AJN The American Journal of Nursing

Wolters Kluwer Health Logo

Search Jobs
Login
Register
Activate Subscription
Subscribe
eTOC
Help
Enter Keyw All Issues
Search

Advanced Search
Saved Searches
Recent Searches
disableButton

Hom
e
Current
Issue
Previous
Issues
Published
Ahead-of-Print
Collection
s
Medi
a
C
E
For Authors Journal Info
Home > Current Issue > Professional Licensure: Investigation and
Disciplinary Acti...
< Previous Article | Next Article >
Text sizing:
A
A
A
AJN, American Journal of Nursing:
November 2012 - Volume 112 - Issue 11 - p 5360
doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000422256.95706.9b
Legal Clinic
Professional Licensure: Investigation and
Disciplinary Action
Brous, Edie JD, MS, MPH, RN
Free Access
Article Outline

Login
Username or
Email:

Password:

Remember me

Login

Forgot Password?

Forgot your
Password?

Author Information
Edie Brous is a nurse attorney in New York City and coordinator of Legal
Clinic: ediebrous@aol.com. The author has disclosed no potential conflicts of
interest, financial or otherwise.

Abstract
This is the second article in a three-part series on nursing boards disciplinary
actions and what nurses need to know to maintain their license in good
standing. This article discusses common reasons boards of nursing conduct
investigations and take disciplinary action. The third and final article will
discuss strategies for protecting your license.
Complaints to nursing boards can come from a number of sources. Patients,
coworkers, members of the public, or employers can call the board of nursing,
put complaints in writing, or complete a board of nursing Web site complaint
form. Licensees may also self-report when required by law to do so.
Additionally, a board may be notified by other nursing boards, other agencies,
or law enforcement of action taken against a nurse. Generally, the complaint
is kept confidential, as is the identity of the complainant. The information
obtained in the investigation may also be kept confidential, even from the
subject of the investigation.

Figure. Illustration...
Image Tools
Upon receipt of a complaint, the nursing board will confirm that the nurse is
licensed in that state or jurisdiction and that the complaint is governed by the
laws and regulations of that state. If the complaint lies outside the parameters
of the nursing board's purview, the complainant will be notified that the
matter won't be addressed by the board. The complaint may be forwarded to
other agencies under whose jurisdiction the matter does fall, or the case may
be closed. If the matter is found to be within the board's jurisdiction, and the
complaint is such that, were the allegations true, they would constitute a
Enter and submit
the email address
you registered
with. An email
with instructions
to reset your
password will be
sent to that
address.
Email:

Submit


false

Article Tools
Article as
PDF (475
KB)
Article as
EPUB
Print this
Article
Email To
Colleague
Add to My
Favorites
Export to
Citation
Manager
Alert Me
When
Cited
Request
Permission
s
violation of nursing rules and regulations, a formal investigation will ensue.
The nurse is notified that an investigation is being undertaken; at that time,
she or he should immediately seek the advice of counsel. Failure to respond to
a nursing board inquiry can result in a default judgment of disciplinary action,
including permanent revocation of one's license.
Back to Top | Article Outline
INVESTIGATION
Nursing boards take complaints very seriously and may be required by law to
investigate each complaint received. Because the mission of the licensing
board is to protect the public, an investigation may be required to ensure that
the licensee is competent and ethical and provides safe care. Investigations
are conducted in a number of manners. Some nursing boards use board-
appointed investigators to conduct interviews of the licensee who is the
subject of the complaint. Some boards require nurses to complete
questionnaires, called interrogatories, to provide the necessary information.
Nursing boards may also conduct informal settlement conferences or formal
hearings to determine whether the nurse has violated laws and regulations that
govern nursing practice in the state. Still other states issue an order to show
cause, which is a court order requiring nurses to appear at a certain time and
date and prove why the board shouldn't take disciplinary action. This is an
adversarial process, and nurses shouldn't answer questions, make statements,
or appear at proceedings without counsel present.
The purpose of the investigation is fact-finding. The investigator collects data,
interviews parties, reviews records, and assembles evidence related to the
events and circumstances surrounding the complaint. The investigator then
compiles a report that details the elements of the allegations against the nurse
and the facts as determined by the investigation. Relevant evidence and
documents are then forwarded to the prosecutor or nursing boarddesignated
personnel. Expert consultants may review the materials and may be used as
testifying witnesses by the prosecutor. Investigations will include a review of
adverse employment actions, other administrative agency determinations,
criminal proceedings, and out-of-state disciplinary actions.
The licensee will be notified either that the investigation didn't result in
information suggesting that violations occurred or that charges are warranted.
If the nursing board finds that there isn't sufficient evidence to support
adverse actions, the matter will be closed. How long nursing boards keep the
investigative materials and whether or not they expunge the complaint from
the nurse's record varies. (State-specific information can be found on the
National Council of State Boards of Nursing [NCSBN] Web site:
www.ncsbn.org/boards.htm.) If the board thinks disciplinary action is
indicated, the nurse may have one of several options: a consent agreement,
Images
View
Images in
Gallery
Export All
Images to
PowerPoin
t File
http://journals.lww

Export to.

End Note
Procite
Reference
Manager
Save my
selection
Export Cancel


Related Links
Articles in
PubMed by
Edie
Brous, JD,
MS, MPH,
RN
This article
in PubMed
Articles in
Google
Scholar by
Edie
Brous, JD,
MS, MPH,
RN
Other
settlement, or stipulation; attendance at an informal settlement conference; or
a formal hearing. Regardless of whether they result from a consent agreement,
informal settlement conference, or formal hearing, disciplinary actions may
then be published on the Internet, posted on the nursing board's Web site,
printed in the board's next newsletter, or reported to other agencies, including
data banks and the NCSBN. Most disciplinary actions become a permanent
part of the nurse's record and are considered public information.
Consent agreement. A consent agreement or stipulation is a negotiated
settlement in which the board of nursing and the nurse agree to a penalty. The
nurse may or may not be required to admit wrongdoing to enter into the
agreement. In states in which the licensee does have to admit wrongdoing, it
will be impossible to later deny the allegations or appeal the facts of the
charges once the agreement has been signed. Signing a consent agreement
may also waive one's right to a later hearing or appeal.
Once the agreement is signed, it's submitted to the board for approval, along
with all investigative materials. The licensee may or may not be present when
the agreement is presented. If the nurse is present when the agreement is
submitted to the board, she or he may be required to take an oath and answer
questions board members pose. If the nurse isn't required to be present,
notification will be sent as to whether or not the agreement was accepted. If
the agreement is accepted, it will be followed by a formal final order
accepting the terms. (A final order is a written order issued by the board that
contains the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the case.) If the
agreement isn't accepted, the prosecutor and the nurse will be notified and the
matter may proceed to an informal settlement conference or a formal hearing.
Informal settlement conference. Although less formal than an actual
hearing, informal settlement conferences are still official proceedings.
Because statements made at an informal settlement conference can be harmful
to the nurse in a subsequent formal hearing, nurses shouldn't attend informal
settlement conferences without an attorney.
Generally, the prosecutor will begin by offering an agreement that contains
the findings from the investigation and the prosecutor's recommendations
regarding the discipline for the infraction. If the nurse agrees to the proposed
order, the agreement is signed by both parties and sent to the board for
approval. The board may approve the proposed order as is, suggest
modifications, or reject it entirely. If the board approves the proposed order
without changes, it becomes a final order. If the board rejects the proposed
order or suggests modifications, the nurse may still be able to proceed to a
formal hearing.
If the nurse doesn't agree with the proposed order, the conference provides the
nurse with an opportunity to respond to the allegations and dispute the
articles in
this journal
by Edie
Brous, JD,
MS, MPH,
RN

evidence or proposed disciplinary action and to provide additional
information for the board's consideration. The committee or hearing officer
will generally make a determination at the end of the conference. If the nurse
disagrees with the recommendations, the board may require the nurse to
submit proposed revisions for consideration or permit the nurse to proceed
directly to a formal hearing. There may be time limits for requesting the
hearing, and the right to do so may be waived if the deadline is missed.
Formal hearing. Formal hearings are similar to civil trials. The board of
nursing must prove the allegations in the complaint, but the standard of proof
required to do so will differ by state. Even though the standard isn't as
rigorous as in a criminal prosecution (beyond a reasonable doubt), the board
may need to show by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not)
or by clear and convincing evidence that the assertions are true. The hearing
takes place in a courtroom-like setting in front of an administrative law judge
(ALJ), hearing officer, a board of nursing member, a hearing panel consisting
of several nursing board members, or the entire board of nursing, depending
on the state.
A court reporter records the entire proceeding and a transcript is made. The
prosecutor makes statements; examines witnesses, including experts; and
presents evidence. The defense may cross-examine the prosecution's
witnesses. After resting her or his case, the defense may also present evidence
and the defense witnesses may be cross-examined by the prosecutor. When
both sides have rested their cases, the hearing will be concluded.
Decisions are generally not handed down at the conclusion of the hearing.
The transcript of the proceedings is made available to both sides, along with
the opportunity to correct any errors. In some states the parties have a certain
period of time to propose an order. In other states the ALJ or hearing panel
will render a decision and make a recommendation to the nursing board.
Attorneys for both sides may be permitted to file exceptions (statements of
disagreement) regarding the findings, which the board may take into
consideration. The board considers the ALJ or hearing panel recommendation
and issues a final order. The process can be a lengthy one and take months or
even years to fully resolve.
Back to Top | Article Outline
CAUSES OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION
The board of nursing may take disciplinary action against any nurse who's
thought to be in violation of nursing laws or who's thought to pose a danger to
the public. Many complaints can fall into a category of professional
misconduct or unprofessional conduct as well as unsafe practice or illegal
or unethical behavior. These terms are defined by the individual states, and
nurses are advised to know the definitions in each state in which they're
licensed or in which they practice.
Professional misconduct or unprofessional conduct. Professional
misconduct is a broad term that encompasses many areas in both clinical and
nonclinical arenas. Anything that falls outside the bounds of what the board of
nursing considers acceptable may be deemed professional misconduct or
unprofessional conduct. Charges of professional misconduct can be brought
against a nurse for such things as
* dishonesty or fraud in obtaining or renewing a license.
* practicing outside one's authorized scope or delegating to an unlicensed
person activities that may only be performed by licensed professionals.
* failure to adequately monitor and supervise those to whom care has been
delegated.
* practicing negligently, incompetently, or while impaired.
* failure to practice within minimally acceptable standards of safe practice.
* habitual drug or alcohol use or chemical dependency.
* criminal convictions or failure to notify the board of nursing of the same.
* disciplinary action imposed by another licensing board.
* violations of public health law.
* failure to abide by a state's mandatory reporting obligations.
* failure to abide by consent agreement provisions or conditions of probation
or practicing while one's license is suspended or expired.
* failure to notify the board of nursing of address or name changes within the
required time frame.
* moral character lapses.
* falsifying medical or business records.
* inadequate or improper documentation.
* failure to cooperate in a board of nursing investigation.
* privacy violations.
* advertising or soliciting business in violation of state rules.
* refusing to care for patients on the basis of race, religion, or other
nonclinical reasons.
* patient abandonment, neglect, or abuse.
* sexual misconduct or boundary violations with patients or inappropriate
involvement with patients or their finances.
* failure to wear an identification badge with one's name and status
prominently displayed.
* failure to abide by infection control practices.
* failure to protect clients from unsafe practices or conditions, abusive acts, or
neglect.
* appropriating for personal use medication, supplies, equipment, or personal
items of the patient or employer, or borrowing money, materials, or property
from patients.
* financial improprieties or failure to file accurate and timely tax returns.
* failure to pay spousal or child support or student loans.
* driving under the influence.
Many professional misconduct allegations aren't directly related to the nurse's
clinical practice but may still result in an investigation and disciplinary action
on one's license. In Weber v. State Board of Nursing (1992),
1
the Colorado
Board of Nursing charged nurse Sherry Weber with failing to furnish medical
records in a timely fashion to four of her patients, guilty pleas in two felony
check charges, and procuring her nursing license by fraud, deceit,
misrepresentation, misleading omission, or material misstatements of fact, in
that she had denied that she'd pled guilty to the felonies when renewing her
RN license. The board imposed a one-year suspension of her license, to be
followed by two years of probation.
Weber unsuccessfully appealed the nursing board decision by arguing that she
was disciplined for conduct that didn't involve the practice of nursing.
Specifically, she argued that the state's definition of nursing didn't include the
handling of medical records. She argued that, therefore, even if she had failed
to handle her patients medical records properly, that failure didn't violate
generally accepted standards of nursing practice.
The court noted that an expert had testified at the hearing that the failure to
properly maintain patient medical records fell below generally accepted
standards of nursing practice. The ALJ had concluded from this testimony
that the handling of records constituted an integral part of the profession of
nursing and an essential element of appropriate patient care. This part of
the ALJ's decision was upheld.
1

Weber also argued that the guilty pleas were deferred judgments that never
resulted in convictions. Once she had completed the deferred judgment
period, her guilty pleas were withdrawn. The pleas, therefore, didn't legally
exist at the time the board brought charges against her. The court agreed with
her that the board had been wrong on the law for this portion of the ALJ's
decision. Nevertheless, the court also held that, [i]n professional disciplinary
proceedings, a licensing board is allowed to consider the underlying conduct
giving rise to the criminal charges in the context of other disciplinary rules.
The case was then sent back to the board of nursing for a new hearing on the
penalty.
1

Substance abuse or impairment. Between 8% and 12% of nurses have
substance abuse disorders, and such disorders may impair their practice.
2
This
proportion is comparable to that in the general population; government
statistics put the percentage of the population ages 12 or older with substance
dependence or abuse at 8.7%.
3
Compared with that in the general population,
prescription medication use is higher among nurses, but marijuana and
cocaine use is lower.
2
Because vulnerable patients may be harmed by
impaired providers, nursing boards will respond to complaints regarding
substance use, even if such substances are legal.
Many states offer an alternative-to-discipline program for nurses if patients
haven't been harmed. Such programs may be referred to as peer assistance,
professional assistance, diversion, or intervention projects. Although the exact
manner in which they operate is specific to the state and the program, they
typically operate with a mission to protect the public and rehabilitate the
nurse. Although participation in the program is voluntary, the alternative may
be actual disciplinary action on one's license or reporting to a data bank. A
growing number of boards of nursing are adopting alternative-to-discipline
programs because they protect the public while providing for early
intervention and monitoring.
4

Nurses in these programs may be required to sign written agreements and
temporarily surrender any or all of their licenses to the nursing board. They
will be evaluated by an addiction center approved by the board, then
participate in treatment and ongoing monitoring. This may be at the nurse's
expense. Once the board-approved monitor deems the nurse ready to return to
practice, the board may return the nurse's license while imposing practice
restrictions, probationary terms, random drug testing, individual and group
counseling, and continuing monitoring and treatment. Deviations from the
prescribed treatment plan, violations of probationary terms, or a return to
substance use may disqualify the nurse from the program and result in
disciplinary action. The programs may be lengthy, requiring monitoring for
months or even years. Chemical dependency or mental illness programs are
generally confidential, but nurses may be required to advise their employers
and any prescribing providers of their participation in these programs.
Even in the absence of impaired practice, exposure to illegal substances can
result in disciplinary action. In Ferguson v. Delaware Bd. of Nursing (2009),
5

nurse Marilyn Ferguson was issued a letter of reprimand by the board after
she tested positive for marijuana. Although she presented expert testimony
that the test had been unreliable and that passive inhalation could produce a
positive result, the board still held that she had violated professional conduct
rules. On appeal, the court held that the board had ignored expert testimony
and that its decision wasn't supported by substantial evidence. It reversed the
board's decision and sent the case back for reconsideration.
Criminal convictions. Nursing boards may take disciplinary action against a
licensee on the basis of criminal convictions. Conviction, as defined by the
board, may include plea arrangements or deferred adjudication, and the board
may decline to issue a license to an applicant with any criminal history,
including such arrangements. In Bethea-Tumani v. Bureau of Professional
and Occupational Affairs (2010),
6
Pennsylvania's board of nursing had denied
Glecina Bethea-Tumani's application for licensure as an RN based upon
misdemeanor convictions for insurance fraud and conspiracy. Bethea-Tumani
was granted a hearing, and the board found that she had failed to produce
satisfactory evidence that she is of good moral character, can practice
nursing with reasonable skill, honesty, and safety to patients, and is able to
meet the requirements of the profession. When a license was still refused,
Bethea-Tumani filed an appeal. On appeal, the board contended that the
convictions demonstrated a pattern of bad judgment and called into question
her moral character and ability to practice nursing. Because the convictions
directly related to honesty, and because they had occurred within a year of the
application for licensure, the board had substantial evidence to support the
decision to refuse a license. Additionally, the law specifically authorized the
board to refuse to issue a license to an applicant when the applicant has pled
guilty to a felony or crime of moral turpitude. The court agreed and upheld
the board's decision.
Reciprocal discipline. Disciplinary action in one state creates grounds for
other states to take action against a licensee, regardless of whether that license
is active or lapsed. Nurses may need to defend themselves in every state in
which they've ever been licensed if they're charged with misconduct in any
one of them. In Lankheim v. Bd. of Registration (2011),
7
nurse Penelope
Lankheim was dismissed from a Florida graduate nursing program after
failing a course. In 2003, she was subsequently charged by the Florida
Department of Health with falsely representing to a physician that she was
still enrolled in the program so he would act as her preceptor. While seeing
patients under his supervision, she prescribed treatment plans and medications
and disclosed confidential information on some of the patients.
An ALJ determined that Lankheim had violated the rules of professional
conduct by making fraudulent representations relating to the practice of
nursing ([as evidenced by] misrepresenting herself as a current nursing
graduate student); by practicing as an unlicensed advanced registered nurse
practitioner; and by violating rules governing patient confidentiality.
7
The
Florida Board of Nursing agreed to impose the ALJ's recommended penalties,
which included a reprimand, probation, and a fine. Nurse Lankheim, however,
offered to voluntarily relinquish her license. As Florida law specifically states
in the Board of Medicine Voluntary Relinquishment form, which contains
clarifying language (http://bit.ly/RTWoYP),
If a licensee wishes to voluntarily relinquish a license, but the licensee or the
license is currently under [investigation with pending disciplinary action]
then the licensee may relinquish the license only with the approval of the
Board. If the voluntary relinquishment is accepted by the Board at the time an
investigation is underway, or is anticipated, or when a disciplinary action is in
progress, then the acceptance of the voluntary relinquishment of the license
shall be considered disciplinary action against the license and shall be
reported as such by the Board. In addition, the licensee will be required to
cease practice immediately upon signing the voluntary relinquishment and
agrees to never reapply for licensure in Florida again.
The board made it clear to Lankheim that relinquishment would be considered
discipline and issued a final order indicating that this had been explained to
her. Lankheim had held a Massachusetts nursing license since 1987.
Massachusetts concluded that the facts underlying her relinquishment in
Florida (the unauthorized practice of nursing, deceiving a physician, and
violating patient confidentiality) constituted violations of Massachusetts
nursing law and moral character requirements, therefore warranting sanctions
in Massachusetts. In 2005, the Massachusetts Board of Nursing issued an
order to show cause addressing why, in light of her discipline in Florida, her
Massachusetts license should not be disciplined. The Massachusetts board
then issued a decision suspending her Massachusetts license for five years.
Lankheim appealed the Massachusetts board's decision, arguing that for a
number of reasons, the final order of the Florida Board of Nursing didn't
constitute discipline that could serve as the basis of reciprocal discipline in
Massachusetts
7
:
* The Florida board's decision included no findings of fact.
* Lankheim hadn't understood that the voluntary relinquishment of her license
in Florida would constitute discipline.
* She hadn't admitted any wrongdoing.
* She hadn't agreed not to contest the allegations against her.
The court held that the first three arguments were not supported by the
evidence. As for the fourth argument, the court held that when she had agreed
to relinquish her license voluntarily and permanently in lieu of other
sanctions, she effectively agreed not to contest the allegations against her.
Because she had been free to challenge the evidence before the Florida board
and chose not to do so, she could not now do so in Massachusetts. The
Massachusetts board's decision to suspend her license for five years was
upheld.
Back to Top | Article Outline
POTENTIAL DISCIPLINARY OUTCOMES
Nursing board decisions to take disciplinary action determine one's ability to
practice or hold oneself out as a nurse. Specific actions that a board of nursing
can take vary by state. The matter may be closed without sanction, or
disciplinary action can be taken. If the matter is not closed without sanctions,
punishments can take a number of forms and may be imposed in combination.
Examples include
* reprimand or censurereprimand and censure are similar in that they're
official records indicating that a licensee has been disciplined. They may, in
themselves, not compromise one's ability to practice but may be imposed
along with other penalties.
* citationthe board of nursing imposes a fine or order of abatement in lieu
of making a formal accusation.
* cease and desist orderan order to stop a particular activity or else face
further penalty.
* warningthis can be accompanied by stipulations or specific requirements.
* mandated continuing education.
* fine or civil penalty.
* remediationan attempt to correct practice and promote safety; it may
define terms for the license to be reinstated in good standing.
* referral to an alternative-to-discipline program.
* community service.
* probationduring probation, the nurse may or may not be permitted to
practice. If the nurse is permitted to remain in practice during the period of
probation, it is with terms and conditions or restrictions.
* practice restrictions, monitoring, or supervision.
* suspensiona period of time in which a nurse may not practice or hold
herself or himself out as a nurse. The suspension may be actual or stayed.
During actual suspension, the license is surrendered to the board and the
licensee may not practice or hold herself or himself out as a nurse during that
time. During a stayed suspension, the nurse may be permitted to work with
probationary terms. Suspensions may be partially actual and partially stayed,
and may be for a definite or indefinite period of time.
* emergency or summary suspensionan emergency suspension occurs when
the nursing board determines that there is an imminent threat to public safety
in allowing the nurse to continue in practice.
* surrender or relinquishmenta voluntary returning of one's license to the
board of nursing after which the nurse may no longer practice or hold herself
or himself out as a nurse. Surrender and relinquishment are viewed as the
equivalent of revocation. There may or may not be the opportunity to petition
for reinstatement at a later date.
* revocationan indefinite or permanent separation from practice in which
the nurse may no longer practice or hold herself or himself out as a nurse.
States differ, but there may be a waiting period during which the nurse may
not petition for reconsideration or restoration. The mandatory waiting period
may be as long as seven years from the date of revocation.
Back to Top | Article Outline
COLLATERAL IMPLICATIONS
Even if one's license has been restored to good status, the fact that there was
disciplinary action can create other barriers to practice. When a nurse has
been disciplined, the board of nursing may report that discipline to other
agencies or authorities. The board may consider disciplinary action to be
public information and post the infraction and penalty on the Internet. Other
regulatory agencies may follow those postings and take action.
The state health department, the Office of the Medicaid Inspector General, or
the attorney general's office may be advised that disciplinary action was taken
against a nurse by the board, or discover the action through interagency
communications. Such bodies may then take action as well. The Office of the
Medicaid Inspector General, for example, may place the nurse on its
disqualified- or excluded-provider list. Once on the list, the nurse may not
work for any employer in that state that receives Medicaid reimbursement for
nursing services. Similarly, the federal government may exclude the nurse
from participation in the Medicare program. Although most nurses aren't
direct billers to these programs, they may still be disqualified from working
for employers who do receive Medicaid or Medicare reimbursement.
Consequently, the nurse may be unable to secure employment, even if the
license has been restored to good standing with the nursing board. Placement
on a disqualified-provider list may also make it difficult to obtain licensure
and employment in another state.
Action taken against a health care professional's license is reported to federal
data banks, the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) and the Healthcare
Integrity and Protection Data Bank (HIPDB). According to the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS),
8
the NPDB
is intended to improve the quality of health care by encouraging State
licensing boards, hospitals, professional societies, and other health care
organizations to identify and discipline those who engage in unprofessional
behavior; to report medical malpractice payments; and to restrict the ability of
incompetent physicians, dentists, and other health care practitioners to move
from State to State without disclosure or discovery of previous medical
malpractice payment and adverse action history.
The DHHS describes the purpose of the HIPDB this way: to combat fraud
and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery.
8

Data bank listings can compromise clinical privileges, professional society
membership, participation in Medicare and Medicaid, collaborative practice
agreements, and employability.
Obtaining licensure in another field may also be difficult if a nursing license
has been disciplined. Cosmetologists, barbers, architects, real estate agents,
and workers in many other nonhealth care fields require licenses to practice,
and such licenses may not be issued if a nursing license was revoked,
surrendered, or suspended.
Back to Top | Article Outline
CHALLENGING NURSING BOARD DECISIONS
Nurses have property interests in their professional licenses because it's the
license that permits them to earn a living. The Constitution prohibits states
from depriving citizens of their property rights without due process. For
nurses accused of professional misconduct, this means that they have the right
to notice of the charges and the opportunity to be heard in their own defense.
Nurses who have had adverse license determinations, therefore, may appeal
those decisions. This may be done internallyby petitioning for a rehearing
or review of the matter by the boardor it may entail requesting judicial
reviewgoing to court. Both actions may be restricted by a time limitation,
after which an appeal may not be possible. Similarly, an appeal may not be
possible if the nurse has signed a consent agreement that waives appeal rights.
The state's administrative procedure act will outline the specific requirements,
time frames, and process for appealing nursing board decisions. The process
can be lengthy, but it may be possible to obtain a temporary injunction against
the board while the matter is pending. In such cases, the discipline is stayed,
allowing the nurse to continue practicing until a court renders a decision.
Successful appeals require an understanding of what is required to perfect the
appeal, as well as knowledge of administrative and procedural requirements
in the state.
Although the explicit standards for appealing a licensing board decision are
state specific, the courts are usually reluctant to overturn a board of nursing
determination. There may be narrow grounds upon which they will do so. The
deference granted to nursing board decisions is based upon a legislative intent
and assumption that professional regulation is performed by those agencies
with expertise in the profession being regulated. Courts, therefore, are hesitant
to substitute their judgment for that of the board. The court considers the
evidence and all reasonable inferences from the evidence in the light most
favorable to the nursing board's findings. If the court thinks that the board
could have reasonably made its findings and reached its result, the court will
affirm its decision.
The reasons a court will hear an appeal of a nursing board's decision are
outlined by individual state statutes (referred to as a standard of review), but
there are several common reasons a court will reverse a nursing board or send
the matter back to the board (remand) for a new proceeding:
* The board's decision was in violation of the state's constitution.
* The board exceeded its authority.
* The board made an error of law.
* The board's decision was not supported by substantial evidence.
* The board's decision was arbitrary and capricious.
* The board's decision was an abuse of discretion.
In all steps, from the filing of a complaint through final resolution and appeal,
nurses obtain more favorable outcomes when represented by attorneys with
specific expertise in administrative law and nursing-licensure defense.
It's important to note that the emotional and psychological effects of being
investigated by the nursing board are considerable. For most nurses, their
license and identity as nurses are at the core of their self-image, and when the
latter is threatened it can be very destabilizing. Nursing is not merely what we
do; for many of us it is who we are. Part 3 will discuss licensure-protection
strategies and suggest actions nurses can take to maintain their licenses in
good standing.
Back to Top | Article Outline
REFERENCES
1. Weber v. Colorado State Board of Nursing. Colorado Court of Appeals
1992.
Cited Here...

2. [no author]. More nurses seek help for substance abuse. Strategies for
nurse managers.com 2012.
http://www.strategiesfornursemanagers.com/ce_detail/236646.cfm.
Cited Here...

3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA),
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Results from the 2010
national survey on drug use and health: summary of national findings.
Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
NSDUH series H-41;
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k10MH_Findings/2k10MHResults.pd
f.
Cited Here...

4. National Council of State Boards of Nursing. Substance use disorder in
nursing: a resource manual and guidelines for alternative and disciplinary
monitoring programs. Chicago; 2011. https://www.ncsbn.org/SUDN_10.pdf.
Cited Here...

5. Ferguson v. Delaware Board of Nursing. Superior Court of the State of
Delaware 2009.
Cited Here...

6. Bethea-Tumani v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2010.
Cited Here...

7. Lankheim v. Board of Registration in Nursing. Supreme Judicial Court of
Massachusetts 2011.
Cited Here...

8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Data Bank. 2012.
http://www.npdb-hipdb.hrsa.gov/topNavigation/aboutUs.jsp.
Cited Here...

2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.





Previous Next
Actions
Additional image features are made available by installing Adobe Flash


FF1 false ctl00_SPWebPart 1


Email to a Colleague

Your Name: (optional)

Your Email:

Colleague's Email:

Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:
Thought you might ap

Send a copy to your email
Send

Add Item(s) to:


An Existing Folder

A New Folder
Folder Name:

Description:

Add Item(s) Cancel


Copyright 2012
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
NIH Public Access Policy
Subscribe to eTOC
Feedback
Sitemap
RSS Feeds
LWW Journals