Board Materials 09-09-14 1pm

NEW BUSINESS
1
0123456789
1
TAB 1
Los Angeles Unified School District
Board of Education Report
333 South Beaudry Ave,
Los Angeles, CA 90017
File #: Rep-036-14/15, Version: 1
APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT ACTIONS
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education (Board) ratify the contract actions taken by the Procurement
Services Division within delegated authority as listed in Attachment A including the approval of award of
Professional Service Contracts not exceeding $250,000: New Contracts and Amendments; Low Value -
Decentralized Purchase Orders; Goods and General Services Contracts: Purchase Orders, Low Value -
Decentralized Purchase Orders; District Credit Card Transactions; Rental of Facilities; Travel/Conference
Attendance; General Stores Distribution Center; and Book/Instructional Material Purchase Orders; and
approve the Professional Service Contracts (exceeding $250,000): New Contracts; Goods and General
Services Contracts (exceeding $250,000): Contract Amendment and Piggyback Contract Amendment listed in
Attachment B.
Background:
Procurement Services staff prepares monthly reports for contract actions necessary for the execution of the
projects approved by the Board for the educational and operational requirements of the District in accordance
with Board delegated authority to the Superintendent.
Expected Outcomes:
Approval of these items will allow the goods and services provided by these contracts furnishing the
equipment, supplies, or services to the Los Angeles Unified School District that support Board policies and
goals.
Board Options and Consequences:
The Board can approve all actions presented, or postpone selected actions pending receipt of additional
information. Non-ratification of actions awarded under delegated authority in Attachment A will result in
immediate unavailability of products or discontinuance of services, or both. While non-ratification may be
legally defendable, it would likely result in costly litigation over discontinued payments or if the District
attempts to reclaim payments made to a vendor. District costs will likely increase as fewer vendors compete
for future procurements. Postponement of actions presented for approval in Attachment B will delay contract
award or delivery dates.
Policy Implications:
This action does not change District policy and conforms to California Education Code section 17604 that
permits the Board of Education to delegate authority for Procurement Services (Board Report #474-13/14),
which the Board exercised on June 10, 2014.
Los Angeles Unified School District Printed on 8/27/2014 Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar
2
Budget Impact:
The contract actions presented are within the budget authority previously approved by the Board.
Ratification of contracts awarded under delegation of authority and within their Board approved budget listed
in Attachment A includes:
Award of Professional Service Contracts not exceeding $250,000:
New Contracts; Amendments; Low Value - Decentralized Purchase Orders; and
Goods and General Services Contracts not exceeding $250,000: Procurement Transactions -
Purchase Orders; Low Value - Decentralized Purchase Orders; Rental of Facilities;
Travel/Conference Attendance; District Credit Card Transactions; General Stores Distribution
Center; and Book/Instructional Material Purchase Orders
Request for Approval of Procurement Contracts not under delegated authority listed in Attachment B
includes:
Professional Services Contracts (exceeding $250,000); and
Goods and General Services Contract Amendment (exceeding $250,000) and Piggyback Contract
Amendment
Issues and Analysis:
There are no policy implications on these agreements. The Business and Government Services Team, Office
of the General Counsel, has reviewed and approved the agreements as to form.
Attachments:
Attachment A - Ratification of Contracts Awarded Under Delegated Authority
Attachment B - Request for Approval of Contracts Not Under Delegated Authority
Informatives
powered by Legistar
3
ATTACHMENT A
APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS: RATIFICATION OF DELEGATED AUTHORITY
Bd. of Ed Rpt. No. 036-14/15 Page 1of 9 Board of Education
September 9, 2014
A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
NEW CONTRACTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 $356,415
CONTRACTOR IDENTIFI-
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE OF
FUNDS
AMOUNT
College Summit,
Inc.
4400002994 Single-source contract to provide
comprehensive college access program for up
to 444 students (83 -12
th
graders, 100 - 11
th
graders, 116 - 10
th
graders, and 145 - 9
th
graders) utilizing a structured online
curriculum, college resource center and career
exploration portal, as well as train 9 seniors as
peer leaders. Additionally, senior advisory
teachers and counselors/administrators will be
trained to teach and oversee the program.
Contract Term: 07/17/14 through 06/30/15
Contract Value: $29,525
Requester: William Lupejkis, Principal
Diego Rivera Learning Complex
General
(100%)
$29,525
College Summit,
Inc.
4400003074 Single-source contract to provide
comprehensive college access program for up
to 374 (12
th
grade) students utilizing a
structured online curriculum, college resource
center and career exploration portal, as well as
train 34 seniors as peer leaders. Additionally,
senior advisory teachers and
counselors/administrators will be trained to
teach and oversee the program.
Requester: Sandra Gephart, Principal
Arleta Senior High School
General
(100%)
$42,500
4
ATTACHMENT A
Bd. of Ed Rpt. No. 03614/15 Page 2of 9 Board of Education
September 9, 2014
NEW CONTRACTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 (CONT.)
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Kaleidoscope 4400003060 Single-source contract for proprietary services.
Contractor to provide eight (8) daysof training
of Cognitive Coachingto support the Division
of Special Education Strategic Plan 2015 key
goals of improving student outcomes and
managing employee performance. This training
will enhance participants communication skills
in working with school personnel to expand
learning opportunities for students with
disabilities and reduce disproportionality in the
identification of students who need special
education services. This training will build
capacity among the selected cohort of Division
staff who worksdirectly with school site staff in
an effort to accelerate the achievement of
identified students with disabilities as well as at-
risk learners.
Requester: Lisa Kendrick, Director
Division of Special Education
General
(100%)
$31,200
Silver Strong&
Associates, LLC
4400003044 Single-source contract to provide nine (9) days
of Core Six: Essential Strategies for Achieving
Excellence with the Common Core by Harvey
F. Silver. Training will provide teachers with
the support and knowledge to increase student
literacy skills, increase student engagement, and
incorporate writing across disciplines.
Requester: Rafael Balderas, Principal
Bell High School
Common Core
State Standards
(100%)
$39,290
5
ATTACHMENT A
September 9, 2014
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Think TRG LLC 4400002998 Single-source contract to provide proprietary
legacy software support of Pick/D3 systems
utilized by departments such as Facilities
Services Division.
Requester: Ronald Chandler
Chief Information Officer
Information Technology Division
General
(100%)
$78,720
Controltec, Inc. 4400003004 Single-source contract for maintenance of
proprietary Early Education Student
Information System (EESIS) software.
Contact Value: $60,180
General
(100%)
$60,180
6
ATTACHMENT A
September 9, 2014
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Capital Advisors 44000003079 Single-source contract to provide time-
sensitive advocacy and strategic advice on
financial and compliance-related matters.
Requester: Megan Reilly
Chief Financial Officer
Office of the Chief Financial Officer
General
(100%)
$75,000
7
ATTACHMENT A
September 9, 2014
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 $200,000
CATION &
AMEND-
MENT NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Hansine Fisher &
Associates, Inc.
4400002746-3 Amendment to extend term and increase contract
capacity for software and technical support in
order that the District may submit claims for
federal reimbursement of Medi-Cal
Administrative Activities.
Current Contract Term: 03/11/10 through
06/30/14
New end date by this amendment: 06/30/15
Initial Contract Value: $214,980
Amendment No. 1: $0
Amendment No. 2: $928,440
*Amendment No. 3 $200,000
Aggregate Contract Value: $1,343,420
Requester: Debra Duardo
Executive Director
Medi-Cal Reimbursement Programs
General
(100%)
$200,000*
8
ATTACHMENT A
September 9, 2014
B. AFTER THE FACT NEW CONTRACTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 ALREADY AWARDED $0
The contract actions represented below are unauthorized commitments initiated by the sponsoring school or division
without a formal contract in place. This action requires the Board to ratify the contract after the fact to allow the vendor to
be paid. The District didrequest and has received the benefit of the services. Informative memorandum included.
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
None
9
ATTACHMENT A
September 9, 2014
C. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
$0
The contract action(s) represented below is(are) part of the Common Core Technology Project Plan and ITD-SEP
previously adopted by the Board on February 12, 2013, under Board Report No. 157-12/13.
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
None

GOODS AND GENERAL SERVICES CONRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
$0
The contract action(s) represented below is (are) part of the Common Core Technology Project Plan and ITD-SEP
previously adopted by the Board on February 12, 2013, under Board Report No. 157-12/13. The total amount is
only an estimate since the expenditures made against contracts are based upon purchases and/or approved invoices.
CATION NO.
FUNDS
NOT TO-
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None

10
ATTACHMENT A
September 9, 2014
C. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
$0
previously adopted by the Board on J anuary 14, 2014, under Board Report No. 129-13/14.

CATION NO.
FUNDS
NOT TO-
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None

GOODS AND GENERAL SERVICES CONRACTS ALREADY AWARDED
$0
previously adopted by the Board on J anuary 14, 2014, under Board Report No. 129-13/14. The total amount is
only an estimate since the expenditures made against contracts are based upon purchases and/or approved invoices.

CATION NO.
FUNDS
NOT TO-
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
11
ATTACHMENT A
September 9, 2014
PROCUREMENT AGREEMENTS NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 July 2014 -$12,457,967
YTD - $12,457,967
The contract actions represented below are those actions put in place within each sponsoring schools or divisions
approved budget. These delegated procurement methods represent streamline ordering tools that assist schools and
offices in meeting immediate mission-essential needs for goods or services.
July 2014
Qty of POs/
Transactions
YTD
Qty of POs/
Transactions
July 2014
Total
YTD
Total
Purchase Orders (Avg. Trans.- $99,415) 33 33 $3,280,696 $3,280,696
Low Value Decentralized Purchase Orders
(Avg. Trans. $1,717)
2,370 2,370 $4,069,159 $4,069,159
DISTRICT CARD TRANSACTIONS
(i.e.: P-Card, Fuel Card, Toshiba Card, etc.)
- (Avg. Trans. $630)
3,090 3,090 $1,945,928 $1,945,928
Rental Facilities (Avg. Trans. $13,088)
8 8 $104,702 $104,702
Travel/Conference Attendance -
(Avg. Trans. $894)
429 429 $383,729 $383,739
GENERAL STORES DISTRIBUTION
CENTER - (Avg. Trans. $5,361)
Informative memo included
288 288 $1,543,996 $1,543,996
BOOK/INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL
PURCHASE ORDERS(BPO) -
(Avg. Trans. $5,621)
201 201 $1,129,747 $1,129,747
*Detailed information is provided on the Procurement Services website.
D. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NOT EXCEEDING $250,000 July 2014 - $1,277,945
YTD - $1,277,945
The contract actions represented below are those actions put in place within each sponsoring schools or divisions
approved budget. These delegated procurement methods represent streamline ordering tools that assist schools and
offices in meeting immediate mission-essential needs for professional services.
July 2014
Qty. of POs
YTD
Qty of POs
July 2014
Total
YTD
Total
Low Value DecentralizedPurchase
Orders(Avg. Trans. $7,179)
178 178 $1,277,945 $1,277,945
12
ATTACHMENT B
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS NOT UNDER
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
September 9, 2014
A. APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS
NEW CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $250,000 $7,703,982
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
AMOUNT
Creative
Educational
Consultants, Inc.
4400003131
(RFP 2000000232)
Provide curriculum development, training and
implementation support for Restorative
J ustice in compliance with Board of
Education Resolution-2013, School Discipline
Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights.
includes two (2) one-year option renewals
Aggregate Three-Year Contract Value:
$1,894,420
Requester: Earl R. Perkins
Assistant Superintendent
School Operations
General
(100%)
$1,894,420
AT&T
Management
Applications,
Inc.
NetXperts
Vector
Resources
4400003105
4400003107
4400003108
4400003109
(RFP 2000000181)
Provide high-level technical engineering
support for the installation, configuration and
testing of LAN and WLAN and Scalable
Fiber upgrade projects at 400 schools in
support of the Information Technology
Division and Facilities Services Division
Strategic Education Plans. Theauthority to
increase or decrease individual amounts for
these contracts will be limited to the aggregate
amount of $5,000,000.
includes two (2) one-year option renewals
Aggregate Five-Year Contract Value:
$5,000,000
Bond
(100%)
$5,000,000
13
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
September 9, 2014
AMENDMENTS TO CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $250,000 $0
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
None
NEW CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $250,000 (CONT.)
CATION NO.
FUNDS
AMOUNT
Renaissance
Learning, Inc.
4400003104 Pass-through contract to provide teachers
with professional development workshops at
private schools within the Archdiocese of
Los Angeles. This is a pass-through
contract for TitleII Part A, No Child Left
Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Private
Schools Support with LAUSD as the Local
Education Agency (LEA).
Requester: Justo H. Avila
Chief Human Resources Officer
Human Resources Private School Support
Title II
Part A
Funds
(100%)
$269,562
Educational
Testing Services
4400003143 State of California Department of Education
mandated provider for testing and
assessment of students seeking high school
equivalency certificate.
Requester: Donna Brashear
Executive Director
Division of Adult Career Education
General
Funds
(Off-set by
student fees)
(100%)
$540,000
NEW CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $250,000 (CONT.)
14
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
September 9, 2014
B. APPROVAL OF GOODS AND GENERAL SERVICES CONTRACTS
Authority to award contracts for furnishing equipment, supplies and general services. The total amount is only an
estimate since the expenditures made against contracts are based upon purchases and/or approved invoices.
NEW CONTRACT EXCEEDING $250,000 $0
CATION NO.
FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT EXCEEDING $250,000 $2,000,000
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
AbleMicrosystems
Corp., dba KIS
Computer Center
4400001368-4 Amendment to increase contract capacity to
provide various types of multimedia projectors,
document cameras, carts, supplies and related
services to meet the audio/video, administrative
and instructional needs of schools and offices.
Current Contract Term: 04/01/10 through
03/31/15
Initial Contract Value: $15,302,419
Amendment No. 1& 2: $3,000,000
Amendment No. 3: $4,000,000
*Amendment No. 4: $2,000,000
Microsoft
Voucher
Program
(100%)
$2,000,000*
15
ATTACHMENT B
DELEGATED AUTHORITY
September 9, 2014
B. APPROVAL OF GOODS AND GENERAL SERVICES CONTRACTS
Authorize the utilization of piggyback contracts in effect. The proposed action complies with the Public Contract Code
Sections 10299 and 20118, which allows school districts to utilize other governmental agencies established contracts
and does not change District policy.
UTILIZATION OF PIGGYBACK CONTRACT IN EFFECT EXCEEDING $250,000 $294,500
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
SHI International,
Inc.
4400003150-2 Amendment to theDistricts Microsoft
Enterprise Licensing Agreement incorporating
email archiving and e-discovery subscription
services. Subscription to these services will
allow LAUSD to comply with its newly
implemented Records Retention and
Destruction Policy (BUL-5503.1).
Current Contract Term: 06/13/12through
06/14/16 includes one (1) one-year option
renewal
Amendment No. 1: $0
*Amendment No. 2: $294,500
General
(100%)
$294,500*
INCOME CONTRACT $0
CATION NO.
DESCRIPTION SOURCE
OF FUNDS
NOT TO
EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
16
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
17
No. 036-14/15
For 9/9/14 Board Meeting
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
LosAngelesUnifiedSchool District
INFORMATIVE
TO: Members, Board of Education DATE: September 9, 2014
Dr. J ohn E. Deasy, Superintendent of Schools
FROM: Ronald S. Chandler, Chief Information Officer
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF TWO PROCUREMENT ITEMS TO PROVIDE
CRTIICAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES
The Information Technology Divisionis requesting ratification of twoprocurement items to provide services
necessary for thecontinued operation of schools andoffices. These include 1) maintenance and support for the
Districts Early Education Student Information System (EESIS); and 2) maintenance and support for the
Districts Pick/D3 legacy system currently utilized by various departments including Facilities Division and
Office of Data and Accountability.
All items were executedunder the delegated authority of the Chief Procurement Officer and require Board of
Education ratification. The table below provides additional information on each of these items.
Service Vendor Value Terms
Annual maintenance for the Early Education Student
Information System (EESIS), which in addition to
managing student data for Pre-K students, provides business
data management such as tracking eligibility requirements,
fee management, and payments for subsidized services
provided to low-income families.
Controltec $60,180
(Early
Childhood
Education
Funds)
J uly 1, 2014
J une 30, 2015
The District relies on two legacy mainframe servers to run
many critical applications including the Facilities Services
Division, the Office of Dataand Accountability, and others.
As we work to upgrade these systems onto modern
platforms, Think TRG is providing short-term full-time
software support and maintenance to ensure that the
applications that rely on them continue to operate
uninterrupted during transition.
ThinkTRG $78,720
(General
Funds)
J uly 1, 2014
J une 30, 2015
If you have any questions, please contact me at 213-241-4906.
c: Michelle King Matt Hill David Holmquist Enrique Boullt
George Silva J efferson Crain
18
No. 036-14/15
Office of theChief Financial Officer
INFORMATIVE
TO: Members, Board of Education Date: August 13, 2014
Dr. J ohn E. Deasy, Superintendent
FROM: Megan K. Reilly, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: CAPITOL ADVISORS GROUP, LLC AGREEMENT
This informative provides background on the agreement with Capitol Advisors Group,
LLC, which will be considered as part of aProcurement ratification actions at the
September 9, 2014 Board meeting.
Capitol Advisors providesadvocacy, legislative updatesand strategic advice to the District
on important budget, finance and compliance-related matters. The principals are uniquely
suited because of their subject matter expertise and because of the access they afford the
District to state executive officer decision-makers.
Capitol Advisors work plan for this fiscal year includesworking on the maximization of
revenue recovery in the LAUSD v. County of Los Angeles et al. redevelopment lawsuit
and on ensuring the District will continue to receive full mandate block funding. Capitol
Advisors has and will continue to work with state level officials on the proper
characterization of the Districts damages recovery, which will lead, if successful, to the
District retaining more back payments owed as a result of this litigation. Staff anticipates
the finalization of this lawsuit within this fiscal year and will be available for a closed
session discussion of the matter, including the role played by Capitol Advisors.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 213.241-7888.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
GeorgeSilva
19
No. 036-14/15
School Operations
INFORMATIVE
TO: Members, Board of Education DATE: August 8, 2014
FROM: Earl R. Perkins
Assistant Superintendent, School Operations
SUBJECT: CONTRACTOR: CREATIVE EDUCATIONAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
CONTRACT NO.: 4400003131
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $1,894,420
REQUEST FOR APPOVAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE TRAINING
In keeping with our District goals of ensuring student safety, creating caring and nurturing learning
environments for students, and supporting all employees, on May 14, 2013, the Board adopted by
majority vote the Board Resolution 2013 School Discipline Policy and School Discipline Bill of
Rights. The resolution requested that staff review current policies related to discipline, establish
alternatives to school suspensions to correct student misconduct and develop and implement
Restorative J ustice practices as an alternative to traditional school discipline.
Why is this necessary?
Per the May 2013 Board Resolution School Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights,
as part of its commitment to implement Restorative J ustice practices in all schools specialized
training is required. This contract is necessary in order to provide expert training, ongoing
technical support, development of Restorative J ustice curriculumin conjunction with Central
School Operations, and monitoringthe implementation of Restorative J ustice practices inthe
selected 25 demonstration high schools. These sites will serve as Restorative J ustice
demonstration schools for other District schools to visit and observe best practices for
implementing Restorative J ustice practices with in school communities. The Restorative J ustice
curriculum will be used to train all District schools.
Why do we need to do this now?
We need this now to meet the requirements of the May 2013 Board ResolutionSchool Discipline
Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights to implement Restorative J ustice practices.
What would happen if this were not approved?
A Yes vote means that we would fulfill the commitment of theMay 2013 Board Resolution
School Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights. We would provide expert training,
ongoing technical support, development of Restorative J ustice curriculum, and monitoring the
implementation of Restorative J ustice practices in our selected 25 demonstration high schools.
20
Members, Board of Education -2- August 8, 2014
A No vote means non-approval of this contract and would leave us out of compliance with the
May 2013 Board Resolution School Discipline Policy and School Climate Bill of Rights. Doing
sowould impede our ability to provide expert training, ongoing technical support, development of
Restorative J ustice curriculum, and monitoring the implementation of Restorative J ustice
practices in our selected 25 demonstration high schools.
What are the terms of the proposed agreement?
This contract is a one-year term for services, with the option of a two-year extension, not to
exceed the contract amount of $714,000. Funding will come from General Funds, Unrestricted
Restorative J ustice Program.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me or Deborah Brandy
at deborah.brandy@lausd.net or at (213) 241-5337.
c: Michelle King
Matt Hill
David Holmquist
Gerardo Loera
Enrique Boullt
J efferson Crain
George Silva
Deborah Brandy
J asmin Malinao
Christopher Ortiz
ZsuzsannaVincze
21
Procurement ServicesDivision
INFORMATIVE
FROM: George Silva, Chief Procurement Officer
Procurement Services Division
SUBJECT: GENERAL STORES DISTRIBUTION CENTER SPEND FOR
REPLENISHMENT OF STOCK INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES,
EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE
Duringthe Boardof Educations April 10, 2012meeting, pre-authorization was grantedto the
Procurement Services Division (PSD) to enter into various new contracts, extend existing contracts,
and award various purchase orders to make regular and routine procurements of products used by
schools and offices and stocked in the General Stores Distribution Section. As part of the pre-
authorization, it was agreed that PSDwould report on the total procurement activity on a monthly (per
board report) basis. Inan effort to streamline and enhance the reporting process, the chart below lists
the major commodity categories and total purchase order issuance for the month of J uly.
GENERAL STORES DISTRIBUTION
MAJOR COMMODITY CATEGORIES
PURCHASE ORDER ISSUANCE
JULY1TOJULY31,2014
ACCUMULATIVE
FISCAL YEAR TOTAL
Furniture $406,620.59 $406,620.59
Office Essentials $223,510.20 $223,510.20
Custodial/Maint. & Operations $394,831.28 $394,931.28
Paper $95,333.06 $95,333.06
Visual Arts $196,254.73 $196,254.73
Educational Supplies/Tools $92,897.46 $92,897.46
Science/Home Economics/First Aid $92,937.43 $92,937.43
No. 036-14/15
22
Members, Board of Education
Dr. J ohn E. Deasy, Superintendent -2- August 4, 2014
MAJOR COMMODITY CATEGORIES
PURCHASE ORDER ISSUANCE
JULY1TOJULY30,2014
ACCUMULATIVE
FISCAL YEAR TOTAL
Audio Visual $25,258.95 $25,258.95
Athletic Equipment $8,545.25 $8,545.25
Forms & Publications $6,226.85 $6,226.85
Music $1,580.56 $1,580.56
TOTALS $1,543,996.36 $1,543,996.36
If you have questions or require additional information, please contact meat (213) 241-1751.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
Marc Monforte
23
No. 036-14/15
INFORMATIVE
SUBJECT: APPROVE CONTRACTS WITH AT&T, MANAGEMENT
APPLICATIONS, INC., NETXPERTS, AND VECTOR RESOURCES TO
SUPPLEMENT ENGINEERING CAPACITY FOR SCHOOL NETWORK
UPGRADE PROJECTS
The Information Technology Divisionis requesting approval of master agreements( also known as
bench contracts) with a) AT&T, b) Management Applications, Inc., c) Netxperts, and d) Vector
Resources to provide a temporary increase in network engineering capacity to support local area
network (LAN) and wireless local area network (WLAN) projects at approximately 400 schools
over the next 18 months. All projects supported by the proposed action were approved as part of
the Districts Information Technology Strategic Execution Plan and Facilities Service Division
Strategic Execution Plan.
Due to the increasing demand for technology-enabled classrooms that support 1:1 computing and
media-rich learning content, the timelines for network modernization projectsincluding
increased bandwidth capacity and high-density wireless accesshasbeen accelerated. The District
requires temporary increases in network engineer capacity in order to keep these projects moving
forward on schedule. The proposed contracts provide as-needed access to staff members with the
necessary technical expertise needed to support modernization projects during peak periods.
The Districts Information Technology Strategic Execution Plan and Facilities Services Division
Strategic Execution Plan have aggressive schedules for extending wireless networking capability
to all District campuses. The temporary capacity increase is necessary to prevent disruptions to
these schedules and delaying student access to technology-enabled learning systems.
What would happen if there were not approved?
Without access to staff with the required technical expertise, network modernization projects
cannot move forward, meaning thousands of students and teachers would be unable to benefit
from the Districts instructional technology initiatives. Ongoing maintenance and repair costs for
gaining and failing networks would continue to present a major cost burden.
24
Members, Board of Education -2-
The proposed items are zero-dollar task-order contracts that have three-year terms with two one-
year options. When staff increases are necessary to support project schedules, task orderswill be
to the firms fromthe approved bench contracts. The total value for the potential five-year period
is not to exceed $5 million. Source of funding is 100% Bond Funds. No general funds will be
expended.
If you have anyquestions, please contact me at 213-241-4906.
25
No. 036-14/15
Human Resources Division
INFORMATIVE
FROM: J usto H. Avila
SUBJECT: RENAISSANCE LEARNING, INC.
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $269,562.00 CONTRACT NO. 4400003104
Section 1119 of Title II Part A of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001requires
equitable participation of private school teachers and other educational personnel to the
extent that the Local Educational Agency (LEA) reserves funds for professional
development. As the LEA, LAUSDentered into consultation with the Archdiocese of Los
Angeles Consortium. Through the required consultation process, it was determined that the
professional development offered by Renaissance Learning, Inc. would best meet the goal of
the Archdiocese to provide training in the analysis of student assessment data and support
teachers and principals in using the results of that data to inform instruction and improve
student achievement.

As the LEA, the LAUSD is obligated to administer and oversee the appropriate, equitable
and timely utilization of these funds generated by students of private schools whoreside
within the boundaries of the LAUSD. Approval of this request by the Board of Education
will ensure the timely delivery of services to the Archdiocese of LA schools for this fiscal
year.
If the contract with Renaissance Learning is not approved for the Archdiocese of LA
schools, the District would likely receive a warning fromthe California Department of
Education to rectify the situation immediately and may receive subsequent sanctions if the
matter is not resolved.
26
Dr. J ohn E. Deasy, Superintendent - 2- August 11, 2014
Services will include:
3One-Day Professional Development Days 6 hour onsite days Champions
Academy
Online Professional Development Coursesfor teachers and administrators at 104
elementary schools in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles ongoing through the end of
the 2014-15 school year
Invoices with supporting documentation will be sent to the LAUSD at the end of each
monthas work is completed.
Documentation for OnlineProfessional Development Courses includes sample of grade
level assessments, summary report of courses completed by teachers and evaluationsby
participants. Documentation for workshops includes agendas, sign-ins and evaluations.
The contract for Renaissance Learning will not exceed $269,562.00. There will be no
changes to the terms of the agreement.
Funding Source: Title II Part A funds for the private schools are pass-through funds.
If there are any questions, please contact me at (213) 241-6131or justo.avila@lausd.net.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
George Silva
27
No. 036-14/15
Division of Adult and Career Education
INFORMATIVE
FROM: Donna Brashear
Executive Director
SUBJECT: EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICES (ETS)
CONTRACT NO.: 4400003143
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $540,000
REQUEST APPROVAL OF A STATE MANDATED PROVIDER OF THE
HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY TEST
This is an extraordinary year in the area of High School Equivalency Testing. For the first time
Californias adult students have more than one option for earning their High School Equivalency
certificate. Before 2014 the GEDexam was only test that lead to the HSE certificate.
Recognizing the need for more options for students, in March of this year, the State Board of
Education approved two additional test instruments for use by districts to certify high school
equivalency, the High School Equivalency Test (HiSET), made by Educational Testing Services
and the Test Assessing Secondary Completion (TASC) made by CTB-McGraw Hill. Los
Angeles Unified has plans to offer both alternative exams but to-date the state has not finalized
their MOU with CTB-McGraw Hill.
The HiSETexam has been approved by the California Department of Education as one of the
test that leads to a High School Equivalency certificate. At this time, it is the only alternative
approved by the California State Department of Education. Since LAUSD opted not to
administer thenew more costly GED2014 exam, the need for a replacement test has arisen.
Replacing the GEDwith the HiSETwill render a significant savings to the district as it costs
less to administer.
The California Department of Education signed the Memorandum of Understanding on J uly 11,
2014. It is the only alternative test approved for high school equivalency certification at this time.
LAUSD. Since we are not administering any high school equivalency test since December of
2013, there are thousands of students whose progress towards earning a high school diploma or
gaining employment have been put on hold.
28
Members, Board of Education -2- August 12, 2014
Thousands of students who are on waiting lists throughout the district will have to continuing
waiting. This would mean a higher dropout rate and less revenue to the district as each student
who passesthe exam earns a Workforce Investment Act payment points resulting in federal funds
for the Division of Adult and Career Education.
Identify terms of any proposed agreements as well as funding sources.
The cost of the HiSETtest materials and scoring service is $70 per student. Adult students
offset the cost of administration of the HiSETby paying a test fee of $150 for the full battery.
Students who pass the HiSETare awarded the same High School Equivalency Certificate.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Danna Escalanteat
dme74491@lausd.net or at (213) 241-3150
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
J efferson Crain
George Silva
29
No. 036-14/15
INFORMATIVE
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO APPROVE A CONTRACT CAPCITY INCREASE TO
SUPPORT THE MICROSOFT VOUCHER PROGRAM
The Information Technology Division(ITD) is requesting approval of a capacity increase for the
KIS Computer Center to enablethe Procurement Services Division to offer a menu of qualifying
items for purchase for schools who are eligible for Microsoft Voucher reimbursements.
In March 2014, the Los Angeles Unified School District received allocations for $19.3millionin
reimbursements distributed through the California Education Technology K-12 Voucher
Program. Of the $19.3million, approximately $9.7millionin General Purpose Vouchers will be
distributed for use by 728 eligible schools. In partnership with the procurement Services
Division, ITDwill administer the distribution through what is known as the Microsoft (MS)
Voucher Program.
Eligible schools will have the opportunity to select from a menu of products that are pre-
approved by the voucher programs settlement claims administrator. Products such as desktops,
laptops, projectors, document cameras, iPad keyboards, and others will be availableto order
through an online shopping site.
Based on 1) a survey of school administratorsand teachers conducted during the early weeks of
August 2014, and 2) purchasing data from the 2009 Voucher Website and feedback received
from instructional staff and administrators, ITD projected the sales for eachqualifying product.
In order to meet the anticipated demands, we areseeking approval to increase the capacity of an
existing contract with KIS Computers (contract #44001368) by $2 million, ensuring that schools
are able obtain pre-negotiated prices with volume discounts.
The new voucher websiteis targeted tolaunch in mid-October 2014with a two-month window
during which schools will be able to place orders. The proposed procurement actionmust be
approved before then in order for the purchasing system to be released on schedule.
30
Without approval of the proposed procurement action, eligible schools will not be able to take
advantage of the voucher program to purchase technology products theyneed.
The proposed action will increase the KIS Computer Center contract value from approximately
$22.3millionto $24.3million; the remaining terms of the contract will not change.
All purchases related to the MS Voucher Program will have no impact on the General Fund, as
Microsoft Vouchers will comprise 100% of the funding source.
31
No. 036-14/15
INFORMATIVE
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO AMEND EXISTING CONTRACT TO INCORPORATE
EMAIL ARCHIVING AND E-DISCOVERY SERVICES
The Information Technology Division is requesting to amend the Microsoft Enterprise Licensing
Agreement (ELA) to incorporateEmail Archiving and E-Discovery services, enabling the District
to comply with the Records Retention and Destruction Policy (BUL-5503.1); specifically, the
section governing email messagesthrough implementation of an automated, enterprise-enforced
system and to fulfill litigation support requests in a cost effective manner.
Compliance is the principal reasonfor implementing an Email Archivingand E-Discovery
solution. On J uly 1, 2012, the Office of the Superintendent issued the Records Retention and
Destruction (Other than Pupil Records) Policy Bulletin BUL-5503.1, which mandates the
automatic deletion of non-permanent records from the District email system after one year. The
Archiving and E-Discovery solution 1) will reduce the time and costs associated with responses
to discovery requests and investigations, and 2) is aligned tothe December 2010 amendments to
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures governing the discovery of electronic information for civil
litigation.
The District is currently out of compliance with its own Records Retention and Destruction (Other
than Pupil Records) Policy Bulletin BUL-5503.1. Additionally, existing processes used to
respond to discovery requests are labor-intensive and inefficient. Expedited acquisition of the
proposed services will enable the District to move quickly on ensuring compliance with all
applicable policies and maximize efficiency.
Without an automated archiving system, the District will continue to rely on email account
holders to deletequalifying items manually in order to comply with the one-year maximum
retention policy. The District would also continue to rely on costly and inefficient contracted
services to provide discovery processes when called for by litigation processes.
32
The contract amendment will include ninemonths of Microsoft Email Archiving and E-
Discovery services. At the end of the 2014-15 year, the ELA will be re-negotiated with the new
services and brought back to the Board of Education for ratification. The value of the proposed
increase to the existing contract is $294,500. Source of funding is the General Fund.
If you have anyquestions, please contact me at 213-241-4906.
33
2
TAB 2
Approval of Routine Personnel Actions
Action Proposed:
Approve 5,024 routine personnel actions (including, but not limited to elections, promotions, transfers, leaves,
terminations, separations, permits and contracts) according to the following breakdown:
Classified: 2,720
Certificated: 1,717
Unclassified: 587
It is proposed that the following routine personnel actions (including, but not limited to elections, promotions,
transfers, leaves, terminations, separations, permits and contracts) be approved.
SAP transaction numbers: 1818465 to 1946553
ROUTINE PERSONNEL ACTIONS
Total (this report) Total
(8/1/2014 to 8/20/2014) (Year-to-date)
1. Classified 2,720 253,939
2. Certificated 1,717 186,006
3. Unclassified 587 94,265
TOTAL 5,024 534,210
BREAKDOWN OF ACTIONS
Actions Classified Certificated Unclassified Total
Hire 478 474 233 1185
Leaves/Paid 78 68 0 146
Leaves/Unpaid 21 30 0 51
Reassignments/Demotions 4 0 0 4
Reassignments/Transfer 677 293 76 1046
Reassignments/Promotions 502 228 1 731
Retirements 19 30 0 49
Separation/Non-
Resignations
172 50 87 309
Separation/Resignation 89 33 38 160
Other Actions* 680 511 152 1343
powered by Legistar
34
Actions Classified Certificated Unclassified Total
Hire 478 474 233 1185
Leaves/Paid 78 68 0 146
Leaves/Unpaid 21 30 0 51
Reassignments/Demotions 4 0 0 4
Reassignments/Transfer 677 293 76 1046
Reassignments/Promotions 502 228 1 731
Retirements 19 30 0 49
Separation/Non-
Resignations
172 50 87 309
Separation/Resignation 89 33 38 160
Other Actions* 680 511 152 1343
*Other actions include absences, conversion codes from legacy, change of pay, change of work schedule and
benefits.
Background:
This report is presented at each Board Meeting for approval of routine personnel actions.
Expected Outcomes:
Not applicable
Specifically in regard to disciplinary action, a no vote may nullify the disciplinary action due to legal time
constraints. A no vote impacts the timeliness of processing personnel actions for classified and certificated
employees regarding their assignment, salary/rate, transfer, and new appointment and may be in conflict with
procedural rights and benefits afforded them under applicable Education Code provisions, Personnel
Commission Rules, District Policy, and respective Collection Bargaining Agreements (UTLA, AALA,
Teamsters, Los Angeles School Police Sergeants and Lieutenants Association). Employees have procedural
rights that are based on their status (permanent or probationary) associated with the specific personnel action
being submitted and the respective rights available to them in accordance with the above. Additionally, based
on Personnel Commission Rules, permanent classified employees have rights to appeals.
Not applicable
Budget Impact:
Cost Neutral
Not applicable
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
35
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E

C
O
N
F
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
Confidential Information
Redacted
36
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
38
No. 044-14/15
For 09-09-14 Board Meeting
Personnel Commission
INFORMATIVE
FROM: J analyn W. Glymph, Ph.D.
Personnel Director
SUBJECT: NUMBER OF ROUTINE PERSONNEL ACTIONS
This informative addresses the number of classified personnel hire actions on the Board of
Education Routine Personnel Actions Report for the September 9, 2014 meeting.
The following table represents a breakdown of the new hire, reassignment, and rehire actions for
the September 9, 2014board report for the period of August 1, 2014 to August 20, 2014.
Hire Data:
As presented in the table below, the total number of classifiedhire actions for the period of
August 1, 2014 to August 20, 2014is 1661, of which 1375(83%) are rehires or reassignments,
and 286(17%) are new hires.
With the exception of 109assignments, all of the actions are for positions which are school-based
or provide direct support to the schools or their operations. Teacher Assistant positions, although
unclassified, are included in the data as they are indicated as classified in the BTS system and they
are processed by the Personnel Commission.
All new hires to regular/permanent positions are for A B, C, or E basis positions. The new hires
consist of an Accounting Technician II (2), Adults with Disabilities Program Assistant, Assistant
Buyer, Building and Grounds Worker (3), Building Project Estimator, Counselor Aide (2), Heavy
Truck Driver (3), Instructional Aide for the Deaf & Hard of Hearing Students-Signing,
Instructional Aide-Computer Lab, IT Electronics Communications Technician (4), Labor
Compliance Technician, Maintenance Worker (4), Microcomputer Support Assistant (4), Program
Associate M, School Facilities Attendant (Male) (Restricted) (2), School Facilities Attendant
(Restricted) (6), Senior Food Service Worker, Speech Language Pathology Assistant (8), Staff
Assistant to Board Members I, andStudent Support Services Case Manager (2).
The following regular/permanent positions have been filled by promotional employees:
Accounting Technician II, Building and Grounds Worker, Campus Aide & Restricted, Counselor
Aide (2), Customer Services Center Representative, Financial Analyst (4), Food Service Manager
I (38), Food Service Manager IV (4), Food Service Worker II (Driving) (3), Health Care Assistant
(2), Instructional Aide-Computer Lab, Licensed Vocational Nurse, Maintenance Worker (3),
Microcomputer Support Assistant (2), Payroll Specialist II (2), Plant Manager I, Plant Manager II,
39
Plant Manager III, Police Detective (3), Relocatable Housing Coordinator, School Administrative
Assistant (3), School Safety Officer, Selection Technician, Senior Financial Manager, Senior
Food Service Worker (12), Senior Police Officer, Sergeant, Special Education Assistant (82),
Student Support Services Case Manager (2), and Supervising Microcomputer Support Assistant.
Hire Data of All Classified and Teacher Assistant Employees
From August 1, 2014 to August 20, 2014
By New Hire, Reassignment, and Rehire
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
NEW HIRE
Accounting Technician II 1 1
Accounting Technician II* 1 1
Adults with Disabilities Program Assistant 1 1
Assistant Buyer 1 1
Athletics Assistant 5 5
Building and Grounds Worker 3 6 1 10
Building Project Estimator* 1 1
Campus Aide & Restricted 20 20
Campus Aide (Female/Restricted) 1 1
Campus Aide (Male/Restricted) 2 2
Counselor Aide 2 2
Deputy Director of Architecture &
Engineering* 1 1
Heavy Truck Driver 3 3
Information Technology Intern,
Programming* 1 1
Instructional Aide for the Deaf & Hard of
Hearing Students-Signing 1 1
Instructional Aide I & (Restricted) 5 5
Instructional Aide-Computer Lab 1 1
IT Electronics Communications
Technician* 4 4
Labor Compliance Technician* 1 1
Library Aide 1 1
Maintenance Worker 4 4
Microcomputer Support Assistant 4 4
Microcomputer Support Assistant* 11 11
Office Technician 2 2
Office Technician* 6 6
Program Associate M* 1 1
School Facilities Attendant (Male)
(Restricted) 2 2
School Facilities Attendant (Restricted) 6 1 7
Security Officer 7 7
Senior Food Service Worker 1 1
Senior Office Technician 1 1
Special Education Trainee 16 16
Speech Language Pathology Assistant 8 8
Staff Assistant to Board Members I* 1 1
Student Support Services Case Manager 2 1 3
40
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
NEW HIRE
Teacher Assistant - Degree Track 147 147
Teacher Assistant - Degree Track* 1 1
Textbook Inventory Clerk 1 1
New Hire Total 0 49 28 0 60 149 286
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REASSIGNMENT
Accountant 1 1
Accounting Technician II* 2 2
Administrative Analyst (CPOS)* 1 1
Administrative Analyst* 1 1
Asbestos Surveyor 1 1
Assignment Technician* 1 1
Assistant Chief Human Resources
Officer* 1 1
Assistant Plant Manager I 3 2 1 6
Assistant Plant Manager I* 1 1
Associate Civil Engineer* 1 1
Budget Technician* 1 1
Building and Grounds Worker 119 119
Building and Grounds Worker* 2 2
Campus Aide & Restricted 21 6 27
Campus Aide (Male/Restricted) 1 1 2
Civil Engineer* 1 1
Clerk 8 1 9
Clerk* 1 1
Compressor & Pneumatic Tool Operator 1 1
Continuation School Office Manager 1 1
Contract Payments Supervisor* 1 1
Counselor Aide 2 2
Customer Services Center Representative 1 1
Early Education Center Aide I &
(Restricted) 9 2 11
Early Education Center Office Manager 1 1
Education Aide II 17 17
Education Aide II (Restricted) 1 1
Education Aide III (AVID) 1 1
Education Aide III (Restricted) 2 2
Education Aide III (Spanish
Language/Restricted) 2 2
41
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REASSIGNMENT
Educational Resource Aide (Restricted) 3 3
Educational Resource Aide (Spanish
Language/Restricted) 1 1
Electrician 1 1
Electrician* 1 1
Environmental Compliance Manager 1 1
Financial Aide 1 1
Financial Aide * 1 2 3
Financial Analyst 4 4
Financial Analyst * 1 1
Financial Manager 10 10
Financial Manager* 2 2
Fiscal Specialist 2 2
Food Production Assistant 1 1 2
Food Service Manager I 14 348 362
Food Service Manager II 1 3 4
Food Service Manager IV 3 4 7
Food Service Manager V 1 2 3
Food Service Training Specialist* 1 1
Food Service Worker 19 19
Food Service Worker II (Driving) 5 5
Food Service Worker* 1 1
Food Services Staff Aide* 2 2
Gardener 3 3
Graphics Designer II* 1 1
Health Care Assistant 31 31
Heating and Air Conditioning Fitter 2 2
Housekeeper 1 1
Information Resources Support Assistant 3 3
Information Technology Trainer I 1 1
Instructional Aide I & (Restricted) 2 1 3
Instructional Aide II & (Restricted) 2 2
Instructional Aide-Computer Lab 1 1
Insurance Technician* 1 1
Inventory Control Clerk* 5 5
IT Electronics Communications
Technician* 1 1
Library Aide 20 1 21
Licensed Vocational Nurse* 1 1
Light Truck Driver 1 1
Meal Compliance Audit Clerk* 2 2
Medical Assistant* 1 1
Microcomputer Support Assistant* 3 2 5
42
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REASSIGNMENT
Office Technician 103 5 108
Office Technician (CPOS) 1 1
Office Technician* 2 5 7
Payroll Specialist II 3 3
Placement Assistant 1 1
Plant Manager I 1 7 1 9
Plant Manager II 1 6 1 8
Plant Manager III 2 2
Plant Manager III* 1 1
Police Detective 3 3
Principal Assignment Technician* 1 1
Principal Clerk 1 1
Relocatable Housing Coordinator 1 1
Salary Credits Assistant* 1 1
School Administrative Assistant 1 15 16
School Business and Operations
Manager 1 1
School Facilities Attendant (Female)
(Restricted) 1 1
School Facilities Attendant (Male)
(Restricted) 4 4
School Facilities Attendant (Restricted) 5 1 6
School Facilities Attendant (Restricted)* 1 1
School Office Computer Coordinator
(Adult) 2 2
School Safety Officer 4 4
Selection Technician* 1 1
Senior Assignment Technician* 1 1
Senior Early Childhood Education Division
Fiscal Technician 1 1
Senior Financial Analyst 1 1
Senior Financial Manager 3 3
Senior Financial Manager* 1 1
Senior Food Service Worker 6 18 24
Senior Office Technician 5 23 1 29
Senior Office Technician* 1 3 4
Senior Police Officer 1 1
Senior Secretary 1 1
Sergeant 1 1
Sign Language Interpreter 3 3
Special Assistant to the Chief Facilities
Executive* 1 1
Special Assistant, Facilities Services* 1 1
Special Education Assistant 187 187
Special Education Assistant (Male) 1 1
43
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REASSIGNMENT
Student Support Services Case Manager 4 1 5
Student Support Services Program
Coordinator 1 1
Supervising Assignment Technician* 1 1
Supervising Clerk 1 1
Supervising Microcomputer Support
Assistant* 1 1
Supervising Special Education Assistant 1 1
Window/Wall Washer 2 2
Zone of Choice Facilitator (Spanish
Language)* 1 1
Reassignment Total 58 1111 9 1 19 89 1287
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REHIRE
Building and Grounds Worker 2 1 3
Campus Aide & Restricted 5 5
Campus Aide (Male/Restricted) 1 1
Food Production Worker 1 1 2
Food Service Worker 1 1
Information Systems Support Assistant I 1 1
Instructional Aide I & (Restricted) 1 1
Library Aide 2 2
Office Technician 3 2 5
Office Technician* 2 2
Parent Resource Liaison 1 1
Placement Assistant 3 3
Plasterer and Concrete Finisher 1 1
Plumber 1 1
Secretary & (Restricted) 1 1
Senior Office Technician 1 1
Special Education Assistant 3 2 5
Special Education Trainee 9 9
Speech Language Pathology Assistant 1 1
Student Integration Helper & (Restricted) 1 1
44
Classification Prov
Reg/
Perm Restr.
Return
Retiree Subs Temp
Grand
Total
REHIRE
Textbook Inventory Clerk 3 3
Rehire Total 1 24 7 0 23 33 88
Grand Total 59 1184 44 1 102 271 1661
*non-school based
Summary
Temporary and Substitute employees are often needed for short periods of time to assume responsibilities for
regular employees when they are unavailable; they are not intended to replace regular employees for an
extended period of time. Positions for several classifications, such as Education Aides and Instructional Aides,
are typically filled by restricted status employees.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
J WG 09/09/2014
45
Human Resources Division

No. 044 -13/14

INFORMATIVE

Dr. John E. Deasy, Superintendent

FROM: Justo H. Avila

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ROUTINE PERSONNEL ACTIONS

This informative provides additional details regarding the Routine Personnel Actions outlined in Board
Report No. 044-14/15. The Human Resources Division reports 474 certificated new hires during the time
period covered by this report and a summary list of hires appears below. The 474 certificated new hires will
serve at schools and programs throughout the District and are comprised of both former employees selected
from rehire lists and newly employed certificated employees. Substitute teachers are being hired to assure
increased coverage capacity for teacher absences and planned professional development activities during the
school year.

1. ADVSR, TEMP,INSTRUCTIONAL Advisor, Temporary, Instructional 1
2. ASMT,NONCLSRM,PREP Nonclassroom Assignment, Preparatory 1
3. ASST PRIN, ELEM INSTRCTNL Assistant Principal, Elementary Instructional 1
4. ASST PRIN, ELEMENTARY Assistant Principal, Elementary 1
5. ASST PRIN, SECONDARY Assistant Principal, Secondary 1
6. COUNS, PUPIL SERV&ATTEND Counselor, Pupil Services and Attendance 15
7. Couns, Secondary School Counselor, Secondary School 1
8. DIR, DISTRICT NURSING SER Director, District Nursing Services 1
9. ELEMENTARY TEACHER Elementary Teacher 82
10. INSTR, MARINE CORPS JROTC Instructor, Marine Corps JROTC 3
11. OCCUPATIONAL THER,SCH,SP School Occupational Therapist, Special Education 6
12. PSYCLGST, SCHOOL School Psychologist 20
13. SCHOOL AUDIOMETRIST School Audiometrist 2
14. SCHOOL NURSE School Nurse 9
15. SECONDARY TEACHER Secondary Teacher 132
16. SOCIAL WKR,PSYTRC Social Worker, Psychiatric 10
17. SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER Special Education Teacher 48
18. Speech & Language Patholo Speech and Language Pathologist 4

46

Members, Board of Education - 2 - August 22, 2014

19. TCHR, SP ED, RES SPST PRG Teacher, Special Education, Resource Specialist Program 14
20. TCHR,AD SUB,DAY/DAY Adult Teacher, Day-to-Day Substitute, Rate 1 5
21. TCHR,C/LTD CNT Teacher, Categorical Limited Contract 1
22. TCHR,EL,SUB,D-D Teacher, Elementary, Substitute, Day-to-Day 31
23. TCHR,K-12,ADPT PE Teacher, K-12, Adapted Physical Education 2
24. TCHR,MATHEMATICS,FOUNDATI Teacher, Mathematics, Foundation 1
25. TCHR,S,LIBR MEDIA Teacher, Secondary, Library Media 1
26. TCHR,S,SUB,D-D Teacher, Secondary, Substitute, Day-to-Day 75
27. Teacher, Early Childhood Teacher, Early Childhood 6

JHA:yv

c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
Jefferson Crain

47
TAB 3
Approval of Non-Routine Personnel Actions
Action Proposed:
It is proposed that the following non-routine personnel actions be approved:
CLASSIFIED
Dismissal
1. EN 927892 from permanent Campus Aide effective at the close of September 10, 2014.
Suspension-Dismissals
2. EN 584704 from permanent Forklift Operator. Suspension from August 12, 2014 through
September 10, 2014; dismissal effective at the close of September 10, 2014.
3. EN 723609 from permanent Light Bus Driver. Suspension from August 12, 2014 through
September 10, 2014; dismissal effective at the close of September 10, 2014.
Background:
This report is presented at each Board Meeting for approval of non-routine personnel actions.
Expected Outcomes:
Not applicable
Specifically in regard to disciplinary action, a no vote may nullify the disciplinary action due to legal time
constraints. A no vote impacts the timeliness of processing personnel actions for classified and certificated
employees regarding their assignment, salary/rate, transfer, and new appointment and may be in conflict with
procedural rights and benefits afforded them under applicable Education Code provisions, Personnel
Commission Rules, District Policy, and respective Collective Bargaining Agreements (UTLA, AALA,
Teamsters, Los Angeles School Police Association, Service Employees International Union, Local 99,
California School Employees Association, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades
Council, Los Angeles School Police Sergeants and Lieutenants Association). Employees have procedural
rights that are based on their status (permanent or probationary) associated with the specific personnel action
being submitted and the respective rights available to them in accordance with the above. Additionally, based
on Personnel Commission Rules, permanent classified employees have rights to appeals.
Not applicable
powered by Legistar
48
Budget Impact:
No budget impact
Not applicable
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
49
Confidential Information
Redacted
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E

C
O
N
F
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
50
TAB 4
Report of cash disbursements
Donations of money
Action Proposed:
1. Report of cash disbursements: The Controller reports having disbursed the following payments of
approved demands, and recommends that the Board approve the disbursements against funds of the District.
A Warrants dated June 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014.
Warrant Numbers:
1113067-1113141
1113144-1133438
1138252-1138257
Net total of A Warrants issued: $ 19,206,725.19
Net total of direct deposit payroll
(Automated Clearing House - ACH) issued: $ 192,374,293.60
Total net amount of payroll disbursements: $ 211,581,018.79
B Warrants dated June 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014.
Warrant Numbers:
21382188-21382407 21415939-21416232
21384734-21385146 21418437-21418809
21387276-21387483 21422265-21422584
21390522-21390762 21425521-21425735
21393353-21393619 21428346-21428558
21397084-21397456 21431339-21431826
21402064-21402473 21434568-21434748
21405119-21405353 21437414-21437621
21408080-21408380 21440508-21440817
21411080-21411293 21443824-21444010
21413477-21413686
Net total of B Warrants issued: $125,783,210.60
Net total of ACH payments issued: $163,550,223.61
Total net of disbursements: $289,333,434.21
powered by Legistar
71
Total Amount of Report: $500,914,453.00
The above disbursements are within approved budgeted appropriations or were made in accordance with
established Board policies.
2. Donations of Money: It is recommended that the donations be accepted; that appreciation be expressed to
the donors for their contributions; the funds in the amount shown be deposited; and the Controller be
authorized to draw checks for the purposes shown below:
Date: 06/31/2014
Donor: Community School Parent Association
Donation: $89,900.00
For use at: Community Magnet Charter Elementary School
Purpose: To provide funding for substitute and supervision aide
salaries and instructional materials.
Date: 08/01/2014
Donor: The Los Angeles Fund for Public Education
Donation: $147,000.00
For use at: Educational Service Center - ISIC - Instruction
Purpose: To provide funding towards purchase of electronic books for
schools digital library.
Date: 08/01/2014
Donor: Playa Vista Education Group Inc. DBA Friends of Playa
Vista School
For use at: Playa Vista Elementary School
Purpose: To provide funding for seven (7) 6-hour teacher assistants
salaries.
Date: 08/05/2014
Donor: Parent Association Colfax Elementary
Donation: $100,000.00
For use at: Colfax Charter Elementary School
Purpose: To provide funding for six (6) 3-hour school supervision
aides and five (5) afterschool coaches salaries.
Date: 08/13/2014
Donor: Palisades Enrichment Programs (PEP)
For use at: Palisades Enrichment Charter School
Purpose: To provide funding for three (3) Class Size Reduction
teachers salaries.
powered by Legistar
72
Background:
This is a recurring monthly board report for the board to approve various financial transactions that occur as
part of school business.
Expected Outcomes:
The Board will be approving routine District financial transactions.
A yes vote:
1. Approves the previously disbursed payments; and
2. Accepts the donations of money.
A no vote could cause the cancellation of previously issued payments and decline cash donations made to
the District.
This board report does not change any school policy.
Budget Impact:
This board report approves financial transactions but does not change the budget.
The Board will be approving routine District financial transactions.
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
73
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
No. 067-14/15
Education Support Center - Intensive Support and Innovation Center
INFORMATIVE
FROM: Tommy Chang, Instructional Area Superintendent
Intensive Support and Innovation Center
SUBJECT: DONATION OF $147,000.00 TO ESC-ISIC
The Intensive Support and Innovation Center received a donation of $147,000.00 from the
Los Angeles Fund for Public Education- Bezos Foundationto implement aliteracy-based
program.
The donation will allow approximately 7,500 students in LAUSDs most at-risk schools to
access contents fromBaker & Taylor, the worldslargest content distributor, to give
schools access to more than 80,000 titles from 400 publishers. Baker & Taylors
KnowledgePoint platform powers each schools library, with powerful benefits for school
leaders seeking flexible digital libraries for classroom and beyond.
If you have any questions, please contact tommy.chang@lausd.net at (213) 241-0100.
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Maria Casillas
J efferson Crain
Others
TAB 5
Unaudited Actuals Report for Fiscal Year 2013-14 and Gann Limit Resolution
Action Proposed:
In accordance with Education Code section 42100, the Board is requested to approve the Unaudited Actuals
Report for Fiscal Year 2013-14 (Attachment A) and direct staff to submit the report to the County
Superintendent of Schools. In addition, pursuant to Education Code 42132, the Board is also requested to adopt
the Gann Limit Resolution (Attachment B).
Background:
Education Code Section 42100 requires the governing board of each school district to approve, in a format
prescribed by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, an annual statement of all receipts and expenditures of
the district for the preceding fiscal year and to file the statement with the County Superintendent of Schools on
or before September 15th.
Education Code Section 42132 requires the governing board of each school district to adopt a resolution
identifying their estimated appropriations limit for the current year and their actual appropriations limit for the
preceding year. The so-called Gann Initiative placed limits on the growth of expenditures for publicly
funded programs. Although the Gann Limit Calculations are provided as part of the Unaudited Actuals Report,
a specific resolution is required by statute.
Expected Outcomes:
The Districts statement of revenues and expenditures (Unaudited Actuals) for Fiscal Year 2013-14 will be
filed with the County Superintendent of Schools, in compliance with Education Code 42100. The budget for
the current fiscal year (2014-15) will be updated based on the Unaudited Actuals report.
The adopted Gann Limit Resolution will be made available to the public.
Board approval and filing of the Unaudited Actuals Report and adoption of the Gann Limit Resolution is
statutorily mandated.
None.
Budget Impact:
Budget adjustments for the current fiscal year may be required based on updated ending balances from the prior
fiscal year. In addition, budget projections for the current fiscal year and two out-years may be revised based on
a review of expenditures and updated balances from the Unaudited Actuals. The informative on the Unaudited
Actuals provides a summary of 2013-14 ending balances.
powered by Legistar
74
None.
Attachments:
Informatives: Materials for Board Item 064-14/15 - Unaudited Actuals Report for Fiscal Year 2013-14 and
Gann Limit Resolution
powered by Legistar
75
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
76
77
TAB 6
Approval of Reimbursement to the Los Angeles and Orange County Offices of Education for Specialized
Programs Offered to District Referred Students
Action Proposed:
Staff recommends the approval of reimbursements totaling $4,649,139 and $ 227,375, respectively, to the Los
Angeles County Office of Education (LACOE) and to the Orange County Department of Education (OCDE) for
services provided at county community or specialized secondary schools for District-referred students in FY
2013-14.
Background:
Under the new Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), county offices of education no longer receive direct
state funding for District-referred students attending county community day schools or specialized secondary
schools. Instead, program funding is now provided as part of the LCFF allocations to school districts. LACOE
and OCDE seek reimbursement for program costs related to District-referred students incurred in FY 2013-14,
and District program and Finance staff has validated the invoiced amounts.
As background, county community schools enroll students who have been expelled from a school district,
referred by a school attendance review board, referred by probation, or who are homeless. County specialized
secondary schools provide students with advanced learning opportunities in a variety of subjects and includes
schools such as the Los Angeles County High School for the Arts and the International Polytechnic High
School located on the campus of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.
Program and Finance staff is developing a policy to establish criteria and procedures for the District-referral of
students to county office of education programs. In addition, staff is working with LACOE and OCDE to
develop Memoranda of Understanding for students referred in FY 2014-15.
Expected Outcomes:
The county offices of education will be reimbursed for students served in FY 2013-14. FY 2013-14 amounts
may be adjusted based on the CDEs Annual Apportionment in February 2015.
Yes - LACOE and OCDE will be reimbursed for District- referred students served in FY 2013-14.
No - LACOE and OCDE will not be reimbursed for District- referred students served in FY 2013-14.
Staff is drafting a policy that formalizes the referral of District students to county educational programs, and
facilitates the accurate transfer of funds
Budget Impact:
powered by Legistar
78
As this is a pass-through of resources from the State to the Counties, there is no budget impact in FY 2013-14.
The FY 2014-15 MOU will require agreement by both parties on the documentation required to support the
number of students referred, and the reimbursement rate per student.
Attachments:
LACOE Invoice #46369
LACOE Invoice #46370
OCDE Invoice #94II0199
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
79
80
81
82
TAB 7
Facilities Services Division Contract Actions
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education (Board) ratify the Facilities Services Division (FSD) contract
actions taken by Facilities Contracts under delegated authority as listed in Attachment A including: award of
advertised construction contracts; award of 17406 contract; approval of change orders; completion of contracts;
award of informal contracts; award of architectural and engineering contracts; award of professional/technical
service contracts/amendments; extra services/amendments; and approve the proposed contract actions as listed
in Attachment B including: approval of professional/technical service contracts/amendments.
Background:
Facilities Contracts staff prepares monthly reports for contract actions necessary for the execution of projects
approved by the Board and contained in the FSD Strategic Execution Plan (SEP), and for the maintenance and
operation of District facilities in accordance with District policies and Board-delegated authority. As described
in the November 12, 2013 BOE 048-13/14 Informative, detailed information is provided on the Facilities
Services website.
Expected Outcomes:
Approval of these items will allow services provided by these contracts to proceed in support of FSD projects,
District policies and goals, and the Board-approved FSD-SEP.
The Board can approve all actions presented or postpone selected actions pending receipt of additional
information. Non-ratification of actions awarded under delegated authority in Attachment A will result in the
immediate discontinuance of services. While non-ratification may be legally defendable, it will likely result in
costly litigation over discontinued payments or if the District attempts to reclaim payments made to a vendor.
District costs will likely increase as fewer contractors compete for future procurements.
This action does not change District policy and conforms to California Education Code section 17604 that
permits the Board of Education to delegate authority for Facilities Contracts (Board Report #474-13/14), which
the Board exercised on June 10, 2014.
Budget Impact:
The contract actions presented are within the budget authority previously approved by the Board.
There are no policy implications on these agreements.
Attachments:
powered by Legistar
83
Attachment A" - Ratification of Facilities Contract Actions Awarded Under Delegated Authority.
B - Approval of Facilities Contract Actions Not Under Delegated Authority.
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
84
ATTACHMENT A
RATIFICATION OF CONTRACTS AWARDED UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY
Bd. of Ed Rpt No. 040 14/15 Page 1of 2 Board of Education
Report submitted 09/02/14 Revision #1 September 09, 2014
A. AWARD OF ADVERTISED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS $779,000
The District has engaged in two-tier procurement for its Year 2012 Local Area Network (LAN) Modernization Projects
(ITD/E-Rate) partially funded by Federal E-Rate grants. The four (4) contracts below represent the 2nd tier procurement
made pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20118.2.
CONTRACTOR BID NO./CONTRACT NO. SCHOOL / PROJ ECT AMOUNT
WNG Construction J .V. Inc.
(SBE)
1410133 / 1200203 Union ES
Board Member: Mnica Garca
$94,000
Masters Contracting
Corporation (SBE)
1410144 / 1200205 Cleveland HS
Board Member: Tamar Galatzan
$330,000
WNG Construction J .V. Inc.
(SBE)
1410148 / 1200203 Markham MS
Board Member: Richard Vladovic
$185,000
Construct Alliance, Inc. (SBE) 1410149 / 1200203 Fulton College Prep. School
Board Member: Mnica Ratliff
$170,000
17406 CONTRACTS / AMENDMENTS $5,232,000
CONTRACTOR CONTRACT NO. SCHOOL/PROJ ECT AMOUNT
OHNO Construction Company
(SBE)
4400003148 / 1410150 University HS
Track and Field Improvement
Board Member: Steve Zimmer
$5,232,000
B. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS $595,031
QUANTITY AMOUNT
Construction contracts that have change orders which do not individually
exceed 10 percent for J uly2014 (Average Transaction: $30,182).
8 $241,454
Repair and modernization contracts that have change orders which do not individually
exceed 15 percent for J uly2014 (Average Transaction: $10,102).
35 $353,577
Repair and modernization contracts that have change orders which individually exceed 15 percent (but
do not exceed 25 percent) for J uly2014 that require 75 percent approval by the Board.
0 $0
QUANTITY
C. COMPLETION OF CONTRACTS - J uly2014 45
D. AWARD OF INFORMAL CONTRACTS (Not Exceeding $84,100) $629,595
QUANTITY AMOUNT
A & B Letters for J uly 2014 (Avg. Trans. $9,837) 64 $629,595
E. REJECTION OF BIDS
BID NO. SCHOOL/PROJ ECT REASON
None
ATTACHMENT A
RATIFICATION OF CONTRACTS AWARDED UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY
Report submitted 09/02/14 Revision #1 September 09, 2014
F. AWARD OF ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTS $3,289,226
CONTRACTOR BID NO./CONTRACT NO. SCHOOL/PROJ ECT NOT-TO-EXCEED
AMOUNT
HMC Architects 1520001 / 4400003042 Foshay Learning Center
Design services for major seismic retrofit and extensive
modernization of the north classroom building and the
lunch pavilion/ student store buildings.
Board Member: Dr. GeorgeJ . McKennaIII
$3,265,626
Nadel Public Sector, Inc. 1520003 / 4400003072 South Region Early Education Center (EEC) No. 3
Planning and feasibility studyfor siting the proposed EEC
on the western portion of the Richard N. Slawson
Southeast Occupational Center.
Board Member: Bennett Kayser
$23,600
I. EXTRA SERVICES / AMENDMENTS $32,998
CONTRACT NO. 0320166 / 4400001541, 0620154 / 4400000284, 1320006 / 4400000608, and 1320010 / 4400000616
G. AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL / TECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACTS $444,788
CONTRACTOR CONTRACT NO. SERVICES AMOUNT
Telenet VolP Inc.
(SBE)
1580002 / 4400003091 Provide and install Aiphone video intercom systemsat
various schools.
$245,000
Funding Varies
Current Contract Term: 07/31/14through07/31/15
Plus 4Option Years (OY)
Tarr Whithman Group,
LLC
(SBE)
1590009 / 4400003100 Sharepoint document control and storage services.
Current Contract Term: 08/04/14through 01/04/16
$199,788
H. AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL / TECHNICAL SERVICES AMENDMENTS $160,000
CONTRACTOR CONTRACT
/AMENDMENT NO.
SERVICES CAPACITY
INCREASE
Modern Parking, Inc.
(MPI)/Modern Transit
Enterprise, Inc.
(SBE)
1090033.09 / 4400001617 Provide shuttle service to and fromBeaudry Headquarters.
Current Contract Term: 02/25/10 through 06/30/15
Including 4Option Years (OY)
Initial Contract Value:
Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 2
Amendment No. 3
Amendment No. 4
Amendment No. 5
Amendment No. 6
Amendment No. 7
Amendment No. 8
*Amendment No. 9
Aggregate Contract Value:
$240,000
$350,000
+Contract term
adjustment
OY1
$220,000
Exhibit A
+OY2
$60,000
$189,000
$246,000
$180,000
+OY3
$160,000
+OY4
$1,645,000
$160,000*
General Funded
ATTACHMENT B
APPROVAL OF CONTRACTS NOT UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY
September 9, 2014
A. APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL / TECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACTS
CONTRACTOR CONTRACT NO. DESCRIPTION NOT-TO-EXCEED
AMOUNT
APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL / TECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT AMENDMENT $2,300,000
CONTRACTOR BID NO./CONTRACT NO.
(Amendment No.)
DESCRIPTION NOT-TO-EXCEED
CAPACITY
Morlin Asset Management, LP 1190048.07/ 4400001229 Facility and property management services for
BeaudryHeadquarters and other administrative
sites District-wide.
Including 3 Option Years(OY)
Amendment No. 1: Terms Modification
Amendment No. 05: $3,394,539
+OY 1
Amendment No. 06: $3,100,000
+OY 2
*Amendment No. 07: $2,300,000
+OY 3
$2,300,000*
B. APPROVAL OF GOODS / GENERAL SERVICES CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR BID NO./CONTRACT NO. DESCRIPTION NOT-TO-EXCEED
AMOUNT
None
87
TAB 8
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve
Alterations and Improvements and Board Member Priority Projects
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education approve an amendment to the Facilities Services Division (FSD)
Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to define and approve 7 Alteration and Improvement (A&I) and Board Member
Priority (BMP) projects (as listed on Attachment A), and authorize the Chief Facilities Executive, and/or his
designee, to make any purchases associated with these projects. The total combined budget for these projects is
$257,508.
Background:
In accordance with the Maintenance and Operations Weighted Allocation Formula, local Bond Measures K, R
and Y funds have been allocated to Board-Prioritized Facilities Programs for A&I and BMP projects. Projects
are developed at the discretion of the Board District or Educational Service Center with support from Facilities
Services Division staff and input from school administrators. All projects must be capital in nature and adhere
to bond language and laws.
The projects proposed in this Board Report will upgrade, modernize and/or enhance the learning environment
for students. The projects include various modernization, security upgrade and repair scopes of work. Project
scopes, schedules and budgets within these categories may vary depending on site conditions and needs.
Expected Outcomes:
Execution of these projects will help improve the learning environment for students, teachers and staff.
A yes vote will allow staff to execute the projects listed on Attachment A. Failure to approve this proposed
action will delay the projects and ultimately the anticipated benefit to the schools and their students.
The requested actions are consistent with the Board-Prioritized Facilities Programs for A&I and BMP projects
and the Districts commitment to address unmet school facilities needs and provide students with a safe and
healthy learning environment.
Budget Impact:
The total combined budget for the seven projects is $257,508. Two projects are funded by BMP funds. The
remaining five projects are funded by A&I Funds. All projects are funded with Bond Program funds
earmarked specifically for these programs.
This report includes many time-sensitive, small to medium-sized projects that have been deemed critical by
Board Members and/or Administrators of Operations and school administrators.
powered by Legistar
88
Attachments:
Attachment A
Informatives:
None
powered by Legistar
89
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-
-

B
O
A
R
D

M
E
M
B
E
R

P
R
I
O
R
I
T
Y

A
N
D

A
L
T
E
R
A
T
I
O
N

I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
B
D
E
S
C
S
c
h
o
o
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m

F
u
n
d
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

B
u
d
g
e
t
A
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

S
t
a
r
t

A
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n

2
E
a
s
t

L
e
i
c
h
t
y

M
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

g
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m

b
y

r
e
p
l
a
c
i
n
g

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

b
l
e
a
c
h
e
r

s
e
a
t
s

a
n
d

h
a
n
d

r
a
i
l
s
A
&
I

F
u
n
d
s

$
5
6
,
0
0
0
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
Q
2
-
2
0
1
5
2
E
a
s
t

A
l
e
x
a
n
d
r
i
a

E
S
U
p
g
r
a
d
e

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

o
f

t
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l

b
y

p
u
r
c
h
a
s
i
n
g

a
n
d

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g

a
n

e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c

c
a
m
e
r
a

d
o
o
r

e
n
t
r
y

s
y
s
t
e
m

a
t

t
h
e

m
a
i
n

e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
A
&
I

F
u
n
d
s

$
2
5
,
0
3
5
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
Q
1
-
2
0
1
5
1
W
e
s
t
N
o
r
m
a
n
d
i
e

E
S
U
p
g
r
a
d
e

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

o
f

t
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l

b
y

p
u
r
c
h
a
s
i
n
g

a
n
d

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g

a
n

e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c

c
a
m
e
r
a

d
o
o
r

e
n
t
r
y

s
y
s
t
e
m

a
t

t
h
e

m
a
i
n

e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
A
&
I

F
u
n
d
s

$
1
9
,
4
5
5
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
Q
1
-
2
0
1
5
5
S
o
u
t
h

S
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t

M
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

c
a
m
p
u
s

b
y

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

n
e
w

c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e

w
a
l
k
w
a
y
s

t
o

p
r
e
v
e
n
t

d
i
r
t

b
e
i
n
g

t
r
a
c
k
e
d

i
n
t
o

t
h
e

c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
s
A
&
I

F
u
n
d
s

$
7
0
,
6
8
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
5
S
o
u
t
h

H
o
l
m
e
s

E
S
U
p
g
r
a
d
e

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

o
f

t
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l

b
y

p
u
r
c
h
a
s
i
n
g

a
n
d

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g

a
n

e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c

c
a
m
e
r
a

d
o
o
r

e
n
t
r
y

s
y
s
t
e
m

a
t

t
h
e

m
a
i
n

e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
A
&
I

F
u
n
d
s

$
2
2
,
0
1
9
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
Q
1
-
2
0
1
5
5
S
o
u
t
h

S
o
u
t
h

G
a
t
e

M
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l

p
o
w
e
r

a
n
d

c
i
r
c
u
i
t
r
y

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r

l
a
b
B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
2
7
,
0
3
3
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
Q
1
-
2
0
1
5
7
S
o
u
t
h

1
5
t
h

S
t
r
e
e
t

E
S
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

c
a
m
p
u
s

b
y

r
e
m
o
v
i
n
g

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

m
a
r
q
u
e
e

a
n
d

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

a

n
e
w

e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c

m
a
r
q
u
e
e
B
M
P

F
u
n
d
s
$
3
7
,
2
8
2
Q
4
-
2
0
1
4
Q
1
-
2
0
1
5
T
o
t
a
l

$
2
5
7
,
5
0
8
B
d
.

o
f

E
d

R
p
t

N
o
.

4
6
-
1
4
/
1
5

P
a
g
e

1
B
o
a
r
d

o
f

E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

9
,

2
0
1
4
90
91
92
TAB 9
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve 12
Projects That Address Critical School Repair Needs
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education approve an amendment to the Facilities Services Division (FSD)
Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to define and approve 12 projects that address critical school repair needs. The
detailed budget, scope and schedule for the 12 proposed projects are described in Attachment A. The total
combined budget for the 12 projects is $8,453,158.
Background:
On January 14, 2014, the Board of Education approved the establishment of the School Upgrade Program
(SUP), the next phase of the District's Bond Program which will modernize, build and repair school facilities to
improve student health, safety and educational quality. The Board's action approved the overarching goals and
principles, funding sources, specific categories of need, and spending targets for the SUP. In total,
$7,852,970,000 was allocated to support the development of projects under the SUP.
The SUP includes a spending target to address "Critical School Repair and Safety Improvements to School
Building Components." Projects developed under this category of need are included in the Facilities Services
Division Strategic Execution Plan. The 12 proposed projects that address critical school repair needs are
necessary to improve student health, safety and educational quality.
Expected Outcomes:
Staff anticipates that the Board of Education will approve the proposed action to define and approve 12 projects
to address critical school repair needs that will improve student health, safety and educational quality.
A yes vote will authorize staff to proceed with the expenditure of bond funds to undertake the 12 proposed
projects in accordance with the provisions set forth in Measures K, R, Y and Q. If the proposed action is not
approved, bond funds will not be expended and critical school repair needs will remain unaddressed.
These actions are consistent with the Districts commitment to address unmet school facilities needs and
provide students with a safe and healthy learning environment.
Budget Impact:
The total combined budget for the 12 projects is $8,453,158. The projects will be funded by Bond Program
funds earmarked specifically for critical school repair and safety improvements to school building components.
It may be necessary to undertake feasibility studies, site analysis, scoping, and/or due diligence activities on the
proposed projects prior to initiating design. As necessary, the Office of Environmental Health and Safety
powered by Legistar
93
(OEHS) will evaluate the proposed projects in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) to ensure compliance. If through the planning and design process it is determined that the proposed
project scope(s) will not sufficiently address the critical need identified, the project scope, schedule and budget
will be revised accordingly.
Bond Oversight Committee Recommendations:
This item was considered by the School Construction Bond Citizens Oversight Committee (BOC) at its
meeting of August 21, 2014. Staff has concluded that this proposed FSD SEP amendment will facilitate
implementation of the FSD SEP, and therefore, it will not adversely affect the Districts ability to successfully
complete the FSD SEP.
Attachments:
Attachment A- Project Definitions for 12 Projects That Address Critical School Repair Needs.
Informatives:
None
powered by Legistar
94

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Bd. of Ed Rpt No. 47-14/15 Page 4 of 6 Board of Education
September 9, 2014

Attachment A

1. 1
st
Street Elementary School Project to Address Deteriorated Roof Systems
Educational Service Center East, Board District 2 - Garca
! Project Background and Scope This project is to replace the roofing on five classroom
buildings. The roofing is more than 18 years old. The proposed project includes the installation
of new metal flashing, replacement of damaged wood, and painting to match existing areas
affected in the roof demolition.
! Project Budget -- $187,184
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in March 2015, and conclude in June
2015

2. 95
th
Street Elementary School Project to Address Deteriorated Roof Systems
Educational Service Center West, Board District 1 - McKenna
! Project Background and Scope This project is to replace the roofing on seven classroom
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in March 2015, and conclude in July
2015.

3. 156
th
Street Elementary School Project to Address Damaged Asphalt Due to Tree Roots
Educational Service Center South, Board District 7 - Vladovic
! Project Background and Scope This project is to remove five trees whose root system is
causing significant damage to the asphalt and concrete paving at various locations on the site.
Three ficus trees and two liquidambar trees will be removed and replaced with new trees with
less aggressive root systems to preserve the 23,000 square feet of new asphalt paving and 3,300
square feet of concrete paving that will be replaced as a result of the damage.
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin October 2015, and conclude in February
2016.

4. Ambler Elementary School Project to Address Deteriorated Roof Systems
Educational Service Center South, Board District 7 - Vladovic
! Project Background and Scope This project is to replace the roofing on seven classroom
2015.

95


September 9, 2014

5. Bancroft Middle School Project to Address Deteriorated Roof Systems
Educational Service Center West, Board District 4 - Zimmer
! Project Background and Scope This project is to replace the roofing on five classroom
2015.

6. Banning High School Project to Address Deteriorated Floor Covering in the Dance
Classroom and Foyer of the Gymnasium Building
Educational Service Center XP, Board District 7 - Vladovic
! Project Background and Scope This project is to replace the floor covering in the dance
classroom and the foyer of the gymnasium. The project will include asbestos abatement of
existing 9X9 asbestos-containing floor tiles.
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in February 2015, and conclude in April
2015.

7. Grant High School Project to Address Deteriorated Emergency Lighting System on the
Football Field
Educational Service Center North, Board District 3 - Galatzan
! Project Background and Scope This project is to remove and replace the burned out and
antiquated inverters that are a part of the emergency lighting system for the football field. The
Office of Environmental Health and Safety (OEHS) identified this as a safety hazard and has
restricted access to the football field bleachers by students and staff for evening and night
activities until the emergency lighting system has been restored to working order. The restriction
will not affect the use of the field for football games this Fall, as OEHS has approved M&O to
deploy a manned generator during games to be at the ready in case there is a power outage.
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in December 2014, and conclude in
February 2015.

8. Griffin Elementary School Project to Address Deteriorated Upper Deck Concrete Walkway
Educational Service Center East, Board District 2 - Garca
! Project Background and Scope The concrete membrane of the upper deck walkway and
landings has deteriorated, which has created a tripping hazard. The scope of work includes
completely removing and replacing the concrete membrane of the upper deck, and repairing the
deteriorated areas of the connected stairwell and landings.
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in October 2014, and conclude in
November 2014.
96


September 9, 2014

9. Marshall High School Project to Address Deteriorated Upper Deck Concrete Walkway
Educational Service Center East, Board District 5 - Kayser
! Project Background and Scope The concrete membrane of the upper deck walkway and
landings has deteriorated, which has created a tripping hazard. The scope of work includes
completely removing and replacing the concrete membrane of the upper deck walkway of the
500 and 700 Buildings.
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in October 2014, and conclude
November 2014.

10. Parthenia Elementary School Project to Address Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
Systems
! Project Background and Scope This project will replace the existing heating, ventilation and air
conditioning systems throughout the entire campus. The existing systems are over 25 years old
and are in poor condition resulting in frequent system failures and unreliable service.
! Project Budget -- $4,755,912
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in November 2015, and conclude in
March 2017.

11. Pinewood Elementary School Project to Address Deteriorated Floor Covering in the 3-story
Main Classroom Building
Educational Service Center North, Board District 6 - Ratliff
! Project Background and Scope This project is to replace the floor covering in the 3-story main
classroom building. The project will include asbestos abatement of existing 9X9 asbestos-
containing floor tiles.
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in February 2015, and conclude in April
2015.

12. Reed Middle School Project to Address Deteriorated Boiler System
! Project Background and Scope This project will replace three hot water boilers with four new
hot water boilers and one hot water pump that are more energy efficient. Field findings revealed
that the hot water boilers and hot water pump are aged, deteriorated, break often, require
frequent/extensive maintenance, and are not energy efficient.
! Project Schedule Construction is anticipated to begin in May 2015, and conclude in September
2015.

97
98
99
TAB 10
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Consolidate and Update Two
Facilities Improvement Projects at Crenshaw High School
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education amend the Facilities Services Division (FSD) Strategic Execution
Plan (SEP) to consolidate and update two facilities improvement projects at Crenshaw High School as follows:
- Cancel the urgent repair project previously defined and approved to address the aging and deteriorating
Energy Management System (EMS), central plant chillers, and the Heating, Ventilation & Air
Conditioning (HVAC) equipment (BOE #317-12/13; Project #10364101); and
- Redefine the seismic modernization project, which was previously defined and approved to provide
various seismic corrections, upgrades and/or replacements to the school lunch pavilion, student store
building, and multi-purpose/food service building (BOE #317-12/13; Project #10363845), to include
the following scope:
o Replacement of the schools EMS management system;
o Replacement of the central plant chillers;
o Replacement of HVAC equipment serving the main classroom/administration building;
o Replacement of heating and ventilation equipment serving the gymnasium;
o Demolition of the existing lunch pavilion and covered walkways, student store, multi-
purpose/food service building and music building;
o Construction of a replacement lunch pavilion, student store, and covered walkways;
o Construction of a new performing arts and food service facility to replace the multi-
purpose/food service and music buildings;
o Relocation of utility infrastructure currently installed on the roof of the existing covered
walkways; and
o Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and path of travel upgrades to ensure compliance with
all applicable codes, regulations and laws.
Background:
Crenshaw High School is located in Board District 1 (McKenna) and operated by the Intensive Support and
Innovation Center. The proposed redefined project is anticipated to begin construction in the second quarter of
2016, and is anticipated to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2019. The scope of the project related to the
EMS and HVAC equipment upgrades is anticipated to be completed prior to completion of the entire project.
This work is anticipated to be completed in the second quarter of 2018. The budget for the redefined project is
$68,050,000.
On June 18, 2013, the Board of Education amended the FSD-SEP and the Information Technology SEP to
define and approve 309 school facilities improvement projects deemed urgent in nature (BOE #317-12/13).
powered by Legistar
100
This action included two projects at Crenshaw High School, an EMS and HVAC urgent repair project and a
seismic modernization project.
The seismic modernization project was initially defined to include:
- Demolition of the existing lunch pavilion/student store;
- Construction of a replacement lunch pavilion/student store and a new outdoor dining courtyard;
- Seismic retrofit and modernization of the multi-purpose/food service building;
- Relocation of utility lines; and
- ADA and path of travel upgrades to ensure compliance with all applicable codes, regulations and laws.
The seismic modernization project was originally defined with a $25,099,000 budget. Construction was
anticipated to begin in the fourth quarter of 2015, and to be completed in the second quarter of 2018.
The EMS and HVAC urgent repair project was initially defined to include:
- Replacement of the EMS with a web-based direct digital controls system;
- Replacement of the central plant chillers;
- Replacement of HVAC equipment serving the classroom/administration building; and
- Replacement of heating and ventilation equipment serving the gymnasium.
The urgent repair project was originally defined with a $6,400,000 budget. It was anticipated to begin
construction in the second quarter of 2015, and to be completed in the second quarter of 2016. To date,
approximately $3,000 has been expended on this project.
Following the Boards approval of the projects in June 2013, staff initiated preliminary design efforts for both
facilities improvement projects at Crenshaw High School. An engineering and architectural analysis of the
sites existing infrastructure was undertaken in order to evaluate the extent and detail of work necessary to
ensure each project complied with all codes, standards and requirements. The analysis also identified potential
overlaps and impacts that each project may have on the other.
The analysis included a structural evaluation and identification of the necessary upgrades to retrofit and
modernize the multi-purpose/food service building. Based on the results, staff has determined that the extent of
work needed to bring the multi-purpose/food service building to current standards warrants the existing
structure be demolished and a replacement facility be constructed. Additionally, the existing multi-
purpose/food service building and adjacent music building have previously been identified by school site staff
as not providing adequate performing arts spaces to support the schools educational program. In an effort to
provide Crenshaw High School with facilities that are safe and secure, sound and efficient, and aligned with the
schools instructional program, the new building(s) replacing the existing multi-purpose/food service and
adjacent music building will include:
- Food services facilities:
o Kitchen and service lines; and
o Student and faculty dining.
- Performing arts facilities:
o Auditorium with lobby, seating, stage, and control room;
o Choral, music and dance rooms; and
o Storage and restrooms.
powered by Legistar
101
The analysis also evaluated the extent of work required to complete the critical upgrades to the EMS and
HVAC equipment previously approved by the Board. The evaluation identified additional five fan units and air
mixing components in the classroom/administration building that require replacement but were previously not
included in the project. The evaluation also indicated that air ducts throughout the building will require
selective repair to ensure the maximum efficiency of the system.
Expected Outcomes:
Staff anticipates that the Board of Education will amend the FSD-SEP to consolidate and update two facilities
improvement projects at Crenshaw by cancelling the EMS and HVAC urgent repair project and redefining the
seismic modernization project. This action, if approved, will enable staff to better address important repair,
modernization, and upgrade needs in support of the School Upgrade Program.
Approval of this proposed action will authorize staff to proceed with the expenditure of Bond Program funds to
design and construct the proposed redefined seismic modernization project at Crenshaw High School. If the
proposed action is not approved, staff would not be authorized to proceed with the updated scope of work
deemed necessary by the recently completed engineering and architectural site analysis. Since the original
scope of work is insufficient, the projects could not proceed as currently defined. Staff would begin preparing
an alternative action to propose to the Board at a later date.
The proposed action is consistent with the District's long-term goal to address unmet school facilities needs as
described in Proposition BB and Measures K, R, Y, and Q. It is also aligned with the goals and principles of
the School Upgrade Program, which was approved by the Board of Education on January 14, 2014.
Budget Impact:
The project is funded by Bond Program funds associated with the School Upgrade Program. The total
combined budget for the two projects previously approved is $31,499,000. The proposed action will result in
an updated budget of $68,050,000 for the seismic modernization project.
The budget increase of $36,551,000 will be funded by Bond Program funds associated with the School Upgrade
Program. The major renovations, modernizations and reconfigurations category of need will provide
$27,975,000 of the budget increase. The critical school repair and safety improvements category of need will
provide the remaining $8,576,000. This project, including the associated budget, will be accounted for and
tracked as part of the School Upgrade Programs major renovations, modernizations and reconfigurations
category of need.
Combining the facilities improvement projects at Crenshaw High School will enable staff to better coordinate
design and construction efforts, minimizing impacts to the learning environment. The redefined project will
also enable staff to improve specific facilities at Crenshaw so that they are safe and secure, sound and efficient,
and align with the schools instructional program.
meeting on August 21, 2014. Staff has concluded that this proposed FSD-SEP amendment will help facilitate
implementation of the FSD-SEP, and therefore, it will not adversely affect the Districts ability to successfully
complete the FSD-SEP.
powered by Legistar
102
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
103
104
105
106
TAB 11
Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Redefine the Monroe High
School Industrial Arts Building Rehabilitation Project as the Monroe High School Industrial Arts
Building Replacement Project and Approve the Revised Project
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education amend the Facilities Services Divisions (FSD) Strategic Execution
Plan (SEP) to redefine the Monroe High School Industrial Arts Building rehabilitation project as a building
replacement project with a revised project budget of $14,949,557. This action will update the project definition
of the Monroe Industrial Arts Rehabilitation Project previously approved by the Board of Education on August
20, 2013 (Board of Education Report Number 016-13/14, Project #10364177) with a budget of $7,800,000 and
the new project will be named the Monroe High School Industrial Arts Building Replacement Project.
Background:
The existing Industrial Arts building at Monroe High School was substantially damaged by fire on November
9, 2012 placing a portion of the building under containment and making it unusable. Hazardous material
abatement was completed in January 2014 allowing access to the containment area and further investigation of
the fire damage. The investigation exposed more extensive damage to the structure above the Wood Shop than
was originally expected. Rehabilitation of the existing building would have required new structural framing,
seismic retrofit, code upgrades to mechanical and fire sprinkler systems, compliance with the current American
Disability Act regulations, and replacement of fire-damaged electrical system components. The extent of work
required to bring the building to current standards warrants the existing structure be demolished and a
replacement facility be constructed.
The Monroe Industrial Arts Building Replacement Project will provide a new facility that will include a
Robotics Laboratory, Wood Shop, Media Center, one classroom, and related restrooms and support spaces.
The demolition of the existing Industrial Arts Building will follow the construction and occupancy of the new
building.
Preconstruction activities will proceed Q3-2014. Construction is anticipated to begin Q4-2016 and be
completed with occupancy Q2-2018. This project is located Educational Service Center XP, Board District 6
(Monica Ratliff).
Expected Outcomes:
Staff anticipates that the Board of Education will amend the FSD-SEP to redefine the Monroe High School
Industrial Arts Building rehabilitation project as a building replacement project and approve the revised project
totaling $14,949,557. This project will revise the Monroe Industrial Arts Rehabilitation Project previously
approved by the Board of Education on August 20, 2013 (Board of Education Report Number 016-13/14,
Project #10364177) for $7,800,000.
Approval of this proposed action will authorize staff to proceed with the expenditure of Bond Program funds to
powered by Legistar
107
design and construct the proposed Monroe High School Industrial Arts Building Replacement Project. If the
proposed action is not approved, this project will not be constructed and staff will develop alternate options for
student housing.
The proposed action is consistent with the District's long-term goal to address unmet school facilities needs as
described in Proposition BB and Measures K, R, Y, and Q. It is also aligned with the goals and principles of
the School Upgrade Program approved by the Board of Education on January 14, 2014
Budget Impact:
The project is funded by Bond Program funds associated with the School Upgrade Program Critical Repair
category of need and yet to be determined insurance claim proceeds. To the extent insurance proceeds are
received in the future they will be incorporated into the Bond Program and used on this project. The total
budget for the project is $14,949,557.
The redefined project will also enable staff to improve specific facilities at Monroe High School so that they are
safe and secure, sound and efficient, and align with the schools instructional program.
meeting on August 21, 2014. Staff has concluded that this proposed FSD-SEP amendment will help facilitate
implementation of the FSD-SEP, and therefore, it will not adversely affect the Districts ability to successfully
complete the FSD-SEP.
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
108
109
110
111
TAB 12
Ratification of Real Estate Leases, Licenses, and Other Agreements or Instruments That Are Necessary
or Incidental for the Use of Real Property
Action Proposed:
Staff proposes that the Board of Education (Board) ratify the leases, licenses, and other agreements or
instruments entered into by the Facilities Services Division within its delegated authority for the period of
January 2014 through June 2014 as listed in Attachment A.
Background:
The District is a party to various types of lease agreements and other real estate instruments. The Facilities
Services Division processes these transactions for various user groups within the District under delegated
authority granted by the Board. Pursuant to this delegation and Board policy, the Facilities Services Division
presents leases and other related instruments to the Board of Education for ratification on a semi-annual basis.
Expected Outcomes:
Ratification of leases, licenses and other agreements included in this report as shown in Attachment A.
These real property transactions have been executed under Board delegated authority and are being presented to
the Board for ratification. The leases and other real estate instruments listed in this report vary in length of
term. Some transactions have expired, yet Board ratification is still required. A yes vote will validate the in-
place agreements. A no vote may render these current agreements unenforceable.
The requested action does not change current District policies.
Budget Impact:
Pursuant to this delegated authority and Board policy, the Facilities Services Division is presenting leases and
other related instruments to the Board for ratification. Attachment A is a summary of leases and other
agreements entered into by the District for the months of January 2014 through June 2014, in categories A-E as
described as follows:
(A) Third Party Leases (District as Tenant)
Number of Transactions: 1
Cumulative Rent Over Lease Term: $-0-
(B) Long Term Leases (District as Landlord)
Total Anticipated Receipts: $1,222,596
(C) Short Term Leases (District as Landlord)
powered by Legistar
112
Total Receipts: $1,044,893
(D) Other Agreements (Joint-Use, Permits, License Agreements, etc.)
Total Anticipated Receipts: $-0-
(E) Charter Agreements
Total Anticipated Receipts: $-0-
None
Attachments:
Attachment A
Informatives:
None
powered by Legistar
113
ATTACHMENT A
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 65-14/15 A-1 Board of Education
September XX, 2014
A. THIRD PARTY LEASES (DISTRICT AS TENANT)
Lessor School/User Group
Cumulative
Rent Over
Premises Purpose/Use Term Term of Lease
County of Los Angeles Housing Authority
4909 E Cesar Chavez
Central High School
Educational
Two years $-0-
Total Transactions 1
Total Anticipated Rent $-0-
B. LONG TERM LEASES (DISTRICT AS LANDLORD)
BOARD DISTRICT 1 School Licensee
No of Transactions 4 Audubon Middle School Divine Deliverance Ministries Inc.
Sum of Anticipated Receipts $61,698 Bradley Elementary Politics &
Government Magnet
Love and Live Again Ministries
Middle College High School Community Coalition
Purche Elementary School ARISE Family Ministries
No. of Transactions 6 Lanterman High School New Dawn Christian Village
Sum of Anticipated Receipts $386,258 Norwood Elementary School University of Southern California
San Pedro Elementary School J ubilee Consortium
White Elementary School (Carondelet
Garage)
1865 Bush Street Investors L.P.,
Montgomery Partners Inc.
White Elementary School (Carondelet
Garage)
County of Los Angeles
Wilshire Park Elementary School Los Angeles Doctors Symphony Orchestra
No. of Transactions 5 Beckford Charter Enrichment Studies Computerwisekids Inc.
Sum of Anticipated Receipts $78,006 Dearborn Elementary School ICFG/M Church
Gault Elementary School Soaring Eagles
Lawrence Middle School International Church of the Foursquare Gospel
dba Freedom Church
Woodlake Elementary School Woodlake Avenue PTSA
No. of Transactions 12 Emerson Adult Learning Center California State University, Northridge
Sum of Anticipated Receipts $323,789 Encino Charter Elementary School Soaring Eagles
Fairfax High School Orange Grove-Melrose Property, LLC
Fairfax High School Premiere Valet Services, Inc.
Kentwood Elementary School Catalyst An Evangelical Covenant Church
Melrose Elementary School One Church International
Serrania Elementary School PCS Enterprises, Inc. dba Prime Time Sports
Camp
Sutter Middle School Inspiring Notes, Inc.
University High School Vintage Church
Westminster Elementary School Athena Parking, Inc.
Woodland Hills Academy Shepherd of the Hills West Valley
Woodland Hills Elementary School Westlake Patticate
No. of Transactions 6
Sum of Anticipated Receipts $69,837 Bell High School Rhema of Life Church
Buchanan Elementary School Antioch City Church
Ivanhoe Elementary School Christian City Church - C3 Silverlake
Micheltorena Elementary School Ghetto Gloss
Ride Elementary Smart Academy South Central Family Health Center
Riordan Primary Center All Saints Episcopal Church
No. of Transactions 6 East Valley High School International Church of the Foursquare Gospel
Sum of Anticipated Receipts $205,531 Lorne Elementary School Inspiring Notes, Inc.
Panorama High School L.A. International Church of Christ/
Turning Point Christian Church
Reseda High School Islamic Center of Reseda
Stagg Elementary School Soaring Eagles
Vista Middle School Praise Chapel Christian Fellowship
114
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
B. LONG TERM LEASES (DISTRICT AS LANDLORD) continued
BOARD DISTRICT 7
No. of Transactions 3 School Licensee
Sum of Anticipated Receipts $97,477 Banneker Special Education Center City of Refuge Ministries
Carnegie Middle School Los Angeles Church of Christ South Region
Eshelman Elementary School Remembrance Community Church
Total No. of Transactions 42
Total Anticipated Receipts $1,222,596
C. SHORT TERM LEASES (DISTRICT AS LANDLORD)
Board District 1 School Licensee
No. of
Leases
No. of Transactions 51 32nd USC Magnet Great March for Climate Change 1
Total Receipts $113,253 3rd Street Elementary School Friends of Third Street 1
3rd Street Elementary School Kids Kor 1
52nd Street Elementary School Community Development Technologies
Center
1
61st Street Elementary School Slauson Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Alexander Science Center School Alexander Science Center School PTA 1
Baldwin Hills Elementary School Village Green Owners Association 1
Burroughs Middle School Bais Chana Heritage Inc.
dba Ohel Chana High School
1
Burroughs Middle School Heidi Davis of Keller Williams Realty 1
Canfield Elementary School Beverlywood Homes Association 1
Canfield Elementary School Friends of Canfield 5
Castle Heights Elementary School Beverlywood Homes Association 1
Century Park Elementary School Calvary Chapel Inglewood 1
Clover Elementary School Clover Avenue Booster Club 1
Cochran Middle School Degnan Congregation of J ehovah's Witnesses 1
Crenshaw High School Crenshaw Cougars Youth Football 1
Crenshaw High School Eyes, Hands & Feet 1
Crenshaw High School Leslie Grigsby 1
Crescent Heights Elementary School Snowball Church L.A. 1
Dorsey High School GBL Sports 1
Foshay Learning Center County of Los Angeles - Ridley Thomas 1
Hamilton High School California Track Starter Association - LA Unit 1
Hamilton High School Creation Station Dance 1
Hamilton High School National Youth Arts 1
Hamilton High School New Los Angeles Charter School 1
Hamilton High School St. Mark Church 1
Hawkins High School South Congregation of J ehovah's Witnesses 1
Hawkins High School UC Regents of UCLA Teacher Education
Program
1
Los Angeles Center for Enriched Studies Cheder Menachem Elementary School 1
Los Angeles Center for Enriched Studies Maimonides Academy 1
Los Angeles Center for Enriched Studies Shalhevet High School 1
Los Angeles High School General Dynamics Information Technology 1
Los Angeles High School Youth Policy Institute 1
Mack Elementary School Hoover Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Marvin Elementary School Mid City Neighborhood Council 1
Obama Global Preparatory Academy University of Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Overland Elementary School Overland PTA 1
Palms Middle School Game Time Sports and Arts Camp 1
Raymond Elementary School Estrella Congregation of J ehovah's Witnesses 1
Saturn Elementary School Holy Spirit Catholic Church 1
Shenandoah Elementary School The Da Camera Society of Mt. St. Mary's
College
1
Vermont Elementary School St. Agnes Parish School 1
Washington Preparatory High School Gethsemane Christian Love Baptist Church 1
Washington Preparatory High School Transition 2 Success 1
Weemes Elementary School Walton Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Western Elementary School County of Los Angeles - Ridley Thomas 1
Wilshire Crest Elementary School The Enrichment Center 1
115
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
C. SHORT TERM LEASES (DISTRICT AS LANDLORD) continued
No. of
Leases
No. of Transactions
Total Receipts
70
$130,682
1st Street Elementary School Boyle Heights Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Adams Middle School Adair Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Belmont High School City Year, Inc. 1
Boyle Heights High School LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
J aime Escalante Math Program
1
Breed Elementary School St. Mary Church 1
Chavez Elementary School Navarro Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Clinton Middle School City Year, Inc. 1
Commonwealth Elementary School Bengali American Hindu Society 1
Contreras Learning Complex American Cancer Society, Inc. 1
Contreras Learning Complex Gay Men's Chorus of LA 1
Contreras Learning Complex Los Angeles Police Department
Centurions Football Team
1
Contreras Learning Complex Miguel Contreras Foundation Freedom School 1
Cortines School of Visual & Performing
Arts
3-23 Area Kidz 1
Arts
Athena Parking, Inc. 1
Arts
California Institute of the Arts Community
Arts Partnership
2
Arts
Debbie Allen Dance Academy 1
Arts
St. Anthony's Kolo Club "Croatia" 1
Arts
The Colburn School 2
Arts
Young Musicians Foundation 1
Del Olmo Elementary School Montessori Shir-Hashirim 2
Dena Elementary School J umpstart for Young Children 1
Downtown Business Magnet University of San Diego 1
East Los Angeles Occupational Center Panish, Shea & Boyle, LLP 1
Garfield High School Bienvenidos Community Health Center 1
Garfield High School General Dynamics Information Technology 1
Gates Elementary School Power to the Playground Production LLC 1
Gratts Elementary School Gay Men's Chorus of LA 1
Gratts Elementary School Loma Spanish Christian Congregation
of J ehovah's Witnesses
1
Griffith Middle School Via Corona Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Harvard Elementary School Fountain Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Hollenbeck Middle School LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
1
Hollenbeck Middle School No Easy Props, Inc. 1
Hollenbeck Middle School Spanish Villa Hermosa Congregation of
J ehovah's Witnesses
1
Lanterman High School Omega Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Los Angeles Elementary School Kenmore Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
MacArthur Park Elementary School Los Angeles Onnuri Church 2
Mendez High School LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
1
Olympic Primary Center Westlake South Neighborhood Council 2
Plasencia Elementary School Echo Park Spanish Congregation of
1
Politi Elementary School LA's BEST School 1
Politi Elementary School Sunnyside Presbyterian Church 1
Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools ACE Mentor Los Angeles 1
Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools American Entertainment Marketing 1
Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools Archdiocese of Los Angeles,
Office of Religious Education/Congress
1
Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools Cornerstone Theater Company 1
Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools Kollaboration/Ktown Night Market 1
Roosevelt High School HealthCorps 1
116
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
No. of
Leases
Roosevelt High School LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
1
Roosevelt High School No Easy Props, Inc. 1
Roosevelt High School The Send 1
Rowan Elementary School Paraiso Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Roybal Learning Center 3-23 Area Kidz 1
Roybal Learning Center Athena Parking, Inc. 2
Roybal Learning Center UCLA Local Government & Community
Relations
1
Soto Elementary School Operation Help the Homeless 1
Stevenson Middle School LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
1
Torres East Los Angeles Performing Arts
Magnet
Bella Vista Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Magnet
Los Angeles Education Partnership 1
Magnet
South Bay Center for Counseling 1
West Adams Preparatory High School Stepping in the Right Direction 1
West Adams Preparatory High School The Dance Center 1
Wilshire Park Elementary School Casa De La Cultura de Guatemala 1
Wilshire Park Elementary School Koreatown Youth & Community Center 1
Wilshire Park Elementary School Los Angeles Doctors Symphony Orchestra 1
No. of
Leases
No. of Transactions 113 Andasol Elementary School Academic Chess 2
Total Receipts $204,582 Balboa Gifted Magnet A.S.E. Enrichment, Inc. 1
Balboa Gifted Magnet Academic Chess 1
Balboa Gifted Magnet Balboa Spirit Club 1
Balboa Gifted Magnet Sky High Dance 1
Beckford Elementary School Beckford PTA 3
Beckford Elementary School Computerwisekids, Inc. 1
Canoga Park High School Canoga Park High School FFA Alumni &
Boosters
1
Canoga Park High School Friends of Wilbur 1
Canoga Park High School Radha Govind Dham LA 1
Carpenter Elementary School Beats and Feet 1
Carpenter Elementary School Farnaz Kaufman School for Intellectual
Curiosity
1
Carpenter Elementary School Lori Belateche 1
Chatsworth High School American Cancer Society, Inc. 1
Chatsworth High School Devotional Association of Yogeshnar USA 1
Cleveland High School American Cancer Society, Inc. 1
Colfax Elementary School Colfax Summer Camp 1
Colfax Elementary School PTA Colfax Elementary 1
Columbus Middle School Big Up Kidz 1
Darby Elementary School Darby Avenue PTA 1
Dixie Canyon Elementary School Musical Minds 1
El Oro Way Elementary School El Oro Way PTA 1
Emelita Elementary School Soaring Eagles 1
Grant High School Grant High School Magnet Parent Association 1
Henry Middle School Crafty Ladies Boutique 1
Henry Middle School Laurel Canyon Tagalog Congregation
1
Kennedy High School Kennedy High School PTSA 1
Kester Elementary School Kester Avenue Magnet Parents Association 1
Kester Elementary School Kester Elementary School PTA 3
Kittridge Elementary School Crest Apartments LP
(c/o Skid Row Housing Trust)
1
Kittridge Elementary School Valet Parking Service 1
Knollwood Elementary School Sky High Dance 1
Lankershim Elementary School East Valley Family YMCA 1
Lawrence Middle School Green Leaf Academy 1
Lawrence Middle School San Fernando Valley Foursquare
Church DBA Freedom Church
1
Lemay Elementary School Hamid Mirghanbari 3
Lemay Elementary School Parents Assisting Lemay Students 1
117
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
School Licensee
No. of
Leases
Madison Middle School Del Valle Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Madison Middle School Kaiser Permanente Health Plan, Inc. 1
Miller Career & Transition Center Williams Syndrome Association 1
Millikan Middle School KidsCanCode, LLC 1
Millikan Middle School Southern California Arts Program (SCAP) 1
Millikan Middle School Sports Plus Day Camp 1
Millikan Middle School The Tyler Project 1
Monlux Elementary School Kristine Demirchian dba Homework Club 1
Monlux Elementary School Play-Well TEKnologies 1
Monlux Elementary School Sky High Dance 2
Nevada Elementary School The Final 6th Graders of Nevada Reunion 1
North Hollywood High School Archie Kakachan 1
North Hollywood High School Lankershim Spanish Congregation
1
Northridge Academy High School Music Teachers' Association of California,
San Fernando West Valley Branch
1
Parthenia Elementary School Tiny Thinkers School 1
Pomelo Elementary School TEAM Pomelo 2
Pomelo Elementary School West Hills Montessori 1
Pomelo Elementary School World Clown Association &
J oseph Michael Kabosius
1
Porter Ranch Greater Los Angeles Mathematics Council 1
Porter Ranch Pinnacle Prodigies, LLC 1
Porter Ranch Amadeus School of Music 1
Porter Ranch North Valley Family YMCA 1
Reed Middle School American Cancer Society
Relay for Life of South Valley
1
Reed Middle School East Valley Family YMCA 1
Reed Middle School Friends of Reed 2
Reed Middle School KidsCanCode, LLC 2
Reed Middle School Knights of Vartan Sevan Lodge 1
Reed Middle School Robotics & Things, Inc. 2
Reed Middle School Tomer Kleinman 1
Reed Middle School Watch Me Dance Studio, Inc. 1
Rio Vista Elementary School Sky High Dance 2
Riverside Elementary School Parents for Riverside Drive 2
Sherman Oaks Elementary School Blue Starz Dance & Theatre 1
Sherman Oaks Elementary School Los Angeles County
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk
1
Sherman Oaks Elementary School Ovation Group Productions 1
Sherman Oaks Elementary School Sherman Oaks Parents Association 1
Superior Elementary School Academic Chess 1
Superior Elementary School Superior Street PTA 1
Topeka Elementary School A.S.E. Enrichment, Inc. 2
Topeka Drive Elementary School Cheeky Ads Ent.
dba Money Munchkids
1
Topeka Drive Elementary School North Valley Family YMCA 1
Topeka Drive Elementary School Northridge West Neighborhood Council 1
Van Gogh Elementary School A.S.E. Enrichment, Inc. 1
Van Gogh Elementary School Academic Chess 1
Van Gogh Elementary School Friends of Van Gogh Elementary School 3
Van Gogh Elementary School Kadima Conservatory of Music 1
Van Gogh Elementary School Sky High Enrichment 1
Van Nuys Middle School Kester Avenue Magnet Parents Association 1
Van Nuys Middle School Maharashtra Mandal Los Angeles 1
Van Nuys Middle School Sherman Oaks Parents Association 1
Welby Elementary School Parents of Welby Way 5
Woodlake Elementary School Woodlake Elementary School PTSA 4
No. of
Leases
No. of Transactions 187 Bancroft Middle School A Time for Dance 1
Total Receipts $445,463 Bancroft Middle School Premiere Valet Service 3
Bancroft Middle School Valet Of The Dolls, LLC 1
Bancroft Middle School Yeshiva RavIsacsohn 2
Bernstein High School Youth Policy Institute 1
Braddock Elementary School Venice Portuguese Congregation
1
Brentwood Science Magnet Coast Sports, LLC 1
118
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
School Licensee
No. of
Leases
Brentwood Science Magnet Friends of Brentwood Science Elementary 1
Broadway Elementary School Dragon Sprouts 1
Broadway Elementary School Loyola Marymount University
Center for Equity for English Learners
1
Broadway Elementary School Play Well TEKnologies 2
Broadway Elementary School Premiere Valet Service 1
Broadway Elementary School The Exploratory 2
Calabash Charter Academy Calabash PTA 3
Calvert Elementary School Calvert Elementary School PTA 1
Canyon Charter Elementary School Canyon Elementary Booster Club 2
Canyon Charter Elementary School Chuck's Parking Service 1
Coeur D'Alene Elementary School Friends of Coeur D'Alene 4
Coeur D'Alene Elementary School Regeneration Church 2
Coeur D'Alene Elementary School Sports Mania Camp (PEP, Inc.) 1
Community Magnet Elementary School Creative City Repertory Co., Inc. 1
Community Magnet Elementary School J ohn Thomas Dye School 1
Encino Elementary School Encino E-Team Annual Family Movie Night 1
Fairburn Elementary School Fairburn Youth Association 1
Fairfax High School Alzheimer's Assocation,
California Southland Chapter
1
Fairfax High School Mercedes-Benz Driving Academy 1
Fairfax High School The Marlborough School 1
Gardner Elementary School American-Russian Business Council 1
Gardner Elementary School Friends of Gardnerville 1
Gardner Elementary School Guitar Center 1
Gardner Elementary School Premiere Valet Service 1
Gardner Elementary School The Gathering LA 3
Grand View Elementary School Grand View Elementary PTA 1
Grand View Elementary School Wildwood School 1
Hancock Park Elementary School Good Sports Plus, dba ARC 2
Hancock Park Elementary School Got Game Sports 4
Hancock Park Elementary School Hancock Park Elementary Booster Club 1
Hesby Oaks Charter School Planet Bravo, LLC 1
Hollywood High School Epifani Performing Art Center 1
Hollywood High School HELPS International 1
Hollywood High School Hollywood High School Alumni Association 1
Hollywood High School J BL Pro-Am Basketball 2
Hollywood High School Saddleback Valley Community Church 1
Kentwood Elementary School Kentwood Education Fund 1
Lanai Road Elementary School Holy Spirit Retreat Center 1
Laurel Elementary School Premiere Valet Service 1
Laurel Elementary School Valet of The Dolls, LLC 1
Le Conte Middle School Angst Associates, LLP 1
Le Conte Middle School Paramount Pictures Corporation 1
Mar Vista Elementary School J ennifer Cunningham Art 1
Mar Vista Elementary School Kenneth J ames Garland 1
Mar Vista Elementary School Mar Vista Elementary PTA 1
Mar Vista Elementary School Mar Vista School Enrichment Group 1
Marina Del Rey Middle School Enrichment Educational Experience 1
Marina Del Rey Middle School Goethe International Charter School 3
Marina Del Rey Middle School Venice J apanese Community Center 1
Mark Twain Middle School Grand View Blvd Elementary PTA 1
Marquez Charter School Friends of Marquez 1
Marquez Charter School Marquez Knolls Property Owner Association 1
Melrose Elementary School Beverly Hills Best Valet 1
Melrose Elementary School Premiere Valet Service 1
Melrose Elementary School Valet Of The Dolls, LLC 2
Nestle Elementary School Friends of Nestle 1
Nestle Elementary School Nestle PTA 1
Open Charter Magnet Friends of The Open School 1
Open Charter Magnet J ason Boze, Ron McBain, Marya Alford 1
Palisades Elementary School Fundamentals First 1
Paseo Del Rey Elementary School Build It Up LLC dba Bricks 4 Kidz 1
Paseo Del Rey Elementary School Paseo Del Rey PTO 1
Paseo Del Rey Elementary School Westchester YMCA 1
Playa Del Rey Elementary School Booster Club of Playa del Rey 1
Playa Vista Elementary School Friends of Playa Vista School 1
Playa Vista Elementary School Loyola Marymount University 1
Portola Middle School Academic Chess 1
Portola Middle School Apple Tours & Travel, Inc. 1
119
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
School Licensee
No. of
Leases
Portola Middle School Friends of Portola 2
Portola Middle School Sky High Dance 1
Portola Middle School West Valley Family YMCA 1
Revere Middle School Dance for Kids 1
Revere Middle School HL&B Corporation, Beverly Hills Best Valet 1
Revere Middle School Inclusive Education & Community Partnership 1
Revere Middle School Parking Service 2000, Inc. 1
Revere Middle School Premiere Valet Service 1
Revere Middle School Santa Monica Oceanaires
(Barbershop Harmony Society)
1
Revere Middle School Sports Mania Camp (PEP, Inc.) 1
Revere Middle School Trailhead Marketing, Inc. (Eat/See/Hear) 1
Revere Middle School Village Arts Center 1
Richland Elementary School Fun in the Sun Day Camp 1
Richland Elementary School Richland Booster Club 1
Roscomare Elementary School Roscomare School Booster Club 1
Rosewood Elementary School Friends of Rosewood 1
Rosewood Elementary School KU Champions 1
Rosewood Elementary School Premiere Valet Service 1
Serrania Elementary School Friends of Serrania 2
Serrania Elementary School Friends of Serrania and Rotary of
Encino/Tarzana
1
Sterry Elementary School Creative Kids Youth Theater Project 1
Sterry Elementary School Sierra Club, Wilderness Travel Course 1
Sterry Elementary School Valet Girls 1
Stoner Elementary School Citizens of the World Charter School 1
Stoner Elementary School Playa Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Sutter Middle School De Soto Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Sutter Middle School Farzan Deljou 1
Sutter Middle School Negah Media 2
Sutter Middle School St. Pius X Catholic Church 1
Sutter Middle School Vietnamese Community of SFV 1
Taft High School River Way Ranch Camp 1
Taft High School Secure Planning 1
Taft High School Town Square Partners 2
Topanga Elementary School Topanga Enrichment Programs 1
University High School General Dynamics Information Technology 1
University High School The Dance Center 1
University High School The Regents of the University of California
(UCLA-Center X)
1
Valley View Elementary School Athena Parking, Inc. 1
Van Ness Elementary School Paramount Pictures Corporation 1
Venice High School American Cancer Society, Inc. 1
Venice High School Gondolier Booster Club 1
Venice High School Native American Indian Parents, Family
and Friends of Victims of Murder
1
Venice Skills Center Venice Beach Fellowship 1
Venice Skills Center Venice Family Clinic Art Walk 1
Vine Elementary School Chuck's Parking Service 1
Vine Elementary School SIM Digital 1
Walgrove Elementary School Santa Monica Girls Fastpitch Softball 1
Walgrove Elementary School Steve and Kate's Camp 1
Walgrove Elementary School Venice Family Clinic Art Walk 1
Webster Middle School Danceline LA 1
West Hollywood Elementary School American Cancer Society, Inc. 1
West Hollywood Elementary School J axx Theatricals, Inc. 1
Westchester High School Crescent Bay Sports League 1
Westchester High School General Dynamics Information Technology 1
Westchester High School Institute of Divine Metaphysical Research 2
Westchester High School Loyola Village EL Booster Club 1
Westminster Elementary School Car Park, Inc. 1
Westminster Elementary School Chuck's Parking Service 1
Westminster Elementary School DNA Events, Inc. 1
Westminster Elementary School Movies by Kids 1
Westminster Elementary School Premiere Valet Service 7
Westminster Elementary School Schwabel Studio 1
Westminster Elementary School Valet Of The Dolls, LLC 1
Westminster Elementary School Venice Family Clinic Art Walk 1
120
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
School Licensee
No. of
Leases
Westminster Elementary School Westminster School Endowment Group 2
Westwood Elementary School Chabad Central Westwood 1
Westwood Elementary School Upstage Theatre School, Inc. 1
Westwood Elementary School Westwood Involvement Supports Education 1
Wilbur Elementary School Child's World School/The J .E.M.M. Corp 1
Wonderland Elementary School Rock the Playground.PTA 1
Wright Middle School Build It Up LLC DBA Bricks 4 Kidz 1
Wright Middle School Los Angeles Arts Collective 1
Wright Middle School Planet Bravo, LLC 1
Wright Middle School Rainbow Afterschool Care 2
Wright Middle School Westchester YMCA 1
Wright Middle School WISH Charter School 2
No. of
Leases
No. of Transactions 64 Atwater Elementary School Friends of Atwater 1
Total Receipts $54,475 Bell High School Azteca Boxing Club 2
Bell High School LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
2
Carver Middle School Teach For America 1
Clifford Elementary School Aimee Arts Productions 1
Dahlia Heights Elementary School Dahlia Heights PTA 2
Delevan Elementary School Aimee Arts Productions 1
Delevan Elementary School Crescendo Young Musicians Guild 1
Delevan Elementary School Play Well TEKnologies 1
Eagle Rock Elementary School Bloom School of Music and Dance 1
Eagle Rock High School American Cancer Society, California Division
Inc.
1
Eagle Rock High School Eagle Rock/Sylmar Volleyball League 1
Franklin Elementary School Friends of Franklin 3
Franklin High School 1st Impression All Stars 1
Franklin High School LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
1
Heliothrope Elementary School Maywood North Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Heliothrope Elementary School Oneida Total Integrated Enterprises, LLC 1
King Middle School City of Los Angeles: Council District 13 1
King Middle School Friends of Ivanhoe 1
King Middle School Power Valet Parking 1
King Middle School Virgil Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Lillian Elementary School Alameda Sur Spanish Congregation of
1
Lockwood Elementary School Summer Sunshine Enrichment Academy 3
Los Feliz Elementary School Khandakapala Buddhist Center
dba Kadampa Meditation Center Hollywood
1
Marquez High School East Los Angeles Spartans 1
Marquez High School LA Misioneros FC 1
Marquez High School Marquez Gladiators 1
Marshall High School Friends of Ivanhoe 1
Marshall High School General Dynamics Information Technology 1
Micheltorena Elementary School 213 Events 1
Micheltorena Elementary School Aimee Art Productions 1
Micheltorena Elementary School Bring on the Music, Inc. dba Silverlake
Conservatory of Music
1
Micheltorena Elementary School City of Angels Ballet 1
Micheltorena Elementary School Community Partners Group 1
Micheltorena Elementary School Friends of Micheltorena
(a project of Community Partners Group)
6
Micheltorena Elementary School Premiere Valet Service 2
Micheltorena Elementary School Redlightspecialevents.com 1
Micheltorena Elementary School Silverlake Conservatory of Music 1
Micheltorena Elementary School Silverlake Neighborhood Council 1
Middleton Elementary School Malabar Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Montara Elementary School Southern Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Nava Learning Academy LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
1
Ride Elementary School South Central Family Health Center 1
121
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
School Licensee
No. of
Leases
San Antonio Elementary School Randolph Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Sotomayor High School Points of Light 1
Sotomayor High School SEA Charter School 1
South East High School South Gate Blue J ays 1
South Gate HighSchool General Dynamics Information Technology 1
South Gate Middle School Victoria Congregation of J ehovah's Witnesses 1
Walnut Park Elementary School YWCA Greater Los Angeles 1
Woodlawn Elementary School El Aviso Magazine 1
No. of
Leases
No. of Transactions 42 Anatola Elementary School Child Care Resource Center 1
Total Receipts $42,369 Bertrand Elementary School Bertrand PTA 2
Chavez LA High School Chavez Basketball Club 3
Chavez LA High School Chavez Girls' Basketball Club 1
Chavez LA High School Danzone 1
Chavez LA High School El Cariso Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
East Valley High School Los Pinos Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
El Dorado Elementary School El Dorado PTA 1
Fulton College Preparatory J AGS Baseball 1
Kennedy-San Fernando Community Adult
School
Islamic Center Northridge, CA 1
Monroe High School Nank Sadan Sikh Temple 2
Olive Vista Middle School American Cancer Society, Inc. 1
Panorama High School Saticoy Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Panorama High School Wat Thai of Los Angeles 1
Polytechnic High School Sherman Oaks Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Reseda High School General Dynamics Information Technology 1
Reseda High School Reseda Softball 1
Reseda High School St. Pius X Catholic Church 1
San Fernando High School Fox Studio of Dance 1
San Fernando High School General Dynamics Information Technology 1
San Fernando High School Royalty Dance Academy 1
San Fernando High School St. Ferdinand Church/Grupo De La
Misericordia
1
San Fernando High School Tiger Softball Club 1
San Fernando Middle School Divina Misericordia/St. Ferdinand Church 1
San Fernando Middle School Hansen Dam Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
San Fernando Middle School Youth Speak Collective Club Futbolito 1
Saticoy Elementary School NoHo West Neighborhood Council 1
Sendak Elementary School East Valley Family YMCA 1
Stonehurst Elementary School Stonehurst Elementary School PTA 1
Sun Valley High School Black Belt Taekwondo Group 1
Sun Valley High School Chul J in Martial Arts 1
Sun Valley High School Sun Valley Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Sylmar High School Eagle Rock/Sylmar Volleyball League 1
Sylmar High School J eff Andrew Bryant III United 1
Van Nuys High School Aaron Weissman 1
Van Nuys High School International Music Conference/Dorvil
Enterprises
1
Van Nuys High School Sarachchandra 1
Vista Del Valle Elementary School Mountains Recreation & Conservation
Authority
1
No. of
Leases
No. of Transactions 33 186th Street Elementary School South Bay Center for Counseling 1
Total Receipts $48,705 Angelou High School Community Development Technologies 1
Angelou High School Main Spanish Congregation of J ehovah's
Witnesses
1
Angelou High School Trust South Los Angeles 1
Banneker Special Education Center City of Refuge Ministries 1
Banning High School American Cancer Society/Relay For Life 1
122
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
School Licensee
No. of
Leases
Bethune Middle School J -TECH Institute dba Southern California
Falcons
1
Bonita Elementary School Office of Somoan Affairs (OSA) 1
Carson High School Carson Softball 1
Compton Elementary School Kaiser Permanente Health Plan, Inc. 1
Curtiss Middle School City of Carson Recreation & Human Services 1
Dymally High School LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
1
Eshelman Elementary School Remembrance Community Church 1
Fleming Middle School Kings and Clowns, Inc. 1
Flournoy Elementary School Macedonia Baptist Church 1
Gardena High School Deyampert Dance Academy 1
Gompers Middle School Woodcraft Rangers After-School Program/
Family Action Team
1
Griffith J oyner Elementary School Women of Watts 1
J ordan High School General Dynamics Information Technology 1
King Drew High School Drew League 1
Los Angeles Academy Middle School Metro c/o Arellano Associates 1
Miramonte Elementary School Florence-Firestone Chamber of Commerce 1
Narbonne High School Wild Ones 1
Rancho Dominguez Preparatory School J ust Run Pro Training 1
Rivera Learning Complex LACCD on Behalf of East LA College
1
San Pedro High School All Green E-Waste 1
San Pedro High School Pirate Baseball Club 1
San Pedro High School Port of Los Angeles High School 1
San Pedro High School Marine/Math/
Science Magnet
Foundation for Marine Animal Husbandry Inc.,
DBA Marine Mammal Care Centre
1
San Pedro High School Marine/Math/
Science Magnet
Northwest San Pedro Neighborhood
Council & San Pedro Rotary
1
Taper Elementary School San Pedro Peninsula Homeowner's United 1
Towne Elementary School Stub Hub Center 1
Wilmington Middle School South Coast Air Quality Management District 1
Total All Transactions 560
Total of All Receipts $1,040,529
D. OTHER AGREEMENTS (JOINT USE, PERMITS, LICENSE AGREEMENTS, ETC.)
Type of Agreement Location Entity
No. of
Leases Compensation
Access Hyde Park Early Education Center Totum Corporation 1 $-0-
Access Playa Vista Elementary School Playa Vista Capital Company 2 $-0-
Access Transportation Office (15th Street) AMG Signs, Inc. 4 $-0-
Access Vine Street Elementary School Hollywood Boys and Girls Club 1 $-0-
Beautification 20th Street Elementary School Deloitte LLP 1 $-0-
Beautification Aldama Elementary School Audubon Center at Debs Park 1 $-0-
Beautification Angeles Mesa Elementary School City Year Inc.
(c/o City Year Los Angeles)
1 $-0-
Beautification Burroughs Middle School Regents of the University of
California-UCLA Volunteer Center
1 $-0-
Beautification Canfield Elementary School Friends of Canfield 1 $-0-
Beautification Carson-Gore Academy of Environmental
Studies
City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Castelar Elementary School City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Chatsworth Park Elementary School TreePeople 1 $-0-
Beautification Coeur d'Alene Elementary School Friends of Coeur d'Alene 1 $-0-
Beautification Coughlin Elementary School TreePeople 1 $-0-
Beautification Daniel Webster Middle School City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Dearborn Elementary School TreePeople 1 $-0-
Beautification Delevan Elementary School Los Angeles Conservation Corps 1 $-0-
Beautification Denker Elementary School The Heart of America Foundation
(Target Corporation)
1 $-0-
Beautification Franklin Elementary School Enrich LA 1 $-0-
Beautification Fullbright Elementary School Los Angeles Conservation Corps 1 $-0-
123
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
D. OTHER AGREEMENTS (JOINT USE, PERMITS, LICENSE AGREEMENTS, ETC.)
Type of Agreement Location Entity
No. of
Leases Compensation
Beautification Griffin Elementary School Regents of the University of
1 $-0-
Beautification Harvard Elementary School City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Helen Bernstein High School Paramount Pictures Corporation 1 $-0-
Beautification Hubbard Elementary School TreePeople 1 $-0-
Beautification J ack London High School TreePeople 1 $-0-
Beautification Kester Elementary School Enrich LA 1 $-0-
Beautification Lankershim Elementary School Los Angeles Conservation Corps 1 $-0-
Beautification Le Conte Middle School Paramount Pictures Corporation 1 $-0-
Beautification Magnolia Elementary School Regents of the University of
1 $-0-
Beautification Mar Vista Elementary School Los Angeles Conservation Corps 1 $-0-
Beautification Mark Twain Middle School Regents of the University of
1 $-0-
Beautification Mark Twain Middle School The J . Paul Getty Trust 1 $-0-
Beautification Markham Middle School Sherman Oaks Construction 1 $-0-
Beautification Mc Kinley Elementary School City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Melrose Elementary School City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Micheltorena Elementary School Community Partners 1 $-0-
Beautification Mosk Elementary School A+Interactive Technologies/
Collaboration Solutions Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Napa Elementary School TreePeople 3 $-0-
Beautification Pacoima Charter School TreePeople 1 $-0-
Beautification Playa Del Rey Elementary School City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Rio Vista Elementary School City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification Ritter Elementary School LA Works, Inc. 1 $-0-
Beautification Ritter Elementary School The Green Schoolhouse 1 $-0-
Beautification Roscoe Elementary School City Year Inc.
1 $-0-
Beautification San Fernando Institute Of Applied Media TreePeople 1 $-0-
Beautification San Pascual Elementary School Audubon Center at Debs Park
and TreePeople
1 $-0-
Beautification Sherman Oaks Elementary Charter School Sherman Oaks Parent
Association
1 $-0-
Beautification Superior Elementary School Boys Scouts of America 1 $-0-
Beautification Superior Elementary School Creative Systems 1 $-0-
Beautification Telfair Early Education Center TreePeople 1 $-0-
Beautification Third Street Elementary School Paramount Pictures Corporation 1 $-0-
Beautification Van Nuys Elementary School Enrich LA 1 $-0-
Beautification Walgrove Elementary School Common Vision 1 $-0-
Beautification Westminster Elementary School Westminster Endowment Group 4 $-0-
Beautification Woodrow Wilson High School Asian Pacific American Legal
Center
1 $-0-
Beautification Wright Middle School Emerson Avenue Community
Garden Club
1 $-0-
J oint Use Beethoven Elementary School American Youth Soccer
Organization (AYSO)
1 $-0-
J oint Use Markham Middle School American Youth Soccer
Organization (AYSO)
1 $-0-
License Beaudry Headquarters 3rdHuntley Lot Athena Parking, Inc. 1 $300
License Parent Community Services Branch University of San Diego $5,064
License Various Schools American National Red Cross 1 $-0-
Total Anticipated Receipts $5,364
124
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
September 9, 2014
E. CHARTER AGREEMENTS
Type of Agreement Location Entity Compensation
Second Amendment Charter
School Lease &J oint Use
Agreement
Miguel Contreras Learning Center Camino Nuevo Charter Academy $-0-
Total Anticipated Receipts $-0-
125
TAB 13
Approval of the Charter for City High School
Action Proposed:
Staff of the Charter Schools Division recommends the approval of the proposed charter for City High School
for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020, to serve 135 students in grade nine in year 1 and
up to 540 students in grades nine through twelve by the end of its charter term.
Background:
On June 18, 2014, City High School submitted a charter petition application to the Charter Schools Division,
which included the number of signatures required under Education Code 47605(a). A Public Hearing was
held on July 1, 2014. The charter petition and supporting documents were reviewed by the Charter Schools
Division, the Office of the General Counsel, and other District staff. Pursuant to a waiver executed by
petitioners and the District, the statutory timeline for Board action on this petition has been extended to
September 16, 2014.
Staff affirms that City High School has met the requirements set forth in Education Code 47605, based on
review and consideration of its charter school petition application.
City High School is proposed to be located within the 90034 zip code of Los Angeles, CA. This area is served
by Educational Service Center West (ESCW) in Board District 1. The school will serve approximately 135
students in grade nine in its first year and expand to serve up to 540 students in grades nine through twelve by
2020. City High School has indicated that it intends to obtain a private site for its facility. However, the school
also plans to apply for a facility under Proposition 39.
The vision of City High School is to create a community of learners founded on three pillars: Educational
Excellence, Diversity, and Community. It is committed to serving a diverse student body and creating a
mixed socioeconomic status student population (mixed SES).
As stated in its mission statement, City High School seeks to provide an exceptional college preparatory
education to a diverse student body. Through individual attention in a supportive and dynamic learning
environment, students become college- and career-ready creative and critical thinkers who ask questions,
debate, and express ideas fearlessly and respectfully. With a focus on civic responsibility, public speaking, and
the written word, City students are prepared for a lifetime of meaningful work and ongoing service to a cause
greater than themselves.
City High School will adopt and implement its own English Learner (EL) Master Plan. For the 2013-14
academic year, its sister schools, City Charter Elementary and City Charter Middle School, opted to implement
their own EL plan.
City High School has identified its emphasis on constructivism and problem-based learning as innovative
features.
powered by Legistar
126
City High School states that it will provide an alternative option for families seeking a quality public
education in a community where high-quality educational options are in demand, and the existing schools are
failing to meet the needs of every child.
City High School indicates in its petition that diversity is a core value of all City Charter Schools. It has
committed to recruit students from various racial and ethnic groups so as to achieve a balance that is reflective
of Los Angeles and the general population residing within the territorial jurisdiction of the school district. It
has committed to maintaining an accurate accounting of the ethnic and racial balance of enrolled students and
will maintain documentation of their efforts to achieve racial and ethnic balance. The 2013-14 demographics of
Hamilton, a District school within a two-mile radius of the proposed charter school location, are 52% Latino,
26% African American, 16% White, 4% Asian, and 1% Filipino, based on the data set. It also serves 8%
English Learners, and 57% Free and Reduced Lunch.
City Charter Schools currently operates City Charter Elementary and City Charter Middle School. The middle
school was approved on February 7, 2012 for five years to serve 360 students in grades 6-8 with a proposed
location along the Pico Corridor of the City of Los Angeles with specific conditions. In 2013-14, its second
year of operation, this school was located at 11625 West Pico Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90064 which is in ESC
West, Board District 4. Based on the LAUSD Secondary Schools Classification Report for Month #10, this
school served 313 students in grades 6-8, as of June 30, 2014. The proposed charter states that the middle
school offers an exceptional educational experience that is widely sought-after by families across the targeted
area with a reported waiting list of over 600 students for 120 spaces.
After its first year of operation, in 2012-13, City Charter Middle School achieved a 2013 Growth API of 863,
with 2013 Statewide and Similar Schools Ranks of 8 and 10, respectively (CDE). Also, according to the CDE,
because the school did not have a valid 2012 Base API due to its being a new school, it does not have target
information.
City Charter Middle School was not assigned an SPF classification because it did not have third grade reading
proficiency data (and was categorized as an elementary school based on its student population). Although an
exact determination cannot be made, based on the data we do have, the school would have earned 16 status
points and 1 AGT point placing it at the Service and Support/Achieving level. Its 2012-13 Academic Growth
Over Time in ELA and math is within the range of predicted growth and below predicted growth, respectively.
In response to the AGT in math, the school indicated that when it realized that students were struggling in math
based on internal testing, the school adjusted the curriculumand schedule accordingly which in turn produced
tremendous growth, though it recognizes opportunity for additional growth.
Based on the 2013-14 annual oversight visit, City Charter Middle School demonstrates strengths in the
following: organized structure for parent engagement and parent communication; and overall overwhelming
parent satisfaction based on a school administered survey, as well as a CSD-conducted focus group. It also
provided evidence of a more developed internal data analysis process.
After completing its first year of operation in 2013-14, City Charter Elementary School does not have official
testing data. Based on the 2013-14 annual oversight visit, it demonstrated that it continues to develop its data
analysis component, including analysis by subgroup, as well as its process to document safety trainings and its
volunteer policy. Its strengths were in the areas of varied groupings for teacher professional development; and
teacher representation on the schools leadership team.
Additionally, both schools have a diverse student population and are in strong fiscal standing. Based on CDE
powered by Legistar
127
Additionally, both schools have a diverse student population and are in strong fiscal standing. Based on CDE
data, in 2013-14, the middle school had a student population of 19.7% Latino, 2.6% Asian, 0.3% Pacific
Islander, 17.4% African American, 44.8% White and 14.2% Two or More Races (1% did not report).
Similarly, the elementary school had 48.0% Latino, 0.8% Asian, 26.0% African American, 16.3% White and
8.9% Two or More Races.
Their fiscal condition is as follows:
City Charter Middle School: The audit for 2012/2013, the first year of operation, shows positive net assets of
$251, 332. The audit shows a cash reserve of $92,445 which is 5.9% of expenses and which exceeds the
recommended cash reserve of 5.0%. Net income is positive, $33,086. The second interim report, the most
recent fiscal report available, projects continued positive net assets, $309,258, and continued net income,
$104,916 by June 30, 2014.
City Charter Elementary School: The second interim report, the most recent report CSD has, projects a cash
reserve of $153,964, which represents 13.4% of expenses and which exceeds the recommended reserve of 5%.
The report also projects positive net assets of $356,248 and positive net income of $239,050.
Current members of the City High School Board of Directors completed questionnaires regarding conflicts of
interest. A due diligence review performed by the Office of the Inspector General of the schools leader and on-
site financial manager, revealed no material negative findings.
If approved, the City High School charter will have a five-year term, beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30,
2020. As part of its oversight responsibility, the Charter Schools Division will perform ongoing oversight of
the charter school throughout the term of the charter.
The petition is available for perusal in the Charter Schools Division and online at the Districts Board of
Education website at <http://laschoolboard.org/charterpetitions>.
Expected Outcomes:
City High School is expected to operate its charter school in a manner consistent with local, state, and federal
ordinances, laws and regulations, and the terms and conditions set forth in its petition. The measurable pupil
outcomes for student academic achievement are set forth in the petition.
Yes - The approval of the charter petition for City High School would grant its Board of Directors the right to
operate the charter school under the terms of the approved charter for a five-year period, beginning July 1, 2015
until June 30, 2020.
No - The denial of the charter petition would result in the Board of Directors for City High School being
prohibited from opening the charter school, unless City High School appeals the denial and the charter is
granted by the Los Angeles County Board of Education or the California State Board of Education. This Board
Report 060 - 14/15 and accompanying documents shall constitute the Board of Educations adopted written
findings of fact for the denial of City High Schools petition.
There are no policy implications at this time.
powered by Legistar
128
Budget Impact:
State income and various other income sources to the District are reduced when current District students enroll
at a charter school, and comparable or offsetting expenditure savings may not occur in such cases. Under
Education Code section 47604(c), a school district that grants a charter to a charter school to be operated by, or
as, a nonprofit public benefit corporation is not held liable for the charter schools debts or obligations as long
as the school district complies with all oversight responsibilities. The District will continue to have monitoring
and oversight responsibility for charter school finances, as specified in the Charter Schools Act. Any
modifications to the charter schools petition or operations with significant financial implications would require
District approval prior to implementation. Petition approval is also contingent upon adequate liability insurance
coverage.
City High School has selected LAUSD SELPA Option 2. Beginning with the 2014-2015 school year and
continuing through the end of the charter petition period, Charter Schools fair share contribution for special
education will be 20% of the Districts general fund contribution rate per ADA for the first fiscal year of the
charter petition period which will be paid from the Charter Schools Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF)
funds or other unrestricted revenue sources. This formula will increase by 5% for each subsequent fiscal year
of the charter petition period until the applicable percentage reaches 35%. For the remainder of the Charter
Schools petition period, the rate will remain at 35% of the Districts general fund contribution rate for each
fiscal year. If Charter School is renewing its charter petition and has reached the 35% fair share contribution
rate for special education, Charter School shall continue to contribute at the 35% rate for the full renewal
period.
If Charter School does not spend their allocation of special education funds during a fiscal year of the charter
petition period, the allocation of special education funds to Charter School for the next fiscal year will be
reduced in an amount equal to the unspent special education funds from the previous fiscal year.
Prior to the Board approval of the charter petition, the school must have resolved any pending issues in the
review process and submitted any requested material including a signed Special Education Memorandum of
Understanding. Should City High School not comply with this requirement, this Board item will be withdrawn
from the agenda.
Attachments: Desegregation Impact Statement
Informatives: Not applicable.
powered by Legistar
129
DESEGREGATION IMPACT STATEMENT (DIS)
CITY HIGH SCHOOL
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT 060 -14115
September 9, 2014
I. Category of Proposed Action:
The proposed action would initiate the charter for City High School for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2015
until June 30, 2020, to serve 135 students in grade nine in year I and up to 540 students in grades nine
through twelve by the end of its charter tenn.
II. Summary Description of Current District Practice:
Charter schools are schools of choice by legislation and are open to any student in the State of California.
Charter schools are granted single charter status for a maximum of five (5) years. It should be noted,
however, that although State legislation allows students to attend a charter school from any area in the state,
the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is under Court Order, Crawford v. LAUSD, which
applies to all schools within or chartered through the LAUSD. Any modifications to the Court-Ordered
Integration Program must first be approved by Student Integration Services.
III. Proposed Change:
The approval ofthis charter petition would grant the charter of City High School for five (5) years beginning
July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020.
IV. Effects of This Proposal:
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) does not guarantee availability of Court-ordered
Integration funding. The charter school will be responsible for maintaining the Court Order and providing
infonnation requested by the LAUSD as set forth in the Charter petition. Modifications or school decisions
cannot negatively impact or cause additional costs to the Court-ordered Integration budget.
V. Analyze the Impact of This Proposal on Integration, Desegregation, Re-segregation and/or Segregation:
If the Charter goals are met, there should be positive results on the five (5) Harms of Racial Isolation which
are low academic achievement, low self-esteem, lack of access to post-secondary opportunities, interracial
hostility and intolerance, and overcrowded conditions. The Court-ordered Integration Program for
participating students will operate under various Court Orders for schools within the Los Angeles Unified
School District. Any modification of the Court-ordered Integration Program must first be approved by
Student Integration Services.
VI. If proposed action affects negatively any desegregation program, list other option(s) identified:
If the District Court-ordered Integration Guidelines are followed, there will not be a negative effect on the
District ' s Court-ordered Integration Program.
CLAUDIA M. LARA, ED.D.
Specialist
Charter Schools Division
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 060 - 1411 5
Executive Director
Student Integration Services
Page 1 of 1 Board of Education
September 9, 2014
130
CHARTER SCHOOLS DIVISION
BRIEFINGPAGE
CITY HIGH SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT 060 14/15
September 9, 2014
The Charter Schools Division recommends Board of Education approval of City High School based onthe
findings from the Divisions rigorous and comprehensive petition review process. The petition and
supporting documentation was reviewed by staff of the Charter Schools Division, the Office of the General
Counsel, and other District offices.
Education Code 47605 sets forth the standards and criteria for approval of charter school petitions. The
charter school authorizer must find that:
The charter petitionpresents a sound educational program.
The petitioners are likely to successfully implement the program.
The petition does contain the number of signatures required.
The petition does contain the required affirmations.
The petition does contain reasonably comprehensive descriptions of the 16 required elements.
The following summary provides a brief overview of the charter petition and information about the
petitioner team.
Name of Organization Applying for Charter: City Charter Schools
Type of Charter School Proposed: Start-Up, Independent
Proposed Charter Term: J uly 1, 2015 J une 30, 2020
Projected Start Date: August 24, 2015
Grades To Be Served - Year 1: 9
th

Grades To Be Served - Year 5: 9
th
, 10
th
, 11
th
and 12
th
Projected Enrollment - Year 1: 135
Projected Enrollment - Year 5: 540
Facility Address or Target Neighborhood: City High School is proposed to be located within the
90034 zip code of Los Angeles, CA. This area is served by Educational Service Center West in Board
District 1.
Facility Status: The organization has signed a lease for a private facility in the 90034 zip code. This
site would be a permanent location with 42,000 square feet of space. It would fully accommodate all
of the grade 9-12students (and the 360 students from their existing middle school). As an alternate
plan, it has stated that it will apply for a facility through Proposition 39.
Proposition 39: The school plans to apply for a facility under Proposition 39.
LAUSD Goals/Policy Considerations: City High School believes that it would provide a much
needed educational option for high school students in the target location. City High School will
provide an alternative option for families seeking a quality public education in a community where
high-quality educational options are in demand, and the existing schools are failing to meet the needs
of every child.
Please also see Surrounding Schools Table below.
131
ESCBD
Loc.
Code School
Grade
Span
2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

T
e
s
t
i
n
g

E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t

2
0
1
3
-
1
4

P
I

S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
c
h
-
w
i
d
e

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t

2
0
1
3

S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p

G
r
o
w
t
h

T
a
r
g
e
t
s

2
0
1
3

G
r
o
w
t
h

A
P
I

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

2
0
1
3

A
P
I

S
t
a
t
e

R
a
n
k

2
0
1
3

A
P
I

S
i
m
i
l
a
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
s

R
a
n
k

%

F
/
R

L
u
n
c
h
%

S
p

E
d
%

G
A
T
E
%

E
L
%

R
F
E
P
%

L
a
t
i
n
o
%

W
h
i
t
e
%

A
f

A
m
e
r
%

A
s
i
a
n
%

F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o

%

A
m

I
n
d
i
a
n
%

P
a
c
i
f
i
c

I
s
l
a
n
d

%

T
w
o

o
r

M
o
r
e
W 1 6671 Shenandoah Street Elementary K- 5 317 Year 3 No No 757 755 3 5 100 12 10 43 32 88 2 8 1 0 1 0 0
W 4 6260 Richland Avenue Elementary K- 6 128 Year 2 No No 786 785 4 1 61 16 7 23 13 73 10 12 5 0 0 0 0
W 4 5192 Mar Vista Elementary K- 5 417 Yes Yes 913 921 9 4 16 11 17 5 6 20 52 10 17 1 1 0 0
W 1 2740 Canfield Avenue Elementary K- 5 287 Yes Yes 893 898 9 6 26 17 23 12 8 15 61 17 5 1 1 1 0
W 1 2877 Castle Heights Elementary K- 5 388 Yes Yes 899 896 9 6 32 13 24 12 5 32 41 18 7 1 0 1 0
W 1 3002 Charnock Road Elementary K- 6 234 Yes Yes 808 796 5 7 71 13 8 38 18 67 9 11 11 3 0 0 0
W 1 3123 Clover Avenue Elementary K- 5 379 Yes Yes 953 957 10 8 23 7 22 12 12 18 26 10 41 2 2 1 0
W 1 5904 Overland Avenue ElementaryK- 5 299 Yes Yes 946 958 10 2 9 8 30 0 3 7 63 5 21 3 0 0 0
W 1 5986 Palms Elementary K- 5 266 Year 3 Yes No 816 827 6 7 76 20 8 32 20 61 7 17 12 3 0 1 0
W 1 8686 Alexander Hamilton Senior High 9-12 2276 Yes No 742 727 5 7 57 11 27 8 28 52 16 26 4 1 0 0 0
W 1 8340 Palms Middle 6- 8 1573 Yes No 879 881 9 10 55 8 46 5 23 41 18 26 11 3 0 0 0
W 4 8481 Daniel Webster Middle 6- 8 643 Year 5 No No 711 726 2 8 81 25 9 15 26 63 9 24 1 1 1 1 0
XR 4 8011 Magnolia Science Academy 46-12 182 Year 1 No No 761 767 5 7 76 12 0 8 30 60 18 16 2 2 0 1 1
XR 1 8013 Magnolia Science Academy 6 6- 8 126 Year 2 Yes No 828 845 7 7 48 10 0 3 14 50 20 15 3 6 2 1 3
XR 4 5191 City Charter Middle 6- 8 181 863 B 8 10 29 9 0 3 7 23 41 28 3 1 0 0 4
W 4 7740 Westwood Elementary K- 5 520 Yes Yes 946 940 10 4 6 11 20 6 5 10 68 5 16 1 0 1 0
Please note: School Demographic percentages may not sum to 100 due to responses of: other, multiple, or non-response.
Board of Directors: Thirteen of fifteen director seats are currently filled. Board membership
includes: Ben Paul (Chair); Brett Thomas (Secretary); Lisa Woods (Vice Chair); Craig M. Silvers
(Treasurer); Michael Schlesinger; Alissa Chariton; Maggie Pulley; Michelle Sorgen; Lindsay Sturman;
Staci Miller; Rebecca George; Samantha Coyne; and J enna Flexner. The Board represents
experiences in the following domains: non-profit organizations, including management; charter school
and other Board membership including leadership; finance; educational programs; labor and
employment law; students with special needs; real estate; charter school start-up; K-6 instruction;
constructivist/project-based curriculum; youth literacy and writing development; organizational
strategy/management; fundraising; secondary instruction; executive recruitment; and accounting.
Charter Development Team Leaders: Valerie Braimah, current Executive Director, with Sheri
Werner, current principal of City Charter Middle School, as co-lead petitioner.
Proposed Charter Schools Mission: City High School will provide an exceptional college
preparatory education to a diverse student body. Through individual attention in a supportive and
dynamic learning environment, students become college- and career-ready creative and critical
thinkers who ask questions, debate, and express ideas fearlessly and respectfully. With a focus on
civic responsibility, public speaking, and the written word, City students are prepared for a lifetime of
meaningful work and ongoing service to a cause greater thanthemselves.
Proposed Charter Schools Vision: The creation of a community of learners founded on three pillars:
Educational Excellence, Diversity, and Community.
Source(s) of Core Funding: City High School stated that the vast majority of its funding will come
from the states Local Control Funding Formula. It also plans to pursue (but will not rely on) other
sources of funding, including the Public Charter School Grant Program (PCSGP), and the Walton
Foundation Charter School Grant Program, among others. It also fundraises constantly through
pledge drives, events, and private foundations and grants.
Other Charter Schools Operated by Same Organization: City Charter Elementary School and City
Charter Middle School.
Other Charter School Petitions: None.
Innovative Features of Proposed Educational Program: College preparatory curriculum for all
students; social, emotional, and academic support for all students; and parent and community
engagement.
132
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

W
I
T
H
I
N

A

2
-
M
I
L
E

R
A
D
I
U
S
C
i
t
y
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
3
2
8
0
M
o
t
o
r
A
v
e
.
,
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
l
e
s
.
C
A
9
0
0
3
4
G
r
a
d
e
s
1
2
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.
C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
d
e
S
p
a
n
2
0
1
3
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
P
I
T
e
s
t
i
n
g
E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
2
0
1
3
1
4
P
I
S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t
2
0
1
3
S
c
h
w
i
d
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t
2
0
1
3
S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p
G
r
o
w
t
h
T
a
r
g
e
t
s
2
0
1
3
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
P
I
2
0
1
2
B
a
s
e
A
P
I
2
0
1
3
A
P
I
S
t
a
t
e
R
a
n
k
2
0
1
3
A
P
I
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
R
a
n
k
F
/
R
L
u
n
c
h
%
S
p
E
d
%
G
A
T
E
%
E
L
%
R
F
E
P
%
L
a
t
i
n
o
%
W
h
i
t
e
%
A
f
A
m
e
r
%
A
s
i
a
n
%
F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o
A
m
I
n
d
i
a
n
%
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
I
s
l
a
n
d
T
w
o
o
r
M
o
r
e
W
1
6
6
7
1
S
h
e
n
a
n
d
o
a
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
5
3
1
7
Y
e
a
r
3
N
o
N
o
7
5
7
7
5
5
3
5
1
0
0
1
2
1
0
4
3
3
2
8
8
2
8
1
0
1
0
0
W
4
6
2
6
0
R
i
c
h
l
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
6
1
2
8
Y
e
a
r
2
N
o
N
o
7
8
6
7
8
5
4
1
6
1
1
6
7
2
3
1
3
7
3
1
0
1
2
5
0
0
0
0
W
4
5
1
9
2
M
a
r
V
i
s
t
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
5
4
1
7
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
1
3
9
2
1
9
4
1
6
1
1
1
7
5
6
2
0
5
2
1
0
1
7
1
1
0
0
W
1
2
7
4
0
C
a
n
f
i
e
l
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
5
2
8
7
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
9
3
8
9
8
9
6
2
6
1
7
2
3
1
2
8
1
5
6
1
1
7
5
1
1
1
0
W
1
2
8
7
7
C
a
s
t
l
e
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
5
3
8
8
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
9
9
8
9
6
9
6
3
2
1
3
2
4
1
2
5
3
2
4
1
1
8
7
1
0
1
0
W
1
3
0
0
2
C
h
a
r
n
o
c
k
R
o
a
d
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
6
2
3
4
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
8
0
8
7
9
6
5
7
7
1
1
3
8
3
8
1
8
6
7
9
1
1
1
1
3
0
0
0
W
1
3
1
2
3
C
l
o
v
e
r
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
5
3
7
9
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
5
3
9
5
7
1
0
8
2
3
7
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
8
2
6
1
0
4
1
2
2
1
0
W
1
5
9
0
4
O
v
e
r
l
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
5
2
9
9
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
4
6
9
5
8
1
0
2
9
8
3
0
0
3
7
6
3
5
2
1
3
0
0
0
W
1
5
9
8
6
P
a
l
m
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
5
2
6
6
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
s
N
o
8
1
6
8
2
7
6
7
7
6
2
0
8
3
2
2
0
6
1
7
1
7
1
2
3
0
1
0
W
1
8
6
8
6
A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r
H
a
m
i
l
t
o
n
S
e
n
i
o
r
H
i
g
h
9
1
2
2
2
7
6
Y
e
s
N
o
7
4
2
7
2
7
5
7
5
7
1
1
2
7
8
2
8
5
2
1
6
2
6
4
1
0
0
0
W
1
8
3
4
0
P
a
l
m
s
M
i
d
d
l
e
6
8
1
5
7
3
Y
e
s
N
o
8
7
9
8
8
1
9
1
0
5
5
8
4
6
5
2
3
4
1
1
8
2
6
1
1
3
0
0
0
W
4
8
4
8
1
D
a
n
i
e
l
W
e
b
s
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
6
8
6
4
3
Y
e
a
r
5
N
o
N
o
7
1
1
7
2
6
2
8
8
1
2
5
9
1
5
2
6
6
3
9
2
4
1
1
1
1
0
X
R
4
8
0
1
1
M
a
g
n
o
l
i
a
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
4
6
1
2
1
8
2
Y
e
a
r
1
N
o
N
o
7
6
1
7
6
7
5
7
7
6
1
2
0
8
3
0
6
0
1
8
1
6
2
2
0
1
1
X
R
1
8
0
1
3
M
a
g
n
o
l
i
a
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
6
6
8
1
2
6
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
s
N
o
8
2
8
8
4
5
7
7
4
8
1
0
0
3
1
4
5
0
2
0
1
5
3
6
2
1
3
X
R
4
5
1
9
1
C
i
t
y
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
6
8
1
8
1
8
6
3
B
8
1
0
2
9
9
0
3
7
2
3
4
1
2
8
3
1
0
0
4
W
4
7
7
4
0
W
e
s
t
w
o
o
d
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
5
5
2
0
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
4
6
9
4
0
1
0
4
6
1
1
2
0
6
5
1
0
6
8
5
1
6
1
0
1
0
P
l
e
a
s
e
n
o
t
e
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
s
m
a
y
n
o
t
s
u
m
t
o
1
0
0
d
u
e
t
o
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
o
f
:
o
t
h
e
r
,
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
,
o
r
n
o
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
.
S
p
a
n
:
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
ic
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
ilit
y
*

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
w
a
s

n
o
t

o
p
e
n
e
d

in

2
0
1
1
-
1
2

o
r

2
0
1
2
-
1
3
.

#

=

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
d
id

n
o
t

h
a
v
e

a

v
a
lid

2
0
1
2

B
a
s
e

A
P
I

o
r

r
a
n
k
s
.

U
p
d
a
t
e
d

o
n

8
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
4
1

o
f

2
133
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
2
0
1
2

B
A
S
E

A
P
I

A
N
D

2
0
1
3

G
R
O
W
T
H

A
P
I

D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

O
P
E
R
A
T
E
D

B
Y

T
H
E

S
A
M
E

P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.
C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
d
e
S
p
a
n
2
0
1
3
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
P
I
T
e
s
t
i
n
g
E
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
2
0
1
3
1
4
P
I
S
t
a
t
u
s
M
e
t
2
0
1
3
S
c
h
w
i
d
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t
2
0
1
3
S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p
G
r
o
w
t
h
T
a
r
g
e
t
s
2
0
1
3
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
P
I
2
0
1
2
B
a
s
e
A
P
I
2
0
1
3
B
a
s
e
A
P
I
S
t
a
t
e
R
a
n
k
2
0
1
3
B
a
s
e
A
P
I
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
R
a
n
k
F
/
R
L
u
n
c
h
%
S
p
E
d
%
G
A
T
E
%
E
L
%
R
F
E
P
%
H
i
s
p
%
W
h
i
t
e
%
A
f
A
m
e
r
%
A
s
i
a
n
%
F
i
l
i
p
i
n
o
A
m
I
n
d
i
a
n
%
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
I
s
l
a
n
d
T
w
o
o
r
M
o
r
e
X
R
1
2
2
7
1
C
i
t
y
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
K
2
X
R
4
5
1
9
1
C
i
t
y
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
6
8
1
8
1
8
6
3
B
8
1
0
2
9
9
0
3
7
2
3
4
1
2
8
3
1
0
0
4
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
ic
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
ilit
y
*

T
h
e

s
c
h
o
o
l
is

n
e
w

o
r

a

p
r
im
a
r
y

c
e
n
t
e
r
.
8
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
4
2

o
f

2
134
k
$
G
G
G
G
GF
West ESC
Admin
Office
Magnolia
Science
Acad #4
Magnolia
Science
Academy 6
City Charter
Middle
Twain
Middle
Beethoven
St
Crescent
Heights
Mag
Crescent
Heights EEC
McBride
Spec Ed Ctr
Grand
View Blvd
Walgrove Ave
Westwood
Shenandoah
St
Sterry
Venice High
Hamilton
High
Los Angeles Ctr
for Enriched
Studies
Palms
Middle
Webster
Middle
Emerson
Comm Chrtr
Middle
Richland
Ave
Mar Vista
Fairburn
Ave
Canfield
Ave
Castle
Heights
Charnock
Rd
Clover Ave
Overland
Ave
Palms
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E

4
0
5
INTERSTATE 10
V
E
N
IC
E
B
L
V
D
W
A
S
H
IN
G
T
O
N
P
L
W
P
IC
O
B
L
V
D
W
ILSHIR
E
BLVD
W
JEFFERSON BLVD
S
B
U
N
D
Y
D
R
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
B
L
V
D
W OLYMPIC BLVD
S
A
N
TA
M
O
N
IC
A
B
LVD
S
E
P
U
L
V
E
D
A
B
L
V
D
S
L
A
C
I
E
N
E
G
A
B
L
V
D
NATIONA
L
P
L
RODEO RD
G
A
T
E
W
A
Y
B
L
V
D
B
E
V
E
R
W
I
L

D
R
J
E
F
F
E
R
S
O
N

B
L
V
D
S

R
O
B
E
R
T
S
O
N

B
L
V
D
C
U
L
V
E
R
B
L
V
D
S
B
E
V
E
R
L
Y
G
L
E
N
B
L
V
D
S
S
E
P
U
L
V
E
D
A
B
L
V
D
W
E
S
T
W
O
O
D

B
L
V
D
NATIONAL BLVD
S
C
E
N
T
I
N
E
L
A
A
V
BEVERLY
HILLS
CULVER
CITY
LOS
ANGELES
SANTA
MONICA
WEST
L.A.U.S.D. FACILITIES WITHIN A TWO MILE RADIUS OF
CITY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL
LAUSD Facilities and Planned Projects

Prepared by Master Planning and Demographics
Facilities Services Division
Copyright 2014. All Rights Reserved.
The information contained herein is the proprietary property of
the following owners supplied under license and may not be
reproduced except as licensed by LAUSD and
Los Angeles County.
MPD-2780
7/24/2014
LAUSD Boundaries
Area Outside of LAUSD
LAUSD Boundary
West Educational Service Center Area WEST
Area of Interest
City Charter High School
(Located in Board of Education District #1) GF
2 mi. Radius of
City Charter High School
City Charter
High School
Charter School G
# Elementary School
" Middle School
# High School
!(
Planned Early
Education Center
Planned Classroom
Addition _
Planned Playground
Expansion
[
^_
Planned School
Reconfiguration
#0
Planned Continuation
School
Administrative Office $
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Span School
Planned School
(Color Indicates Grade Level)
Closed School
(Color Indicates Grade Level)
Special Education School
Administrative Site
Opportunity School or Non K-12 School
Charter School
(Fill Color Indicates Grade Level)
Magnet School
(Fill Color Indicates Grade Level)
135
CITY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL
SEPTEMBER 9, 2014
The following documents:
Final budget
Final petition
Enrollment and lottery form
are available for perusal at the:
333 South Beaudry Avenue, 20th Floor
(213) 241-0399
The final petition may also be viewed at the following link:
http://www.laschoolboard.org/charterpetitions
136
TAB 14
Approval of the Renewal of the Charter for James Jordan Middle School [Public Hearing]
Action Proposed:
Staff recommends the approval of the renewal of the charter for James Jordan Middle School (JJMS), for five
(5) years, beginning July 1, 2015 until June 30, 2020, to serve up to 370 students in grades 6-8 in year 1 and up
to 390 students in grades 6-8 by the end of its charter term.
Background:
On July 17, 2014, James Jordan Middle School submitted its charter renewal petition application to the Charter
Schools Division. The charter petition and supporting documents were reviewed by staff of the Charter
Schools Division, the Office of the General Counsel, and other District offices. The 60-day statutory timeline
for Board action on this petition ends September 16, 2014.
Upon submission, the District reviews each renewal petition application to determine whether the school has
met the requirements for renewal set forth in Education Code sections 47605 and 47607. The Districts review
process includes the following:
Determination whether the charter school meets the minimum academic performance criteria for
renewal eligibility (Ed. Code 47607(b));
Analysis of the schools academic performance data to determine whether and to what extent the school
has produced increases in academic achievement for all numerically significant subgroups of students
served by the charter school (Ed. Code 47607(a)(3));
Review of the charter petition to assess the soundness of the described educational program; ensure it
contains the required affirmations; and ensure it contains reasonably comprehensive descriptions of 16
specific elements (Ed. Code 47605(b)); and
Assessment whether the petitioners are demonstrably likely to successfully implement the program,
which includes review of the schools record of past performance and future plans regarding academics,
finances, and operations, as demonstrated in part by the results of annual Charter Schools Division
oversight and the schools achievement classification on the Districts School Performance Framework.
(Ed. Code 47605(b); 5 CCR 11966.4.)
Pursuant to the requirements of SB 1290, the District shall consider increases in pupil academic achievement
for all groups of pupils served by the charter school as the most important factor in determining whether to
grant a charter renewal. Ed. Code 47607(a) (3) (A).
Based on the results of the District review process, staff assesses that James Jordan Middle School has met the
statutory requirements for renewal.
powered by Legistar
137
James Jordan Middle School (JJMS) serves students in grades 6-8 in Board District 3, Educational Service
Center North (ESCN), at 7911 Winnetka Avenue, Canoga Park, CA 91306. JJMS has reported its current
enrollment as 307 students in grades 6-8. The school is located on a private site.
James Jordan Middle School was originally approved by the Board of Education on May 10, 2005 for a period
of (3) three years with grades 6-7, with the addition of 8
th
grade within the three year period. On March 25,
2008, JJMS was granted a (2) two year extension by the Board of Education, until June 30, 2010. On March
23, 2010 the Board of Education approved the renewal of James Jordan Middle School for a (5) five year
period ending June 30, 2015. For the proposed 2015-2020 charter term, the school plans to serve up to 370
students in grades 6-8 in year 1 and up to 390 students in grades 6-8 by the end of its charter term. During the
current charter term of James Jordan Middle School, the schools student body has reflected the community in
which it operates. According to October 2013 CALPADS Demographics with Comparison Schools data, the
schools demographics are approximately 90.5% Latino, 2.8% White, 1.9% African American, 2.2% Asian,
1.3% Filipino, .3% American Indian, and 0.3% Pacific Islander.
James Jordan Middle School has chosen to implement its own English Learner Master Plan and has provided
supporting documentation to the Charter Schools Division.
James Jordan Middle School has met the minimum academic performance criteria for renewal required under
Education Code section 47607(b), as evidenced below in the Summary of School Performance. In 2012-2013,
the school achieved a school-wide Growth API of 792, an 8-point increase from its 2012 Base API of 784. Its
three-year API aggregate growth of 74 points exceeds the 15-point target. The school earned a 2013 Statewide
Rank of 5 and a Similar Schools Rank of 8. Lastly, the school has outperformed the resident District schools
with comparable demographics in each year of its charter in Growth API and in the percentage of students
scoring proficient and advanced on CST ELA.
SB 1290 requires the District to consider increases in pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils
served by the charter school as the most important factor in determining whether to grant a charter renewal.
Analysis of the schools record of academic performance shows that James Jordan Middle School has
consistently raised academic achievement each year in both ELA and Math for most of its numerically
significant subgroups. For example, in 2012-13 English Learners achieved a 29 point growth on the API
exceeding their target of 5 point growth. The overall trend for the school has been on a positive trajectory over
the last three years.
Based on its 2013-14 annual evaluation report, James Jordan Middle School earned an Accomplished (4)
rating in Governance, Organizational Management and Operations, and Fiscal Operations; and a
Proficient (3) rating in Student Achievement and Educational Performance. In 2012-13 the school achieved
an Accomplished (4) rating in Governance and Fiscal Operations; and a Proficient (3) rating in Student
Achievement and Educational Performance and Fulfillment of the Charters Educational Program.
The District-wide School Performance Framework (SPF) classification is a key indicator considered in
determining whether petitioners are demonstrably likely to successfully implement the educational program
described in the petition. James Jordan Middle School does not have a final SPF classification because it does
not offer Algebra 1 since the school offers General Math instead; however, the school earned 17 status points
and 5 AGT points. The schools performance is equivalent to a school classified as Achieving on the School
Performance Framework. The District's Academic Growth Over Time (AGT) report for James Jordan Middle
School is another criterion considered for charter school renewal to determine whether the charter school has a
sound educational program. The AGT data compares a student's performance to his/her own expected
powered by Legistar
138
sound educational program. The AGT data compares a student's performance to his/her own expected
performance. The AGT results for James Jordan Middle School in the areas of English Language Arts 3-Year
Average and Science 3-Year Average are Far Above Predicted District outcomes. The AGT results in the areas
of General Math 3-Year Average and Science 3-Year Average are Above Predicted District outcomes. Tying
the academic curriculum to real world careers is one factor that the school believes is fundamental to its
having achieved the aforementioned outcomes. The school has instituted a more intensive intervention plan for
students who have scored Basic and below on the CST, including a Saturday school program to meet the needs
of the most struggling students. School administration is closely monitoring this intervention program.
As a high quality authorizer, LAUSD strives to share and leverage promising and innovative practices across
LAUSD schools to help generate innovation and improve educational outcomes for all students. The school
has exhibited two promising practices: 1) Marzano Strategies-Teachers employ instruction drawing on the work
of Marzano especially those strategies detailed in Classroom Instruction that Works. James Jordan Middle
School teachers deliver instruction with a focus on effectively structured cooperative and collaborative learning
activities. JJMS students engage in active learning where the student is the worker and the teacher is the coach.
2) Professional Development Plan-Teachers participate in an intensive (10) ten day professional development
retreat before school starts with additional (3) three days of on boarding for new staff members. Every week
grade level teams meet and use the Japanese Lesson Study Protocol to create peer-to-peer reviews. Teachers
are observed formally every quarter and are provided with written feedback to build and strengthen teacher
capacity. New teachers are assigned mentors that meet with the new staff once a week for support,
observations, demonstration lessons, and planning.
Current James Jordan Middle School Governing Board members completed questionnaires regarding conflicts
of interest. A due diligence review performed by the Office of the Inspector General of the schools leader and
on-site financial manager, revealed no material negative findings.
Prior to Board of Education approval of the charter renewal, the school must submit any requested materials,
including a signed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Special Education.
The petition is available for perusal in the Charter Schools Division and online at the Districts Board of
Education website at <http://laschoolboard.org/charterpetitions>.
Expected Outcomes:
James Jordan Middle School is expected to operate its charter school in a manner consistent with local, state,
and federal ordinances, laws and regulations and with the terms and conditions set forth in its petition. The
measurable pupil outcomes and method by which pupil progress toward outcomes will be measured as are set
forth in the charter petition.
Yes - The approval of the renewal of the charter term for five (5) years would grant James Jordan Middle
School the right to operate as a charter school under the terms of the renewal petition for a five (5) year period
beginning July 1, 2015.
No - The denial of the renewal petition would cause the charter to expire on June 30, 2015, unless James
Jordan Middle School appeals the denial and the charter is granted by the Los Angeles County Board of
Education or the California State Board of Education. This Board Report No. 061 - 14/15, accompanying
documents, and transcript of the Board meeting, shall constitute the Board of Educations adopted written
findings of fact for the denial of the James Jordan Middle School renewal petition.
powered by Legistar
139
There are no policy implications at this time.
Budget Impact:
State income and various other income sources to the District are reduced when current District students enroll
at a charter school, and comparable or offsetting expenditure savings may not occur in such cases. Under
Education Code section 47604(c), a school district that grants a charter to a charter school to be operated by, or
as, a nonprofit public benefit corporation is not held liable for the charter schools debts or obligations as long
as the school district complies with all oversight responsibilities. The District will continue to have monitoring
and oversight responsibility for charter school finances, as specified in the Charter Schools Act. Any
modifications to the charter schools petition or operations with significant financial implications would require
District approval prior to implementation. Petition approval is also contingent upon adequate liability insurance
coverage.
Charter School has selected to join the Charter-operated Program section of the LAUSD SELPA. Beginning
with the 2014-2015 school year and continuing through the end of the charter petition period, the Charter
Schools fair share contribution to special education will be 10% of the charter schools AB 602 (rate includes
Base, COLA, and Growth/Decline reduced by the amount withheld for Program Specialist/Regionalized
Services) and Federal IDEA revenues. This amount will be paid from the Charter Schools Local Control
Funding Formula (LCFF) funds or other unrestricted revenue sources and will be allocated to support the
existing District-wide administration of special education supports and services. The revenue rate will be
adjusted to account for changes in the States funding formula beginning in fiscal year 2013-14. The amount
withheld by the District from the Program Specialist/Regionalized Services in fiscal year will continue to be
withheld and adjusted annually for COLA. An additional 10% of special education revenues will be retained
by the District and allocated as directed by the Advisory Board and members of the Charter-operated Program,
with the leadership of the Charter-operated Program special education director. These funds will be used to
support the personnel for the Charter-operated Programsection of the SELPA; build management and operating
procedures to create an infrastructure to support schools in meeting the needs of students with mild to severe
disabilities; and, to create and implement new programs that serve students in charter schools. If Charter
School does not spend their allocation of special education funds during a fiscal year of the charter petition
period, the allocation of special education funds to Charter School for the next fiscal year will be reduced in an
amount equal to the unspent special education funds from the previous fiscal year.
If all pending issues, including but not limited to special education requirements, special education local
planning area (SELPA) requirements, and facilities matters, are not resolved at the time of the Board meeting,
the item will be pulled from the agenda.
Attachments: Desegregation Impact Statement
Informatives: Not applicable.
powered by Legistar
140
DESEGREGATION IMPACT STATEMENT (DIS)
JAMES JORDAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT 061-14115
September 9,2014
I. CategOlY of Proposed Action:
The proposed action would renew the charter for James Jordan Middle School, beginning July 1, 2015 until
June 30, 2020 to serve 370 students in grades 6-8 in year 1 and up to 390 students in grades 6-8 by the end of
its chat1er term.
II. Summary Description of Current District Practice:
Charter schools are schools of choice by legislation and are open to any student in the State of California.
Charter schools are granted single charter status for a maximum of five (5) years. It should be noted,
however, that although State legislation allows students to attend a chat1er school from any area in the state,
the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is under Court Order, Crawford v. LAUSD, which applies
to all schools within or chat1ered through the LAUSD. Any modifications to the C0U11-0rdered Integration
Program must first be approved by Student Integration Services.
III. Proposed Change:
The renewal approval of this charter petition would grant the chat1er of James Jordan Middle School for five
(5) years beginning July 1,2015 until June 30, 2020.
IV. Effects of This Proposal:
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) does not guarantee availability of Court-ordered
Integration funding. The chat1er school will be responsible for maintaining the C0U11 Order and providing
information requested by the LAUSD as set f0l1h in the Chat1er petition. Modifications or school decisions
cannot negatively impact or cause additional costs to the Court-ordered Integration budget.
V. Analyze the Impact of This Proposal on Integration, Desegregation, Re-segregation and/or Segregation:
If the Chat1er goals are met, there should be positive results on the five (5) Harms of Racial Isolation which
are low academic achievement, low self-esteem, lack of access to post-secondary opp0l1unities, interracial
hostility and intolerance, and overcrowded conditions. The C0U11-ordered Integration Program for
pat1icipating students will operate under various C0U11 Orders for schools within the Los Angeles Unified
School District. Any modification of the C0U11-ordered Integration Program must first be approved by
Student Integration Services.
VI. If proposed action affects negatively any desegregation program, list other option(s) identified:
If the District Court-ordered Integration Guidelines are followed, there will not be a negative effect on the
District ' s Court-ordered Integration Program.
PREPARED BY:
J I ~
AIDA T A TIOSSIAN
Specialist
Chat1er Schools Division
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 061 - 14115
xecutive Director
Student Integration Services
Page 1 of 1 Board of Education
September 9, 2014
141
Bd. of Ed. Rpt. No. 061 14/15 Page 1of 4 Board of Education
September 9, 2014
SUMMARY OF CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
J AMES J ORDAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
September 9, 2014
As part of its renewal petition review process, the Charter Schools Division has analyzed the
performance of J ames J ordan Middle School (also referred to herein as Charter School) in several key
areas, including but not limited to the following:
Student Discipline
District schools must comply with the California Education Code requirements regarding student
discipline, suspension, and expulsion. LAUSD-authorized independent charter schools must comply
with the provisions related to student discipline, suspension, and expulsion that are set forth in the
District Required Language for Independent Charter Petitions (New and Renewal) and Material
Revisions (DRL). DRL is included in all LAUSD-approved charter school petitions.
J ames J ordan Middle School implements a school-wide positive behavior intervention and support plan
that fosters a culture of discipline grounded in positive behavior interventions to ensure that students
succeed both socially and academically. The program is led by school site administration with the
support of stakeholders from the school community. All students experience school wide positive
behavior interventions and are provided with multiple types of support including modeling, social skills
training, and access to mental health services that encourage and empower students to develop pro-
social behavior. Partnerships with community agencies provide wrap-around services to J ames J ordan
Middle School students and families with counseling opportunities.
J ames J ordan Middle School is addressing further reducing suspensions through designing and
facilitating professional development for all teachers and staff in the use of proactive strategies to
encourage pro-social behavior; response and monitoring for minor issues to prevent escalation; and
targeting support services to students who incur frequent discipline notices with the goal of developing
pro-social behavior. Its important to note that although the Districts data shows 9 suspensions for the
2012-2013 school year, J amesJ ordan Middle School actually had 27 suspensions that year according to
CALPADS data. The school noted this discrepancy and corrected subsequent reporting anomalies.
Please see table below.
SUSPENSION and EXPULSION*
2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
Suspensions
(number of incidents)
0 26 9
Expulsions 0 0 0
*Based on the most recent school data available as of the date of this report.
142
September 9, 2014
Special Education
Similar to District schools, charter schools must serve and meet the needs of students with disabilities.
According to the December 2013 CASEMIS report, Charter School has enrolled special education
students at a rate that is higher than the District average for similar schools. Please see table below.
Charter School has expressed its commitment to continuing its efforts to identify and serve students with
disabilities. The school provides both strategic and intensive targeted intervention as needed for all
students, including students with disabilities, and has implemented the Collaborative Learning Model
(CLM) of full inclusion to meet the unique learning and social needs of students with disabilities. This
model includes regular collaboration between special education and general education teachers to embed
instructional strategies in the weekly lessons to ensure access to the curriculum, specialized academic
instruction in the classrooms, and ongoing progress monitoring on a biweekly basis.
To reach this target population of students with special needs, the school has strategically formed good
relations with local elementary schools including Winnetka, Limerick, Sunny Brae, and Calahan.

SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS*
#

T
o
t
a
l

E
n
r
o
l
l

(
O
C
T

2
0
1
3
)
#

S
p

E
d

E
n
r
o
l
l

%

S
p

E
d

E
n
r
o
l
l

%

H
i
g
h

I
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e
%

L
o
w

I
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e
#

A
U
T
#

D
B
#

D
E
A
F
#

E
D
#

E
M
D
#
H
O
H
#

I
D
#

O
H
I
*
*
#

O
I
#

S
L
D
*
*
#

S
L
I
*
*
#

T
B
I
#

V
I
Charter School 317 55 17% 91% 9% 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 39 3 0 0
LAUSD Similar Schools
from CDE Median
490 75 14% 80% 20% 10 0 0 0 0 1 3 8 1 25 18 0 0
* Based on December 2013 CASEMIS Report ** High incidence eligibilities
English Learners
In order to serve and meet the needs of English Learners, an LAUSD-authorized charter school may
choose to adopt and implement the Districts English Learner Master Plan (J une 2012) or establish and
implement its own English Learner Master Plan that meets the criteria set forth in both the DRL as well
as the Districts Master Plan. Each charter school submits a certification annually to the Charter Schools
Division to indicate which option the school has selected.
J ames J ordan Middle School has adopted and implements its own English Learner Master Plan. The
data tables below provide the number and percentage of English Learners identified, served and
reclassified by Charter School over the last three years. As the data shows, J ames J ordan Middle School
has served about half the number of English Learners (for the last two years) as the median number
served at District similar schools. The school has achieved a solid record of reclassification that
generally has beendoublethereclassification rates at District similar schools.
Drawing on the work of Marzano, especially those strategies detailed in Classroom Instruction that
Works, J ames J ordan Middle School teachers deliver instruction with a focus on effectively structured
cooperative and collaborative learning activities. Furthermore, teachers use a variety of methods (visual,
aural, kinesthetic) to convey or have students practice information. The school is rigorous in their close
143
September 9, 2014
monitoring of the progress of English learners, providing targeted, differentiated instruction, and
reclassifying students when they are ready.
DEMOGRAPHICS*
#
Total
Enroll
%
F/R
Meal
%
GATE
%
EL
%
Latino
%
White
%
Afr.
Amer.
%
Asian
%
Filipino
%
Amer.
Indian
%
Pacific
Islander
%
Two or
More
Charter School 317 91.5% 0% 21.1% 90.5% 2.8% 1.9% 2.2% 1.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.6%
LAUSD Similar
Schools from CDE
Median
490 90% 4% 46% 81% 0% 18% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
* Based on October 2013 CALPADSCensus
RECLASSIFICATION
2013-2014
2012-2013
# EL
2013-2014
# Reclassified
2013-2014
Reclassification
Rate
Change from
Prior Year
Charter School 65 13 20% -5%
LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median 236 25 11% -1%
Resident Schools Median 221 35 21% -3%
Comparison Schools in Charter Median 223 32 21% -3%
District 161,006 21,554 13% -2%
2012-2013
2011-2012
# EL
2012-2013
# Reclassified
2012-2013
Reclassification
Rate
Charter School 51 13 25%
LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median 238 29 12%
Resident Schools Median 191 36 24%
Comparison Schools in Charter Median 193 36 24%
District 176,928 27,871 16%
2011-2012
2010-2011
# EL
2011-2012
# Reclassified
2011-2012
Reclassification
Rate
Charter School 11 13 118%
LAUSD Similar Schools from CDE Median 34 47 132%
Resident Schools Median 44 39 85%
Comparison Schools in Charter Median 42 44 96%
District 188,617 23,592 13%
Fiscal Operations
J ames J ordans fiscal operations remain strong. Audit reports from 2010/2011 to 2012/2013 show
school has positive net assets, and net income. Liabilities show a decreasing trend from $454,089 in
2010/2011 to $202,112 in 2012/2013. This will strengthen schools fiscal position. The school received
a rating of 4, accomplished.
144
September 9, 2014
Per Audit Reports - The school is showing a trend in positive net assets, and positive net income.
1. Net assets:
a. 2012/2013: $768,863
b. 2011/2012: $717,417
c. 2010/2011: $610,680
2. Net income:
a. 2012/2013: $ 51,446
b. 2011/2012: $106,737
c. 2010/2011: $325,608
Second Interim projection for fiscal year 2013/2014
a. Net assets: $895,184
b. Net income: $126,323
145
0109884
SchoolwideAcademicPerformanceIndex
(API)
BaseAPI
GrowthAPI
GrowthTarget
Growth
MetSchoolwideGrowthTarget
MetAllStudentGroupsTarget
BaseAPIStateRank
BaseAPISimilarSchoolsRank
SubgroupAPI
Growth
Target
Growth MetTarget
Growth
Target
Growth
Met
Target
Growth
Target
Growth
Met
Target
AfricanAmericanorBlack
AmericanIndianorAlaskaNative
Asian
Filipino
Latino 6 53 Yes 5 17 Yes 5 17 Yes
NativeHawaiianorPacificIslander
White
TwoorMoreRaces
EnglishLearners 5 5 No 5 29 Yes
SocioeconomicallyDisadvantaged 5 45 Yes 5 26 Yes 5 9 Yes
StudentswithDisabilities
2011
BaseAPI
2012
GrowthAPI
1112
Growth
2012
BaseAPI
2013
GrowthAPI
1213
Growth
JamesJordanMiddle 746 765 19 784 792 8
CDESimilarSchoolsMedian 733 749 17 749 730 19
ResidentSchoolsMedian 741 751 10 769 764 5
ComparisonSchoolsMedian 736 746 10 760 751 9
Basic,Below
Basic&Far
BelowBasic
Proficient&
Advanced
Basic,
BelowBasic
&FarBelow
Basic
Proficient&
Advanced
JamesJordanMiddle 54% 46% 51% 49%
CDESimilarSchoolsMedian 62% 38% 53% 48%
ResidentSchoolsMedian 57% 43% 50% 50%
ComparisonSchoolsMedian 58% 43% 58% 42%
#Criteria #Met %Met #Criteria #Met %Met
JamesJordanMiddle 17 14 82% 20 15 75%
CDESimilarSchoolsMedian 21 15 76% 21 10 48%
ResidentSchoolsMedian 21 21 71% 21 16 58%
ComparisonSchoolsMedian 21 15 68% 21 14 58%
EnglishLanguageArts Mathematics
AYPComparison
2012AYP 2013AYP
201213CSTComparison
Yes No Yes
3 4 5
6 8 8
Blanksindicatesthatthesubgroupisnotnumericallysignificant;thereforewillhavenotAPIscoreortargetinformation.
APIComparison
47 19 8
Yes Yes Yes
747 765 792
5 5 5
Acharterschoolthathasoperatedforatleastfouryearsiseligibleforrenewalonlyiftheschoolhassatisfiedatleastoneofthefollowingcriteriapriorto
receivingacharterrenewal:AttaineditsAcademicPerformanceIndex(API)growthtargetintheprioryearorintwoofthelastthreeyears,bothschoolwideand
forallgroupsofpupilsservedbythecharterschool;ranked4to10ontheAPIstatewideorsimilarschoolsrankintheprioryearorintwoofthelastthreeyears
bothschoolwideandforallgroupsofpupilsservedbythecharterschool (SB1290).Theacademicperformanceofthecharterschoolmustbeatleastequalto
theacademicperformanceofthepublicschoolsthatthecharterschoolpupilswouldotherwisehavebeenrequiredtoattend,aswellastheacademic
performanceoftheschoolsintheschooldistrictinwhichthecharterschoolislocated,takingintoaccountthecompositionofpupilpopulationservedatthe
charterschool(Ed.Code47607).
201011 201112 201213
700 746 784
JamesJordanMiddle
Loc.Code: 8195
CDSCode:
CRITERIASUMMARY
Office of Data and Accountability 8/22/2014
146
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
2
0
1
3
E
n
r
o
l
l
o
n
1
s
t
D
a
y
o
f
T
e
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
f
2
0
1
2
B
a
s
e
A
P
I
2
0
1
3
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
P
I
2
0
1
3
S
t
a
t
e
R
a
n
k
2
0
1
3
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
R
a
n
k
M
e
t
2
0
1
3
S
c
h
w
i
d
e
T
a
r
g
e
t
M
e
t
2
0
1
3
S
u
b
g
r
o
u
p
T
a
r
g
e
t
s
%
F
r
e
e
/
R
e
d
u
c
e
d
L
u
n
c
h
%
S
p
E
d
%
G
A
T
E
%
E
L
%
R
F
E
P
%
L
a
t
i
n
o
%
W
h
i
t
e
%
A
f
.
A
m
e
r
%
A
s
i
a
n
%
F
i
l
i
A
m
I
n
d
i
a
n
%
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
I
s
l
a
n
d
%
T
w
o
o
r
M
o
r
e
X
R
3
8
1
9
5
J
a
m
e
s
J
o
r
d
a
n
M
i
d
d
l
e
2
6
2
6
8
7
8
4
7
9
2
5
8
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
9
2
1
9
4
2
0
4
5
8
9
3
3
2
2
0
0
1
L
A
U
S
D
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
r
o
m
C
D
E
X
R
2
2
0
1
7
C
a
m
i
n
o
N
u
e
v
o
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
4
2
0
k
8
8
2
4
8
2
1
6
1
0
Y
e
s
N
o
9
8
9
0
5
8
3
5
9
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
2
2
3
8
5
G
r
a
t
t
s
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
F
o
r
Y
o
u
n
g
S
c
h
6
0
2
2
6
7
5
1
7
4
6
2
6
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
5
0
3
3
9
5
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
3
7
9
5
F
i
f
t
y
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
0
K
5
6
9
9
7
0
9
1
5
Y
e
s
N
o
1
0
0
1
2
9
2
4
1
3
5
4
0
4
5
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
7
3
8
2
2
F
i
g
u
e
r
o
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
5
2
2
5
7
5
5
7
4
3
2
5
N
o
N
o
8
1
1
2
8
3
2
3
0
7
7
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
7
5
8
4
9
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
G
r
i
f
f
i
t
h
J
o
y
n
e
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
3
6
K
5
6
3
9
6
1
8
1
1
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
0
2
3
5
2
0
7
2
0
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
N
6
4
7
7
5
L
a
n
g
d
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
7
4
K
5
7
5
7
7
2
2
2
6
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
7
7
4
9
3
5
9
6
1
3
0
0
0
1
0
S
1
5
3
2
1
L
o
r
e
n
M
i
l
l
e
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
5
8
K
6
7
1
7
7
0
0
1
3
N
o
N
o
7
6
1
2
9
3
8
2
5
8
2
0
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
E
2
6
2
7
4
M
o
r
r
i
s
K
.
H
a
m
a
s
a
k
i
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
2
1
K
6
7
9
5
7
5
6
3
7
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
2
3
6
2
7
2
0
9
5
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
W
1
5
5
2
1
N
i
n
e
t
y
F
i
f
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
6
4
0
K
5
7
6
0
7
5
7
3
8
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
0
5
3
3
2
4
6
8
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
S
7
5
8
3
6
O
n
e
H
u
n
d
r
e
d
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
0
2
K
5
7
3
2
6
9
1
1
1
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
0
7
4
1
1
4
7
9
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
E
2
6
5
7
5
S
e
c
o
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
7
7
K
6
7
4
7
7
3
8
2
6
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
4
7
3
9
3
0
9
7
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
2
6
9
8
8
S
u
n
r
i
s
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
1
9
K
6
7
1
2
7
0
9
1
2
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
9
1
2
3
9
3
4
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
P
7
7
6
3
4
W
e
i
g
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
5
5
K
5
6
8
9
6
6
2
1
1
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
5
5
4
7
2
2
8
8
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
7
6
7
1
W
e
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
5
1
K
5
7
5
8
7
6
5
3
7
Y
e
s
N
o
8
9
1
7
1
5
3
2
1
9
7
4
0
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
W
1
7
7
9
5
W
i
l
s
h
i
r
e
C
r
e
s
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
5
0
K
5
8
1
2
7
7
6
4
8
N
o
N
o
8
6
1
9
7
2
5
1
2
5
6
1
3
3
3
2
3
1
0
X
P
1
4
6
5
8
Y
e
s
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
4
1
4
K
5
7
0
4
6
7
0
1
1
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
3
6
3
3
1
1
6
2
0
3
8
0
0
0
0
0
L
A
U
S
D
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
r
o
m
C
D
E
M
e
d
i
a
n
3
6
3
7
4
9
7
3
0
2
6
1
0
0
1
3
7
3
7
2
3
8
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
N
4
8
4
0
6
J
o
h
n
A
.
S
u
t
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
3
0
5
6
8
7
3
5
7
6
4
4
8
Y
e
s
N
o
1
0
0
1
9
1
4
1
8
4
3
8
3
4
5
6
2
0
0
0
N
3
8
2
1
7
E
r
n
e
s
t
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
5
7
3
6
8
8
1
9
8
1
1
6
4
Y
e
s
N
o
6
0
1
1
3
2
1
0
2
6
5
2
1
7
6
1
7
6
0
0
0
N
3
8
1
0
2
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s
M
i
d
d
l
e
8
3
5
6
8
7
4
1
6
9
8
1
3
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
6
1
7
2
3
4
4
8
0
8
3
5
3
0
0
0
N
3
8
2
8
3
N
o
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
8
6
2
6
8
7
6
9
7
4
4
3
9
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
2
1
1
2
2
0
4
6
8
3
5
4
5
2
0
0
0
N
4
8
1
0
7
G
a
s
p
a
r
D
e
P
o
r
t
o
l
a
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
7
7
3
6
8
8
6
4
8
6
6
8
6
Y
e
s
N
o
5
3
1
0
4
2
7
2
2
3
5
4
5
7
1
0
3
0
0
0
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
M
e
d
i
a
n
1
3
0
5
7
6
9
7
6
4
4
6
1
0
0
1
6
1
7
1
8
4
3
8
0
8
5
6
3
0
0
0
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
N
3
8
1
0
2
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s
M
i
d
d
l
e
8
3
5
6
8
7
4
1
6
9
8
1
3
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
1
6
1
7
2
3
4
4
8
0
8
3
5
3
0
0
0
N
3
8
2
1
7
E
r
n
e
s
t
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
5
7
3
6
8
8
1
9
8
1
1
6
4
Y
e
s
N
o
6
0
1
1
3
2
1
0
2
6
5
2
1
7
6
1
7
6
0
0
0
E
5
8
2
6
4
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
N
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
a
l
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
9
3
0
6
8
7
5
0
7
5
7
4
6
Y
e
s
N
o
1
0
0
1
7
1
7
2
6
4
3
7
0
0
2
2
7
1
0
0
0
N
3
8
2
8
3
N
o
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
8
6
2
6
8
7
6
9
7
4
4
3
9
N
o
N
o
1
0
0
2
1
1
2
2
0
4
6
8
3
5
4
5
2
0
0
0
N
4
8
4
0
6
J
o
h
n
A
.
S
u
t
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
3
0
5
6
8
7
3
5
7
6
4
4
8
Y
e
s
N
o
1
0
0
1
9
1
4
1
8
4
3
8
3
4
5
6
2
0
0
0
W
4
8
4
9
3
O
r
v
i
l
l
e
W
r
i
g
h
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
A
n
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
M
6
2
6
6
8
7
7
5
7
3
7
3
3
N
o
N
o
5
9
1
2
2
0
3
8
2
3
9
6
3
3
1
1
0
0
P
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
M
e
d
i
a
n
8
9
6
7
6
0
7
5
1
4
5
1
0
0
1
7
1
7
1
9
4
3
7
5
7
5
6
2
0
0
0
2
0
1
2
B
A
S
E
A
P
I
A
N
D
2
0
1
3
G
R
O
W
T
H
A
P
I
D
E
M
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S
W
I
T
H
C
O
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N
S
C
H
O
O
L
S
T
h
i
s
p
a
g
e
d
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
t
h
e
2
0
1
2
B
a
s
e
A
P
I
,
s
c
h
o
o
l
r
a
n
k
s
,
2
0
1
3
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
P
I
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
d
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
2
0
1
3
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
P
I
r
e
p
o
r
t
.
J
a
m
e
s
J
o
r
d
a
n
M
i
d
d
l
e
A
n
a
s
t
e
r
i
s
k
(
*
)
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
v
a
l
i
d
2
0
1
2
B
a
s
e
A
P
I
o
r
2
0
1
3
G
r
o
w
t
h
A
P
I
.
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
8
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
4
147
a
ESC BD
Loc
Code
School
TotalEnroll
#
%F/R
Meal
%GATE %EL %Latino %White
%Af.
Amer.
%Asian %Fili.
%Am
Indian
%Pacific
Island
%Twoor
More
XR 3 8195 JamesJordanMiddle 317 91.5% 0.0% 21.1% 90.5% 2.8% 1.9% 2.2% 1.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.6%
LAUSDSimilarSchoolsfromCDE
XR 2 2017 CaminoNuevoCharterAcademy 561 97.3% 0.0% 59.9% 98.4% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.5%
XP 2 2385 GrattsLearningAcademyForYoungSchol 579 90.7% 14.7% 57.3% 94.6% 0.5% 3.5% 0.3% 0.2% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0%
W 1 3795 FiftyNinthStreetElementary 400 84.0% 4.3% 33.3% 59.0% 0.5% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0%
XP 7 3822 FigueroaStreetElementary 464 93.8% 3.2% 39.7% 74.8% 0.0% 25.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
XP 7 5849 FlorenceGriffithJoynerElementary 648 89.2% 4.6% 40.4% 69.8% 0.2% 29.6% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
N 6 4775 LangdonAvenueElementary 587 94.0% 2.6% 64.9% 96.1% 0.7% 2.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%
S 1 5321 LorenMillerElementary 847 79.6% 3.4% 48.5% 80.4% 0.6% 18.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0%
E 2 6274 MorrisK.HamasakiElementary 442 86.2% 6.8% 28.1% 93.0% 1.6% 3.2% 0.9% 0.2% 0.7% 0.5% 0.0%
W 1 5521 NinetyFifthStreetElementary 921 91.0% 2.5% 46.1% 71.4% 0.0% 27.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0%
S 7 5836 OneHundredNinthStreetElementary 470 85.7% 3.0% 52.6% 81.5% 0.0% 18.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
E 2 6575 SecondStreetElementary 426 93.0% 5.4% 49.3% 96.7% 0.5% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.2% 0.0%
XP 2 6988 SunriseElementary 459 93.5% 5.0% 44.9% 99.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
XP 7 7634 WeigandAvenueElementary 440 90.0% 1.8% 50.5% 87.0% 0.2% 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
W 1 7671 WesternAvenueElementary 510 80.6% 6.5% 44.7% 74.3% 0.2% 25.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%
W 1 7795 WilshireCrestElementary 223 76.7% 5.4% 23.8% 55.6% 2.7% 34.5% 2.7% 0.4% 2.7% 1.3% 0.0%
XP 1 4658 YesAcademy 639 93.6% 3.1% 35.1% 59.5% 0.2% 39.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%
LAUSDSimilarSchoolsfromCDEMedian 490 90% 4% 46% 81% 0% 18% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
ResidentSchools
N 4 8406 JohnA.SutterMiddle 1147 92% 13% 25% 82% 5% 5% 6% 2% 0% 0% 0%
N 3 8217 ErnestLawrenceMiddle 1479 60% 32% 12% 51% 18% 6% 18% 6% 0% 0% 0%
N 3 8102 ChristopherColumbusMiddle 790 83% 18% 24% 83% 7% 3% 5% 3% 0% 0% 0%
N 3 8283 NorthridgeMiddle 820 92% 15% 24% 82% 4% 4% 6% 2% 0% 1% 0%
N 4 8107 GasparDePortolaMiddle 1825 52% 40% 10% 35% 44% 8% 10% 3% 0% 0% 0%
ResidentSchoolsMedian 1147 83% 18% 24% 82% 7% 5% 6% 3% 0% 0% 0%
CharterComparisonSchools
N 3 8102 ChristopherColumbusMiddle 790 83% 18% 24% 83% 7% 3% 5% 3% 0% 0% 0%
N 3 8217 ErnestLawrenceMiddle 1479 60% 32% 12% 51% 18% 6% 18% 6% 0% 0% 0%
E 5 8264 FlorenceNightingaleMiddle 823 89% 17% 27% 72% 1% 1% 26% 1% 0% 0% 0%
N 3 8283 NorthridgeMiddle 820 92% 15% 24% 82% 4% 4% 6% 2% 0% 1% 0%
N 4 8406 JohnA.SutterMiddle 1147 92% 13% 25% 82% 5% 5% 6% 2% 0% 0% 0%
W 4 8493 OrvilleWrightEngineeringAndDesignMa 649 66% 19% 3% 22% 7% 67% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0%
CharterComparisonSchoolsMedian 822 86% 17% 24% 77% 6% 5% 6% 2% 0% 0% 0%
OCTOBER2013CALPADSDEMOGRAPHICSWITHCOMPARISONSCHOOLS
ThispagedisplaysK12enrollmentnumberandpercentagesofselectsubgroupsasofOctober2013CensusDay.%ofEnglishLearners
(ELs)iscalculatedbydividingthetotalnumberofELsbyCensusenrollmentnumber.
JamesJordanMiddle
SchoolDemographicCharacteristics
148
ESC BD
Loc
Code
School
1011
EL#
1112
Reclass#
1112
Reclass
Rate
1112
EL#
1213
Reclass#
1213
Reclass
Rate
1213
EL#
1314
Reclass#
1314
Reclass
Rate
XR 3 8195 JamesJordanMiddle 11 13 118% 51 13 25% 65 13 20%
LAUSDSimilarSchoolsfromCDE
XR 2 2017 CaminoNuevoCharterAcademy 38 45 118% 359 29 8% 332 99 30%
XP 2 2385 GrattsLearningAcademyForYoun 64 93 145% 359 73 20% 311 74 24%
W 1 3795 FiftyNinthStreetElementary 22 16 73% 115 7 6% 121 11 9%
XP 7 3822 FigueroaStreetElementary 30 49 163% 196 38 19% 205 50 24%
XP 7 5849 FlorenceGriffithJoynerElementar 51 30 59% 324 28 9% 291 32 11%
N 6 4775 LangdonAvenueElementary 32 87 272% 368 46 13% 398 66 17%
S 1 5321 LorenMillerElementary 65 100 154% 450 42 9% 395 24 6%
E 2 6274 MorrisK.HamasakiElementary 41 25 61% 124 16 13% 125 14 11%
W 1 5521 NinetyFifthStreetElementary 52 82 158% 405 48 12% 453 70 15%
S 7 5836 OneHundredNinthStreetElemen 22 20 91% 209 6 3% 235 12 5%
E 2 6575 SecondStreetElementary 51 37 73% 210 26 12% 214 23 11%
XP 2 6988 SunriseElementary 36 54 150% 257 38 15% 236 33 14%
XP 7 7634 WeigandAvenueElementary 26 16 62% 232 29 13% 214 22 10%
W 1 7671 WesternAvenueElementary 22 54 245% 236 26 11% 241 25 10%
W 1 7795 WilshireCrestElementary 8 9 113% 78 12 15% 64 9 14%
XP 1 4658 YesAcademy 23 48 209% 239 11 5% 206 20 10%
LAUSDSimilarSchoolsfromCDEMedian 34 47 132% 238 29 12% 236 25 11%
ResidentSchools
N 4 8406 JohnA.SutterMiddle 76 64 84% 261 63 24% 283 61 22%
N 3 8217 ErnestLawrenceMiddle 26 49 188% 151 36 24% 169 35 21%
N 3 8102 ChristopherColumbusMiddle 38 39 103% 194 34 18% 221 28 13%
N 3 8283 NorthridgeMiddle 46 39 85% 191 67 35% 225 61 27%
N 4 8107 GasparDePortolaMiddle 44 32 73% 135 35 26% 143 26 18%
ResidentSchoolsMedian 44 39 85% 191 36 24% 221 35 21%
CharterComparisonSchools
N 3 8102 ChristopherColumbusMiddle 38 39 103% 194 34 18% 221 28 13%
N 3 8217 ErnestLawrenceMiddle 26 49 188% 151 36 24% 169 35 21%
E 5 8264 FlorenceNightingaleMiddle 45 57 127% 277 35 13% 259 26 10%
N 3 8283 NorthridgeMiddle 46 39 85% 191 67 35% 225 61 27%
N 4 8406 JohnA.SutterMiddle 76 64 84% 261 63 24% 283 61 22%
W 4 8493 OrvilleWrightEngineeringAndDe 9 8 89% 17 6 35% 21 5 24%
CharterComparisonSchoolsMedian 42 44 96% 193 36 24% 223 32 21%
RECLASSIFICATIONRATESWITHCOMPARISONSCHOOLS
a
JamesJordanMiddle
ThispagedisplaysthenumberofEnglishlearners(ELs),thenumberofstudentsreclassifiedsincethepriorCensusDay,and
thereclassificationrateforeachspecifiedyear.ThenumbersusedarefromtheLanguageCensus.Thereclassificationrateis
calculatedbydividingthenumberreclassifiedbythenumberofprioryearELs.
149
201314 201213#EL
201314#
Reclassified
201314
Reclassification
Rate
ChangefromPrior
Year
JamesJordanMiddle 65 13 20% 5%
LAUSDSimilarSchoolsfromCDEMedian 236 25 11% 1%
ResidentSchoolsMedian 221 35 21% 3%
ComparisonSchoolsinCharterMedian 223 32 21% 3%
District 161,006 21,554 13% 2%
201213 201112#EL
201213#
Reclassified
201213
Reclassification
Rate
JamesJordanMiddle 51 13 25%
LAUSDSimilarSchoolsfromCDEMedian 238 29 12%
ResidentSchoolsMedian 191 36 24%
ComparisonSchoolsinCharterMedian 193 36 24%
District 176,928 27,871 16%
201112 201011#EL
201112#
Reclassified
201112
Reclassification
Rate
JamesJordanMiddle 11 13 118%
LAUSDSimilarSchoolsfromCDEMedian 34 47 132%
ResidentSchoolsMedian 44 39 85%
ComparisonSchoolsinCharterMedian 42 44 96%
District 188,617 23,592 13%
JamesJordanMiddle
RECLASSIFICATIONOFENGLISHLEARNERSWITHCOMPARISONSCHOOLS'MEDIANS
ThispagedisplaysthenumberofEnglishlearners(ELs),thenumberofstudentsreclassifiedsincetheprior
CensusDayandthereclassificationrateforeachspecifiedyear.ThenumbersusedarefromtheLanguage
CensuscollectedbythestateeachMarch.Thereclassificationrateiscalculatedbydividingthenumber
reclassifiedbythenumberofprioryearELs.
150
a
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
O
C
T
2
0
1
3
E
n
r
o
l
l
#
S
p
E
d
E
n
r
o
l
l
#
S
p
E
d
E
n
r
o
l
l
%
%
H
i
g
h
I
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
%
L
o
w
I
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
#
A
U
T
#
D
B
D
E
A
F
#
E
D
#
E
M
D
#
H
O
H
M
R
O
H
I
*
#
O
I
#
S
L
D
*
S
L
I
*
#
T
B
I
#
V
I
X
R
3
8
1
9
5
J
a
m
e
s
J
o
r
d
a
n
M
i
d
d
l
e
3
1
7
5
5
1
7
%
9
1
%
9
%
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
8
1
3
9
3
0
0
L
A
U
S
D
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
r
o
m
C
D
E
X
R
2
2
0
1
7
C
a
m
i
n
o
N
u
e
v
o
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
A
c
5
6
1
4
0
7
%
9
5
%
5
%
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
8
1
7
0
0
X
P
2
2
3
8
5
G
r
a
t
t
s
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
5
7
9
6
4
1
1
%
7
2
%
2
8
%
1
5
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
3
1
1
3
0
0
W
1
3
7
9
5
F
i
f
t
y
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
4
0
0
8
2
2
1
%
8
3
%
1
7
%
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
3
3
2
2
0
0
X
P
7
3
8
2
2
F
i
g
u
e
r
o
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
4
6
4
4
3
9
%
8
4
%
1
6
%
2
0
0
5
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
3
1
0
0
X
P
7
5
8
4
9
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
G
r
i
f
f
i
t
h
J
o
y
n
e
r
E
6
4
8
9
2
1
4
%
8
5
%
1
5
%
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
6
1
3
7
2
5
0
0
N
6
4
7
7
5
L
a
n
g
d
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
5
8
7
1
1
4
1
9
%
8
7
%
1
3
%
8
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
2
3
4
4
4
3
0
0
S
1
5
3
2
1
L
o
r
e
n
M
i
l
l
e
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
8
4
7
8
5
1
0
%
7
6
%
2
4
%
5
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
9
2
4
5
1
1
1
0
E
2
6
2
7
4
M
o
r
r
i
s
K
.
H
a
m
a
s
a
k
i
E
l
e
m
e
4
4
2
6
6
1
5
%
4
8
%
5
2
%
2
5
0
0
0
0
2
7
6
0
1
2
1
4
0
0
W
1
5
5
2
1
N
i
n
e
t
y
F
i
f
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
9
2
1
7
5
8
%
9
1
%
9
%
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
3
1
3
2
2
3
0
0
S
7
5
8
3
6
O
n
e
H
u
n
d
r
e
d
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
4
7
0
3
3
7
%
8
5
%
1
5
%
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
2
1
3
1
1
0
0
E
2
6
5
7
5
S
e
c
o
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
2
6
6
1
1
4
%
5
6
%
4
4
%
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
5
0
2
1
8
0
0
X
P
2
6
9
8
8
S
u
n
r
i
s
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
5
9
8
3
1
8
%
7
2
%
2
8
%
1
6
0
0
0
0
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
2
0
0
X
P
7
7
6
3
4
W
e
i
g
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
4
4
0
4
1
9
%
8
5
%
1
5
%
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
W
1
7
6
7
1
W
e
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
5
1
0
8
0
1
6
%
6
6
%
3
4
%
8
0
0
0
0
0
1
7
1
8
2
1
6
1
9
0
0
W
1
7
7
9
5
W
i
l
s
h
i
r
e
C
r
e
s
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
2
3
7
5
3
4
%
5
9
%
4
1
%
2
0
0
0
3
0
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
8
0
2
X
P
1
4
6
5
8
Y
e
s
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
6
3
9
8
8
1
4
%
6
7
%
3
3
%
1
8
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
6
2
3
0
0
L
A
U
S
D
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
r
o
m
C
D
E
M
e
d
i
a
n
4
9
0
7
5
1
4
%
8
0
%
2
0
%
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
8
1
2
5
1
8
0
0
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
N
4
8
4
0
6
J
o
h
n
A
.
S
u
t
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
1
4
7
2
4
2
2
1
%
7
7
%
2
3
%
3
6
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
5
1
6
0
6
0
1
N
3
8
2
1
7
E
r
n
e
s
t
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
4
7
9
1
7
4
1
2
%
8
7
%
1
3
%
1
4
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
9
6
1
1
8
4
0
0
N
3
8
1
0
2
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s
M
i
7
9
0
1
3
1
1
7
%
7
7
%
2
3
%
9
0
0
4
0
2
1
2
2
0
3
7
7
4
0
0
N
3
8
2
8
3
N
o
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
8
2
0
1
7
2
2
1
%
8
8
%
1
2
%
4
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
1
4
4
1
3
4
3
0
0
N
4
8
1
0
7
G
a
s
p
a
r
D
e
P
o
r
t
o
l
a
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
8
2
5
1
9
7
1
1
%
8
1
%
1
9
%
3
3
0
0
1
0
2
0
4
6
2
1
1
2
1
0
0
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
M
e
d
i
a
n
1
1
4
7
1
7
4
1
7
%
8
1
%
1
9
%
1
4
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
4
1
1
8
4
0
0
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
N
3
8
1
0
2
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s
M
i
7
9
0
1
3
1
1
7
%
7
7
%
2
3
%
9
0
0
4
0
2
1
2
2
0
3
7
7
4
0
0
N
3
8
2
1
7
E
r
n
e
s
t
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
4
7
9
1
7
4
1
2
%
8
7
%
1
3
%
1
4
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
9
6
1
1
8
4
0
0
E
5
8
2
6
4
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
N
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
a
l
e
M
i
d
d
8
2
3
1
3
6
1
7
%
7
5
%
2
5
%
1
8
0
0
1
0
2
9
1
2
3
8
8
2
1
0
N
3
8
2
8
3
N
o
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
8
2
0
1
7
2
2
1
%
8
8
%
1
2
%
4
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
1
4
4
1
3
4
3
0
0
N
4
8
4
0
6
J
o
h
n
A
.
S
u
t
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
1
4
7
2
4
2
2
1
%
7
7
%
2
3
%
3
6
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
5
1
6
0
6
0
1
W
4
8
4
9
3
O
r
v
i
l
l
e
W
r
i
g
h
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
6
4
9
8
5
1
3
%
8
2
%
1
8
%
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
6
0
4
8
6
0
0
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
i
n
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
M
e
d
i
a
n
8
2
2
1
5
4
1
7
%
8
0
%
2
0
%
1
3
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
1
8
4
1
0
3
4
0
0
J
a
m
e
s
J
o
r
d
a
n
M
i
d
d
l
e
T
h
i
s
p
a
g
e
d
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
t
h
e
1
2
e
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
t
o
t
a
l
(
a
s
o
f
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
3
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
1
2
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
i
n
t
o
t
a
l
,
b
y
i
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
y
,
a
n
d
b
y
e
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
s
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
3
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
(
C
A
S
E
M
I
S
)
R
e
p
o
r
t
.
H
i
g
h
i
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e
e
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
b
y
a
n
a
s
t
e
r
i
s
k
(
*
)
.
1
2
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
E
D
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
T
U
D
E
N
T
S
W
I
T
H
C
O
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N
S
C
H
O
O
L
S
(
D
E
C
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
3
C
A
S
E
M
I
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
)
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
8
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
4
151
A
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.
C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
a
m
e
#
T
e
s
t
e
d
%
F
a
r
B
e
l
o
w
B
a
s
i
c
%
B
e
l
o
w
B
a
s
i
c
%
B
a
s
i
c
%
P
r
o
f
%
A
d
v
%
B
/
B
B
/
F
B
B
%
P
r
o
f
/
A
d
v
#
T
e
s
t
e
d
%
F
a
r
B
e
l
o
w
B
a
s
i
c
%
B
e
l
o
w
B
a
s
i
c
%
B
a
s
i
c
%
P
r
o
f
%
A
d
v
%
B
/
B
B
/
F
B
B
%
P
r
o
f
/
A
d
v
X
R
3
8
1
9
5
J
a
m
e
s
J
o
r
d
a
n
M
i
d
d
l
e
2
2
5
2
%
1
0
%
4
2
%
3
2
%
1
4
%
5
4
%
4
6
%
2
2
9
2
%
1
5
%
3
4
%
3
6
%
1
3
%
5
1
%
4
9
%
L
A
U
S
D
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
r
o
m
C
D
E
X
R
2
2
0
1
7
C
a
m
i
n
o
N
u
e
v
o
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
4
0
5
2
%
1
2
%
3
5
%
3
5
%
1
7
%
4
9
%
5
2
%
4
0
6
1
%
7
%
2
0
%
4
1
%
3
1
%
2
8
%
7
2
%
X
P
2
2
3
8
5
G
r
a
t
t
s
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
F
o
r
Y
o
u
n
g
S
c
h
o
l
a
r
s
(
G
5
7
3
8
%
1
6
%
4
0
%
2
7
%
9
%
6
4
%
3
6
%
5
7
4
3
%
1
8
%
2
7
%
3
1
%
2
1
%
4
8
%
5
2
%
W
1
3
7
9
5
F
i
f
t
y
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
0
1
5
%
1
8
%
2
8
%
2
7
%
1
2
%
6
1
%
3
9
%
2
6
0
6
%
2
4
%
2
4
%
1
8
%
2
8
%
5
4
%
4
6
%
X
P
7
3
8
2
2
F
i
g
u
e
r
o
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
2
2
1
1
%
1
8
%
3
2
%
2
5
%
1
4
%
6
1
%
3
9
%
4
2
2
4
%
1
6
%
2
1
%
2
7
%
3
2
%
4
1
%
5
9
%
X
P
7
5
8
4
9
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
G
r
i
f
f
i
t
h
J
o
y
n
e
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
0
4
2
3
%
2
3
%
3
1
%
2
0
%
3
%
7
7
%
2
3
%
4
0
5
1
6
%
3
0
%
2
3
%
1
9
%
1
3
%
6
9
%
3
2
%
N
6
4
7
7
5
L
a
n
g
d
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
4
2
1
2
%
1
6
%
3
9
%
2
5
%
8
%
6
7
%
3
3
%
3
4
6
5
%
2
1
%
2
5
%
2
9
%
2
0
%
5
1
%
4
9
%
S
1
5
3
2
1
L
o
r
e
n
M
i
l
l
e
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
0
6
1
4
%
1
8
%
3
4
%
2
2
%
1
1
%
6
6
%
3
3
%
5
0
5
7
%
2
4
%
2
5
%
2
7
%
1
7
%
5
6
%
4
4
%
E
2
6
2
7
4
M
o
r
r
i
s
K
.
H
a
m
a
s
a
k
i
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
8
7
%
1
9
%
3
3
%
2
8
%
1
3
%
5
9
%
4
1
%
2
7
1
7
%
2
5
%
2
7
%
2
4
%
1
7
%
5
9
%
4
1
%
W
1
5
5
2
1
N
i
n
e
t
y
F
i
f
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
9
9
1
0
%
1
6
%
3
3
%
2
7
%
1
4
%
5
9
%
4
1
%
5
9
7
5
%
1
6
%
2
2
%
2
5
%
3
1
%
4
3
%
5
6
%
S
7
5
8
3
6
O
n
e
H
u
n
d
r
e
d
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
8
9
1
6
%
2
0
%
3
3
%
2
0
%
1
1
%
6
9
%
3
1
%
2
8
8
8
%
2
6
%
2
2
%
2
3
%
2
1
%
5
6
%
4
4
%
E
2
6
5
7
5
S
e
c
o
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
4
5
1
2
%
1
7
%
2
6
%
3
4
%
1
1
%
5
5
%
4
5
%
2
4
6
7
%
2
6
%
2
2
%
2
4
%
2
0
%
5
5
%
4
4
%
X
P
2
6
9
8
8
S
u
n
r
i
s
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
8
6
1
5
%
1
5
%
3
3
%
2
7
%
1
0
%
6
3
%
3
7
%
2
8
9
1
1
%
1
5
%
1
9
%
2
8
%
2
7
%
4
5
%
5
5
%
X
P
7
7
6
3
4
W
e
i
g
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
3
0
1
9
%
2
1
%
2
7
%
2
3
%
1
0
%
6
7
%
3
3
%
2
2
8
1
3
%
2
4
%
3
0
%
2
2
%
1
1
%
6
7
%
3
3
%
W
1
7
6
7
1
W
e
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
0
2
8
%
2
2
%
2
9
%
2
6
%
1
5
%
5
9
%
4
1
%
3
0
4
4
%
1
7
%
2
3
%
2
7
%
3
0
%
4
4
%
5
7
%
W
1
7
7
9
5
W
i
l
s
h
i
r
e
C
r
e
s
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
3
6
6
%
1
3
%
3
2
%
3
1
%
1
8
%
5
1
%
4
9
%
1
3
6
6
%
1
6
%
1
9
%
3
0
%
3
0
%
4
1
%
6
0
%
X
P
1
4
6
5
8
Y
e
s
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
3
8
1
1
9
%
1
9
%
2
9
%
2
1
%
1
1
%
6
7
%
3
2
%
3
8
1
1
1
%
2
7
%
2
0
%
2
0
%
2
2
%
5
8
%
4
2
%
L
A
U
S
D
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
r
o
m
C
D
E
M
e
d
i
a
n
3
2
2
1
2
%
1
8
%
3
3
%
2
7
%
1
1
%
6
2
%
3
8
%
3
2
5
7
%
2
3
%
2
3
%
2
6
%
2
2
%
5
3
%
4
8
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
N
4
8
4
0
6
J
o
h
n
A
.
S
u
t
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
1
9
7
7
%
1
3
%
3
7
%
3
0
%
1
3
%
5
7
%
4
3
%
1
2
0
8
4
%
1
6
%
3
0
%
3
8
%
1
2
%
5
0
%
5
0
%
N
3
8
2
1
7
E
r
n
e
s
t
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
5
0
4
6
%
1
0
%
2
6
%
2
7
%
3
2
%
4
2
%
5
9
%
1
5
2
7
5
%
1
9
%
2
3
%
2
5
%
2
8
%
4
7
%
5
3
%
N
3
8
1
0
2
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s
M
i
d
d
l
e
7
4
7
1
2
%
1
7
%
3
1
%
2
7
%
1
4
%
6
0
%
4
1
%
7
6
7
1
0
%
2
6
%
3
2
%
2
4
%
8
%
6
8
%
3
2
%
N
3
8
2
8
3
N
o
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
7
4
1
4
%
1
4
%
4
3
%
2
9
%
1
0
%
6
1
%
3
9
%
7
6
6
3
%
2
3
%
3
2
%
3
0
%
1
1
%
5
8
%
4
1
%
N
4
8
1
0
7
G
a
s
p
a
r
D
e
P
o
r
t
o
l
a
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
7
5
5
4
%
8
%
1
9
%
2
9
%
4
0
%
3
1
%
6
9
%
1
7
5
5
2
%
1
0
%
2
0
%
2
8
%
3
9
%
3
2
%
6
7
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
M
e
d
i
a
n
1
1
9
7
6
%
1
3
%
3
1
%
2
9
%
1
4
%
5
7
%
4
3
%
1
2
0
8
4
%
1
9
%
3
0
%
2
8
%
1
2
%
5
0
%
5
0
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
N
3
8
1
0
2
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s
M
i
d
d
l
e
7
4
7
1
2
%
1
7
%
3
1
%
2
7
%
1
4
%
6
0
%
4
1
%
7
6
7
1
0
%
2
6
%
3
2
%
2
4
%
8
%
6
8
%
3
2
%
N
3
8
2
1
7
E
r
n
e
s
t
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
5
0
4
6
%
1
0
%
2
6
%
2
7
%
3
2
%
4
2
%
5
9
%
1
5
2
7
5
%
1
9
%
2
3
%
2
5
%
2
8
%
4
7
%
5
3
%
E
5
8
2
6
4
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
N
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
a
l
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
8
1
2
7
%
1
4
%
3
7
%
2
8
%
1
4
%
5
8
%
4
2
%
8
4
4
5
%
2
2
%
3
0
%
2
8
%
1
4
%
5
7
%
4
2
%
N
3
8
2
8
3
N
o
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
7
4
1
4
%
1
4
%
4
3
%
2
9
%
1
0
%
6
1
%
3
9
%
7
6
6
3
%
2
3
%
3
2
%
3
0
%
1
1
%
5
8
%
4
1
%
N
4
8
4
0
6
J
o
h
n
A
.
S
u
t
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
1
9
7
7
%
1
3
%
3
7
%
3
0
%
1
3
%
5
7
%
4
3
%
1
2
0
8
4
%
1
6
%
3
0
%
3
8
%
1
2
%
5
0
%
5
0
%
W
4
8
4
9
3
O
r
v
i
l
l
e
W
r
i
g
h
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
A
n
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
M
a
g
n
e
t
5
8
4
5
%
1
5
%
3
2
%
3
0
%
1
8
%
5
2
%
4
8
%
5
8
8
1
0
%
3
0
%
2
7
%
2
0
%
1
1
%
6
7
%
3
1
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
i
n
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
M
e
d
i
a
n
7
8
0
7
%
1
4
%
3
5
%
2
9
%
1
4
%
5
8
%
4
3
%
8
0
6
5
%
2
3
%
3
0
%
2
7
%
1
2
%
5
8
%
4
2
%
J
a
m
e
s
J
o
r
d
a
n
M
i
d
d
l
e
2
0
1
2
1
3
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
T
E
S
T
(
C
S
T
)
E
N
G
L
I
S
H
L
A
N
G
U
A
G
E
A
R
T
S
A
N
D
M
A
T
H
R
E
S
U
L
T
S
A
2
0
1
3
C
S
T
E
L
A
2
0
1
3
C
S
T
M
A
T
H
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
8
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
4
152
E
S
C
B
D
L
o
c
.
C
o
d
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
a
m
e
#
T
e
s
t
e
d
%
F
a
r
B
e
l
o
w
B
a
s
i
c
%
B
e
l
o
w
B
a
s
i
c
%
B
a
s
i
c
%
P
r
o
f
%
A
d
v
%
B
/
B
B
/
F
B
B
%
P
r
o
f
/
A
d
v
#
T
e
s
t
e
d
%
F
a
r
B
e
l
o
w
B
a
s
i
c
%
B
e
l
o
w
B
a
s
i
c
%
B
a
s
i
c
%
P
r
o
f
%
A
d
v
%
B
/
B
B
/
F
B
B
%
P
r
o
f
/
A
d
v
X
R
3
8
1
9
5
J
a
m
e
s
J
o
r
d
a
n
M
i
d
d
l
e
2
2
2
3
%
1
3
%
3
7
%
3
1
%
1
6
%
5
3
%
4
7
%
2
3
0
4
%
2
0
%
3
3
%
3
3
%
1
0
%
5
7
%
4
3
%
L
A
U
S
D
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
r
o
m
C
D
E
X
R
2
2
0
1
7
C
a
m
i
n
o
N
u
e
v
o
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
4
0
8
2
%
1
2
%
2
9
%
3
8
%
2
0
%
4
3
%
5
8
%
4
1
3
2
%
7
%
2
3
%
3
7
%
3
2
%
3
2
%
6
9
%
X
P
2
2
3
8
5
G
r
a
t
t
s
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
F
o
r
Y
o
u
n
g
S
c
h
o
l
a
r
s
(
G
6
0
5
8
%
2
0
%
3
6
%
2
6
%
1
0
%
6
4
%
3
6
%
6
0
7
3
%
1
7
%
2
5
%
3
2
%
2
3
%
4
5
%
5
5
%
W
1
3
7
9
5
F
i
f
t
y
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
5
6
1
5
%
1
7
%
3
3
%
2
3
%
1
1
%
6
5
%
3
4
%
2
5
5
1
0
%
2
0
%
2
3
%
2
6
%
2
1
%
5
3
%
4
7
%
X
P
7
3
8
2
2
F
i
g
u
e
r
o
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
1
5
1
2
%
1
5
%
3
3
%
2
3
%
1
7
%
6
0
%
4
0
%
4
1
7
6
%
1
4
%
1
9
%
2
9
%
3
3
%
3
9
%
6
2
%
X
P
7
5
8
4
9
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
G
r
i
f
f
i
t
h
J
o
y
n
e
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
4
7
4
2
0
%
2
3
%
2
9
%
2
1
%
7
%
7
2
%
2
8
%
4
7
3
1
3
%
2
8
%
2
8
%
1
9
%
1
3
%
6
9
%
3
2
%
N
6
4
7
7
5
L
a
n
g
d
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
1
6
7
%
1
6
%
3
5
%
3
0
%
1
2
%
5
8
%
4
2
%
3
1
9
4
%
1
9
%
2
7
%
2
9
%
2
1
%
5
0
%
5
0
%
S
1
5
3
2
1
L
o
r
e
n
M
i
l
l
e
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
6
2
1
1
1
%
2
1
%
2
6
%
2
7
%
1
5
%
5
8
%
4
2
%
6
2
0
8
%
1
9
%
2
3
%
2
8
%
2
2
%
5
0
%
5
0
%
E
2
6
2
7
4
M
o
r
r
i
s
K
.
H
a
m
a
s
a
k
i
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
7
1
7
%
1
3
%
3
3
%
2
6
%
2
1
%
5
3
%
4
7
%
2
7
5
4
%
1
5
%
2
6
%
3
2
%
2
3
%
4
5
%
5
5
%
W
1
5
5
2
1
N
i
n
e
t
y
F
i
f
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
5
9
3
8
%
1
7
%
3
5
%
2
6
%
1
4
%
6
0
%
4
0
%
6
0
0
7
%
1
8
%
1
9
%
2
7
%
2
9
%
4
4
%
5
6
%
S
7
5
8
3
6
O
n
e
H
u
n
d
r
e
d
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
0
6
1
3
%
1
7
%
3
0
%
2
4
%
1
4
%
6
0
%
3
8
%
3
0
7
7
%
2
2
%
1
9
%
2
2
%
3
0
%
4
8
%
5
2
%
E
2
6
5
7
5
S
e
c
o
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
6
5
9
%
1
4
%
3
5
%
2
5
%
1
6
%
5
8
%
4
1
%
2
7
1
7
%
1
8
%
2
3
%
2
9
%
2
3
%
4
8
%
5
2
%
X
P
2
6
9
8
8
S
u
n
r
i
s
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
3
8
1
6
%
1
8
%
2
9
%
2
4
%
1
2
%
6
3
%
3
6
%
3
3
8
1
1
%
1
9
%
2
5
%
2
1
%
2
4
%
5
5
%
4
5
%
X
P
7
7
6
3
4
W
e
i
g
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
2
5
1
2
0
%
1
6
%
3
0
%
2
5
%
9
%
6
6
%
3
4
%
2
5
1
8
%
2
5
%
2
2
%
2
9
%
1
7
%
5
5
%
4
6
%
W
1
7
6
7
1
W
e
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
3
5
2
1
0
%
1
4
%
3
3
%
2
9
%
1
4
%
5
7
%
4
3
%
3
5
8
3
%
1
9
%
2
3
%
2
4
%
3
1
%
4
5
%
5
5
%
W
1
7
7
9
5
W
i
l
s
h
i
r
e
C
r
e
s
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
1
4
2
5
%
1
4
%
2
5
%
3
8
%
1
8
%
4
4
%
5
6
%
1
4
2
2
%
8
%
2
5
%
2
6
%
3
9
%
3
5
%
6
5
%
X
P
1
4
6
5
8
Y
e
s
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
3
7
5
1
3
%
2
4
%
2
9
%
2
3
%
1
3
%
6
6
%
3
6
%
3
7
6
7
%
2
5
%
2
6
%
2
1
%
2
2
%
5
8
%
4
3
%
L
A
U
S
D
S
i
m
i
l
a
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
f
r
o
m
C
D
E
M
e
d
i
a
n
3
4
5
1
1
%
1
7
%
3
2
%
2
6
%
1
4
%
6
0
%
4
0
%
3
4
8
7
%
1
9
%
2
3
%
2
8
%
2
3
%
4
8
%
5
2
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
N
4
8
4
0
6
J
o
h
n
A
.
S
u
t
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
3
2
0
1
0
%
1
8
%
3
3
%
2
5
%
1
4
%
6
1
%
3
9
%
1
3
2
1
6
%
2
0
%
3
2
%
3
0
%
1
1
%
5
8
%
4
1
%
N
3
8
2
1
7
E
r
n
e
s
t
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
5
8
0
4
%
9
%
2
4
%
2
6
%
3
7
%
3
7
%
6
3
%
1
5
9
4
5
%
1
8
%
2
4
%
2
5
%
2
7
%
4
7
%
5
2
%
N
3
8
1
0
2
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s
M
i
d
d
l
e
7
9
8
8
%
1
6
%
3
1
%
3
0
%
1
5
%
5
5
%
4
5
%
8
1
9
9
%
2
3
%
3
1
%
2
8
%
9
%
6
3
%
3
7
%
N
3
8
2
8
3
N
o
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
7
4
0
4
%
1
3
%
3
6
%
3
3
%
1
4
%
5
3
%
4
7
%
7
5
8
4
%
1
8
%
3
0
%
3
6
%
1
1
%
5
2
%
4
7
%
N
4
8
1
0
7
G
a
s
p
a
r
D
e
P
o
r
t
o
l
a
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
8
4
1
4
%
8
%
1
9
%
2
6
%
4
4
%
3
1
%
7
0
%
1
8
4
2
3
%
1
1
%
1
9
%
3
0
%
3
7
%
3
3
%
6
7
%
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
M
e
d
i
a
n
1
3
2
0
4
%
1
3
%
3
1
%
2
6
%
1
5
%
5
3
%
4
7
%
1
3
2
1
5
%
1
8
%
3
0
%
3
0
%
1
1
%
5
2
%
4
7
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
N
3
8
1
0
2
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
C
o
l
u
m
b
u
s
M
i
d
d
l
e
7
9
8
8
%
1
6
%
3
1
%
3
0
%
1
5
%
5
5
%
4
5
%
8
1
9
9
%
2
3
%
3
1
%
2
8
%
9
%
6
3
%
3
7
%
N
3
8
2
1
7
E
r
n
e
s
t
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
5
8
0
4
%
9
%
2
4
%
2
6
%
3
7
%
3
7
%
6
3
%
1
5
9
4
5
%
1
8
%
2
4
%
2
5
%
2
7
%
4
7
%
5
2
%
E
5
8
2
6
4
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
N
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
a
l
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
9
7
6
7
%
1
8
%
3
3
%
2
7
%
1
5
%
5
8
%
4
2
%
9
9
5
7
%
2
7
%
2
8
%
2
4
%
1
4
%
6
2
%
3
8
%
N
3
8
2
8
3
N
o
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
7
4
0
4
%
1
3
%
3
6
%
3
3
%
1
4
%
5
3
%
4
7
%
7
5
8
4
%
1
8
%
3
0
%
3
6
%
1
1
%
5
2
%
4
7
%
N
4
8
4
0
6
J
o
h
n
A
.
S
u
t
t
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
1
3
2
0
1
0
%
1
8
%
3
3
%
2
5
%
1
4
%
6
1
%
3
9
%
1
3
2
1
6
%
2
0
%
3
2
%
3
0
%
1
1
%
5
8
%
4
1
%
W
4
8
4
9
3
O
r
v
i
l
l
e
W
r
i
g
h
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
A
n
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
M
a
g
n
e
t
7
0
7
5
%
1
0
%
2
8
%
3
1
%
2
6
%
4
3
%
5
7
%
7
1
7
1
0
%
2
4
%
2
5
%
2
6
%
1
6
%
5
9
%
4
2
%
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
i
n
C
h
a
r
t
e
r
M
e
d
i
a
n
8
8
7
6
%
1
5
%
3
2
%
2
9
%
1
5
%
5
4
%
4
6
%
9
0
7
7
%
2
2
%
2
9
%
2
7
%
1
3
%
5
9
%
4
2
%
2
0
1
2
C
S
T
M
A
T
H
J
a
m
e
s
J
o
r
d
a
n
M
i
d
d
l
e
2
0
1
1
1
2
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
T
E
S
T
(
C
S
T
)
E
N
G
L
I
S
H
L
A
N
G
U
A
G
E
A
R
T
S
A
N
D
M
A
T
H
R
E
S
U
L
T
S
2
0
1
2
C
S
T
E
L
A
O
f
f
i
c
e

o
f

D
a
t
a

a
n
d

A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
8
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
4
153
J AMES J ORDAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
SEPTEMBER 9, 2014
The following documents:
Final budget
Final petition
Enrollment and lottery form
are available for perusal at the:
333 South Beaudry Avenue, 20th Floor
(213) 241-0399
The final petition may also be viewed at the following link:
http://www.laschoolboard.org/charterpetitions
154
TAB 15
[Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement with LAs BEST]
Action Proposed:
Approval of Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the District and LAs BEST for after
school services.
Background:
The Beyond the Bell Branch (BTB) provides after school programming at 190 District schools in partnership
with LAs BEST. Starting with ten schools in 1988, the partnership has grown to serve 190 schools. This
partnership is in cooperation with the City of Los Angeles, and numerous corporate and private funders which
LAs BEST develops each year.
When the California Department of Education releases a new After School Education and Safety (ASES) grant
Request for Proposal, BTB responds to gain funding for after school programming, and then determines which
sites LAB can best serve. As the Board was informed in a Board Informative dated, May 13, 2014, BTB
transfers funds to LAs BEST for the program support costs of the after school programs at the elementary
schools LAB serves. This arrangement is formalized in a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), which is
reissued every five years. The MOA is approved under delegated authority without a funding amount. When
funding becomes available, the MOA is amended to add a Notice of Funding, allowing for payment. LAB then
invoices BTB for services rendered, and the funding is made available to LAB.
BTB is requesting Board ratification of the fiscal year 2011-2012 payment of $2,863,225 and 2012-2013
payment of $2,710,538 previously made under the MOA, and approval of the amendment for the currently
pending fiscal year 2013-2014 payment of $3,463,485 to LAB.
Expected Outcomes:
Continued provision of after school services at 190 schools in partnership with LAs BEST.
The District owes LAB for services it provided in the 2013 and 2014 school years. If the MOA is not approved
BTB may seek other means to recover its costs from LAUSD and LAUSD may have to contract with other
agencies to supply after school program services at 190 schools going forward.
There is no policy implication.
Budget Impact:
There is no budgetary impact. This program is grant funded through the ASES after school program.
The partnership with LAs BEST brings additional resources into the after school program. In the 2012-13
powered by Legistar
155
school year LAs BEST raised 41.8% of its revenues from sources outside the ASES grant. This is a figure well
above the 33% percentage of outside funding goal set by CDE. In order to continue this partnership BTB is
seeking Board ratification of the MOA so that payments can be authorized and processed.
Informatives:
Informative: Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement with LAs Best
powered by Legistar
156
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
157
No. 068-14/15
For Sept. 9, Board Meeting
Beyond the Bell Branch
INFORMATIVE
FROM: Alvaro Corts, Executive Director
Beyond the Bell Branch
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH LAS BEST
Starting in1988 LAs BEST (LAB), a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization, has been
providing after school services in partnershipwith the Beyond the Bell Branch (BTB) at
LAUSD schools. This partnership was established through the Office of then-Mayor Tom
Bradley, as part of an initiative to create new community partnerships in the City of Los
Angeles.
LAB and BTB have developed a unique relationship. LAUSD's role includes, but is not
limited to, providing financial and human resources to operate the after school program.
LABs role includes administrative activities such asraising funds from public and private
sources (among them, Wells Fargo, LA84 Foundation, the Packard Foundation, and the
Mott Foundation) to operate the program, setting the direction and agenda for the
programs, advocacy, and publicizing the activities and results of the program.
So, the contracting process for this relationshiplikewisediffers from the method by which
BTB contracts for similar services. LAUSD and LAB enter into a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) under delegated authoritywithout a funding amount, while funding is
pending. When grant funding becomes available, LAUSD amends the MOA to issue a
Notice of Funding to LAB; LAB then invoices BTB at the end of the fiscal year for LABs
program support costs. As the Board was informed in a Board Informative dated, May 13,
2014, BTB transfers funds to LAs BEST from After School Education and Safety
Program (ASES) and 21
st
Century Community Learning Centers (21
st
CCLC) funding for
theafter school programs at the elementary schools LAB serves.
Pursuant to the process outlined in the MOA, BTB is requesting Board ratification of the
fiscal year 2012-2013 payment of $2,710,538previously made under the MOA, and
approval of the amendment for the currently pending fiscal year 2013-2014 payment of
$3,463,485.
BTB is proud of the achievements itspartnership with LAB, and considers our program a
model for other districts around the State and across the nation to follow.
158
c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Gerardo Loera
J efferson Crain
Others
159
TAB 16
Submission of Center for Equity for English Learners at Loyola Marymount University (LMU) and Los
Angeles Unified School District i3 Federal Grant Application for 2015-2019 Funding Cycle
Action Proposed:
The Division of Intensive Support and Intervention proposes that the Board of Education approve the
submission of the Center for Equity for English Learners at Loyola Marymount University and the Los Angeles
Unified School Districts 2014 i3grant application to the US Department of Education (USDOE). The grant
would serve students identified as Long-Term English Learners (LTELs) in grades 6-8. The grant is estimated
to be between $1.4 and $3 million. The 5-year grant period begins January, 2015 and ends December 21, 2019.
Background:
Project Purposeful Engagement in Academic Rigor and Language Learning (PEARLL) for Long Term English
Learners (LTEL) addresses Absolute Priority 4a: Improving Academic Outcomes for English Learners. It
implements and evaluates a data-driven, dynamic and replicable systemic model to improve programs and
instruction for English Learners (ELs) in grades 6, 7 and 8, to prevent and reduce the number of Long Term
English Learners (LTELs) at high risk of school failure. Addressing their needs in middle school prepares these
students to complete high school and be college-ready. Project PEARLL incorporates and evaluates
instructional approaches and tools sensitive to the language demands necessary to access challenging content,
including technology tools, and thereby will increase the number and proportion of English Learners (ELs)
successfully completing core academic courses. The PEARLL systemic model includes these three innovative
components: 1) District and Site Level Systemic Infrastructure Development; 2) Professional Development
(PD) for Teachers and Coaches; 3) Consistent, High Quality Implementation of Two Innovative LTEL Courses.
Project PEARLL is a long-term partnership between the Center for Equity for English Learners (CEEL) at
Loyola Marymount University (lead agency), a non-profit institution of higher education, and the Los Angeles
Unified School District (LAUSD). Over one-third (48,054) of ELs have been identified as LTELs, 11,802 of
whom are in grades six through eight.
PEARLL will serve approximately 7,100 LAUSD English Learners (high-need students), 100% of whom are
LTELs, at 42 middle schools, along with at least 100 of their teachers, 48 administrators and 32 coaches.
Project PEARLL will implement practices to improve student achievement and student growth, and close
achievement gaps.
Currently, we know of no systemic model being implemented to prevent and decrease LTEL status, and
evidence-based research in this area is virtually nonexistent.
Expected Outcomes:
The key components of PEARLL are (1) Leadership development and systemic innovation, (2) PD for teachers
and coaches, (3) Consistent, High Quality Implementation of Two Innovative LTEL Courses. Collectively,
these components are intended to generate the following outcomes: (1) LTEL teachers increased knowledge
and application of Reciprocal Teaching (RT) and Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) strategies in their teaching, (2)
powered by Legistar
160
Title 3 Coaches increased capacity and self-efficacy to support LTEL teachers use of RT and PAL strategies,
(3) an increase in the percentage of LTELs who successfully complete core content courses, (4) an increase in
LTELs mean scale score on the ELPAC, (5) improvement in the rates at which LTELs are reclassified as Fluent
English Proficient, and (6) systemic district-level changes that reduce or prevent the incidence of ELs becoming
LTELs.
The Center for Equity for English Learners at LMU and the Los Angeles Unified School District have prepared
an Application for Grants under the US Department of Education. Approval by the Board will ensure
submission of this proposal for funding from USDOE to support the implementation of this program at 42
middle schools.
If authorization to submit is not granted, the LMU/District partnership would not be considered for this grant
from USDOE.
The partnership between LMU and LAUSD to focus collaborative resources provides greater resources for the
district to use and also increases the capacity of university staff to support the innovations. In addition, in
combination with the use of data to drive this systemic work, creates a dynamic model that will enable the
university, district and sites to define, refine, align, provide and connect resources to improve outcomes for
students.
Budget Impact:
As a sub-recipient, LAUSD must provide in-kind resources over the period of the grant estimated between
$105,000 and $225,000. The District match is expected to be more than met by the existing Title III coaching
program. In addition, costs for sub-time associated with professional development will be paid by the grant.
To the extent that private foundation support is not identified, the District may need to provide additional
resources.
None
Attachments:
Informative - Center for Equity for English Learners at Loyola Marymount University (LMU) and Los Angeles
Unified School District i3 Federal Grant Application for 2015-2019 Funding Cycle
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
161
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
TAB 17
Submission of Urban Arts Partnership i3 Federal Grant Application for 2014-2017 Funding Cycle
Action Proposed:
The Division of Intensive Support and Intervention proposes that the Board of Education approve the submittal
of the Urban Arts Partnership (UAP) to submit the 2014 grant application to the US Department of Education
(USDOE). The grant would serve students at Julian Nava Learning Center, Belvedere MS, Bancroft MS, and
Elizabeth Learning Center. These schools have agreed to participate. All schools fit the criteria: middle
school, high number of ELL or former ELL population, Title 1, and participate in the "Arts at the Core"
initiative which provides arts integration professional development to all teachers. UAP is currently working
with all four schools through "Arts at the Core". The funding for three out of four schools is private funds by
UAP, and ELC is through UAPs partnership with the LA Fund for Public schools.
Background:
Urban Arts Partnership (UAP) is a community-based organization that has been providing education programs
in Title I NYC public schools since 1992 and high-need public schools in LAUSD since 2012. In Los Angeles,
UAP is currently working with Julian Nava Learning Center, Belvedere MS, Bancroft MS, Elizabeth Learning
Center, Teresa Hughes Elementary, ArTES High School, and two special education learning centers. Their
experience in the two largest school districts in the country position them well to address the needs of the large
and diverse populations of English Learners (ELs) in each, with a novel approach based on a sustainable, self-
replicating model to support fluency and academic achievement among ELs. This proposal addresses Absolute
Priority 4 of the i3 grant, subpart a to serve English Language learners in successfully completing courses in
core academic subjects. In partnership with two LEAs (Los Angeles Unified School District and New York
City District 6 [NYC CSD]), Urban Arts Partnership (UAP) will develop, implement, and evaluate an
instructional approach to working with ELs based on personal narratives and integration with visual and theater
arts. This project builds on their successful Story Studio program, currently funded through a 2007 Arts in
Education: Model Development and Dissemination (AEMDD) grant as well the professional development
approach used in their i3-funded Everyday Arts in Special Education (EASE) project, using a self-sustaining
model of peer collaboration among teachers to support the widespread application of the project approach to
serving the needs of ELs. The project will support students in grades 6-8. To support this project, UAP is
committed to providing a match of 15%. This project will impact 360 teachers and 34,600 students by the end
of the grant period.
Story Studio demonstrates evidence of promise after four years of implementation, and is currently serving
1,300 ELs and 97 teachers in New York City and 319 ELs and 24 teachers in Los Angeles, in grades 3-12.
When analyzing data from 2012-2013, Story Studio students were found to have Median Adjusted Growth
Percentile Scores of 67% in ELA and 72% in Math (compared to scores of 50% indicating equivalence with the
comparison group). Additionally, 82% demonstrated increased knowledge of academic vocabulary.
Participating ESL teachers improved their ability to integrate visual arts and theater units with their ESL
powered by Legistar
162
curriculum (85% and 79%, respectively). Ninety-seven percent of participating teachers increased
communication with other teachers across subject areas.
Expected Outcomes:
The goals of this project are to support improved outcomes among both students and teachers. Students
participating in Story Studio classrooms in treatment schools will improve in their scores on ELA and English
as a Second Language tests, increase their knowledge of artistic and academic vocabulary, increase competent
usage of technology-based tools, and grow towards fluency in English, showing relative gains compared to a
comparison group of students.
Each year for four years, cohorts of ESL classroom teachers in partnership with UAP teaching artists will
develop their ability to deliver arts-based instructional approaches, proven to accelerate core ELA achievement
for ELs, until they not only deliver the curriculum without support, but are able to teach it to others. By the end
of 4 years, there will be 80 Lead Teachers in 30 schools poised to carry the model forward. This project will
impact 360 teachers and 34,600 students by the end of the grant period.
The long-term goals of the project are for 1) EL students to improve their usage of English in both the
classroom and socially, gaining the tools to successfully access challenging content and succeed academically
and 2) to create a self-sustaining community of teachers supporting each other to continually improve education
for ELs using the arts to drive innovation in education.
Urban Arts Partnership has prepared an Application for Grants under the US Department of Education.
Approval by the Board will ensure submission of this proposal for funding from USDOE to support the
implementation of the program in 4 schools.
If authorization to submit is not granted, the District would not be considered for participation in a $4 million
grant from USDOE, and a large cohort of students and teachers would not be able to participate.
Making adequate progress in English Language Development as well as access to core are high priorities for
the Los Angeles Unified School District as evidenced in The Master Plan. Furthermore, Common Core State
Standards have a specific listening and speaking standards as well as an expectation of integration across the
curriculum. Recent Board action supports the strengthening of arts in the curriculum.
Budget Impact:
As a sub-recipient, LAUSDs budget impact is limited to in-kind contributions.
None
Attachments:
Informative - Submission of Urban Arts Partnership i3 Federal Grant Application for 2014-2017 Funding Cycle
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
163
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
TAB 18
Submission of Los Angeles Educational Partnership (LAEP) i3 Federal Grant Application for 2014-2017
Funding Cycle
Action Proposed:
of Los Angeles Education Partnership (LAEP)s 2014 grant application to the US Department of Education
(USDOE). Funding requested is $1 million per year for three years. The grant would serve students at
Bethune Middle School
Cesar Chavez Learning Academy: ArTES and Social Justice Humanitas
Diego Rivera Learning Complex: Communication and Technology School and Public Service
Community School
Esteban E. Torres High School: East Los Angeles Performing Arts Academy, East Los Angeles
Renaissance Academy, Engineering & Technology Academy, Humanitas Academy of Arts and
Technology, and Social Justice Leadership Academy
Fremont High School (3 SLCs and one magnet)
Sonia Sotomayor Learning Academy: School of History and Dramatic Arts
Studio School
This i3 project would be a continuation of the work LAEP is already doing with these partner schools. All of
the participating schools are already familiar with the proposed activities and have signed an MOU.
Background:
Founded in 1984, LAEP pioneered career academies in Los Angeles in 1986; developed the Humanitas instructional
model that is interdisciplinary, project-based and well-aligned with the Common Core State Standards in 1987; assisted
teacher-design teams in creating 10 semiautonomous pilot schools in the 2000s; has become the local leader in
developing community schools; and is a sought-after provider of professional development. In 2013, LAEP consolidated
its work in some of the highest-need campuses in LAUSD to provide high-quality instruction, career themes with Linked
Learning experiences, and community schools offering coordinated cognitive and non-cognitive supports. LAEPs
innovative approach places a community-school coordinator on each campus to collaborate with the school community to
develop solutions to local problems and to integrate services.
LAEPs project design arises from its work in three areas:
Humanitas: interdisciplinary instruction, project-based learning, teacher networks
Linked Learning: career themes, career experiences, workplace preparation
Community Schools: personalization, non-cognitive supports, community collaboration
powered by Legistar
164
Through their work with LAEP, some schools are exemplars in one or more of these areas. But due to the multiple
challenges in high-poverty schools and lack of resources, none of the schools excel in all three areas.
This project has garnered private support to fund some aspects of the model. However, it is not being fully implemented.
An i3 development grant will add features that LAEP considers essential for success: 1) An associate director of
Transform Schools and two transformation coaches who will collaborate with school administrators on full-scale school
systems improvement and coordination of instructional resources and strategies in the three geographic areas in which our
target schools are clustered: East L.A., South L.A., Northeast San Fernando Valley. Transformation coaches are critical
because schools do not have the capacity to tackle whole-scale improvement on their own. 2) Five content coaches who
will work with teachers to implement Common Core, integrate career experiences into project-based lessons, develop
inquiry-based lessons in core subjects, and strengthen teachers skills in areas of weakness. Content coaches are essential
to delivery of high-quality, engaging instruction that prepares students for college and careers. 3) Salaries of two
community-school coordinators who are not already funded by private grants. The coordinators align collaborators and
resources and match them to needs of individual students to eliminate barriers to learning. Also, they collaborate with
teachers, students, parents and partner organizations to build systems, services and activities at the school that support and
enrich students. Additional activities and expenses will be funded by foundation and corporate grants, many of which
have been secured.
Expected Outcomes:
LAEPs overall goal is that all students graduate ready for careers or postsecondary education. LAEPs work is
guided by six core principles for school transformation that synthesize the best practices learned from
Humanitas, career academies, community schools and research.
A development grant will enable LAEP to improve fidelity to this comprehensive model, students non-
cognitive abilities and engagement, academic success, and college- and career- readiness, while developing a
cadre of teacher-leaders to embed and sustain the reforms. By showing the effectiveness of this model to
improve low-performing schools, we will establish the potential for replication in urban public schools.
The project design includes evaluation by Public Works and the Annenberg Institute for School Reform at
Brown University, which is developing a technical guide to school reform aligned with LAEPs six core
elements and wishes to do case studies of our work and evaluation of our model. The evaluation will seek to
study how LAEPs proposed solution (six core elements) affect both school culture and student outcomes. The
evaluation will gather qualitative and quantitative data to answer the primary research questions: 1) Is there a
correlation between level of participation and service provision (intensity) and school and student outcomes? 2)
Is there a correlation between commitment to model fidelity (implementation) and school and student
outcomes?
LAEP has prepared an application for grants under the US Department of Education. Approval by the Board
will ensure submission of this proposal for funding from USDOE to support further implementation in 13
schools.
If authorization to submit is not granted, the District would not be considered for a $1 million grant annually for
three years (total of $3 million) from USDOE.
This i3 project is a continuation of the work LAEP is already doing with their partner schools. It compliments
the District's priorities particularly the Teaching and Learning Framework, the CORE waiver and the
powered by Legistar
165
implementation of Common Core, as well as LAEP's community school strategy.
Budget Impact:
Funding is provided by LAEP through the i3 grant, foundation and corporate grants.
LAUSD is a sub-recipient.
There is no requirement for additional monetary or in-kind match from LAUSD.
None
Attachments:
Informative - Submission of Los Angeles Educational Partnership (LAEP) i3 Federal Grant Application for
2014-2017 Funding Cycle
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
166
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
No. 071-13/14
For September 9, 2014 Board Meeting

Division of Intensive Support and Intervention

INFORMATIVE

FROM: Dr. Donna E. Muncey, Chief, Intensive Support and Intervention

SUBJECT: SUBMISSION OF LOS ANGELES EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP (LAEP) i3
FEDERAL GRANT APPLICATION FOR 2014-2017 FUNDING CYCLE

The Investing in Innovation Fund, established under section 14007 of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), provides funding to support (1) local educational agencies (LEAs)
and (2) nonprofit organizations in partnership with (a) one or more LEAs or (b) a consortium of schools.
The purpose of this program is to provide competitive grants to applicants with a record of improving
student achievement and attainment in order to expand the implementation of, and investment in,
innovative practices that are demonstrated to have an impact on improving student achievement or
student growth, closing achievement gaps, decreasing dropout rates, increasing high school graduation
rates, or increasing college enrollment and completion rates.
These grants will (1) allow eligible entities to expand and develop innovative practices that can serve as
models of best practices, (2) allow eligible entities to work in partnership with the private sector and the
philanthropic community, and (3) identify and document best practices that can be shared and taken to
scale based on demonstrated success.

LAEP is one of 118 Development pre-applicants to submit an application for the FY 2014 Full
Application Development Competition. LAEP will address Absolute Priority 2: Improving Low-
Performing Schools, subpart (b) improve students non-cognitive abilities and enhance student
engagement in learning or mitigate the effects of poverty on student engagement in learning. LAEP will
work with nine small schools and three comprehensive schools organized into small learning
communities in LAUSD that enroll more than 10,000 middle or high school students. As part of the
NCLB CORE waiver that eight California districts received from the U.S. Dept. of Education, LAUSD
identified 97 schools as priority (lowest 5%) or focus (within-school achievement gap or low-
achieving subgroup) for intervention. All the schools we will work with are designated priority or
focus or are newly built schools whose students come from focus schools. Our targeted focus
schools are uniformly poor (88% National School Lunch Program) and Latino (95%), meaning that there
are effectively no comparison subgroups to create a within-school achievement gap; instead these
schools have low-achieving subgroups. The grant would serve students at

Bethune Middle School
Cesar Chavez Learning Academy: ArTES and Social Justice Humanitas
Dr. John E. Deasy, Superintendent 2 September 9, 2014

Diego Rivera Learning Complex: Communication and Technology School and Public Service
Community School
Esteban E. Torres High School: East Los Angeles Performing Arts Academy, East Los Angeles
Renaissance Academy, Engineering & Technology Academy, Humanitas Academy of Arts and
Technology, and Social Justice Leadership Academy
Fremont High School (3 SLCs and one magnet)
Sonia Sotomayor Learning Academy: School of History and Dramatic Arts
Studio School

All of the participating schools are already familiar with the proposed activities and have signed the
MOU. Funding requested is $1 million per year for three years.

Founded in 1984, LAEP pioneered career academies in Los Angeles in 1986; developed the Humanitas
instructional model that is interdisciplinary, project-based and well-aligned with the Common Core State
Standards in 1987; assisted teacher-design teams in creating 10 semiautonomous pilot schools in the
2000s; has become the local leader in developing community schools; and is a sought-after provider of
professional development. In 2013, LAEP consolidated its work in some of the highest-need campuses
in LAUSD to provide high-quality instruction, career themes with Linked Learning experiences, and
community schools offering coordinated cognitive and non-cognitive supports. LAEPs innovative
approach places a community-school coordinator on each campus to collaborate with the school
community to develop solutions to local problems and to integrate services.
LAEPs project design arises from its work in three areas:

Humanitas: interdisciplinary instruction, project-based learning, teacher networks
Linked Learning: career themes, career experiences, workplace preparation
Community Schools: personalization, non-cognitive supports, community collaboration

Through their work with LAEP, some schools are exemplars in one or more of these areas. But due to
the multiple challenges in high-poverty schools and lack of resources, none of the schools excels in all
these areas.

LAEPs approach is novel in another way. LAEP builds sustainable success in our partner schools. Other
organizations at times impose strategies that end when the organization stops working with a school. We
are philosophically opposed to top-down solutions because they do not build the buy-in necessary for
permanent improvement. Our mission-driven approach builds capacity by assisting schools in
developing distributed leadership, schoolwide collaboration, effective teacher practice and a community-
school system for providing personalized supports. In this way, LAEPs strategies and model become
embedded in the school culture for sustainable success with grassroots support from educators, students
and parents.

LAEPs work is guided by six core principles for school transformation that synthesize the best practices
learned from Humanitas, career academies, community schools and research. The six core principles are
the long-term goals of this project:

High quality instruction enables all students to graduate
Teachers are empowered to collaborate and share in distributed leadership

All students graduate college and career ready
All parents are invested in their childs success in school
All youth are empowered to take responsibility for their education
Greater educational equity reduces learning barriers for historically underperforming subgroups
of students.

LAEPs six core elements will address the desired outcomes of Absolute Priority 2, subpart b:

SUBPART B PROJECT CORE PRINCIPAL OR ACTIVITY
MOTIVATION Parents as partners, youth development, college and career experiences
PERSISTENCE Youth development, parents as partners
RESILIENCE Youth development as peer mentors or mediators; personalization and
community school to address cognitive and noncognitive needs of each
student in a small-school environment.
ENGAGEMENT IN
LEARNING
Learning via high-quality, inquiry-based, project-based instruction;
college and career experiences; teacher collaboration
MITIGATE THE
EFFECTS OF
POVERTY
Learning via high-quality, inquiry-based, project-based instruction;
college and career experiences; teacher collaboration

This project has garnered private support to fund some aspects of the model. However, it is not being
fully implemented. An i3 development grant will add features that LAEP considers essential for success:
1) An associate director of Transform Schools and two transformation coaches who will collaborate with
school administrators on full-scale school systems improvement and coordination of instructional
resources and strategies in the three geographic areas in which our target schools are clustered: East
L.A., South L.A., Northeast San Fernando Valley. Transformation coaches are critical because schools
do not have the capacity to tackle whole-scale improvement on their own. 2) Five content coaches who
will work with teachers to implement Common Core, integrate career experiences into project-based
lessons, develop inquiry-based lessons in core subjects, and strengthen teachers skills in areas of
weakness. Content coaches are essential to delivery of high-quality, engaging instruction that prepares
students for college and careers. 3) Salaries of two community-school coordinators who are not already
funded by private grants. The coordinators align collaborators and resources and match them to needs of
individual students to eliminate barriers to learning. Also, they collaborate with teachers, students,
parents and partner organizations to build systems, services and activities at the school that support and
enrich students.

A development grant will enable LAEP to improve fidelity to this comprehensive model, students non-
cognitive abilities and engagement, academic success, and college- and career- readiness, while
developing a cadre of teacher-leaders to embed and sustain the reforms. By showing the effectiveness of
this model to improve low-performing schools, we will establish the potential for replication in urban
public schools. The project design includes evaluation by Public Works and the Annenberg Institute for
School Reform at Brown University, which is developing a technical guide to school reform aligned
with LAEPs six core elements and wishes to do case studies of our work and evaluation of our model.
The evaluation will seek to study how LAEPs proposed solution (six core elements) affect both school
culture and student outcomes.


If you have any questions, please contact Angel Barrett at 213-241-8700.

TAB 19
Submission of ESC West/LMU Professional Development for Arts Educators Grant Application for 2014
-2018 Funding Cycle
Action Proposed:
of a 2014 grant application to the US Department of Education (USDOE) from ESC West and Loyola
Marymount University (LMU). Funding requested is $1,259,935 over four years.
If the grant is awarded, six public elementary schools in the Westchester and Playa Vista communities of Los
Angeles, with, on average, 55% percent of students from low-income families will participate in the
professional development program. These elementary schools include: Loyola Village ES; Playa Vista ES;
Cowan Avenue ES; Kentwood Avenue ES; Westport Heights ES; and Paseo del Rey ES. These schools are
currently part of LMUs Family of Schools Collaborative. This grant augments work already being done in
these schools.
Background:
The Project proposed by the Los Angeles Unified School District, Educational Services Center West (LAUSD)
and the School of Educations Family of Schools (FOS) at Loyola Marymount University (LMU) will meet the
Absolute Priority of the U.S. Department of Educations 2014 Professional Development for Arts Educators
Program by implementing a minimum 40-hour professional development program for K-12 arts educators and
other instructional staff that uses innovative instructional methods and current knowledge from education
research and focuses on the development, enhancement of standards has based arts professional development.
This grant augments Loyola Marymount Universitys work through its Family of Schools program to provide a
high quality professional development opportunity to meet the Visual Arts Historical and Cultural Standard for
grades 1-5. LAUSD teachers will meet the Historical and Cultural Standard by learning from LMUs African
American and Chicano Departments cultural and historical experts, and be trained by local Master artists and
educators. This team will provide a master professional development course for teachers that will bring together
diverse skill sets and knowledge to deliver a multifaceted and well-rounded program. This evidence-based
professional development program is designed to uplift the cultures most LAUSD & LMU/Integrating L.A.s
Culture & Context into Visual Arts PD prominent among LAUSD students as a basis for meeting the California
State Standards. While the Los Angeles area has a rich diversity with populations from around the Globe,
LAUSD is comprised primarily of those of African and Latino Descent. In LAUSD, African Americans make
up 9% of the population and Latinos make up 74% of the population. LMU faculty members will provide an
understanding of Black and Latino culture nationally, and within the Los Angeles region. They will make
connections between the history and culture, emphasizing how art has been used to express these groups
diverse experiences. A local artist will work with teachers to learn creative expression and show how they have
integrated history and culture into their works of art. Finally two master visual arts instructors will work with
teachers to create integrated lesson plans for their 1
st
through 5
th
grade classes.
One teacher from each of the grades 1 -5 across all 6 public elementary schools will participate annually over
powered by Legistar
167
the four-year Project period. In years 2 through 4 of the grant period, 30 teachers will participate each year,
resulting in 90 teachers, or 75% of the teaching population at these schools being trained.
Expected Outcomes:
Through this overall experience, teachers will meet the following goals:
1. Acquire specific knowledge about history and cultures of two diverse groups in Los Angeles;
2. Understand the connection between history, culture and art;
3. Experience several approaches to art that incorporates this knowledge;
4. Connect with local artists, museums and other art resources;
5. Develop robust arts curricula that meet their grade level standards for Culture and Context.
The outcomes evaluation will include assessments of teacher knowledge, quality of lesson planning and quality
of student work. This will be a longitudinal study of teachers art knowledge based on the curriculum of the PD
instructors, comfort with teaching and integrating visual arts, and perceptions of art education expertise. The
evaluation is designed to use teachers from the same schools who have not participated in the professional
develop to serve as comparison groups, and once each group is trained, they will be followed over the 3-year
Project implementation to observe their ongoing development. This study will include a Pre/Post Summer
Training PD and 1-year test of art knowledge based on the curriculum of the PD instructors, comfort with
teaching and integrating visual arts, and perceptions of art education expertise. The evaluation will include all 1
st
through 5
th
grade art teachers from the six Project sites. We expect that 75% of the 1
st
through 5
th
grade art
teachers will have been trained by the Project cycle in 2017.
Expert review by instructors of lesson plans and art pieces and the integration of culture and context into those
pieces will be conducted before the arts PD workshop and then annually until the end of the grant period as will
expert review of student work over the 3 years as part of the African American and Latin@ cultural arts work.
ESC West and LMU prepared an application for grants under the US Department of Education. Approval by
the Board will support submission of this proposal for funding from USDOE to support further implementation
for 6 schools.
If the Board does not approve this application, the program will not be developed in these schools.
Loyola Marymount University through its Family of Schools Collaborative will provide a high quality
professional development opportunity to meet the Visual Arts Historical and Cultural Standard for grades 1-5.
LAUSD teachers will meet the Historical and Cultural Standard by learning from LMUs African American
and Chicano Departments cultural and historical experts, and be trained by local Master artists and educators.
This project is consistent with LAUSD policies supporting arts integration, culturally-relevant pedagogy and
the common core state standards.
Budget Impact:
powered by Legistar
168
Increase in federal competitive grants of $1.3 million over 4 years for selected schools.
None
Attachments:
Informatives:
powered by Legistar
169
TAB 20
[Memorandum of Understanding: Channel Sharing (KLCS/KCETLink)]
Action Proposed:
Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Los Angeles Unified School District and
KCETLink for broadcast incentive auction channel sharing.
Background:
The District is the owner of a license issued by the Federal Communications Commission for Frequency (MHz)
632-638 spectrum, which is used to broadcast KLCS. In June 2015 the FCC will conduct a Broadcast
Incentive Auction under which broadcasters such as KLCS may relinquish some of its spectrum usage rights
in exchange for money. The money would originate with mobile broadband providers such as Verizon and
AT&T which will pay the FCC for spectrum usage rights, the FCC will then pay the owners of bandwidth
licenses who have given up their spectrum.
Prior to participating in the auction, broadcasters must enter into sharing agreements that provide that one
broadcaster will auction its spectrum and divide the proceeds with the other broadcaster who, in turn, will share
its bandwidth KLCS proposes to enter into this MOU regarding Channel Sharing with KCETLink - a public
television station. Under the MOU the District commits to entering into a channeling sharing agreement with
KCETLink and foregoes negotiations with other broadcasters.
Expected Outcomes:
Approval of this MOU will enable KLCS to jointly partner with KCETLink to develop a channeling sharing
agreement and make commitments regarding the subsequent auction of spectrum usage rights. The proposed
channeling sharing agreement, and recommendation regarding disposition of revenues realized from such a
spectrum usage rights auction, will be subject to Board action in the Spring 2015 timeframe.
The Board of Education will retain its FCC broadcast license and bandwidth sufficient to sustain broadcast
capabilities. In 2-3 years, bandwidth will be increased beyond current capacities.
N/A
Budget Impact:
There is no budget impact to this action, which is an approval of a MOU for joint partnering with KCETLink to
develop a channel sharing agreement.
Channel Sharing with KCETLink will not impact the Board of Educations FCC broadcast license. KLCS will
retain broadcasting abilities and receive equal bandwidth from KCETLink.
powered by Legistar
Attachments:
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding
Informatives:
Informative: Recommendation Spectrum Channel Sharing Memorandum of Understanding
powered by Legistar
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This memorandum of understanding (MOU) is dated as of August 7, 2014, between
KCETLink, 2900 West Alameda Ave., Burbank, CA 91505, and KLCS, 1061 West Temple
Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (KLCS) and confirms the basic understanding between the
parties in connection with channel sharing, as that term is understood in connection with the
Reports and Orders of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted April 27,
2012 and J une 2, 2014 (individually and collectively Order) in response to the Middle Class
Tax Relief and J ob Creation Act of 2012 ( (the Spectrum Act), the spectrum incentive auction
as authorized in the Spectrum Act (Auction), and the FCCs 2010 National Broadband Plan
upon the terms and conditions set forth below.
Subject to the approval of this MOU by each partys Board of Directors, as evidenced by a
written Resolution by each such Board, and provided this MOU is signed by both parties no later
than 60 days within electronic receipt thereof, this MOU will become binding and effective upon
the signature date set forth below. The parties agree they will not discuss channel sharing with
any other third party once this MOU is fully-executed.
In addition to sharing bandwidth, and unrelated to the specifics of said sharing, the parties agree
that they will share on a 50/50 basis the proceeds derived from the sale of 6MHz of spectrum
surrendered by the applicable party in the Auction. The parties agree to determine in good faith
which party will surrender its spectrum based on the best economic advantage for both parties.
The parties agree that whichever party surrenders its spectrum in the Auction, said party will
accept the proffered FCC Auction price unconditionally.
KLCS acknowledges that KCETLink has engaged Media Venture Partners as its consultant in
connection with, among other things, the possible early monetization of its spectrumrights in
connection withthe Auction. KCETLink is responsible for 100% of the costs incurred for such
services and said engagement does not confer any third party beneficiaryrights or obligations on
KLCS, unless otherwise agreed to by thepartiesin writing.
1. Share of Bandwidth: Pursuant to the Order, theparties wish to equally share one 6 MHz
channel or 19.39 Megabits per second (Mb/s) as allocated under the current ATSC
system. The engineering staffs of each party will work together to design a mutually
agreed upon best plan for sharing bandwidth to achieve the best engineering solution
for each party. Each party shall be entitled to 9.695Mb/s (the Bit Allowance) for their
respective broadcast needs. In connection therewith, each party agrees that:
(a) It will allocate the requisite amount of bits for the common PSIP information
necessary to provide the required tuning and guide information. As such:
(i) The bits devoted to the common requirements will be deducted equally
from each partysBit Allowance;
(ii) The parties shall mutually agree to the minimum number of days of Event
Information Tableinformation to be provided;
2
(iii) Other than the required common PSIP information, each entity is free to
set the bit rates for audio, video or other ancillary data it wishes to
broadcast;
(iv) The parties understand and agree that a number of null packets may be
required for the TV receivers to respond properly (the amount of required
null packets shall be deducted equally from each partys Bit Allowance).
The partiesagree to work together to insure proper reception and decoding
of the signal; and
(v) The parties may elect to have separate encoding facilities and have one
combiner to join the streams together for transmission if technically
possible, or the parties may elect to have oneencoding pool if desired.
(b) Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary in paragraph 1. (a), the
parties may mutually agree to combine their Bit Allowances into one pool for
encoding efficiency and better picture quality. Such an agreement will have a
weighting system as allowed by the encoding pool to allow each party to
prioritize their program streams(Encoding Agreement). In that instance:
(i) Each party will have one program stream each to have the highest priority;
(ii) Other sub channels (program streams) will have a lesser priority as agreed
uponby the parties. This determination of settings will be mutually agreed
upon by the parties based on empirical testing by the parties to allow the
best results for both parties. Given there is a likelihood that an uneven
amount of streams will be required by each party, the respective
engineering staffs will work cooperatively to devise a system that
produces the best results for each party with minimum picture
degradation; and
(iii) In the event the parties cannot agree on such settings, thebandwidth will
be divided as described in Paragraph 1. (a) herein.
(c) Each party shall have the right to monitor and audit the encoding system to insure
compliance with theEncoding Agreement. All records of the encoding shall be
available to each party uponwritten request during normal business hours;
(d) Either party may make a portion of their Bit Allowanceavailable to the other for
exploitation under mutually agreed uponterms;
(e) Each party agrees to separately maintain and insure that all FCC requirements are
met regarding theoperation of itslicense, including but not limited to, compliance
with all FCC rules, regulations, and orders; and
3
(f) In the event that a new standard of modulation is adopted and approved by the
FCC, the parties shall divide the available bandwidth (bit rate) as described in
Paragraph 1. The parties may also mutually agree to divide the bandwidth as
described in Paragraph 1. (b).
2. Transmitter:
(a) The parties agree to share one main transmission facility (Facility). They will
share equally the responsibility of maintenance and upkeep of the Facility and
will shareequallyin the cost of said maintenance and upkeep.
(b) Both parties will have unrestricted access to the Facility.
(c) The parties will mutually agree upon redundancy and power back up for the
Facility, and the cost in connection therewith will be considered part of the
maintenance cost of the Facility.
(d) With the likelihood of the frequency being changed in the repacking of broadcast
channels by the FCC, the respectiveengineering staffs of the parties will mutually
agree as to the nature and design of a new transmitter, antenna and radio
frequency (RF) system, if required for the repack.
(e) Other secondary transmission facilities may be desired by either or both parties.
Either party may have such a facility without the consent of the other. In such
event, eachpartywill separately agree if it wishesto participate inthe purchase or
rental and ongoing maintenance of such facilities. Such an agreement will be
negotiated separately and is not a part of this MOU. The content of the shared
channel may not be used in such a facility without the express written agreement
of the parties. Either party may use its own content for such a facility without
permission of the other party.
3. Warranties:
(a) Each party warrants to the other party that it has authority to enter into this MOU.
(b) Each party warrants to the other party that it has all governmental and regulatory
licenses and approvals required to operate its respectivetransmitter.
4. Indemnities: Each party (Indemnifying Party) shall indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless the other party and its affiliated companies and its respective officers, directors,
employees and partners (collectively, Representatives) against all liabilities, claims, demands,
actions, costs, damages and loss (collectively, Liabilities) arising out of any breach by the
Indemnifying Party of any warranty or of the terms of this MOU. Notwithstanding anything
contained herein to the contrary, neither party shall hold the other responsible for any loss or
interruption of service resulting from failure of the Facility. Both parties will work cooperatively
to restore services as soon as any interruption occurs.
4
5. Termination: Either party may terminate this MOU only if (i) the other party is in
material breach of this MOU and does not cure the breach within ten (10) business days after
receiving written notice of such breach, or (ii) the other party becomes insolvent, or voluntary or
involuntary bankruptcy or insolvency or other similar proceedings are instituted against the
party.
6. Confidentiality: In the performance of this MOU, either party may be receiving
information related to the other party's business operations or which is designated as proprietary
or confidential by the other party ("Confidential Information"). The party receiving any such
Confidential Information (the "Receiving Party") shall hold such Confidential Information in
strictest confidence for the exclusive use of the Receiving Party, and the Receiving Party shall
not take any action in derogation of such confidentiality. The Receiving Party shall take all
reasonable steps to insure that the Confidential Information is not used by or made available or
furnished or disclosed to any other party (other than the Receiving Party's employees directly
concerned with the performance of this MOU and who need such disclosure for the conduct of
their ordinary work responsibilities), including, but not limited to, taking all steps it takes to
protect information, data or other tangible or intangible property of its own that it regards as
proprietary or confidential. Information shall not be deemed "Confidential Information" which
(i) is or has become publicly known or is used in the industry in question as of the date of receipt
by the Receiving Party other than through disclosure by the Receiving Party; (ii) is already in the
possession of, or actually and demonstrably is known to, the Receiving Party at the time of
disclosure; (iii) is rightfully received by the Receiving Party from a third party without breach of
any duty of nondisclosure; or (iv) is approved for public release by written authorization from
the party disclosing any Confidential Information.
7. Notices: Any notices under this MOU shall be in writing and delivered to the President
and CEO of KCETLink and the General Manager of KLCS to the respective address aboveby
overnight delivery service, fax or e-mail. Copies of such notices shall be made to the respective
designated attorney or General Counsel of each party and to Gordon Bell of KCETLink and Alan
Popkin of KLCS.
8. Miscellaneous: The parties understand that as of the date of this MOU, the FCC has not
adopted a final Report and Order pertaining to all aspects of the Auction, i.e., precise channels to
be sold in the forward auction andmethodology for ascertaining value to the Commission of the
stations, i.e., for stations acquired for the forward auction to broadband or for repacking. The
parties intend to execute a more detailed long-form agreement containing the foregoing and
other provisions customary for similar agreements in the broadcast and communications
industries relating to the Spectrum Act, including but not limited to, spectrum valuation,
limitation of liabilities, assignment, jurisdiction, conflicts of laws, severability, andamendment.
Such long-term agreement shall be consistent with all applicable FCC rules, either now in
existence or with prospective FCC rules and shall be subject to good faith negotiationbut shall
not change the material terms agreed to herein. Until the execution of such long form
agreement, this MOU sets forth all of the material terms and conditions of the agreement
between the parties. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, nothing in this
MOU shall violate any of the terms and conditions of the Order or any such subsequent FCC
5
orders in connection with the Spectrum Act. If it is determined by either party that any term or
condition herein is in violation of the Order or any such subsequent order, the parties agreethe
MOU shall be amended to be in compliancewith the Order or any such subsequent order.
KLCS KCETLink
By: ___________________________ By: __________________________
Sabrina Fair Thomas Al J erome
KLCS General Manager President and CEO
Date: __________________________ Date: _________________________
By: ___________________________
Dr. Richard Vladovic
President, Board of Education
Date: __________________________
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
No. 075-14/ 15
For 9-9-14 Board Meeting
KLCS TV
INFORMATIVE
September 9, 2014
TO: Members, Board of Education
Dr. J ohn Deasy, Superintendent
FROM: Sabrina Fair Thomas, KLCS General Manager
SUBJ ECT: RECOMMENDATION SPECTRUM CHANNEL SHARING:
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
The purpose of this memorandumis to submit a recommendation for KLCS to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with KCETLink regarding channel sharing in the
upcoming Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Spectrum Auction. The MOU and
subsequent Agreement will retain the Board of Educations FCC license and ability to broadcast
and operate KLCS. The purpose of the MOU is for both parties to commit to channel sharing and
to prohibit further third party considerations. A formal Agreement will be developed by April
2015 following formalized FCC rules governing the SpectrumAuction.
BACKGROUND
As detailed in an April 4, 2014 Informative, The FCC has been asked by Congress to encourage
broadcasters to sell Ultra High Frequency (UHF) spectrum to clear additional broadband for
wireless carriers. Given its geographic and demographic market area, KLCS spectrum is
extremely valuable, and auctionproceeds designated exclusively for KLCS can allow the Board
to retain the Stations license without General Fund contributions. Through an auction
process scheduled for J une 2015, broadcasters, including KLCS, will be encouraged to 1) sell
spectrum they do not use, 2) share with other broadcasters to free upspectrum or 3) move to Very
High Frequency (VHF) channels (7-13).
RECOMMENDATION
After extensive research and analysis of multiple scenarios and offers, Option 2 will enable
KLCS to share its bandwidthwith the recommended partner, KCETLink, essentially broadcasting
multiple program streams in the bandwidth of one station. In the proposed plan, KCETLink or
KLCS will auction its spectrum and share bandwidth. The proceeds from the auction will be
divided equally betweenthe stations. Negotiations between KCETLink and KLCS have resulted
in a MOU that has been reviewed by KLCS FCC Counsel; is under reviewby LAUSD counsel,
and will be executed upon Board approval. The MOU is highly desirable in part because
KCETLink and KLCS already share a transmitter site, as well as a philosophical commitment to
the betterment of educational services and public media in Los Angeles. The MOU also includes
critical considerations such as allocation of bandwidth, rights of access to facilities, handling of
operation, maintenance, and modification of facilities, each partys financial obligations (if
applicable), and termination or transfer/sale rights.
Strategically, time is of the essence. Stations are scrambling to create partnerships and in this
phase of musical chairs, KLCS does not want to be left without a seat at the FCC Auction table.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1) The Agreement will provide off budget funding for KLCS for the foreseeable future
while maintaining the Districts control of a television channel for educational purposes
2) KLCS and KCETLink currently share a common transmitter site
a. Enables the best use of existing assets
b. Simplest engineering
c. Reduces potential cost of decommissioning existing plant
3) KCET is a non commercial station as well
a. Reduces potential tax liability to maximize return
b. Eliminates the potential for objectionable material that could be tied to the
District
4) KCET is committed to accepting theprice the FCC will offer
a. Commercial stations may drop out if the price goes below a multiple of cash flow
leaving KLCS without a partner and essentially unable to participate in the
benefit of the auction
5) The capacity we would be giving up is not needed to fulfill the existing mission
a. With the near term implementation of a new transmission standard (3-5 years) we
would actually have more capacity in the future than we currently have
6) The partnership can evolve with the potential of reshaping the Public Media space in Los
Angeles for the public and educational benefit of all
The terms of the MOU are highly sensitive and should be considered strictly confidential
and maintained under a cone of silence. If there are additional questions, please contact meat
213-241-4050.
c. Michelle King
David Holmquist
Enrique Boullt
Jefferson Crain
Thomas Waldman
RESOLUTIONS
171
0123456789
TAB 21
File #: Res-001-14/15, Version: 2
Ms. Galatzan - Keeping Parents Informed: Charter Transparency (Res-001-14/15) (Noticed August 26, 2014)
Whereas, Charter schools were established in 1992 by the California Education Code as a way to encourage
innovation, increase opportunities for teaching and learning and expand school choice for parents and students;
Whereas, A Board of Education or other authorizing entity grants a charter with the expectation that a school
will adhere to the procedures outlined in its petition and uphold the publics trust in carrying out the agreement;
Whereas, California Education Code 47607 allows an authorizing entity to grant a charter for a period not to
exceed five years and to grant one or more renewals of five years each;
Whereas, California Education Code 47606(c)(2) states, Charter schools shall, on a regular basis, consult with
their parents, legal guardians and teachers regarding the school's educational programs;
Whereas, California Education Code 47604.32 requires the authorizing entity, including the Governing Board
of the Los Angeles Unified School District, to provide oversight of a charter schools operations, including its
fiscal conditions and financial operations:
Whereas, California Ed Code 47604.3 requires charter schools to respond to all reasonable inquiries from its
chartering authority, including those regarding its financial records;
Whereas, The District requires every charter school to cooperate with investigations of waste, fraud, abuse and
other material violations of law related to its operation;
Whereas, California Education Code 47607(c) states that the authorizing entity may revoke a charter through
the showing of substantial evidence that the school did any of the following: Committed a material violation of
any of the conditions, standards or procedures set forth in the charter; failed to meet or pursue any of the pupil
outcomes identified in the charter; failed to meet generally accepted accounting principles or engaged in fiscal
mismanagement; violated any provision of the law;
Whereas, California Education Code 47607(c)-(e) and corresponding state regulations require the chartering
authority to adhere to the following procedures when revoking a charter: Issuance of a Notice of Violations;
issuance of a Notice to Revoke and Notice of Facts in Support of Revocation; public hearing; final vote;
Whereas, The District currently requires charter schools to notify parents and guardians within 72 hours of a
closure action and to simultaneously provide proof of the notification to the Charter Schools Division, but does
not mandate any such notice when the revocation process is initiated or underway;
Whereas, When a school has a renewal hearing before the Board, there is currently no requirement that a school
must inform parents, legal guardians, and teachers of the outcome; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Los Angeles Unified School District expects a charter management organization or charter
powered by Legistar
school to be transparent with its stakeholders regarding all aspects of its operation, including the possible
revocation of its charter;
Resolved further, That a charter school be required to notify all parents, guardians and teachers in writing
within 72 hours when the district issues a of the Issuance of Notice of Violations, and to issue another
notification if a Notice of Intent to Revoke and/or the Recommendation for Non-renewal is issued; and that the
notification include the districts rationale for the action. The school shall also be required to simultaneously
provide proof of the notification to the Charter Schools Division; and, be it finally
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District encourages each charter
school to inform parents, legal guardians, and other stakeholders of the outcome of its renewal hearings.
powered by Legistar
TAB 22
Ms. Garca, Dr. McKenna, Ms. Ratliff - Celebrating Latino Heritage Month (Res-002-14/15) (Noticed August
26, 2014)
Whereas, The United States Congress approved Public Law 90-498 in 1968 to designate the week of September
15th as National Hispanic Heritage Week;
Whereas, President Obama previously declared that Latinos have helped shape our communities and expand
our country, from laboratories and industry to board rooms and classrooms;
Whereas, The week-long observance was expanded in 1988 by Congress to a month-long celebration (Sept. 15
- Oct. 15), effective the following year;
Whereas, Understanding Latino history and culture is an important part of celebrating Latino Heritage Month;
Whereas, Many Latinos trace their roots to Indigenous, African or European ancestry, as well as to Mexico,
Central America, South America and the Caribbean;
Whereas, The September-October period covers a wide range of Independence Days for the Latin American
countries of Central America, South America, the Caribbean and Mexico;
Whereas, Latino Heritage Month is a time when Latinos honor their spirit of self-determination, dignity, and
respect for cultural heritage;
Whereas, Latino Heritage Month celebrates the history and culture of the nations Latinos and acknowledges
their influence on politics, the economy, and the social and cultural life throughout the United States;
Whereas, The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) notes there are 5850
Latino elected officials nationwide which only represents 1.13% of an estimated 513,200 elected officials
nationwide.
Whereas, Latinos are the nations largest ethnic or racial minority in the United States, constituting 17% of the
U.S. population.
Whereas, Those persons who have come from Latin American countries have long added a special quality and
enrichment to the cultural heritage and institutions of the United States, the State of California, the City of Los
Angeles and the Los Angeles Unified School District; and
Whereas, More than 70% of the Districts elementary and secondary students are Latino; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District hereby promotes September
15th through October 15th as Latino Heritage Month; and, be it finally
powered by Legistar
174
Resolved, That by adoption of this resolution, the Board hereby encourages all students, faculty, administrators,
and parents, to remember and celebrate the contributions that Latinos have made to California and the United
States.
powered by Legistar
175
TAB 23
Ms. Garca, Mr. Zimmer, Dr. Vladovic - Resolution Calling for Comprehensive Immigration Reform and
Accountability in America (Res-003-14/15) (Noticed August 26, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District (District) has the responsibility to protect the educational
rights of all children and serve those who comply with laws that mandate compulsory education;
Whereas, Again an unprecedented number of children have been forced to flee from their home countries in
Central America to seek refuge in the United States;
Whereas, Data collected by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) shows that since
October 2013, more than 51,000 Central American children have experienced this traumatic journey of family
and home separation, which represents a substantial increase from prior years;
Whereas, It is estimated that 90,000 children will enter the United States from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015;
Whereas, According to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, approximately two-
thirds of the minors who have recently arrived qualify for international protections as a result of violence and
abuse in their home countries;
Whereas, The William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of
2008, signed into law under George W. Bush, in conjunction with previous legislation, makes it illegal to send
away unaccompanied children from non-congruous countries;
Whereas, Returning Central American children to their home countries would be a violation of the protections
granted under the William Wilberforce Act and more importantly, a violation of our moral principles;
Whereas, Since its inception in 1781, the City of Los Angeles has been the first home to many immigrant
families;
Whereas, Los Angeles is home to the largest concentration of Central Americans living outside of their
respective countries, with an estimated population of one million nationals who are inextricably linked to their
homeland;
Whereas, Los Angeles benefits from a rich network of culturally competent organizations and
service providers with expertise in addressing the needs of Central American and Latino immigrant
communities;
Whereas, Labor, community and faith based organizations have banded together to stand as one to provide
these children dignity and justice;
Whereas, California State law and District policy provides for protection of the educational rights of all
powered by Legistar
176
students within District boundaries, and it is our goal to ensure the immediate enrollment of all students
including children who are new to the country;
Whereas, The District does not discriminate against students based on their immigration status;
Whereas, The District launched the Student Enrollment and Placement Assistance (SEPA) Center to facilitate
the enrollment and adaptation to newly arriving immigrant students to District schools;
Whereas, Historically the District has received immigrant children and youth into the educational system to
provide comprehensive academic, health and socio-emotional support;
Whereas, Unaccompanied youth are guaranteed immediate enrollment regardless of the availability of school
records, immunization records and school uniforms; and
Whereas, The SEPA Center (formerly the GAP Center) has seen an influx of children from Central America.
For example, in 2013-14 the Center helped approximately 1,800 students, an increase of 400 more cases (29%
increase) seen by SEPA Center than in previous years (despite being open less days/time than in comparison
years), and in the last three months of the 2013-14 school year, the SEPA Center saw a large influx of families
(children) immigrating to Los Angeles from Central America; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District reaffirms its commitment to
educating all children;
Resolved further, That the Board will again be the national model in receiving, supporting, and nurturing
unaccompanied children into the United States;
Resolved further, That the Board urges President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry to ensure the
humane treatment of the thousands of minors being detained and to extend the necessary level of protections
including humanitarian relief, advocacy, legal support, expeditious reunification of minors with their families
and consideration of their status as refugees;
Resolved further, That the Board urges the federal government to strengthen protections for unaccompanied
minor children and enact comprehensive immigration reform policies that will teach and affirm the ideals of
our United States of America as set forth by the original undocumented immigrants; and, be it finally
Resolved, That this resolution be forwarded to President Obama, Vice President Biden, the California
Congressional Delegation and Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson.
powered by Legistar
177
TAB 24
Ms. Galatzan - Expanding Educational Equity and Achievement for Title I Students (Res-004-14/15) (Noticed
August 26, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District is committed to providing all children with a world-class
education, regardless of socioeconomic status or other factors, and
students living in material poverty are especially deserving of services to help them
succeed academically;
Whereas, The federal government has long recognized the need to provide additional resources to children
living in poverty in order to advance equity in public education;
Whereas, President Lyndon Johnson established Title I funding in 1965 to help close the achievement gap
between low-income children and their middle-class peers;
Whereas, More than 75 percent of Los Angeles Unified students quality for the federal free and reduced-price
meal program, a measurement used to determine Title I eligibility;
Whereas, Local school boards are empowered to determine how to distribute Title I revenue to eligible
campuses, which are those with low-income enrollments of at least 35 percent;
Whereas, The District currently distributes Title I revenue using a two-tier system, which in 2014-15 allocated
$470 per student for schools with low-income enrollments of 50-64.99 percent; and $619 per student for
schools with 65 percent or more low-income students;
Whereas, The proportion of Title I funds allocated to the lower tier has historically been roughly 70 percent of
the dollars allocated to the 65-100 percent tier;
Whereas, A $34 million reduction in the Districts 2011-12 Title I allocation in 2011-12 prompted the
Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District to raise the eligibility threshold from 40 to 50
percent in order to shift more money to the highest-poverty schools;
Whereas, The State of California has reformed its education financing system through the Local Control
Funding Formula (LCFF), which provides additional revenue to help districts educate students living in
poverty, English Learners and foster youth;
Whereas, LCFF revenue to districts is expected to increase annually until 2020, when the system is fully
implemented;
Whereas, The Districts LCFF allocation for 2014-15 includes a base amount for every student, based on grade
level; a supplemental grant of $150 for each high-needs student (using an unduplicated count); and a
concentration grant of $400 for each unduplicated student in a high-needs category where the enrollment
powered by Legistar
exceeds 55 percent;
Whereas, Title I and LCFF supplemental revenue combined generate an additional $620 per student for schools
with low-income enrollments of 50-54.99 percent;
Whereas, Title I and LCFF supplemental and concentration revenue combined generate as much as $1,020
more per student for schools with low-income concentrations of 55-64.99 percent;
Whereas, Title I and LCFF supplemental and concentration revenue combined generate as much as $1,169
more per student for schools with low-income concentrations of 65 percent or above;
Whereas, LCFF supplemental grants generate an additional $150 student for each high-needs student at schools
where the low-income enrollment is less than 50 percent; and
Whereas, Schools in the 40-49.9 percent range struggle to educate significant numbers of low-income students
without additional federal Title I resources to support their work;
Whereas, That in addition to school-site funding, the Districts Title I budget includes allocations to cover
administration and federally mandated costs;
Whereas, Los Angeles Unified historically has a multimillion-dollar carryover of Title I revenue, and is
prohibited by law from allowing that surplus to exceed 15 percent; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District directs the Superintendent to
lower the Title I eligibility threshold to 40 percent and create a three-tiered funding system: 40-49.99 percent;
50-64.99 percent; and 65 to 100 percent;
Resolved, That any Title I carryover first be allocated to fund the tier that benefits schools in the 40-49.99
percent tier;
Resolved, That beginning with the 2015-2016 school year, the proportion of Title I funds allocated to the 40-
49.99 percent tier will be approximately 70 percent of the 50-64.99 percent tier, and the 50-64.99 percent tier
will be approximately 70 percent of the 65-100% tier, and finally be it
Resolved, That the balance of the carryover be allocated by Title I program staff as part of the annual budgeting
process.
powered by Legistar
TAB 25
Ms. Garca, Dr. McKenna, Dr. Vladovic - Declare September as Student Attendance Month (Res-005-14/15)
(Noticed August 26, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District (District) has a mission to reach 100% graduation and
student attendance remains the primary factor in academic achievement;
Whereas, The District has set a goal of 100% attendance for all students, and has set annual targets for the
number of students achieving 96% or higher attendance;
Whereas, The Districts Information Technology Division has created a number of attendance tracking systems
and early at-risk reports to monitor attendance trends of individual students, classes and schools to provide the
opportunity for prevention and intervention;
Whereas, The Pupil Services Unit has created an Attendance Policy and Procedures Manual to provide school
administrators with easy access to policy and procedures for enrollment, registration, accurate attendance
accounting, protocols for enforcement of mandated attendance, and templates for creation of annual School
Attendance and Dropout Prevention Plans;
Whereas, Chronic absenteeism, defined as missing ten percent or more of school days, is one of the strongest
indicators of future dropout, and chronic absenteeism in kindergarten predicts low academic achievement in
fifth grade, and by sixth grade, a pattern of absence is a predictor of high school dropout;
Whereas, One student drops out of school every 26 seconds; more than one million American high school
students drop out every year; one-third of all public high school students do not graduate with their class and
African Americans and Latinos have only a 50% chance of graduating with their class;
Whereas, Research shows that dropouts have lower earnings, have higher rates of criminal behavior and
incarceration, are less likely to be employed, are more likely to be dependent on public assistance, have poorer
health and higher rates of mortality;
Whereas, Research confirms the decision to drop out is complex and in fact, many students do not simply drop
out, but fade out over time or are pushed or forced out of school; and
Whereas, Predictors of school failure include lack of early education, low grades, language and literacy issues,
low test scores, school transfers and mobility, school suspensions, school culture, curriculum and teacher
quality, lack of parent engagement, poverty and race; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Los Angeles Unified School District will hold all school and District staff accountable to the
goal of increasing attendance; that every school and District office will develop plans to ensure that all students
are enrolled, attending and on track to graduate; that schools will create safe, welcoming environments that
powered by Legistar
180
engage both students and parents;
Resolved further, That the District will continue to promote attendance awareness using District websites,
media communications, social media networks, Student Recovery Day, the GradVan, the Los Angeles County-
Wide School Attendance Task Force and by using other educational and outreach partnerships and
opportunities;
Resolved further, That the District recognizes that student attendance affects everyone; and that students need
the support of parents, extended family and friends, schools, businesses, public officials, health providers,
religious institutions, community agencies as well as individuals throughout the City and County of Los
Angeles, the State of California and nationwide; and, be it finally
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District hereby declares the month of
September, 2014, as Student Attendance Month and supports activities to increase awareness of the importance
of student attendance.
powered by Legistar
181
TAB 26
Ms. Ratliff - Resolution to Declassify Reports of the Office of the Inspector General Relating to the
Procurement Process for the Common Core Technology Project (Res-007-14/15) (For Action October 14,
2014)
Whereas, There has been much public and media interest in the process by which Apple devices and Pearson
curriculum were selected for Phase 1 of the Common Core Technology Project (CCTP) of the Los Angeles
Unified School District; and
Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District seeks to promote transparency
regarding the procurement of computing devices for the CCTP; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the District hereby declassifies any report or reports prepared by its Office of the Inspector
General relating to the procurement process for the CCTP (OIG CCTP Procurement Reports), as non-
confidential; and, be it finally
Resolved, That the Districts Office of the Inspector General be, and it hereby is, directed to cause any OIG
CCTP Procurement Reports to be publicly disseminated as soon as practicable.
powered by Legistar
TAB 27
Ms. Ratliff - Resolution in Support of Attendance Equity (Res-008-14/15) (For Action October 14, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District recognizes the importance of the Compulsory Attendance
Law (California Education Code Section 48200), which underscores each students right and obligation to
receive an education by attending school daily;
Whereas, The District has set a goal of 100% attendance for all students, and has set annual targets for the
number of students achieving 96% or higher attendance;
Whereas, California Education Code Section 48205 (the Excused Absence Statute) provides the basis on
which a pupils absence from school shall be excused; and
Whereas, In the interest of enhancing consistency across the District, the Governing Board of the Los Angeles
Unified School District wishes to clarify certain circumstances that shall be deemed justifiable personal
reasons, within the meaning of paragraph (a)(7) of the Excused Absence Statute; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That administrators throughout the Los Angeles Unified School District shall interpret justifiable
personal reasons, as used in the Excused Absence Statute, as including the observance of a secular historical
remembrance or cultural holiday or ceremony (for example, Armenian Martyrs Day or Yom Hashoah); and, be
it finally
Resolved, That absences for justifiable personal reasons shall not count against a pupils eligibility for
District-wide awards based on attendance.
powered by Legistar
TAB 28
Ms. Garca - Celebrating National Coming Out Day, Building Allies for Safe Schools (Res-009-14/15) (For
Action October 14, 2014)
Whereas, National Coming Out Day was founded 26 years ago by two Angelenos who envisioned a
world where lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people could live truthfully and openly.
They believed that honest and genuine relationships would undermine the pervasive prejudice about
LGBT concerns. That vision still holds true.
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District models, advocates and promotes the safe and
respectful treatment of all our members;
Whereas, The month of October is recognized as National Bullying Prevention Month and LGBT
History Month;
Whereas, October 11
th
is recognized as National Coming Out Day, a day that promotes a safe world for
LGBTQ individuals and their allies to live truthfully and openly;
Whereas, Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) students who can identify an
out LGBT school staff or adult ally report a dramatic increase in feeling safe overall at their school;
Whereas, Almost 25% of students either have an LGBT family member or identify as LGBT
themselves;
Whereas, Sexual orientation and gender expression-biased bullying is among the most common forms
of harassment in schools;
Whereas, School dropout rate for LGBTQ students is up to triple the national rate of non-LGBTQ
students, due to peer harassment and bullying;
Whereas, We strive to ensure that District schools are consistently safe and affirming spaces for all
students and their families;
Whereas, Human Relations, Diversity and Equity, Health Education, Educational Equity Compliance,
and Project 10 are resources for trainings, consultation, activities, lessons, and service-learning projects
for and about LGBTQ concerns and are committed to fostering a safe and respectful District, school and
community culture;
Whereas, The District and the Los Angeles LGBT Center formed an initiative, Project SPIN (Suicide
Prevention Intervention Now), to support systemic efforts creating safe and supportive environments for
LGBTQ youth and to support all youth experiencing suicidal ideation; and
powered by Legistar
184
Whereas, By recognizing National Coming Out Day we reaffirm our commitment to the 1988
Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School Districts Resolution for the Respectful Treatment
of All Persons; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, By recognizing October 11
th
as National Coming Out Day, we the Governing Board of the
Los Angeles Unified School District support policies, practices and curriculum that honor and respect
lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning staff, students and their families.
powered by Legistar
185
TAB 29
Celebrating College Awareness at LAUSD to Encourage, Nurture, and Develop a Path to Success for All (Res-
010-14/15) (For Action October 14, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District (District) is committed to providing every student
with a quality education;
Whereas, The District has a clear mission of ensuring that every child graduates from high school
college-prepared and career ready;
Whereas, Attaining a college education serves as the gateway to better options and more
opportunities;
Whereas, Every day is a great opportunity to educate students about their rightful place in a college
classroom;
Whereas, Bold initiatives such as GO East LA: A Pathway for College and Career Success exemplify
partnerships that are instrumental in promoting a college-going culture and guaranteeing admission to
students that fulfill their expectations in their K-12 educational path;
Whereas, In 1960, the State of California instituted the Master Plan for Higher Education with a
promise that every qualified student wishing to pursue a college education would have access to one;
Whereas, The District recognizes that the opportunity to attend college is indispensable in
preparing our students for success in life;
Whereas, The District resolved to create educational equity by implementing A-G courses as a high
school graduation requirement;
Whereas, Policies such as the School Climate Bill of Rights and investments in our Health and Wellness
Centers have removed obstacles for students that want to be high school graduates;
Whereas, Through the efforts of the District family of leaders, principals, teachers, support staff,
parents, and students, we have witnessed an encouraging increase in the number of high school
graduates; and
Whereas, The District has welcomed the Class of 2027 to their kindergarten classrooms, and preparing
to launch the Class of 2015 into college; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District, hereby declares
October as College Awareness Month and authorizes the Superintendent to encourage all district staff to
powered by Legistar
186
promote a college-going culture, during the month of October and each and every day throughout the
year.
powered by Legistar
187
TAB 30
Ms. Garca - ARTE: All Rising Through Education (Res-011-14/15) (For Action October 14, 2014)
Whereas, Arts education is an important component of getting all students to 100 percent graduation;
Whereas, The Los Angeles Theatre Center (LATC) is a facility of the City of Los Angeles and operated by the
Latino Theater Company (LTC);
Whereas, In January 2006, the LTC was awarded a 20 year lease for the LATC from the City of Los Angeles
and received a $4 million grant from the California Cultural and Historic Endowment to refurbish the building;
Whereas, In 2008 the first full season was produced with multi-disciplinary programming that reflects the
population of Los Angeles;,
Whereas, Today the LATC is a world class arts center for those pursing artistic excellence; where both tradition
and innovation are honored and honed; a place where the convergence of people, cultures and ideas contribute
to the future;
Whereas, The LTC is committed to artistic professionalism, inclusion, and reflection of the cultural landscape
of Los Angeles;
Whereas, The LTC, will partner with the District on a groundbreaking opportunity to expose 10,000 high
school students to contemporary Latina/o Theater in the U.S. as they present the 2014 LATC, Encuentro: A
National Latina/o Theatre Festival;
Whereas, The National Latina/o Theater Festival also provides a perfect opportunity to add relevant arts
programming to Latino Heritage Month activities throughout the District; and
Whereas, From October 12
th
to November 10
th
, the LTC, in association with the Latina/o Theatre Commons
and Howlround, will host the largest national Latina/o Theatre Festival in over 25 years. Held at the historic
Los Angeles Theatre Center, the festival will feature over 100 artists representing 15 companies from across the
country, who will travel to Los Angeles to present their work to L.A. audiences for one month; now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District, welcomes The 2014 LATC
Encuentro: A National Latina/o Theatre Festival and agrees to partner with LATC and promote this celebration
of culture and performing arts that exposes our students to live theater, compelling stories, artistic inspiration
and community pride at this historic and groundbreaking event.
powered by Legistar
powered by Legistar
TAB 31
Ms. Garca - Celebrating Partnerships to Strengthen Civic Participation in LAUSD (Res-012-14/15) (For
Action October 14, 2014)
Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District (District) is committed to preparing all students to be
college and career-ready graduates despite the schools they attend or the neighborhoods in which they live;
Whereas, The District has continued to strengthen academic support systems to meet the needs of our students
to ensure their path to graduation;
Whereas, The Districts identity is defined by its promise of equality, respect for diversity, and commitment to
innovation;
Whereas, Like education, citizenship is an important symbol of full membership and participation in our
society that must be encouraged and not barred;
Whereas, The City of Los Angeles continuously ranks as one the municipalities with the highest concentrations
of residents of Korean ancestry outside of the Republic of Korea;
Whereas, The District has celebrated its ties with the Korean-American community by naming schools after
distinguished individuals, such as Dr. Sammy Lee Medical and Health Science Magnet Elementary School and
Young Oak Kim Academy;
Whereas, The Korean Resource Center (KRC) was founded in 1983 to empower the Korean American
community through a holistic model combining education, social services, and culture;
Whereas, The KRC, through its Immigrant Rights Program, has been promoting greater civic participation by
educating our community members to exercise the full extent of their civil rights;
Whereas, The District and the KRC have a common interest in educating our community members to become
integral, participating members of our society regardless of their immigration status or country of origin; and
Whereas, The District and the KRC are uniquely situated to distribute information regarding integrated
immigration services such as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and AB540 to immigrant families for
whom English proficiency is a barrier to full participation in our society; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Los Angeles Unified School District announce a formal partnership with the Korean
Resource Center to provide information about integrated immigration services and other available benefits to
Korean-American students and their families in the form of workshops, direct mailings, or other appropriate
tools; and, be it finally
powered by Legistar
Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District directs the Superintendent and
staff to work in partnership with the Korean Resource Center to disseminate information regarding integrated
immigration services at our schools, in a manner consistent with state law and District policy, to increase the
number of students and families that would benefit from immigration reform and to encourage greater civic
participation among the Korean-American and broader immigrant community, and asks the Los Angeles
County Office of Education to do the same.
powered by Legistar
TAB 32
File #: 0010-14/15, Version: 1
Resolution Authorizing the Execution of Deeds of Dedication of Easements at the Selma Workforce Housing and Joint
Parking Project for Street Widening and Cable Utility Services
powered by Legistar
190
1
NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO DEDICATE EASEMENTS
AT THE SELMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJ ECT
At a meeting of the Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles, Governing Board of the Los Angeles
Unified School District, held August 26, 2014, the following resolution was adopted by at least a two-
thirds vote of all its members:
RESOLVED: That the Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles, in pursuance of the
provisions of Sections 17556 through 17561, inclusive, of the Education Code of the State of California,
does hereby declare its intention to irrevocably offer to dedicateaneasement for street widening purposes
to the City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation (hereinafter called Street Easement Grantee) and
irrevocably offer to dedicate a general utility easement to Time Warner Cable, a private corporation,
(hereinafter called Utility Easement Grantee) at the Selma Workforce Housing Project with regard tothat
certain real property situated in the County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, State of California,
legally described on ExhibitsA-1 and A-2andalsoshown on ExhibitsB-1 and B-2attached hereto.
The proposed dedicationof easements to theCity of Los Angeles and Time Warner Cablewill be in the
form of an Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate and a Grant of Easement, respectively, as legally described in
ExhibitsA-1 and A-2and shown on ExhibitsB-1 and B-2attached hereto.
The Street Easement Grantee and the Utility Easement Grantee, shall respectively be responsible for
damage caused intentionally or by any negligent act or omission of the respective grantee, its agent or
employees while exercising the rights granted respectively herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That a public meeting of this Board beheld in the Los Angeles
Unified School District Board Room, 333 South Beaudry Avenue, 1st Floor, Los Angeles, 90017, the
regular place of meeting of this Board, at or about 4:00p.m., onSeptember 9, 2014for a public hearing
upon the question of such dedication.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That it is the intention of the Board at the time and place fixed
for such public hearing or meeting, unless a petition protesting against the proposed dedication, signed by
at least ten percent of the qualified electors of said Los Angeles Unified School District, as shown by the
affidavit of one of the petitioners, be filed with this Board, to order such dedications and adopt a
resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of the dedication of easements for street widening and
utility purposes.
Notice of the adoption of this resolution and of the time and place of holding said meeting shall be given
by posting copies of this resolution, signed by the members of this Board or a majority thereof, in three
public places in this Los Angeles Unified School District of Los Angeles County, not less than ten days
before the date of said meeting and by publishing a copy of this resolution once not less than five days
before the date of said meeting in a newspaper of general circulation published in the Los Angeles School
District of Los Angeles County.
191
192
193
194
195
196
TAB 33
File #: 0011-14/15, Version: 1
Charter Petitions for Public Hearing
powered by Legistar
197
L
O
S

A
N
G
E
L
E
S

U
N
I
F
I
E
D

S
C
H
O
O
L

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
C
H
A
R
T
E
R

S
C
H
O
O
L
S

D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
(
C
S
D
)
1
o
f

1
L
I
S
T

O
F

N
E
W

C
H
A
R
T
E
R

P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
S

F
O
R

P
U
B
L
I
C

H
E
A
R
I
N
G
B
O
A
R
D

O
F

E
D
U
C
A
T
I
O
N

M
E
E
T
I
N
G

S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R

9
,

2
0
1
4
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N

N
A
M
E

T
Y
P
E
C
S
D

T
E
A
M
A
S
S
I
G
N
M
E
N
T
B
D
E
S
C
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

A
R
E
A
/
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
G
R
A
D
E

L
E
V
E
L
S
#

O
F

S
T
U
D
E
N
T
S
T
E
R
M
1
.
M
a
s
s
i
s

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
w
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
6
N
V
a
n

N
u
y
s
,

C
A

9
1
4
0
1
K
-
5
4
5
0
2
0
1
5
-
2
0
2
.
C
o
l
l
e
g
i
a
t
e

C
h
a
r
t
e
r

H
i
g
h

S
c
h
o
o
l

o
f

L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s

N
e
w
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
2
E
B
o
y
l
e

H
e
i
g
h
t
s

a
n
d

L
i
n
c
o
l
n

H
e
i
g
h
t
s
9
-
1
2
5
2
8
2
0
1
5
-
2
0
198
TAB 34
File #: 0009-14/15, Version: 4
09-09-14 Report of Correspondence
powered by Legistar
199

REPORT OF CORRESPONDENCE - 1 - SEPTEMBER 9, 2014

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District
SEPTEMBER 9, 2014
REPORT OF CORRESPONDENCE

The following correspondence addressed to the Board of Education is submitted with the recommended
Disposition, Refer to Superintendent for referral to Office of the General Counsel to take all steps
necessary to protect the interests of the Board of Education, including assignment to outside counsel;
Controller to draw warrants in such amounts as may be necessary for the payment of costs and fees upon
invoices as approved by the Office of the General Counsel:

FROM LEGAL ACTION

1. JML Law Summons and Complaint for: 1) Discrimination Based on
Age in Violation of Gov. Code 1294 et seq. (FEHA);
2) Disability Discrimination in Violation of the FEHA;
3) Failure to Accommodate in Violation of the FEHA;
4) Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process in Violation
of the FEHA; 5) Harassment in Violation of the FEHA;
6) Retaliation in Violation of the FEHA; 7) Failure to
Prevent Discrimination and Harassment in Violation of the
FEHA. Case No. BC 545871; Los Angeles Superior Court
of the State of California. Marilyn McGloin, an individual,
Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a
government entity; Karen Fattal, an individual; and Does 1
Through 100, Inclusive, Defendants.

2. William D. Evans Summons and Complaint for Damages for: 1) Wrongful
Refusal to Rehire, Race Discrimination (42 U.S.C.
2000e-2(a)(1)); 2) Intentional Infliction of Emotional
Distress; and 3) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.
Case No. BC 549099; Los Angeles Superior Court of the
State of California. Kenneth Watts, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District; Doe 1 corporation
Through Doe 10 corporation 10; Doe 1 partnership Through
Doe 10 partnership, Defendants.

3. Michael N. Feuer
Timothy McWilliams
Peter E. Langsfeld

Summons and Complaint in Eminent Domain (C.C.P.
1250.310). Case No. BC 554622; Los Angeles Superior
City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff, v.
Los Angeles Unified School District, a unified school
district; Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC; Clear Channel
Outdoor, Inc.; All Persons Unknown and Claiming Interest
in the Property; and Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive,
Defendants.Court of the State of California.

200


4. K&L Gates First Amended Complaint for Damages: 1) Failure to
Engage in the Interactive Process; 2) Failure to Reasonably
Accommodate; 3) Disability Discrimination; 4) Retaliation;
5) Failure to Prevent Discrimination; 6) Failure to Prevent
Retaliation. Case No. BC 541293; Los Angeles Superior
Court of the State of California. Theresa Guerrero, an
individual, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District;
and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

5. Law Offices of Stephan Math Complaint For Damages: 1) Intentional Violation of Statute
(Viol. Of CFRA; Gov. Code, Sect. 12945.2); 2) Intentional
Violation of Statute (Age Discrimination; Gov. Code, 12940
et seq.); 3) Intentional Violation of Statute (Failure to
Prevent Discrimination; Gov. Code 12940(k) ); 4) Intentional
Violation of Statute (Retaliation and Harassment; Gov. Code
12940 et seq.); 5) Intentional Violation of Statute (Disability
discrimination; Gov. Code 12940 et seq.); 6) Intentional
Violation of Statute (Failure to Accommodate Disability;
Gov. Code 12940 et. Seq.) Case No. BC 552448; Los
Angeles Superior Court of the State of California.
Michele Hales v. Los Angeles Unified School District;
Melanie Karabedian, an individual and Does 1 Through 10,
Inclusive, Defendants.

6. Law Offices of Alvin L. Pittman Summons and Complaint for Damages and Demand for
Jury Trial for; 1) Employment Discrimination, Disability;
2) Employment Discrimination (Retaliation). Case No.
BC 551358; Los Angeles Superior Court of the State of
California. Andrea Dymally Shirley, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District; and Does 1 Through 100,

7. Law Offices Of Yolanda A. Slaughter
Mesriani Law Group
Summons and Complaint For: 1) Disability Discrimination;
2) Disability Harassment; 3) Failure to Accommodate
Disability; 4) Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process of
Accommodation of Disability; 5) Failure to Correct, Prevent
and Remedy Discrimination and Harassment; 6) Retaliation
for Complaints of Harassment and Discrimination;
7) Wrongful Termination; 8) Intentional Infliction of
Emotional Distress; 9) Negligent Infliction of Emotional
Distress. Case No. BC 544801; Los Angeles Superior Court of
the State of California. Norma Castillo, an individual,
Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; Dr. Theodore
Alexander Science Center School, a public entity; Norma
Spencer, an individual; and Does 1 Through 25, Inclusive,
Defendants.

8. Mancini & Associates Summons and Plaintiffs Complaint for Damages:
1) Perceived and or Disability Discrimination, Harassment,
201


and Retaliation in Violation of Cal. Gov. Code 12940, et
seq.; 2) Violation of California Family Rights Act, Cal. Gov.
Code 12942.2 et seq.; 3) Declaratory Relief (Permanent
Injunction Requested). Case No. BC 548107; Los Angeles
Superior Court of the State of California. Melanie Thomas,
Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; and Does 1

9. Gregory S. Martin & Associates Summons and Complaint for: 1) Breach of Contract;
2) Breach of Implied Warranty of Plans and Specifications;
3) Declaratory Relief; 4) Recovery on Payment Bond.
Case No. BC 549893; Los Angeles Superior Court of the State
of California. HB Parkco Construction, Inc, a California
corporation, Plaintiff, v. McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.,
a Missouri corporation; Los Angeles Unified School District, a
California agency; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of
America, a Connecticut corporation; Federal Insurance Co., a
New Jersey corporation; Fidelity and Deposit Co. of
Maryland, a Maryland corporation; and Zurich America
Insurance Co., a New York corporation; and Does 1 Through
10, Inclusive, Defendants.

10. Natanzi Law Group, Inc. Summons and Plaintiffs Complaint for Damages; Demand for
Jury Trial: 1) Disability Discrimination in Violation of
FEHA; 2) Discrimination Based on Perceived Disability in
Violation of FEHA; 3) Failure to Engage in Interactive
Process in Violation of FEHA; 4) Failure to Accommodate
Disability in Violation of FEHA; 5) Age Discrimination in
Violation of FEHA; 6) Failure to Prevent Harassment and
Discrimination Based on Disability and Age; 7) Wrongful
Termination in Violation of Public Policy; 8) Retaliation;
9) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair
Dealing; 10) Negligence Per Se; 1) Intentional Infliction of
Emotional Distress. Case No. BC 546876; Los Angeles
Superior Court of the State of California. Charles Phuhl, an
individual, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a
California public entity; and Does 1 Through 25, Inclusive,
Defendants.

11. Ralph J. Ortolano, Jr Notice of Appeal; Order Denying Petition for Writ of
Mandate; Denial of Petition is Final Judgment CCP 1064.
Case No. BC 491637; Los Angeles Superior Court of the State
of California. Ralph Ortolano, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles
Unified School District.

202


12. Rachele Singer Summons and Complaint for: 1) Breach of Contract;
2) Common Counts for Materials, Quantum Meruit;
3) Payment Under the Surety Bond. Case No. BC 550450 Los
Angeles Superior Court of the State of California. Vista Paint
Corporation, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. Turner
Construction Company, a New York corporation; Liberty
Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts corporation, dba
Liberty Mutual Surety; Zurich American Insurance Company,
a New York Corporation, dba The Fidelity and Deposit
Company of Maryland; Federal Insurance Company, an
Indiana corporation; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
of America, a Connecticut corporation; The Continental
Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation; XL Specialty
Insurance Company, a Delaware corporation; Los Angeles
Unified School District; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive,
Defendants.

13. Spear Law Firm Summons and Complaint For Damages For: 1) Violation of
Gov. Code 835. Case No. BC 548450; Los Angeles County
Superior Court of the State of California. April Beltran,
Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; City of Los
Angeles; and Does 1 Through 25, Inclusive, Defendants.

14. Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad Summons and Verified Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(C.C.P 1085) and Declaratory Relief; Memorandum of Points
and Authorities. Case No. BS 149305; Los Angeles Superior
Court of the State of California. United Teachers Los Angeles,
Elizabeth Aronson, Krysia Finley, and Susan Zarakov,
Petitioners, v. Los Angeles Unified School District,
Respondent.

15. Wilson Trial Group
The Sweeney Law Firm
Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Wrongful
Termination in Violation of Public Policy Cal. Gov. Code
12940(a), Constructive Discharge; 2) Disability
Discrimination in Violation of Cal. Gov. Code 12940 et seq.;
3) Retaliation in Violation of Cal. Gov. Code 12940(h); 4)
Failure to Take Reasonable Steps to Prevent Discrimination in
Violation of Cal. Gov. Code 12940(k); 5) Failure to Provide
a Reasonable Accommodation in Violation of Cal. Gov. Code
12940(k); 6) Failure to Engage in the Interactive Progress in
Violation of Cal. Gov. Code 12940 et seq.; 7) Declaration
Relief, Permanent Injunction Requested. Case No. BC 550552
Los Angeles Superior Court of the State Of California. Geneva
White, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; and
Does 1 Through 50, Defendants.

203


16. David Yeremian & Associates, Inc. Summons and Complaint For: 1) Age Discrimination in
Violation of Cal. Gov. Code 12940 et seq.; 2) Failure to
Prevent Discrimination in Violation of Cal. Gov. Code
12940(k); 3) Retaliation in Violation of Cal. Gov. Code
12940(h); 4) Retaliation in Violation of Labor Code
1102.5; 5) Whistleblower Violations Under Cal. Ed.
Code 44111-44113; 6) Breach of Fiduciary Duty;
7) Promissory Estoppel; 8) Breach of Contract; 9) Breach of
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing;
10) Intentional Misrepresentation; 11) Negligent
Misrepresentation; 12) Intentional Interference with
Contractual Relations; 13) Negligent Interference
with Prospective Economic Relations; 14) Wrongful
Termination in Violation of Public Policy; 15) Defamation
Per Se; 16) Defamation; 17) Intentional Infliction of
Emotional Distress; 18) Negligent Infliction of Emotional
Distress; 19) Violation of Business & Profession Code
17200 et seq. Case No. BC 544499; Los Angeles Superior
Court of the State of California. Shakeh Avakian, an
individual, Plaintiff, v. Santa Monica Boulevard Community
Charter School, a California non-profit corporation; Fenton
Charter Public Schools, a California non-profit corporation;
Los Angeles Unified School District, a California public entity;
Vahe Markarian, an individual; Roxanne Shelby, an individual;
David Riddick, an individual; Irene Sumida, an individual; and
Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

The recommended disposition of the following item is Refer to Superintendent for referral to the
Office of the Risk Management and Insurance Services:
17. Allred, Maroko & Golberg Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Sexual Orientation
Discrimination, (Cal. Ed. Code 220, et seq.); 2) Harassment Based
on Sexual Orientation, (Cal. Ed. Code 220, et seq.); 3) Negligence.
Case No. BC 547897; Los Angeles Superior Court of the State of
California. James Anthony Scott, a minor, appearing through Amber
Baker, his Guardian Ad Litem, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified
School District; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

18. Ben-Cohen Lawyers Summons and Plaintiffs Complaint For Damages and Demand for
Jury Trial: 1) Dangerous Condition of Public Property. Case No.
BC 549643; Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of
California. Shirleyann Allen, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles
Defendants.

19. Carpenter, Zuckerman & Rowley Summons and Complaint For Damages. Case No. BC 545154; Los
Angeles Superior Court of the State of California. Sophia Mertzel, a
minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Rebecca Topol,
Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; and Does 1
204


20. Center for Disability Access Summons and Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages for
Volation of: 1) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act,
42 U.S.C. 12131 et seq.; 2) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act,
29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.; and 3) Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Gov.
Code 54 et seq. Case No. CV14-3752PSG-JCx; United States
District Court of the State of California. Gary Scherer, Plaintiff, v.
Los Angeles Unified School District; Birmingham Community
Charter High School, a California corporation, and Does 1 Through

21. The Claypool Law Firm Summons and Complaint For: 1) Negligence, Negligent Hiring,
Supervision and Retention; 2) Intentional Infliction of Emotional
Distress; 3) Sexual Harassment (Civ. Code 51.9). Case No.
California. Dequan Whitfield through his Guardian Ad Litem,
Laquanda Wilson; Laquanda Wilson, individually, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District, a public school entity form
unknown; The Help Group, a nonprofit; Yellow Cab, a privately
owned company; Elaina Ramirez, an individual; and Does 1 Through

22. Gulden & Associates, Inc. Summons and First Amended Complaint for: 1) Negligent Hiring,
Supervision and Retention; 2) Negligence; 3) Breach of Fiduciary
Duty; and 4) Respondent Superior Liability. Case No. BC 546299;
Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. C.N.,
a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Josefina Corona,
Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; Martha Contreras;
Ms. Herrarte; Lorena Delgado; Mr. Navarrez; and Does 1 Through

23. The Kirkpatrick Legal Group Summons and Complaint For Damages. Case No. BC 525859; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Maria
Pina, Guardian Ad Litem, for Angel Pina, a minor, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District; a public entity; San Pedro High
School; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

24. Khorshidi Law Building Summons and Complaint For Damages. Case No. BC 545256; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Maria
Partida; Melissa Partida, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem,
Maria Partida, Plaintiffs, v. Loreto Street Elementary; Melissa
Villnueva (Villanueva); and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive,
Defendants.

25. Law Offices of Daniel V.
Behesnilian
Summons and Complaint For Damages. Case No. BC 544484; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Salem
Mustafa, a minor by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Flor
Narvaez, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a public
entity and governing district of Madison Middle School; and Does 1
205


26. Law Offices of Carpenter,
Zuckerman & Rowley
Summons and Complaint For: Personal Injury, Property Damage,
Wrongful Death; General Negligence; Loss of Future Earnings and
Medical Expenses. Second Amended General Order re Personal
Injury Court (PI Court) Procedures (Effective as of January 6, 2014).
Second Amended General Order, Final Status Conference, Personal
Injury (PI) Courts (Effective as of January 6, 2014). Case No.
California. Guadalupe Hernandez, an Individual; v. Los Angeles
Unified School District and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive,
Defendants.

27. Law Offices of Luis A. Carrillo Summons and First Amended Complaint for Damages for: Unlimited
Jurisdiction; Demand for Jury Trial (Filed Pursuant to C.C.P.
340.1(a)). Case No. BC 521713; Los Angeles Superior Court of the
State of California. J.M.G., a minor, by her Guardian Ad Litem, Ana
Maria Garcia; A.J.G.L., a minor, by her Guardian Ad Litem, Manor
Garcia; D.R., a minor, by her Guardian Ad Litem, Ines Hernandez;
C.I., a minor, by her Guardian Ad Litem, Ana Gloria Islas; A.B.G., a
minor, by her Guardian Ad Litem, Veronica Gonzalez; Jane Doe,
Plaintiffs, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; Ramon Cortines;
and Does 1 Through 20, Defendants.

28. Law Offices of Luis Carrillo
Law Offices of Andrew
Zeytuntsyan
Summons and Complaint for Damages for: 1) Negligence, Negligent
supervision, Negligent Hiring and or Retention; 2) Demand for Jury
Trial; 3) Second Amended General Order Re Personal Injury Court
(PI Court) Procedures (Effective as of January 6, 2014); 4) Second
Amended General Order, Final Status Conference, Personal Injury
(PI) Courts (Effective as of January 6, 2014); 5) Application and
Order for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem , Civil. Case No.
BC 548749 Los Angeles Superior Court of the State of California.
E.M., a Minor, by and Through his Guardian Ad Litem, Lucia Del
Carmen Molina, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District;

29. Law Offices of Mauro Fiore, Jr. Summons and Complaint For Damages. Case No. BC 528438; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Ivan
Rodriguez, Jr., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Ivan
Rodriguez, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; and
Does 1 Through 50, Defendants.

30. Law Offices of Paul Kingston Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Failure to Perform a
Mandatory Duty arising from Gov. Code 815.2 and 815.6 and 820
through 823 et.seq., and Vehicle Code 17001 and 17002 et.seq.;
2) Personal Injury and Property Damage, including Negligence and
under Gov. Code 815.6 and 820 through 823 et. seq., and Vehicle
Code 17001 et. seq. Case No. 14K02825; Los Angeles County
206


Superior Court of the State of California. Nabil Wasef, Plaintiff, v.
Los Angeles Unified School District; Glen Taeyoon Kim; and Does 1

31. Law Offices of Kottler & Kottler Summons and Complaint For Damages. Case No. BC 550918; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Desiree
Aguillon, a minor by and through her Mother and Guardian Ad
Litem, Karina Aguillon, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School
District; and Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive, Defendants.

32. Law Offices of Etan Z. Lorant Summons and Complaint for Personal Injuries and Damages:
1) Sexual Abuse of a Minor; 2) Negligence (Gov. Code 815.2
and 820); 3) Breach of Mandatory Duty (Gov. Code 815.6).
Case No. BS 148540; Los Angeles County Superior Court of the
State of California. M.G., a minor by and through his Guardian Ad
Litem, S.A., Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a
public entity; Robert Patnik, an individual; Todd Jonathan Myers, an
individual; Graciela Rodriguez, an individual; and Does 1 Through

33. Law Office of Shawna L. Parks
Heather Zackson

Learning Rights Law Center
Newman Aaronson & Vanaman
Summons and Complaint for Violations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq.; Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794, et. seq.; The Unruh Civil Rights
Act Cal. Civ. Code 51, et. eq.; California Constitution Art.1;
California Constitution Art. 9; Demand for Jury Trial. Case No.
CV 14-4384-MWF (RZX); United States District Court of the State
Of California. A.O., a minor, by and Through his Guardian Ad Litem,
K.A., Plaintiffs, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; and Does 1
Through 10, Inclusive, Defendant.

34. Law Offices of Ricardo Perez Summons and Complaint For: 1) Negligence; 2) Negligent Hiring,
Supervision and Retention; 3) Negligent Training. Case No.
California. Jorge Garcia, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles
Unified School District, a governmental entity; Maria Sotomayor, an
individual; Kevin Kilpatrick, an individual; Luis Barazza, an
individual; John Deasy, an individual; and Does 1 Through 100,

35. Law Offices of Michael E.
Reznick
Summons and Complaint For Damages for Negligent Supervision
and Negligence. Case No. BC 545295; Los Angeles County Superior
Court of the State of California. David Jewell, as Guardian Ad Litem
for Marina Jewell, a minor, Plaintiff, v. Pomelo Community Charter
School, Charter No. 1347, a business form unknown; Los Angeles
Defendants.

207


36. Law Offices of Hamid
Soleimanian
Summons and Complaint For Damages Pursuant to California Gov.
Code, 815.2, 815.6, and 820. Case No. BC 548766; Los Angeles
County Superior Court of the State of California. Elijah Soleimanian,
a minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Amir Soleimanian, Plaintiffs, v.
Los Angeles Unified School District, also commonly known as
LAUSD; Hannah L. Bree, an individual; and Does 1 Through 20,
Defendants.

37. Herny M. Lee, Law Corporation Summons and Complaint For: 1) Negligence; 2) Dangerous
Condition; 3) Negligent Supervision; 4) Assault; 5) Battery;
6) Strict Products Liability - Design Defect; 7) Strict Products
Liability, Failure to Warn and Instruct. Case No. BC 546356; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. Jaden
Hyun, a minor, by his Guardian, Jin Ok Hyun, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District, a public entity; Edison Chicas, an
individual; L.A. Steel Craft Products, Inc., a California corporation;

38. Law Offices of Andrew M. Wyatt Summons and Complaint For Damages: 1) Failure to Discharge
Mandatory Duty (Gov. Code 815 et seq. 820, Ed Code 44807,
44808); 2) Negligent Supevision (Gov. Code 815 et seq., 820,
Ed Code 44807, 44808); 3) Negligence Per Se. (Gov. Code
815 et seq., 820, Ed Code 44807, 44808); 4) Negligent
Infliction of Emotional Distress (Gov. Code 815 et seq., 820;
Ed. Code 44807, 44808; 5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional
Distress (Gov. Code 815 et seq., 820, Ed Code 44807,
44808). Case No. BC 514414; Los Angeles County Superior Court
of the State of California. Zoila E., by and through her Guardian Ad
Litem, Mayar E., Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District;

39. Manly, Stewart & Finaldi
The Law Offices of Tommy A.
Troncoso
Summons and Complaint for Damages for: 1) Negligence, Negligent
Supervision, Negligent Hiring and Retention, Negligent Failure to
Warn, Train or Educate; 2) Constructive Fraud (CC 1573);
3) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; 4) Sexual
Harassment (CC 51.9); and 5) Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Case No.
California. John TDC Doe and John JG Doe, Plaintiffs, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District, a business entity of form unknown;
Telfair Elementary School, a business entity of form unknown; John
Deasy, an individual; Alfonso Jimenez, an individual; and Does 1
Through 100, Defendants.

40. Abassian Marrache Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Dangerous Condition of
Public Property; 2) Negligence. Barbara Rivera, Plaintiff, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District, and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive,
Defendants. Case No. 14K07906; Los Angeles Superior Court of the
State of California. Barbara Rivera, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified
School District; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.
208


41. Norton & Melnik Summons and Complaint For Damages: 1) Battery; 2) Negligence;
Negligent Hiring, Retention, and Supervision; 4) Negligent Failure to
Recognize and Report Child Abuse; 5) Intentional Infliction of
Emotional Distress; 6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress;
7) For Violation of Civil Rights Under Title 42 U.S.C. 1983;
8) For Violation of the Americans with Disability Act of 1990.
Case No. BC 541468; Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State
of California. Genesis C., by and through her Guardian Ad Litem,
Minerva Torres, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District, a
governmental entity, Maribel Figueroa; Fujizawa, first name unknown;

42. Owen, Patterson & Owen Proof of Service of Petitioners, Imelda Munoz and Rafael Beltrans,
Documents in Support of their Petition for Relief from Claim Filing
Requirements; Notice of Hearing on Petitioners Petition for Relief
from Claim Filing Requirements and Order Permitting Claim Against
Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6); Petitioners Petition for
Relief from Claim Filing Requirements and Order Permitting Claim
Against Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6) (Notice of
Hearing, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Declaration of
Gregory J. Owen, Esq., and (Proposed) Order Filed Concurrently
herewith.); (Proposed) Order on Petitioners Petition for Relief from
Claim Filing Requirements and Order Permitting Claim Against
Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6); Petitioners
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of their Petition
for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements and Order Permitting
Claim Against Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6) (Notice of
Hearing, Petition for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements,
Declaration of Gregory J. Owen, Esq., and (Proposed) Order Filed
Concurrently herewith); Declaration of Gregory J. Owen, Esq,, in
Support of Petitioners, Maria Alvizars, Petition for Relief from
Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6) (Notice of Hearing,
Petition for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements, Memorandum of
Points and Authorities, and (Proposed) Order Filed Concurrently
herewith). Case No. BS 149855; Los Angeles County Superior Court
of the State of California. Imelda Munoz and Rafael Beltran,
Petitioners, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; Mark Henry
Berndt; Martin R. Sandoval; and Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive,
Respondents.

43. Owen, Patterson & Owen Proof of Service of Petitioner, Frank Z.s, Documents in Support of
his Petition for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements; Notice of
Hearing on Petitioner, Frank Z.s, Petition for Relief from Claim
Filing Requirements and Order Permitting Claim Against
Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6); Petitioner, Frank Zs,
Petition for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements and Order
Permitting Claim Against Governmental Entity (Gov. Code
946.6); Petitioner, Frank Zs, Memorandum of Points and
209


Authorities in Support of his Petition for Relief from Claim Filing
Requirements and Order Permitting Claim Against Governmental
Entity (Gov. Code 946.6); Petitioner, Frank Zs, Declaration in
Support of his Petition for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements
and Order Permitting Claim Against Governmental Entity (Gov.
Code 946.6); (Proposed) Order on Petitioner, Frank Z.s, Petition
for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements and Order Permitting
Claim Against Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6); Notice of
Related Cases; Declaration of Susan A. Owen, Esq. in Support of
Petitioner, Frank Z.s, Petition for Relief from Claim Filing
Requirements and Order Permitting Claim Against Governmental
Entity (Gov. Code 946.6). Case No. BS 149054; Los Angeles
Superior Court of the State of California. Frank Z., Petitioner, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District; Doe Principal; Mark Henry Berndt;
and Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive, Respondents.

44. Owen, Patterson & Owen Notice of Continuance of Petitioner/Plaintiff, J.Z.s, Petition for
Order Permitting Late Claim Against Governmental Entity (Gov.
Code 946.6). Case No. BS 148540. J.Z., Petitioner, Plaintiff, v.
Los Angeles Unified School District; Doe Principal; Mark Henry
Berndt; and Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive, Respondents.

45. Owen, Patterson & Owen Petitioner, I.A.s, Declaration in Support of her Petition for Relief
from Claim Filling Requirements and Order Permitting Claim
Against Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6). Case No.
BS 149080; Los Angeles Superior Court of the State of California.
I.A., Petitioner, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; Doe
Principal; Mark Henry Berndt; and Does 1 Through 100, Inclusive,
Respondents.

46. Owen, Patterson & Owen Proof of Service of Petitioner, I. As, Documents in Support of his
Petition for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements; Notice of
Hearing on Petitioner, Maria Alvizars, Petition for Relief from
Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6) Petitioner, Maria
Alvizars, Petition for Relief from Claim; Filing Requirements and
Order Permitting Claim Against Governmental Entity (Gov. Code
946.6) (Notice of Hearing, Memorandum of Points and
Authorities, Declaration of Gregory J. Owen, Esq., and (Proposed)
Order Filed Concurrently herewith); Petitioner, Maria Alvizars,
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of her Petition for
Relief from Claim; Filing Requirements and Order Permitting Claim
Against Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6) (Notice of
Hearing, Petition for Relief from Claim Filing Requirements;
Declaration of Gregory J. Owen, Esq., and (Proposed) Order Filed
Concurrently herewith); Declaration of Gregory J. Owen, Esq,,
in Support of Petitioner, Maria Alvizars, Petition for Relief from
Governmental Entity (Gov. Code 946.6) (Notice of Hearing, Petition for
210


Relief from Claim Filing Requirements, Memorandum of Points and
Authorities, and (Proposed) Order Filed Concurrently.
Case No. BS 149599; Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of
California. Maria Alvizar, Petitioner, v. Los Angeles Unified School
District; Doe Principal; Mark Henry Berndt; and Does 1 Through 100,
Inclusive, Respondents.

47. Quirk Law Group Summons and Complaint for: 1) Negligence; 2) Negligent
Supervision of Students; 3) Negligent Hiring, Retention, and
Supervision of Employees. Case No. BC 549267; Los Angeles
County Superior Court of the State of California. Vanesa Hernandez
Huerta, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Modesta
Hernandez, Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; Ascot
Elementary; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

48. Quirk Law Group Summons and Complaint for: 1) Negligence; 2) Negligent
Supervision of Students; 3) Negligent Hiring, Retention, and
Supervision of Employees. Case No. BC 549268; Los Angeles
County Superior Court of the State of California. Dana Aragon,
a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Patricia Olivares,
Plaintiffs, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; Ellen Ochoa
Learning Center; and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

49. Sanford Jossen Summons and Complaint for Damages: 1) Negligence; 2) Breach of
Mandatory Duties; 3) Negligent Hiring and Training; 4) Negligent
Infliction of Emotional Distress; 5) Negligence, Negligent Infliction of
Emotional Distress. Case No. BC 552002; Los Angeles County Superior
Court of the State of California. Oscar Santoyo, individually and as
Guardian Ad Litem for Vanessa Santoyo, a minor, Plaintiffs, v. Los
Angeles Unified School District; Alfonso Perez Special Education Center;

50. Tofer & Associates Summons and Complaint For Damages: 1) Negligence (Gov. Code
815.2, Edu. Code 44807; 5 C.C.R. 5552; Penal Code 245.6;
Penal Code 289). Case No. BC 536246; Los Angeles County
Superior Court of the State of California. Jonathan Zargari and
Edmond Sasooness, Plaintiffs, v. Los Angeles Unified School District;

51. Weber & Baer Summons and Complaint For: 1) Negligence; 2) Negligent
Supervision; 3) Negligent Failure to Warn Train or Educate;
4) Public Entitys Liability Based on the Torts of Government
Employees (Gov. Code 815.2). Case No. BC 541466; Los
Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. John HF
Doe, a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Jane AF Doe,
Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles Unified School District; and Does 1 Through

211


Office of the Risk Management and Insurance Services:

No.

Received From

Type of Damage

Claimant
Date of
Damage

52. Maria Achoy Damages Manuel A. Martin Del Campo 05/29/14
53. John W. Adams Damages John W. Adams 09/12/13
54. Bergkvist, Bergkvist & Carter, LLP
Paul J. Carter
Damages Sandra Forte Guardian for
Khameryn Forte
Not Clearly
Stated
55. Bermeo & Merluza, LLP
Ricardo Y. Merluza
Damages Abraham Canales 02/10/14
56. Michael Brennen Damages Palmer Weir 05/16/14
57. The Cartwright Law Firm, Inc
Robert E. Cartwright, Jr.
David G. Yen
Damages Madison Perry
Dave Perry
03/03/14
58. The Cochran Firm California Damages Shelton Franklin for D.F. 05/29/14
59. Jane Cortez Damages Stella Cortez (2 Recd) 11/13/13
60. Liliana Cortez Damages Eileen Cortez 04/29/14
61. Maria De La Torre Damages Alexis Avina 02/12/14
62. Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad
Lawrence B. Trygstad
Damages Jacinta Plaza Not Clearly
Stated
63. Downtown Law Group
John Oh
Damages Daniel Kim Swei
Hyun Cheol Kim
06/10/14
64. Aida Garcia Damages Aida Garcia 06/03/14
65. David Grey Law Office
Jeffrey L. Molchan
Damages Karina Contreras
Michael Mayorga
01/16/14
66. Maria J. Yool Garrido Damages Maria J. Yool Garrido 05/19/14
67. Haney and Young
Ryan Duckett
Damages Ernesto Silva-Valdivia (2 Recd) Not Clearly
Stated
68. Hanger, Steinberg, Shapiro & Ash
Jody Steinberg
Damages Abby Spencer-Knerr 04/24/14
69. Kristina Ibarra Damages Lauren Alyssa Ibarra 02/06/14
70. Soraya Kay Damages Madison Kay 02/24/14
71. Lorcan Kilroy Damages Lorcan Kilroy (2 Recd) 01/11/14
72. Yoo Jin Kim Damages Min-Hyeok Choe
Yoo Jin Kim
04/28/14
212


73. Vicki M. Kirakosian Damages Sylvia V. Kirakosian 01/14/14
74. Kosnett Law Firm
Emily Stuart
Damages Sophia Stuart 03/13/13
75. Kosnett Law Firm
Emily Stuart
Damages Maya Stuart Approx.
02/14/14
76. Law Offices Of Peter T. Brown
Peter T. Brown
Damages Francisco Jesus Madero 12/17/13
77. Law Offices of Luis A. Carrillo
Luis A. Carrillo
Damages Claudia Herrera
Cesar Ortiz
06/04/14
78. Law Offices of Steve C. Gambardella
Steve C. Gambardella
Damages Staffon Chiles 05/20/14
79. Law Offices of Daniel A. Gibalevich
Ofelia Martinez Cruz
Damages Ofelia Martinez Curiel for
Fernando Mireles
02/28/14
80. Law Offices of Eric Hershler
Eric Hershler
Damages Noe Alexander Navarrete 04/12/14
81. Law Offices of Victor Jacobovitz
Gabriela Feria-Jurenka
Damages Gabriela Feria-Jurenka 04/01/12-
02/12/14
82. Law Offices of Sanford Jossen
Brent Hawkins
Damages Brent Hawkins, Jr. 03/06/14
83. Law Offices of Manuel H. Miller
Scott Houtz
Damages Stefanny Perez 05/01/14
84. Law Offices of Joachim Joe
Nwude - Jorge McKeller Jr.
Sandra Bederad
Damages Jorge McKeller Jr. 05/07/14
85. Law Offices of Levin and Levin
Dean J. Levin
Damages Daniel OLeary 03/25/14
86. Law Offices of Mabel N. Orue
Silver Andrade
Damages Silver Andrade 02/25/14
87. Law Offices of Robin E. Paley
Robin E. Paley
Damages Jaylin Sheppard 04/09/14
Robin E. Paley
Damages Samajay Sheppard 04/09/14
89. Law Offices of Jose Perez
Jose Perez
Damages Freddy Villavicencio 03/14/14
90. Law Offices of Randolph &
Associates - Albert Oganesyan
Damages Jose Manuel Padilla, Jr.
Susana Lopez
12/10/13
91. Law Offices of Vicki I. Sarmiento
Vicki I. Sarmiento
Damages Sylvia Lopez
Kelly N.
02/13/14
92. Kawanna Lewis Damages Kawanna Lewis
Tatanka-Janal Baskerville II
04/09/14
213


93. Daniel Lopez
Nancy Solorio
Damages Sabrina Lopez 03/24/14
94. Jeannette Lopez

Damages Jeannette Lopez
Nicholas V. Scotto Di Ve Himo
02/13/14
95. Gerald L. Marcus Damages Sabrina Hill 02/28/14
96. Martin & Martin, LLP
Mark B. Plummer
Damages Ana Maria Baldwin 02/21/14
97. Rudy Martinez Damages Rudy Martinez 12/2013
98. Martinian & Associates
Suzanna Abrahamian
Damages Edgar Poghosyan 04/08/14
99. Karen Norwood Damages Jordan Derrick Norwood 06/02/14
100. Navarrow Law Firm
F. Edward Navarro
Damages Luis De La Torre Approx.
04/28/14
101. Sonia Nazari Damages Hilana Nazari 02/19/14
102. Joanna Neudorff Damages Joanna Neudorff
Richard Neudorff
10/16/13
103. Newman Aaronson Vanaman
David W. German
Damages Luis Diaz
Rosa Ramirez
06/02/14
104. Karen Norwood Damages Jordan Derrick Norwood 06/02/14
105. Owen, Patterson & Owen
Gregory J. Owen
Damages Maria Alvizar Not clearly
stated
Susan A. Owen
Damages F.Z. Not clearly
stated
Tamiko B. Herron
Damages N.C. 2 Recd Not clearly
stated
108. Cristina Padilla Damages Elvis R. Lopez 05/19/14
109. The Sweeney Law Firm
Brandon Sweeney
Damages Geneva White October
2013
110. Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad
Daniel J. Kolodziej
Damages Alvaro Novoa Not Clearly
Stated
111. Panish Shea & Boyle LLP
Deborah S. Chang
Brian J. Panish
Damages Vellvet Miguel-Barrera(3 Recd)
Caroline Miguel-Barrera
Estate of Marleni Edith Barrera
02/11/14
112. Rafii & Associates
Daniel J. Rafii
Damages Evelia Arteta 05/13/14
113. Sayre & Levitt
C. Sayre
Damages Madalyn Contreras 03/21/14
114. Brenda Vargas Damages Karla Covarrubias 04/25/14
214


115. Carolina Velazquez Damages Joel Santos 03/04/14
116. Jose Velasquez
Devany Velasquez
Damages Devany Velasquez 03/04/14
117. Virginia Valdovinos Damages Virginia Valdovinos 04/24/14
118. Temra E. Wald Damages Lauren Wald 02/20/14
119. Rosie Lee Watson Damages Rosie Lee Watson 05/30/14
120. Laura Weitz Damages Frank Weitz 02/11/14
121. Toni Wilson Damages Daemon Cooke 04/2014
122. Woodsmall Law Group
Mark K. McBride
John Marzilli
Damages Jake Christopher Marzilli 03/25/14
123. AAA
Linda Robinson
Vehicle Damages AAA
Sharon Letraunik
06/19/14
124. Billy Alcaraz Vehicle Damages Billy Alcaraz 03/24/14
125. Alma Alonzo Vehicle Damages Alma Alonzo 04/01/14
126. Carter B. Austin Vehicle Damages Carter B. Austin 05/30/14
127. Vonterance Bell Vehicle Damages Vonterance Bell 06/12/14
128. Chubb Group of Insurance
Companies
Briana C. Diver
Vehicle Damages Federal Insurance Co.
Center Theater Group of Los
Angeles
01/22/14
129. Patricia Dant Vehicle Damages Patricia Dant 04/30/14
130. Cynthia Dunbar Vehicle Damages Cynthia Dunbar 06/16/14
131. Antonio Estrada Vehicle Damages Antonio Estrada 07/14/14
132. Farmers Insurance
Jenny Pho-Hua
Vehicle Damages Farmers Insurance for
Youn Sook Kim
Not Clearly
Stated
Tamara Hart
Vehicle Damages Mid Century Insurance
Elke Dobrowolski
06/10/14
Heather Wontorcik
Vehicle Damages Salvador Reyes 04/28/14
135. Infinity Insurance Company
Iva Pearson
Vehicle Damages Glayds Ravelero 05/29/14
136. Magdalia D. Flores-Rodriguez Vehicle Damages Magdalia Rodriguez 05/13/14
137. Gerald Fortier Vehicle Damages Gerald Fortier 06/23/14
138. Donna Gatewood Vehicle Damages Donna Gatewood 06/30/14
139. Tawanna C. Harrison Vehicle Damages Tawanna C. Harrison 06/02/14
215


140. The Hartford Insurance
Chaminade College Prep
Tony Escalante
Vehicle Damages Chaminade College Prep. 07/25/13
141. Norma A. Hernandez Vehicle Damages Norma A. Hernandez 07/01/14
142. Lacey G. Howell Vehicle Damages Lacey G. Howell 06/24/14
143. Melissa Huerta Vehicle Damages Melissa Huerta 01/30/14
144. Deborah D. Jackson-Smith Vehicle Damages Deborah D. Jackson-Smith 05/26/14
145. Irma Macias Vehicle Damages Irma Macias 02/06/14
Robin Paley
Vehicle Damages Tracey Wilson 04/09/14
147. Rene Quinonez Leyva Vehicle Damages Rene Quinonez Leyva (2 Recd) 05/14/14
148. Taya McLoud Vehicle Damages Taya McLoud 04/30/14
149. Elizabeth Magallanes Vehicle Damages Elizabeth Magallanes 06/04/14
150. Rosa L. Martinez Vehicle Damages Rosa L. Martinez 05/08/14
151. Mercury Insurance Group
Alexandra Marino
Vehicle Damages John Dant (2 Recd) 04/30/14
152. Mercury Insurance
Janine M. Chaparro
Vehicle Damages Samuel Dunbar 04/08/14
153. Mercury Insurance Company
Brianne Carson
Vehicle Damages Mercury Insurance 04/02/14
154. Mercury Insurance Co.
Ahmad Hairston
Vehicle Damages Mercury Insurance Company
Leo Puentes, Jr.
03/19/14
Edna Gonzalez
Vehicle Damages Mercury Insurance
Saborio Daniel
03/24/14
Andrew Alatorre
Vehicle Damages Mercury Insurance (2 Recd)
Maria Ruiz
05/05/14
Chris Randal
Vehicle Damages Lloyd A. Sarte 06/03/14
Eddie De La Gala
Vehicle Damages Mercury Insurance
Meng Tao
04/24/14
159. Kelly Hulett-Peay Vehicle Damages Kelly Hulett-Peay 05/22/14
160. Mercury Insurance Group
Daniel Lopez
Vehicle Damages James H. Palmer 07/09/14
161. Yolanda D. Morin Vehicle Damages Yolanda D. Morin 04/30/14
162. Brenda Noj Vehicle Damages Brenda Noj 06/03/14
163. Millicent T. Preston Vehicle Damages Millicent T. Preston 06/03/14
164. Andy Rawn Vehicle Damages Andrew Bryson Rawn 05/15/14
165. Kareli Rodriguez Vehicle Damages Kareli Rodriguez 09/26/13
216


166. Daniel R. Saborio Vehicle Damages Daniel R. Saborio 03/24/14
167. Rozalyn Andrea Sandville Vehicle Damages Rozalyn Andrea Sandville 06/03/14
168. Patricia Sanzon Vehicle Damages Patricia Sanzon 06/16/14
169. Minoo Sarshad Vehicle Damages Minoo Sarshad 03/11/14
170. State Farm
Demetira King
Vehicle Damages Kyung Ok Jin 03/06/14
171. Minerva Suastegui Vehicle Damages Minerva Suastegui 03/05/14
172. Ciana Tallas Vehicle Damages Ciana Tallas 04/30/14
173. Tofer & Associates
Rita Bulk
Vehicle Damages Ashley Hill 06/20/14
174. Tofer & Associates
Erica Timbo
Vehicle Damages Erica Timbo 06/20/14
175. Dawna E. Watson Vehicle Damages Dawna E. Watson 07/08/14
176. Wawanesa Insurance
Cynthia Cordero
Vehicle Damages Jonathan R. Matthews 01/27/14
177. Wawanesa Insurance
Mathew Bailey
Vehicle Damages Sevak Zaribian (3 Recd) 01/22/14
178. Elizabeth Wynn Vehicle Damages Elizabeth Wynn 05/15/14
179. Virginia Aguirre Property Loss Virginia Aguirre 05/09/14
180. Jose A. Blanco Property Loss Jose A. Blanco 10/2013
181. Miesha Buchanan Property Loss Miesha Buchanan 05/08/14
182. Douglas Castellanos Property Loss Douglas Castellanos 05/23/14
183. Manuel Donis Property Loss Manuel Donis 05/28/14
184. Jessica Duarte Property Loss Jessica Duarte 05/21/14
185. Tina Ducksworth Property Loss Kennedi Beamon 04/29/14
186. Karla Figueroa Property Loss Karla Figueroa 05/13/14
187. Alfredo Gonzalez
Pedro Villalobos
Alfredo Gonzalez
Property Loss Alfredo Gonzalez 05/30/14
188. William Henderson Property Loss William Henderson 06/02/14
189. Rutilo Herrera Property Loss Miguel Herrera (2 Recd) 07/20/14
190. Edythe Jason Property Loss Edythe Jason 05/19/14
191. Hulises Lopez Property Loss Hulises Lopez 06/04/14
192. Jim Nasra Property Loss Ramsey Nasra 05/29/14
217


193. Martha Valencia Property Loss Victor Rubio 05/16/14
194. Dolisa Martinez Property Loss Andrew I. Romero 05/23/14

Facilities Construction Claims Insurance Services:

No.

Received From

Type of Damage

Claimant
Date of
Damage

1. Humphrey, Berger &
Associates

Breach of Contract
(re: Fire Alarm System,
Independence Continuation
High School)
American Safety Casualty
Insurance Company (ASCIC)

Not Clearly
Stated
2. NSA Construction
Group, Inc.
Breach of Contract

NSA Construction Group, Inc.

04/23/14 -
06/08/14
3. Torres Construction
Corp.
Breach of Contract

Torres Construction Corp. Not Clearly
Stated

Respectfully Submitted

JEFFERSON CRAIN
Executive Officer of the Board
218
MINUTES
219
TAB 35
File #: 0012-14/15, Version: 1
Minutes for Board Approval
powered by Legistar
Bd. of Ed. Regular Meeting Minutes, 12 p.m., 06-18-13 1

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
333 South Beaudry Avenue, Board Room
12:00 p.m., Tuesday, June 18, 2013

The Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles, acting as the Governing Board of the Los Angeles
Unified School District, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 18, 2013, at the Los Angeles City
Board of Education Administrative Offices, Board Room, 333 South Beaudry Avenue, Los Angeles,
California.

Ms. Garca called the meeting to order at 12:28 p.m.

The following Board Members were present: Ms. Tamar Galatzan, Mr. Bennett Kayser, Ms. Marguerite
P. LaMotte, Ms. Nury Martinez, Dr. Richard Vladovic, Mr. Steve Zimmer, and Board President Mnica
Garca.

Superintendent John Deasy was present.

Ms. Garca led the Pledge of Allegiance.

SUPERINTENDENTS REPORTS

SENIOR GRADUATION SPEAKERS

Superintendent Deasy welcomed Class of 2013 valedictorians from Grant High School and Sun Valley
High School to the meeting. Ms. Tali Moore of Grant High School and Mr. Luis Ortiz of Sun Valley
High School presented their graduation speeches to the Board.

FACILITIES LOCAL HIRING UPDATE

Superintendent Deasy introduced Mr. Mark Hovatter, Chief Facilities Executive, to provide an update
on the local hiring program within the construction program.

Mr. Hovatter stated that in 1999, the District entered into an agreement with local construction partners
to hire workers living within the District boundaries at a rate of 50%. For many years, the District
struggled to get local hiring rates above 30%. Upon examination, it was determined that this low
percentage was due to the low number of qualified, local people in the construction trades. The District
began an aggressive program of training local residents in the construction field and facilitating job
placement on District and City construction projects and apprenticeship training programs. As of May
2013, the District was able to attain a local participation rate of over 50%. This rate continued in June
2013. Mr. Hovatter thanked several partners that made this possible.

Remarks were heard from Board Members.

- - -
President Garca modified the Order of Business
- - -
MISCELLANEOUS

DISTRICT ENGLISH LEARNER ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL UPDATE

Mr. Luis Astudillo, President, District English Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) lead the annual
presentation of the DELACs recommendations on the five topics required for review by California
Education Code:

English Learner (EL) Master Plan
Importance of Regular School Attendance
Needs Assessment
Single Plan for Student Achievement
Language Census

Mr. Brent Anderson, Public Relations, DELAC, discussed the EL Master Plan and DELACs
recommendations that the EL Master Plan should be explained to parents in a manner that is easy to
understand. Also, the Committee believes the District should require ongoing training be provided to
parents. Mr. Astudillo reviewed the recommendation of attendance improvement plans as well as
monitoring and addressing reasons for student absences. In terms of the needs assessment, Ms. Susuki
Figueroa, Vice President, DELAC, stated that data about the academic progress of English Learners
should be provided to parents throughout the year and effective academic strategies that contribute to
reclassification must be shared and implemented. Ms. Aurora Lopez, Secretary, DELAC, stated that
parents should be involved in the development of the Single Plan for Student Achievement and budget
expenditures should be based on the needs of English Learners. Lastly, the Language Census
recommendation is that categorical programs coordinators should be bilingual and categorical funding
must be used for programs for English Learners.

Superintendent Deasy stated that the District wholeheartedly supports the recommendations of the
DELAC.

Remarks were heard from Ms. LaMotte regarding Standard English Learners.

Ms. Rowena Lagrosa, Executive Director, Parent Community Services Branch commented on the
recommendations.

NEW BUSINESS FOR ACTION

BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT NO. 322 12/13
Naming of Mervyn M. Dymally High School

The following speakers addressed the Board:

Hon. Diane Watson, former Board Member and U.S. Congresswoman
Hon. Gwen Moore, former State Assemblywoman

Later in the meeting, Dr. Vladovic moved that the report be adopted. Ms. Martinez seconded the
motion.


Hon. Warren Furutani, former Board Member and California Assemblyman
Ms. Simone Charles, Principal
Dr. Lynn Dymally
Ms. Doris Jeanne Blaker

Following the speakers and by general consent, the report was adopted.

MISCELLANEOUS (continued)

RECOGNITION OF BOARD MEMBER NURY MARTINEZ

Ms. Garca led a celebration honoring the service of Ms. Nury Martinez, who was elected to serve on the
Los Angeles City Council. Ms. Martinez was presented with the traditional school bell in appreciation
of dedicated service to public education. Superintendent Deasy presented Ms. Martinez with a
Resolution acknowledging her service as a Board Member.

Remarks were heard from Ms. Martinez.

The following speaker addressed the Board:

Mr. Steve List, Teacher, Sylmar High School


The Board recessed at 1:24 p.m. to allow for a reception honoring Ms. Martinez. The Board reconvened
at 1:41 p.m. Mr. Kayser, Ms. LaMotte, Ms. Martinez, Dr. Vladovic, Mr. Zimmer and Ms. Garca were
present. Ms. Galatzan returned at 1:43 p.m.

- - -
President Garca resumed the Order of Business
- - -

CONSENT ITEMS

Items for action below to be adopted by a single vote:

OLD BUSINESS FOR ACTION:

Renewal of the Affiliated Charter for Colfax Charter Elementary

President Garca made the following statement:

Before action is taken on the following reports, a public hearing must be held:

- Board Report No. 298 12/13, Renewal of the Affiliated Charter for Colfax Charter
Elementary
- Board Report No. 336 12/13, Renewal of the Affiliated Charter for Westwood
Charter
- Board Report No. 341 12/13, Denial of the Renewal of the Charter for
Anauacalmecac International University Preparatory High School and Amendment to
Expand to Grades K-8

This constitutes a public hearing on the reports, and a maximum of 12 individuals who wish to
address the Board on these items will be heard. Those who wish to speak to these reports should pull
a speaker form from the slots located on the pillar in the rear of the Board Room. Speakers will be
heard in numerical order as indicated on the speaker form.

The Board will be taking action on these reports. Petitions denied may be submitted directly to the
Los Angeles County Office of Education or directly to the State for action.

NEW BUSINESS FOR ACTION:

Report of Warrants Issued, Request to Reissue Expired Warrants, and Donations of Money

Certification of Signatures for All Orders Drawn on the Funds of the
Los Angeles Unified School District in the Name of the Governing Board

Submission of Fiscal Year 2013-14 Consolidated Application for Categorical Aid Programs

Routine Personnel Actions

Nonroutine Personnel Actions

Reemployment of Certificated Employees Based on Special Training and Experience

BOARD OF EDUCATION REVISED REPORT NO. 313 12/13
Facilities Services Division Contract Actions

Approval of the 2013 Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan

Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve 34
Board Member Priority and Alteration and Improvement Projects

Amendment to the Facilities Services Division and Information Technology Strategic Execution Plans to
Define and Approve 309 School Facilities Improvement Projects

Authorization for Staff to Enter into a Development Agreement for the Delivery of the
Fremont High School Redevelopment Project

Authority to Execute a Joint Powers Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for the
Construction of the San Fernando High School Teen Health Center

Authorization to Extend the Lease for Two Transportation Services Division Parking Lots

Authorization to Extend the Sublease for Board District 4 Field Office

Authorization to Negotiate and Execute Alternative Agreement and Facilities Use Agreement with
Valor Academy Charter School, Inc. and Bright Star Schools, Inc.

Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Approve a
Charter Augmentation Grant for the Camino Nuevo Charter Academy Project and Authorization to
Negotiate and Execute All Agreements Necessary for the Financing, Construction and Operation of a
Permanent Charter School Facility

Charter for Fenton Academy for Social and Emotional Learning (FASEL)

Charter for Fenton Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Academy

Conversion to Affiliated Charter Status for The Academy for Enriched Sciences Magnet

Conversion to Affiliated Charter Status for Woodland Hills Academy

Material Revision to the Charter for Animo Jackie Robinson High to Increase Its
Enrollment from 525 Students to 600 Students

Contingent Material Revision to the Charter for Endeavor College Preparatory Charter School to Merge
with Futuro College Preparatory Elementary School

Renewal of the Affiliated Charter for Westwood Charter

Fiscal Year 2014 Office of the Inspector General Work Plan
Los Angeles Trust for Childrens Health Bylaws Amendment

Alternative Schools of Choice Annual Evaluation

Establishment of New Magnet Programs

Renewal of the Transition Partnership Program for Three Years: 2013-2016

Naming of Michelle Obama Elementary School

Naming of Theodore Roosevelt Senior High School

Naming of Felicitas and Gonzalo Mndez High School

BOARD MEMBER RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION:

Ms. Martinez, Mr. Kayser, Mr. Zimmer - Resolution in Support of Aligning Preschool through 3rd
Grade (Noticed June 18, 2013, 9 a.m.)

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District is committed to providing every student with
a quality education in a safe, caring environment and ensuring that every student will graduate
college-prepared and career ready;

Whereas, To ensure that all children are on the path to college and career readiness, we must lay
the foundation early, focusing on childrens learning starting at birth, preparing them for
Kindergarten and building on their progress in early elementary grades;

Whereas, PreK-3 alignment is a national initiative to transform how children ages three to eight
learn in schools based on research demonstrating that the cornerstone of a successful education is
the learning that takes place from preschool through third grade;

Whereas, Currently, there is little instructional coordination from year to year, even within the
same school, much less across a school district or a state;

Whereas, Without early education programs, children growing up in low-income households lose
ground to their middle-class peers and that gap only widens as they advance through elementary
school;

Whereas, According to decades of developmental and educational research, the first eight years
of life are critical because that is when children acquire three distinct types of skills and
knowledge:

Developing a strong foundation in cognitive skills such as early reading and math;
Building social and emotional capabilities that allow children to interact productively
with both peers and adults; and
Establishing engagement in school and learning
1
;

Whereas, During a childs first three years of life, their brains are being wired for future success.
Brain development is more rapid during this period than at any other, with more than 700 neural
connections created each second. Children are learning everything from smiling, walking and
speaking to making choices, exploring and developing relationships
2
;

Whereas, In the pre-Kindergarten years, young children not only develop core academic
knowledge in pre-literacy and early math, they develop important learning skills, such as paying
attention, managing emotions and completing tasks. Over a hundred studies, in the U.S. alone,
show that quality preschool significantly benefits childrens school success;

Whereas, There is an increasing number of English Language Learners under the age of five in
our community and there is also a growing body of research indicating the ability of young
children to learn more than one language in a supportive environment and that acquiring more
than one language in the early years increases brain development and promotes academic
achievement;

Whereas, The early elementary grades are when children learn to understand foundation math,
reading, and reasoning skills that allow them to tackle more complex subjects in fourth grade and
beyond;

Whereas, California is failing to meet the needs of all its children and far too many of
Californias children do not have access to the high-quality early learning experiences they need
and deserve;

Whereas, Our students are not getting a strong start when it matters most;

Whereas, In California, 52 percent of 3
rd
graders test below proficient in English-Language Arts
and more than 30 percent are not proficient in Mathematics. For low-income students and those
of color, significant barriers exist, with nearly half testing below proficient in both English and
Math
3
;

Whereas, In 2011-2012, only 43 percent of the Districts 3rd graders were proficient in 3
rd
grade
English Language Arts and 62 percent of 3rd graders are expected to be proficient in English
Language Arts by 2013-2014;

Whereas, The District currently educates over 35,000 young children in early learning programs
intended to prepare them for K-12 success;

1
Kauerz, K. (2012). "Pre-K-3rd Grade: A Comprehensive Approach." Retrieved from: http://www.eec.state.ma.us/docs1/NewsUpdates/20120807-prek-3rd-
comprehensive-approach.pdf
2
Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (n.d.). "Five Numbers to Remember About Early Childhood Development." Retrieved from:
http://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/multimedia/interactive_features/five-numbers
06/12/13version
3
California Department of Education. (2012). "2012 STAR Test Results." Retrieved from:
http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2012/ViewReport.aspx?ps=true&lstTestYear=2012&lstTestType=C&lstCounty=&lstDistrict=&lstSchool=&lstGroup=1&lstSubGr
oup=1

Whereas, While well-designed pre-Kindergarten does improve childrens social and cognitive
skills, these gains frequently fade as children advance beyond Kindergarten;

Whereas, Since adopting a preschool through 3
rd
grade approach within its school district, the
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) in Maryland has seen nearly 88 percent of 3
rd

graders read proficiently and a narrowing of the achievement gap and increase in benefits for
English Learners;

Whereas, Research shows that students who start out behind too often stay behind and those who
are not reading proficiently in 3
rd
grade are four times more likely to not graduate from high
school
4
;

Whereas, There is increasing evidence that high quality curricula and instruction, data-driven
improvement, and instructional leadership that creates and sustains a supportive environment for
young learners are central to effective reforms and that, in concert, they help to narrow
achievement gaps and provide children with a solid foundation for lifelong learning; and

Whereas, When these crucial efforts are connected and aligned to create continuity between early
care and education (ECE) and elementary schools, the gains are even greater; now, therefore, be
it

Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District reaffirms its
commitment to its youngest learners by committing to the development of a framework based on
educational standards, curricula, assessment and professional development that are strongly
aligned across high-quality pre-Kindergarten, Kindergarten, first, second and third grades;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to establish a Preschool Through 3
rd

Grade (P-3) Alignment and Articulation Task Force comprised of the Office of Early Childhood
Education, Office of Curriculum, Instruction and School Support, Parent and Community
Services Branch, early learning content and curriculum experts, community stakeholders,
Facilities Services Division, school leaders, teachers, key public institutions including
universities and philanthropies, and others as appropriate for the purpose of developing a
framework by which the District can adopt a preschool through 3rd grade approach;

Resolved further, That the aforementioned Task Force is charged with developing goals and a
comprehensive plan to position the District to become a leader in the nation around aligning
preschool through 3rd grade, primarily focusing on issues of pre-K-3 implementation across both
school- and community-based sites; and, be it finally,

Resolved, The Task Force will issue a report within 90 days outlining recommendations for
improvements to the Districts long-term educational challenges that begin with creating an
aligned and high-quality system of early learning across early childhood and elementary
education.

4
Hernandez, D. (2012). "Double Jeopardy: How Third-Grade Reading Skills and Poverty Influence High School Graduation." Retrieved from:
http://www.aecf.org/~/media/Pubs/Topics/Education/Other/DoubleJeopardyHowThirdGradeReadingSkillsandPovery/DoubleJeopardyReport030812forweb

The report shall focus on:

Funding sources for increasing access to high quality preschool for children in all of the
Districts early learning programs from birth to age five, particularly in areas in the
District where early learning opportunities are severely limited.
High-quality parental engagement in early learning programs that help position parents to
serve as their childs first and lifelong teacher, as well as, educating them to become
critical advocates for all children in the District.
Child development and early childhood curriculum.
Data systems to track progress of children across preschool through 3rd grade.
Explore potential collaboration with internal and community based providers who can
offer developmental screenings to diagnose and treat early developmental delays.
Explore joint ECE and K-3 professional development.
Work with the Facilities Services Division to identify and prioritize highest need
communities for expansion.

RESOLUTIONS REQUESTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT:

Appointment of Member to the School Construction Bond Oversight Committee

Resolved, That the Governing Board of Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District
ratifies the nomination of Mr. Garrett Francis, representing the Associated General Contractors
of California Los Angeles District, for a two-year term, commencing immediately, and
determines that Mr. Francis is not an employee, official, vendor, contractor, or consultant of the
District.

CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS:

Report of Correspondence

PUBLIC HEARINGS:

Resolution of Intention to Dedicate an Easement to the City of Los Angeles at Harry Bridges
Span School

Ms. Garca made the following statement:

Reference is made to the following March 19, 2013 Board of Education Report No. 294-12/13,
wherein the Board adopted a resolution of intention to dedicate an easement to the City of Los
Angeles at Harry Bridges Span School.

The Board has fixed this meeting as the time and place for the public hearing upon the question of
such dedication.

An opportunity is now given to anyone present to file with the Board petitions protesting the proposed
dedication, signed by at least ten percent of the qualified electors of the District as shown by the
affidavit of one of the petitioners.

No petitions being filed, a motion is now in order to adopt the resolution and to direct the Director of
Real Estate to sign on behalf of the Board the deeds dedicating said properties.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

12 p.m., Regular Board Meeting Minutes, October 9, 2012
1 p.m., Special Board Meeting Minutes, April 17, 2012
9 a.m., Regular Closed Session Meeting Minutes, May 14, 2013

MISCELLANEOUS:

Motion to schedule a Regular Board Meeting on July 2, 2013 at 10 a.m.

NEW BUSINESS FOR ACTION (Continued):

Approval of the Material Revision of the Charter for Westside Innovative School House (WISH) to
Expand from K-5 to K-6

Mr. Zimmer moved that the consent calendar be adopted with the following amendments:

Board Report No. 310 12/13, Submission of Fiscal Year 213-14 Consolidated Application for
Categorical Aid Programs, amended to change the total projected revenue on Page 2 from $487.6
million to $477.4 million
Board Report No. 323 12/13, Fiscal Year 2014 Office of the Inspector General Work Plan,
amended to add an audit of the Title I process
Board Report No. 319 12/13, Alternative Schools of Choice Annual Evaluation, amended to
move Revere Math/Science Magnet from Page 4 to the Affiliated Charters section on Page 5

Ms. Martinez seconded the motion.


Mr. David Tokofsky, Associated Administrators of Los Angeles (AALA), on Board of
Education Report No. 298 12/13, 2013-14 Renewal of the Affiliated Charter for Colfax
Charter Elementary
Mr. Bill Ring on Board of Education Report No. 310 12/13, Submission of Fiscal Year
2013-14 Consolidated Application for Categorical Aid Programs
Mr. David Lyell, United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA), on Board of Education Report
No. 346 12/13, Reemployment of Certificated Employees Based on Special Training and
Experience

Remarks were heard from Dr. Vladovic regarding the inclusion of Early Childhood, Options Programs,
and Adult Education in the MiSIS Program in relation to Board Report No. 257 12/13, Amendment to
the Facilities Services Division and Information Technology Strategic Execution Plans to Define and
Approve 309 School Facilities Improvement Projects.

Ms. Cheryl Ortega, UTLA, on Board of Education Report No. 318 12/13, Amendment to the
Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Approve a Charter Augmentation
Grant for the Camino Nuevo Charter Academy Project and Authorization to Negotiate and
Execute All Agreements Necessary for the Financing, Construction and Operation of a
Permanent Charter School Facility

Mr. Hovatter and Superintendent Deasy responded to questions from Board Members regarding charter
augmentation grants and Proposition 39.

Remarks were heard from Mr. Zimmer regarding K-12 instructional pipelines in relation to Board of
Education Report No. 335 12/13, Contingent Material Revision to the Charter for Endeavor College
Preparatory Charter School to Merge with Futuro College Preparatory Elementary School.

Remarks were heard from Mr. Zimmer regarding having evaluation information for all District schools
in relation to Board of Education Report No. 319 12/13, Alternative Schools of Choice Annual
Evaluation.

Ms. Galatzan commented on Board policies for naming schools in relation to Board of Education Report
No. 325 12/13, Naming of Michelle Obama Elementary School.
Dr. Vladovic requested the Superintendent ensure the school has a school garden.

Remarks were heard from Mr. Zimmer on Board of Education Report No. 349 12/13, Approval of the
Material Revision of the Charter for Westside Innovative School House (WISH) to Expand from K-5 to
K-6.

Ms. Sandy Escobedo, Advancement Project, on the Resolution in Support of Aligning Preschool
through Third Grade
Ms. Ofelia Medina, Alliance for a Better Community (ABC), on the Resolution in Support of
Aligning Preschool through Third Grade
Mr. Ernesto Saldaa, Early Ed California, on the Resolution in Support of Aligning Preschool
through Third Grade
Ms. Kim Pattillo Brownson, Advancement Project, on the Resolution in Support of Aligning
Preschool through Third Grade
Mr. Warren Fletcher, UTLA, on the Resolution in Support of Aligning Preschool through Third
Grade
Ms. Silvia Leon, Montara Avenue Elementary School, on the Resolution in Support of
Aligning Preschool through Third Grade
Ms. Sandy Houston, Teacher, on the Resolution in Support of Aligning Preschool through
Third Grade
Ms. Sherrie Fisher-Bobrosky, Teacher, on the Resolution in Support of Aligning Preschool
through Third Grade

Remarks were heard from Mr. Zimmer and Dr. Vladovic regarding maintaining the parent component of
the School Readiness Language Development Program (SRLDP).

Following the speakers, the Consent Items were adopted by general consent with Board of Education
Report Nos. 310 12/13, 323 12/13, and 319 12/13 being adopted as amended.

Mr. Kayser recorded no votes on the following items:

Board of Education Report No. 346 12/13, Reemployment of Certificated Employees Based on
Special Training and Experience
Board of Education Report No. 318 12/13, Amendment to the Facilities Services Division
Strategic Execution Plan to Approve a Charter Augmentation Grant for the Camino Nuevo
Charter Academy Project and Authorization to Negotiate and Execute All Agreements Necessary
for the Financing, Construction and Operation of a Permanent Charter School Facility
Board of Education Report No. 330 12/13, Charter for Fenton Academy for Social and
Emotional Learning
Board of Education Report No. 331 12/13, Charter for Fenton STEM Academy
Board of Education Report No. 334 12/13, Material Revision to the Charter for Animo Jackie
Robinson High to Increase its Enrollment from 525 Students to 600 Students
Board of Education Report No. 335 12/13, Contingent Material Revision to the Charter for
Endeavor College Preparatory Charter School to Merge with Futuro College Preparatory
Elementary School
Board of Education Report No. 340 12/13, Renewal of the Transition Partnership Program for
Three Years: 2013-2016
Board of Education Report No. 349 12/13, Approval of the Material Revision to the Charter for
Westside Innovative School House to Expand from K-5 to K-6

Ms. LaMotte recorded a no vote on the following item:

Board of Education Report No. 318 12/13, Amendment to the Facilities Services Division
Strategic Execution Plan to Approve a Charter Augmentation Grant for the Camino Nuevo
Charter Academy Project and Authorization to Negotiate and Execute All Agreements Necessary
for the Financing, Construction and Operation of a Permanent Charter School Facility

Ms. Garca recorded an abstention on the following item:

Board of Education Report No. 337 12/13, Authority to Execute a Joint Powers Agreement
with the County of Los Angeles for the Construction of the San Fernando High School Teen
Health Center

- - -
- - -

BOARD MEMBER RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION

Ms. Galatzan moved the following resolution, Local Control Funding Formula Strategy and
Implementation:

Whereas, Governor Jerry Browns proposed Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) attempts to
rectify longstanding funding disparities between school districts across California;

Whereas, The LCFF aims to simplify education funding, and create a system that is transparent,
clear and equitable;
Whereas, The LCFF does away with categorical funding, much of which no longer serves its
intended purpose;

Whereas, The LCFF aims to make education funding equitable, but not equal, and to leave no
student in the state behind;

Whereas, To make sure funding is equitable, and recognizing that some students need more
services than others, the LCFF allocates additional funding to students who live in poverty, are
foster children, or are English Learners (supplemental funding), and further funding on top of
that to districts where more than half the students fall in one of those categories (concentration
grants); and

Whereas, Every child in the Los Angeles Unified School District is entitled to a certain level of
basic services to support his or her education; now, therefore be it

Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District will continue to
advocate for Governor Browns proposed Local Control Funding Formula in Sacramento;

Resolved further, That when education funds come to the District in the form of supplemental
funding and a concentration grant, that money will follow the child to the school site;

Resolved further, That the Superintendent and his staff will come back in 90 days with different
allocation models where the dollars follow the child;

Resolved further, That those models will take into consideration the base level of funding every
school needs to survive and thriveregardless of zip code, size or composition;

Resolved further, That the Superintendent will bring back a timeline to the Board for
determining what that base level of funding is; and, be if finally

Resolved, That the above process to determine what services and programs are part of a schools
base funding will include parent, school, and community participation.

Ms. Garca seconded the motion.


Ms. Rachel Greene, Parent
Ms. Mary Rose OLeary, Teacher
Ms. Jenny Skoble, Parent
Ms. Heather Thompson, Parent
Mr. Ryan Smith, United Way


Remarks were heard from Mr. Tokofsky regarding the position of AALA.

Mr. Edgar Zazueta, Director, Office of Government Relations, and Superintendent Deasy responded to
questions from Board Members regarding per pupil funding, distribution of funds, funds following
students, relevant legislation, and budget assumptions.

Remarks were heard from Mr. Fletcher regarding the position of UTLA.

Board Member remarks continued.

Mr. Zazueta, Superintendent Deasy, and Ms. Megan Reilly, Chief Financial Officer, responded to
questions from Board Members regarding allocation of funds, reporting to State, timelines, and impact
on special education funding.

Dr. Vladovic moved that the resolution be postponed to the August 2013 Regular Board meeting.
Mr. Zimmer seconded the motion. The amendment to postpone the resolution was adopted, 4 ayes, 3
noes, Ms. Galatzan, Ms. Martinez and Ms. Garca.


Contract Authorization for Common Core Technology Project Plan


In accordance with Government Code Section 87105 of the Political Reform Act, Board Member
Kayser, Superintendent Deasy, and General Counsel David Holmquist have disqualifying interest in
the form of stock holdings or income from stock holdings in Apple, Inc. They will step out of the
room until the Boards discussion and action on this item have concluded.

Ms. LaMotte moved that the report be adopted. Ms. Galatzan seconded the motion.


Ms. Robyn Hines, Microsoft
Mr. Warren Fletcher, UTLA

Mr. Hovatter, Dr. Jaime Aquino, Deputy Superintendent of Instruction, Mr. Matt Hill, Chief Strategy
Officer, Mr. John Sterritt, Director, Environmental and Health Services, Ms. Bernadette Lucas, Director,
Common Core Technology Project, and Ms. Michelle King, Senior Deputy Superintendent, responded
to questions from Board Members regarding Board authorization, ratification of contract, product
selection, scope of work, Phase I and II contracts, staffing, digital curriculum, device accessories, final
price, device replacement, warranties, access to technology, additional expenses, comparison of devices,
student digital portfolios, procurement process, performance contract, devices for charter schools,
compatibility, timelines, e-waste, vendor selection, English Learners, device content, training,
professional development, contract cancellation, and funding for coordinators.

After discussion and by general consent, the report was adopted. Mr. Kayser was absent.

BOARD MEMBER RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION (Continued)

Ms. Galatzan moved the following resolution, Beyond 180: Increasing Instructional Time to Improve
Student Success:

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has made exceptional progress towards
increasing educational success and preparing college- and career-ready students;

Whereas, It is the responsibility of every adult involved in the educational system to continue
implementing solutions to get to 100% graduation;

Whereas, President Barack Obama has stated the challenges of a new century demand more
time in the classroom;

Whereas, In 1983, a report entitled A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform by
the Commission on Excellence in Education recommended that "school districts and State
legislatures should strongly consider 7-hour school days, as well as a 200- to 220-day school
year";

Whereas, The California Education Code sections 46200 and 406201.1 penalize and fine school
districts that have an instructional calendar shorter than the state minimum of 175 days;

Whereas, The Districts instructional calendar is currently 180 days;

Whereas, It is estimated that more than 100 school districts across the nation have been forced to
implement a four day school week due to severe budget cuts;

Whereas, According to the National Center on Time and Learning, as of 2012, more than 1000
schools across the United States of America have implemented extended learning time strategies
to increase student outcomes;

Whereas, Extending the instructional calendar will provide an opportunity for credentialed and
classified staff to demonstrate their commitment to student success;

Whereas, The District, after passage of Proposition 30, is expected to see an increase in funding
in the 2014-15 school year to increase educational equity in our schools; and

Whereas, Governor Browns proposed Local Control Funding Formula suggests an eventual net
increase in funding for the District; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District recognizes and
commends educational leaders that have implemented extended learning time strategies within
schools across the District;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to propose a strategy to implement
extended learning time;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to examine the feasibility of
increasing the academic calendar beyond 180 days, including but not limited to 1) extending the
2014-15 academic calendar by at least 5% and 2) the feasibility of a 200 day academic calendar
year; and, be it finally

Resolved, That the Board directs the Superintendent to report back on the implementation of this
resolution within 120 days.

Ms. LaMotte seconded the motion.


Mr. Elmer Roldan, United Way
Ms. Leslie Valmonte, ABC
Mr. Lester Mesa, InnerCity Struggle
Ms. Blanca Dueas, InnerCity Struggle


Mr. Kayser moved that the resolution be amended to change implementation to feasibility in the
final Resolved. With the consent of the resolutions mover and seconder, the amendment was accepted
as friendly.

After discussion and by general consent, the resolution was adopted as amended.

The final text of the resolution reads as follows:

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has made exceptional progress towards
increasing educational success and preparing college- and career-ready students;

Whereas, It is the responsibility of every adult involved in the educational system to continue
implementing solutions to get to 100% graduation;

Whereas, President Barack Obama has stated the challenges of a new century demand more
time in the classroom;

Whereas, In 1983, a report entitled A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform by
the Commission on Excellence in Education recommended that "school districts and State
legislatures should strongly consider 7-hour school days, as well as a 200- to 220-day school
year";

Whereas, The California Education Code sections 46200 and 406201.1 penalize and fine school
districts that have an instructional calendar shorter than the state minimum of 175 days;

Whereas, The Districts instructional calendar is currently 180 days;

Whereas, It is estimated that more than 100 school districts across the nation have been forced to
implement a four day school week due to severe budget cuts;

Whereas, According to the National Center on Time and Learning, as of 2012, more than 1000
schools across the United States of America have implemented extended learning time strategies
to increase student outcomes;

Whereas, Extending the instructional calendar will provide an opportunity for credentialed and
classified staff to demonstrate their commitment to student success;

in the 2014-15 school year to increase educational equity in our schools; and

increase in funding for the District; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District recognizes and
commends educational leaders that have implemented extended learning time strategies within
schools across the District;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to propose a strategy to implement
extended learning time;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to examine the feasibility of
increasing the academic calendar beyond 180 days, including but not limited to 1) extending the
2014-15 academic calendar by at least 5% and 2) the feasibility of a 200 day academic calendar
year; and, be it finally

Resolved, That the Board directs the Superintendent to report back on the implementation
feasibility of this resolution within 120 days.

Mr. Kayser moved the following amended version of the resolution, Creating Equitable and Enriching
Learning Environments for All Los Angeles Unified School District Students:

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has continued its upward trajectory of
academic achievement and made significant progress in preparing its students for successful
careers;

Whereas, The District has built 131 new Kindergarten through twelfth grade schools to eliminate
year-round calendars and chronically over-crowded campuses;

Whereas, The District is committed to creating the most enriching academic environment for all
students, which includes a reduction in class-size;

Whereas, The District is committed to implementing Common Core Standards and to
transforming its curriculum to an A-G model;

Whereas, The National Education Association (NEA), in a 2008 policy brief stated that class-
size reduction yields:

Reduction in the achievement gap
Early identification of learning disabilities
Improved high school graduation rates
Increased college entrance rates
Improved student behavior

Whereas, The Districts current class-size ratios by grade are:

K-3=24 students :1 teacher
4-6=30 students :1 teacher
7-8=30 students and above

Whereas, The 2008 NEA policy brief on class-size reduction states, a $2 return on every $1
spent is obtained when calculating the financial benefits of class-size reduction;

Whereas, Essential classified staff responsible for maintaining a safe, nurturing environment
have been consistently depleted at schools leading to supervision and less time interacting and
fostering an enriching learning experience for students;

Whereas, Administrative norms are significantly higher than they were prior to the 2007-08
budget leading to less supervision and less instructional leadership;

Whereas, School-based classified staff have been depleted at schools leading to less supervision
and less time interacting and fostering an enriching environment for students;

Whereas, The District seeks to restore school site employee salaries to competitive rates similar
to other school districts;

Whereas, District students have dealt with shortened school years and the lack of an appropriate
summer intervention program to meet their needs;

in the 2014-15 school year to promote educational equity in our schools;

Whereas, The last year the District was not negatively affected by budget cuts was 2007-08 and
even then, some levels, such as student-to-counselor ratios, were less than optimal;

increase in funding for the District; and

Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District understands that
working conditions of employees must be negotiated; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District directs the
Superintendent to examine the feasibility of implementing class-size reduction for the 2014-15
academic calendar and to develop a long term, class-size reduction strategy that will yield
positive academic results;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to design a three year strategy to
implement the return of other school site certificated positions, for example, counselors and
librarians, that have a direct impact on student success and welfare to the same levels as 2007-08
for consideration by the Board;

implement the return of classified positions and hours per position that have been lost to the
same support levels as 2007-2008 for consideration by the Board, while maintaining the current
level of classified employees and taking into account the immediate need for additional classified
staff with the implementation of beneficial class-size reductions;

increase enrollment in adult and early education for consideration by the Board;

implement the return of classified positions (e.g. Building and Grounds Workers and
Maintenance and Operations Workers), that have a direct impact on student success and welfare
to the same levels as 2007-08 for consideration by the Board;

implement returning school site administrative levels to the 2007-08 school years for
consideration by the Board;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to design a three year strategy for
consideration by the Board to implement competitive wages for District employees whose pay
rates have been cut repeatedly over the past several years;

implement an extended school year or provide for the restoration of a full summer intervention
and enrichment program for consideration by the Board; and, be it finally

Resolved, That the Board directs the Superintendent to report back at a Board meeting on the
implementation of all strategies called for in this resolution within sixty days.

Dr. Vladovic seconded the motion.

Ms. Martinez moved that the resolution be amended to add a Resolved directing the Superintendent to
design a three year strategy to increase funding for arts education and integrated arts instruction. With
the consent of the resolutions mover and seconder, the amendment was accepted as friendly.

Ms. Garca moved that the resolution be amended to add a Resolved directing the Superintendent to add
a Psychiatric Social Worker to each site. With the consent of the resolutions mover and seconder, the
amendment was accepted as friendly.


Ms. Martha Snchez, Parent
Ms. Maria Vijares, Parent
Ms. Janis Lukstein, Teacher
Ms. Odilia Mendez, Student
Ms. Antonetta Garcia, Parent
Ms. Melanie House, Teacher
Ms. Susan Fong, Counselor
Mr. Michael Morrow, Parent & Counselor
Ms. Yvonne Lozell, Padres Unidos de South Gate
Ms. Maria Parra, Padres Unidos de South Gate


After discussion and on roll call vote, the resolution was adopted as amended, 5 ayes, 2 noes,
Ms. Galatzan and Ms. Garca.

The final text of the resolution reads as follows:

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has continued its upward trajectory of
academic achievement and made significant progress in preparing its students for successful
careers;

Whereas, The District has built 131 new Kindergarten through twelfth grade schools to eliminate
year-round calendars and chronically over-crowded campuses;
Whereas, The District is committed to creating the most enriching academic environment for all
students, which includes a reduction in class-size;

Whereas, The District is committed to implementing Common Core Standards and to
transforming its curriculum to an A-G model;

Whereas, The National Education Association (NEA), in a 2008 policy brief stated that class-
size reduction yields:

Reduction in the achievement gap
Early identification of learning disabilities
Improved high school graduation rates
Increased college entrance rates
Improved student behavior

Whereas, The Districts current class-size ratios by grade are:

K-3=24 students :1 teacher
4-6=30 students :1 teacher

Whereas, The 2008 NEA policy brief on class-size reduction states, a $2 return on every $1
spent is obtained when calculating the financial benefits of class-size reduction;

Whereas, Essential classified staff responsible for maintaining a safe, nurturing environment
have been consistently depleted at schools leading to supervision and less time interacting and
fostering an enriching learning experience for students;

Whereas, Administrative norms are significantly higher than they were prior to the 2007-08
budget leading to less supervision and less instructional leadership;

Whereas, School-based classified staff have been depleted at schools leading to less supervision
and less time interacting and fostering an enriching environment for students;

Whereas, The District seeks to restore school site employee salaries to competitive rates similar
to other school districts;
Whereas, District students have dealt with shortened school years and the lack of an appropriate
summer intervention program to meet their needs;

in the 2014-15 school year to promote educational equity in our schools;

Whereas, The last year the District was not negatively affected by budget cuts was 2007-08 and
even then, some levels, such as student-to-counselor ratios, were less than optimal;

increase in funding for the District; and

Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District understands that
working conditions of employees must be negotiated; now, therefore, be it

Superintendent to examine the feasibility of implementing class-size reduction for the 2014-15
academic calendar and to develop a long term, class-size reduction strategy that will yield
positive academic results;

implement the return of other school site certificated positions, for example, counselors and
librarians, that have a direct impact on student success and welfare to the same levels as 2007-08
for consideration by the Board;

implement the return of classified positions and hours per position that have been lost to the
same support levels as 2007-2008 for consideration by the Board, while maintaining the current
level of classified employees and taking into account the immediate need for additional classified
staff with the implementation of beneficial class-size reductions;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to add a Psychiatric Social Worker
to each site;

increase enrollment in adult and early education for consideration by the Board;

increase funding for arts education and integrated arts instruction;

implement the return of classified positions (e.g. Building and Grounds Workers and
Maintenance and Operations Workers), that have a direct impact on student success and welfare
to the same levels as 2007-08 for consideration by the Board;

implement returning school site administrative levels to the 2007-08 school years for
consideration by the Board;

Resolved further, That the Board directs the Superintendent to design a three year strategy for
consideration by the Board to implement competitive wages for District employees whose pay
rates have been cut repeatedly over the past several years;

implement an extended school year or provide for the restoration of a full summer intervention
and enrichment program for consideration by the Board; and, be it finally

Resolved, That the Board directs the Superintendent to report back at a Board meeting on the
implementation of all strategies called for in this resolution within sixty days.

NEW BUSINESS FOR ACTION (Continued)

Denial of the Renewal of the Charter for Anahuacalmeccac International University
Preparatory High School and Amendment to Expand to Grades K-8

Ms. Galatzan moved that the report be amended. Mr. Kayser seconded the motion.


Mr. George Buzzetti, Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) CA
Speaker
Dr. Irene Vasquez, University of New Mexico
Mr. Ernesto Coln, Loyola Marymount University
Mr. Marcos Aguilar, Executive Director, Semillas Community Schools
Ms. Minnie Ferguson, Semillas Community Schools
Ms. Maria Perez, Student
Ms. Nancy Luna, Parent
Mr. Hector Gomez, Parent
Mr. Edmundo Perez, Parent
Ms. Stephanie Garcia

- - -
President Garca passed the gavel to Ms. Galatzan.
- - -

Mr. Saloman Zavala, Esq., Anahuacalmeccac International University Preparatory High School

Ms. Garca moved that the report be amended to renew the charter for five years. Ms. Martinez
seconded the motion, which failed on roll call vote, 6 noes, 1 aye, Ms. Garca.

On roll call vote, the report was adopted, 6 ayes, 1 no, Ms. Garca.

Adoption of the Superintendents 2013-14 Final Budget and Approval of Education
Protection Account Resolutions for 2012-13 and 2013-14

Earlier in the meeting, Ms. Garca made the following statement:

Before action is taken on Board of Education Report No. 343 12/13 regarding the Adoption of
the Superintendents 2013-14 Final Budget and Approval of Education Protection Account
Resolutions for 2012-13 and 2013-14, a public hearing must be held.

This constitutes a public hearing on the report, and a maximum of 12 individuals who wish to
address the Board on this item will be heard. Those who wish to speak to this report should pull a
speaker form from the slots located on the pillar in the rear of the Board Room. Speakers will be

Ms. Martinez moved that the report be adopted. Mr. Kayser seconded the motion.


Mr. Vladomar Morales, Students United
Ms. Laura Vazquez
Ms. Peggy Pea, Teacher
Ms. Karla Garcia, Parent
Ms. Melanie House, Teacher
Ms. Gilberta Gonzalez
Mr. Matthew Kogan, UTLA
Ms. Janis Lukstein, Teacher
Mr. David Lyell, UTLA
Ms. Hattie McFrazier, UTLA
Ms. Heidi Brewington, 31
st
District PTSA


Ms. Reilly responded to questions from Board Members regarding dual budget adoption.

After discussion and by general consent, the report was adopted.

BOARD MEMBER RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION (continued)

Dr. Vladovic moved the following amended resolution, Comprehensive Information for Parent Initiated
School Transformation:

Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District recognizes the
essential role of parents and legal guardians in every aspect of their childs public education and
in the successful transformation of schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District;

Whereas, California State Education Code 53300-53303 (The Parent Empowerment Act) allows
for parents at the persistently lowest achieving schools to trigger transformation options for
school transformation if over 50% of parents or legal guardians at a campus sign a petition
calling for the implementation of one of four interventions;

Whereas, California State Education Code 53300-53303 only allows parents and legal guardians
who sign the petition to vote for the selected transformation model;

Whereas, California State Education Code 53300-53303 does not currently require public
meetings or other mechanisms to ensure accurate and balanced information about school
performance or transformation options be provided to all stakeholders during the petition
process;

Whereas, Two District elementary schools have been transformed through this process in the
2013-14 school year and the Board assumes there will be several attempts to transform District
schools in the 2014-15 school year;

Whereas, Very limited information about the school and monitoring of the signature gathering
process was presented to the Board for 24
th
Street and Weigand Avenue Elementary Schools;

Whereas, The Board has not adopted specific policies and guidelines for receiving petitions and
validating the transformation process; and

Whereas, The Superintendent has not issued clear guidelines for principals and school site
personnel regarding protocols and operational procedures for each stage of the parent trigger
process; now, therefore, be it

Office of General Counsel and the Superintendent to submit the following information to the
Board for each future transformation petition that is presented to the Board:

1. Independent verification of the signatures, as mandated by State and Federal law, and the
signature gathering process
2. Evidence of public notice and a summary of information presented at a public meeting
held in the school community detailing accurate information about the school and the
available options for transformation
3. An analysis of five years of school data
4. A summary of interventions attempted at the school site and an analysis the success or
failure of these attempted interventions
5. An analysis of school report card data and/or school climate survey data;
6. Verification that the school is currently subject to intervention under the Parent
Empowerment Act;

Resolved further, that the Board directs the Superintendent to report back with options for
impartial third party facilitators (universities, League of Women Voters) who could organize
public meetings, under the mandates of state law, regarding the Parent Empowerment Act
intervention process and possible outcomes in order to provide all stakeholders with accurate and
objective information. These meetings should happen within the area covered by each
Educational Service Center and at specific school sites per Site Council request;

Resolved further, That the Superintendent bring guidelines and operational procedures for school
site personnel to use during parent trigger transformation processes for review by the Board at
the first scheduled business meeting of the 2013-14 school year; and, be it finally

Resolved, That the Board urges directs the Superintendent and Office of Government Relations
staff to seek legislative changes to California State Education Code 53300-53303 and or
administrative rules and regulations that will better serve all parents and legal guardians in the
transformation process. These changes should include, but not be limited to:

1. Provisions that ensure all parents and legal guardians (not solely those who sign the
petition) be allowed meaningful participation in all aspects of the transformation process
and vote on the transformation option;
2. Provisions that ensure accurate and independently verifiable information about school
performance and transformation intervention options that are available to all parents; and
3. Provisions that safeguard against manipulation of families in the process and validate
training of all Parent Empowerment Act signature gatherers.

Ms. LaMotte seconded the motion.


Ms. Karen Wolfe
Ms. Raquel Cedillo, Parent
Ms. Clara Gonzalez
Mr. Ray Gonzalez
Ms. Shalita Williams
Ms. Guadalupe Rincon, Parent
Mr. David Tokofsky
Ms. Ingrid Villeda, UTLA
Mr. Warren Fletcher, UTLA

- - -
President Garca assumed the Chair.
- - -

Mr. Gabriel Rose, Parent Revolution

Remarks were heard from Board Members and Superintendent Deasy.

Ms. Galatzan moved that the following amendments be adopted:


for parents at persistently lowest achieving schools to trigger options for school transformation if
over 50% of parents or legal guardians at a campus sign a petition calling for the implementation
of one of four interventions;


process;


th




1. Independent verification of the signatures and the signature gathering process
2. Evidence, if any, that the District provided of public notice and a summary of information
presented at a public meeting held in the school community detailing accurate
information about the school and the available options for transformation

site personnel to use during parent trigger processes for review by the Board at the first
scheduled business meeting of the 2013-14 school year and for those guidelines and operational
procedures to include, at a minimum:

1. Issuance of a public, formal Parent Empowerment Code of Conduct and Parent
Empowerment Fact Sheet to prevent misconduct amongst school site personnel; and, be
it finally

Resolved, That the Board urges the Superintendent and Office of Government Relations staff to
seek legislative changes to California State Education Code 53300-53303 that will better serve
all parents and legal guardians in the transformation process. These changes should include, but
not be limited to:

performance and transformation options that are available to all parents; and
training of all Parent Empowerment Act signature gatherers Direction to local school
boards when faced with verified evidence of fraud in the Parent Empowerment Petition.


Ms. LaMotte requested to co-sponsor the resolution.

Ms. Garca seconded the amendments. On roll call, the amendments failed, 4 noes, 3 ayes,
Ms. Galatzan, Ms. Martinez and Ms. Garca.

Ms. Garca moved that the final Resolved be amended to ask the State to repeal Education Code 53300-
53303. Mr. Kayser seconded the motion. On roll call, the amendment was adopted, 4 ayes, 3 noes,
Ms. LaMotte, Dr. Vladovic, and Mr. Zimmer.

After discussion and on roll call, the resolution was adopted as amended, 5 ayes, 2 noes, Ms. Galatzan
and Ms. Garca.

Later in the meeting, Mr. Zimmer moved the reconsideration of the amendment, placing the resolution
back before the Board in its originally moved form. Dr. Vladovic seconded the motion. On roll call, the
motion was adopted, 4 ayes, 2 noes, Ms. Galatzan and Ms. Garca. Ms. Martinez was absent.

Ms. LaMotte moved the resolution with its originally moved language. Mr. Kayser seconded the
motion. On roll call, the resolution was adopted as originally amended, 4 ayes, 2 noes, Ms. Galatzan
and Ms. Garca. Ms. Martinez was absent.

The final version of the resolution reads as follows:


for parents at the persistently lowest achieving schools to trigger transformation options for
school transformation if over 50% of parents or legal guardians at a campus sign a petition
calling for the implementation of one of four interventions;


process;


th




7. Independent verification of the signatures, as mandated by State and Federal law, and the
signature gathering process
8. Evidence of public notice and a summary of information presented at a public meeting
held in the school community detailing accurate information about the school and the
available options for transformation
12. Verification that the school is currently subject to intervention under the Parent
Empowerment Act;

Resolved further, that the Board directs the Superintendent to report back with options for
impartial third party facilitators (universities, League of Women Voters) who could organize
public meetings, under the mandates of state law, regarding the Parent Empowerment Act
intervention process and possible outcomes in order to provide all stakeholders with accurate and
objective information. These meetings should happen within the area covered by each
Educational Service Center and at specific school sites per Site Council request;

site personnel to use during parent trigger transformation processes for review by the Board at
the first scheduled business meeting of the 2013-14 school year; and, be it finally

Resolved, That the Board urges directs the Superintendent and Office of Government Relations
staff to seek legislative changes to California State Education Code 53300-53303 and or
administrative rules and regulations that will better serve all parents and legal guardians in the
transformation process. These changes should include, but not be limited to:

performance and transformation intervention options that are available to all parents; and
training of all Parent Empowerment Act signature gatherers.

- - -
- - -

NEW BUSINESS FOR ACTION (continued)

Procurement Actions


In accordance with Government Code Section 87105 of the Political Reform Act, Board Member
Galatzan has a disqualifying interest in the form of stock holdings or income in Microsoft, Inc. She
has stepped out of the room until the Boards discussion and action on the item have concluded.

Dr. Vladovic moved that the report be adopted with the amendment to revise Page 11. Ms. LaMotte
seconded the motion.

Dr. Vladovic requested additional information on Contract Nos. 1300235, 1300236, 1300256, 1300243,
1300244, 1300232, 1300254, and 1400047.

Superintendent Deasy responded to questions from Board Members regarding Contract No. 1300254,
Paula M. Evans.

Dr. Vladovic moved that Contract Nos. 1300256, Microsoft Corporation, and 1300243, Streamline
Solutions dba xRM, be voted on separately. Ms. LaMotte seconded the motion. On roll call, the
contracts failed, 4 noes, 1 aye, Ms. Garca. Ms. Galatzan and Ms. Martinez were absent.

Mr. Kayser moved that Contract No. 1300254, Paula M. Evans, be voted on separately. Ms. Garca
seconded the motion. On roll call vote, the contract was adopted, 4 ayes, 1 no, Mr. Kayser.
Ms. Galatzan and Ms. Martinez were absent.

On roll call, the balance of the report was adopted as amended by general consent. Ms. Galatzan and
Ms. Martinez were absent.

Later in the meeting, Dr. Vladovic moved the reconsideration Contract Nos. 1300256 and 1300243.
Ms. Galatzan stepped out of the room in accordance with Government Code Section 87105 of the
Political Reform Act.

Mr. Matt Hill, Chief Strategy Officer, and Mr. Marvin Cruz, Deputy Chief Information Officer,
responded to questions from Board Members regarding the contracts, compliance issues, and the
inclusion of options schools.

Ms. LaMotte seconded the motion. By general consent, the reconsidered contracts were adopted.
Ms. Galatzan and Ms. Martinez were absent.

The balance of the contracts were adopted as amended by general consent. Ms. Galatzan and
Ms. Martinez were absent.


The following resolution, To Engage the Los Angeles Unified School District Community and
Establish Fiscal Priorities, was postponed to the Regular Board meeting of August 20, 2013:

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has suffered tremendous adverse fiscal
impacts due to the nations economic crisis including the elimination of critical programs and the
staff supporting them;

Whereas, The State of California continues to shamefully sit at the bottom of the nation in per-
pupil funding, consequently, we must do more with less;

Whereas, Devastating cuts have been made to arts and music education, early education, adult
education, libraries, afterschool programs, outdoor education, and nursing and counseling
services, while class sizes increased, salaries were cut, summer school was eliminated and the
school year shortened;

Whereas, Through the efforts of Governor Jerry Brown, the voters and the organizations that
worked so hard to pass Propositions 30 and 39, next years budget is expected to improve;

Whereas, The Governors proposed Local Control Funding Formula should also positively
impact the situation locally as it provides a base grant of about $6,800 per student, which would
be supplemented with extra funds for districts with large numbers and concentrations of students
qualifying for free and reduced price lunch, English Language Learners and foster youth,
encompassing the vast majority of District students;

Whereas, Often when new money comes into a system, it is spent in a, non-holistic,
hodgepodge fashion riddled with pet projects, minimal community input and little planning;
Whereas, There remains a pre-existing structural deficit to deal with;

Whereas, The students, families, members of the community and District employees have shared
the pain and should have a voice in the Districts recovery efforts as well as a sense of
transparency; and

Whereas, California school districts are required by the State Education Code to hold a public
hearing regarding categorical budgeting; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That prior to the Los Angeles Unified School District final budget adoption in June,
2013, the District shall make use of the Parent Community Service Branch in each Educational
Service Center, the Facilities Services Community Relations and the Public Information Office
to coordinate, promote and conduct public hearings so as to better inform the budgetary decision-
making process and to best reflect the communitys priorities going forward;

Resolved further, That the District shall convene a discussion open to its 100,000 employees and
nine bargaining units, as those closest to the students, seeking their advice as to how resources
should be used;

Resolved further, That the Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District shall
conduct a Committee of the Whole meeting to publically discuss and rank its priorities and to
align any future new dollars to those priorities; and, be it finally

Resolved, That the Superintendent shall, within 60 days, identify and present plans, including
accountability metrics, to seek additional sources of funding on behalf of our students.

The following resolution, To Create Sustainable Funding for Modern Technology in Los Angeles
Unified School District Classrooms, was withdrawn:

Whereas, The stated goal of the Los Angeles Unified School District is for its 664,000 students
to graduate well-prepared for their future endeavors, and to do so, they must have the tools and
preparation required;

Whereas, Around the globe, computers, in one form or another, have become an everyday
resource in well-funded schools and a necessity in the workforce;

Whereas, The State of California ranks 49th in per-pupil funding and the District is coming out
of many years of fiscal deprivation, including devastating cuts to arts and music education, early
education, adult education, libraries, afterschool programs, outdoor education, and nursing and
counseling services, while class sizes increased, salaries were cut, summer school was
eliminated and the school year shortened;

Whereas, The State of California accounts for approximately thirteen percent of all public
school students in the United States and the District educates about thirteen percent of all
Californians;

Whereas, Seventy-nine percent of District students live in poverty and qualify for free and
reduced lunch and are unlikely to have access to computers and the internet in the home;

Whereas, If the District is not pro-active, its students will be left on the wrong side of the digital
divide;

Whereas, The Common Core Curriculum will, within the next five years, require all school
districts in California to make use of computers in its testing process thus gradually preparing
for this expense and experience is wise;

Whereas, The District has recently embarked on a fifty-school pilot project to learn best-
practices with computing devices, but does not have funds designated to replace them five years
hence nor to broaden the effort to all 1,000 District schools;

Whereas, The pilot project alone is expected to cost $50 million; and

Whereas, The natural life-span of computing devices is limited and a sustained effort is
required, particularly with regard to training, upgrades to hardware and software, and technical
support; now, therefore, be it

Superintendent to develop a District-wide technology implementation plan for its students
including a budget and an oversight mechanism.

- - -
- - -

RESOLUTIONS REQUESTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT

Ms. LaMotte moved the following resolution, Declaration of Need for Fully Qualified Educators Senate
Bill 435 (Watson) and Senate Bill 148 (Bergeson):

That the Board of Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District declares that it is necessary
to apply for emergency permits as additional authorizations for credentialed teachers under
provisions of Education Code 44300. Such permits/authorizations allow teachers to earn Bilingual
and/or Cross-Cultural Language and Academic Development (BCLAD and CLAD) certificates,
Resource Specialist (RSP) certificate (for experienced special education teachers whose credentials
do not specifically authorize RSP services), and teacher librarian certificates for credentialed teachers
who are serving in librarian positions while completing their library media programs. The Board of
Education also declares that it may be necessary to apply for Limited Assignment Permits for
credentialed special education teachers to authorize service to students with an Autism Spectrum
Disorder, or when a credentialed general education teacher is assigned to teach a course in a subject
outside of his/her credential area.

Ms. Garcia seconded the motion.


Ms. Lorena Jaramillo

Following the speaker and by general consent, the resolution was adopted. Ms. Martinez was absent.
- - -
- - -

BOARD MEMBER RESOLUTIONS FOR INITIAL ANNOUNCEMENT

The following resolution will be for action at the Regular Board meeting of July 2, 2013:

Mr. Kayser - Supporting a Pathway to U.S. Citizenship through Adult Education

Whereas, The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) reformed the United States
immigration law which granted legal status to more than 3 million of the nations undocumented
immigrants;

Whereas, When Congress passed the IRCA of 1986, it required the 3 million undocumented
immigrants who were legalized under that law to enroll in at least 40 hours of English courses
before obtaining green cards;

Whereas, Currently this number has increased to 12 million undocumented immigrants in the
United States, and of which 3 million reside in California and 900,000 are students;

Whereas, The proposed 2013 Immigration Reform Act will remove barriers for thousands of
students making it the first critical step in supporting education for our students;

Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District annually serves more
than 255,697 students that attend adult education schools and campuses;

Whereas, With the passage of the 2013 Immigration Reform Act, the adult English as a Second
Language (ESL) system would face challenges, including the influx of thousands of new
students;

Whereas, The current system in place for teaching English to the nations immigrants, state and
federally funded classes, has been hit hard by state budget cuts since the recession began and
there is not enough funding currently to deal with the numbers of people who both need and
want English-language instruction; and

Whereas, In the 2013-2014 year the adult education department has only budgeted to offer nine
ESL classes in each of the 10 adult schools in the District; now, therefore, be it

Superintendent and the Office of Government Relations to work with Governor Jerry Brown, the
State Legislature, and Federal representatives to address the inequitable funding system in adult
education, specifically ESL classes, that has historically underfunded students with in future
years.


Ms. Galatzan moved the following resolution, Defining Criteria That Would Trigger Material Revisions
for Charter Schools:

Whereas, There are more than 185 charter schools and 89,112 students enrolled in independent
charter schools in Los Angeles;

Whereas, Per state law, a school district, county office of education, or state board of education
must approve a schools charter petition before it opens;

Whereas, A charter petition lays out the schools mission, vision, educational philosophy,
educational program, governance, organizational structure, demographic targets, financial plan,
enrollment, etc., as part of the legally required 16 elements as stated in law;

Whereas, A charter is granted to a school for a period of up to five years, after which they must
come back for renewal;

Whereas, A schools academic, demographic, enrollment, financial situation, governance,
organizational structure, demographic makeup, may change during that period;

Whereas, Some of those changes are minor, but others are major changes that cause the school to
deviate from the original charter petitions approved by the Governing Board of the Los Angeles
Unified School District;

Whereas, A minor change can be handled administratively, but an amendment to the charter
must be approved by the governing board of the charter school and the Board, in accordance
with California Education Code;

Whereas, Those amendments, known as material revisions, are governed by the same standards
and criteria that apply to a new petition;

Whereas, The changes or amendments to a charter which would trigger the need for a material
revision have not always been clear; and

Whereas, District staff has been working on a broader policy on material revisions; now,
therefore, be it

Resolved, The Los Angeles Unified School District will come up with a clear list of criteria and
changes at a school that would require a material revision;

Resolved further, That these changes would include, but not be limited to:

The addition or reduction of grades served
Any increase in enrollment of more than 20% of students
Any change to instructional model or design, other than those required by law
Any admissions preferences and lottery/enrollment procedures not expressly cited in federal
or state law or regulation
Any change to disciplinary procedures; and, be it finally
Resolved, That District staff will come back in 60 days with a plan and a definitive list of criteria
for changes that require a material revision to be part of the existing Board-approved
administrative procedures.

Mr. Zimmer seconded the motion.


Ms. Lorena Jaramillo

Mr. Zimmer moved that the second Resolved be amended as follows:

Resolved further, That these changes would may include, but not be limited to:

Any change to disciplinary procedures;
Any change to governance or leadership structure including, but not limited to, substantial
changes in the number of governing Board Members, changes to Board Member selection
process or replacement of the nonprofit corporation, be identified in the charter to operate
the charter, and, be it finally

With the consent of the resolutions mover, the amendment was accepted as friendly.

Mr. Jose Cole-Gutierrez, Director, Charter Schools Division, responded to questions from Board
Members regarding charter amendments and revisions.

After discussion and by general consent, the resolution was adopted as amended. Ms. Martinez was
absent.

The final version of the resolution reads as follows:

Whereas, There are more than 185 charter schools and 89,112 students enrolled in independent
charter schools in Los Angeles;

Whereas, Per state law, a school district, county office of education, or state board of education
must approve a schools charter petition before it opens;

Whereas, A charter petition lays out the schools mission, vision, educational philosophy,
educational program, governance, organizational structure, demographic targets, financial plan,
enrollment, etc., as part of the legally required 16 elements as stated in law;

Whereas, A charter is granted to a school for a period of up to five years, after which they must
come back for renewal;

Whereas, A schools academic, demographic, enrollment, financial situation, governance,
organizational structure, demographic makeup, may change during that period;

Whereas, Some of those changes are minor, but others are major changes that cause the school to
deviate from the original charter petitions approved by the Governing Board of the Los Angeles
Unified School District;

Whereas, A minor change can be handled administratively, but an amendment to the charter
must be approved by the governing board of the charter school and the Board, in accordance
with California Education Code;

Whereas, Those amendments, known as material revisions, are governed by the same standards
and criteria that apply to a new petition;

Whereas, The changes or amendments to a charter which would trigger the need for a material
revision have not always been clear; and

Whereas, District staff has been working on a broader policy on material revisions; now,
therefore, be it

Resolved, The Los Angeles Unified School District will come up with a clear list of criteria and
changes at a school that would require a material revision;

Resolved further, That these changes would may include, but not be limited to:

Any change to disciplinary procedures;
Any change to governance or leadership structure including, but not limited to, substantial
changes in the number of governing Board Members, changes to Board Member selection
process or replacement of the nonprofit corporation, be identified in the charter to operate
the charter, and, be it finally

Resolved, That District staff will come back in 60 days with a plan and a definitive list of criteria
for changes that require a material revision to be part of the existing Board-approved
administrative procedures.

Ms. LaMotte moved that the meeting be extended past 8 p.m. Ms. Galatzan seconded the motion, which
by general consent was adopted. Ms. Martinez was absent.

PUBLIC COMMENT

The following speakers addressed the Board on the subject indicated:

Ms. Cathy Ellingford Elementary School Libraries
Ms. Melinda Buterball School & Library Improvement Block Grant
Ms. Ana Carrin DELAC
Ms. Karina Lopez DELAC
Speaker DELAC
Mr. Roberto Fonseca DELAC
Ms. Laura Lavin, Parent Co-location at Lorena Street ES
Mr. Adrian Tamayo, Parent Co-location at Lorena Street ES
Ms. Becky Garcia School Autonomy
Ms. Carolina Perez, Padres Activos SFV UTLA Concerns
Ms. Ivonne Loucel Bungalows
Ms. Maria Parra Overcrowding

ADJOURNMENT

Mr. Kayser moved that the meeting be adjourned. Ms. LaMotte seconded the motion, which by general
consent was adopted. Ms. Martinez was absent.

The meeting adjourned at 9:13 p.m.

APPROVED BY BOARD:

____________________________________ ______________________________________
MONICA GARCIA JEFFERSON CRAIN
PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE BOARD
cs
Bd. of Ed. Regular Meeting Minutes, 10 a.m., 07-02-13 1

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
333 South Beaudry Avenue, Board Room
10:00 a.m., Tuesday, July 2, 2013

The Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles, acting as the Governing Board of the Los Angeles
Unified School District, met in regular session on Tuesday, July 2, 2013, at the Los Angeles City Board
of Education Administrative Offices, Board Room, 333 South Beaudry Avenue, Los Angeles,
California.

Ms. Garca called the meeting to order at 12:58 p.m.

The following Board Members were present: Ms. Tamar Galatzan, Ms. Mnica Garca, Mr. Bennett
Kayser, Ms. Marguerite P. LaMotte, Mr. Steve Zimmer, and Board President Dr. Richard Vladovic.
Ms. Mnica Ratliff arrived at 1:02 p.m.

Superintendent John Deasy was present.

PUBLIC NOTICE OF BARGAINING UNION INITIAL PROPOSAL

CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION

Ms. Letetsia Fox, representing CSEA, addressed the Board.

CONSENT ITEMS

Items for action below to be adopted by a single vote:

NEW BUSINESS FOR ACTION:

Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Define and Approve Six
Board Member Priority and Alteration and Improvement Projects

Authorization to Enter into a Development Agreement for the Delivery of the Solano Elementary School
Food Services/Modernization Project

Routine Personnel Actions

Nonroutine Personnel Actions

CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS:

Report of Correspondence including Williams/Valenzuela Settlement Uniform Complaint
Quarterly Report Summary

Mr. Jefferson Crain, Executive Officer of the Board, made the following statement:

Before action is taken on the Report of Correspondence regarding the Williams/Valenzuela
Settlement Uniform Complaint Quarterly Report Summary from Kevin OConnell, Director,
Educational Equity Compliance Office, a public hearing must be held.

This constitutes a public hearing on the report, and a maximum of 12 individuals who wish to
address the Board on this item will be heard. Those who wish to speak to this report should pull a
speaker form from the slots located on the pillar in the rear of the Board Room. Speakers will be

Ms. Garcia moved that the consent calendar be adopted with the following amendment:

Board of Education Report No. 006 13/14, Nonroutine Personnel Actions, amended to
withdraw Employee No. 696724.

Ms. Galatzan seconded the motion. The Consent Items were adopted by general consent with Board of
Education Report No. 006 13/14 being adopted as amended.


Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Add 330 Schools and
Additional Funding to the Removal and Replacement of Fold-Up Tables and Benches Program

Ms. Garca moved that the report be adopted. Ms. Galatzan seconded the motion.

Mr. Mark Hovatter, Chief Facilities Executive, responded to questions from Board Members regarding
single source contracts, RFPs, and costs.

After discussion and on roll call, the report was adopted, 6 ayes, 1 no, Ms. LaMotte.

BOARD MEMBER RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION

The following resolution, Supporting a Pathway to U.S. Citizenship through Adult Education, was
postponed to the Regular Board meeting of August 20, 2013:

Whereas, The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) reformed the United States
immigration law which granted legal status to more than 3 million of the nations undocumented
immigrants;

Whereas, When Congress passed the IRCA of 1986, it required the 3 million undocumented
immigrants who were legalized under that law to enroll in at least 40 hours of English courses
before obtaining green cards;
Whereas, Currently this number has increased to 12 million undocumented immigrants in the
United States, and of which 3 million reside in California and 900,000 are students;

Whereas, The proposed 2013 Immigration Reform Act will remove barriers for thousands of
students making it the first critical step in supporting education for our students;

Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District annually serves more
than 255,697 students that attend adult education schools and campuses;

Whereas, With the passage of the 2013 Immigration Reform Act, the adult English as a Second
Language (ESL) system would face challenges, including the influx of thousands of new
students;

Whereas, The current system in place for teaching English to the nations immigrants, state and
federally funded classes, has been hit hard greatly reduced by state budget cuts since the
recession began and there is not enough insufficient funding currently to deal with meet the
needs of the numbers of people who both need and want English-language instruction; and

Whereas, The Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District in 2007-2008 served
approximately 406,700 students and in 2012-2013 served approximately 99,900 in the Adult and
Career Education Division; and

Whereas, In the 2013-2014 year the adult education department Adult and Career Education
Division has only budgeted to offer nine for an average of 53 ten hour a week ESL classes in
each of the 10 adult schools service areas in the District; now, therefore, be it

Superintendent and the Office of Government Relations to work with Governor Jerry Brown, the
State Legislature, and Federal representatives to address the inequitable funding system in adult
education, specifically ESL classes, that has have been historically underfunded students with in
future years and are now negatively impacted by flexibility.

Mr. Zimmer moved a Waiver of Board Rule 72 for the Washington Involving Neighborhoods Initiative
resolution. Ms. Ratliff seconded the motion.

Ms. Marilyn Williams, Project Director, Washington Involving Neighborhoods Initiative, responded to
questions from Board Members regarding timelines, funding, and staffing.

On roll call vote, the waiver was adopted, 5 ayes, 2 noes, Ms. Galatzan and Ms. Garca.

Superintendent Deasy responded to questions from Board Members regarding funding, budget, and
included schools.

Ms. Garca moved that the resolution be amended to include an additional Resolved directing the
Superintendent to locate $350,000 for the 2013-14 school year to support the community in schools
model in every Board District. Ms. LaMotte seconded the motion. On roll call, the amendment failed, 6
noes, 1 aye, Ms. Garca.

Ms. LaMotte moved the following resolution Washington Involving Neighborhoods Initiative:

Whereas, The Safe Schools, Healthy Students Program through the Washington Involving
Neighborhoods initiative (WIN) in the Los Angeles Unified School District has built systems of
coordinated services at its schools that have led to a safer, more inclusive climate and greater
student access to mental and health services;

Whereas, WIN has proven to reduce violence within schools and boost attendance and academic
achievement;

Whereas, The WIN program has generated over $200,000, in one semester, in regained revenue
as a result of increased student attendance and a decrease in suspensions;

Whereas, Los Angeles County agencies such as the Departments of Mental Health, Children and
Family Services, and the Commission on Human Relations (Community and Senior Services),
along with community nonprofit partners, including mentoring services, are willing to commit
$860,000 in staffing and other resources;

Whereas, Without funding, the Safe Schools, Healthy Students WIN specially trained staff of
wellness facilitators will be reassigned, leaving no one to link and coordinate county and
community services for the more than 9,000 students in the Washington Preparatory High
Schools complex of schools, which include some of the Districts most high risk and challenged
neighborhoods;

Whereas, Safe Schools/Healthy Students grants have been received and benefitted other District
schools in the past, such as the Belmont High School Learning Complex;

Whereas, The successful, evidenced-based model, will help the schools attain the Districts goals
in attendance, decreased suspension rate and academic performance indicators, and can be used
as a model for other challenged schools; and

Whereas, The WIN grant for school-based, coordinated and referral services has been exhausted
and funding is needed to prevent disruption of critical mental health and school safety services
and community sponsored support; now, therefore, be it

Superintendent to locate $350,000 in funds for the 2013-14 academic year, enabling the WIN
staff to pursue efforts to obtain sustainability through grants and outside funding, thereby
maintaining the continuum of services and comprehensive strategies currently in place to
promote safe schools and healthy students.

Mr. Kayser seconded the motion.

Ms. Williams responded to questions from Board Members regarding future funding.

After discussion and on roll call, the resolution was adopted, 5 ayes, 2 noes, Ms. Galatzan and
Ms. Garca.

PUBLIC COMMENT

The following speakers addressed the Board on the subjects indicated:

Ms. Barbara Torres Special Education
Mr. David Serrano Truth

ADJOURNMENT

Mr. Zimmer moved that the meeting be adjourned. Mr. Kayser seconded the motion, which by general
consent was adopted.

The meeting adjourned at 1:37 p.m.

APPROVED BY BOARD:

____________________________________ ______________________________________
DR. RICHARD VLADOVIC JEFFERSON CRAIN
PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE BOARD
cs
TAB 36
File #: 0013-14/15, Version: 1
Receipt of Special Report
powered by Legistar
Special Report
For September 9, 2014 Board Meeting

Inter-Office Correspondence

INFORMATIVE
Dr. John Deasy, Superintendent

FROM: Megan K. Reilly
Chief Financial Officer

SUBJECT: FINAL COST OF ISSUANCE AND UNDERWRITING FOR GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS CLOSED ON AUGUST 19

On August 19, 2014, the District closed the sale of $135.83 million of General Obligation Bonds
for Measure R and Y projects as follows:

Election of 2004, Series J (2014) (Tax Exempt): $68,170,000;
Election of 2004, Series K (2014) (Taxable): $7,045,000;
Election of 2005, Series K (2014) (Tax Exempt): $34,465,000; and
Election of 2005, Series L (2014) (Taxable): $25,150,000.

The above-listed series of bonds are new money bonds (as opposed to refunding bonds). AB
1482, which revised Education Code 15146(c)(1), requires that after a new money bond sale,
the governing board will be presented the actual cost information for the sale at its next
scheduled public meeting. The purpose of this Informative is to report the issuance costs of the
General Obligation Bonds sold on August 5, 2014 pursuant to the April 8, 2014 resolution.

This Informative is included as an agenda item under "Special Reports" for the September 9,
2014 Board meeting.

Actual Cost Table

The actual issuance costs for the General Obligation Bonds sold on August 5, 2014 are outlined
in Attachment A.

Proposed Action

No action is required. The actual issuance costs are $812,778 for the General Obligation Bonds
sold on August 5, 2014.

Dr. John Deasy, Superintendent
September 2, 2014
FINAL COST OF ISSUANCE AND UNDERWRITING FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS CLOSED ON
AUGUST 19
Page 2

Budget Impact

The costs of issuance for the General Obligation Bonds sold on August 5, 2014 are paid from
proceeds of the bonds. Of the $812,778 of issuance costs, $257,251 was used to pay the
underwriting fees and expenses. The remaining $555,527 paid for counsel fees, escrow fees,
financial advisor, and other transaction costs. The debt service payments attributable to general
obligation bond issuances such as the General Obligation Bonds sold on August 5, 2014 will be
paid from tax levies imposed on the Districts taxpayers.

If you have any questions, please call me at (213) 241-7888.

c: Michelle King
David Holmquist
Jefferson Crain
John Walsh
Luis Buendia

Enclosure Attachment A Special Report: Final Cost of Issuance and Underwriting for
General Obligation Bonds Closed on August 19

A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T

A

-

S
P
E
C
I
A
L

R
E
P
O
R
T
L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s

U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
c
h
o
o
l

D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

O
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

B
o
n
d
s

M
e
a
s
u
r
e

R
,

S
e
r
i
e
s

J
M
e
a
s
u
r
e

R
,

S
e
r
i
e
s

K
M
e
a
s
u
r
e

Y
,

S
e
r
i
e
s

K
M
e
a
s
u
r
e

Y
,

S
e
r
i
e
s

L

P
A
R

A
M
O
U
N
T
T
a
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t

T
a
x
a
b
l
e

T
a
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t

T
a
x
a
b
l
e

$
1
3
5
,
8
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
8
,
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
0
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
4
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
B
O
N
D

A
N
D

T
A
X

C
O
U
N
S
E
L
:

S
i
d
l
e
y

A
u
s
t
i
n

L
L
P

-

F
e
e

a
n
d

D
i
s
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s

$

1
5
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

$

7
8
,
2
9
2
.
8
7

$

8
,
0
9
1
.
1
4

$

4
0
,
7
3
1
.
3
6

$

2
8
,
8
8
4
.
6
4

D
I
S
C
L
O
S
U
R
E

C
O
U
N
S
E
L
:

H
a
w
k
i
n
s

D
e
l
a
f
i
e
l
d

&

W
o
o
d

-

F
e
e

a
n
d

D
i
s
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s

1
1
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

5
6
,
7
1
2
.
1
4

5
,
8
6
0
.
8
9

2
9
,
5
0
4
.
1
2

2
0
,
9
2
2
.
8
4

B
A
N
K

C
O
U
N
S
E
L

F
O
R

2
0
0
9

C
O
P
S

P
R
E
P
A
Y
M
E
N
T
:

N
i
x
o
n

P
e
a
b
o
d
y

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

-

-

3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

-

P
A
Y
I
N
G

A
G
E
N
T
:

F
i
r
s
t

a
n
n
u
a
l

p
a
y
i
n
g

a
g
e
n
t

f
e
e

a
n
d

C
O
I

d
i
s
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t

f
e
e
s
,

p
e
r

C
o
u
n
t
y

M
a
s
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t

2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0

5
5
0
.
0
0

5
5
0
.
0
0

5
5
0
.
0
0

5
5
0
.
0
0

E
S
C
R
O
W

A
G
E
N
T

F
E
E

F
O
R

2
0
0
7

C
O
P
s

(
I
S
I
S
)

A
N
D

2
0
0
9

C
O
P
s

R
E
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
N
G

2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0

-

-

2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0

-

E
S
C
R
O
W

A
G
E
N
T

F
E
E

F
O
R

2
0
0
7

C
O
P
s

(
B
T
S
)

1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0

-

-

1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0

-

E
S
C
R
O
W

A
G
E
N
T
'
S

C
O
U
N
S
E
L

-

F
e
e

f
o
r

r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
g

C
O
P
s

p
r
e
p
a
y
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n

(
2
0
0
9

C
O
P
s
)

2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0

-

-

2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0

-

V
E
R
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N

A
G
E
N
T

F
E
E

F
O
R

C
O
P
S

D
E
F
E
A
S
A
N
C
E
:

G
r
a
n
t

T
h
o
r
n
t
o
n

4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

-

-

4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

-

O
V
E
R
L
A
P
P
I
N
G

D
E
B
T

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T

F
O
R

P
O
S
/
O
S
:

C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a

M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l

S
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
s

5
2
5
.
0
0

2
6
3
.
4
9

2
7
.
2
3

1
3
7
.
0
8

9
7
.
2
1

S

&

P
:

R
a
t
i
n
g

a
g
e
n
c
y

f
e
e

5
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

2
5
,
5
9
5
.
7
4

2
,
6
4
5
.
1
8

1
3
,
3
1
6
.
0
2

9
,
4
4
3
.
0
5

M
O
O
D
Y
'
S
:

R
a
t
i
n
g

a
g
e
n
c
y

f
e
e

5
1
,
4
2
5
.
0
0

2
4
,
6
5
0
.
0
0

5
,
5
2
5
.
0
0

1
0
,
6
2
5
.
0
0

1
0
,
6
2
5
.
0
0

R
E
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T

T
O

D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T

O
F

P
R
I
O
R

F
A

F
E
E
S

O
N

B
O
N
D

P
R
O
G
R
A
M

(
T
A
I

I
n
v
o
i
c
e

2
0
1
3
-
5
)
2
2
,
8
4
8
.
4
8

1
1
,
4
6
7
.
1
3

1
,
1
8
5
.
0
7

5
,
9
6
5
.
7
0

4
,
2
3
0
.
5
8

P
R
I
N
T
I
N
G

A
N
D

M
A
I
L
I
N
G

O
F

P
O
S
/
O
S
:

P
r
i
n
t
e
r

7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

3
,
5
1
3
.
1
4

3
6
3
.
0
6

1
,
8
2
7
.
6
9

1
,
2
9
6
.
1
1

D
I
S
S
E
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N

A
G
E
N
T
:

D
i
g
i
t
a
l

A
s
s
u
r
a
n
c
e

C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

(
D
A
C
)

2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0

1
,
2
5
4
.
6
9

1
2
9
.
6
7

6
5
2
.
7
5

4
6
2
.
8
9

F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L

A
D
V
I
S
O
R
Y

F
E
E
:

W
o
r
k

O
r
d
e
r

3
9

(
T
a
m
a
l
p
a
i
s

A
d
v
i
s
o
r
s
,

I
n
c

-

K
N
N
)

7
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

3
9
,
6
4
0
.
8
0

1
,
8
8
9
.
9
7

1
9
,
5
8
2
.
3
8

1
3
,
8
8
6
.
8
4

F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L

A
D
V
I
S
O
R
'
S

D
I
S
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
:

T
a
m
a
l
p
a
i
s

A
d
v
i
s
o
r
s
,

I
n
c
.

-

K
N
N

1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0

5
,
0
1
8
.
7
7

5
1
8
.
6
6

2
,
6
1
0
.
9
8

1
,
8
5
1
.
5
8

F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L

A
D
V
I
S
O
R
'
S

A
D
V
A
N
C
E
S

5
,
0
1
4
.
3
0

2
,
5
1
6
.
5
6

2
6
0
.
0
7

1
,
3
0
9
.
2
3

9
2
8
.
4
4

P
O
S
T
-
I
S
S
U
A
N
C
E

C
O
M
P
L
I
A
N
C
E

4
6
,
0
1
4
.
5
8

2
6
,
5
5
7
.
2
0

5
,
0
2
0
.
9
3

3
,
7
9
1
.
8
4

1
0
,
6
4
4
.
6
2

G
r
a
n
d

T
o
t
a
l

C
O
I
5
5
5
,
5
2
7
.
3
6
$

2
7
6
,
0
3
2
.
5
4
$

3
2
,
0
6
6
.
8
8
$

1
4
3
,
6
0
4
.
1
4
$

1
0
3
,
8
2
3
.
8
0
$

U
N
D
E
R
W
R
I
T
I
N
G

F
E
E
S

A
N
D

E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S

2
5
7
,
2
5
0
.
7
5

1
2
5
,
9
9
0
.
2
5

1
2
,
9
3
3
.
1
2

7
2
,
1
5
1
.
1
8

4
6
,
1
7
6
.
2
0

G
r
a
n
d

T
o
t
a
l

U
n
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
i
n
g

2
5
7
,
2
5
0
.
7
5
$

1
2
5
,
9
9
0
.
2
5
$

1
2
,
9
3
3
.
1
2
$

7
2
,
1
5
1
.
1
8
$

4
6
,
1
7
6
.
2
0
$

G
r
a
n
d

T
o
t
a
l
,

A
l
l

C
o
s
t
s
8
1
2
,
7
7
8
.
1
1
$

4
0
2
,
0
2
2
.
7
9
$

4
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

2
1
5
,
7
5
5
.
3
2
$

1
5
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$

E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

2
0
0
4

(
M
e
a
s
u
r
e

R
)
,

S
e
r
i
e
s

J

(
2
0
1
4
)

a
n
d

S
e
r
i
e
s

K

(
2
0
1
4
)
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

2
0
0
5

(
M
e
a
s
u
r
e

Y
)
,

S
e
r
i
e
s

K

(
2
0
1
4
)

a
n
d

S
e
r
i
e
s

L

(
2
0
1
4
)
C
O
S
T
S

O
F

I
S
S
U
A
N
C
E

A
N
D

U
N
D
E
R
W
R
I
T
I
N
G

B
Y

S
E
R
I
E
S
*
U
n
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
s

w
i
l
l

o
b
t
a
i
n

a
n
d

p
a
y

f
o
r

D
T
C

e
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
,

C
U
S
I
P
,

I
p
r
e
o
,

M
S
R
B
,

a
n
d

C
D
I
A
C

c
h
a
r
g
e
s
.
L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s

U
n
i
f
i
e
d

S
c
h
o
o
l

D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t

-

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

O
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

B
o
n
d
s
,

2
0
1
4
T
a
m
a
l
p
a
i
s

A
d
v
i
s
o
r
s
,

I
n
c
.

Board Materials 09-09-14 1pm

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Board Materials 09-09-14 1pm

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NEW BUSINESS

LAUSD Facilities and Planned Projects

You might also like