You are on page 1of 3

SUMMARY BY YUNI SUSANTI

Discriminative Approach to Fill-in-the-Blank Quiz Generation for


Language Learners (Sakaguchi et.al., 2013)
1 Introduction
This paper focuses on automated distractor generation methods using a large-scale ESL corpus with a discriminative
model. They focus on semantically confusing distractors that measure learners competence to distinguish word-sense
and select an appropriate word. Evaluation is done using 3 native speakers and 23 non-native speakers of English,
and after that correlate their performance on quiz generated with their actual TOEFL/TOEIC scores. Contributions of
this paper are: 1) Present method for generating reliable and valid distractors, 2) Demonstrate the effectiveness of ESL
corpus and discriminative models on distractor generation.
2 Methodology
2.1 Error-Correction Pair Extraction
This step is to collect error-correction pair from Lang-8 corpus of Learner English. Error-correction pairs are extracted by
comparing trigrams around the replacement in the original and corrected sentences for considering surrounding context
of target.
Using the error-correction pairs, conditional probabilities P(wewc), which represent how probable that learners misuse
word wc as we are calculated. Based on that, confusion matrix is calculated to generate distractors. Given a sentence,
verbs appearing in the matrix are identied and blanked, then outputs distractors candidate that have high confusion
matrix.
For generating semantic distractors, they used correction as a target, and the misused word (error) as one of the distractor
candidates.
2.2 Discriminative Model for Distractor Generation and Selection
Multiple classier for each target word are trained using error-correction pairs extracted fromthe previous step. A classier
for a target word takes a sentence (in which the target word appears) as an input, and outputs the a verb as the best
distractor given the context using following features: 5 gram (+- 1 and 2 words of the target) lemmas and dependency
type with the target child. For pronoun, date time, or number the dependent is normalized (e.g. he PRP) to avoid
feature space sparse.
SUMMARY BY YUNI SUSANTI
Two methods for training the classiers:
DiscESL: directly use the corrected sentences in Lang-8 corpus, and use the original word (misused word by
learners) as a class. See table 1.
DiscSimESL: ESL-simulated native corpus, using articles from VOA Learning English. For each target in a given
sentence, the target is changed into an incorrect word according to the error probabilities obtained from the learners
confusion matrix. For each training sentence, 100 samples are generated, and the target word is replaced into an
erroneour word.
3 Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation with Native Speakers
This evaluation is to measure the reliability of the distractors. Three native speakers og English are asked to solve the
ll-in-the-blank quiz generated by the system. 50 quizzes are generated using different sentences per each method to
avoid showing the same sentence. The source sentence to generate the quiz are collected from VOA.
Evaluation metric is the ratio of the appropriate distractors.
RAD =
N
AD
N
ALL
Where NALL is the total number of quizzes and NAD is the number of quizzes in which more than or equal to 2 judges
agree by selecting the correct answer. When at least 2 judges select the option c (both options are correct), it means that
the distractors are inappropriate. The human evaluation shows that 98.3% of distractors are reliable.
3.2 Evaluation with ESL Learners
This evaluation measures the validity of the distractors by evaluate the correlation between learners accuracy for the gen-
erated quizzes and their TOEIC score. The participants are 24 Japanese native speakers. The result is that DiscSimESL
achieved higher level of positive correlation (0.76).
SUMMARY BY YUNI SUSANTI
4 Conclusion
The paper proposed a method to generate semantic distractors automatically in ll-in-the-blank quiz. The proposed
methods employ discriminative models trained using error patterns extracted from ESL corpus and can generate reliable
distractors by taking context of a given sentence into consideration.

You might also like