Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C for 100 h was the highest of its nitrided product among the products nitrided in a temperature range of
130170
C. Thermal decomposition of iron pentacarbonyl was also applied to obtain a narrow particle size distribution of monodispersed -Fe
spherical particles of 30 nm. It was performed in the presence of oleic acid stabilizer in octyl ether solvent.
2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Iron nitride; Ferromagnetism; Fe
16
N
2
; Low temperature nitridation
1. Introduction
Fe
16
N
2
has attracted much attention due to its possible gigan-
tic magnetization [1]. Most of the investigations have been
performed on its thin lms prepared by applying various kinds of
deposition methods such as MBE and sputter deposition [24].
The values expected for the magnetic moments have been scat-
tered over a range between 2.4 and 3.9
B
.
Ferromagnetic Fe
16
N
2
ne powder was recently prepared by
low temperature nitridation of -Fe of about 20 nm crystallite
size obtained from -Fe
2
O
3
[5]. Its saturation magnetization
was 162 emu/g at room temperature. The value was too small
compared to the average magnetic moment of 2.52
B
estimated
from the hyperne elds in its M ossbauer spectrum. A satura-
tion magnetization value of 225 emu/g was recently observed
on the nitrided product at 130
C for 8 h
[6]. An additional paramagnetic component was present in its
M ossbauer spectrum with an area ratio of 19%. A maximum
saturation magnetization of 278 emu/g could be expected for a
sample entirely formed of the ferromagnetic phase. This value
was about 30% larger than that of -Fe. There was a wide par-
Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 11 706 6739; fax: +81 11 706 6739.
E-mail address: kikkawa@eng.hokudai.ac.jp (S. Kikkawa).
ticle size distribution of -Fe
2
O
3
in the range of 5100 nm. Its
small size region might lead to a formation of either superpara-
magnetic Fe
16
N
2
or higher nitrides such as Fe
4
N with a smaller
magnetization.
The low temperature nitridation reaction should strongly
depend on the starting powder, especially on its particle size, size
distribution, surface morphology and the preparation method. In
the present study, particle size dependence of the low tempera-
ture nitridation was studied on -Fe ne powders prepared from
-Fe
2
O
3
with narrow particle size distribution.
2. Experimental
Three kinds of -Fe
2
O
3
ne powders with narrow particle size distributions
at 30 nm (A), 60 nm (B) and 200 nm (C) supplied by Sakai Chemicals Co. Ltd.
(FRO3, 6, 20) were used as starting materials. They were reduced to -Fe in
hydrogen stream at 500
C. Control
of the nitrogen content to obtain Fe
16
N
2
was not easy in these
cases. Nitridation was very slow in the reaction of the powder
(C). Fe
16
N
2
was not formed at all even at 150
C, and only Fe
4
N
appeared above 160
C;
(C-1 and -2) nitrided -Fe (C) at 150 and 170
C, respectively.
tive amount of Fe
16
N
2
was smaller than previous study carried
out by the present authors using -Fe
2
O
3
powder with similar
particle size as the starting material [6]. Powder morphology was
much more voluminous in the previous -Fe
2
O
3
than the present
iron oxide prepared from aqueous solution. The saturation mag-
netization value of the present nitrided product at 140
C was
207 emu/g, which is almost comparable to the value for -Fe.
Magnetic coercivity increased to 0.34 kOe from0.10 kOe for the
-Fe powder in the nitridation.
Crystallite size of the Fe
16
N
2
was estimated as 27 nm from
XRD line broadening. The size is larger than the critical size
for a single magnetic domain. Its M ossbauer spectrum could be
tted with four ferromagnetic components: Fe (1), Fe (2), Fe (3)
in Fe
16
N
2
, -Fe (36.4%) and a paramagnetic singlet (5.5%) as
summarized in Table 2. Observed area ratio of these magnetic
components in Fe
16
N
2
was 1.5:1.55:0.95. It should be 1:2:1 as
estimated fromits crystal structure. The deviation fromthe ideal
ratio suggests that there is a partial disordering of nitrogen in
the present Fe
16
N
2
crystal lattice. Some amount of the nitrogen
atoms are distributed in a random way similar to the crystal lat-
tice of
C for 1 h.
Its nitrided product was a mixture of Fe
16
N
2
with -Fe and its
magnetization was 184 emu/g at roomtemperature, almost com-
parable to the value of the present -Fe nanopowder. It was again
nitrided at 130
C
Fe (1) Fe (2) Fe (3) -Fe Singlet
Isomer shift (mms
1
) 0.127 0.256 0.244 0.13 0.277
Quadruple splitting
(mms
1
)
0.11 0.09 0.04
Hyperne eld (T) 29.1 31.4 40.2 33.2
Area ratio (%) 21.1 22.9 14.1 36.4 5.5
Fig. 4. Monodispersed -Fe nanoparticles prepared by thermal decomposition
of iron pentacarbonyl in the presence of oleic acid stabilizer with molar ratios
of the stabilizer/iron pentacarbonyl: (a) 0.5 and (b) 2.
4. Conclusion
In summary, particle size dependence of low temperature
nitridation to prepare Fe
16
N
2
with a gigantic magnetization was
studied starting from -Fe
2
O
3
powder with a narrow particle
size distribution. The -Fe powder with 120 nm in particle size
10 S. Kikkawa et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 449 (2008) 710
obtained by hydrogen reduction of -Fe
2
O
3
powder with a par-
ticle size of 60 nm was the most suitable to prepare Fe
16
N
2
.
The nal product was a mixture with -Fe possessing a satu-
ration magnetization of 207 emu/g. Thermal decomposition of
iron pentacarbonyl was also studied in octyl ether solvent to
control the size and shape of -Fe powder product. Particle size
of -Fe nanopowder changed with the amount of stabilizer such
as oleic acid. The maximum size obtained was less than 30 nm.
It was too small to obtain Fe
16
N
2
with a large magnetization.
Acknowledgement
This research was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Exploratory Research from JSPS (#17655090).
References
[1] T.K. Kim, M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 20 (1972) 492.
[2] M. Komuro, Y. Kozono, M. Hanazono, Y. Sugita, J. Appl. Phys. 67 (1990)
5126.
[3] M. Takahashi, H. Shoji, H. Takahashi, H. Nashi, T. Wakiyama, J. Appl. Phys.
76 (1994) 6642.
[4] K. Nakajima, S. Okamoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (1990) 92.
[5] A. Nagatomi, S. Kikkawa, T. Hinomura, S. Nasu, F. Kanamaru, J. Jpn. Soc.
Powder Powder Metall. 46 (1999) 151.
[6] A. Yamada, T. Takeda, S. Kikkawa, Solid State Sci., in press.
[7] D. Weller, A. Moser, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 (1999) 4423.
[8] S. Sun, C.B. Murray, D. Weller, L. Folks, A. Moser, Science 287 (2000)
1989.
[9] S. Sun, S. Anders, T. Thomson, J.E.E. Baglin, M.F. Toney, H.F. Hamann,
C.B. Murray, B.D. Terris, J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 5419.