A novel process of rapid tooling, non-baking of ceramic moulding, was studied. It uses a casting mould made from ceramic slurry and rapid prototyping to form a metal tool. The process has been used in the automotive, consumer products, casting, and toy industries.
A novel process of rapid tooling, non-baking of ceramic moulding, was studied. It uses a casting mould made from ceramic slurry and rapid prototyping to form a metal tool. The process has been used in the automotive, consumer products, casting, and toy industries.
A novel process of rapid tooling, non-baking of ceramic moulding, was studied. It uses a casting mould made from ceramic slurry and rapid prototyping to form a metal tool. The process has been used in the automotive, consumer products, casting, and toy industries.
2003 Springer-Verlag London Limited Rapid Manufacture of Metal Tooling by Rapid Prototyping Z. Shan, Y. Yan, R. Zhang, Q. Lu and L. Guan Center for Laser Rapid Forming, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, PR China As the race to launch a product successfully into the market increases in speed, the drive to reduce metal tooling lead time will become more important. Time reduction for fabricating metal tools depends on fast, efcient, and exible manufactur- ing processes that dramatically reduce lead times while not sacricing mechanical properties. A novel process of rapid tooling, non-baking of ceramic moulding, was studied. It uses a casting mould made from ceramic slurry and rapid prototyp- ing to form a metal tool. It provides a quick, accurate, and relatively cost-effective route for producing metal parts or tools. The process and key technologies are analysed in detail. The process has been used in the automotive, consumer pro- ducts, casting, and toy industries. Applications show that the total costs for new products can be reduced by as much as 4060%, and lead times can be reduced by 5060%. The surface roughness is approximately Ra 3.2, and it can be improved to better that Ra 1.6 by polishing. The dimensional accuracy relative to size is about 0.1 mm for dimensions less than 200 mm. Keywords: Casting; Net shape forming; Non-baking ceramic mould; Rapid prototyping; Rapid tooling 1. Introduction New market conditions require faster product development and reduced time to market. They also demand higher quality, greater efciency, and lower cost and the ability to meet the technical requirements of the manufactured products. Creating tooling for prototype and production components represents one of the most time-consuming and costly phases in the development of new products. It is particularly problematic for low-volume products or rapidly changing high-volume products [1,2]. The emergence of rapid prototyping (RP) technology has caused great changes in rapid tooling (RT). Many different kinds of RT processes have been used for various applications Correspondence and offprint requests to: Mr Z. Shan, The Centre for Laser Rapid Forming, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PR China. E-mail: shanzhongde@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn as rapid RT brings many benets to industry [3,4]. Table 1 contrasts RT and conventional tooling. The main benets of RT are reduced lead times, parts in desired materials, low-risk design/tool changes, improved product quality, earlier testing, and more iterations in less time, avoidance of early nancial commitment, timely product introduction, and increased marked share and prots. The rapid tooling goal is to produce complex parts quickly of the required accuracy and quality, so it can be used in concurrent engineering. The RT processes can be classied as soft tooling, rm tooling, and hard tooling, according to the tooling cycle life. These tooling processes can be divided into direct tooling and indirect tooling according to the manufactur- ing process. Each RT process has its applications and short- comings. At present, the indirect tooling processes have many more applications than direct tooling processes because of their dimensional exibility, accuracy, strength, and range of materials. The direct metal tooling methods are usually used to provide a near net shape of the required tool [5]. Direct metal laser sintering fabricates metal tools directly from CAD data. The process is popular in rapid direct tooling. It could provide metal tools with very ne detail, but the sintered parts are relatively soft, rough, and porous. The experience and skill of the operator plays an important role in producing a good part, and a new material system has to be further developed in order to produce a better strength tool [6]. It is very difcult to manufacture large metal tools. Although direct manufacturing of metal tools by RP is not well developed, indirect methods have been used and shown to be feasible through the combination of RP and metal casting. Although application in mass production is not practical, this kind of technology is very suitable for one-off or low-volume production [4]. Rapid production is the combination of RP and the casting processes. Many kinds of precision casting process can be used to fabricate RT, such as precision sand casting, the evaporative pattern casting (EPC), the vacuum sealed pro- cess (V-process), plaster mould casting, ceramic mould casting, and investment casting. The different processes are compared in Table 2. The ceramic casting, sand casting, and the V processes are applicable for medium and large dies made of various alloys. Plaster casting is applicable for medium size tools made of aluminium alloys. Lost form and investment casting are suitable for medium and small dies. 470 Z. Shan et al. Table 1. Contrast between RT and conventional tooling. Item Rapid tooling Conventional tooling Fabrication time and cost Not affected by complexity Affected by complexity Accuracy and surface nish Good accuracy and excellent surface nish Highly accuracy and excellent surface nish Concerns over tool modications Few concerns A few concerns Driving mode Direct CAD use Indirect CAD use Tooling life Small or medium volume capability High-volume capability Tooling types Rapid soft, bridge, hard tools Hard tools Table 2. Comparison of different casting processes. Casting process Dimensional Surface Size limitations Intricacy accuracy roughness (Ra) Investment CT46 0.83.2 Small and middle Complicated Plaster CT46 0.81.6 Small and middle Complicated Lost CT57 1.66.3 All Complicated Sand CT58 6.312.5 All Medium Ceramic CT46 0.83.2 All Medium Vacuum CT57 1.63.2 Large Medium Many case studies of different RP processes and casting techniques have proved to be successful. There are many combinations in which the approach is satisfactory. Each kind of RP process can fabricate prototypes with the specic kind of materials, which will require the corresponding casting technique to provide the conversion from prototypes to metal parts. It is not always practical for any kind of RP technique to combine with any kind of casting process directly. Some paths need transition steps and many of them need improve- ment of quality. It is an acceptable way to fabricate large metal tools quickly and at low cost, especially used in automobile manufacture by combining RP and the ceramic casting process. Ceramic mould casting has been used in the casting industry for many years, but a considerable range of ring temperatures, from 300 to 1300C, is recommended in the literature [7], and 68 h are required to bake the ceramic mould. It is unlikely that any substantial improvement in strength will be obtained at sintering temperatures below 1000C. Slightly oxidising conditions are recommended when ring moulds to encourage the burning of residual volatile substances. Many composite moulds present their own difculties, with radiant heating in tunnel furnaces being preferred to re the ceramic material without excessively heating the backing material. However, the moulds are often destroyed or distorted by the different coefcients of thermal conductivity among the ceramic material, the backing material and the metal sand box. A novel process of rapid tooling, involving non-baking ceramic moulding based on RP is reported in this paper, which uses a casting moulded from ceramic slurry and rapid prototyping to form a metal tool. It provides a quick, accurate, and relatively cost-effective route for producing large metal parts or tools. The process and key technologies are analysed. 2. The Rapid Metal Tooling Process Description The rapid metal tooling process data is shown in Fig. 1. First, a 3D solid model is created. The CAD data can either be created by using CAD software or directly from 3D probes. Many CAD software systems can be used to design the mould, such as Solidworks, Pro/Engineer, and Unigraphics. In this work, the Solidworks software system is employed to design the mould. The metal shrink ratio is predicted in the tooling design stage, so the CAD model can be designed to account for the shrinkage. The Marc FEM software system is used to simulate the metal shrinkage ratio. Secondly, the CAD le is usually converted into an STL le, and then the STL le is sliced at intervals equal to the layer thickness. The data le is then used to drive currently available RP systems such as LOM (SSM), FDM, and SL to fabricate a physical object directly. The rapid prototype of the mould is fabricated by using a rapid prototyping system. Many kinds of RP system can be used to manufacture the master Fig. 1. The rapid production development system. Rapid Manufacture of Metal Tooling 471 prototype. The SSM800 (Solid Slice Manufacturing) system made at Tsinghua University is employed in order to achieve a smooth nish and good dimensional accuracy. The CAD le with slice data is fed into the RP system. A carbon dioxide laser cuts the outline of each separate lm according to the information for the layer. Layer by layer, the process is repeated automatically until the pattern is nished. After it is polished, the pattern can be used to fabricate the metal mould. The dimensional data of the prototype will be checked to ensure surface quality. If the prototype is acceptable, a silicon rubber mould is then made from the prototype. The metal tooling is then manufactured using the non-baking ceramic casting process, which is shown in Fig. 2. The RP pattern is xed on a mould plate (Fig. 2(a)), and then a clay blanket about 2 mm thick is applied uniformly to the pattern (Fig. 2(b)). The purpose of the clay is only to produce an oversize cavity in the backing mould. The backing sand mould (Fig. 2(c)) is fabricated and then the pattern is removed (Fig. 2(d)). The mould is then positioned over the RP pattern (Fig. 2(e)). If the pattern is not easy to remove, a silicon RTV mould will be required. The gap between the pattern and the mould is lled with the ceramic slurry (Fig. 2(f)). After the ceramic slurry gels (about 1520 min), the pattern must be separated from the mould (Fig. 2(g)). The mould is immediately heated by a gasoline torch (Fig. 2(h)). The mould may then be cast while still hot (Fig. 2(i)). Finally, the metal tooling (Fig. 2(j)) is fabricated from the rapid prototypes. The advantages of moulds manufactured by this processes include the following: Good dimensional stability and low surface roughness. Good pattern stripping characteristics and mould strength. Good resistance to thermal shock and spalling and washing. Low cost and quick. Fig. 2. The unbaked ceramic mould casting process. (a) RP pattern. (b) Sticky layer. (c) Backing sand mould. (d) Remove the pattern. (e) Put in RP pattern. (f) Pouring slurry. (g) Remove RP pattern. (h) Torch ceramic mould. (i) Close mould and cast. (j) Finishing. Non-baking of the ceramic mould. 3. Key Technologies for Rapid Metal Mould 3.1 Rapid Prototyping Surface Treatment Prototypes were made using LOM (SSM) and FDM machines. The prototypes must be polished before they are used as master patterns in the non-baking ceramic process. Figure 3 shows the surface roughness relationship between the LOM pattern and the ceramic mould. After surface treatment, the prototypes have high surface roughness and can meet the requirement of tools or parts. On the other hand, the prototypes can be protected from dampness and do not deform, split, or curl. The prototypes can usually be stored for a long time in good condition. Fig. 3. The surface roughness relationship between the LOM pattern and the ceramic mould. , before treatment; , after treatment. 472 Z. Shan et al. 3.2 Choice of Mould Materials Materials for unbaked ceramic moulds must be selected with care if optimum mould properties are to be obtained, since the mould materials must be able to withstand the pouring tempera- ture of the metal alloy used for the tools. The following factors must be considered: Proper linear expansion. Suitable melting point and refractory properties. Consistent chemical and physical characteristics. Small gas output and moisture absorption characteristics. Good particle distribution and size. Many kinds of refractory materials can be used for the mould. Table 3 shows the melting points, densities, and linear expansion coefcients for a selection of mould materials. Although all the refractory materials (Table 3) can be used for mould forming, it is very important to choose materials with a small linear expansion coefcient to increase dimension accuracy. Cost is another important factor in the materials selection. The principle materials used in the non-baking moulding process are mullite and zircon. 3.3 Binders and Mixture Ratio of Hydrolytic Solution The most commonly used binders are ethyl silicate [8]. They are produced by the reaction between silicon tetrachloride and ethanol at a temperature of 340C. The chemical equation is: SiCl 4 4C 2 H 5 OH (C 2 H 5 O) 4 Si 4HCl The molecular structural formulae are This material has a theoretical silica content of 28.8% wt. Commercial ethyl silicate binders include silica 32 and silica 40. The main characteristics of silica 32 and silica 40 are Table 3. Refractory materials and their physical characteristics. Refractory Chemical Melting Density Linear expansion materials notation point (C) (g cm 3 ) coefcient (C 1 ) Sillimanite Al 2 O 3 .SiO 2 1800 3.25 3.14.3 10 6 Mullite 3Al 2 O 3 .2SiO 2 1810 3.083.15 5.3 10 6 Corundum Al 2 O 3 2045 3.954.02 8.4 10 6 Fused silica SiO 2 1713 2.65 12.5 10 6 Quartz glass 1710 2.12.2 0.5 10 6 Mullite MgO.Al 2 O 3 2135 3.56 7.6 10 6 Zirconia ZrO 2 2690 5.73 7.210 10 6 Zircon ZrSiO 4 2430 4.74.9 5.1 10 6 Magnesia MgO 2800 3.58 14.17 10 6 given in Table 4. Silica 40 is strongly recommended as the binder in the non-baking mould process. The ethyl silicate itself has no bonding properties unless it is hydrolysed. The reaction is commonly carried out in water and ethanol using an acid catalyst such as hydrochloric acid (HCl). The reaction is fairly rapid and highly exothermic and it forms complex silicic acids that are capable of condensing to form coherent gels having good bonding properties. The main chemical reactions are (C 2 H 5 O) 4 Si 2HCl (C 2 H 5 O) 2 SiCl 2 2C 2 H 5 OH (C 2 H 5 O) 2 SiCl 2 2H 2 O (C 2 H 5 O) 2 Si(OH) 2 2HCl (C 2 H 5 O) 2 Si(OH) 2 2H 2 O SiO 2 2H 2 O 2C 2 H 5 OH (C 2 H 5 O) 4 Si 2H 2 O SiO 2 4C 2 H 5 OH Water, ethanol, HCl, and ethyl silicate were mixed in various proportions and in the proper process sequence as follows. First, HCl solution is mixed with the proper volume of distilled water. The sequence is that HCl is decanted into water. Secondly, the solution of HCl and distilled water is then decanted into ethyl alcohol and mixed. Thirdly, silica 40 is slowly put into the solution made from water, HCL, and ethyl alcohol and the mixture is stirred for at least 30 min. The hydrolysed solution must be aged for some time in a sealed container before it is used, for the hydrolytic decompo- sition is not sufcient. After storage in a sealed package for at least 24 h, it may be used to fabricate a ceramic mould. The variation of the ceramic mould strength with ageing time of the hydrolysed solution is shown in Fig. 4. With the increase of the hydrolysed solution ageing time, the hydrolysation reac- Table 4. Main physical characteristics of silica 32 and silica 40. Characters SiO 2 Acidity Dynamic Density Ethyl silicate (%) (HCl%) viscosity (20C g (20C cm 3 ) mm 2 s 1 ) Silica 40 40.81 0.05 4.0 1.047 Silica 32 30.57 0.05 0.97 0.944 Rapid Manufacture of Metal Tooling 473 Fig. 4. Mould strength variation with ageing time. , normal tempera- ture strength; , retained strength; , high-temperature strength. tion will continue until the hydrolysed solution reaches a uniform state. If the ageing time is short, coarse cracking could be produced easily on the ceramic mould surface, but if the ageing time is too long, the viscosity of the hydrolysed solution will increase and its uidity will be insufcient. A long ageing time will result in the hydrolysed solution nally becoming gelatinous, and it will be useless. The variation of the shelf life of the hydrolysed solution with the storage temperature is illustrated in Fig. 5. The shelf life of the hydrolysed solution is about 10 days at room temperature. At high ambient tempera- tures, the hydrolysed solution should be stored in a refrigerator. The main composition of the hydrolysed solution is as follows: if the weight of silica 40 is 100 g, the hydrolysed solution will require 13 g distilled water, 125 g alcohol and 1.8 ml HCl. 3.4 Acceleration Gelling Process The gelling rate of silica binders mixed with ceramic powder is a function of many factors, such as temperature, the compo- nents of the hydrolytic solution, the pH of the slurry, etc. The pH of the slurry is particularly signicant. Gelling is most rapid between pH 5 and 6 or at pH below 1.0. The pH can be adjusted by adding acid solutions including H 2 SO 4 and HCl or alkaline solutions such as NaOH, Ca(OH) 2 , MgO, CaO, Mg(OH) 2 , Na 2 CO 3 , etc. After consideration of various factors, a mixture of Ca(OH) 2 and MgO is recommended for the non- baking ceramic mould process. 3.5 Pattern Drawing Process The separation of the pattern from the mould can be a source of dimensional inaccuracies in most casting processes, so it Fig. 5. Shelf-life variation for different storage temperatures. requires particular care and attention in the rapid precision mould process. A hydraulic pattern drawing machine is rec- ommended for the process. In this process, RP can be used directly as a pattern if the parts are not too complex to remove from the sand mould, but, soft tooling will be required if the pattern cannot be removed from the mould. One of the most popular tooling applications for RP is the production of room temperature vulcanising (RTV) silicone rubber moulds. Silicone is a versa- tile material that can be moulded around a master pattern to produce a cavity. Silicone rubber tooling provides fast, inexpen- sive moulds, excellent part cosmetics, and the option of using multiple materials. The silicone materials have excellent natural release charac- teristics, provide good resistance to most chemicals, reproduce intricate details, resist tearing with repeated use, are exible enough to reduce demoulding and stress problems, work in a wide range of service temperatures, and create good quality reproductions. Using silicone mould making materials, tough- but-exible moulds can be created to reproduce intricate details and deliver high-quality replicas with high dimensional accu- racy. The optimum drawing pattern time is when the coating has enough strength and hardness and is also in the elastic con- dition. The pattern should be extracted from the sand mould in 3040 min. 3.6 Torching Process After the RP pattern has been separated from the mould, different torching processes can signicantly inuence the qual- ity of the nished mould. The inuences of the torching process on the dimensional accuracy are shown in Fig. 6. The inuence of the torching process on the mould strength is illustrated in Fig. 7. Torching immediately following pattern stripping provides the best dimensional accuracy and mould strength, which can be seen from Figs 6 and 7, so torching immediately is strongly recommended for the rapid metal tooling process. The main reason why the best dimensional accuracy and mould strength can be obtained is that it is impossible for some organic solvents in the surface coating to vapourise quickly at large scale if the coating is torched immediately Fig. 6. Variation of the mould dimensions for various torching pro- cesses. 474 Z. Shan et al. Fig. 7. Variation of the mould strength for various torching processes. after the separation of the pattern from the mould. A great deal of organic solvent burns off quickly, so the strength of surface coating can rapidly rise by removing organic solvent and by the heat effect. Although any residual organic materials in the mould will continue to be given off, the exterior surface will reach high strength and rigidity. It is advantageous to increase the dimensional precision and the mould strength. The torching time need only be about 2035 min after drawing the pattern from the mould, so if a rapid prototype has been fabricated, the metal tool can be manufactured in 10 h. 4. Example: Rapid Tooling of Alloy Iron for Automotive Cover Parts The SSM (layered object manufacturing) process involves the manufacturing of 3D physical models by laminating layers of paper material coated with polyethylene. This project used a SSM-800 system which can be used to fabricate patterns up to a volume of 800 550 500 mm 3 . Figure 8(a) shows the RP punch pattern with dimensions 575 50 80 mm 3 (LWH), and Fig. 8(c) shows the RP die pattern with dimensions 575 220 115 mm 3 (L W H) as a master pattern. Figs 8(b) and 8(d) show the corresponding metal Fig. 8. Rapid metal tooling of automative sheet metal parts. (a) SSM punch pattern. (b) Metal punch. (c) SSM die pattern. (d) Metal die. tools made from iron alloy to fabricate the automotive sheet metal parts. 5. Conclusions Our goal was to develop a rapid metal tooling method from an RP pattern for use in the die and mould industry. The metal tools were fabricated using RP combining the ceramic mould casting processes, the mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of which can meet the technical requirements. A wide range of metal alloy tools can be fabricated quickly using the process. The alloys range from carbon and low alloy steels, stainless steels, and tool steels to aluminium-based alloys and copper-based alloys. Although small parts can be manufactured, the main objective is middle-sized parts and large parts. The lead times and tooling costs are reduced. Metal tools can be produced in several days, e.g. one to two days after the RP patterns are prepared. The surface nish of the metal tools fabricated by this process is inuenced by several factors such as the RP pattern surface roughness, refractory grading, and metal and mould temperatures. Finer refractory grades give better RP pattern surfaces, which results in improved metal tool surface rough- ness. Generally, the metal die and punch can be manufactured with surface roughness of better than 3.2 m. The attainable dimensional accuracy can reach CT46. The continued development of CAD systems, RP systems, FEM systems, RT systems, and quality checking and feedback systems will produce signicant improvements in the quality of dies and moulds in the future, leading many more success- ful applications. References 1. A. Rosochowski and A. Matuszak, Rapid tooling: the state of the art, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 106, pp. 191198, 2000. Rapid Manufacture of Metal Tooling 475 2. H. Muller and J. Sladojevic, Rapid tooling approaches for small lot production of sheet metal parts, Journal of Materials Pro- cessing Technology, 115, pp. 97103, 2001. 3. K. P. Karunakaran, P. Vivekananda Shanmuganathan, Sanjay Janardhan Jadhav, et al. Rapid prototyping of metallic parts and moulds, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 105, pp. 371381, 2000. 4. D. Kochan, C. C. Kai and D. Zhaohui, Rapid prototyping issues in the 21st century, Computers in Industry, 39, pp. 310, 1999. 5. B. G. Bryden, I. R. Pashby, D. I. Wimpenny and C. Adams, Laminated steel tooling in the aerospace industry, Materials and Design, 21, pp. 403408, 2000. 6. M. W. Khaing, J. Y. H. Fah and L. Lu, Direct metal laser sintering for rapid tooling: process and characterisation of EOS parts, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 113, pp. 269272, 2001. 7. A. J. Clegg, Precision Casting Processes, pp. 123145, Pergamon, 1991. 8. L. Guan, Rapid metal tooling based on rapid prototyping, Masters dissertation, Tsinghua University, 2000.