Table Showing Corresponding Sections of Accounts and Audit in Companies Act 2013 Companies Act 1956 Companies Act 2013 Section No. Heading Section No. Heading 205 Di vi dend to be pai d onl y out of profi ts 123 Decl arati on of Di vi dend 205A Unpai d di vi dend to be transferred to speci al di vi dend account 123, 124 Decl arati on of Di vi dend and Unpai d Di vi dend Account 205B Payment of unpai d or uncl ai med di vi dend 124 Unpai d Di vi dend Account 205C Establ i shment of I nvestor Educati on and Protecti on Fund 125 I nvestor Educati on and Protecti on Fund 206 Di vi dend not to be pai d except to regi stered sharehol ders or to thei r order to thei r bankers 123 Decl arati on of Di vi dend 206A Ri ght to Di vi dend, ri ghts shares and bonus shares to be hel d i n abeyance pendi ng regi strati on of transfer of shares 126 Ri ght to Di vi dend, ri ghts shares and bonus shares to be hel d i n abeyance pendi ng regi strati on of transfer of shares 207 Penal ty for fai l ure to di stri bute di vi dends wi thi n30 days 127 Puni shment for fai l ure to di stri bute di vi dends. 208 Power of company to pay i nterest out of capi tal i n certai n cases - - 209 Books of account to be kept by company 2(13) Books of account 128 Books of account, etc., to be kept by company 209A I nspecti on of books of account, etc., of compani es 207 Conduct of i nspecti on and i nqui ry 208 Report on i nspecti on made 210 Annual accounts and bal ance sheet 129 Fi nanci al statement 210A Consti tuti on of Nati onal Advi sory Commi ttee on Accounti ng Standards 132 Consti tuti on of Nati onal Fi nanci al Reporti ng Authori ty 211 Form and contents of bal ance sheet and profi t and l oss account 2(2) Accounti ng Standards 129 Fi nanci al statement 133 Central Government to prescri be accounti ng standards 212 Bal ance sheet of hol di ng company to i ncl ude certai n parti cul ars as to i ts subsi di ari es -- -- 213 Fi nanci al year of hol di ng company and subsi di ary -- -- 214 Ri ght of hol di ng companys representati ves and members 128 Books of account, etc., to be kept by company 215 Authenti cati on of bal ance sheet and profi t and l oss account 134 Fi nanci al Statement, Boards report, etc. COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 2
216 Profi t and l oss account to be annexed and audi tors report to be attached to bal ance sheet 134 Fi nanci al Statement, Boards report, etc. 217 Boards report 134 Fi nanci al Statement, Boards report, etc. 218 Penal ty for i mproper i ssue, ci rcul ati on or publ i cati on of bal ance sheet or profi t and l oss account -- -- 219 Ri ght of member to copi es of bal ance sheet and audi tors report 136 Ri ght of member to copi es of audi ted fi nanci al statement 220 Three copi es of bal ance sheet, etc., to be fi l ed wi th Regi strar 137 Copy of fi nanci al statement to be fi l ed wi th Regi strar 221 Duty of offi cer to make di scl osure of payments, etc. -- -- 222 Constructi on of references to documents annexed to accounts -- -- 223 Certai n compani es to publ i sh statement i n the Form i n Tabl e F i n Schedul e I -- -- 224 Appoi ntment and remunerati on of audi tors 139 Appoi ntment of audi tors 142 Remunerati on of audi tors 224A Audi tor not to be appoi nted except wi th the approval of the company by speci al resol uti on i n certai n cases -- -- 225 Provi si ons as to resol uti ons for appoi nti ng or removi ng audi tors 140 Removal , resi gnati on of audi tor and gi vi ng of speci al noti ce 226 Qual i fi cati ons and di squal i fi cati ons of audi tors 141 El i gi bi l i ty, qual i fi cati ons and di squal i fi cati ons of audi tors 227 Power and duti es of audi tors 143 Power and duti es of audi tors and Audi ti ng Standards 228 Audi t of accounts of branch offi ce of company 143 Powers and duti es of audi tors and Audi ti ng Standards 229 Si gnature of Audi t report, etc. 145 Audi tor to si gn audi t reports, etc. 230 Readi ng and i nspecti on of audi tors report 145 Audi tor to si gn audi t reports, etc. 231 Ri ght of audi tor to attend general meeti ng 146 Audi tors to attend general meeti ng 232 Penal ty for non-compl i ance by audi tor wi th secti ons 225 to 231 147 Puni shment for contraventi on 233 Penal ty for non-compl i ance by audi tor wi th secti ons 227 and 229 147 Puni shment for contraventi on 233A Power of Central Government to di rect speci al audi t i n certai n cases -- -- 233B Audi t of cost accounts i n certai n cases 148 Central Government to speci fy audi t of i tems of cost i n respect of certai n compani es 292A Audi t Commi ttee 177 Audi t Commi ttee COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 3
Table Showing Corresponding Sections of Accounts and Audit in Companies Act 1956 Section of Companies Act, 2013 Corresponding sections of Companies Act, 1956 123 Decl arati on of Di vi dend 205 Di vi dend to be pai d onl y out of profi ts 205A (3) Unpai d di vi dend to be transferred to speci al di vi dend account 206 Di vi dend not to be pai d except to regi stered sharehol ders or to thei r order to thei r bankers 124 Unpai d Di vi dend Account 205A Unpai d di vi dend to be transferred to speci al di vi dend account 205B Payment of unpai d or uncl ai med di vi dend 125 I nvestor Educati on and Protecti on Fund 205C Establ i shment of I nvestor Educati on and Protecti on Fund 126 Ri ght to Di vi dend, ri ghts shares and bonus shares to be hel d i n abeyance pendi ng regi strati on of transfer of shares 206A Ri ght to Di vi dend, ri ghts shares and bonus shares to be hel d i n abeyance pendi ng regi strati on of transfer of shares 127 Puni shment for fai l ure to di stri bute di vi dends 207 Penal ty for fai l ure to di stri bute di vi dends wi thi n30 days 128 Books of account, etc., to be kept by company 209 Books of account to be kept by company 214 Ri ghts of hol di ng companys representati ves and members 129 Fi nanci al Statement 210 Annual accounts and bal ance sheet 211 Form and contents of bal ance sheet and profi t and l oss account 130 Re-openi ng of accounts on Courts or Tri bunal s orders -- -- 131 Vol untary revi si on of fi nanci al statements or Boards report -- -- 132 Consti tuti on of Nati onal Fi nanci al Reporti ng Authori ty 210A Consti tuti on of Nati onal Advi sory Commi ttee on Accounti ng Standards 133 Central Government to prescri be accounti ng standards 211(3) Form and contents of bal ance sheet and profi t and l oss account 134 Fi nanci al Statement, Boards report, etc. 215 Authenti cati on of bal ance sheet and profi t and l oss account 216 Profi t and l oss account to be annexed and audi tors report to be attached to bal ance sheet 217 Boards report COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 4
135 Corporate Soci al Responsi bi l i ty -- -- 136 Ri ght of member to copi es of audi ted fi nanci al statement 219 Ri ght of member to copi es of bal ance sheet and audi tors report 137 Copy of fi nanci al statement to be fi l ed wi th Regi strar 220 Three copi es of bal ance sheet, etc., to be fi l ed wi th Regi strar 138 I nternal Audi t -- -- 139 Appoi ntment of audi tors 224 Appoi ntment and remunerati on of audi tors 619 Appl i cati on of secti ons 224 to 233 to Government compani es 140 Removal , resi gnati on of audi tor and gi vi ng of speci al noti ce 225 Provi si ons and di squal i fi cati ons of audi tors 141 El i gi bi l i ty, Qual i fi cati ons and di squal i fi cati ons of audi tors 226 Qual i fi cati on and di squal i fi cati ons of audi tors 142 Remunerati on of audi tors 224(8) Appoi ntment and remunerati on of audi tors 143 Powers and duti es of audi tors and audi ti ng standards 227 Powers and duti es of audi tors 228 Audi t of accounts of branch offi ce of company 619 Appl i cati on of secti ons 224 to 233 to Government compani es 144 Audi tor not to render certai n servi ces -- -- 145 Audi tor to si gn audi t reports, etc. 229 Si gnature of audi t report, etc. 230 Readi ng and i nspecti on of audi tors report 146 Audi tors to attend general meeti ng 231 Ri ght of audi tor to attend general meeti ng 147 Puni shment for contraventi on 232 Penal ty for non-compl i ance wi th secti ons 225 to 231 233 Penal ty for non-compl i ance by audi tor wi th secti ons 227 and 229 148 Central Government to speci fy audi t of i tems of cost i n respect of certai n compani es 233B Audi t of cost accounts i n certai n cases 177 Audi t Commi ttee 292A Audi t Commi ttee COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 5
MAJOR POINT OF DIFFERENCE IN PROVISIONS RELATED WITH ACCOUNTS Points of comparison Companies Act, 2013 Companies Act 1956 (1) (2) (3)
ACCOUNTS Books of account in electronic mode Company may keep such books of account or other rel evant papers i n el ectroni c mode i n such manner as may be prescri bed. No provi si on to keep books of account i n el ectroni c mode. Consolidated F.S. Mandatory i f company has one or more subsi di ari es or associ ated or joi nt ventures. No provi si ons Requirement to attach subsidiary companys accounts etc. to holding companys accounts Requi rement omi tted. I f a company was a hol di ng company, i t was requi red to attach to i ts bal ance sheet a statement showi ng hol di ng companys i nterest i n subsi di ary. - - Secti on 212(5). Compulsory placing of accounts on companys website A l i sted company shal l al so pl ace i ts F.S. i ncl udi ng consol i dated F.S. & al l other documents requi red to be attached or annexed thereto, on i ts websi te, whi ch i s mai ntai ned by or on behal f of the company. Every company havi ng a subsi di ary or subsi di ari es shal l , - (a) Pl ace separate audi ted accounts i n respect of each of i ts subsi di ary on i ts websi te, i f any; (b) Provi de a copy of separate audi ted F.S. i n respect of each of i ts subsi di ary, to any sharehol der of the company who asks for i t. Not requi red Re-opening accounts on courts or Tribunals orders Provi si ons contai ned i n secti on 130. No provi si ons Voluntary revision of F.S. or Boards report Provi si ons contai ned i n secti on 131 Such vol untary reopeni ng al l owed wi th Tri bunal s approval . No provi si ons. COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 6
NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY NACAS v. NFRA NACAS renamed as Nati onal Fi nanci al Reporti ng Authori ty (NFRA). NFRA shal l consi der the I FRS & other i nternati onal l y accepted accounti ng & audi ti ng pol i ci es and standards whi l e maki ng recommendati ons on such matters to the C.G. whi ch wi l l i mprove the competi ti veness of I ndi an Compani es. NFRA i s al so empowered wi th quasi -judi ci al powers to ensure i ndependent oversi ght over CAs. NACAS A mere advi sory body under the 1956 Act. Statutory Recognition to auditing standards The 2013 Act provi des for noti fi cati on of both mandatory AS and mandatory audi ti ng standards by the C.G. i n consul tati on wi th the NFRA. The 1956 Act provi ded for noti fi cati on by the C.G. of mandatory AS i n consul tati on wi th the NACAS.
REPORT OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS Disclosures in Boards report Addi ti onal / New di scl osures requi red i n report of the Board of Di rectors: Extract of annual return, Number of meeti ngs of the Board. A statement on decl arati on gi ven by i ndependent di rectors [See secti on 149( 6) ]. Companys pol i cy on di rectors appoi ntment & remunerati on i ncl udi ng cri teri a for determi ni ng qual i fi cati ons. Posi ti ve attri butes, i ndependence of a di rector and other matters [see secti on 178(1)/ 178( 3) ]. Expl anati ons or comments by the Board on every qual i fi cati on, reservati on or adverse remark or di scl ai mer made by the CS i n practi ce i n hi s secretari al audi t report. Parti cul ars of l oans, guarantees or i nvestments [See secti on 186 of the 2013 Act]. Parti cul ars of contracts or arrangements [See secti on 188( 1) of the 2013 Act]. A statement i ndi cati ng devel opment and i mpl ementati on of a ri sk management pol i cy for the company i ncl udi ng i denti fi cati on therei n of el ements of ri sk, i f any, whi ch i n the opi ni on of the Board may threaten the exi stence of the company. Detai l s about the pol i cy devel oped and i mpl emented by the company on CSR i ni ti ati ves taken duri ng the year. I n the case of a l i sted company and every other publ i c company havi ng such pai d-up capi tal as may be prescri bed, a statement i n whi ch formal eval uati on has been made by the Board of i ts own performance and that of i ts commi ttees and i ndi vi dual di rectors. Such other matters as may be prescri bed. Di scl osures requi red by the 1956 Act i n the board of Di rectors Report. COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 7
Directors Responsibility Statement (DRS) in Boards Report The Di rectors Responsi bi l i ty Statement i n the report of the Board of di rectors shal l contai n the fol l owi ng addi ti onal decl arati ons (a) The di rectors, i n the case of a l i sted company, had l ai d down i nternal fi nanci al control s to be fol l owed by the company and that such i nternal fi nanci al control s are adequate and were operati ng effecti vel y. (b) (b) The di rectors had devi sed proper systems to ensure compl i ance wi th the provi si ons of thi s Act and rul es made there under and that such systems were adequate and operati ng effecti vel y. Decl arati ons regardi ng i nternal fi nanci al control s and l egal compl i ance system not requi red i n DRS.
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILTIY Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) I n every fi nanci al year, CSR spends of at l east 2% of the average net profi ts the company made duri ng the 3 i mmedi atel y precedi ng fi nanci al year i s mandatory for every company sati sfyi ng of the fol l owi ng cri teri a: Havi ng net worth of Rs. 500 crores or more, or Havi ng turnover of Rs. 1,000 crores or more, or Havi ng net profi t of Rs. 5 crores or more No provi si ons.
INTERNAL AUDIT Compulsory internal audit Secti on 138 of the 2013 Act provi des as under: Such cl ass or descri pti on of compani es as may be prescri bed shal l be requi red to appoi nt an i nternal audi tor to conduct i nternal audi t of books of account of the company. I nternal audi tor shal l be a CA or Cost Accountant or such other professi onal as may be deci ded by the Board. The C.G. may make rul es to prescri be the manner i n whi ch i nternal audi t shal l be conducted and reported. No provi si ons i n the 1956 Act as regards mandatory i nternal audi t.
SCHEDULE III OF THE 2013 ACT : GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATIONI OF BALANCE SHEET & STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS OF A COMPANY CORRES- PONDING TO SCHEDULE VI OF THE 1956 ACT Schedul e I I I of the 2013 Act i s same as Revi sed Schedul e VI of the 1956 Act expect that Schedul e I I I contai ns general i nstructi ons for the preparati on of consol i dated F.S. of company and i ts subsi di ari es as preparati on of consol i dated accounts has been made mandatory by the 2013 Act. The GI (CFS) No. 1 provi des that the consol i dated F.S. shal l di scl ose i nformati on as per the appl i cabl e AS i ncl udi ng (i ) Profi t and Loss attri butabl e to mi nori ty i nterest and to owners of the parent i n the statement of P & L (thi s shal l be presented as al l ocati on for the peri od) (i i ) Mi nori ty I nterests i n the bal ance sheet wi thi n equi ty (Thi s shal l be presented separatel y from the equi ty of owners of the parent). - GI (CFS) No. 2 provi des for di scl osure of addi ti onal i nformati on regardi ng share of vari ous enti ti es (parent, subsi di ari es, mi nori ty i nterests i n subsi di ari es, i nvestment i n associ ates, J Vs) i n consol i dated net assets and consol i dated profi t or l oss. - GI (CFS) No. 3 provi des that al l subsi di ari es, associ ates and J Vs (whether I ndi an or forei gn) wi l l be covered under the CFS. - GI (CFS) No. 4 provi des that an enti ty shal l di scl ose the l i st of subsi di ari es or associ ates or J Vs whi ch have not been consol i dated and the reasons for not consol i dati ng. COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 8
APPOINTMENT AND ROTATION OF AUDITORS Appointment of auditor of Government Company Ti me bound annual appoi ntment or reappoi ntment of audi tors by CAG for Govt. compani es (Audi tor to be appoi nted wi thi n 180 days from the commencement of the FY. I f CAG does not appoi nt fi rst audi tors of Govt. Company wi thi n 60 days from the date of regi strati on of the company, the BOD of the company shal l appoi nt such audi tor wi thi n next 30 days. I n the case of fai l ure of the Board to appoi nt such audi tor wi thi n next 30 days, i t shal l i nform members of the company who shal l appoi nt such audi tor wi thi n 60 days at an EGM. Casual vacanci es i n the offi ce of audi tor of Govt. Company to be fi l ed up by the CAG wi thi n 30 days, fai l i ng whi ch the BOD shal l fi l l i t up wi thi n next 30 days. Concept of deemed Govt. compani es [Secti on 619B of the 1956 Act] omi tted by the 2013 Act and repl aced wi th concept of compani es owned or control l ed, di rectl y or i ndi rectl y by the C.G. Appoi ntment of audi tors of Government compani es and deemed Govt. compani es by CAG. Appoi ntment not ti me bound process. Appointment of Auditors of Companies other than Govt. Companies at AGM for 5 years tenure Appoi ntment of audi tors for 5 years tenure subj ect to rati fi cati on at every AGM. Where at any annual general meeti ng, no audi tor i s appoi nted or reappoi nted or reappoi nted, the exi sti ng audi tor shal l conti nue to be the audi tor of the company. No provi si ons i n the 1956 Act for 5 years tenure for audi tors. No provi si ons i n the 1956 Act for exi sti ng audi tor to conti nue i n defaul t of reappoi ntment at AGM. Special resolution for appointment of auditors Requi rement of speci al resol uti on for appoi ntment of audi tor dropped
Secti on 224A requi res that audi tor not to be appoi nted except wi th the approval of the company by speci al resol uti on i n certai n cases. Power of C.G.. to appoint auditor The 2013 Act omi ts power of Central Government to appoi nt audi tors where audi tors where audi tor not appoi nted or reappoi nted at AGM. Secti on 224(3) provi des the appoi ntment by C.G. where audi tor not appoi nted or reappoi nted at AGM. Compulsory rotation of auditors Appl i cabl e to l i sted compani es & cl asses of compani es as may be prescri bed. I ndi vi dual audi tor to be rotated after 1 term of 5 year Audi t Fi rm to be rotated after 2 terms of 5 years. No requi rement for thi s i n the 1956 Act. COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 9
REMOVAL OF AUDITORS Removal of auditors before expiry of term in case of non-Govt. Companies Removal of audi tors shal l requi re speci al resol uti on & previ ous approval of Central Govt. Ordi nary resol uti on and pri or approval of C.G. requi red for removal of audi tors. Removal of auditors before expire of term in case of Government Companies Removal of audi tors of Govt. company before expi ry of tenure shal l al so requi re speci al resol uti on and previ ous approval of Central Govt. (i nstead of removal by CAG). Removal by CAG under the 1956 Act. Procedure for removal of auditor before expiry of term The audi tor sought to be removed shoul d be gi ven a reasonabl e opportuni ty of bei ng heard. Thi s si mpl e rul e of natural justi ce repl aces the l engthy and tedi ous procedure of secti on 225 of the 1956 Act. Tedi ous and l engthy procedure under secti on 225 of the 1956 Act.
RESIGNATION OF AUDITORS Resignation of auditors The audi tor who has resi gned from the company shal l fi l e wi thi n 30 days of resi gnati on a statement i n the prescri bed form wi th the company as wel l as wi th the ROC i ndi cati ng reasons and other facts as may be rel evant wi th regard to hi s resi gnati on. I n case of compani es referred to secti on 139(5) of the 2013 Act, the audi tor shal l al so fi l e such statement wi th the CAG, i ndi cati ng the reasons and other facts an may be re rel evant wi th regard to hi s resi gnati on. I f audi tor does not fi l e such statement as above, he shal l be puni shabl e wi th a fi ne not l ess than Rs. 50,000 but whi ch may extend to Rs. 5,00,000. No statutory obl i gati ons on audi tor who resi gns.
DIRECTION BY TRIBUNAL TO CHANGE AUDITORS Direction by Tribunal to company to change its auditors Tri bunal may di rect the company to change i ts audi tors i f i t i s sati sfi ed that audi tor of a company has ei ther di rectl y or i ndi rectl y acted i n a fraudul ent manner or abetted or col l uded i n any fraud by or i n rel ati on to the company or i ts offi cers or di rectors. I f appl i cati on i s made by C.G. and the Tri bunal i s sati sfi ed that any change of audi tor i s requi red, i t shal l wi thi n 15 days of the recei pt of the appl i cati on make an order that he shal l not functi on as audi tor and the C.G. may appoi nt another audi tor i n hi s pl ace. Audi tor agai nst whom order passed not el i gi bl e to be audi tor of any company for 5 years. No such provi si ons.
COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 10
AUDIOTR QUALIFICATIONS & DISQUALIFICATIONS Restricted State auditors No l onger qual i fi ed under secti on 141 of the 2013 Act to be audi tors of a company. Qual i fi ed to be audi tors of compani es under Secti on 226(2) of the 1956 Act. Firm/ LLP of chartered Accountants. The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 as amended i n 2006 now al l ows CAs to enter i nto partnershi ps wi th other professi onal s. I n vi ew of thi s, secti on 141(2) of the 2013 Act provi des that i f a fi rm i ncl udi ng LLP i s appoi nted as an audi tor of a company, onl y the partners who are CA i n practi ce shal l be authori zed by the fi rm to act and si gn on behal f of the fi rm. The 1956 Act provi ded that a fi rm coul d be appoi nted as edi tors of a company onl y i f all i ts partners are CAs practi ci ng i n I ndi a. Auditors disqualify- cations The l i st of di squal i fi cati ons for appoi ntment as audi tors under secti on 141 of the 2013 Act i s l onger than under secti on 226(3) of the 1956 Act. The fol l owi ng are the new di squal i fi cati ons that were not there i n the 1956 Act: A person or a fi rm who has busi ness rel ati onshi p wi th the company, or i ts subsi di ary, or i ts hol di ng or associ ate company or subsi di ary of such hol di ng company or associ ate company of such nature as may be prescri bed. A person whose rel ati ve i s a di rector or i s i n the company as a di rector or key manageri al personnel ; A person convi cted for fraud and 10 years not el apsed from date of convi cti on; A person whose subsi di ary or associ ate company or any other form of enti ty i s engaged i n consul ti ng and speci al i zed servi ces as provi ded i n secti on 144 of the 2013 Act. Much narrower l i st of di squal i fi cati ons under the 1956 Act compared to the 2013 Act. Indebtedness of relative of auditor Even i f rel ati ve or partner of a person i s i ndebted to the company, or i ts subsi di ary, or i ts hol di ng company, the sai d person shal l be di squal i fi ed from bei ng appoi nted as audi tor of a company. I ndebtedness of a rel ati ve was not a di squal i fi cati on under the 1956 Act. Indebtedness to an associate company Di squal i fi cati on for audi tor Not a di squal i fi cati on for audi tor COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 11
RIGHTS & DUTIES OF AUDITORS Compliance with auditing standards Every audi tor shal l compl y wi th audi ti ng standards. Audi ti ng standar ds not r ecogni zed nor made mandator y. Rights of auditor of holding company The audi tor of a hol di ng company shal l al so have the ri ght of access to the records of al l i ts subsi di ari es i nsofar as i t rel ates to the consol i dati on of i ts F.S. wi th that of i ts subsi di ari es. No Provi si on Auditors Duty to comment regarding internal financial controls The audi tors report to state whether company has adequate i nternal fi nanci al control s system i n pl ace and operati ng effecti veness of such control s. No Provi si on Auditors report in case of a Govt. company I n the case of a Government company, the audi tors report shal l , among other thi ngs, i ncl ude: (a) the di recti ons, i f any, i ssued by the CAG. (b) the acti on taken on such di recti ons and the i mpact thereof on the companys F.S. No Provi si on Duty of auditor to report fraud to C.G. I f an audi tor of a company, i n the course of the performance of hi s duti es as audi tor, has r eason to bel i eve that an offence i nvol vi ng fraud i s bei ng or has been commi tted agai nst the company by offi cers or empl oyees of the company, he shal l i mmedi atel y report the matter to the C.G. wi thi n such ti me and i n such manner as may be prescri bed. No duty to whi ch an audi tor of a company may be subj ect to shal l be regarded as havi ng been contravened by reason of hi s reporti ng the matter as above i f i t i s done i n good fai th. These provi si ons shal l mutati s appl y to a ----- (a) the Cost Accountant i n practi ce conducti ng cost audi t under secti on 148 of the 2013 Act; or (b) the Company Secretary i n practi ce conducti ng Secretari al Audi t under secti on 204 of the 2013 Act; I f any audi tor, cost accountant or CS i n practi ce do not report fraud commi tted or bei ng commi tted as above, he shal l be puni shabl e wi th fi ne whi ch shal l not be l ess than Rs. 1 Lac but whi ch may extend to Rs. 25 Lacs No such duty/ provi si ons Auditor not to render certain services Secti on 144 of the 2013 Act speci fi es certai n servi ces not to be rendered by audi tor to company or to i ts hol di ng company or subsi di ary. No provi si on Auditors attendance at general meetings Audi tor shal l , unl ess otherwi se exempted by the company, attend any general meeti ng: (i ) by hi msel f or (i i ) through hi s authori zed representati ve who i s qual i fi ed to be an audi tor. Audi tors attendance at general meeti ngs opti onal ,
COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 12
BRANCH AUDIT Exemption from Branch Audit Sec. 143 contai ns no such provi si on empoweri ng C.G. to exempt branch offi ces from audi t. Sec. 228 empowers the C.G. to frame rul es provi di ng for the exempti on of any branch offi ce from audi t to the extent speci fi ed i n the rul es.
COST AUDIT Companies required to maintain cost records Secti on 148 empowers the C.G. to prescri be cost records for any cl ass or cl asses of compani es engaged i n prescri bed servi ces. I t al so provi des that before prescri bi ng cost records i n respect of any cl ass of compani es regul ated under a speci al Act, the C. G. shal l consul t the regul atory body consti tuted or establ i shed under such speci al Act. Sec. 209(1)(d) empowers the C.G. to prescri be cost records for any cl ass or cl asses of compani es engaged i n the producti on, processi ng manufacturi ng or mi ni ng acti vi ti es. Previous approval of C.G. for the Appointment of cost auditor The previ ous approval of Central Government i s no l onger requi red for appoi ntment of cost audi tor as secti on 148 of the 2013 Act di spenses wi th thi s requi rement. Previ ous approval of Central Govt. requi red for appoi ntment of cost audi tor. Remuneration of cost auditor Remunerati on of cost audi tor to be determi ned by members of the company i n such manner as may be prescri bed. Determi ned by the BOD. Provisions if sufficient number of cost accountants not available Thi s provi si on has been omi tted from the 2013 Act presumabl y as there are suffi ci ent numbers of practi ci ng cost accountants now. Secti on 233B provi des that i f the C.G. i s of opi ni on that suffi ci ent number of cost accountants are not avai l abl e, i t may, by noti fi cati on i n the Offi ci al Gazette, di rect that, CAs who possess the prescri bed qual i fi cati ons, may al so conduct the audi t of the cost accounts of compani es. Power of C.G. to direct the company whose cost accounts have been audited to circulate to its members portions of cost audit report Thi s provi si on has been omi tted from the 2013 Act. Sec. 233B provi ded that C.G. may di rect the company whose cost accounts have been audi ted to ci rcul ate to i ts members, al ong wi th the noti ce of the AGM to be hel d for the fi rst ti me after the submi ssi on of such report, the whol e or such porti on of the sai d report as i t may speci fy i n thi s behal f. COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 13
Cost Auditing Standards made mandatory The 2013 Act recogni zes cost audi ti ng standards i ssued by I nsti tute of Cost Accountants of I ndi a wi th Central Govt. approval . 2013 Act makes i t mandatory for cost audi tor to compl y wi th CAS whi l e conducti ng cost audi t. No provi si ons regardi ng Cost Audi ti ng Standards.
DECLARATION AND PAYMENT OF DIVIDEND Whether dividend declaration/ payment bared if company is in default of repayment of deposits? Yes. A company whi ch fai l s to compl y wi th secti ons 73 and 74 of the 2013 Act (repayment of deposi ts accepted before commencement of the Act) shal l not, so l ong as such fai l ure conti nues, decl are any di vi dend on i ts equi ty shares. No such bar i n the 1956 Act. Dividend only from free reserves Thi rd provi so to secti on 123(1) of the 2013 Act provi des that no di vi dend shal l be decl ared or pai d by a company from i ts reserves other than free reserves. No express provi si ons i n thi s regards i n the 1956 Act. Whether past losses required to be set off before declaring dividend Not requi red. No express provi si ons i n Compani es Act 2013. Requi red under fi rst provi so to cl ause (b) to secti on 205(1) of the 1956 Act. Power of C.G. to permit in public interest declaration of dividend without providing dep. No such power conferred on the C.G. by the 2013 Act. The C.G. may, i n the publ i c i nterest al l ow any company to decl are or pay di vi dend for any FY out of the profi ts for that year out of the profi ts for the year wi thout provi di ng for dep. Whether transfer to reserves compulsory? No. A company may, before the decl arati on of any di vi dend i n any FY, transfer such percentage of i ts profi ts for that FY as i t may consi der appropri ate to the reserves of the company. Where the company proposes to decl are di vi dend for any fi nanci al year (at a rate exceedi ng 10% of the pai d- up capi tal ) out of the profi ts for that year, the company has to transfer to reserve such percentage of profi ts (not exceedi ng 10 per cent) as prescri bed i n the Compani es (Transfer of Profi t to Reserves) Rul es, 1975. COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 14
Payment of dividend through electronic mode to registered shareholder Expressl y al l owed. No express provi si ons al l owi ng thi s. Unpaid Dividend Account Secti on 124(6) of the 2013 Act provi des that al l shares i n respect of whi ch unpai d or uncl ai med di vi dend has been transferred to the I nvestor Educati on and Protecti on Fund shal l al so be transferred by the company i n the name of I nvestor Educati on and Protecti on Fund al ong wi th a statement contai ni ng such detai l s as may be prescri bed. Any cl ai mant of shares transferred above shal l be enti tl ed to cl ai m the transfer of shares from I nvestor Educati on and Protecti on Fund i n accordance wi th such procedure and on submi ssi on of such documents as may be prescri bed. Sec. 205 provi des that amounts i n the unpai d di vi dend account of compani es whi ch have remai ned unpai d for a peri od of 7 Years from the date they become due for payment shal l be transferred by a company to I nvestor Educati on and Protecti on Fund. Right of Investor to make a claim to Investor Education and Protection Fund. Sec. 125 provi des that cl ai m of an i nvestor over a di vi dend or benefi t from a securi ty not cl ai med for more than 7 years woul d not be exti ngui shed. I n other words, any person cl ai mi ng to be enti tl ed to such di vi dend or money may appl y to the authori ty admi ni steri ng the fund for payment. I nvestor/ Deposi tor/ Sharehol d er/ Debenture hol der cannot cl ai m the amount from the fund / the company after the expi ry of 7 years peri od as above.
AUDIT COMMITTEE For which companies it is mandatory to constitute audit committee Every l i sted company and such other cl ass or cl asses of compani es, as may be prescri bed. Every publ i c company havi ng pai d-up capi tal of not l ess than fi ve crores of rupess. Composition of the audit committee Mi ni mum of three di rectors. I ndependent di rectors formi ng a majori ty. Majori ty of members i ncl udi ng chai rperson shal l be persons wi th abi l i ty to read and understand the fi nanci al statements. The Audi t Commi ttee shal l consi st of not l ess than 3 di r ector s & such number of other di r ector s as the Boar d may deter mi ne of whi ch 2/ 3 of the total number of member s shal l be di r ector s, other than managi ng or whol e- ti me di r ector s. COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 15
Role and functions of the audit committee Every Audi t Commi ttee shal l act i n accordance wi th the terms of reference speci fi ed i n wri ti ng by the Board whi ch shal l i ncl ude, among other thi ngs- (a) the recommendati on for appoi ntment, remunerati on and terms of engagement of audi tors of the company, (b) revi ew and moni tor the audi tors i ndependence and performance, and effecti veness of audi t process, (c) Exami nati on of the fi nanci al statements and the audi tors report thereon. (d) Approval or any subsequent modi fi cati on of transacti ons of the company wi th rel ated parti es. (e) Scruti ny of i nter-corporate l oans and i nvestments. (f) Val uati on of undertaki ng or assets of the company wherever i t i s necessary. (g) Eval uati on of i nternal fi nanci al control s and ri sk management systems. (h) Moni tori ng the end use of funds rai sed through publ i c offers and rel ated matters. The Audi t Commi ttee shal l have authori ty to i nvesti gate i nto any matter i n rel ati on to the i tems (i ) to (vi i i ) above or referred to i t by the Board and for thi s purpose shal l have power to obtai n professi onal advi ce from external sources and have ful l access to i nformati on contai ned i n the records of the company, The Audi t Commi ttee may cal l for the comments of the audi tors about i nternal control systems, the scope of audi t, i ncl udi ng the observati ons of the audi tors and revi ew fi nanci al statements before thei r submi ssi on to the Board The audi t commi ttee shoul d- 1. have di scussi ons wi th the audi tors peri odi cal l y about: I nternal control systems, the scope of audi t i ncl udi ng the observati ons of the audi tors and 2. Revi ew the hal f yearl y and annual F.S. before submi ssi on to the Board and 3. Al so ensure compl i ance of i nternal control systems. The Audi t Commi ttee shal l have authori ty to i nvesti gate i nto any matter i n rel ati on to the i tems speci fi ed or referred to i t by the Board and for thi s purpose, shal l have ful l access to i nformati on contai ned i n the records of the company and external professi onal advi ce, i f necessary. Who shall have right to attend meetings of audit committee besides its members? Audi tors of a company and the key manageri al personnel shal l have a ri ght to attend the meeti ngs of the Audi t commi ttee when i t consi ders the audi tors report but shal l not have the ri ght to vote Audi tor s, the i nter nal audi tor , i f any, and the di r ector - i nchar ge of fi nance shal l attend and par ti ci pate at meeti ngs of the Audi t Commi ttee but shal l not have the r i ght to vote COMPANIES ACT 1956 vs. COMPANIES ACT 2013 for CA IPCC & Final Auditing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg Page 16
Attendance at annual general meetings by Chairman of Audit Committee Not obl i gatory under the 2013 Act The chai rman of the Audi t Commi ttee shal l attend the annual general meeti ngs of the company to provi de any cl ari fi cati on on matters rel ati ng to audi t
AUDITORS LIABILITIES Punishment of auditors for contraventio ns Secti on 147 of the 2013 Act bri ngs about a sea change i n audi tors cri mi nal l i abi l i ty for contraventi on of the contents of audi t report (secti on 143 of the 2013 Act), renderi ng of prohi bi ted non-audi t servi ces to audi tee company (secti on 144 of the 2013 Act) and si gni ng of audi t report (secti on 145 of the 2013 Act). Secti on 147 provi des for mi ni mum fi ne of Rs. 25,000 and maxi mum fi ne of Rs. 5,00,000. I f contraventi on i s wi l l ful or knowi ngl y wi th i ntent to decei ve the company or i t sharehol ders or credi tors or tax authori ti es, secti on 147 provi des for i mpri sonment of the audi tor up to one year and mi ni mum fi ne of Rs. 1,00,000 and maxi mum fi ne of Rs. 25,00,000. Further, Sec. 147 requi res the convi cted audi tor to refund remunerati on to the company and pay damages to the company, statutory bodi es or authori ti es or mi sl eadi ng statements of parti cul ars made i n hi s audi t report. Such provi si ons were not there i n 1956 Act. The Central Government shal l , by noti fi cati on, speci fy any statutory body or authori ty or an offi cer for ensuri ng prompt payment of damages to the company or the persons speci fi ed above. Such body, authori ty or offi cer shal l after payment of damages to such company or persons fi l e a report wi th Central Government i n respect of maki ng such damages i n such manner as may be speci fi ed i n the sai d noti fi cati on. Where the audi tor of a company i s an audi t fi rm and i t i s proved that the audi t partner or partners has or have:- Acted i n a fraudul ent manner or Abetted or col l uded i n any fraud by or i n rel ati on to or by the company or i ts di rectors or offi cers, the l i abi l i ty whether ci vi l or cri mi nal as provi ded i n the Act or any other l aw for such an act woul d be of the audi t partner or partners concerned as wel l as of the fi rm joi ntl y and several l y. Pal try fi ne up to Rs. 10,000 i n the event of wi l l ful noncompl i an ce by audi tor wi th secti on 227 (Powers and duti es of audi tors) or secti on 229 (si gnature of audi t report etc. --------------------
Assessing Gross Efficiency and Propelling Efficiency in Swimming Paola Zamparo Department of Neurological Sciences, Faculty of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy