% produce a result different from that which the offender intended are. / viv Pa'e 1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 a. ERROR IN PERSONAE ? mista/e in the identit% of the victimF in+urin' one person mista/en for another (this is a comple- crime under Art. >:" b. ABERRATIO ICTUS ? mista/e in the blow, that is, when the offender intendin' to do an in+ur% to one person actuall% inflicts it on anotherF and c. PRAETER INTENTIONEM @ the act e-ceeds the intent, that is, the in+urious result is 'reater than that intended. G RPC, Art. 13 +itigating circumstance @ 3" That the offender had no intention to commit so 'rave a wron' as that committed. 7! ,y any person performing an act #hich #oul be an offense against persons or property& #ere it not for the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment or an account of the employment of inae-uate or ineffectual means! B"!no +. An4#&s (.22() Facts: 1arcia, a 1rade > elementar% school pupil, and his pla%mate, Ailson Quinto, who was about 11 %rs old saw Andres and Pacheco who invited them to 'o fishin' inside a draina'e culvert. Ailson assented but 1arcia seein' that it was dar/ inside opted to remain seated in a 'rass% area about #meters from the entrance of the draina'e s%stem. Pacheco, Andres and Quinto, entered the draina'e s%stem which was covered b% concrete culvert about a meter hi'h and a meter wide, with water about a foot deep. After a while, respondent Pacheco, who was holdin' a fish, came out of the draina'e s%stem and left without sa%in' a word. Andres also came out, went bac/ inside, and emer'ed a'ain, this time, carr%in' Ailson who was alread% dead. Andres laid the bo%Ms lifeless bod% down in the 'rass% area. $hoc/ed at the sudden turn of events, 1arcia fled from the scene. Cor his part, Andres went to the house of petitioner *elba Quinto, AilsonMs mother, and informed her that her son had died. *elba Quinto rushed to the draina'e culvert while respondent Andres followed her. Held: The court ruled that respondents cannot be held criminall% nor civill% liable for the death of Ailson. 6n this case, the petitioner failed to adduce proof of an% ill?motive on the part of either respondent to /ill the deceased before or after the latter was invited to +oin them in fishin'. 6ndeed, the petitioner testified that respondent Andres used to 'o to their house and pla% with her son before the latterMs death. Ahen the petitionerMs son died inside the draina'e culvert, it was respondent Andres who brou'ht out the deceased. ,e then informed the petitioner of her sonMs death. <ven after informin' the petitioner of the death of her son, respondent Andres followed the petitioner on her wa% to the 'rass% area where the deceased was. P&o*%& +. ),%%&4o# (.22.) Facts: Ro'er was in his house wor/in' on a letterin' +ob inside his bedroom to'ether with his first cousin, <lsa and his friends# $implicio and Antonio. All of a sudden, Jalledor entered the room, uttered Ro'erMs nic/name (L8erL" and immediatel% attac/ed him with a /nife. Jalledor then stabbed <lsa on the chest and said, LA/o a/abales den, <lsa.L (6 had m% reven'e, <lsa". Thereafter, Jalledor fled, leavin' $implicio and Antonio unharmed. Ro'er and <lsa were immediatel% brou'ht to the hospital. 2n their wa% out, Antonio noticed a commotion and saw that Ricardo, a nei'hbor of the victim, who was li/ewise stabbed b% Jalledor was wounded. <lsa was declared dead on arrival. Ro'er on the other hand was treated for the !?centimeter wound sustained b% him on his ri'ht forearm. Jalledor invo/ed the defense of insanit%. Held: Jalledor failed to dischar'e the burden of overcomin' the presumption of sanit% at the time of the commission of the crime. 8ud'in' from his acts, Jalledor was clearl% aware and in control of what he was doin' as he in fact purposel% chose to stab onl% the two victims. Two other people were also inside the room, but Jalledor went for the victims. ,is obvious motive of reven'e a'ainst the victims was accentuated b% callin' out their names and utterin' the words, L6 had m% reven'eL after stabbin' them. Cinall%, his act of immediatel% fleein' from the scene after the incident indicates that he was aware of the wron' he has done and the conse9uence thereof. As consistentl% held b% this Court, LA man ma% act cra4% but it does not necessaril% and conclusivel% prove that he is le'all% so. Then, too, the medical findin's showin' that Jalledor was sufferin' from a mental disorder after the commission of the crime, has no bearin' on his liabilit%. Ahat is decisive is his mental condition at the time of the perpetration of the offense. Cailin' to dischar'e the burden of provin' that he was le'all% insane when he stabbed the victims, he should be held liable for his felonious acts. Intent R&$"o +. P&o*%& (.220) ,eld. 1eneral criminal intent is an element of all crimes but malice is properl% applied onl% to deliberate acts done on purpose and with desi'n. <vil intent must unite with an unlawful act for there to be a felon%. A deliberate and unlawful act 'ives rise to a presumption of malice b% intent. 2n the other hand, specific intent is a definite and actual purpose to accomplish some particular thin'. The 'eneral criminal intent is presumed from the criminal act and in the absence of an% 'eneral intent is relied upon as a defense, such absence must be proved b% the accused. 1enerall%, a specific intent is not presumed. 6ts e-istence, as a matter of fact, must be proved b% the $tate +ust as an% other essential element. This ma% be shown, however, b% the nature of the act, the circumstances under which it was committed, the means emplo%ed and the motive of the accused IMPOSSIBLE CRIMES REBUISITESD 1. T;, ;& ,$ *o#3&4 9o"%4 /& ,n o88&ns& ,-,!ns persons o# property! FELONIES A6AINST PERSONS ARED a. Parricide b. *urder c. ,omicide d. 6nfanticide e. Abortion f. )uel '. Ph%sical 6n+uries h. Rape FELONIES A6AINST PROPERTY ARED a. Robber% / viv Pa'e 1: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 b. (ri'anda'e c. Theft d. 3surpation e. Culpable 6nsolvenc% f. $windlin' and other deceits '. Chattel *ort'a'e h. Arson and other crimes involvin' destruction i. *alicious *ischief .. T;, ;& ,$ 9,s 4on& 9!; evil intent! The offender must have intent to do in+ur% to another. @. T;, !s ,$$o3*%!s;3&n !s inherently !3*oss!/%&' o# ;, ;& 3&,ns &3*%o>&4 !s &!;&# inae-uate o# ineffectual . 6n impossible crime, the act performed b% the offender cannot produce an offense a'ainst persons or propert% because. ,. the commission of the offense is inherently impossible of accomplishment ? The act intended b% the offender is b% its nature one of impossible accomplishment. ? There must either 1" &<1A& 6*P2$$6(6&6TK, or #" P,K$6CA& 6*P2$$6(6&6TK ? e-amples. 1" when one tries to /ill another b% puttin' in his substance which he believes to be arsenic when in fact it is common saltF #" when one tries to murder a corpse. b. the means employe is either inae-uate or ineffectual ? e-ample. when one tries to poison another but the 9uantit% of arsenic added in his substance was not sufficient to /ill a person ? but where the means emplo%ed is ade9uate and the result e-pected is not produced, it is not an impossible crime, but a frustrated felon%. 1. T;, ;& ,$ *o#3&4 s;o"%4 no $ons!"& , +!o%,!on o8 ,no;&# *#o+!s!on o8 ;& RPC ? e-ample. A pointed a 'un at ( to rob the latter of a watch but ( was not wearin' a watch. 6t is not an impossible crime because ABs pointin' his 'un at ( alread% constituted at least the crime of 'rave threats. 0hy is an impossible crime punishable: 6t is punishable in order to suppress criminal tendencies. 2b+ectivel%, the offender has not committed a felon%, but sub+ectivel%, he is a criminal. U#/,no +. IAC (1988) Facts: 3rbano went to his rice field and found his pala% flooded with water. 3rbano found out that it was 8avier who was responsible for the openin' of the irri'ation canal. ,e 'ot an'r% and tried to hac/ 8avier but the latter tried to parr% the attac/ and in the process, a two?inch incised wound was inflicted on the ri'ht palm of 8avierBs hand. The wound was treated and incapacitation was dia'nosed to be from ;?: da%s. ## da%s after, 8avier was rushed to the hospital in a ver% serious condition caused b% tetanus to-in. 8avier died the ne-t da%. 3rbano was convicted of homicide. Held: 3rbano is ac9uitted because the infection was distinct and forei'n to the crime. The pro-imate cause of 8avierBs death was due to his own ne'li'ence as he went bac/ to wor/ even if his wound had not %et healed properl%. The evidence on record also shows that the wound inflicted b% 3rbano did not e-hibit an% si'ns of bein' infected with tetanusF at most, it was onl% infected with a mild form of tetanus and not the severe form that /illed him. Ino4 +. CA (199.) Facts: 6ntod et al. went to Palan'pan'anBs house, all armed with firearms. The% went the bedroom and be'an firin' their weapons. ,owever, Palan'pan'an was in another cit% and her home was occupied b% her son?in?law and his famil%. No one was in the room when the accused fired their weapons. RTC convicted the accused of attempted murder. Held. The accused is 'uilt% of an impossible crime. The factual situation in the case presents a ph%sical impossibilit% which rendered the intended crime impossible of performance. B. CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTIN6 CRIMINAL LIABILITY IMPUTABILITY RESPONSIBILITY Qualit% b% which an act ma% be ascribed to a person as its author or owner. 2bli'ation of sufferin' the conse9uences of the crime. 6mplies that a deed ma% be imputed to a person. 6mplies that the person must ta/e the conse9uence of such deed. 1. 7USTIFYIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES L Those where the act of a person is said to be in accordance with law, so that such person is deemed not to have trans'ressed the law and is free from both criminal and civil liabilit%. L The law reco'ni4es the non?e-istence of a crime b% e-pressl% statin' in the openin' sentence of Art. 11 that the person therein mentioned 5)2 N2T 6NC3R CR6*6NA& &6A(6&6TK.7 A#. 11. 4ustifying circumstances. I The followin' do not incur an% criminal liabilit%. 1. An%one who acts in defense of his person or ri'hts, provided that the followin' circumstances concurF First. 3nlawful a''ression Second. Reasonable necessit% of the means emplo%ed to prevent or repel it. ,hird. &ac/ of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defendin' himself. #. An% one who acts in defense of the person or ri'hts of his spouse, ascendants, descendants, or le'itimate, natural or adopted brothers or sisters, or his relatives b% affinit% in the same de'rees and those consan'uinit% within the fourth civil de'ree, provided that the first and second re9uisites prescribed in the ne-t precedin' circumstance are present, and the further re9uisite, in case the revocation was 'iven b% the person attac/ed, that the one ma/in' defense had not part therein. / viv Pa'e #= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 3. An%one who acts in defense of the person or ri'hts of a stran'er, provided that the first and second re9uisites mentioned in the first circumstance of this Article are present and that the person defendin' be not induced b% reven'e, resentment, or other evil motive. >. An% person who, in order to avoid an evil or in+ur%, does not act which causes dama'e, provided that the followin' re9uisites are present. First. That the evil sou'ht t be avoided actuall% e-ists. Second. That the in+ur% feared be 'reater than that done to avoid itF ,hird. That there be no other practical and less harmful means of preventin' it. !. An% person who acts in fulfillment of a dut% or in the lawful e-ercise of a ri'ht or office. 0. An% person who acts in obedience to an order issued b% a superior for some lawful purpose.
R Article 11 reco'ni4es the acts of such persons as +ustified. $uch persons are not criminals, as there is no crime committed P,#. 1 M SELF=DEFENSE L $elf?defense includes not onl% the defense of the person or bod% of the one assaulted but also that of his ri'hts, that is, those ri'hts the en+o%ment of which is protected b% law. REBUISITESD a! "here must be unla#ful aggression R This is an indispensable re9uisite. R 6f there is no unlawful a''ression, there is nothin' to prevent or repel. R 3nlawful a''ression is e9uivalent to assault or at least threatened assault of an immediate and imminent /ind. R There must be an ACT3A& P,K$6CA& assault upon a person, or at least a T,R<AT to inflict real in+ur%. R Ahen there is no peril to oneBs life, limb or ri'ht, there is no unlawful a''ression. PERIL TO ONENS LIFE 1. ACTUAL @ that the dan'er must be present, that is, actuall% in e-istence. #. IMMINENT? that the dan'er is on the point of happenin'. 6t is not re9uired that the attac/ alread% be'ins, for it ma% be too late. R A slap on the face constitutes unlawful a''ression since the face represents a person and his di'nit%. $lappin' it is a serious personal attac/. R Retaliation is different from an act of self?defense. 6n #&,%!,!on, the a''ression that was be'un b% the in+ured part% alread% ceased to e-ist when the accused attac/ed him. 6n s&%8=4&8&ns&, the a''ression was still e-istin' when the a''ressor was in+ured or disabled b% the person ma/in' a defense. R 6n self?defense, the person must have no time nor occasion for deliberation and cool thin/in'. R The unlawful a''ression must come from the person who was attac/ed b% the accused. R There is no unlawful a''ression when there is a'reement to fi'ht because where the fi'ht has been a'reed upon, each of the prota'onists is at once assailant and assaulted. (ut when the a''ression is ahead of the stipulated time and place, it is unlawful. R The rule now is $TAN) 1R23N) A,<N 6N T,< R61,T. $o, where the accused is where he has the ri'ht to be, the law does not re9uire him to retreat when his assailant is rapidl% advancin' upon him with a deadl% weapon. R The belief of the person ma% be considered in determinin' the e-istence of unlawful a''ression. <-. 6f the a''ressor used a to% pistol but the accused believed it was a real 'un, he ma% claim self? defense. b! Reasonable necessity of the means employe to prevent or repel it R The second re9uisite presupposes the e-istence of unlawful a''ression. R The law protects not onl% the person who #&*&%s an a''ression (meanin' actual", but even the person who tries to *#&+&n an a''ression that is e-pected (meanin' imminent". R The reasonableness of the necessit% depends upon the circumstances particularl% the time and location where the a''ression too/ place. R The means emplo%ed b% the person ma/in' a defense must be rationall% necessar% to prevent or repel an unlawful a''ression. R The reasonableness of the means used will depend upon the NAT3R< and Q3A&6TK of the weapon used b% the a''ressor, his P,K$6CA& C2N)6T62N, $6S< and other circumstances, and those of the person defendin' himself, and also the place and occasion of the assault. GGG T,< C6R$T TA2 R<Q36$6T<$ AR< C2**2N T2 T,R<< O6N)$ 2C &<16T6*AT< )<C<N$<. 1" $<&C? )<C<N$<, #" )<C<N$< 2C A R<&AT6J< AN) 3" )<C<N$< 2C A $TRAN1<R. c! Lac% of sufficient provocation on the part of the person efening himself R The third re9uisite of self?defense is present. 1. Ahen no provocation at all was 'iven to the a''ressor b% the person defendin' himselfF or #. Ahen, even if a provocation was 'iver, it was not sufficientF or 3. Ahen, even if the provocation was sufficient, it was not 'iven b% the person defendin' himselfF or / viv Pa'e #1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 >. Ahen, even if a provocation was 'iven b% the person defendin' himself, it was not pro-imate and immediate to the act of a''ression. BATTERED WOMAN DEFENSE (RA 9.0.) P&o*%& +. 6&nos,' 119 SCRA (@7 (.221) Facts: (en was found dead in a rented apartment he shared with his pre'nant wife *arivic and their two children. *arivic admitted in court havin' /illed her husband. $he confessed hittin' (enBs nape with a metal pipe and of shootin' him at the bac/ of his head when the latter went to bed after attac/in' her. The trial court found *arivic 'uilt% of parricide. $he now invo/es, self defense andDor defense of her unborn child. 6n claimin' self defense, *arivic raised the theor% of the 5battered woman s%ndrome ((A$".7 Held: (attered woman has been defined as a woman Lwho is repeatedl% sub+ected to an% forceful ph%sical or ps%cholo'ical behavior b% a man in order to coerce her to do somethin' he wants her to do without concern for her ri'hts. (attered women include wives or women in an% form of intimate relationship with men. Curthermore, in order to be classified as a battered woman, the couple must 'o throu'h the batterin' c%cle at least twice. An% woman ma% find herself in an abusive relationship with a man once. 6f it occurs a second time, and she remains in the situation, she is defined as a battered woman.L 6n an% event, the e-istence of (A$ in a relationship does not in itself establish the le'al ri'ht of the woman to /ill her abusive partner. <vidence must still be considered in the conte-t of self?defense. Crucial to the (A$ defense is the state of mind of the battered woman at the time of the offense I she must have actuall% feared imminent harm from her batterer and honestl% believed in the need to /ill him in order to save her life. The one who resorts to self?defense must face a real threat on oneMs lifeF and the peril sou'ht to be avoided must be imminent and actual, not merel% ima'inar%. 3nlawful a''ression is the most essential element of self?defense. 6t presupposes actual, sudden and une-pected attac/ I or an imminent dan'er thereof I on the life or safet% of a person. 6n the present case, however, accordin' to the testimon% of *arivic herself, there was a sufficient time interval between the unlawful a''ression of (en and her fatal attac/ upon him. $he had alread% been able to withdraw from his violent behavior and escape to their childrenMs bedroom. )urin' that time, he apparentl% ceased his attac/ and went to bed. The realit% or even the imminence of the dan'er he posed had ended alto'ether. ,e was no lon'er in a position that presented an actual threat on her life or safet%. ,ad (en still been awaitin' *arivic when she came out of their childrenMs bedroom I and based on past violent incidents, there was a 'reat probabilit% that he would still have pursued her and inflicted 'raver harm I then, the imminence of the real threat upon her life would not have ceased %et. Ahere the brutali4ed person is alread% sufferin' from (A$, further evidence of actual ph%sical assault at the time of the /illin' is not re9uired. 6ncidents of domestic batter% usuall% have a predictable pattern. To re9uire the battered person to await an obvious, deadl% attac/ before she can defend her life Lwould amount to sentencin' her to Mmurder b% installment.ML $till, impendin' dan'er (based on the conduct of the victim in previous batterin' episodes" prior to the defendantMs use of deadl% force must be shown. Threatenin' behavior or communication can satisf% the re9uired imminence of dan'er. Considerin' such circumstances and the e-istence of (A$, self? defense ma% be appreciated. The Court reiterated the principle that a''ression, if not continuous, does not warrant self? defense. 6n the absence of such a''ression, there can be no self?defense I complete or incomplete I on the part of the victim. Thus, *arivicMs /illin' of (en was not completel% +ustified under the circumstances. The Court futher however held that the severe beatin's repeatedl% inflicted on *arivic constituted a form of cumulative provocation that bro/e down her ps%cholo'ical resistance and self?control. This Lps%cholo'ical paral%sisL she suffered diminished her will power, thereb% entitlin' her to the miti'atin' factor under para'raphs : and 1= of Article 13 of the RPC 6n addition, *arivic was also credited with the e-tenuatin' circumstance of havin' acted upon an impulse so powerful as to have naturall% produced passion and obfuscation. The acute batterin' she suffered that fatal ni'ht in the hands of her batterer?spouse, in spite of the fact that she was ei'ht months pre'nant with their child, overwhelmed her and put her in the aforesaid emotional and mental state, which overcame her reason and impelled her to vindicate her life and her unborn childMs. To%&4o +. P&o*%& (.221) Facts: Toledo saw his nephew, Ric/%, and the latterMs friends about ! m awa% from his house, havin' a drin/in' spree. ,e ordered them not to ma/e loud noises, and the% obli'ed. ,e then went to his house and went to sleep. After some time, Ric/% and his friends also went to sleep. The% had not laid down for lon' when he heard stones bein' hurled at the roof of the house. Ric/% saw Toledo stonin' their house and as/ed him wh% he was doin' the same. Toledo did not answer but met Ric/% at the doorstep of his house and without warnin' stabbed Ric/% on the abdomen with a bolo which resulted to his death. 6n the lower courts, Toledo defended himself b% alle'in' that his bolo accidental% hit the stomach of the victim and that he was able to prove all the essential elements of self defense. Held: The Court ruled that it is an aberration for Toledo to invo/e the two defenses at the same time because the said defenses are intrinsicall% antithetical. There is no such defense as accidental self?defense in the realm of criminal law. The court further ruled that Toledo was not +ustified in stabbin' Ric/%. There was no imminent threat in his life necessitatin' his assault. Records reveal that there is no unlawful a'ression, a condition sine 9ua non for the +ustif%in' circumstance of self defense, on the part of Ric/%. Ric/% arrived at ToledoBs house unarmed. Aith no weapon to attac/ Toledo or defend himself, no si'n of hostilit% ma% be deduced from him. P&o*%& +. En8&$,n,(.22.) Facts. Ahile Adelaida and her husband &eo were on their wa% home, the% were sideswiped b% a tric%cle driven b% appellant <rwin with <fren both surnamed <nfectana as passen'er. As a result, her husband fell in a crouchin' position. Ahen he was about to 'et up, <usebio also surnamed <nfectana came from behind to stab him. Then <rwin and <fren too/ turns in stabbin' &eo. ,e died as a result. 6n court, <usebio <nfectana admitted that he /illed &eo. ,e, however, alle'ed that he acted in self?defense / viv Pa'e ## #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Held: 6t is an established principle that once this +ustif%in' circumstance is raised, the burden of provin' the elements of the claim shifts to him who invo/es it. The elements of self?defense are. (1" that the victim has committed unlawful a''ression amountin' to actual or imminent threat to the life and limb of the person claimin' self?defenseF (#" that there be reasonable necessit% in the means emplo%ed to prevent or repel the unlawful a''ressionF and (3" that there be lac/ of sufficient provocation on the part of the person claimin' self?defense or, at least, that an% provocation e-ecuted b% the person claimin' self?defense be not the pro-imate and immediate cause of the victimMs a''ression. The condition of unlawful a''ression is a sine 9ua nonF otherwise stated, there can be no self? defense, complete or incomplete, unless the victim has committed unlawful a''ression a'ainst the person defendin' himself. 1iven the fact that the relationship between the parties had been marred b% ill will and animosities, and pursuant to the rule on the burden of evidence imposed b% law on the part% invo/in' self?defense, the admission of <usebio that he /illed &eo made it incumbent upon appellant to convincin'l% prove that there was unlawful a''ression on the part of the victim which necessitated the use of deadl% force b% <usebio. 3nfortunatel%, <usebio miserabl% failed to prove the e-istence of unlawful a''ression on the part of the victim. <usebio is 'uilt% of murder. C,no +. P&o*%& (.22@) Facts: Conrado and his deceased brother were rivals in the Rush 6) Photo business and had booths alon' the sidewal/ of Ri4al Avenue, $ta. Cru4, *anila. Condrado borrowed the permit of the deceased and had it photocopied without the latterBs permission. The deceased confonted Conrado and tried to stab him with a fan /nife. The latter loc/ed himself in the dar/ room of his booth to protect himself but was followed b% the deceased and the% ended up attac/in' each other. )urin' the scuffle, the scissors which 2rlando was able to 'rab fell from his hands. ,e then 'rabbed the /nife of the deceased who in turn pic/ed the scissors. The% a'ain attac/ed each other which resulted to the death of the other. Held: ConradoBs act of /illiln' his brother was attended b% a +ustif%in' circumstance of self?defense. 6t was the deceased who purposel% sou'ht and initiall% attac/ed 2rlando with a /nife. The act of a person armed with a bladed weapon pursuin' another constitutes unlawful a'ression because it si'nifies the pursuers intent to commit an assault with his weapon. There was also lac/ of sufficient provocation on the part of Condrado. ,is act of photocop%in' the permit of his brother without the latters permission can hardl% be conidered as provocation to merit so deadl% an assault with a bladed weapon. B,%"n"&$o +. CA (.22@) Facts: Amelia was coddlin' her %oun'est child in front of her house when she saw accused Re%naldo, his father 8uanito, brothers Ricardo and Ramon, all surnamed (alunueco, and one Clores chasin' her brother?in?law $ervando. Aith the ! individuals in hot pursuit, $ervando scampered into the safet% of AmeliaMs house. *eanwhile, $enando, who was then coo/in' supper, went out of the house unaware of the commotion 'oin' on outside. 3pon seein' $enando, Re%naldo turned his attention on him and 'ave chase. $enando instinctivel% fled towards the fields but he was met b% Armando who hit him with a stone, causin' $enando to feel di44%. Re%naldo, Ricardo, and Armando cornered their 9uarr% near a canal and 'an'ed up on him. Armando placed a can on top of $enandoMs head and Ricardo repeatedl% struc/ $enando with an a- on the head, shoulder, and hand. At one point, Ricardo lost his hold on the a-, but somebod% tossed him a bolo and then he continued hac/in' the victim who fell on his /nees. To shield him from further violence, Amelia put her arms around her husband but it was not enou'h to detract Ricardo from his murderous fren4%. Amelia was also hit on the le'. The RTC and CA convicted Ricardo of ,omicide. ,e now imputes errors to the CA in not ta/in' into consideration the fact that if indeed he participated, he had acted in defense of his relatives. Held: 2f the three (3" re9uisites of defense of relatives, unlawful a''ression is a condition sine 9ua non, for without it an% defense is not possible or +ustified. 6n order to consider that an unlawful a''ression was actuall% committed, it is necessar% that an attac/ or material a''ression, an offensive act positivel% determinin' the intent of the a''ressor to cause an in+ur% shall have been madeF a mere threatenin' or intimidatin' attitude is not sufficient to +ustif% the commission of an act which is punishable per se, and allow a claim of e-emption from liabilit% on the 'round that it was committed in self?defense or defense of a relative. 6n the case at bar, petitioner Ricardo utterl% failed to adduce sufficient proof of the e-istence of a positivel% stron' act of real a''ression on the part of the deceased $enando.. 6t was he and his /in who had inititated the unlawful a'ression and not $enando. Curther, the natural impulse of an% person who has /illed someone in defense of his person or relative is to brin' himself to the authorities and tr% to dispel an% suspicion of 'uilt that the authorities mi'ht have a'ainst him. Ricardo failed to do the same. Aith the e-ception of his self?servin' alle'ations, there is nothin' on record that would +ustif% his /illin' of $enando. P&o*%& +. D!J,n (.22.) Facts $ilvestre and ,ilario were at a store to bu% some ci'arettes when the% saw the 'roup of )i+an, Pa'linawan and &i4ardo, passin' b% the store. Pa'linawan suddenl% confronted ,ilario for purportedl% 'ivin' him a Lbad stare.L $ilvestre apolo'i4ed and e-plained that it was the natural wa% ,ilario 'a4ed at people. )i+an, Pa'linawan and &i4ardo then left the place while $ilvestre and ,ilario proceeded home. Ahile $ilvestre and ,ilario were wal/in', the 3 accused, 'an'ed up on, and too/ turns in stabbin', ,ilario. At that point, ,ilario, who was wal/in' sli'htl% ahead of $ilvestre, cried out and told the latter to flee. $ilvestre ran awa% until he was able to clin' to a passin' passen'er +eepne%. ,ilario was found to have sustained several stab wounds, punctured and incised wounds, and abrasion in various parts of the bod% which caused his death. Appealin' his conviction in court, )i+an invo/ed the +ustif%in' circumstance of 5defense of a stran'er.7 Held: 6n order to successfull% put up this defense an accused must show the e-istence of unlawful a''ression on the part of the victim. The unlawful a''ression must be a continuin' circumstance or must have been e-istin' at the time the defense is made. 2nce unlawful a''ression is found to have ceased, the one ma/in' the defense of a stran'er would li/ewise cease to have an% +ustification for /illin', or even +ust woundin', the former a''ressor. Crom the defense / viv Pa'e #3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 account, it would appear that ,ilario was alread% disarmed and the unlawful a''ression b% ,ilario (if indeed he was the a''ressor" to have b% then been abated, when )i+an still delivered the fatal thrusts on the victim. The number of wounds sustained b% the victim would itself li/ewise ne'ate )i+anBs claim of defense of a stran'er. The autops% conducted on the corpse would show that the deceased sustained 1> in+uries consistin' of : stab wounds, 3 punctured wounds, an incised wound and an abrasion. Certainl%, the nature and number of wounds inflicted b% an accused on the victim should be si'nificant indicia in determinin' the plausibilit% of the defense plea. M,#Fon!, +. P&o*%& (.220) Held. As the Court previousl% held, mortall% woundin' an assailant with a pen/nife is not a reasonabl% necessar% means to repel fist blows. P,#. . M DEFENSE OF RELATI)ES RELATI)ES THAT CAN BE DEFENDED 1. $pouse #. Ascendants 3. )escendants >. &e'itimate, natural or adopted brothers and sisters, or relatives b% affinit% in the same de'rees. !. Relatives b% consan'uinit% within the fourth civil de'ree. R Relatives b% affinit%, because of marria'e, are parents? in?law, son or dau'hter?in?law, and brothers or sisters? in?law. R )eath of the spouse terminates the relationship b% affinit%F unless the marria'e has resulted in issue who is still livin', in which case the relationship of affinit% continues. R Consan'uinit% refers to blood relatives. (rothers and sisters are within the second civil de'reeF uncle and niece or aunt and nephew are within the third civil de'reeF and first cousins are within the fourth civil de'ree. REBUISITES OF DEFENSE OF RELATI)ESD 6! 3nla#ful aggression - R 3nlawful a''ression ma% not e-ist as a matter of fact, it can be made to depend upon the honest belief of the one ma/in' a defense. <-. The sons of A honestl% believed that their father was the victim of an unlawful a''ression when in fact it was their father who attac/ed (. 6f the% /illed ( under such circumstance, the% are +ustified. 7! Reasonable necessity of the means employe to prevent or repel it. R The 'au'e of reasonable necessit% of the means emplo%ed to repel the a''ression as a'ainst oneBs self or in defense of a relative is to be found in the situation as 6T APP<AR$ T2 T,< P<R$2N R<P<&&6N1 T,< A11R<$$62N (the defender". 8! *n case the provocation #as given by the person attac%e& the one ma%ing a efense ha no part therein. R There is still le'itimate defense of relative even if the relative bein' defended has 'iven provocation, provided that the one defendin' such relative has no part in the provocation. R Reason for the rule. Althou'h the provocation pre+udices the person who 'ave it, its effects do not reach the defender who too/ no part therein, because the latter was prompted b% some noble or 'enerous sentiment in protectin' and savin' a relative. P,#. @ M DEFENSE OF STRAN6ER R<Q36$6T<$. 1. 3nlawful a''ressionF #. Reasonable necessit% of the means emplo%ed to prevent or repel itF 3. The person defendin' be not induced b% reven'e, resentment or other evil motive. 0ho are eeme strangers: An% person not included in the enumeration of relatives mentioned in para'raph # of this article, is considered stran'er for the purpose of para'raph 3. BASISD Ahat one ma% do in his defense, another ma% do for him. The ordinar% man would not stand idl% b% and see his companion /illed without attemptin' to save his life. P&o*%& +. N,#+,&F (198@) Facts: Narvae4 was ta/in' his rest inside his house when he heard that the wall of his house was bein' chiseled. ,e saw that Cleischer and Rubia, to'ether with their laborers, were fencin' the land of the father of the deceased Cleischer. 6f the fencin' would 'o on, Narvae4 would be prevented from 'ettin' into his house and the bode'a of his ricemill so he as/ed the 'roup to stop but the% refused. The accused 'ot mad so he 'ot his shot'un and shot Cleischer. Rubia ran towards the +eep and /nowin' there is a 'un on the +eep, the accused fired at Rubia as well. Narvae4 claimed he acted in defense of his person and ri'hts. Held: The court too/ into consideration the fact that the # deceased were accompanied with three laborers and that the were usin' tools which could be lethal weapons such as nail and hammer, bolo, etc. and that the +eep the deceased used contained a 'un leanin' near the steerin' wheel. There was a''ression on the part of the victims not on the person of the accused but on his propert% ri'hts when Cleischer an'ril% ordered the continuance of the fencin'. The third element of self?defense is also present because there was no sufficient provocation on the part of Narvae4 since he was sleepin' when the deceased where fencin'. ,owever, the second element was lac/in'. $hootin' the victims from the window of his house is disproportionate to the ph%sical a''ression b% the victims. Thus, there is incomplete self?defense and the accused is entitled to a penalt% lower b% one or two de'rees. Dissent. )efense of propert% is not of such importance as the ri'ht to life and defense of propert% can onl% be invo/ed when it is coupled with some form of attac/ on the person of one entrusted with said propert%. 6n this case before us, there is no evidence that an attac/ was attempted. The utterance, 5no, 'addemit, proceed, 'o ahead7 is not unlawful a''ression / viv Pa'e #> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 which entitles him neither to a plea of self?defense nor to a miti'atin' circumstance of incomplete self?defense. P&o*%& +. Bo;o%s=C,/,%%&#o (1971) Facts: (oholst (wife" and Caballero (husband" are married to each other. (ut since their marria'e was an unhapp% one, the% separated. 2ne evenin', the wife went carolin' with her friends and she was seen b% her husband standin' in a corner of the %ard of (arabad. $he accused her of prostitutin' and threatened to /ill her as he held her b% the hair, slapped her face until her nose bled. ,e, then, cho/ed her and at the same time continuousl% sa%in' that he will /ill her. The wife then pulled out the /nife of her husband tuc/ed inside the belt line and stabbed him. Ahen she was released, she ran home. The wife is claimin' self?defense. Held: The wife who bein' stran'led and cho/ed b% a furious a''ressor had no other recourse but to 'et hold of an% weapon within her reach to save herself. The claim that it was not proper for the wife to be standin' in the middle of the ni'ht outside a %ard 'ivin' the impression that she is prostitutin' herself, is not sufficient provocation. All that the accused did was to provo/e an ima'inar% commission of a wron' in the mind of her husband which is not a sufficient provocation under the law of self?defense. P&o*%& +. A%$on-, (1917) Facts: The deceased (arion was the ban/er in the 'ame of blac/ +ac/. Raposo pla%ed the 'ame while the accused posted himself behind the (arion actin' as a spotter of the cards of the latter and communicatin' it to his partner Raposo. Ahen (arion learned about what Raposo and Alcon'a, an e-chan'e of words ensued. 2ne mornin', when Alcon'a was in the 'uardhouse, (arion arrived and swun' his pingahan but the former the accused was able to avoid the blow. 6n a crawlin' position, Alcon'a avoided the followin' blows and was able to draw his revolver and shoot (arion. ,e was able to crawl out of the 'uardhouse and a hand?to?hand fi'ht ensued. ,avin' sustained several wounds, (arion ran awa% but was followed b% the accused and another fi'ht too/ place. Alcon'a then slashed (arionBs head with a bolo which caused the latterBs death. The accused pleaded self?defense. Held: An accused was no lon'er actin' in self? defense when he pursued and /illed a fleein' adversar%, thou'h ori'inall% the unlawful a''ressor, there bein' no more a''ression to defend a'ainst, the same havin' ceased from the moment the deceased too/ to his heels. P&o*%& +. S"3!$,4 (19@.) Facts: $umicad was haulin' lo's when Cubol suddenl% struc/ him with his fist. $umicad tried to escape but Cubol continued to stri/e him with his fists. $umicad receded until he found himself cornered b% a pile of lo's which prevented him from further retreat. As Cubol advanced towards him, $umicad drew out his bolo and struc/ him. Cubol tried to wrest the bolo from $umicad and to prevent this, the latter struc/ him a'ain twice which bro/e his CubolBs cranium resultin' to his death. Held: As a 'eneral rule, a man is not +ustified in /illin' an assailant who is not armed with an% dan'erous weapon. This rule applies onl% when the contendin' parties are in the open and the person assaulted can escape. ,owever, where one has no means of escapin', the one who is assaulted can use a weapon in an% wa% reasonabl% necessar% to his protection a'ainst the a''ressor. The deceased here is a bull of /nown violent character and althou'h unarmed, he attempted to ta/e from the accused a bolo which is the onl% means of defense possessed b% the latter. 6t would have been an act of suicide on the part of the accused to allow the bolo to pass into the hands of his anta'onist. P&o*%& +. L",-"& (19@() Facts: The deceased tried to rape the accused while her husband was awa%. The deceased threatened the accused with a /nife to compel her to have se- with him. As the deceased was preparin' to lie down with her, he placed the /nife on the floor and so the accused too/ advanta'e of the situation b% 'ettin' the /nife and stabbin' the deceased with it. Held: An attempt to rape is a sufficient a''ression for a le'itimate claim of self?defense. Ae have the ri'ht to ,2N2R. AomanBs honor is a ri'ht as precious as her ver% e-istence because chastit% once defiled cannot be restored. P&o*%& +. D&%, C#"F (19@() Facts: Accused was found 'uilt% of homicide for stabbin' and /illin' Rivera. Prosecution claimed that )ela Cru4 and Rivera had a relationship and that the accused was madl% in love with the deceased and was e-tremel% +ealous of another woman with whom Rivera also had a relationship. )ela Cru4 claimed, on the other hand, that on her wa% home one evenin', Rivera followed her, embraced and /issed her and touched her private parts. $he didnBt /now that it was Rivera and that she was unable to resist the stren'th of Rivera so she 'ot a /nife from her poc/et and stabbed him in defense of her honor. Held: $he is +ustified in usin' the poc/et/nife in repellin' what she believed to be an attac/ upon her honor. 6t was a dar/ ni'ht and she could not have identified Rivera. There bein' no other means of self? defense. P&o*%& +. 7",#!-"& (1910) Facts: Amado (deceased" has been courtin' the accused Avelina in vain. 2n the da% of the crime, Avelina and Amado were in Church. Amado sat beside Avelina and placed his hand on her thi'h. Thereafter, Avelina too/ out her /nife and stabbed Amado in the nec/, causin' the death of Amado. Held: Althou'h the defense of oneBs honor e-empts one from criminal liabilit%, it must be proved that there is actual dan'er of bein' raped. 6n this case, 1" the church was well?lit, #" there were several people in the church, includin' the father of the accused and other town officials. 6n li'ht of these circumstances, accused could not have possibl% been raped. The means emplo%ed in defense of her honor was evidentl% e-cessive. US +. B"3,-%,n- (1929) Facts: (uman'lan' was missin' >= bundles of pala%. &ater, accompanied b% his co?defendants, he awaited the culprit and cau'ht Ribis so the% confronted him assaulted him with stic/s and other cuttin' and stabbin' weapons. As a result, Ribis died. )efendants declared that durin' the fi'ht the% onl% beat the deceased with stic/s and Ribis unsheathed his bolo. (uman'lan' et al were convicted of homicide. Held: The bolo of the deceased was sheathed when the bod% was discovered. There was no unlawful a''ression on the part of Ribis. Thus, there can be no claim of self?defense. / viv Pa'e #! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Separate 'pinion: A man who ambushed one he suspects to be a thief can claim defense of propert%. Not onl% was there unlawful a''ression a'ainst (uman'la', there was also a wron'ful invasion of his habitat and attempt to commit a felon% a'ainst his propert%. Aith the imminence of dan'er to his life, he reali4ed that he had to as/ assistance from his friends, considerin' RibisB criminal record, character and unusual stren'th. P,#. 1 M A)OIDANCE OF A 6REATER E)IL An% person who, in order to avoid an evil or in+ur%, does an act which causes dama'e to another. DAMA6E TO ANOTHER @ the term covers in+ur% to persons and dama'e to propert%. REBUISITESD 1. "hat the evil sought to be avoie actually existsI ? The evil must actuall% e-ist and not merel% e-pected or anticipated or ma% happen in the future. 7! "hat the in(ury feare be greater than that one to avoi it. Note. The instinct of self?preservation will alwa%s ma/e one feel that his own safet% is of 'reater importance than that of another. ? The 'reater evil should not be brou'ht about b% the ne'li'ence or imprudence of the actor. ? The evil which brou'ht about the 'reater evil must not result from a violation of law b% the actor. 8! "hat there be no other practical an less harmful means of preventing it! 9eneral rule. No liabilit% in +ustif%in' circumstances because there is no crime. Exception. There is C6J6& &6A(6&6TK under this para'raph. 6t is borne b% the persons benefited b% the act. The% shall be liable in proportion to the benefit which the% ma% have been received. P&o*%& +. R!$o;oso (1971) Facts: The land Ricohermoso cultivated belon'ed to 1eminiano. Ahen the latter went to the house of the former, as if b% prearran'ement, Ricohermoso unsheathed his bolo and approached 1eminiano from the left while $evero (RicoBs father?in? law" 'ot an a-e and approached from the ri'ht. Rico stabbed 1eminiano first and while in a helpless position, the latter was hac/ed on the bac/ b% $evero. At that same place and time while the /illin' of 1eminiano was ta/in' place, 8uan (son of $evero" suddenl% embraced *arianito (son of 1eminiano", who had a 'un slun' on his shoulder, from behind. The% 'rappled and rolled downhill towards the camote patch. *arianito passed out and when he re'ained consciousness, his rifle was 'one. ,e wal/ed uphill and saw his father. 1eminiano died later. 8uan invo/ed the +ustif%in' circumstance of 'reater necessit% in e-plainin' his act of preventin' *arianito from shootin' Rico and $evero. Held: The act of 8uan was desi'ned to insure the /illin' of 1eminiano without an% ris/ to his assailants. 8uan was not avoidin' an% evil but his malicious intention was to forestall an% interference in the felonious assault. ,e acted in conspirac% with Rico and $evero. T> +. P&o*%& (.221) Facts. T%Ms mother Chua &ao $o 3n was confined at the *anila )octorsM ,ospital from 2ctober 1::= until 8une 1::#. (ein' the patientMs dau'hter, T% si'ned the LAc/nowled'ment of Responsibilit% for Pa%mentL in the Contract of Admission. T%Ms sister, 8ud% Chua, was also confined at the same hospital. The total hospital bills of the two patients amounted to P1,=;!,!:#.:!. T% e-ecuted a promissor% note wherein she assumed pa%ment of the obli'ation in installments. To assure pa%ment of the obli'ation, she drew ; postdated chec/s a'ainst *etroban/ pa%able to the hospital which were all dishonored b% the drawee ban/ and returned unpaid to the hospital due to insufficienc% of funds. Cor her defense, T% claimed that she issued the chec/s because of 5an uncontrollable fear of a 'reater in+ur%7 $he averred that she was forced to issue the chec/s to obtain release for her mother who was bein' inhumanel% and harshl% treated b% the hospital. $he alle'ed that her mother has comtemplated suicide if she would not be dischar'ed from the hospital. T% was found 'uilt% b% the lower courts of ; counts of violation of (P##. Held:The court sustained the findin's of the lower courts. The evil sou'ht to be avoided is merel% e-pected or anticipated. 6f the evil sou'ht to be avoided is merel% e-pected or anticipated or ma% happen in the future, the defense of an uncontrollable fear of a 'reater in+ur%7 is not applicable. T% could have ta/en advanta'e of an available option to avoid committin' a crime. (% her own admission, she had the choice to 'ive +ewelr% or other forms of securit% instead of postdated chec/s to secure her obli'ation. *oreover, for the defense of state of necessit% to be availin', the 'reater in+ur% feared should not have been brou'ht about b% the ne'li'ence or imprudence, more so, the willful inaction of the actor. 6n this case, the issuance of the bounced chec/s was brou'ht about b% T%Ms own failure to pa% her motherMs hospital bills. P,#. ( M FULFILLMENT OF A DUTY OR LAWFUL EGERCISE OF RI6HT OR OFFICE. REBUISITESD 1. "hat the accuse acte in the performance of a uty or in the la#ful exercise of a right or office $rt! ;7<! Civil Coe. The owner or lawful possessor of a thin' has the ri'ht to e-clude an% person from the en+o%ment and disposal thereof. Cor this purpose, he ma% use such force as ma% be reasonabl% necessar% to repel or prevent an actual or threatened unlawful ph%sical invasion or usurpation of his propert%. (doctrine of self?help" 6f in protectin' his possession of the propert% he in+ured (not seriousl%" the one tr%in' to 'et it from him, he is +ustified. The actual invasion of propert% ma% consist of a mere disturbance of possession or of a real dispossession. / viv Pa'e #0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 7! "hat the in(ury cause or the offense committe be the necessary conse-uence of the ue performance of uty or the la#ful exercise of such right or office! $hootin' an offender who refused to surrender is +ustified but shootin' a thief who refused to be arrested is not +ustified. P&o*%& +. D&%!3, (19..) Facts: Napilon escaped from the +ail where he was servin' sentence. $ome da%s afterwards the policeman, )elima, who was loo/in' for him found him in the house of Ale'ria, armed with a pointed piece of bamboo in the shape of a lance. )elima demanded the surrender of the weapon but Napilon refused. )elima fired his revolver to impose his authorit% but the bullet did not hit him. The criminal ran awa% and )elima went after him and fired a'ain his revolver this time hittin' and /illin' him. Held: The /illin' was done in the performance of a dut%. The deceased was under the obli'ation to surrender and had no ri'ht, after evadin' service of his sentence, to commit assault and disobedience with a weapon in his hand, which compelled the policeman to resort to such e-treme means, which, althou'h it proved to be fatal, was +ustified b% the circumstance. P&o*%& +. O,n!s (191@) Althou'h an officer in ma/in' a lawful arrest is +ustified in usin' such force as is reasonabl% necessar% to secure and detain the offender, overcome his resistance, prevent his escape, recapture him if he escapes, and protect himself from bodil% harm, %et he is never +ustified in usin' unnecessar% force or in treatin' him with wanton violence or in resortin' to dan'erous means when the arrest could be effected otherwise. Po3o> +. P&o*%& (.221) Fats: Police ser'eant Pomo%, went near the door of the +ail where (alboa was detained for robber% and directed the latter to come out, purportedl% for tactical interro'ation at the investi'ation room. At that time, petitioner had a 'un, a .>! caliber pistol, tuc/ed in a holster which was han'in' b% the side of his belt. The 'un was full% embedded in its holster, with onl% the handle of the 'un protrudin' from the holster. (alboa tried to remove Pomo%Bs 'un and the two 'rappled for possession of the 'un. Thereafter, # 'unshots were heard. Ahen the source of the shots was verified, petitioner was seen still holdin' a .>! caliber pistol, facin' (alboa, who was l%in' in a pool of blood. Pomo% invo/ed the defense of accident for his defense. Held: Pomo% is ac9uitted. At the time of the incident, petitioner was a member I specificall%, one of the investi'ators I of the Philippine National Police (PNP" stationed at the 6loilo Provincial *obile Corce Compan%. Thus, it was in the lawful performance of his duties as investi'atin' officer that, under the instructions of his superior, he fetched the victim from the latterMs cell for a routine interro'ation. The participation of petitioner, if an%, in the victimMs death was limited onl% to acts committed in the course of the lawful performance of his duties as an enforcer of the law. The removal of the 'un from its holster, the release of the safet% loc/, and the firin' of the two successive shots I all of which led to the death of the victim I were sufficientl% demonstrated to have been conse9uences of circumstances be%ond the control of petitioner. At the ver% least, these factual circumstances create serious doubt on the Pomo%Bs culpabilit%. P&o*%& +. U%&* (.222) Accused?appellant and the other police officers involved ori'inall% set out to perform a le'al dut%. to render police assistance, and restore peace and order at *undo' $ubdivision where the victim was then runnin' amuc/. There were two (#" sta'es of the incident at *undo' $ubdivision. )urin' the first sta'e, the victim threatened the safet% of the police officers b% menacin'l% advancin' towards them, notwithstandin' accused?appellantMs previous warnin' shot and verbal admonition to the victim to la% down his weapon or he would be shot. As a police officer, it is to be e-pected that accused?appellant would stand his 'round. 3p to that point, his decision to respond with a barra'e of 'unfire to halt the victimMs further advance was +ustified under the circumstances. After all, a police officer is not re9uired to afford the victim the opportunit% to fi'ht bac/. Neither is he e-pected @ when hard pressed and in the heat of such an encounter at close 9uarters @ to pause for a lon' moment and reflect cooll% at his peril, or to wait after each blow to determine the effects thereof. ,owever, he cannot be e-onerated from overdoin' his dut% durin' the second sta'e of the incident I when he fatall% shot the victim in the head, even after the latter slumped to the 'round due to multiple 'unshot wounds sustained while char'in' at the police officers. $ound discretion and restraint dictated that accused?appellant, a veteran policeman, should have ceased firin' at the victim the moment he saw the latter fall to the 'round. The victim at that point no lon'er posed a threat and was alread% incapable of mountin' an a''ression a'ainst the police officers. $hootin' him in the head was obviousl% unnecessar%. The law does not clothe police officers with authorit% to arbitraril% +ud'e the necessit% to /ill? it must be stressed that their +ud'ment and discretion as police officers in the performance of their duties must be e-cercised neither capriciousl% nor oppressivel%, but within reasonable limits. M,3,-"n +. P&o*%& (.227) Facts: A policeman in pursuit of a snatcher accidentall% shot one of the b%standers who was actuall% helpin' him chase the robber. Held: To be sure, acts in the fulfillment of a dut%, without more, do not completel% +ustif% the petitionerBs firin' the fatal 'unshot at the victim. True, petitioner, as one of the policemen respondin' to a reported robber% then in pro'ress, was performin' his dut% as a police officer as well as when he was tr%in' to effect the arrest of the suspected robber and in the process, fatall% shoot said suspect, albeit the wron' man. ,owever, in the absence of the e9uall% necessar% +ustif%in' circumstance that the in+ur% or offense committed be the necessar% conse9uence of the due performance of such dut%, there can onl% be incomplete +ustification, a privile'ed miti'atin' circumstance under Articles 13 and 0: of the Revised Penal Code. There can be no 9uibblin' that there was no rational necessit% for the /illin' of Contreras. Petitioner could have first fired a warnin' shot before pullin' the tri''er a'ainst Contreras who was one of the residents chasin' the suspected robber. / viv Pa'e #; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 P,#. 0 M OBEDIENCE TO AN ORDER ISSUED FOR SOME LAWFUL PURPOSE REBUISITESD 1. ,hat an order has been issued by a superior. #. ,hat such order must be for some lawful purpose. 3. ,hat the means used by the subordinate to carry out said order is lawful. Ahen the order is not for a lawful purpose, the subordinate who obe%ed it is criminall% liable. The subordinate is not liable for carr%in' out an ille'al order of his superior, if he is not aware of the ille'alit% of the order and he is not ne'li'ent. P&o*%& +. B&#on!%%, (19(() Facts: (or+al was the elected ma%or of &a Pa4, Abra at the outbrea/ of war and continued to serve as *a%or durin' 8apanese occupation. (eronilla was appointed later as *ilitar% *a%or. &ater, while the operations for the liberation of Abra was in pro'ress, (eronilla, pursuant to his instructions, placed (or+al in his custod% and as/ed the residents to file char'es of espiona'e, aidin' the enem%, and abuse of authorit% a'ainst him. After trial, (or+alBs e-ecution too/ place. &ater, (eronilla, to'ether with a priest, e-ecutioner, 'raver di''er, etc. were indicted for murder. The prosecution claimed that Col. Jol/mann transmitted a radio'ram messa'e statin' that the +ur% s%stem or'ani4ed b% the municipalit% is ille'al and cannot order e-ecution of (or+al. Held: There is no proof that (eronilla was able to receive the radio'ram messa'e. The records are ample to sustain the claim of the accused that the arrest, prosecution and trial were done pursuant to e-press orders of the 1! th 6nfantr% ,Q. Ahere the accused acted upon orders of superior officers that the, as militar% subordinates, could not 9uestion, and obe%ed in 'ood faith, without bein' aware of their ille'alit%, without an% fault or ne'li'ence on their part, the act is not accompanied b% criminal intent. A crime is not committed if the mind of the person performin' the ac be innocent. T,/"&n, +. S,n4!-,n/,>,n (1997) Facts: Pres. *arcos instructed Tabuena over the phone to pa% directl% to the 2ffice of the President in cash what *6AA owes the Phil. National Construction Corporation (PNCC" which later was reiterated in writin'. The *arcosB memo indicated the amount of P!!m for partial pa%ment of the obli'ation to PNCC as mentioned in 2n'pinBs memo. 6n obedience to *arcosB instruction, the accused withdrew the amount b% means of 3 separate issuances of mana'erBs chec/ and encashment in 3 separate dates as well. The mone% withdrawn were placed in peerless bo-es and duffle ba's and delivered to the private secretar% of *arcos also in 3 separate da%s. Accordin' to the accused, the disbursement was not in the normal procedure since it is paid in cold case, there were no vouchers supportin' it and no receipt from PNCC. Tabuena and Peralta were convicted b% the $andi'anba%an of malversation as defined in Art. #1;, RPC for misappropriatin' funds of *anila 6nternational Airport Authorit% (*6AA" worth P!!*. Held: The accused are ac9uitted. The accused is entitled to the +ustif%in' circumstance of obedience to an order issued b% a superior for some lawful purpose. $andi'anba%an claimed that *arcosB memo was unlawful because it orders disbursement of P!!* when the 2n'pin memo reveals that the liabilit% is onl% 3>.!*. 1rantin' this to be true, it will not affect TabuenaBs 'ood faith as to ma/e him criminall% liable. Thus, even if the order is ille'al if it is patentl% le'al and subordinate is not aware of its ille'alit%, the subordinate is not liable, for then there would onl% be a mista/e of fact committed in 'ood faith. .. EGEMPTIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES <-emptin' circumstances (non?imputabilit%" are those 'rounds for e-emption from punishment because there is wantin' in the a'ent of the crime an% of the condition which ma/e the act voluntar% or ne'li'ent. The e-emption from punishment is based on the C2*P&<T< A($<NC< of intelli'ence, freedom of action, or intent, or on the absence of ne'li'ence on the part of the accused. A#. 1.. Circumstances which exempt from criminal liability. I the followin' are e-empt from criminal liabilit%. 1. An imbecile or an insane person, unless the latter has acted durin' a lucid interval. Ahen the imbecile or an insane person has committed an act which the law defines as a felon% (delito", the court shall order his confinement in one of the hospitals or as%lums established for persons thus afflicted, which he shall not be permitted to leave without first obtainin' the permission of the same court. #. A person under nine %ears of a'e. 3. A person over nine %ears of a'e and under fifteen, unless he has acted with discernment, in which case, such minor shall be proceeded a'ainst in accordance with the provisions of Art. = of this Code. Ahen such minor is ad+ud'ed to be criminall% irresponsible, the court, in conformabl% with the provisions of this and the precedin' para'raph, shall commit him to the care and custod% of his famil% who shall be char'ed with his surveillance and education otherwise, he shall be committed to the care of some institution or person mentioned in said Art. =. >. An% person who, while performin' a lawful act with due care, causes an in+ur% b% mere accident without fault or intention of causin' it. !. An% person who act under the compulsion of irresistible force. 0. An% person who acts under the impulse of an uncontrollable fear of an e9ual or 'reater in+ur%. ;. An% person who fails to perform an act re9uired b% law, when prevented b% some lawful insuperable cause. L 2ne who acts b% virtue of an% of the e-emptin' circumstances commits a crime, althou'h b% the complete absence of an% of the conditions which constitute free will or voluntariness of the act, no criminal liabilit% arise. / viv Pa'e # #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 P,#. 1 M AN IMBECILE OR INSANE PERSON' UNLESS THE LATTER HAS ACTED DURIN6 A LUCID INTER)AL IMBECILE ? one who, while advanced in a'e, has a mental development comparable to that of children between # and ; %ears of a'e. @ one who is deprived completel% of reason or discernment and freedom of the will at the time of committin' the crime. exempt in all cases from criminal liabilit% INSANE ? there is a complete deprivation of intelli'ence in committin' the act but capable of havin' lucid intervals. )urin' a lucid interval, the insane acts with intelli'ence and thus, not e-empt from criminal liabilit%. PROCEDURE WHEN AN IMBECILE OR INSANE COMMITTED A FELONY ? The court shall order his confinement in one of the hospitals or as%lums established for persons afflicted, which he shall not be permitted to leave without first obtainin' the permission of the court. The court must obtain the opinion of the )irector of ,ealth before permittin' his release. R Ahen the person is sane at the time of the commission of the crime but he becomes insane at the time of the trial, he is liable criminall%. The trial, however, shall be suspended until mental capacit% of the accused be restored to afford him a fair trial. R <vidence of insanit% must refer to the time precedin' the act under prosecution or to the ver% moment of its e-ecution. 6f the evidence points to insanit% subse9uent to the commission of the crime, the accused cannot be ac9uitted. R Ceeblemindedness is not imbecilit% because a feeble? minded person can distin'uish ri'ht from wron'. R Cases covered under this article. a. )ementia praeco- b. Oleptomania @ if found b% a competent ps%chiatrist as irresistible c. <pileps% d. $omnambulism @ sleep?wal/in' e. *ali'nant malaria @ which affects the nervous s%stem In R& MNN,-;&n (181@) 6"!4&%!n&s A man who shot someone claimed insanit%. Held: <ver% man is presumed to be sane. 6t must be clearl% proved that at the time of committin' the act, A was under a defect of reason that he did not /now the nature of act or if he did /now what he was doin', he did not /now he was wron'. The 9uestion to be as/ed is whether the accused at the time of doing the act &new the differences between right and wrong. The emphasis is on reason or co'nition. P&o*%& +. T"/o-o$, (1998) Facts: 8ac9ueline, to'ether with her sisters, lived with their father after their mother died. 2ne ni'ht, she was roused b% her father who as/ed her to scratch his bac/ but later she was forced to have intercourse with him. ,er sister 8in/% also e-perienced the same with his father # %ears after. Ahen their 'randmother found out about the incident, the% filed char'es a'ainst the accused. The accused claim that he cannot remember an%thin' because he often drin/s li9uor at home. Held: The law presumes ever% man to be sane. The accused failed to overthrow the presumption of sanit%. Cailure to remember is in itself no proof of the mental condition of the accused when the crime was performed. ,is charade of amnesia is a desperate 'ambit for e-culpation. P&o*%& +. M,4,#,n- (.222) Facts: Cernando and his wife 9uarreled. 6n the heat of the fi'ht, the accused stabbed his wife causin' her death. The accused declared that he had no recollection of the stabbin' incident. Curther, he alle'es that he did not /now where he was that da%. Court ordered the accusedBs confinement in a mental institution where it was found that he was inflicted with schi4ophrenia. ,e was submitted to treatment for # %ears, after which, he faced the char'es a'ainst him. Held: The accused failed to prove that he was completel% deprived of intelli'ence in committin' the act. ,e did not show an% si'ns of insanit% prior to and immediatel% after the act. ,e was onl% dia'nosed of schi4ophrenia months after the incident. Also, schi4os have lucid intervals. P&o*%& +. Bono,n (19@7) A person sufferin' from dementia praeco- pleaded insanit% as a defense for committin' murder. 6n dementia praeco-, the crime is usuall% preceded b% much complainin' and plannin'. in these people, homicide attac/s are common because of delusions that the% are bein' interfered with se-uall% or that their propert% is bein' ta/en. )urin' period of e-citement, such person has no control whatever of his acts. An irresistible homicide impulse was considered embraced in the terms of 5insanit%7.
P&o*%& +. T,n&o (19@@) Facts: A fiesta was bein' celebrated in the barrio and visitors were bein' entertained at the house of Taneo and his wife. That afternoon, Taneo went to sleep and while sleepin', he suddenl% 'ot up, left the room with a bolo in his hand. ,e wounded his wife who was pre'nant at that time in the abdomen when she tried to stop him. ,e attac/ed two of his visitors and his father, after which, he wounded himself. ! da%s later, his wife died because of the wound. ,e was char'ed of parricide. Held: The accused acted while in a dream and his acts, with which he is char'ed, were not voluntar% in the sense of entailin' criminal liabilit%. P&o*%& +. Fo#3!-on&s (19(2) Held: 2ne da%, the accused stabbed his wife from the bac/ who was sittin' at the top of the stairs in their house. Accused admitted the /illin' and that he was +ealous and had suspicions that his wife and his brother were havin' a relationship. Counsel for accused interposed the defense of insanit% statin' that in prison, the accused behaved li/e an insane person, would 'o star/ na/ed in the presence of his inmates, remain indifferent to his surroundin's and san' chorus with inmates or b% himself. / viv Pa'e #: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Held. At most, the accused is found to be feeble?minded but this does not e-empt him from liabilit% but ma% serve as a miti'atin' circumstance. The accused admitted to his motive for the /illin' which is +ealous% so he must /now what he was doin' at that time. ,is actions immediatel% after he struc/ his wife and his behavior in prison ma% onl% be due to remorse at havin' /illed his wife or his feeblemindedness. P&o*%& +. M,4,#,n- (.222) Facts: Cernando and his wife 9uarreled. 6n the heat of the fi'ht, the accused stabbed his wife causin' her death. The accused declared that he had no recollection of the stabbin' incident. Curther, he alle'es that he did not /now where he was that da%. Court ordered the accusedBs confinement in a mental institution where it was found that he was inflicted with schi4ophrenia. ,e was submitted to treatment for # %ears, after which, he faced the char'es a'ainst him. Held: The accused failed to prove that he was completel% deprived of intelli'ence in committin' the act. ,e did not show an% si'ns of insanit% prior to and immediatel% after the act. ,e was onl% dia'nosed of schi4ophrenia months after the incident. Also, schi4os have lucid intervals. P&o*%& +. ),%%&4o# (s"*#,) Facts: Ro'er was in his house wor/in' on a letterin' +ob inside his bedroom to'ether with his first cousin, <lsa and his friends# $implicio and Antonio. All of a sudden, Jalledor entered the roomF uttered Ro'erMs nic/name (L8erL" and immediatel% attac/ed him with a /nife. Jalledor then stabbed <lsa on the chest and said, LA/o a/abales den, <lsa.L (6 had m% reven'e, <lsa". Thereafter, Jalledor fled, leavin' $implicio and Antonio unharmed. Ro'er and <lsa were immediatel% brou'ht to the hospital. 2n their wa% out, Antonio noticed a commotion and saw that Ricardo, a nei'hbor of the victim, who was li/ewise stabbed b% Jalledor was wounded. <lsa was declared dead on arrival. Ro'er on the other hand was treated for the !?centimeter wound sustained b% him on his ri'ht forearm. Jalledor invo/ed the defense of insanit%. Held: Jalledor failed to dischar'e the burden of overcomin' the presumption of sanit% at the time of the commission of the crime. 8ud'in' from his acts, Jalledor was clearl% aware and in control of what he was doin' as he in fact purposel% chose to stab onl% the two victims. Two other people were also inside the room, but Jalledor went for the victims. ,is obvious motive of reven'e a'ainst the victims was accentuated b% callin' out their names and utterin' the words, L6 had m% reven'eL after stabbin' them. Cinall%, his act of immediatel% fleein' from the scene after the incident indicates that he was aware of the wron' he has done and the conse9uence thereof. As consistentl% held b% this Court, LA man ma% act cra4% but it does not necessaril% and conclusivel% prove that he is le'all% so. Then, too, the medical findin's showin' that Jalledor was sufferin' from a mental disorder after the commission of the crime, has no bearin' on his liabilit%. Ahat is decisive is his mental condition at the time of the perpetration of the offense. Cailin' to dischar'e the burden of provin' that he was le'all% insane when he stabbed the victims, he should be held liable for his felonious acts. P,#. .. M A PERSON UNDER NINE YEARS OF A6E R C6CT<<N K<AR$ 2R &<$$ @ presumed to be incapable of committin' a crime, and this presumption is an absolute one which cannot be overcome b% an% evidence. (R.A. N2. :33>" R $enilit%, althou'h said to be the second childhood, is onl% miti'atin'. 1 PERIODS OF THE LIFE OF A HUMAN BEIN6 a. 1! %ears and below @ /01 'F /2S'3),1 4RR1SP'5S42434,6 b. between 1! and 1 %ears ? /01 'F C'5D4,4'5/3 R1SP'5S42434,6 c. 1 or over to ;= %ears ? /01 'F F)33 R1SP'5S42434,6 d. over ;= %ears of a'e @ /01 'F +4,40/,1D R1SP'5S42434,6. P,#. @. M A PERSON O)ER 9 YEARS OF A6E AND UNDER 1( UNLESS HE HAS ACTED WITH DISCERNMENT' IN WHICH CASE' SUCH MINOR SHALL BE PROCEEDED A6AINST IN COORDANCE WITH THE PRO)ISIONS OF ARTICLE 82 OF THIS CODE. L A minor over 1! and under 1 %ears of a'e must have acted without discernment to be e-empted from criminal liabilit%. DISCERNMENT @ means the mental capacit% of a minor between 1! and 1 %ears of a'e to full% appreciate the conse9uences of his lawful act. DISCERNMENT INTENT *oral si'nificance that a person ascribes to the said act )esired act of the person R )iscernment ma% be shown b% 1" the manner the crime was committed or #" the conduct of the offender after its commission. P&o*%& +. Do<"&n, (19@9) A 13?%ear old student stabs the school bull%, and is convicted for havin' shown discernment throu'h his responsible demeanor and school performance. )o9uenaBs discernment is 'leaned from his academic records, leadership 9ualities and demeanor while testif%in' in court. The discernment that constitutes an e-ception to the e-emption from criminal liabilit% of a minor under fifteen %ears of a'e but over nine, is his mental capacit% to understand the difference between ri'ht and wron', and such capacit% ma% be /nown b% ta/in' into consideration all the facts and circumstances afforded b% the records in each case, the ver% appearance, the ver% attitude of said minor not onl% before and durin' the commission of the act but also after and even durin' trial. 7os& +. P&o*%& (.22() Facts: 8ose, 13 %rs old was in a car with his cousin Sarra'a, when the latter in9uired from the poseur bu%er $P21 1uevarra if he could afford to bu% shabu. 1uevarra replied in the affirmative afterwhich Sarra'a called the petitioner to brin' out and hand over the shabu wrapped in plastic and white soft paper. 8ose handed over the plastic containin' the shabu to Sarra'a / viv Pa'e 3= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 who handed the same to 1uevarra. The trial court rendered +ud'ment convictin' both 8ose and Sarra'a. Held: 8ose is ac9uitted. The prosecution failed to prove be%ond reasonable doubt that he acted with discernment relative to the sale of shabu. Aside from brin'in' out and handin' over the plastic ba' to Sarra'a, 8ose merel% sat in the car and had no other participation in the transaction between his cousin and the poseur bu%er. There is no evidence that 8ose /new what was inside the plastic and soft white paper before and at the time he handed the same to Sarra'a. L%,+& +. P&o*%& (.220) Facts. A 1# %ear old honor student was char'ed with rapin' his seven %ear old nei'hbor. Ahen cau'ht, the accused ran awa% and hid for a few da%s at his 'randparentBs house. ,e claimed that he acted without discernment. Held. Article 1#, para'raph 3 of the Revised Penal Code provides that a person over nine %ears of a'e and under fifteen is e-empt from criminal liabilit%, unless he acted with discernment. The basic reason behind the e-emptin' circumstance is complete absence of intelli'ence, freedom of action of the offender which is an essential element of a felon% either b% dolus or b% culpa. 6ntelli'ence is the power necessar% to determine the moralit% of human acts to distin'uish a licit from an illicit act. 2n the other hand, discernment is the mental capacit% to understand the difference between ri'ht and wron'. The prosecution is burdened to prove that the accused acted with discernment b% evidence of ph%sical appearance, attitude or deportment not onl% before and durin' the commission of the act, but also after and durin' the trial. The surroundin' circumstances must demonstrate that the minor /new what he was doin' and that it was wron'. $uch circumstance includes the 'ruesome nature of the crime and the minorBs cunnin' and shrewdness. 6n the present case, the petitioner, with methodical fashion, dra''ed the resistin' victim behind the pile of hollow bloc/s near the vacant house to insure that passersb% would not be able to discover his dastardl% acts. Ahen he was discovered b% Teofisto (ucud who shouted at him, the petitioner hastil% fled from the scene to escape arrest. 3pon the proddin' of his father and her mother, he hid in his 'randmotherBs house to avoid bein' arrested b% policemen and remained thereat until baran'a% tanods arrived and too/ him into custod%. A#. 82. Suspension of sentence of minor delin*uents. I Ahenever a minor of either se-, under si-teen %ears of a'e at the date of the commission of a 'rave or less 'rave felon%, is accused thereof, the court, after hearin' the evidence in the proper proceedin's, instead of pronouncin' +ud'ment of conviction, shall suspend all further proceedin's and shall commit such minor to the custod% or care of a public or private, benevolent or charitable institution, established under the law of the care, correction or education of orphaned, homeless, defective, and delin9uent children, or to the custod% or care of an% other responsible person in an% other place sub+ect to visitation and supervision b% the )irector of Public Aelfare or an% of his a'ents or representatives, if there be an%, or otherwise b% the superintendent of public schools or his representatives, sub+ect to such conditions as are prescribed herein below until such minor shall have reached his ma+orit% a'e or for such less period as the court ma% deem proper. The court, in committin' said minor as provided above, shall ta/e into consideration the reli'ion of such minor, his parents or ne-t of /in, in order to avoid his commitment to an% private institution not under the control and supervision of the reli'ious sect or denomination to which the% belon'. The )irector of Public Aelfare or his dul% authori4ed representatives or a'ents, the superintendent of public schools or his representatives, or the person to whose custod% or care the minor has been committed, shall submit to the court ever% four months and as often as re9uired in special cases, a written report on the 'ood or bad conduct of said minor and the moral and intellectual pro'ress made b% him. The suspension of the proceedin's a'ainst a minor ma% be e-tended or shortened b% the court on the recommendation of the )irector of Public Aelfare or his authori4ed representative or a'ents, or the superintendent of public schools or his representatives, accordin' as to whether the conduct of such minor has been 'ood or not and whether he has complied with the conditions imposed upon him, or not. The provisions of the first para'raph of this article shall not, however, be affected b% those contained herein. 6f the minor has been committed to the custod% or care of an% of the institutions mentioned in the first para'raph of this article, with the approval of the )irector of Public Aelfare and sub+ect to such conditions as this official in accordance with law ma% deem proper to impose, such minor ma% be allowed to sta% elsewhere under the care of a responsible person. 6f the minor has behaved properl% and has complied with the conditions imposed upon him durin' his confinement, in accordance with the provisions of this article, he shall be returned to the court in order that the same ma% order his final release. 6n case the minor fails to behave properl% or to compl% with the re'ulations of the institution to which he has been committed or with the conditions imposed upon him when he was committed to the care of a responsible person, or in case he should be found incorri'ible or his continued sta% in such institution should be inadvisable, he shall be returned to the court in order that the same ma% render the +ud'ment correspondin' to the crime committed b% him. The e-penses for the maintenance of a minor delin9uent confined in the institution to which he has been committed, shall be borne totall% or partiall% b% his parents or relatives or those persons liable to support him, if the% are able to do so, in the discretion of the courtF Provided, That in case his parents or relatives or those persons liable to support him have not been ordered to pa% said e-penses or are found indi'ent and cannot pa% said e-penses, the municipalit% in which the offense was committed shall pa% one?third of said e-pensesF the province to which the municipalit% belon's shall pa% one?thirdF and the remainin' one?third shall be borne b% the National 1overnment. Provided, however, That whenever the $ecretar% of Cinance certifies that a municipalit% is not able to pa% its share in the e-penses above mentioned, such share which is not paid b% said municipalit% shall be borne b% the National 1overnment. Chartered cities shall pa% two?thirds of said e-pensesF and in case a chartered cit% cannot pa% said e-penses, the internal revenue allotments which ma% be due to said cit% shall be withheld and applied in settlement of said indebtedness in accordance with section five hundred and ei'ht%?ei'ht of the Administrative Code. / viv Pa'e 31 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 R Ahen the minor is ad+ud'ed criminall% irresponsible @ dut% of court is to commit him to custod% of his famil% or some institution. R The alle'ation of 5with intent to /ill7 in the information is sufficient alle'ation of discernment. PD 02@ THE CHILD AND YOUTH WELFARE CODE A#!$%& 189. 5outhful 'ffener Define. ? A %outhful offender is one who is over nine %ears but under twent%?one %ears of a'e at the time of the commission of the offense. A child nine %ears of a'e or under at the time of the offense shall be e-empt from criminal liabilit% and shall be committed to the care of his or her father or mother, or nearest relative or famil% friend in the discretion of the court and sub+ect to its supervision. The same shall be done for a child over nine %ears and under fifteen %ears of a'e at the time of the commission of the offense, unless he acted with discernment, in which case he shall be proceeded a'ainst in accordance with Article 1:#. The provisions of Article = of the Revised Penal Code shall be deemed modified b% the provisions of this Chapter. A#!$%& 192. Physical an )ental Examination! ? 6t shall be the dut% of the law?enforcement a'enc% concerned to ta/e the %outhful offender, immediatel% after his apprehension, to the proper medical or health officer for a thorou'h ph%sical and mental e-amination. Ahenever treatment for an% ph%sical or mental defect is indicated, steps shall be immediatel% underta/en to provide the same. The e-amination and treatment papers shall form part of the record of the case of the %outhful offender. A#!$%& 191. Care of 5outhful 'ffener +el for Examination or "rial! ? A %outhful offender held for ph%sical and mental e-amination or trial or pendin' appeal, if unable to furnish bail, shall from the time of his arrest be committed to the care of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare or the local rehabilitation center or a detention home in the province or cit% which shall be responsible for his appearance in court whenever re9uired. Provided, That in the absence of an% such center or a'enc% within a reasonable distance from the venue of the trial, the provincial, cit% and municipal +ail shall provide 9uarters for %outhful offenders separate from other detainees. The court ma%, in its discretion, upon recommendation of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare or other a'enc% or a'encies authori4ed b% the Court, release a %outhful offender on reco'ni4ance, to the custod% of his parents or other suitable person who shall be responsible for his appearance whenever re9uired. A#!$%& 19.. Suspension of Sentence an Commitment of 5outhful 'ffener! ? 6f after hearin' the evidence in the proper proceedin's, the court should find that the %outhful offender has committed the acts char'ed a'ainst him the court shall determine the imposable penalt%, includin' an% civil liabilit% char'eable a'ainst him. ,owever, instead of pronouncin' +ud'ment of conviction, the court shall suspend all further proceedin's and shall commit such minor to the custod% or care of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare, or to an% trainin' institution operated b% the 'overnment, or dul% licensed a'encies or an% other responsible person, until he shall have reached twent%?one %ears of a'e or, for a shorter period as the court ma% deem proper, after considerin' the reports and recommendations of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare or the a'enc% or responsible individual under whose care he has been committed. The %outhful offender shall be sub+ect to visitation and supervision b% a representative of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare or an% dul% licensed a'enc% or such other officer as the Court ma% desi'nate sub+ect to such conditions as it ma% prescribe. A#!$%& 19@. $ppeal! ? The %outhful offender whose sentence is suspended can appeal from the order of the court in the same manner as appeals in criminal cases. A#!$%& 191. Care an )aintenance of 5outhful 'ffener. ? The e-penses for the care and maintenance of the %outhful offender whose sentence has been suspended shall be borne b% his parents or those persons liable to support him. Provided, That in case his parents or those persons liable to support him can not pa% all or part of said e-penses, the municipalit% in which the offense was committed shall pa% one?third of said e-penses or part thereofF the province to which the municipalit% belon's shall pa% one?thirdF and the remainin' one?third shall be borne b% the National 1overnment. Chartered cities shall pa% two?thirds of said e-pensesF and in case a chartered cit% cannot pa% said e-penses, part of the internal revenue allotments applicable to the unpaid portion shall be withheld and applied to the settlement of said indebtedness. All cit% and provincial 'overnments must e-ert efforts for the immediate establishment of local detention homes for %outhful offenders. A#!$%& 19(. Report on Conuct of Chil! ? The )epartment of $ocial Aelfare or its representative or dul% licensed a'enc% or individual under whose care the %outhful offender has been committed shall submit to the court ever% four months or oftener as ma% be re9uired in special cases, a written report on the conduct of said %outhful offender as well as the intellectual, ph%sical, moral, social and emotional pro'ress made b% him. A#!$%& 190. Dismissal of the Case! ? 6f it is shown to the satisfaction of the court that the %outhful offender whose sentence has been suspended, has behaved properl% and has shown his capabilit% to be a useful member of the communit%, even before reachin' the a'e of ma+orit%, upon recommendation of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare, it shall dismiss the case and order his final dischar'e. A#!$%& 197. Return of the 5outh 'ffener to Court! ? Ahenever the %outhful offender has been found incorri'ible or has wilfull% failed to compl% with the conditions of his rehabilitation pro'rams, or should his continued sta% in the trainin' institution be inadvisable, he shall be returned to the committin' court for the pronouncement of +ud'ment. Ahen the %outhful offender has reached the a'e of twent%?one while in commitment, the court shall determine whether to dismiss the case in accordance with the ne-t precedin' article or to pronounce the +ud'ment of conviction. 6n an% case covered b% this article, the %outhful offender shall be credited in the service of his sentence with the full time spent in actual commitment and detention effected under the provisions of this Chapter. A#!$%& 198. Effect of Release of Chil ,ase on 9oo Conuct! ? The final release of a child pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter shall not obliterate his civil liabilit% for dama'es. $uch release shall be without pre+udice to the ri'ht for a writ of e-ecution for the recover% of civil dama'es. A#!$%& 199. Living =uarters for 5outhful 'ffeners Sentence! ? Ahen a +ud'ment of conviction is pronounced in accordance with the provisions of Article 1:;, and at the time of said pronouncement the %outhful offender / viv Pa'e 3# #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 is still under twent%?one, he shall be committed to the proper penal institution to serve the remainin' period of his sentence. Provided, That penal institutions shall provide %outhful offenders with separate 9uarters and, as far as practicable, 'roup them accordin' to appropriate a'e levels or other criteria as will insure their speed% rehabilitation. Provided, further, That the (ureau of Prisons shall maintain a'ricultural and forestr% camps where %outhful offenders ma% serve their sentence in lieu of confinement in re'ular penitentiaries. A#!$%& .22. Recors of Proceeings! ? Ahere a %outhful offender has been char'ed before an% cit% or provincial fiscal or before an% municipal +ud'e and the char'es have been ordered dropped, all the records of the case shall be destro%ed immediatel% thereafter. Ahere a %outhful offender has been char'ed and the court ac9uits him, or dismisses the case or commits him to an institution and subse9uentl% releases him pursuant to this Chapter, all the records of his case shall be destro%ed immediatel% after such ac9uittal, dismissal or release, unless civil liabilit% has also been imposed in the criminal action, in which case such records shall be destro%ed after satisfaction of such civil liabilit%. The %outhful offender concerned shall not be held under an% provision of law, to be 'uilt% of per+ur% or of concealment or misrepresentation b% reason of his failure to ac/nowled'e the case or recite an% fact related thereto in response to an% in9uir% made of him for an% purpose. LRecordsL within the meanin' of this article shall include those which ma% be in the files of the National (ureau of 6nvesti'ation and with an% police department, or an% other 'overnment a'enc% which ma% have been involved in the case. A#!$%& .21. Civil Liability of 5outhful 'ffeners! ? The civil liabilit% for acts committed b% a %outhful offender shall devolve upon the offenderMs father and, in case of his death or incapacit%, upon the mother, or in case of her death or incapacit%, upon the 'uardian. Civil liabilit% ma% also be voluntaril% assumed b% a relative or famil% friend of the %outhful offender. A#!$%& .2.. Rehabilitation Centers! ? The )epartment of $ocial Aelfare shall establish re'ional rehabilitation centers for %outhful offenders. The local 'overnment and other non?'overnmental entities shall collaborate and contribute their support for the establishment and maintenance of these facilities. A#!$%& .2@. Detention +omes! ? The )epartment of &ocal 1overnment and Communit% )evelopment shall establish detention homes in cities and provinces distinct and separate from +ails pendin' the disposition of cases of +uvenile offenders. A#!$%& .21. Liability of Parents or 9uarian or $ny Person in the Commission of Delin-uent $cts by "heir Chilren or 0ars! ? A person whether the parent or 'uardian of the child or not, who /nowin'l% or wilfull%, 1. Aids, causes, abets or connives with the commission b% a child of a delin9uenc%, or #. )oes an% act producin', promotin', or contributin' to a childMs bein' or becomin' a +uvenile delin9uent, shall be punished b% a fine not e-ceedin' five hundred pesos or to imprisonment for a period not e-ceedin' two %ears, or both such fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court. EN BANC [A.M. No. 02-1-19-SC. February 28, 2002.] RE: PROPOSED R!E ON COMM"#MEN# OF C$"!DREN R E S O L U T I O N Acting on the letter of the Chairman of the Committee on Revision of the Rules of Court submitting for this Court's consideration and aroval the !roosed Rule on Commitment Of Children" the Court Resolved to A!!RO#E the same$ The Rule shall ta%e effect on Aril &'" ())( follo*ing its ublication in a ne*saer of general circulation not later than +arch &'" ())($ ,ebruar- (." ())($ RULE ON CO++IT+ENT O, C/IL0REN SEC#"ON 1. Ob%e&'()e. 1 The ob2ective of this Rule is to ensure that ever- effort is e3erted to romote the child's *elfare and enhance his oortunities for a useful and ha- life$ To*ard this end" this Rule see%s to rotect the child from all forms of neglect" abuse" cruelt-" e3loitation and other conditions re2udicial to his develoment $ SEC#"ON 2. "*'er+re'a'(o*. 1 The best interests of the child shall be the aramount consideration in all actions concerning him" *hether underta%en b- ublic or rivate social *elfare institutions" courts of la*" administrative authorities and legislative bodies consistent *ith the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child$ SEC#"ON ,. De-(*('(o* o- #er./. 1 4a5 6Child6 is a erson belo* eighteen -ears of age$ 4b5 60eartment6 refers to the 0eartment of Social 7elfare and 0eveloment$ 4c5 60eendent child6 is one *ho is *ithout a arent" guardian or custodian" or one *hose arents" guardian or other custodian for good cause desires to be relieved of his care and custod-" and is deendent uon the ublic for suort$ 4d5 6Abandoned child6 is one *ho has no roer arental care or guardianshi" or *hose arents or guardian has deserted him for a eriod of at least si3 485 continuous months$ 4e5 6Neglected child6 is one *hose basic needs have been deliberatel- unattended to or inade9uatel- attended to" h-sicall- or emotionall-" b- his arents or guardian$ 4f5 6!h-sical neglect6 occurs *hen the child is malnourished" ill: clad and *ithout roer shelter$ 4g5 6Emotional neglect6 occurs *hen a child is raed" seduced" maltreated" e3loited" over*or%ed or made to *or% under conditions not conducive to good health; made to beg in the streets or ublic laces" or *hen laced in moral danger" or e3osed to drugs" alcohol" gambling" rostitution and other vices$ 4h5 60isabled child6 includes mentall- retarded" h-sicall- handicaed" emotionall- disturbed and mentall- ill children" children *ith cerebral als- and those *ith similar afflictions$ 4i5 6+entall- retarded child6 is one *ho is 4&5 sociall- incometent" that is" sociall- inade9uate" occuationall- incometent and unable to manage his o*n affairs; 4(5 mentall- subnormal; 4<5 intellectuall- retarded from birth or earl- age; 4=5 retarded at maturit-; 4'5 mentall- deficient as a result of constitutional origin through heredit- or diseases or 485 essentiall- incurable$ 425 6!h-sicall- handicaed child6 is one *ho is criled" deaf: mute" blind" or other*ise suffers from a defect *hich restricts his means of action or communication *ith others$ 4%5 6Emotionall- disturbed child6 is one *ho" although not afflicted *ith insanit- or mental defect" is unable to maintain normal social relations *ith others and the communit- in general due to emotional roblems or comle3es" 4l5 6+entall- ill child6 is one *ith an- behavioral disorder" *hether functional or organic" *hich is of such a degree of severit- as to re9uire rofessional hel or hositali>ation$ 4m5 6Commitment6 or 6surrender of a child6 is the legal act of entrusting a child to the care of the 0eartment or an- dul- licensed child: lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual b- the court" arent or guardian or an- interested art-$ 4n5 6Involuntaril- committed child6 is one *hose arents have been ermanentl- and 2udiciall- derived of arental authorit- due to abandonment; substantial" continuous" or reeated neglect; abuse; or incometence to discharge arental resonsibilities in accordance *ith Section = herein$ / viv Pa'e 33 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 4o5 6#oluntaril- committed child6 is one *hose arents %no*ingl- and *illingl- relin9uished arental authorit- to the 0eartment or an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual in accordance *ith Section < herein$ 45 6Child:lacing or child:lacement agenc-6 refers to a rivate non:rofit or charitable institution or government agenc- dul- licensed" and accredited b- the 0eartment to rovide comrehensive child *elfare services" including but not limited to" receiving alications for adotion or foster care" evaluating the rosective adotive or foster arents and rearing the home stud- reort$ 495 6Child:caring agenc-6 refers to a rivate non:rofit or charitable institution or government agenc- dul- licensed and accredited b- the 0eartment that rovides t*ent-:four hour residential care services for abandoned" orhaned" neglected" involuntaril- or voluntaril- committed children$ 4r5 6?uardian ad litem6 is a erson aointed b- the court *here the case is ending for a child sought to be committed to rotect his best interests$ 4s5 6Case Stud- Reort6 is a *ritten reort of the result of an investigation conducted b- a social *or%er as to the socio:cultural" economic and legal status or condition of the child sought to be committed$ It shall include among others his develomental age" educational attainment" famil- and social relationshis" the 9ualit- of his eer grou" his famil-'s strengths and *ea%nesses and arental control over him$ The reort is submitted to the ,amil- Court to aid it in its$ evaluation of *hether the child ought to be committed to the care of the 0eartment or an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual$ SEC#"ON 0. Pe'('(o* -or "*)o1u*'ary Co..('.e*' o- a C2(13. 1 4a5 7ho ma- file$ 1 The Secretar- of the 0eartment or his authori>ed reresentative or an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child: caring agenc- having %no*ledge of a child *ho aears to be deendent" abandoned or neglected" ma- file a verified etition for involuntar- commitment of said child to the care of an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual$ 4b5 #enue$ 1 The etition shall be filed *ith the ,amil- Court of the rovince or cit- in *hich the arent or guardian resides or *here the child is found$ 4c5 Contents of #erified !etition$ 1 The etition must state@ 4&5 The names of the arents or guardian and their lace of residence$ If the child's arents are un%no*n" etitioner must allege that diligent efforts have been e3erted to locate them$ If said arents are deceased" etitioner shall attach a certified true co- of their death certificate; 4(5 The facts sho*ing that the child is deendent" abandoned" or neglected; 4<5 The facts sho*ing *ho has custod- of the child at the time of the filing of the etition; and 4=5 The name" address and *ritten consent of the 0eartment or dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual to *hose care the commitment of the child is sought to be entrusted$ 4d5 Summons; Court to Set Time for /earing$ 1 If the court is satisfied that the etition is sufficient in form and substance" it shall direct the cler% of court to immediatel- issue summons *hich shall be served together *ith a co- of the etition and a notice of hearing" uon the arents or guardian of the child and the office of the ublic rosecutor not less than five 4'5 da-s before the date of the hearing$ The office of the ublic rosecutor shall be directed to immediatel- transmit the summons to the rosecutor assigned to the ,amil- Court concerned$ If it aears from the etition that both arents of the child are dead or that neither arent can be found in the rovince or cit- *here the court is located and the child has no guardian residing therein" summons ma- not be issued and the court shall thereuon aoint a guardian ad litem ursuant to Sub:section 4f5 belo* and roceed *ith the hearing of the case *ith due notice to the rovincial or cit- rosecutor" 4e5 Social 7or%er$ 1 After the court sets the etition for hearing in accordance *ith Sub:section 4d5 above" it shall direct the social *or%er to submit" before the hearing" a case stud- reort of the child to aid it in evaluating *hether said child should be committed to the care of the 0eartment or an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual$ The reort shall bear the signature of the social *or%er on ever- age$ 4f5 ?uardian Ad Litem of Child$ 1 If neither of the arents nor the guardian of the child can be located or does not aear in court desite due notice" or if the court finds them incometent to rotect the best interests of the child" it shall be the dut- of the court to aoint a suitable erson as guardian ad litem to reresent the child$ In ma%ing the aointment" the court shall consider the bac%ground of the guardian ad litem and his familiarit- *ith the 2udicial rocess" social service rograms and child develoment$ A member of the !hiliine Aar ma- be aointed guardian ad litem$ 4g5 Child's Right to Counsel$ 1 The court" uon re9uest of the child caable of forming his o*n vie*s or uon re9uest of his guardian ad litem" shall aoint a la*-er to reresent him in the roceedings$ 4h5 0ut- of !ublic !rosecutor$ 1 The rovincial or cit- rosecutor shall aear for the State and ascertain if there has been due notice to all arties concerned and that there is 2ustification for the declaration of deendenc-" abandonment or neglect$ 4i5 /earing$ 1 The court shall direct the erson or agenc- *hich has custod- of the child to bring the latter to the court on the date of the hearing of the etition and shall ascertain the facts and determine *hether the child is deendent" abandoned" or neglected" and if so" the cause and circumstances of such condition$ 425 Budgment$ 1 If" after the hearing" the court shall find the child to be deendent" abandoned" or neglected" it shall render 2udgment committing him to the care and custod- of the 0eartment or an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual until he reaches the age of eighteen 4&.5$ The 2udgment shall li%e*ise ma%e roer rovisions for the custod- of the roert- or mone- belonging to the committed$ child$ If the child is committed to the 0eartment" it shall notif- the court *ithin thirt- 4<)5 da-s from the order of commitment" the name and address of the dul- licensed and accredited child:lacement or child: caring agenc- or individual *here the child shall be laced$ /o*ever" if the court finds that the abandonment or neglect of the child ma- be remedied" the child ma- be allo*ed to sta- in his o*n home under the care and control of his arents or guardian" sub2ect to suervision and direction of the 0eartment$ 4%5 #isitation or Insection$ 1 An- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual to *hom a child has been committed b- the court shall be sub2ect to visitation or insection b- a reresentative of the court or of the 0eartment" as the case ma- be or of both" to determine *hether the *elfare and interests of the child are being served$ 4l5 Reort of !erson or Institution$ 1 An- dul- licensed child: lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual to *hom a child has been committed b- 2udicial order ma- at an- time be re9uired b- the court to submit a reort" containing all necessar- information for determining *hether the *elfare of the child is being served$ 4m5 Temorar- Custod- of Child$ 1 The dul- licensed child: lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual to *hom a child has been committed ma- file a verified motion *ith the court *hich granted the etition for involuntar- commitment of a child to lace him in the care of an- suitable erson" uon the latter's re9uest" for a eriod not e3ceeding one month at a time$ The court ma- order the social *or%er to submit a case stud- reort to aid it in evaluating *hether such temorar- custod- shall be for the best interests of the child$ The eriod of temorar- custod- of the child ma- be e3tended b- the court for a eriod not e3ceeding one month at a time uon motion of the dul- licensed child:lacement or child: caring agenc- or individual to *hich the child has been committed$ The court" motu rorio" or uon re9uest of the child assisted b- his guardian ad litem" or at the instance of the agenc- or erson to *hom the child *as committed" after due notice and hearing" shall discontinue the temorar- custod- of the child if it aears that he is not being given roer care$ / viv Pa'e 3> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 After one month from the date temorar- custod- of the child *as given to another suitable erson" the agenc- or individual shall submit to the court a verified reort on *hether the temorar- custod- of the child has romoted his best interests$ 4n5 Change of Custod-$ 1 If the child is committed to the 0eartment" it shall have the authorit- to change the custod- of a child it had laced *ith an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual if it aears that such change is for the best interests of the child$ The 0eartment shall notif- the court of an- change in custod- of the child$ 7hen conflicting interests arise among child:lacement or child: caring agencies" the court *hich granted the involuntar- commitment of the child" uon motion of the 0eartment or an- of the agencies concerned" shall order the change of commitment of the child$ 4o5 Removal of Custod-$ 1 A motion to remove custod- of a child ma- be filed b- an authori>ed reresentative of the 0eartment *ith %no*ledge of the facts against a child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual to *hose custod- a child has been committed b- the court on the ground of neglect of such child as defined in Section < 4e5 of this Rule$ The court shall set the motion for hearing *ith notice to the ublic rosecutor and the court:designated social *or%er$ If the court finds after hearing that the allegations of the motion have been established and that it is for the best interests and *elfare of the child" the court shall issue an order removing him from the custod- of the erson or agenc-" as the case ma- be" and committing him to the custod- of another dul- licensed child: lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual$ In the same roceeding" the court ma- susend or revo%e the license of the agenc- or individual found guilt- of such neglect deending uon the gravit- or fre9uenc- of the offense$ 45 Restoration of !arental Authorit- After Involuntar- Commitment$ 1 4i5 7ho ma- file; ?round$ 1 The arents or guardian of a child committed to the care of a erson" agenc- or institution b- 2udicial order ma- file a verified motion for the restoration of his rights over the child *ith the court *hich granted the involuntar- commitment on the ground that he is no* able to ta%e roer care and custod- of said child" rovided" ho*ever" that the child has not -et been adoted$ /0ATSI 4ii5 Notice of /earing$ 1 The court shall fi3 the time and date for the hearing of the motion" *hich shall not be earlier than thirt- 4<)5 da-s nor later than si3t- 48)5 da-s from the date of the filing of said motion and cause notice of the hearing to be sent to the erson" agenc- or institution to *hich the child has been committed" the ublic rosecutor and the court:designated social *or%er" at least five 4'5 da-s before the date of hearing$ 4iii5 /earing$ 1 At the hearing" an- erson ma- be allo*ed to intervene at the discretion of the court to contest the right to the relief demanded$ 7itnesses ma- be called and e3amined b- the arties or b- the court motu rorio$ 4iv5 Resolution$ 1 If it is found that the cause for the commitment of the child no longer e3ists and that the movant is alread- able to ta%e roer care and custod- of the child" the court" after ta%ing into consideration the best interests and the *elfare of the child" shall issue a resolution terminating the arental authorit- of the erson" agenc- or institution to *hom the child *as committed b- 2udicial order and restoring arental authorit- to the movant$ 95 Burisdiction for !rosecution of !unishable Acts$ 1 The ,amil- Court *hich granted the involuntar- commitment shall have 2urisdiction over the rosecution of a child *ho left *ithout rior ermission from the erson or institution to *hich he has been 2udiciall- committed or the erson under *hose custod- he has been 2udiciall- committed in accordance *ith Subsection 4m5 of Section = of this Rule$ It shall li%e*ise have 2urisdiction over the erson *ho induced the child to leave such erson or institution" e3cet in case of actual or imminent grave h-sical or moral danger to the child$ The ,amil- Court *hich granted the involuntar- commitment shall also have 2urisdiction over the rosecution of arents or guardians of the child *ho ma- be held liable under Articles 'C and 8) of !$0$ No$ 8)< and Sections C" &) and <& of R$A$ No$ D8&)$ SEC#"ON 4. 5o1u*'ary Co..('.e*' o- a C2(13 'o a* "*/'('u'(o* or "*3()(3ua1. 1 The arent or guardian of a deendent" abandoned or neglected child ma- voluntaril- commit him to the 0eartment or an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual sub2ect to the rules of the 0eartment$ /o*ever" no child shall be committed unless he is surrendered in *riting b- his arents or guardian stating such voluntar- commitment and secificall- naming the office" agenc-" or individual to *hose custod- the child is to be committed$ Such *ritten instrument should be notari>ed and signed in the resence of an authori>ed reresentative of the 0eartment after counseling and other services have been made available to encourage the child's arents to %ee the child$ 4a5 !etition for removal of Custod-$ 1 4i5 7ho ma- file; ?round$ 1 The arents or guardian *ho voluntaril- committed the child" or in their absence or failure" an- erson *ith %no*ledge of the facts" ma- file a verified etition to remove custod- of the child against the child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual to *hose custod- the child has been voluntaril- committed on the ground of neglect of such child as defined in Section < 4e5 of this Rule$ A child ma- also be removed from the custod- of the child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual on the ground that the voluntar- commitment of the child *as un2ustified$ 4ii5 #enue$ 1 The etition shall be filed *ith the ,amil- Court of the rovince or cit- *here the child:lacement or child:caring agenc- to *hich the child has been voluntaril- committed is located or *here the child ma- be found$ 4iii5 Contents of #erified !etition 1 The etition must state@ 4&5 The name and address of the child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual to *hose custod- the child has been voluntaril- committed; SEI0AC 4(5 The facts sho*ing that the child has been neglected b- the agenc- or in cases *here the voluntar- commitment *as un2ustified" that the arents of the child are actuall- caable of ta%ing care and custod- of the child; 4<5 The name" address and *ritten consent of the dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual to *hose care the child ma- be transferred$ 4=5 The facts sho*ing that etitioner has e3hausted the administrative remedies available to him$ 4iv5 Notice of /earing$ 1 If the etition is sufficient in form and substance" the court shall set the same for hearing *ith notice to the 0eartment" the ublic rosecutor" the court: designated social *or%er" the agenc- or individual to *hom the child has been committed and in aroriate cases" the arents of the child$ 4v5 Budgment$ 1 If after hearing the court finds that the allegations of the etition have been established and that it is for the best interests and *elfare of the child" it shall issue an order removing the child from the custod- of the erson or agenc- concerned" and committing him to the custod- of another dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual$ The court" in the same roceeding ma-" after hearing the comment or recommendation of the 0eartment" susend or revo%e the license of the agenc- or individual found guilt- of such neglect deending uon the gravit- or fre9uenc- of the offense$ 4b5 Restoration of !arental Authorit- After #oluntar- Commitment$ 1 The restoration of rights of the arent or guardian over the child *ho has been voluntaril- committed shall be governed b- the rules of the 0eartment" rovided" ho*ever" that the etition for restoration is filed *ithin si3 485 months from the date of voluntar- commitment$ In case the 0eartment refuses to grant legal custod- and arental authorit- to the arent or guardian over the child *ho has been voluntaril- committed to an agenc- or individual" the arent or guardian ma- file a etition in court for restoration of arental authorit- in accordance *ith Section = 45 of this Rule$ / viv Pa'e 3! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 4c5 Burisdiction for !rosecution of !unishable Acts$ 1 The ,amil- Court of the lace *here the child ma- be found or *here the dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual is located shall have 2urisdiction over the rosecution of a child *ho left *ithout rior ermission from the erson or institution to *hich he has been voluntaril- committed$ It shall li%e*ise have 2urisdiction over the erson *ho induced the child to leave such erson or institution" e3cet in case of grave actual or imminent h-sical or moral danger" to the child$ The same ,amil- Court shall also have 2urisdiction over the rosecution of arents or guardians of the child *ho ma- be held liable under Articles 'C and 8) of !$0$ No$ 8)< and Sections C" &) and <& of R$A$ No$ D8&)$ SEC#"ON 6. Pe'('(o* -or Co..('.e*' o- a D(/ab1e3 C2(13. 7 4a5 7ho ma- file$ 1 7here a child aears to be mentall- retarded" h-sicall- handicaed" emotionall- disturbed" mentall- ill" *ith cerebral als- or *ith similar afflictions and needs institutional care but his arents or guardians are oosed thereto" the 0eartment" or an- dul- licensed child:lacement or child:caring agenc- or individual ma- file a verified etition for commitment of the said child to an- reutable institution roviding care" training and rehabilitation for disabled children$ The arents or guardian of the child ma- file a similar etition in case no immediate lacement can be arranged for the disabled child *hen his *elfare and interests are at sta%e$ AE/TIC 4b5 #enue$ 1 The etition for commitment of a disabled child shall be filed *ith the ,amil- Court of the lace *here the arent or guardian resides or *here the child is found$ 4c5 Contents of #erified !etition$ 1 The etition for commitment must state the follo*ing@ 4&5 The facts sho*ing that the child aears to be mentall- retarded" h-sicall- handicaed" emotionall- disturbed" mentall- ill" *ith cerebral als- or *ith similar afflictions and needs institutional care; IA0CES 4(5 The name of the arents and their residence" if %no*n" or if the child has no living arent" the name and residence of the guardian" if an-; and 4<5 The fact that the arents or guardian or an- dul- licensed disabled child:lacement or child:caring agenc-" as the case ma- be" has oosed the commitment of such child; 4=5 The name and *ritten conformit- of the institution *here the child is to be committed$ 4'5 An estimate of the costs and other e3enses of maintaining the child in the institution$ The verified etition shall be sufficient if based uon the ersonal %no*ledge of the etitioner$ 4d5 Order of /earing; Notice$ 1 If the etition filed is sufficient in form and substance" the court" b- an order reciting the urose of the etition" shall fi3 the date of the hearing thereof" and a co- of such order shall be served on the child alleged to be mentall- retarded" h-sicall- handicaed" emotionall- disturbed" mentall- ill" *ith cerebral als- or *ith similar afflictions and on the erson having charge of him or an- of his relatives residing in the rovince or cit- as the court ma- deem roer$ The order shall also direct the sheriff or an- other officer of the court to roduce" if necessar-" the alleged disabled child on the date of the hearing$ 4e5 /earing and Budgment$ 1 If the court finds that the allegations of the etition have been established and that institutional care of the child is for his best interests or the ublic *elfare and that his arents" or guardian or relatives are unable for an- reason *hatsoever to ta%e roer care of him" the court shall order his commitment to the roer institution for disabled children$ The court shall li%e*ise ma%e roer rovisions for the custod- of the roert- or mone- belonging to the committed child$ The e3ense of maintaining a disabled child in the institution to *hich he has been committed shall be borne rimaril- b- the arents or guardian and secondaril-" b- such disabled child" if he has roert- of his o*n$ In all cases *here the e3enses for the maintenance of the disabled child cannot be aid in accordance *ith the immediatel- receding aragrah" the 0eartment shall bear the e3enses" or such art thereof as ma- remain unaid$ The court shall furnish the institution to *hich the child has been committed *ith a co- of its 2udgment" together *ith all the reorts and other data ertinent to the case$ 4f5 0ischarge of Budiciall- Committed 0isabled Child$ 1 Uon motion of the arent" guardian or institution to *hich the child has been 2udiciall- committed under this rule" the court" after hearing" shall order the discharge of such child if it is established and certified b- the 0eartment that@ 4&5 /e is no longer a danger to himself and the communit-; 4(5 /e has been sufficientl- rehabilitated" from his h-sical handica or if of *or%ing age" is alread- fit to engage in gainful occuation; or 4<5 /e has been sufficientl- relieved of his s-chological" mental and emotional roblems and is read- to assume normal social relations$ SEC#"ON 8. E--e&'()('y. 1 This rule shall ta%e effect on Aril &'" ())( after its ublication in a ne*saer of general circulation not later than +arch &'" ())($ [A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC. February 28, 2002.] RE: PROPOSED R!E ON 95EN"!ES "N CONF!"C# :"#$ #$E !A: R E S O ! # " O N Acting on the letter of the Chairman of the Committee on Revision of the Rules of Court submitting for this Court's consideration and aroval the !roosed Rule on Buveniles In Conflict 7ith The La*" the Court Resolved to A!!RO#E the same$ The Rule shall ta%e effect on Aril &'" ())( follo*ing its ublication in a ne*saer of general circulation not later than +arch &'" ())($ ,ebruar- (." ())($ SEC#"ON 1. A++1(&ab(1('y o- '2e Ru1e. 1 This Rule shall al- to all criminal cases involving 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la*$ A 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* is a erson *ho at the time of the commission of the offense is belo* eighteen 4&.5 -ears of age but not less than nine 4C5 -ears of age$ This Rule shall not al- to an accused *ho at the time of initial contact as defined in Section =45 of this Rule" or at an- time thereafter" shall have reached the age of eighteen 4&.5" in *hich case the regular rules on criminal rocedure shall al- *ithout re2udice to the rights granted under Sections <8" <D" <. and <C of this Rule$ 4n5 SEC#"ON 2. Ob%e&'()e$ 1 The ob2ective of this Rule is to ensure that the 2ustice s-stem treats ever- 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* in a manner that recogni>es and uholds his human dignit- and *orth" and instills in him resect for the fundamental rights and freedoms of others$ The Rule considers his develomental age and the desirabilit- of his reintegration into and assumtion of a constructive role in societ- in accordance *ith the rincile of restorative 2ustice$ To attain this ob2ective" the Rule see%s@ a5 To rovide a rocedure in the ad2udication of 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la* that ta%es into account their distinct circumstances and assures the arties of a fair hearing *ith their constitutional and statutor- rights recogni>ed and resected; b5 To divert from the 2ustice s-stem 2uveniles *ho can be cared for or laced under communit-:based alternative rograms of treatment" training and rehabilitation in conformit- *ith the rincile of restorative 2ustice; c5 To deal *ith the 2uvenile in a famil- environment *henever ossible" searate him from his arents onl- *hen necessar- for his *elfare or in the interest of ublic safet-; d5 To remove from 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la* the stigma of criminalit- and the conse9uences of criminal behavior; and e5 To rovide for the care" rotection and *holesome moral" mental" and h-sical develoment of 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la*$ / viv Pa'e 30 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 SEC#"ON ,. "*'er+re'a'(o*$ 1 This Rule shall be interreted liberall- to romote the best interests of the child in conformit- *ith !hiliine la*s and the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of the Child$ SEC#"ON 0. De-(*('(o*/. 1 As used in this Rule" 4a5 To be in conflict *ith the la* means being charged *ith the commission of an act defined and unished as a crime or offense under the la*" including violations of traffic la*s" rules and regulations" and ordinances of local government units$ 4b5 Serious offense refers to an- offense not covered b- Section &" ar$ A" Criminal Cases" of the Rule on Summar- !rocedure" to *it@ 4&5 violations of traffic la*s" rules and regulations; 4(5 violations of the rental la*; 4<5 violations of municial or cit- ordinances; 4=5 all other offenses unished *ith imrisonment not e3ceeding si3 months" or a fine not e3ceeding one thousand esos 4!&")))$))5" or both" irresective of other imosable enalties" accessor- or other*ise" or of the civil liabilit- arising therefrom; rovided" ho*ever" that in offenses involving damage to roert- through criminal negligence" the imosable fine is not in e3cess of ten thousand esos 4!&)")))$))5$ 4c5 Eouth detention center refers to a government:o*ned or oerated agenc- roviding habilitating and rehabilitative facilities *here a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* ma- be h-sicall- restricted ending court disosition of the charge against him$ 4d5 Inta%e reort is a reliminar- *ritten reort containing the ersonal and other circumstances of the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* and reared b- the social *or%er assigned b- the 0eartment of Social 7elfare and 0eveloment 40S705 or local government unit to assist him as soon as he enters the 2ustice s-stem$ 4e5 Case stud- reort is a *ritten reort of the result of an investigation conducted b- the social *or%er designated b- the ,amil- Court on the social" cultural" economic and legal status or condition of the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*$ It includes" among others" his develomental age; educational attainment; famil- and social relationshis; the 9ualit- of his eer grou; the strengths and *ea%nesses of his famil-; arental control over him; his attitude to*ard the offense; the harm or damage done to others resulting from the offense; his record of rior offenses" if an-; and the attitude of his arents to*ards his resonsibilit- for the offense$ 4f5 0iversion refers to an alternative child:aroriate rocess of determining the resonsibilit- and treatment of a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* on the basis of his social" cultural" economic" s-chological or educational bac%ground *ithout resorting to formal court ad2udication$ 4g5 0iversion rograms refer to rograms that the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* is re9uired to undergo in lieu of formal court roceedings" 4h5 0isosition conference is a meeting held b- the court *ith the social *or%er *ho reared the case stud- reort together *ith the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* and his arents or guardian ad litem" for the urose of determining the disosition measures aroriate to the ersonal and eculiar circumstances of the 2uvenile$ 4i5 Recogni>ance is an underta%ing in lieu of a bond assumed b- a arent or custodian *ho shall be resonsible for the aearance in court b- the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* *hen re9uired$ 425 !robation is a disosition alternative under *hich a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* is released and ermitted to remain in his home after conviction and sentence$ The 2uvenile is sub2ect to conditions imosed in the sentence and to suervision b- the court and a robation officer *ho has the dut- to return the 2uvenile to the court in case of violation of a condition of his robation$ 4%5 Susended sentence is the holding in abe-ance of the service of the sentence imosed b- the court uon a finding of guilt of the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* *ho *ill undergo rehabilitation$ 4l5 Communit- continuum is a communit-:based grou thera- rocess that rovides continuous guidance and suort to the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* uon his release from rehabilitation and his reintegration into societ-$ 4m5 Age of criminal resonsibilit- is the age *hen a 2uvenile *ho is nine 4C5 -ears or over but under fifteen 4&'5 -ears commits an offense *ith discernment$ 4n5 0iscernment means the mental caacit- to understand the difference bet*een right and *rong and its conse9uences$ 4o5 Restorative Bustice is a rincile *hich re9uires a rocess of resolving conflicts *ith the ma3imum involvement of the victim" the offender" and the communit-$ It see%s to obtain rearation for the victim" reconciliation of the offender" the offended and the communit- and reassurance to the offender that he can be reintegrated into societ-$ It$ also enhances ublic safet- b- activating the offender" the victim and the communit- in revention strategies$ 45 Initial contact is the arehension or ta%ing into custod- of a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* b- la* enforcement officers or rivate citi>ens$ It includes the time *hen the 2uvenile receives a suboena under Section < 4b5 of Rule &&( of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure or summons under Section 8 4a5 or Sec$ C 4b5 of the same Rule in cases that do not re9uire reliminar- investigation or *here there is no necessit- to lace the 2uvenile under immediate custod-$ 495 Cororal unishment is an- %ind of h-sical unishment inflicted on the bod- as distinguished from ecuniar- unishment or fine$ SEC#"ON 4. E;e.+'(o* -ro. Cr(.(*a1 !(ab(1('y$ 1 A minor under nine 4C5 -ears of age at the time of the commission of the offense shall be e3emt from criminal liabilit-$ A minor nine 4C5 -ears and above but under fifteen 4&'5 -ears of age at the time of the commission of the offense shall be committed to the care of his father or mother" or nearest relative or famil- friend; in the sound discretion of the court and sub2ect to its suervision$ /o*ever" if the rosecution roves that he has acted *ith discernment; he shall be roceeded against in accordance *ith Sections (= to (." or <8 to =) of this Rule" as the case ma- be" and sub2ected to a delin9uenc- revention rogram as determined b- the court$ E3emtion from criminal liabilit- does not include e3emtion from civil liabilit- *hich shall be enforced in accordance *ith the rovisions of Article ((& of the ,amil- Code in relation to Article &)& of the Revised !enal Code and Rule &&& of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure$ In case the act or omission of the 2uvenile involves a 9uasi:delict" Article (&.) of the Civil Code shall al-$ SEC#"ON 6. Pro&e3ure (* #a<(*= a 9u)e*(1e (*'o Cu/'o3y$ 1 An- erson ta%ing into custod- a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* shall@ 4a5 Identif- himself and resent roer identification to the 2uvenile; 4b5 Inform the 2uvenile of the reason for such custod- and advise him of his constitutional rights in a language or dialect understood b- him; 4c5 Refrain from using vulgar or rofane *ords and from se3uall- harassing or abusing" or ma%ing se3ual advances on the 2uvenile; 4d5 Avoid disla-ing or using an- firearm" *eaon" handcuffs or other instruments of force or restraint" unless absolutel- necessar- and onl- after all other methods of control have been e3hausted and have failed; 4e5 Refrain from sub2ecting the 2uvenile to greater restraint than is necessar- for his arehension; 4f5 Avoid violence or unnecessar- force; 4g5 Notif- the arents of the 2uvenile or his nearest relative or guardian" if an-" and the local social *elfare officer as soon as the arehension is made; 4h5 Ta%e the 2uvenile immediatel- to an available government medical or health officer for a h-sical and mental e3amination$ The e3amination results shall be %et confidential unless other*ise ordered b- the ,amil- Court$ 7henever treatment for an- h-sical or mental defect is necessar-" stes shall be immediatel- ta%en b- the said officer to rovide the 2uvenile *ith the necessar- and roer treatment; and 4i5 /old the 2uvenile in secure 9uarters searate from that of the oosite se3 and adult offenders$ SEC#"ON 8. #a<(*= Cu/'o3y o- a 9u)e*(1e :('2ou' a :arra*'. 1 A eace officer or a rivate erson ta%ing into custod- a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* *ithout a *arrant shall li%e*ise follo* the rovisions of Sections '" . and C of Rule &&< of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure and shall forth*ith deliver him to the nearest olice / viv Pa'e 3; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 station$ The 2uvenile shall be roceeded against in accordance *ith Section D of Rule &&($ SEC#"ON 8. Co*3u&' o- "*('(a1 "*)e/'(=a'(o* by '2e Po1(&e. 1 The olice officer conducting the initial investigation of a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* shall do so in the resence of either of the arents of the 2uvenile; in the absence of both arents" the guardian or the nearest relative" or a social *elfare officer" and the counsel of his o*n choice$ In their resence" the 2uvenile shall be informed of his constitutional rights during custodial investigation$ The right of the 2uvenile to rivac- shall be rotected at all times$ All measures necessar- to romote this right shall be ta%en" including the e3clusion of the media$ SEC#"ON 9. F(*=er+r(*'(*= a*3 P2o'o=ra+2(*= o- '2e 9u)e*(1e. 1 7hile under investigation" no 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* shall be fingerrinted or hotograhed in a humiliating and degrading manner$ The follo*ing guidelines shall be observed *hen fingerrinting or hotograhing the 2uvenile@ 4a5 /is fingerrint and hotograh files shall be %et searate from those of adults and shall be %et confidential$ The- ma- be insected b- la* enforcement officers onl- *hen necessar- for the discharge of their duties and uon rior authorit- of the ,amil- Court; TA0CSE 4b5 /is fingerrints and hotograhs shall be removed from the files and destro-ed@ 4&5 if the case against him is not filed" or is dismissed; or 4(5 *hen the 2uvenile reaches t*ent- one 4(&5 -ears of age and there is no record that he committed an offense after reaching eighteen 4&.5 -ears of age$ SEC#"ON 10. "*'a<e Re+or' by '2e So&(a1 :e1-are O--(&er$ 1 Uon the ta%ing into custod- of a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*" the social *elfare officer assigned to him b- the 0S70 shall immediatel- under ta%e a reliminar- bac%ground investigation of the 2uvenile and submit" rior to arraignment of the 2uvenile" a reort on his findings to the ,amil- Court in *hich the case ma- be filed$ SEC#"ON 11. F(1(*= o- Cr(.(*a1 A&'(o*. 1 A criminal action ma- be instituted against a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* b- filing a comlaint *ith the rosecutor or the municial trial court in cases *here a reliminar- investigation is re9uired$ In +anila and other chartered cities" if their charters so rovide" the comlaint shall be filed *ith the Office of the !rosecutor$ It ma- also be filed directl- *ith the ,amil- Court if no reliminar- investigation is re9uired under Section & of Rule &&( of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure$ All criminal actions commenced b- comlaint or information shall be rosecuted under the direction and control of the ublic rosecutor assigned to the ,amil- Court$ SEC#"ON 12. Pro/e&u'(o* o- C()(1 A&'(o*. 1 7hen a criminal action is instituted against a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*" the action for recover- of civil liabilit- arising from the offense charged shall be governed b- Rule &&& of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure$ SEC#"ON 1,. Pre1(.(*ary "*)e/'(=a'(o*$ 1 As far as consistent *ith this Rule" the reliminar- investigation of a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* shall be governed b- Section < of Rule &&( of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure$ If clarificator- 9uestions become necessar-" the Rule on E3amination of a Child 7itness shall al-$ If a reliminar- investigation is re9uired before the filing of a comlaint or information" the same shall be conducted b- the 2udge of the +unicial Trial Court or the ublic rosecutor in accordance *ith the ertinent rovisions of Rule &&( of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure$ If the investigating rosecutor finds robable cause to hold the 2uvenile for trial" he shall reare the corresonding resolution and information for aroval b- the rovincial or cit- rosecutor" as the case ma- be$ The 2uvenile" his arentsFnearest relativeFguardian and his counsel shall be furnished forth*ith a co- of the aroved resolution$ SEC#"ON 10. 5e*ue. 1 Sub2ect to the rovisions of Section &'" Rule &&) of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure" an- criminal or civil action involving a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* shall be instituted and tried in the ,amil- Court of or nearest the lace *here the offense *as committed or *here an- of its essential elements occurred$ SEC#"ON 14. Re&o=*(>a*&e. 1 Aefore final conviction" all 2uveniles charged *ith offenses falling under the Revised Rule on Summar- !rocedure shall be released on recogni>ance to the custod- of their arents or other suitable erson *ho shall be resonsible for the 2uveniles' aearance in court *henever re9uired$ SEC#"ON 16. :2e* Ba(1 a Ma''er o- R(=2'. 1 All 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la* shall be admitted to bail as a matter of right before final conviction of an offense not unishable b- death" reclusion eretua or life imrisonment$ In the event the 2uvenile cannot ost bail for lac% of financial resources" the ,amil- Court shall commit the 2uvenile ursuant to Section &. of this Rule$ /o*ever" *here the 2uvenile does not ose a threat to ublic safet-" the ,amil- Court ma-" motu rorio or uon motion and recommendation of the 0S70" release the 2uvenile on recogni>ance to the custod- of his arents or other resonsible erson$ SEC#"ON 18. :2e* Ba(1 No' A Ma''er o- R(=2'. 1 No 2uvenile charged *ith an offense unishable b- death" reclusion eretua or life imrisonment shall be admitted to bail *hen evidence of guilt is strong$ SEC#"ON 18. Care o- 9u)e*(1e/ (* Co*-1(&' ?('2 '2e !a?$ 1 The 2uvenile charged *ith having committed a delin9uent act" held for trial or *hile the case is ending aeal" if unable to furnish bail or is denied bail" shall" from the time of his being ta%en into custod-" be committed b- the ,amil- Court to the care of the 0S70" a -outh detention center" or a local rehabilitation center recogni>ed b- the government in the rovince" cit- or municialit- *ithin the 2urisdiction of the said court$ The center or agenc- concerned shall be resonsible for the 2uvenile's aearance in court *henever re9uired$ In the absence of an- such center or agenc- *ithin a reasonable distance from the venue of the trial" the 2uvenile shall be detained in the rovincial" cit- or municial 2ail *hich shall rovide ade9uate 9uarters for the 2uvenile searate from adult detainees and detainees of the oosite se3$ SEC#"ON 19. Ca/e S'u3y Re+or'. 1 After the institution of the criminal action" the social *or%er of the ,amil- Court shall immediatel- underta%e a case stud- of the 2uvenile and his famil-" his environment and such other matters relevant to the roer disosition of the case$ /is reort shall be submitted *ithin the eriod fi3ed b- the ,amil- Court" referabl- before arraignment" to aid it in the roer disosition of the case$ SEC#"ON 20. D()er/(o* Pro&ee3(*=/ Be-ore Arra(=*.e*'. 1 7here the ma3imum enalt- imosed b- la* for the offense *ith *hich the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* is charged is imrisonment of not more than si3 485 months" regardless of fine or fine alone regardless of amount" and the corresonding comlaint or information is filed *ith the ,amil- Court" the case shall not be set for arraignment; instead" it shall forth*ith be referred to the 0iversion Committee *hich shall determine *hether the 2uvenile can be diverted and referred to alternative measures or services offered b- non:court institutions$ !ending determination b- the Committee" the court shall deliver the 2uvenile on recogni>ance to the custod- of his arents or legal guardian *ho shall be resonsible for the resence of the 2uvenile during the diversion roceedings$ SEC#"ON 21. D()er/(o* Co..(''ee. 1 In each ,amil- Court" there shall be a 0iversion Committee to be comosed of its branch cler% of court as chairerson" and the rosecutor" a la*-er of the !ublic Attorne-'s Office and the social *or%er assigned to the said ,amil- Court as members$ / viv Pa'e 3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 The chairerson of the Committee shall call for a conference *ith notice to the 2uvenile" his arentsFlegal guardian and his counsel" and the rivate comlainant and his counsel" and recommend to the ,amil- Court *hether the 2uvenile should be diverted to a diversion rogram or undergo formal court roceedings$ In ma%ing its recommendation" the Committee shall consider the follo*ing factors@ a5 The record of the 2uvenile on his conflict *ith the la*; b5 7hether the imosable ma3imum enalt- of the offense is more than si3 485 months" regardless of fine; or onl- a fine" regardless of amount; c5 7hether the 2uvenile is an obvious threat to himself andFor the communit-; d5 7hether the 2uvenile is unreentant; e5 7hether the 2uvenile or his arents are indifferent or hostile; and 7hether the 2uvenile's relationshis *ith his eers increase the ossibilit- of delin9uent behavior$ If the Committee recommends diversion" it shall submit the diversion rogram for the 2uvenile for the consideration and aroval of the court$ The Committee cannot recommend diversion should the 2uvenile or the rivate comlainant ob2ect thereto$ If no diversion rogram is recommended" the court shall include the case in its calendar for formal roceedings$ Consent to diversion b- the 2uvenile or a-ment b- him of civil indemnit- shall not in an- *a- be construed as admission of guilt and used as evidence against him in the event that his case is included in the court calendar for formal roceedings$ SEC#"ON 22. D()er/(o* Pro=ra./. 1 The diversion rogram designed b- the Committee shall be distinct to each 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* limited for a secific eriod$ It ma- include an- or a combination of the follo*ing@ a5 7ritten or oral rerimand or citation; b5 Return of roert-; c5 !a-ment of the damage caused; d5 7ritten or oral aolog-; e5 ?uidance and suervision orders; f5 Counseling for the 2uvenile and his famil-; g5 Training" seminars and lectures on 4i5 anger management s%ills; 4ii5 roblem:solving andFor conflict resolution s%ills; 4iii5 values formation; and 4iv5 other s%ills that *ill aid the 2uvenile to roerl- deal *ith situations that can lead to a reetition of the offense; h5 !articiation in available communit-:based rograms; i5 Institutional care and custod-; or 25 7or%:detail rogram in the communit-$ SEC#"ON 2,. $ear(*= o- D()er/(o* Pro=ra.. 1 The ,amil- Court shall set the recommendation and diversion rogram for hearing *ithin ten 4&)5 da-s from receit thereof$ SEC#"ON 20. *3er'a<(*=. 1 In all cases *here a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* is given the benefit of a diversion rogram" an underta%ing describing the rogram shall be signed b- him" his arents or legal guardian and the comlainant" and aroved b- the ,amil- Court$ The rogram" *hich shall be enforced under the suervision and control of the ,amil- Court" shall contain the follo*ing terms and conditions@ a5 The 2uvenile shall resent himself to the social *or%er of the ,amil- Court that aroved the diversion rogram at least once a month for evaluation of its effectiveness$ 7henever the 2uvenile is ermitted to reside in a lace under the 2urisdiction of another ,amil- Court" control and suervision over him shall be transferred to the ,amil- Court of that lace" and in such case" a co- of the underta%ing" the inta%e and case stud- reorts and other ertinent records shall be furnished the said court$ Thereafter" the ,amil- Court to *hich 2urisdiction over the 2uvenile is transferred shall have the o*er *ith resect to the latter that *as reviousl- ossessed b- the ,amil- Court that aroved the diversion and such other conditions as the Committee ma- deem 2ust and roer under the circumstances$ b5 The 2uvenile shall faithfull- coml- *ith the terms and conditions in the underta%ing$ /is non:comliance shall be referred b- the Committee to the ,amil- Court *here the case has been transferred for a sho*:cause hearing *ith notice to the 2uvenile and rivate comlainant$ The court shall determine *hether the 2uvenile should continue *ith the diversion rogram or his case returned to the original court for formal roceedings$ The ,amil- Court shall e3ert its best efforts to secure satisfaction of the civil liabilit- of the 2uvenile and his arents or guardian$ /o*ever" inabilit- to a- the said liabilit- shall not b- itself be a ground to discontinue the diversion rogram of the 2uvenile$ SEC#"ON 24. C1o/ure Or3er$ 1 The 2uvenile sub2ect of diversion roceedings shall be visited eriodicall- b- the ,amil- Court social *or%er *ho shall submit to the Committee his reorts thereon$ At an- time before or at the end of the diversion eriod" a reort recommending closure or e3tension of diversion" as the case ma- be" shall be filed b- the Committee *ith the ,amil- Court$ The reort and recommendation shall be heard b- the ,amil- Court *ithin fifteen 4&'5 da-s from its receit thereof" *ith notice to the members of the Committee" the 2uvenile and his arents or legal guardian and counsel and the comlainant to determine *hether the underta%ing has been full- and satisfactoril- comlied *ith$ If the 2uvenile has comlied *ith his underta%ing" the ,amil- Court shall issue the corresonding closure order terminating the diversion rogram$ It ma-" ho*ever" e3tend the eriod of diversion to give the 2uvenile a further chance to be rehabilitated$ In the event the court finds that the diversion rogram *ill no longer serve its$ urose" it shall include the case of the 2uvenile in its calendar for formal roceedings$ SEC#"ON 26. Du'y o- '2e Fa.(1y Cour' 'o Pro'e&' '2e R(=2'/ o- '2e 9u)e*(1e. 1 In all criminal roceedings in the ,amil- Court" the 2udge shall ensure the rotection of the follo*ing rights of the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*@ a5 To be resumed innocent until the contrar- is roved be-ond reasonable doubt; b5 To be informed romtl- and directl- of the nature and cause of the charge against him" and if aroriate" through his arents or legal guardian; c5 To be resent at ever- stage of the roceedings" from arraignment to romulgation of 2udgment$ The 2uvenile ma-" ho*ever" *aive his resence at the trial ursuant to the stiulations set forth in his bail" unless his resence at the trial is secificall- ordered b- the court for uroses of identification$ The absence of the 2uvenile *ithout 2ustifiable cause at the trial of *hich he had notice shall be considered a *aiver of his right to be resent thereat$ 7hen the 2uvenile under custod- escaes" he shall be deemed to have *aived his right to be resent in all subse9uent hearings until custod- over him is regained; d5 To have legal and other aroriate assistance in the rearation and resentation of his defense; e5 To testif- as a *itness in his o*n behalf and sub2ect to cross: e3amination onl- on matters covered b- direct e3amination" rovided that the Rule on the E3amination of a Child 7itness shall be observed *henever convenient and racticable$ The 2uvenile shall not be comelled to be a *itness against himself and his silence shall not in an- manner re2udice him; f5 To confront and cross:e3amine the *itnesses against him; g5 To have comulsor- rocess issued to secure the attendance of *itnesses and roduction of other evidence in his behalf; h5 To have seed- and imartial trial" *ith legal or other aroriate assistance and referabl- in the resence of his arents or legal guardian" unless such resence is considered not to be in the best interests of the 2uvenile ta%ing into account his age or other eculiar circumstances; 4i5 To aeal in all cases allo*ed and in the manner rescribed b- la*; 25 To be accorded all the rights under the Rule on E3amination of a Child 7itness; and / viv Pa'e 3: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 %5 To have his rivac- full- resected in all stages of the roceedings$ SEC#"ON 28. Arra(=*.e*' a*3 P1ea. 1 The rovisions of Rules &&8 and &&D of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure shall al- to the arraignment of the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*$ The arraignment shall be scheduled *ithin seven 4D5 da-s from the date of the filing of the comlaint or information *ith the ,amil- Court" unless a shorter eriod is rovided for b- la*$ Arraignment shall be held in chambers and conducted b- the 2udge b- furnishing the 2uvenile a co- of the comlaint or information" reading the same in a language or dialect %no*n to and understood b- him" e3laining the nature and conse9uences of a lea of guilt- or not guilt- and as%ing him *hat his lea is$ SEC#"ON 28. Pre-'r(a1. 1 The rovisions of Rule &&. of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure shall govern the re:trial of the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*$ Agreements or admissions made during the re trial conference shall be in *riting and signed b- the 2uvenile" his arents or guardian and his counsel; other*ise" the- cannot be used against him$ 7henever ossible and racticable" the ,amil- Court shall e3lore all ossibilities of settlement of the case" e3cet its criminal asect$ !lea bargaining shall be resorted to onl- as a last measure *hen it *ill serve the best interests of the 2uvenile and the demands of restorative 2ustice$ SEC#"ON 29. #r(a1. 1 All hearings shall be conducted in a manner conducive to the best interests of the 2uvenile and in an environment that *ill allo* him to articiate full- and freel- in accordance *ith the Rule on E3amination of a Child 7itness$ SEC#"ON ,0. @u(3(*= Pr(*&(+1e/ (* 9u3=(*= '2e 9u)e*(1e. 1 Sub2ect to the rovisions of the Revised !enal Code" as amended" and other secial la*s" the 2udgment against a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* shall be guided b- the follo*ing rinciles@ &$ It shall be in roortion to the gravit- of the offense" and shall consider the circumstances and the best interests of the 2uvenile" the rights of the victim" the needs of societ- in line *ith the demands of restorative 2ustice$ ($ Restrictions on the ersonal libert- of the 2uvenile shall be limited to the minimum$ 7here discretion is given b- la* to the 2udge to determine *hether the enalt- to be imosed is fine or imrisonment" the imosition of the latter should be referred as the more aroriate enalt-$ <$ No cororal unishment shall be imosed$ SEC#"ON ,1. Pro.u1=a'(o* o- Se*'e*&e. 1 If after trial the ,amil- Court should find the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* guilt-" it shall imose the roer enalt-" including an- civil liabilit- *hich the 2uvenile ma- have incurred" and romulgate the sentence in accordance *ith Section 8" Rule &() of the Revised Rules of Criminal !rocedure$ SEC#"ON ,2. Au'o.a'(& Su/+e*/(o* o- Se*'e*&e a*3 D(/+o/('(o* Or3er/. 1 The sentence shall be susended *ithout need of alication b- the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*$ The court shall set the case for disosition conference *ithin fifteen 4&'5 da-s from the romulgation of sentence *hich shall be attended b- the social *or%er of the ,amil- Court" the 2uvenile" and his arents or guardian ad litem$ It shall roceed to issue an- or a combination of the follo*ing disosition measures best suited to the rehabilitation and *elfare of the 2uvenile@ &$ Care" guidance" and suervision orders; ($ Communit- service orders; <$ 0rug and alcohol treatment; =$ !articiation in grou counseling and similar activities; '$ Commitment to the Eouth Rehabilitation Center of the 0S70 or other centers for 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la* authori>ed b- the Secretar- of the 0S70$ The Social Services and Counseling 0ivision 4SSC05 of the 0S70 shall monitor the comliance b- the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* *ith the disosition measure and shall submit regularl- to the ,amil- Court a status and rogress reort on the matter$ The ,amil- Court ma- set a conference for the evaluation of such reort in the resence" if racticable" of the 2uvenile" his arents or guardian" and other ersons *hose resence ma- be deemed necessar-$ The benefits of susended sentence shall not al- to a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* *ho has once en2o-ed susension of sentence" or to one *ho is convicted of an offense unishable b- death" reclusion eretua or life imrisonment" or *hen at the time of romulgation of 2udgment the 2uvenile is alread- eighteen 4&.5 -ears of age or over$ SEC#"ON ,,. D(/&2ar=e o- 9u)e*(1e Sub%e&' o- D(/+o/('(o* Mea/ure. 1 Uon the recommendation of the SSC0 and a dul- authori>ed officer of the 0S70" the head of an aroriate center or the dul- accredited child:caring agenc- *hich has custod- over the 2uvenile" the ,amil- Court shall" after due notice to all arties and hearing" dismiss the case against the 2uvenile *ho has been issued disosition measures" even before he has reached eighteen 4&.5 -ears of age" and order a final discharge if it finds that the 2uvenile has behaved roerl- and has sho*n the caabilit- to be a useful member of the communit-$ If the ,amil- Court" ho*ever" finds that the 2uvenile has not behaved roerl-" has been incorrigible" has not sho*n the caabilit- of becoming a useful member of societ-" has *illfull- failed to coml- *ith the conditions of his disosition or rehabilitation rogram" or should his continued sta- in the training institution *here he has been assigned be not in his best interests" he shall be brought before the court for e3ecution of his 2udgment$ If the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* has reached the age of eighteen 4&.5 -ears *hile in commitment" the ,amil- Court shall determine *hether to dismiss the case in accordance *ith the first aragrah of this Section or to e3ecute the 2udgment of conviction$ In the latter case" unless the 2uvenile has alread- availed of robation under !residential 0ecree No$ 8)< or other similar la*s" he ma- al- for robation if 9ualified under the rovisions of the !robation La*$ The final release of the 2uvenile shall not e3tinguish his civil liabilit-$ The arents and other ersons e3ercising arental authorit- over the 2uvenile shall be civill- liable for the in2uries and damages caused b- the acts or omissions of the 2uvenile living in their coman- and under their arental authorit- sub2ect to the aroriate defenses rovided b- la*$ SEC#"ON ,0. Proba'(o* a/ a* A1'er*a'()e 'o ".+r(/o*.e*'. 1 After romulgation of sentence and uon alication at an- time b- the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* *ithin the eriod to aeal" the ,amil- Court ma- lace the 2uvenile on robation" if he is 9ualified under the !robation La*$ SEC#"ON ,4. Cre3(' (* Ser)(&e o- Se*'e*&e. 1 The 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* *ho has undergone reventive imrisonment shall be credited in the service of his sentence consisting of derivation of libert-" *ith the full time during *hich he has undergone reventive imrisonment" if he agrees voluntaril- in *riting to abide b- the same or similar discilinar- rules imosed uon convicted risoners" e3cet in an- of the follo*ing cases@ &$ 7hen the 2uvenile is a recidivist or has been convicted reviousl- t*ice or more times of an- crime; or ($ 7hen uon being summoned for e3ecution of sentence" he failed to surrender voluntaril-$ If the 2uvenile does not agree to abide b- the same discilinar- rules imosed uon convicted risoners" he shall be credited in the service of his sentence *ith four:fifths of the time during *hich he has undergone reventive imrisonment$ 7henever the 2uvenile has undergone reventive imrisonment for a eriod e9ual to or more than the ossible ma3imum imrisonment of the offense charged to *hich he ma- be sentenced and his case is not -et terminated" he shall be released immediatel- *ithout re2udice to the continuation of the trial thereof or the roceeding on aeal" if the same is under revie*$ In case the ma3imum enalt- to *hich the 2uvenile ma- be / viv Pa'e >= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 sentenced is destierro" he shall be released after thirt- 4<)5 da-s of reventive imrisonment$ An- form of h-sical restraint imosed on the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*" including communit- service and commitment to a rehabilitation center" shall be considered reventive imrisonment$ SEC#"ON ,6. Co*-(3e*'(a1('y o- Pro&ee3(*=/ a*3 Re&or3/. 1 All roceedings and records involving 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la* from initial contact until final disosition of the case b- the ,amil- Court shall be considered rivileged and confidential$ The ublic ma- be e3cluded from the roceedings and" ursuant to the rovisions of Section <& of the Rule on E3amination of a Child 7itness" the records shall not be disclosed directl- or indirectl- to an-one b- an- of the arties or the articiants in the roceedings for an- urose *hatsoever" e3cet to determine if the 2uvenile ma- have his sentence susended under Section (' of this Rule or if he ma- be granted robation under the !robation La*" or to enforce the civil liabilit- imosed in the criminal action$ The ,amil- Court shall ta%e other measures to rotect this confidentialit- of roceedings including non:disclosure of records to the media" the maintenance of a searate olice blotter for cases involving 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la* and the adotion of a s-stem of coding to conceal material information" *hich *ill lead to the 2uvenile's identit-$ Records of 2uveniles in conflict *ith the la* shall not be used in subse9uent roceedings or cases involving the same offender as an adult$ SEC#"ON ,8. No*-1(ab(1('y -or +er%ury or &o*&ea1.e*' or .(/re+re/e*'a'(o*. 1 An- erson *ho has been in conflict *ith the la* as a 2uvenile shall not be held guilt- of er2ur- or of concealment or misreresentation b- reason of his failure to ac%no*ledge the case or recite an- fact related thereto in resonse to an- in9uir- made to him for an- urose$ SEC#"ON ,8. Sea1(*= o- Re&or3/. 1 The ,amil- Court motu rorio" or on alication of a erson *ho has been ad2udged a 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la*" or if still a minor" on motion of his arents or legal guardian" shall" uon notice to the rosecution and after hearing" order the sealing of the records of the case if it finds that t*o 4(5 -ears have elased since the final discharge of the 2uvenile after susension of sentence or robation" or from the date of the closure order and he has no ending case of an offense or a crime involving moral turitude$ Uon entr- of the order" the case shall be treated as if it never occurred$ All inde3 references shall be deleted and in case of in9uir-" the ,amil- Court" rosecution" la* enforcement officers and all other offices and agencies that dealt *ith the case shall rel- that no record e3ists *ith resect to the 2uvenile concerned$ Coies of the order shall be sent to these officials and agencies named in the order$ Insection of the sealed records thereafter ma- be ermitted onl- b- order of the ,amil- Court uon etition$ of the 2uvenile *ho is the sub2ect of the records or of other roer arties$ This rocedure shall be *ithout re2udice to the rule on destruction of video or audio taes under Section <& of the Rule on the E3amination of a Child 7itness$ SEC#"ON ,9. Pro2(b('(o* A=a(*/' !abe1(*=. 1 In the conduct of roceedings from initial contact *ith the 2uvenile in conflict *ith the la* to the final disosition of the case" there shall be no branding or labeling of the latter as a -oung criminal" 2uvenile delin9uent" rostitute" vagrant" or attaching to him in an- manner an- derogator- name$ Li%e*ise" no discriminator- remar%s and ractices shall be allo*ed" articularl- *ith resect to the 2uvenile's social or economic status" h-sical disabilit- or ethnic origin$ SEC#"ON 00. Co*'e.+' Po?er/. 1 A erson *ho directl- or indirectl- disobe-s an- order of the ,amil- Court or obstructs or interferes *ith its roceedings or the enforcement of its orders issued under this Rule shall be liable for contemt of court$ SEC#"ON 01. E--e&'()('y$ 1 This rule shall ta%e effect on Aril &'" ())( after its ublication in a ne*saer of general circulation not later than +arch &'" ())($ P,#. 1. M ANY PERSON WHO' WHILE PERFORMIN6 A LAWFUL ACT WITH DUE CARE' CAUSES AN IN7URY BY MERE ACCIDENT WITHOUT FAULT OR INTENTION OF CAUSIN6 IT. ELEMENTSD 1. A person performin' a lawful actF #. Aith due careF 3. ,e causes an in+ur% to another b% mere accidentF >. Aithout fault or intention of causin' it. R $tri/in' another with a 'un in self?defense, even if it fired and seriousl% in+ured the assailant is a lawful act. ACCIDENT @ somethin' that happen outside the swa% of our will and althou'h it comes about throu'h some act of our will, lies be%ond the bounds of humanl% foreseeable conse9uences. ? 6f the conse9uences are plainl% foreseeable, it will be a case of ne'li'ence. P&o*%& +. A-%!4,> (.221) Facts: The wife of the accused was washin' dishes in the /itchen when her son was shot with a shot'un b% her husband. Conchita claimed that she and her husband 9uarreled before the incident and then her husband left the /itchen 'ot his shot'un and went bac/ to the /itchen to shoot his son. Accused claimed that it was onl% an accident. ,e was merel% cleanin' his 'un and the 'un accidentall% went off and his sonBs buttoc/ was hit. Held. The e-emption from criminal liabilit% under the circumstance showin' accident is based on the lac/ of criminal intent. 6n the case at bar, accused 'ot his shot'un and returned to the /itchen to shoot his son who had intervened in the 9uarrel between the former and his wife. There was clear intent to fire and not mere accident. US +. T,n&4o (1912) Facts: The accused, while huntin', saw wild chic/ens and fired a shot. The slu', after hittin' a wild chic/en, recoiled and struc/ the tenant who was a relative of the accused. The man who was in+ured died. Held. 6f life is ta/en b% misfortune or accident while the actor is in the performance of a lawful act e-ecuted with due care and without intention of doin' harm, there is no criminal liabilit%. P&o*%& +. B!n4o> (19@1) Facts: The accused, while in a drin/in' session, offered some tuba to PacasB wife but she refused so the accused threatened to in+ure her if she didnBt accept. Pacas stepped into defend his wife, attemptin' to ta/e awa% from the accused the bolo he carried. 6n the course of the stru''le, accused succeeded in disen'a'in' himself from Pacas, wrenchin' the bolo from the latterBs hand towards the left behind the accused, with such violence that the point of the bolo reached <mi'dioBs chest who was then behind the accused. / viv Pa'e >1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Held: The accused, in his effort to free himself hit <mi'dio in the chest. There is no evidence that this was done deliberatel%. 6t is merel% accidental. P&o*%& +. A-%!4,> (.221) Facts: The wife of the accused was washin' dishes in the /itchen when her son was shot with a shot'un b% her husband. Conchita claimed that she and her husband 9uarreled before the incident and then her husband left the /itchen 'ot his shot'un and went bac/ to the /itchen to shoot his son. Accused claimed that it was onl% an accident. ,e was merel% cleanin' his 'un and the 'un accidentall% went off and his sonBs buttoc/ was hit. Held. The e-emption from criminal liabilit% under the circumstance showin' accident is based on the lac/ of criminal intent. 6n the case at bar, accused 'ot his shot'un and returned to the /itchen to shoot his son who had intervened in the 9uarrel between the former and his wife. There was clear intent to fire and not mere accident. P&o*%& +. Con$&*$!on (.22.) Facts: 1alan' 'ot involved in a 9uarrel at the town pla4a. ,e was brou'ht to the baran'a% hall for 9uestionin' b% (r'% Captain Capitli. $hortl% after, Concepcion arrived and fired his rifle twice or thrice past the ears of 1alan', who was then sittin', but without in+urin' him. After that, however, Concepcion thrust the barrel of the 'un a'ainst the abdomen of 1alan'. Then there was an e-plosion. 1alan' was shot in the thi'h. At least 3 more shots were fired, hittin' him in the chest. &oren4o died instantl%. 6n his defense Concepcion claimed that the shootin' was onl% accidental. Held: There was no accident. (% ConcepcionBs own testimon%, the victim was unarmed. 6n contrast, he had an armalite and a hand'un. 6t is hi'hl% inconceivable that an unarmed man could pose bodil% harm to another who is heavil% armed. ConcepcionBs 'un dischar'ed several shots that hit vital parts of the victimMs bod%. As observed b% the trial court, rec/lessl% appellant had put his fin'er on the tri''er of his coc/ed and loaded rifle. 6n that state, with the sli'htest movement of his fin'er, the rifle would fire readil%. And it did not +ust once but several fires. Concepcion is 'uilt% of homicide. P,# (. M ANY PERSON WHO ACTS UNDER THE COMPULSION OF AN IRRESISTIBLE FORCE. ELEMENTSD 1. That the compulsion is b% means of ph%sical force. #. That the ph%sical force must be irresistible. 3. That the ph%sical force must come from a third person R (efore force can be considered to be an irresistible one, it must produce such an effect upon the individual that, in spite of all resistance, it reduces him to a mere instrument and, as such, incapable of committin' a crime. R The irresistible force can never consist in an impulse or passion or obfuscation. 6t must consist of an e-traneous force comin' from a third person. R A person who acts under the compulsion of an irresistible force, li/e one who acts under the impulse of uncontrollable fear of e9ual or 'reater in+ur% is e-empt from criminal liabilit% because he does not act with freedom. P&o*%& +. L!s!n- (1998) Facts: *analili as/ed 1arcia if he could find someone who could effect the arrest of Robert ,errera, the suspect of the /illin' of his brother. 1arcia introduced &isin' and the% came up with an a'reement. &isin'Bs surveillance 'roup was at the CastanosB residence in the hope of spottin' ,errera. The 'roup saw a man and a woman (the victims" leave the residence and followed them. Ali'htin' from the car, the two were accosted. The abduction of the # hit the front pa'es and two 'uards told the police that their friends who were emplo%ees of &isin' informed them that &isin' /illed the # victims. &ater, the bodies of the # were found. &ower court found that since there was an a'reement amon' *analili, 1arcia and &isin', the% were all co?conspirators of the crime and therefore liable principall%. 1arcia claimed that he acted under compulsion of irresistible force. Held: To be e-empt from criminal liabilit%, a person invo/in' irresistible force must show that the force e-erted was such that it reduced him to a mere instrument who acted not onl% without will but a'ainst his will. 1arciaBs participation and presence from the time the abduction was hatched upto the /illin' of the victims is undisputed. Conspirac% has been established. US +. E%!$,n,% (1910) Facts: The accused was a member of the crew of a lorcha and 1uiloresa was the chief mate. The latter mentioned that he was 'oin' to /ill the captain because he was ver% an'r% with him and as/ed him to assist him. The accused too/ this statement as a +o/e and he was smilin' onl% when he made the statement. The followin' mornin', 1uillermo assaulted the captain and with the help of the crew (e-cept the accused" sei4ed the captain and tied him with a rope. 1uillermo then struc/ the captain at the bac/ of the nec/ with an iron bar and then, deliverin' the weapon to the accused ordered him to come forward and assist. The accused struc/ the captain on the head which caused the latterBs death. Held. (efore one uses the defense of actin' under uncontrollable fear, it must appear that the threat which caused the fear was an evil 'reater than or at least e9ual to that which he re9uired to commit and that it promised an evil of such 'ravit% and imminence that it mi'ht be said that the ordinar% man would have succumbed to it. <vidence fails to establish that the threat directed to the accused b% the chiefmate, if an%, was of such character as to deprive him of all volition and to ma/e him a mere instrument without will. The fear was not insuperable. US +. C,/,%%&#os (192() Facts: The defendants have been sentenced as accessories in the crime of assassination of > American school teachers. The defendants too/ part in the burial of the corpses of the victims. Held: The defendant (aculi is e-empt from criminal liabilit% because he onl% assisted in the burial because he was compelled to do so b% the murderers. As to defendant Caballeros, there is no proof that he too/ part in an% wa% in the e-ecution of the crime. ,is / viv Pa'e ># #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 confession cannot be accepted as proof on a trial because it was not done voluntaril%. US +. E:,%,!on (192() Facts: <-altation and Tanchico were convicted with rebellion based on documents found in the house of a certain Contreras, a so?called 'eneral of bandits, which contained the si'natures of defendants swearin' alle'iance to the Oatipunan. )efendants aver that these documents were si'ned under duress and fear of death. The% alle'e further that the% were abducted b% thieves and that these men forced the defendants to si'n the documents Held. The duress under which the defendants acted relieved them from criminal liabilit%. Prosecution was unable to prove the 'uilt of the accused and testimonies of witnesses for the accused further corroborated their defense. P&o*%& +. F#on4, (199@) Facts: (alaan brothers were ta/en b% ; armed NPA members accompanied b% accused Cronda and Padua. The accused are both residents of the same place. The two were convicted of murder. Cronda appealed claimin' he was merel% ta/en b% the armed men as a 5pointer7. Held: Records show that appellantBs participation in the commission of the crime consisted of. 1" leadin' the members of the armed 'roup to the house where the victims were found, #" t%in' the victimsB hands and 3" di''in' the 'rave where the victims were buried. ,e is not a principal b% indispensable cooperation but onl% an accomplice. The defense of uncontrollable fear cannot be accepted because the fact that the accused was seen bein' handed b% and receivin' a huntin' /nife from one of the armed men, as well as, his ine-plicable failure to report the incident to the authorities for more than 3 %ears ne'ates the e-istence of uncontrollable fear, such acts bein' indicative of his conscious concurrence with the acts of the assailants. T> +. P&o*%& (s"*#,) Facts: T%Ms mother Chua &ao $o 3n was confined at the *anila )octorsM ,ospital from 2ctober 1::= until 8une 1::#. (ein' the patientMs dau'hter, T% si'ned the LAc/nowled'ment of Responsibilit% for Pa%mentL in the Contract of Admission. T%Ms sister, 8ud% Chua, was also confined at the same hospital. The total hospital bills of the two patients amounted to P1,=;!,!:#.:!. T% e-ecuted a promissor% note wherein she assumed pa%ment of the obli'ation in installments. To assure pa%ment of the obli'ation, she drew ; postdated chec/s a'ainst *etroban/ pa%able to the hospital which were all dishonored b% the drawee ban/ and returned unpaid to the hospital due to insufficienc% of funds. Cor her defense, T% claimed that she issued the chec/s because of 5an uncontrollable fear of a 'reater in+ur%7 $he averred that she was forced to issue the chec/s to obtain release for her mother who was bein' inhumanel% and harshl% treated b% the hospital. $he alle'ed that her mother has comtemplated suicide if she would not be dischar'ed from the hospital. T% was found 'uilt% b% the lower courts of ; counts of violation of (P##. Held:The court sustained the findin's of the lower courts. The evil sou'ht to be avoided is merel% e-pected or anticipated. 6f the evil sou'ht to be avoided is merel% e-pected or anticipated or ma% happen in the future, the defense of an uncontrollable fear of a 'reater in+ur%7 is not applicable. T% could have ta/en advanta'e of an available option to avoid committin' a crime. (% her own admission, she had the choice to 'ive +ewelr% or other forms of securit% instead of postdated chec/s to secure her obli'ation. *oreover, for the defense of state of necessit% to be availin', the 'reater in+ur% feared should not have been brou'ht about b% the ne'li'ence or imprudence, more so, the willful inaction of the actor. 6n this case, the issuance of the bounced chec/s was brou'ht about b% T%Ms own failure to pa% her motherMs hospital bills. P,# 0. M ANY PERSON WHO ACTS UNDER THE IMPULSE OF AN UNCONTROLLABLE FEAR OF AN EBUAL OR 6REATER IN7URY. ELEMENTSD 1. That the threat which causes the fear is of an evil 'reater than or at least e9ual to, that which he is re9uired to commitF #. That it promises an evil of such 'ravit% and imminence that the ordinar% man would have succumbed to it. R R<Q36$6T<$. a. e-istence of an uncontrollable fearF b. the fear must be real and imminentF and c. the fear of an in+ur% is 'reater than or at least e9ual to that committed. R )uress as a valid defense should be based on real, imminent or reasonable fear for oneBs life or limb and should not be speculative, fanciful or remote fear. R A threat of future in+ur% is not enou'h. The compulsion must be of such a character as to leave no opportunit% to the accused for escape or self?defense in e9ual combat. R $peculative, fanciful and remote fear is not uncontrollable fear. R The case of 3$ v. <-altation is also an e-ample were there is real, imminent or reasonable fear. IRRESISTIBLE FORCE UNCONTROLLABLE FEAR The offender uses violence or ph%sical force to compel another person to commit the crime. The offender emplo%s intimidation or threat in compellin' another to commit a crime. 7USTIFYIN6 EGEMPTIN6 There is neither a crime nor a criminal. There is a crime but no criminal. The act is not +ustified but the actor is not criminall% liable. No civil liabilit% e-cept in no. > There is civil liabilit% e-cept no. > and ;. P,#. 7 M ANY PERSON WHO FAILS TO PERFORM AN ACT REBUIRED BY LAW' WHEN PRE)ENTED BY SOME LAWFUL OR INSUPERABLE CAUSE. ELEMENTSD 1. That an act is re9uired b% law to be doneF #. That a person fails to perform such actF 3. That his failure to perform such act was due to some lawful or insuperable cause. / viv Pa'e >3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 US +. )!$&n!%%o (1911) A policeman char'ed cannot be held liable for ille'al detention when after arrestin' his victims, it too/ him three da%s to reach the nearest +ud'e. The distance which re9uired a +ourne% for three da%s was considered to be an insuperable cause. P&o*%& +. B,n4!,n (19@0) A woman cannot be held liable for infanticide when she left her newborn child in the bushes without bein' aware that she had 'iven birth at all. $evere di44iness and e-treme debilit% made it ph%sicall% impossible for (andian to ta/e home the child plus the assertion that she didnBt /now that she had 'iven birth. @. MITI6ATIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES *iti'atin' circumstances are those which, if present in the commission of the crime, do not entirel% free the actor from criminal liabilit%, but serve onl% to reduce the penalt%. The% are based on the diminution of either freedom of action, intelli'ence or intent or on the lesser perversit% of the offender. CLASSES OF MITI6ATIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES 1. ORDINARY MITI6ATIN6 ? Those mentioned in subsections 1 to 1= of Art. 13. .. PRI)ILE6ED MITI6ATIN6 A#. 08. Penalty to be impose upon a person uner eighteen years of age! I Ahen the offender is a minor under ei'hteen %ears and his case is one comin' under the provisions of the para'raphs ne-t to the last of Article = of this Code, the followin' rules shall be observed. 1. 3pon a person under fifteen but over nine %ears of a'e, who is not e-empted from liabilit% b% reason of the court havin' declared that he acted with discernment, a discretionar% penalt% shall be imposed, but alwa%s lower b% two de'rees at least than that prescribed b% law for the crime which he committed. #. 3pon a person over fifteen and under ei'hteen %ears of a'e the penalt% ne-t lower than that prescribed b% law shall be imposed, but alwa%s in the proper period. A#. 09. Penalty to be impose #hen the crime committe is not #holly excusable. I A penalt% lower b% one or two de'rees than that prescribed b% law shall be imposed if the deed is not wholl% e-cusable b% reason of the lac/ of some of the conditions re9uired to +ustif% the same or to e-empt from criminal liabilit% in the several cases mentioned in Article 11 and 1#, provided that the ma+orit% of such conditions be present. The courts shall impose the penalt% in the period which ma% be deemed proper, in view of the number and nature of the conditions of e-emption present or lac/in'. R Privile'ed miti'atin' circumstances which are applicable onl% to particular crimes. 1. Art. #0, par. 3. Joluntar% release of the person ille'all% detained within 3 da%s without the offender attainin' his purpose and before the institution of criminal action. The penalt% is one de'ree lower. #. Art. 333, par. 3. Abandonment without +ustification of the spouse who committed adulter%. The penalt% is one de'ree lower. ORDINARY MC PRI)ILED6ED MC $usceptible of bein' offset b% an% a''ravatin' circumstance Cannot be offset b% a''ravatin' circumstance 6f not offset b% a''ravatin' circumstance, produces the effect of appl%in' the penalt% provided b% law for the crime in its min period in case of divisible penalt% The effect of imposin' upon the offender the penalt% lower b% one or two de'rees than that provided b% law for the crime. RR N2T<. *iti'atin' circumstances onl% reduce the penalt% but do not chan'e the nature of the crime. A#. 1@. )itigating circumstances. I The followin' are miti'atin' circumstancesF 1. Those mentioned in the precedin' chapter, when all the re9uisites necessar% to +ustif% or to e-empt from criminal liabilit% in the respective cases are not attendant. #. That the offender is under ei'hteen %ear of a'e or over sevent% %ears. 6n the case of the minor, he shall be proceeded a'ainst in accordance with the provisions of Art. =. 3. That the offender had no intention to commit so 'rave a wron' as that committed. >. That sufficient provocation or threat on the part of the offended part% immediatel% preceded the act. !. That the act was committed in the immediate vindication of a 'rave offense to the one committin' the felon% (delito", his spouse, ascendants, or relatives b% affinit% within the same de'rees. 0. That of havin' acted upon an impulse so powerful as naturall% to have produced passion or obfuscation. ;. That the offender had voluntaril% surrendered himself to a person in authorit% or his a'ents, or that he had voluntaril% confessed his 'uilt before the court prior to the presentation of the evidence for the prosecutionF . That the offender is deaf and dumb, blind or otherwise sufferin' some ph%sical defect which thus restricts his means of action, defense, or comm>unications with his fellow bein's. :. $uch illness of the offender as would diminish the e-ercise of the will?power of the offender without however deprivin' him of the consciousness of his acts. 1=. And, finall%, an% other circumstances of a similar nature and analo'ous to those above mentioned. P,#. 1= THOSE MENTIONED IN THE PRECEDIN6 CHAPTER' WHEN ALL THE REBUISITES NECESSARY TO 7USTIFY OR TO EGEMPT FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN THE RESPECTI)E CASES ARE NOT ATTENDANT. The circumstances of %ustification or exemption which ma% 'ive place to mitigation, because not all the re9uisites necessar% to +ustif% the act or to e-empt from / viv Pa'e >> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 criminal liabilit% in the respective cases are attendant, are the ff. 1. $elf?defense #. )efense of Relatives 3. )efense of $tran'ers >. $tate of necessit% !. Performance of dut% 0. 2bedience to order of superior ;. *inorit% over : and under 1! %ears of a'e . Causin' in+ur% b% mere accident :. 3ncontrollable fear INCOMPLETE 7USTIFYIN6 CIRCUMSTANCE 1. *ncomplete self-efense& efense of relatives& efense of stranger 6n these 3 classes of defense, 3N&AAC3& A11R<$$62N must alwa%s be present. 6t is an indispensable re9uisite. Par. 1 of Art. 13 is applicable onl% when unlawful a''ression is present but the other # re9uisites are not present in an% of the cases referred to in circumstances number 1, # and 3 or Art. 11. <-. Ahen the one ma/in' defense a'ainst unlawful a''ression used unreasonable means to prevent or repel it, he is entitled to a privile'ed miti'atin' circumstance. #. *ncomplete (ustifying circumstance of avoiance of greater evil or in(ury. R<Q36$6T<$ under par. > of Art. 11. a. That the evil sou'ht to be avoided actuall% e-istsF b. That the in+ur% feared be 'reater than that done to avoid itF c. That there be no other practical and less harmful means of preventin' it. Avoidance of 'reater evil or in+ur% is a +ustif%in' circumstance if all the three re9uisites mentioned in par. > of Art. 11 are present. (ut if an% of the last two re9uisites is lac/in', there is onl% a miti'atin' circumstance. 3. *ncomplete (ustifying circumstance of performance of uty! R<Q36$6T<$ under par. ! of Art. 11. a. That the accused acted in the performance of a dut% or in the lawful e-ercise of a ri'ht or officeF and b. That the in+ur% caused or offense committed be the necessar% conse9uence of the due performance of such dut% or the lawful e-ercise of such ri'ht or office. 6n People v. 2anis, the $C considered one of the # re9uisites as constitutin' the ma+orit%. 6t seems that there is no ordinar% miti'atin' circumstance under Art. 13 par. 1 when the +ustif%in' or e-emptin' circumstance has # re9uisites onl%. INCOMPLETE EGEMPTIN6 CIRCUMSTANCE 1. *ncomplete exempting circumstance of minority over < an uner 6> years of age! R<Q36$6T<$ under par. 3 of Art. 1#. a. That the offender is over : and under 1! %ears oldF and b. That he does not act with discernment. 6f the minor over : and under 1! %ears of a'e acted with discernment, he is entitled onl% to a miti'atin' circumstance, because not all the re9uisites to e-empt from criminal liabilit% are present. #. *ncomplete exempting circumstance of accient! R<Q36$6T<$ under par. > of Art. 1# . a. A person is performin' a lawful actF b. Aith due careF c. ,e causes an in+ur% to another b% mere accidentF and d. Aithout fault or intention of causin' it. 6f the # nd re9uisite and 1 st part of
the > th re9uisite are absent, the case will fall under Art. 30! which punishes rec/less imprudence. 6f the 1 st re9uisite and # nd part
of the > th re9uisite are absent, it will be an intentional felon%. 3. *ncomplete exempting circumstance of uncontrollable fear . R<Q36$6T<$ under par. 0 of Art. 1#. a. That the threat which caused the fear was of an evil 'reater than, or at least e9ual to, that which he was re9uired to commitF b. That it promised an evil of such 'ravit% and imminence that an ordinar% person would have succumbed to it. 6f onl% one of these re9uisites is present, there is onl% a miti'atin' circumstance. P,#. . M THAT THE OFFENDER IS UNDER 18 YEARS OF A6E OR O)ER 72 YEARS. IN THE CASE OF THE MINOR' HE SHALL BE PROCEEDED A6AINST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRO)ISIONS OF ART. 82. Par. # contemplates the ff. 1. An offender over : but under 1! of a'e who acted with discernment. #. An offender fifteen or over but under 1 %ears of a'e. 3. An offender over ;= %ears old. A#. 82. Suspension of sentence of minor elin-uents! I Ahenever a minor of either se-, under si-teen %ears of a'e at the date of the commission of a 'rave or less 'rave felon%, is accused thereof, the court, after hearin' the evidence in the proper proceedin's, instead of pronouncin' +ud'ment of conviction, shall suspend all further proceedin's and shall commit such minor to the custod% or care of a public or private, benevolent or charitable institution, established under the law of the care, correction or education of orphaned, homeless, defective, and delin9uent children, or to the custod% or care of an% other responsible person in an% other place sub+ect to visitation and supervision b% the )irector of Public Aelfare or an% of his a'ents or representatives, if there be an%, or otherwise b% the superintendent of public schools or his representatives, sub+ect to such conditions as are prescribed herein / viv Pa'e >! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 below until such minor shall have reached his ma+orit% a'e or for such less period as the court ma% deem proper. The court, in committin' said minor as provided above, shall ta/e into consideration the reli'ion of such minor, his parents or ne-t of /in, in order to avoid his commitment to an% private institution not under the control and supervision of the reli'ious sect or denomination to which the% belon'. The )irector of Public Aelfare or his dul% authori4ed representatives or a'ents, the superintendent of public schools or his representatives, or the person to whose custod% or care the minor has been committed, shall submit to the court ever% four months and as often as re9uired in special cases, a written report on the 'ood or bad conduct of said minor and the moral and intellectual pro'ress made b% him. The suspension of the proceedin's a'ainst a minor ma% be e-tended or shortened b% the court on the recommendation of the )irector of Public Aelfare or his authori4ed representative or a'ents, or the superintendent of public schools or his representatives, accordin' as to whether the conduct of such minor has been 'ood or not and whether he has complied with the conditions imposed upon him, or not. The provisions of the first para'raph of this article shall not, however, be affected b% those contained herein. 6f the minor has been committed to the custod% or care of an% of the institutions mentioned in the first para'raph of this article, with the approval of the )irector of Public Aelfare and sub+ect to such conditions as this official in accordance with law ma% deem proper to impose, such minor ma% be allowed to sta% elsewhere under the care of a responsible person. 6f the minor has behaved properl% and has complied with the conditions imposed upon him durin' his confinement, in accordance with the provisions of this article, he shall be returned to the court in order that the same ma% order his final release. 6n case the minor fails to behave properl% or to compl% with the re'ulations of the institution to which he has been committed or with the conditions imposed upon him when he was committed to the care of a responsible person, or in case he should be found incorri'ible or his continued sta% in such institution should be inadvisable, he shall be returned to the court in order that the same ma% render the +ud'ment correspondin' to the crime committed b% him. The e-penses for the maintenance of a minor delin9uent confined in the institution to which he has been committed, shall be borne totall% or partiall% b% his parents or relatives or those persons liable to support him, if the% are able to do so, in the discretion of the courtF Provided, That in case his parents or relatives or those persons liable to support him have not been ordered to pa% said e-penses or are found indi'ent and cannot pa% said e-penses, the municipalit% in which the offense was committed shall pa% one?third of said e-pensesF the province to which the municipalit% belon's shall pa% one?thirdF and the remainin' one?third shall be borne b% the National 1overnment. Provided, however, That whenever the $ecretar% of Cinance certifies that a municipalit% is not able to pa% its share in the e-penses above mentioned, such share which is not paid b% said municipalit% shall be borne b% the National 1overnment. Chartered cities shall pa% two?thirds of said e-pensesF and in case a chartered cit% cannot pa% said e-penses, the internal revenue allotments which ma% be due to said cit% shall be withheld and applied in settlement of said indebtedness in accordance with section five hundred and ei'ht%?ei'ht of the Administrative Code. LE6AL EFFECTS OF )ARIOUS A6ES OF OFFENDERD 1. 3nder : %ears of a'e, an e-emptin' circumstance. (Art. 1#, par. #" #. 2ver : and under 1! %ears of a'e, also an e-emptin' circumstance, unless he acted with discernment (Art. 1#, par. 3" 3. *inor delin9uent under 1 %ears of a'e, the sentence ma% be suspended. (Art. 1:#, P) No. 0=3 as amended b% P) 11;:" >. 3nder 1 %ears of a'e, privile'ed miti'atin' circumstance (Art. 0" !. 1 %ears or over, full criminal responsibilit%. P,#. @ M THAT THE OFFENDER HAD NO INTENTION TO COMMIT SO 6R A WRON6 AS THAT COMMITTED. This circumstance can be ta/en into account onl% when the facts proven show that there is a notable and evident disproportion between the means emplo%ed to e-ecute the criminal act and its conse9uences. The intention, as an internal act, is +ud'ed not onl% b% the proportion of the means emplo%ed b% him to the evil produced b% his act, but also b% the fact that the blow was or was not aimed at a vital part of the bod%. 6ntention must be +ud'ed b% considerin' the weapon used, the in+ur% inflicted and his attitude of the mind when the accused attac/ed the deceased. This miti'atin' circumstance is not applicable when the offender emplo%ed brute force. &ac/ of intent to commit so 'rave a wron' is not appreciated where the offense committed is characteri4ed b% treacher%. 6n crimes a'ainst persons who do not die as a result of the assault, the absence of the intent to /ill reduces the felon% to mere ph%sical in+uries, but it does not constitute a miti'atin' circumstance under Art. 13 par 3. 6t is not applicable to felonies b% ne'li'ence because in these /inds of felonies, there is no intent on the part of the offender which ma% be considered diminished. Par. 3 is onl% applicable to offense resultin' in ph%sical in+uries or material harm. 6t is not applicable to defamation or slander. P&o*%& +. U#,% (1971) Facts: Aitness Alberto saw policeman 3ral inside the +ail bo-in' detention prisoner Napola. As Napola collapsed on the floor, 3ral went out to 'et a bottle. ,e poured the contents to the dress of Napola and set it on fire. Napola 'ot burned and he as/ed merc% from 3ral. 6nstead, 3ral loc/ed him up and threatened the witness not to tell an%one or else he will burn also. Ahen Napola was alread% sufferin' much from the burns, 3ral became fri'htened and he and $iton helped put out the fire. Napola died later because of the burns. Held: 2ffender is criminall% liable althou'h conse9uence of his felonious act was not intended b% him. This is covered b% Art. > of the RPC. The TC failed / viv Pa'e >0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 to appreciate the miti'atin' circumstance that the offender has no intention to commit so 'rave a wron' as that committed. 6t is manifest from the facts that the accused had no intent to /ill the victim. ,is onl% desi'n was onl% to maltreat him ma%be because of his drun/en condition. Ahen the accused reali4ed the fearful conse9uences of his act, he allowed the victim to secure medical treatment. P&o*%& +. A3! (1972) Facts: Amit pleads 'uilt% to rape with homicide and sentenced to death. Amit appeals claimin' that there are 3 miti'atin' circumstances includin' lac/ of intention to commit so 'rave a wron'. Held: A 'reat disproportion between means emplo%ed to accomplish the criminal act on the one hand, and its conse9uences on the other, must first be shown. 2therwise, the miti'atin' circumstance could not be considered. (ased on the narration 'iven b% the accused where he said that he held victimBs nec/ down as he bo-ed her in the face, and considerin' moreover that the victim was !; %ears old while the accused was onl% 3#, the court held that the means emplo%ed b% the accused was sufficient to have caused the death of the victim. )eath penalt% should be imposed. 6t is a sin'le indivisible penalt% applied re'ardless of miti'atin' circumstance, especiall% when records of the present case evince the a''ravatin' circumstances of ni'httime and abuse of superior stren'th. P&o*%& +. R&-,o (1981) Facts: Re'ato, Ramire4 and $alceda robbed the store of Jictor Clores. Jictor was maltreated to force him to reveal where their mone% was. The robbers found the mone% in a place different from where Jictor revealed to them. Ramire4 'ot mad and called Jictor a liar. Jictor retorted, 5%ou robbersT7. Aith this remar/, Ramire4 shot Jictor and the three rushed out of the house. Held: The $C did not find merit in the contention that there was lac/ of intent to commit so 'rave a wron' as that committed. 6ntention is a mental process and is an internal state of mind. The intention must be +ud'ed b% the ACT62N, C2N)3CT and <HT<RNA& ACT$ of the accused. Ahat men do is the best inde- of their intention. 6n the case at bar, the aforesaid miti'atin' circumstance cannot be appreciated considerin' that the acts emplo%ed b% the accused were reasonabl% sufficient to produce the result that the% actuall% made @ the death of the victim. P&o*%& +. C,%%& (.22.) Facts: Alfredo, &ecpo% and <duardo were beside each other as the% watched a cara % cru4 'ame. Alfredo sat close to the 'round, with his buttoc/s restin' on his ri'ht foot. &ecpo% and <duardo sat on a piece of wood and on a stone, respectivel%. 2ut of nowhere, the accused, Callet, appeared behind Alfredo and stabbed the latter on the left shoulder near the base of the nec/ with a :?inch huntin' /nife. 6nstinctivel%, Alfredo stood up and mana'ed to wal/ a few meters. Ahen he fell on the 'round, &ecpo% and <duardo rushed to help him but to no avail. Alfredo died shortl% thereafter. Calleto voluntar% surrendered. ,e claims that his liabiit% should be miti'ated b% the fact that he had no intention to commit so 'rave a wron'. Held: The lac/ of LintentL to commit a wron' so 'rave is an internal state. 6t is wei'hed based on the weapon used, the part of the bod% in+ured, the in+ur% inflicted and the manner it is inflicted. The fact that the accused used a :?inch huntin' /nife in attac/in' the victim from behind, without 'ivin' him an opportunit% to defend himself, clearl% shows that he intended to do what he actuall% did, and he must be held responsible therefor, without the benefit of this miti'atin' circumstance. P,#. 1. M THAT SUFFICIENT PRO)OCATION OR THREAT ON THE PART OF THE OFFENDED PARTY IMMEDIATELY PRECEDED THE ACT PRO)OCATION ? An% un+ust or improper conduct or act of the offended part%, capable of e-citin', incitin', or irritatin' an%one. REBUISITESD a. That the provocation must be sufficient b. That it must ori'inate from the offended part% c. That the provocation must be immediate to the act, i.e., to the commission of the crime b% the person who is provo/ed. P&o*%& +. P,-,% (1977) Facts: Pa'al and Torcelino, emplo%ees of 1au 1uan, conspired to'ether to ta/e awa% from their emplo%er P1,#1. Ahen 1au 1uan refused to open the /aha de %ero, the% stabbed him with an icepic/ and clubbed him with an iron pipe which resulted to his death. The two accused were char'ed with the crime of robber% with homicide. 2n appeal, the% claimed that the% are entitled to # miti'atin' circumstances. sufficient provocation or threat on the part of the offended part% and havin' acted upon an impulse so powerful as to produce passion and obfuscation. Held: The # miti'atin' circumstances cannot be considered as # distinct and separate circumstances but should onl% be treated as one because the% both arose from the same incident @ the alle'ed maltreatment of Pa'al and Torcelino b% 1au 1uan. The circumstance of passion and obfuscation cannot be miti'atin' in a crime which is planned and calml% meditated before its e-ecution. Also, provocation in order to be miti'atin' must be sufficient and immediatel% precedin' the act. 6n this case, it was months a'o when the incident of alle'ed maltreatment too/ place. Ro3&#, +. P&o*%& (.221) Facts: Ahile l%in' in bed, Romera heard the victim Ro% call him and his wife, as/in' if the% had beer and a fi'hter for sale. ,e did not answer Ro% because he /new that Ro% was alread% drun/. Ro% as/ed for Romera but when the latterMs wife told him that he was alread% asleep, Ro% told her to wa/e her husband up. Romera went down the house and as/ed who was at the door. 8ust as he opened the door for Ro%, Ro% thrust his bolo at him. ,e successfull% parried the bolo and as/ed Ro% what it was all about. Ro% answered he would /ill Romera. Romera tried to prevent Ro% from enterin', so he pushed the door shut. As Ro% was hac/in' at the wall, RomeraBs wife held the door to allow Romera to e-it in another door to face Ro%. ,e hurled a stone at Ro%, who dod'ed it. Ro% rushed to him and hac/ed him, but he parried the blow. Petitioner 'rappled for the bolo and stabbed Ro% in the stomach. Aounded, Ro% be''ed petitioner for for'iveness. / viv Pa'e >; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Romera ceased harmin' Ro% for fear he mi'ht /ill him. Held: There was sufficient provocation and the circumstance of passion or obfuscation attended the commission of the offense. Thrustin' his bolo at Romera, threatenin' to /ill him, and hac/in' the bamboo walls of his house are sufficient provocation to enra'e an% man, or stir his ra'e and obfuscate his thin/in', more so when the lives of his wife and children are in dan'er. Romera stabbed the victim as a result of those provocations, and while Romera was still in a fit of ra'e. The court however stressed that provocation and passion or obfuscation are not # separate miti'atin' circumstances. Aell?settled is the rule that if these # circumstances are based on the same facts, the% should be treated to'ether as one miti'atin' circumstance. Crom the facts established in this case, it is clear that both circumstances arose from the same set of facts aforementioned. ,ence, the% should not be treated as two separate miti'atin' circumstances. P,#. (. M THAT THE ACT WAS COMMITTED IN THE IMMEDIATE )INDICATION OF A 6RA)E OFFENSE TO THE ONE COMMITTIN6 THE FELONY (DELITO)' HIS SPOUSE' ASCENDANTS' DESCENDANTS' LE6ITIMATE' NATURAL OR ADOPTED BROTHERS OR SISTERS' OR RELATI)ES BY AFFINITY WITHIN THE SAME DE6REE. REBUISITESD a. That there be a gra!e offense done to the one committin' the felon%, his spouse, ascendants, descendants, le'itimate, natural or adopted brothers or sisters, or relatives b% affinit% within the same de'ree. b. That the felon% is committed in vindication of such 'rave offense. A lapse of time is allowed between the vindication and the doin' of the 'rave offense. PRO)OCATION )INDICATION 6t is made directl% onl% to the person committin' the offense The 'rave offense ma% be committed also a'ainst the offenderBs relatives mentioned in the law. The cause that brou'ht about the provocation need not be a 'rave offense. The offended part% must have done a 'rave offense to the offender or his relatives mentioned in the law. 6t is necessar% that the provocation or threat immediatel% preceded the act. The vindication of the 'rave offense ma% be proximate, which admits of an interval of time between the 'race offense done b% the offended part% and the commission of the crime. ,asis to etermine the gravity of offense in vinication The 9uestion whether or not a certain personal offense is 'rave must be decided b% the court, havin' in mind the social standing of the person, the place and the time when the insult was made. Jindication of a 'rave offense and passion or obfuscation cannot be counted separatel% and independentl%. P&o*%& +. A3*,# (1917) Facts: A fiesta was in pro'ress and the accused Ampar went to the /itchen and as/ed from Patobo some of the roast pi'. Patobo replied, 5There is no more. Come here and 6 will ma/e roast pi' of %ou.7 &ater, while Patobo was s9uattin' down, Ampar struc/ him on the head with an a-, causin' his death the followin' da%. The TC appreciated the miti'atin' circumstance of immediate vindication of a 'rave offense. Held: The offense which the defendant was endeavorin' to vindicate would be to the avera'e person considered as a mere trifle. (ut to this defendant, an old man, it evidentl% was a serious matter to be made the butt of a +o/e in the presence of so man% 'uests. The TC was correct. P&o*& +. P,#,n, (19@7) Facts: The precedin' ni'ht, Parana and &ama% were at the house of the deceasedBs brother pla%in' cards when the two had an e-chan'e of words so the deceased as/ed them to leave. The accused refused so the deceased slapped him and ordered him to leave. The mornin' after, Parana was about to surprise the deceased and stab him from behind when the chauffeur shouted to warn the deceased. The deceased, defendin' himself retreated until he fell into a ditch. The appellant mounted astride of the deceased and continued to stab him with the da''er. The deceased was first brou'ht to the hospital but e-pired 0 da%s after. Held: The miti'atin' circumstance that he had acted in the immediate vindication of a 'rave offense committed a'ainst him a few hours before, when he was slapped b% the deceased in the presence of man% persons, must li/ewise be ta/en into consideration. Althou'h this offense (slappin'" was not so immediate, the court believes that the influence thereof, b% reason of its 'ravit% and the circumstances under which it was inflicted, lasted until the moment the crime was committed. P&o*%& +. D!o?no (19@0) Facts: The deceased and the dau'hter of accused <pifanio eloped. <pifanio and his son, Roman went to loo/ for them. Ahen the% were able to find the deceased, the% stabbed him several times until he died. Held: The presence of the ! th miti'atin' circumstance must be ta/en into consideration. There was no interruption from the time the offense was committed to the vindication thereof. The herein accused belon' to a famil% of old customs to whom the elopement of a dau'hter with a man constitutes a 'rave offense to their honor and causes disturbance of the peace of the home. The fact that the accused saw the deceased run upstairs when he became aware of their presence, as if he refused to deal with them after havin' 'ravel% offended them, was certainl% a stimulus stron' enou'h to produce in their mind a fit of passion which blinded them and led them to commit that crime. P&o*%& +. To#*!o (.221) Facts. Ahile havin' a drin/in' spree in a cotta'e, Anthon% tried to let )ennis Torpio drin/ 'in and as the latter refused, Anthon% bathed )ennis with 'in and mauled him several times. )ennis crawled beneath the table and Anthon% tried to stab him with a / viv Pa'e > #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 ## fan /nife but did not hit him. )ennis 'ot up and ran towards their home. 3pon reachin' home, he 'ot a /nife. ,e went bac/ to the cotta'e b% another route and upon arrival Anthon% was still there. 3pon seein' )ennis, Anthon% avoided )ennis and ran b% passin' the shore towards the cree/ but )ennis met him, bloc/ed him and stabbed him. Ahen he was hit, Anthon% ran but 'ot entan'led with a fishin' net beside the cree/ and fell on his bac/. )ennis then mounted on him and continued stabbin' him resultin' to the latters death. Thereafter, )ennis left and slept at a 'rass% meadow near a Camp. 6n the mornin', he went to <strera, a police officer to whom he voluntaril% surrendered. Held: The miti'atin' circumstance of havin' acted in the immediate vindication of a 'rave offense is properl% appreciated. )ennis was humiliated, mauled and almost stabbed b% the Anthon%. Althou'h the unlawful a''ression had ceased when )ennis stabbed Anthon%, it was nonetheless a 'rave offense for which the )ennis ma% be 'iven the benefit of a miti'atin' circumstance. ,owever, the miti'atin' circumstance of sufficient provocation cannot be considered apart from the circumstance of vindication of a 'rave offense. These two circumstances arose from one and the same incident, i.e., the attac/ on the appellant b% Anthon%, so that the% should be considered as onl% one miti'atin' circumstance. P&%on!, +. P&o*%& (.220) Held: The miti'atin' circumstance of havin' acted in the immediate vindication of a 'rave offense was, li/ewise, properl% appreciated. Petitioner was humiliated in front of his 'uests and /in in his own house. 6t is settled, however, that the mitigating circumstance of sufficient provocation cannot be consiere apart from the circumstance of vinication of a grave offense! These two circumstances arose from one and the same incident so that the% should be considered as onl% one miti'atin' circumstance. P,#. 0. M THAT OF HA)IN6 ACTED UPON AN IMPULSE SO POWERFUL AS NATURALLY TO HA)E PRODUCED PASSION OR OBFUSCATION. REBUISITESD a. The accused acted upon an impulse. b. The impulse must be so powerful that it naturall% produce passion or obfuscation in him. Passion or obfuscation ma% constitute as a miti'atin' circumstance onl% when the same arose from &AAC3& $<NT6*<NT$. 6t is not applicable when. a. The act committed in a spirit of &AA&<$$N<$$. b. the act is committed in a spirit of R<J<N1<. The crime committed must be the result of a sudden impulse of natural and uncontrollable fur%. The accused who raped a woman is not entitled to the miti'atin' circumstance of 5havin' acted upon an impulse so powerful as naturall% to have produced passion7 +ust because he finds himself in a secluded place with that %oun' ravishin' woman, almost na/ed and therefore, 5liable to succumb to the uncontrollable passion of his bestial instinct.7 The miti'atin' circumstance of obfuscation arisin' from +ealous% cannot be invo/ed in favor of the accused whose relationship with the woman was ille'itimate. Passion and obfuscation ma% lawfull% arise from causes e-istin' onl% in the honest belief of the offender. PASSION OR OBFUSCATION IRRESISTIBLE FORCE *iti'atin' circumstance <-emptin' circumstance Cannot 'ive rise to an irresistible force because the latter re9uires ph%sical force Passion or obfuscation is in the offender himself 6rresistible force must come from a third person *ust arise from lawful sentiments The irresistible force is unlawful PASSION PRO)OCATION Produced b% an impulse which ma% be caused b% provocation Comes form the in+ured part% Need not be immediate. 6t is onl% re9uired that the influence thereof lasts until the moment the crime is committed *ust immediatel% precede the commission of the crime The effect is the loss of reason and self?control on the part of the offender. P&o*%& +. M"! (198.) Facts: Rosario *uit was the (r'%. Sone President and Torrero was the 4one auditor. The% used to meet fre9uentl% because the% were havin' an affair which eventuall% reached the husband of Rosario, )elfin. )elfin shot Torrero 3 times at the front %ard of the *uits. )elfin surrendered himself and turned in the pistol he had used. Held: *uit is 'uilt% of murder with miti'atin' circumstances of voluntar% surrender and passion and obsfuscation. The accused was driven stron'l% b% +ealous%. The feelin' of resentment resultin' from the rivalr% in amorous relations with a woman is a powerful stimulant to +ealous% and prone to produce an'er and obfuscation. US +. HICCS (1929) Facts: Cor about ! %ears, ,ic/s and $ola lived to'ether as husband and wife when the% separated. A few da%s later, $ola contracted new relations with another ne'ro named Aallace. ,ic/s went to AallaceBs house and as/ed the latter to 'o out. The% tal/ed for awhile and then ,ic/s shot Aallace Held: <ven if it is true that the accused acted with obfuscation because of +ealous%, the miti'atin' circumstance cannot be considered in his favor because the causes which miti'ate criminal responsibilit% for the loss of self?control are such which ori'inate from legitimate feelings and not those which arise from !icious# unworthy and immoral passions. The cause of the passion of the accused was his ve-ation en'endered b% the refusal of the woman to continue to live in illicit relations with him, which she had a perfect ri'ht to do. US +. DE LA CRUE (191.) Facts: The evidence clearl% discloses that the convict, in the heat of passion, /illed the deceased, who / viv Pa'e >: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 had theretofore been his lover upon discoverin' her in flagrante in carnal communication with a mutual ac9uaintance. Held: The accused was entitled to the miti'atin' circumstance of passion or obfuscation because the impulse was caused b% the sudden revelation that she was untrue to him, and his discover% of her in flagrante in the arms of another. note. when the court used the word 5illicit7, it doesnBt mean that it is an ille'itimate or bi'amous relationship. 6t means that it is cohabitation without a valid marria'e. P&o*%& +. 6!n, (1998) Facts: 2ne ni'ht, the accused went to the An'eles residence to loo/ for Ra%mund. ,e went to verifi% the news that the latter mauled and stabbed the accusedBs mentall% retarded brother, Rafael. Ra%mund was not %et at home and the moment he arrived, the accused spotted him and shot him. Held: There is no treacher%. Passion cannot co? e-ist with treacher% because in passion, the offender loses his control and reason while in treacher% the means emplo%ed are consciousl% adopted. 2ne who loses his reason and self?control could not deliberatel% emplo% a particular method or form of attac/ in the e-ecution of the crime. Passion e-isted in this case because it clearl% arose from lawful sentiments or le'itimate feelin's. The accused committed the crime due to the maltreatment inflicted b% the victim on his mentall% retarded brother. Ro3&#, +. P&o*%& (.221) Facts: Ahile l%in' in bed, Romera heard the victim Ro% call him and his wife, as/in' if the% had beer and a fi'hter for sale. ,e did not answer Ro% because he /new that Ro% was alread% drun/. Ro% as/ed for Romera but when the latterMs wife told him that he was alread% asleep, Ro% told her to wa/e her husband up. Romera went down the house and as/ed who was at the door. 8ust as he opened the door for Ro%, Ro% thrust his bolo at him. ,e successfull% parried the bolo and as/ed Ro% what it was all about. Ro% answered he would /ill Romera. Romera tried to prevent Ro% from enterin', so he pushed the door shut. As Ro% was hac/in' at the wall, RomeraBs wife held the door to allow Romera to e-it in another door to face Ro%. ,e hurled a stone at Ro%, who dod'ed it. Ro% rushed to him and hac/ed him, but he parried the blow. Petitioner 'rappled for the bolo and stabbed Ro% in the stomach. Aounded, Ro% be''ed petitioner for for'iveness. Romera ceased harmin' Ro% for fear he mi'ht /ill him. Held: There was sufficient provocation and the circumstance of *,ss!on o# o/8"s$,!on attended the commission of the offense. Thrustin' his bolo at Romera, threatenin' to /ill him, and hac/in' the bamboo walls of his house are sufficient provocation to enra'e an% man, or stir his ra'e and obfuscate his thin/in', more so when the lives of his wife and children are in dan'er. Romera stabbed the victim as a result of those provocations, and while Romera was still in a fit of ra'e. The court however stressed that provocation and passion or obfuscation are not # separate miti'atin' circumstances. Aell?settled is the rule that if these # circumstances are based on the same facts, the% should be treated to'ether as one miti'atin' circumstance. Crom the facts established in this case, it is clear that both circumstances arose from the same set of facts aforementioned. ,ence, the% should not be treated as two separate miti'atin' circumstances. P&o*%& +. 6onF,%&F (.221) Facts: (oth of the families of Andres and that of 1on4ale4 were on their wa% to the e-it of the &o%ola *emorial Par/. 1on4ales was with his 'randson and 3 housemaids, while Andres was drivin' with his pre'nant wife, Celiber, his #%r old son, Oenneth, his nephew Oevin and his sister?in?law. At an intersection, their two vehicles almost collided. 1on4ales continued drivin' while Andres tailed 1on4alesB vehicle and cut him off when he found the opportunit% to do so, then 'ot out of his vehicle and /noc/ed on the appellantMs car window. ,eated e-chan'e of remar/s followed. 2n his wa% bac/ to his vehicle, he met 1on4ales son, )ino. Andres had a shoutin' match this time with )ino. 1on4ales then ali'hted from his car and fired a sin'le shot at the last window on the left side of AndresM vehicle at an an'le awa% from Andres. The sin'le bullet fired hit Oenneth, Oevin and Celiber which caused the latters death. Held: The miti'atin' circumstance of passion and obfuscation is not obtainin'. AndresM act of shoutin' at 1on4alesB son, who was then a nurse and of le'al a'e, is not sufficient to produce passion and obfuscation. )ino was shoutin' bac/ at Andres. 6t was not a case wherein 1on4ales son appeared helpless and oppressed that 1on4ales lost his reason and shot at the vehicle of Andres. The same holds true for 1on4alesB claim of provocation on the part of Andres. Provocation must be sufficient to e-cite a person to commit the wron' committed and that the provocation must be commensurate to the crime committed. The sufficienc% of provocation varies accordin' to the circumstances of the case. The a''ressive behavior of Andres towards 1on4ales and his son ma% be demeanin' or humiliatin' but it is not sufficient provocation to shoot at 1on4alesB vehicle. P&o*%& +. L,/=&o (.22.) Facts. After bein' told to 'o awa% b% the victim. &ab?eo left and returned to where the victim was sellin' clothes and then and there stabbed her at the bac/ with a /nife. Thereafter, he surrendered to the Chief of Police. &ab?eo ar'ues for the appreciation of the miti'atin' circumstances of passion and obfuscation, as well as of sufficient provocation, in his favor. Held: Cor a person to be motivated b% passion and obfuscation, there must first e-ist an unlawful act that would naturall% produce an impulse sufficient to overcome reason and self?control. There is passional obfuscation when the crime is committed due to an uncontrollable burst of passion provo/ed b% prior un+ust or improper acts, or due to a le'itimate stimulus so powerful as to overcome reason. 6n as/in' &abIeo to leave, the victim did not do an%thin' unlawful. There is an absolute lac/ of proof that the &ab?eo was utterl% humiliated b% the victimMs utterance. Nor was it shown that the victim made that remar/ in an insultin' and repu'nant manner. The victimMs utterance was not the stimulus re9uired b% +urisprudence to be so overwhelmin' as to overcome reason and self?restraint. P&o*%& +. B,&s (.22@) Facts: Ahile <d'ar, $imon, and 8ose are alon' a trail leadin' to the house of Carlito (ates, the latter suddenl% emer'ed from the thic/ banana plantation surroundin' the trail, aimin' his firearm at 8ose who was then wal/in' ahead of his companions. 8ose 'rabbed / viv Pa'e != #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 CarlitoMs ri'ht hand and elbow and tried to wrest possession of the firearm. Ahile the # were 'rapplin' for possession, the 'un fired, hittin' Carlito who immediatel% fell to the 'round. At that instant, *arcelo (ates and his son *arcelo (ates, 8r., brother and nephew of Carlito, respectivel%, emer'ed from the banana plantation, each brandishin' a bolo. The% immediatel% attac/ed 8ose hac/in' him several times. 8ose fell to the 'round and rolled but *arcelo and his son /ept on hac/in' him. Held: Passion and obfuscation ma% not be properl% appreciated in favor of the appellant. To be considered as a miti'atin' circumstance, passion or obfuscation must arise from lawful sentiments and not from a spirit of lawlessness or reven'e or from an'er and resentment. 6n the present case, clearl%, *arcelo was infuriated upon seein' his brother, Carlito, shot b% 8ose. ,owever, a distinction must be made between the first time that *arcelo hac/ed 8ose and the second time that the former hac/ed the latter. Ahen *arcelo hac/ed 8ose ri'ht after seein' the latter shoot at Carlito, and if appellant refrained from doin' an%thin' else fter that, he could have validl% invo/ed the miti'atin' circumstance of passion and obfuscation. (ut when, upon seein' his brother Carlito dead, *arcelo went bac/ to 8ose, who b% then was alread% prostrate on the 'round and hardl% movin', hac/in' 8ose a'ain was a clear case of someone actin' out of an'er in the spirit of reven'e. P,#. 7. M THAT THE OFFENDER HAD )OLUNTARILY SURRENDERED HIMSELF TO A PERSON IN AUTHORITY OR HIS A6ENTS' OR THAT HE HAD )OLUNTARILY CONFESSED HIS 6UILT BEFORE THE COURT PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE E)IDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION. . MITI6ATIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER THIS PARA6RAPHD 1. Joluntar% surrender to a person in authorit% or his a'entsF #. Joluntar% confession of 'uilt before the court prior to the presentation of evidence for the prosecution. RE=3*S*"ES '1 2'L3N"$R5 S3RRENDERD a. That the offender had not been actuall% arrested. b. That the offender surrendered himself to a person in authorit% or to the latterBs a'ent. c. That the surrender was voluntar%. *erel% re9uestin' a policeman to accompan% the accused to the police ,Q is not e9uivalent to voluntar% surrender. 2ther e-amples. a. The warrant of arrest showed that the accused was in fact arrested. b. The accused surrendered onl% after the warrant of arrest was served. c. The accused went into hidin' and surrendered onl% when the% reali4ed that the forces of the law were closin' in on them. $urrender must be $P2NTAN<23$. ,e surrendered 1" because he ac/nowled'es his 'uilt% or #" because he wishes to save them the trouble and e-penses necessaril% incurred in his search and capture. The surrender must be b% reason of the commission of the crime for which he is prosecuted. P&o*%& +. P!n$, (1999) Facts: Pinca and Abenir, after drin/in' at a ba/eshop, hitched a ride with a tric%cle driver on their wa% home. After passin' a man who was apparentl% drun/ because he was swa%in' while he wal/ed, the accused as/ed the driver to drop them off alread%. Pinca told Abenir that that was the 'u% who spilled a drin/ on him earlier that da%. The accused pic/ed up a lon' piece of wood and waited for the man to pass b%. Ahen the latter did, the accused hit him at the bac/ of his head which led to his death. Ahen the police came, the accused readil% went with them and proceeded to tell his stor% that he was innocent and that it was Abenir who /illed the man. The accused was convicted of the crime of murder. Held: Cor voluntar% surrender to be appreciated, 3 re9uisites should be present. 1" the offender has not been actuall% arrestedF #" the offender surrendered to a person of authorit% and 3" the surrender was voluntar%. The actions of the accused belied this claim. ,e actuall% )<N6<) havin' committed the crimes. ,e went on to tr% and 5clear his name.7 There is no voluntar% surrender. P&o*%& +. A3,-"!n (1991) Facts: Celso and 1ildo, to'ether with others, attac/ed the 2ros. )urin' the fra%, 1ildo was armed with a /nife and an 56ndian tar'et.7 And +ust as the% were about to finish off the 2ro brothers, Aillie, the eldest of the Ama'uins, appeared with a revolver and delivered the coup de grace. Held: $C a'rees with the accused?appellantsB view that voluntar% surrender should be appreciated in their favor. Ahile it ma% have ta/en both Aillie and 1ildo a wee/ before turnin' themselves in, the fact is, the% voluntaril% surrendered to the police before arrest could be effected. P&o*%& +. D"%os (1991) Facts: The accused hired two professional entertainers to entertain his 'uests. 2ne of the entertainers, $usan, accepted an offer to chec/ in with the accused 'uests but later on chan'ed her mind and re+ected the offer. Ahen she went home with her bo%friend, the accused chased them and as/ed for the amount paid to $usan b% one of his 'uests. $usan denied this. $usanBs bo%friend was shot b% the accused which resulted to his death. Held: J$ cannot be appreciated where there was no conscious effort on the part of the accused to voluntaril% surrender. ,ere, there was no conscious effort on the part of the accused to J$ to the militar% authorities when he went to Camp $ion'co after the fateful incidents. As he himself admitted, he was not placed under custod% b% the militar% authorities as he was free to roam around as he pleased. There is no J$ also where an accused merel% surrendered the 'un he used in the /illin', without surrenderin' his person to the authorities. RE=3*S*"ES '1 PLE$ '1 93*L"5 a. That the offender spontaneousl% confessed his 'uiltF Plea of 'uilt% on appeal is not miti'atin'. / viv Pa'e !1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 b. That the confession of 'uilt% was made in open court, that is, before the competent court that is to tr% the caseF and The e-tra+udicial confession made b% the accused is not voluntar% confession. $uch confession was made outside the court. The confession must be made in open court. c. That the confession of 'uilt was made prior to the presentation of evidence for the prosecution. The chan'e of plea should be made at the first opportunit% when his arrai'nment was first set. A conditional plea of 'uilt% is not miti'atin' G Plea of 'uilt% is miti'atin' because it indicates a moral disposition in the accused, favorable to his reform. 6t is an act of repentance and respect for the law. P&o*%& +. C#!soso3o (1988) Facts: 2n Christmas da%, while the accused was passin' near the house of Romeo, he met the latter and invited him to 'o drin/in'. Romeo declined and suddenl%, the accused rushed towards Romeo from behind and shot him with a revolver. After the arrai'nment wherein accused entered a plea of not 'uilt% and a'ain durin' the trial, the accused si'nified his intention to withdraw his plea of not 'uilt% to a lesser char'e of homicide and pra%ed that he be allowed to prove the miti'atin' circumstances. Held: The appellant offered to enter a plea of 'uilt% to the lesser offense of homicide onl% after some evidence of the prosecution had been presented. ,e reiterated his offer after the prosecution rested its case. This is certainl% not miti'atin'. P&o*%& +. 7os& & ,% (1971) Facts: The *a''ie )e la Riva stor%. *a''ie was drivin' her car with her maid inside when the% were stopped b% another car. The appellant, Pineda, to'ether with his 3 companions too/ *a''ie with them leavin' the maid behind. *a''ie who was blindfolded was brou'ht to a hotel. 6nside the room, her blindfold was removed and she was as/ed to strip for them. Then, the appellants raped her. Held: Pineda contends that because the char'e a'ainst him and his co?appellants is a capital offense and the amended complaints cited a''ravatin' circumstances, which, if proved, would raise the penalt% to death, it was the dut% of the court to insist on his presence durin' all sta'es of the trial. The contention is untenable. Ahile a plea of 'uilt% is miti'atin', at the same time it constitutes an admission of all the material facts alle'ed in the information, includin' the a''ravatin' circumstances, and it matters not that the offense is capital, for the admission covers both the crime and its attendant circumstances 9ualif%in' andDor a''ravatin' the crime. (ecause of the aforesaid le'al effect of PinedaBs plea of 'uilt%, it was not incumbent upon the trial court to receive his evidence, much less to re9uire his presence in court. An4#,4, +. P&o*%& (.22() Facts. 6nside a restaurant, Andrada approached and scolded Cpl. 3'erio while the latter was tal/in' to a woman who passed b% their table. $'t. $umabon', identif%in' himself as a PC non? commissioned officer, advised Andrada to pa% his bill and 'o home as he was apparentl% drun/. Andrada paid his bill and left the restaurant with his companions. Ahile $'t. $umabon' was pa%in' his bill, he heard Cpl. 3'erio, seated about a meter awa%, moanin' in pain. Ahen $'t. $umabon' turned around, he saw Cpl. 3'erio sprawled on the floor. Andrada was hac/in' him on the head with a bolo. $'t. $umabon' approached them but Andrada ran awa%, followed b% a companion. ,e was eventuall% arrested at a waitin' shed and was brou'ht bac/ to the restaurant where the% recovered the bolo used in hac/in' the victim. Andrada invo/ed the miti'atin' circumstance of voluntar% surrender. Held: Andrada, after attac/in' the victim# ran awa%. ,e was apprehended b% respondin' officers at a waitin' shed. Cor voluntar% surrender to be appreciated, the surrender must be spontaneous, made in such a manner that it shows the interest of the accused to surrender unconditionall% to the authorities, either because he ac/nowled'es his 'uilt or wishes to save them the trouble and e-penses that would be necessaril% incurred in his search and capture. ,ere, the surrender was not spontaneous. P,#. 8. M THAT THE OFFENDER IS DEAF AND DUMB' BLIND OR OTHERWISE SUFFERIN6 FROM SOME PHYSICAL DEFECT WHICH THUS RESTRICTS HIS MEANS OF ACTION' DEFENSE' OR COMMUNICATION WITH HIS FELLOW BEIN6S. This para'raph does not distin'uish between educated and uneducated deaf?mute or blind persons. Ph%sical defect referred to in this para'raph is such as bein' armless, cripple, or a stutterer, whereb% his means to act, defend himself or communicate with his fellow bein's are limited. P,#. 9. M SUCH ILLNESS OF THE OFFENDER AS WOULD DIMINISH THE EGERCISE OF THE WILL= POWER OF THE OFFENDER WITHOUT HOWE)ER DEPRI)IN6 HIM OF CONSCIOUSNESS OF HIS ACTS. REBUISITESD a. That the illness of the offender must diminish the e-ercise of his will?power. b. That such illness should not deprive the offender of consciousness of his acts. Ahen the offender completel% lost the e-ercise of will? power, it ma% be an e-emptin' circumstance. 6t is said that this para'raph refers onl% to diseases of pathological state that trouble the conscience or will. <-. A mother who, under the influence of a puerperal fever, /illed her child the da% followin' her deliver%. P,#. 12. M AND FINALLY' ANY OTHER CIRCUMSTANCE OF A SIMILAR NATURE AND ANALO6OUS OF THOSE ABO)EMENTIONED. 2ver 0= %ears old with failin' si'ht, similar to over ;= %ears of a'e mentioned in para'raph #. Joluntar% restitution of the propert% stolen b% the accused or immediatel% reimbursin' the amount malversed is a miti'atin' circumstance as analo'ous to voluntar% surrender. / viv Pa'e !# #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Not resistin' arrest is not analo'ous to voluntar% surrender. Testif%in' for the prosecution is analo'ous to plea of 'uilt%. Davalos vs! People (#==0" Cacts. The accused was char'ed with misappropriation of public funds. )urin' trial, he offered to return the amount and pleaded that the same is analo'ous to voluntar% surrender. ,eld. The return of the said amount cannot be considered a miti'atin' circumstance analo'ous to voluntar% surrender considerin' that it too/ petitioner almost seven (;" %ears to return the amount. Petitioner has not advanced a plausible reason wh% he could not li9uidate his cash advance which was in his possession for several %ears. C*RC3)S"$NCES 0+*C+ $RE NE*"+ER E?E)P"*N9 N'R )*"*9$"*N9 1. *ista/e in the blow or aberratio ictus, for under Art. >, there is a comple- crime committed. The penalt% is even hi'her. #. *ista/e in the identit% of the victim, for under Art. >, par. 1, the accused is criminall% liable even if the wron' done is different from that which is intended. 3. <ntrapment of the accused. >. The accused is over 1 %ears of a'e. 6f the offender is over 1 %ears old, his a'e is neither e-emptin' nor miti'atin'. !. Performance of ri'hteous action. 1. A66RA)ATIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES U A''ravatin' circumstances are those which, if attendant in the commission of the crime, serve to increase the penalt% without, however, e-ceedin' the ma-imum of the penalt% provided b% law for the offense. U The% are based on the 'reater perversit% of the offender manifested in the commission of the felon% as shown b%. a. motivatin' power itselfF b. the place of commissionF c. the means and wa%s emplo%edF d. the timeF or e. the personal circumstances of the offender, or of the offended part%. FOUR CINDS OF A66RA)ATIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES 1. 6ENERIC @ Those that can 'enerall% appl% to all crimes. Nos. 1, #, 3 (dwellin'", >, !, 0, :, 1=, 1>, 1, 1:, and #= e-cept 5b% means of motor vehicles7. #. SPECIFIC @ Those that appl% onl% to particular crimes. Nos. 3 (e-cept dwellin'", 1!, 10, 1; and #1. 3. BUALIFYIN6 MThose that chan'e the nature of the crime. Art. #> enumerates the 9ualif%in' AC which 9ualif% the /illin' of person to murder. >. INHERENT @ Those that must accompan% the commission of the crime. 6ENERIC AC BUALIFYIN6 AC The effect of a 'eneric AC, not offset b% an% miti'atin' circumstance, is to increase the penalt% The effect of a 9ualif%in' AC is not onl% to 'ive the crime its proper and e-clusive name but also to which should be imposed upon the accused to the *AH6*3* P<R62). place the author thereof in such a situation as to deserve no other penalt% than that speciall% prescribed b% law for said crime. A 'eneric a''ravatin' circumstance ma% be compensated b% a miti'atin' circumstance. A 9ualif%in' AC cannot be offset b% a miti'atin' circumstance. Accordin' to the new rules, 'eneric and 9ualif%in' a''ravatin' circumstances must be alle'ed in order to be appreciated. $99R$2$"*N9 C*RC3)S"$NCES 0+*C+ D' N'" +$2E "+E E11EC" '1 *NCRE$S*N9 "+E PEN$L"5 AC 1" which in themselves constitute a crime speciall% punishable b% law, or b" which are included b% the law in definin' a crime and prescribin' the penalt% therefore shall not be ta/en into account for the purpose of increasin' the penalt% (Art. 0#, par. 1" U AC which arise. a" from the moral attributes of the offender or b" from his private relations with the offended part%, or c" from an% other personal cause, shall onl% serve to a''ravate the liabilit% of the principals, accomplices, and accessories as to whom such circumstances are attendant. A#. 11. $ggravating circumstances! I The followin' are a''ravatin' circumstances. 1. That advanta'e be ta/en b% the offender of his public position. #. That the crime be committed in contempt or with insult to the public authorities. 3. That the act be committed with insult or in disre'ard of the respect due the offended part% on account of his ran/, a'e, or se-, or that is be committed in the dwellin' of the offended part%, if the latter has not 'iven provocation. >. That the act be committed with abuse of confidence or obvious un'ratefulness. !. That the crime be committed in the palace of the Chief <-ecutive or in his presence, or where public authorities are en'a'ed in the dischar'e of their duties, or in a place dedicated to reli'ious worship. 0. That the crime be committed in the ni'ht time, or in an uninhabited place, or b% a band, whenever such circumstances ma% facilitate the commission of the offense. Ahenever more than three armed malefactors shall have acted to'ether in the commission of an offense, it shall be deemed to have been committed b% a band. ;. That the crime be committed on the occasion of a confla'ration, shipwrec/, earth9ua/e, epidemic or other calamit% or misfortune. . That the crime be committed with the aid of armed men or persons who insure or afford impunit%. :. That the accused is a recidivist. A recidivist is one who, at the time of his trial for one crime, shall have been previousl% convicted b% final +ud'ment of another crime embraced in the same title of this Code. 1=. That the offender has been previousl% punished b% an offense to which the law attaches an e9ual or 'reater penalt% or for two or more crimes to which it attaches a li'hter penalt%. 11. That the crime be committed in consideration of a price, reward, or promise. / viv Pa'e !3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 1#. That the crime be committed b% means of inundation, fire, poison, e-plosion, strandin' of a vessel or international dama'e thereto, derailment of a locomotive, or b% the use of an% other artifice involvin' 'reat waste and ruin. 13. That the act be committed with evidence premeditation. 1>. That the craft, fraud or dis'uise be emplo%ed. 1!. That advanta'e be ta/en of superior stren'th, or means be emplo%ed to wea/en the defense. 10. That the act be committed with treacher% (ale!osia". There is treacher% when the offender commits an% of the crimes a'ainst the person, emplo%in' means, methods, or forms in the e-ecution thereof which tend directl% and speciall% to insure its e-ecution, without ris/ to himself arisin' from the defense which the offended part% mi'ht ma/e. 1;. That means be emplo%ed or circumstances brou'ht about which add i'nomin% to the natural effects of the act. 1. That the crime be committed after an unlawful entr%. 1:. There is an unlawful entr% when an entrance of a crime a wall, roof, floor, door, or window be bro/en. #=. That the crime be committed with the aid of persons under fifteen %ears of a'e or b% means of motor vehicles, motori4ed watercraft, airships, or other similar means. (As amended b% RA !>3". #1. That the wron' done in the commission of the crime be deliberatel% au'mented b% causin' other wron' not necessar% for its commissions. P&o*%& +. Anon!o (.22.) Facts: Oevin Paul, ; %r old son of the victim $er'io was l%in' on the bed beside his father $er'io in the bedroom when he heard a window bein' opened and the sound of feet steppin' on the floor. Then someone /ic/ed open the door to the bedroom. Oevin saw Ailson Antonio carr%in' a shot'un. Ailson aimed his 'un at $er'io who was asleep on the bed and fired hittin' $er'io on the chest, shoulder and bac/. ,e was also hit on his left thi'h. 6mmediatel% after firin' his 'un, Ailson hurriedl% left the room. Ahen the police arrived, $er'io was alread% dead. Ailson surrendered to the police after eludin' arrest for more than 1 %r. The trial court convicted him of murder 9ualified b% treacher% and a''ravated b% the circumstance of evident premeditation, dwellin' and unlawful entr%. The above a'rravatin' circumstances were not alle'ed in the 6nformation. Held: Pursuant to the #=== Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, ever% Complaint or 6nformation must state not onl% the 9ualif%in' but also the a''ravatin' circumstances. This rule ma% be 'iven retroactive effect in the li'ht of the well?established rule that statutes re'ulatin' the procedure of the courts will be construed as applicable to actions pendin' and undetermined at the time of their passa'e. The a''ravatin' circumstances of evident premeditation, dwellin' and unlawful entr%, not havin' been alle'ed in the 6nformation, ma% not now be appreciated to enhance the liabilit% of Ailson. P&o*%& +. S"&%, (.22.) Facts. (rothers <d'ar and Nerio $uela, and <d'ardo (atocan sportin' s/i mas/s, bonnets and 'loves, brandishin' hand'uns and /nife bar'ed into the room of )irector Rosas who was watchin' television to'ether with his adopted son, Norman and his friend 1abilo. The% threatened Rosas, Norman and 1abilo to 'ive the location of their mone% and valuables, which the% eventuall% too/. The% dra''ed 1abilo downstairs with them. 3pon NerioBs instructions, (atocan stabbed 1abilo ! times which caused the latterBs death . The trial court sentenced <d'ar, Nerio and (atocan to suffer the penalt% of death appreciatin' the a''ravatin' circumstance of dis'uise which was not alle'ed in the 6nformation a'ainst the three. Held. Collowin' current Rules on Criminal Procedure particularl% $ection : of the new Rule 11=, and current +urisprudence, the a''ravatin' circumstance of dis'uise cannot be appreciated a'ainst appellants. 6nasmuch as the same was not alle'ed in the 6nformation, the a''ravatin' circumstance of dis'uise cannot now be appreciated to increase the penalt% to death notwithstandin' the fact that the new rule re9uirin' such alle'ation was promul'ated onl% after the crime was committed and after the trial court has alread% rendered its )ecision. 6t is a cardinal rule that rules of criminal procedure are 'iven retroactive application insofar as the% benefit the accused. P&o*%& +. M&n4oF, (.222) Facts: Anchito and *arianito passed b% appellantMs house and as/ed for a drin/ from appellantMs wife, <mil%. Anchito be'an tal/in' with <mil% and the% were about > rms?len'th from *arianito when appellant suddenl% appeared. Appellant hac/ed Anchito on the nape, which prompted *arianito to flee out of fear for his life. Anchito died in a /neelin' position with hac/ wounds at the bac/ of the nec/ and bod%. Appellant voluntar% surrendere. The trial court ruled that voluntar% surrender was Loffset b% the a''ravatin' circumstance of treacher%. Held. The trial court erred in rulin' that voluntar% surrender was Loffset b% the a''ravatin' circumstance of treacher%. Treacher% in the present case is a 9ualif%in', not a 'eneric a''ravatin' circumstance. 6ts presence served to characteri4e the /illin' as murderF it cannot at the same time be considered as a 'eneric a''ravatin' circumstance to warrant the imposition of the ma-imum penalt%. Thus, it cannot offset voluntar% surrender. P,#. 1. = THAT MAD)ANTA6E BE TACEN BY THE OFFENDER OF HIS PUBLIC POSITION. The public officer must use the influence, presti'e or ascendanc% which his office 'ives him as the means b% which he reali4es his purpose. The essence of the matter is presented in the in9uir%, 5did the accused abuse his office in order to commit the crimeV7 U Ahen a public officer commits a common crime independent of his official functions and does acts that are not connected with the duties of his office, he should be punished as a private individual without this AC. U The mere fact that he was in fati'ue uniform and had arm% rifle at the time is not sufficient to established that he misused his public position in the commission of the crimes (People v. Panto+a" U <ven if defendant did not abuse his office, if it is proven that he has failed in his duties as such public / viv Pa'e !> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 officer, this circumstance would warrant the a''ravation of his penalt%. U Ta/in' advanta'e of public position, cannot be ta/en into consideration in offenses where it is made b% law an inte'ral element of the crime such as in malversation or in falsification of documents committed b% public officers. P&o*%& +. C,*,%,$ (198.) Facts: *a'aso stabbed *oises in a coc/pit. The a''ressor attemptin' to escape was confronted b% # brothers of *oises, 8esus (deceased" and appellant *ario Capalac. *a'aso, seein' that he was cornered, raised his hands as a si'n of surrender. The brothers were not appeased. *ario proceeded to pistol?whip *a'aso and after he had fallen, 8esus stabs him. The &C convicted the accused of murder and too/ into consideration the AC of ta/in' advanta'e of public office because the accused is a police officer. Held: 2n the AC that the accused used his public position as a policeman, it was held that the mere fact that he was a member of the police force was insi'nificant to the attac/. ,e acted li/e a brother, instinctivel%. ,e pistol?whipped the deceased because he had a pistol with him. 6t came in hand% and so he acted accordin'l%. That he was a policeman is of no relevance. P&o*%& +. 6,*,s!n (1991) Facts. 1apasin was a member of the Phil. Constabular%. ,e was issued a mission order to investi'ate a report re'ardin' the presence of unidentified armed men in one barrio. ,e was informed that a certain Calpito had an unlicensed firearm. ,e shot Calpito with the use of an armalite after seein' the latter wal/in' alon' the road. 1apasin was convicted of murder. Held. The accused too/ advanta'e of his public position because as a member of the PC, he committed the crime with an armalite which was issued to him when he received his order. P&o*%& +. )!%%,3o# (.22.) Facts. (rothers 8err% and 8elord Jele4 were on their wa% home on board a motorc%cle. 8err% was drivin'. As the% neared a +unction, the% heard a speedin' motorc%cle fast approachin' from behind. The brothers i'nored the other motorc%cle, which cau'ht up with them. As the% were about to cross the brid'e leadin' to their home, 'unshots ran' out from behind them. The% abruptl% turned the motorc%cle around towards the direction of the 'unfire. The li'ht of their motorc%cleMs headlamp fell on their attac/ers aboard the second motorc%cle. The assailants fired at them a second time and fled. 8err% saw P23 Jillamor and *a'hilom on board the motorc%cle behind them. *a'hilom was drivin' the motorc%cle while Jillamor was holdin' a short 'un pointed at them. 8err% sustained 'unshot wounds but survived. 8elord, however, died on the spot durin' the first 'unburst. Held. There was no showin' that Jillamor too/ advanta'e of his bein' a policeman to shoot 8elord Jele4 or that he used his Linfluence, presti'e or ascendanc%L in /illin' the victim. Jillamor could have shot Jele4 even without bein' a policeman. 6n other words, if the accused could have perpetrated the crime even without occup%in' his position, there is no abuse of public position. The Court cited the case of People v. ,errera, where the Court emphaticall% said that the mere fact that accused?appellant is a policeman and used his 'overnment issued .3 caliber revolver to /ill is not sufficient to establish that he misused his public position in the commission of the crime. P,#. .. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED IN CONTEMPT OR WITH INSULT TO THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES. REBUISITESD a. That the public authorit% is en'a'ed in the e-ercise of his functions. b. That he who is thus en'a'ed in the e-ercise of his functions is not the person a'ainst whom the crime is committed. c. The offender /nows him to be a public authorit%. d. ,is presence has not prevented the offender from committin' the criminal act. PUBLIC AUTHORITY A PERSON IN AUTHORITY A public officer who is directl% vested with +urisdiction, that is, a public officer who has the power to 'overn and e-ecute the laws. The councilor, ma%or, 'overnor, baran'a% captain etc. are persons in authorit%. A school teacher, town municipal health officer, a'ent of the (6R, chief of police, etc. are now considered a person in authorit%. U Par. # is not applicable if committee din the presence of an a'ent onl% such as a police officer. A6ENT A subordinate public officer char'ed with the maintenance of public order and the protection and securit% of life and propert%, such as barrio policemen, councilmen, and an% person who comes to the aid of persons in authorit%. U The crime should not be committed a'ainst the public authorit% or else it becomes direct assault. U &ac/ of /nowled'e on the part of the offender that a public authorit% is present indicates lac/ of intention to insult the public authorit%. P,#. @. ? THAT THE ACT BE COMMITTED (1) WITH INSULT OR IN DISRE6ARD OF THE RESPECT DUE THE OFFENDED PARTY ON ACCOUNT OF HIS (,) RANC' (/) A6E' OR ($) SEG' OR (.) THAT IS BE COMMITTED IN THE DWELLIN6 OF THE OFFENDED PARTY' IF THE LATTER HAS NOT 6I)EN PRO)OCATION. U Cour circumstances are enumerated in this para'raph, which can be considered sin'le or to'ether. 6f all the > circumstances are present, the% have the wei'ht of one a''ravatin' circumstance onl%. U This circumstance (ran/, a'e or se-" ma% be ta/en into account onl% in crimes a'ainst person or honor. U There must be evidence that in the commission of the crime, the accused deliberatel% intended to offend or insult the se- or a'e of the offended part%. (1) WITH INSULT OR IN DISRE6ARD OF THE REPECT DUE THE OFFENDED PARTY ON ACCOUNTD / viv Pa'e !! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 @aA '1 "+E R$NB '1 "+E '11ENDED P$R"5 e-. An attempt upon the life of a 'eneral of the Philippine Arm% is committed in disre'ard of his ran/. (/) '1 "+E $9E '1 "+E '11ENDED P$R"5 e-. Ahen the a''ressor is >! %ears old and the victim was an octo'enarian. U 6t is not proper to consider disre'ard of old a'e in crimes a'ainst propert%. Robber% with homicide is primaril% a crime a'ainst propert%. ($) '1 "+E SE? '1 "+E '11ENDED P$R"5 U This refers to the female se-, not to the male se- (Re%es" U Oillin' a woman is not attended b% this AC if the offender did not manifest an% specific insult or disrespect towards her se-. U THIS A66RA)ATIN6 CIRCUMSTANCE IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE FOLLOWIN6D 1. Ahen the offender acted with passion and obfuscation. #. Ahen there e-ists a relationship between the offended part% and the offender. 3. Ahen the condition of bein' a woman is indispensable in the commission of the crime i.e. parricide, rape, etc. U )isre'ard of se- absorbed in treacher%.
(.) THAT BE COMMITTED IN THE DWELLIN6 OF THE OFFENDED PARTY D0ELL*N9 @ (36&)6N1 2R $TR3CT3R<, <HC&3$6J<&K 3$<) C2R R<$T AN) C2*C2RT. U a 5combination house and store7 or a mar/et stall where the victim slept is not a dwellin'. U This is considered an AC primaril% because of the sanctit% of privac%, the law accords to human abode. Also, in certain cases, there is an abuse of confidence which the offended part% reposed in the offender b% openin' the door to him. U The evidence must show clearl% that the defendant entered the house of the deceased to attac/ him. U The offended part% must not 'ive provocation. 6f the provocation did not ta/e place in the house, dwellin' ma% be considered as an AC. U )wellin' is a''ravatin', even if the offender did not enter the upper part of the house where the victim was, but shot from under the house. U <ven if the /illin' too/ place outside the dwellin', it is a''ravatin' provided that the commission of the crime was be'un in the dwellin'. U )wellin' is a''ravatin' in abduction or ille'al detention. U 6t is not a''ravatin' where the deceased was called down from his house and he was murdered in the vicinit% of his house. U )wellin' includes dependencies, the foot of the staircase and the enclosure under the house. 6f the deceased was onl% about to step on the first run' of the ladder when he was assaulted, the AC of dwellin' will not be applicable. DWELLIN6 NOT APPLICABLED 1. Ahen both offender and offended part% are occupants of the same house. #. Ahen the robber% is committed b% the use of force upon thin's, dwellin' is not a''ravatin' because it is inherent to the crime. 3. 6n the crime of trespass to dwellin', it is also inherent or included b% law in definin' the crime. >. Ahen the owner of the dwellin' 'ave sufficient and immediate provocation. !. Ahen the dwellin' where the crime was committed did not belon' to the offended part%. 0. Ahen the rape was committed in the 'round floor of the #?store% structure, the lower floor bein' used as a video rental store and not as a private place of abode or residence. U A victim raped in the boardin' house where she was a bedspacer. ,er room constituted a 5dwellin'7. U )wellin' ma% be temporary dwelling. U Note. The Code spea/s of dwellin', not domicile. U )wellin' is not a''ravatin' in adulter% when paramour also lives in the con+u'al home. U )wellin' is not included in treacher%. P&o*%& +. Ro4!% (1981) Facts: &t. *esana approached Rodil and identifies himself as a PC officer. ,e as/ed Rodil whether or not the 'un which the latter possessed had a license. Rodil attempted to draw his 'un but was prevented b% *esanaBs companions. Rodil was as/ed to si'n a document attestin' to the confiscation of the 'un but he refused. 6nstead, he drew a da''er and mana'ed to stab *esana in the chest repeatedl%. Held: The AC of disre'ard of ran/ should be appreciated because it is obvious that *esana identified himself as a PC officer to the accused who is merel% a member of the Anti?$mu''lin' 3nit and therefore inferior both in ran/ and social status to the victim. P&o*%& +. D,n!&% (1978) Facts: 13?%ear?old *ar'arita was at the bus station when the accused, )aniel, started molestin' her, as/in' her name and tr%in' to 'et her ba' to carr% it for her. $he refused and as/ed the help of the conductor and driver but the% did not help her. $he ran to the +eepne% stop and rode the +eep. )aniel followed her to the boardin' house and he raped her. Held: Althou'h *ar'arita was merel% rentin' a bedspace in a boardin' house, her room constituted for all intents and purposes a 5dwellin'7 as the term is used in Art. 1>(3" of the RPC. (e he a lessee, a boarder, or a bedspacer, the place is his home the sanctit% of which the law see/s to protect and uphold. P&o*%& +. B,n&F (1999) Facts: The accused was livin' with his parents. ,is sisters complained to their father that the accused made trouble whenever he was drun/. The% wanted to put up the accuse in another house. That ni'ht while the% were discussin' the plans for the accused, while their father went to his room, the accused, who loo/ed drun/, ran to the /itchen and 'ot # /nives and then stabbed the father. The father died. Held. The AC of dwellin' cannot be considered a''ravatin' where the accused and the victim were livin' in the same house where the crime was / viv Pa'e !0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 committed. The rationale for considerin' dwellin' an AC is the violation b% the offender of the sanctit% of the home of the victim b% trespassin' therein to commit the crime. This reason is entirel% absent in this case.
P&o*%& +. L,*,F (1989) Facts: <ulalia Cabuna', a ;=?%ear?old woman who was livin' alone, was beaten to death b% 3 men. Appellant (arleso, &apa4 and Cristoto a'reed to /ill <ulalia because there was one incident when the victim called (arleso a thief in front of man% people. Held: The presence of treacher% is clear as (arleso invited two companions to help him e-ecute his plan to beat the victim to death with pieces of wood in the middle of the ni'ht insurin' the /illin' of the victim without ris/ to himself arisin' from the defense with the offended part% mi'ht ma/e. Ahile it ma% be true that ni'httime is absorbed in the AC of treacher%, the AC of disre'ard of se- and a'e cannot be similarl% absorbed. Treacher% refers to the manner of the commission of the crime. )isre'ard of se- and a'e pertains to the relationship of the victim, who is a ;=?%ear old woman, and the appellant who is a %oun' man, #; %ears old, at the time of the commission of the offense. P&o*%& +. T,/o-, (.22.) Facts: Tabo'a entered the house of Tubon, a widowed septua'enarian, robbed, stabbed and burned be%ond reco'nition the latterBs house. Held: Anent the circumstance of a'e, there must be a showin' that the malefactor deliberatel% intended to offend or insult the a'e of the victim. Neither could disre'ard of respect due to se- be appreciated if the offender did not manifest an% intention to offend or disre'ard the se- of the victim. 6n other words, /illin' a woman is not attended b% the a''ravatin' circumstance if the offender did not manifest an% specific insult or disrespect towards the offended part%Ms se-. 6n the case at bar, there is absolutel% no showin' that Tabo'a deliberatel% intended to offend or insult the victim. ,owever, even if disrespect or disre'ard of a'e or se- were not appreciated, the four circumstances enumerated in Article 1>, para'raph 3 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, can be considered sin'l% or to'ether. P&o*%& +. D& M&s, (.221) Facts: *otas, (aran'a% Chairman of (aran'a% $ta. Cru4 Putol, $an Pablo Cit%, was shot b% )e *esa while pla%in' a card 'ame with some townmates at a nei'hborhood store resultin' to his death. The trial court, in convictin' )e *esa for murder, appreciated the a''ravatin' circumstance of commission of the crime in contempt of or with assault to public authorities. Held: The trial court also erred in appreciatin' the a''ravatin' circumstance that the commission of the crime was in contempt of or with assault to public authorities. The re9uisites of this circumstance are. (1" the public authorit% is en'a'ed in the dischar'e of his duties and (#" he is not the person a'ainst whom the crime is committed. None of these circumstances are present in this case. 6n the first place, the crime was committed a'ainst the baran'a% chairman himself. At the time that he was /illed, he was not en'a'ed in the dischar'e of his duties as he was in fact pla%in' a card 'ame with his nei'hbors. P&o*%& +. Mon!no%, (S"*#,) Facts: *ontinola boarded a passen'er +eepne% driven b% ,ibinioda. Amon' the passen'ers was Reteracion. All of a sudden, appellant drew his 'un, an unlicensed firearm, .3= cal pistol and directed Reteracion to hand over his mone% or else he would be /illed. *ontinola aimed the firearm at the nec/ of Reteracion and fired successive shots at the latter. As a result Reteracion slumped dead. *ontinola was char'ed with robber% with homicide and ille'al possession of firearm. Held: )6sre'ard of a'e, se- or ran/ is not a''ravatin' in robber% with homicide, which is primaril% a crime a'ainst propert%, as the homicide is re'arded as merel% incidental to the robber%. P&o*%& +. T,5o (.222) Facts: Am% was tendin' a video rental shop owned b% *arina. TaNo /ept 'oin' in and out of the shop and on the last time he went inside said shop, he suddenl% +umped over the counter, stran'led Am%, po/ed a /nife at the left side of her nec/, pulled her towards the /itchen where he forced her to undress, and 'ained carnal /nowled'e of her a'ainst her will and consent. (efore the% could reach the upper floor, he suddenl% pulled Am% down and started maulin' her until she lost consciousnessF then he freel% ransac/ed the place. &eavin' Am% for dead after repeatedl% ban'in' her head, first on the wall, then on the toilet bowl, he too/ her bracelet, rin' and wristwatch. ,e then proceeded upstairs where he too/ as well the +ewelr% bo- containin' other valuables belon'in' to his victimMs emplo%er. The trial court appreciated dwellin' as an a''ravatin' circumstance because the incident too/ place supposedl% at the residence of private complainantMs emplo%er, Lwhich doubles as a video rental shop. Held: )wellin' cannot be appreciated as an a''ravatin' circumstance in this case because the rape was committed in the 'round floor of a two?stor% structure, the lower floor bein' used as a video rental store and not as a private place of abode or residence. P&o*%& +. R!os (.222) Facts: Rios hurled stones at the house of Ambrocio and Anacita (enedicto. A few minutes later, and while the (enedicto spouses were tendin' their store, Rios bou'ht ci'arettes. Ambrocio confronted Rios about the stonin' incident and an altercation ensued between them. ,avin' heard the appellant shout at Ambrocio, *esa intervened and re9uested the # to part wa%s and escorted them to their respective residences. A few minutes later, appellant went bac/ to the store. Ambrocio went to the terrace of their house. Appellant suddenl% approached Ambrocio and stabbed his ri'ht stomach. *esa and his 'roup saw Anacita weepin' while Ambrocio was l%in' lifeless in the terrace of their house. Ambrocio died before he was brou'ht to the hospital. The trial court appreciated the a''ravatin' circumstance of dwellin'. Held. The trial court correctl% appreciated the a''ravatin' circumstance of dwellin' or morada in this case. The word dwellin' includes ever% dependenc% of the house that forms an inte'ral part thereof and therefore it includes the staircase of the house and much more, its terrace. Ahen a crime is committed in the dwellin' of the offended part% and the latter has not 'iven provocation, dwellin' ma% be appreciated as an a''ravatin' circumstance. 3# Provocation in the a''ravatin' circumstance of dwellin' must be. (a" 'iven b% the offended part%, (b" sufficient, and (c" immediate to the commission of the crime. / viv Pa'e !; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 P&o*%& +. A#!Fo/,% (.222) Facts: Ari4obal and two others entered the house of spouses Clementina and &aurencio 1imene4. The% then ransac/ed the house and ordered &aurencio to 'o with them to his son 8imm%Bs house. 3pon reachin' the house of 8imm%, the% tied the latter and one Crancisco also surnamed 1imene4. The% consumed the food and ci'arettes 8imm%Bs wife <rlinda, was sellin'. The% proceeded to ransac/ed the household in search of valuables. Thereafter, <rlinda was ordered to produce P1==,== in e-chan'e for 8imm%Bs life. <rlinda offered to 'ive a certificate of lar'e cattle but the document was thrown bac/ at her. The 3 then dra''ed 8imm% outside the house to'ether with &aurencio. 2ne of the culprits returned and told <rlinda that 8imm% and &aurencio had been /illed for tr%in' to escape. The trial court appreciated the a''ravatin' circumstance of dwellin'. Held: The trial court is correct in appreciatin' dwellin' as an a''ravatin' circumstance. 1enerall%, dwellin' is considered inherent in the crimes which can onl% be committed in the abode of the victim, such as trespass to dwellin' and robber% in an inhabited place. ,owever, in robber% with homicide the authors thereof can commit the heinous crime without trans'ressin' the sanctit% of the victimMs domicile. 6n the case at bar, the robbers demonstrated an impudent disre'ard of the inviolabilit% of the victimsM abode when the% forced their wa% in, looted their houses, intimidated and coerced their inhabitants into submission, disabled &aurencio and 8imm% b% t%in' their hands before dra''in' them out of the house to be /illed. P,#. 1. = THAT THE ACT BE COMMITTED WITH (1) ABUSE OF CONFIDENCE OR (.) OB)IOUS UN6RATEFULNESS. (1) ABUSE OF CONFIDENCE REBUISITESD a. That the offended part% had trusted the offender. b. That the offender abused such trust b% committin' a crime a'ainst the offended part%. c. That the abuse of confidence facilitated the commission of the crime. U The confidence between the offender and the offended part% must be immediate and personal. U 6t is inherent in malversation, 9ualified theft, estafa b% conversion or misappropriation and 9ualified seduction. (.) OB)IOUS UN6RATEFULNESS U The un'ratefulness must be obvious @ manifest and clear. P&o*%& +. M,n4o%,4o (198@) Facts: *andolado and 2rtillano, with <rinada and $imon are traineesDdraftees of the ACP. The% 'ot to /now each other and had a drin/in' session at the bus terminal. The accused was drun/. ,e 'ot his 'un and started firin'. <rinada and $imon rode a +eep and tried to escape from *andolado and 2rtillano but the two eventuall% cau'ht up with them. The two accused shot the victims to death. Held: There is no AC of abuse of confidence. 6n order that abuse of confidence be deemed as a''ravatin', it is necessar% that 5there e-ists a relation of trust and confidence between the accused and one a'ainst whom the crime was committed and that the accused made use of such a relationship to commit the crime. 6t is also essential that the confidence between the parties must be immediate and personal such as would 'ive the accused some advanta'e to commit the crime. 6t is obvious that the accused and the victims onl% met for the first time so there is no personal or immediate relationship upon which confidence mi'ht rest between them. P&o*%& +. A##oJ,4o (.221) Facts: Arro+ado is the first cousin of the victim, *ar% Ann and lived with her and her father. Arro+ado helped care for the victimBs father for which he was paid a P1,=== monthl% salar%. Arro+ado /illed *ar% Ann b% stabbin' her with a /nife. Thereafter he claimed that the latter committed suicide. Held: The a''ravatin' circumstance of abuse of confidence is present in this case. Cor this a''ravatin' circumstance to e-ist, it is essential to show that the confidence between the parties must be immediate and personal such as would 'ive the accused some advanta'e or ma/e it easier for him to commit the criminal act. The confidence must be a means of facilitatin' the commission of the crime, the culprit ta/in' advanta'e of the offended part%Ms belief that the former would not abuse said confidence. P,#. (. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED IN THE PALACE OF THE CHIEF EGECUTI)E OR IN HIS PRESENCE' OR WHERE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES ARE EN6A6ED IN THE DISCHAR6E OF THEIR DUTIES' OR IN A PLACE DEDICATED TO RELI6IOUS WORSHIP. PLACE WHER PUBLIC AUTHORITIES ARE EN6A6ED IN THE DISCHAR6E OF THEIR DUTIES (*,#. () CONTEMPT OR INSULT TO PUBLIC AUTHORITIES (*,#. .) The public authorities are in the performance of their duties. The public authorities who are in the performance of their duties must be in their office. The public authorities are performin' their duties outside of their offices. The public authorit% ma% be the offended part%. The public authorit% should not be the offended part%. U 6f it is the *alacaNan' palace or a church, it is a''ravatin', re'ardless of whether $tate or official or reli'ious functions are bein' held. U The President need not be in the palace. ,is presence alone in an% place where the crime is committed is enou'h to constitute the AC. 6t also applies even if he is not en'a'ed in the dischar'e of his duties in the place where the crime was committed. U (ut as re'ards the place where the public authorities are en'a'ed in the dischar'e of their duties, there must be some performance of public functions. U Cemeteries are not places dedicated for reli'ious worship. U 2ffender must have the intention to commit a crime when he entered the place. / viv Pa'e ! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 P,#. 0. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED (1) IN THE NI6HT TIME' OR (.) IN AN UNINHABITED PLACE' OR (@) BY A BAND' WHENE)ER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES MAY FACILITATE THE COMMISSION OF THE OFFENSE. WHENE)ER MORE THAN THREE ARMED MALEFACTORS SHALL HA)E ACTED TO6ETHER IN THE COMMISSION OF AN OFFENSE' IT SHALL BE DEEMED TO HA)E BEEN COMMITTED BY A BAND. U These 3 circumstances ma% be considered separatel% when their elements are distinctl% perceived and can subsist independentl%, revealin' a 'reater de'ree of perversit%. Nighttime& uninhabite place or ban is aggravatingC 1. Ahen it facilitated the commission of the crimeF or #. Ahen especiall% sou'ht for b% the offender to insure the commission of the crime or for the purpose of impunit%F or 3. Ahen the offender too/ advanta'e thereof for the purpose of impunit%. @6A N*9+""*)E ? The commission of the crime must be'in and be accomplished in the ni'httime. ? The offense must be actuall% committed in the dar/ness of the ni'ht. Ahen the place is illuminated b% li'ht, ni'httime is not a''ravatin'. @7A 3N*N+$,*"ED PL$CE ? 2ne where there are no houses at all, a place at a considerable distance from town, or where the houses are scattered at a 'reat distance from each other. ? TEST. A2N in the place of the commission of the offense, there was a reasonable possibilit% of the victim receivin' some help. ? The fact that persons occasionall% passed in the uninhabited place and that on the ni'ht of the murder another huntin' part% was not a 'reat distance awa%, does not matter. 6t is the nature of the place which is decisive. ? 6t must appear that the accused $231,T T,< $2&6T3)< of the place where the crime was committed, in order to better attain his purpose. ? The offenders must choose the place as an aid either (1" to an eas% and uninterrupted accomplishment of their criminal desi'ns or (#" to insure concealment of the offense. @8A ,$ND ? Ahenever more than 3 armed malefactors shall have acted to'ether in the commission of an offense, it shall be deemed to have been committed b% a band. ? The armed men must act to'ether in the commission of the crime. ? 6f one of the four armed persons is a principal b% inducement, the% do not form a band. ? All the armed men, at least four in number, must ta/e direct part in the e-ecution of the act constitutin' the crime. ? Considered in crimes a'ainst propert% and persons and not to crimes a'ainst chastit%. ? 6t is inherent in bri'anda'e. P&o*%& +. 7os& (supraA Facts: The *a''ie )ela Riva stor%. *a''ie was on her was home, drivin' her car accompanied b% her maid, when she was stopped b% another car boarded b% > men. Accused Pineda pulled her out of the car and forced her inside the assailantsB car. $he was brou'ht to a hotel and there, the > raped her. Held: $C found that there was committed forcible abduction with rape. Aith rape as the more serious crime, the penalt% to be imposed is the ma-imum in accordance with Art. > of the RPC. Aith this findin', the e-treme penalt% of death was imposed. Ahile the $C found no necessit% of considerin' the ACBs, the Court still considered the ACBs for the purpose of determinin' the proper penalt% to be imposed in each of the other 3 crimes of simple rape. The court claimed that there was an AC of ni'httime because of appellants have purposel% sou'ht such circumstance to facilitate the commission of these crimes. P&o*%& +. D&s,%!s, (1991) Facts: *oved b% hatred and +ealous%, the accused, armed with a sharp pointed instrument, attac/ed and inflicted ph%sical in+uries on the va'ina of his wife who was about ! months pre'nant. Thereafter, the accused han'ed his wife to a +ac/fruit tree, causin' her death and that of her fetus. ,e was found 'uilt% of the comple- crime of parricide with unintentional abortion and was sentenced to life imprisonment b% the &C. Held: The AC of uninhabited place is present. The uninhabitedness of a place is determined not b% the distance of the nearest house to the scene of the crime but whether or not in the place of the commission, there was reasonable possibilit% of the victim receivin' some help. Considerin' that the /illin' was done durin' ni'httime and man% fruit trees obstruct the view of nei'hbors and passersb%, there was no reasonable possibilit% for the victim to receive an% assistance. The couple lived on a small nipa house on a hill. There are # other houses in the nei'hborhood which are 1!= meters awa%F the house of NormaBs parents and house of Carlito. These cannot, however, be seen from the coupleBs house because of the man% fruit trees and shrubs prevalent in the area. 6,3,#, +. ),%&#o (197@) Facts: Petition for certiorari and prohibition was filed impu'nin' the order of the +ud'e of the lower court to forward the records of the case to the *ilitar% Tribunal. This is claimed to be in accordance with 1eneral 2rders No. 1# that those involvin' crimes a'ainst persons and propert% when committed b% a s%ndicate or a band falls under the +urisdiction of the *ilitar% Tribunal. Held: Ahile the information char'es four persons, it was not, however, shown that all of them were armed when the% alle'edl% acted in concert in the commission of the crime. Ahat is more, the supposed participation of petitioner 1amara was that of principal b% inducement, which undoubtedl% connotes that he had no direct participation in the perpetration thereof. P&o*%& +. S!%+, (.22.) Facts: Accused armed with a 'un, a bolo, a rope and a flashli'ht abducted brothers <dmund and *anuel Ceriales while the two were pla%in' a 'ame of cards inside their house in the middle of the ni'ht. The% tied both their hands and feet with a rope and the% brou'ht the brothers at an isolated place. <dmund was / viv Pa'e !: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 stabbed and beheaded causin' his instantaneous death. <dmund Ceriales was able to escape while the accused were about to /ill his brother. The trial court appreciated ni'httime as an a''ravatin' circumstance. Held: (% and of itself, ni'httime is not an a''ravatin' circumstance, however, it becomes a''ravatin' onl% when. (1" it is especiall% sou'ht b% the offenderF or (#" it is ta/en advanta'e of b% himF or (3" it facilitates the commission of the crime b% ensurin' the offenderMs immunit% from capture. 6n this case, the trial court correctl% appreciated ni'httime as a''ravatin' considerin' that ni'httime facilitated the abduction of the Ceriales brothers, the /illin' of *anuel and the attempt to /ill <dmund. <vidence shows that accused? appellants too/ advanta'e of the dar/ness to successfull% consummate their plans. The fact that the% brou'ht with them a flashli'ht clearl% shows that the% intended to commit the crime in dar/ness. P&o*%& +. An$;&, (.221) Facts: Appellant 3lep and his 'roup, robbed Alfredo Roca of 3! sac/s of Pala% after /illin' his son, his wife and his mother with their 'uns. Thereafter, the% boarded their +eep and left. Held: The offense was proven to have been e-ecuted b% a band. A crime is committed b% a band when at least four armed malefactors act to'ether in the commission thereof. 6n this case, all si- accused were armed with 'uns which the% used on their victims. Clearl%, all the armed assailants too/ direct part in the e-ecution of the robber% with homicide. P&o*%& +. L!/#,n4o (.222) Facts: <dwin and his dau'hter Aileen, and a relative, Cernando, were traversin' a hill% portion of a trail on their wa% home when the% met Raelito &ibrando, &arr% and <ddie. <dwin was carr%in' a torch at that time as it was alread% dar/. Raelito in9uired from <dwin the whereabouts of Cernando and without an% warnin' hit <dwin with a piece of wood. <ddie followed suit and delivered another blow to <dwin. <dwin ran but he was chased b% Raelito. Thereafter, the three men too/ turns hittin' <dwin with pieces of wood until the latter fell and died. The trial court considered ni'httime and uninhabited place as +ust one a''ravatin' circumstance. Held: The court did not err in considerin' ni'httime and uninhabited place as +ust one a''ravatin' circumstance. The court cited the case of People vs. $antos where it has been held that if the a''ravatin' circumstances of ni'httime, uninhabited place or band concur in the commission of the crime, all will constitute one a''ravatin' circumstance onl% as a 'eneral rule althou'h the% can be considered separatel% if their elements are distinctl% perceived and can subsist independentl%, revealin' a 'reater de'ree of perversit%. P,#. 7. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED ON THE OCCASION OF A CONFLA6RATION' SHIPWRECC' EARTHBUACE' EPIDEMIC OR OTHER CALAMITY OR MISFORTUNE. U The reason for the e-istence of this AC is found in the debased form of criminalit% met in one who, in the midst of a 'reat calamit%, instead of lendin' aid to the afflicted, adds to their sufferin' b% ta/in' advanta'e of their misfortune to despoil them. U The offender must ta/e advanta'e of the calamit% or misfortune. U 52R 2T,<R CA&A*6TK 2R *6$C2RT3N<7 @ refers to other conditions of distress similar to 5confla'ration, shipwrec/, earth9ua/e or epidemic.7 P,#. 8. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED WITH THE AID OF ARMED MEN OR PERSONS WHO INSURE OR AFFORD IMPUNITY. REBUISITESD 1. That the armed men or persons too/ part in the commission of the crime, directl% or indirectl%. #. That the accused availed himself of their aid or relied upon them when the crime was committed. U The armed men must ta/e part directl% or indirectl% in the offense. U This AC shall not be considered when both the attac/in' part% and the part% attac/ed were e9uall% armed. U This AC is not present when the accused as well as those who cooperated with him in the commission of the crime, acted under the same plan and for the same purpose. WITH AID OF ARMED MEN (*,#. 8) BY A BAND (*,#. 0) Aid of armed men is present even if one of the offenders merel% relied on their aid, for actual aid is not necessar%. *ore than 3 armed malefactors that have acted to'ether in the commission of an offense. U 6f there are > armed men, 5aid of armed men7 is absorbed b% 5emplo%ment of a band7 U 5Aid of armed men7 includes 5armed women7 P,#. 9. = THAT THE ACCUSED IS A RECIDI)IST. A#. 102. Commission of another crime durin' service of penalt% imposed for another offenseF Penalt%. I (esides the provisions of Rule ! of Article 0#, an% person who shall commit a felon% after havin' been convicted b% final +ud'ment, before be'innin' to serve such sentence, or while servin' the same, shall be punished b% the ma-imum period of the penalt% prescribed b% law for the new felon%. An% convict of the class referred to in this article, who is not a habitual criminal, shall be pardoned at the a'e of sevent% %ears if he shall have alread% served out his ori'inal sentence, or when he shall complete it after reachin' the said a'e, unless b% reason of his conduct or other circumstances he shall not be worth% of such clemenc%. U A recidivist is one who, at the time of his trial for one crime, shall have been previousl% convicted b% final +ud'ment of another crime embraced in the same title of the RPC. REBUISITESD a. That the offender is on trial for an offenseF b. That he was previousl% convicted b% final +ud'ment of another crimeF / viv Pa'e 0= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 c. That both the first and the second offenses are embraced in the same title of the CodeF d. That the offender is convicted of the new offense. U Ahat is controllin' is the time of trial, not the time of the commission of the crime. U There is no recidivism if the subse9uent conviction is for an offense committed before the offense involved in the prior conviction. U $ec. ; of Rule 1#= , Rules of Court, provides that a +ud'ment in a criminal case becomes final (1" after the lapse of the Wperiod for perfectin' an appeal, or (#" when the sentence has been partiall% or totall% satisfied or served, or (3" the defendant has e-pressl% waived in writin' his ri'ht to appeal, or (>" the accused has applied for probation. U There is recidivism even if the lapse of time between two felonies is more than 1= %ears. Recidivism must be ta/en into account no mater how man% %ears have intervened between the 1 st and # nd felonies. U Pardon does not obliterate the fact that the accused was a recidivistF but amnest% e-tin'uishes the penalt% and its effects. P&o*%& +. Mo%!n, (.222) Facts: (rothers 8oseph and An'elito, alon' with their cousin, )ann% were on their wa% home when the% heard somebod% shout 5/uba7, referrin' to 8oseph, a hunchbac/. The% as/ed who said that but no one admitted. As the 3 were about to 'o, *olina delivered a stron' stabbin' blow at the bac/ of 8oseph. An'elito came to aid his brother but *olina also stabbed him at the bac/. 8oseph was dead on arrival at the clinic. Held: To prove recidivism, it is necessar% to alle'e the same in the information and to attach thereto certified copies of the sentences rendered a'ainst the accused. Nonetheless, the trial court ma% still 'ive such AC credence if the accused does not ob+ect to the presentation of evidence on the fact of recidivism. 6n the case at bar, the accused never voiced out an% ob+ection when confronted with the fact of his previous conviction for attempted homicide. P,#. 12. = THAT THE OFFENDER HAS BEEN PRE)IOUSLY PUNISHED BY AN OFFENSE TO WHICH THE LAW ATTACHES AN EBUAL OR 6REATER PENALTY OR FOR TWO OR MORE CRIMES TO WHICH IT ATTACHES A LI6HTER PENALTY. A#. 0.! Effect of the attenance of mitigating or aggravating circumstances an of habitual elin-uency! I *iti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstances and habitual delin9uenc% shall be ta/en into account for the purpose of diminishin' or increasin' the penalt% in conformit% with the followin' rules. !. ,abitual delin9uenc% shall have the followin' effects. (a" 3pon a third conviction the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalt% provided b% law for the last crime of which he be found 'uilt% and to the additional penalt% of prision correccional in its medium and ma-imum periodsF (b" 3pon a fourth conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalt% provided for the last crime of which he be found 'uilt% and to the additional penalt% of prision ma%or in its minimum and medium periodsF and (c" 3pon a fifth or additional conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalt% provided for the last crime of which he be found 'uilt% and to the additional penalt% of prision ma%or in its ma-imum period to reclusion temporal in its minimum period. Notwithstandin' the provisions of this article, the total of the two penalties to be imposed upon the offender, in conformit% herewith, shall in no case e-ceed 3= %ears. Cor the purpose of this article, a person shall be deemed to be habitual delin9uent, is within a period of ten %ears from the date of his release or last conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious ph%sical in+uries, robo# hurto, estafa or falsification, he is found 'uilt% of an% of said crimes a third time or oftener. REBUISITESD a. That the accused is on trial for an offenseF b. That he previousl% served sentence for another offense to which the law attaches an e9ual or 'reater penalt%, or for # or more crimes to which it attaches li'hter penalt% han that for the new offenseF and c. That he is convicted of the new offense. RE*"ER$C*'N/ HABITUALITY RECIDI)ISM 6t is necessar% that the offender shall have served out his sentence for the first offense. 6t is enou'h that a final +ud'ment has been rendered in the first offense. The previous and subse9uent offenses must not be embraced in the same title of the Code. 6t is the re9uirement that the offenses be included in the same title of the Code. Reiteracion is not alwa%s an a''ravatin' circumstance. Recidivism is not alwa%s to be ta/en into consideration in fi-in' the penalt% to be imposed upon the accused. FOUR FORMS OR REPETITIOND 1. RECIDI)ISM .. RE*"ER$C"*'N OR HABITUALITY @. MULTI=RECIDI)ISM OR HABITUAL DELINBUENCY ? when a person, within a period of 1= %ears from the date of his release or last conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious ph%sical in+uries, robber%, theft, estafa or falsification, is found 'uilt% of an% of said crimes a third time or oftener. 6n habitual delin9uenc%, the offender is either a recidivist or one who has been previousl% punished for two or more offenses (habitualit%". ,e shall suffer an additional penalt% for bein' a habitual delin9uent. 1. BUASI=RECIDI)ISM ? An% person who shall commit a felon% after havin' been convicted b% final +ud'ment, before be'innin' to serve such sentence or while servin' the / viv Pa'e 01 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 same, shall be punished b% the ma-imum period of the penalt% prescribed b% law for the new felon%. P&o*%& +. 6,o#,n, (1998) Facts: *arivel, upon instruction of Rowena (common?law wife of the accused" went to the house of 1aorana and saw the couple l%in' down. *arivel was as/ed to come it and Rowena stood up to urinate. 1aorana covered her mouth and pointed a huntin' /nife to her nec/ and raped her. The second incident of rape occurred while *arivel was sleepin' in the sala with her brother and sister. *arivel did not shout because she was afraid of the accused who was a prisoner and had alread% /illed somebod%. Held: The # 6nformation alle'ed that both instances of rape were attended b% the a''ravatin' circumstance of 9uasi?recidivism. The TC made no e-press rulin' that the appellant was a 9uasi?recidivist, and ri'htl% so. )urin' the trial, the prosecution manifested that appellant had been convicted b% the RTC and was servin' sentence for the crime of homicide. ,owever, the prosecution failed or ne'lected to present in evidence the record of appellantBs previous conviction. Quasi?recidivism, li/e recidivism and reiteracion, necessitates the presentation of a certified cop% of the sentence convictin' an accused. The fact that appellant was an inmate of )AP<C2& does not prove that final +ud'ment had been rendered a'ainst him. P&o*%& +. )!%%,*,n4o (1989) Facts: The accused was char'ed before the RTC with the crimes of murder and of attempted homicide. Held: The court does not a'ree that reiteracion or habitualit% should be appreciated in this case. The appellant was found b% the trial court to have committed offenses prior to and after the incident of 8an. 1>, 1:;:. 6n habitualit%, it is essential that the offender be previousl% punished, that is, he has served the sentence, for an offense in which the law attaches, or provides for an e9ual or 'reater penalt% than that attached b% law to the second offense, or for two or ore offenses, in which the law attaches a li'hter penalt%. ,ere, the records do not disclose that the appellant has been previousl% punished b% an offense to which the law attaches an e9ual or 'reater or penalt% or for two or more crimes to which it attaches a li'hter penalt%. P&o*%& +. Mo%!n, (.222) Facts: (rothers 8oseph and An'elito, alon' with their cousin, )ann% were on their wa% home when the% heard somebod% shout 5/uba7, referrin' to 8oseph, a hunchbac/. The% as/ed who said that but no one admitted. As the 3 were about to 'o, *olina delivered a stron' stabbin' blow at the bac/ of 8oseph. An'elito came to aid his brother but *olina also stabbed him at the bac/. 8oseph was dead on arrival at the clinic. Held: To prove recidivism, it is necessar% to alle'e the same in the information and to attach thereto certified copies of the sentences rendered a'ainst the accused. Nonetheless, the trial court ma% still 'ive such AC credence if the accused does not ob+ect to the presentation of evidence on the fact of recidivism. 6n the case at bar, the accused never voiced out an% ob+ection when confronted with the fact of his previous conviction for attempted homicide. P&o*%& +. D,$!%%o (.221) Facts: Pacot stabbed and stran'led Rosemarie leadin' to the latters death. )acillo for his part, hold down RosemarieBs le's to prevent her from stru''lin'. The two men stopped onl% when the% were sure that the victim was alread% dead. )acillo then encase her corpse in a cement. The trial court imposed the death penalt% on the 'round that )acillo admitted durin' re?cross e-amination that he had a prior conviction for the death of his former live?in partner. The fact that )acillo was a recidivist was appreciated b% the trial court as a 'eneric a''ravatin' circumstance which increased the imposable penalt% from reclusion perpetua to death Held: The a''ravatin' circumstance of recidivism was not alle'ed in the information and therefore cannot be appreciated a'ainst appellant. 6n order to appreciate recidivism as an a''ravatin' circumstance, it is necessar% to alle'e it in the information and to attach certified true copies of the sentences previousl% meted out to the accused. #0 This is in accord with Rule 11=, $ection of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure which states. $<C. . )esi'nation of the offense. I The complaint or information shall state the desi'nation of the offense 'iven b% the statute, aver the acts or omissions constitutin' the offense, and specif% its 9ualif%in' and a''ravatin' circumstances. 6f there is no desi'nation of the offense, reference shall be made to the section or subsection of the statute punishin' it. P&o*%& +. C,J,#, (.222) Facts: Accused Ca+ara raped 10?%ear old *arita in front of his common?law wife who is the half?sister of the victim and his two small children. The trial court convicted him as char'ed and sentenced him to death. Held. The records show that the crime was a''ravated b% reiteracion under Art. 1>, par. 1=, of The Revised Penal Code, the accused havin' been convicted of frustrated murder in 1:;! and of homicide, frustrated homicide, trespass to dwellin', ille'al possession of firearms and murder sometime in 1:: where his sentences were later commuted to imprisonment for #3 %ears and a fine of P#==,===.==. ,e was 'ranted conditional pardon b% the President of the Philippines on November 1::1. Reiteracion or habitualit% under Art. 1>, par. 1=, herein cited, is present when the accused has been previousl% punished for an offense to which the law attaches an e9ual or 'reater penalt% than that attached b% law to the second offense or for two or more offenses to which it attaches a li'hter penalt%. As alread% discussed, herein accused can be convicted onl% of simple rape and the imposable penalt% therefor is reclusion perpetua. Ahere the law prescribes a sin'le indivisible penalt%, it shall be applied re'ardless of the miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstances attendant to the crime, such as in the instant case. P,#. 11. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED IN CONSIDERATION OF A PRICE' REWARD' OR PROMISE. R Ahen this AC is present, there must be # or more principals, the one who 'ives or offers the price or promise and the one who accepts it, both of whom are principals @ to the former, because he directl% induces the latter to commit the crime, and the latter because he commits it. R Ahen this AC is present, it affects not onl% the person who received the price or reward, but also the person who 'ave it. / viv Pa'e 0# #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 R The evidence must show that one of the accused used mone% or other valuable consideration for the purpose of inducin' another to perform the deed. P,#. 1.. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED BY MEANS OF INUNDATION' FIRE' POISON' EGPLOSION' STRANDIN6 OF A )ESSEL OR INTERNATIONAL DAMA6E THERETO' DERAILMENT OF A LOCOMOTI)E' OR BY THE USE OF ANY OTHER ARTIFICE IN)OL)IN6 6REAT WASTE AND RUIN. R 3nless used b% the offender as a means to accomplish a criminal purpose, an% of the circumstances in para'raph 1# cannot be considered to increase the penalt% or to chan'e the nature of the offense. R Ahen another AC alread% 9ualifies the crime, an% of these ACBs shall be considered as 'eneric a''ravatin' circumstance onl%. R Ahen the crime intended to be committed is arson and somebod% dies as a result thereof, the crime is simpl% arson and the act resultin' in the death of that person is not even an independent crime of homicide, it bein' absorbed. R The /illin' of the victim b% means of such circumstances as inundation, fire, poison or e-plosion 9ualifies the offense to murder. R 6t will be noted that each of the circumstances of 5fire7, 5e-plosion,7 and 5derailment of a locomotive7 ma% be a part of the definition of particular crime, such as, arson, crime involvin' destruction, and dama'es and obstruction to means of communication. 6n these cases, the% do not serve to increase the penalt%, because the% are alread% included b% the law in definin' the crimes. P,#. 1@. = THAT THE ACT BE COMMITTED WITH E)IDENCE PREMEDITATION. R <vident premeditation implies a deliberate plannin' of the act before e-ecutin' it. R The essence of premeditation is that the e-ecution of the criminal act must be preceded b% cool thou'ht and reflection upon the resolution to carr% out the criminal intent durin' the space of time sufficient to arrive at a calm +ud'ment. R <vident premeditation ma% not be appreciated absent an% proof as to how and when the plan was hatched or what time elapsed before it was carried out. REBUISITIESD 1. The time when the offender determined to commit the crimeF #. An act manifestl% indicatin' that the culprit has clun' to his determinationF and ? Ahen the crime was carefull% planned b% the offendersF ? Ahen the offenders previousl% prepared the means which the% considered ade9uate to carr% it out. 3. A sufficient lapse of time between the determination and e-ecution, to allow him to reflect upon the conse9uences of his act and to allow is conscience to overcome the resolution of his will. ? The offender must have an opportunit% to cooll% and serenel% thin/ and deliberate on the meanin' and the conse9uences of what he planned to do, an interval lon' enou'h for his conscience and better +ud'ment to overcome his evil desire and scheme. R Conspirac% 'enerall% presupposes premeditation. R <vident premeditation, while inherent in robber%, ma% be a''ravatin' in robber% with homicide if the premeditation included the /illin' of the victim. P&o*%& +. B!/, (1998) Facts: At around 1.3= pm, (ibat stabbed to death one &lo%d del Rosario as the latter was on his wa% to school waitin' for a ride. The suspect fled while the victim was brou'ht to the hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival. A witness testified that the accused and several others often met in RoblesB house. 6n one of their meetin's, the accused and his companions hid some 'uns and 5tuso/7 in the house. Also, other witnesses saw the accused at around 11.3= am with some companions and heard the plan to /ill someone. Held: There is evident premeditation determination because the 3 re9uisites are present. There was evident premeditation where # hours had elapsed from the time the accused clun' to his determination to /ill the victim up to the actual perpetration of the crime. P&o*%& +. L"-=,9 (1991) Facts: Pal?lo% was fencin' the boundar% limits of the land he was famin' when his dau'hter, $onia, heard a shot. 6mmediatel%, she went uphill and +ust as a second 'un shot resounded, she saw (anna% and &u'? aw from a distance and that her father was bout to draw his bolo when &u'?aw shot him. Held: The $C ruled that there was no evident premeditation because no one witnessed the initial attac/. As $onia herself testified, she heard the first whot, went up a hill, climbed a tree and from ther, saw &u'?aw shootin' her father with the shot reverberatin' as the second 'un report. Ahat she did see was her father tr%in' to repel the assault with a bolo but he failed because a second shot hit him. The records are bereft of evidence that the crime was committed with evident premeditation. P&o*%& +. C,3!%& (1980) Facts: After a pra%er meetin' was held at the place of the victim, a deaf?mute bo% arrived cr%in' and while ma/in' si'nals, was able to conve% that he was stran'led and span/ed. Accompanied b% some of his 'uests, the victim proceeded to 'o to the place where the bo% said he was accosted. Nearin' the place, the victim was suddenl% stabbed b% the accused in the stomach with a lon' /nife. Held: <vident premeditation was not established b% the prosecution. Althou'h the facts tend to show that Camilet mi'ht have harbored ill?feelin's towards the Camanchos after the% too/ a portion of the land he was farmin' and, as he himself stated to the police, the% also too/ the produce from his cornfield, there is no proof that Camilet conceived of /illin' the victim. 6ndeed, there is no evidence of 1" the time when he determined to commit the crime, #" an act manifestl% indicatin' that he has clun' to his determination and e-ecution to allow him to reflect upon the conse9uences of his act and to allow his conscience to overcome the / viv Pa'e 03 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 resolution of his will had he desired to hear/en to its warnin's. P&o*%& +. I%,o, (1991) Facts: The ! accused were char'ed for the 'ruesome murder of Nestor de &o%ola. The conviction was based on the followin' circumstances. a" The deceased was seen on the ni'ht before the /illin' in a drin/in' session with some of the accusedF #" The drun/en voices accused Ruben and Nestor were later heard and Nestor was then seen bein' /ic/ed and mauled b% the ! accusedF 3" some of the accused borrowed the tric%cle of Ale- at about # a.m.F >" blood was found in RubenBs shirt. Held: <vident premeditation cannot be considered. There is nothin' in the records to show that appellant, prior to the ni'ht in 9uestion, resolved to /ill Nestor, nor is there proof to show that such /illin' was the result of meditation, calculation or resolution on his part. 2n the contrar%, the evidence tends to show that the series of circumstances which culminated in the /illin' constitutes an unbro/en chain of events with no interval of time separatin' them for calculation and meditation. P&o*%& +. Mon4!J,# (.22.) Facts:. 6n a previous incident, Aplacador had stabbed *ondi+ar, his father in law on the /nee. A month after, *ondii+ar stabbed and hac/ed his son?in?law with the use of a sharp and pointed bolo which resulted to his death. Held: There was no evident premeditation. Cor the circumstance of evident premeditation to be appreciated, the prosecution must present clear and positive evidence of the plannin' and preparation underta/en b% the offender prior to the commission of the crime. $ettled is the rule that evident premeditation, li/e an% other circumstance that 9ualifies a /illin' to murder, must be established be%ond reasonable doubt as conclusivel% and indubitabl% as the /illin' itself. 6n the present case, no evidence was presented b% the prosecution as to when and how appellant planned and prepared for the /illin' of the victim. There is no showin' of an% notorious act evidencin' a determination to commit the crime which could prove appellantMs criminal intent. P&o*%& +. To#*!o (s"*#,) Facts: Ahile havin' a drin/in' spree in a cotta'e, Anthon% tried to let )ennis Torpio drin/ 'in and as the latter refused, Anthon% bathed )ennis with 'in and mauled him several times. )ennis crawled beneath the table and Anthon% tried to stab him with a ## fan /nife but did not hit him. )ennis 'ot up and ran towards their home. 3pon reachin' home, he 'ot a /nife. ,e went bac/ to the cotta'e b% another route and upon arrival Anthon% was still there. 3pon seein' )ennis, Anthon% avoided )ennis and ran b% passin' the shore towards the cree/ but )ennis met him, bloc/ed him and stabbed him. Ahen he was hit, Anthon% ran but 'ot entan'led with a fishin' net beside the cree/ and fell on his bac/. )ennis then mounted on him and continued stabbin' him resultin' to the latters death. Thereafter, )ennis left and slept at a 'rass% meadow near a Camp. 6n the mornin', he went to <strera, a police officer to whom he voluntaril% surrendered. Held: No evident premeditation e-ist in this case. There was no sufficient interre'num from the time )ennis was stabbed b% the victim, when )ennis fled to their house and his armin' himself with a /nife, and when he stabbed the victim. 6n a case of fairl% recent vinta'e, it was ruled that there is no evident premeditation when the fracas was the result, not of a deliberate plan but of risin' tempers, or when the attac/ was made in the heat of an'er. P&o*%& +. B&#n,% (.22.) Facts: Appellant, Cernando, Celi-, Re% all surnamed (ernal and the victim Pedrito went to a pubhouse. Pedrito, Re% and appellant went inside while Cernando and Celi- waited outside. Cernando later went inside and saw the three in a sleepin' position. Cernando then as/ed Celi- to start the tric%cle as the% would brin' home the three. ,e first brou'ht Pedrito out of the pub and had him seated at the passen'ers seat inside the tric%cle. Cernado then 'ot appellant who was roused when the% reached the tric%cle. Ahile Cernado was fetchin' Re%, accused positioned himself at the bac/ of Pedrito who was still asleep and dischar'ed his firearm twice hittin' the latter on the head. Held: The Court ruled that there was no evidence directl% showin' an% pre?conceived plan or devise emplo%ed b% accused?appellant to /ill the victim. Accused?appellant did not 'o to (aran'a% )an'dan'la, (an'ued to /ill the victim but to attend to some important matters. Accused?appellant was +ust invited b% his relatives, whom he had not seen for a while after he chan'ed residence, to have a drin/in' spree. The probabilit% is that the decision to shoot the victim was made onl% ri'ht there and then. This should at least cast reasonable doubt on the e-istence of a premeditated plan to /ill the victim. Curther, the mere e-istence of ill? feelin' or 'rud'e between the parties is not sufficient to establish premeditated /illin'. ,ence, it would be erroneous to declare that the /illin' of the victim was premeditated. P&o*%& +. B!so (.22@) Facts: )ario, a blac/ belt in /arate, entered an eater%, seated himself beside Teresita and made se-ual advances to her in the presence of her brother, <duardo. <duardo contacted his cousin, (iso, an e-?convict and a /nown tou'hie in the area, and related to him what )ario had done to Teresita. <duardo and Pio, and # others decided to confront )ario. The% positioned themselves in the alle% near the house of )ario. Ahen )ario arrived on board a ta-icab, the four assaulted )ario. <duardo held, with his ri'ht hand, the wrist of )ario and covered the mouth of )ario with his left hand. The # others held )arioMs ri'ht hand and hair. Pio then stabbed )ario near the breast with a fan /nife. <duardo stabbed )ario and fled with his three companions from the scene. Held: There was no evident premeditation. The prosecution failed to prove that the four intended to /ill )ario and if the% did intend to /ill him, the prosecution failed to prove how the malefactors intended to consummate the crime. <-cept for the fact that the appellant and his three companions waited in an alle% for )ario to return to his house, the prosecution failed to prove an% overt acts on the part of the appellant and his cohorts showin' that that the% had clun' to an% plan to /ill the victim. P,#. 11. = THAT THE CRAFT' FRAUD OR DIS6UISE BE EMPLOYED. CR$1" @ involves intellectual tric/er% and cunnin' on the part of the accused. 6t is emplo%ed as a scheme in the e-ecution of the crime. / viv Pa'e 0> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 e.-. Ahere the defendants pretended to be constabular% soldiers to 'ain entr% into the place of the victims. The act of the accused in pretendin' to be bona fide passen'ers of the ta-icab driven b% the deceased, when the% were not so in fact, in order not to arouse his suspicion, and then /illin' him, constituted craft. R Ahere craft parta/es of an element of the offense, the same ma% not be appreciated independentl% for the purpose of a''ravation. 1R$3D @ insidious words or machinations used to induce the victim to act in a manner which would enable the offender to carr% out his desi'n. e.-. To enter the house, one of the accused shouted from the outside that the% wanted to bu% ci'arettes. R There is a hairline distinction between craft and fraud. R )6$T6NCT62N. Ahen there is a )6R<CT 6N)3C<*<NT b% insidious words or machinations, fraud is presentF otherwise, the act of the accused done in order N2T T2 AR23$< T,< $3$P6C62N of the victim constitutes craft. D*S93*SE @ resortin' to an% device to conceal identit%. e-. Aearin' of mas/s R The purpose of the offender in usin' an% device must be to conceal his identit%. P&o*%& +. M,#<"&F (198.) Facts: Crancisca was in their house to'ether with her children and main when somebod% called in front of their window who identified themselves as PC soldiers loo/in' for contraband. The men ordered her to open up otherwise the% will shoot up their house. Then accused *ar9ue4 went inside to'ether with other armed companions. The% too/ some of their belon'in's and one of them even raped Crancisca, &eticia (dau'hter of Crancisca" and Rufina (maid". Held: The followin' ACBs were proved a" ni'httimeF #" unlawful entr%F 3" dwellin' of the offended partiesF >" dis'uise, that is b% pretendin' to be PC officersF and !" b% utter disre'ard due to victimsB a'e and se-. P&o*%& +. E3*,$!s (199@) Facts: <mpacis et al. held?up the store of Cidel and his wife. As Cidel was about to 'ive the mone%, he decided to fi'ht. ,e was stabbed several times which resulted to his death. <mpacis was stabbed b% the son of Cidel. Ahen he went to a clinic for treatment, he was arrested. Held: &an'omes and <mpacis pretended to be bona fide customers of the victimBs store and on this prete-t 'ained entr% into the latterBs store and into another part of his dwellin'. Thus, there AC of craft was ta/en into consideration. P&o*%& +. L,/"-"&n (.222) Facts: 3nder the prete-t of sellin' 3 cows to the victim, &abu'uen convinced the victim to see the cows and brin' P>=,=== with him. The two rode on the victiimBs motorc%cle and &abu'uen lured him to where he could divest the victim of his mone% with the least dan'er of bein' cau'ht. ,e then boarded a bus leavin' the motorc%cle of the victim on the side of the road. The victimBs dead bod% was found on the middle of a rice field, != meters from the service drop of an irri'ation canal. Held. The 'eneric a''ravatin' circumstances of fraud and craft is present in this case. Craft involves intellectual tric/er% and cunnin' on the part of the offender. Ahen there is a direct inducement b% insidious words or machinations, fraud is present. (% sa%in' that he would accompan% the victim to see the cows which the latter intended to bu%, appellant was able to lure the victim to 'o with him. P,#. 1(. = THAT (1) AD)ANTA6E BE TACEN OF SUPERIOR STREN6TH' OR (.) MEANS BE EMPLOYED TO WEACEN THE DEFENSE. (1) SUPERIOR STREN6TH R To TAO< A)JANTA1< of superior stren'th means to use purposel% e-cessive force out of proportion to the means of defense available to the person attac/ed. R 2ne who attac/s another with passion and obfuscation dos not ta/e advanta'e of his superior stren'th. R An attac/ made b% a man with a deadl% weapon upon an unarmed and defenseless woman constitutes the circumstance of abuse of that superiorit% which his $<H and the A<AP2N used in the act afforded him, and from which the woman was unable to defend herself. R No abuse of superior stren'th in parricide a'ainst the wife because it is inherent in the crime. 6t is 'enerall% accepted that the husband is ph%sicall% stron'er than the wife. R There must be evidence that the accused was ph%sicall% stron'er and that the% abused such superiorit%. The mere fact of there bein' a superiorit% in numbers is not sufficient to brin' the case within the a''ravatin' circumstance. R There is abuse of superior stren'th when weapon used is out of proportion to the defense available to the offended part%. R Abuse of superior stren'th is absorbed in treacher%. R Abuse of superior stren'th is a''ravatin' in coercion and forcible abduction, when 'reatl% in e-cess of that re9uired to commit the offense. BY A BAND ABUSE OF SUPERIOR STREN6TH Ahen the offense is committed b% more than 3 armed malefactors re'ardless of the comparative stren'th of the victim. The 'ravamen of abuse of superiorit% is the ta/in' advanta'e b% the culprits of their collective stren'th to overpower their wea/er victims.
(.) MEANS EMPLOYED TO WEACEN DEFENSE R This circumstance is applicable onl% to crimes a'ainst persons and sometimes a'ainst person and propert%, such as robber% with ph%sical in+uries or homicide. R This AC is absorbed in treacher%. R <-. 2ne who, while fi'htin' with another, suddenl% casts sand or dirt upon the latterBs e%es and / viv Pa'e 0! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 then wound or /ills him, evidentl% emplo%s means which wea/en the defense of his opponent. P&o*%& +. C,/,o (1988) Facts: The accused with # other men who are still at lar'e, armed with firearms and stones and usin' face mas/s, entered the dwellin' of the victim. The% held the victim ti'ht as well as the wife, who was able to scratch the face of the mas/ed man, as a result was able to identif% the accused. Not satisfied with the mone% 'iven b% the couple, the two un/nown robbers hit the victim with stone at the bac/ of his head and the accused did the same to the wife which caused her death. The prosecution ar'ued that since the attac/ was b% a robust man of #: %ears with a hu'e stone a'ainst an a'ein' defenseless human, abuse of superior stren'th should a''ravate the crime. Held. The prosecution failed to prove that there was indeed a notorious ine9ualit% between the a'es, si4es and stren'th of the anta'onists and that these notorious advanta'es were purposel% sou'ht for or used b% the accused to achieve his ends. P&o*%& +. R"&%,n (1991) Facts: Ruelan (#= %rs old" was hired b% the spouses Ricardo and Rosa (;0 %rs old" to help them sell and deliver rice to their customers. 2ne da%, Rosa as/ed Ruelan to accompan% her, in openin' their store in the public mar/etF she also ordered him to brin' a sac/ and an a-e. Ahen the% were about to leave the premises, the house do' 'ot loose and went towards the street. Rosa 'ot an'r% and scolded Ruelan. Ruelan pleaded her to stop but Rosa did not so Ruelan struc/ her behind her ri'ht ear, causin' her to fall face down. ,e left her to a 'rass% portion beside the street and fled. ,e surrendered to the police after # da%s. Held: Althou'h abuse of superior stren'th was proven since Ruelan was onl% #= %ears old whereas his victim was ;0 %ears old alread%, this was not pleaded in the information, hence, it shall onl% be considered as a 'eneric circumstance in the imposition of the correct penalt%. P&o*%& +. P,4!%%, (1991) Facts: Pat. 2me'a was on dut% when 2ntuca approached him as/in' for help claimin' he was bein' maltreated b% stran'ers. The% proceeded to the place where the% saw 3 men and a woman. An ar'ument ensued between 2ntuca and the 3 men, one of which was $'t. Padilla. 2me'a left but returned when he saw that the 3 men were 'an'in' up on 2ntuca. The latter was stripped of his service revolver. 2ntuca was pursued b% Padilla. The former, with onl% a piece of pl%wood as a defense, was shot b% the latter in the head. Held: The /illin' was 9ualified b% the AC of abuse of superior stren'th which was alle'ed in the information and proved durin' trial. The abuse of superior stren'th is present not onl% when the offenders en+o% numerical superiorit%, or there is a notorious ine9ualit% of forces between the victim and the a''ressor, but also when the offender uses a powerful weapon which is out of proportion to the defense available to the victim as in this case. P&o*%& +. Lo/#!-,s (.22.) Facts: Cran/, *arlito, both surnamed &obri'as and *ante mauled and bo- Ta%laran who was alread% ;0 %ears old. The victim died caused b% severe beatin' and maulin' on the chest portion on the victimBs bod%. Held: The crime committed was murder 9ualified b% the a''ravatin' circumstance of abuse of superior stren'th. To appreciate abuse of superior stren'th, there must be a deliberate intent on the part of the malefactors to ta/e advanta'e of their 'reater number. The% must have notoriousl% selected and made use of superior stren'th in the commission of the crime. To ta/e advanta'e of superior stren'th is to use e-cessive force that is out of proportion to the means for self?defense available to the person attac/edF thus, the prosecution must clearl% show the offendersM deliberate intent to do so. P&o*%& +. B,#$&%on (.22.) Facts: (arcelon went inside the house of Amador. Thereafter, accused stran'led and stabbed the victim with a /nife. Amador died as a result. At the time the crime was committed, Amador was a 0: %ear?old woman and (arcelon was onl% #: %ears old. Held: Abuse of superior stren'th was present in the commission of the crime. The court cited the case of People vs. 2cumen, where an attac/ b% a man with a deadl% weapon upon an unarmed woman constitutes the circumstance of abuse of that superiorit% which his se- and the weapon used in the act afforded him, and from which the woman was unable to defend herself. The disparit% in a'e between the assailant and the victim, a'ed #: and 0:, respectivel%, indicates ph%sical superiorit% on appellantMs part over the deceased. 6t did not matter that appellant was Ldar/L with a Lslim bod% buildL or Lmed%o mataba.L Ahat mattered was that the malefactor was male and armed with a lethal weapon that he used to sla% the victim. P&o*%& +. S,ns,& (.22.) Facts 3ldarico was drin/in' with 1! other men that include the $ansaet brothers, Ro'elio, &eopoldo and $ilverio. (ecause of a bad +o/e that cropped up, verbal e-chan'es ensued. Thereafter, Ro'elio and 3ldarico started hac/in' each other with bolos. $ilverio and &eopolo positioned themselves behind the victim and also hac/ed him. 3ldarico retaliated woundin' $ilverio. Ro'elio then hac/ed 3ldarico a # nd time. &eopoldo and Ro'elio continued hac/in' 3ldarico when the latter fell. The% then dra''ed 3ldarico towards the river and there the% each twice hac/ed 3ldarico resultin' to his death. Held: L*ere superiorit% in number, even assumin' it to be a fact, would not necessaril% indicate the attendance of abuse of superior stren'th. The prosecution should still prove that the assailants purposel% used e-cessive force out of proportion to the means of defense available to the persons attac/ed.L LCinall%, to appreciate the 9ualif%in' circumstance of abuse of superior stren'th, what should be considered is whether the a''ressors too/ advanta'e of their combined stren'th in order to consummate the offense. To ta/e advanta'e of superior stren'th means to purposel% use e-cessive force out of proportion to the means available to the person attac/ed to defend himself.L 6n the case at bar, the victim 3ldarico de Castro was the one who pic/ed a fi'ht with the accused? appellants because he did not li/e the +o/e b% one of the accused?appellants. There was no evidence to show that the accused?appellants purposel% sou'ht and too/ advanta'e of their number to subdue the victim. P&o*%& +. )&n"#, (.221) Facts: Jentura armed with a .3 Caliber ,ome? made Revolver and Clores armed with a bladed weapon, entered the house of the (ocate+as b% cuttin' a hole in the /itchen door. Jentura announced a hold?up and hit 8aime on the head and as/ed for the /e%s. 8aime called out for help and tried to wrestle the 'un awa% from / viv Pa'e 00 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Jentura. Clores then stabbed 8aime 3 times. Clores also stabbed 8aimeBs wife Aileen who had been awa/ened. Aileen tried to defend herself with an elecrtric cord to no avail. Aileen died on the hospital on the same da%. Held. (% deliberatel% emplo%in' a deadl% weapon a'ainst Aileen, Clores too/ advanta'e of the superiorit% which his stren'th, se- and weapon 'ave him over his unarmed victim. The fact that Aileen attempted to fend off the attac/ on her and her husband b% throwin' nearb% ob+ects, such as an electric cord, at appellant Clores does not automaticall% ne'ate the possibilit% that the latter was able to ta/e advanta'e of his superior stren'th P,#. 10. = THAT THE ACT BE COMMITTED WITH TREACHERY ($LE2'S*$). R TR<AC,<RK means that the offended part% was not 'iven opportunit% to ma/e a defense. R There is treacher% when the offender commits an% of the crimes a'ainst the person, emplo%in' means, methods or forms in the e-ecution thereof which tend directl% and speciall% to insure its e-ecution, without ris/ to himself arisin' from the defense which the offended part% mi'ht ma/e. REBUISITESD a. That at the time of the attac/, the victim was not in a position to defend himselfF and b. That the offender consciousl% adopted the particular means, method or form of attac/ emplo%ed b% him. R Treacher% does not connote the element of surprise alone. R There is no treacher% when the attac/ is preceded b% a warnin' or the accused 'ave the deceased a chance to prepare. R The 9ualif%in' circumstance of treacher% ma% not be simpl% deduced from presumption as it is necessar% that the e-istence of this 9ualif%in' or a''ravatin' circumstance should be proven as full% as the crime itself in order to a''ravate the liabilit% or penalt% incurred b% the culprit. RULES RE6ARDIN6 TREACHERY a. Applicable onl% to crimes a'ainst persons. b. *eans, methods or forms need not insure accomplishment of crime. c. The mode of attac/ must be consciousl% adopted. R *ere suddenness of the attac/ is not enou'h to constitute treacher%. $uch method or form of attac/ must be deliberatel% chosen b% the accused. ATTACCS SHOWN INTENTION TO ELIMITNATE RISCD a. Jictim asleep b. Jictim half?awa/e or +ust awa/ened c. Jictim 'rapplin' or bein' held. d. Attac/ed from behind R There is treacher% in /illin' a child because the wea/ness of the victim due to his tender a'e results in the absence of an% dan'er to the accused. ADDITIONAL RULESD 1. Ahen the a''ression is C2NT6N323$, treacher% must be present in the (<16NN6N1 of the assault. #. Ahen the assault AA$ N2T C2NT6N323$, in that there was an interruption, it is sufficient that treacher% was present AT T,< *2*<NT T,< CATA& (&2A AA$ 16J<N. R 6n treacher%, it ma/es no difference whether or not the victim was the same person whom the accused intended to /ill. R Ahen it is N2T $,2AN that the principal b% induction directed the /iller of the deceased to adopt the means or methods actuall% used b% the latter in accomplishin' the murder, because the former left to the latter the details as to how it was to be accomplished, treacher% cannot be ta/en into consideration as to the principal b% induction. TREACHERY ABUSE OF SUPERIOR STREN6TH MEANS EMPLOYED TO WEACEN DEFENSE The means, methods or forms of attac/ are emplo%ed to ma/e it impossible or hard for the offended part% to defend himself. The offender does not emplo% means, methods or forms of attac/F he onl% ta/es advanta'e of his superior stren'th. The offender, li/e in treacher%, emplo%s means but the means emplo%ed onl% materiall% wea/ens the resistin' power of the offended part%. R Ahen there is conspirac%, treacher% is considered a'ainst all the offenders. R Treacher%, evident premeditation and use of superior stren'th are, b% their nature, inherent in the offense of treason. R Treacher% absorbs abuse of superior stren'th, aid of armed men, b% a band and means to wea/en the defense. R Ni'httime and craft are absorbed in treacher% e-cept if treacher% rests upon an independent factual basis. R Treacher% is inherent in murder b% poisonin'. R Treacher% cannot co?e-ist with passion and obfuscation. P&o*%& +. C,s!%%o (1998) Facts: Jelasco was sittin' outside the pubhouse tal/in' with his co?wor/er, )orie, when one of the customers named Ton% went out of the pubhouse. Then, Castillo suddenl% appeared and, without warnin', stabbed Ton% with a fan /nife on his left chest. Ton% pleaded for help but accused stabbed him once more. Jelasco placed a chair between Ton% and the accused to stop the latter. Ton% ran awa% but was pursued b% the accused. Ton% died and his bod% was found outside the fence of 6'lesia ni Cristo Compound. Held: The /illin' was 9ualified b% treacher%. Treacher% is committed when two conditions concur, namel%, that the person attac/ed had no opportunit% to defend himself and that such means, method, and forms of e-ecution were deliberatel% and consciousl% adopted b% the accused without dan'er to his person. These re9uisites were evidentl% present in this case when the / viv Pa'e 0; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 accused appeared from nowhere and swiftl% stabbed the victim +ust as he was biddin' 'oodb%e to his friend, Jelasco. $aid action rendered it difficult for the victim to defend himself. The presence of 5defense wounds7 does not ne'ate treacher% because, as testified to b% Jelasco, the first stab, fatal as it was, was inflicted on the chest. The incised wounds in the arms were inflicted when the victim was alread% rendered defenseless. P&o*%& +. S,n-,%,n- (1971) Facts: Corte4 left his nipa hut to 'ather tuba from a coconut tree nearb%. Ahile he was on top of the tree, he was struc/ b% a volle% of shots and he fell to the 'round at the base of the coconut tree. The accused and his companions shot Corte4 several times which resulted to his death. Held: The victim was shot while he was 'atherin' tuba on top of a coconut tree. ,e was unarmed and defenseless. ,e was not e-pectin' to be assaulted. ,e did not 'ive immediate provocation. The deliberate, surprise attac/ shows that $an'alan' and his companions emplo%ed a mode of e-ecution which insured the /illin' without an% ris/ to them arisin' from an% defense which the victim could have made. The /illin' can be cate'ori4ed as murder because of the 9ualif%in' circumstance of treacher%. P&o*%& +. 6"!&##&F (1988) Facts: Ahile drun/, the accused started cursin' *atuano and challen'ed him # or 3 times while at the office where the two wor/ed. The accused was holdin' a balison'. *atuanoBs son intervened as/in' the accused to calm down and the latter seemin'l% acceded. As soon as the son resumed wor/, the accused lun'ed towards *atuano whose bac/ was turned and stabbed him. Held: The claim that the challen'in' words of the victim precluded the circumstance of treacher% because it put him on his 'uard is untenable. The fact that the accused seemed to be pacified b% the son of the victim made it clear that the victim had no reason to e-pect an attac/. As such the attac/ was sudden and une-pected, from behind and with the victim unarmed without an% chance to defend himself a'ainst the initial assault, clearl% show that treacher% was present. P&o*%& +. )&#$;&F (1991) Facts: A team of 'overnment a'ents of the PC conducted a surveillance on a house reported to be the hideout of a 'an' of suspected robbers. The a'ents stopped a car comin' out of the house. 6t was driven b% (alane. (alane was prevailed upon into accompan%in' the a'ents into the house. The% proceeded to the house in > cars and when the 1 st car approached, the% were met with heav% 'unfire. A firefi'ht ensued. 3 of the a'ents were hitF one died and two were in+ured. The men inside the house later surrendered. Amon' them was Jerche4. Held: The two re9uisites of treacher% were not proven. The lawmen, /nowin' that the% were dealin' with a 'an' of ban/ robbers, were prepared to deal with an% resistance that ma% possibl% be put up. Also, $'t. Norcio was /illed durin' the 'un battle and not durin' the first volle% of shots fired b% the robbers. Thus, there is no showin' that appellants deliberatel% and consciousl% adopted their mode of attac/. Neither is there an% showin' that the% intended to ambush the lawmen. P&o*%& +. R&n4,J& (.222) Facts: &ennie was a 1!?%ear old deaf?mute. Renda+e, on the other hand, was #3 %ears old and in the prime of his stren'th. Renda+e followed &ennie when the latter was on her wa% home alone. Aith the use of a /nife, he then inflicted stab wounds, ! of which were fatal on the victimBs bac/. &ennie died as a result. ,er bod% was found in a su'ar cane plantation. Held: Treacher% 9ualified the /illin' to murder. To constitute treacher%, two conditions must concur. (1" the emplo%ment of means, methods or manner of e-ecution that would ensure the offenderMs safet% from an% defense or retaliator% act on the part of the offended part%F and (#" the offenderMs deliberate or conscious choice of the means, method or manner of e-ecution. No one has positivel% testified on how &ennie was /illed but the victimBs bod% shows the manner in which she was attac/ed b% her assailant. 6t elo9uentl% spea/s for itself. The in+uries established the manner in which the /illin' was cruell% carried out with little or no ris/ to the assailant. The number of stab wounds, most of which were inflicted at the bac/ of the child I unarmed and alone I shows the deliberateness, the suddenness and the une-pectedness of the attac/, which thus deprived her of the opportunit% to run or fi'ht bac/. P&o*%& +. U3,>,3 (.22.) Facts: 3ma%am and the victim, *endo4a were livin' as husband and wife in a shant% erected inside a compound owned b% Jelas9ue4. )urin' the coupleBs sta% in the compound, Jelas9ue4 would notice them fre9uentl% 9uarellin' and *endo4a on occasions would run to Jelas9ue4 for help for the beatin's inflicted on her b% her husband. Jelas9ue4 then noticed a foul odor emanatin' from the coupleBs shant% which he at first thou'ht to be that of a poultr% feed or &aning baboy. Aith the assistance of the police who bro/e the shant%Bs walls, the decomposin' bod% of *endo4a was found inside. The trial court found 3ma%am 'uilt% of murder. Held: The 9ualif%in' circumstance of treacher% was not established with concrete evidence. The circumstantial evidence on record does not clearl% show that there was an% conscious and deliberate effort on the part of the accused to adopt an% particular means, method or form of attac/ to ensure the commission of the crime without affordin' the victim an% means to defend herself. The conclusion that there was treacher% can hardl% be 'leaned because the victim and 3ma%am were inside their shant% and no one witnessed how the /illin' too/ place. Notabl%, the medical findin's of the victimMs cadaver show, contusions on her arms and le's, indicatin' that there ma% have been a 9uarrel prior to the stabbin'. This reasonabl% ne'ates treacher%. P&o*%& +. P!&4,4 (.22.) The essence of treacher% is a deliberate and sudden attac/, affordin' the hapless, unarmed and unsuspectin' victim no chance to resist or to escape. Ahile it is true that the victim herein ma% have been warned of a possible dan'er to his person, since the victim and his companion headed towards their residence when the% saw the 'roup of accused? appellants comin' bac/ for them after an earlier 9uarrel +ust minutes before, in treacher%, what is decisive is that the attac/ was e-ecuted in such a manner as to ma/e it impossible for the victim to retaliate. 6n the case at bar, *ateo did not have an% chance of defendin' himself from the accused?appellantMs concerted assault, even if he was forewarned of the / viv Pa'e 0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 attac/. *ateo was obviousl% overpowered and helpless when accused?appellantsM 'roup numberin' around ei'ht, 'an'ed up and mauled him. &u4 came to *ateoMs succor b% embracin' him and pacif%in' his a''ressors, but accused?appellants were unrelentin'. *ore importantl%, *ateo could not have actuall% anticipated the sudden landin' of a lar'e concrete stone on his head. The stone was thus treacherousl% struc/. Neither could the victim have been aware that &ito came up beside him to stab his bac/ as persons were beatin' him from ever% direction. &itoMs act of stabbin' the victim with a /nife, inflictin' a 1!?cm deep wound shows deliberate intent of usin' a particular means of attac/. Considerin' the location of the in+uries sustained b% the victim and the absence of defense wounds, *ateo clearl% had no chance to defend himself. P&o*%& +. D"3,4,- (.221) Facts: Prudente with his friends includin' *eliston a'reed to meet at a swimmin' pool to celebrate the feast of $t. 8ohn. 2n their wa% home, there was heav% downpour so the% decided to ta/e a shelter at a store where # men, 1 of whom is )umada' are havin' some drin/s. )umada' offered Prudente a drin/ of Tandua% but the latter refused then left. )umada' followed Prudente and stabbed the victim on his breast with a /nife which resulted to his death. Held: As a 'eneral rule, a sudden attac/ b% the assailant, whether frontall% or from behind, is treacher% if such mode of attac/ was deliberatel% adopted b% him with the purpose of deprivin' the victim of a chance to either fi'ht or retreat. The rule does not appl% if the attac/ was not preconceived but merel% tri''ered b% infuriation of the appellant on an act made b% the victim. 6n the present case, it is apparent that the attac/ was not preconceived. 6t was tri''ered b% the appellantMs an'er because of the victimMs refusal to have a drin/ with the appellant and his companions. P&o*%& +. D& 6"F3,n (.227) Held: d 6t should be made clear that the essence of treacher% is the sudden and une-pected attac/ on an unsuspectin' victim without the sli'htest provocation on his part. This is even more true if the assailant is an adult and the victim is a minor. M!no# $;!%4#&n' 9;o /> #&,son o8 ;&!# &n4&# >&,#s' $,nno /& &:*&$&4 o *" "* , 4&8&ns&. Thus, when an adult person ille'all% attac/s a minor, treacher% e-ists. P,#. 17. = THAT MEANS BE EMPLOYED OR CIRCUMSTANCES BROU6HT ABOUT WHICH ADD I6NOMINY TO THE NATURAL EFFECTS OF THE ACT. I6NOMINY M it is a circumstance pertainin' to the moral order, which adds dis'race ad oblo9u% to the material in+ur% caused b% the crime. R This AC is applicable to crimes a'ainst chastit% and persons. R Ahen the accused raped a woman after windin' co'on 'rass around his 'enital or'an, he thereb% au'mented the wron' done b% increasin' its pain and addin' i'nomin% there to (People v. Torrefiel". G N2T<. Accordin' to Professor Ambion, this is not i'nomin% but cruelt%. R The means emplo%ed or the circumstances brou'ht about must tend to ma/e the effects of the crime *2R< ,3*6&6AT6N1 or T2 P3T T,< 2CC<N)<) PARTK T2 $,A*<. e-. Ahen the accused raped a married woman in the presence of her husband. P&o*%& +. S!,o (.222) Facts: <strella wor/ed as a housemaid of Rene $iaoBs famil%. 2ne da%, Rene ordered Re%lan, their housebo%, to brin' <strella to a room. Ahile holdin' a 'un, Rene forced Re%lan to have se- with <strella (oral se-, missionar% position, and in the manner do's perform se-ual intercourse". Held. The accused was held 'uilt% of rape with the use of a deadl% weapon, which is punishable b% reclusion perpetua to death. (ut the trial court overloo/ed and did not ta/e into account the a''ravatin' circumstance of i'nomin% and sentenced accused to the sin'le indivisible penalt% of reclusion perpetua. 6t has been held that where the accused in committin' the rape used not onl% the missionar% position, the AC of i'nomin% attended the commission thereof. P&o*%& +. C,$;o%, (.221) Facts. 8essie was about to leave their house to watch cartoons in his uncleMs house ne-t door when accused suddenl% entered the front door of their house. The% ordered 8essie to drop to the floor, and then hit him in the bac/ with the butt of a lon' 'un. Aithout much ado, the intruders shot to death 8essieMs uncle, Jictorino who was then in the livin' room. 8essie forthwith crawled and hid under a bed, from where he saw the feet of a third man who had also entered the house. The men entered the /itchen and continued shootin'. Ahen the rampa'e was over and after the malefactors had alread% departed, 8essie came out of his hidin' place and proceeded to the /itchen. There he saw his mother, CarmelitaF his brother Celi-.F and his cousin Rubenson I all slau'htered. The death certificate of Jictorino reveals that his penis was e-cised. Held: 6'nomin% cannot be appreciated in this case. Cor i'nomin% to be appreciated, it is re9uired that the offense be committed in a manner that tends to ma/e its effect more humiliatin', thus addin' to the victimMs moral sufferin'. Ahere the victim was alread% dead when his bod% or a part thereof was dismembered, i'nomin% cannot be ta/en a'ainst the accused. 6n this case, the information states that JictorinoMs se-ual or'an was severed after he was shot and there is no alle'ation that it was done to add i'nomin% to the natural effects of the act. Ae cannot, therefore, consider i'nomin% as an a''ravatin' circumstance. P&o*%& +. B"3!4,n- (.222) Facts. (aliwan' (umidan' raped 1loria in front of her = %ear old father, *elecio. *elecio helplessl% saw the accused rape her dau'hter but did not move because he was too afraid and wea/. (efore rapin' the victim, (aliwan' e-amined the 'enitals of 1loria with a flashli'ht. Held: The a''ravatin' circumstance of i'nomin% shall be ta/en into account if means are emplo%ed or circumstances brou'ht about which add i'nomin% to the natural effects of the offenseF or if the crime was committed in a manner that tends to ma/e its effects more humiliatin' to the victim, that is, add to her moral sufferin'. 6t was established that (aliwan' used the flashli'ht and e-amined the 'enital of 1loria before / viv Pa'e 0: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 he ravished her. ,e committed his bestial deed in the presence of 1loriaMs old father. These facts clearl% show that (aliwan' deliberatel% wanted to further humiliate 1loria, thereb% a''ravatin' and compoundin' her moral sufferin's. 6'nomin% was appreciated in a case where a woman was raped in the presence of her betrothed, or of her husband, or was made to e-hibit to the rapists her complete na/edness before the% raped her. P,#. 18. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED AFTER AN UNLAWFUL ENTRY. THERE IS AN UNLAWFUL ENTRY WHEN AN ENTRANCE OF A CRIME A WALL' ROOF' FLOOR' DOOR' OR WINDOW BE BROCEN. R There is unlawful entr% when an entrance is effected b% a wa% not intended for the purpose. R 3nlawful entr% must be a means to effect entrance and not for escape. R There is no unlawful entr% when the door is bro/en and thereafter the accused made an entr% thru the bro/en door. The brea/in' of the door is covered b% para'raph 1:. RAT62NA&< C2R PAR. 1. 2ne who acts, not respectin' the walls erected b% men to 'uard their propert% and provide for their personal safet%, shows a 'reater perversit%, a 'reater audacit%F hence, the law punishes him with more severit%. R This AC is inherent in robber% with force upon thin's. R )wellin' and unlawful entr% is ta/en separatel% in murders committed in a dwellin'. R 3nlawful entr% is not a''ravatin' in trespass to dwellin'. P&o*%& +. B,&%%o (199@) Facts: (r'%. Captain (or+a awo/e one ni'ht to find out that their front door was open and that their TJ set was missin'. ,e and his wife saw their dead dau'hter l%in' in bed. The TJ set was recovered b% the police at the house of Tadifo, (aelloBs brother?in?law. Tadifo claimed that (aello and 8err% had an a'reement to rob the house of (or+a. 6t was 8err% who /illed (or+aBs dau'hter because it was he who was left inside the house. Held: the AC of unlawful entr% was properl% appreciated a'ainst the accused as he and his companion, 8err%, had entered the (or+a residence throu'h the second floor window, a wa% not intended for in'ress. P,#. 19 = THERE IS AN UNLAWFUL ENTRY WHEN AN ENTRANCE OF A CRIME A WALL' ROOF' FLOOR' DOOR' OR WINDOW BE BROCEN. R To be considered as an AC, brea/in' the door must be utili4ed as a means to the commission of the crime. R 6t is onl% a''ravatin' in cases where the offender resorted to an% of said means T2 <NT<R the house. 6f the wall, etc. is bro/en in order to 'et out of the place, it is not a''ravatin'. P,#. .2. = THAT THE CRIME BE COMMITTED (1) WITH THE AID OF PERSONS UNDER FIFTEEN YEARS OF A6E OR (.) BY MEANS OF MOTOR )EHICLES' MOTORIEED WATERCRAFT' AIRSHIPS' OR OTHER SIMILAR MEANS. (AS AMENDED BY RA (1@8). (1) WITH THE AID OF PERSONS UNDER 1( YEARS OF A6E (.) BY MEANS OF A MOTOR )EHICLE R 6t is a''ravatin' where the accused used the motor vehicle in 'oin' to the place of the crime, in carr%in' awa% the effects thereof, and if facilitatin' their escape. R 6f the motor vehicle was used onl% in facilitatin' the escape, it should not be an a''ravatin' circumstance. R <stafa, which is committed b% means of deceit or abuse of confidence, cannot be committed b% means of motor vehicle. R Theft, which is committed b% merel% ta/in' personal propert% which need not be carried awa%, cannot be committed b% means of motor vehicles. 5or other similar meansD @ the e-pression should be understood as referrin' to *2T2R6S<) vehicles or other efficient means of transportation similar to automobile or airplane. P,#. .1. = THAT THE WRON6 DONE IN THE COMMISSION OF THE CRIME BE DELIBERATELY AU6MENTED BY CAUSIN6 OTHER WRON6 NOT NECESSARY FOR ITS COMMISSIONS. CRUELTY R There is cruelt% when the culprit en+o%s and deli'hts in ma/in' his victim suffer slowl% and 'raduall%, causin' him unnecessar% ph%sical pain in the consummation of the criminal act. R Cor cruelt% to e-ist, it must be shown that the accused en+o%ed and deli'hted in ma/in' his victim suffer. REBUISITESD 1. That the in+ur% caused be deliberatel% increased b% causin' other wron'F #. That the other wron' be unnecessar% for the e-ecution of the purpose of the offender. R Cruelt% refers to ph%sical sufferin' of victim purposel% intended b% offender. R Pluralit% of wounds alone does not show cruelt%. R There is no cruelt% when other wron' was done after the victim was dead. I6NOMINY CRUELTY 6nvolves moral sufferin'. Refers to ph%sical sufferin'. P&o*%& +. L,$,o (1971) Facts: 1allardo, comin' from a 'atherin', decided to 'o home. As he was descendin' the stairs (alata4ar followed him and stabbed him with a /nife at the ri'ht side of his bod%. (alta4ar tried to pull out the /nife. 1allrado ran. Ahen the latter reached the bamboo 'rove, he was assaulted b% )avid and his son, $alvador, 8ose and Cederico. 1allardo sustained 1> wounds b% different bladed instruments. ,is assailants dra''ed him to the field. ,e died later. 6t was found that each of the / viv Pa'e ;= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 : wounds could have caused his death if there were no timel% medical assistance. Held: The numerousness of wound is not the criterion for appreciatin' cruelt%. The test is whether the accused deliberatel% and sadisticall% au'mented the wron' b% causin' another wron' not necessar% for its commission or inhumanl% increased the victimBs sufferin' or outra'ed or scoffed at his person or corpse. P&o*%& +. I%,o, (supraA The fact that NestorBs decapitated bod% bearin' >3 stab wounds, #> of which were fatal, was found dumped in the street is not sufficient for a findin' of cruelt% where there is no showin' that appellant 6laoa, for his pleasure and satisfaction, caused Nestor to suffer slowl% and painfull% and inflicted on him unnecessar% ph%sical and moral pain. Number of wounds alone is not the criterion for the appreciation of cruelt% as an a''ravatin' circumstance. Neither can it be inferred from the mere fact that the victimBs dead bod% was dismembered. P&o*%& +. C,!,n (.22.) Facts: Catian repeatedl% stri/e Aill% with a Lcha/oL on the head, causin' Aill% to fall on his /nees. Calunod seconded b% stri/in' the victim with a piece of wood on the face. Ahen Aill% finall% collapsed, $umalpon' pic/ed him up, carried him over his shoulder, and carried Aill% to a place where the% burned Aill%. The latterBs s/eletal remains were discovered b% a child who was pasturin' his cow near a peanut plantation. Held: The circumstance of cruelt% ma% not be considered as there is no showin' that the victim was burned while he was still alive. Cor cruelt% to e-ist, there must be proof showin' that the accused deli'hted in ma/in' their victim suffer slowl% and 'raduall%, causin' him unnecessar% ph%sical and moral pain in the consummation of the criminal act. No proof was presented that would show that accused?appellants deliberatel% and wantonl% au'mented the sufferin' of their victim. P&o*%& +. 6"&##&#o (.22.) Appellant first severed the victimMs head before his penis was cut?off. This bein' the se9uence of events, cruelt% has to be ruled out for it connotes an act of deliberatel% and sadisticall% au'mentin' the wron' b% causin' another wron' not necessar% for its commission, or inhumanel% increasin' the victimMs sufferin'. As testified to b% )r. $an'la%, and reflected in her medical certificate, <rnesto in fact died as a result of his head bein' severed. No cruelt% is to be appreciated where the act constitutin' the alle'ed cruelt% in the /illin' was perpetrated when the victim was alread% dead. SPECIAL A66RA)ATIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES R&*"/%!$ A$ 8@(@ An act e-pandin' the definition of the crime of rape, reclassif%in' the same as a crime a'ainst persons, amendin' for the purpose act no. 31!, as amended, otherwise /nown as the revised penal code, and for other purposes SECTION 1. Short "itle. = This Act shall be /nown as 7,he /ntiRape 3aw of 899:7. SECTION .. Rape as a Crime $gainst Persons! = The crime of rape shall hereafter be classified as a Crime A'ainst Persons under Title <i'ht of Act 31!, as amended, otherwise /nown as the Revised Penal Code. Accordin'l%, there shall be incorporated into Title <i'ht of the same Code a new chapter to be /nown as Chapter Three on Rape, to read as follows. LChapter Three RapeL Article #00?$! Rape. Ahen and ,ow Committed. ? Rape is Committed? 1" (% a man who shall have carnal /nowled'e of a woman under an% of the followin' circumstances. a" Throu'h force, threat, or intimidationF b" Ahen the offended part% is deprived of reason or otherwise unconsciousF c" (% means of fraudulent machination or 'rave abuse of authorit%F d" Ahen the offended part% is under twelve (1#" %ears of a'e or is demented, even thou'h none of the circumstances mentioned above be presentF #" (% an% person who, under an% of the circumstances mentioned in para'raph 1 hereof, shall commit an act of se-ual assault b% insertin' his penis into other personMs mouth or anal orifice, or an% instrument or ob+ect, into the 'enital or anal orifice of another person. Article #00?,! Penalties. ? Rape under para'raph 1 of the ne-t precedin' article shall be punished b% reclusion perpetua. Ahenever the rape is committed with the use of a deadl% weapon or b% two or more persons, the penalt% shall be reclusion perpetua to death. Ahen b% reason or on the occasion of the rape, the victim has become insane, the penalt% shall be reclusion perpetua to death. Ahen the rape is attempted and a homicide is committed b% reason or on the occasion thereof, the penalt% shall be reclusion perpetua to death. Ahen b% reason or on the occasion of the rape, homicide is committed, the penalt% shall be death. The death penalt% shall also be imposed if the crime of rape is committed with an% of the followin' a''ravatin'D9ualif%in' circumstances. 1" Ahen the victim is under ei'hteen (1" %ears of a'e and the offender is a parent, ascendant, step?parent, 'uardian, relative b% consan'uinit% or affinit% within the third civil de'ree, or the common?law spouse of the parent of the victim. #" Ahen the victim is under the custod% of the police or militar% authorities or an% law enforcement of penal institution. 3" Ahen the rape is committed in full view of the spouse, parent, an% of the children or other relatives within the third civil de'ree of consan'uinit%. >" Ahen the victim is a reli'ious en'a'ed in le'itimate reli'ious vocation or callin' and is personall% /nown to be such b% the offender before or at the time of the commission of the crime. (!" Ahen the victim is a child below seven (;" %ears old. (0" Ahen the offender /nows that he is afflicted with ,uman 6mmune?)eficienc% Jirus (,6J"DAc9uired 6mmune )eficienc% $%ndrome (A6)$" or an% other se-uall% transmissible disease and the virus or disease is transmitted to the victim. (;" Ahen committed b% an% member of the Armed Corces of the Philippines or paramilitar% units thereof or the Philippine National Police or an% law enforcement a'enc% or penal institution, when the offender too/ advanta'e of his position to facilitate the commission of the crime. (" Ahen b% reason or on the occasion of the rape, the victim suffered permanent ph%sical mutilation or disabilit%. / viv Pa'e ;1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 (:" Ahen the offender /new of the pre'nanc% of the offended part% at the time of the commission of the crime. (1=" Ahen the offender /new of the mental disabilit%, emotional disorder andDor ph%sical handicap of the offended part% at the time of the commission of the crime. Rape under para'raph # of the ne-t precedin' article shall be punished b% prision mayor. Ahenever the rape is committed with the use of a deadl% weapon or b% two or more persons, the penalt% shall be prision mayor to reclusion temporal. Ahen b% reason or on the occasion of the rape, the victim has become insane, the penalt% shall be reclusion temporal. Ahen the rape is attempted and a homicide is committed b% reason or on the occasion thereof, the penalt% shall be reclusion temporal to reclusion perpetua. Ahen b% reason or on the occasion of the rape, homicide is committed, the penalt% shall be reclusion perpetua. Reclusion temporal shall also be imposed if the rape is committed b% an% of the ten a''ravatin'D9ualif%in' circumstances mentioned in this article. Article #00?C! Effect of Paron ? The subse9uent valid marria'e between the offender and the offended part% shall e-tin'uish the criminal action or the penalt% imposed. 6n case it is the le'al husband who is the offender, the subse9uent for'iveness b% the wife as the offended part% shall e-tin'uish the criminal action or the penalt%. Pro!ided# That the crime shall be e-tin'uish or the penalt% shall not be abated if the marria'e is void ab initio. Article #00?D! Presumptions. ? An% ph%sical overt act manifestin' resistance a'ainst the act of rape in an% de'ree from the offended part%, or where the offended part% is so situated as to render herDhim incapable of 'ivin' valid consent, ma% be accepted as evidence in the prosecution of the acts punished under Article #00?A.L SECTION @. Separability Clause.= 6f an% part, section, or provision of this Act is declared invalid or unconstitutional, the other parts thereof not affected thereb% shall remain valid. SECTION 1. Repealing Clause.= Article 33! of Act No. 31!, as amended, and all laws, acts presidential decrees, e-ecutive orders, administrative orders, rules and re'ulations, inconsistent with or contrar% to the provisions of this Act are deemed amended, modified or repealed accordin'l%. SECTION (. Effectivity. = This Act shall ta/e effect fifteen (1!" da%s after completion of its publication in two (#" newspapers of 'eneral circulation.
P&o*%& +. B,%-os (.222) Facts: (al'os was accused of rapin' a 0?%ear old child named Criselle. Ahile the victim was pla%in', the accused as/ed his nieces to 'o outside and bu% cheese curls. Ahen the% left, the accused opened his 4ipper and made Criselle hold his penis. The # 'irls came bac/ and he as/ed them to 'o out and bu% more cheese curls. Ahen the% left, he loc/ed the door and had carnal /nowled'e with Criselle. The accused cannot penetrate the victimBs or'an. The lower court convicted the accused of 9ualified rape. Held: The trial court was correct. 3nder Art. 33! of the RPC as amended b% RA ;0!: and further amended b% RA 3!3, the penalt% of death shall be imposed if the crime of rape is committed a'ainst a child below ; %ears of a'e. There is no dispute that the victim was 0 %ears of a'e when the accused had carnal /nowled'e with her. P&o*%& +. L,4J,,%,3 (.222) Facts: Accused who is maintainin' a dru' den fired an unlicensed *?1> rifle at the policemen who were about to enter his house to serve a search warrant. Held: 6f an unlicensed firearm is used in the commission of an% crime, there can be no separate offense of simple ille'al possession of firearms. ,ence, if the Lother crimeL is murder or homicide, ille'al possession of firearms becomes merel% an a''ravatin' circumstance, not a separate offense. $ince direct assault with multiple attempted homicide was committed in this case, appellant can no lon'er be held liable for ille'al possession of firearms. *oreover, penal laws are construed liberall% in favor of the accused. 6n this case, the plain meanin' of RA #:>Ms simple lan'ua'e is most favorable to herein appellant. Jeril%, no other interpretation is +ustified, for the lan'ua'e of the new law demonstrates the le'islative intent to favor the accused. Accordin'l%, appellant cannot be convicted of # separate offenses of ille'al possession of firearms and direct assault with attempted homicide. $ince the crime committed was direct assault and not homicide or murder, ille'al possession of firearms cannot be deemed an a''ravatin' circumstance. (. ALTERNATI)E CIRCUMSTANCES R Alternative circumstances are those which must be ta/en into consideration as A11RAJAT6N1 or *6T61AT6N1 accordin' to the nature and effects of the crime and the other conditions attendin' its commission. A#. 1(. "heir concept! I Alternative circumstances are those which must be ta/en into consideration as a''ravatin' or miti'atin' accordin' to the nature and effects of the crime and the other conditions attendin' its commission. The% are the relationship, into-ication and the de'ree of instruction and education of the offender. The alternative circumstance of relationship shall be ta/en into consideration when the offended part% in the spouse, ascendant, descendant, le'itimate, natural, or adopted brother or sister, or relative b% affinit% in the same de'rees of the offender. The into-ication of the offender shall be ta/en into consideration as a miti'atin' circumstances when the offender has committed a felon% in a state of into-ication, if the same is not habitual or subse9uent to the plan to commit said felon% but when the into-ication is habitual or intentional, it shall be considered as an a''ravatin' circumstance. The alternative circumstances are. a. R<&AT62N$,6P b. 6NT2H6CAT62N c. )<1R<< 2C 6N$TR3CT62N AN) <)3CAT62N 2C T,< 2CC<N)<R a! REL$"*'NS+*P This is ta/en into consideration when the offended part% is the. a. spouse b. ascendant c. descendant d. le'itimate, natural or adopted brother or sister / viv Pa'e ;# #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 e. relative b% affinit% in the same de'ree of the offender R As a rule, relationship is *6T61AT6N1 in crimes a'ainst propert% b% analo'% to the provisions of Art. 33#. ? 3nder Art. 33# of the RPC, no criminal, but onl% civil, liabilit% shall result from commission of the crime of theft, swindlin' or malicious mischief committed or caused mutuall% b% spouses, ascendants, and descendants, or relatives b% affinit% in the same lineF brothers and sisters and brothers?in?law and sisters?in?law, if livin' to'ether. ? Relationship becomes actuall% an e-emptin' circumstance since there is no occasion to consider a miti'atin' or an a''ravatin' circumstance because there is no criminal liabilit%. 6t is aggra!ating in CR6*<$ A1A6N$T P<R$2N$ in cases where the offended party is a relati!e of a higher degree than the offender, or when the offender and the offended party are relati!es of the same le!el, as /illin' a brother, a brother?in?law, a half?brother or adopted brother. Ahen the CR6*< A1A6N$T P<R$2N$ is an% of the $<R623$ P,K$6CA& 6N83R6<$ (Art. #03", even if the offended part% is a descendant of the offender, relationship is an A11RAJAT6N1 C6RC3*$TANC<. ? (ut the serious ph%sical in+uries must not be inflicted b% a parent upon his child b% e-cessive chastisement. Ahen the crime is less serious ph%sical in+uries or sli'ht ph%sical in+uries, ordinar% rule appliesF relationship is *6T61AT6N1 if the offended part% is a relative of lower de'ree and A11RAJAT6N1 if the offended part% is a relative of a hi'her de'ree than the offender. Ahen the crime a'ainst persons is homicide or murder, relationship is a''ravatin' even if the victim of the crime is a relative of lower de'ree. R Relationship is miti'atin' in trespass to dwellin'. R Relationship is neither miti'atin' nor a''ravatin', when relationship is an element of the offense. R 6n crimes a'ainst chastit%, relationship is alwa%s a''ravatin'. ? (ecause of the nature and effect of the crime committed, it is considered A11RAJAT6N1 althou'h the offended part% is a relative of lower de'ree. P&o*%& +. Ao* (1998) Facts: 11?%ear?old Re'ina lives with her 'randmother. Atop is the common?law husband of her 'randmother. Atop was found 'uilt% of > counts of rape which was committed in 1::3 (#-", 1::> and 1::!. The lower court too/ into account the AC of relationship. Held: The law cannot be stretched to include persons attached b% common?law relations. 6n this case, there is no blood relationship or le'al bond that lin/s Atop to his victim. P&o*%& +. M,#$os (.221) Facts: Jir'ilio arrived at the house of the *arcoses and proceeded to the artesian well (+etmatic" located +ust at the bac/ of the house. Jir'ilio bent down to put on the 'round the tools he was carr%in'. Cesar then came out of the /itchen door with a bolo in hand and suddenl% hac/ed Jir'ilio from behind. Jir'ilio was hit on the nape of the nec/ which caused him to fall to the 'round. Then Cesar hac/ed him a'ain and this time Jir'ilio was hit on the ri'ht side of the head. Jir'ilio is the elder brother of Cesar. Held: 6n order that the alternative circumstance of relationship ma% be ta/en into consideration in the imposition of the proper penalt%, the offended part% must either be the (a" spouse, (b" ascendant, (c" descendant, (d" le'itimate, natural or adopted brother or sister, or (e" relative b% affinit% in the same de'ree, of the offender. 6n the case at bar, Cesar and Jir'ilio *arcos are brothers. Accused li/ewise declared that Jir'ilio is his brother. That the victim is the elder brother of Cesar is li/ewise alle'ed in the 6nformation. The rule is that relationship is a''ravatin' in crimes a'ainst persons as when the offender and the offended part% are relatives of the same level such as /illin' a brother. Thus, relationship was correctl% appreciated as an a''ravatin' circumstance. b! *N"'?*C$"*'N MITI6ATIN6 a. if into-ication is not habitual, or b. if into-ication is not subse9uent to the plan to commit a felon%. A66RA)ATIN6 a. if into-ication is habitualF or b. if it is intentional (subse9uent to the plan to commit a felon%" ? 6t is intentional when the offender drin/s li9uor full% /nowin' its effects, to find in the li9uor a stimulant to commit a crime or a means to suffocate an% remorse. R Ahen the offender has committed a felon% in a state of into-ication. ? This clause means that the offenderBs mental faculties must be affected b% drun/enness. ? The accusedBs state of into-ication must be proved. ;H15 ,H1 45,'<4C/,4'5 4S H/24,)/3 ? A habitual drun/ard is one 'iven to into-ication b% e-cessive use of into-icatin' drin/s. The habit should be actual and confirmed, but it is not necessar% that it be continuous or b% dail% occurrence. P&o*%& +. R&n&J,n& (1988) Facts: The accused was convicted for the crime of murder of 1 policeman and his companion. 6t was found that Rene+ane was with these # persons and some other people and the% were havin' a drin/in' session when the incident too/ place. 6t was also found that the policeman apprehended Rene+ane a month before the incident of ille'al possession of mari+uana. Held: )run/enness is not necessaril% an a''ravatin' circumstance. The fact that the accused dran/ li9uor prior to the commission of the crime did not necessaril% 9ualif% such action as an a''ravatin' circumstance. 6nto-ication is a''ravatin' if it is habitual or intentional. There is no findin' of either b% the lower court. The affair was an ordinar% drin/in' part%. Neither / viv Pa'e ;3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 can this be considered as a miti'atin' circumstance in the absence of proof that the inta/e of alcoholic drin/s was of such 9uantit% as to blur the appellantBs reason and deprive him of a certain de'ree of control. P&o*%& +. C,3,no (198.) Facts: After the accused had been drin/in' li9uor, he stabbed twice the victim Pascua with a bolo while the latter was wal/in' alon' the barrio street. After hac/in' and stabbin' to death the victim, the accused proceeded to the seashore and on findin' (uenaflor hac/ed the latter with the same bolo. Held: 6nto-ication is miti'atin' if accidental, not habitual nor intentional, that is, no subse9uent to the plan to commit the crime. 6t is a''ravatin' if habitual or intentional. To be miti'atin', it must be indubitabl% proved. A habitual drun/ard is one 'iven to into-ication b% e-cessive use of into-icatin' drin/s. The habit should be actual and confirmed. 6t is unnecessar% that it be a matter of dail% occurrence. 6t lessens individual resistance to evil thou'ht and undermines will?power ma/in' its victim a potential evil doer. The into-ication of the appellant not bein' habitual and considerin' that the said appellant was in a state of into-ication at the time of the commission of the felon%, the alternative circumstance of into-ication should be considered miti'atin'. c! DE9REE '1 *NS"R3C"*'N $ND ED3C$"*'N '1 "+E '11ENDER &ow de'ree of instruction and education or lac/ of it is 'enerall% miti'atin'. ,i'h de'ree of instruction and education is a''ravatin', when the offender avails himself of his learnin' in committin' the crime. 3/C= 'F 45S,R)C,4'5# /S +4,40/,450 ? &ac/ of instruction cannot be ta/en into account where the defendant admitted that he studied in the first 'rade in a public elementar% school. Art. 1! applies onl% to him who reall% has not received an% instruction. R Not illiterac% alone, but also lac/ of sufficient intelli'ence are necessar% to invo/e the benefit of the alternative circumstance of lac/ of instruction, the determination of which is left to the trial court. R &ac/ of sufficient instruction is not miti'atin' when the offender is a cit% resident who /nows how to si'n his name. R &ac/ of instruction must be proved positivel% and directl% and cannot be based on mere deduction or inference. R The 9uestion of lac/ of instruction cannot be raised for the first time in appellate court. R 2rdinaril%, &2A )<1R<< 2R &ACO 2C 6N$TR3CT62N 6$ *6T61AT6N1 6N A&& CR6*<$. <-ceptions. (1" crimes a'ainst propert% such as estafa, theft, robber% arson e-cept theft of lar'e cattle and robber% with homicide. (#" crimes a'ainst chastit% (3" treason @ because love of countr% should be a natural feelin' of ever% citi4en, however unlettered or uncultured he ma% be (>" murder @ because to /ill is forbidden b% natural law which ever% rational bein' is endowed to /now and feel. H40H D10R11 'F 45S,R)C,4'5# /S /00R/>/,450 )e'ree of instruction is a''ravatin' when the offender availed himself or too/ advanta'e of it in committin' the crime. ABSOLUTORY CAUSES AND OTHER SPECIAL SITUATIONS Absolutor% causes are those where the act committed is a crime but for reasons of public polic% and sentiment there is no penalt% imposed. ,. ENTRAPMENT AND INSTI6ATION ENTRAPMENT INSTI6ATION Aa%s and means are resorted to for the purpose of trappin' and capturin' the lawbrea/er in the e-ecution of his criminal plan The insti'ator practicall% induces the would?be accused into the commission of the offense and himself becomes a co? principal. The means ori'inate from the mind of the criminal. The law enforcer conceives the commission of the crime and su''ests to the accused who adopts the idea and carries it into e-ecution. A person has planned or is about to commit a crime and wa%s and means are resorted to b% a public officer to trap and catch the criminal. A public officer or a private detective induces an innocent person to commit a crime and would arrest him upon or after the commission of the crime b% the latter. Not a bar to the prosecution and conviction of the lawbrea/er. The accused must be ac9uitted. P&o*%& +. L", C;" ,n4 U> S& T!n- (19@1) Facts: $amson was the chief of customs secret service in Cebu and Natividad was the former collector of customs. ,e was instructed to ma/e sure that the shipment containin' opium shall be unloaded in the countr%. ,e went alon' the plan and then he informed the Philippine Constabular% of all that had ta/en place and the% discussed a plan to capture the opium owners. Held: The mere fact that the chief of customs secret service pretended to a'ree to a plan for smu''lin' ille'all% imported opium throu'h the customhouse, in order the better to assure the sei4ure of said opium and the arrest of its importers, is no bar to the prosecution and conviction of the accused. $amson did not induce nor insti'ate the accused to import the opium but merel% pretended to have an understandin' with the collector of customs. There is nothin' immoral in this or a'ainst the public 'ood which should prevent the 'overnment from prosecutin' and punishin' the culprits, for this is not a case where an innocent person is induced to commit a crime merel% to prosecute him, but it is simpl% a trap set to catch a criminal. / viv Pa'e ;> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 A#,n&, +. CA (1980) Facts: Att%. Araneta was the hearin' officer of the )ept. of &abor in Cabanatuan while *rs. Ko%on'co is the widow of a 'overnment emplo%ee. The latter went to see Araneta re'ardin' her claim for death compensation and Araneta as/ed for P1== for her claim to be processed. The widow reported this to the PC and the PC decided to entrap Araneta. The entrapment was successful and Att%. Araneta was char'ed for violatin' the anti?'raft law. Held: <ntrapment is not a defense in a criminal case. 6t is different from insti'ation. There is insti'ation when the accused was induced to commit the crime. 6n entrapment, the mens rea ori'inates from the mind of the criminal. <ntrapment does not e-empt the criminal from liabilit%. P&o*%& +. P,$!s (.22.) Facts: Att%. Kap, supervisin' a'ent of the )an'erous )ru's )ivision?N(6, received information that Pacis was offerin' to sell X /' of Lshabu.L A bu%?bust operation was approved. Kap and $enior A'ent Con'4on, 8r., were assi'ned to handle the case. Kap, Con'4on and the informant then went to the house of Pacis. The informant introduced Kap to Pacis as interested bu%er. The% ne'otiated the sale of X /' of shabu. 6t was a'reed that pa%ment and deliver% of shabu would be made on the followin' da%. The ne-t da%, the N(6 a'ents and the informant went to PacisMs house as a'reed. Pacis handed to Kap a paper ba' with mar/in's L%ellow cabL. Ahen he opened the ba', Kap found a transparent plastic ba' with white cr%stalline substance inside. Ahile e-aminin' it, Pacis as/ed for the pa%ment. Kap instructed Con'4on to 'et the mone% from the car. Con'4on returned and 'ave the Lboodle mone%L to Att%. Kap who handed the mone% to Pacis. 3pon PacisM receipt of the pa%ment, the officers identified themselves as N(6 a'ents and arrested him. Held: The operation that led to the arrest of appellant was an entrapment, not an insti'ation. 6n entrapment, wa%s and means are resorted to for the purpose of trappin' and capturin' lawbrea/ers in the e-ecution of their criminal plan. 6n insti'ation on the other hand, insti'ators practicall% induce the would?be defendant into the commission of the offense and become co?principals themselves. 6t has been held in numerous cases b% this Court that entrapment is sanctioned b% law as a le'itimate method of apprehendin' criminal elements en'a'ed in the sale and distribution of ille'al dru's. /. EFFECT OF PARDON RPC' A#. .@. Effect of paron by the offene party. I A pardon of the offended part% does not e-tin'uish criminal action e-cept as provided in Article 3>> of this CodeF but civil liabilit% with re'ard to the interest of the in+ured part% is e-tin'uished b% his e-press waiver. R.A. No. 8@(@. An!=R,*& L,9 o8 1997. A#!$%& .00=C! Effect of Paron ? The subse9uent valid marria'e between the offender and the offended part% shall e-tin'uish the criminal action or the penalt% imposed. 6n case it is the le'al husband who is the offender, the subse9uent for'iveness b% the wife as the offended part% shall e-tin'uish the criminal action or the penalt%. Pro!ided# That the crime shall be e-tin'uish or the penalt% shall not be abated if the marria'e is void ab initio. A pardon b% the offended part% does not e-tin'uish criminal action because a crime is an offense a'ainst the $tate. 6n criminal cases, the intervention of the a''rieved parties is limited to bein' witnesses for the prosecution. Compromise does not e-tin'uish criminal liabilit%. The offended part% in crimes of adulter% and concubina'e cannot institute criminal prosecution, if he shall have consented or pardoned the offenders. ? the pardon here ma% be implied, as continued inaction of the offended part% after learnin' the offense. ? both offenders must be pardoned b% the offended part%. $. ABSOLUTORY CAUSES A#. 0(@). ? There is an attempt when the offender commences the commission of a felon% directl% or over acts, and does not perform all the acts of e-ecution which should produce the felon% b% reason of some cause or accident other than this own spontaneous desistance. A#. 7. 0hen light felonies are punishable. I &i'ht felonies are punishable onl% when the% have been consummated, with the e-ception of those committed a'ainst person or propert%. A#. 10. 0ho are criminally liable! I The followin' are criminall% liable for 'rave and less 'rave felonies. 1. Principals. #. Accomplices. 3. Accessories. A#. .2. $ccessories #ho are exempt from criminal liability. H The penalties prescribed for accessories shall not be imposed upon those who are such with respect to their spouses, ascendants, descendants, le'itimate, natural, and adopted brothers and sisters, or relatives b% affinit% within the same de'rees, with the sin'le e-ception of accessories fallin' within the provisions of para'raph 1 of the ne-t precedin' article. A#. .17. Death or physical in(uries inflicte uner exceptional circumstances. I An% le'all% married person who havin' surprised his spouse in the act of committin' se-ual intercourse with another person, shall /ill an% of them or both of them in the act or immediatel% thereafter, or shall inflict upon them an% serious ph%sical in+ur%, shall suffer the penalt% of destierro. 6f he shall inflict upon them ph%sical in+uries of an% other /ind, he shall be e-empt from punishment. These rules shall be applicable, under the same circumstances, to parents with respect to their dau'hters under ei'hteen %ears of a'e, and their seducer, while the dau'hters are livin' with their parents. An% person who shall promote or facilitate the prostitution of his wife or dau'hter, or shall otherwise / viv Pa'e ;! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 have consented to the infidelit% of the other spouse shall not be entitled to the benefits of this article. A#. .82. =ualifie trespass to #elling. H An% private person who shall enter the dwellin' of another a'ainst the latterMs will shall be punished b% arresto ma%or and a fine not e-ceedin' 1,=== pesos. 6f the offense be committed b% means of violence or intimidation, the penalt% shall be prision correccional in its medium and ma-imum periods and a fine not e-ceedin' 1,=== pesos. The provisions of this article shall not be applicable to an% person who shall enter anotherMs dwellin' for the purpose of preventin' some serious harm to himself, the occupants of the dwellin' or a third person, nor shall it be applicable to an% person who shall enter a dwellin' for the purpose of renderin' some service to humanit% or +ustice, nor to an%one who shall enter cafes, taverns, inn and other public houses, while the same are open. A#. @@.. Persons exempt from criminal liability. I No criminal, but onl% civil liabilit%, shall result from the commission of the crime of theft, swindlin' or malicious mischief committed or caused mutuall% b% the followin' persons. 1. $pouses, ascendants and descendants, or relatives b% affinit% in the same line. #. The widowed spouse with respect to the propert% which belon'ed to the deceased spouse before the same shall have passed into the possession of anotherF and 3. (rothers and sisters and brothers?in?law and sisters?in?law, if livin' to'ether. The e-emption established b% this article shall not be applicable to stran'ers participatin' in the commission of the crime. A#. @11. Prosecution of the crimes of aultery& concubinage& seuction& abuction& rape an acts of lasciviousness! I The crimes of adulter% and concubina'e shall not be prosecuted e-cept upon a complaint filed b% the offended spouse. The offended part% cannot institute criminal prosecution without includin' both the 'uilt% parties, if the% are both alive, nor, in an% case, if he shall have consented or pardoned the offenders. The offenses of seduction, abduction, rape or acts of lasciviousness, shall not be prosecuted e-cept upon a complaint filed b% the offended part% or her parents, 'randparents, or 'uardian, nor, in an% case, if the offender has been e-pressl% pardoned b% the above named persons, as the case ma% be. 6n cases of seduction, abduction, acts of lasciviousness and rape, the marria'e of the offender with the offended part% shall e-tin'uish the criminal action or remit the penalt% alread% imposed upon him. The provisions of this para'raph shall also be applicable to the co?principals, accomplices and accessories after the fact of the above?mentioned crimes. 4. ACTS NOT CO)ERED BY LAW AND IN CASE OF EGCESSI)E PUNISHMENT A#. (. Duty of the court in connection #ith acts #hich shoul be represse but #hich are not covere by the la#& an in cases of excessive penalties! I Ahenever a court has /nowled'e of an% act which it ma% deem proper to repress and which is not punishable b% law, it shall render the proper decision, and shall report to the Chief <-ecutive, throu'h the )epartment of 8ustice, the reasons which induce the court to believe that said act should be made the sub+ect of le'islation. 6n the same wa%, the court shall submit to the Chief <-ecutive, throu'h the )epartment of 8ustice, such statement as ma% be deemed proper, without suspendin' the e-ecution of the sentence, when a strict enforcement of the provisions of this Code would result in the imposition of a clearl% e-cessive penalt%, ta/in' into consideration the de'ree of malice and the in+ur% caused b% the offense. P&o*%& +. )&n&#,$!on (199() Facts: The accused was found 'uilt% of the crime of Rape with ,omicide. The instant petition raised the issue whether or not the respondent +ud'e acted with 'rave abuse of discretion when he failed or refused to impose the mandator% penalt% of death under RA ;0!: Held: The law plainl% and une9uivocabl% provides that 5when b% reason or on the occasion of rape, a homicide is committed, the penalt% shall be death. Courts are not concerned with wisdom, efficac% or moralit% of law. The discomfort faced b% those forced b% law to impose death penalt% is an ancient one, but it is a matter upon which +ud'es have no choice. The Rules of Court mandates that after an ad+udication of 'uilt, the +ud'es should impose the proper penalt% and civil liabilit% provided for b% the law on the accused. ). PERSONS CRIMINALLY LIABLE A#. 10. 0ho are criminally liable! I The followin' are criminall% liable for 'rave and less 'rave felonies. 1. Principals. #. Accomplices. 3. Accessories. The followin' are criminall% liable for li'ht felonies. 1. Principals #. Accomplices. The treble division of persons criminall% responsible for an offense rests upon the ver% nature of their participation in the commission of the crime. The ACC<$$2R6<$ are not liable for li'ht felonies because in the commission of li'ht felonies, the social wron' as well as the individual pre+udice is so small that penal sanction is deemed not necessar% for accessories RULES RELATI)E TO LI6HT FELONIESD a. &i'ht felonies are punishable onl% when the% have been consummated. b. (ut when li'ht felonies are committed a'ainst persons or propert%, the are punishable even if the% are onl% in the attempted or frustrated sta'e of the e-ecution. c. 2nl% principals and accomplices are liable for li'ht felonies. d. Accessories are not liable for li'ht felonies, even if the% are committed a'ainst persons or propert%. 2nl% natural persons can be the active sub+ect of crime because of the hi'hl% personal nature of the criminal responsibilit%. / viv Pa'e ;0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 On%> , n,"#,% *&#son $,n /& ;& o88&n4&# /&$,"s&D a. The RPC re9uires that the culprit should have acted with personal malice or ne'li'ence. An artificial or +uridical person cannot act with malice or ne'li'ence. b. A +uridical person, li/e a corporation, cannot commit a crime in which a willful purpose or a malicious intent is re9uired. c. There is substitution of deprivation of libert% (subsidiar% imprisonment" for pecuniar% penalties in case of in case of insolvenc% of the accused. d. 2ther penalties consistin' in imprisonment and other deprivation of libert% li/e destierro, can be e-ecuted onl% a'ainst individuals. 2fficers, not the corporation, are criminall% liable. 8uridical persons are criminall% liable under certain special laws. 6n all crimes there are alwa%s # parties. ACT6J< (the criminal" and PA$$6J< (the in+ured part%". A. PRINCIPALS A#. 17. Principals! I The followin' are considered principals. 1. Those who ta/e a direct part in the e-ecution of the actF #. Those who directl% force or induce others to commit itF 3. Those who cooperate in the commission of the offense b% another act without which it would not have been accomplished. R Ahen a sin'le individual commits a crime, there is no difficult% in determinin' his participation in the commission thereof. R (ut when # or more persons are involved, it is necessar% to determine the participation of each. PAR. 1. M PRINCIPALS BY DIRECT PARTICIPATION The principal b% direct participation P<R$2NA&&K TAO<$ PART 6N T,< <H<C3T62N 2C T,< ACT constitutin' the crime. R Two or more persons who too/ part in the commission of the crime are principals b% direct participation, when the followin' re9uisites are present. 1. That the% participated in the criminal resolution #. That the% carried out their plan and personall% too/ part in its e-ecution b% acts which directl% tended to the same end. 1irst re-uisite E Participation in the criminal resolution R Two or more persons are said to have participated in the criminal resolution when the% were in conspirac% at the time of the commission of the crime. R 6t is well settled that a person ma% be convicted for the criminal act of another where, between them, there has been conspirac% or unit% of purpose and intention in the commission of the crime char'ed. C'NSP*R$C5 ? A conspirac% e-ists when # or more persons come to an a'reement concernin' the commission of a felon% and decide to commit it. R The conspirac% contemplated in the first re9uisite is not a felon%, but onl% a manner of incurrin' criminal liabilit%. R 6n order to hold an accused 'uilt% as co? principal b% reason of conspirac%, it must be established that he performed an over act in furtherance of the conspirac%, either b% activel% participatin' in the actual commission of the crime, or b% lendin' moral assistance to his co?conspirators b% bein' present at the scene of the crime, or b% e-ertin' moral ascendanc% over the rest of the conspirators as to move them to e-ecutin' the conspirac%. R *ere /nowled'e without cooperation or a'reement to cooperate is not enou'h to constitute conspirac%. R $ilence does not ma/e one a conspirator R The e-istence of conspirac% does not re9uire necessaril% an a'reement for an appreciable len'th of time prior to the e-ecution of its purpose, since from the le'al viewpoint, conspirac% e-ists if, at the time of the commission of the offense, the accused had the same purpose and were united in its e-ecution. R Conspirac% arises on the ver% instant the plotters a'ree, e-pressl% or impliedl%, to commit the felon% and forthwith decide to pursue it. R Cormal a'reement or previous ac9uaintance amon' several persons not necessar% in conspirac%. R *ust be established b% positive and conclusive evidence. R Ahen there is no conspirac%, each of the offenders is liable onl% for the act performed b% him. 6t is not enou'h that a person participated in the assault made b% another in order to consider him a co?principal in the crime committed. ,e must also participate in the criminal resolution of the other. Ahen there is conspirac%, the act of one is the act of all. There is collective criminal responsibilit%. Conspirac% ma% cover persons previousl% undetermined. A person in conspirac% with others, who had desisted before the crime was committed b% the other, is not criminall% liable. Ahen there is conspirac%, it is not necessar% to ascertain the specific act of each conspirator. There could be no conspirac% to commit an offense throu'h ne'li'ence. 6n cases of criminal ne'li'ence or crimes punishable b% special law, allowin' or failin' to prevent an act to be performed b% another, ma/es one a co? principal. Secon re-uisite E that the culprits Fcarrie out their plan an personally too% part in its execution& by acts #hich irectly tene to the same en!D The principals b% direct participation must be at the scene of the crime, personall% ta/in' part in its e-ecution. The acts of each offender must directl% tend to the same end. 2ne servin' as 'uard pursuant to the conspirac% is a principal b% direct participation. Ahen the second re9uisite is lac/in', there is onl% conspirac%. / viv Pa'e ;; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 P&o*%& +. N"n,- (1989) Facts: The victim claimed that while she was standin' outside the house of her nei'hbor peepin' throu'h an open window to watch a TJ pro'ram, Nuna' came towards her appearin' to be drun/. Nuna', threatenin' to /ill her, led her to a nearb% ricefield. &ater, the% were +oined b% the other > accused. Nuna' then undressed her and had se-ual intercourse with her. *andap followed and she lost consciousness after. $he re'ained consciousness onl% when *analili was abusin' her. Held: Accused Nuna', *andap and *analili are found 'uilt% of 3 distinct and separate crimes of rape. The% bein' principals b% direct participation while the other # accused as principals b% indispensable cooperation since there is no sufficient evidence that the latter also had se-ual intercourse with the victim. The victim lost consciousness and onl% assumed that the two also raped her. P&o*%& +. D&%, C&#n, (1907) Facts: Rafael filed an e+ectment suit a'ainst dela CernaBs father wherein the court ruled in his favor. &ater he was shot b% the accused while the former and his famil% were brin'in' sac/s of corn. ,e was ta/en awa% b% his famil% to tend his wounds but )ela Cerna and compan% followed them and Rafael was shot a'ain resultin' to his death. *a9uilin', one companion of )ela Cerna, shot Casiano, a relative of Rafael. Held. )ela Cerna cannot be held liable for the death of Casiano because the conspirac% was to /ill Rafael onl%. The rule has alwa%s been. co?conspirators are liable onl% for acts done pursuant to the conspirac%F for other acts done outside the contemplation of the co? conspirators or which are not the necessar% and lo'ical conse9uence of the intended crime, onl% the actual perpetrators are liable. Althou'h *a9uilin' 'ot the 'un from )ela Cerna, the latter onl% 'ave it to the former as per their a'reement to shoot Rafael As to the other companions, facts prove their active participation in the /illin'. The% are all principals. P&o*%& +. D,$!%%o (s"*#,) Facts: Pacot stabbed and stran'led Rosemarie leadin' to the latters death. )acillo for his part, hold down RosemarieBs le's to prevent her from stru''lin'. The two men stopped onl% when the% were sure that the victim was alread% dead. )acillo then encase her corpse in a cement. Held:. Two or more persons ta/in' part in the commission of a crime are considered principals b% direct participation if the followin' re9uisites are present. 1. the% participated in the criminal resolution and #. the% carried out their plan and personall% too/ part in its e-ecution b% acts which directl% tended to the same end. (oth re9uisites were met in this case. Curther )acilloBs admission that he participated in the commission of the crime b% holdin' RosemarieBs le's made him a principal b% direct participation. PAR. .. M PRINCIPALS BY INDUCTION F,hose who directly force or induce others to commit it.@ The principal b% induction becomes liable onl% when the principal b% direct participation committed the act induced. 7 0$5S '1 ,EC')*N9 PR*NC*P$L ,5 *ND3C"*'N 1" 26 D4R1C,36 F'RC450 /5',H1R ,' C'++4, / CR4+1 a. (% usin' 6RR<$6$T6(&< C2RC< b. (% causin' 3NC2NTR2&&A(&< C<AR #" 26 D4R1C,36 45D)C450 /5',H1R ,' C'++4, / CR4+1. a. (% 'ivin' price, or offerin' reward or promise. b. (% usin' words of command. REBUISITESD 1. That the inducement be made directl% with the intention of procurin' the commission of the crimeF and a. A thou'htless e-pression without intention to produce the result is not an inducement to commit a crime. b. The inducement ma% be b% acts of command, advice, or throu'h influence, or a'reement for consideration. #. That such inducement be the determinin' cause of the commission of the crime b% the material e-ecutor. ? The words of advice of the influence must have actuall% moved the hands of the principal b% direct participation. PRINCIPAL BY INDUCEMENT PROPOSAL TO COMMIT THE FELONY There is an inducement to commit a crime. The principal b% inducement becomes liable onl% when the crime is committed b% the principal b% direct participation. The mere proposal to commit a felon% is punishable in treason and rebellion. The person to whom the proposal is made should not commit the crimeF otherwise, the proponent becomes a principal b% inducement. The inducement involves an% crime The proposal to be punishable must involve onl% treason or rebellion. E11EC"S '1 $C=3*""$L '1 PR*NC*P$L ,5 D*REC" P$R"*C*P$"*'N 3P'N "+E L*$,*L*"5 '1 PR*NC*P$L ,5 *ND3CE)EN" 1" Conspirac% is ne'ated b% the ac9uittal of co? defendant. #" 2ne cannot be held 'uilt% of havin' insti'ated the commission of a crime without first bein' shown that the crime has been actuall% committed b% another. P&o*%& +. D&%, C#"F (1982) Facts: )ela Cru4 met with $alip and a couple of other men when he proposed to them the /illin' of Antonio Ku and the /idnappin' of the latterBs brother for a ransom. A 'roup of men sailed for (asilan where the% met with $alip. The% proceeded to the accusedBs house where the accused informed the 'roup of the whereabouts of the Chinese brothers and other details of the plan. The 'roup was able to /idnap and detain the brother for a short while before he attempted to escape and was shot b% one of the men. Held: The contention of the accused that since he did not ta/e part in the commission of the / viv Pa'e ; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 crime, conspirac% does not e-ist, is untenable. The re9uisites necessar% in order that a person ma% be convicted as principal b% inducement are present. Aithout )ela Cru4, the crime would not have been conceived, much less committed. Clearl%, he was the principal b% induction. US +. In4!,n,n (191@) Facts: 6ndianan was the ,<A)*AN of the district of Paran'. ,e ordered his subordinates to sei4e $ariol (victim" and brin' the latter to 6ndianan. The victim was detained b% 6ndianan until ni'htfall, then 6ndianan ordered his subordinates to ta/e $ariol to an isolated place and /ill him. 6ndianan bolstered his command b% claimin' that he had an order from the 'overnor that $ariol be e-ecuted. 6ndiananBs subordinates too/ $ariol to a cemeter% and /illed him. Held: 6ndianan had a ver% powerful influence over his subordinates based on TRA)6T62N AN) C3$T2* as well as his representation that he had an order from the 'overnor. ,ence, his power over them was such that an% order issued b% him had the force and efficac% of ph%sical coercion. The domination of 6ndianan was such as to ma/e him responsible for whatever the% did in obedience to such orders. ,e is a principal b% inducement. PAR. @. M PRINCIPALS BY INDISPENSABLE COOPERATION A,hose who cooperate in the commission of the offense by another act without which it would not ha!e been accomplished.@ REBUISITESD 1. Participation in the criminal resolution, that is, there is either anterior conspirac% or unit% of criminal purpose and intention immediatel% before the commission of the crime char'edF and #. Cooperation in the commission of the offense b% performin' another act, without which it would not have been accomplished. To be liable as principals, the offender must fall under an% of the three concepts defined in Article 1;. There is collective criminal responsibilit% when the offenders are criminall% liable in the same manner and to the same e-tent. The penalt% to be imposed must be the same for all. Principals b% direct participation have collective criminal responsibilit%. Principal b% induction, e-cept that who directl% forced another to commit a crime, and principal b% direct participation have collective criminal responsibilit%. Principal b% indispensable cooperation has collective criminal responsibilit% with the principal b% direct participation. P&o*%& +. Mon&,%&-#& (1988) Facts: Abadilla was eatin' at a restaurant when he detected the smell of mari+uana smo/e comin' from a nearb% table. 6ntendin' to call a policeman, he went outside and saw a police and reported the matter. The police approached the table and held *onteal're and Capalad. Capalad suddenl% pulled out his /nife and started stabbin' the police at the bac/. The police released the # in order to draw his 'un but *onteale're restrained the police so that Capalad ma% continue stabbin'. The 3 'rappled and the police was able to draw his 'un and fired at the # assailants. A chase ensued. Capalad was shot which resulted to his death. The police also died because of the wounds inflicted b% Capalad. Held: The accused was correctl% considered a co?principal for havin' collaborated with Capalad in the /illin' of the police officer. The # acted in concert. <ven if the accused did not himself commit the act of stabbin', he is nonetheless e9uall% 'uilt% thereof for havin' prevented the police from resistin' the attac/ a'ainst him. The accused was a principal b% indispensable cooperation. B. ACCOMPLICES A#. 18. /ccomplices. I Accomplices are those persons who, not bein' included in Art. 1;, cooperate in the e-ecution of the offense b% previous or simultaneous acts. 6n 9uasi?collective criminal responsibilit%, some of the offenders in the crime are principals and the others are accomplices. The participation of an accomplice presupposes the commission of the crime b the principal b% direct participation. Ahen there is no conspirac% between or amon' the defendants but the% were animated b% one and the same purpose to accomplish the criminal ob+ective, those who cooperated b% previous or simultaneous act but cannot be held liable as principals are accomplices. An accomplice does not have a previous a'reement or understandin' or is not in conspirac% with the principal b% direct participation. CONSPIRATOR ACCOMPLICE The% /now and a'ree with the criminal desi'n. Conspirators /now the criminal intention because the% themselves have decided upon such course of action. Accomplices come to /now about it after the principals have reached the decision and onl% then do the% a'ree to cooperate in its e-ecution. Conspirators decide that a crime should be committed. Accomplices merel% assent to the plan and cooperate in it accomplishment Conspirators are the authors of a crime Accomplices are merel% instruments who perform acts not essential to the perpetration of the offense. REBUISITESD 1. That there be communit% of desi'nF that is, /nowin' the criminal desi'n of the principal b% direct participation, he concurs with the latter in his purposeF #. That he cooperates in the e-ecution of the offense b% pre!ious or simultaneous acts# with the intention of suppl%in' material or moral aid in the e-ecution of the crime in an efficacious wa%F and 3. That there be a relation between the acts done b% the principal and those attributed to the person char'ed as accomplice. / viv Pa'e ;: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 The communit% of desi'n need not be to commit the crime actuall% committed. 6t is sufficient if there was a common purpose to commit a particular crime and that the crime actuall% committed was a natural or probable conse9uence of the intended crime. The cooperation of an accomplice is not due to a conspirac%. Ahen the acts of the accused are not indispensable in the /illin', the% are merel% accomplices. The accomplice merel% supplies the principal with material or moral aid without conspirac% with the latter. The wounds inflicted b% an accomplice in crimes a'ainst persons should mot have caused the death of the victim. RULES. 1. The one who had the ori'inal criminal desi'n is the person who committed the resultin' crime. #. The accomplice, after concurrin' in the criminal purpose of the principal, cooperates b% previous or simultaneous acts. Ahen the cooperation is b% simultaneous act, the accomplice ta/es part while the crime is bein' committed b% the principal b% direct participation or immediatel% thereafter. 3. The accomplice in crimes a'ainst persons does not inflict the more or most serious wounds. The moral aid ma% be throu'h advice, encoura'ement or a'reement. There must be a relation between the criminal act of the principal and the act of the one char'ed as accomplice. PRINCIPAL /> COOPERATION ACCOMPLICE Cooperation is indispensable in the commission of the act. Cooperation is not indispensable in the commission of the act. P&o*%& +. M,n4o%,4o (supraA Held: An accomplice cooperates in the e-ecution of the offense b% previous or simultaneous acts, provided he has no direct participation in its e-ecution or does not force or induce others to commit it, or his cooperation is not indispensable to its accomplishment. 6n the case at bar, 2rtillano, b% his acts showed /nowled'e of the criminal desi'n of *andolado. ,e was present when the latter tried to attac/ the driver of the Cord Ciera with a /nife and fired at the vehicle hittin' a female passen'er. Ahen *andolado coc/ed his 'un and ordered Tenorio to stop the +eep, their # other companion, $imon and <rinada, immediatel% +umped off the +eep and ran awa% but 2rtillano sta%ed. 6n a displa% of unit% with *andolado, 2rtillano fired his armalite while the% were ridin' in the +eep of the victim. And 2rtillanoBs act of firin' his 'un towards the 'round manifested his concurrence with the criminal intent. 6n other words, his simultaneous acts supplied moral aid in the e-ecution of the crime in an efficacious wa%. ,is presence served to encoura'e *andolado, the principal, or to increase the odds a'ainst the victims. P&o*%& +. Do$o%&#o (1991) Facts: The 3 accused, &udovico, Conrado and Jir'ilio (all surnamed )octolero" threw stones at $a'unBs house and called to all the men in the house to come out. <pifiana and &olita and 8onathan (1 X %ear old child of &olita" were struc/ and stabled b% the accused inside the house of $a'un. <pifiana and &olita died while 8onathan was sli'htl% in+ured. The same accused while alread% on the road, hac/ed and stabbed *arcelo which caused his death. Held: There is no 9uestion that while the 3 accused were still stonin' at the house, the% heard the # women protestin' and &udovico went inside and brutall% /illed the # women inside the room of the said house. 6t is impossible to claim that Jir'ilio and Conrado did not /now what their brother was doin'. The% /new and the% +ust stood b% and did nothin' to stop their brother. Their presence 'ave &udovico encoura'ement in the commission of the crime. Thus, the # are accomplices. 2nce can be an accomplice even if he did not /now of the actual crime intended b the principal provided he was aware that it was an illicit act. P&o*%& +. Ro$;& (.222) Facts: Roderic/ and Rodel Cerol were havin' drin/s with a friend named (obot inside the Cerol compound. Aithout an% warnin', Roche and 1re'orio bar'ed into the compound. 1re'orio tried to hit Rodel with an empt% beer bottle but failed because his common?law wife, ,elen, pulled him awa% on time. Roderic/ however was stabbed on the bac/ with an ice pic/ b% Roche. Roderic/ ran towards the house of his friend (obot but outside the compound, Caballes cau'ht up with him. Roderic/ fell to the 'round and was repeatedl% stabbed with a /nife b% Caballes. 2ne Rossel tried to stop Caballes but he was chased b% the latter. A brother of the victim, 8on?8on, threw bottles at Caballes, forcin' the latter to run awa%, and leave his victim behind. Roderic/ was then ta/en to his house b% Ro'elio and 8on?8on. (ut at the time, Roderic/ was alread% dead. Held: Roche can not be held liable as an accomplice for the crime char'ed. There is no evidence to show that he performed an% previous or simultaneous act to assist Caballes in /illin' Roderic/. 6t has not been proven that he was aware of CaballesB plan to attac/ and /ill Roderic/. Absent an% evidence to create the moral certaint% re9uired to convict Roche, the court cannot uphold the trial courtBs findin' of 'uilt. P&o*%& +. P!%o%, (.22@) Facs: 8oselito, 8ulian, <dmar and 2dilon were havin' a drin/in' spree. 6n the course of their drin/in', an altercation between <dmar and 8ulian ensued. <dmar and 2dilon then left the store. 8oselito and 8ulian were also about to leave when <dmar and 2dilon returned, bloc/in' their wa%. <dmar punched 8ulian in the face. The two then traded fist blows. Cor his part, 2dilon positioned himself on top of a pile of hollow bloc/s and watched as <dmar and 8ulian swapped punches. 8oselito tried to placate the prota'onists but his intervention apparentl% did not sit well with 2dilon. ,e pulled out his /nife with his ri'ht hand and stepped down from his perch. ,e placed his left arm around 8oselitoMs nec/, and stabbed the latter. Ronnie and the appellant Pilola, who were across the street, saw their 'an'mate 2dilon stabbin' the victim and decided to +oin the fra%. The% pulled out their /nives, rushed to the scene and stabbed 8oselito. The victim fell in the canal. 2dilon and the appellant fled. (efore runnin' awa% from the scene, Ronnie pic/ed up a piece of hollow bloc/ and with it / viv Pa'e = #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 bashed 8oselitoMs head. Not content, Ronnie 'ot a piece of bro/en bottle and struc/ 8oselito once more. 8oselito died on the spot. ,eld. To hold a person liable as an accomplice, two elements must concur. (a" the communit% of criminal desi'nF that is, /nowin' the criminal desi'n of the principal b% direct participation, he concurs with the latter in his purposeF (b" the performance of previous or simultaneous acts that are not indispensable to the commission of the crime. Accomplices come to /now about the criminal resolution of the principal b% direct participation after the principal has reached the decision to commit the felon% and onl% then does the accomplice a'ree to cooperate in its e-ecution. Accomplices do not decide whether the crime should be committedF the% merel% assent to the plan of the principal b% direct participation and cooperate in its accomplishment. ,owever, where one cooperates in the commission of the crime b% performin' overt acts which b% themselves are acts of e-ecution, he is a principal b% direct participation, and not merel% an accomplice All thin's considered, it was ruled that Ronnie and the appellant conspired with 2dilon to /ill the victimF hence, all of them are criminall% liable for the latterMs death. The appellant is not merel% an accomplice but is a principal b% direct participation. <ven assumin' that the appellant did not conspire with Ronnie and 2dilon to /ill the victim, the appellant is nevertheless criminall% liable as a principal b% direct participation. The stab wounds inflicted b% him cooperated in brin'in' about and accelerated the death of the victim or contributed materiall% thereto. P&o*%& +. 6,#$!, (.22.) Facts: Jaller and 1arcia /idnapped Att%. Tioleco for the purpose of e-tortin' ransom. &ariba and Ro'el were cau'ht b% police officers inside the house where a handcuffed and blinfolded Att%. Tioleco was detained. (oth were unarmed althou'h 'uns inside the house are available for their possession. Held: &ariba and Ro'el, were merel% 'uardin' the house for the purpose of either helpin' the other accused?appellants in facilitatin' the successful denouement to the crime or repellin' an% attempt to rescue the victim, as shown b% the availabilit% of arms and ammunition to them. The% thus cooperated in the e-ecution of the offense b% previous or simultaneous acts b% means of which the% aided or facilitated the e-ecution of the crime but without an% indispensable act for its accomplishment. 3nder Art. 1 of The Revised Penal Code, the% are mere accomplices. C. ACCESSORIES A#. 19. $ccessories! I Accessories are those who, havin' /nowled'e of the commission of the crime, and without havin' participated therein, either as principals or accomplices, ta/e part subse9uent to its commission in an% of the followin' manners. 1. (% profitin' themselves or assistin' the offender to profit b% the effects of the crime. #. (% concealin' or destro%in' the bod% of the crime, or the effects or instruments thereof, in order to prevent its discover%. 3. (% harborin', concealin', or assistin' in the escape of the principals of the crime, provided the accessor% acts with abuse of his public functions or whenever the author of the crime is 'uilt% of treason, parricide, murder, or an attempt to ta/e the life of the Chief <-ecutive, or is /nown to be habituall% 'uilt% of some other crime. An accessor% does not participate in the criminal desi'n, nor cooperate in the commission of the felon%, but, with /nowled'e of the commission of the crime, he subse9uentl% ta/es part in 3 wa%s. a" b% profitin' from the effects of the crimeF b" b% concealin' the bod%, effects or instruments of the crime in order to prevent its discover%F and c" b% assistin' in the escape or concealment of the principal of the crime, provided he acts with abuse of his public functions or the principal is 'uilt% of treason, parricide, murder, or an attempt to ta/e the life of the Chief <-ecutive, or is /nown to be habituall% 'uilt of some other crime. F%no#lege of the commission of the crimeD *ere possession of stolen propert% does not ma/e the accused an accessor% where the thief was alread% convicted. <ntertainin' suspicion that a crime has been committed is not enou'h. Onowled'e of the commission of the crime ma% be established b% circumstantial evidence Fcommission of the crimeD the crime committed b% the principal must be proved be%ond reasonable doubt. F#ithout having participate therein either as principals or accomplicesD Fta%e part subse-uent to its commissionD The accessor% ta/es part ACT<R the crime has been committed. SPECIFIC ACTS OF THE ACCESSORIES 1. ,5 PR'1*"*N9 "+E)SEL2ES 'R $SS*S"*N9 "+E '11ENDER "' PR'1*" ,5 "+E E11EC"S '1 "+E CR*)E ? The accessor% must receive the propert% from the principal. ,e should not ta/e it without the consent of the principal, or else, he is not an accessor% but a principal in the crime of theft. ? ;hen is profiting by the effect of the crime punished as the act of principal# and not the act of accessory. Ahen a person /nowin'l% ac9uired or received propert% ta/en b% the bri'ands. #. ,5 C'NCE$L*N9 'R DES"R'5*N9 "+E ,'D5 '1 "+E CR*)E "' PRE2EN" *"S D*SC'2ER5 . (2)K 2C T,< CR6*< @5corpus delicti7 which means that a specific offense was in fact committed b% someone @. ,5 +$R,'R*N9& C'NCE$L*N9 'R $SS*S"*N9 *N "+E ESC$PE '1 "+E PR*NC*P$L '1 "+E CR*)E . CLASSESD / viv Pa'e 1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 a. Public officers who harbor conceal or assist in the escape of the principal of an% crime (not li'ht felon%" with abuse of his public functions R1B)4S4,1S: (1" The accessor% is a public officerF (#" ,e harbors, conceals, or assists in the escape of the principalF (3" The public officer acts with abuse of his public functions. (>" The crime committed b% the principal is an% crime, provided it is not a li'ht felon%. b. Private persons who harbor, conceal or assist in the escape of the author of the crime @ 'uilt% of treason, parricide, murder, or an attempt a'ainst the life of the President, or who is /nown to be habituall% 'uilt% of some other crime. R1B)4S4,1S: (1" The accessor% is a private person. (#" ,e harbors, conceals or assists in the escape of the author of the crime. (3" The crime committed b% the principal is either. (a" treason, (b" parricide, (c" murder, (d" attempt a'ainst the life of the president, or (e" that the principal is /nown to be habituall% 'uilt% of some other crime. PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 101. ANTI=FENCIN6 LAW OF 1979 A,<R<A$, reports from law enforcement a'encies reveal that there is rampant robber% and thiever% of 'overnment and private propertiesF A,<R<A$, such robber% and thiever% have become profitable on the part of the lawless elements because of the e-istence of read% bu%ers, commonl% /nown as fence, of stolen propertiesF A,<R<A$, under e-istin' law, a fence can be prosecuted onl% as an accessor% after the fact and punished li'htl%F A,<R<A$, is imperative to impose heav% penalties on persons who profit b% the effects of the crimes of robber% and theft. N2A, T,<R<C2R<, 6, C<R)6NAN) <. *ARC2$, President of the Philippines b% virtue of the powers vested in me b% the Constitution, do hereb% order and decree as part of the law of the land the followin'. S&$!on 1. Title. This decree shall be /nown as the Anti?Cencin' &aw. S&$!on .. )efinition of Terms. The followin' terms shall mean as follows. (a" LCencin'L is the act of an% person who, with intent to 'ain for himself or for another, shall bu%, receive, possess, /eep, ac9uire, conceal, sell or dispose of, or shall bu% and sell, or in an% other manner deal in an% article, item, ob+ect or an%thin' of value which he /nows, or should be /nown to him, to have been derived from the proceeds of the crime of robber% or theft. (b" LCenceL includes an% person, firm, association corporation or partnership or other or'ani4ation whoDwhich commits the act of fencin'. S&$!on @. Penalties. An% person 'uilt% of fencin' shall be punished as hereunder indicated. (a" The penalt% of prision ma%or, if the value of the propert% involved is more than 1#,=== pesos but not e-ceedin' ##,=== pesosF if the value of such propert% e-ceeds the latter sum, the penalt% provided in this para'raph shall be imposed in its ma-imum period, addin' one %ear for each additional 1=,=== pesosF but the total penalt% which ma% be imposed shall not e-ceed twent% %ears. 6n such cases, the penalt% shall be termed reclusion temporal and the accessor% penalt% pertainin' thereto provided in the Revised Penal Code shall also be imposed. (b" The penalt% of prision correccional in its medium and ma-imum periods, if the value of the propert% robbed or stolen is more than 0,=== pesos but not e-ceedin' 1#,=== pesos. (c" The penalt% of prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods, if the value of the propert% involved is more than #== pesos but not e-ceedin' 0,=== pesos. (d" The penalt% of arresto ma%or in its medium period to prision correccional in its minimum period, if the value of the propert% involved is over != pesos but not e-ceedin' #== pesos. (e" The penalt% of arresto ma%or in its medium period if such value is over five (!" pesos but not e-ceedin' != pesos. (f" The penalt% of arresto ma%or in its minimum period if such value does not e-ceed ! pesos. S&$!on 1. &iabilit% of 2fficials of 8uridical Persons. 6f the fence is a partnership, firm, corporation or association, the president or the mana'er or an% officer thereof who /nows or should have /nown the commission of the offense shall be liable. S&$!on (. Presumption of Cencin'. *ere possession of an% 'ood, article, item, ob+ect, or an%thin' of value which has been the sub+ect of robber% or thiever% shall be prima facie evidence of fencin'. S&$!on 0. ClearanceDPermit to $ellD3sed $econd ,and Articles. Cor purposes of this Act, all stores, establishments or entities dealin' in the bu% and sell of an% 'ood, article item, ob+ect of an%thin' of value obtained from an unlicensed dealer or supplier thereof, shall before offerin' the same for sale to the public, secure the necessar% clearance or permit from the station commander of the 6nte'rated National Police in the town or cit% where such store, establishment or entit% is located. The Chief of Constabular%D)irector 1eneral, 6nte'rated National Police shall promul'ate such rules and re'ulations to carr% out the provisions of this section. An% person who fails to secure the clearance or permit re9uired b% this section or who violates an% of the provisions of the rules and re'ulations promul'ated thereunder shall upon conviction be punished as a fence. S&$!on 7. Repealin' Clause. All laws or parts thereof, which are inconsistent with the provisions of this )ecree are hereb% repealed or modified accordin'l%. S&$!on 8. <ffectivit%. This )ecree shall ta/e effect upon approval. )one in the Cit% of *anila, this #nd da% of *arch, in the %ear of 2ur &ord, nineteen hundred and sevent%?nine. ACCESSORY DISTIN6UISHED FROM PRINCIPAL AND FROM ACCOMPLICE 1. The accessor% does not ta/e direct part or cooperate in, or induce, the commission of the crime. #. The accessor% does not cooperate in the commission of the offense b% acts either prior thereto or simultaneous therewith. 3. That the participation of the accessor% in all cases alwa%s ta/es place after the commission of the crime. A#. .2. $ccessories #ho are exempt from criminal liability. I The penalties prescribed for accessories shall not be imposed upon those who are such with / viv Pa'e # #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 respect to their spouses, ascendants, descendants, le'itimate, natural, and adopted brothers and sisters, or relatives b% affinit% within the same de'rees, with the sin'le e-ception of accessories fallin' within the provisions of para'raph 1 of the ne-t precedin' article. The e-emption is based on the ties of blood and the preservation of the cleanliness of oneBs name, which compels one to conceal crimes committed b% relatives. An AC<$$2RK is e-empt from criminal liabilit%, when the principal is his. 1. spouse, #. ascendant, 3. descendant, >. le'itimate, natural or adopted brother, sister or relative b% affinit% within the same de'ree. ? even if onl% two of the principals 'uilt% of murder are the brothers of the accessor% and the others are not related to him, such accessor% is e-empt from criminal liabilit%. ? a nephew or niece is not included An accessor% is N2T <H<*PT from criminal liabilit% even if the principal is related to him, if such accessor% (1" PR2C6T<) b% the effects of the crime, or (#" assisted the offender to profit b% the effects of the crime P&o*%& +. T,%!n-4,n (1978) Facts: (ernardo and Teresa lived to'ether but for 9uite some time their relationship has 'otten bitter. (ernardo /new that Teresa had an illicit relationship with Talin'dan. Their child testified that on the da% the /illin' occurred, there were > men inside their house and (ernardo /new about it but continued plowin' his field. &ater, when (ernardo came inside the /itchen, Talin'dan and Tobias fired at (ernardo and the > climbed the stairs of the (atalan. $eein' that the victim was alive the% fired at him a'ain. Teresa came out after from her room and pulled her child to 9uestion her. Teresa threatened to /ill her if she would reveal the incident. Held: 2ne who conceals or assists in the escape of the principal in the crime can be held 'uilt% as accessor%. There is morall% convincin' proof that Teresa is an accessor% to the offense. $he was inside the room when her husband was shot. As she came out after the shootin', she in9uired from the child if she was able to reco'ni4e the assailants and when the latter identified the > accused as the culprits, Teresa did not onl% en+oin her dau'hter not to reveal what she /new to an%one but she went to the e-tent of warnin' her not to tell an%one or else she would /ill her. &ater when the police came, she claimed she had no suspects in mind. $he, thus, became active in her cooperation with the > accused. P&o*%& +. To%&n!no (.22.) Facts: Ailfredo Tolentino hit ,erman $a'ario with a piece of wood and later stabbed him with a bolo. Ailfedo then instructed appellant 8onathan Cabros and *erwin &edesma to help him brin' ,ernan out of the house. Ailfredo held him b% the nec/ while both appellant and *erwin 'rasped his feet. The% then carried ,ernan towards a cree/. Appellant assisted Ailfredo out of fear and when he noticed that $a'ario re'ained conciousness, he ran awa% towards a banana plantation. Ailfredo then stab $a'ario on the different parts of his bod% causin' his death. Thereafter, Ailfredo pushed and waded $a'ario on the water. Held: Appellant 8onathan Cabros cannot be convicted as an accessor%. 3nder para'raph # of Article 1: of the Revised Penal Code, the concealment or the destruction of the bod% of the crime or of the effects or the instruments thereof must have been done in order to prevent the discover% of the crime. That, precisel%, is wantin' in the present case. Appellant was afraid that his co?accused would hurt him if he refused so he a'reed to assist the latter in carr%in' the victim towards the river. The fact that appellant left thereafter li/ewise indicated his innocence of the char'e. Jeril%, he ade9uatel% e-plained his conduct prior to the stabbin' incident as one born of fear for his own life. 6t is not incredible for an e%ewitness to a crime, especiall% if unarmed, to desist from assistin' the victim if to do so would put the formerMs life in peril. P&o*%& +. M,#!,no (.222) Facts: Ruth and their maid *ichelle often en'a'ed in a ph%sical fi'ht. The fi'ht usuall% ends with Ruth pourin' boilin' water on *ichelle. )urin' their fi'hts which number to at least 0 times a month, Ruth would ban' *ichelleBs head and pull on her hair. *ichelle subse9uentl% died as a result. Ruth placed the bod% of *ichelle in a bo- which she then loaded inside the lu''a'e compartment of her sister Rub%Bs car. Ruth and Rub% were both convicted of murder b% the trial court. Held: Rub% is the sister of Ruth. As such, their relationship e-empts Rub% from criminal liabilit% under Art. #= of the Revised Penal Code IART6C&< #=. Accessories who are e-empt from criminal liabilit%.IThe penalties prescribed for accessories shall not be imposed upon those who are such with respect to their spouses, ascendants, descendants, le'itimate, natural and adopted brothers and sisters, or relatives b% affinit% within the same de'rees, with the sin'le e-ception of accessories fallin' within the provisions of para'raph 1 of the precedin' article (emphasis supplied". The reason for e-emption is obviousF it is based on ties of blood and the preservation of the cleanliness of oneMs name, which compels one to conceal crimes committed b% relatives so near as those mentioned in the above?9uoted article. Rub% *ariano is ac9uitted. ). PENALTIES Penalt% is the sufferin' that is inflicted b% the $tate for the trans'ression of a law. D!88&#&n 7"#!4!$,% Con4!!ons o8 P&n,%>D 1. *ust be PR2)3CT6J< 2C $3CC<R6N1, without however affectin' the inte'rit% of the human personalit%. #. *ust be C2**<N$3RAT< with the offense @ different crimes must be punished with different penalties. 3. *ust be P<R$2NA& @ no one should be punished for the crime of another. >. *ust be &<1A& @ it is the conse9uence of a +ud'ment accordin' to law. !. *ust be C<RTA6N @ no one ma% escape its effects. 0. *ust be <Q3A& for all. ;. *ust be C2RR<CT62NA&. / viv Pa'e 3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 The purpose of the $tate in punishin' crimes is T2 $<C3R< 83$T6C<. Penal +ustice must therefore be e-ercised b% the $tate in the service and satisfaction of a dut% and rests primaril% on the moral ri'htfulness of the punishment inflicted. T;&o#!&s J"s!8>!n- *&n,%>D a. PR<J<NT62N @ to suppress dan'er to the $tate b. $<&C?)<C<N$< @ to protect the societ% from the threat and wron' inflicted b% the criminal. c. R<C2R*AT62N @ to correct and reform the offender. d. <H<*P&AR6TK @ to serve as an e-ample to deter others from committin' crimes. e. 83$T6C< @ for retributive +ustice, a vindication of absolute ri'ht and moral law violated b% the criminal. P"#*os& o8 *&n,%> "n4&# ;& RPCD a. R<TR6(3T62N 2R <HP6AT62N @ the penalt% is commensurate with the 'ravit% of the offense. b. C2RR<CT62N 2R R<C2R*AT62N @ as shown b% the rules which re'ulate the e-ecution of the penalties consistin' in deprivation of libert%. c. $2C6A& )<C<N$< @ shown b% its infle-ible severit% to recidivist and habitual delin9uents. A. 6ENERAL PRINCIPLES NO ex post facto %,9s A#. .1. Penalties that may be impose! I No felon% shall be punishable b% an% penalt% not prescribed b% law prior to its commission. This article prohibits the 1overnment from punishin' an% person for an% felon% with an% penalt% which has not been prescribed b% the law. 6t has no application to an% of the provisions of the RPC for the reason that for ever% felon% defined in the Code, a penalt% has been prescribed. R1/S'5. An act or omission cannot be punished b% the $tate if at the time it was committed there was no law prohibitin' it, because a law cannot be rationall% obe%ed unless it is first shown, and a man cannot be e-pected to obe% an order that has not been 'iven. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITIONS 1987 CONSTITUTION S&$!on 18. (1" No person shall be detained solel% b% reason of his political beliefs and aspirations. (#" No involuntar% servitude in an% form shall e-ist e-cept as a punishment for a crime whereof the part% shall have been dul% convicted. S&$!on 19. (1" <-cessive fines shall not be imposed, nor cruel, de'radin' or inhuman punishment inflicted. Neither shall death penalt% be imposed, unless, for compellin' reasons involvin' heinous crimes, the Con'ress hereafter provides for it. An% death penalt% alread% imposed shall be reduced to reclusion perpetua. S&$!on .2. No person shall be imprisoned for debt or non?pa%ment of a poll ta-. S&$!on ... No ex post facto law or bill of attainder shall be enacted. In R&D C,> )!%%&-,s C,3! (1972) Facts: Petition for declarator% relief challen'in' the validit% of $ec. of RA 013# on the 'round that it violates due process, ri'ht of association, freedom of e-pression and that it is an e- post facto law. Held: An e- post facto law is one which. 1. ma/es criminal an act done before the passa'e of the law and which was innocent when done, and punishes such an act. #. a''ravates a crime, or ma/es it 'reater than it was when committedF 3. chan'es the punishment and inflicts a 'reater punishment than the law anne-ed to the crime when committedF >. alters the le'al rules of evidence, and authori4es conviction upon less or different testimon% than the law re9uired at the time of the commission of the offenseF !. assumin' to re'ulate civil ri'hts and remedies onl%, in effect imposes penalt% or deprivation of a ri'ht for somethin' which when done was lawfulF and 0. deprives a person accused of a crime of some lawful protection to which he has become entitled, such as the protection of a former conviction or ac9uittal, or a proclamation of amnest%. The constitutional inhibition refers onl% to criminal laws which are 'iven retroactive effect. Ahile it is true that $ec. 1 penali4es a violation of an% provision of RA 013# includin' $ec. thereof, the penalt% is imposed onl% for acts committed after the approval of the law and not those perpetrated prior thereto. P&o*%& +. F&##&# (197.) A2N the Anti?subversion Act is a bill of attainderV The trial court ruled that the Act is a bill of attainder because it 5tars and feathers7 the communist part% as a 5continuin' menace to the freedom and securit% of the countr%.7 Held: A bill of attainder is a le'islative act which inflicts punishment without a trial. The Act simpl% declares the Communist Part% to be an or'ani4ed conspirac% for the overthrow of the 'overnment. 6ts focus is not on the individuals but on the conduct. 6t is not enou'h that the statute specif% persons or 'roups in order that it ma% be called a bill of attainder. 6t is necessar% that it must appl% retroactivel% and reach past conduct. This re9uirement follows from the nature of a bill of attainder as a le'islative ad+udication of 'uilt. P&o*%& +. B#,$,3on& (1990) Facts: Jioleta and her common law husband, Clar/ )in, arrived home and 3 men rushin' out of the house. 6nside the house, the% found their maid hands tied with her mouth 'a''ed and bathed in her own blood. Thereafter, the% saw their son in the /itchen his head and bod% immersed in a pail of water, dead. Held: To impose upon the accused the death penalt% reimposed b% RA ;0!: which too/ effect on )ec. 31, 1::3 for a crime committed bac/ on $ep. #3, 1:; would violate the basic rule in criminal law that, if the new law imposes a heavier penalt%, the law in force at the time of the commission of the offense shall be applied. P&o*%& +. ),%4&F (1999) Facts: Accused was convicted b% the RTC and sentenced him to death for the comple- crime of *ultiple *urder with )ouble Crustrated *urder, and / viv Pa'e > #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 li/ewise separatel% sentenced him to suffer the prison term of reclusion perpetua for the crime of 6lle'al Possession of Cirearms (P) 100" Held: There can be no separate conviction of the crime of ille'al possession under P) 100 in view of the amendments introduced b% RA #:> wherein ille'al possession bein' merel% ta/en as an a''ravatin' circumstance to other crimes committed. 6nsofar as RA #:> will spare the accused from a separate conviction for the crime of ille'al possession, it ma% be 'iven retroactive effect. PROSPECTI)ITYI EGCEPTION RPC' A#. .1. Penalties that may be impose! I No felon% shall be punishable b% an% penalt% not prescribed b% law prior to its commission. A#. ... Retroactive effect of penal la#s. I Penal &aws shall have a retroactive effect insofar as the% favor the persons 'uilt% of a felon%, who is not a habitual criminal, as this term is defined in Rule ! of Article 0# of this Code, althou'h at the time of the publication of such laws a final sentence has been pronounced and the convict is servin' the same. CI)IL CODE' A#. 11. Penal laws and those of public securit% and safet% shall be obli'ator% upon all who live or so+ourn in the Philippine territor%, sub+ect to the principles of public international law and to treat% stipulations. 6ENERAL RULED T2 16J< CR6*6NA& &AA$ PR2$P<CT6J< <CC<CT E:$&*!onD to 'ive them retroactive effect when favorable to the accused. Reason for the exception. The soverei'n, in enactin' a subse9uent penal law more favorable to the accused, has reco'ni4ed that the 'reater severit% of the former law is un+ust. The soverei'n would be inconsistent if it would still enforce its ri'ht under conditions of the former law, which has alread% been re'arded b% conscientious public opinion as +uridical burdensome. The favorable retroactive effect of a new law ma% find the defendant in one of these 3 situations. a. The crime has been committed and prosecution be'insF b. $entence has been passed but service has not be'unF c. The sentence is bein' carried out. Ahen the culprit is ,A(6T3A& )<&6NQ3<NT, he is not entitled to the benefit of the provisions of the new favorable statute. A person shall be deemed to be a ,A(6T3A& )<&6NQ3<NT if within a period of 1= %ears from the date of his release of last conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious ph%sical in+uries, robber%, theft, estafa or falsification, he is found 'uilt of an said crimes a third time or oftener. The principle a'ainst retroactivit% does not appl% to civil liabilit%. ? but a new law increasin' the civil liabilit% cannot be 'iven retroactive effect. The provisions of this article are applicable even to special laws which provide more favorable conditions to the accused. Criminal liabilit% under the former law is obliterated when the repeal is absolute. Criminal liabilit% under the repealed law subsists. a. Ahen the provisions of the former law are R<<NACT<)F or b. Ahen the repeal is b% 6*P&6CAT62NF c. Ahen there is a $AJ6N1 C&A3$< Ahat penalt% ma% be imposed for the commission of a felon%V ? 2nl% the penalt% prescribed b% law prior tot the commission of the felon% ma% be imposed. ? Celonies are punishable under the laws in force at the time of their commission. ? (ut the penalt% prescribed b% law enacted after the commission of the felon% ma% be imposed, if it is favorable to the offender. P&o*%& +. 6,%%o (1999) Facts: The accused see/s a modification of his death sentence to reclusion perpetua in line with the new Court rulin's which annunciate that the ; attendant circumstances introduced in $ec. 11 of RA ;0!: parta/e of the nature of 9ualif%in' circumstances that must be pleaded in the indictment in order to warrant the imposition of the penalt% (1arcia doctrine reiterated in *edina". Held: (% operation of law, the appellant is ri'htfull% entitled to the beneficial application of the 1arcia or *edina doctrine. $entence modified. P&o*%& +. P,,%!n (1999) Facts: The accused were convicted of Robber% with Ph%sical 6n+uries and Robber% with *ultiple Rape and were sentenced to imprisonment and death penalt% respectivel% for the two convictions. Held: There is no 9uestion that the abolition of the death penalt% benefits herein accused. The subse9uent reimposition of the death penalt% will not affect them. The framers of the Constitution themselves state that the law to be passed b% Con'ress reimposin' the death penalt% (RA ;0!:" can onl% have prospective application. A subse9uent statute cannot be so applied retroactivel% as to impair a ri'ht that accrued under the old law. DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF REPEAL OF PENAL LAW. a. 6f the repeal ma/es the penalty lighter in the new law, the new law shall be applied, e-cept when the offender is a habitual delin9uent or when the new law is made not applicable to pendin' action or e-istin' causes of action. b. 6f the new law imposes a hea!ier penalty, the law in force at the time of the commission of the offense shall be applied. c. 6f the new law totall% repeals the e-istin' law so that the act which was penali4ed under the old law is no lon'er punishable, the crime is obliterated. Ahen the repeal is absolute the offense ceases to be criminal. Ahen the new law and the old law penali4e the same offense, the offender can be tried under the old law. Ahen the repealin' law fails to penali4e the offense under the old law, the accused cannot be convicted under the new law. / viv Pa'e ! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 A person erroneousl% accused and convicted under a repealed statute ma% be punished under the repealin' statute. A new law which omits an%thin' contained in the old law dealin' on the same sub+ect, operates as are penal of an%thin' not so included in the amendator% act. P&o*%& +. P!3&n&% (supra) Held: Ahere the repeal of a penal law is total and absolute and the act which was penali4ed b% a prior law ceases to be criminal under the new law, the previous offense is obliterated. Aith the enactment of RA ;030, the char'e of ille'al possession of firearm and ammunition 9ualified b% subversion should be amended to simple ille'al possession of firearm and ammunition, since subversion is no lon'er a crime. B. PENALTIES WHICH MAY BE IMPOSED A#. .(. Penalties #hich may be impose! I The penalties which ma% be imposed accordin' to this Code, and their different classes, are those included in the followin'. $cale PRINCIPAL PENALTIES
C,*!,% *"n!s;3&nD )eath.
A88%!$!+& *&n,%!&sD Reclusion perpetua, Reclusion temporal, Perpetual or temporar% absolute dis9ualification, Perpetual or temporar% special dis9ualification, Prision ma%or. Co##&$!on,% *&n,%!&sD Prision correccional, Arresto ma%or, $uspension, )estierro.
L!-; *&n,%!&sD Arresto menor, Public censure.
P&n,%!&s $o33on o ;& ;#&& *#&$&4!n- $%,ss&sD Cine, and (ond to /eep the peace.
ACCESSORY PENALTIES Perpetual or temporar% absolute dis9ualification, Perpetual or temporar% special dis9ualification, $uspension from public office, the ri'ht to vote and be voted for, the profession or callin'. Civil interdiction, 6ndemnification, Corfeiture or confiscation of instruments and proceeds of the offense, Pa%ment of costs. PRINCIPAL PENALTIES @ those e-pressl% imposed b% the court in the +ud'ment of conviction. ACCESSORY PENALTIES @ those that are deemed included in the imposition of the principal penalties. 2ther classifications of penalties. $ccoring to their ivisibilityC 1. D!+!s!/%& ? those that have fi-ed duration and are divisible into three periods. #. 6n4!+!s!/%& ? those which have no fi-ed duration. a. )eath b. Reclusion perpetua c. Perpetual absolute or special dis9ualification d. Public censure $ccoring to sub(ect-matter 8. Corporal (death" C. )eprivation of freedom (reclusion# prision# arresto" D. Restriction of freedom (destierro$ E. )eprivation of ri'hts (dis*ualification and suspension$ F. Pecuniar% (fine$ $ccoring to their gravity 1. Capital #. Afflictive 3. Correctional >. &i'ht NOTE. Public censure is a penalt%, thus, it is not proper in ac9uittal. ,owever, the Court in ac9uittin' the accused ma% critici4e his acts or conduct. R Penalties that are either principal or accessor%. Perpetual or temporar% absolute dis9ualification, perpetual or temporar% special dis9ualification, and suspension ma% be principal or accessor% penalties, because the% formed in the # 'eneral classes. DURATION OF EACH OF DIFFERENT PENALTIES 1. Reclusion perpetua E #= %ears and 1 da% to >= %ears .. Reclusion temporal M 1# %ears and 1 da% to #= %ears @. Prision mayor an temporary is-ualification 0 %ears and 1 da% to 1# %ears e-cept when dis9ualification is accessor% penalt%F in which case its duration is that of the principal penalt% 1. Prision correccional& suspension an estierro ? 0 months and 1 da% to 0 %ears e-cept when suspension is an accessor% penalt%, in which case its duration is that of the principal penalt%. (. $rresto )ayor = 1 month and 1 da% to 0 months 0. $rresto )enor " 1 da% to 3= da%s. C. SPECIFIC PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY PENALTIES CAPITAL PUNISHMENT REPUBLIC ACT NO. 70(9 AN ACT TO IMPOSE THE DEATH PENALTY ON CERTAIN HEINOUS CRIMES' AMENDIN6 FOR THAT PURPOSE / viv Pa'e 0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 THE RE)ISED PENAL LAWS' AS AMENDED' OTHER SPECIAL PENAL LAWS' AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Section 1. Declaration of Policy. - It is hereby declared the policy of the State to foster and ensure not only obedience to its authority, but also to adopt such measures as would effectively promote the maintenance of peace and order, the protection of life, liberty and property, and the promotion of the general welfare which are essential for the enjoyment by all the people of the blessings of democracy in a just and humane society; Section 2. Article 114 of the evised !enal "ode, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows# $Art% 114% &reason% - Any 'ilipino citi(en who levies war against the !hilippines or adheres to her enemies giving them aid or comfort within the !hilippines or elsewhere, shall be punished by reclusion perpetua to death and shall pay a fine not to e)ceed 1**,*** pesos%$ +o person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses at least to the same overt act or on confession of the accused in open court% ,i-ewise, an alien, residing in the !hilippines, who commits acts of treason as defined in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be punished by reclusion temporal to death and shall pay a fine not to e)ceed 1**,*** pesos%$ Section 3. Section &hree, "hapter .ne, &itle .ne of /oo- &wo of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# $Section &hree% - !iracy and mutiny on the high seas or in the !hilippine waters Art% 100% !iracy in general and mutiny on the high seas or in !hilippine waters% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua shall be inflicted upon any person who, on the high seas, or in !hilippine waters, shall attac- or sei(e a vessel or, not being a member of its complement nor a passenger, shall sei(e the whole or part of the cargo of said vessel, its e1uipment or passengers% &he same penalty shall be inflicted in case of mutiny on the high seas or in !hilippine waters%$ Art% 102% 3ualified piracy% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death shall be imposed upon those who commit any of the crimes referred to in the preceding article, under any of the following circumstances# 1% 4henever they have sei(ed a vessel by boarding or firing upon the same; 0% 4henever the pirates have abandoned their victims without means of saving themselves or; 2% 4henever the crime is accompanied by murder, homicide, physical injuries or rape%$ Section 4. &here shall be incorporated after Article 011 of the same "ode a new article to read as follows# $Art% 011-A% 3ualified /ribery% - If any public officer is entrusted with law enforcement and he refrains from arresting or prosecuting an offender who has committed a crime punishable by reclusion perpetua and5or death in consideration of any offer, promise, gift or present, he shall suffer the penalty for the offense which was not prosecuted% If it is the public officer who as-s or demands such gift or present, he shall suffer the penalty of death%$ Section 5. &he penalty of death for parricide under Article 046 of the same "ode is hereby restored, so that it shall read as follows# $Art% 046% !arricide% - Any person who shall -ill his father, mother, or child, whether legitimate of illegitimate, or any of his ascendants, or descendants, or his spouse, shall be guilty of parricide and shall be punished by the penalty of reclusion perpetua to death%$ Section 6. Article 047 of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# $Art% 047% 8urder% - Any person who, not falling within the provisions of Article 046 shall -ill another, shall be guilty of murder and shall be punished by reclusion perpetua, to death if committed with any of the following attendant circumstances# 1% 4ith treachery, ta-ing advantage of superior strength, with the aid of armed men, or employing means to wea-en the defense or of means or persons to insure or afford impunity% 0% In consideration of a price, reward or promise% 2% /y means of inundation, fire, poison, e)plosion, shipwrec-, stranding of a vessel, derailment or assault upon a railroad, fall of an airship, or by means of motor vehicles, or with the use of any other means involving great waste and ruin% 4% .n occasion of any of the calamities enumerated in the preceding paragraph, or of an earth1ua-e, eruption of a volcano, destructive cyclone, epidemic or other public calamity% 9% 4ith evident premeditation% 6% 4ith cruelty, by deliberately and inhumanly augmenting the suffering of the victim, or outraging or scoffing at his person or corpse%$ Section 7. Article 099 of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# $Art% 099% Infanticide% - &he penalty provided for parricide in Article 046 and for murder in Article 047 shall be imposed upon any person who shall -ill any child less than three days of age% If any crime penali(ed in this Article be committed by the mother of the child for the purpose of concealing her dishonor, she shall suffer the penalty of prision mayor in its medium and ma)imum periods, and if said crime be committed for the same purpose by the maternal grandparents or either of them, the penalty shall be reclusion temporal%$ Section 8. Article 06: of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# $Art% 06:% ;idnapping and serious illegal detention% - Any private individual who shall -idnap or detain another, or in any other manner deprive him of his liberty, shall suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua to death# 1% If the -idnapping or detention shall have lasted more than three days% 0% If it shall have been committed simulating public authority% 2% If any serious physical injuries shall have been inflicted upon the person -idnapped or detained; or if threats to -ill him shall have been made% 4% If the person -idnapped or detained shall be a minor, e)cept when the accused is any of the parents, female or a public officer% &he penalty shall be death penalty where the -idnapping or detention was committed for the purpose of e)torting ransom from the victim or any other person, even if none of the circumstances above-mentioned were present in the commission of the offense% 4hen the victim is -illed or dies as a conse1uence of the detention or is raped, or is subjected to torture or dehumani(ing acts, the ma)imum penalty shall be imposed%$ Section 9. Article 0<4 of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# $Art% 0<4% obbery with violence against or intimidation of persons - !enalties% - Any person guilty of robbery with the use of violence against or intimidation of any person shall suffer# 1% &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death, when by reason or on occasion of the robbery, the crime of homicide shall have been committed, or when the robbery shall have been accompanied by rape or intentional mutilation or arson% 0% &he penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua, when or if by reason or on occasion of such robbery, any of the physical injuries penali(ed in subdivision I of Article 062 shall have been inflicted% 2% &he penalty of reclusion temporal, when by reason or on occasion of the robbery, any of the physical injuries penali(ed in subdivision 0 of the article mentioned in the ne)t preceding paragraph, shall have been inflicted% 4% &he penalty of prision mayor in its ma)imum period to reclusion temporal in its medium period, if the violence or intimidation employed in the commission of the robbery shall have been carried to a degree clearly unnecessary for the commission of the crime, or when in the course of its e)ecution, the offender shall have inflicted upon any person not responsible for its commission any of the physical injuries covered by subdivisions 2 and 4 of said Article 062% 9% &he penalty of prision correccional in its ma)imum period to prision mayor in its medium period in other cases%$ Section 10. Article 20* of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# / viv Pa'e ; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 $Art% 20*% =estructive Arson% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death shall be imposed upon any person who shall burn# 1% .ne >1? or more buildings or edifices, conse1uent to one single act of burning, or as a result of simultaneous burnings, committed on several or different occasions% 0% Any building of public or private ownership, devoted to the public in general or where people usually gather or congregate for a definite purpose such as, but not limited to, official governmental function or business, private transaction, commerce, trade, wor-shop, meetings and conferences, or merely incidental to a definite purpose such as but not limited to hotels, motels, transient dwellings, public conveyances or stops or terminals, regardless of whether the offender had -nowledge that there are persons in said building or edifice at the time it is set on fire and regardless also of whether the building is actually inhabited or not% 2% Any train or locomotive, ship or vessel, airship or airplane, devoted to transportation or conveyance, or for public use, entertainment or leisure% 4% Any building, factory, warehouse installation and any appurtenances thereto, which are devoted to the service of public utilities% 9% Any building the burning of which is for the purpose of concealing or destroying evidence of another violation of law, or for the purpose of concealing ban-ruptcy or defrauding creditors or to collect from insurance% Irrespective of the application of the above enumerated 1ualifying circumstances, the penalty of reclusion perpetua to death shall li-ewise be imposed when the arson is perpetrated or committed by two >0? or more persons or by a group of persons, regardless of whether their purpose is merely to burn or destroy the building or the burning merely constitutes an overt act in the commission or another violation of law% &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death shall also be imposed upon any person who shall burn# 1% Any arsenal, shipyard, storehouse or military powder or firewor-s factory, ordnance, storehouse, archives or general museum of the @overnment% 0% In an inhabited place, any storehouse or factory of inflammable or e)plosive materials% If as a conse1uence of the commission of any of the acts penali(ed under this Article, death results, the mandatory penalty of death shall be imposed%$ Section 11. Article 229 of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# $Art% 229% 4hen and how rape is committed% - ape is committed by having carnal -nowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances# 1% /y using force or intimidation; 0% 4hen the woman is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious; and 2% 4hen the woman is under twelve years of age or is demented% &he crime of rape shall be punished by reclusion perpetua% 4henever the crime of rape is committed with the use of a deadly weapon or by two or more persons, the penalty shall be reclusion perpetua to death% 4hen by reason or on the occasion of the rape, the victim has become insane, the penalty shall be death% 4hen the rape is attempted or frustrated and a homicide is committed by reason or on the occasion thereof, the penalty shall be reclusion perpetua to death% 4hen by reason or on the occasion of the rape, a homicide is committed, the penalty shall be death% &he death penalty shall also be imposed if the crime of rape is committed with any of the following attendant circumstances# 1% when the victim is under eighteen >17? years of age and the offender is a parent, ascendant, step-parent, guardian, relative by consanguinity or affinity within the third civil degree, or the common-law-spouse of the parent of the victim% 0% when the victim is under the custody of the police or military authorities% 2% when the rape is committed in full view of the husband, parent, any of the children or other relatives within the third degree of consanguinity% 4% when the victim is a religious or a child below seven >:? years old% 9% when the offender -nows that he is afflicted with Ac1uired Immune =eficiency Syndrome >AI=S? disease% 6% when committed by any member of the Armed 'orces of the !hilippines or the !hilippine +ational !olice or any law enforcement agency% :% when by reason or on the occasion of the rape, the victim has suffered permanent physical mutilation%$ Section 12. Section 0 of epublic Act +o% :*7* >An Act =efining and !enali(ing the "rime of !lunder? is hereby amended to read as follows# $Sec% 0% =efinition of the "rime of !lunder; !enalties% - Any public officer who, by himself or in connivance with members of his family, relatives by affinity or consanguinity, business associates, subordinates or other persons, amasses, accumulates or ac1uires ill- gotten wealth through a combination or series of overt criminal acts as described in Section 1 >d? hereof in the aggregate amount or total value of at least 'ifty million pesos >!9*,***,***%**? shall be guilty of the crime of plunder and shall be punished by reclusion perpetua to death% Any person who participated with the said public officer in the commission of an offense contributing to the crime of plunder shall li-ewise be punished for such offense% In the imposition of penalties, the degree of participation and the attendance of mitigating and e)tenuating circumstances, as provided by the evised !enal "ode, shall be considered by the court% &he court shall declare any and all ill-gotten wealth and their interests and other incomes and assets including the properties and shares of stoc-s derived from the deposit or investment thereof forfeited in favor of the State%$ Section 13. Sections 2, 4, 9, :, 7 and <, of Article II of epublic Act +o% 6409, as amended, -nown as the =angerous =rugs Act 1<:0, are hereby amended to read as follows# $Sec% 2% Importation of !rohibited =rugs% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who, unless authori(ed by law, shall import or bring into the !hilippines any prohibited drug% $Sec% 4% Sale, Administration, =elivery, =istribution and &ransportation of !rohibited =rugs% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who, unless authori(ed by law, shall sell, administer, deliver, give away to another, distribute, dispatch in transit or transport any prohibited drug, or shall act as a bro-er in any of such transactions% +otwithstanding the provisions of Section 0* of this Act to the contrary, if the victim of the offense is a minor, or should a prohibited drug involved in any offense under this Section be the pro)imate cause of the death of a victim thereof, the ma)imum penalty herein provided shall be imposed% $Sec% 9% 8aintenance of a =en, =ive or esort for !rohibited =rug Asers% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person or group of persons who shall maintain a den, dive or resort where any prohibited drug is used in any form or where such prohibited drugs in 1uantities specified in Section 0*, !aragraph 1 of this Act are found% +otwithstanding the provisions of Section 0* of this Act to the contrary, the ma)imum of the penalty shall be imposed in every case where a prohibited drug is administered, delivered or sold to a minor who is allowed to use the same in such place% Should a prohibited drug be the pro)imate cause of the death of a person using the same in such den, dive or resort, the ma)imum penalty herein provided shall be imposed on the maintainer notwithstanding the provisions of Section 0* of this Act to the contrary% $Sec% :% 8anufacture of !rohibited =rug% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who, unless authori(ed by law, shall engage in the manufacture of any prohibited drug% $Sec% 7% !ossession or Ase of !rohibited =rugs% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who, unless authori(ed by law, shall possess or use any prohibited drug subject to the provisions of Section 0* hereof% / viv Pa'e #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 $Sec% <% "ultivation of !lants which are Sources of !rohibited =rugs% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who shall plant, cultivate or culture any medium Indian hemp, opium poppy >papaver somniferum?, or any other plant which is or may hereafter be classified as dangerous drug or from which any dangerous drug may be manufactured or derived% &he land or portions hereof, and5or greenhouses on which any of said plants is cultivated or cultured shall be confiscated and escheated to the State, unless the owner thereof can prove that he did not -now such cultivation or culture despite the e)ercise of due diligence on his part% If the land involved in is part of the public domain, the ma)imum of the penalties herein provided shall be imposed upon the offender%$ Section 14. Sections 14, 14-A, and 19 of Article III of epublic Act +o% 6409, as amended, -nown as the =angerous =rugs Act of 1<:0, are hereby amended to read as follows# $Sec% 14% Importation of egulated =rugs% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who, unless authori(ed by law, shall import or bring any regulated drug in the !hilippines% $Sec% 14-A% 8anufacture of egulated =rugs% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who, unless authori(ed by law, shall engage in the manufacture of any regulated drug% $Sec% 19% Sale, Administration, =ispensation, =elivery, &ransportation and =istribution of egulated =rugs% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who, unless authori(ed by law, shall sell, dispense, deliver, transport or distribute any regulated drug% +otwithstanding the provisions of Section 0* of this Act to the contrary, if the victim of the offense is a minor, or should a regulated drug involved in any offense under this Section be the pro)imate cause of the death of a victim thereof, the ma)imum penalty herein provided shall be imposed%$ Section 15. &here shall be incorporated after Section 19 of Article III of epublic Act +o% 6409, as amended, -nown as the =angerous =rug Act of 1<:0, a new section to read as follows# $Sec% 19-a% 8aintenance of a den, dive or resort for regulated drug users% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person or group of persons who shall maintain a den, dive or resort where any regulated drugs is used in any form, or where such regulated drugs in 1uantities specified in Section 0*, paragraph 1 of this Act are found% +otwithstanding the provisions of Section 0* of this Act to the contrary, the ma)imum penalty herein provided shall be imposed in every case where a regulated drug is administered, delivered or sold to a minor who is allowed to use the same in such place% Should a regulated drug be the pro)imate cause of the death of a person using the same in such den, dive or resort, the ma)imum penalty herein provided shall be imposed on the maintainer notwithstanding the provisions of Section 0* of this Act to the contrary%$ Section 16. Section 16 of Article III of epublic Act +o% 6409, as amended, -nown as the =angerous =rugs Act of 1<:0, is amended to read as follows# $Sec% 16% !ossession or Ase of egulated =rugs% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos shall be imposed upon any person who shall possess or use any regulated drug without the corresponding license or prescription, subject to the provisions of Section 0* hereof%$ Section 17. Section 0*, Article IB of epublic Act +o% 6409, as amended, -nown as the =angerous =rugs Act of 1<:0, is hereby amended to read as follows# Sec% 0*% Application of !enalties, "onfiscation and 'orfeiture of the !roceeds or Instruments of the "rime% - &he penalties for offenses under Section 2, 4, :, 7 and < of Article II and Sections 14, 14-A, 19 and 16 of Article III of this Act shall be applied if the dangerous drugs involved is in any of the following 1uantities # 1% 4* grams or more of opium; 0% 4* grams or more of morphine; 2% 0** grams or more of shabu or methylamphetamine hydrochloride; 4% 4* grams or more of heroin; 9% :9* grams or more of indian hemp or marijuana; 6% 9* grams or more of marijuana resin or marijuana resin oil; :% 4* grams or more of cocaine or cocaine hydrochloride; or 7% In the case of other dangerous drugs, the 1uantity of which is far beyond therapeutic re1uirements, as determined and promulgated by the =angerous =rugs /oard, after public consultations5hearings conducted for the purpose% .therwise, if the 1uantity involved is less than the foregoing 1uantities, the penalty shall range from prision correccional to reclusion perpetua depending upon the 1uantity% Cvery penalty imposed for the unlawful importation, sale, administration, delivery, transportation or manufacture of dangerous drugs, the cultivation of plants which are sources of dangerous drugs and the possession of any opium pipe and other paraphernalia for dangerous drugs shall carry with it the confiscation and forfeiture, in favor of the @overnment, of all the proceeds of the crime including but not limited to money and other obtained thereby and the instruments or tools with which it was committed, unless they are the property of a third person not liable for the offense, but those which are not of lawful commerce shall be ordered destroyed without delay% =angerous drugs and plant sources of such drugs as well as the proceeds or instruments of the crime so confiscated and forfeited in favor of the @overnment shall be turned over to the /oard for proper disposal without delay% Any apprehending or arresting officer who misappropriates or misapplies or fails to account for sei(ed or confiscated dangerous drugs or plant-sources of dangerous drugs or proceeds or instruments of the crime as are herein defined shall after conviction be punished by the penalty of reclusion perpetua to death and a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos to ten million pesos%$ Section 18. &here shall be incorporated after Section 0* of epublic Act +o% 6409, as amended, -nown as the =angerous =rugs Act of 1<:0, a new section to read as follows# $Sec% 0*-A% !lea-bargaining !rovisions% - Any person charged under any provision of this Act where the imposable penalty is reclusion perpetua to death shall not be allowed to avail of the provision on plea bargaining%$ Section 19. Section 04 of epublic Act +o% 6409, as amended, -nown as the =angerous =rugs Act of 1<:0, is hereby amended to read as follows # $Sec% 04% !enalties for @overnment .fficial and Cmployees and .fficers and 8embers of !olice Agencies and the Armed 'orces, D!lantingD of Cvidence% - &he ma)imum penalties provided for Section 2, 4>1?, 9>1?, 6, :, 7, <, 11, 10 and 12 of Article II and Sections 14, 14-A, 19>1?, 16 and 1< of Article III shall be imposed, if those found guilty of any of the said offenses are government officials, employees or officers, including members of police agencies and the armed forces% Any such above government official, employee or officer who is found guilty of $planting$ any dangerous drugs punished in Sections 2, 4, :, 7, < and 12 of Article II and Sections 14, 14-A, 19 and 16 of Article III of this Act in the person or in the immediate vicinity of another as evidence to implicate the latter, shall suffer the same penalty as therein provided%$ Section 20. Sec% 14 of epublic Act +o% 692<, as amended, -nown as the Anti-"arnapping Act of 1<:0, is hereby amended to read as follows# $Sec% 14% !enalty for "arnapping% - Any person who is found guilty of carnapping, as this term is defined in Section &wo of this Act, shall, irrespective of the value of motor vehicle ta-en, be punished by imprisonment for not less than fourteen years and eight months and not more than seventeen years and four months, when the carnapping is committed without violence or intimidation of persons, or force upon things; and by imprisonment for not less than seventeen years and four months and not more than thirty / viv Pa'e : #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 years, when the carnapping is committed by means of violence against or intimidation of any person, or force upon things; and the penalty of reclusion perpetua to death shall be imposed when the owner, driver or occupant of the carnapped motor vehicle is -illed or raped in the course of the commission of the carnapping or on the occasion thereof%$ Section 21. Article 0: of the evised !enal "ode, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows# $Art% 0:% eclusion perpetua% - &he penalty of reclusion perpetua shall be from twenty years and one day to forty years% eclusion temporal% - &he penalty of reclusion temporal shall be from twelve years and one day to twenty years% !rision mayor and temporary dis1ualification% - &he duration of the penalties of prision mayor and temporary dis1ualification shall be from si) years and one day to twelve years, e)cept when the penalty of dis1ualification is imposed as an accessory penalty, in which case, it shall be that of the principal penalty% !rision correccional, suspension, and destierro% - &he duration of the penalties of prision correccional, suspension, and destierro shall be from si) months and one day to si) years, e)cept when the suspension is imposed as an accessory penalty, in which case, its duration shall be that of the principal penalty% Arresto mayor% - &he duration of the penalty of arresto mayor shall be from one month and one day to si) months% Arresto menor% - &he duration of the penalty of arresto menor shall be from one day to thirty days% /ond to -eep the peace% - &he bond to -eep the peace shall be re1uired to cover such period of time as the court may determine%$ Section 22. Article 4: of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# Art% 4:% In what cases the death penalty shall not be imposed; Automatic review of the =eath !enalty "ases% - &he death penalty shall be imposed in all cases in which it must be imposed under e)isting laws, e)cept when the guilty person is below eighteen >17? years of age at the time of the commission of the crime or is more than seventy years of age or when upon appeal or automatic review of the case by the Supreme "ourt, the re1uired majority vote is not obtained for the imposition of the death penalty, in which cases the penalty shall be reclusion perpetua% In all cases where the death penalty is imposed by the trial court, the records shall be forwarded to the Supreme "ourt for automatic review and judgment by the "ourt en banc, within twenty >0*? days but not earlier than fifteen >19? days after promulgation of the judgment or notice of denial of any motion for new trial or reconsideration% &he transcript shall also be forwarded within ten >1*? days from the filing thereof by the stenographic reporter%$ Section 23. Article 60 of the same "ode, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows # $Art% 60% Cffects of the attendance of mitigating or aggravating circumstances and of habitual delin1uency% - 8itigating or aggravating circumstances and habitual delin1uency shall be ta-en into account for the purpose of diminishing or increasing the penalty in conformity with the following rules# 1% Aggravating circumstances which in themselves constitute a crime specially punishable by law or which are included by the law in defining a crime and prescribing the penalty therefor shall not be ta-en into account for the purpose of increasing the penalty% 1>a?% 4hen in the commission of the crime, advantage was ta-en by the offender of his public position, the penalty to be imposed shall be in its ma)imum regardless of mitigating circumstances% &he ma)imum penalty shall be imposed if the offense was committed by any group who belongs to an organi(ed5syndicated crime group% An organi(ed5syndicated crime group means a group of two or more persons collaborating, confederating or mutually helping one another for purposes of gain in the commission of any crime% 0% &he same rule shall apply with respect to any aggravating circumstances inherent in the crime to such a degree that it must of necessity accompany the commission thereof% 2% Aggravating or mitigating circumstances which arise from the moral attributes of the offender, or from his private relations with the offended party, or from any other personal cause, shall only serve to aggravate or mitigate the liability of the principals, accomplices and accessories as to whom such circumstances are attendant% 4% &he circumstances which consist in the material e)ecution of the act, or in the means employed to accomplish it, shall serve to aggravate or mitigate the liability of those persons only who had -nowledge of them at the time of the e)ecution of the act or their cooperation therein% 9% Eabitual delin1uency shall have the following effects # >a? Apon a third conviction the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalty provided by law for the last crime of which he be found guilty and to the additional penalty of prision correccional in its medium and ma)imum periods; >b? Apon a fourth conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalty provided for the last crime of which he be found guilty and to the additional penalty of prision mayor in its minimum and medium periods; and >c? Apon a fifth or additional conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalty provided for the last crime of which he be found guilty and to the additional penalty of prision mayor in its ma)imum period to reclusion temporal in its minimum period% +otwithstanding the provisions of this article, the total of the two penalties to be imposed upon the offender, in conformity herewith, shall in no case e)ceed 2* years% 'or purposes of this article, a person shall be deemed to be a habitual delin1uent, if within a period of ten years from the date of his release or last conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious physical injuries, robo, hurto, estafa or falsification, he is found guilty of any of said crimes a third time or oftener% Section 24. Article 71 of the same "ode, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows # $Art% 71% 4hen and how the death penalty is to be e)ecuted% - &he death sentence shall be e)ecuted with preference to any other and shall consist in putting the person under sentence to death by electrocution% &he death sentence shall be e)ecuted under the authority of the =irector of !risons, endeavoring so far as possible to mitigate the sufferings of the person under the sentence during electrocution as well as during the proceedings prior to the e)ecution% If the person under sentence so desires, he shall be anaestheti(ed at the moment of the e)ecution% As soon as facilities are provided by the /ureau of !risons, the method of carrying out the sentence shall be changed to gas poisoning% &he death sentence shall be carried out not later than one >1? year after the judgment has become final% Section 25. Article 72 of the same "ode is hereby amended to read as follows# $Art% 72% Suspension of the e)ecution of the death sentence% - &he death sentence shall not be inflicted upon a woman while she is pregnant or within one >1? year after delivery, nor upon any person over seventy years of age% In this last case, the death sentence shall be commuted to the penalty of reclusion perpetua with the accessory penalties provided in Article 4*% In all cases where the death sentence has become final, the records of the case shall be forwarded immediately by the Supreme "ourt to the .ffice of the !resident for possible e)ercise of the pardoning power%$ Section 26. F modified or repealed hereby are Act this of provisions the with inconsistent thereof parts regulations and rules orders, e)ecutive issuances, decrees presidential laws,G Section 27. If, for any reason or reasons, any part of the provision of this Act shall be held to be unconstitutional or invalid, other parts or provisions hereof which are not affected thereby shall continue to be in full force and effect% Section 28. &his Act shall ta-e effect fifteen >19? days after its publication in two >0? national newspapers of general circulation% &he publication shall not be later than seven >:? days after the approval hereof% Approved# =ecember 12, 1<<2 / viv Pa'e := #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8177 AN ACT ESI!NATIN! EAT" B# LET"AL IN$ECTION AS T"E %ET"O O& CARR#IN! OUT CAPITAL PUNIS"%ENT' A%ENIN! &OR T"E PURPOSE ARTICLE 81 O& T"E RE(ISE PENAL COE' AS A%ENE B# SECTION 24 O& REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7659. SECTION 1. Article 71 of the evised !enal "ode, as amended by Section 04 of epublic Act +o% :69< is hereby further amended to read as follows# $Art% 71% When and how the death penalty is to be executed. H &he death sentence shall be e)ecuted with preference to any other penalty and shall consist in putting the person under the sentence to death by lethal injection% &he death sentence shall be e)ecuted under the authority of the =irector of the /ureau of "orrections, endeavoring so far as possible to mitigate the sufferings of the person under the sentence during the lethal injection as well as during the proceedings prior to the e)ecution% $&he =irector of the /ureau of "orrections shall ta-e steps to ensure that the lethal injection to be administered is sufficient to cause the instantaneous death of the convict% $!ursuant to this, all personnel involved in the administration of lethal injection shall be trained prior to the performance of such tas-% $&he authori(ed physician of the /ureau of "orrections, after thorough e)amination, shall officially ma-e a pronouncement of the convictDs death and shall certify thereto in the records of the /ureau of "orrections% &he death sentence shall be carried out not earlier than one >1? year nor later than eighteen >17? months after the judgment has become final and e)ecutory without prejudice to the e)ercise by the !resident of his e)ecutive clemency powers at all times%$ Sec. 2. !ersons already sentenced by judgment, which has become final and e)ecutory, who are waiting to undergo the death penalty by electrocution or gas poisoning shall be under the coverage of the provisions of this Act upon its effectivity% &heir sentences shall be automatically modified for this purpose% Sec. 3. Implementing Rules. H &he Secretary of Iustice in coordination with the Secretary of Eealth and the /ureau of "orrections shall, within thirty >2*? days from the effectivity of this Act, promulgate the rules to implement its provisions% Sec. 4. Repealing Clause. H All laws, presidential decrees and issuances, e)ecutive orders, rules and regulations or parts thereof inconsistent with the provisions of this Act are hereby repealed or modified accordingly%
Sec. 5. Effectivity. H &his Act shall ta-e effect fifteen >19? days after its publication in the .fficial @a(ette or in at least two >0? national newspapers of general circulation, whichever comes earlier% !ublication shall not be later than ten >1*? days after the approval thereof%
Approved: %)*c+ 20' 1996 RULES AN RE!ULATIONS TO I%PLE%ENT REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8177 P,*-,)nt to Section 3 o. Re/,01ic Act No. 8177 entit1e2 3AN ACT ESI!NATIN! EAT" B# LET"AL IN$ECTION AS T"E %ET"O O& CARR#IN! OUT CAPITAL PUNIS"%ENT' A%ENIN! &OR T"E PURPOSE ARTICLE 81 O& T"E RE(ISE PENAL COE' AS A%ENE B# SECTION 24 O& REPUBLIC ACT NO. 76593' t+e ,n2e*-i4ne2' in coo*2in)tion 5it+ t+e Sec*et)*6 o. "e)1t+ )n2 t+e i*ecto* o. Co**ection-' +e*e06 i--,e- t+e .o11o5in4 R,1e- to 4o7e*n t+e i8/1e8ent)tion o. -)i2 Act9 SECTION 1. .bjectives% H &hese ules see- to ensure the orderly and humane e)ecution of the death penalty by lethal injection% SECTION 2. =efinition of &erms% H As used in these ules, unless the conte)t otherwise re1uires H a% $=eath "onvict$ or $"onvict$ shall refer to a prisoner whose death penalty imposed by a egional &rial "ourt is affirmed by the Supreme "ourt en banc; b% $,ethal Injection$ refers to sodium thiopenthotal, pancuronium bromide, potassium chloride and such other lethal substances as may be specified by the =irector of "orrections that will be administered intravenously into the body of a convict until said convict is pronounced dead; c% $/ureau$ refers to the /ureau of "orrections; d% $=irector$ refers to the =irector of the /ureau of "orrections; e% $Secretary$ refers to the Secretary of the =epartment of Iustice; SECTION 3. !rinciples% H &he following principles shall be observed in the implementation of these ules# a% &here shall be no discrimination in the treatment of a death convict on account of race, color, religion, language, politics, nationality, social origin, property, birth or other status% b% In the e)ecution of a death penalty, the death convict shall be spared from unnecessary an)iety or distress% c% &he religious beliefs of the death convict shall be respected% SECTION 4. !rison Services% H Subject to the availability of resources, a death convict shall enjoy the following services and privileges to encourage and enhance his self-respect and dignity# a% 8edical and =ental; b% eligious, @uidance and "ounseling; c% C)ercise; d% Bisitation; and e% 8ail% SECTION 5. "onfinement% H 4henever practicable, the death convict shall be confined in an individual cell in a building that is e)clusively assigned for the use of death convicts% &he convict shall be provided with a bun-, a steel5wooden bed or mat, a pillow or blan-et and mos1uito net% SECTION 6. eligious Services% H Subject to security conditions, a death convict may be visited by the priest or minister of his faith and given such available religious materials which he may re1uire% SECTION 7. C)ercise% H A death convict shall be allowed to enjoy regular e)ercise periods under the supervision of a guard% SECTION 8. 8eal Services% H 8eals shall, whenever practicable, be served individually to a death convict inside his cell% 8ess utensils shall be made of plastic% After each meal, said utensils shall be collected and accounted% SECTION 9. Bisitation% H A death convict shall be allowed to be visited by his immediate family and reputable friends at regular intervals and during designated hours subject to security procedures% SECTION 10. ,ist of Bisitors% H A list of persons who may visit a death convict shall be compiled and maintained by the prison authorities% &he list may include the members of the convictDs immediate family such as his parents, step parents, foster parents, brothers and sisters, wife or husband and children% &he list may, upon the re1uest of the convict, include his grandparents, aunts, uncles, in- laws and cousins% .ther visitors may, after investigation, be included in the list if it will assist in raising the morale of the convict% SECTION 11. Interviews of "onvicts% H &elevision, radio and other interviews by media of a death convict shall not be allowed% SECTION 12. Eandling of Inmate 8ail% H &he sending and receiving of mail by a death convict shall be controlled to prevent illicit communication% 8ail shall be censored in accordance with e)isting prison rules% SECTION 13. .utside 8ovement% H A death convict may be allowed to leave his place of confinement only for diagnosis of a life- threatening situation or treatment of a serious ailment, if the diagnosis cannot be done or the treatment provided in the prison hospital% SECTION 14. "ourt Appearance% H A death convict shall not be brought outside the penal institution where he is confined for appearance or attendance in any court e)cept when the Supreme "ourt authori(es, upon proper application, said outside movement% A judge who re1uires the appearance or attendance of a death convict in any judicial proceeding shall conduct such proceeding within the premises of the penal institution where the convict is confined% / viv Pa'e :1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 SECTION 15. Eow ,ethal Injection is to be Administered% H &he e)ecution of the death sentence by lethal injection shall be done under the authority of the =irector who shall endeavor to mitigate the sufferings of the convict prior to and during the e)ecution% SECTION 16. +otification and C)ecution of the Sentence and Assistance to the "onvict% H &he court shall designate a wor-ing day for the e)ecution of the death penalty but not the hour thereof% Such designation shall only be communicated to the convict after sunrise of the day of the e)ecution, and the e)ecution shall not ta-e place until after the e)piration of at least eight >7? hours following the notification, but before sunset% =uring the interval between the notification and e)ecution, the convict shall, as far as possible, be furnished such assistance as he may re1uest in order to be attended in his last moments by a priest or minister of the religion he professes and to consult his lawyers, as well as in order to ma-e a will and confer with members of his family or of persons in charge of the management of his business, of the administration of his property, or of the care of his descendants% SECTION 17. Suspension of the C)ecution of the =eath Sentence% H C)ecution by lethal injection shall not be inflicted upon a woman within the three years ne)t following the date of the sentence or while she is pregnant, nor upon any person over seventy >:*? years of age% In this latter case, the death sentence shall be commuted to the penalty of reclusion perpetua with the accessory penalties provided in Article 4* of the evised !enal "ode% SECTION 18. !lace of C)ecution% H &he e)ecution by lethal injection shall ta-e place in the prison establishment and space thereat as may be designated by the =irector% Said place shall be closed to public view% SECTION 19. C)ecution !rocedure% H =etails of the procedure prior to, during and after administering the lethal injection shall be set forth in a manual to be prepared by the =irector% &he manual shall contain details of, among others, the se1uence of events before and after the e)ecution; procedures in setting up the intravenous line; the administration of the lethal drugs; the pronouncement of death; and the removal of the intravenous system% Said manual shall be confidential and its distribution shall be limited to authori(ed prison personnel% SECTION 20. 3uantity and Safe-eeping of =rugs !urchased% H &he e)act 1uantities of the drugs needed for an e)ecution of a death penalty shall be purchased by the =irector pursuant to e)isting rules and regulations not earlier than ten >1*? days before the scheduled date of e)ecution% &he drugs shall be -ept securely at the office of the superintendent of the prison where the death sentence is to be e)ecuted% All unused drugs shall be inventoried and disposed of properly under the direct supervision of the =irector% SECTION 21. Administering ,ethal =rugs% H &he injection of the lethal drugs to a death convict shall be made by a person designated by the =irector% SECTION 22. Identity of !erson Administering ,ethal Injection% H &he identity of the person who is designated to administer the lethal injection shall be -ept secret% SECTION 23. !ersons 4ho 8ay 4itness C)ecution% H &he e)ecution of a death convict shall be witnessed only by the priest or minister assisting the offender and by his lawyers, and by his relatives, not e)ceeding si), if the convict so desires, by the physician and the necessary personnel of the penal establishment, and by such persons as the =irector may authori(e% A person below eighteen >17? years of age shall not be allowed to witness an e)ecution% SECTION 24. C)pulsion of 4itness% H Any person who ma-es unnecessary noise or displays rude or improper behavior during an e)ecution shall be e)pelled from the lethal injection chamber% SECTION 25. +on-ecording of C)ecution% H &he =irector shall not allow the visual, sound or other recording of the actual e)ecution by media or by any private person or group% SECTION 26. =isposition of "orpse of "onvict% H Anless claimed by his family, the corpse of a death convict shall, upon the completion of the legal proceedings subse1uent to the e)ecution, be turned over to an institution of learning or scientific research first applying for it, for the purpose of study and investigation, provided that such institution shall ta-e charge of the decent burial of the remains% .therwise, the =irector shall order the burial of the body of the convict at government e)pense, granting permission to be present thereat to the members of the family of the convict and the friends of the latter% In no case shall the burial of a death convict be held with pomp% SECTION 27. Cffectivity% H &hese ules shall ta-e effect fifteen >19? days after publication in a newspaper of general circulation% A!!.BC=% Adopted# April 07, 1<<: 1987 CONSTITUTION. S&$!on 19. 1. <-cessive fines shall not be imposed, nor cruel, de'radin' or inhuman punishment inflicted. Neither shall death penalt% be imposed, unless, for compellin' reasons involvin' heinous crimes, the Con'ress hereafter provides for it. An% death penalt% alread% imposed shall be reduced to reclusion perpetua. #. The emplo%ment of ph%sical, ps%cholo'ical, or de'radin' punishment a'ainst an% prisoner or detainee or the use of substandard or inade9uate penal facilities under subhuman conditions shall be dealt with b% law. RPC' A#. 12. Death. *ts accessory penalties! I The death penalt%, when it is not e-ecuted b% reason of commutation or pardon shall carr% with it that of perpetual absolute dis9ualification and that of civil interdiction durin' thirt% %ears followin' the date sentence, unless such accessor% penalties have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. RPC' A#. 17. *n #hat cases the eath penalty shall not be impose. I The death penalt% shall be imposed in all cases in which it must be imposed under e-istin' laws, e-cept in the followin' cases. 1. Ahen the 'uilt% person be more than sevent% %ears of a'e. #. Ahen upon appeal or revision of the case b% the $upreme court, all the members thereof are not unanimous in their votin' as to the propriet% of the imposition of the death penalt%. Cor the imposition of said penalt% or for the confirmation of a +ud'ment of the inferior court imposin' the death sentence, the $upreme Court shall render its decision per curiam, which shall be si'ned b% all +ustices of said court, unless some member or members thereof shall have been dis9ualified from ta/in' part in the consideration of the case, in which even the unanimous vote and si'nature of onl% the remainin' +ustices shall be re9uired. *a+orit% vote of the $C is re9uired for the imposition of the death penalt%. The 1:; Constitution suspended the imposition of the death penalt% but RA ;0!: restored it. )eath penalt% is not imposed in the followin' cases. a. Ahen the 'uilt% person is below 1 %ears of a'e at the time of the commission of the crime. b. Ahen the 'uilt% person is more than ;= %ears of a'e. c. Ahen upon appeal or automatic review of the case b% the $C, the vote of members is not obtained for the imposition of the death penalt%. The death penalt% is not e-cessive, un+ust or cruel within the meanin' of that word in the Constitution. Punishments are cruel when the% involve torture or lin'erin' death. RA #:0 providin' that ei'ht +ustices must concur in the imposition of death penalt% is retroactive. / viv Pa'e :# #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 Review b% the $C of the death sentence is absolutel% necessar%. 6n what crimes is death penalt% imposed. 1. Treason #. Pirac% 3. Qualified Pirac% >. Qualified briber% !. Parricide 0. *urder ;. 6nfanticide . Oidnappin' and serious ille'al detention :. Robber% with homicide 1=. )estructive arson 11. Rape with homicide 1#. Plunder 13. Certain violations of the )an'erous )ru's Act 1>. Carnappin' RPC' A#. 81. 0hen an ho# the eath penalty is to be execute! I The death sentence shall be e-ecuted with reference to an% other and shall consist in puttin' the person under sentence to death b% electrocution. The death sentence shall be e-ecuted under the authorit% of the )irector of Prisons, endeavorin' so far as possible to miti'ate the sufferin's of the person under sentence durin' electrocution as well as durin' the proceedin's prior to the e-ecution. 6f the person under sentence so desires, he shall be anaestheti4ed at the moment of the electrocution. )eath sentence shall be e-ecuted with preference to an% other penalt%. )eath sentence is e-ecuted b% lethal in+ection. The death sentence shall be carried out not earlier than 1 %ear nor later than 1 months after the +ud'ment becomes final and e-ecutor%, without pre+udice to the e-ercise b% the President of his e-ecutive clemenc% powers. A#. 8.. Notification an execution of the sentence an assistance to the culprit! I The court shall desi'nate a wor/in' da% for the e-ecution but not the hour thereofF and such desi'nation shall not be communicated to the offender before sunrise of said da%, and the e-ecution shall not ta/e place until after the e-piration of at least ei'ht hours followin' the notification, but before sunset. )urin' the interval between the notification and the e-ecution, the culprit shall, in so far as possible, be furnished such assistance as he ma% re9uest in order to be attended in his last moments b% priests or ministers of the reli'ion he professes and to consult law%ers, as well as in order to ma/e a will and confer with members of his famil% or persons in char'e of the mana'ement of his business, of the administration of his propert%, or of the care of his descendants. A convict sentenced to death ma% ma/e a will. A#. 8@. Suspension of the execution of the eath sentence. I The death sentence shall not be inflicted upon a woman within the three %ears ne-t followin' the date of the sentence or while she is pre'nant, nor upon an% person over sevent% %ears of a'e. 6n this last case, the death sentence shall be commuted to the penalt% of reclusion perpetua with the accessor% penalties provided in Article >=. )eath sentence shall be suspended when the accused is a. a. Aoman, while pre'nantF b. Aoman, within one %ear after deliver%F c. Person over ;= %ears of a'eF d. Convict who becomes insane after final sentence of death has been pronounced. Art. >; provides for cases in which death penalt% is not to be imposed. 2n the other hand, Art. 3 provides for suspension onl% of the e-ecution of death sentence. RTC can suspend e-ecution of death sentence. The records of the case shall be forwarded to the 2ffice of the President, when the death sentence has become final, for possible e-ercise of the pardonin' power. A#. 81. Place of execution an persons #ho may #itness the same! I The e-ecution shall ta/e place in the penitentiar% of (ilibid in a space closed to the public view and shall be witnessed onl% b% the priests assistin' the offender and b% his law%ers, and b% his relatives, not e-ceedin' si-, if he so re9uest, b% the ph%sician and the necessar% personnel of the penal establishment, and b% such persons as the )irector of Prisons ma% authori4e. The e-ecution shall ta/e place in the penitentiar% or (ilibid in a space closed to the public view. PERSONS WHO MAY WITNESS EGECUTIOND a. priests assistin' the offenderF b. offenderBs law%ersF c. offenderBs relatives, not e-ceedin' si-, if so re9uestedF d. ph%sician, and e. necessar% personnel of penal establishment a person below 1 %ears of a'e ma% not be allowed to witness an e-ecution. RPC' A#. 8(. Provisions relative to the corpse of the person execute an its burial. I 3nless claimed b% his famil%, the corpse of the culprit shall, upon the completion of the le'al proceedin's subse9uent to the e-ecution, be turned over to the institute of learnin' or scientific research first appl%in' for it, for the purpose of stud% and investi'ation, provided that such institute shall ta/e char'e of the decent burial of the remains. 2therwise, the )irector of Prisons shall order the burial of the bod% of the culprit at 'overnment e-pense, 'rantin' permission to be present thereat to the members of the famil% of the culprit and the friends of the latter. 6n no case shall the burial of the bod% of a person sentenced to death be held with pomp. The burial of the bod% of a person sentenced to death should not be held with pomp. ? The purpose of the law is to prevent an%one from ma/in' a hero out of a criminal. P&o*%& +. E$;&-,#,> (1990) Facts: <che'ara% was sentenced to death penalt% for rapin' his 1=?%ear@old dau'hter. 2n appeal, the accused claimed that the penalt% imposed b% the court is erroneous under RA ;0!: because he is neither / viv Pa'e :3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 a father, stepfather nor 'randfather of Rodessa althou'h he was a confirmed lover of the RodessaBs mother. Held: Ahere the accused is a confirmed lover of the victimBs mother, he falls s9uarel% within $ec. 11 of RA ;0!: under the term 5common?law spouse of the parent of the victim.7 Also, the fact that the victim referred to the accused as 5Papa7 is reason enou'h to conclude that the accused is either the farther or stepfather of the victim. E$;&-,#,> +. S&$#&,#> o8 7"s!$& (1999) Facts: 3pon conviction of <che'ara% in People v. <che'ara%, the $C temporaril% restrained the e-ecution of its own decision. The respondents claim that $C has no more +urisdiction over the case because +ud'ment has become final and it cannot restrain the e-ecution of its decision. Held: The rule on finalit% of +ud'ment cannot divest the $C of its +urisdiction to e-ecute and enforce the same +ud'ment. Notwithstandin' the order of e-ecution and the e-ecutor% nature thereof on the date set, the date can be postponed. The power to control the e-ecution of its decision is an essential aspect of +urisdiction @ supervenin' events ma% chan'e the circumstance of the parties and compel the courts to intervene and ad+ust the ri'hts of the liti'ants to prevent unfairness. The $C did not restrain the effectivit% of the law enacted b% the Con'ress. 6t merel% restrained the e-ecution of its +ud'ment to 'ive reasonable time to chec/ its fairness in li'ht of supervenin' events in Con'ress. P&o*%& +. Es*,#,s (1990) Facts: <sparas was char'ed with violation of RA 0>#! as amended b% RA ;!: for importin' into the countr% #=/' of shabu. As the accused remains at lar'e up to the present time, the issue that confronts the Court is whether or not it will proceed to automaticall% review her death sentence. Held: The reimposition of the death penalt% revived the procedure b% which the $upreme Court reviews death penalt% cases pursuant to the Rules of Court @ it remains automatic and continues to be mandator% and does not depend on the whims of the death convict and leaves the $C without an% option. An% court decision authori4in' the $tate to ta/e life must be as error?free as possible. 6t is not onl% within the power of the $C but also it is its dut% to review all death penalt% cases. $ec. of Rule 1#> of the Rules of Court which authori4es the dismissal of an appeal when the appellant +umps bail has no application to cases where the death penalt% has been imposed. P&o*%& +. M"noF (1989) Facts: 2f the 11 persons who were char'ed with murder, onl% > were identified and convicted. The% were held 'uilt% for /illin' 3 persons. Held: The advocates of the *asan'/a% rulin' ar'ue that the Constitution abolished the death penalt% and thereb% limited the penalt% for murder to the remainin' periods, to wit, the minimum and the medium. ,owever, a readin' of the Constitution will readil% show that there is reall% nothin' therein which e-pressl% declares the abolition of death penalt%. 6t merel% states that the death penalt% shall not be imposed unless for compellin' reasons involvin' heinous crimes the Con'ress hereafter provides for it and, if alread% imposed, shall be reduced to reclusion perpetua. The Constitution does not chan'e the periods of the penalt% prescribed b% Art. #> of the RPC, e-cept onl% in so far as it prohibits the imposition of the death penalt% and reduces it to reclusion perpetua. The ran'e of the medium and minimum penalties remains unchan'ed. The problem in an event is addressed not to this Court but to the Con'ress. A/o%!!on o8 ;& D&,; P&n,%> R&*"/%!$ A$ No. 9@10 P&o*%& +. Bon (.220) Held. Ket in truth, there is no material difference between 5imposition7 and 5application,7 for both terms embod% the operation in law of the death penalt%. $ince Article ;1 denominates 5death7 as an element in the 'raduated scale of penalties, there is no 9uestion that the operation of Article ;1 involves the actual ,**%!$,!on of the death penalt% as a means of determinin' the e-tent which a personBs libert% is to be deprived. $ince Rep. Act No. :3>0 une9uivocall% bars the application of the death penalt%, as well as e-pressl% repeals all such statutor% provisions re9uirin' the application of the death penalt%, such effect necessaril% e-tends to its relevance to the 'raduated scale of penalties under Article ;1. The court cannot find basis to conclude that Rep. Act No. :3>0 intended to retain the operative effects of the death penalt% in the 'raduation of the other penalties in our penal laws. *uno4 cannot en+oin us to adopt such conclusion. Rep. Act No. :3>0 is not swaddled in the same restraints appreciated b% *uNo4 on $ection 1:(1", Article 666. The ver% Con'ress empowered b% the Constitution to reinstate the imposition of the death penalt% once thou'ht it best to do so, throu'h Rep. Act No. ;0!=. Aithin the same realm of constitutional discretion, Con'ress has reversed itself. 6t must be asserted that toda%, the le'al status of the suppression of the death penalt% in the Philippines has never been more secure than at an% time in our political histor% as a nation. AFFLICTI)E PENALTIES A#. .7. Reclusion perpetua! I An% person sentenced to an% of the perpetual penalties shall be pardoned after under'oin' the penalt% for thirt% %ears, unless such person b% reason of his conduct or some other serious cause shall be considered b% the Chief <-ecutive as unworth% of pardon. Reclusion temporal. I The penalt% of reclusion temporal shall be from twelve %ears and one da% to twent% %ears. Prision mayor an temporary is-ualification. I The duration of the penalties of prision ma%or and temporar% dis9ualification shall be from si- %ears and one da% to twelve %ears, e-cept when the penalt% of dis9ualification is imposed as an accessor% penalt%, in which case its duration shall be that of the principal penalt%. A#. 11. Reclusion perpetua an reclusion temporal. "heir accessory penalties. I The penalties of reclusion perpetua and reclusion temporal shall carr% with them that of civil interdiction for life or durin' the period of the sentence as the case ma% be, and that of perpetual absolute dis9ualification which the offender shall suffer even thou'h pardoned as to the / viv Pa'e :> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 principal penalt%, unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. A#. 1.. Prision mayor. *ts accessory penalties! I The penalt% of prision ma%or, shall carr% with it that of temporar% absolute dis9ualification and that of perpetual special dis9ualification from the ri'ht of suffra'e which the offender shall suffer althou'h pardoned as to the principal penalt%, unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. RECLUSION PERPETUA D"#,!on. #= %ears and 1 da% to >= %ears A$$&sso#> P&n,%!&sD a. Civil interdiction for life or durin' the period of the sentence as the case ma% be. b. Perpetual Absolute )is9ualification which the offender shall suffer even thou'h pardoned as to the principal penalt%, unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. P&o*%& +. 6,9,#4 (1997) Facts: The accused was convicted of violatin' the )an'erous )ru's Act for unlawfull% importin' into the Philippines heroin. The trial court sentenced the accused to suffer the penalt% of imprisonment for 3! %ears of reclusion perpetua there bein' no a''ravatin' or miti'atin' circumstance shown to have attended in the commission of the crime. Held: As amended b% RA ;0!:, the penalt% of reclusion perpetua is now accorded a defined duration ran'in' from #= %ears and 1 da% to >= %ears. The Court held that in spite of the amendment puttin' the duration of RP, it should remain as an indivisible penalt% since there was never an intent on the part of Con'ress to reclassif% it into a divisible penalt%. The ma-imum duration of reclusion perpetua is not and has never been 3= %ears which is merel% the number of ears which the convict must serve in order to be eli'ible for pardon or for the application of the 3?fold rule. P&o*%& +. B,%%,/,#& (1990) Held: The trial court erred in imposin' the penalt% of life imprisonment for violation of P) 100. The crime of ille'al possession of firearm in its a''ravated form is punished b% the penalt% of death. $ince the offense was committed on $ep. 10, 1::=, at a time when the imposition of the death penalt% was prohibited, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree which is reclusion perpetua should be imposed. This is not e9uivalent to life imprisonment. Ahile life imprisonment ma% appear to be the <n'lish translation of reclusion perpetua, in realit%, it 'oes deeper than that. Reclusion Perpetua as indivisible penalty P&o*%& +. R,3!#&F (.221) Facts: (aNe4 invited 8o+o to a drin/in' spree in a nearb% store. The% sat side b% side a bench outside the store while e-chan'in' pleasantries and drin/in'. Ramire4 suddenl% came in front of them. Ramire4 ordered beer then he calml% approached and stabbed 8o+o which caused the latters death. The trial court sentenced appellant Lto suffer imprisonment of >= %ears reclusion perpetua.L Held: The $C disa'rees with the trial court in sentencin' appellant Lto suffer imprisonment of fort% (>=" %ears reclusion perpetua.L There was no +ustification or need for the trial court to specif% the len'th of imprisonment, because reclusion perpetua is an indivisible penalt%. The si'nificance of this fundamental principle was laid down b% the Court in People v. )i9uit. L$ince reclusion perpetua is an indivisible penalt%, it has no minimum, medium or ma-imum periods. 6t is imposed in its entiret% re'ardless of an% miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstances that ma% have attended the commission of the crime. (Art. 03, Revised Penal Code" Reclusion Perpetua is imprisonment for life but the person sentenced to suffer it shall be pardoned after under'oin' the penalt% for thirt% (3=" %ears, unless b% reason of his conduct or some other serious cause, he shall be considered b% the Chief <-ecutive as unworth% of pardon (Art. #;, Revised Penal Code".L LIFE IMPRISONMENT RECLUSION PERPETUA 6mposed for serious offenses penali4ed b% special laws Prescribed under the RPC )oes not carr% with it accessor% penalties Carries with it accessor% penalties )oes not appear to have an% definite e-tent or duration <ntails imprisonment for at least 3= %ears after which the convict becomes eli'ible for pardon althou'h the ma-imum period shall in no case e-ceed >= %ears RECLUSION TEMPORAL D"#,!onD 1# %ears and 1 da% to #= %ears A$$&sso#> P&n,%!&sD a. Civil interdiction for life or durin' the period of the sentence as the case ma% be. b. Perpetual Absolute )is9ualification which the offender shall suffer even thou'h pardoned as to the principal penalt%, unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. PRISION MAYOR D"#,!onD 0 %ears and 1 da% to 1# %ears A$$&sso#> P&n,%!&sD a. Temporar% Absolute )is9ualification b. Perpetual $pecial )is9ualification from the ri'ht to suffra'e which the offender shall suffer althou'h pardoned as to the principal penalt% unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. CORRECCIONAL PENALTIES A#. .7 (1). Prision correccional& suspension& an estierro! I The duration of the penalties of prision correccional, suspension and destierro shall be from si- months and one da% to si- %ears, e-cept when suspension is imposed as an accessor% penalt%, in which case, its duration shall be that of the principal penalt%. $rresto mayor! I The duration of the penalt% of arresto ma%or shall be from one month and one da% to si- months. / viv Pa'e :! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 A#. @9. Subsiiary penalty. I 6f the convict has no propert% with which to meet the fine mentioned in the para'raph 3 of the nest precedin' article, he shall be sub+ect to a subsidiar% personal liabilit% at the rate of one da% for each ei'ht pesos, sub+ect to the followin' rules. 1. 6f the principal penalt% imposed be prision correccional or arresto and fine, he shall remain under confinement until his fine referred to in the precedin' para'raph is satisfied, but his subsidiar% imprisonment shall not e-ceed one?third of the term of the sentence, and in no case shall it continue for more than one %ear, and no fraction or part of a da% shall be counted a'ainst the prisoner. #. Ahen the principal penalt% imposed be onl% a fine, the subsidiar% imprisonment shall not e-ceed si- months, if the culprit shall have been prosecuted for a 'rave or less 'rave felon%, and shall not e-ceed fifteen da%s, if for a li'ht felon%. 3. Ahen the principal imposed is hi'her than prision correccional, no subsidiar% imprisonment shall be imposed upon the culprit. >. 6f the principal penalt% imposed is not to be e-ecuted b% confinement in a penal institution, but such penalt% is of fi-ed duration, the convict, durin' the period of time established in the precedin' rules, shall continue to suffer the same deprivations as those of which the principal penalt% consists. !. The subsidiar% personal liabilit% which the convict ma% have suffered b% reason of his insolvenc% shall not relieve him, from the fine in case his financial circumstances should improve. (As amended b% RA !>0!, April #1, 1:0:". A#. 1@. Prision correccional. *ts accessory penalties. I The penalt% of prision correccional shall carr% with it that of suspension from public office, from the ri'ht to follow a profession or callin', and that of perpetual special dis9ualification from the ri'ht of suffra'e, if the duration of said imprisonment shall e-ceed ei'hteen months. The offender shall suffer the dis9ualification provided in the article althou'h pardoned as to the principal penalt%, unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. A#. 11. $rresto- 4ts accessory penalties. I The penalt% of arresto shall carr% with it that of suspension of the ri'ht too hold office and the ri'ht of suffra'e durin' the term of the sentence. PRISION CORRECCIONAL D"#,!onD 0 months and 1 da% to 0 %ears A$$&sso#> P&n,%!&sD a. $uspension from public office b. $uspension from the ri'ht to follow a profession or callin' c. Perpetual $pecial )is9ualification fro the ri'ht of suffra'e, if the duration of the imprisonment shall e-ceed 1 months ARRESTO MAYOR D"#,!onD 1 month and 1 da% to 0 months A$$&sso#> P&n,%!&sD a. $uspension of ri'ht to hold office b. $uspension of the ri'ht of suffra'e durin' the term of the sentence. LI6HT PENALTIES A#. .7 (0). $rresto menor! I The duration of the penalt% of arresto menor shall be from one da% to thirt% da%s. A#. @9. Subsiiary penalty. I 6f the convict has no propert% with which to meet the fine mentioned in the para'raph 3 of the nest precedin' article, he shall be sub+ect to a subsidiar% personal liabilit% at the rate of one da% for each ei'ht pesos, sub+ect to the followin' rules. 1. 6f the principal penalt% imposed be prision correccional or arresto and fine, he shall remain under confinement until his fine referred to in the precedin' para'raph is satisfied, but his subsidiar% imprisonment shall not e-ceed one?third of the term of the sentence, and in no case shall it continue for more than one %ear, and no fraction or part of a da% shall be counted a'ainst the prisoner. #. Ahen the principal penalt% imposed be onl% a fine, the subsidiar% imprisonment shall not e-ceed si- months, if the culprit shall have been prosecuted for a 'rave or less 'rave felon%, and shall not e-ceed fifteen da%s, if for a li'ht felon%. 3. Ahen the principal imposed is hi'her than prision correccional, no subsidiar% imprisonment shall be imposed upon the culprit. >. 6f the principal penalt% imposed is not to be e-ecuted b% confinement in a penal institution, but such penalt% is of fi-ed duration, the convict, durin' the period of time established in the precedin' rules, shall continue to suffer the same deprivations as those of which the principal penalt% consists. !. The subsidiar% personal liabilit% which the convict ma% have suffered b% reason of his insolvenc% shall not relieve him, from the fine in case his financial circumstances should improve. (As amended b% RA !>0!, April #1, 1:0:". A#. 11. $rresto. 4ts accessory penalties. I The penalt% of arresto shall carr% with it that of suspension of the ri'ht too hold office and the ri'ht of suffra'e durin' the term of the sentence. ARRESTO MENOR D"#,!onD 1 da% to 3= da%s A$$&sso#> P&n,%!&sD a. $uspension of ri'ht to hold office b. $uspension of the ri'ht of suffra'e durin' the term of the sentence. PUBLIC CENSURE Censure, bein' a penalt% is not proper in ac9uittal. PENALTIES COMMON TO AFFLICTI)E' CORRECCIONAL AND LI6HT PENALTIES FINE A#. .0. 0hen afflictive& correctional& or light penalty. I A fine, whether imposed as a sin'le of as an alternative penalt%, shall be considered an afflictive penalt%, if it e-ceeds 0,=== pesosF a correctional penalt%, if it does not e-ceed 0,=== pesos / viv Pa'e :0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 but is not less than #== pesosF and a li'ht penalt% if it less than #== pesos. This article merel% classifies fine and has nothin' to do with the definition of li'ht felon%. Cine is. 1. Afflictive @ over P0,=== #. Correctional @ P#== to P0,=== 3. &i'ht Penalt% @ less than P#== A#. 00. *mposition of fines! I 6n imposin' fines the courts ma% fi- an% amount within the limits established b% lawF in fi-in' the amount in each case attention shall be 'iven, not onl% to the miti'atin' and a''ravatin' circumstances, but more particularl% to the wealth or means of the culprit. The court can fi- an% amount of the fine within the limits established b% law. The court must consider. a. The miti'atin' and a''ravatin' circumstancesF and b. *ore particularl%, the wealth or means of the culprit. Ahen the law does not fi- the minimum of the fine, the determination of the amount of the fine to be imposed upon the culprit is left to the sound discretion of the court, provided it shall not e-ceed the ma-imum authori4ed b% law. Cines are not divided into 3 e9ual portions. BOND TO CEEP THE PEACE A#. @(. Effects of bon to %eep the peace! I 6t shall be the dut% of an% person sentenced to 'ive bond to /eep the peace, to present two sufficient sureties who shall underta/e that such person will not commit the offense sou'ht to be prevented, and that in case such offense be committed the% will pa% the amount determined b% the court in the +ud'ment, or otherwise to deposit such amount in the office of the cler/ of the court to 'uarantee said underta/in'. The court shall determine, accordin' to its discretion, the period of duration of the bond. $hould the person sentenced fail to 'ive the bond as re9uired he shall be detained for a period which shall in no case e-ceed si- months, is he shall have been prosecuted for a 'rave or less 'rave felon%, and shall not e-ceed thirt% da%s, if for a li'ht felon%. The offender must present # sufficient sureties who shall underta/e that the offender will not commit the offense sou'ht to be prevented, and that in case such offense be committed the% will pa% the amount determined b% the courtF or The offender must deposit such amount with the cler/ of court to 'uarantee said underta/in'F or The offender ma% be detained, if he cannot 'ive the bond, for a period not to e-ceed 0 months if prosecuted for gra!e or less gra!e felony# or for a period not to e-ceed 3= da%s, if for a light felony. (ond to /eep the peace is different from bail bon which is posted for the provisional release of a person arrested for or accused of a crime. D. ACCESSORY PENALTIES A#. @2. Effects of the penalties of perpetual or temporary absolute is-ualification. I The penalties of perpetual or temporar% absolute dis9ualification for public office shall produce the followin' effects. 1. The deprivation of the public offices and emplo%ments which the offender ma% have held even if conferred b% popular election. #. The deprivation of the ri'ht to vote in an% election for an% popular office or to be elected to such office. 3. The dis9ualification for the offices or public emplo%ments and for the e-ercise of an% of the ri'hts mentioned. 6n case of temporar% dis9ualification, such dis9ualification as is comprised in para'raphs # and 3 of this article shall last durin' the term of the sentence. >. The loss of all ri'hts to retirement pa% or other pension for an% office formerl% held. A#. @1. Effect of the penalties of perpetual or temporary special is-ualification. I The penalties of perpetual or temporal special dis9ualification for public office, profession or callin' shall produce the followin' effects. 1. The deprivation of the office, emplo%ment, profession or callin' affectedF #. The dis9ualification for holdin' similar offices or emplo%ments either perpetuall% or durin' the term of the sentence accordin' to the e-tent of such dis9ualification. A#. @.. Effect of the penalties of perpetual or temporary special is-ualification for the exercise of the right of suffrage! I The perpetual or temporar% special dis9ualification for the e-ercise of the ri'ht of suffra'e shall deprive the offender perpetuall% or durin' the term of the sentence, accordin' to the nature of said penalt%, of the ri'ht to vote in an% popular election for an% public office or to be elected to such office. *oreover, the offender shall not be permitted to hold an% public office durin' the period of his dis9ualification. A#. @@. Effects of the penalties of suspension from any public office& profession or calling& or the right of suffrage! I The suspension from public office, profession or callin', and the e-ercise of the ri'ht of suffra'e shall dis9ualif% the offender from holdin' such office or e-ercisin' such profession or callin' or ri'ht of suffra'e durin' the term of the sentence. The person suspended from holdin' public office shall not hold another havin' similar functions durin' the period of his suspension. A#. @1. Civil interiction. I Civil interdiction shall deprive the offender durin' the time of his sentence of the ri'hts of parental authorit%, or 'uardianship, either as to the person or propert% of an% ward, of marital authorit%, of the ri'ht to mana'e his propert% and of the ri'ht to dispose of such propert% b% an% act or an% conve%ance inter vivos. A#. 11. Reclusion perpetua an reclusion temporal. "heir accessory penalties! I The penalties of reclusion perpetua and reclusion temporal shall carr% with them that of civil interdiction for life or durin' the period of the sentence as the case ma% be, and that of perpetual absolute dis9ualification which the offender shall suffer even thou'h pardoned as to the / viv Pa'e :; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 principal penalt%, unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. A#. 1.. Prision mayor. *ts accessory penalties! I The penalt% of prision ma%or, shall carr% with it that of temporar% absolute dis9ualification and that of perpetual special dis9ualification from the ri'ht of suffra'e which the offender shall suffer althou'h pardoned as to the principal penalt%, unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. A#. 1@. Prision correccional. *ts accessory penalties. I The penalt% of prision correccional shall carr% with it that of suspension from public office, from the ri'ht to follow a profession or callin', and that of perpetual special dis9ualification from the ri'ht of suffra'e, if the duration of said imprisonment shall e-ceed ei'hteen months. The offender shall suffer the dis9ualification provided in the article althou'h pardoned as to the principal penalt%, unless the same shall have been e-pressl% remitted in the pardon. A#. 11. $rresto. *ts accessory penalties! I The penalt% of arresto shall carr% with it that of suspension of the ri'ht to hold office and the ri'ht of suffra'e durin' the term of the sentence. A#. 1(. Confiscation an forfeiture of the procees or instruments of the crime! I <ver% penalt% imposed for the commission of a felon% shall carr% with it the forfeiture of the proceeds of the crime and the instruments or tools with which it was committed. $uch proceeds and instruments or tools shall be confiscated and forfeited in favor of the 1overnment, unless the% be propert% of a third person not liable for the offense, but those articles which are not sub+ect of lawful commerce shall be destro%ed. PERPETUAL OR TEMPORARY ABSOLUTE DISBUALIFICATION E88&$sD a. )eprivation of an% public office or emplo%ment f offender b. )eprivation of the ri'ht to vote in an% election or to be voted upon c. &oss of ri'hts to retirement pa% or pension All these effects last durin' the lifetime of the convict and even after the service of the sentence e-cept as re'ards para'raphs # and 3 of the above in connection with temporar% absolute dis9ualification. PERPETUAL OR TEMPORARY SPECIAL DISBUALIFICATION E88&$sD For public office# profession or calling: a. )eprivation of the office, emplo%ment, profession or callin' affectedF b. )is9ualification for holdin' similar offices or emplo%ments durin' the period of dis9ualificationF For the exercise of right to suffrage: c. )eprivation of the ri'ht to vote or to be elected in an officeF d. Cannot hold an% public office durin' the period of dis9ualification The penalt% for dis9ualification if imposed as an accessor% penalt% is imposed for PR2T<CT62N and N2T for the withholdin' of a privile'e. Temporar% dis9ualification or suspension if imposed as an accessor% penalt%, the duration is the same as that of the principal penalt%. SUSPENSION FROM PUBLIC OFFICE' THE RI6HT TO )OTE AND BE )OTED FOR' THE RI6HT TO PRACTICE A PROFESSION OR CALLIN6 E88&$sD a. )is9ualification from holdin' such office or the e-ercise of such profession or ri'ht of suffra'e durin' the term of the sentenceF b. Cannot hold another office havin' similar functions durin' the period of suspension. CI)IL INTERDICTION E88&$sD )eprivation of the followin' ri'hts. 1" Parental authorit% #" 1uardianship over the ward 3" *arital authorit% >" Ri'ht to mana'e propert% and to dispose of the same b% acts inter vivos Civil interdiction is an accessor% penalt% to the followin' principal penalties. a" )eath if commuted to life imprisonmentF b" Reclusion perpetua c" Reclusion temporal INDEMNIFICATION OR CONFISCATION OF INSTRUMENTS ORPROCEES OF THEOFFENSE This is included in ever% penalt% for the commission of the crime. The confiscation is in favor of the 'overnment. Propert% of a third person not liable for the offense is not sub+ect to confiscation. 6f the trial court did not order an% confiscation of the procees of the crime, the 'overnment cannot appeal from the confiscation as that would increase the penalt% alread% imposed. PAYMENT OF COSTS 6ncludes. a. Cees, and b. 6ndemnities, in the course of +udicial proceedin's. Costs ma% be fi-ed amounts alread% determined b% law or re'ulations or amounts sub+ect to a schedule. 6f the accused is convictedF costs ma% be char'ed a'ainst him. 6f he is ac9uitted, costs are de officio# meanin' each part% bears his own e-pense. E. MEASURES NOT CONSIDERED PENALTY RPC' A#. .1. )easures of prevention or safety #hich are nor consiere penalties. I The followin' shall not be considered as penalties. 1. The arrest and temporar% detention of accused persons, as well as their detention b% reason of / viv Pa'e : #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 insanit% or imbecilit%, or illness re9uirin' their confinement in a hospital. #. The commitment of a minor to an% of the institutions mentioned in Article = and for the purposes specified therein. 3. $uspension from the emplo%ment of public office durin' the trial or in order to institute proceedin's. >. Cines and other corrective measures which, in the e-ercise of their administrative disciplinar% powers, superior officials ma% impose upon their subordinates. !. )eprivation of ri'hts and the reparations which the civil laws ma% establish in penal form. The% are not penalties because the% are not imposed as a result of +udicial proceedin's. Those mentioned in par. 3 and > are merel% preventive measures before conviction of offenders. The commitment of a minor mentioned in par. # is not a penalt% because it is not imposed b% the court in a +ud'ment of conviction. The imposition of the sentence in such case is suspended. The succeedin' provisions are some e-amples of deprivation of ri'hts established in penal form. F,3!%> Co4&' A#. ..8. Parental authorit% terminates permanentl%. (1" 3pon the death of the parentsF (#" 3pon the death of the childF or (3" 3pon emancipation of the child. (3#;a" F,3!%> Co4&' A#. ..9. 3nless subse9uentl% revived b% a final +ud'ment, parental authorit% also terminates. (1" 3pon adoption of the childF (#" 3pon appointment of a 'eneral 'uardianF (3" 3pon +udicial declaration of abandonment of the child in a case filed for the purposeF (>" 3pon final +ud'ment of a competent court divestin' the part% concerned of parental authorit%F or (!" 3pon +udicial declaration of absence or incapacit% of the person e-ercisin' parental authorit%. (3#;a" F. APPLICATION AND COMPUTATION OF PENALTIES A#. .8. Computation of penalties. I 6f the offender shall be in prison, the term of the duration of the temporar% penalties shall be computed from the da% on which the +ud'ment of conviction shall have become final. 6f the offender be not in prison, the term of the duration of the penalt% consistin' of deprivation of libert% shall be computed from the da% that the offender is placed at the disposal of the +udicial authorities for the enforcement of the penalt%. The duration of the other penalties shall be computed onl% from the da% on which the defendant commences to serve his sentence. R"%&s 8o# ;& $o3*",!on o8 *&n,%!&sD 1. ;H15 ,H1 'FF15D1R 4S 45 PR4S'5 @ the duration of temporar% penalties is from the da% on which the +ud'ment of conviction becomes final. #. ;H15 ,H1 'FF15D1R 4S 5', 45 PR4S'5 @ the duration of penalt% consistin' in deprivation of libert%, is from the da% that the offender is placed at the disposal of +udicial authorities for the enforcement of the penalt%. 3. ,H1 D)R/,4'5 'F ',H1R P15/3,41S @ the duration is from the da% on which the offender commences to serve his sentence E:,3*%&s o8 &3*o#,#> *&n,%!&sD 1. Temporar% absolute dis9ualification #. Temporar% special dis9ualification 3. $uspension 6f offender is under detention, as when he is under'oin' preventive imprisonment, Rule No. 1 applies. 6f not under detention, because the offender has been released on bail, Rule No. 3 applies. E:,3*%&s o8 *&n,%!&s $ons!s!n- !n 4&*#!+,!on o8 %!/&#>D 1. 6mprisonment #. )estierro Ahen the offender is not in prison, Rule No. # applies. 6f the offender is under'oin' preventive imprisonment, Rule No. 3 applies but the offender is entitled to a deduction of full time or >D! of the time of his detention. A#. .9. Perio of preventive imprisonment eucte from term of imprisonment! I 2ffenders who have under'one preventive imprisonment shall be credited in the service of their sentence consistin' of deprivation of libert%, with the full time durin' which the% have under'one preventive imprisonment, if the detention prisoner a'rees voluntaril% in writin' to abide b% the same disciplinar% rules imposed upon convicted prisoners, e-cept in the followin' cases. 1. Ahen the% are recidivists or have been convicted previousl% twice or more times of an% crimeF and #. Ahen upon bein' summoned for the e-ecution of their sentence the% have failed to surrender voluntaril%. 6f the detention prisoner does not a'ree to abide b% the same disciplinar% rules imposed upon convicted prisoners, he shall be credited in the service of his sentence with four?fifths of the time durin' which he has under'one preventive imprisonment. (As amended b% Republic Act 01#;, 8une 1;, 1:;=". Ahenever an accused has under'one preventive imprisonment for a period e9ual to or more than the possible ma-imum imprisonment of the offense char'ed to which he ma% be sentenced and his case is not %et terminated, he shall be released immediatel% without pre+udice to the continuation of the trial thereof or the proceedin' on appeal, if the same is under review. 6n case the ma-imum penalt% to which the accused ma% be sentenced is destierro, he shall be released after thirt% (3=" da%s of preventive imprisonment. (As amended b% <.2. No. #1>, 8ul% 1=, 1:". The accused under'oes preventive imprisonment when the offense char'ed is nonbailable, or even if bailable, he cannot furnish the re9uired bail. The convict is to be released immediatel% if the penalt% imposed after trial is less than the full time or four?fifths of the time of the preventive imprisonment. / viv Pa'e :: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 The accused shall be released immediatel% whenever he has under'one preventive imprisonment for a period e9ual to or more than the possible ma-imum imprisonment for the offense char'ed. A#. 10. Penalty to be impose upon principals in general! I The penalt% prescribed b% law for the commission of a felon% shall be imposed upon the principals in the commission of such felon%. Ahenever the law prescribes a penalt% for a felon% is 'eneral terms, it shall be understood as applicable to the consummated felon%. 6ENERAL RULED The penalt% prescribed b% law in 'eneral terms shall be imposed. a. 3pon the principals b. Cor consummated felon% EGCEPTIOND The e-ception is when the penalt% to be imposed upon the principal in frustrated or attempted felon% is fi-ed b% law. Ahenever it is believed that the penalt% lower b% one or two de'rees correspondin' to said acts of e-ecution is not in proportion to the wron' done, the law fi-es a distinct penalt% for the principal in frustrated or attempted felon%. The 'raduation of penalties b% de'rees refers to $TA1<$ 2C <H<C3T62N (consummated, frustrated or attempted" and to the )<1R<< 2C T,< CR6*6NA& PART6C6PAT62N 2C T,< 2CC<N)<R (whether as principal, accomplice or accessor%" The division of a divisible penalt% into three periods, as ma-imum, medium and minimum, refers to the proper period of the penalt% which should be imposed when a''ravatin' or miti'atin' circumstances attend the commission of the crime. P&o*%& +. Fo#3!-on&s (19(2) Facts: The accused without a previous 9uarrel or provocation too/ his bolo and stabbed his wife in the bac/ resultin' to the latterBs death. The accused was sentenced to the penalt% of reclusion perpetua. Held: The penalt% applicable for parricide under Art. #>0 of the RPC is composed onl% of # indivisible penalties, reclusion perpetua to death. Althou'h the commission of the act is attended b% some miti'atin' circumstance without an% a''ravatin' circumstance to offset them, Art. 03 of the RPC should be applied. The said article provides that when the commission of the act is attended b% some miti'atin' circumstance and there is no a''ravatin' circumstance, the lesser penalt% shall be applied. PRINCIPALS' ACCOMPLICES AND ACCESSORIES IN CONSUMMATED' FRUSTRATED AND ATTEMPTED FELONIES. A#. 10. Penalty to be impose upon principals in general! I The penalt% prescribed b% law for the commission of a felon% shall be imposed upon the principals in the commission of such felon%. Ahenever the law prescribes a penalt% for a felon% is 'eneral terms, it shall be understood as applicable to the consummated felon%. A#. (2. Penalty to be impose upon principals of a frustrate crime! I The penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree than that prescribed b% law for the consummated felon% shall be imposed upon the principal in a frustrated felon%. Art. !1. Penalty to be imposed upon principals of attempted crimes. I A penalt% lower b% two de'rees than that prescribed b% law for the consummated felon% shall be imposed upon the principals in an attempt to commit a felon%. A#. (.. Penalty to be impose upon accomplices in consummate crime! I The penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree than that prescribed b% law for the consummated shall be imposed upon the accomplices in the commission of a consummated felon%. A#. (@. Penalty to be impose upon accessories to the commission of a consummate felony! I The penalt% lower b% two de'rees than that prescribed b% law for the consummated felon% shall be imposed upon the accessories to the commission of a consummated felon%. A#. (1. Penalty to impose upon accomplices in a frustrate crime! I The penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree than prescribed b% law for the frustrated felon% shall be imposed upon the accomplices in the commission of a frustrated felon%. A#. ((. Penalty to be impose upon accessories of a frustrate crime! I The penalt% lower b% two de'rees than that prescribed b% law for the frustrated felon% shall be imposed upon the accessories to the commission of a frustrated felon%. A#. (0. Penalty to be impose upon accomplices in an attempte crime! I The penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree than that prescribed b% law for an attempt to commit a felon% shall be imposed upon the accomplices in an attempt to commit the felon%. A#. (7. Penalty to be impose upon accessories of an attempte crime! I The penalt% lower b% two de'rees than that prescribed b% law for the attempted felon% shall be imposed upon the accessories to the attempt to commit a felon%. DIA6RAM OF THE APPLICATION OF ARTS. (2=(7D CONSMMA#ED FRS#RA#ED A##EMP#ED PR"NC"PA!S = 1 # ACCOMP!"CES 1 # 3 ACCESSOR"ES # 3 > 5=7 represents the penalt% prescribed b% law in definin' a crime, which is to be imposed n the PR6NC6PA& in a C2N$3**AT<) 2CC<N$<, in accordance with the provisions of Art. >0. The other fi'ures represent the de'rees to which the penalt% must be lowered, to meet the different situation anticipated b% law. EGCEPTIONSD Arts. != to !; shall not appl% to cases where the law e-pressl% prescribes the penalt% for frustrated or attempted felon%, or to be imposed upon accomplices or accessories. / viv Pa'e 1== #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 BASES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE EGTENT OF PENALTYD 1. The sta'e reached b% the crime in its development (either attempted, frustrated or consummated" #. The participation therein of the person liable. 3. The a''ravatin' or miti'atin' circumstances which attended the commission of the crime. A DE6REE is one entire penalt%, one whole penalt% or one unit of the penalties enumerated in the 'raduated scales provided for in Art. ;1. <ach of the penalties of reclusion perpetua, reclusion temporal, prision ma%or, etc., enumerated in the 'raduated scales of Art. ;1 is a de'ree. Ahen there is a miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstance, the penalt% is lowered or increased b% P<R62) onl%, e-cept when the penalt% is divisible and there are two or more miti'atin' and without a''ravatin' circumstances, in which case the penalt% is lowered b% de'ree. A PERIOD is one of the three e9ual portions called the minimum, medium and ma-imum of a divisible penalt%. A#. 02. Exception to the rules establishe in $rticles >G to >H. I The provisions contained in Articles != to !;, inclusive, of this Code shall not be applicable to cases in which the law e-pressl% prescribes the penalt% provided for a frustrated or attempted felon%, or to be imposed upon accomplices or accessories. Arts. != to !; shall not appl% to cases where the law e-pressl% prescribes the penalt% for frustrated or attempted felon%, or to be imposed upon accomplices or accessories. 6ENERAL RULE. An accomplice is punished b% a penalt% one de'ree lower than the penalt% imposed upon the principal. EGCEPTIONSD a. The ascendants, 'uardians, curators, teachers and an% person who b% abuse of authorit% or confidential relationship, shall cooperate as accomplices in the crimes of rape, acts of lasciviousness, seduction, corruption of minors, white slate trade or abduction. (Art. 3>0" b. 2ne who furnished the place for the perpetration of the crime of sli'ht ille'al detention. (Art. #0" 6ENERAL RULE. An accessor% is punished b% a penalt% two de'rees lower than the penalt% imposed upon the principal. EGCEPTION. Ahen accessor% is punished as principal @ /nowin'l% concealin' certain evil practices is ordinaril% an act of the accessor%, but in Art. 1>#, such act is punished as the act of the principal. Ahen accessories are punished with a penalt% one de'ree lower. a. Onowin'l% usin' counterfeited seal or for'ed si'nature or stamp of the President (Art. 10#". b. 6lle'al possession and use of a false treasur% or ban/ note (Art. 10". c. 3sin' falsified document (Art. 1;3 par.3 " d. 3sin' falsified dispatch (Art. 1;3 par. #" A#. 01. Rules for grauating penalties! I Cor the purpose of 'raduatin' the penalties which, accordin' to the provisions of Articles != to !;, inclusive, of this Code, are to be imposed upon persons 'uilt% as principals of an% frustrated or attempted felon%, or as accomplices or accessories, the followin' rules shall be observed. 1. Ahen the penalt% prescribed for the felon% is sin'le and indivisible, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'rees shall be that immediatel% followin' that indivisible penalt% in the respective 'raduated scale prescribed in Article ;1 of this Code. #. Ahen the penalt% prescribed for the crime is composed of two indivisible penalties, or of one or more divisible penalties to be impose to their full e-tent, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree shall be that immediatel% followin' the lesser of the penalties prescribed in the respective 'raduated scale. 3. Ahen the penalt% prescribed for the crime is composed of one or two indivisible penalties and the ma-imum period of another divisible penalt%, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree shall be composed of the medium and minimum periods of the proper divisible penalt% and the ma-imum periods of the proper divisible penalt% and the ma-imum period of that immediatel% followin' in said respective 'raduated scale. >. when the penalt% prescribed for the crime is composed of several periods, correspondin' to different divisible penalties, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree shall be composed of the period immediatel% followin' the minimum prescribed and of the two ne-t followin', which shall be ta/en from the penalt% prescribed, if possibleF otherwise from the penalt% immediatel% followin' in the above mentioned respective 'raduated scale. !. Ahen the law prescribes a penalt% for a crime in some manner not especiall% provided for in the four precedin' rules, the courts, proceedin' b% analo'%, shall impose correspondin' penalties upon those 'uilt% as principals of the frustrated felon%, or of attempt to commit the same, and upon accomplices and accessories. This article provides for the rules to be observed in lowerin' the penalt% b% one or two de'rees. a. Cor the principal in frustrated felon% @ one de'ree lowerF b. Cor the principal in attempted felon% @ two de'rees lowerF c. Cor the accomplice in consummated felon% @ one de'ree lowerF and d. Cor the accessor% in consummated felon% @ two de'rees lower. The rules provided for in Art. 01 should also appl% in determinin' the *6N6*3* of the indeterminate penalt% under the 6ndeterminate $entence &aw. The *6N6*3* of the indeterminate penalt% is within the ran'e of the penalt% next lower than that prescribed b% the RPC for the offense. Those rules also appl% in lowerin' the penalt% b% one or two de'rees b% reason of the presence of pri!ileged miti'atin' circumstance (Arts. 0 and 0:", or when the penalt% is divisible and there are two or more miti'atin' circumstances ('eneric" and no a''ravatin' circumstance (Art. 0>". The lower penalt% shall be ta/en from the 'raduated scale in Art. ;1. The INDI)ISIBLE PENALTIES are. a. death b. reclusion perpetua / viv Pa'e 1=1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 c. public censure The DI)ISIBLE PENALTIES are. a. reclusion temporal b. prision ma%or c. prision correccional d. arresto ma%or e. destierro f. arresto menor G the divisible penalties are divided into three periods. *6N6*3*, *<)63* AN) T,< *AH6*3* RULESD FIRST RULED Ahen the penalt% is sin'le and indivisible. <-. reclusion perpetua The penalt% immediatel% followin' it is reclusion temporal. Thus, reclusion temporal is the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree. SECOND RULED Ahen the penalt% is composed of two indivisible penalties <-. reclusion perpetua to death The penalt% immediatel% followin' the lesser of the penalties, which is reclusion perpetua, is reclusion temporal. Ahen the penalt% is composed of one or more divisible penalties to be imposed to their full e-tent <-. prision correccional to prision mayor The penalt% immediatel% followin' the lesser of the penalties of prision correccional to prision mayor is arresto mayor. THIRD RULED Ahen the penalt% is composed of two indivisible penalties and the ma-imum period of a divisible penalt% <-. reclusion temporal in its *AH6*3* period to death )eath Penalt% for the principal in consummated murder Reclusion Perpetua Reclusion ,emporal *a-imum *edium Penalt% for accompliceF or for principal in frustrated murder *inimum Prision +ayor *a-imum *edium *inimum Ahen the penalt% is composed of one indivisible penalt% and the ma-imum period of a divisible penalt% <-. Reclusion temporal in its *AH6*3* period to Reclusion perpetua The same rule shall be observed in lowerin' the penalt% b% one or two de'rees. FOURTH RULED Ahen the penalt% is composed of several periods ? This rule contemplates a penalt% composed of at least 3 periods. The several periods must correspond to different divisible penalties. <-. Prision +ayor in its *<)63* period to Reclusion temporal in its *6N6*3* period. Reclusion temporal *a-imum *edium *inimum Penalt% for the principal in the consummated felon% Prision *a-imum +ayor *edium *inimum Penalt% for the accompliceF or principal in frustrated felon% Prision Correccional *a-imum *edium *inimum FIFTH RULED Ahen the penalt% has two periods <-. Prision correccional in its *6N6*3* and *<)63* periods Prision correccional *a-imum *edium The penalt% prescribed for the felon% *inimum /rresto +ayor *a-imum The penalt% ne-t lower *edium *inimum Ahen the penalt% has one period ? 6f the penalt% is an% one of the three periods of a divisible penalt%, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree shall be that period ne-t followin' the 'iven penalt%. <-. Prision +ayor in its *AH6*3* period The penalt% immediatel% inferior is prision mayor in its *<)63* period. SIMPLIFIED RULESD The rules prescribed in pars. > and ! of Art. 01 ma% be simplified as follows. 1. 6f the penalt% prescribed b% the Code consists in 3 periods, correspondin' to different divisible penalties, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree is the penalt% consistin' in the 3 periods down in the scale. #. 6f the penalt% prescribed b the Code consists in # periods, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree is the penalt% consistin' in # periods down in the scale. 3. 6f the penalt% prescribed b% the Code consists in onl% 1 period, the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree is the ne-t period down in the scale. EFFECTS OF MITI6ATIN6 AND A66RA)ATIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES A#. 0.. Effect of the attenance of mitigating or aggravating circumstances an of habitual elin-uency. I *iti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstances and habitual delin9uenc% shall be ta/en into account for the purpose of diminishin' or increasin' the penalt% in conformit% with the followin' rules. 1. A''ravatin' circumstances which in themselves constitute a crime speciall% punishable b% law or which are included b% the law in definin' a crime and prescribin' the penalt% therefor shall not be ta/en into account for the purpose of increasin' the penalt%. #. The same rule shall appl% with respect to an% a''ravatin' circumstance inherent in the crime to such a de'ree that it must of necessit% accompan% the commission thereof. 3. A''ravatin' or miti'atin' circumstances which arise from the moral attributes of the offender, or from his private relations with the offended part%, or from an% other personal cause, shall onl% serve to a''ravate or miti'ate the liabilit% of the principals, accomplices and accessories as to whom such circumstances are attendant. / viv Pa'e 1=# #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 >. The circumstances which consist in the material e-ecution of the act, or in the means emplo%ed to accomplish it, shall serve to a''ravate or miti'ate the liabilit% of those persons onl% who had /nowled'e of them at the time of the e-ecution of the act or their cooperation therein. !. ,abitual delin9uenc% shall have the followin' effects. (a" 3pon a third conviction the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalt% provided b% law for the last crime of which he be found 'uilt% and to the additional penalt% of prision correccional in its medium and ma-imum periodsF (b" 3pon a fourth conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalt% provided for the last crime of which he be found 'uilt% and to the additional penalt% of prision ma%or in its minimum and medium periodsF and (c" 3pon a fifth or additional conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced to the penalt% provided for the last crime of which he be found 'uilt% and to the additional penalt% of prision ma%or in its ma-imum period to reclusion temporal in its minimum period. Notwithstandin' the provisions of this article, the total of the two penalties to be imposed upon the offender, in conformit% herewith, shall in no case e-ceed 3= %ears. Cor the purpose of this article, a person shall be deemed to be habitual delin9uent, is within a period of ten %ears from the date of his release or last conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious ph%sical in+uries, robo# hurto, estafa or falsification, he is found 'uilt% of an% of said crimes a third time or oftener. 0hat are the effects of the attenance of mitigating or aggravating circumstances: a. A''ravatin' circumstances which are not considered for the purpose of increasin' the penalt%. 1. Those which in themselves constitute a crime especiall% punishable b% law. #. Those included b% law in definin' the crime. 3. Those inherent in the crime but of necessit% the% accompan% the commission thereof. b. A''ravatin' or miti'atin' circumstances that serve to a''ravate or miti'ate the liabilit% of the offender to whom such are attendant. Those arisin' from. 1. *oral attributes of the offender #. ,is private relations with the offended part% 3. An% other personal cause c. A''ravatin' or miti'atin' circumstances that affect the offenders onl% who had /nowled'e of them at the time of the e-ecution of the act or their cooperation therein. Those which consist. 1. 6n the material e-ecution of the act ? will not affect all the offenders but onl% those to whom such act are attendant #. *eans to accomplish the crime ? will affect onl% those offenders who have /nowled'e of the same at the time of the act of e-ecution or their cooperation therein 0hat are the legal effects of habitual elin-uency: 1) T;!#4 $on+!$!on ? the culprit is sentenced to the penalt% for the crime committed and to the additional penalt% of prision correccional in its medium and ma-imum period. .) Fo"#; $on+!$!on ? the penalt% is that provided b% law for the last crime and the additional penalt% of prision mayor in its minimum and medium periods. @) F!8; o# ,44!!on,% $on+!$!on ? the penalt% is that provided b% law for the last crime and the additional penalt% of prision mayor in its ma-imum period to reclusion temporal in its minimum period. Note. 6n no case shall the total of the # penalties imposed upon the offender e-ceed 3= %ears. The law does not appl% to crimes described in Art. 1!! The imposition of the additional penalt% on habitual delin9uents are C2N$T6T3T62NA& because such law is neither an 1< P'S, F/C,' 3/; nor an additional punishment for future crimes. 6t is simpl% a punishment on future crimes on account of the criminal propensities of the accused. The imposition of such additional penalties is mandator% and is not discretionar%. ,abitual delin9uenc% applies at an% sta'e of the e-ecution because sub+ectivel%, the offender reveals the same de'ree of depravit% or perversit% as the one who commits a consummated crime. 6t applies to all participants because it reveals persistence in them of the inclination to wron'doin' and of the perversit% of character that led them to commit the previous crime. Cases #here attening aggravating or mitigating circumstances are not consiere in the imposition of penalties ? Penalt% that is sin'le and indivisible ? Celonies throu'h ne'li'ence ? Ahen the penalt% is a fine ? Ahen the penalt% is prescribed b% a special law. A#. 0@. Rules for the application of inivisible penalties. I 6n all cases in which the law prescribes a sin'le indivisible penalt%, it shall be applied b% the courts re'ardless of an% miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstances that ma% have attended the commission of the deed. 6n all cases in which the law prescribes a penalt% composed of two indivisible penalties, the followin' rules shall be observed in the application thereof. 1. Ahen in the commission of the deed there is present onl% one a''ravatin' circumstance, the 'reater penalt% shall be applied. #. Ahen there are neither miti'atin' nor a''ravatin' circumstances and there is no a''ravatin' circumstance, the lesser penalt% shall be applied. 3. Ahen the commission of the act is attended b% some miti'atin' circumstances and there is no / viv Pa'e 1=3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 a''ravatin' circumstance, the lesser penalt% shall be applied. >. Ahen both miti'atin' and a''ravatin' circumstances attended the commission of the act, the court shall reasonabl% allow them to offset one another in consideration of their number and importance, for the purpose of appl%in' the penalt% in accordance with the precedin' rules, accordin' to the result of such compensation. Rules for the application of inivisible penaltiesC 1. P&n,%> !s s!n-%& ,n4 !n4!+!s!/%& ? The penalt% shall be applied re'ardless of the presence of miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstances. <-. reclusion perpetua or death .. P&n,%> !s $o3*os&4 o8 . !n4!+!s!/%& *&n,%!&sD a. 2ne a''ravatin' circumstance present ? ,61,<R penalt% b. No miti'atin' circumstances present ? &<$$<R penalt% c. $ome miti'atin' circumstances present and no a''ravatin' ? &<$$<R penalt% d. *iti'atin' and a''ravatin' circumstances offset each other ? (asis of penalt%. number and importance. A#. 01. Rules for the application of penalties #hich contain three perios! I 6n cases in which the penalties prescribed b% law contain three periods, whether it be a sin'le divisible penalt% or composed of three different penalties, each one of which forms a period in accordance with the provisions of Articles ;0 and ;;, the court shall observe for the application of the penalt% the followin' rules, accordin' to whether there are or are not miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstances. 1. Ahen there are neither a''ravatin' nor miti'atin' circumstances, the% shall impose the penalt% prescribed b% law in its medium period. #. Ahen onl% a miti'atin' circumstances is present in the commission of the act, the% shall impose the penalt% in its minimum period. 3. Ahen an a''ravatin' circumstance is present in the commission of the act, the% shall impose the penalt% in its ma-imum period. >. Ahen both miti'atin' and a''ravatin' circumstances are present, the court shall reasonabl% offset those of one class a'ainst the other accordin' to their relative wei'ht. !. Ahen there are two or more miti'atin' circumstances and no a''ravatin' circumstances are present, the court shall impose the penalt% ne-t lower to that prescribed b% law, in the period that it ma% deem applicable, accordin' to th;e number and nature of such circumstances. 0. Ahatever ma% be the number and nature of the a''ravatin' circumstances, the courts shall not impose a 'reater penalt% than that prescribed b% law, in its ma-imum period. ;. Aithin the limits of each period, the court shall determine the e-tent of the penalt% accordin' to the number and nature of the a''ravatin' and miti'atin' circumstances and the 'reater and lesser e-tent of the evil produced b% the crime. Rules for the application of D*2*S*,LE PEN$L"*ES a. No a''ravatin' and No miti'atin' ? *<)63* P<R62) b. 2ne miti'atin' ? *6N6*3* P<R62) c. 2ne a''ravatin' (an% number cannot e-ceed the penalt% provided b% law in its ma-imum period" ? *AH6*3* P<R62) d. *iti'atin' and a''ravatin' circumstances present ? to offset each other accordin' to relative wei'ht e. # or more miti'atin' and no a''ravatin' ? one de'ree lower (has the effect of a privile'ed miti'atin' circumstance" N2T<. Art. 0> does not appl% to. ? indivisible penalties ? penalties prescribed b% special laws ? fines ? crimes committed b% ne'li'ence A#. 07. Penalty to be impose #hen not all the re-uisites of exemption of the fourth circumstance of $rticle 67 are present.I Ahen all the conditions re9uired in circumstances Number > of Article 1# of this Code to e-empt from criminal liabilit% are not present, the penalt% of arresto ma%or in its ma-imum period to prision correccional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon the culprit if he shall have been 'uilt% of a 'rave felon%, and arresto ma%or in its minimum and medium periods, if of a less 'rave felon%. Penalty to be impose if the re-uisites of accient @$rt! 67 par ;A are not all presentC a. 1RAJ< C<&2NK arresto mayor ma-imum period to prision correccional minimum period b. &<$$ 1RAJ< C<&2NK arresto mayor minimum period and medium period A#. 09. Penalty to be impose #hen the crime committe is not #holly excusable! I A penalt% lower b% one or two de'rees than that prescribed b% law shall be imposed if the deed is not wholl% e-cusable b% reason of the lac/ of some of the conditions re9uired to +ustif% the same or to e-empt from criminal liabilit% in the several cases mentioned in Article 11 and 1#, provided that the ma+orit% of such conditions be present. The courts shall impose the penalt% in the period which ma% be deemed proper, in view of the number and nature of the conditions of e-emption present or lac/in'. Penalty to be impose #hen the crime committe is not #holly excusable ? 2ne or two de'rees lower if the ma+orit% of the conditions for +ustification or e-emption in the cases provided in Arts. 11 and 1# are present. P&o*%& +. L,$,n!%,o (1988) Facts: The CC6 found the accused, a policeman, 'uilt% of homicide. 2n appeal before the CA, the CA found that the accused acted in the performance of a dut% but that the shootin' of the victim was not the necessar% conse9uence of the due performance thereof, therefore creditin' to him the miti'atin' circumstance consistin' of the incomplete +ustif%in' circumstance of fulfillment of dut%. The CA lowered the penalt% merel% / viv Pa'e 1=> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 b% one period appl%in' Art. 0> (#" appreciatin' incomplete fulfillment of dut% as a mere 'eneric miti'atin' circumstance lowerin' the penalt% to minimum period. Held: CA erred because incomplete fulfillment of dut% is a privile'ed miti'atin' circumstance which not onl% cannot be offset b% a''ravatin' circumstances but also reduces the penalt% b% one or two de'rees than that prescribed b law. The 'overnin' provision is Art. 0: of the RPC. P&o*%& +. C,3*";,n (supraA The penalt% for attempted rape is two (#" de'rees lower than the imposable penalt% of death for the offense char'ed, which is statutor% rape of a minor below seven (;" %ears. Two (#" de'rees lower is reclusion temporal, the ran'e of which is twelve (1#" %ears and one (1" da% to twent% (#=" %ears. Appl%in' the 6ndeterminate $entence &aw, and in the absence of an% miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstance, the ma-imum of the penalt% to be imposed upon the accused shall be ta/en from the medium period of reclusion temporal, the ran'e of which is fourteen (1>" %ears, ei'ht (" months and (1" da% to seventeen (1;" %ears and four (>" months, while the minimum shall be ta/en from the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree, which is prision mayor, the ran'e of which is from si- (0" %ears and one (1" da% to twelve (1#" %ears, in an% of its periods. 6. SPECIAL RULES COMPLEG CRIMES A#. 18. Penalty for complex crimes! I Ahen a sin'le act constitutes two or more 'rave or less 'rave felonies, or when an offense is a necessar% means for committin' the other, the penalt% for the most serious crime shall be imposed, the same to be applied in its ma-imum period. Art. > re9uires the commission of at least # crimes. (ut the two or more 1RAJ< or &<$$ 1RAJ< felonies must be the result of a $6N1&< ACT, or an offense must be a N<C<$$ARK *<AN$ C2R C2**6TT6N1 the other. 6n comple- crimes, althou'h two or more crimes are actuall% committed, the% constitute onl% one crime in the e%es of the law as well as in the conscience of the offender. The offender has onl% one criminal intent. <ven in the case where an offense is a necessar% means for committin' the other, the evil intent of the offender is onl% one. TWO CINDS OF COMPLEG CRIMES 1. C')P'3ND CR*)E ? Ahen a sin'le act constitutes two or more 'rave or less 'rave felonies #. C')PLE? CR*)E PR'PER = Ahen an offense is a necessar% means for committin' the other. COMPOUND CRIME R1B)4S4,1S: 1. That onl% a $6N1&< ACT is performed b% the offender #. That the sin'le acts produces (a" # or more 'rave felonies, or (b" one or more 'rave and one or more less 'rave felonies, or (c" two or more less 'rave felonies &i'ht felonies produced b% the same act should be treated and punished as separate offenses or ma% be absorbed b% the 'rave felon%. <-. Ahen the crime is committed b% force or violence, sli'ht ph%sical in+uries are absorbed. <-ample of compound crime. ? Ahere the victim was /illed while dischar'in' his dut% as baran'a% captain to protect life and propert% and enforce law and order in his barrio, the crime is a comple- crime of homicide with assault upon a person in authorit%. Ahen in obedience to an order several accused simultaneousl% shot man% persons, without evidence how man% each /illed, there is onl% a sin'le offense, there bein' a sin'le criminal impulse. COMPLEG CRIME PROPER R1B)4S4,1S: 1. That at least two offenses are committed #. That one or some of the offenses must be necessar% to commit the other 3. That both or all the offenses must be punished under the same statute. The phrase 5necessar% means7 does not mean 5indispensable means7 6n comple- crime, when the offender e-ecutes various acts, he must have a sin'le purpose. $ubse9uent acts of intercourse, after forcible abduction with rape, are separate acts of rape. Not comple- crime when trespass to dwellin' is a direct means to commit a 'rave offense. No comple- crime, when one offense is committed to conceal the other. Ahen the offender had in his possession the funds which he misappropriated, the falsification of a public or official document involvin' said offense is a separate offense. No comple- crime where one of the offense is penali4ed b% a special law. There is no comple- crime of rebellion with murder, arson, robber%, or other common crimes. Ahen two crimes produced b% a sin'le act are respectivel% within the e-clusive +urisdiction of two courts of different +urisdiction, the court of hi'her +urisdiction shall tr% the comple- crime. The penalt% for comple- crime is the penalt% for the most serious crime, the same to be applied in its ma-imum period. Ahen two felonies constitutin' a comple- crime are punishable b% imprisonment and fine, respectivel%, onl% the penalt% of imprisonment should be imposed. Art. > applies onl% to cases where the Code does not provide a definite specific penalt% for a comple- crime. 2ne information should be filed when a comple- crime is committed. Ahen a comple- crime is char'ed and one offense is not proven, the accused can be convicted of the other. Art. > does not appl% when the law provides one sin'le penalt% for special comple- crimes. / viv Pa'e 1=! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 PL3R$L*"5 '1 CR*)ES ? consists in the successive e-ecution b% the same individual of different criminal acts upon an% of which no conviction has %et been declared. CINDS OF PLURALITY OF CRIMES 1. 1'R)$L 'R *DE$L PL3R$L*"5 ? There is but one criminal liabilit% in this /ind of pluralit%. ? divided into 3 'roups. a. Ahen the offender commits an of the comple- crimes defined in Art. > of the Code. b. Ahen the law specificall% fi-es a sin'le penalt% for # or more offenses committed. c. Ahen the offender commits continued crimes. .! RE$L 'R )$"ER*$L PL3R$L*"5 ? There are different crimes in law as well as in the conscience of the offender. 6n such cases, the offender shall be punished for each and ever offense that he committed. ? <-. A stabbed (. Then, A also stabbed C. There are two crimes committed. PLURALITY OF CRIMES RECIDI)ISM There is no conviction of an% of the crimes committed. There must be conviction b% final +ud'ment of the first or prior offense.
C'N"*N3ED CR*)E 1. A sin'le crime consistin' of a series of acts but all arisin' from one criminal resolution. #. A continuous, unlawful act or series of acts set on foot b% a sin'le impulse and operated b% an unintermittent force, however lon' a time it ma% occup%. <-. a collector of a commercial firm misappropriates for his personal use several amounts collected b% him from different persons. 2ne crime onl% because the different appropriations are but the different moments durin' which once criminal resolution arises and a sin'le defraudation develops. A continued crime is not a comple- crime. A continued crime is different from a TRAN$6T2RK CR6*< which is also called a *2J6N1 CR6*<. REAL OR MATERIAL PLURALITY CONTINUED CRIME There is a series of acts performed b% the offender. <ach act performed b the offender constitutes a separate crime because each act is 'enerated b% a criminal impulse. The different acts constitute onl% one crime because all of the acts performed arise from one criminal resolution. P&o*%& +. Es$o/&# (supra) $pecial comple- crime of robber% with homicide. Rule is established that whenever a homicide has been committed as a conse9uence of or on the occasion of a robber%, all those who too/ part as principals in the special comple- crime of robber% with homicide althou'h the% did no actuall% ta/e part in the homicide unless endeavored to prevent homicide. Ahile it has been established that Pun4alanBs participation in the crime was to act as a loo/?out, and as such he did not participate in the /illin' of the two helpless victims, he cannot evade responsibilit%. P&o*%& +. H&#n,n4&F (19(0) Facts: ,ernande4 and others were char'ed with the crime of rebellion with multiple murder, arsons and robberies. ,e was found 'uilt% and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment. Held: *urder, arson and robber% are mere in'redients of the crime of rebellion, as a means 5necessar%7 for the perpetration of the offense. $uch common offenses are absorbed or inherent in the crime of rebellion. 6nasmuch as the acts specified in Art. 13! constitute one sin'le crime, it follows that said acts offer no occasion for the application of Art. > which re9uires therefore the commission of atleast # crimes. Principle of pro reo. Art. > is intended to favor the culprit. when two or more crimes are the result of a sin'le act, the offender is deemed less perverse than when he commits said crimes throu'h separate and distinct acts. P&o*%& +. 6&#on!3o (19(0) As in treason, where both intent and overt act are necessar%, the crime of rebellion is inte'rated b% the coe-istence of both the armed uprisin' for the purposes e-pressed in Art. 13> of the RPC, and the overt acts of violence described in the first para'raph of Art. 13!. That both purpose and overt acts are essential components of one crime and that without either of them the crime of rebellion le'all% does not e-ist, is shown b% the absence of an% penalt% attached to Art. 13>. 6t follows, therefore, that an% or all of the acts described in Art. 13!, when committed as a means to or in furtherance of the subversive ends described in Art. 13>, become absorbed in the crime of rebellion and cannot be re'arded or penali4ed as distinct crimes in themselves. Not ever% act of violence is to be deemed absorbed in the crime of rebellion solel% because it happens to be committed simultaneousl%. 6f the /illin', robbin', etc were done for private purposes, the crime would be separatel% punishable and would not be absorbed b% the rebellion. En#!%& +. S,%,F,# (1992) The appellants proposed 3 options to the court. (b" abandon HernandeG and adopt the minorit% view in said case that rebellion cannot absorb more serious crimes, and that under Art. > rebellion ma% be properl% comple-ed with common offenses, (c" hold HernandeG applicable onl% to offense committed in furtherance, or as a necessar% means for the commission, of rebellion, but not to acts committed in the course of a rebellion which also constitute 5common7 crimes of 'rave or less 'rave character, (d" maintain HernandeG as appl%in' to ma/e rebellion absorb all other offenses committed in its course, whether or not necessar% to its commission or in furtherance thereof. Held: ,ernande4 doctrine remains bindin' and operates to prohibit the comple-in' of rebellion with another offense committed on the occasion thereof, / viv Pa'e 1=0 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 either as a means necessar% to its commission or as an unintended effect of an activit% that constitutes rebellion. P&o*%& +. To%!n- (197() The ei'ht /illin's and the attempted /illin' should be treated as separate crimes of murder and attempted murder 9ualified b% treacher%. The une-pected surprise assaults perpetrated b% the twins upon their co?passen'ers, who did not anticipate that the twins would act li/e +uramentados and who were unable to defend themselves was a mode of e-ecution that insured the consummation of the twinsB diabolical ob+ective to butcher their co?passen'ers. The conduct of the twins evinced conspirac% and communit% of desi'n. The ei'ht /illin's and the attempted murder were perpetrated b% means of different acts. ,ence, the% cannot be re'arded as constitutin' a comple- crime under art. > of the RPC which refers to cases where 5a sin'le act constitutes two or more 'rave felonies, or when an offense is a necessar% means for committin' the other.7 Mon&+& +. P&o*%& (.22.) Facts: *onteverde was purportedl% char'ed with the comple- crime of estafa throu'h falsification of a commercial document for alle'edl% falsif%in' the document she had submitted to show that the mone% donated b% PA1C2R was used and spent for li'htin' materials for her baran'a%. Held: 3nder Article > of the Revised Penal Code, a comple- crime refers to (1" the commission of at least two 'rave or less 'rave felonies that must both (or all" be the result of a sin'le act, or (#" one offense must be a necessar% means for committin' the other (or others". Ne'ativel% put, there is no comple- crime when (1" two or more crimes are committed, but not b% a sin'le actF or (#" committin' one crime is not a necessar% means for committin' the other (or others". 3sin' the above 'uidelines, the acts attributed to petitioner in the present case cannot constitute a comple- crime. $pecificall%, her alle'ed actions showin' falsification of a public andDor a commercial document were not necessar% to commit estafa. Neither were the two crimes the result of a sin'le act. P&o*%& +. 6onF,%&F (S"*#,) Facts: (oth of the families of Andres and that of 1on4ale4 were on their wa% to the e-it of the &o%ola *emorial Par/. 1on4ales was drivin' with his 'randson and 3 housemaids, while Andres was drivin' with his pre'nant wife, Celiber, his #%r old son, Oenneth, his nephew Oevin and his sister?in?law. At an intersection, their two vehicles almost collided. 1on4ales continued drivin' while Andres tailed 1on4alesB vehicle and cut him off when he found the opportunit% to do so, then 'ot out of his vehicle and /noc/ed on the appellantMs car window. ,eated e-chan'e of remar/s followed. 2n his wa% bac/ to his vehicle, he met 1on4ales son, )ino. Andres had a shoutin' match this time with )ino. 1on4ales then ali'hted from his car and fired a sin'le shot at the last window on the left side of AndresM vehicle at an an'le awa% from Andres. The sin'le bullet fired hit Oenneth, Oevin and Celiber which caused the latterBs death. Held: The rules on the imposition of penalties for comple- crimes under Art. > of the Revised Penal Code are not applicable in this case. Art. > applies if a sin'le act constitutes two or more 'rave and less 'rave felonies or when an offense is a necessar% means of committin' anotherF in such a case, the penalt% for the most serious offense shall be imposed in its ma-imum period. Art. : of the Revised Penal Code in relation to Art. #! defines 'rave felonies as those to which the law attaches the capital punishment or afflictive penalties from reclusion perpetua to prision ma%orF less 'rave felonies are those to which the law attaches a penalt% which in its ma-imum period falls under correctional penaltiesF and li'ht felonies are those punishable b% arresto menor or fine not e-ceedin' two hundred pesos. Considerin' that the offenses committed b% the act of the appellant of firin' a sin'le shot are one count of homicide, a 'rave felon%, and two counts of sli'ht ph%sical in+uries, a li'ht felon%, the rules on the imposition of penalties for comple- crimes, which re9uires two or more 'rave andDor less 'rave felonies, will not appl%. P&o*%& +. Co3,4#& (.221) Facts: Robert A'banlo', Aabe, (ullanda%, Camat and <u'enio were havin' a drin/in' spree on the terrace of the house of RobertBs father, 8aime A'banlo', 8aime was seated on the banister of the terrace listenin' to the conversation of the companions of his son. As the drin/in' session went on, Robert and the others noticed appellants 1eor'e and Antonio Comadre and &o4ano wal/in'. The 3 stopped in front of the house. Ahile his companions loo/ed on, Antonio suddenl% lobbed a hand 'renade which fell on the roof of the terrace. Appellants immediatel% fled. The hand 'renade e-ploded rippin' a hole in the roof of the house. Robert died while his father, 8aime, Aabe, Camat, and (ullanda% sustained shrapnel in+uries.. Held: Antonio is 'uilt% of the comple- crime of murder with multiple attempted murder under Article > of the Revised Penal Code. The underl%in' philosoph% of comple- crimes in the Revised Penal Code, which follows the pro reo principle, is intended to favor the accused b% imposin' a sin'le penalt% irrespective of the crimes committed. The rationale bein', that the accused who commits two crimes with sin'le criminal impulse demonstrates lesser perversit% than when the crimes are committed b% different acts and several criminal resolutions. The sin'le act b% appellant of detonatin' a hand 'renade ma% 9uantitativel% constitute a cluster of several separate and distinct offenses, %et these component criminal offenses should be considered onl% as a sin'le crime in law on which a sin'le penalt% is imposed because the offender was impelled b% a 5sin'le criminal impulse7 which shows his lesser de'ree of perversit%. P&o*%& +. D&%os S,nos (.221) Facts: 1lenn )elos $antos and his 3 friends went to (u/idnon on his 6su4u <lf truc/. 2n their wa%, the% decided to pass b% a restaurant where 1lenn had 3 bottles of beer. Crom (u/idnon to Ca'a%an de 2ro Cit%, 1lennBs truc/ hit, bumped, seriousl% wounded and claimed the lives of several members of the PNP who were under'oin' an endurance run on a hi'hwa% wearin' blac/ shirts and shorts and 'reen combat shoes. Twelve trainees were /illed on the spot, 1# were seriousl% wounded, 1 of whom eventuall% died and 1= sustained minor in+uries. At the time of the occurrence, the place of the incident was ver% dar/ as there was no moon. Neither were there lamposts that illuminated the hi'hwa%. The trial court convicted 1lenn of the comple- crime of multiple murder, multiple frustrated murder and / viv Pa'e 1=; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 multiple attempted murder, with the use of motor vehicle as the 9ualif%in' circumstance. Held: Considerin' that the incident was not a product of a malicious intent but rather the result of a sin'le act of rec/less drivin', 1lenn should be held 'uilt% of the comple- crime of rec/less imprudence resultin' in multiple homicide with serious ph%sical in+uries and less serious ph%sical in+uries. The sli'ht ph%sical in+uries caused b% 1lenn to the ten other victims throu'h rec/less imprudence, would, had the% been intentional, have constituted li'ht felonies. (ein' li'ht felonies, which are not covered b% Article >, the% should be treated and punished as separate offenses. $eparate informations should have, therefore, been filed P&o*%& +. )&%,s<"&F (.222) Facts: Jelas9ue4, po/ed a to% 'un and forced Oaren to 'o with her at his 'randmotherBs house. 2ut of fear and not /nowin' that the 'un that Jelas9ue4 was holdin' is a mere to%, Oaren went with Jelas9ue4. Jelas9ue4 then raped Oaren twice. The trial court convicted Jelas9ue4 of two counts of rape. Held: Considerin' that Jelas9ue4 forcibl% abducted Oaren and then raped her twice, he should be convicted of the comple- crime of forcible abduction with rape and simple rape. The penalt% for comple- crimes is the penalt% for the most serious crime which shall be imposed in its ma-imum period. Rape is the more serious of the two crimes and is punishable with reclusion perpetua under Article 33! of the Revised Penal Code and since reclusion perpetua is a sin'le indivisible penalt%, it shall be imposed as it is. The subse9uent rape committed b% Jelas9ue4 can no lon'er be considered as a separate comple- crime of forcible abduction with rape but onl% as a separate act of rape punishable b% reclusion perpetua. SPECIAL COMPLEG CRIMES Art. > does not appl% when the law provides one sin'le penalt% for special comple- crimes. 1. Robber% with ,omicide (Art. #:> (1"" #. Robber% with Rape (Art. #:> (#"" 3. Oidnappin' with serious ph%sical in+uries (Art. #0; (3"" >. Rape with ,omicide (Art. 33!" P&o*%& +. F,/on (.222) The trial court inaccuratel% desi'nated the crime committed as 5robber% with homicide and rape.7 Ahen the special comple- crime of robber% with homicide is accompanied b another offense li/e rape or intentional mutilation, such additional offense is treated as an a''ravatin' circumstance which would result in the imposition of the ma-imum of the penalt% of death. The proper desi'nation is robber% with homicide a''ravated b% rape. Ahen rape and homicide co?e-ist in the commission of robber%, it is the first para'raph of Art. #:> of the RPC which applies, the rape is considered as an a''ravatin' circumstance. P&o*%& +. E3*,n& (1999) Facts: The accused was found 'uilt% of three counts of rape a'ainst his dau'hter who was then below 1 %ears old and sentenced him to death and to indemnif% his dau'hter in the amount of P!=/ with moral dama'es amountin' to another P!o/ for each count of rape. 2n appeal, he claims that the trial court should have appreciated two miti'atin' circumstances in his favor namel% voluntar% confession of 'uilt and into-ication and sentenced him to a lesser penalt%. Held: Qualified rape is punishable b% the sin'le indivisible penalt% of death, which must be applied re'ardless of an% miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstance which ma% have attended the commission of the deed. CRIME DIFFERENT FROM THAT INTENDED A#. 19. Penalty to be impose upon the principals #hen the crime committe is ifferent from that intene! I 6n cases in which the felon% committed is different from that which the offender intended to commit, the followin' rules shall be observed. 1. 6f the penalt% prescribed for the felon% committed be hi'her than that correspondin' to the offense which the accused intended to commit, the penalt% correspondin' to the latter shall be imposed in its ma-imum period. #. 6f the penalt% prescribed for the felon% committed be lower than that correspondin' to the one which the accused intended to commit, the penalt% for the former shall be imposed in its ma-imum period. 3. The rule established b% the ne-t precedin' para'raph shall not be applicable if the acts committed b% the 'uilt% person shall also constitute an attempt or frustration of another crime, if the law prescribes a hi'her penalt% for either of the latter offenses, in which case the penalt% provided for the attempted or the frustrated crime shall be imposed in its ma-imum period. Art. >: has reference to Art. > (1". 6t applies onl% when there is <RR2R 6N P<R$2NA<. 6n Art. >: pars. 1 and #, the &2A<R P<NA&TK in its *AH6*3* P<R62) is alwa%s imposed. 6n Par. 3, the penalt% for the attempted or frustrated crime shall be imposed in its ma-imum period. This rule is not necessar% and ma% well be covered b% Art. >, in view of the fact that the same act also constitutes an attempt or a frustration of another crime. IMPOSSIBLE CRIMES A#. (9. Penalty to be impose in case of failure to commit the crime because the means employe or the aims sought are impossible. I Ahen the person intendin' to commit an offense has alread% performed the acts for the e-ecution of the same but nevertheless the crime was not produced b% reason of the fact that the act intended was b% its nature one of impossible accomplishment or because the means emplo%ed b% such person are essentiall% inade9uate to produce the result desired b% him, the court, havin' in mind the social dan'er and the de'ree of criminalit% shown b% the offender, shall impose upon him the penalt% of arresto ma%or or a fine from #== to !== pesos. Art. !: is limited to cases where the act performed would be 'rave or less 'rave felonies. (asis of penalt%. 1. social dan'er #. de'ree of criminalit% shown b% the offender ADDITIONAL PENALTY FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORIES / viv Pa'e 1= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 A#. (8. $itional penalty to be impose upon certain accessories. I Those accessories fallin' within the terms of para'raphs 3 of Article 1: of this Code who should act with abuse of their public functions, shall suffer the additional penalt% of absolute perpetual dis9ualification if the principal offender shall be 'uilt% of a 'rave felon%, and that of absolute temporar% dis9ualification if he shall be 'uilt% of a less 'rave felon%. Absolute perpetual dis9ualification if the principal offender is 'uilt% of a 'rave felon%. Absolute temporar% dis9ualification if the principal offender is 'uilt of less 'rave felon%. WHERE THE OFFENDER IS BELOW 18 YEARS A#. 08. Penalty to be impose upon a person uner eighteen years of age! I Ahen the offender is a minor under ei'hteen %ears and his case is one comin' under the provisions of the para'raphs ne-t to the last of Article = of this Code, the followin' rules shall be observed. 1. 3pon a person under fifteen but over nine %ears of a'e, who is not e-empted from liabilit% b% reason of the court havin' declared that he acted with discernment, a discretionar% penalt% shall be imposed, but alwa%s lower b% two de'rees at least than that prescribed b% law for the crime which he committed. #. 3pon a person over fifteen and under ei'hteen %ears of a'e the penalt% ne-t lower than that prescribed b% law shall be imposed, but alwa%s in the proper period. PD No. 02@. ART. 19.. S"s*&ns!on o8 S&n&n$& ,n4 Co33!3&n o8 Yo";8"% O88&n4&#. 6f after hearin' the evidence in the proper proceedin's, the court should find that the %outhful offender has committed the acts char'ed a'ainst him the court shall determine the imposable penalt%, includin' an% civil liabilit% char'eable a'ainst him. ,owever, instead of pronouncin' +ud'ment of conviction, the court shall suspend all further proceedin's and shall commit such minor to the custod% or care of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare, or to an% trainin' institution operated b% the 'overnment, or dul% licensed a'encies or an% other responsible person, until he shall have reached twent%?one %ears of a'e or, for a shorter period as the court ma% deem proper, after considerin' the reports and recommendations of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare or the a'enc% or responsible individual under whose care he has been committed. The %outhful offender shall be sub+ect to visitation and supervision b% a representative of the )epartment of $ocial Aelfare or an% dul% licensed a'enc% or such other officer as the court ma% desi'nate sub+ect to such conditions as it ma% prescribe. Art. 0 applies to such minor if his application for suspension of sentence is disapproved or if while in the reformator% institution he becomes incorri'ible in which case he shall be returned to the court for the imposition of the proper penalt%. : to 1! %ears onl% with discernment. at least # de'rees lower. 1! to 1 %ears old. penalt% ne-t lower Art. 0 provides for two of the PR6J6&<1<) *6T61AT6N1 C6RC3*$TANC<$ 6f the act is attended b% two or more miti'atin' and no a''ravatin' circumstance, the penalt% bein' divisible, a minor over 1! but under 1 %ears old ma% still 'et a penalt% two de'rees lower. THE THREE=FOLD RULE A#. 72. Successive service of sentence. I Ahen the culprit has to serve two or more penalties, he shall serve them simultaneousl% if the nature of the penalties will so permit otherwise, the followin' rules shall be observed. 6n the imposition of the penalties, the order of their respective severit% shall be followed so that the% ma% be e-ecuted successivel% or as nearl% as ma% be possible, should a pardon have been 'ranted as to the penalt% or penalties first imposed, or should the% have been served out. Cor the purpose of appl%in' the provisions of the ne-t precedin' para'raph the respective severit% of the penalties shall be determined in accordance with the followin' scale. 1. )eath, #. Reclusion perpetua, 3. Reclusion temporal, >. Prision ma%or, !. Prision correccional, 0. Arresto ma%or, ;. Arresto menor, . )estierro, :. Perpetual absolute dis9ualification, 1= Temporal absolute dis9ualification. 11. $uspension from public office, the ri'ht to vote and be voted for, the ri'ht to follow a profession or callin', and 1#. Public censure Notwithstandin' the provisions of the rule ne-t precedin', the ma-imum duration of the convictMs sentence shall not be more than three?fold the len'th of time correspondin' to the most severe of the penalties imposed upon him. No other penalt% to which he ma% be liable shall be inflicted after the sum total of those imposed e9uals the same ma-imum period. $uch ma-imum period shall in no case e-ceed fort% %ears. 6n appl%in' the provisions of this rule the duration of perpetual penalties (pena perpetua" shall be computed at thirt% %ears. (As amended". O"%!n& o8 ;& *#o+!s!ons o8 ;!s A#!$%&D 1. Ahen the culprit has to serve # or more penalties, he shall serve them simultaneousl% if the nature of the penalties will so permit. #. 2therwise, the order of their respective severit% shall be followed. 3. The respective severit% of the penalties is as follows. a. )eath b. Reclusion perpetua c. Reclusion temporal d. Prision mayor e. Prision correccional f. /rresto mayor g. /rresto menor h. Destierro i. Perpetual absolute dis9ualification +. Temporar% absolute dis9ualification / viv Pa'e 1=: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 /. $uspension from public office, the ri'ht to vote, and be voted for, the ri'ht to follow profession or callin', and l. Public censure T;& *&n,%!&s 9;!$; $,n /& s!3"%,n&o"s%> s&#+&4 ,#&D 1. Perpetual absolute dis9ualification #. Perpetual special dis9ualification 3. Temporar% absolute dis9ualification >. Temporar% special dis9ualification !. $uspension H. Destierro ;. Public Censure . Cine and (ond to /eep the peace :. Civil interdiction 1=. Confiscation and pa%ment of costs The above penalties, e-cept destierro, can be served simultaneousl% with imprisonment. Penalties consistin' in deprivation of libert% cannot be served simultaneousl% b% reason of the nature of such penalties. T;#&&=8o%4 R"%& The ma-imum duration of the convictBs sentence shall not be more than three times the len'th of time correspondin' to the most severe of the penalties imposed upon him. The phrase 5the most severe of the penalties7 includes e9ual penalties. The three?fold rule applies onl% when the convict has to serve at least four sentences. All the penalties, even if b% different courts at different times, cannot e-ceed three?fold the most severe. ? The Rules of Court specificall% provide that an% information must not char'e more than one offense. Necessaril%, the various offense punished with different penalties must be char'ed under different informations which ma% be filed in the same court or in different courts, at the same time or at different times. $ubsidiar% imprisonment forms part of the penalt%. 6ndemnit% is a penalt%. Court must impose all the penalties for all the crimes of which the accused is found 'uilt%, but in the service of the same, the% shall not e-ceed three times the most severe and shall not e-ceed >= %ears. M&Jo#,4, +. S,n4!-,n/,>,n (1987) Facts: The petitioner was convicted of violatin' $ection 3(<" of RA No. 3=1: a/a the Anti?1raft and Corrupt Practices Act. 2ne of the issues raised b% the petitioner concerns the penalt% imposed b% the $andi'anba%an which totals !0 %ears and da%s of imprisonment. ,e impu'ns this as contrar% to the three? fold rule and insists that the duration of the a''re'ate penalties should not e-ceed >= %ears. Held: Petitioner is mista/en in his application of the 3?fold rule as set forth in Art. ;= of the RPC. This article is to be ta/en into account not in the imposition of the penalt% but in connection with the service of the sentence imposed. Art. ;= spea/s of 5service7 of sentence, 5duration7 of penalt% and penalt% 5to be inflicted7. Nowhere in the article is an%thin' mentioned about the 5imposition of penalt%7. 6t merel% provides that the prisoner cannot be made to serve more than three times the most severe of these penalties the ma-imum which is >= %ears. WHERE THE PENALTY IS NOT COMPOSED OF @ PERIODS A#. 0(. Rule in cases in #hich the penalty is not compose of three perios! I 6n cases in which the penalt% prescribed b% law is not composed of three periods, the courts shall appl% the rules contained in the fore'oin' articles, dividin' into three e9ual portions of time included in the penalt% prescribed, and formin' one period of each of the three portions. MEANIN6 OF THE RULE 1. Compute and determine first the 3 periods of the entire penalt%. #. The time included in the penalt% prescribed should be divided into 3 e9ual portions, after subtractin' the minimum (eliminate the 1 da%" from the ma-imum of the penalt%. 3. The minimum of the minimum period should be the minimum of the 'iven penalt% (includin' the 1 da%" >. The 9uotient should be added to the minimum prescribed (eliminate the 1 da%" and the total will represent the ma-imum of the minimum period. Ta/e the ma-imum of the minimum period, add 1 da% and ma/e it the minimum of the medium periodF then add the 9uotient to the minimum (eliminate the 1 da%" of the medium period and the total will represent the ma-imum of the medium period. Ta/e the ma-imum of the medium period, add 1 da% and ma/e it the minimum of the ma-imum periodF then add the 9uotient to the minimum (eliminate the 1 da%" of the ma-imum period and the total will represent the ma-imum of the ma-imum period. In ;& M,&# o8 ;& *&!!on 8o# H,/&,s Co#*"s o8 P&& L,-#,n (.221) Facts: The accused was convicted of 3 counts of violatin' (P## and was sentenced to imprisonment of 1 %ear for each count. ,e was detained on Ceb. #>, 1:::. 2n *ar. 1:, #==1, he filed a petition for habeas corpus claimin' he completed the service of his sentence. Citin' Art. ;=, RPC, he claimed that he shall serve the penalties simultaneousl%. Thus, there is no more le'al basis for his detention. Held: Art. ;= allows simultaneous service of two or more penalties onl% if the nature of the penalties so permit. 6n the case at bar, the petitioner was sentenced to suffer one %ear imprisonment for ever% count of the offense committed. The nature of the sentence does not allow petitioner to serve all the terms simultaneousl%. The rule of successive service of sentence must be applied. H. THE INDETERMINATE SENTENCE LAW ACT NO. 4103 AN ACT TO PRO(IE &OR AN INETER%INATE SENTENCE AN PAROLE &OR ALL PERSONS CON(ICTE O& CERTAIN CRI%ES B# T"E COURTS O& T"E P"ILIPPINE ISLANS: TO CREATE A BOAR O& INETER%INATE SENTENCE AN TO PRO(IE &UNS T"ERE&OR: AN &OR OT"ER PURPOSES SECTION 1. Eereafter, in imposing a prison sentence for an offense punished by the evised !enal "ode, or its amendments, the court shall sentence the accused to an indeterminate sentence the ma)imum term of which shall be that which, in view of the / viv Pa'e 11= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 attending circumstances, could be properly imposed under the rules of the said "ode, and the minimum which shall be within the range of the penalty ne)t lower to that prescribed by the "ode for the offense; and if the offense is punished by any other law, the court shall sentence the accused to an indeterminate sentence, the ma)imum term of which shall not e)ceed the ma)imum fi)ed by said law and the minimum shall not be less than the minimum term prescribed by the same% >As amended by Act +o% 4009%? SECTION 2. &his Act shall not apply to persons convicted of offenses punished with death penalty or life-imprisonment; to those convicted of treason, conspiracy or proposal to commit treason; to those convicted of misprision of treason, rebellion, sedition or espionage; to those convicted of piracy; to those who are habitual delin1uents; to those who have escaped from confinement or evaded sentence; to those who having been granted conditional pardon by the "hief C)ecutive shall have violated the terms thereof; to those whose ma)imum term of imprisonment does not e)ceed one year, not to those already sentenced by final judgment at the time of approval of this Act, e)cept as provided in Section 9 hereof% >As amended by Act +o% 4009%? SECTION 3. &here is hereby created a /oard of !ardons and !arole to be composed of the Secretary of Iustice who shall be its "hairman, and four members to be appointed by the !resident, with the consent of the "ommission on Appointments who shall hold office for a term of si) years# !rovided, &hat one member of the board shall be a trained sociologist, one a clergyman or educator, one psychiatrist unless a trained psychiatrist be employed by the board, and the other members shall be persons 1ualified for such wor- by training and e)perience% At least one member of the board shall be a woman% .f the members of the present board, two shall be designated by the !resident to continue until =ecember thirty, nineteen hundred and si)ty-si) and the other two shall continue until =ecember thirty, nineteen hundred and si)ty-nine% In case of any vacancy in the membership of the /oard, a successor may be appointed to serve only for the une)pired portion of the term of the respective members% >As amended by epublic Act +o% 40*2, Iune 1<, 1<69%? SECTION 4. &he /oard of !ardons and !arole is authori(ed to adopt such rules and regulations as may be necessary for carrying out its functions and duties% &he /oard is empowered to call upon any bureau, office, branch, subdivision, agency or instrumentality of the @overnment for such assistance as it may need in connection with the performance of its functions% A majority of all the members shall constitute a 1uorum and a majority vote shall be necessary to arrive at a decision% Any dissent from the majority opinion shall be reduced to writing and filed with the records of the proceedings% Cach member of the /oard, including the "hairman and the C)ecutive .fficer, shall be entitled to receive as compensation fifty pesos for each meeting actually attended by him, notwithstanding the provisions of Section two hundred and fifty-nine of the evised Administrative "ode, and in addition thereto, reimbursement of actual and necessary travelling e)penses incurred in the performance of duties# !rovided, however, &hat the /oard meetings will not be more than three times a wee-% >As amended by epublic Act +o% 40*2, Iune 1<, 1<69%? SECTION 5. It shall be the duty of the /oard of Indeterminate Sentence to loo- into the physical, mental and moral record of the prisoners who shall be eligible to parole and to determine the proper time of release of such prisoners% 4henever any prisoner shall have served the minimum penalty imposed on him, and it shall appear to the /oard of Indeterminate Sentence, from the reports of the prisonerDs wor- and conduct which may be received in accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed, and from the study and investigation made by the /oard itself, that such prisoner is fitted by his training for release, that there is a reasonable probability that such prisoner will live and remain at liberty without violating the law, and that such release will not be incompatible with the welfare of society, said /oard of Indeterminate Sentence may, in its discretion, and in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted hereunder, authori(e the release of such prisoner on parole, upon such terms and conditions as are herein prescribed and as may be prescribed by the /oard% &he said /oard of Indeterminate Sentence shall also e)amine the records and status of prisoners who shall have been convicted of any offense other than those named in Section 0 hereof, and have been sentenced for more than one year by final judgment prior to the date on which this Act shall ta-e effect, and shall ma-e recommendation in all such cases to the @overnor-@eneral with regard to the parole of such prisoners as they shall deem 1ualified for parole as herein provided, after they shall have served a period of imprisonment not less than the minimum period for which they might have been sentenced under this Act for the same offense% SECTION 6. Cvery prisoner released from confinement on parole by virtue of this Act shall, at such times and in such manner as may be re1uired by the conditions of his parole, as may be designated by the said /oard for such purpose, report personally to such government officials or other parole officers hereafter appointed by the /oard of Indeterminate Sentence for a period of surveillance e1uivalent to the remaining portion of the ma)imum sentence imposed upon him or until final release and discharge by the /oard of Indeterminate Sentence as herein provided% &he officials so designated shall -eep such records and ma-e such reports and perform such other duties hereunder as may be re1uired by said /oard% &he limits of residence of such paroled prisoner during his parole may be fi)ed and from time to time changed by the said /oard in its discretion% If during the period of surveillance such paroled prisoner shall show himself to be a law-abiding citi(en and shall not violate any of the laws of the !hilippine Islands, the /oard of Indeterminate Sentence may issue a final certificate of release in his favor, which shall entitle him to final release and discharge% SECTION 7. &he /oard shall file with the court which passed judgment on the case, and with the "hief of "onstabulary, a certified copy of each order of conditional or final release and discharge issued in accordance with the provisions of the ne)t preceding two sections% SECTION 8. 4henever any prisoner released on parole by virtue of this Act shall, during the period of surveillance, violate any of the conditions of his parole, the /oard of Indeterminate Sentence may issue an order for his re-arrest which may be served in any part of the !hilippine Islands by any police officer% In such case the prisoner so re-arrested shall serve the remaining une)pired portion of the ma)imum sentence for which he was originally committed to prison, unless the /oard of Indeterminate Sentence shall, in its discretion, grant a new parole to the said prisoner% >As amended by Act +o% 4009%? SECTION 9. +othing in this Act shall be construed to impair or interfere with the powers of the @overnor-@eneral as set forth in Section 64>i? of the evised Administrative "ode or the Act of "ongress approved August 0<, 1<16 entitled $An Act to declare the purpose of the people of the Anited States as to the future political status of the people of the !hilippine Islands, and to provide a more autonomous government for those Islands%$ SECTION 10. 4henever any prisoner shall be released on parole hereunder he shall be entitled to receive the benefits provided in Section 1:91 of the evised Administrative "ode% Approved and effective on =ecember 9, 1<<2% The indeterminate sentence is composed of. 1. a *AH6*3* ta/en from the penalt% imposable under the penal code #. a *6N6*3* ta/en from the penalt% ne-t lower to that fi-ed in the code. The law does not appl% to certain offenders. 1. Persons convicted of offense punished with death penalt% or life imprisonment. #. Those convicted of treason, conspirac% or proposal to commit treason. 3. Those convicted of misprision of treason, rebellion, sedition or espiona'e. >. Those convicted of pirac%. !. Those who are habitual delin9uents. 0. Those who shall have escaped from confinement or evaded sentence. / viv Pa'e 111 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 ;. Those who violated the terms of conditional pardon 'ranted to them b% the Chief <-ecutive. . Those whose ma-imum term of imprisonment does not e-ceed one %ear. :. Those who, upon the approval of the law, had been sentenced b% final +ud'ment. 1=. Those sentenced to the penalt% of destierro or suspension. Purpose of the law. to uplift and redeem valuable human material and prevent unnecessar% and e-cessive deprivation of libert% and economic usefulness ? 6t is necessar% to consider the criminal first as an individual, and second as a member of the societ%. ? The law is intended to favor the defendant, particularl% to shorten his term of imprisonment, dependin' upon his behavior and his ph%sical, mental and moral record as a prisoner, to be determined b% the (oard of 6ndeterminate $entence. The settled practice is to 'ive the accused the benefit of the law even in crimes punishable with death or life imprisonment provided the resultin' penalt%, after considerin' the attendin' circumstances, is reclusion temporal or less. 6$& does not appl% to destierro. 6$& is e-pressl% 'ranted to those who are sentenced to imprisonment e-ceedin' 1 %ear. PROCEDURE FOR DETERMIN6 THE MAGIMUM AND MINIMUM SENTENCE 6s consists of a ma-imum and a minimum instead of a sin'le fi-ed penalt%. Prisoner must serve the minimum before he is eli'ible for parole. The period between the minimum and ma-imum is indeterminate in the sense that the prisoner ma% be e-empted from servin' said indeterminate period in whole or in part. The ma-imum is determined in an% case punishable under the RPC in accordance with the rules and provisions of said code e-actl% as if the 6$& had never been enacted. Appl% first the effect of privile'ed miti'atin' circumstances then consider the effects of a''ravatin' and ordinar% miti'atin' circumstances. The minimum depends upon the courtBs discretion with the limitation that it must be within the ran'e of the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree to that prescribed b% the Code for the offense committed. N2T<. A minor who escaped from confinement in the reformator% is entitled to the benefits of the 6$& because his confinement is not considered imprisonment. A#. 01. Rules for the application of penalties #hich contain three perios! I 6n cases in which the penalties prescribed b% law contain three periods, whether it be a sin'le divisible penalt% or composed of three different penalties, each one of which forms a period in accordance with the provisions of Articles ;0 and ;;, the court shall observe for the application of the penalt% the followin' rules, accordin' to whether there are or are not miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstances. 1. Ahen there are neither a''ravatin' nor miti'atin' circumstances, the% shall impose the penalt% prescribed b% law in its medium period. #. Ahen onl% a miti'atin' circumstance is present in the commission of the act, the% shall impose the penalt% in its minimum period. 3. Ahen an a''ravatin' circumstance is present in the commission of the act, the% shall impose the penalt% in its ma-imum period. >. Ahen both miti'atin' and a''ravatin' circumstances are present, the court shall reasonabl% offset those of one class a'ainst the other accordin' to their relative wei'ht. !. Ahen there are two or more miti'atin' circumstances and no a''ravatin' circumstances are present, the court shall impose the penalt% ne-t lower to that prescribed b% law, in the period that it ma% deem applicable, accordin' to the number and nature of such circumstances. 0. Ahatever ma% be the number and nature of the a''ravatin' circumstances, the courts shall not impose a 'reater penalt% than that prescribed b% law, in its ma-imum period. ;. Aithin the limits of each period, the court shall determine the e-tent of the penalt% accordin' to the number and nature of the a''ravatin' and miti'atin' circumstances and the 'reater and lesser e-tent of the evil produced b% the crime. D& %, C#"F +. CA (1990) 6n as much as the amount of P;1!/ is P0:3/ more than the abovementioned benchmar/ of P##/, then addin' one %ear for each additional P1=/, the ma-imum period of 0 %ears, months and #1 da%s to %ears of prision mayor minimum would be increased b% 0: %ears, as computed b% the trial court. (ut the law cate'oricall% declares that the ma-imum penalt% then shall not e-ceed #= %ears of reclusion temporal. 3nder the 6$&, the minimum term of the indeterminate penalt should be within the ran'e of the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree to that prescribed b the Code for the offense committed, which is prision correccional. P&o*%& +. C,3*";,n (supraA The penalt% for attempted rape is two (#" de'rees lower than the imposable penalt% of death for the offense char'ed, which is statutor% rape of a minor below seven (;" %ears. Two (#" de'rees lower is reclusion temporal, the ran'e of which is twelve (1#" %ears and one (1" da% to twent% (#=" %ears. Appl%in' the 6ndeterminate $entence &aw, and in the absence of an% miti'atin' or a''ravatin' circumstance, the ma-imum of the penalt% to be imposed upon the accused shall be ta/en from the medium period of reclusion temporal, the ran'e of which is fourteen (1>" %ears, ei'ht (" months and (1" da% to seventeen (1;" %ears and four (>" months, while the minimum shall be ta/en from the penalt% ne-t lower in de'ree, which is prision mayor, the ran'e of which is from si- (0" %ears and one (1" da% to twelve (1#" %ears, in an% of its periods. P&o*%& +. S,%&> (supraA 3nder the 6ndeterminate $entence &aw, the ma-imum term of the penalt% shall be Lthat which, in view of the attendin' circumstances, could be properl% imposedL under the Revised Penal Code, and the minimum shall be Lwithin the ran'e of the penalt% ne-t lower to that prescribedL for the offense. The penalt% / viv Pa'e 11# #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 ne-t lower should be based on the penalt% prescribed b% the Code for the offense, without first considerin' an% modif%in' circumstance attendant to the commission of the crime. The determination of the minimum penalt% is left b% law to the sound discretion of the court and it can be an%where within the ran'e of the penalt% ne-t lower without an% reference to the periods into which it mi'ht be subdivided. The modif%in' circumstances are considered onl% in the imposition of the ma-imum term of the indeterminate sentence. The fact that the amounts involved in the instant case e-ceed P##,===.== should not be considered in the initial determination of the indeterminate penalt%F instead, the matter should be so ta/en as analo'ous to modif%in' circumstances in the imposition of the ma-imum term of the full indeterminate sentence. This interpretation of the law accords with the rule that penal laws should be construed in favor of the accused. $ince the penalt% prescribed b% law for the estafa char'e a'ainst accused?appellant is prision correccional ma-imum to prision mayor minimum, the penalt% ne-t lower would then be prision correccional minimum to medium. Thus, the minimum term of the indeterminate sentence should be an%where within si- (0" months and one (1" da% to four (>" %ears and two (#" months . I. EGECUTION AND SER)ICE OF PENALTIES E:&$"!on o8 P&n,%!&s A#. 78. 0hen an ho# a penalty is to be execute. I No penalt% shall be e-ecuted e-cept b% virtue of a final +ud'ment. A penalt% shall not be e-ecuted in an% other form than that prescribed b% law, nor with an% other circumstances or incidents than those e-pressl% authori4ed thereb%. 6n addition to the provisions of the law, the special re'ulations prescribed for the 'overnment of the institutions in which the penalties are to be suffered shall be observed with re'ard to the character of the wor/ to be performed, the time of its performance, and other incidents connected therewith, the relations of the convicts amon' themselves and other persons, the relief which the% ma% receive, and their diet. The re'ulations shall ma/e provision for the separation of the se-es in different institutions, or at least into different departments and also for the correction and reform of the convicts. The +ud'ment must be final before it can be e-ecuted, because the accused ma% still appeal within 1! da%s from its promul'ation. (ut if the defendant has e-pressl% waived in writin' his ri'ht to appeal, the +ud'ment becomes final and e-ecutor%. $ee Rules and re'ulations to implement RA No. 1;; under Capital Punishment. A#. 80. Reclusion perpetua& reclusion temporal& prision mayor& prision correccional an arresto mayor! I The penalties of reclusion perpetua, reclusion temporal, prision ma%or, prision correccional and arresto ma%or, shall be e-ecuted and served in the places and penal establishments provided b% the Administrative Code in force or which ma% be provided b% law in the future. A#. 87. Destierro! I An% person sentenced to destierro shall not be permitted to enter the place or places desi'nated in the sentence, nor within the radius therein specified, which shall be not more than #!= and not less than #! /ilometers from the place desi'nated. Convict shall not be permitted to enter the place desi'nated in the sentence nor within the radius specified, which shall not more than #!= and not less than #! /m from the place desi'nated. 6f the convict enters the prohibited area, he commits evasion of sentence. )estierro is imposed. a. Ahen the death or serious ph%sical in+uries is caused or are inflicted under e-ceptional circumstances (art. #>;" b. Ahen a person fails to 'ive bond for 'ood behavior (art. #>" c. As a penalt% for the concubine in the crime of concubina'e (Art. 33>" d. Ahen after lowerin' the penalt% b% de'rees, destierro is the proper penalt%. A#. 88. $rresto menor. I The penalt% of arresto menor shall be served in the municipal +ail, or in the house of the defendant himself under the surveillance of an officer of the law, when the court so provides in its decision, ta/in' into consideration the health of the offender and other reasons which ma% seem satisfactor% to it. $ervice of the penalt% of arresto menor. a. 6n the municipal +ail b. 6n the house of the offender, but under the surveillance of an officer of the law, whenever the court so provides in the decision due to the health of the offender. In ;& M,&# o8 ;& *&!!on 8o# H,/&,s Co#*"s o8 P&& L,-#,n (.221) Facts: The accused was convicted of 3 counts of violatin' (P## and was sentenced to imprisonment of 1 %ear for each count. ,e was detained on Ceb. #>, 1:::. 2n *ar. 1:, #==1, he filed a petition for habeas corpus claimin' he completed the service of his sentence. Citin' Art. ;=, RPC, he claimed that he shall serve the penalties simultaneousl%. Thus, there is no more le'al basis for his detention. Held: Art. ;= allows simultaneous service of two or more penalties onl% if the nature of the penalties so permit. 6n the case at bar, the petitioner was sentenced to suffer one %ear imprisonment for ever% count of the offense committed. The nature of the sentence does not allow petitioner to serve all the terms simultaneousl%. The rule of successive service of sentence must be applied. E88&$s o8 ;& P#o/,!on L,9 T"E PROBATION LA; T)<en .*o8 t+e O$ 5e0-ite Section 2>a? of !residential =ecrees <67, as amended, defines probation as a disposition under which an accused, after conviction and sentence, is released subject to conditions imposed by the court and to the supervision of a probation officer% It is a privilege granted by the court; it cannot be availed of as a matter of right by a person convicted of a crime% &o be able to enjoy the benefits of probation, it must first be shown that an applicant has none of the dis1ualifications / viv Pa'e 113 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 imposed by law% i-=,)1i.ie2 O..en2e*- !robation under != +o% <67, as amended, is intended for offenders who are 17 years of age and above, and who are not otherwise dis1ualified by law% .ffenders who are dis1ualified are those# >1? sentenced to serve a ma)imum term of imprisonment of more than si) years; >0? convicted of subversion or any offense against the security of the State, or the !ublic .rder; >2? who have previously been convicted by final judgment of an offense punished by imprisonment of not less than one month and one day and5or a fine of not more than &wo Eundred !esos; >4? who have been once on probation under the provisions of this =ecree; Po-t>Sentence In7e-ti4)tion &he !ost-Sentence Investigation >!SI? and the submission of the !ost-Sentence Investigation eport >!SI? are pre-re1uisites to the court disposition on the application for probation% Pe*io2 o. P*o0)tion &he period of probation is in essence a time-bound condition% It is a condition in point of time which may be shortened and lengthened within the statutory limits and the achievements by the probationer of the reasonable degrees of social stability and responsibility from the measured observation of the supervising officer and the e)ercise discretion by the court in decisive order% P*o0)tion Con2ition- &he grant of probation is accompanied by conditions imposed by the court# &he mandatory conditions re1uire that the probationer shall >a? present himself to the probation officer designated to underta-e his supervision at each place as may be specified in the order within :0 hours from receipt of said order, and >b? report to the probation officer at least once a month at such time and place as specified by said officer% Special or discretionary conditions are those additional conditions imposed on the probationer which are geared towards his correction and rehabilitation outside of prison and right in the community to which he belongs% A violation of any of the conditions may lead either to a more restrictive modification of the same or the revocation of the grant of probation% "onse1uent to the revocation, the probationer will have to serve the sentence originally imposed% %o2i.ic)tion o. Con2ition- o. P*o0)tion =uring the period of probation, the court may, upon application of either the probationers or the probation officer, revise or modify the conditions or period of probation% &he court shall notify either the probationer or the probation officer of the filing of such an application so as to give both parties an opportunity to be heard thereon% T*)n-.e* o. Re-i2ence 4henever a probationer is permitted to reside in a place under the jurisdiction of another court, control over him shall be transferred to the e)ecutive judge of the $"ourt of 'irst Instance$ of that place, and in such case, a copy of the !robation .rder, the investigation report and other pertinent records shall be furnished to said e)ecutive judge% &hereafter, the e)ecutive judge to whom jurisdiction over the probationer is transferred shall have the power with respect to him that was previously possessed by the court which granted the probation% Re7oc)tion o. P*o0)tion At any time during probation, the court may issue a warrant for the arrest of a probationer for any serious violation of the conditions of probation% &he probationer, once arrested and detained, shall immediately be brought before the court for a hearing of the violation charged% &he defendant may be admitted to bail pending such hearing% In such case, the provisions regarding release on bail of persons charged with crime shall be applicable to probationers arrested under this provision% An order revo-ing the grant of probation or modifying the terms and conditions thereof shall not be appealable% Te*8in)tion o. P*o0)tion After the period of probation and upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the probation officer, the court may order the final discharge of the probationer upon finding that he has fulfilled the terms and conditions of his probation and thereupon the case is deemed terminated% P*o4*)8- )n2 Se*7ice- Po-t>Sentence In7e-ti4)tion. After conviction and sentence, a convicted offender or his counsel files a petition for probation with the trail court, who in turn orders the !robation .fficer to conduct a post- sentence investigation to determine whether a convicted offender may be placed on probation or not% &he role of the probation officer in this phase is to conduct the post-sentence investigation and to submit his report to the court within the period not later than 6* days from receipt of the order of the "ourt to conduct the said investigation% P*e>P)*o1e In7e-ti4)tion. &he !A.,C A+= !./A&I.+ A=8I+IS&A&I.+ - >!!A? conducts pre-parole investigation of all sentenced prisoners confined in prisons and jails within their jurisdiction% &he purpose is to determine whether offenders confined in prisons5jails are 1ualified for parole or any form of e)ecutive clemency and to discuss with them their plans after release% !robation officers submit their pre-parole assessment reports to the /oard of !ardons and !arole% S,/e*7i-ion o. O..en2e*-. &he Agency supervises two types of offenders under conditional release# >1? probationers, or persons placed under probation by the courts; >0? parolees and pardonees, or prisoners released on parole or conditional pardon and referred by the /oard of !ardons and !arole >/!!? to !A.,C A+= !./A&I.+ A=8I+IS&A&I.+ - >!!A? >!!A?% &he objectives of supervision are to carry out the conditions set forth in the probation5parole order, to ascertain whether the probationer5parolee5pardonee is complying with the said conditions, and to bring about the rehabilitation of the client and his re-integration into the community% Re+)0i1it)tion P*o4*)8-. &he treatment process employed by the field officers focused on particular needs of probationers, parolees and pardonees% Assistance is provided to the clientele in the form of job placement, s-ills training, spiritual5moral upliftment, counseling, etc% Co88,nit6 Lin<)4e- !robation5!arole, as a community-based treatment program, depends on available resources in the community for the rehabilitation of offenders% &hus, the Agency, recogni(ing the important role of the community as a rehabilitation agent, involves the community in probation wor- through the use of volunteer wor-ers and welfare agencies% !residential =ecree +o% <67 permits the utili(ation of the services of Bolunteer !robation Aides to assist the !robation and !arole .fficers in the supervision of probationers, parolees and pardonees particularly in the areas where the caseload is heavy and the office is understaff or where the residence of the clientele is very far from the !arole and !robation .ffice% As defined, a Bolunteer !robation Aide is a volunteer who is a citi(en of good moral character and good standing in the community, who has been carefully selected and trained to do volunteer probation wor-% Ee is appointed by the Administrator after successful completion of the Introductory &raining "ourse for probation volunteers% Eis term of office is one year but can be renewed thereafter or terminated earlier depending upon his performance and willingness to serve% 'urther, the !A.,C A+= !./A&I.+ A=8I+IS&A&I.+ - >!!A?, through its "ommunity Services =ivision, egional and 'ield .ffices nationwide, has been tapping government5non-government organi(ations5individuals for various rehabilitation programs and activities for probationers, parolees and pardonees% L%,3,4o +. CA (1989) 6n its present form, $ection > of the Probation &aw establishes a much narrower period durin' which an application for probation ma be filed with the trial curt. 5after the trial curt shall have convicted and sentenced a defendant and @ within the period for perfecting an appeal7. The provision e-pressl% prohibits the 'rant of / viv Pa'e 11> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 an application for probation if the defendant has perfected an appeal from the +ud'ment of conviction. PetitionerBs ri'ht to appl% for probation was lost when he perfected his appeal from the +ud'ment of the trial court. The trial court lost +urisdiction alread% over the case. B,%, +. M,#!n&F (1992) P) 1::= which amends $ec. > of P) :0 is not applicable to the case at bar. 6t went into effect on 8an. 1!, 1:! and cannot be 'iven retroactive effect because it would be pre+udicial to the accused. (ala was placed on probation on Au'. 11, 1:#. <-piration of probation period alone does not automaticall% terminate probationF a final order of dischar'e from the court is re9uired. Probation is revocable before the final dischar'e b% the court. Probationer failed to reunite with responsible societ%. ,e violated the conditions of his probation. Thus, the revocation of his probation is compellin'. S,%-,4o +. CA (1992) There is no 9uestion that the decision convictin' $al'ado of the crime of serious ph%sical in+uries had become final and e-ecutor% because the filin' b% respondent of an application for probation is deemed a waiver of his ri'ht to appeal. The 'rant of probation does not e-tin'uish the civil liabilit% of the offender. The order of probation with one of the conditions providin' for the manner of pa%ment of the civil liabilit% durin' the period of probation, did not increase or decrease the civil liabilit% ad+ud'ed. The conditions listed under $ec. 1= of the Probation law are not e-clusive. Courts are allowed to impose practicall% an% term it chooses, the onl% limitation bein' that it does not +eopardi4e the constitutional ri'hts of the accused. O88!$& o8 ;& Co"# A43!n!s#,o# +. L!/#,4o (1990) Facts: The respondent is a deput% sheriff who was char'ed of violatin' the )an'erous )ru's Act and is now claimin' he is in probation. The 2CA filed an administrative case a'ainst him and he was suspended from office. Held: Ahile indeed the purpose of the Probation &aw is to save valuable human material, it must not be for'otten that unli/e pardon probation does not obliterate the crime of which the person under probation has been convicted. The ima'e of the +udiciar% is tarnished b% conduct involvin' moral turpitude. The reform and rehabilitation of the probationer cannot +ustif% his retention in the 'overnment service. S"s*&ns!on !n $,s& o8 Ins,n!> o# M!no#!> A#. 79. Suspension of the execution an service of the penalties in case of insanity! I Ahen a convict shall become insane or an imbecile after final sentence has been pronounced, the e-ecution of said sentence shall be suspended onl% with re'ard to the personal penalt%, the provisions of the second para'raph of circumstance number 1 of Article 1# bein' observed in the correspondin' cases. 6f at an% time the convict shall recover his reason, his sentence shall be e-ecuted, unless the penalt% shall have prescribed in accordance with the provisions of this Code. The respective provisions of this section shall also be observed if the insanit% or imbecilit% occurs while the convict is servin' his sentence. 2nl% e-ecution of personal penalt% is suspended. civil liabilit% ma% be e-ecuted even in case of insanit% of convict. An accused ma% become insane. a. at the time of commission of the crime @ e-empt from criminal liabilit% b. at the time of the trial ? court shall suspend hearin's and order his confinement in a hospital until he recovers his reason c. at the time of final +ud'ment or while servin' sentence @ e-ecution suspended with re'ard to the personal penalt% onl% see <-emptin' Circumstance of *inorit% for P) No. 0=3 and Rule on 8uveniles in Conflict with &aw. )I. EGTINCTION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY
A. TOTAL EGTINCTION A#. 89. +o# criminal liability is totally extinguishe! I Criminal liabilit% is totall% e-tin'uished. 1. (% the death of the convict, as to the personal penalties and as to pecuniar% penalties, liabilit% therefor is e-tin'uished onl% when the death of the offender occurs before final +ud'ment. #. (% service of the sentenceF 3. (% amnest%, which completel% e-tin'uishes the penalt% and all its effectsF >. (% absolute pardonF !. (% prescription of the crimeF 0. (% prescription of the penalt%F ;. (% the marria'e of the offended woman, as provided in Article 3>> of this Code. Ho9 !s $#!3!n,% %!,/!%!> &:!n-"!s;&4K 1. T2TA& #. PART6A& <-tinction of criminal liabilit% does not automaticall% e-tin'uish the civil liabilit%. C,"s&s o8 &:!n$!on o8 $#!3!n,% %!,/!%!>D 1. BY DEATH OF THE CON)ICT ? the death of the convict whether before or after final +ud'ment e-tin'uished criminal liabilit%. ? civil liabilit% is e-tin'uished onl% when death occurs before final +ud'ment. ? death of the accused pendin' appeal of his conviction e-tin'uished his criminal liabilit% as well as the civil liabilit% based solel% on the offense committedF except, the claim for civil liabilit% survives if the same ma% also be predicated on a source of obli'ation other than delict such as law, contracts, 9uasi?contracts and 9uasi?delicts. ? death of the offended part% does not e-tin'uish the criminal liabilit% of the offender. .. BY SER)ICE OF SENTENCE ? crime is a debt incurred b% the offender as a conse9uence of his wron'ful act and the penalt% is but / viv Pa'e 11! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 the amount of his debt. Ahen pa%ment is made, the debt is e-tin'uished. $ervice of sentence does not e-tin'uish civil liabilit%. @. BY AMNESTY ? amnest% is an act of the soverei'n power 'rantin' oblivion or a 'eneral pardon for a past offense, and is rarel%, if ever, e-ercised in favor of a sin'le individual, and is usuall% e-erted in behalf of certain classes of persons, who are sub+ect to trial but have not %et been convicted. 1. BY ABSOLUTE PARDON ? 6t is an act of 'race proceedin' from the power entrusted with the e-ecution of the laws which e-empts the individual on whom is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for the crime he has committed. P,#4on A3n&s> 6ncludes an% crime 1enerall% political offenses 1iven after conviction 1iven before conviction or institution of the action &oo/s forward and for'ives the punishment &oo/s bac/wards and abolished the offense itself *ust be proved as a defense (ein' a result of a proclamation, the court ma% ta/e +udicial notice of the same )o not e-tin'uish civil liabilit% (. BY PRESCRIPTION OF CRIME ? the forfeiture or loss of the ri'ht of the $tate to prosecute the offender after the lapse of a certain time. 0. BY PRESCRIPTION OF PENALTY ? the loss or forfeiture of the ri'ht of the 'overnment to e-ecute the final sentence after the lapse of a certain time. Re9uisites. a" that there be final +ud'ment b" that the period of time prescribed b% law for its enforcement has elapsed. 7. BY THE MARRIA6E OF THE OFFENDED WOMAN ? applicable in the crimes of rape, seduction, abduction or acts of lasciviousness. *arria'e must be made in 'ood faith. A#. 92. Prescription of crime. I Crimes punishable b% death, reclusion perpetua or reclusion temporal shall prescribe in twent% %ears. Crimes punishable b% other afflictive penalties shall prescribe in fifteen %ears. Those punishable b% a correctional penalt% shall prescribe in ten %earsF with the e-ception of those punishable b% arresto ma%or, which shall prescribe in five %ears. The crime of libel or other similar offenses shall prescribe in one %ear. The crime of oral defamation and slander b% deed shall prescribe in si- months. &i'ht offenses prescribe in two months. Ahen the penalt% fi-ed b% law is a compound one, the hi'hest penalt% shall be made the basis of the application of the rules contained in the first, second and third para'raphs of this article. (As amended b% RA >001, approved 8une 1:, 1:00". 6n computin' the period of prescription, the first da% is to be e-cluded and the last da% included. Ahere the last da% of the prescriptive period for filin' an information falls on a $unda% or le'al holida%, the information can no lon'er be filed on the ne-t da% as the crime has alread% prescribed. PERIOD OF PRESCRIPTION OF CRIMES PUNISHED BYD 1. death, reclusion perpetua and reclusion temporal ? #= %ears #. other afflictive penalties ? 1! %ears 3. correctional penalties ? 1= %ears e-cept arresto mayor which prescribes in ! %ears >. libel or similar offense ? 1 %ear (as amended b% RA >001" !. oral defamation and slander b% deed ? 0 months 0. li'ht offenses ? # months PRESCRIPTION OF OFFENSES PUNISHED BY SPECIAL LAWSD a. punished b% a fine or imprisonment not more than 1 month or both @ 1 %ear b. punished b% imprisonment of more than 1 month but less than # %ears @ > %ears c. punished b% imprisonment for # %ears but less than 0 %ears @ %ears d. punished b% imprisonment for 0 %ears or more @ 1# %ears e. 6nternal Revenue offenses @ ! %ears f. *unicipal ordinances @ # months (Act. No. 3;03, as amended" A#. 91. Computation of prescription of offenses! I The period of prescription shall commence to run from the da% on which the crime is discovered b% the offended part%, the authorities, or their a'ents, and shall be interrupted b% the filin' of the complaint or information, and shall commence to run a'ain when such proceedin's terminate without the accused bein' convicted or ac9uitted, or are un+ustifiabl% stopped for an% reason not imputable to him. The term of prescription shall not run when the offender is absent from the Philippine Archipela'o. Period commences to run from the da% the offense is committed or discovered b% the offended part%, the authorities or their a'ents. 6t does not run if the offender is outside the Philippines. The fact that the offender is un/nown will not interrupt the period of prescription because what the Code re9uires is the discover% of the crime and not of the offender. The period is interrupted b% the filin' of the complaint or information. ? The period is not interrupted b the mere act of reportin' the case to the fiscal. ? The preliminar% investi'ation conducted b% the municipal ma%or in the absence of the +ustice of peace / viv Pa'e 110 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 parta/es of the nature of a +udicial proceedin' and it does not interrupt the runnin' of the period of prescription. The period commences to run a'ain when the proceedin' is terminated. ? without the accused bein' convicted or ac9uitted ? the proceedin' is un+ustifiabl% stopped for a reason not imputable to the offender. 6n continuin' crime, the prescription commences to run after the termination of the continuit% of the offense. Period of prescription of election offense be'ins to run. 1" if discover% of the offense is incidental in a +udicial proceedin' ? from the date of the termination of the proceedin's #" otherwise ? from the date of the commission of the offense
A#. 9.. 0hen an ho# penalties prescribe! I The penalties imposed b% final sentence prescribe as follows. 1. )eath and reclusion perpetua, in twent% %earsF #. 2ther afflictive penalties, in fifteen %earsF 3. Correctional penalties, in ten %earsF with the e-ception of the penalt% of arresto ma%or, which prescribes in five %earsF >. &i'ht penalties, in one %ear. PERIOD OF PRESCRIPTION OF PENALTIESD 1. death and reclusion perpetua #= %ears #. other afflictive penalties @ 1! %ears 3. correctional penalties @ 1= %ears e-cept arresto mayor which prescribes in ! %ears >. li'ht penalties ? %ear A#. 9@. Computation of the prescription of penalties! I The period of prescription of penalties shall commence to run from the date when the culprit should evade the service of his sentence, and it shall be interrupted if the defendant should 'ive himself up, be captured, should 'o to some forei'n countr% with which this 1overnment has no e-tradition treat%, or should commit another crime before the e-piration of the period of prescription. Period commences to run from the date the culprit evades the service of sentence. The period is interrupted. a. if the defendant surrenders b. if he is captured c. if he should 'o to a forei'n countr% with which the Philippines has no e-tradition treat% d. if he should commit another crime before the e-piration of the period of prescription ELEMENTSD a. penalt% is imposed b% final sentence b. the convict evaded the service of sentence b% escapin' durin' the term of his sentence c. escaped convict has not 'iven himself up, or has been captured d. penalt% has prescribed because of the lapse of time A#. @0. Paron. its effect. I A pardon shall not wor/ the restoration of the ri'ht to hold public office, or the ri'ht of suffra'e, unless such ri'hts be e-pressl% restored b% the terms of the pardon. A pardon shall in no case e-empt the culprit from the pa%ment of the civil indemnit% imposed upon him b% the sentence. Mons,no +. F,$o#,n (1989) *onsanto was convicted of the comple- crime of estafa thru falsification of public documents. $he was pardoned. $he now see/s reinstatement to her former position as Assistant treasurer, without need of a new appointment. Pardon does not ipso facto restore a convicted felon to public office. A pardon althou'h full and plenar%, cannot preclude the appointin' power from refusin' appointment to an%one deemed of bad character, a poor moral ris/, or who is unsuitable b% reason of the pardoned conviction. P#&s!4&n!,% A4 Ho$ F,$=F!n4!n- Co33!&& +. D&s!&#o (.221) The applicable law in the computation of the prescriptive period for RA 3=1: is $ection # of Act No. 33#0 which provides that prescription shall be'in to run from the da% of the commission of the violation of the law and if the same be not /nown at the time, from the discover% thereof and the institution of +udicial proceedin's for its investi'ation and punishment. P&o*%& +. A/"n-,n (.222) Facts: Abun'an, to'ether with # others were char'ed with murder for the death of )irilo, $r. Abun'an pleaded not 'uilt% upon his arrai'nment. After trial on the merits, the trial court sentenced Pedro Abun'an to suffer the penalt% of reclusion and such penalties accessor% thereto. Abun'an appealed his case but died durin' the pendenc% of his appeal. Held: The death of appellant e-tin'uished his criminal liabilit%. *oreover, because he died durin' the pendenc% of the appeal and before the finalit% of the +ud'ment a'ainst him, his civil liabilit% arisin' from the crime or delict (civil liabilit% e- delicto" was also e-tin'uished. 6t must be added, thou'h, that his civil liabilit% ma% be based on sources of obli'ation other than delict. Cor this reason, the victims ma% file a separate civil action a'ainst his estate, as ma% be warranted b% law and procedural rules. R&$&/!4o +. P&o*%& (.222) Facts: 2n $eptember :, 1::=, )orol went to the house of her cousin, Recebido, to redeem her propert%, an a'ricultural land with an area of 3,!#= s9 meters, which )orol mort'a'ed to Recebido sometime in April of 1:!. Recebido and )orol did not e-ecute a document on the mort'a'e but )orol instead 'ave Recebido a cop% of the )eed of $ale dated 8une 10, 1:;3 e-ecuted in her favor b% her father. 6n said confrontation, petitioner refused to allow )orol to redeem her propert% on his claim that she had sold her propert% to him in 1:;:. )orol maintained and insisted that the transaction between them involvin' her propert% was a mort'a'e. )orol verified from the 2ffice / viv Pa'e 11; #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 of the Assessor in $orso'on that there e-ists on its file a )eed of $ale dated Au'ust 13, 1:;:, alle'edl% e-ecuted b% )orol in favor of Recebido and that the propert% was re'istered in the latterMs name. 3pon e-amination of the said )eed of $ale, it was discovered that )orolBs si'nature on said document was falsified b% Recebido. Recebido then alle'ed that 8uan )orol sold the said land to him on Au'ust 13, 1:3. Held: 3nder Article :1 of the Revised Penal Code, the period of prescription shall Lcommence to run from the da% on which the crime is discovered b% the offended part%, the authorities, or their a'ents, . . ..L 6n People v. Re%es, The Court has declared that re'istration in public re'istr% is a notice to the whole world. The record is constructive notice of its contents as well as all interests, le'al and e9uitable, included therein. All persons are char'ed with /nowled'e of what it contains. The Court noted that )orol had no actual /nowled'e of the falsification prior to $eptember :, 1::=. The alle'ed sale also could not have been re'istered before 1:3, the %ear the alle'ed deed of sale was e-ecuted b% )orol. Considerin' the fore'oin', it is lo'ical and in consonance with human e-perience to infer that the crime committed was not discovered, nor could have been discovered, b% the offended part% before 1:3. Neither could constructive notice b% re'istration of the for'ed deed of sale, which is favorable to the petitioner since the runnin' of the prescriptive period of the crime shall have to be rec/oned earlier, have been done before 1:3 as it is impossible for the petitioner to have re'istered the deed of sale prior thereto. <ven 'rantin' ar'uendo that the deed of sale was e-ecuted b% the private complainant, delivered to the petitioner?accused in Au'ust 13, 1:3 and re'istered on the same da%, the 1=%r prescriptive period of the crime had not %et elapsed at the time the information was filed in 1::1. The crime had not prescribed at the time of the filin' of the information. D&% C,s!%%o +. To##&$,3*o (.22.) Facts: The trial court rendered +ud'ment and declared Torrecampo 'uilt% of violatin' $ection 1; (nn" of P) 1#:0, otherwise /nown as the 1:; <lection Code, for stri/in' the electric bulb and # /erosene petroma- lamps durin' the countin' of the votes in a votin' center plun'in' the room in complete dar/ness, thereb% interruptin' and disruptin' the proceedin's of the (oard of <lection Tellers. Torrecampo appealed his conviction to the CA which eventuall% affirmed the decision of the trial court in toto. $aid decision became final and e-ecutor%. Thus, the e-ecution of +ud'ment was scheduled on 2ctober 1>, 1:;. )urin' the e-ecution of +ud'ment, petitioner failed to appear which prompted the presidin' +ud'e to issue an order of arrest of petitioner and the confiscation of his bond. ,owever, petitioner was never apprehended. ,e remained at lar'e. Ten %ears later, on 2ctober #>, 1::;, Torrecampo filed a motion to 9uash the warrant issued for his arrest on the 'round of prescription of the penalt% imposed upon him. Held: Article :3 of the Revised Penal Code provides when the prescription of penalties shall commence to run. 3nder said provision, it shall commence to run from the date the felon evades the service of his sentence. Pursuant to Article 1!; of the same Code, evasion of service of sentence can be committed onl% b% those who have been convicted b% final +ud'ment b% escapin' durin' the term of his sentence. L<scapeL in le'al parlance and for purposes of Articles :3 and 1!; of the RPC means unlawful departure of prisoner from the limits of his custod%. Clearl%, one who has not been committed to prison cannot be said to have escaped therefrom. 6n the instant case, Torrecampo was never brou'ht to prison. 6n fact, even before the e-ecution of the +ud'ment for his conviction, he was alread% in hidin'. Now Torrecampo be's for the compassion of the Court because he has ceased to live a life of peace and tran9uilit% after he failed to appear in court for the e-ecution of his sentence. (ut it was Torrecampo who chose to become a fu'itive. The Court accords compassion onl% to those who are deservin'. Torrecampo 'uilt was proven be%ond reasonable doubt but he refused to answer for the wron' he committed. ,e is therefore not to be rewarded therefor. P&o*%& +. P,#!,#$, (.222) Facts: Patriarca with the alias of Oa )+an'o, an NPA, with ten (1=" armed companions, re9uested permission to rest in the house of *alto. The% had with them Arevalo who was ho'tied. Patriarca as/ed that the li'hts in *altoMs house be e-tin'uished. Patriarca then ordered Arevalo to lie down then shot the latter two times. The trial court convicted Patriarca of murder. Patriarca then applied for amnest% under Proclamation No. ;#> amendin' Proclamation No. 3>;, dated *arch #!, 1::>, entitled L1rantin' Amnest% to Rebels, 6nsur'ents, and All 2ther Persons Aho ,ave or *a% ,ave Committed Crimes A'ainst Public 2rder, 2ther Crimes Committed in Curtherance of Political <nds, and Jiolations of the Article of Aar, and Creatin' a National Amnest% Commission.L ,is application was favorabl% 'ranted b% the National Amnest% (oard Held: Para'raph 3 of Article : of the Revised Penal Code provides that criminal liabilit% is totall% e-tin'uished b% amnest%, which completel% e-tin'uishes the penalt% and all its effects. The Court ta/es +udicial notice of the 'rant of amnest% upon Patriarca. 2nce 'ranted, it is bindin' and effective. ,ence, the 'rant of amnest% e-tin'uishes the liabilit% of Patriarca in the present case. B. PARTIAL EGTINCTION A#. 91. Partial Extinction of criminal liability. I Criminal liabilit% is e-tin'uished partiall%. 1. (% conditional pardonF #. (% commutation of the sentenceF and 3. Cor 'ood conduct allowances which the culprit ma% earn while he is servin' his sentence. CAUSES OF PARTIAL EGTINCTION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITYD 1. CONDITIONAL PARDON a" when delivered and accepted is considered a contract between the soverei'n power and the convict that the former will release the latter upon compliance with the condition b" usual condition 5he shall not a'ain violate an% of the penal laws of the Philippines >iolations of the conditions: offender is rearrested and re?incarcerated prosecution under Art. 1!: of the RPC / viv Pa'e 11 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 .. COMMUTATION OF SENTENCE a" reduce de'ree of penalt% b" decrease the len'th of imprisonment c" decrease the amount of fine Specific cases where commutation is pro!ided for by the Code: convict sentenced to death over ;= %ears old 1= +ustices of the $C fail to reach a decision for the affirmance of the death penalt% @. 6OOD CONDUCT ALLOWANCES DURIN6 CONFINEMENT ? deduction for the term of sentence for 'ood behavior 1. PAROLE ? consists in the suspension of the sentence of a convict without 'rantin' pardon, prescribin' the terms upon which the sentence shall be suspended. ? *a% be 'ranted to a prisoner after servin' the minimum penalt% under the indeterminate sentence law ? Consists in the suspension of the sentence of a convict after servin' the minimum term of the indeterminate penalt%, without 'rantin' a pardon prescribin' the terms upon which the sentence shall be punished. Con4!!on,% P,#4on P,#o%& *a% be 'iven an time before final +ud'ment is 'ranted b% the Chief <-ecutive under the Administrative Code *a% be 'iven after the prisoner has served the minimum penalt% is 'ranted b% the (oard of Parole and Pardons under the 6$& Cor violation, convict ma% be rearrested or prosecuted under Art. 1!: Cor violation, convict can be rearrested and re? incarcerated to serve the une-pired portion of his ori'inal penalt% A#. 9(. 'bligation incurre by person grante conitional paron! I An% person who has been 'ranted conditional pardon shall incur the obli'ation of compl%in' strictl% with the conditions imposed therein otherwise, his non?compliance with an% of the conditions specified shall result in the revocation of the pardon and the provisions of Article 1!: shall be applied to him. A#. 90. Effect of commutation of sentence. I The commutation of the ori'inal sentence for another of a different len'th and nature shall have the le'al effect of substitutin' the latter in the place of the former. A#. 97. $llo#ance for goo conuct. I The 'ood conduct of an% prisoner in an% penal institution shall entitle him to the followin' deductions from the period of his sentence. 1. )urin' the first two %ears of his imprisonment, he shall be allowed a deduction of five da%s for each month of 'ood behaviorF #. )urin' the third to the fifth %ear, inclusive, of his imprisonment, he shall be allowed a deduction of ei'ht da%s for each month of 'ood behaviorF 3. )urin' the followin' %ears until the tenth %ear, inclusive, of his imprisonment, he shall be allowed a deduction of ten da%s for each month of 'ood behaviorF and >. )urin' the eleventh and successive %ears of his imprisonment, he shall be allowed a deduction of fifteen da%s for each month of 'ood behavior. 6OOD CONDUCT ALLOWANCES OF A PRISONER IN A PENAL INSTITUTIOND 1. Cirst # %ears a. ! da%s per month of 'ood behavior #. 3 rd @ ! th %ear b. da%s 3. followin' %ears to 1= th %ear c. 1= da%s >. 11 th %ear and successive %ears d. 1! da%s These allowances are 'ranted b% the )irector of Prisons and once 'iven cannot be revo/ed. A#. 98. Special time allo#ance for loyalty. I A deduction of one?fifth of the period of his sentence shall be 'ranted to an% prisoner who, havin' evaded the service of his sentence under the circumstances mentioned in Article ! of this Code, 'ives himself up to the authorities within > hours followin' the issuance of a proclamation announcin' the passin' awa% of the calamit% or catastrophe to in said article. SPECIAL TIME ALLOWANCE FOR LOYALTY ? it is a deduction of 1D! of the period of his sentence if he, havin' evaded the service of his sentence under the circumstances mentioned in Art. 1!, 'ives himself up to the authorities within > hours followin' the issuance of a proclamation announcin' the passin' awa% of the calamit%. This article does not appl% to prisoners who did not escape. The deduction of 1D! is based on the ori'inal sentence. 3nder Art. 1!, a convict who evaded service of his sentence b% leavin' the penal institution on the occasion of disorder resultin' from a confla'ration, earth9ua/e, e-plosion or similar catastrophe or durin' a mutin% in which he did not participate, is liable to an increased penalt% (1D! of the time still remainin' to be served @ not to e-ceed 0 months" if he fails to 'ive himself up within > hours followin' the issuance of a proclamation b% the President announcin' the passin' awa% of the calamit%. A#. 99. 0ho grants time allo#ances. I Ahenever lawfull% +ustified, the )irector of Prisons shall 'rant allowances for 'ood conduct. $uch allowances once 'ranted shall not be revo/ed. / viv Pa'e 11: #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 )II. CI)IL LIABILITY ARISIN6 FROM FELONY As a 'eneral rule, an offense causes two classes of in+uries. 1. SOCIAL IN7URY @ produced b% the disturbance and alarm which are the outcome of the offense ? this is sou'ht to be repaired throu'h the imposition of the correspondin' penalt%. #. PERSONAL IN7URY @ caused to the victim of the crime who ma% have suffered dama'e, either to his person, to his propert%, to his honor, or to her chastit%. ? this is sou'ht to be repaired throu'h indemnit% which is civil in nature. A. 6ENERAL RULE RPC' A#. 122. Civil liability of a person guilty of felony. I <ver% person criminall% liable for a felon% is also civill% liable. (A$6$. A crime has dual character. a" as an offense a'ainst the state because of the disturbance of the social orderF and b" as an offense a'ainst the private person in+ured b% the crime unless it involves the crime of treason, rebellion, espiona'e, contempt and others wherein no civil liabilit% arises on the part of the offender either because there are no dama'es to be compensated or there is no private person in+ured b% the crime. 6n crimes a'ainst persons, li/e the crime of ph%sical in+uries, the in+ured part% is entitled to be paid for whatever he spent for the treatment of his wounds, doctorBs fees etc. as well as for loss or impairment of earnin' capacit%. *oral dama'es ma% be recovered as well. <-emplar% dama'es as part of the civil liabilit% ma be imposed when the crime was committed with one or more a''ravatin' circumstances. (ut if there is no dama'e caused b% the commission of the crime, the offender is not civill% liable. Civil liabilit% arises from the commission of the felon%. 6t is determined in the criminal action e-cept. a. the offended part% waives his ri'ht to file a civil action b. the offended part% reserves his ri'ht to institute it separatel%, or c. the offended part% institutes the civil action prior to the criminal action. A reservation of the ri'ht to file a separate civil action onl% 'ives the part% a''rieved the ri'ht to choose under which bod% of laws he must brin' the civil action, either under the. 1. RPC @ where the recover% ma% be defeated b% proof that the acts on which the action is based do not e-ist, or #. Civil Code @ where the same proof is re9uired to preclude recover%, or proof of dili'ence in the selection and emplo%ment of the emplo%ee <ffect of ACQ36TTA&. As a rule, if the offender is ac9uitted, the civil liabilit% is e-tin'uished, e-cept. a" if the ac9uittal is on the 'round that the 'uilt has not been proved be%ond reasonable doubt b" the ac9uittal was due to an e-emptin' circumstance li/e insanit% and c" when the court finds and states in its +ud'ment that there is onl% civil responsibilit%. SEPARATE CI)IL ACTION The rule is that when the criminal action is instituted, a separate civil action cannot be instituted or if alread% instituted, it is to be suspended. $aid rule applies onl% when the plaintiff in the civil action is the offended part% in the criminal action and both cases arise from the same offense. <-ceptions. *nepenent civil actions may be file forD a. violations of fundamental ri'hts (Art. 3#" b. defamation, fraud and ph%sical in+uries (Art. 33" c. failure or refusal of a member of the police force to render aid or protection to an% person in case of dan'er to life or propert% (Art. 3>" PERTINENT PRO)ISIONS C!+!% Co4&' A#. .2. <ver% person who, contrar% to law, wilfull% or ne'li'entl% causes dama'e to another, shall indemnif% the latter for the same. A#. 1101. Civil obli'ations arisin' from criminal offenses shall be 'overned b% the penal laws, sub+ect to the provisions of Article #1;;, and of the pertinent provisions of Chapter #, Preliminar% Title, on ,uman Relations, and of Title HJ666 of this (oo/, re'ulatin' dama'es. (1=:#a" A#. .170. Ahoever b% act or omission causes dama'e to another, there bein' fault or ne'li'ence, is obli'ed to pa% for the dama'e done. $uch fault or ne'li'ence, if there is no pre?e-istin' contractual relation between the parties, is called a 9uasi?delict and is 'overned b% the provisions of this Chapter. A#. .177. Responsibilit% for fault or ne'li'ence under the precedin' article is entirel% separate and distinct from the civil liabilit% arisin' from ne'li'ence under the Penal Code. (ut the plaintiff cannot recover dama'es twice for the same act or omission of the defendant. (n" RULE 111 PROSECUTION OF CI)IL ACTION 198( R&+!s&4 R"%&s on C#!3!n,% P#o$&4"#&
S&$!on 1. Ins!"!on o8 $#!3!n,% ,n4 $!+!% ,$!ons. Ahen a criminal action is instituted, the civil action for / viv Pa'e 1#= #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 the recover% of civil liabilit% is impliedl% instituted with the criminal action, unless the offended part% waives the civil action, reserves his ri'ht to institute it separatel%, or institutes the civil action prior to the criminal action. $uch civil action includes recover% of indemnit% under the Revised Penal Code, and dama'es under Articles 3#, 33, 3> and #1;0 of the Civil Code of the Philippines arisin' from the same act or omission of the accused. A waiver of an% of the civil actions e-tin'uishes the others. The institution of, or the reservation of the ri'ht to file, an% of said civil actions separatel% waives the others. The reservation of the ri'ht to institute the separate civil actions shall be made before the prosecution starts to present its evidence and under circumstances affordin' the offended part% a reasonable opportunit% to ma/e such reservation. 6n no case ma% the offended part% recover dama'es twice for the same act or omission of the accused. Ahen the offended part% see/s to enforce civil liabilit% a'ainst the accused b% wa% of moral, nominal, temperate or e-emplar% dama'es, the filin' fees for such civil action as provided in these Rules shall constitute a first lien on the +ud'ment e-cept in an award for actual dama'es. 6n cases wherein the amount of dama'es, other than actual, is alle'ed in the complaint or information, the correspondin' filin' fees shall be paid b% the offended part% upon the filin' thereof in court for trial. S&$. .. Ins!"!on o8 s&*,#,& $!+!% ,$!on. <-cept in the cases provided for in $ection 3 hereof, after the criminal action has been commenced, the civil action which has been reserved cannot be instituted until final +ud'ment has been rendered in the criminal action. (a" Ahenever the offended part% shall have instituted the civil action as provided for in the first para'raph of $ection 1 hereof before the filin' of the criminal action and the criminal action is subse9uentl% commenced, the pendin' civil action shall be suspended, in whatever sta'e before final +ud'ment it ma% be found, until final +ud'ment in the criminal action has been rendered. ,owever, if no final +ud'ment has been rendered b% the trial court in the civil action, the same ma% be consolidated with the criminal action upon application with the court tr%in' the criminal action. 6f the application is 'ranted, the evidence presented and admitted in the civil action shall be deemed automaticall% reproduced in the criminal action, without pre+udice to the admission of additional evidence that an% part% ma% wish to present. 6n case of consolidation, both the criminal and the civil actions shall be tried and decided +ointl%. (b" <-tinction of the penal action does not carr% with it e-tinction of the civil, unless the e-tinction proceeds from a declaration in a final +ud'ment that the fact from which the civil mi'ht arise did not e-ist. S&$. @. W;&n $!+!% ,$!on 3,> *#o$&&4 !n4&*&n4&n%>. 6n the cases provided for in Articles 3#, 33, 3> and #1;0 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, the independent civil action which has been reserved ma% be brou'ht b% the offended part%, shall proceed independentl% of the criminal action, and shall re9uire onl% a preponderance of evidence. S&$. 1. 7"4-3&n !n $!+!% ,$!on no , /,#. A final +ud'ment rendered in a civil action absolvin' the defendant from civil liabilit% is no bar to a criminal action. S&$. (. E%&3&ns o8 *#&J"4!$!,% <"&s!on. The two (#" essential elements of a pre+udicial 9uestion are. (a" the civil action involves an issue similar or intimatel% related to the issue raised in the criminal actionF and (b" the resolution of such issue determines whether or not the criminal action ma% proceed. S&$. 0. S"s*&ns!on /> #&,son o8 *#&J"4!$!,% <"&s!on. A petition for suspension of the criminal action based upon the pendenc% of a pre+udicial 9uestion in a civil action ma% be filed in the office of the fiscal or the court conductin' the preliminar% investi'ation. Ahen the criminal action has been filed in court for trial, the petition to suspend shall be filed in the same criminal action at an% time before the prosecution rests.
B"!no +. An4#&s (.22() Facts: 1arcia, a 1rade > elementar% school pupil, and his pla%mate, Ailson Quinto, who was about 11 %rs old saw Andres and Pacheco who invited them to 'o fishin' inside a draina'e culvert. Ailson assented but 1arcia seein' that it was dar/ inside opted to remain seated in a 'rass% area about #meters from the entrance of the draina'e s%stem. Pacheco, Andres and Quinto, entered the draina'e s%stem which was covered b% concrete culvert about a meter hi'h and a meter wide, with water about a foot deep. After a while, respondent Pacheco, who was holdin' a fish, came out of the draina'e s%stem and left without sa%in' a word. Andres also came out, went bac/ inside, and emer'ed a'ain, this time, carr%in' Ailson who was alread% dead. Andres laid the bo%Ms lifeless bod% down in the 'rass% area. $hoc/ed at the sudden turn of events, 1arcia fled from the scene. Cor his part, Andres went to the house of petitioner *elba Quinto, AilsonMs mother, and informed her that her son had died. *elba Quinto rushed to the draina'e culvert while respondent Andres followed her. The respondents aver that since the prosecution failed to adduce an% evidence to prove that the% committed the crime of homicide and caused the death of Ailson, the% are not criminall% and civill% liable for the latterBs death. Held: The e-tinction of the penal action does not carr% with it the e-tinction of the civil action. ,owever, the civil action based on delict shall be deemed e-tin'uished if there is a findin' in a final +ud'ment in the civil action that the act or omission from where the civil liabilit% ma% arise does not e-ist. 6n the present case, the court ruled that respondents cannot be held criminall% nor civill% liable for the death of Ailson. 6n this case, the petitioner failed to adduce proof of an% ill? motive on the part of either respondent to /ill the deceased before or after the latter was invited to +oin them in fishin'. 6ndeed, the petitioner testified that respondent Andres used to 'o to their house and pla% with her son before the latterMs death. Ahen the petitionerMs son died inside the draina'e culvert, it was respondent Andres who brou'ht out the deceased. ,e then informed the petitioner of her sonMs death. <ven after informin' the petitioner of the death of her son, respondent Andres followed the petitioner on her wa% to the 'rass% area where the deceased was. / viv Pa'e 1#1 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 C;", +. CA (.221) Facts: ,ao, treasurer of $iena Realt% Corporation, filed a complaint?affidavit with the Cit% Prosecutor of *anila char'in' $pouses Crancis and <lsa Chua, of > counts of falsification of public documents pursuant to Article 1;# in relation to Article 1;1 of the RPC. Accused alle'edl% prepared, certified, and falsified the *inutes of the Annual $toc/holders meetin' of the (2) of the $iena Realt% Corporation b% causin' it to appear in said *inutes that ,ao was present and has participated in said proceedin's. )urin' the trial in the *eTC, Att%. $ua?Oho and Att%. Rivera appeared as private prosecutors. Chua moved to e-clude complainantMs counsels as private prosecutors in the case on the 'round that ,ao failed to alle'e and prove an% civil liabilit% in the case. Petitioner cites the case of Tan, 8r. v. 1allardo, holdin' that where from the nature of the offense or where the law definin' and punishin' the offense char'ed does not provide for an indemnit%, the offended part% ma% not intervene in the prosecution of the offense. Held: PetitionerMs contention lac/s merit. 1enerall%, the basis of civil liabilit% arisin' from crime is the fundamental postulate that ever% man criminall% liable is also civill% liable. Ahen a person commits a crime he offends two entities namel% (1" the societ% in which he lives in or the political entit% called the $tate whose law he has violatedF and (#" the individual member of the societ% whose person, ri'ht, honor, chastit% or propert% has been actuall% or directl% in+ured or dama'ed b% the same punishable act or omission. An act or omission is felonious because it is punishable b% law, it 'ives rise to civil liabilit% not so much because it is a crime but because it caused dama'e to another. Additionall%, what 'ives rise to the civil liabilit% is reall% the obli'ation and the moral dut% of ever%one to repair or ma/e whole the dama'e caused to another b% reason of his own act or omission, whether done intentionall% or ne'li'entl%. The indemnit% which a person is sentenced to pa% forms an inte'ral part of the penalt% imposed b% law for the commission of the crime. The civil action involves the civil liabilit% arisin' from the offense char'ed which includes restitution, reparation of the dama'e caused, and indemnification for conse9uential dama'es. 3nder the Rules, where the civil action for recover% of civil liabilit% is instituted in the criminal action pursuant to Rule 111, the offended part% ma% intervene b% counsel in the prosecution of the offense. 31 Rule 111(a" of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that, LWwPhen a criminal action is instituted, the civil action arisin' from the offense char'ed shall be deemed instituted with the criminal action unless the offended part% waives the civil action, reserves the ri'ht to institute it separatel%, or institutes the civil action prior to the criminal action.L ,ao did not waive the civil action, nor did she reserve the ri'ht to institute it separatel%, nor institute the civil action for dama'es arisin' from the offense char'ed. Thus, we find that the private prosecutors can intervene in the trial of the criminal action. B,s!%!o +. CA (.222) Facts: Pronebo was found 'uilt% b% the trial court of Rec/less 6mprudence resultin' to the death of one Advincula. Pronebo then filed an application for probation. $ubse9uentl%, the trial court issued an 2rder 'rantin' the motion for e-ecution of the subsidiar% liabilit% of his emplo%er (asilio. (asilio now asserts that he was not 'iven the opportunit% to be heard b% the trial court to prove the absence of an emplo%er?emplo%ee relationship between him and accused. Nor that, alternativel%, the accused was not lawfull% dischar'in' duties as an emplo%ee at the time of the incident. Held: The statutor% basis for an emplo%erMs subsidiar% liabilit% is found in Article 1=3 of the RPC. This liabilit% is enforceable in the same criminal proceedin' where the award is made. ,owever, before e-ecution a'ainst an emplo%er ensues, there must be a determination, in a hearin' set for the purpose of 1" the e-istence of an emplo%er?emplo%ee relationshipF #" that the emplo%er is en'a'ed in some /ind of industr%F 3" that the emplo%ee is ad+ud'ed 'uilt% of the wron'ful act and found to have committed the offense in the dischar'e of his duties (not necessaril% an% offense he commits LwhileL in the dischar'e of such dutiesF and >" that said emplo%ee is insolvent. (asilio /new of the criminal case that was filed a'ainst his driver because it was his truc/ that was involved in the incident. Curther, it was the insurance compan%, with which his truc/ was insured, that provided the counsel for Pronebo, pursuant to the stipulations in their contract. (asilio did not intervene in the criminal proceedin's, despite /nowled'e, throu'h counsel, that the prosecution adduced evidence to show emplo%er?emplo%ee relationship. Aith the convictMs application for probation, the trial courtMs +ud'ment became final and e-ecutor%. All told, it is our view that the lower court did not err when it found that (asilio was not denied due process. ,e had all his chances to intervene in the criminal proceedin's, and prove that he was not the emplo%er of the accused, but he chooses not to intervene at the appropriate time.
P;!%!**!n& R,//! +. P&o*%& (.221) Facts: Accused Roman, an emplo%ee of Philippine Rabbit was found 'uilt% and convicted of the crime of rec/less imprudence resultin' to triple homicide, multiple ph%sical in+uries and dama'e to propert%. The court further ruled that Philippine Rabbit, in the event of the insolvenc% of accused, shall be liable for his civil liabilities. Accused then +umped bail and remained at?lar'e. Philippine Rabbit filed a notice of appeal. 6t ar'ues that, as an emplo%er, it is considered a part% to the criminal case and is conclusivel% bound b% the outcome thereof. Conse9uentl%, petitioner must be accorded the ri'ht to pursue the case to its lo'ical conclusion I includin' the appeal. Held: The ar'ument has no merit. 3ndisputedl%, petitioner is not a direct part% to the criminal case, which was filed solel% a'ainst Roman, its emplo%ee. The cases dealin' with the subsidiar% liabilit% of emplo%ers uniforml% declare that, strictl% spea/in', the% are not parties to the criminal cases instituted a'ainst their emplo%ees. Althou'h in substance and in effect, the% have an interest therein, this fact should be viewed in the li'ht of their subsidiar% liabilit%. Ahile the% ma% assist their emplo%ees to the e-tent of suppl%in' the latterMs law%ers, as in the present case, the former cannot act independentl% on their own behalf, but can onl% defend the accused. Ahen the accused?emplo%ee absconds or +umps bail, the +ud'ment meted out becomes final and e-ecutor%. The emplo%er cannot defeat the finalit% of the +ud'ment b% filin' a notice of appeal on its own behalf in the 'uise of as/in' for a review of its subsidiar% civil liabilit%. (oth the primar% civil liabilit% of the accused? emplo%ee and the subsidiar% civil liabilit% of the / viv Pa'e 1## #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 emplo%er are carried in one sin'le decision that has become final and e-ecutor%. P&o*%& +. T,,n (.220) Held: Re'ardin' dama'es, when death occurs due to a crime, the followin' ma% be recovered. (1" civil indemnit% ex delicto for the death of the victimF (#" actual or compensator% dama'esF (3" moral dama'esF (>" e-emplar% dama'esF (!" attorne%Bs fees and e-penses of liti'ationF and (0" interest, in proper cases. B. SPECIAL CASE A#. 121. Rules regaring civil liability in certain cases. I The e-emption from criminal liabilit% established in subdivisions 1, #, 3, ! and 0 of Article 1# and in subdivision > of Article 11 of this Code does not include e-emption from civil liabilit%, which shall be enforced sub+ect to the followin' rules. First. 6n cases of subdivisions 1, #, and 3 of Article 1#, the civil liabilit% for acts committed b% an imbecile or insane person, and b% a person under nine %ears of a'e, or b% one over nine but under fifteen %ears of a'e, who has acted without discernment, shall devolve upon those havin' such person under their le'al authorit% or control, unless it appears that there was no fault or ne'li'ence on their part. $hould there be no person havin' such insane, imbecile or minor under his authorit%, le'al 'uardianship or control, or if such person be insolvent, said insane, imbecile, or minor shall respond with their own propert%, e-ceptin' propert% e-empt from e-ecution, in accordance with the civil law. Second. 6n cases fallin' within subdivision > of Article 11, the persons for whose benefit the harm has been prevented shall be civill% liable in proportion to the benefit which the% ma% have received. The courts shall determine, in sound discretion, the proportionate amount for which each one shall be liable. Ahen the respective shares cannot be e9uitabl% determined, even appro-imatel%, or when the liabilit% also attaches to the 1overnment, or to the ma+orit% of the inhabitants of the town, and, in all events, whenever the dama'es have been caused with the consent of the authorities or their a'ents, indemnification shall be made in the manner prescribed b% special laws or re'ulations. ,hird. 6n cases fallin' within subdivisions ! and 0 of Article 1#, the persons usin' violence or causin' the fears shall be primaril% liable and secondaril%, or, if there be no such persons, those doin' the act shall be liable, savin' alwa%s to the latter that part of their propert% e-empt from e-ecution. CI)IL LIABILITY OF PERSONS EGEMPT FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY <-emption from criminal liabilit% does not include e-emption from civil liabilit%. 1xceptions: 1. There is no civil liabilit% in para'raph > of Art. 1# which provides for in+ur% caused b% mere accident. #. There is no civil liabilit% in par. ; of Art. 1# which provides for failure to perform an act re9uired b% law when prevented b% some lawful or insuperable cause. The e-emption from criminal liabilit% does not include e-emption from civil liabilit% in the cases provided for in pars. 1, #, 3, ! and 0 of Art. 1#. Pars. > and ; are not mentioned. Therefore, there is also e-emption from civil liabilit% in the cases provided for in pars. > and ; of Art. 1#. 1. CI)IL LIABILITY FOR ACTS COMMITTED BY AN INSANE OR IMBECILE OR MINOR UNDER 9 OR O)ER 9 AND LESS THAN 1( WHO ACTED WITH DEISCERNMENT A minor over 1! %ears of a'e who acts with discernment is not e-empt from criminal liabilit% that is wh% the RPC is silent as to the subsidiar% liabilit% of his parents. The particular law that 'overns is Art. #1= of the Civil Code which provides, 5the father and, in case of his death or incapacit%, the mother are responsible for dama'es caused b% the minor children who live in their compan%.7 The final release of a child based on 'ood conduct does not obliterate his civil liabilit% for dama'es. .. CI)IL LIABILITY FOR ACTS COMMITTED BY PERSONS ACTIN6 UNDER IRRESISTIBLE FORCE OR UNCONTROLLABE FEAR ? The persons usin' violence or causin' the fear are primaril% liable. if there be no such persons, those doin' the act shall be liable secondaril%. @. CI)IL LIABILITY OF PERSONS ACTIN6 UNDER 7USTIFYIN6 CIRCUMSTANCES ? There is no civil liabilit% in +ustif%in' circumstances e-cept in par. > of Art. 11 wherein the person who was benefited b% the act which causes dama'e to another is the one civill% liable. 1. CI)IL LIABILITY OF INNCEEPERS AND SIMILAR PERSONS A#. 12.. Subsiiary civil liability of inn%eepers& tavern%eepers an proprietors of establishments! I 6n default of the persons criminall% liable, inn/eepers, tavern/eepers, and an% other persons or corporations shall be civill% liable for crimes committed in their establishments, in all cases where a violation of municipal ordinances or some 'eneral or special police re'ulation shall have been committed b% them or their emplo%ees. 6nn/eepers are also subsidiaril% liable for the restitution of 'oods ta/en b% robber% or theft within their houses from 'uests lod'in' therein, or for the pa%ment of the value thereof, provided that such 'uests shall have notified in advance the inn/eeper himself, or the person representin' him, of the deposit of such 'oods within the innF and shall furthermore have followed the directions which such inn/eeper or his representative ma% have 'iven them with respect to the care and vi'ilance over such 'oods. No liabilit% shall attach in case of robber% with violence a'ainst or intimidation of persons unless committed b% the inn/eeperMs emplo%ees. SUBSIDIARY CI)IL LIABILITY OF INNCEEPERS' TA)ERNCEEPERS OR PROPRIETORS OF ESTABLISHMENTS M ELEMENTS OF PAR. 1D 1. That the 6NNO<<P<R, TAJ<RNO<<P<R 2R PR2PR6<T2R of establishment or his emplo%ee committed a violation of municipal ordinance or some 'eneral or special police re'ulation. / viv Pa'e 1#3 #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 #. That a crime is committed in such inn, tavern or establishment. 3. That the person criminall% liable is insolvent. Ahen all the above elements are present, the inn/eeper, tavern/eeper or an% other person or corporation is civill% liable for the crime committed in his establishment. ELEMENTS OF PAR .. 1. The 'uests notified in advance the inn/eeper or the person representin' him of the deposit of their 'oods within the inn or house. #. The 'uest followed the directions of the inn/eeper or his representative with respect to the care of the vi'ilance over such 'oods. 3. $uch 'oods of the 'uests lod'in' therein were ta/en b% robber% with force upon thin's or theft committed within the inn or house. Ahen all the above elements are present, the inn/eeper is subsidiaril% liable. No liabilit% shall attach in case of robber% with violence a'ainst or intimidation of persons, unless committed b% the inn/eeperBs emplo%ees. 6t is not necessar% that the effects of the 'uest be actuall% delivered to the inn/eeper, it is enou'h that the% were within the inn. (. SUBSIDIARY LIABILITY OF OTHER PERSONS A#. 12@. Subsiiary civil liability of other persons! H The subsidiar% liabilit% established in the ne-t precedin' article shall also appl% to emplo%ers, teachers, persons, and corporations en'a'ed in an% /ind of industr% for felonies committed b% their servants, pupils, wor/men, apprentices, or emplo%ees in the dischar'e of their duties. ELEMENTSD 1. The emplo%er, teacher, person or corporation is en'a'ed in an% /ind of industr%. #. An% of their servants, pupils, wor/men, apprentices or emplo%ees commits a felon% while in the dischar'e of his duties. 3. The said emplo%ee is insolvent and has not satisfied his civil liabilit%. Private persons without business or industr% are not subsidiaril% liable. The felon% must be committed b% the servant or emplo%ee of the defendant in the civil case. <mplo%er has the ri'ht to ta/e part in the defense of his emplo%ee. No defense of dili'ence of a 'ood father of a famil%. C,#*!o +. Do#oJ, (1989) Rulin' upon the enforcement of the subsidiar% liabilit% of an emplo%er in the same criminal proceedin' without the need of a separate action, the court held that it should be shown that. 1" the emplo%er, etc. is en'a'ed in an% /ind of industr% #" the emplo%ee committed the offense in the dischar'e of his duties and 3" he is insolvent The subsidiar% liabilit% of the emplo%er, however, arises onl% after conviction of the emplo%ee in the criminal action. All these re9uisites present, the emplo%er, becomes ipso facto subsidiaril% liable upon the emplo%eeBs conviction and upon proof of the latterBs insolvenc%. C. WHAT CI)IL LIABILITY INCLUDES A#. 121. 0hat is inclue in civil liability. I The civil liabilit% established in Articles 1==, 1=1, 1=#, and 1=3 of this Code includes. 1. RestitutionF #. Reparation of the dama'e causedF 3. 6ndemnification for conse9uential dama'es. The first remed% 'ranted b% law is R<$T6T3T62N of the thin' ta/en awa% b% the offenderF if restitution cannot be made b% the offender or b% his heirs, the law allows the offended part% R<PARAT62N. 6n either case, indemnit% for conse9uential dama'es ma% be re9uired. Ahen propert% ta/en awa% is not recovered, the court must order the accused to restore it to its owner or, as an alternative, to pa% its +ust value. A#. 12(. Restitution. +o# mae! I The restitution of the thin' itself must be made whenever possible, with allowance for an% deterioration, or diminution of value as determined b% the court. The thin' itself shall be restored, even thou'h it be found in the possession of a third person who has ac9uired it b% lawful means, savin' to the latter his action a'ainst the proper person, who ma% be liable to him. This provision is not applicable in cases in which the thin' has been ac9uired b% the third person in the manner and under the re9uirements which, b% law, bar an action for its recover%. R<$T6T3T62N of the thin' itself must be made whenever possible. The convict cannot, b% wa% of restitution, 'ive to the offended part a similar thin' of the same amount, /in or species and 9ualit%. Ahere the crime committed is not a'ainst propert%, no restitution nor reparation of the thin' dama'ed can be done, althou'h the offended part% is entitled to indemnification under Art. 1=;. 6f the accused is ac9uitted, he cannot be ordered to return the propert% or amount received <HC<PT if. ? it is proved that the propert% belon'ed to the offended part% was in his possession when stolen from him ? and the identit% of the offender is not proved, in which case the ac9uitted person in whose possession the propert% was found ma% be ordered b% the court to return it to the owner. HOW RESTITUTION IS MADEK The thin' itself is to be restored, whenever possible, with allowance for deterioration, or diminution of value, even if found in the possession of the 3 rd person who ac9uired it le'all%, althou'h the latter can file an action a'ainst the person who ma% be liable to him e-cept if the thin' has been ac9uired b% the 3 rd person in the manner provided b% law which bars an action for its recover%. A#. 120. Reparation. +o# mae. I The court shall determine the amount of dama'e, ta/in' into / viv Pa'e 1#> #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 consideration the price of the thin', whenever possible, and its special sentimental value to the in+ured part%, and reparation shall be made accordin'l%. HOW IS REPARATION MADEK ? The court determines the amount of dama'es b% considerin'. a" the price of the thin' and b" its special sentimental value to the offended part%. 6f there is no evidence as to the value of the thin' unrecovered, there can be no reparation. The dama'es are limited to those caused b% the crime. The accused is liable for the dama'es caused as a result of the destruction of the propert% after the crime was committed either because it was lost or destro%ed b% the accused himself or that of an% other person or as a result of an% other cause or causes. The accused is not relieved of his obli'ation to satisf% his civil liabilit% if the insurance compan% has alread% paid the offended part% as the pa%ment of the insurance compan% was not made on behalf of the accused but because the contract with the insured?offended part%. ,owever, the insurance compan% is subro'ated to the ri'ht of the offended part% to collect dama'es. A#. 127. *nemnification. 0hat is inclue! I 6ndemnification for conse9uential dama'es shall include not onl% those caused the in+ured part%, but also those suffered b% his famil% or b% a third person b% reason of the crime. 6ndemnification for conse9uential dama'es includes. a. those caused the in+ured part% b. those suffered b% the famil%, or c. those suffered b% 3 rd person b% reason of the crime )ama'es cover not onl% ACT3A& 2R C2*P<N$AT2RK dama'es but also *2RA& AN) <H<*P&ARK or C2RR<CT6J< dama'es, especiall% when attended b% 1 or more a''ravatin' circumstances in the commission of the crime and considerin' that proof of pecuniar% loss is not necessar% in order that moral or e-emplar% dama'es ma% be ad+udicated as the assessment of such dama'es is left to the discretion of the court. Contributor% ne'li'ence of the offended part% reduces the liabilit% of the accused. Ahere )<AT, results. 1. 6N)<*N6TK. P!=,=== #. &ost of <arnin' Capacit% 3. $upport to a non?heir >. *oral dama'es for mental an'uishE !. <-emplar% dama'es if attended b% 1 or more a''ravatin' circumstances D. PERSONS CI)ILLY LIABLE A#. 128. 'bligation to ma%e restoration& reparation for amages& or inemnification for conse-uential amages an actions to eman the same. 3pon #hom it evolves. I The obli'ation to ma/e restoration or reparation for dama'es and indemnification for conse9uential dama'es devolves upon the heirs of the person liable. The action to demand restoration, reparation, and indemnification li/ewise descends to the heirs of the person in+ured. 3pon whom does the obli'ation to ma/e restoration, reparation or indemnification for dama'es devolveV ? upon the ,<6R$ of the person liable The heirs of the person liable has no obli'ation if restoration is not possible and the deceased left no propert%. Civil liabilit% is possible onl% when the offender dies after final +ud'ment. The action to demand restoration, reparation and indemnification descends to the heirs of the person in+ured. A#. 129. Share of each person civilly liable. I 6f there are two or more persons civill% liable for a felon%, the courts shall determine the amount for which each must respond. A#. 112. Several an subsiiary liability of principals& accomplices an accessories of a felony. Preference in payment! I Notwithstandin' the provisions of the ne-t precedin' article, the principals, accomplices, and accessories, each within their respective class, shall be liable severall% (in solidum" amon' themselves for their 9uotas, and subsidiaries for those of the other persons liable. The subsidiar% liabilit% shall be enforced, first a'ainst the propert% of the principalsF ne-t, a'ainst that of the accomplices, and, lastl%, a'ainst that of the accessories. Ahenever the liabilit% in solidum or the subsidiar% liabilit% has been enforced, the person b% whom pa%ment has been made shall have a ri'ht of action a'ainst the others for the amount of their respective shares. LIABILITY OF PRINCIPALS' ACCOMPLICES AND ACCESSORIES ? <ach within their respective class is liable in solidum amon' themselves for their 9uotas and subsidiaril% for those of the other persons liable. $ubsidiar% liabilit% is enforced. first, a'ainst the propert% of the principalsF second# a'ainst that of the accomplicesF third# a'ainst that of the accessories The person who made the pa%ment when liabilit% is in solidum or subsidiar% liabilit% has been enforced, will have a ri'ht of action a'ainst the others for the amount of their respective shares. A#. 111. 'bligation to ma%e restitution in certain cases! I An% person who has participated 'ratuitousl% in the proceeds of a felon% shall be bound to ma/e restitution in an amount e9uivalent to the e-tent of such participation. This refers to a person who has participated 'ratuitousl% in the commission of a felon% and he is bound to ma/e restitution in an amount e9uivalent to the e-tent of such participation. The third person must be innocent of the commission of the crimeF otherwise, he would be liable as an accessor% and this article will appl%. / viv Pa'e 1#! #==>?#==! CRIMINAL LAW 1 UP College of Law ESGUERRA NOTES 2004-2005 E. EGTINCTION OF CI)IL LIABILITY A#. 11.. Extinction of civil liability! I Civil liabilit% established in Articles 1==, 1=1, 1=#, and 1=3 of this Code shall be e-tin'uished in the same manner as obli'ations, in accordance with the provisions of the Civil &aw. <-tin'uished in the same manner as other obli'ations in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code. CI)IL CODE' A#. 1.@1. 2bli'ations are e-tin'uished. (1" (% pa%ment or performance. (#" (% the loss of the thin' due. (3" (% the condonation or remission of the debtF (>" (% the confusion or mer'er of the ri'hts of creditor and debtorF (!" (% compensationF (0" (% novation. 2ther causes of e-tin'uishment of obli'ations, such as annulment, rescission, fulfillment of a resolutor% condition, and prescription, are 'overned elsewhere in this Code. (11!0a" &oss of the thin' due does not e-tin'uish civil liabilit% because if the offender cannot ma/e restitution, he is obli'ed to ma/e reparation. 6ndemnit% for dama'es as a +ud'ment in a criminal case is purel% civil in nature and is independent of the penalt% imposed. A#. 11@. 'bligation to satisfy civil liability. I <-cept in case of e-tinction of his civil liabilit% as provided in the ne-t precedin' article the offender shall continue to be obli'ed to satisf% the civil liabilit% resultin' from the crime committed b% him, notwithstandin' the fact that he has served his sentence consistin' of deprivation of libert% or other ri'hts, or has not been re9uired to serve the same b% reason of amnest%, pardon, commutation of sentence or an% other reason. 3nless e-tin'uished, civil liabilit% subsists even if the offender has served sentence consistin' of deprivation of libert% or other ri'hts or has served the same, due to amnest%, pardon, commutation of sentence or an% other reason. 3nder the law as amended, even if the subsidiar% imprisonment is served for non?pa%ment of fine, this pecuniar% liabilit% of the defendant is not e-tin'uished. / viv Pa'e 1#0 #==>?#==!