Professional Documents
Culture Documents
,5
] isolated a
neurotrophin from the river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis
neurotrophin [Lf-NT] and another one from the Atlantic
hagfish (Myxine glutinosa neurotrophin [Mg-NT]). The lam-
preys and hagfish are jawless fish that diverged early in
vertebrate history, some 460 million years ago [7,8
].
Neither Lf-NT nor Mg-NT display any close similarity to
the other neurotrophins.
The neurotrophins bind two types of receptors: the tyro-
sine kinase Trk receptors and the low-affinity NGF
receptor p75, which is a member of the tumour necrosis
receptor superfamily. The function of p75 is less well
understood than that of the Trk receptors [9,10]. The Trk
receptors mediate specificity and several of the neu-
rotrophic functions of the neurotrophins. There are three
main types of Trk receptors: TrkA is a receptor for NGF,
NT-6 and NT-7; TrkB a receptor for BDNF and NT-4/5;
and TrkC is a receptor for NT-3 [1]. Two additional verte-
brate Trk receptors, which are different from TrkA, TrkB
and TrkC, have been isolated from lamprey (L. fluviatilis)
[6
].
nb9507.qxd 10/25/1999 8:30 PM Page 616
Evolution of the vertebrate neurotrophin and Trk receptor gene families Hallbk 617
of the neurotrophin and Trk gene families, which is illus-
trated in Figure 1. Two duplications led to the formation of
NGF, NT-3, BDNF and NT-4/5 (Figure 1a). NGF and
NT-3 were formed by the duplication of one intermediate
neurotrophin ancestral gene, whereas BDNF and NT-4/5
came from another intermediate ancestor. These duplica-
tions took place before the split of cartilaginous fish but
after the split of lampreys and hagfish from the common
vertebrate lineage. Thus, Lf-NT and Mg-NT arose before
the gene duplications and are descendants of the interme-
diate neurotrophin ancestors. This course of events
suggests the existence of an additional neurotrophin in
lamprey and hagfish. The inferred neurotrophin and Trk
trees (Figure 1a,c) are similar in many respects, suggesting
that the Trk genes were formed during a course of events
similar to that of the neurotrophins. According to this
model, trkA and trkC were formed by the duplication of an
intermediate ancestral trk gene. Lf-trk1 is probably a
descendant of the intermediate trkA/C ancestor.
The timing of these duplications early in vertebrate history
parallels that of several other gene families [11,12,13
].
Figure 1
TrkA
TrkC
TrkB
Lf-Trk1 Myxine
Lampetra
Ancestral Trk
TrkA/TrkC ancestor
TrkB ancestor
Chondrichtyes
Osteichtyes
Tetrapods
Lf-Trk2
TrkB
TrkA
TrkC1
TrkB1
TrkC2 TrkB2
NGF
NT-3
BDNF
NT-4/5
NGF
NT-3
BDNF
(NGF)
NT-3 BDNF
Mg-NT Lf-NT
Myxine
Lampetra
Ancestral neurotrophin
NGF/NT-3 ancestor
BDNF/NT-4 ancestor
Chondrichtyes
Osteichtyes
Myxini
Cephala-
spidomorphi
Agnatha
Agnatha
NT-7
(NT-4/5)
Tetrapods
Additional
duplication
Additional
duplication
NT-6
(a) (b)
Neurotrophin evolution
Trk receptor evolution
TrkC
TrkA
> 460 MYBP
> 400 MYBP
> 360 MYBP
> 460 MYBP
> 400MYBP
> 360 MYBP
Lf-Trk1
Lf-Trk2
human TrkA
rat TrkA
chick TrkA
human TrkC
rat TrkC
chick TrkC
zebrafish TrkC2
zebrafish TrkC1
human TrkB
rat TrkB
chick TrkB
zebrafish TrkB2
zebrafish TrkB1
81
100
100
98
100
74
76
100
68
100
74
(c) (d)
Lf-NT
human BDNF
platyfish BDNF
ray BDNF
human NT-4/5
rat NT-4/5
Xl NT-4
human NT-3
chick NT-3
chick NGF
rat NGF
human NGF
platyfish NT-6
carp NT-7
84
100
100
100
57
100
100
100
82
100
65
100
64
platyfish NGF
zebrafish NT-7
ray NT-3
84
Mg-NT
(D. rerio)
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
(NT-4/5)
nb9507.qxd 10/25/1999 8:30 PM Page 617
Furthermore, the phylogenies are in agreement with a sug-
gested hypothesis (called the 2R hypothesis) that two
rounds of tetraploidisation doubled the genome twice early
in chordate and vertebrate history [14,15]. According to
this hypothesis, a first duplication of a single ancestor
would have produced two intermediate neurotrophin
ancestors. A second duplication would then have produced
NGF, NT-3, BDNF, and NT-4/5. This hypothesis also pro-
poses that a trkB ancestor was duplicated, into trkB and a
trkB sister, which was probably lost during evolution
(Figure 1d). However, the phylogenies of several gene
families do not provide support for the 2R hypothesis
[16
], or biological constraints.
Neurotrophin and Trk receptor genes in
paralogous chromosomal regions
The neurotrophin genes reside on different chromo-
somes. NGF is on human chromosome 1p (HSA 1p),
BDNF on 11p, NT-3 on 12p and NT-4/5 on 19q. A com-
pilation of the maps in the regions of the neurotrophin
genes has shown that several paralogues are located in the
vicinity of the neurotrophin genes (Figure 2a). These
paralogous regions, which have sets of linked genes that
each have linked homologues on another chromosome
[14], argue against random gene duplication as the mech-
anism of formation. Rather, they suggest that the gene
copies were formed at duplication events involving chro-
mosome segments or the entire genome, though the
history of such regions may be complex [13
]. Similar to
the neurotrophin genes, the TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC genes
are located within paralogous regions that contain genes
with homologues in two or more other chromosomes
(Figure 2b). The TrkA, TrkB and TrkC genes are located
on HSA 1q, 9q and 15q (chromosomes 3, 13 and 7 in
mouse). Several translocations and inversions have taken
place since the proposed duplication events. In humans,
the TrkB gene is located on HSA 9q, but the paralogous
region is split on HSA 5p and 9q (Figure 2b), indicating a
translocation; however, in the mouse, this region is con-
tinuous on chromosome 13.
The prime examples of conserved paralogous regions are
in HSA 2q, 7p, 12q, and 17q and their mouse counterparts,
which contain the Hox gene clusters. The four human
chromosomes contain the genes that encode fibrillar colla-
gen, clusters of integrin genes and genes for intermediate
filaments [14,17,18]. A first compilation of the zebrafish
gene map has recently been compared with mammalian
maps [19
].
Orthologues, paralogues and ancestors
Homologous genes that are derived by means of speciation
are called orthologues, and if they are formed by gene
duplication, they are called paralogues. NGF, BDNF, NT-3
and NT-4/5 are paralogues. NT-4 was first isolated from
Xenopus laevis [2], and NT-5 was first isolated from rat [20].
Phylogeny (Figure 1a) and biological data clearly show that
NT-4 and NT-5 are orthologues [21]. Although NT-6 and
NT-7 have been suggested to be paralogues [4
,5
], they
are more likely to be orthologues [6
], as indicated by the
phylogeny (Figure 1a) and the fact that they are related to
each other in a similar way as the species from which they
were isolated. They probably resulted from the duplica-
tion of an ancestral fish NGF gene. Zebrafish NGF/NT-7,
as well as trkB1/trkB2 and trkC1/trkC2 [22], were probably
formed at the major duplication event early in the history
of Osteichtyes [19
,23].
The agnathan neurotrophins have the same structural
characteristics as the gnathostome neurotrophins, suggest-
ing that their common ancestral neurotrophin,
arche-neurotrophin, also had these characteristics. A 3D-
fold similar to the one present in NGF has been found in
the invertebrate clotting protein coagulogen isolated from
the horseshoe crab [24,25]. Coagulogen is a cysteine-knot
protein and appears to share similarities also with the
Drosophila protein sptzle [26]. This suggests that the fold-
ing motif of the neurotrophins is older than the vertebrates
and that it was shared with a distant ancestor in common
with coagulogen and other cysteine-knot proteins.
The diversification of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs)
[27] and other genes [28
].
6. Hallbk F, Lundin L-G, Kullander K: Lampetra fluviatilis
neurotrophin homologue (Lf-NT), descendant of a neurotrophin
ancestor discloses the early molecular evolution of neurotrophins
in the vertebrate subphylum. J Neurosci 1998, 18:8700-8711.
Reports the isolation of neurotrophins and Trks from jawless fish. The phy-
logeny and chromosomal localisation of these neurotrophins suggest that
the gene families were formed early in vertebrate history by major duplication
events.
7. Benton M J: The Fossil Record 2. London: Chapham & Hall; 1993.
8. Kumar S, Hedges SB: A molecular timescale for vertebrate
evolution. Nature 1998, 392:917-920.
Provides molecular divergence-time estimates for mammalian orders and
major lineages of vertebrates based on 658 nuclear genes. The use of a high
numer of genes to obtain an estimate of divergence time is more reliable
since estimates from single genes may have large statistical errors.
9. Carter BD, Lewin GR: Neurotrophins live or let die: does p75NTR
decide? Neuron 1997, 18:187-190.
10. Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Carter BD, Dobrowsky RT, Chao MV: Death of
oligodendrocytes mediated by the interaction of nerve growth
factor with its receptor p75. Nature 1996, 383:716-719.
11. Sharman AC, Holland PW: Estimation of Hox gene cluster number
in lampreys. Int J Dev Biol 1998, 42:617-620.
12. Holland PW, Garcia FJ, Williams NA, Sidow A: Gene duplications
and the origins of vertebrate development. Development Suppl
1994:125-133.
620 Evolution of the nervous system
nb9507.qxd 10/25/1999 8:30 PM Page 620
13. Patton SJ, Luke GN, Holland PWH: Complex history of a
chromosomal paralogy region: insights from Amphioxus aromatic
amino acid hydroxylase genes and insulin-related genes.
Mol Biol Evol 1998, 15:1373-1380.
By examining the phylogeny of physically linked genes on different chromo-
somes in a paralogous region, the authors show that linked genes do not
need to have identical evolutionary histories.
14. Lundin LG: Evolution of the vertebrate genome as reflected in
paralogous chromosomal regions in man and the house mouse.
Genomics 1993, 16:1-19.
15. Sidow A: Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early
vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1996, 6:715-722.
16. Hughes AL: Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do
not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplications
early in vertebrate history. J Mol Evol 1999, 48:555-564.
Presents a test of the 2R hypothesis using molecular phylogeny of nine dif-
ferent genes. The inferred trees of the majority of the genes do not give the
expected tree topology.
17. Katsanis N, Fitzgibbon J, Fisher EMC: Paralogy mapping:
identification of a region in the human MHC triplicated onto
human chromosomes 1 and 9 allows the prediction and isolation
of novel PBX and NOTCH loci. Genomics 1996, 35:101-108.
18. Wang W, Wu W, Desai T, Ward D, Kaufman S: Localization of the
alpha 7 integrin gene (ITGA7) on human chromosome 12q13:
clustering of integrin and Hox genes implies parallel evolution of
these gene families. Genomics 1995, 26:568-570.
19. Postlethwait JH, Yan YL, Gates MA, Horne S, Amores A, Brownlie A,
Donovan A, Egan ES, Force A, Gong Z et al.: Vertebrate genome
evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nat Genet 1998,
18:345 349.
The authors mapped 144 zebrafish genes. The map was then compared
with mammalian maps. The comparison revealed large conserved chromo-
some segments. The results corroborate the hypothesis that two polyploidi-
sation events took place before the divergence of fish and mammalian
lineages.
20. Berkemeier LR, Winslow JW, Kaplan DR, Nikolics K, Goeddel DV,
Rosenthal A: Neurotrophin-5: a novel neurotrophic factor that
activates trk and trkB. Neuron 1991, 7:857-866.
21. Ip NY, Stitt TN, Tapley P, Klein R, Glass DJ, Fandl J, Greene LA,
Barbacid M, Yancopoulos G D: Similarities and differences in the
way neurotrophins interact with the Trk receptors in neuronal and
nonneuronal cells. Neuron 1993, 10:137-149.
22. Martin SC, Marazzi G, Sandell JH, Heinrich G: Five Trk receptors in
the zebrafish. Dev Biol 1995, 169:745-758.
23. Prince VE, Joly J, Ekker M, Ho R: Zebrafish hox genes: genome
organization and modified colinear expression patterns in the
trunk. Development 1998, 125:407-420.
24. Bergner A, Oganessyan V, Muta T, Iwanaga S, Typke D, Huber R,
Bode W: Crystal structure of a coagulogen, the clotting protein
from horseshoe crab: a structural homologue of nerve growth
factor. EMBO J 1996, 15:6789-6797.
25. Bergner A, Muta T, Iwanaga S, Beisel HG, Delotto R, Bode W:
Horseshoe crab coagulogen is an invertebrate protein with a
nerve growth factor-like domain. Biol Chem 1997, 378:283-287.
26. DeLotto Y, DeLotto R: Proteolytic processing of the Drosophila
sptzle protein by easter generates a dimeric NGF-like molecule
with ventralising activity. Mech Dev 1998, 72:141-148.
27. Suga H, Kuma K, Iwabe N, Nikoh N, Ono K, Koyanagi M, Hoshiyama
D, Miyata T: Intermittent divergence of the protein tyrosine kinase
family during animal evolution. FEBS Lett 1997, 412:540-546.
28. Brooke NM, Garcia-Fernandez J, Holland PW: The ParaHox gene
cluster is an evolutionary sister of the Hox gene cluster.
Nature 1998, 392:920-922.
Reports the identification of dispersed Hox-like genes that form a novel
gene cluster in Amphioxus. This cluster is suggested to be a paralogue to
the Amphi-Hox gene cluster. The two clusters arose through a duplication of
a proto-Hox gene cluster, and it is suggested that this duplication facilitated
an increase in body complexity during the Cambrian explosion.
29. Adoutte A, Balavoine G, Lartillot N, de Rosa R: Animal evolution, the
end of the intermediate taxa? Trends Genet 1999, 15:104-108.
Presents a re-evaluation of metazoan phylogeny. A review on the changing
view of metazoan evolution. Presents a re-evaluation of metazoan phylogeny
that takes in account molecular phylogeny and the degree of conservation of
developmental genes and their expression.
30. van Kesteren RE, Fainzilber M, Hauser G, van Minnen J, Vreugdenhil
E, Smit A B, Ibez CF, Geraerts WP, Bulloch AG: Early evolutionary
origin of the neurotrophin receptor family. EMBO J 1998,
17:2534-2542.
The authors identified a tyrosine receptor kinase (designated Ltrk) from the
snail Lymnaea stagnalis, and found that it displays several characteristics
typical of mammalian Trk receptors. Trk is expressed in neurons and binds to
human NT-3.
31. Kullander K, Kaplan D, Ebendal T: Two restricted sites on the
surface of the nerve growth factor molecule independently
determine specific TrkA receptor binding and activation.
J Biol Chem 1997, 272:9300-9307.
32. Ibez CF: Emerging themes in structural biology of neurotrophic
factors. Trends Neurosci 1998, 21:438-444.
33. Wyatt S, Pinon LG, Ernfors P, Davies AM: Sympathetic neuron
survival and TrkA expression in NT3-deficient mouse embryos.
EMBO J 1997, 16:3115-3123.
34. Mcdonald NQ, Chao MV: Structural determinants of neurotrophin
action. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:19669-19672.
35. Black IB: Neurotrophic selection and synaptic plasticity. In Brain
and Mind: Evolutionary Perspectives. Edited by Gazzaniga MS,
Altman JS. Strasbourg: Human Frontier Science Program; 1998:43-49.
36. Pirvola U, Hallbk F, Xin-Qun L, Saarma M, Ylikoski J: Neurotrophins
in the developing, adult and regenerating avian cochlea.
J Neurobiol 1997, 30:1019-1933.
37. Ernfors P, van der Water T, Loring J, Jaenisch R: Complementary
roles of BDNF and NT-3 in vestibular and auditory development.
Neuron 1995, 14:1153-1164.
38. Fritzsch B, Silos-Santiago I, Bianchi LM, Farias I: The role of
neurotrophic factors in regulating the development of inner ear
innervation. Trends Neurosci 1997, 20:159-164.
39. Barde YA: Neurotrophic factors: an evolutionary perspective.
J Neurobiol 1994, 25:1329-1333.
40. Gtz R, Raulf F, Schartl M: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is
more highly conserved in structure and function than nerve
growth factor during vertebrate evolution. J Neurochem 1992,
59:432-442.
41. Gtz R, Schartl M: The conservation of neurotrophic factors during
vertebrate evolution. Comp Biochem Physiol 1994, 108:1-10.
42. Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar H, Nicholson C: The Central Nervous
System of Vertebrates. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1998.
Evolution of the vertebrate neurotrophin and Trk receptor gene families Hallbk 621
nb9507.qxd 10/25/1999 8:30 PM Page 621