from Coffee Processing Wastewater Using Avocado Seed
Carbon (ASC) Rani Devi Received: 23 January 2009 / Accepted: 24 June 2009 / Published online: 8 August 2009 # US Government 2009 Abstract The study estimated the efficiency of Avocado seed carbon (ASC) for chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) reduction from coffee processing wastewater. It was performed under batch mode conditions to investigate the optimum operating conditions and efficiency for COD and BOD reduction with ASC compared with commercial activated carbon (CAC). Adsorption isotherm study was also performed and it was found that the values of regression coefficient (r 2 ), adsorption capacity (k), and adsorption intensity (1/n) for COD and BOD reduction with ASC were comparable to those of CAC. Under optimum operating conditions, the maximum percentage reduc- tion of COD and BOD concentration using ASC was 98.28% and 99.19%, respectively and with CAC was 99.12% and 99.45%, respectively and hence adsorp- tion capacity of ASC is comparable with that of CAC. Thus, this technique may be a good option for treatment of domestic wastewater. Keywords Adsorption . Avocado . BOD . COD . Coffee processing wastewater/effluent 1 Introduction The place of coffee origin in the world is Ethiopia as the first coffee plant was initially found there only and it is the worlds third largest coffee exporter after Burundi and El Salvador. Jimma zone is one of the important coffee producing zones and wet coffee processing method has been adopted here. This coffee processing method needs mechanical removal of pulp with the help of water and due to this, a considerable amount of wastewater is generated (Enden 2002; Murthy et al. 2003, 2004). About half of the water is consumed in pulping process only (Fresner and Schnitzer 1996; GTZ-PPP 2002; Enden and Calvert 2002). There is a high concentration of organic matter in the wastewater generated from coffee processing plant (Matos et al. 2001; INEP 2001; MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forest, 2003) like pectin, proteins, and sugars (Adams 1980; Calvert 1997; Mendoza and Rivera 1998; Deepa et al. 2002). Due to this, its disposal without treatment has become undesirable (Rolz 1982) as it can impacts the water bodies and human health. Thus, prior to discharge to water bodies, it needs a proper treatment. The treatment of this wastewater with conventional methods is very expensive (Piet et al. 1994; Mazumder and Roy 2000). Therefore, to meet the environmental standards and to protect environment, it has become necessary to find suitable environmental friendly and economically viable treatment technologies. Water Air Soil Pollut (2010) 207:299306 DOI 10.1007/s11270-009-0137-2 R. Devi (*) Department of Energy and Environmental Sciences, Ch. Devil al University, Sirsa, Haryana, India e-mail: rani_sahu@yahoo.com A number of research efforts are in progress (Mohammed et al. 1998; Wang et al. 2005) for development of such types of wastewater treatment technologies. Various low-cost adsorbents like chitin, chitosan, corn stalks, peat, rice husk, and wood have been used for removal of organic matter from industrial effluents (Poots et al. 1976; Mckay et al. 1980; Sharma and Sharma 1994). Discarded material- based low-cost adsorbents of different origins like industrial waste material, bagasse fly ash, and jute- processing waste can also be used for removal of organic matter from wastewater (Patnaik et al. 1996; Pala and Tokat 2002; Srivastava et al. 2005; Wang and Wu 2006; Bhatnagar 2007). Adsorption-based technique (Devi et al. 2002; Devi and Dahiya 2006) developed with low-cost carbonaceous materials showed good potential, more so for chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal from domestic wastewater. Such adsorption approach can offer an easy and economic solution to these environmental challenges. Moreover, activated carbon is considered very effective in reduction of color, absorbable organic halides and non-biodegradable pollutants present in such wastewater but this process also has some additional costs associated with the production of activated carbon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of Avocado seed carbon for treatment of coffee processing wastewater and also to compare its results with commercial activated carbon. 2 Materials and Methods 2.1 Selection and Preparation of Adsorbent Wastewater samples were collected from a coffee processing plant and were stored at 23C to avoid any change in their physico-chemical character- istics. Adsorbent used in the present study was derived from Avocado seed. Since the raw dis- carded material was available free of cost but its transportation and processing costs were to be taken into account and thus the resulting adsorbent was expected to be economically viable for the wastewater treatment. This is a quite efficient method specifically for removing the organic sub- stances from coffee processing wastewater. For standardization of the results, same types of experi- ments were conducted with commercial activated carbon also. The seeds of Avocado fruits were separated from the pulp and then crushed in a crushing mill (Model- BB 100 Rosrfrei, Retsch Germany). The resulting product was washed several times with distilled water to eliminate water soluble impurities and then oven- dried at 105C for 24 h. Two hundred fifty grams small pieces of this oven-dried Avocado seeds were mixed with 30 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ). The mixture was carbonized at 600C for 12 h. Then sample was withdrawn from furnace and cooled in a desiccator. After cooling, this sample was rinsed several times with distilled water till its pH became 6 to 7. The wet sample was dried at 105C for 24 h. It was further crushed and filtered. The particles of size ranging from 0.75 to 0.25 mm were recovered and were used throughout the study. Characterization of so prepared discarded material- based carbonaceous adsorbents was done using standard methods (Indian Standard Methods 1986). The commercial activated carbon (Calgon Co- Filtrasorb 400) was purchased from a local chemical supplier. The important physical properties were surface area, bulk density, porosity, moisture content, contents of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen as shown in Table 1. 2.2 Analysis of Wastewater The pH and temperature of the wastewater samples were measured on collection site to avoid the change in their values. The wastewater samples for measure- ment of electrical conductance, turbidity, total solids, total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, bio- Table 1 Characteristics of the commercial activated carbon and Avocado seed carbon Parameters ASC CAC Surface area of sample, m 2 /kg 750 1,000 Bulk density, kg/m 3 165 180 Porosity, % 75.00 85.00 Moisture content, % 8.5 4.50 Carbon content, % 88 92.00 Hydrogen content, % 2.82 1.80 Nitrogen content, % 3.70 3.20 Oxygen content, % 6.44 5.00 300 Water Air Soil Pollut (2010) 207:299306 chemical oxygen demand (BOD), COD, and most probable number (MPN) were stored at 4C and were analyzed in laboratory according to the well-known methods prescribed by APHA (American Public Health Association 1998) handbook. But for the present study, only the removal of COD and BOD were taken under consideration. The COD and BOD of the wastewater samples were measured in labora- tory before and after its treatment with adsorbents. 2.3 Batch Mode Treatment of Wastewater The complete experimental study was conducted at ambient temperature (25C) in batch mode. The batch experiments were conducted in different flasks of 250 ml capacity using an average speed shaker. Adsorption experiments were conducted in different batches for all the experimental conditions like adsorbent treatment time, adsorbent dose, pH of the solution, initial COD and BOD concentrations, agitation speed, and adsorbent particle size. Varying one parameter and keeping others constant studied the influence of various operating parameters. Stirring speed of the shaker was kept constant for each run throughout the experiment thus ensuring equal mixing, except for those, which were meant for investigating the effects of agitation speed. The desired pH was maintained using dilute NaOH (0.1 N)/HCl (0.1 N) solution. Each flask was filled with a known volume of sample having desired pH and stirring was initiated. The sample was withdrawn from the shaker at predetermined time intervals, filtered through Whatmann No. 44 filter paper and analyzed for COD and BOD concentrations. Effect of contact time of the adsorbents with waste- water sample was investigated by agitating 100 ml sample and adding 2 g adsorbent for different time- periods varying from 10 to 100 min. Initial COD and BOD concentration of the sample was 22,000 mg/l and 12,000 mg/l respectively, pH of 7, agitation speed 800 rpm, and adsorbent particle size 0.75 mm. The treated samples were withdrawn from shaker at predetermined time intervals, filtered, and the resid- ual COD and BOD concentrations were measured. To determine contribution of the adsorbent dose on COD and BOD reduction, 100 ml of sample was treated with different doses of adsorbent ranging from 0.1 to 10 g/100 ml; the other conditions were: treatment time of 70 min, pH7, initial COD and BOD concentration of the sample of 22,000 mg/l and 12,000 mg/l respectively, agitation speed 800 rpm, and adsorbent particle size 0.75 mm. The samples were agitated for specific time intervals, filtered, and then analyzed for the residual COD and BOD concentration. The effect of pH was studied with constant initial concentration, adsorbent dose, and contact time but varying the pH values from 1 to 12 using dilute NaOH or HCl solution. The samples were agitated for specific time, filtered, and then analyzed for residual COD and BOD concentration and data was fitted into Freundlich adsorption isotherm (Faust and Aly 1986). The effect of initial COD and BOD concentration was studied by keeping all other conditions constant except changing the initial COD and BOD concen- tration ranging from 15,000 mg/l to 30,000 mg/l and 3,000 mg/l to 18,000 mg/l, respectively. The effect of agitation speed and adsorbent particle size on the COD and BOD reduction was also Parameters Characteristics of effluent WHO permissible limits pH 4.5 6.88.5 Electrical conductance (mho/cm) 3.110 4 110 3 Temperature (C) 25 20 Turbidity (nephalometer turbidity Unit) 430 510 Total solids (mg/l) 2,050 650 Total suspended solids (mg/l) 700 200 Total dissolved solids (mg/l) 1,350 450 Chemical oxygen demand (mg/l) 22,000 300 Biochemical oxygen demand (mg/l) 12,000 100 MPN (coliform cells/100 ml) 110 9 1.510 7 Table 2 Physicalchemical properties of effluent of coffee processing plant along with WHO permissi- ble limits (WHO 1995) for the discharge of treated effluent to irrigation channel Water Air Soil Pollut (2010) 207:299306 301 studied. As usual, one parameter is varied for one set of experiments. Discrete values of the agitation speed were kept from 100 rpm (revolution per min) to 1,000 rpm and adsorbent particle size as category A (0.75 mm), B (0.55 mm), C (0.35 mm), and D (0.25 mm), respectively. 3 Results and Discussions The physico-chemical analysis of the wastewater collected from the coffee processing plant was done as shown in Table 2. It was evident that this wastewater was polluted with organic load besides dissolved and suspended matter. Organic load was presented in terms of COD, BOD, and MPN. In this paper, study was done only for reduction of COD and BOD concentrations using discarded material-based carbon made up of Avocado seed. The COD and BOD concentrations were very high compared to their permissible limits to discharge this water for irrigation and horticultural uses as pre- scribed by WHO as shown in Table 1. The wastewa- ter was treated at 25C under batch mode operation with ASC and its COD and BOD concentrations were measured before and after treatment with adsorbent. The important operating parameters taken under consideration for the present study were; adsorbent treatment time, adsorbent dose, pH of the medium, initial COD/ BOD concentration of the wastewater, agitation speed, and adsorbent particle size. Adsorbent Treatment Time The percentage COD and BOD reduction as a function of treatment time with ASC was shown in Fig. 1. Test with commercial activated carbon was also done for comparing the 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Treatment Time (min) %
r e d u c t i o n % COD by CAC % BOD by CAC % COD by ASC % BOD by ASC Fig. 1 Effect of treatment time on percent COD and BOD reduction using ASC and CAC adsorbents. Initial COD and BOD concentrations, 22,000/12,000 mg/l; adsorbent dose, 2 g/100 ml of wastewater; pH7; agitation speed, 800 rpm; and particle size of adsorbent, 0.75 mm 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Adsorbent dose (g/l) %
r e d u c t i o n % COD by CAC % BOD by CAC % COD by ASC % BOD by ASC Fig. 2 Effect of adsorbent dose on percent COD and BOD reduction using ASC and CAC adsorbents. Initial COD and BOD concentrations, 22,000/12,000 mg/l; treatment time, 70 min; pH7; agitation speed, 800 rpm; and particle size of adsorbent, 0.75 mm Freundlich adsorption isotherm for COD concentration reduction by ASC 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 log Ce l o g
x / m COD by ASC Linear (COD by ASC) Freundlich adsorption isotherm for BOD concentration reduction by ASC 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 log Ce l o g
x / m BOD by ASC Linear (BOD by ASC) Fig. 3 Freundlich plot for COD and BOD reduction using ASC adsorbent. Initial COD and BOD concentrations, 22,000/ 12,000 mg/l; treatment time, 70 min; pH7; agitation speed, 800 rpm; and adsorbent particle size, 0.75 mm 302 Water Air Soil Pollut (2010) 207:299306 results. The percentage reduction of COD and BOD with ASC was 84.92% and 86.09% after a treatment time of 70 min whereas the maximum reduction of COD and BOD concentrations with commercial activated carbon was 89.15% and 93.97%, respectively after a treatment time of 70 min. As the treatment time progressed, the adsorbent sites had the tendency towards saturation. Difference between the adsorp- tion capacities could be attributed due to the difference in number of carbonaceous adsorption sites in the different adsorbents. Adsorbent Dose The effect of adsorbent dose on percent reduction of COD and BOD concentrations with ASC and CAC was shown in Fig. 2. Here the treatment time was kept constant at 70 min. Equilib- rium was reached corresponding to 4 g/100 ml of adsorbent dose for both ASC as well as CAC. Percent reduction of BOD concentration was greater than that of COD concentration for all the adsorbent doses and was also comparable to CAC. The adsorption studies conducted at fixed initial COD and BOD concentration and varying adsorbent dose were fitted to Freundlich isotherm (Faust and Aly 1986) of the form: x m k C 1=n e where, x/m (mg/g) was the amount of COD and BOD removed (x) per unit mass of adsorbent (m), C e (mg/l) was residual COD and BOD concentration of aqueous solution, k and 1/n were Freundlich constants and measure of adsorption capacity and adsorption inten- sity, respectively. The Freundlich isotherm corresponding to the experimental measurements for ASC and CAC were plotted on log scales as shown in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively. Values of regression coefficient (r 2 ) had been calculated from the linear fit and based on the fit, the respective values of the slope 1/n, and intercept on Y-axis taken as k were also calculated as shown in Table 3. Values of 1/n, k, and regression coefficient r 2 for ASC were 0.2401, 4.7786, and 0.8636 corresponding to COD concentration reduc- tion and 0.2497, 4.5886, and 0.8645 corresponding to BOD concentration reduction respectively and those for CAC were 0.02658, 4.9472, and 0.8435 corresponding to COD concentration reduction and 0.2698, 4.7302, and 0.8599 corresponding to BOD concentration reduction respectively. CAC and ASC had the comparable values of 1/n and k. Thus, ASC showed the comparable adsorption capacity and adsorption intensity with CAC. Freundlich adsorption isotherm of BOD concentration reduction by CAC 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 l o g
x / m BOD by CAC Linear (BOD by CAC) Freundlich adsorption isotherm of COD concentration reduction by CAC 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 log Ce 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 log Ce l o g
x / m COD by CAC Linear (COD by CAC) Fig. 4 Freundlich plot for COD and BOD reduction using CAC adsorbent. Initial COD and BOD concentrations, 22,000/ 12,000 mg/l; treatment time, 70 min; pH7; agitation speed, 800 rpm; and particle size of adsorbent, 0.75 mm Table 3 Effect of adsorbent particle size on percent COD and BOD reduction by ASC and CAC Adsorbent particle ASC CAC Size % COD reduction % BOD reduction % COD reduction % BOD reduction A (0.75 mm) 51.34 59.02 58.19 63.78 B (0.55 mm) 69.09 74.26 75.54 80.59 C (0.35 mm) 91.95 94.03 95.56 97.15 D (0.25 mm) 98.20 99.28 99.12 99.45 Water Air Soil Pollut (2010) 207:299306 303 The constant 1/n and k are of definite importance in determining the adsorption capacity of organic pollutants from wastewater and reduction of COD and BOD concentrations by adsorbents. The slope 1/n is dependent on the order of the change of reduction in COD and BOD concentrations with the adsorbent dose, while k is dependent on the extent of removal of COD by the adsorbents. pH It has an important effect on the adsorption capacity of CAC and ASC and hence COD concen- tration and BOD concentration reduction from waste- water and was shown in Fig. 5. The optimum pH for maximum adsorption of organic impurities and COD concentration and BOD concentration reduction from wastewater of coffee processing plant by CAC and ASC was 7. Initial CODConcentration and BODConcentration The investigation was also made for the effect of initial COD and BOD concentration of the wastewater solution on the percent COD and BOD reduction by CAC and ASC as was shown in Fig. 6. The percent COD concentration and BOD concentration reduction with ASC and CAC was found to increase with increase in the initial COD concentration and BOD concentration and after reaching to saturation levels, it started decreasing. The rate of adsorption increased because of the increasing driving force. But at 24,000 mg/l of initial COD concentration and 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2000 7000 12000 17000 22000 27000 32000 Initial COD and BOD Concentration %
r e d u c t i o n % COD by CAC % BOD by CAC % COD by ASC % BOD by ASC Fig. 6 Effect of initial COD and BOD concentration on percent COD and BOD reduction using ASC and CAC adsorbents. Treatment time, 70 min; adsorbent dose, 4 g/100 ml; pH7; agitation speed, 800 rpm; and particle size of adsorbent, 0.75 mm 30 50 70 90 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 pH %
r e d u c t i o n % COD by CAC % BOD by CAC % COD by ASC % BOD by ASC Fig. 5 Effect of pH on percent COD and BOD reduction using ASC and CAC adsorbents. Initial COD and BOD concen- trations, 22,000/12,000 mg/l; treatment time, 70 min; adsorbent dose, 4 g/100 ml; agitation speed, 800 rpm; and particle size of adsorbent, 0.75 mm 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 50 250 450 650 850 1050 Agitation speed (rpm) %
r e d u c t i o n % COD by CAC % BOD by CAC % COD by ASC % BOD by ASC Fig. 7 Effect of agitation speed on percent COD and BOD concentration using ASC and CAC adsorbents. Initial COD and BOD concentrations, 22,000/12,000 mg/l; treatment time, 70 min, adsorbent dose, 4 g/100 ml; pH7; and particle size of adsorbent, 0.75 mm Table 4 Residual COD and BOD concentration after treatment with ASC and CAC under batch mode operation under optimum operating conditions Adsorbents Residual COD concentration Residual BOD concentration ASC 294 98.2 CAC 216.3 78.38 304 Water Air Soil Pollut (2010) 207:299306 12,000 mg/l of initial BOD concentration, the curves reached their saturation points. It was because of saturation of adsorbent sites and hence the ratios of the initial number of adsorbate molecules to the available adsorption sites of the adsorbent diminished accordingly. Agitation Speed The effect of agitation speed on percent COD and BOD reduction with ASC and CAC was investigated by changing speed from 100 rpm to 1,000 rpm. Figure 7 showed that there was a good trend for the percent COD and BOD concentration reduction with the agitation speed for CAC and ASC. Maximum COD concentration and BOD concentration reduction were observed around 800 rpm for both the adsorbents. But at higher agitation speeds, the loosely attached molecules might re-enter into the adsorbate, hence lowering the percent COD concentration and percent BOD concentration reduction. Therefore, the agitation speed was kept at 800 rpm to see the effect of percent COD and BOD concentration reduction by both the adsorbents. Adsorbent Particle Size From the study, it was found that adsorbent particle size had significant influence on percent reduction of COD and BOD concentration with ASC and CAC. The percent COD and BOD concentration reduction for both the adsorbents were maximum for particle size of category D and the minimum reductions in COD and BOD was obtained corresponding to particles of category A for both the adsorbents as shown in Table 3. The values for maximum percent COD concentration and percent BOD concentration reduction with ASC and CAC were 98.20% and 99.28% and 99.12% and 99.45%, respectively corresponding to category D. It was observed that smaller particles showed better adsorp- tion than the larger ones because surface area is directly related with adsorption capacity. This could be explained on the basis of net surface area, as smaller particles in a given quantity of powder would have larger surface area than the case when bigger particles are taken. Optimum Operating Conditions for Wastewater Treatment The optimum operating conditions for getting maximum COD/BOD concentration reduction from coffee processing effluent with ASC and CAC were same and these conditions were treatment time of 70 min, adsorbent dose of 4 g/l00 ml, pH of 7, initial COD/BOD concentration of 22,000/12,000 mg/l, respectively, agitation speed of 800 rpm, and adsorbent particle size of 0.25 mm. It could be inferred from the experimental results presented in this paper that residual concentrations of COD and BOD after treatment with ASC under optimum operating con- ditions were 294 mg/l and 98.2 mg/l respectively and were well within the permissible limits of WHO standards as shown in Table 4. These results could be utilized for working out the design parameters of an adsorption-based industrial wastewater treatment system. Moreover, if ASC was added in secondary treatment tank for the effluent treatment, there would be a good saving of energy, which otherwise could have been consumed in aeration process. 4 Conclusion It was found in the present study that ASC is an effective adsorbent for the reduction of COD and BOD concentration from effluent of coffee processing plant. Removal of COD and BOD concentrations with ASC and CAC were found to be dependent on treatment time, adsorbent dose, pH, initial COD and BOD concentration, agitation speed, and adsorbent particle size. The data of this adsorption study is obeying the Freundlich Adsorption Model. The results of treatment of wastewater generated in coffee processing industry with adsorbent made up of Avocado seed could be a good alternative to expen- sive activated carbon. The quality of water after treatment with ASC was found well within the permissible limits prescribed by WHO for discharging the treated water in irrigation drain. References Adams, K. (1980). Coffee development and management techniques. Addis Ababa: Ministry of coffee and Tea development. American Public Health Association (APHA), 1998. Standard methods for analysis of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC. Bhatnagar, A. (2007). Removal of bromophenols from water using industrial wastes as low cost adsorbents. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 139(1), 93102. Water Air Soil Pollut (2010) 207:299306 305 Calvert, K. C. (1997) The treatment of coffee wastewater, the biogas optiona review and preliminary report of ongoing research. Coffee research report (50). Coffee industry corporation ltd. kainantu, Papua New Guinea. Deepa, G. B., Chanakya, H. N., de Alwis, A. A. P., Manjunath, G. R., & Devi, V. (2002). Overcoming pollution of lakes and water bodies due to coffee pulping activities with appropriate technology solutions. In: Proceedings Sym- posium on Conservation, Restoration and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, paper 4. Centre for ecological sciences, Indian Institute of Science (IIS) and the Karnataka Environment Research Foundation [KERF], Bangalore and commonwealth of learning, Canada. Devi, R., & Dahiya, R. P. (2006). Chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction in domestic wastewater by fly ash and brick kiln ash. J Water, Air and Soil Poll, 174(14), 3346. Devi, R., Dahiya, R. P., & Gadgil, K. (2002). Investigation of coconut coir carbon and sawdust based adsorbents for combined removal of COD and BOD from domestic wastewater, Water and Env. Manag. Series, International Water Association, 2002, 12091218. Enden, V. J. C. (2002). Best practices at wet processing pay financial benefits to farmers and processors. GTZ-PPP Project on Improvement of coffee quality and sustainability of coffee production in Vietnam. Enden, V. J. C., & Calvert, K. C. (2002). Limit environmental damage by basic knowledge of coffee waste waters. GTZ- PPP project-improvement of coffee quality and sustainability of coffee production in Vietnam. http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Coffee_wastewater. Faust, S. D., & Aly, O. M. (1986). Adsorption process for water treatment (pp. 1423). Stoneham: Butterworths. Fresner, J., & Schnitzer, H. (1996). How coffee-making can help one understand cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 4(3-4), 213217. GTZ-PPP. (2002). Post harvest processing: Limit environmental damage by basic knowledge of coffee wastewater. http:// www.venden.de/pdfs/coffee_waste_water_treatmentV4. pdf Indian standard methods for determination of specific surface area of powders and porous particles using low tempera- ture gas adsorption technique, IS-1986. INEP. (2001). Bioreactors for clean coffee effluentsreducing water pollution in Western Ghat with appropriate technology solutions. http://www.inep-karnataka.org/pdfs/coffee.pdf and http://www.inepkarnataka. Matos, D. T. A., Lo Monaco, P. A., Pinto, A. B., Fia, R., & Fukunaga, D. C. (2001). Pollutant potential of wastewater of the coffee fruits processing. Federal University of Viosa, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Viosa-MG, Brazil. http://www.ufv.br/poscolheita/aguas/artigos/Pollutant. Mazumder, D., & Roy, B. (2000). Low cost options for treatment and reuse of municipal wastewater. Ind J Environ Prot, 20(7), 529532. Mckay, G., Otterburn, M. S., & Sweeney, A. G. (1980). The removal of color from effluent using various adsorbents III silica: rate processes. Water Research, 14, 2025. Mendoza, B. R., & Rivera, C. M. F. (1998). Start-up of an anaerobic hybrid UASBFilter reactor treating wastewater from a coffee processing plant. J of Anaerobe Env Microbiology, 4, 219225. MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forest), 2003. Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess (Amendment) Act, 2003. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi. Mohammed, A., Akhtar, H. K., & Ahmad, A. (1998). Role of sawdust in the removal of copper (II) from industrial wastes. Water Research, 32(10), 30853091. Murthy, N. K. V., Chandru, B. T., & Antonette D. S. (2003). Report on IEIs Rural Electricity and Water Supply Utility (REWSU) project with special reference to the utility at Mavinakere. International Energy Initiative, Bangalore, http://www.iei-asia.org/IEIBLRREWSUReport. Murthy, N. K. V., Antonette, D. S., & Kapur, G. (2004). An effluent treatment-cum-electricity generation option at coffee estates: is it financially feasible? Draft version. Bangalore: International Energy Initiative. Pala, A., & Tokat, E. (2002). Color removal from cotton textile industry wastewater in an activated sludge system with various additives. Ind J Environ Prot, 36, 29202925. Patnaik, S. N., Baisak, P. C., & Patnaik, L. N. (1996). Removal of COD from textile mills effluent using fly ash. Ind J Environ Prot, 591594. Piet, N. L., Piet, M. V., Lode, S., & Willy, H. V. (1994). Direct treatment of domestic wastewater by percolation over peat, bark and woodchips. Water Research, 28(1), 1726. Poots, V. J. P., McKay, G., & Healy, J. J. (1976). Removal of basic dyes from effluents using wood as an adsorbent. J Wat Poll Control Fed, 50, 926935. Rolz, C. (1982). Biotechnology in washed coffee processing. Process Biochemistry, 17(2), 810. Sharma, N., & Sharma, R. (1994). Combined paper mill effluent treatment by Wateer hyacinth. Ind J Environ Prot, 14, 678681. Srivastava, V. C., Mall, I. D., & Mishra, I. D. (2005). Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewaters with poly aluminium chloride and bagasse fly ash. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 260(13), 17 28. Wang, S., & Wu, H. (2006). Environmental-benign utilization of fly ash as low-cost adsorbents. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136(3), 482501. Wang, S., Li, L., Wu, H., & Zhu, Z. H. (2005). Unburned carbon as a low-cost adsorbent for treatment of methylene blue-containing wastewater. J Colloid and Inter Sc, 292 (2), 336343. WHO. (1995). Guideline for discharge of industrial effluent characteristics. Geneva, 3, 231236. 306 Water Air Soil Pollut (2010) 207:299306 Reproducedwith permission of thecopyright owner. Further reproductionprohibited without permission.